Ileo-anal pouch excision: A review of indications and outcomes

Standardization of ileoanal J-pouch surgery technique: Quality assessment of minimally invasive ileoanal J-pouch surgery videos

BACKGROUND

Ileal pouch anal anastomosis is a complex procedure associated with significant morbidity, with several complications after ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery leading to pouch failure. The aim of the study is to evaluate the heterogeneity surrounding the technique of ileoanal J-pouch surgery by assessing the safety and quality of published online peer-reviewed surgical videos.

METHODS

Ileal pouch anal anastomosis videos published on peer-reviewed surgical journals and video channels were edited and anonymized to demonstrate specific steps of the surgical procedure: mobilization and division of the rectum, formation of the ileoanal J-pouch reservoir, anastomosis, and lengthening techniques. The anonymized videos were presented to a group of reviewers with expertise in ileal pouch anal anastomosis blinded to the names and affiliations of the surgeons performing the procedure. Primary outcome was the rate of interobserver variability in the assessment of specific technical steps of the ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery procedure. Secondary outcome was the appropriateness of the use of surgical videos review as an assessment tool for ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery, measured as rate of reviewers being unable to answer for poor video quality.

RESULTS

In total, 29 video fragments were distributed, and 13 assessors completed a 60-item survey, organized in 7 major domains. The survey completion rate was 93.4%. Out of a total 729 answers, in 23 (3.2%) the reviewers indicated they were unable to comment due to poor video image, and in 48 (6.5%) were unable to comment due to the particular step not being shown in the procedure. The proportion of assessors rating rectal mobilization technically appropriate ranged from 30.7% to 92.3% and from 7.7% to 69.2% for safety. The level of rectal division was considered appropriate in 0 to 53.8% of the videos, whereas the stapling technique used for rectal division was appropriate in 0 to 70% of the videos.

CONCLUSION

Our study assessed published peer-reviewed videos on ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery and reported heterogeneity in the safety of the demonstrated techniques. Blind assessment of published peer-reviewed ileal pouch anal anastomosis videos reported a high rate of unsafe or inappropriate technique for rectal mobilization and transection in the reviewed videos, with fair interobserver agreement among reviewers. There is a need for consensus on what is considered safe and appropriate in ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery. Peer review of ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery videos could facilitate training and accreditation in this complex procedure.

Abdominal Pain in a Patient With Diverted Bowel and Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Patients with medically refractory inflammatory bowel disease may undergo total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. However, fecal diversion is necessary in patients with pouch failure. We present a rare case of pyogenic liver abscess (PLA) in a patient with ulcerative colitis with a history of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis complicated by chronic pouchitis requiring fecal diversion via loop ileostomy. The PLA was managed with computed tomography-guided aspiration drainage and antibiotics, followed by permanent ileostomy and pouch excision to prevent recurrence of PLA. This is the first case report of PLA in a patient with ulcerative colitis with a long-standing history of diversion pouchitis.

Ileo-anal pouch excision and permanent ileostomy - Indications and outcomes from a tertiary centre

PURPOSE

Pouch excision is a major complication of ileoanal pouch surgery. Current practice is for this type of surgery to be performed in a specialist centre. We present a series of patients undergoing pouch excision surgery in a high volume centre in the UK and assess the outcomes in these patients.

METHODS

All patients undergoing pouch excision at the Royal Liverpool Hospital between 1995 and 2015 under the care of a single surgeon were included. Demographics and outcomes were taken from patients' notes and a dedicated retrospectively compiled database.

RESULTS

35 patients underwent pouch excision surgery during this period. Around half the patients had their original pouch surgery elsewhere and were referred for management of complications. Median time to pouch excision was 13 years from the original operation. Overall complication rate was 31% with 11% requiring re-intervention post-operatively. There was no mortality in this series.

CONCLUSION

Pouch excision is a complex, high-risk procedure that should be carried out in specialist centres. Our series shows that in such settings, good outcomes can be achieved for these patients.