Nishi T, Kume T, Yamada R, Koto S, Sasahira Y, Okamoto H, Tamada T, Koyama T, Imai K, Neishi Y, Ughi GJ, Uemura S. Efficacy of a new generation intracoronary optical coherence tomography imaging system with fast pullback.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2023;
101:520-527. [PMID:
36740230 DOI:
10.1002/ccd.30573]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
We sought to investigate whether a novel, fast-pullback, high-frequency optical coherence tomography (HF-OCT) imaging system enables data acquisition with a reduced amount of contrast agents while retaining the same qualitative and quantitative lesion assessment to conventional OCT.
BACKGROUND
The increased amount of administered contrast agents is a major concern when performing intracoronary OCT.
METHODS
The present study is a single-center, prospective, observational study including 10 patients with stable coronary artery disease. A total of 28 individual coronary arteries were assessed by both fast-pullback HF-OCT and by conventional OCT.
RESULTS
The contrast volume used in each OCT run for the HF-OCT system was significantly lower than for the conventional OCT system (5.0 ± 0.0 mL vs. 7.8 ± 0.7 mL, respectively, with a mean difference of -2.84 [95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.10 to -2.58]). No significant difference was found in the median value of the clear image length between the two OCT systems (74 mm [interquartile range [IQR]; 63, 81], 74 mm [IQR; 71, 75], p = 0.89). Fast-pullback HF-OCT showed comparable measurements to conventional OCT, including minimum lumen area (3.27 ± 1.53 mm2 vs. 3.21 ± 1.53 mm2 , p = 0.27), proximal reference area (7.03 ± 2.28 mm2 vs. 7.03 ± 2.34 mm2 , p = 0.96), and distal reference area (5.93 ± 1.96 mm2 vs. 6.03 ± 2.02 mm2 , p = 0.23). Qualitative OCT findings were comparable between the fast-pullback HF-OCT runs and conventional OCT with respect to identifying lipid-rich plaques, calcifications, layered plaques, macrophages, and cholesterol crystals.
CONCLUSION
With the fast pullback function of a novel HF-OCT imaging system, we acquired OCT images using a significantly lower amount of contrast volume while retaining a comparable qualitative and quantitative lesion assessment to conventional OCT.
Collapse