1
|
Leone N, Scozzari G, Olandese F, Horeman T, Passera R, Arezzo A, Morino M. "O.R. GOES GREEN": a first step toward reducing our carbon footprint in the operating room and hospital. Updates Surg 2024:10.1007/s13304-024-01793-8. [PMID: 38526697 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-024-01793-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
Hospitals in Europe produce approximately 6 million tons of medical waste annually, about one-third of this originating in operating rooms. Most of it is solid waste, which can be recycled if bodily fluids do not contaminate it. Only 2-3% of hospital waste must be disposed of as infectious waste, and this is much lower than the 50-70% of garbage in the biohazard waste stream. In June 2021, at the main operating room of the Department of General Surgery of the University of Turin, we began a separate collection program for materials consisting of plastic, paper, TNT (material not contaminated by bodily fluids), and biohazardous waste. We calculated the number of boxes and the weight of special waste disposed produced every month in one operating room for 18 months. The monthly number of Sanibox and the monthly weight of biohazardous waste decreased during the observation period. The reduction trend was not constant but showed variations during the 18 months. Direct proportionality between number of low-complexity procedures and production of biohazardous waste was found (p = 0.050). We observed an optimization in the collection and filling of plastic, paper and TNT boxes separated and sent for recycling. One of the barriers to recycling hospital waste, and surgical waste in particular, is the failure to separate infectious waste from clean waste. A careful separate collection of waste in the operating room is the first step in reducing environmental pollution and management costs for the disposal of hospital waste.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Leone
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, C.So Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.
| | - Gitana Scozzari
- Department of Health Care Management, Città della Salute e Delle Scienze Molinette, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Olandese
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, C.So Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Tim Horeman
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Technical University of Delft, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Roberto Passera
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, C.So Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Mario Morino
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, C.So Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schrijvershof P, Rahimi AM, Leone N, Bloemendaal A, Daams F, Arezzo A, Mintz Y, Horeman T. Design and evaluation of a smart passive dynamic arm support for robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:71. [PMID: 38340240 PMCID: PMC10858817 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01820-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
Surgeons performing robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery experience physical stress and overuse of shoulder muscles due to sub-optimal arm support during surgery. The objective is to present a novel design and prototype of a dynamic arm support for robotic laparoscopic surgery to evaluate its ergonomics and performance on the AdLap-VR simulation training device. The prototype was designed using the mechanical engineering design process: Technical requirements, concept creation, concept selection, 3D-design and built of the prototype. A crossover study was performed on a marble sorting task on the AdLap-VR. The first group performed four trials without the arm support, followed by four trials with the arm support, and the other group executed the sequence vice versa. The performance parameters used were time to complete (s), path length (mm), and the number of collisions. Afterward, the participants filled out a questionnaire on the ergonomic experience regarding both situations. 20 students executed 160 performed trials on the AdLap-VR Significant decreases in the subjective comfort parameters mental demand, physical demand, effort and frustration were observed as a result of introducing the novel arm support. Significant decreases in the objective performance parameters path length and the number of collisions were also observed during the tests. The newly developed dynamic arm support was found to improve comfort and enhance performance through increased stability on the robotic surgery skills simulator AdLap-VR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pim Schrijvershof
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Technical University of Delft, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - A Masie Rahimi
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC - VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Skills Centre for Health Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Nicola Leone
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | | | - Freek Daams
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC - VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Skills Centre for Health Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Yoav Mintz
- Department of General Surgery, Hadassah Hebrew-University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Tim Horeman
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Technical University of Delft, Delft, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ortenzi M, Corallino D, Botteri E, Balla A, Arezzo A, Sartori A, Reddavid R, Montori G, Guerrieri M, Williams S, Podda M. Correction: Safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by trainee surgeons with different cholangiographic techniques (SCOTCH): a prospective non-randomized trial on the impact of fluorescent cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by trainees. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:1116. [PMID: 38228837 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10698-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Ortenzi
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
| | - Diletta Corallino
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Emanuele Botteri
- General Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia PO Montichiari, Montichiari, Brescia, Italy
| | - Andrea Balla
- Coloproctology and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Surgery Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- UOC of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hospital "San Paolo", Largo Donatori del Sangue 1, Civitavecchia, 00053, Rome, Italy
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of General Surgery, Ospedale Di Montebelluna, Montebelluna, Treviso, Italy
| | - Alberto Sartori
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | - Mario Guerrieri
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Mauro Podda
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Boal M, Di Girasole CG, Tesfai F, Morrison TEM, Higgs S, Ahmad J, Arezzo A, Francis N. Evaluation status of current and emerging minimally invasive robotic surgical platforms. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:554-585. [PMID: 38123746 PMCID: PMC10830826 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10554-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The rapid adoption of robotics within minimally invasive surgical specialties has also seen an explosion of new technology including multi- and single port, natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), endoluminal and "on-demand" platforms. This review aims to evaluate the validation status of current and emerging MIS robotic platforms, using the IDEAL Framework. METHODS A scoping review exploring robotic minimally invasive surgical devices, technology and systems in use or being developed was performed, including general surgery, gynaecology, urology and cardiothoracics. Systems operating purely outside the abdomen or thorax and endoluminal or natural orifice platforms were excluded. PubMed, Google Scholar, journal reports and information from the public domain were collected. Each company was approached via email for a virtual interview to discover more about the systems and to quality check data. The IDEAL Framework is an internationally accepted tool to evaluate novel surgical technology, consisting of four stages: idea, development/exploration, assessment, and surveillance. An IDEAL stage, synonymous with validation status in this review, was assigned by reviewing the published literature. RESULTS 21 companies with 23 different robotic platforms were identified for data collection, 13 with national and/or international regulatory approval. Of the 17 multiport systems, 1 is fully evaluated at stage 4, 2 are stage 3, 6 stage 2b, 2 at stage 2a, 2 stage 1, and 4 at the pre-IDEAL stage 0. Of the 6 single-port systems none have been fully evaluated with 1 at stage 3, 3 at stage 1 and 2 at stage 0. CONCLUSIONS The majority of existing robotic platforms are currently at the preclinical to developmental and exploratory stage of evaluation. Using the IDEAL framework will ensure that emerging robotic platforms are fully evaluated with long-term data, to inform the surgical workforce and ensure patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Boal
- The Griffin Institute, Northwick Park and St Marks Hospital, London, UK
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Intervention and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- Association of Laparoscopic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (ALSGBI) Academy, London, UK
| | | | - F Tesfai
- The Griffin Institute, Northwick Park and St Marks Hospital, London, UK
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Intervention and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- Association of Laparoscopic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (ALSGBI) Academy, London, UK
| | - T E M Morrison
- Association of Laparoscopic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (ALSGBI) Academy, London, UK
| | - S Higgs
- Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, UK
| | - J Ahmad
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK
| | - A Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - N Francis
- The Griffin Institute, Northwick Park and St Marks Hospital, London, UK.
- Yeovil District Hospital, Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Yeovil, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Finocchiaro M, Banfi T, Donaire S, Arezzo A, Guarner-Argente C, Menciassi A, Casals A, Ciuti G, Hernansanz A. A Framework for the Evaluation of Human Machine Interfaces of Robot-Assisted Colonoscopy. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2024; 71:410-422. [PMID: 37535479 DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2023.3301741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
The Human Machine Interface (HMI) of intraluminal robots has a crucial impact on the clinician's performance. It increases or decreases the difficulty of the tasks, and is connected to the users' physical and mental stress. OBJECTIVE This article presents a framework to compare and evaluate different HMIs for robotic colonoscopy, with the objective of identifying the optimal HMI that minimises the clinician's effort and maximises the clinical outcomes. METHODS The framework comprises a 1) a virtual simulator (clinically validated), 2) wearable sensors measuring the cognitive load, 3) a data collection unit of metrics correlated to the clinical performance, and 4) questionnaires exploring the users' impressions and perceived stress. The framework was tested with 42 clinicians investigating the optimal device for tele-operated control of robotic colonoscopes. Two control devices were selected and compared: a haptic serial-kinematic device and a standard videogame joypad. RESULTS The haptic device was preferred by the endoscopists, but the joypad enabled better clinical performance and reduced cognitive and physical load. CONCLUSION The framework can be used to evaluate different aspects of a HMI, both hardware and software, and determine the optimal HMI that can reduce the burden on clinicians while improving the clinical outcome. SIGNIFICANCE The findings of this study, and of future studies performed with this framework, can inform the design and development of HMIs for intraluminal robots, leading to improved clinical performance, reduced physical and mental stress for clinicians, and ultimately better patient outcomes.
Collapse
|
6
|
Ortenzi M, Corallino D, Botteri E, Balla A, Arezzo A, Sartori A, Reddavid R, Montori G, Guerrieri M, Williams S, Podda M. Safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by trainee surgeons with different cholangiographic techniques (SCOTCH): a prospective non-randomized trial on the impact of fluorescent cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by trainees. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:1045-1058. [PMID: 38135732 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10613-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/26/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The identification of the anatomical components of the Calot's Triangle during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) might be challenging and its difficulty may increase when a surgical trainee (ST) is in charge, ultimately allegedly affecting also the incidence of common bile duct injuries (CBDIs). There are various methods to help reach the critical view of safety (CVS): intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC), critical view of safety in white light (CVS-WL) and near-infrared fluorescent cholangiography (NIRF-C). The primary objective was to compare the use of these techniques to obtain the CVS during elective LC performed by ST. METHODS This was a multicentre prospective observational study (Clinicalstrials.gov Registration number: NCT04863482). The impact of three different visualization techniques (IOC, CVS-WL, NIRF-C) on LC was analyzed. Operative time and time to achieve the CVS were considered. All the participating surgeons were also required to fill in three questionnaires at the end of the operation focusing on anatomical identification of the general task and their satisfaction. RESULTS Twenty-nine centers participated for a total of 338 patients: 260 CVS-WL, 10 IOC and 68 NIRF-C groups. The groups did not differ in the baseline characteristics. CVS was considered achieved in all the included case. Rates were statistically higher in the NIR-C group for common hepatic and common bile duct visualization (p = 0.046; p < 0.005, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences in operative time (p = 0.089) nor in the time to achieve the CVS (p = 0.626). Three biliary duct injuries were reported: 2 in the CVS-WL and 1 in the NIR-C. Surgical workload scores were statistically lower in every domain in the NIR-C group. Subjective satisfaction was higher in the NIR-C group. There were no other statistically significant differences. CONCLUSIONS These data showed that using NIRF-C did not prolong operative time but positively influenced the surgeon's satisfaction of the performance of LC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Ortenzi
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
| | - Diletta Corallino
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Emanuele Botteri
- General Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia PO Montichiari, Montichiari, Brescia, Italy
| | - Andrea Balla
- Coloproctology and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Surgery Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- UOC of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hospital "San Paolo", Largo Donatori del Sangue 1, Civitavecchia, 00053, Rome, Italy
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of General Surgery, Ospedale Di Montebelluna, Montebelluna, Treviso, Italy
| | - Alberto Sartori
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | - Mario Guerrieri
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Mauro Podda
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Agresta F, Montori G, Podda M, Ortenzi M, Giordano A, Bergamini C, Mazzarolo G, Licitra E, Gobbi T, Procida G, Borgo AD, Botteri E, Ansaloni L, Fugazzola P, Savino G, Guerrieri M, Campanile FC, Sartori A, Petz W, Silecchia G, di Saverio S, Catena F, Agrusa A, Salemi M, Morales-Conde S, Arezzo A. Diverticulitis, surgery, evidence-based medicine, and the Steve Jobs' dots: a narrative review. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2024; 50:81-91. [PMID: 37747500 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-023-02362-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Emergency treatment of acute diverticulitis remains a hazy field. Despite a number of clinical studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), guidelines and surgical societies recommendations, the most critical hot topics have yet to be addressed. METHODS Literature research from 1963 until today was performed. Data regarding the principal RCTs and observational studies were summarized in descriptive tables. In particular we aimed to focus on the following topics: the role of laparoscopy, the acute care setting, the RCTs, guidelines, observational studies and classifications proposed by literature, the problem in case of a pandemic, and the importance of adapting treatment /place/surgeon conditions. RESULTS In the evaluation of these points we did not try to find any prospective evolution of the concepts achievements. On the contrary we simply report the individuals strands of research from a retrospective point of view, similarly to what Steve Jobes said: "you can't connect the dots looking forward; you can only connect them looking backwards. So you have to trust that the dots will somehow connect in your future". We have finally obtained what can be defined "a narrative review of the literature on diverticulitis". CONCLUSIONS Not only evidence-based medicine but also the contextualization, as also the role of 'competent' surgeons, should guide to novel approach in acute diverticulitis management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ferdinando Agresta
- Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Vittorio Veneto Hospital, Via C. Forlanini 71, 31029, Vittorio Veneto, TV, Italy
| | - Giulia Montori
- Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Vittorio Veneto Hospital, Via C. Forlanini 71, 31029, Vittorio Veneto, TV, Italy.
| | - Mauro Podda
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Monica Ortenzi
- Clinica di Chirurgia Generale e d'Urgenza, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Alessio Giordano
- Surgery Department, Emergency Surgery Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Carlo Bergamini
- Surgery Department, Emergency Surgery Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Giorgio Mazzarolo
- Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Vittorio Veneto Hospital, Via C. Forlanini 71, 31029, Vittorio Veneto, TV, Italy
| | - Edelweiss Licitra
- Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Vittorio Veneto Hospital, Via C. Forlanini 71, 31029, Vittorio Veneto, TV, Italy
| | - Tobia Gobbi
- Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Vittorio Veneto Hospital, Via C. Forlanini 71, 31029, Vittorio Veneto, TV, Italy
| | - Giuseppa Procida
- Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Vittorio Veneto Hospital, Via C. Forlanini 71, 31029, Vittorio Veneto, TV, Italy
| | - Andrea Dal Borgo
- Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Vittorio Veneto Hospital, Via C. Forlanini 71, 31029, Vittorio Veneto, TV, Italy
| | | | - Luca Ansaloni
- Unit of General Surgery I, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Paola Fugazzola
- Unit of General Surgery I, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Grazia Savino
- Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Vittorio Veneto Hospital, Via C. Forlanini 71, 31029, Vittorio Veneto, TV, Italy
| | - Mario Guerrieri
- Clinica di Chirurgia Generale e d'Urgenza, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Alberto Sartori
- Department of General Surgery, Ospedale di Montebelluna, Montebelluna, Italy
| | - Wanda Petz
- Division of Digestive Surgery, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianfranco Silecchia
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, University La Sapienza of Rome, Latina, Italy
| | - Salomone di Saverio
- Department of General Surgery, ASUR Marche, AV5, Hospital of San Benedetto del Tronto, San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy
| | - Fausto Catena
- Department of Surgery, "Bufalini" Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Antonino Agrusa
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Stomatological Disciplines, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Michelangelo Salemi
- Medical Director of ULSS 2Trevigiana, Vittorio Veneto Hospital, Vittorio Veneto, TV, Italy
| | | | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Moynihan A, Hardy N, Dalli J, Aigner F, Arezzo A, Hompes R, Knol J, Tuynman J, Cucek J, Rojc J, Rodríguez-Luna MR, Cahill R. CLASSICA: Validating artificial intelligence in classifying cancer in real time during surgery. Colorectal Dis 2023; 25:2392-2402. [PMID: 37932915 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM Treatment pathways for significant rectal polyps differ depending on the underlying pathology, but pre-excision profiling is imperfect. It has been demonstrated that differences in fluorescence perfusion signals following injection of indocyanine green (ICG) can be analysed mathematically and, with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI), used to classify tumours endoscopically as benign or malignant. This study aims to validate this method of characterization across multiple clinical sites regarding its generalizability, usability and accuracy while developing clinical-grade software to enable it to become a useful method. METHODS The CLASSICA study is a prospective, unblinded multicentre European observational study aimed to validate the use of AI analysis of ICG fluorescence for intra-operative tissue characterization. Six hundred patients undergoing transanal endoscopic evaluation of significant rectal polyps and tumours will be enrolled in at least five clinical sites across the European Union over a 4-year period. Video recordings will be analysed regarding dynamic fluorescence patterns centrally as software is developed to enable analysis with automatic classification to happen locally. AI-based classification and subsequently guided intervention will be compared with the current standard of care including biopsies, final specimen pathology and patient outcomes. DISCUSSION CLASSICA will validate the use of AI in the analysis of ICG fluorescence for the purposes of classifying significant rectal polyps and tumours endoscopically. Follow-on studies will compare AI-guided targeted biopsy or, indeed, AI characterization alone with traditional biopsy and AI-guided local excision versus traditional excision with regard to marginal clearance and recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Moynihan
- University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - N Hardy
- University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - J Dalli
- University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - F Aigner
- Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - A Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
- European Association for Endoscopic Surgery, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - R Hompes
- Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg Autonome Verzorgingsinstelling, Genk, Belgium
| | - J Knol
- Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg Autonome Verzorgingsinstelling, Genk, Belgium
| | - J Tuynman
- Stitching VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Cucek
- Arctur, Nova Gorica, Slovenia
| | - J Rojc
- Arctur, Nova Gorica, Slovenia
| | | | - R Cahill
- University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Robertson D, Sterke F, van Weteringen W, Arezzo A, Mintz Y, Horeman T. Escape of surgical smoke particles, comparing conventional and valveless trocar systems. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:8552-8561. [PMID: 37794124 PMCID: PMC10615925 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10444-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND During minimal access surgery, surgical smoke is produced which can potentially be inhaled by the surgical team, leading to several health risks. This smoke can escape from the abdominal cavity into the operating room due to trocar leakage. The trocars and insufflator that are used during surgery influence gas leakage. Therefore, this study compares particle escape from a valveless (Conmed AirSeal iFS), and a conventional (Karl Storz Endoflator) system. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using an in vitro model, a conventional and a valveless trocar system were compared. A protocol that simulated various surgical phases was defined to assess the surgical conditions and particle leakage. Insufflation pressures and instrument diameters were varied as these are known to affect gas leakage. RESULTS The conventional trocar leaked during two distinct phases. Removal of the obturator caused a sudden release of particles. During instrument insertion, an average of 211 (IQR 111) particles per second escaped when using the 5 mm diameter instrument. With the 10 mm instrument, 50 (IQR 13) particles per second were measured. With the conventional trocar, a higher abdominal pressure increased particle leakage. The valveless trocar demonstrated a continuously high particle release during all phases. After the obturator was removed, particle escape increased sharply. Particle escape decreased to 1276 (IQR 580) particles per second for the 5 mm instrument insertion, and 1084 (IQR 630) particles per second for 10 mm instrument insertion. With the valveless trocar system, a higher insufflation pressure lowered particle escape. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that a valveless trocar system releases more particles into the operating room environment than a conventional trocar. During instrument insertion, the leakage through the valveless system is 6 to 20 times higher than the conventional system. With a valveless trocar, leakage decreases with increasing pressure. With both trocar types leakage depends on instrument diameter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Robertson
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands.
| | - Frank Sterke
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Willem van Weteringen
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Yoav Mintz
- Department of General Surgery, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Tim Horeman
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Robertson D, van Duijn M, Arezzo A, Mintz Y, Horeman-Franse T. The influence of prolonged instrument manipulation on gas leakage through trocars. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:7325-7335. [PMID: 37442835 PMCID: PMC10462547 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10240-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND During laparoscopic surgery, CO2 insufflation gas could leak from the intra-abdominal cavity into the operating theater. Medical staff could therefore be exposed to hazardous substances present in leaked gas. Although previous studies have shown that leakage through trocars is a contributing factor, trocar performance over longer periods remains unclear. This study investigates the influence of prolonged instrument manipulation on gas leakage through trocars. METHODS Twenty-five trocars with diameters ranging from 10 to 15 mm were included in the study. An experimental model was developed to facilitate instrument manipulation in a trocar under loading. The trocar was mounted to a custom airtight container insufflated with CO2 to a pressure of 15 mmHg, similar to clinical practice. A linear stage was used for prolonged instrument manipulation. At the same time, a fixed load was applied radially to the trocar cannula to mimic the reaction force of the abdominal wall. Gas leakage was measured before, after, and during instrument manipulation. RESULTS After instrument manipulation, leakage rates per trocar varied between 0.0 and 5.58 L/min. No large differences were found between leakage rates before and after prolonged manipulation in static and dynamic measurements. However, the prolonged instrument manipulation did cause visible damage to two trocars and revealed unintended leakage pathways in others that can be related to production flaws. CONCLUSION Prolonged instrument manipulation did not increase gas leakage rates through trocars, despite damage to some individual trocars. Nevertheless, gas leakage through trocars occurs and is caused by different trocar-specific mechanisms and design issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Robertson
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands.
| | - Matthijs van Duijn
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Yoav Mintz
- Department of General Surgery, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Tim Horeman-Franse
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Arezzo A, Nicotera A, Bonomo LD, Olandese F, Veglia S, Ferguglia A, Pentassuglia G, Mingrone G, Morino M. Outcomes of surgical treatment of diverticular abscesses after failure of antibiotic therapy. Updates Surg 2023:10.1007/s13304-023-01509-4. [PMID: 37093495 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01509-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023]
Abstract
Management of diverticular abscess (DA) is still controversial. Antibiotic therapy is indicated in abscesses ≤ 4 cm, while percutaneous drainage/surgery in abscesses > 4 cm. The study aims to assess the role of antibiotics and surgical treatments in patients affected by DA. We retrospectively analyzed 100 consecutive patients with DA between 2013 and 2020, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. They were divided into two groups depending on abscess size ≤ or > 4 cm (group 1 and group 2, respectively). All patients were initially treated with intravenous antibiotics. Surgery was considered in patients with generalized peritonitis at admission or after the failure of antibiotic therapy. The primary endpoint was to compare recurrence rates for antibiotics and surgery. The secondary endpoint was to assess the failure rate of each antibiotic regimen resulting in surgery. In group 1, 31 (72.1%) patients were conservatively treated and 12 (27.9%) underwent surgery. In group 2, percentages were respectively 50.9% (29 patients) and 49.1% (28 patients). We observed 4 recurrences in group 1 and 6 in group 2. Recurrence required surgery in 3 patients/group. We administered amoxicillin-clavulanic acid to 74 patients, piperacillin-tazobactam to 14 patients and ciprofloxacin + metronidazole to 12 patients. All patients referred to surgery had been previously treated with amoxicillin-Powered by Editorial Manager® and ProduXion Manager® from Aries Systems Corporation clavulanic acid. No percutaneous drainage was performed in a hundred consecutive patients. Surgical treatment was associated with a lower risk of recurrence in patients with abscess > 4 cm, compared to antibiotics. Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid was associated with a higher therapeutic failure rate than piperacillin-tazobactam/ciprofloxacin + metronidazole.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.
| | - Antonella Nicotera
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Luca Domenico Bonomo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Olandese
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Simona Veglia
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Radiotherapy, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino-University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Alice Ferguglia
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Pentassuglia
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Mingrone
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Mario Morino
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ortenzi M, Agresta F, Vettoretto N, Gerardi C, Allocati E, Botteri E, Montori G, Balla A, Arezzo A, Piatto G, Sartori A, Antoniou S, Podda M. Use of High Energy Devices (HEDs) versus electrocautery for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Surg Endosc 2023:10.1007/s00464-023-10060-7. [PMID: 37074420 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10060-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION According to the literature, there is no clear definition of a High Energy Devices (HEDs), and their proper indications for use are also unclear. Nevertheless, the flourishing market of HEDs could make their choice in daily clinical practice arduous, possibly increasing the risk of improper use for a lack of specific training. At the same time, the diffusion of HEDs impacts the economic asset of the healthcare systems. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of HEDs compared to electrocautery devices while performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). MATERIALS AND METHODS On behalf of the Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery and New Technologies, experts performed a systematic review and meta-analysis and synthesised the evidence assessing the efficacy and safety of HEDs compared to electrocautery devices while performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative observational studies were included. Outcomes were: operating time, bleeding, intra-operative and post-operative complications, length of hospital stay, costs, and exposition to surgical smoke. The review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021250447). RESULTS Twenty-six studies were included: 21 RCTs, one prospective parallel arm comparative non-RCT, and one retrospective cohort study, while three were prospective comparative studies. Most of the studies included laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed in an elective setting. All the studies but three analysed the outcomes deriving from the utilisation of US sources of energy compared to electrocautery. Operative time was significantly shorter in the HED group compared to the electrocautery group (15 studies, 1938 patients; SMD - 1.33; 95% CI - 1.89 to 0.78; I2 = 97%, Random-effect). No other statistically significant differences were found in the other examined variables. CONCLUSIONS HEDs seem to have a superiority over Electrocautery while performing LC in terms of operative time, while no difference was observed in terms of length of hospitalisation and blood loss. No concerns about safety were raised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Ortenzi
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.
| | - Ferdinando Agresta
- Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Vittorio Veneto Hospital, Vittorio Veneto, Treviso, Italy
| | - Nereo Vettoretto
- General Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili Di Brescia PO Montichiari, Montichiari, Brescia, Italy
| | - Chiara Gerardi
- Istituto Di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Eleonora Allocati
- Istituto Di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Emanuele Botteri
- General Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili Di Brescia PO Montichiari, Montichiari, Brescia, Italy
| | - Giulia Montori
- Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Vittorio Veneto Hospital, Vittorio Veneto, Treviso, Italy
| | - Andrea Balla
- General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hospital "San Paolo", Civitavecchia, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Giacomo Piatto
- Department of General Surgery, Ospedale Di Montebelluna, Montebelluna, Treviso, Italy
| | - Alberto Sartori
- Department of General Surgery, Ospedale Di Montebelluna, Montebelluna, Treviso, Italy
| | - Stavros Antoniou
- Department of Surgery, Mediterranean Hospital of Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Mauro Podda
- Department of Surgical Science, Emergency Surgery Unit, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cassinotti E, Al-Taher M, Antoniou SA, Arezzo A, Baldari L, Boni L, Bonino MA, Bouvy ND, Brodie R, Carus T, Chand M, Diana M, Eussen MMM, Francis N, Guida A, Gontero P, Haney CM, Jansen M, Mintz Y, Morales-Conde S, Muller-Stich BP, Nakajima K, Nickel F, Oderda M, Parise P, Rosati R, Schijven MP, Silecchia G, Soares AS, Urakawa S, Vettoretto N. European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) consensus on Indocyanine Green (ICG) fluorescence-guided surgery. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:1629-1648. [PMID: 36781468 PMCID: PMC10017637 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-09928-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent years, the use of Indocyanine Green (ICG) fluorescence-guided surgery during open and laparoscopic procedures has exponentially expanded across various clinical settings. The European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) initiated a consensus development conference on this topic with the aim of creating evidence-based statements and recommendations for the surgical community. METHODS An expert panel of surgeons has been selected and invited to participate to this project. Systematic reviews of the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane libraries were performed to identify evidence on potential benefits of ICG fluorescence-guided surgery on clinical practice and patient outcomes. Statements and recommendations were prepared and unanimously agreed by the panel; they were then submitted to all EAES members through a two-rounds online survey and results presented at the EAES annual congress, Barcelona, November 2021. RESULTS A total of 18,273 abstracts were screened with 117 articles included. 22 statements and 16 recommendations were generated and approved. In some areas, such as the use of ICG fluorescence-guided surgery during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the perfusion assessment in colorectal surgery and the search for the sentinel lymph nodes in gynaecological malignancies, the large number of evidences in literature has allowed us to strongly recommend the use of ICG for a better anatomical definition and a reduction in post-operative complications. CONCLUSIONS Overall, from the systematic literature review performed by the experts panel and the survey extended to all EAES members, ICG fluorescence-guided surgery could be considered a safe and effective technology. Future robust clinical research is required to specifically validate multiple organ-specific applications and the potential benefits of this technique on clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Cassinotti
- Department of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, University of Milan, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20121, Milan, Italy.
| | - M Al-Taher
- Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD), Strasbourg, France
| | - S A Antoniou
- Department of Surgery, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - A Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - L Baldari
- Department of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, University of Milan, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20121, Milan, Italy
| | - L Boni
- Department of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, University of Milan, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20121, Milan, Italy
| | - M A Bonino
- Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - N D Bouvy
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - R Brodie
- Department of General Surgery, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - T Carus
- Niels-Stensen-Kliniken, Elisabeth-Hospital, Thuine, Germany
| | - M Chand
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London, London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - M Diana
- IHU Strasbourg, Institute of Image-Guided Surgery and IRCAD, Research Institute Against Cancer of the Digestive System, Strasbourg, France
| | - M M M Eussen
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - N Francis
- Department of General Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Yeovil, UK
| | - A Guida
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Translation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - P Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Science, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - C M Haney
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M Jansen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Y Mintz
- Department of General Surgery, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - S Morales-Conde
- Unit of Innovation in Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, University of Sevilla, Seville, Spain
| | - B P Muller-Stich
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - K Nakajima
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - F Nickel
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M Oderda
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Science, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - P Parise
- U.O.C. Chirurgia Generale, Policlinico di Abano Terme, Abano Terme, PD, Italy
| | - R Rosati
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - M P Schijven
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, North Holland, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, North Holland, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Digital Health, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, North Holland, The Netherlands
| | - G Silecchia
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Translation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - A S Soares
- Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London, London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - S Urakawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - N Vettoretto
- U.O.C. Chirurgia Generale, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia P.O. Montichiari, Ospedale di Montichiari, Montichiari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Seno E, Allaix ME, Ammirati CA, Bonino MA, Arezzo A, Mistrangelo M, Morino M. Intracorporeal or extracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis after laparoscopic right colectomy: cost analysis of the Torino trial. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:479-485. [PMID: 35999317 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09546-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 08/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intracorporeal (IIA) and extracorporeal anastomosis (EIA) are two well-established techniques for restoration of bowel continuity after laparoscopic right colectomy (LRC). Since no economic analysis comparing the two different anastomotic techniques has been performed yet, it is still unclear if IIA can reduce perioperative costs. The aim of the study was to compare costs of LRC with IIA or EIA for right-sided colon neoplasm. METHODS This is a cost analysis of a single-institution double-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing the outcomes of LRC with IIA and LRC with EIA in patients with a right-sided colon neoplasm. All direct in-hospital costs related to patient's admission were recorded (intraoperative costs: operative room, surgical tools, blood units-postoperative costs: hospital stay, laboratory and microbiology analyses, diagnostic services, analgesic drugs and antibiotic therapy, blood units, reoperation-outpatient costs: post-discharge wound medications). This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, Number NCT03045107. RESULTS A total of 140 patients were randomized and analyzed. Mean overall costs in the IIA group exceeded 349 € the mean overall costs of the EIA group (7926.87 ± 4617.23 € vs. 7577.45 ± 6131.17 €; P = 0.704). A mean extra charge of 608 € regarding total intraoperative costs was recorded in the IIA group (3058.84 ± 897.42 € vs. 2450.15 ± 558.90 €; P < 0.001). The cost of surgical instruments resulted in 542 € additional charge per patient in the IIA group compared to EIA group (1782.74 ± 541.26 € vs. 1240.55 ± 384.09 €; P < 0.001). The mean cost of operative room occupancy was comparable in IIA and EIA group: 1276.09 ± 514.94 € vs. 1209.60 ± 422.80 € (P = 0.405). No significant differences were observed in postoperative costs and in outpatient costs. CONCLUSION This economic analysis showed that IIA and EIA after LRC had similar overall costs, even though there were intraoperative extra costs of IIA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabetta Seno
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso A. M. Dogliotti, 14, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Ettore Allaix
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso A. M. Dogliotti, 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.
| | - Carlo Alberto Ammirati
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso A. M. Dogliotti, 14, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Augusto Bonino
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso A. M. Dogliotti, 14, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso A. M. Dogliotti, 14, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Mistrangelo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso A. M. Dogliotti, 14, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Mario Morino
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso A. M. Dogliotti, 14, 10126, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Balla A, Saraceno F, Rullo M, Morales-Conde S, Targarona Soler EM, Di Saverio S, Guerrieri M, Lepiane P, Di Lorenzo N, Adamina M, Alarcón I, Arezzo A, Bollo Rodriguez J, Boni L, Biondo S, Carrano FM, Chand M, Jenkins JT, Davies J, Delgado Rivilla S, Delrio P, Elmore U, Espin-Basany E, Fichera A, Flor Lorente B, Francis N, Gómez Ruiz M, Hahnloser D, Licardie E, Martinez C, Ortenzi M, Panis Y, Pastor Idoate C, Paganini AM, Pera M, Perinotti R, Popowich DA, Rockall T, Rosati R, Sartori A, Scoglio D, Shalaby M, Simó Fernández V, Smart NJ, Spinelli A, Sylla P, Tanis PJ, Valdes-Hernandez J, Wexner SD, Sileri P. Protective ileostomy creation after anterior resection of the rectum: Shared decision-making or still subjective? Colorectal Dis 2022; 25:647-659. [PMID: 36527323 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
AIM The choice of whether to perform protective ileostomy (PI) after anterior resection (AR) is mainly guided by risk factors (RFs) responsible for the development of anastomotic leakage (AL). However, clear guidelines about PI creation are still lacking in the literature and this is often decided according to the surgeon's preferences, experiences or feelings. This qualitative study aims to investigate, by an open-ended question survey, the individual surgeon's decision-making process regarding PI creation after elective AR. METHOD Fifty four colorectal surgeons took part in an electronic survey to answer the questions and describe what usually led their decision to perform PI. A content analysis was used to code the answers. To classify answers, five dichotomous categories (In favour/Against PI, Listed/Unlisted RFs, Typical/Atypical, Emotions/Non-emotions, Personal experience/No personal experience) have been developed. RESULTS Overall, 76% of surgeons were in favour of PI creation and 88% considered listed RFs in the question of whether to perform PI. Atypical answers were reported in 10% of cases. Emotions and personal experience influenced surgeons' decision-making process in 22% and 49% of cases, respectively. The most frequently considered RFs were the distance of the anastomosis from the anal verge (96%), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (88%), a positive intraoperative leak test (65%), blood loss (37%) and immunosuppression therapy (35%). CONCLUSION The indications to perform PI following rectal cancer surgery lack standardization and evidence-based guidelines are required to inform practice. Until then, expert opinion can be helpful to assist the decision-making process in patients who have undergone AR for adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Balla
- UOC of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hospital 'San Paolo', Civitavecchia, Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Saraceno
- UOC of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hospital 'San Paolo', Civitavecchia, Rome, Italy.,Ph.D. Program in Applied Medical-Surgical Sciences, Department of General Surgery, University of Rome 'Tor Vergata', Rome, Italy
| | - Marika Rullo
- Department of Social, Political and Cognitive Sciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Salvador Morales-Conde
- Unit of Innovation in Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital 'Virgen del Rocio', University of Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Eduardo M Targarona Soler
- General and Digestive Surgery Unit, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- ASUR Marche 5, San Benedetto del Tronto General Hospital, San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy
| | - Mario Guerrieri
- Department of General Surgery, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Pasquale Lepiane
- UOC of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hospital 'San Paolo', Civitavecchia, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicola Di Lorenzo
- Ph.D. Program in Applied Medical-Surgical Sciences, Department of General Surgery, University of Rome 'Tor Vergata', Rome, Italy
| | - Michel Adamina
- Department of Surgery, Kantonsspital Winterthur and Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Isaias Alarcón
- Unit of Innovation in Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital 'Virgen del Rocio', University of Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Jesus Bollo Rodriguez
- General and Digestive Surgery Unit, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Luigi Boni
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Maria Carrano
- Ph.D. Program in Applied Medical-Surgical Sciences, Department of General Surgery, University of Rome 'Tor Vergata', Rome, Italy
| | - Manish Chand
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - John T Jenkins
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, North West London NHS Trust, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Justin Davies
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.,University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Paolo Delrio
- Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Ugo Elmore
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Eloy Espin-Basany
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Hospital Valle de Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alessandro Fichera
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Texas, Dallas, USA
| | - Blas Flor Lorente
- Digestive Surgery Department, 'La Fe' University Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - Nader Francis
- Department of General Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Higher Kingston, Yeovil, UK
| | - Marcos Gómez Ruiz
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.,Valdecilla Biomedical Research Institute, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | | | - Eugenio Licardie
- Unit of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Quironsalud Sagrado Corazón, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Carmen Martinez
- General and Digestive Surgery Unit, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Monica Ortenzi
- Department of General Surgery, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Yves Panis
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France
| | - Carlos Pastor Idoate
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, University Clinic of Navarre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alessandro M Paganini
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties 'Paride Stefanini', Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Miguel Pera
- Hospital del Mar, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Roberto Perinotti
- Department of General Surgery, SS Colo-Rectal and Proctological Surgery, Biella Hospital, Ponderano, Biella, Italy
| | | | - Timothy Rockall
- General Surgery at Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
| | - Riccardo Rosati
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Sartori
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, San Valentino Hospital, Montebelluna, Treviso, Italy
| | - Daniele Scoglio
- Department of General Surgery, AULSS 4 Veneto Orientale, San Donà di Piave General Hospital, San Donà di Piave, Italy
| | - Mostafa Shalaby
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Mansoura University Hospital, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | | | | | - Antonino Spinelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.,IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Pieter J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Javier Valdes-Hernandez
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, General and Digestive Surgery Unit, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Steven D Wexner
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Florida, Weston, USA
| | - Pierpaolo Sileri
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Adamina M, Andreou A, Arezzo A, Christogiannis C, Di Lorenzo N, Gioumidou M, Glavind J, Iavazzo C, Mavridis D, Muysoms FE, Preda D, Smart NJ, Syropoulou A, Tzanis AΑ, Van de Velde M, Vermeulen J, Antoniou SA. EAES rapid guideline: systematic review, meta-analysis, GRADE assessment, and evidence-informed European recommendations on appendicitis in pregnancy. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:8699-8712. [PMID: 36307599 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09625-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical practice recommendations for the management of acute appendicitis in pregnancy are lacking. OBJECTIVE To develop an evidence-informed, trustworthy guideline on the management of appendicitis in pregnancy. We aimed to address the questions of conservative or surgical management, and laparoscopic or open surgery for acute appendicitis. METHODS We performed a systematic review, meta-analysis, and evidence appraisal using the GRADE methodology. A European, multidisciplinary panel of surgeons, obstetricians/gynecologists, a midwife, and 3 patient representatives reached consensus through an evidence-to-decision framework and a Delphi process to formulate the recommendations. The project was developed in an online authoring and publication platform (MAGICapp). RESULTS Research evidence was of very low certainty. We recommend operative treatment over conservative management in pregnant patients with complicated appendicitis or appendicolith on imaging studies (strong recommendation). We suggest operative treatment over conservative management in pregnant patients with uncomplicated appendicitis and no appendicolith on imaging studies (weak recommendation). We suggest laparoscopic appendectomy in patients with acute appendicitis until the 20th week of gestation, or when the fundus of the uterus is below the level of the umbilicus; and laparoscopic or open appendectomy in patients with acute appendicitis beyond the 20th week of gestation, or when the fundus of the uterus is above the level of the umbilicus, depending on the preference and expertise of the surgeon. CONCLUSION Through a structured, evidence-informed approach, an interdisciplinary panel provides a strong recommendation to perform appendectomy for complicated appendicitis or appendicolith, and laparoscopic or open appendectomy beyond the 20th week, based on the surgeon's preference and expertise. GUIDELINE REGISTRATION NUMBER IPGRP-2022CN210.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michel Adamina
- Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Anthoula Andreou
- Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Christos Christogiannis
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Nicola Di Lorenzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy
| | - Meropi Gioumidou
- Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Julie Glavind
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Christos Iavazzo
- Gynaecological Oncology Department, Metaxa Cancer Hospital, Piraeus, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Mavridis
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
- Faculté de Médecine, Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Filip E Muysoms
- Department of Surgery, Maria Middelares Hospital, Gent, Belgium
| | - Daniel Preda
- 1St Clinic of Surgery, Craiova Emergency Clinical County Hospital, Craiova, Romania
| | - Neil J Smart
- Department of General Surgery, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK
| | | | | | - Marc Van de Velde
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven and Department of Anaesthesiology, UZ Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Joeri Vermeulen
- Department Health Care, Erasmus Brussels University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Public Health, Biostatistics and Medical Informatics Research Group, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bemelman WA, Arezzo A, Banasiewicz T, Brady R, Espín-Basany E, Faiz O, Jimenez-Rodriguez RM. Use of sponge-assisted endoluminal vacuum therapy for the treatment of colorectal anastomotic leaks: expert panel consensus. BJS Open 2022; 6:6765232. [PMID: 36268752 PMCID: PMC9585396 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Revised: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Anastomotic leaks represent one of the most significant complications of colorectal surgery and are the primary cause of postoperative mortality and morbidity. Sponge-assisted endoluminal vacuum therapy (EVT) has emerged as a minimally invasive technique for the management of anastomotic leaks; however, there are questions regarding patient selection due to the heterogeneous nature of anastomotic leaks and the application of sponge-assisted EVT by surgeons. Method Seven colorectal surgical experts participated in a modified nominal group technique to establish consensus regarding key questions that arose from existing gaps in scientific evidence and the variability in clinical practice. After a bibliographic search to identify the available evidence and sequential meetings with participants, a series of recommendations and statements were formulated and agreed upon. Results Thirty-seven recommendations and statements on the optimal use of sponge-assisted EVT were elaborated on and unanimously agreed upon by the group of experts. The statements and recommendations answer 10 key questions about the indications, benefits, and definition of the success rate of sponge-assisted EVT for the management of anastomotic leaks. Conclusion Although further research is needed to resolve clinical and technical issues associated with sponge-assisted EVT, the recommendations and statements produced from this project summarize critical aspects to consider when using sponge-assisted EVT and to assist those involved in the management of patients with colorectal anastomotic leaks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willem A Bemelman
- Correspondence to: Willem A. Bemelman, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (e-mail: )
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Tomasz Banasiewicz
- Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Department of General, Endocrinological Surgery and Gastroenterological Oncology, Poznań, Poland
| | - Richard Brady
- Newcastle Centre for Bowel Disease Research Group, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
| | - Eloy Espín-Basany
- Unit of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Vall d’Hebron-Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Rosa M Jimenez-Rodriguez
- Unidad de Coloproctología, Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Milone M, Elmore U, Manigrasso M, Ortenzi M, Botteri E, Arezzo A, Silecchia G, Guerrieri M, De Palma GD, Agresta F. ERas and COLorectal endoscopic surgery: an Italian society for endoscopic surgery and new technologies (SICE) national report. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:7619-7627. [PMID: 35501602 PMCID: PMC9485180 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09212-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several reports demonstrated a strong association between the level of adherence to the protocol and improved clinical outcomes after surgery. However, it is difficult to obtain full adherence to the protocol into clinical practice and has still not been identified the threshold beyond which improved functional results can be reached. METHODS The ERCOLE (ERas and COLorectal Endoscopic surgery) study was as a cohort, prospective, multi-centre national study evaluating the association between adherence to ERAS items and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive colorectal surgery. The primary endpoint was to associate the percentage of ERAS adherence to functional recovery after minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery. The secondary endpoints of the study was to validate safety of the ERAS programme evaluating complications' occurrence according to Clavien-Dindo classification and to evaluate the compliance of the Italian surgeons to each ERAS item. RESULTS 1138 patients were included. Adherence to the ERAS protocol was full only in 101 patients (8.9%), > 75% of the ERAS items in 736 (64.7%) and > 50% in 1127 (99%). Adherence to > 75% was associated with a better functional recovery with 90.2 ± 98.8 vs 95.9 ± 33.4 h (p = 0.003). At difference, full adherence to the ERAS components 91.7 ± 22.1 vs 92.2 ± 31.6 h (p = 0.8) was not associated with better recovery. CONCLUSIONS Our results were encouraging to affirm that adherence to the ERAS program up to 75% could be considered satisfactory to get the goal. Our study could be considered a call to simplify the ERAS protocol facilitating its penetrance into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Milone
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II" University of Naples, via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
| | - Ugo Elmore
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Manigrasso
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, "Federico II" University of Naples, via Pansini 5, Naples, Italy
| | - Monica Ortenzi
- Department of General Surgery, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Piazza Roma 22, 60121, Ancona, Italy
| | - Emanuele Botteri
- General Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili Di Brescia, Montichiari, Italy
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Gianfranco Silecchia
- Department of Medical Surgical Science and Biotechnologies, Faculty Pharmacy and Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Mario Guerrieri
- Department of General Surgery, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Piazza Roma 22, 60121, Ancona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Domenico De Palma
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II" University of Naples, via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Ferdinando Agresta
- Department of General Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Ulss2 Marca Trevigiana, Vittorio Veneto, TV, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Arezzo A. Giuseppe Gagliardi, Editor Emeritus in memoriam, 1962-2022. Tech Coloproctol 2022; 26:769-770. [PMID: 36040573 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-022-02694-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- A Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Milone M, Elmore U, Manigrasso M, Ortenzi M, Botteri E, Arezzo A, Silecchia G, Guerrieri M, De Palma GD, Agresta F, Agresta F, Pizza F, D’Antonio D, Amalfitano F, Selvaggi F, Sciaudone G, Selvaggi L, Prando D, Cavallo F, Guerrieri M, Ortenzi M, Lezoche G, Cuccurullo D, Tartaglia E, Sagnelli C, Coratti A, Tribuzi A, Di Marino M, Anania G, Bombardini C, Zago MP, Tagliabue F, Burati M, Di Saverio S, Colombo S, Adla SE, De Luca M, Zese M, Parini D, Prosperi P, Alemanno G, Martellucci J, Olmi S, Oldani A, Uccelli M, Bono D, Scaglione D, Saracco R, Podda M, Pisanu A, Murzi V, Agrusa A, Buscemi S, Muttillo IA, Picardi B, Muttillo EM, Solaini L, Cavaliere D, Ercolani G, Corcione F, Peltrini R, Bracale U, Lucchi A, Vittori L, Grassia M, Porcu A, Perra T, Feo C, Angelini P, Izzo D, Ricciardelli L, Trompetto M, Gallo G, Luc AR, Muratore A, Calabrò M, Cuzzola B, Barberis A, Costanzo F, Angelini G, Ceccarelli G, Rondelli F, De Rosa M, Cassinotti E, Boni L, Baldari L, Bianchi PP, Formisano G, Giuliani G, Ceretti AAP, Mariani NM, Giovenzana M, Farfaglia R, Marcianò P, Arizzi V, Piccoli M, Pecchini F, Pattacini GC, Botteri E, Vettoretto N, Guarnieri C, Laface L, Abate E, Casati M, Feo C, Fabri N, Pesce A, Maida P, Marte G, Abete R, Casali L, Marchignoli A, Dall’Aglio M, Scabini S, Pertile D, Aprile A, Andreuccetti J, Di Leo A, Crepaz L, Maione F, Vertaldi S, Chini A, Rosati R, Puccetti F, Maggi G, Cossu A, Sartori A, De Luca M, Piatto G, Perrotta N, Celiento M, Scorzelli M, Pilone V, Tramontano S, Calabrese P, Sechi R, Cillara N, Putzu G, Podda MG, Montuori M, Pinotti E, Sica G, Franceschilli M, Sensi B, Degiuli M, Reddavid R, Puca L, Farsi M, Minuzzo A, Gia E, Baiocchi GL, Ranieri V, Celotti A, Bianco F, Grassia S, Novi A. ERas and COLorectal endoscopic surgery: an Italian society for endoscopic surgery and new technologies (SICE) national report. Surg Endosc 2022. [DOI: https:/doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09212-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/10/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Several reports demonstrated a strong association between the level of adherence to the protocol and improved clinical outcomes after surgery. However, it is difficult to obtain full adherence to the protocol into clinical practice and has still not been identified the threshold beyond which improved functional results can be reached.
Methods
The ERCOLE (ERas and COLorectal Endoscopic surgery) study was as a cohort, prospective, multi-centre national study evaluating the association between adherence to ERAS items and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive colorectal surgery. The primary endpoint was to associate the percentage of ERAS adherence to functional recovery after minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery. The secondary endpoints of the study was to validate safety of the ERAS programme evaluating complications’ occurrence according to Clavien-Dindo classification and to evaluate the compliance of the Italian surgeons to each ERAS item.
Results
1138 patients were included. Adherence to the ERAS protocol was full only in 101 patients (8.9%), > 75% of the ERAS items in 736 (64.7%) and > 50% in 1127 (99%). Adherence to > 75% was associated with a better functional recovery with 90.2 ± 98.8 vs 95.9 ± 33.4 h (p = 0.003). At difference, full adherence to the ERAS components 91.7 ± 22.1 vs 92.2 ± 31.6 h (p = 0.8) was not associated with better recovery.
Conclusions
Our results were encouraging to affirm that adherence to the ERAS program up to 75% could be considered satisfactory to get the goal. Our study could be considered a call to simplify the ERAS protocol facilitating its penetrance into clinical practice.
Collapse
|
21
|
Martin JW, Barducci L, Scaglioni B, Norton JC, Winters C, Subramanian V, Arezzo A, Obstein KL, Valdastri P. Robotic Autonomy for Magnetic Endoscope Biopsy. IEEE Trans Med Robot Bionics 2022; 4:599-607. [PMID: 36249558 PMCID: PMC9555223 DOI: 10.1109/tmrb.2022.3187028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Magnetically actuated endoscopes are currently transitioning in to clinical use for procedures such as colonoscopy, presenting numerous benefits over their conventional counterparts. Intelligent and easy-to-use control strategies are an essential part of their clinical effectiveness due to the un-intuitive nature of magnetic field interaction. However, work on developing intelligent control for these devices has mainly been focused on general purpose endoscope navigation. In this work, we investigate the use of autonomous robotic control for magnetic colonoscope intervention via biopsy, another major component of clinical viability. We have developed control strategies with varying levels of robotic autonomy, including semi-autonomous routines for identifying and performing targeted biopsy, as well as random quadrant biopsy. We present and compare the performance of these approaches to magnetic endoscope biopsy against the use of a standard flexible endoscope on bench-top using a colonoscopy training simulator and silicone colon model. The semi-autonomous routines for targeted and random quadrant biopsy were shown to reduce user workload with comparable times to using a standard flexible endoscope.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Conchubhair Winters
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Keith L. Obstein
- STORM Lab USA, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Shahini E, Passera R, Lo Secco G, Arezzo A. A systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection vs endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal sessile/non-polypoid lesions. MINIM INVASIV THER 2022; 31:835-847. [DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2022.2032759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Endrit Shahini
- Division of Gastroenterology, National Institute of Research "Saverio De Bellis", Castellana Grotte, Italy
| | - Roberto Passera
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Giacomo Lo Secco
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ortenzi M, Balla A, Botteri E, Lepiane P, Guerrieri M, Arezzo A, Sartori A. COVID-19 pandemic: is it time for shared surgical guidelines? A systematic review of the literature. Minerva Surg 2022; 77:171-179. [PMID: 35416005 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-5691.21.09166-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The recent COrona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused a massive disruption of surgical activity and after a year from its first outbreak surgeons still struggle to keep their regular activity coexisting with the virus exhausting requests of healthcare resources. The aim of this paper is to offer a comprehensive overview of the most important recommendations by the International Guidelines about general surgery, and possibly to invite building common shared guidelines to preserve the potential to provide surgical assistance despite the pandemic. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Web of Science databases were searched. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS The searches revealed a total of 18579 articles published up to the end of February 2021. Five articles published between March and May 2020, were included in the present study: Guidelines from The European Society of Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ESTES), The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) and The European Association for Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES), The Endoscopic and Laparoscopic Surgeons of Asia (ELSA), The European Hernia Society (EHS) and The International Organization for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IOS-IBD). CONCLUSIONS In the likely scenario that the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic will become an endemic chronic problem, we should not be forced to choose between COVID-19 or surgery in the future and find a way to make both coexisting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Ortenzi
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy -
| | - Andrea Balla
- General Surgery Unit, San Paolo Hospital, Civitavecchia, Rome, Italy
| | - Emanuele Botteri
- General Surgery Unit, ASST Spedali Civili, Montichiari Hospital, Montichiari, Brescia, Italy
| | - Pasquale Lepiane
- General Surgery Unit, San Paolo Hospital, Civitavecchia, Rome, Italy
| | - Mario Guerrieri
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Alberto Sartori
- Department of General Surgery, Montebelluna Hospital, Montebelluna, Treviso, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hardon SF, Rahimi AM, Postema RR, Willuth E, Mintz Y, Arezzo A, Dankelman J, Nickel F, Horeman T. Safe implementation of hand held steerable laparoscopic instruments: a survey among EAES surgeons. Updates Surg 2022; 74:1749-1754. [PMID: 35416585 PMCID: PMC9481478 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01258-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
The complexity of handheld steerable laparoscopic instruments (SLI) may impair the learning curve compared to conventional instruments when first utilized. This study aimed to provide the current state of interest in the use of SLI, the current use of these in daily practice and the type of training which is conducted before using SLI in the operating room (OR) on real patients. An online survey was distributed by European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) Executive Office to all active members, between January 4th and February 3rd, 2020. The survey consisted of 14 questions regarding the usage and training of steerable laparoscopic instruments. A total of 83 members responded, coming from 33 different countries. Twenty three percent of the respondents using SLI, were using the instruments routinely and of these 21% had not received any formal training in advance of using the instruments in real patients. Of all responding EAES members, 41% considered the instruments to potentially compromise patient safety due to their complexity, learning curve and the inexperience of the surgeons. The respondents reported the three most important aspects of a possible steerable laparoscopic instruments training curriculum to be: hands-on training, safe tissue handling and suturing practice. Finally, a major part of the respondents consider force/pressure feedback data to be of significant importance for implementation of training and assessment of safe laparoscopic and robotic surgery. Training and assessment of skills regarding safe implementation of steerable laparoscopic instruments is lacking. The respondents stressed the need for specific hands-on training during which feedback and assessment of skills should be guaranteed before operating on real patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S F Hardon
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC-VU University Medical Center, Room ZH 7F005, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of BioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
| | - A M Rahimi
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC-VU University Medical Center, Room ZH 7F005, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R R Postema
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC-VU University Medical Center, Room ZH 7F005, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of BioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - E Willuth
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Y Mintz
- Department of General Surgery, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.,Technology Committee, European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES), Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - A Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy.,Technology Committee, European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES), Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - J Dankelman
- Department of BioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - F Nickel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Technology Committee, European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES), Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - T Horeman
- Department of BioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.,Technology Committee, European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES), Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Morino M, Arezzo A. Transanal Local Excision or Endoscopic Dissection for Benign and Large Lesions of the Rectum. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2022; 35:106-112. [PMID: 35237105 PMCID: PMC8885155 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1744356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Since the introduction of transanal endoscopic microsurgery, local excision of "early" rectal lesions has offered the possibility to reduce the invasiveness of treatment for the limited disease. Flexible endoscopy techniques allow today different alternatives consisting of endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection. The first is a straightforward and relatively easy technique, but it prevents a correct pathological staging of the lesion due to fragmentation and the verification of disease-free margins. The second relies on operators' audacity depending on their increasing experience due to the limited progress in technology. What is the preferable technique today is questionable. All the methods have pros and cons. The future certainly will see the use of ideal systems, allowing the possibility of precision surgery for partial- or full-thickness excision, depending on intraoperative findings, and the extension above the rectosigmoid junction. Miniaturized flexible robotic devices may represent the solution for both issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Morino
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy,Address for correspondence Mario Morino, MD Department of Surgical Sciences, University of TorinoC.so Dogliotti 14, 10126 TorinoItaly
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Milone M, Adamina M, Arezzo A, Bejinariu N, Boni L, Bouvy N, de Lacy FB, Dresen R, Ferentinos K, Francis NK, Mahaffey J, Penna M, Theodoropoulos G, Kontouli KM, Mavridis D, Vandvik PO, Antoniou SA. UEG and EAES rapid guideline: Systematic review, meta-analysis, GRADE assessment and evidence-informed European recommendations on TaTME for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:2221-2232. [PMID: 35212821 PMCID: PMC8921163 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09090-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background Evidence and practice recommendations on the use of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer are conflicting. Objective We aimed to summarize best evidence and develop a rapid guideline using transparent, trustworthy, and standardized methodology. Methods We developed a rapid guideline in accordance with GRADE, G-I-N, and AGREE II standards. The steering group consisted of general surgeons, members of the EAES Research Committee/Guidelines Subcommittee with expertise and experience in guideline development, advanced medical statistics and evidence synthesis, biostatisticians, and a guideline methodologist. The guideline panel consisted of four general surgeons practicing colorectal surgery, a radiologist with expertise in rectal cancer, a radiation oncologist, a pathologist, and a patient representative. We conducted a systematic review and the results of evidence synthesis by means of meta-analyses were summarized in evidence tables. Recommendations were authored and published through an online authoring and publication platform (MAGICapp), with the guideline panel making use of an evidence-to-decision framework and a Delphi process to arrive at consensus. Results This rapid guideline provides a weak recommendation for the use of TaTME over laparoscopic or robotic TME for low rectal cancer when expertise is available. Furthermore, it details evidence gaps to be addressed by future research and discusses policy considerations. The guideline, with recommendations, evidence summaries, and decision aids in user-friendly formats can also be accessed in MAGICapp: https://app.magicapp.org/#/guideline/4494. Conclusions This rapid guideline provides evidence-informed trustworthy recommendations on the use of TaTME for rectal cancer. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-022-09090-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Milone
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University "Federico II" of Naples, Naples, Italy.
| | - Michel Adamina
- Department of Surgery, Clinic of Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Allschwil, Switzerland
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Nona Bejinariu
- Department of Pathology, Santomar Oncodiagnostic, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Luigi Boni
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS - Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicole Bouvy
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - F Borja de Lacy
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Institute of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Konstantinos Ferentinos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, Limassol, Cyprus
- European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Nader K Francis
- Department of General Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Yeovil, UK
| | | | | | - George Theodoropoulos
- First Department of Propaedeutic Surgery of Athens, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Katerina Maria Kontouli
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Dimitris Mavridis
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
- Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Per Olav Vandvik
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Schmidt MW, Haney CM, Kowalewski KF, Bintintan VV, Abu Hilal M, Arezzo A, Bahra M, Besselink MG, Biebl M, Boni L, Diana M, Egberts JH, Fischer L, Francis N, Hashimoto DA, Perez D, Schijven M, Schmelzle M, Soltes M, Swanstrom L, Welsch T, Müller-Stich BP, Nickel F. Development and validity evidence of an objective structured assessment of technical skills score for minimally invasive linear-stapled, hand-sewn intestinal anastomoses: the A-OSATS score. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:4529-4541. [PMID: 34755235 PMCID: PMC9085690 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08806-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to develop a reliable objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) score for linear-stapled, hand-sewn closure of enterotomy intestinal anastomoses (A-OSATS). MATERIALS AND METHODS The Delphi methodology was used to create a traditional and weighted A-OSATS score highlighting the more important steps for patient outcomes according to an international expert consensus. Minimally invasive novices, intermediates, and experts were asked to perform a minimally invasive linear-stapled intestinal anastomosis with hand-sewn closure of the enterotomy in a live animal model either laparoscopically or robot-assisted. Video recordings were scored by two blinded raters assessing intrarater and interrater reliability and discriminative abilities between novices (n = 8), intermediates (n = 24), and experts (n = 8). RESULTS The Delphi process included 18 international experts and was successfully completed after 4 rounds. A total of 4 relevant main steps as well as 15 substeps were identified and a definition of each substep was provided. A maximum of 75 points could be reached in the unweighted A-OSATS score and 170 points in the weighted A-OSATS score respectively. A total of 41 anastomoses were evaluated. Excellent intrarater (r = 0.807-0.988, p < 0.001) and interrater (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.923-0.924, p < 0.001) reliability was demonstrated. Both versions of the A-OSATS correlated well with the general OSATS and discriminated between novices, intermediates, and experts defined by their OSATS global rating scale. CONCLUSION With the weighted and unweighted A-OSATS score, we propose a new reliable standard to assess the creation of minimally invasive linear-stapled, hand-sewn anastomoses based on an international expert consensus. Validity evidence in live animal models is provided in this study. Future research should focus on assessing whether the weighted A-OSATS exceeds the predictive capabilities of patient outcomes of the unweighted A-OSATS and provide further validity evidence on using the score on different anastomotic techniques in humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mona W. Schmidt
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany ,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centre Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Caelan M. Haney
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany ,Department of Urology, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, Haus 4, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany ,Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Vasile V. Bintintan
- Department of Surgery, 1st Surgical Clinic, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj Napoca, Romania
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Hepatobiliary Pancreatic and Minimally Invasive Unit, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy ,Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, UK
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Marcus Bahra
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Robotics, Waldfriede Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marc G. Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Matthias Biebl
- Department of Surgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte/Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Luigi Boni
- Fondazione IRCCS-Ca`Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Diana
- IRCAD Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer, Strasbourg, France ,IHU-Strasbourg, Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, Strasbourg, France ,Department of General, Digestive, and Endocrine Surgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France ,ICube Lab, Photonics for Health, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Jan H. Egberts
- Department of General, Visceral, Thoracic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, Kurt Semm Center for Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Lars Fischer
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Mittelbaden, Baden-Baden, Germany
| | - Nader Francis
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Yeovil District Hospital Foundation Trust, Yeovil, UK
| | | | - Daniel Perez
- Department of General, Visceral, and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marlies Schijven
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Moritz Schmelzle
- Department of Surgery, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte/Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marek Soltes
- 1St Department of Surgery, University of Pavol Jozef Safarik, Košice, Slovakia
| | - Lee Swanstrom
- IHU-Strasbourg, Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, Strasbourg, France
| | - Thilo Welsch
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Beat P. Müller-Stich
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix Nickel
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Sartori A, Podda M, Botteri E, Passera R, Agresta F, Arezzo A. Appendectomy during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy: a multicenter ambispective cohort study by the Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery and new technologies (the CRAC study). Updates Surg 2021; 73:2205-2213. [PMID: 34219197 PMCID: PMC8255092 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01126-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Major surgical societies advised using non-operative management of appendicitis and suggested against laparoscopy during the COVID-19 pandemic. The hypothesis is that a significant reduction in the number of emergent appendectomies was observed during the pandemic, restricted to complex cases. The study aimed to analyse emergent surgical appendectomies during pandemic on a national basis and compare it to the same period of the previous year. This is a multicentre, retrospective, observational study investigating the outcomes of patients undergoing emergent appendectomy in March-April 2019 vs March-April 2020. The primary outcome was the number of appendectomies performed, classified according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) score. Secondary outcomes were the type of surgical technique employed (laparoscopic vs open) and the complication rates. One thousand five hundred forty one patients with acute appendicitis underwent surgery during the two study periods. 1337 (86.8%) patients met the inclusion criteria: 546 (40.8%) patients underwent surgery for acute appendicitis in 2020 and 791 (59.2%) in 2019. According to AAST, patients with complicated appendicitis operated in 2019 were 30.3% vs 39.9% in 2020 (p = 0.001). We observed an increase in the number of post-operative complications in 2020 (15.9%) compared to 2019 (9.6%) (p < 0.001). The following determinants increased the likelihood of complication occurrence: undergoing surgery during 2020 (+ 67%), the increase of a unit in the AAST score (+ 26%), surgery performed > 24 h after admission (+ 58%), open surgery (+ 112%) and conversion to open surgery (+ 166%). In Italian hospitals, in March and April 2020, the number of appendectomies has drastically dropped. During the first pandemic wave, patients undergoing surgery were more frequently affected by more severe appendicitis than the previous year's timeframe and experienced a higher number of complications. Trial registration number and date: Research Registry ID 5789, May 7th, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Sartori
- Department of General Surgery, Ospedale Di Montebelluna, Montebelluna, Italy
| | - Mauro Podda
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Di Monserrato "Duilio Casula" University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Emanuele Botteri
- General Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili Di Brescia, Montichiari, Italy
| | - Roberto Passera
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | | | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, corso AM Dogliotti 14, 10126, Torino, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Robertson D, Sterke F, van Weteringen W, Arezzo A, Mintz Y, Nickel F, Horeman T. Correction to: Characterisation of trocar associated gas leaks during laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:4552. [PMID: 34812924 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08897-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Robertson
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, TU Delft, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands.
| | - Frank Sterke
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, TU Delft, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands.,Department of Paediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Willem van Weteringen
- Department of Paediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Yoav Mintz
- Department of General Surgery, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.,Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Felix Nickel
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im, Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Tim Horeman
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, TU Delft, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Chiurazzi M, Damone A, Finocchiaro M, Farnesi F, Secco GL, Forcignano E, Arezzo A, Ciuti G. Small bowel to closest human body surface distance calculation through a custom-made software using CT-based datasets. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2021; 2021:2903-2909. [PMID: 34891853 DOI: 10.1109/embc46164.2021.9630828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Screening of the gastrointestinal tract is imperative for the detection and treatment of physiological and pathological disorders in humans. Ingestible devices (e.g., magnetic capsule endoscopes) represent an alternative to conventional flexible endoscopy for reducing the invasiveness of the procedure and the related patient's discomforts. However, to properly design localization and navigation strategies for capsule endoscopes, the knowledge of anatomical features is paramount. Therefore, authors developed a semi-automatic software for measuring the distance between the small bowel and the closest human external body surface, using CT colonography images. In this study, volumetric datasets of 30 patients were processed by gastrointestinal endoscopists with the dedicated custom-made software and results showed an average distance of 79.29 ± 23.85 mm.
Collapse
|
31
|
Affiliation(s)
- A Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, c.so Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.
| | - G Gagliardi
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Shahini E, Libânio D, Lo Secco G, Pisani A, Arezzo A. Indications and outcomes of endoscopic resection for non-pedunculated colorectal lesions: A narrative review. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 13:275-295. [PMID: 34512876 PMCID: PMC8394186 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v13.i8.275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Revised: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
In the last years, endoscopic techniques gained a crucial role in the treatment of colorectal flat lesions. At the same time, the importance of a reliable assessment of such lesions to predict the malignancy and the depth of invasion of the colonic wall emerged. The current unsolved dilemma about the endoscopic excision techniques concerns the necessity of a reliable submucosal invasive cancer assessment system that can stratify the risk of the post-procedural need for surgery. Accordingly, this narrative literature review aims to compare the available diagnostic strategies in predicting malignancy and to give a guide about the best techniques to employ. We performed a literature search using electronic databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library). We collected all articles about endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) registering the outcomes. Moreover, we analyzed all meta-analyses comparing EMR vs ESD outcomes for colorectal sessile or non-polypoid lesions of any size, preoperatively estimated as non-invasive. Seven meta-analysis studies, mainly Eastern, were included in the analysis comparing 124 studies and overall 22954 patients who underwent EMR and ESD procedures. Of these, eighty-two were retrospective, twenty-four perspective, nine case-control, and six cohorts, while three were randomized clinical trials. A total of 18118 EMR and 10379 ESD were completed for a whole of 28497 colorectal sessile or non-polypoid lesions > 5-10 mm in size. In conclusion, it is crucial to enhance the preoperative diagnostic workup, especially in deciding the most suitable endoscopic method for radical resection of flat colorectal lesions at risk of underlying malignancy. Additionally, the ESD necessitates further improvement because of the excessively time-consuming as well as the intraprocedural technical hindrances and related complications. We found a higher rate of en bloc resections and R0 for ESD than EMR for non-pedunculated colorectal lesions. Nevertheless, despite the lower local recurrence rates, ESD had greater perforation rates and needed lengthier procedural times. The prevailing risk for additional surgery in ESD rather than EMR for complications or oncologic reasons is still uncertain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Endrit Shahini
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, National Institute of Research “Saverio De Bellis,” Castellana Grotte (Bari) 70013, Italy
| | - Diogo Libânio
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto 4200-072, Portugal
| | - Giacomo Lo Secco
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Turin 10126, Italy
| | - Antonio Pisani
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, National Institute of Research “Saverio De Bellis,” Castellana Grotte (Bari) 70013, Italy
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Turin 10126, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Nakajima K, Mintz Y, Nickel F, Arezzo A. The EAES intellectual property awareness survey. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:3340-3346. [PMID: 34363113 PMCID: PMC8345906 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08650-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Introduction The protection of intellectual property (IP) is one of the fundamental elements in the process of medical device development. The significance of IP, however, is not well understood among clinicians and researchers. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the current status of IP awareness and IP-related behaviors among EAES members. Methods A web-based survey was conducted via questionnaires sent to EAES members. Data collected included participant demographics, level of understanding the need, new ideas and solutions, basic IP knowledge, e.g., employees' inventions and public disclosure, behaviors before and after idea disclosures. Results One hundred and seventy-nine completed forms were obtained through an email campaign conducted twice in 2019 (response rate = 4.8%). There was a dominancy in male, formally-trained gastrointestinal surgeons, working at teaching hospitals in European countries. Of the respondents, 71% demonstrated a high level of understanding the needs (frustration with current medical devices), with 66% developing specific solutions by themselves. Active discussion with others was done by 53%. Twenty-one percent of respondents presented their ideas at medical congresses, and 12% published in scientific journals. Only 20% took specific precautions or appropriate actions to protect their IPs before these disclosures. Conclusions The current level of awareness of IP and IP-related issues is relatively low among EAES members. A structured IP training program to gain basic IP knowledge and skill should be considered a necessity for clinicians. These skills would serve to prevent the loss of legitimate IP rights and avoid failure in the clinical implementation of innovative devices for the benefit of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiyokazu Nakajima
- Department of Next Generation Endoscopic Intervention (Project ENGINE) and Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Yoav Mintz
- Department of General Surgery, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Felix Nickel
- Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Carrara A, Ghezzi G, Reich F, Motter M, Pertile R, Guglielmi A, Pecori S, Arezzo A, Arolfo S, Donner D, Morino M, Tirone G. Risk factors for nodal involvement in early stage rectal cancer: a new scoring system based in the analysis of 326 cases. Minerva Surg 2021; 77:448-454. [PMID: 34338462 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-5691.21.08940-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to identify which clinicopathological features of early-stage rectal cancer (ESRC) are significantly correlated with the risk of local-regional lymph node metastases (LNM) and to quantify the strength of this association through a novel scoring system. According to several case studies, about 20% of operated ESRC are found with occult lymph nodal metastases at the histological examination. The low frequency of local recurrence in these tumours treated with total mesorectal excision (TME) compared to transanal approaches highlights the role of mesorectal lymph nodes as a site of metastatic location. METHODS 386 consecutive patients with ESRC treated with radical resection and TME were examined in a retrospective, observational multi-centric study, operated between 2007 and 2019 in seven centres. Demographic and tumour related clinicopathological characteristics were identified, collected and analysed. Each variable was specifically weighted based on the strength of its association with the presence of nodal metastases. A scoring system using these weighted variables was developed. RESULTS Six variables were found to be significantly associated with local regional LNM: lymphatic invasion combined with vascular invasion, poor differentiation (G3), stage T2, age ≥60 years, male sex, perineural invasion. A novel scoring system weighted on the presence of each of these variables able to quantify the risk of LNM in ESRC was developed. CONCLUSIONS The proposed scoring system is a good predictor of the risk of LNM and should be of help in the decision-making process for ESRC cases diagnosed either by local excision or endoscopic biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gianmarco Ghezzi
- Department of General Surgery, S. Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Federico Reich
- Department of General Surgery, S. Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Michele Motter
- Department of General Surgery, S. Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Riccardo Pertile
- Clinical Epidemiology Service, S. Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Alfredo Guglielmi
- Unit of Hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery, Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Verona Medical School, Verona, Italy
| | - Sara Pecori
- Department of Pathology, Policlinic G.B. Rossi, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Simone Arolfo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Davide Donner
- Department of Radiology, OU of Nuclear Medicine, S. Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Mario Morino
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tirone
- Department of General Surgery, S. Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Dawood AB, Fras J, Aljaber F, Mintz Y, Arezzo A, Godaba H, Althoefer K. Fusing Dexterity and Perception for Soft Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery: What We Learnt from STIFF-FLOP. Applied Sciences 2021; 11:6586. [DOI: 10.3390/app11146586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/30/2023]
Abstract
In recent years we have seen tremendous progress in the development of robotic solutions for minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Indeed, a number of robot-assisted MIS systems have been developed to product level and are now well-established clinical tools; Intuitive Surgical’s very successful da Vinci Surgical System a prime example. The majority of these surgical systems are based on the traditional rigid-component robot design that was instrumental in the third industrial revolution—especially within the manufacturing sector. However, the use of this approach for surgical procedures on or around soft tissue has come under increasing criticism. The dangers of operating with a robot made from rigid components both near and within a patient are considerable. The EU project STIFF-FLOP, arguably the first large-scale research programme on soft robots for MIS, signalled the start of a concerted effort among researchers to investigate this area more comprehensively. While soft robots have many advantages over their rigid-component counterparts, among them high compliance and increased dexterity, they also bring their own specific challenges when interacting with the environment, such as the need to integrate sensors (which also need to be soft) that can determine the robot’s position and orientation (pose). In this study, the challenges of sensor integration are explored, while keeping the surgeon’s perspective at the forefront of ourdiscussion. The paper critically explores a range of methods, predominantly those developed during the EU project STIFF-FLOP, that facilitate the embedding of soft sensors into articulate soft robot structures using flexible, optics-based lightguides. We examine different optics-based approaches to pose perception in a minimally invasive surgery settings, and methods of integration are also discussed.
Collapse
|
36
|
Podda M, Sylla P, Baiocchi G, Adamina M, Agnoletti V, Agresta F, Ansaloni L, Arezzo A, Avenia N, Biffl W, Biondi A, Bui S, Campanile FC, Carcoforo P, Commisso C, Crucitti A, De'Angelis N, De'Angelis GL, De Filippo M, De Simone B, Di Saverio S, Ercolani G, Fraga GP, Gabrielli F, Gaiani F, Guerrieri M, Guttadauro A, Kluger Y, Leppaniemi AK, Loffredo A, Meschi T, Moore EE, Ortenzi M, Pata F, Parini D, Pisanu A, Poggioli G, Polistena A, Puzziello A, Rondelli F, Sartelli M, Smart N, Sugrue ME, Tejedor P, Vacante M, Coccolini F, Davies J, Catena F. Multidisciplinary management of elderly patients with rectal cancer: recommendations from the SICG (Italian Society of Geriatric Surgery), SIFIPAC (Italian Society of Surgical Pathophysiology), SICE (Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery and new technologies), and the WSES (World Society of Emergency Surgery) International Consensus Project. World J Emerg Surg 2021; 16:35. [PMID: 34215310 PMCID: PMC8254305 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-021-00378-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Although rectal cancer is predominantly a disease of older patients, current guidelines do not incorporate optimal treatment recommendations for the elderly and address only partially the associated specific challenges encountered in this population. This results in a wide variation and disparity in delivering a standard of care to this subset of patients. As the burden of rectal cancer in the elderly population continues to increase, it is crucial to assess whether current recommendations on treatment strategies for the general population can be adopted for the older adults, with the same beneficial oncological and functional outcomes. This multidisciplinary experts' consensus aims to refine current rectal cancer-specific guidelines for the elderly population in order to help to maximize rectal cancer therapeutic strategies while minimizing adverse impacts on functional outcomes and quality of life for these patients. METHODS The discussion among the steering group of clinical experts and methodologists from the societies' expert panel involved clinicians practicing in general surgery, colorectal surgery, surgical oncology, geriatric oncology, geriatrics, gastroenterologists, radiologists, oncologists, radiation oncologists, and endoscopists. Research topics and questions were formulated, revised, and unanimously approved by all experts in two subsequent modified Delphi rounds in December 2020-January 2021. The steering committee was divided into nine teams following the main research field of members. Each conducted their literature search and drafted statements and recommendations on their research question. Literature search has been updated up to 2020 and statements and recommendations have been developed according to the GRADE methodology. A modified Delphi methodology was implemented to reach agreement among the experts on all statements and recommendations. CONCLUSIONS The 2021 SICG-SIFIPAC-SICE-WSES consensus for the multidisciplinary management of elderly patients with rectal cancer aims to provide updated evidence-based statements and recommendations on each of the following topics: epidemiology, pre-intervention strategies, diagnosis and staging, neoadjuvant chemoradiation, surgery, watch and wait strategy, adjuvant chemotherapy, synchronous liver metastases, and emergency presentation of rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauro Podda
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Cagliari University Hospital "D. Casula", Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
| | - Patricia Sylla
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gianluca Baiocchi
- ASST Cremona, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Michel Adamina
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of Winterthur, Winterthur - University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Ferdinando Agresta
- Department of General Surgery, Vittorio Veneto Hospital, AULSS2 Trevigiana del Veneto, Vittorio Veneto, Italy
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- 1st General Surgery Unit, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Nicola Avenia
- SC Chirurgia Generale e Specialità Chirurgiche Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | - Walter Biffl
- Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Scripps Memorial Hospital, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Antonio Biondi
- Department of General Surgery and Medical - Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Simona Bui
- Department of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Fabio C Campanile
- Department of Surgery, ASL VT - Ospedale "San Giovanni Decollato - Andosilla", Civita Castellana, Italy
| | - Paolo Carcoforo
- Department of Surgery, Unit of General Surgery, University Hospital of Ferrara, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Claudia Commisso
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Antonio Crucitti
- General and Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, Cristo Re Hospital and Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicola De'Angelis
- Unit of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Digestive Surgery, Regional General Hospital F. Miulli, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Gian Luigi De'Angelis
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | | | - Belinda De Simone
- Department of General and Metabolic Surgery, Poissy and Saint Germain en Laye Hospitals, Poissy, France
| | | | - Giorgio Ercolani
- General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Forlì, Italy
| | - Gustavo P Fraga
- Division of Trauma Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | | | - Federica Gaiani
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | | | | | - Yoram Kluger
- Division of General Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Ari K Leppaniemi
- Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Andrea Loffredo
- UOC Chirurgia Generale - AOU san Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona, Università di Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Tiziana Meschi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma Geriatric-Rehabilitation Department, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Ernest E Moore
- Ernest E Moore Shock Trauma Center at Denver Health, Denver, USA
| | | | | | - Dario Parini
- Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
| | - Adolfo Pisanu
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Cagliari University Hospital "D. Casula", Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Gilberto Poggioli
- Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Sant'Orsola Hospital, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Polistena
- Dipartimento di Chirurgia Pietro Valdoni Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza Università degli Studi di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Puzziello
- UOC Chirurgia Generale - AOU san Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona, Università di Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - Fabio Rondelli
- SC Chirurgia Generale e Specialità Chirurgiche Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | | | | | - Michael E Sugrue
- Letterkenny University Hospital and CPM sEUBP Interreg Project, Letterkenny, Ireland
| | | | - Marco Vacante
- Department of General Surgery and Medical - Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Federico Coccolini
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Justin Davies
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Fausto Catena
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Parma Maggiore Hospital, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Morino M, Forcignanò E, Arezzo A. Early clinical adoption of a flexible robotic endoscope for local excision of rectal lesions. Br J Surg 2021; 108:e296. [PMID: 34109388 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M Morino
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Italy
| | - E Forcignanò
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Italy
| | - A Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Vettoretto N, Foglia E, Ferrario L, Gerardi C, Molteni B, Nocco U, Lettieri E, Molfino S, Baiocchi GL, Elmore U, Rosati R, Currò G, Cassinotti E, Boni L, Cirocchi R, Marano A, Petz WL, Arezzo A, Bonino MA, Davini F, Biondi A, Anania G, Agresta F, Silecchia G. Could fluorescence-guided surgery be an efficient and sustainable option? A SICE (Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery) health technology assessment summary. Surg Endosc 2021; 34:3270-3284. [PMID: 32274626 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07542-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Indocyanine green fluorescence vision is an upcoming technology in surgery. It can be used in three ways: angiographic and biliary tree visualization and lymphatic spreading studies. The present paper shows the most outstanding results from an health technology assessment study design, conducted on fluorescence-guided compared with standard vision surgery. METHODS A health technology assessment approach was implemented to investigate the economic, social, ethical, and organizational implications related to the adoption of the innovative fluorescence-guided view, with a focus on minimally invasive approach. With the support of a multidisciplinary team, qualitative and quantitative data were collected, by means of literature evidence, validated questionnaires and self-reported interviews, considering the dimensions resulting from the EUnetHTA Core Model. RESULTS From a systematic search of literature, we retrieved the following studies: 6 on hepatic, 1 on pancreatic, 4 on biliary, 2 on bariatric, 4 on endocrine, 2 on thoracic, 11 on colorectal, 7 on urology, 11 on gynecology, 2 on gastric surgery. Fluorescence guide has shown advantages on the length of hospitalization particularly in colorectal surgery, with a reduction of the rate of leakages and re-do anastomoses, in spite of a slight increase in operating time, and is confirmed to be a safe, efficacious, and sustainable vision technology. Clinical applications are still presenting a low evidence in the literature. CONCLUSION The present paper, under the patronage of Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery, based on an HTA approach, sustains the use of fluorescence-guided vision in minimally invasive surgery, in the fields of general, gynecologic, urologic, and thoracic surgery, as an efficient and economically sustainable technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Vettoretto
- Chirurgia Montichiari, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Degli Spedali Civili, V.le Ciotti 154, Montichiari, 25018, Brescia, Italy.
| | - E Foglia
- LIUC - Università Cattaneo, Castellanza, VA, Italy
| | - L Ferrario
- LIUC - Università Cattaneo, Castellanza, VA, Italy
| | - C Gerardi
- Centro di Politiche Regolatorie, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri" IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - B Molteni
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Surgery, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - U Nocco
- Ingegneria Clinica, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale dei Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy
| | - E Lettieri
- School of Management, Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico, Milano, Italy
| | - S Molfino
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Surgery, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - G L Baiocchi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Surgery, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - U Elmore
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - R Rosati
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - G Currò
- Department of Human Pathology of Adult and Evolutive Age, University Hospital of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - E Cassinotti
- Chirurgia Generale, Fondazione IRCCS - Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico - University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - L Boni
- Chirurgia Generale, Fondazione IRCCS - Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico - University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - R Cirocchi
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - A Marano
- Chirurgia Generale ed Oncologica, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy
| | - W L Petz
- Chirurgia, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - A Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - M A Bonino
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - F Davini
- Centro multidisciplinare Chirurgia Robotica, Chirurgia Toracica mini-invasiva e Robotica, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - A Biondi
- Chirurgia Generale, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Rome, Italy
| | - G Anania
- Chirurgia Generale, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - F Agresta
- Chirurgia Generale, Azienda ULSS 5 "Polesana", Hospital of Adria, Adria, RO, Italy
| | - G Silecchia
- Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome-Polo Pontino, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Collins JW, Marcus HJ, Ghazi A, Sridhar A, Hashimoto D, Hager G, Arezzo A, Jannin P, Maier-Hein L, Marz K, Valdastri P, Mori K, Elson D, Giannarou S, Slack M, Hares L, Beaulieu Y, Levy J, Laplante G, Ramadorai A, Jarc A, Andrews B, Garcia P, Neemuchwala H, Andrusaite A, Kimpe T, Hawkes D, Kelly JD, Stoyanov D. Ethical implications of AI in robotic surgical training: A Delphi consensus statement. Eur Urol Focus 2021; 8:613-622. [PMID: 33941503 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Revised: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT As the role of AI in healthcare continues to expand there is increasing awareness of the potential pitfalls of AI and the need for guidance to avoid them. OBJECTIVES To provide ethical guidance on developing narrow AI applications for surgical training curricula. We define standardised approaches to developing AI driven applications in surgical training that address current recognised ethical implications of utilising AI on surgical data. We aim to describe an ethical approach based on the current evidence, understanding of AI and available technologies, by seeking consensus from an expert committee. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The project was carried out in 3 phases: (1) A steering group was formed to review the literature and summarize current evidence. (2) A larger expert panel convened and discussed the ethical implications of AI application based on the current evidence. A survey was created, with input from panel members. (3) Thirdly, panel-based consensus findings were determined using an online Delphi process to formulate guidance. 30 experts in AI implementation and/or training including clinicians, academics and industry contributed. The Delphi process underwent 3 rounds. Additions to the second and third-round surveys were formulated based on the answers and comments from previous rounds. Consensus opinion was defined as ≥ 80% agreement. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS There was 100% response from all 3 rounds. The resulting formulated guidance showed good internal consistency, with a Cronbach alpha of >0.8. There was 100% consensus that there is currently a lack of guidance on the utilisation of AI in the setting of robotic surgical training. Consensus was reached in multiple areas, including: 1. Data protection and privacy; 2. Reproducibility and transparency; 3. Predictive analytics; 4. Inherent biases; 5. Areas of training most likely to benefit from AI. CONCLUSIONS Using the Delphi methodology, we achieved international consensus among experts to develop and reach content validation for guidance on ethical implications of AI in surgical training. Providing an ethical foundation for launching narrow AI applications in surgical training. This guidance will require further validation. PATIENT SUMMARY As the role of AI in healthcare continues to expand there is increasing awareness of the potential pitfalls of AI and the need for guidance to avoid them.In this paper we provide guidance on ethical implications of AI in surgical training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin W Collins
- University College London, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Research Department of Targeted Intervention; Wellcome/ESPRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London; University College London Hospital, Division of Uro-oncology.
| | - Hani J Marcus
- Wellcome/ESPRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London
| | - Ahmed Ghazi
- Simulation Innovation Laboratory, University of Rochester, USA
| | - Ashwin Sridhar
- University College London, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Research Department of Targeted Intervention; University College London Hospital, Division of Uro-oncology
| | - Daniel Hashimoto
- Surgical Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA
| | - Gregory Hager
- Malone Center for engineering in healthcare, Department of Computer Science, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Italy
| | | | - Lena Maier-Hein
- Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Division of Computer Assisted Medical Interventions, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Keno Marz
- Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Division of Computer Assisted Medical Interventions, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pietro Valdastri
- STORM Lab, School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Kensaku Mori
- Director of Information Technology Center, Nagoya University, Japan
| | - Daniel Elson
- Hamlyn Centre for robotic surgery, Department of Surgery and cancer, Imperial College London, UK
| | - Stamatia Giannarou
- Hamlyn Centre for robotic surgery, Department of Surgery and cancer, Imperial College London, UK
| | - Mark Slack
- Honorary Senior Lecturer, University of Cambridge, Cambridge UK; CMO CMR Surgical, Cambridge, UK
| | - Luke Hares
- Chief technology director, CMR Surgical, Cambridge, UK
| | - Yanick Beaulieu
- Division of Cardiology and Critical Care, Sacré-Coeur Hospital, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Jeff Levy
- Institute for Surgical Excellence, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Guy Laplante
- Director, Global Medical Affairs at Medtronic Minimally Invasive Therapies, Brampton, Canada
| | - Arvind Ramadorai
- Director, Digital-Assisted Surgery (DAS), Medtronic Surgical Robotics, North Haven, CT, USA
| | - Anthony Jarc
- Applied Research, Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA
| | - Ben Andrews
- Strategy, Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Tom Kimpe
- BARCO NV - Healthcare division, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - David Hawkes
- Wellcome/ESPRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London
| | - John D Kelly
- University College London, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Research Department of Targeted Intervention; Wellcome/ESPRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London; University College London Hospital, Division of Uro-oncology
| | - Danail Stoyanov
- Wellcome/ESPRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Morino M, Arezzo A, Farnesi F, Forcignanò E. Colonic Stenting in the Emergency Setting. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 57:medicina57040328. [PMID: 33915760 PMCID: PMC8067149 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57040328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Revised: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Nowadays, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequent cancer, and about a third of patients with CRC presents themselves with symptoms of large bowel obstruction. Historically, surgical resection was the treatment of choice for colonic obstruction, but this kind of approach is burdened by a high risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. In recent times, the use of a colonic stent has been proposed to overcome the obstruction and transform an emergency surgical case into an elective one to avoid emergency surgery complications. Endoscopic stenting is the first-line treatment option in the palliative management of colonic obstruction, and there is sufficient scientific evidence to support this approach. However, endoscopic stent used as a bridge to surgery is not yet widely adopted because the concern was raised about the long-term survival and cancer safety of this approach. The recent scientific evidence has shown that this approach improves the short-term outcomes, such as postoperative complications and the stoma rate, without differences in long-term outcomes compared to emergency surgery. Therefore, the European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in 2020 has reconsidered stenting as a bridge to surgery as a valid alternative to emergency surgery.
Collapse
|
41
|
Onaizah O, Koszowska Z, Winters C, Subramanian V, Jayne D, Arezzo A, Obstein KL, Valdastri P. Guidelines for Robotic Flexible Endoscopy at the Time of COVID-19. Front Robot AI 2021; 8:612852. [PMID: 33718439 PMCID: PMC7947201 DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2021.612852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Flexible endoscopy involves the insertion of a long narrow flexible tube into the body for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. In the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, flexible endoscopy plays a major role in cancer screening, surveillance, and treatment programs. As a result of gas insufflation during the procedure, both upper and lower GI endoscopy procedures have been classified as aerosol generating by the guidelines issued by the respective societies during the COVID-19 pandemic-although no quantifiable data on aerosol generation currently exists. Due to the risk of COVID-19 transmission to healthcare workers, most societies halted non-emergency and diagnostic procedures during the lockdown. The long-term implications of stoppage in cancer diagnoses and treatment is predicted to lead to a large increase in preventable deaths. Robotics may play a major role in this field by allowing healthcare operators to control the flexible endoscope from a safe distance and pave a path for protecting healthcare workers through minimizing the risk of virus transmission without reducing diagnostic and therapeutic capacities. This review focuses on the needs and challenges associated with the design of robotic flexible endoscopes for use during a pandemic. The authors propose that a few minor changes to existing platforms or considerations for platforms in development could lead to significant benefits for use during infection control scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Onaizah Onaizah
- School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Zaneta Koszowska
- School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Conchubhair Winters
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | | | - David Jayne
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Keith L. Obstein
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Pietro Valdastri
- School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Anania G, Davies RJ, Arezzo A, Bagolini F, D’Andrea V, Graziosi L, Di Saverio S, Popivanov G, Cheruiyot I, Cirocchi R, Donini A. Rise and fall of total mesorectal excision with lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy for rectal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 11,366 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021; 36:2321-2333. [PMID: 34125269 PMCID: PMC8505280 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-03946-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED The role of lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) during total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer is still controversial. Many reviews were published on prophylactic LLND in rectal cancer surgery, some biased by heterogeneity of overall associated treatments. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to perform a timeline analysis of different treatments associated to prophylactic LLND vs no-LLND during TME for rectal cancer. METHODS A literature search was performed in PubMed, SCOPUS and WOS for publications up to 1 September 2020. We considered RCTs and CCTs comparing oncologic and functional outcomes of TME with or without LLND in patients with rectal cancer. RESULTS Thirty-four included articles and 29 studies enrolled 11,606 patients. No difference in 5-year local recurrence (in every subgroup analysis including preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy), 5-year distant and overall recurrence, 5-year overall survival and 5-year disease-free survival was found between LLND group and non LLND group. The analysis of post-operative functional outcomes reported hindered quality of life (urinary, evacuatory and sexual dysfunction) in LLND patients when compared to non LLND. CONCLUSION Our publication does not demonstrate that TME with LLND has any oncological advantage when compared to TME alone, showing that with the advent of neoadjuvant therapy, the advantage of LLND is lost. In this review, the most important bias is the heterogeneous characteristics of patients, cancer staging, different neoadjuvant therapy, different radiotherapy techniques and fractionation used in different studies. Higher rate of functional post-operative complications does not support routinely use of LLND.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Anania
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche, Università degli Studi di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Richard Justin Davies
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit - Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126 Torino, Italy
| | - Francesco Bagolini
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche, Università degli Studi di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Vito D’Andrea
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Luigina Graziosi
- Department of Surgery and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia, 06121 Perugia, Italy
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- Department of General Surgery (S.D.S., G.I., E.Z., G.C.), University of Insubria, University Hospital of Varese, ASST Sette Laghi, Regione Lombardia, Italy
| | - Georgi Popivanov
- Department of Surgery, Military Medical Academy, ul. “Sv. Georgi Sofiyski” 3, 1606 Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Isaac Cheruiyot
- Department of Human Anatomy, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Roberto Cirocchi
- Department of Surgery and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia, 06121 Perugia, Italy
| | - Annibale Donini
- Department of Surgery and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia, 06121 Perugia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Anania G, Arezzo A, Davies RJ, Marchetti F, Zhang S, Di Saverio S, Cirocchi R, Donini A. A global systematic review and meta-analysis on laparoscopic vs open right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021; 36:1609-1620. [PMID: 33644837 PMCID: PMC8280018 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-03891-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of right hemicolectomy with CME performed with laparoscopic and open surgery. METHODS PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, Google Scholar and the ClinicalTrials.gov register were searched. Primary outcome was the overall number of harvested lymph nodes. Secondary outcomes were short and long-term course variables. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate risk ratios. RESULTS Twenty-one studies were identified with 5038 patients enrolled. The difference in number of harvested lymph nodes was not statistically significant (MD 0.68, - 0.41-1.76, P = 0.22). The only RCT shows a significant advantage in favour of laparoscopy (MD 3.30, 95% CI - 0.20-6.40, P = 0.04). The analysis of CCTs showed an advantage in favour of the laparoscopic group, but the result was not statically significantly (MD - 0.55, 95% CI - 0.57-1.67, P = 0.33). The overall incidence of local recurrence was not different between the groups, while systemic recurrence at 5 years was lower in laparoscopic group. Laparoscopy showed better short-term outcomes including overall complications, lower estimated blood loss, lower wound infections and shorter hospital stay, despite a longer operative time. The rate of anastomotic and chyle leak was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Despite the several limitations of this study, we found that the median number of lymph node harvested in the laparoscopic group is not different compared to open surgery. Laparoscopy was associated with a lower incidence of systemic recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Anania
- grid.8484.00000 0004 1757 2064Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Fossato di Mortara 70, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- grid.7605.40000 0001 2336 6580Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Richard Justin Davies
- grid.24029.3d0000 0004 0383 8386Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Francesco Marchetti
- grid.8484.00000 0004 1757 2064Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Fossato di Mortara 70, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
| | - Shu Zhang
- grid.452404.30000 0004 1808 0942Department of Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- grid.18147.3b0000000121724807Department of General Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Roberto Cirocchi
- grid.9027.c0000 0004 1757 3630Department of General Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, PG Italy
| | - Annibale Donini
- grid.9027.c0000 0004 1757 3630Department of General Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, PG Italy
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Anania G, Davies RJ, Arezzo A, Bagolini F, D’Andrea V, Graziosi L, Di Saverio S, Popivanov G, Cheruiyot I, Cirocchi R, Donini A. Correction to: Rise and fall of total mesorectal excision with lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy for rectal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 11,366 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021; 36:2335. [PMID: 34401973 PMCID: PMC9172862 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-04010-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Anania
- grid.8484.00000 0004 1757 2064Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche, Università Degli Studi di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Richard Justin Davies
- grid.24029.3d0000 0004 0383 8386Cambridge Colorectal Unit - Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- grid.7605.40000 0001 2336 6580Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126 Torino, Italy
| | - Francesco Bagolini
- grid.8484.00000 0004 1757 2064Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche, Università Degli Studi di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Vito D’Andrea
- grid.7841.aDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Luigina Graziosi
- grid.9027.c0000 0004 1757 3630Department of Surgery and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia, 06121 Perugia, Italy
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- grid.18147.3b0000000121724807Department of General Surgery (S.D.S, University of Insubria, University Hospital of Varese, ASST Sette Laghi, Regione Lombardia, G.I., E.Z., G.C.) Italy
| | - Georgi Popivanov
- grid.413126.30000 0004 0621 0228Department of Surgery, Ul. “Sv. Georgi Sofiyski” 3, Military Medical Academy, 1606 Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Isaac Cheruiyot
- grid.10604.330000 0001 2019 0495Department of Human Anatomy, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Roberto Cirocchi
- grid.9027.c0000 0004 1757 3630Department of Surgery and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia, 06121 Perugia, Italy
| | - Annibale Donini
- grid.9027.c0000 0004 1757 3630Department of Surgery and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia, 06121 Perugia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Mangiavillano B, Auriemma F, Bianchetti M, Mantovani N, Pilati S, Reggio D, Barletti C, Forcignanò E, Pentassuglia G, Arezzo A, Cavargini E, Fabbri C, Mezzanzanica M, De Luca L, Conigliaro R, Repici A. Through-the-scope esophageal stent for the relief of malignant dysphagia: Results of a multicentric study (with video). Dig Endosc 2021; 33:118-124. [PMID: 32333617 DOI: 10.1111/den.13704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Revised: 04/01/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM In presence of malignant dysphagia, in patients unfit for surgery, the placement of a self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) represents a safe and effective palliative treatment. Esophageal stents (ES) present an over-the-wire mechanism where the stent is deployed under X-ray control. Recently a through-the-scope (TTS) ES was launched. The aim of our retrospective study is to assess the technical and clinical success of the new TTS-ES. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with malignant dysphagia caused by esophageal cancer or ab-extrinsic compression, who underwent TTS esophageal stent in six Italian endoscopic referral centers, were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS A total of 40 patients were enrolled. TTS stent placement was successful in 39/40 patients (97.5%). 31 patients had an Ogilvie score of 4, nine an Ogilvie 3. After 2 weeks from stent placement 29 reported Ogilvie score of 0, eight a score of 1. None of the patients developed retrosternal pain requiring drugs. No patient experienced perforation, bleeding or migration. A total of seven patients (18%) developed dysphagia as late adverse event (AE). CONCLUSION Through-the-scope ES presented less AEs, in terms of bleeding and perforation, if compared to the previous published data. An anti-migration system could be helpful, especially when the stent is placed for "ab-extrinseco" malignant dysphagia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedetto Mangiavillano
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Italy.,Humamitas University, Castellanza, Italy
| | - Francesco Auriemma
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Italy
| | - Mario Bianchetti
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Italy
| | | | | | - Dario Reggio
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Claudio Barletti
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | | | | | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | | | - Carlo Fabbri
- Endoscopy Unit, Morgagni-Pietrantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | | | - Luca De Luca
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy
| | - Rita Conigliaro
- Gastrointestinal and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Civile di Baggiovara Hospital, AOU Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Humamitas University, Castellanza, Italy.,Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Istituto Clinico Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
In the era of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, we critically appraised the literature by means of a systematic review on surgical education and propose an educational curriculum with the aid of available technologies. We performed a literature search on 10 May 2020 of Medline/PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar and major journals with specific COVID-19 sections. Articles eligible for inclusion contained the topic of education in surgery in the context of COVID-19. Specific questions we aimed to answer were: Is there any difference in surgical education from pre-COVID-19 to now? How does technology assist us in teaching? Can we better harness technology to augment resident training? Two-hundred and twenty-six articles were identified, 21 relevant for our aim: 14 case studies, three survey analyses, three reviews and one commentary. The collapse of the traditional educational system due to social distancing caused a fragmentation of knowledge, a reduced acquisition of skills and a decreased employment of surgical trainees. These problems can be partially overcome by using new technologies and arranging 2-weeks rotation shifts, alternating clinical activities with learning. While medical care will remain largely based on the interaction with patients, students' adaptability to innovation will be a characteristic of post-COVID classes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Andrea Vignali
- Department of Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital and San Raffaele Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Ronit Brodie
- Department of General Surgery, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Yoav Mintz
- Department of General Surgery, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Guerrera F, Nicosia S, Costardi L, Lyberis P, Femia F, Filosso PL, Arezzo A, Ruffini E. Proctor-guided virtual reality-enhanced three-dimensional video-assisted thoracic surgery: an excellent tutoring model for lung segmentectomy. Tumori 2020; 107:NP1-NP4. [PMID: 33176614 DOI: 10.1177/0300891620972173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Lung segmentectomy using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is an effective strategy to treat early-stage lung cancer. The objective of this case report is to show the efficacy of Hyper Accuracy 3D™ (HA3D) reconstruction as a tool for trainee surgeons and expert surgeons to perform complex procedures. METHODS An 84-year-old man was treated for colon-rectal cancer. During follow-up, a pulmonary nodule on the right anterior upper lobe suspected for intestinal metastasis was revealed by a computed tomography scan. According to functional tests and radiology, a right anterior upper lobe segmentectomy was planned. HA3D lung reconstruction was used during surgery. RESULTS Using the HA3D virtual model, the procedure was performed with healthy tissue sparing, ensuring safe resection margins. No postoperative morbidities were noted. The patient referred good pain control. The hospital stay was 6 days. CONCLUSIONS VATS segmentectomy is a technically demanding procedure. HA3D lung reconstruction can help surgeons effectively perform the resection, aiding at individuating intersegmental planes, bronchi, and vessels, guaranteeing oncologic radicality and safe surgical margins, and preserving respiratory function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Guerrera
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Samanta Nicosia
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Lorena Costardi
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Paraskevas Lyberis
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Federico Femia
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Pier Luigi Filosso
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Enrico Ruffini
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Botteri E, Podda M, Arezzo A, Vettoretto N, Sartori A, Agrusa A, Allaix ME, Anania G, Brachet Contul R, Caracino V, Cassinotti E, Cuccurullo D, D'Ambrosio G, Milone M, Muttillo I, Petz WL, Pisano M, Guerrieri M, Silecchia G, Agresta F. Current status on the adoption of high energy devices in Italy: An Italian Society for Endoscopic Surgery and New Technologies (SICE) national survey. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:6201-6211. [PMID: 33155075 PMCID: PMC7644118 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08117-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Background In the past three decades, different High Energy Devices (HED) have been introduced in surgical practice to improve the efficiency of surgical procedures. HED allow vessel sealing, coagulation and transection as well as an efficient tissue dissection. This survey was designed to verify the current status on the adoption of HED in Italy. Methods A survey was conducted across Italian general surgery units. The questionnaire was composed of three sections (general information, elective surgery, emergency surgery) including 44 questions. Only one member per each surgery unit was allowed to complete the questionnaire. For elective procedures, the survey included questions on thyroid surgery, lower and upper GI surgery, proctologic surgery, adrenal gland surgery, pancreatic and hepatobiliary surgery, cholecystectomy, abdominal wall surgery and breast surgery. Appendectomy, cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis and bowel obstruction due to adhesions were considered for emergency surgery. The list of alternatives for every single question included a percentage category as follows: “ < 25%, 25–50%, 51–75% or > 75%”, both for open and minimally-invasive surgery. Results A total of 113 surgical units completed the questionnaire. The reported use of HED was high both in open and minimally-invasive upper and lower GI surgery. Similarly, HED were widely used in minimally-invasive pancreatic and adrenal surgery. The use of HED was wider in minimally-invasive hepatic and biliary tree surgery compared to open surgery, whereas the majority of the respondents reported the use of any type of HED in less than 25% of elective cholecystectomies. HED were only rarely employed also in the majority of emergency open and laparoscopic procedures, including cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and adhesiolysis. Similarly, very few respondents declared to use HED in abdominal wall surgery and proctology. The distribution of the most used type of HED varied among the different surgical interventions. US HED were mostly used in thyroid, upper GI, and adrenal surgery. A relevant use of H-US/RF devices was reported in lower GI, pancreatic, hepatobiliary and breast surgery. RF HED were the preferred choice in proctology. Conclusion HED are extensively used in minimally-invasive elective surgery involving the upper and lower GI tract, liver, pancreas and adrenal gland. Nowadays, reasons for choosing a specific HED in clinical practice rely on several aspects, including surgeon’s preference, economic features, and specific drawbacks of the energy employed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuele Botteri
- General Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili Di Brescia, Montichiari, Italy.
| | - Mauro Podda
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Di Monserrato "Duilio Casula" University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Nereo Vettoretto
- General Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili Di Brescia, Montichiari, Italy
| | - Alberto Sartori
- Department of General Surgery, Ospedale Di Montebelluna, Montebelluna, Italy
| | - Antonino Agrusa
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | | | - Gabriele Anania
- Department of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Riccardo Brachet Contul
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Ospedale Regionale Umberto Parini, Aosta, Italy
| | | | - Elisa Cassinotti
- Chirurgia Generale, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Diego Cuccurullo
- Department of General Surgery, Ospedali Dei Colli Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Giancarlo D'Ambrosio
- Department of General Surgery, Surgical Specialties and Organ Transplantation, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Milone
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Irnerio Muttillo
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Ospedale San Filippo Neri, Roma, Italy
| | - Wanda Luisa Petz
- Department of Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Marcello Pisano
- Department of General Surgery, Ospedale San Marcellino di Muravera, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Mario Guerrieri
- Department of General Surgery, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Gianfranco Silecchia
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, University La Sapienza of Rome, Latina, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Arezzo A, Forcignanò E, Morino M. Robotic endoscopic submucosal dissection and full-thickness excision for laterally spreading tumors of the rectum. MINIM INVASIV THER 2020; 31:377-379. [PMID: 33000655 DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2020.1826972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is technically demanding and time-consuming. Moreover, it bears a high risk of adverse events compared to other endoscopic methods, due to the lack of tissue manipulation. Robotic technology can significantly reduce the time of the procedure and increase the rate of complete resection for ESD. In the case of an unclear deep margin it allows to proceed to the full-thickness excision of the bowel wall. While the gain over transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is limited today, the longer systems currently under development will allow these complex procedures to be performed at least in the left side of the colon. The Supplementary video shows the application of the Flex Robotic System to perform an ESD and a full-thickness excision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | | | - Mario Morino
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Arezzo A, Bonino MA, Ris F, Boni L, Cassinotti E, Foo DCC, Shum NF, Brolese A, Ciarleglio F, Keller DS, Rosati R, De Nardi P, Elmore U, Fumagalli Romario U, Jafari MD, Pigazzi A, Rybakov E, Alekseev M, Watanabe J, Vettoretto N, Cirocchi R, Passera R, Forcignanò E, Morino M. Intraoperative use of fluorescence with indocyanine green reduces anastomotic leak rates in rectal cancer surgery: an individual participant data analysis. Surg Endosc 2020; 34:4281-4290. [PMID: 32556696 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07735-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fluorescence imaging by means of Indocyanine green (ICG) has been applied to intraoperatively determine the perfusion of the anastomosis. The purpose of this Individual Participant Database meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness in decreasing the incidence of anastomotic leak (AL) after rectal cancer surgery. METHODS We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrial.gov, EU Clinical Trials and ISRCTN registries on September 1st, 2019. We considered eligible those studies comparing the assessment of anastomotic perfusion during rectal cancer surgery by intraoperative use of ICG fluorescence compared with standard practice. We defined as primary outcome the incidence of AL at 30 days after surgery. The studies were assessed for quality by means of the ROBINS-I and the Cochrane risk tools. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) using the Individual patient data analysis, restricted to rectal lesions, according to original treatment allocation. RESULTS The review of the literature and international registries produced 15 published studies and 5 ongoing trials, for 9 of which the authors accepted to share individual participant data. 314 patients from two randomized trials, 452 from three prospective series and 564 from 4 non-randomized studies were included. Fluorescence imaging significantly reduced the incidence of AL (OR 0.341; 95% CI 0.220-0.530; p < 0.001), independent of age, gender, BMI, tumour and anastomotic distance from the anal verge and neoadjuvant therapy. Also, overall morbidity and reintervention rate were positively influenced by the use of ICG. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of AL may be reduced when ICG fluorescence imaging is used to assess the perfusion of a colorectal anastomosis. Limitations relate to the consistent number of non-randomized studies included and their heterogeneity in defining and assessing AL. Ongoing large randomized studies will help to determine the exact role of routine ICG fluorescence imaging may decrease the incidence of AL in surgery for rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Arezzo
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126, Torino, Italy.
| | - Marco Augusto Bonino
- Department of Surgery, Service of Visceral Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals and medical school, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Frédéric Ris
- Department of Surgery, Service of Visceral Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals and medical school, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Luigi Boni
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS - Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa Cassinotti
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS - Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Nga Fan Shum
- Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | | | | | - Deborah S Keller
- Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Riccardo Rosati
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola De Nardi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Ugo Elmore
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Mehraneh Dorna Jafari
- Colon and Rectal Surgery, General Surgery, UC Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Alessio Pigazzi
- Colon and Rectal Surgery, General Surgery, UC Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Evgeny Rybakov
- Surgical Department of Oncoproctology - State Scientific Centre of Coloproctology, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Mikhail Alekseev
- Surgical Department of Oncoproctology - State Scientific Centre of Coloproctology, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Jun Watanabe
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Nereo Vettoretto
- General Surgery, Montichiari Hospital, ASST Spedali Civili Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Roberto Cirocchi
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Hospital of Terni, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | - Roberto Passera
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Edoardo Forcignanò
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126, Torino, Italy
| | - Mario Morino
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|