1
|
Landolfo C, Ceusters J, Valentin L, Froyman W, Van Gorp T, Heremans R, Baert T, Wouters R, Vankerckhoven A, Van Rompuy AS, Billen J, Moro F, Mascilini F, Neumann A, Van Holsbeke C, Chiappa V, Bourne T, Fischerova D, Testa A, Coosemans A, Timmerman D, Van Calster B. Comparison of the ADNEX and ROMA risk prediction models for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer: a multicentre external validation in patients who underwent surgery. Br J Cancer 2024; 130:934-940. [PMID: 38243011 PMCID: PMC10951363 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02578-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several diagnostic prediction models to help clinicians discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses are available. This study is a head-to-head comparison of the performance of the Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) model with that of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA). METHODS This is a retrospective study based on prospectively included consecutive women with an adnexal tumour scheduled for surgery at five oncology centres and one non-oncology centre in four countries between 2015 and 2019. The reference standard was histology. Model performance for ADNEX and ROMA was evaluated regarding discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. RESULTS The primary analysis included 894 patients, of whom 434 (49%) had a malignant tumour. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.92 (95% CI 0.88-0.95) for ADNEX with CA125, 0.90 (0.84-0.94) for ADNEX without CA125, and 0.85 (0.80-0.89) for ROMA. ROMA, and to a lesser extent ADNEX, underestimated the risk of malignancy. Clinical utility was highest for ADNEX. ROMA had no clinical utility at decision thresholds <27%. CONCLUSIONS ADNEX had better ability to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal tumours and higher clinical utility than ROMA. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov NCT01698632 and NCT02847832.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Landolfo
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumour Immunology and Immunotherapy, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Jolien Ceusters
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumour Immunology and Immunotherapy, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lil Valentin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Wouter Froyman
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Toon Van Gorp
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, Gynaecological Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ruben Heremans
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thaïs Baert
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, Gynaecological Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Roxanne Wouters
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumour Immunology and Immunotherapy, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Oncoinvent AS, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ann Vankerckhoven
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumour Immunology and Immunotherapy, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Jaak Billen
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Francesca Moro
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Floriana Mascilini
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Adam Neumann
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Valentina Chiappa
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, National Cancer Institute of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Tom Bourne
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Daniela Fischerova
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Antonia Testa
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumour Immunology and Immunotherapy, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dirk Timmerman
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ben Van Calster
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
- Leuven Unit for Health Technology Assessment Research (LUHTAR), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jahangir CA, Page DB, Broeckx G, Gonzalez CA, Burke C, Murphy C, Reis-Filho JS, Ly A, Harms PW, Gupta RR, Vieth M, Hida AI, Kahila M, Kos Z, van Diest PJ, Verbandt S, Thagaard J, Khiroya R, Abduljabbar K, Acosta Haab G, Acs B, Adams S, Almeida JS, Alvarado-Cabrero I, Azmoudeh-Ardalan F, Badve S, Baharun NB, Bellolio ER, Bheemaraju V, Blenman KR, Botinelly Mendonça Fujimoto L, Burgues O, Chardas A, Cheang MCU, Ciompi F, Cooper LA, Coosemans A, Corredor G, Dantas Portela FL, Deman F, Demaria S, Dudgeon SN, Elghazawy M, Fernandez-Martín C, Fineberg S, Fox SB, Giltnane JM, Gnjatic S, Gonzalez-Ericsson PI, Grigoriadis A, Halama N, Hanna MG, Harbhajanka A, Hart SN, Hartman J, Hewitt S, Horlings HM, Husain Z, Irshad S, Janssen EA, Kataoka TR, Kawaguchi K, Khramtsov AI, Kiraz U, Kirtani P, Kodach LL, Korski K, Akturk G, Scott E, Kovács A, Laenkholm AV, Lang-Schwarz C, Larsimont D, Lennerz JK, Lerousseau M, Li X, Madabhushi A, Maley SK, Manur Narasimhamurthy V, Marks DK, McDonald ES, Mehrotra R, Michiels S, Kharidehal D, Minhas FUAA, Mittal S, Moore DA, Mushtaq S, Nighat H, Papathomas T, Penault-Llorca F, Perera RD, Pinard CJ, Pinto-Cardenas JC, Pruneri G, Pusztai L, Rajpoot NM, Rapoport BL, Rau TT, Ribeiro JM, Rimm D, Vincent-Salomon A, Saltz J, Sayed S, Hytopoulos E, Mahon S, Siziopikou KP, Sotiriou C, Stenzinger A, Sughayer MA, Sur D, Symmans F, Tanaka S, Taxter T, Tejpar S, Teuwen J, Thompson EA, Tramm T, Tran WT, van der Laak J, Verghese GE, Viale G, Wahab N, Walter T, Waumans Y, Wen HY, Yang W, Yuan Y, Bartlett J, Loibl S, Denkert C, Savas P, Loi S, Specht Stovgaard E, Salgado R, Gallagher WM, Rahman A. Image-based multiplex immune profiling of cancer tissues: translational implications. A report of the International Immuno-oncology Biomarker Working Group on Breast Cancer. J Pathol 2024; 262:271-288. [PMID: 38230434 DOI: 10.1002/path.6238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
Recent advances in the field of immuno-oncology have brought transformative changes in the management of cancer patients. The immune profile of tumours has been found to have key value in predicting disease prognosis and treatment response in various cancers. Multiplex immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence have emerged as potent tools for the simultaneous detection of multiple protein biomarkers in a single tissue section, thereby expanding opportunities for molecular and immune profiling while preserving tissue samples. By establishing the phenotype of individual tumour cells when distributed within a mixed cell population, the identification of clinically relevant biomarkers with high-throughput multiplex immunophenotyping of tumour samples has great potential to guide appropriate treatment choices. Moreover, the emergence of novel multi-marker imaging approaches can now provide unprecedented insights into the tumour microenvironment, including the potential interplay between various cell types. However, there are significant challenges to widespread integration of these technologies in daily research and clinical practice. This review addresses the challenges and potential solutions within a structured framework of action from a regulatory and clinical trial perspective. New developments within the field of immunophenotyping using multiplexed tissue imaging platforms and associated digital pathology are also described, with a specific focus on translational implications across different subtypes of cancer. © 2024 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chowdhury Arif Jahangir
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - David B Page
- Earle A Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Glenn Broeckx
- Department of Pathology PA2, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
- Centre for Oncological Research (CORE), MIPPRO, Faculty of Medicine, Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Claudia A Gonzalez
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Caoimbhe Burke
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Clodagh Murphy
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jorge S Reis-Filho
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amy Ly
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Paul W Harms
- Departments of Pathology and Dermatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Rajarsi R Gupta
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Michael Vieth
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Akira I Hida
- Department of Pathology, Matsuyama Shimin Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Mohamed Kahila
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Zuzana Kos
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sara Verbandt
- Digestive Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jeppe Thagaard
- Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
- Visiopharm A/S, Hørsholm, Denmark
| | - Reena Khiroya
- Department of Cellular Pathology, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Khalid Abduljabbar
- Centre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Balazs Acs
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sylvia Adams
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Manhattan, NY, USA
| | - Jonas S Almeida
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (DCEG), National Cancer Institute (NCI), Rockville, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Sunil Badve
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Enrique R Bellolio
- Departamento de Anatomía Patológica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile
| | | | - Kim Rm Blenman
- Department of Internal Medicine Section of Medical Oncology and Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Computer Science, Yale School of Engineering and Applied Science, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Octavio Burgues
- Pathology Department, Hospital Cliníco Universitario de Valencia/Incliva, Valencia, Spain
| | - Alexandros Chardas
- Department of Pathobiology & Population Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, London, UK
| | - Maggie Chon U Cheang
- Head of Integrative Genomics Analysis in Clinical Trials, ICR-CTSU, Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Francesco Ciompi
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lee Ad Cooper
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Germán Corredor
- Biomedical Engineering Department, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Frederik Deman
- Department of Pathology PA2, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Sandra Demaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pathology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sarah N Dudgeon
- Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Mahmoud Elghazawy
- University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
- Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Claudio Fernandez-Martín
- Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Tecnología Centrada en el Ser Humano, HUMAN-tech, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain
| | - Susan Fineberg
- Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Stephen B Fox
- Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Sacha Gnjatic
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Medicine Hem/Onc, and Pathology, Tisch Cancer Institute - Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Anita Grigoriadis
- Cancer Bioinformatics, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Niels Halama
- Department of Translational Immunotherapy, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Steven N Hart
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Johan Hartman
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Stephen Hewitt
- Laboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Hugo M Horlings
- Division of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sheeba Irshad
- King's College London & Guys & St Thomas NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Emiel Am Janssen
- Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Chemistry, Bioscience and Environmental Technology, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | | | - Kosuke Kawaguchi
- Department of Breast Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Andrey I Khramtsov
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Umay Kiraz
- Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Chemistry, Bioscience and Environmental Technology, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Pawan Kirtani
- Histopathology, Aakash Healthcare Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Liudmila L Kodach
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Konstanty Korski
- Data, Analytics and Imaging, Product Development, F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Guray Akturk
- Translational Molecular Biomarkers, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA
| | - Ely Scott
- Translational Medicine, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Anikó Kovács
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anne-Vibeke Laenkholm
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
- Department of Surgical Pathology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Corinna Lang-Schwarz
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Denis Larsimont
- Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jochen K Lennerz
- Center for Integrated Diagnostics, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marvin Lerousseau
- Centre for Computational Biology (CBIO), Mines Paris, PSL University, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France
- INSERM U900, Paris, France
| | - Xiaoxian Li
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Anant Madabhushi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Biomedical Informatics, Pathology, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sai K Maley
- NRG Oncology/NSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Douglas K Marks
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth S McDonald
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Group, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ravi Mehrotra
- Indian Cancer Genomic Atlas, Pune, India
- Centre for Health, Innovation and Policy Foundation, Noida, India
| | - Stefan Michiels
- Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, Inserm, University Paris-Saclay, Ligue Contre le Cancer labeled Team, Villejuif, France
| | - Durga Kharidehal
- Department of Pathology, Narayana Medical College and Hospital, Nellore, India
| | - Fayyaz Ul Amir Afsar Minhas
- Tissue Image Analytics Centre, Warwick Cancer Research Centre, PathLAKE Consortium, Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Shachi Mittal
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - David A Moore
- CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, UCL and Cellular Pathology Department, UCLH, London, UK
| | - Shamim Mushtaq
- Department of Biochemistry, Ziauddin University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Hussain Nighat
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, India
| | - Thomas Papathomas
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Drammen Sykehus, Vestre Viken HF, Drammen, Norway
| | - Frederique Penault-Llorca
- Service de Pathologie et Biopathologie, Centre Jean PERRIN, INSERM U1240 Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies Théranostiques (IMoST), Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Rashindrie D Perera
- School of Electrical, Mechanical and Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christopher J Pinard
- Radiogenomics Laboratory, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Lakeshore Animal Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
- Centre for Advancing Responsible and Ethical Artificial Intelligence (CARE-AI), University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Giancarlo Pruneri
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Bernardo Leon Rapoport
- The Medical Oncology Centre of Rosebank, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Department of Immunology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Tilman T Rau
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Düsseldorf and Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - David Rimm
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Anne Vincent-Salomon
- Department of Diagnostic and Theranostic Medicine, Institut Curie, University Paris-Sciences et Lettres, Paris, France
| | - Joel Saltz
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shahin Sayed
- Department of Pathology, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Evangelos Hytopoulos
- Department of Pathology, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya
- iRhythm Technologies Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sarah Mahon
- Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Kalliopi P Siziopikou
- Department of Pathology, Section of Breast Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Christos Sotiriou
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory J.-C. Heuson, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Albrecht Stenzinger
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Centers for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Daniel Sur
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Iuliu Hatieganu", Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Fraser Symmans
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Sabine Tejpar
- Digestive Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jonas Teuwen
- AI for Oncology Lab, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Trine Tramm
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - William T Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jeroen van der Laak
- Head of Integrative Genomics Analysis in Clinical Trials, ICR-CTSU, Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Gregory E Verghese
- Cancer Bioinformatics, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Department of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology & University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Noorul Wahab
- Tissue Image Analytics Centre, Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Thomas Walter
- Centre for Computational Biology (CBIO), Mines Paris, PSL University, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France
- INSERM U900, Paris, France
| | | | - Hannah Y Wen
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wentao Yang
- Fudan Medical University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Yinyin Yuan
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Sibylle Loibl
- Department of Medicine and Research, German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Peter Savas
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sherene Loi
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Roberto Salgado
- Department of Pathology PA2, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - William M Gallagher
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Arman Rahman
- UCD School of Medicine, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Laganà AS, Romano A, Vanhie A, Bafort C, Götte M, Aaltonen LA, Mas A, De Bruyn C, Van den Bosch T, Coosemans A, Guerriero S, Haimovich S, Tanos V, Bongers M, Barra F, Al-Hendy A, Chiantera V, Leone Roberti Maggiore U. Management of Uterine Fibroids and Sarcomas: the Palermo Position Paper. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2024:000537730. [PMID: 38382486 DOI: 10.1159/000537730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
Background Uterine fibroids are benign monoclonal tumors originating from the smooth muscle cells of the myometrium, constituting the most prevalent pathology within the female genital tract. Uterine sarcomas, although rare, still represent a diagnostic challenge and should be managed in centers with adequate expertise in gynecological oncology. Objectives This article is aimed to summarize and discuss cutting-edge elements about the diagnosis and management of uterine fibroids and sarcomas. Methods This paper is a report of the lectures presented in an expert meeting about uterine fibroids and sarcomas, held in Palermo in February 2023. Outcome Overall, the combination of novel molecular pathways may help to combine biomarkers and expert ultrasound for the differential diagnosis of uterine fibroids and sarcomas. On the one hand, molecular, and cellular maps of uterine fibroids and matched myometrium may enhance our understanding of tumor development compared to histologic analysis and whole tissue transcriptomics and support the development of minimally invasive treatment strategies; on the other hand, ultrasound imaging allows in most of the cases a proper mapping the fibroids and to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions, which needs appropriate management. Conclusions and Outlook The choice of uterine fibroid management, including pharmacological approaches, surgical treatment, or other strategies such as High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU), should be carefully considered taking into account the characteristics of the patient and reproductive prognosis.
Collapse
|
4
|
Libbrecht S, Vankerckhoven A, de Wijs K, Baert T, Thirion G, Vandenbrande K, Van Gorp T, Timmerman D, Coosemans A, Lagae L. A Microfluidics Approach for Ovarian Cancer Immune Monitoring in an Outpatient Setting. Cells 2023; 13:7. [PMID: 38201211 PMCID: PMC10778191 DOI: 10.3390/cells13010007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Among cancer diagnoses in women, ovarian cancer has the fifth-highest mortality rate. Current treatments are unsatisfactory, and new therapies are highly needed. Immunotherapies show great promise but have not reached their full potential in ovarian cancer patients. Implementation of an immune readout could offer better guidance and development of immunotherapies. However, immune profiling is often performed using a flow cytometer, which is bulky, complex, and expensive. This equipment is centralized and operated by highly trained personnel, making it cumbersome and time-consuming. We aim to develop a disposable microfluidic chip capable of performing an immune readout with the sensitivity needed to guide diagnostic decision making as close as possible to the patient. As a proof of concept of the fluidics module of this concept, acquisition of a limited immune panel based on CD45, CD8, programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1), and a live/dead marker was compared to a conventional flow cytometer (BD FACSymphony). Based on a dataset of peripheral blood mononuclear cells of 15 patients with ovarian cancer across different stages of treatment, we obtained a 99% correlation coefficient for the detection of CD8+PD1+ T cells relative to the total amount of CD45+ white blood cells. Upon further system development comprising further miniaturization of optics, this microfluidics chip could enable immune monitoring in an outpatient setting, facilitating rapid acquisition of data without the need for highly trained staff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Libbrecht
- Life Science Technologies, imec, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium; (S.L.)
| | - Ann Vankerckhoven
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory for Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium; (A.V.); (A.C.)
| | - Koen de Wijs
- Life Science Technologies, imec, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium; (S.L.)
| | - Thaïs Baert
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, Gynecological Oncology, KU Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gitte Thirion
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory for Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium; (A.V.); (A.C.)
| | - Katja Vandenbrande
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory for Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium; (A.V.); (A.C.)
| | - Toon Van Gorp
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, Gynecological Oncology, KU Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dirk Timmerman
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory for Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium; (A.V.); (A.C.)
| | - Liesbet Lagae
- Life Science Technologies, imec, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium; (S.L.)
- Physics Department, KU Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
De Bruyn C, Ceusters J, Vanden Brande K, Timmerman S, Froyman W, Timmerman D, Van Rompuy AS, Coosemans A, Van den Bosch T. Ultrasound features using MUSA terms and definitions in uterine sarcoma and leiomyoma: retrospective cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2023. [PMID: 37970762 DOI: 10.1002/uog.27535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A timely and correct preoperative diagnosis of a uterine sarcoma will increase patients' survival. The primary aim of our study was to describe the ultrasound features in uterine sarcomas compared to uterine leiomyomas based on MUSA (Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment) terms and definitions. The secondary aim was to assess the interobserver agreement of the MUSA ultrasound features. METHODS This retrospective cohort study assessed uterine sarcomas from 1997 until 2019 and uterine leiomyomas from 2016 until 2019 treated in a single tertiary center. Patients' demographics, presenting symptoms and outcome were extracted from the patients' files. The ultrasound images were re-evaluated independently by two sonologists using the MUSA terms and definitions. Descriptive statistics were calculated and interobserver agreement was assessed with Cohen's Kappa (with squared weights) or intraclass correlation coefficient depending on the type of variable. RESULTS Hundred and seven patients were included, of whom 16 had a uterine sarcoma and 91 a uterine leiomyoma. Abnormal uterine bleeding was the most frequent presenting symptom (69/107, 65%). Compared to leiomyoma cases, uterine sarcoma patients were older (mean age of 65 years (IQR 60-70 years) versus (vs.) 48 years (IQR 43-52 years)) and mostly postmenopausal (13/16 (81%) vs. 15/91 (16%)). In the uterine sarcoma cohort, leiomyosarcoma was the most frequent histological type (6/16 (38%) followed by adenosarcoma (4/16 (25%). On ultrasound evaluation, according to observer 1 and 2, the tumor border was irregular in most sarcomas (in 11/16 (69%) and 13/16 (81%), respectively), whereas leiomyomas were most frequently regular (in 65/91 (71%) and 82/91 (90%), respectively). The observers classified the lesion echogenicity as non-uniform, in 68/91 (75%) and 51/91 (56%) of leiomyomas and 15/16 (94%) of uterine sarcoma. More than 60% of the uterine sarcomas showed acoustic shadows (in 11/16 (69%) and 10/16 (62%) respectively) whereas calcifications were reported in a small minority of them (in 0/16 (0%) and 2/16 (13%) respectively). In uterine sarcomas, the intralesional vascularity was reported as moderate to abundant in 13/16 (81%) and 15/16 (94%) respectively while circumferential vascularity was scored as high in 6/16 (38%) by both observers. The interobserver agreement for presence of cystic areas, calcifications, acoustic shadow and central necrosis, color score (overall, intralesional and circumferential), and maximal diameter of the lesion, was moderate. The agreement for lesion tumor border and echogenicity was fair. CONCLUSIONS A postmenopausal patient, presenting with abnormal uterine bleeding and a new or growing mesenchymal mass with irregular tumor borders at ultrasonography, moderate to abundant intralesional vascularity, presence of cystic areas and absence of calcifications, carries a higher risk of having a uterine sarcoma. The interobserver agreement for most MUSA terms and definitions is moderate. Future studies should validate the above clinical and ultrasound findings in a prospective multicenter collection of uterine mesenchymal tumors. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C De Bruyn
- Department of Development and Regeneration - Woman and Child, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department Obstetrics & Gynecology, University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
| | - J Ceusters
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - K Vanden Brande
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - S Timmerman
- Department of Development and Regeneration - Woman and Child, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - W Froyman
- Department of Development and Regeneration - Woman and Child, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - D Timmerman
- Department of Development and Regeneration - Woman and Child, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - A-S Van Rompuy
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - A Coosemans
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - T Van den Bosch
- Department of Development and Regeneration - Woman and Child, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Berckmans Y, Ceusters J, Vankerckhoven A, Wouters R, Riva M, Coosemans A. Preclinical studies performed in appropriate models could help identify optimal timing of combined chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1236965. [PMID: 37744323 PMCID: PMC10512939 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1236965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been revolutionary in the field of cancer therapy. However, their success is limited to specific indications and cancer types. Recently, the combination treatment of ICI and chemotherapy has gained more attention to overcome this limitation. Unfortunately, many clinical trials testing these combinations have provided limited success. This can partly be attributed to an inadequate choice of preclinical models and the lack of scientific rationale to select the most effective immune-oncological combination. In this review, we have analyzed the existing preclinical evidence on this topic, which is only limitedly available. Furthermore, this preclinical data indicates that besides the selection of a specific drug and dose, also the sequence or order of the combination treatment influences the study outcome. Therefore, we conclude that the success of clinical combination trials could be enhanced by improving the preclinical set up, in order to identify the optimal treatment combination and schedule to enhance the anti-tumor immunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yani Berckmans
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jolien Ceusters
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ann Vankerckhoven
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Roxanne Wouters
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Oncoinvent AS, Oslo, Norway
| | - Matteo Riva
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Neurosurgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) UCLouvain Namur, University Hospital of Godinne, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Thagaard J, Broeckx G, Page DB, Jahangir CA, Verbandt S, Kos Z, Gupta R, Khiroya R, Abduljabbar K, Acosta Haab G, Acs B, Akturk G, Almeida JS, Alvarado‐Cabrero I, Amgad M, Azmoudeh‐Ardalan F, Badve S, Baharun NB, Balslev E, Bellolio ER, Bheemaraju V, Blenman KRM, Botinelly Mendonça Fujimoto L, Bouchmaa N, Burgues O, Chardas A, Chon U Cheang M, Ciompi F, Cooper LAD, Coosemans A, Corredor G, Dahl AB, Dantas Portela FL, Deman F, Demaria S, Doré Hansen J, Dudgeon SN, Ebstrup T, Elghazawy M, Fernandez‐Martín C, Fox SB, Gallagher WM, Giltnane JM, Gnjatic S, Gonzalez‐Ericsson PI, Grigoriadis A, Halama N, Hanna MG, Harbhajanka A, Hart SN, Hartman J, Hauberg S, Hewitt S, Hida AI, Horlings HM, Husain Z, Hytopoulos E, Irshad S, Janssen EAM, Kahila M, Kataoka TR, Kawaguchi K, Kharidehal D, Khramtsov AI, Kiraz U, Kirtani P, Kodach LL, Korski K, Kovács A, Laenkholm A, Lang‐Schwarz C, Larsimont D, Lennerz JK, Lerousseau M, Li X, Ly A, Madabhushi A, Maley SK, Manur Narasimhamurthy V, Marks DK, McDonald ES, Mehrotra R, Michiels S, Minhas FUAA, Mittal S, Moore DA, Mushtaq S, Nighat H, Papathomas T, Penault‐Llorca F, Perera RD, Pinard CJ, Pinto‐Cardenas JC, Pruneri G, Pusztai L, Rahman A, Rajpoot NM, Rapoport BL, Rau TT, Reis‐Filho JS, Ribeiro JM, Rimm D, Roslind A, Vincent‐Salomon A, Salto‐Tellez M, Saltz J, Sayed S, Scott E, Siziopikou KP, Sotiriou C, Stenzinger A, Sughayer MA, Sur D, Fineberg S, Symmans F, Tanaka S, Taxter T, Tejpar S, Teuwen J, Thompson EA, Tramm T, Tran WT, van der Laak J, van Diest PJ, Verghese GE, Viale G, Vieth M, Wahab N, Walter T, Waumans Y, Wen HY, Yang W, Yuan Y, Zin RM, Adams S, Bartlett J, Loibl S, Denkert C, Savas P, Loi S, Salgado R, Specht Stovgaard E. Pitfalls in machine learning-based assessment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer: A report of the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group on Breast Cancer. J Pathol 2023; 260:498-513. [PMID: 37608772 PMCID: PMC10518802 DOI: 10.1002/path.6155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
The clinical significance of the tumor-immune interaction in breast cancer is now established, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have emerged as predictive and prognostic biomarkers for patients with triple-negative (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2-negative) breast cancer and HER2-positive breast cancer. How computational assessments of TILs might complement manual TIL assessment in trial and daily practices is currently debated. Recent efforts to use machine learning (ML) to automatically evaluate TILs have shown promising results. We review state-of-the-art approaches and identify pitfalls and challenges of automated TIL evaluation by studying the root cause of ML discordances in comparison to manual TIL quantification. We categorize our findings into four main topics: (1) technical slide issues, (2) ML and image analysis aspects, (3) data challenges, and (4) validation issues. The main reason for discordant assessments is the inclusion of false-positive areas or cells identified by performance on certain tissue patterns or design choices in the computational implementation. To aid the adoption of ML for TIL assessment, we provide an in-depth discussion of ML and image analysis, including validation issues that need to be considered before reliable computational reporting of TILs can be incorporated into the trial and routine clinical management of patients with triple-negative breast cancer. © 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeppe Thagaard
- Technical University of DenmarkKongens LyngbyDenmark
- Visiopharm A/SHørsholmDenmark
| | - Glenn Broeckx
- Department of PathologyGZA‐ZNA HospitalsAntwerpBelgium
- Centre for Oncological Research (CORE), MIPPRO, Faculty of MedicineAntwerp UniversityAntwerpBelgium
| | - David B Page
- Earle A Chiles Research InstituteProvidence Cancer InstitutePortlandORUSA
| | - Chowdhury Arif Jahangir
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway InstituteUniversity College DublinDublinIreland
| | - Sara Verbandt
- Digestive Oncology, Department of OncologyKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Zuzana Kos
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineBC Cancer Vancouver Centre, University of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Rajarsi Gupta
- Department of Biomedical InformaticsStony Brook UniversityStony BrookNYUSA
| | - Reena Khiroya
- Department of Cellular PathologyUniversity College Hospital LondonLondonUK
| | | | | | - Balazs Acs
- Department of Oncology and PathologyKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer DiagnosticsKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
| | - Guray Akturk
- Translational Molecular Biomarkers, Merck & Co IncRahwayNJUSA
| | - Jonas S Almeida
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (DCEG)National Cancer Institute (NCI)Rockville, MDUSA
| | | | - Mohamed Amgad
- Department of PathologyNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoILUSA
| | | | - Sunil Badve
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of MedicineEmory University Winship Cancer InstituteAtlantaGAUSA
| | | | - Eva Balslev
- Department of PathologyHerlev and Gentofte HospitalHerlevDenmark
| | - Enrique R Bellolio
- Departamento de Anatomía Patológica, Facultad de MedicinaUniversidad de La FronteraTemucoChile
| | | | - Kim RM Blenman
- Department of Internal Medicine Section of Medical Oncology and Yale Cancer CenterYale School of MedicineNew HavenCTUSA
- Department of Computer ScienceYale School of Engineering and Applied ScienceNew HavenCTUSA
| | | | - Najat Bouchmaa
- Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Medical SciencesMohammed VI Polytechnic University (UM6P)Ben‐GuerirMorocco
| | - Octavio Burgues
- Pathology DepartmentHospital Cliníco Universitario de Valencia/InclivaValenciaSpain
| | - Alexandros Chardas
- Department of Pathobiology & Population SciencesThe Royal Veterinary CollegeLondonUK
| | - Maggie Chon U Cheang
- Head of Integrative Genomics Analysis in Clinical Trials, ICR‐CTSU, Division of Clinical StudiesThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Francesco Ciompi
- Radboud University Medical CenterDepartment of PathologyNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Lee AD Cooper
- Department of PathologyNorthwestern Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoILUSA
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and ImmunotherapyKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Germán Corredor
- Biomedical Engineering DepartmentEmory UniversityAtlantaGAUSA
| | - Anders B Dahl
- Technical University of DenmarkKongens LyngbyDenmark
| | | | | | - Sandra Demaria
- Department of Radiation OncologyWeill Cornell MedicineNew YorkNYUSA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineWeill Cornell MedicineNew YorkNYUSA
| | | | - Sarah N Dudgeon
- Conputational Biology and BioinformaticsYale UniversityNew HavenCTUSA
| | | | | | - Claudio Fernandez‐Martín
- Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Tecnología Centrada en el Ser Humano, HUMAN‐techUniversitat Politècnica de ValènciaValenciaSpain
| | - Stephen B Fox
- Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - William M Gallagher
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway InstituteUniversity College DublinDublinIreland
| | | | - Sacha Gnjatic
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Medicine Hem/Onc, and Pathology, Tisch Cancer Institute – Precision Immunology InstituteIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNYUSA
| | | | - Anita Grigoriadis
- Cancer Bioinformatics, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Niels Halama
- Department of Translational ImmunotherapyGerman Cancer Research CenterHeidelbergGermany
| | - Matthew G Hanna
- Department of PathologyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkUSA
| | | | - Steven N Hart
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and PathologyMayo ClinicRochester, MNUSA
| | - Johan Hartman
- Department of Oncology and PathologyKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer DiagnosticsKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
| | - Søren Hauberg
- Technical University of DenmarkKongens LyngbyDenmark
| | - Stephen Hewitt
- Laboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthBethesdaMDUSA
| | - Akira I Hida
- Department of PathologyMatsuyama Shimin HospitalMatsuyamaJapan
| | - Hugo M Horlings
- Division of PathologyNetherlands Cancer Institute (NKI)AmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | | | - Sheeba Irshad
- King's College London & Guy's & St Thomas’ NHS TrustLondonUK
| | - Emiel AM Janssen
- Department of PathologyStavanger University HospitalStavangerNorway
- Department of Chemistry, Bioscience and Environmental TechnologyUniversity of StavangerStavangerNorway
| | | | | | - Kosuke Kawaguchi
- Department of Breast SurgeryKyoto University Graduate School of MedicineKyotoJapan
| | | | - Andrey I Khramtsov
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineAnn & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoChicagoILUSA
| | - Umay Kiraz
- Department of PathologyStavanger University HospitalStavangerNorway
- Department of Chemistry, Bioscience and Environmental TechnologyUniversity of StavangerStavangerNorway
| | - Pawan Kirtani
- Department of HistopathologyAakash Healthcare Super Speciality HospitalNew DelhiIndia
| | - Liudmila L Kodach
- Department of PathologyNetherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek HospitalAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Konstanty Korski
- Data, Analytics and Imaging, Product DevelopmentF. Hoffmann‐La Roche AGBaselSwitzerland
| | - Anikó Kovács
- Department of Clinical PathologySahlgrenska University HospitalGothenburgSweden
- Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | - Anne‐Vibeke Laenkholm
- Department of Surgical PathologyZealand University HospitalRoskildeDenmark
- Department of Surgical PathologyUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Corinna Lang‐Schwarz
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbHFriedrich‐Alexander‐University Erlangen‐NurembergBayreuthGermany
| | - Denis Larsimont
- Institut Jules BordetUniversité Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium
| | - Jochen K Lennerz
- Center for Integrated DiagnosticsMassachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUSA
| | - Marvin Lerousseau
- Centre for Computational Biology (CBIO)Mines Paris, PSL UniversityParisFrance
- Institut CuriePSL UniversityParisFrance
- INSERMParisFrance
| | - Xiaoxian Li
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineEmory UniversityAtlantaGAUSA
| | - Amy Ly
- Department of PathologyMassachusetts General HospitalBostonMAUSA
| | - Anant Madabhushi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Biomedical Informatics, PathologyGeorgia Institute of Technology and Emory UniversityAtlantaGAUSA
| | - Sai K Maley
- NRG Oncology/NSABP FoundationPittsburghPAUSA
| | | | | | - Elizabeth S McDonald
- Breast Cancer Translational Research GroupUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPAUSA
| | - Ravi Mehrotra
- Indian Cancer Genomic AtlasPuneIndia
- Centre for Health, Innovation and Policy FoundationNoidaIndia
| | - Stefan Michiels
- Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, InsermUniversity Paris‐Saclay, Ligue Contre le Cancer labeled TeamVillejuifFrance
| | - Fayyaz ul Amir Afsar Minhas
- Tissue Image Analytics Centre, Warwick Cancer Research Centre, PathLAKE Consortium, Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK
| | - Shachi Mittal
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Department of Laboratory Medicine and PathologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattle, WAUSA
| | - David A Moore
- CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, UCL and Cellular Pathology DepartmentUCLHLondonUK
| | - Shamim Mushtaq
- Department of BiochemistryZiauddin UniversityKarachiPakistan
| | - Hussain Nighat
- Pathology and Laboratory MedicineAll India Institute of Medical sciencesRaipurIndia
| | - Thomas Papathomas
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems ResearchUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
- Department of Clinical PathologyDrammen Sykehus, Vestre Viken HFDrammenNorway
| | - Frederique Penault‐Llorca
- Centre Jean Perrin, Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM, U1240 Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies ThéranostiquesClermont FerrandFrance
| | - Rashindrie D Perera
- School of Electrical, Mechanical and Infrastructure EngineeringUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Division of Cancer ResearchPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Christopher J Pinard
- Radiogenomics LaboratorySunnybrook Health Sciences CentreTorontoOntarioCanada
- Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary CollegeUniversity of GuelphGuelphOntarioCanada
- Department of OncologyLakeshore Animal Health PartnersMississaugaOntarioCanada
- Centre for Advancing Responsible and Ethical Artificial Intelligence (CARE‐AI)University of GuelphGuelphOntarioCanada
| | | | - Giancarlo Pruneri
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei TumoriMilanItaly
- Faculty of Medicine and SurgeryUniversity of MilanMilanItaly
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Yale Cancer CenterYale UniversityNew HavenCTUSA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yale School of MedicineYale UniversityNew HavenCTUSA
| | - Arman Rahman
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway InstituteUniversity College DublinDublinIreland
| | | | - Bernardo Leon Rapoport
- The Medical Oncology Centre of RosebankJohannesburgSouth Africa
- Department of Immunology, Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa
| | - Tilman T Rau
- Institute of PathologyUniversity Hospital Düsseldorf and Heinrich‐Heine‐University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Jorge S Reis‐Filho
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Joana M Ribeiro
- Département de Médecine OncologiqueGustave RoussyVillejuifFrance
| | - David Rimm
- Department of PathologyYale University School of MedicineNew HavenCTUSA
- Department of MedicineYale University School of MedicineNew HavenCTUSA
| | - Anne Roslind
- Department of PathologyHerlev and Gentofte HospitalHerlevDenmark
| | - Anne Vincent‐Salomon
- Department of Diagnostic and Theranostic Medicine, Institut CurieUniversity Paris‐Sciences et LettresParisFrance
| | - Manuel Salto‐Tellez
- Integrated Pathology UnitThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
- Precision Medicine CentreQueen's University BelfastBelfastUK
| | - Joel Saltz
- Department of Biomedical InformaticsStony Brook UniversityStony BrookNYUSA
| | - Shahin Sayed
- Department of PathologyAga Khan UniversityNairobiKenya
| | - Ely Scott
- Translational PathologyTranslational Sciences and Diagnostics/Translational Medicine/R&D, Bristol Myers SquibbPrincetonNJUSA
| | - Kalliopi P Siziopikou
- Department of Pathology, Section of Breast PathologyNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoILUSA
| | - Christos Sotiriou
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory J.‐C. Heuson, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB)Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB)BrusselsBelgium
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB)Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB)BrusselsBelgium
| | - Albrecht Stenzinger
- Institute of PathologyUniversity Hospital HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
- Centers for Personalized Medicine (ZPM)HeidelbergGermany
| | | | - Daniel Sur
- Department of Medical OncologyUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hatieganu”Cluj‐NapocaRomania
| | - Susan Fineberg
- Montefiore Medical CenterBronxNYUSA
- Albert Einstein College of MedicineBronxNYUSA
| | - Fraser Symmans
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTXUSA
| | | | | | - Sabine Tejpar
- Digestive Oncology, Department of OncologyKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Jonas Teuwen
- AI for Oncology Lab, The Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | - Trine Tramm
- Department of PathologyAarhus University HospitalAarhusDenmark
- Institute of Clinical MedicineAarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark
| | - William T Tran
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Toronto and Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Jeroen van der Laak
- Department of PathologyRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of PathologyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtThe Netherlands
- Johns Hopkins Oncology CenterBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Gregory E Verghese
- Cancer Bioinformatics, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Department of PathologyEuropean Institute of OncologyMilanItaly
- Department of PathologyUniversity of MilanMilanItaly
| | - Michael Vieth
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbHFriedrich‐Alexander‐University Erlangen‐NurembergBayreuthGermany
| | - Noorul Wahab
- Tissue Image Analytics Centre, Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK
| | - Thomas Walter
- Centre for Computational Biology (CBIO)Mines Paris, PSL UniversityParisFrance
- Institut CuriePSL UniversityParisFrance
- INSERMParisFrance
| | | | - Hannah Y Wen
- Department of PathologyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkUSA
| | - Wentao Yang
- Fudan Medical University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiPR China
| | - Yinyin Yuan
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTXUSA
| | - Reena Md Zin
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of MedicineUniversiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaKuala LumpurMalaysia
| | - Sylvia Adams
- Perlmutter Cancer CenterNYU Langone HealthNew YorkNYUSA
- Department of MedicineNYU Grossman School of MedicineManhattanNYUSA
| | | | - Sibylle Loibl
- Department of Medicine and ResearchGerman Breast GroupNeu‐IsenburgGermany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institut für PathologiePhilipps‐Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum MarburgMarburgGermany
| | - Peter Savas
- Division of Cancer ResearchPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical OncologyUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Sherene Loi
- Division of Cancer ResearchPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical OncologyUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Department of PathologyGZA‐ZNA HospitalsAntwerpBelgium
- Division of Cancer ResearchPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Elisabeth Specht Stovgaard
- Department of PathologyHerlev and Gentofte HospitalHerlevDenmark
- Department of Clinical MedicineUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Page DB, Broeckx G, Jahangir CA, Verbandt S, Gupta RR, Thagaard J, Khiroya R, Kos Z, Abduljabbar K, Acosta Haab G, Acs B, Akturk G, Almeida JS, Alvarado-Cabrero I, Azmoudeh-Ardalan F, Badve S, Baharun NB, Bellolio ER, Bheemaraju V, Blenman KR, Botinelly Mendonça Fujimoto L, Bouchmaa N, Burgues O, Cheang MCU, Ciompi F, Cooper LA, Coosemans A, Corredor G, Dantas Portela FL, Deman F, Demaria S, Dudgeon SN, Elghazawy M, Ely S, Fernandez-Martín C, Fineberg S, Fox SB, Gallagher WM, Giltnane JM, Gnjatic S, Gonzalez-Ericsson PI, Grigoriadis A, Halama N, Hanna MG, Harbhajanka A, Hardas A, Hart SN, Hartman J, Hewitt S, Hida AI, Horlings HM, Husain Z, Hytopoulos E, Irshad S, Janssen EA, Kahila M, Kataoka TR, Kawaguchi K, Kharidehal D, Khramtsov AI, Kiraz U, Kirtani P, Kodach LL, Korski K, Kovács A, Laenkholm AV, Lang-Schwarz C, Larsimont D, Lennerz JK, Lerousseau M, Li X, Ly A, Madabhushi A, Maley SK, Manur Narasimhamurthy V, Marks DK, McDonald ES, Mehrotra R, Michiels S, Minhas FUAA, Mittal S, Moore DA, Mushtaq S, Nighat H, Papathomas T, Penault-Llorca F, Perera RD, Pinard CJ, Pinto-Cardenas JC, Pruneri G, Pusztai L, Rahman A, Rajpoot NM, Rapoport BL, Rau TT, Reis-Filho JS, Ribeiro JM, Rimm D, Vincent-Salomon A, Salto-Tellez M, Saltz J, Sayed S, Siziopikou KP, Sotiriou C, Stenzinger A, Sughayer MA, Sur D, Symmans F, Tanaka S, Taxter T, Tejpar S, Teuwen J, Thompson EA, Tramm T, Tran WT, van der Laak J, van Diest PJ, Verghese GE, Viale G, Vieth M, Wahab N, Walter T, Waumans Y, Wen HY, Yang W, Yuan Y, Adams S, Bartlett JMS, Loibl S, Denkert C, Savas P, Loi S, Salgado R, Specht Stovgaard E. Spatial analyses of immune cell infiltration in cancer: current methods and future directions: A report of the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group on Breast Cancer. J Pathol 2023; 260:514-532. [PMID: 37608771 DOI: 10.1002/path.6165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
Modern histologic imaging platforms coupled with machine learning methods have provided new opportunities to map the spatial distribution of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. However, there exists no standardized method for describing or analyzing spatial immune cell data, and most reported spatial analyses are rudimentary. In this review, we provide an overview of two approaches for reporting and analyzing spatial data (raster versus vector-based). We then provide a compendium of spatial immune cell metrics that have been reported in the literature, summarizing prognostic associations in the context of a variety of cancers. We conclude by discussing two well-described clinical biomarkers, the breast cancer stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes score and the colon cancer Immunoscore, and describe investigative opportunities to improve clinical utility of these spatial biomarkers. © 2023 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David B Page
- Earle A Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Glenn Broeckx
- Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
- Centre for Oncological Research (CORE), MIPPRO, Faculty of Medicine, Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Chowdhury Arif Jahangir
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Sara Verbandt
- Digestive Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rajarsi R Gupta
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Jeppe Thagaard
- Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
- Visiopharm A/S, Hørsholm, Denmark
| | - Reena Khiroya
- Department of Cellular Pathology, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Zuzana Kos
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, BC Cancer Vancouver Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Khalid Abduljabbar
- Centre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Balazs Acs
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Guray Akturk
- Translational Molecular Biomarkers, Merck & Co Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA
| | - Jonas S Almeida
- National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (DCEG), Rockville, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Sunil Badve
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Enrique R Bellolio
- Departamento de Anatomía Patológica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile
| | | | - Kim Rm Blenman
- Internal Medicine Section of Medical Oncology and Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Computer Science, Yale School of Engineering and Applied Science, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Najat Bouchmaa
- Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Mohammed VI Polytechnic University (UM6P), Ben-Guerir, Morocco
| | - Octavio Burgues
- Pathology Department, Hospital Cliníco Universitario de Valencia/Incliva, Valencia, Spain
| | - Maggie Chon U Cheang
- Head of Integrative Genomics Analysis in Clinical Trials, ICR-CTSU, Division of Clinical Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Francesco Ciompi
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lee Ad Cooper
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Germán Corredor
- Biomedical Engineering Department, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Frederik Deman
- Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Sandra Demaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pathology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sarah N Dudgeon
- Conputational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Mahmoud Elghazawy
- University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
- Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Scott Ely
- Translational Pathology, Translational Sciences and Diagnostics/Translational Medicine/R&D, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Claudio Fernandez-Martín
- Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Tecnología Centrada en el Ser Humano, HUMAN-tech, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain
| | - Susan Fineberg
- Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Stephen B Fox
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - William M Gallagher
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Sacha Gnjatic
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Medicine Hem/Onc, and Pathology, Tisch Cancer Institute - Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Anita Grigoriadis
- Cancer Bioinformatics, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
- Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Niels Halama
- Translational Immunotherapy, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Alexandros Hardas
- Pathobiology & Population Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, London, UK
| | - Steven N Hart
- Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Johan Hartman
- Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Stephen Hewitt
- Department of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Akira I Hida
- Department of Pathology, Matsuyama Shimin Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Hugo M Horlings
- Division of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Sheeba Irshad
- King's College London & Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Emiel Am Janssen
- Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Chemistry, Bioscience and Environmental Technology, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Mohamed Kahila
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Kosuke Kawaguchi
- Department of Breast Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Durga Kharidehal
- Department of Pathology, Narayana Medical College, Nellore, India
| | - Andrey I Khramtsov
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Umay Kiraz
- Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Chemistry, Bioscience and Environmental Technology, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Pawan Kirtani
- Department of Histopathology, Aakash Healthcare Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Liudmila L Kodach
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Konstanty Korski
- Data, Analytics and Imaging, Product Development, F.Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Anikó Kovács
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anne-Vibeke Laenkholm
- Surgical Pathology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
- Surgical Pathology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Corinna Lang-Schwarz
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Denis Larsimont
- Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jochen K Lennerz
- Center for Integrated Diagnostics, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marvin Lerousseau
- Centre for Computational Biology (CBIO), Mines Paris, PSL University, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France
- INSERM, U900, Paris, France
| | - Xiaoxian Li
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Amy Ly
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anant Madabhushi
- Biomedical Engineering, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Biomedical Informatics, Pathology, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sai K Maley
- NRG Oncology/NSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Douglas K Marks
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth S McDonald
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Group, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ravi Mehrotra
- Indian Cancer Genome Atlas, Pune, India
- Centre for Health, Innovation and Policy Foundation, Noida, India
| | - Stefan Michiels
- Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, Inserm, University Paris-Saclay, Ligue Contre le Cancer labeled Team, Villejuif, France
| | - Fayyaz Ul Amir Afsar Minhas
- Tissue Image Analytics Centre, Warwick Cancer Research Centre, PathLAKE Consortium, Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Shachi Mittal
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - David A Moore
- CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, UCLH, London, UK
| | - Shamim Mushtaq
- Department of Biochemistry, Ziauddin University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Hussain Nighat
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, India
| | - Thomas Papathomas
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Drammen Sykehus, Vestre Viken HF, Drammen, Norway
| | - Frederique Penault-Llorca
- Centre Jean Perrin, INSERM U1240, Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies Théranostiques, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Rashindrie D Perera
- School of Electrical, Mechanical and Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Christopher J Pinard
- Radiogenomics Laboratory, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Lakeshore Animal Health Partners, Mississauga, ON, Canada
- Centre for Advancing Responsible and Ethical Artificial Intelligence (CARE-AI), University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | | | - Giancarlo Pruneri
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Arman Rahman
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Bernardo Leon Rapoport
- The Medical Oncology Centre of Rosebank, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Department of Immunology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Tilman T Rau
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Düsseldorf and Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Jorge S Reis-Filho
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joana M Ribeiro
- Département de Médecine Oncologique, Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - David Rimm
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Anne Vincent-Salomon
- Department of Diagnostic and Theranostic Medicine, Institut Curie, University Paris-Sciences et Lettres, Paris, France
| | - Manuel Salto-Tellez
- Integrated Pathology Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Precision Medicine Centre, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Joel Saltz
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shahin Sayed
- Department of Pathology, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Kalliopi P Siziopikou
- Department of Pathology, Section of Breast Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Christos Sotiriou
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory J.-C. Heuson, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Albrecht Stenzinger
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Centers for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Daniel Sur
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Iuliu Hatieganu", Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Fraser Symmans
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Sabine Tejpar
- Digestive Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jonas Teuwen
- AI for Oncology Lab, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Trine Tramm
- Pathology, and Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - William T Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jeroen van der Laak
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Gregory E Verghese
- Cancer Bioinformatics, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
- Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Department of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology & University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Michael Vieth
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Noorul Wahab
- Tissue Image Analytics Centre, Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Thomas Walter
- Centre for Computational Biology (CBIO), Mines Paris, PSL University, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France
- INSERM, U900, Paris, France
| | | | - Hannah Y Wen
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wentao Yang
- Fudan Medical University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Yinyin Yuan
- Translational Molecular Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sylvia Adams
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Manhattan, NY, USA
| | | | - Sibylle Loibl
- Department of Medicine and Research, German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Peter Savas
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sherene Loi
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Elisabeth Specht Stovgaard
- Department of Pathology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Berckmans Y, Hoffert Y, Vankerckhoven A, Dreesen E, Coosemans A. Drug Repurposing for Targeting Myeloid-Derived Suppressor-Cell-Generated Immunosuppression in Ovarian Cancer: A Literature Review of Potential Candidates. Pharmaceutics 2023; 15:1792. [PMID: 37513979 PMCID: PMC10385967 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15071792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
The lethality of patients with ovarian cancer (OC) remains high. Current treatment strategies often do not lead to the desired outcome due to the development of therapy resistance, resulting in high relapse rates. Additionally, clinical trials testing immunotherapy against OC have failed to reach significant results to date. The OC tumor microenvironment and specifically myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) are known to generate immunosuppression and inhibit the anti-tumor immune response following immunotherapy treatment. Our review aims to characterize potential candidate treatments to target MDSC in OC through drug-repurposing. A literature search identified repurposable compounds with evidence of their suppressing the effect of MDSC. A total of seventeen compounds were withheld, of which four were considered the most promising. Lurbinectedin, metformin, celecoxib, and 5-azacytidine have reported preclinical effects on MDSC and clinical evidence in OC. They have all been approved for a different indication, characterizing them as the most promising candidates for repurposing to treat patients with OC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yani Berckmans
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Yannick Hoffert
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy Unit, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ann Vankerckhoven
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Erwin Dreesen
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy Unit, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - An Coosemans
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sprooten J, Laureano RS, Vanmeerbeek I, Govaerts J, Naulaerts S, Borras DM, Kinget L, Fucíková J, Špíšek R, Jelínková LP, Kepp O, Kroemer G, Krysko DV, Coosemans A, Vaes RD, De Ruysscher D, De Vleeschouwer S, Wauters E, Smits E, Tejpar S, Beuselinck B, Hatse S, Wildiers H, Clement PM, Vandenabeele P, Zitvogel L, Garg AD. Trial watch: chemotherapy-induced immunogenic cell death in oncology. Oncoimmunology 2023; 12:2219591. [PMID: 37284695 PMCID: PMC10240992 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2023.2219591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Immunogenic cell death (ICD) refers to an immunologically distinct process of regulated cell death that activates, rather than suppresses, innate and adaptive immune responses. Such responses culminate into T cell-driven immunity against antigens derived from dying cancer cells. The potency of ICD is dependent on the immunogenicity of dying cells as defined by the antigenicity of these cells and their ability to expose immunostimulatory molecules like damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and cytokines like type I interferons (IFNs). Moreover, it is crucial that the host's immune system can adequately detect the antigenicity and adjuvanticity of these dying cells. Over the years, several well-known chemotherapies have been validated as potent ICD inducers, including (but not limited to) anthracyclines, paclitaxels, and oxaliplatin. Such ICD-inducing chemotherapeutic drugs can serve as important combinatorial partners for anti-cancer immunotherapies against highly immuno-resistant tumors. In this Trial Watch, we describe current trends in the preclinical and clinical integration of ICD-inducing chemotherapy in the existing immuno-oncological paradigms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Sprooten
- Cell Stress & Immunity (CSI) Lab, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Raquel S. Laureano
- Cell Stress & Immunity (CSI) Lab, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Isaure Vanmeerbeek
- Cell Stress & Immunity (CSI) Lab, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jannes Govaerts
- Cell Stress & Immunity (CSI) Lab, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Stefan Naulaerts
- Cell Stress & Immunity (CSI) Lab, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Daniel M. Borras
- Cell Stress & Immunity (CSI) Lab, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lisa Kinget
- Laboratory of Experimental Oncology, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jitka Fucíková
- Department of Immunology, Charles University, 2Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
- Sotio Biotech, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Radek Špíšek
- Department of Immunology, Charles University, 2Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
- Sotio Biotech, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Lenka Palová Jelínková
- Department of Immunology, Charles University, 2Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
- Sotio Biotech, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Oliver Kepp
- Metabolomics and Cell Biology Platforms, Institut Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Equipe Labellisée Par la Liguecontre le Cancer, Université de Paris, sorbonne Université, Inserm U1138, Institut Universitaire de France, Paris, France
| | - Guido Kroemer
- Metabolomics and Cell Biology Platforms, Institut Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Equipe Labellisée Par la Liguecontre le Cancer, Université de Paris, sorbonne Université, Inserm U1138, Institut Universitaire de France, Paris, France
- Department of Biology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, Paris, France
| | - Dmitri V. Krysko
- Cell Death Investigation and Therapy (CDIT) Laboratory, Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Insitute Ghent, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - An Coosemans
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rianne D.W. Vaes
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk De Ruysscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Steven De Vleeschouwer
- Department Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department Neuroscience, Laboratory for Experimental Neurosurgery and Neuroanatomy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Brain Institute (LBI), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Els Wauters
- Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery (Breathe), Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Evelien Smits
- Center for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Center for Cell Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Sabine Tejpar
- Molecular Digestive Oncology, Department of Oncology, Katholiek Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Cell Death and Inflammation Unit, VIB-Ugent Center for Inflammation Research (IRC), Ghent, Belgium
| | - Benoit Beuselinck
- Laboratory of Experimental Oncology, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sigrid Hatse
- Laboratory of Experimental Oncology, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hans Wildiers
- Laboratory of Experimental Oncology, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Paul M. Clement
- Laboratory of Experimental Oncology, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Peter Vandenabeele
- Cell Death and Inflammation Unit, VIB-Ugent Center for Inflammation Research (IRC), Ghent, Belgium
- Molecular Signaling and Cell Death Unit, Department of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Laurence Zitvogel
- Tumour Immunology and Immunotherapy of Cancer, European Academy of Tumor Immunology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, Inserm, Villejuif, France
| | - Abhishek D. Garg
- Cell Stress & Immunity (CSI) Lab, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Van Hauwenhuyse J, Reniers F, Persoons L, Noppen S, Boel E, Vanstreels E, Vankerckhoven A, Kwanten B, Coosemans A, Mooter GVD, Dehaen W, Daelemans D. Abstract 1652: A novel reversible inhibitor of XPO1 with potent efficacy in multiple preclinical mouse models. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2023-1652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Exportin 1 (XPO1/CRM1) is a key nuclear transport receptor (karyopherin) responsible for the export of different cargo proteins out of the cell’s nucleus into the cytoplasm. Its correct function is essential for cellular homeostasis, however normal XPO1 function is often disrupted in malignant cells. XPO1 is overexpressed in solid and hematological tumors and higher XPO1 expression is often associated with poorer prognosis. XPO1-regulated cargo proteins include tumor suppressor proteins and cell cycle regulators that can be involved in tumorigenesis. For example, aberrant XPO1 function may lead to cytoplasmic mislocalization of tumor suppressor proteins which results in their functional inactivation and hence may cause tumorigenesis. Inhibition of XPO1 function will restore their proper subcellular localization and function and cause tumor regression. Although XPO1 has a central role in cellular homeostasis, it is a good target for cancer therapy, as illustrated by the clinical success of the selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) selinexor. Selinexor is the first and currently the only XPO1 inhibitor clinically approved. It is applied for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma after at least one prior treatment, and for the treatment of diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Selinexor covalently binds to XPO1. The second generation SINE eltanexor is also a covalent XPO1 inhibitor but has only minimal brain penetration and consequently lower toxicity in preclinical studies. Here, we describe a novel chemical class of reversible XPO1 inhibitors with high brain penetration but with good tolerability allowing frequent dosing in preclinical models. The lead compound, FR-027, potently inhibits XPO1 function (EC50 69 ± 10 nM) and shows potent cancer cell growth inhibition in vitro of both hematological and solid cancer cell lines (EC50 50-950 nM). FR-027 is a reversible inhibitor of XPO1 and unlike many other XPO1 inhibitors it does not induce XPO1 protein degradation; this may contribute to an increased tolerability. Indeed, while it shows high brain penetration, FR-027 allows frequent dosing in mice with good tolerability (body weight). It is orally bioavailable and demonstrates strong anti-leukemic efficacy in an aggressive MOLT-4 xenograft model. Importantly, it shows potent efficacy in both an orthotopic U87 MG brain tumor xenograft model and a metastatic syngeneic ID8-fLuc ovarian cancer model with significant survival benefit as monotherapy. Altogether, these results demonstrate that FR-027 is a novel, reversible XPO1 inhibitor with important molecular and pharmacological characteristics that warrant further clinical development.
Citation Format: Janne Van Hauwenhuyse, Felien Reniers, Leentje Persoons, Sam Noppen, Eline Boel, Els Vanstreels, Ann Vankerckhoven, Bert Kwanten, An Coosemans, Guy Van den Mooter, Wim Dehaen, Dirk Daelemans. A novel reversible inhibitor of XPO1 with potent efficacy in multiple preclinical mouse models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 1652.
Collapse
|
12
|
Riva M, Wouters R, Nittner D, Ceusters J, Sterpin E, Giovannoni R, Himmelreich U, Gsell W, VAN Ranst M, Coosemans A. Radiation dose-escalation and dose-fractionation modulate the immune microenvironment, cancer stem cells and vasculature in experimental high-grade gliomas. J Neurosurg Sci 2023; 67:55-65. [PMID: 33056947 DOI: 10.23736/s0390-5616.20.05060-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the context of high-grade gliomas (HGGs), very little evidence is available concerning the optimal radiotherapy (RT) schedule to be used in radioimmunotherapy combinations. This studied was aimed at shedding new light in this field by analyzing the effects of RT dose escalation and dose fractionation on the tumor microenvironment of experimental HGGs. METHODS Neurospheres (NS) CT-2A HGG-bearing C57BL/6 mice were treated with stereotactic RT. For dose-escalation experiments, mice received 2, 4 or 8 Gy as single administrations. For dose-fractionation experiments, mice received 4 Gy as a single fraction or multiple (1.33x3 Gy) fractions. The impact of the RT schedule on murine survival and tumor immunity was evaluated. Modifications of glioma stem cells (GSCs), tumor vasculature and tumor cell replication were also assessed. RESULTS RT dose-escalation was associated with an improved immune profile, with higher CD8+ T cells and CD8+ T cells/regulatory T cells (Tregs) ratio (P=0.0003 and P=0.0022, respectively) and lower total tumor associated microglia/macrophages (TAMs), M2 TAMs and monocytic myeloid derived suppressor cells (mMDSCs) (P=0.0011, P=0.0024 and P<0.0001, respectively). The progressive increase of RT dosages prolonged survival (P<0.0001) and reduced tumor vasculature (P=0.069), tumor cell proliferation (P<0.0001) and the amount of GSCs (P=0.0132 or lower). Compared to the unfractionated regimen, RT dose-fractionation negatively affected tumor immunity by inducing higher total TAMs, M2 TAMs and mMDSCs (P=0.0051, P=0.0036 and P=0.0436, respectively). Fractionation also induced a shorter survival (P=0.0078), a higher amount of GSCs (P=0.0015 or lower) and a higher degree of tumor cell proliferation (P=0.0003). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that RT dosage and fractionation significantly influence survival, tumor immunity and GSCs in experimental HGGs. These findings should be taken into account when aiming at designing more synergistic and effective radio-immunotherapy combinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Riva
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium - .,Department of Neurosurgery, UcL Namur, Mont-Godinne University Hospital, Yvoir, Belgium -
| | - Roxanne Wouters
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - David Nittner
- Center for the Biology of Disease, Catholic University of Leuven Center for Human Genetics - InfraMouse, VIB, Catholic University of University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jolien Ceusters
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Edmond Sterpin
- Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Uwe Himmelreich
- Biomedical MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology and Molecular Small Animal Imaging Center (MoSAIC), Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Willy Gsell
- Biomedical MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology and Molecular Small Animal Imaging Center (MoSAIC), Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marc VAN Ranst
- Laboratory for Clinical and Epidemiological Virology, Rega Institute for Medical Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - An Coosemans
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Leuven Cancer Institute, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Landolfo C, Bourne T, Froyman W, Van Calster B, Ceusters J, Testa AC, Wynants L, Sladkevicius P, Van Holsbeke C, Domali E, Fruscio R, Epstein E, Franchi D, Kudla MJ, Chiappa V, Alcazar JL, Leone FPG, Buonomo F, Coccia ME, Guerriero S, Deo N, Jokubkiene L, Savelli L, Fischerova D, Czekierdowski A, Kaijser J, Coosemans A, Scambia G, Vergote I, Timmerman D, Valentin L. Benign descriptors and ADNEX in two-step strategy to estimate risk of malignancy in ovarian tumors: retrospective validation in IOTA5 multicenter cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2023; 61:231-242. [PMID: 36178788 PMCID: PMC10107772 DOI: 10.1002/uog.26080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Revised: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Previous work has suggested that the ultrasound-based benign simple descriptors (BDs) can reliably exclude malignancy in a large proportion of women presenting with an adnexal mass. This study aimed to validate a modified version of the BDs and to validate a two-step strategy to estimate the risk of malignancy, in which the modified BDs are followed by the Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) model if modified BDs do not apply. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis using data from the 2-year interim analysis of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Phase-5 study, in which consecutive patients with at least one adnexal mass were recruited irrespective of subsequent management (conservative or surgery). The main outcome was classification of tumors as benign or malignant, based on histology or on clinical and ultrasound information during 1 year of follow-up. Multiple imputation was used when outcome based on follow-up was uncertain according to predefined criteria. RESULTS A total of 8519 patients were recruited at 36 centers between 2012 and 2015. We excluded patients who were already in follow-up at recruitment and all patients from 19 centers that did not fulfil our criteria for good-quality surgical and follow-up data, leaving 4905 patients across 17 centers for statistical analysis. Overall, 3441 (70%) tumors were benign, 978 (20%) malignant and 486 (10%) uncertain. The modified BDs were applicable in 1798/4905 (37%) tumors, of which 1786 (99.3%) were benign. The two-step strategy based on ADNEX without CA125 had an area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.92-0.96). The risk of malignancy was slightly underestimated, but calibration varied between centers. A sensitivity analysis in which we expanded the definition of uncertain outcome resulted in 1419 (29%) tumors with uncertain outcome and an AUC of the two-step strategy without CA125 of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.91-0.95). CONCLUSION A large proportion of adnexal masses can be classified as benign by the modified BDs. For the remaining masses, the ADNEX model can be used to estimate the risk of malignancy. This two-step strategy is convenient for clinical use. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. Landolfo
- Department of Development and RegenerationKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of Woman, Child and Public HealthFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCSRomeItaly
| | - T. Bourne
- Department of Development and RegenerationKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea HospitalImperial College Healthcare NHS TrustLondonUK
| | - W. Froyman
- Department of Development and RegenerationKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - B. Van Calster
- Department of Development and RegenerationKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of Biomedical Data SciencesLeiden University Medical Centre (LUMC)LeidenThe Netherlands
| | - J. Ceusters
- Department of Development and RegenerationKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of OncologyLeuven Cancer Institute, KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - A. C. Testa
- Department of Woman, Child and Public HealthFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCSRomeItaly
- Dipartimento Universitario Scienze della Vita e Sanità PubblicaUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreRomeItaly
| | - L. Wynants
- Department of Development and RegenerationKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of EpidemiologyCAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - P. Sladkevicius
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologySkåne University HospitalMalmöSweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences MalmöLund UniversityLundSweden
| | - C. Van Holsbeke
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyZiekenhuis Oost‐LimburgGenkBelgium
| | - E. Domali
- First Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyAlexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of AthensAthensGreece
| | - R. Fruscio
- Clinic of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of Milano‐Bicocca, San Gerardo HospitalMonzaItaly
| | - E. Epstein
- Department of Clinical Science and EducationKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologySödersjukhusetStockholmSweden
| | - D. Franchi
- Preventive Gynecology Unit, Division of GynecologyEuropean Institute of Oncology IRCCSMilanItaly
| | - M. J. Kudla
- Department of Perinatology and Oncological GynecologyFaculty of Medical Sciences, Medical University of SilesiaKatowicePoland
| | - V. Chiappa
- Department of Gynecologic OncologyNational Cancer Institute of MilanMilanItaly
| | - J. L. Alcazar
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyClinica Universidad de Navarra, School of MedicinePamplonaSpain
| | - F. P. G. Leone
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyBiomedical and Clinical Sciences Institute L. Sacco, University of MilanMilanItaly
| | - F. Buonomo
- Institute for Maternal and Child HealthIRCCS ‘Burlo Garofolo’TriesteItaly
| | - M. E. Coccia
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
| | - S. Guerriero
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Duilio CasulaCagliariItaly
| | - N. Deo
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyWhipps Cross HospitalLondonUK
| | - L. Jokubkiene
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologySkåne University HospitalMalmöSweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences MalmöLund UniversityLundSweden
| | - L. Savelli
- Gynecology and Physiopathology of Human Reproduction UnitSant'Orsola‐Malpighi Hospital of BolognaBolognaItaly
| | - D. Fischerova
- Gynecologic Oncology Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of MedicineCharles University and General University Hospital in PraguePragueCzech Republic
| | - A. Czekierdowski
- First Department of Gynecological Oncology and GynecologyMedical University of LublinLublinPoland
| | - J. Kaijser
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyIkazia HospitalRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - A. Coosemans
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of OncologyLeuven Cancer Institute, KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - G. Scambia
- Department of Woman, Child and Public HealthFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCSRomeItaly
- Dipartimento Universitario Scienze della Vita e Sanità PubblicaUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreRomeItaly
| | - I. Vergote
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of OncologyLeuven Cancer Institute, KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - D. Timmerman
- Department of Development and RegenerationKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - L. Valentin
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologySkåne University HospitalMalmöSweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences MalmöLund UniversityLundSweden
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hensler M, Rakova J, Kasikova L, Lanickova T, Pasulka J, Holicek P, Hraska M, Hrnciarova T, Kadlecova P, Schoenenberger A, Sochorova K, Rozkova D, Sojka L, Drozenova J, Laco J, Horvath R, Podrazil M, Hongyan G, Brtnicky T, Halaska MJ, Rob L, Ryska A, Coosemans A, Vergote I, Garg AD, Cibula D, Bartunkova J, Spisek R, Fucikova J. Peripheral gene signatures reveal distinct cancer patient immunotypes with therapeutic implications for autologous DC-based vaccines. Oncoimmunology 2022; 11:2101596. [PMID: 35898703 PMCID: PMC9311316 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2022.2101596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Dendritic cells (DCs) have received considerable attention as potential targets for the development of novel cancer immunotherapies. However, the clinical efficacy of DC-based vaccines remains suboptimal, largely reflecting local and systemic immunosuppression at baseline. An autologous DC-based vaccine (DCVAC) has recently been shown to improve progression-free survival and overall survival in randomized clinical trials enrolling patients with lung cancer (SLU01, NCT02470468) or ovarian carcinoma (SOV01, NCT02107937), but not metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (SP005, NCT02111577), despite a good safety profile across all cohorts. We performed biomolecular and cytofluorometric analyses on peripheral blood samples collected prior to immunotherapy from 1000 patients enrolled in these trials, with the objective of identifying immunological biomarkers that may improve the clinical management of DCVAC-treated patients. Gene signatures reflecting adaptive immunity and T cell activation were associated with favorable disease outcomes and responses to DCVAC in patients with prostate and lung cancer, but not ovarian carcinoma. By contrast, the clinical benefits of DCVAC were more pronounced among patients with ovarian carcinoma exhibiting reduced expression of T cell-associated genes, especially those linked to TH2-like signature and immunosuppressive regulatory T (TREG) cells. Clinical responses to DCVAC were accompanied by signs of antitumor immunity in the peripheral blood. Our findings suggest that circulating signatures of antitumor immunity may provide a useful tool for monitoring the potency of autologous DC-based immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Tereza Lanickova
- Sotio Biotech, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Immunology, Charles University, 2nd Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Peter Holicek
- Sotio Biotech, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Immunology, Charles University, 2nd Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ludek Sojka
- Sotio Biotech, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Immunology, Charles University, 2nd Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jana Drozenova
- Department of Pathology 3rd Faculty of Medicine, And University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jan Laco
- The Fingerland Department of Pathology, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
| | - Rudolf Horvath
- Department of Pediatric and Adult Rheumatology, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Michal Podrazil
- Sotio Biotech, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Immunology, Charles University, 2nd Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Guo Hongyan
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, Hebei Province, China
| | - Tomas Brtnicky
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Bulovka, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Michal J. Halaska
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Charles University, 3rd Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Lukas Rob
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Charles University, 3rd Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ales Ryska
- The Fingerland Department of Pathology, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Laboratory of Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Leuven Cancer Institute, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Abhishek D. Garg
- Laboratory of Cell Stress and Immunity, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - David Cibula
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jirina Bartunkova
- Sotio Biotech, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Immunology, Charles University, 2nd Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Radek Spisek
- Sotio Biotech, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Immunology, Charles University, 2nd Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jitka Fucikova
- Sotio Biotech, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Immunology, Charles University, 2nd Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wouters R, Vankerckhoven A, Verreet W, Ceusters J, Coosemans A. Do autoimmune diseases influence the onset and progression of ovarian cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022; 32:1583-1591. [PMID: 36028235 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Ovarian cancer remains the fifth leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women. The immune system influences the onset and progression of ovarian cancer. Therefore, we aimed to study the behavior of ovarian cancer in patients with a pre-existing immune dysfunction, more specifically autoimmune disease. METHODS For this systematic review we carried out a systematic search of four electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science) with the two main search terms "autoimmunity" and "ovarian cancer" up to May 10, 2020. We included 36 different autoimmune diseases in our search. From the 4799 screened records, we identified 53 relevant articles for our review, of which 48 were used in our meta-analysis. RESULTS The incidence of ovarian cancer was significantly lower in patients with multiple sclerosis (standardized incidence ratio (SIR) 0.76, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.96). There was a tendency towards a lower risk of ovarian cancer in patients with systematic lupus erythematosus (SIR 0.89, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.15) and a tendency towards a higher risk in those with type 1 diabetes mellitus (SIR 1.49, 95% CI 0.98 to 2.28); however, this was not statistically significant. No conclusions could be drawn on mortality or the influence of immunosuppressive drugs used in the treatment of autoimmune diseases and the incidence of ovarian cancer. CONCLUSIONS Our study showed a decreased incidence of ovarian cancer in patients with multiple sclerosis. However, further investigation on the role of the immune system in the development of ovarian cancer in women with autoimmune diseases remains necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxanne Wouters
- Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Oncoinvent AS, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ann Vankerckhoven
- Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Jolien Ceusters
- Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wouters R, Westrøm S, Berckmans Y, Riva M, Ceusters J, Bønsdorff TB, Vergote I, Coosemans A. Intraperitoneal alpha therapy with 224Ra-labeled microparticles combined with chemotherapy in an ovarian cancer mouse model. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:995325. [PMID: 36300186 PMCID: PMC9588927 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.995325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
A novel alpha-therapy consisting of 224Ra-labeled calcium carbonate microparticles (224Ra-CaCO3-MP) has been designed to treat micrometastatic peritoneal disease via intraperitoneal (IP) administration. This preclinical study aimed to evaluate its efficacy and tolerability when given as a single treatment or in combination with standard of care chemotherapy regimens, in a syngeneic model of ovarian cancer in immune competent mice. Female C57BL/6 mice bearing ID8-fLuc ovarian cancer were treated with 224Ra-CaCO3-MP 1 day after IP tumor cell inoculation. The activity dosages of 224Ra ranged from 14 to 39 kBq/mouse. Additionally, 224Ra-CaCO3-MP treatment was followed by either carboplatin (80 mg/kg)-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD, 1.6 mg/kg) or carboplatin (60 mg/kg)-paclitaxel (10 mg/kg) on day 14 post tumor cell inoculation. All treatments were administered via IP injections. Readouts included survival, clinical signs, and body weight development over time. There was a slight therapeutic benefit after single treatment with 224Ra-CaCO3-MP compared to the vehicle control, with median survival ratios (MSRs) ranging between 1.1 and 1.3. The sequential administration of 224Ra-CaCO3-MP with either carboplatin-paclitaxel or carboplatin-PLD indicated a synergistic effect on overall survival at certain 224Ra activities. Moreover, the combinations tested appeared well tolerated in terms of weight assessment in the first 4 weeks after treatment. Overall, this research supports the further evaluation of 224Ra-CaCO3-MP in patients with ovarian cancer. However, the most optimal chemotherapy regimen to combine with 224Ra-CaCO3-MP should be identified to fully exploit its therapeutic potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxanne Wouters
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium,Oncoinvent AS, Oslo, Norway,*Correspondence: Roxanne Wouters
| | | | - Yani Berckmans
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Matteo Riva
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium,Department of Neurosurgery, Mont-Godinne Hospital, UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium
| | | | | | - Ignace Vergote
- Division of Gynecological Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium,Department of Oncology, Gynecological Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - An Coosemans
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Caro AA, Deschoemaeker S, Allonsius L, Coosemans A, Laoui D. Dendritic Cell Vaccines: A Promising Approach in the Fight against Ovarian Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14164037. [PMID: 36011029 PMCID: PMC9406463 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14164037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Revised: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary With an overall 5-year survival of only 20% for advanced-stage ovarian cancer patients, enduring and effective therapies are a highly unmet clinical need. Current standard-of-care therapies are able to improve progression-free survival; however, patients still relapse. Moreover, immunotherapy has not resulted in clear patient benefits so far. In this situation, dendritic cell vaccines can serve as a potential therapeutic addition against ovarian cancer. In the current review, we provide an overview of the different dendritic cell subsets and the roles they play in ovarian cancer. We focus on the advancements in dendritic cell vaccination against ovarian cancer and highlight the key outcomes and pitfalls associated with currently used strategies. Finally, we address future directions that could be taken to improve the dendritic cell vaccination outcomes in ovarian cancer. Abstract Ovarian cancer (OC) is the deadliest gynecological malignancy in developed countries and is the seventh-highest cause of death in women diagnosed with cancer worldwide. Currently, several therapies are in use against OC, including debulking surgery, chemotherapy, as well as targeted therapies. Even though the current standard-of-care therapies improve survival, a vast majority of OC patients relapse. Additionally, immunotherapies have only resulted in meager patient outcomes, potentially owing to the intricate immunosuppressive nexus within the tumor microenvironment. In this scenario, dendritic cell (DC) vaccination could serve as a potential addition to the therapeutic options available against OC. In this review, we provide an overview of current therapies in OC, focusing on immunotherapies. Next, we highlight the potential of using DC vaccines in OC by underscoring the different DC subsets and their functions in OC. Finally, we provide an overview of the advances and pitfalls of current DC vaccine strategies in OC while providing future perspectives that could improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aarushi Audhut Caro
- Laboratory of Myeloid Cell Immunology, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
- Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sofie Deschoemaeker
- Laboratory of Myeloid Cell Immunology, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
- Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lize Allonsius
- Laboratory of Myeloid Cell Immunology, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
- Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
| | - An Coosemans
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Damya Laoui
- Laboratory of Myeloid Cell Immunology, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
- Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +32-2-6291969
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Che H, Jatsenko T, Lenaerts L, Dehaspe L, Vancoillie L, Brison N, Parijs I, Van Den Bogaert K, Fischerova D, Heremans R, Landolfo C, Testa AC, Vanderstichele A, Liekens L, Pomella V, Wozniak A, Dooms C, Wauters E, Hatse S, Punie K, Neven P, Wildiers H, Tejpar S, Lambrechts D, Coosemans A, Timmerman D, Vandenberghe P, Amant F, Vermeesch JR. Pan-Cancer Detection and Typing by Mining Patterns in Large Genome-Wide Cell-Free DNA Sequencing Datasets. Clin Chem 2022; 68:1164-1176. [PMID: 35769009 DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvac095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis holds great promise for non-invasive cancer screening, diagnosis, and monitoring. We hypothesized that mining the patterns of cfDNA shallow whole-genome sequencing datasets from patients with cancer could improve cancer detection. METHODS By applying unsupervised clustering and supervised machine learning on large cfDNA shallow whole-genome sequencing datasets from healthy individuals (n = 367) and patients with different hematological (n = 238) and solid malignancies (n = 320), we identified cfDNA signatures that enabled cancer detection and typing. RESULTS Unsupervised clustering revealed cancer type-specific sub-grouping. Classification using a supervised machine learning model yielded accuracies of 96% and 65% in discriminating hematological and solid malignancies from healthy controls, respectively. The accuracy of disease type prediction was 85% and 70% for the hematological and solid cancers, respectively. The potential utility of managing a specific cancer was demonstrated by classifying benign from invasive and borderline adnexal masses with an area under the curve of 0.87 and 0.74, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This approach provides a generic analytical strategy for non-invasive pan-cancer detection and cancer type prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huiwen Che
- Department of Human Genetics, Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tatjana Jatsenko
- Department of Human Genetics, Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Liesbeth Lenaerts
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynecological Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Luc Dehaspe
- Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Leen Vancoillie
- Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nathalie Brison
- Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ilse Parijs
- Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Daniela Fischerova
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ruben Heremans
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Woman and Child, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Chiara Landolfo
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Antonia Carla Testa
- Department of Woman and Child Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Roma, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Lore Liekens
- Department of Oncology, Molecular Digestive Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Valentina Pomella
- Department of Oncology, Molecular Digestive Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Agnieszka Wozniak
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Christophe Dooms
- Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery (BREATHE), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Pneumology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Els Wauters
- Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases and Thoracic Surgery (BREATHE), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Pneumology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sigrid Hatse
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kevin Punie
- Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of General Medical Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Patrick Neven
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hans Wildiers
- Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of General Medical Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sabine Tejpar
- Department of Oncology, Molecular Digestive Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Diether Lambrechts
- Department of Human Genetics, Laboratory of Translational Genetics, VIB-KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dirk Timmerman
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Woman and Child, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Peter Vandenberghe
- Department of Human Genetics, Laboratory of Genetics of Malignant Diseases, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Hematology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Frédéric Amant
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynecological Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Surgery, Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam-University of Amsterdam and the Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joris Robert Vermeesch
- Department of Human Genetics, Laboratory for Cytogenetics and Genome Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Centre for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Fucikova J, Hensler M, Kasikova L, Lanickova T, Pasulka J, Rakova J, Drozenova J, Fredriksen T, Hraska M, Hrnciarova T, Sochorova K, Rozkova D, Sojka L, Dundr P, Laco J, Brtnicky T, Praznovec I, Halaska MJ, Rob L, Ryska A, Coosemans A, Vergote I, Cibula D, Bartunkova J, Galon J, Galluzzi L, Spisek R. An autologous dendritic cell vaccine promotes anticancer immunity in ovarian cancer patients with low mutational burden and cold tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:3053-3065. [PMID: 35536547 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-4413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Revised: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The successful implementation of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the clinical management of various solid tumors has raised considerable expectations for patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC). However, EOC is poorly responsive to ICIs due to immunological features including limited tumor mutational burden (TMB) and poor lymphocytic infiltration. An autologous dendritic cell (DC)-based vaccine (DCVAC) has recently been shown to be safe and to significantly improve progression-free survival (PFS) in a randomized Phase II clinical trial enrolling patients with EOC (SOV01, NCT02107937). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We harnessed sequencing, flow cytometry, multispectral immunofluorescence microscopy, immunohistochemistry to analyze (pre-treatment) tumor and (pre-treatment and post-treatment) peripheral blood samples from 82 patients enrolled in SOV01, with the aim of identifying immunological biomarkers that would improve the clinical management of patients with EOC treated with DCVAC. RESULTS Although higher-than-median TMB and abundant CD8+ T cell infiltration were associated with superior clinical benefits in patients with EOC receiving standard-of-care chemotherapy, the same did not hold true in women receiving DCVAC. Conversely, superior clinical responses to DCVAC were observed in patients with lower-than-median TMB and scarce CD8+ T cell infiltration. Such responses were accompanied by signs of improved effector functions and tumor-specific cytotoxicity in the peripheral blood. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that while patients with highly infiltrated, "hot" EOCs benefit from chemotherapy, women with "cold" EOCs may instead require DC-based vaccination to jumpstart clinically relevant anticancer immune responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lenka Kasikova
- Deparment of Immunology, 2nd Medical School, Charles University and Sotio, Czech Republic
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ludek Sojka
- Charles University, 2nd Medical School, Praha 5, Czech Republic
| | | | - Jan Laco
- The Fingerland Department of Pathology, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
| | - Tomas Brtnicky
- Charles University, 1st Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Bulovka, Prague, Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ivan Praznovec
- Charles University, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
| | - Michael J Halaska
- 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Lukas Rob
- Charles University, 3rd Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic, Prague 10, Czech Republic
| | - Ales Ryska
- Charles University, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Radek Spisek
- Sotio; Charles University, 2nd Medical School, Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Vanderstichele A, Busschaert P, Landolfo C, Olbrecht S, Coosemans A, Froyman W, Loverix L, Concin N, Braicu EI, Wimberger P, Van Nieuwenhuysen E, Han SN, Van Gorp T, Venken T, Heremans R, Neven P, Bourne T, Van Calster B, Timmerman D, Lambrechts D, Vergote I. Nucleosome footprinting in plasma cell-free DNA for the pre-surgical diagnosis of ovarian cancer. NPJ Genom Med 2022; 7:30. [PMID: 35484288 PMCID: PMC9050708 DOI: 10.1038/s41525-022-00300-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Fragmentation patterns of plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) are known to reflect nucleosome positions of cell types contributing to cfDNA. Based on cfDNA fragmentation patterns, the deviation in nucleosome footprints was quantified between diagnosed ovarian cancer patients and healthy individuals. Multinomial modeling was subsequently applied to capture these deviations in a per sample nucleosome footprint score. Validation was performed in 271 cfDNAs pre-surgically collected from women with an adnexal mass. We confirmed that nucleosome scores were elevated in invasive carcinoma patients, but not in patients with benign or borderline disease. Combining nucleosome scores with chromosomal instability scores assessed in the same cfDNA improved prediction of malignancy. Nucleosome scores were, however, more reliable to predict non-high-grade serous ovarian tumors, which are characterized by low chromosomal instability. These data highlight that compared to chromosomal instability, nucleosome footprinting provides a complementary and more generic read-out for pre-surgical diagnosis of invasive disease in women with adnexal masses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriaan Vanderstichele
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,VIB Center for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pieter Busschaert
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,VIB Center for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium.,Laboratory for Translational Genetics, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Chiara Landolfo
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Siel Olbrecht
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,VIB Center for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Immunovar Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Wouter Froyman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Liselore Loverix
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,VIB Center for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nicole Concin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Elena Ioana Braicu
- Department of Gynecology, Campus Virchow, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Els Van Nieuwenhuysen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sileny N Han
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Toon Van Gorp
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tom Venken
- VIB Center for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium.,Laboratory for Translational Genetics, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ruben Heremans
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Patrick Neven
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tom Bourne
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ben Van Calster
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dirk Timmerman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Diether Lambrechts
- VIB Center for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium. .,Laboratory for Translational Genetics, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wouters R, Westrøm S, Vankerckhoven A, Thirion G, Ceusters J, Claes S, Schols D, Bønsdorff TB, Vergote I, Coosemans A. Effect of Particle Carriers for Intraperitoneal Drug Delivery on the Course of Ovarian Cancer and Its Immune Microenvironment in a Mouse Model. Pharmaceutics 2022; 14:pharmaceutics14040687. [PMID: 35456521 PMCID: PMC9031420 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14040687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Novel treatment strategies are needed to provide a better prognosis for ovarian cancer. For this purpose, the current study was designed to evaluate the effects of different types of particle drug carriers on tumor response and on the tumor immune microenvironment (TME) after intraperitoneal (IP) administration in a murine tumor model. Mice with ID8-fLuc ovarian cancer were injected IP with pegylated liposomes, hydroxyapatite, polystyrene, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) and calcium carbonate (CaCO3) microparticles to evaluate the effect of the candidate carriers without drugs. Our results show that several types of microparticle drug carriers caused hyperproliferation of the tumor when injected IP, as reflected in a reduced survival or an accelerated onset of ascites. Alterations of the product formulation of CaCO3 microparticles could result in less hyperproliferation. The hyperproliferation caused by CaCO3 and PLGA was largely driven by a strong innate immune suppression. A combination with chemotherapy was not able to sufficiently counteract the tumor progression caused by the drug carriers. This research points towards the importance of evaluating a drug carrier before using it in a therapeutic setting, since drug carriers themselves can detrimentally influence tumor progression and immune status of the TME. However, it remains to be determined whether the hyperproliferation in this model will be of relevance in other cancer models or in humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxanne Wouters
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; (A.V.); (G.T.); (J.C.); (A.C.)
- Oncoinvent AS, 0484 Oslo, Norway; (S.W.); (T.B.B.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Sara Westrøm
- Oncoinvent AS, 0484 Oslo, Norway; (S.W.); (T.B.B.)
| | - Ann Vankerckhoven
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; (A.V.); (G.T.); (J.C.); (A.C.)
| | - Gitte Thirion
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; (A.V.); (G.T.); (J.C.); (A.C.)
| | - Jolien Ceusters
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; (A.V.); (G.T.); (J.C.); (A.C.)
| | - Sandra Claes
- Laboratory of Virology and Chemotherapy, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Rega Institute, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; (S.C.); (D.S.)
| | - Dominique Schols
- Laboratory of Virology and Chemotherapy, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Rega Institute, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; (S.C.); (D.S.)
| | | | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium;
- Department of Oncology, Gynecological Oncology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - An Coosemans
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; (A.V.); (G.T.); (J.C.); (A.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
Non-invasive, immuno-dynamic, biomarkers positioned in cancer patient’s blood milieu with immuno-oncological applications are rare. We recently established a “first-in-class” serum functional immunodynamics status (sFIS) assay, wherein in vitro assessment of serum-induced myeloid NFkB and/or interferon (IFN) response-signaling can be performed to “mimic” in situ patient’s serum immune-biology. This modality has clear implications for anticipating patient prognosis and immunotherapy-relevant stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Sprooten
- Department of Cellular & Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Cell Stress & Immunity, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Abhishek D Garg
- Department of Cellular & Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Cell Stress & Immunity, KU Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
El Bairi K, Haynes HR, Blackley E, Fineberg S, Shear J, Turner S, de Freitas JR, Sur D, Amendola LC, Gharib M, Kallala A, Arun I, Azmoudeh-Ardalan F, Fujimoto L, Sua LF, Liu SW, Lien HC, Kirtani P, Balancin M, El Attar H, Guleria P, Yang W, Shash E, Chen IC, Bautista V, Do Prado Moura JF, Rapoport BL, Castaneda C, Spengler E, Acosta-Haab G, Frahm I, Sanchez J, Castillo M, Bouchmaa N, Md Zin RR, Shui R, Onyuma T, Yang W, Husain Z, Willard-Gallo K, Coosemans A, Perez EA, Provenzano E, Ericsson PG, Richardet E, Mehrotra R, Sarancone S, Ehinger A, Rimm DL, Bartlett JMS, Viale G, Denkert C, Hida AI, Sotiriou C, Loibl S, Hewitt SM, Badve S, Symmans WF, Kim RS, Pruneri G, Goel S, Francis PA, Inurrigarro G, Yamaguchi R, Garcia-Rivello H, Horlings H, Afqir S, Salgado R, Adams S, Kok M, Dieci MV, Michiels S, Demaria S, Loi S. The tale of TILs in breast cancer: A report from The International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group. NPJ Breast Cancer 2021; 7:150. [PMID: 34853355 PMCID: PMC8636568 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-021-00346-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The advent of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in modern oncology has significantly improved survival in several cancer settings. A subgroup of women with breast cancer (BC) has immunogenic infiltration of lymphocytes with expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). These patients may potentially benefit from ICI targeting the programmed death 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 signaling axis. The use of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) as predictive and prognostic biomarkers has been under intense examination. Emerging data suggest that TILs are associated with response to both cytotoxic treatments and immunotherapy, particularly for patients with triple-negative BC. In this review from The International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group, we discuss (a) the biological understanding of TILs, (b) their analytical and clinical validity and efforts toward the clinical utility in BC, and (c) the current status of PD-L1 and TIL testing across different continents, including experiences from low-to-middle-income countries, incorporating also the view of a patient advocate. This information will help set the stage for future approaches to optimize the understanding and clinical utilization of TIL analysis in patients with BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khalid El Bairi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mohammed VI University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed Ist University, Oujda, Morocco.
| | - Harry R Haynes
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Great Western Hospital, Swindon, UK
- Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Elizabeth Blackley
- Division of Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Susan Fineberg
- Department of Pathology, Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Jeffrey Shear
- Chief Information Officer, WISS & Company, LLP and President J. Shear Consulting, LLC-Ardsley, Ardsley, NY, USA
| | | | - Juliana Ribeiro de Freitas
- Department of Pathology and Legal Medicine, Medical School of the Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil
| | - Daniel Sur
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Medicine "I. Hatieganu", Cluj Napoca, Romania
| | | | - Masoumeh Gharib
- Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | | | - Indu Arun
- Department of Histopathology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, India
| | - Farid Azmoudeh-Ardalan
- Department of Pathology, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Luciana Fujimoto
- Pathology and Legal Medicine, Amazon Federal University, Belém, Brazil
| | - Luz F Sua
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fundacion Valle del Lili, and Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad ICESI, Cali, Colombia
| | | | - Huang-Chun Lien
- Department of Pathology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Pawan Kirtani
- Department of Histopathology, Manipal Hospitals Dwarka, New Delhi, India
| | - Marcelo Balancin
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Prerna Guleria
- Army Hospital Research and Referral, Delhi Cantt, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Emad Shash
- Breast Cancer Comprehensive Center, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - I-Chun Chen
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Veronica Bautista
- Department of Pathology, Breast Cancer Center FUCAM, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Bernardo L Rapoport
- The Medical Oncology Centre of Rosebank, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Department of Immunology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, corner Doctor Savage Road and Bophelo Road, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa
| | - Carlos Castaneda
- Department of Medical Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, 15038, Peru
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Cientifica del Sur, Lima, Peru
| | - Eunice Spengler
- Departmento de Patologia, Hospital Universitario Austral, Pilar, Argentina
| | - Gabriela Acosta-Haab
- Department of Pathology, Hospital de Oncología Maria Curie, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Isabel Frahm
- Department of Pathology, Sanatorio Mater Dei, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Joselyn Sanchez
- Department of Research, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, 15038, Peru
| | - Miluska Castillo
- Department of Research, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, 15038, Peru
| | - Najat Bouchmaa
- Institute of Biological Sciences, Mohammed VI Polytechnic University (UM6P), 43 150, Ben-Guerir, Morocco
| | - Reena R Md Zin
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, UKM Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Ruohong Shui
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | | | - Wentao Yang
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | | | - Karen Willard-Gallo
- Molecular Immunology Unit, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - An Coosemans
- Laboratory of Tumour Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Edith A Perez
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Elena Provenzano
- Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Paula Gonzalez Ericsson
- Breast Cancer Program, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Eduardo Richardet
- Clinical Oncology Unit, Instituto Oncológico Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina
| | - Ravi Mehrotra
- India Cancer Research Consortium-ICMR, Department of Health Research, New Delhi, India
| | - Sandra Sarancone
- Department of Pathology, Laboratorio QUANTUM, Rosario, Argentina
| | - Anna Ehinger
- Department of Clinical Genetics and Pathology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - David L Rimm
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - John M S Bartlett
- Diagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada
- Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Department of Pathology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IRCCS, and University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Standort Marburg and Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Akira I Hida
- Department of Pathology, Matsuyama Shimin Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Christos Sotiriou
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Stephen M Hewitt
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sunil Badve
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, USA
| | - William Fraser Symmans
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rim S Kim
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP)/NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Giancarlo Pruneri
- Department of Pathology, RCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale Tumori and University of Milan, School of Medicine, Milan, Italy
| | - Shom Goel
- Division of Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Prudence A Francis
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Medical Oncology Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Rin Yamaguchi
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Kurume University Medical Center, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Hernan Garcia-Rivello
- Servicio de Anatomía Patológica, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Hugo Horlings
- Division of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Said Afqir
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mohammed VI University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed Ist University, Oujda, Morocco
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Division of Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Sylvia Adams
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Medical School, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marleen Kok
- Divisions of Medical Oncology, Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maria Vittoria Dieci
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Stefan Michiels
- Service de Biostatistique et d'Epidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, Inserm, University Paris-Saclay, labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France
| | - Sandra Demaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sherene Loi
- Division of Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sprooten J, Vankerckhoven A, Vanmeerbeek I, Borras DM, Berckmans Y, Wouters R, Laureano RS, Baert T, Boon L, Landolfo C, Testa AC, Fischerova D, Van Holsbeke C, Bourne T, Chiappa V, Froyman W, Schols D, Agostinis P, Timmerman D, Tejpar S, Vergote I, Coosemans A, Garg AD. Peripherally-driven myeloid NFkB and IFN/ISG responses predict malignancy risk, survival, and immunotherapy regime in ovarian cancer. J Immunother Cancer 2021; 9:jitc-2021-003609. [PMID: 34795003 PMCID: PMC8603275 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-003609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Tumors can influence peripheral immune macroenvironment, thereby creating opportunities for non-invasive serum/plasma immunobiomarkers for immunostratification and immunotherapy designing. However, current approaches for immunobiomarkers’ detection are largely quantitative, which is unreliable for assessing functional peripheral immunodynamics of patients with cancer. Hence, we aimed to design a functional biomarker modality for capturing peripheral immune signaling in patients with cancer for reliable immunostratification. Methods We used a data-driven in silico framework, integrating existing tumor/blood bulk-RNAseq or single-cell (sc)RNAseq datasets of patients with cancer, to inform the design of an innovative serum-screening modality, that is, serum-functional immunodynamic status (sFIS) assay. Next, we pursued proof-of-concept analyses via multiparametric serum profiling of patients with ovarian cancer (OV) with sFIS assay combined with Luminex (cytokines/soluble immune checkpoints), CA125-antigen detection, and whole-blood immune cell counts. Here, sFIS assay’s ability to determine survival benefit or malignancy risk was validated in a discovery (n=32) and/or validation (n=699) patient cohorts. Lastly, we used an orthotopic murine metastatic OV model, with anti-OV therapy selection via in silico drug–target screening and murine serum screening via sFIS assay, to assess suitable in vivo immunotherapy options. Results In silico data-driven framework predicted that peripheral immunodynamics of patients with cancer might be best captured via analyzing myeloid nuclear factor kappa-light-chain enhancer of activated B cells (NFκB) signaling and interferon-stimulated genes' (ISG) responses. This helped in conceptualization of an ‘in sitro’ (in vitro+in situ) sFIS assay, where human myeloid cells were exposed to patients’ serum in vitro, to assess serum-induced (si)-NFκB or interferon (IFN)/ISG responses (as active signaling reporter activity) within them, thereby ‘mimicking’ patients’ in situ immunodynamic status. Multiparametric serum profiling of patients with OV established that sFIS assay can: decode peripheral immunology (by indicating higher enrichment of si-NFκB over si-IFN/ISG responses), estimate survival trends (si-NFκB or si-IFN/ISG responses associating with negative or positive prognosis, respectively), and coestimate malignancy risk (relative to benign/borderline ovarian lesions). Biologically, we documented dominance of pro-tumorigenic, myeloid si-NFκB responseHIGHsi-IFN/ISG responseLOW inflammation in periphery of patients with OV. Finally, in an orthotopic murine metastatic OV model, sFIS assay predicted the higher capacity of chemo-immunotherapy (paclitaxel–carboplatin plus anti-TNF antibody combination) in achieving a pro-immunogenic peripheral milieu (si-IFN/ISG responseHIGHsi-NFκB responseLOW), which aligned with high antitumor efficacy. Conclusions We established sFIS assay as a novel biomarker resource for serum screening in patients with OV to evaluate peripheral immunodynamics, patient survival trends and malignancy risk, and to design preclinical chemo-immunotherapy strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Sprooten
- Laboratory of Cell Stress & Immunity, Department of Cellular & Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ann Vankerckhoven
- Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Isaure Vanmeerbeek
- Laboratory of Cell Stress & Immunity, Department of Cellular & Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Daniel M Borras
- Laboratory of Cell Stress & Immunity, Department of Cellular & Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Yani Berckmans
- Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Roxanne Wouters
- Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Raquel S Laureano
- Laboratory of Cell Stress & Immunity, Department of Cellular & Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thais Baert
- Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Laboratory of Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Chiara Landolfo
- Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK.,Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonia Carla Testa
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Rome, Italy.,Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità pubblica, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Tom Bourne
- Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK
| | | | - Wouter Froyman
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dominique Schols
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Laboratory of Virology and Chemotherapy, Rega Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Patrizia Agostinis
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Cell Death Research and Therapy Laboratory, KU Leuven, Belgium.,VIB Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dirk Timmerman
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sabine Tejpar
- Laboratory for Molecular Digestive Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Laboratory of Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Abhishek D Garg
- Laboratory of Cell Stress & Immunity, Department of Cellular & Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Fucikova J, Coosemans A, Orsulic S, Cibula D, Vergote I, Galluzzi L, Spisek R. Immunological configuration of ovarian carcinoma: features and impact on disease outcome. J Immunother Cancer 2021; 9:jitc-2021-002873. [PMID: 34645669 PMCID: PMC8515436 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) is a relatively rare malignancy but is the fifth-leading cause of cancer-related death in women, largely reflecting early, prediagnosis dissemination of malignant disease to the peritoneum. At odds with other neoplasms, EOC is virtually insensitive to immune checkpoint inhibitors, correlating with a tumor microenvironment that exhibits poor infiltration by immune cells and active immunosuppression. Here, we comparatively summarize the humoral and cellular features of primary and metastatic EOC, comparatively analyze their impact on disease outcome, and propose measures to alter them in support of treatment sensitivity and superior patient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jitka Fucikova
- Sotio Biotech, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Immunology, Charles University, 2nd Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sandra Orsulic
- UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine and Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - David Cibula
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Division of Gynecological Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lorenzo Galluzzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Caryl and Israel Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Radek Spisek
- Sotio Biotech, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Immunology, Charles University, 2nd Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Olbrecht S, Busschaert P, Qian J, Vanderstichele A, Loverix L, Van Gorp T, Van Nieuwenhuysen E, Han S, Van den Broeck A, Coosemans A, Van Rompuy AS, Lambrechts D, Vergote I. High-grade serous tubo-ovarian cancer refined with single-cell RNA sequencing: specific cell subtypes influence survival and determine molecular subtype classification. Genome Med 2021; 13:111. [PMID: 34238352 PMCID: PMC8268616 DOI: 10.1186/s13073-021-00922-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-grade serous tubo-ovarian cancer (HGSTOC) is characterised by extensive inter- and intratumour heterogeneity, resulting in persistent therapeutic resistance and poor disease outcome. Molecular subtype classification based on bulk RNA sequencing facilitates a more accurate characterisation of this heterogeneity, but the lack of strong prognostic or predictive correlations with these subtypes currently hinders their clinical implementation. Stromal admixture profoundly affects the prognostic impact of the molecular subtypes, but the contribution of stromal cells to each subtype has poorly been characterised. Increasing the transcriptomic resolution of the molecular subtypes based on single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) may provide insights in the prognostic and predictive relevance of these subtypes. METHODS We performed scRNA-seq of 18,403 cells unbiasedly collected from 7 treatment-naive HGSTOC tumours. For each phenotypic cluster of tumour or stromal cells, we identified specific transcriptomic markers. We explored which phenotypic clusters correlated with overall survival based on expression of these transcriptomic markers in microarray data of 1467 tumours. By evaluating molecular subtype signatures in single cells, we assessed to what extent a phenotypic cluster of tumour or stromal cells contributes to each molecular subtype. RESULTS We identified 11 cancer and 32 stromal cell phenotypes in HGSTOC tumours. Of these, the relative frequency of myofibroblasts, TGF-β-driven cancer-associated fibroblasts, mesothelial cells and lymphatic endothelial cells predicted poor outcome, while plasma cells correlated with more favourable outcome. Moreover, we identified a clear cell-like transcriptomic signature in cancer cells, which correlated with worse overall survival in HGSTOC patients. Stromal cell phenotypes differed substantially between molecular subtypes. For instance, the mesenchymal, immunoreactive and differentiated signatures were characterised by specific fibroblast, immune cell and myofibroblast/mesothelial cell phenotypes, respectively. Cell phenotypes correlating with poor outcome were enriched in molecular subtypes associated with poor outcome. CONCLUSIONS We used scRNA-seq to identify stromal cell phenotypes predicting overall survival in HGSTOC patients. These stromal features explain the association of the molecular subtypes with outcome but also the latter's weakness of clinical implementation. Stratifying patients based on marker genes specific for these phenotypes represents a promising approach to predict prognosis or response to therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siel Olbrecht
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
- VIB Centre for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Pieter Busschaert
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Junbin Qian
- VIB Centre for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory for Translational Genetics, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Adriaan Vanderstichele
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Liselore Loverix
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- VIB Centre for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Toon Van Gorp
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Els Van Nieuwenhuysen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sileny Han
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Annick Van den Broeck
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumour Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anne-Sophie Van Rompuy
- Department of Imaging and Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Translational Cell and Tissue Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Diether Lambrechts
- VIB Centre for Cancer Biology, Leuven, Belgium.
- Laboratory for Translational Genetics, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Vanherp L, Govaerts K, Riva M, Poelmans J, Coosemans A, Lagrou K, Gsell W, Vande Velde G, Himmelreich U. CryptoCEST: A promising tool for spatially resolved identification of fungal brain lesions and their differentiation from brain tumors with MRI. Neuroimage Clin 2021; 31:102737. [PMID: 34225021 PMCID: PMC8261661 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Revised: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
The fungal disaccharide trehalose generates a concentration-dependent CEST MRI contrast. CEST MRI can detect endogenous trehalose in Cryptococcus neoformans and C. gattii cells. This enables spatially resolved identification of fungal lesions in the mouse brain. The CryptoCEST contrast can differentiate cryptococcal brain lesions from gliomas. CryptoCEST holds potential for non-invasive differential diagnosis of cryptococcomas.
Infectious brain lesions caused by the pathogenic fungi Cryptococcus neoformans and C. gattii, also referred to as cryptococcomas, could be diagnosed incorrectly as cystic brain tumors if only based on conventional magnetic resonance (MR) images. Previous MR spectroscopy (MRS) studies showed high local concentrations of the fungal disaccharide trehalose in cryptococcomas. The aim of this study was to detect and localize fungal brain lesions caused by Cryptococcus species based on Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CEST) MR imaging of endogenous trehalose, and hereby to distinguish cryptococcomas from gliomas. In phantoms, trehalose and cryptococcal cells generated a concentration-dependent CEST contrast in the 0.2 – 2 ppm chemical shift range, similar to glucose, but approximately twice as strong. In vivo single voxel MRS of a murine cryptococcoma model confirmed the presence of trehalose in cryptococcomas, but mainly for lesions that were large enough compared to the size of the MRS voxel. With CEST MRI, combining the more specific CEST signal at 0.7 ppm with the higher signal-to-noise ratio signal at 4 ppm in the CryptoCEST contrast enabled localization and distinction of cryptococcomas from the normal brain and from gliomas, even for lesions smaller than 1 mm3. Thanks to the high endogenous concentration of the fungal biomarker trehalose in cryptococcal cells, the CryptoCEST contrast allowed identification of cryptococcomas with high spatial resolution and differentiation from gliomas in mice. Furthermore, the CryptoCEST contrast was tested to follow up antifungal treatment of cryptococcomas. Translation of this non-invasive method to the clinic holds potential for improving the differential diagnosis and follow-up of cryptococcal infections in the brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liesbeth Vanherp
- Biomedical MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kristof Govaerts
- Biomedical MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Matteo Riva
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Neurosurgery, Mont-Godinne Hospital, UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - Jennifer Poelmans
- Biomedical MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - An Coosemans
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Katrien Lagrou
- Laboratory of Clinical Bacteriology and Mycology, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; National Reference Centre for Mycosis, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Willy Gsell
- Biomedical MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Greetje Vande Velde
- Biomedical MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Uwe Himmelreich
- Biomedical MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Vankerckhoven A, Baert T, Riva M, De Bruyn C, Thirion G, Vandenbrande K, Ceusters J, Vergote I, Coosemans A. Type of chemotherapy has substantial effects on the immune system in ovarian cancer. Transl Oncol 2021; 14:101076. [PMID: 33770618 PMCID: PMC8022256 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Chemotherapy induces a variety of immunological changes. Studying these effects can reveal opportunities for successful combining chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Immuno-chemotherapeutic combinations in ovarian cancer are currently not generating the anticipated positive effects. To date, only scattered and inconsistent information is available about the immune-induced changes by chemotherapy in ovarian cancer. In this study, we compared six common chemotherapeutics used in ovarian cancer patients (carboplatin, paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, gemcitabine, carboplatin-paclitaxel and carboplatin-gemcitabine) and studied their effects on the immune system in an ovarian cancer mouse model. Mice received a single chemotherapy or vehicle injection 21 days after tumor inoculation with ID8-fluc cells. One week after therapy administration, we collected peritoneal washings for flow cytometry, serum for cytokine analysis with cytometric bead array and tumor biopsies for immunohistochemistry. Carboplatin-paclitaxel showed the most favorable profile with a decrease in immunosuppressive cells in the peritoneal cavity and an increase of interferon-gamma in serum. In contrast, carboplatin-gemcitabine seemed to promote a hostile immune environment with an increase in regulatory T-cells in tumor tissue and an increase of macrophage-inflammatory-protein-1-beta in the serum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann Vankerckhoven
- Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thaïs Baert
- Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen Mitte (KEM), Essen, Germany
| | - Matteo Riva
- Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Neurosurgery, CHU UCL Namur, University Hospital of Godinne, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - Christine De Bruyn
- Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Gitte Thirion
- Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Katja Vandenbrande
- Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jolien Ceusters
- Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Laboratory of Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Belgium; Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Leuven Cancer Institute, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Riva M, Wouters R, Sterpin E, Giovannoni R, Boon L, Himmelreich U, Gsell W, Van Ranst M, Coosemans A. Radiotherapy, Temozolomide, and Antiprogrammed Cell Death Protein 1 Treatments Modulate the Immune Microenvironment in Experimental High-Grade Glioma. Neurosurgery 2021; 88:E205-E215. [PMID: 33289503 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2019] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The lack of immune synergy with conventional chemoradiation could explain the failure of checkpoint inhibitors in current clinical trials for high-grade gliomas (HGGs). OBJECTIVE To analyze the impact of radiotherapy (RT), Temozolomide (TMZ) and antiprogrammed cell death protein 1 (αPD1) (as single or combined treatments) on the immune microenvironment of experimental HGGs. METHODS Mice harboring neurosphere /CT-2A HGGs received RT (4 Gy, single dose), TMZ (50 mg/kg, 4 doses) and αPD1 (100 μg, 3 doses) as monotherapies or combinations. The influence on survival, tumor volume, and tumor-infiltrating immune cells was analyzed. RESULTS RT increased total T cells (P = .0159) and cluster of differentiation (CD)8+ T cells (P = .0078) compared to TMZ. Lymphocyte subpopulations resulting from TMZ or αPD1 treatment were comparable with those of controls. RT reduced M2 tumor-associated macrophages/microglia (P = .0019) and monocytic myeloid derived suppressor cells (mMDSCs, P = .0003) compared to controls. The effect on mMDSC was also seen following TMZ and αPD1 treatment, although less pronounced (P = .0439 and P = .0538, respectively). Combining RT with TMZ reduced CD8+ T cells (P = .0145) compared to RT alone. Adding αPD1 partially mitigated this effect as shown by the increased CD8+ T cells/Tregs ratio, even if this result failed to reach statistical significance (P = .0973). Changing the combination sequence of RT, TMZ, and αPD1 did not alter survival nor the immune effects. CONCLUSION RT, TMZ, and αPD1 modify the immune microenvironment of HGG. The combination of RT with TMZ induces a strong immune suppression which cannot be effectively counteracted by αPD1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Riva
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Godinne, UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - Roxanne Wouters
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Edmond Sterpin
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Roberto Giovannoni
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Louis Boon
- Polpharma Biologics, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Uwe Himmelreich
- Department of Imaging and Pathology and Molecular Small Animal Imaging Center (MoSAIC), Biomedical MRI, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Willy Gsell
- Department of Imaging and Pathology and Molecular Small Animal Imaging Center (MoSAIC), Biomedical MRI, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marc Van Ranst
- Rega Institute for Medical Research, Laboratory for Clinical and Epidemiological Virology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Leuven Cancer Institute, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Wouters R, Bevers S, Riva M, De Smet F, Coosemans A. Immunocompetent Mouse Models in the Search for Effective Immunotherapy in Glioblastoma. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 13:cancers13010019. [PMID: 33374542 PMCID: PMC7793150 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13010019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Revised: 12/19/2020] [Accepted: 12/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Glioblastoma (GBM) remains the most aggressive brain tumor. Treatment typically includes surgery and radio/chemotherapy, but in spite of intensive treatment, virtually all tumors recur within the time-frame of months with insufficient and unsuccessful second line options. This clinical reality is in contrast to preclinical animal experiments, which often show successful outcomes of novel immunotherapeutic approaches. This discrepancy is largely explained by the small number of animal models and their limited capacity to mimic the complexity of the human disease. Moreover, new treatment options are typically administered as single treatments in animal models, whereas patients receive them in combination with standard-of-care. In this review, we provide an overview of the existing mouse models for GBM research and how each of them mimic (parts of) the human disease spectrum. As such we provide an overview of the advantages and limitations of the currently available options for in vivo drug testing for GBM. Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive intrinsic brain tumor in adults. Despite maximal therapy consisting of surgery and radio/chemotherapy, GBM remains largely incurable with a median survival of less than 15 months. GBM has a strong immunosuppressive nature with a multitude of tumor and microenvironment (TME) derived factors that prohibit an effective immune response. To date, all clinical trials failed to provide lasting clinical efficacy, despite the relatively high success rates of preclinical studies to show effectivity of immunotherapy. Various factors may explain this discrepancy, including the inability of a single mouse model to fully recapitulate the complexity and heterogeneity of GBM. It is therefore critical to understand the features and limitations of each model, which should probably be combined to grab the full spectrum of the disease. In this review, we summarize the available knowledge concerning immune composition, stem cell characteristics and response to standard-of-care and immunotherapeutics for the most commonly available immunocompetent mouse models of GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxanne Wouters
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; (R.W.); (S.B.); (M.R.)
- Oncoinvent, A.S., 0484 Oslo, Norway
| | - Sien Bevers
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; (R.W.); (S.B.); (M.R.)
- The Laboratory for Precision Cancer Medicine, Translational Cell and Tissue Research Unit, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium;
| | - Matteo Riva
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; (R.W.); (S.B.); (M.R.)
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mont-Godinne Hospital, UCL Namur, 5530 Yvoir, Belgium
| | - Frederik De Smet
- The Laboratory for Precision Cancer Medicine, Translational Cell and Tissue Research Unit, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium;
| | - An Coosemans
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; (R.W.); (S.B.); (M.R.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Landolfo C, Achten ETL, Ceusters J, Baert T, Froyman W, Heremans R, Vanderstichele A, Thirion G, Van Hoylandt A, Claes S, Oosterlynck J, Van Rompuy AS, Schols D, Billen J, Van Calster B, Bourne T, Van Gorp T, Vergote I, Timmerman D, Coosemans A. Assessment of protein biomarkers for preoperative differential diagnosis between benign and malignant ovarian tumors. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 159:811-819. [PMID: 32994054 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.09.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the diagnostic value of tumor and immune related proteins in the discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses, and between different subgroups of tumors. METHODS In this exploratory diagnostic study, 254 patients with an adnexal mass scheduled for surgery were consecutively enrolled at the University Hospitals Leuven (128 benign, 42 borderline, 22 stage I, 55 stage II-IV, and 7 secondary metastatic tumors). The quantification of 33 serum proteins was done preoperatively, using multiplex high throughput immunoassays (Luminex) and electrochemiluminescence immuno-assay (ECLIA). We calculated univariable areas under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves (AUCs). To discriminate malignant from benign tumors, multivariable ridge logistic regression with backward elimination was performed, using bootstrapping to validate the resulting AUCs. RESULTS CA125 had the highest univariable AUC to discriminate malignant from benign tumors (0.85, 95% confidence interval 0.79-0.89). Combining CA125 with CA72.4 and HE4 increased the AUC to 0.87. For benign vs borderline tumors, CA125 had the highest univariable AUC (0.74). For borderline vs stage I malignancy, no proteins were promising. For stage I vs II-IV malignancy, CA125, HE4, CA72.4, CA15.3 and LAP had univariable AUCs ≥0.80. CONCLUSIONS The results confirm the dominant role of CA125 for identifying malignancy, and suggest that other markers (HE4, CA72.4, CA15.3 and LAP) may help to distinguish between stage I and stage II-IV malignancies. However, further research is needed, also to investigate the added value over clinical and ultrasound predictors of malignancy, focusing on the differentiation between subtypes of malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Landolfo
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, ImmunOvar Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - E T L Achten
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, ImmunOvar Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - J Ceusters
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, ImmunOvar Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - T Baert
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, ImmunOvar Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen Mitte (KEM), Essen, Germany
| | - W Froyman
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - R Heremans
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - A Vanderstichele
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - G Thirion
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, ImmunOvar Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - A Van Hoylandt
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, ImmunOvar Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - S Claes
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Laboratory of Virology and Chemotherapy (Rega Institute), Belgium
| | - J Oosterlynck
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - A S Van Rompuy
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - D Schols
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Laboratory of Virology and Chemotherapy (Rega Institute), Belgium
| | - J Billen
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - B Van Calster
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - T Bourne
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - T Van Gorp
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - I Vergote
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - D Timmerman
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - A Coosemans
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, ImmunOvar Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Van Calster B, Valentin L, Froyman W, Landolfo C, Ceusters J, Testa AC, Wynants L, Sladkevicius P, Van Holsbeke C, Domali E, Fruscio R, Epstein E, Franchi D, Kudla MJ, Chiappa V, Alcazar JL, Leone FPG, Buonomo F, Coccia ME, Guerriero S, Deo N, Jokubkiene L, Savelli L, Fischerová D, Czekierdowski A, Kaijser J, Coosemans A, Scambia G, Vergote I, Bourne T, Timmerman D. Validation of models to diagnose ovarian cancer in patients managed surgically or conservatively: multicentre cohort study. BMJ 2020; 370:m2614. [PMID: 32732303 PMCID: PMC7391073 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m2614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the performance of diagnostic prediction models for ovarian malignancy in all patients with an ovarian mass managed surgically or conservatively. DESIGN Multicentre cohort study. SETTING 36 oncology referral centres (tertiary centres with a specific gynaecological oncology unit) or other types of centre. PARTICIPANTS Consecutive adult patients presenting with an adnexal mass between January 2012 and March 2015 and managed by surgery or follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Overall and centre specific discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility of six prediction models for ovarian malignancy (risk of malignancy index (RMI), logistic regression model 2 (LR2), simple rules, simple rules risk model (SRRisk), assessment of different neoplasias in the adnexa (ADNEX) with or without CA125). ADNEX allows the risk of malignancy to be subdivided into risks of a borderline, stage I primary, stage II-IV primary, or secondary metastatic malignancy. The outcome was based on histology if patients underwent surgery, or on results of clinical and ultrasound follow-up at 12 (±2) months. Multiple imputation was used when outcome based on follow-up was uncertain. RESULTS The primary analysis included 17 centres that met strict quality criteria for surgical and follow-up data (5717 of all 8519 patients). 812 patients (14%) had a mass that was already in follow-up at study recruitment, therefore 4905 patients were included in the statistical analysis. The outcome was benign in 3441 (70%) patients and malignant in 978 (20%). Uncertain outcomes (486, 10%) were most often explained by limited follow-up information. The overall area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was highest for ADNEX with CA125 (0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.92 to 0.96), ADNEX without CA125 (0.94, 0.91 to 0.95) and SRRisk (0.94, 0.91 to 0.95), and lowest for RMI (0.89, 0.85 to 0.92). Calibration varied among centres for all models, however the ADNEX models and SRRisk were the best calibrated. Calibration of the estimated risks for the tumour subtypes was good for ADNEX irrespective of whether or not CA125 was included as a predictor. Overall clinical utility (net benefit) was highest for the ADNEX models and SRRisk, and lowest for RMI. For patients who received at least one follow-up scan (n=1958), overall area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranged from 0.76 (95% confidence interval 0.66 to 0.84) for RMI to 0.89 (0.81 to 0.94) for ADNEX with CA125. CONCLUSIONS Our study found the ADNEX models and SRRisk are the best models to distinguish between benign and malignant masses in all patients presenting with an adnexal mass, including those managed conservatively. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01698632.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Van Calster
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 Box 805, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
- EPI-Centre, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lil Valentin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Wouter Froyman
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 Box 805, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Chiara Landolfo
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 Box 805, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Jolien Ceusters
- Laboratory of Tumour Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Antonia C Testa
- Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Rome, Italy
- Department of Life Science and Public Health, Universita' Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Laure Wynants
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 Box 805, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Epidemiology, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Povilas Sladkevicius
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Ekaterini Domali
- First Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Robert Fruscio
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Milan-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Elisabeth Epstein
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Dorella Franchi
- Preventive Gynaecology Unit, Division of Gynaecology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Marek J Kudla
- Department of Perinatology and Oncological Gynaecology, School of Health Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Valentina Chiappa
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, National Cancer Institute of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Juan L Alcazar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, School of Medicine, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Francesco P G Leone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences Institute L. Sacco, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Buonomo
- Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - Maria Elisabetta Coccia
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Stefano Guerriero
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Duilio Casula, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Nandita Deo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Whipps Cross Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ligita Jokubkiene
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Luca Savelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Daniela Fischerová
- Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Artur Czekierdowski
- First Department of Gynaecological Oncology and Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | - Jeroen Kaijser
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Tumour Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Rome, Italy
- Department of Life Science and Public Health, Universita' Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory of Tumour Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tom Bourne
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 Box 805, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Dirk Timmerman
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 Box 805, 3000 Leuven, Belgium dirk.timmerman@uzleuven
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Belderbos S, González-Gómez MA, Cleeren F, Wouters J, Piñeiro Y, Deroose CM, Coosemans A, Gsell W, Bormans G, Rivas J, Himmelreich U. Simultaneous in vivo PET/MRI using fluorine-18 labeled Fe 3O 4@Al(OH) 3 nanoparticles: comparison of nanoparticle and nanoparticle-labeled stem cell distribution. EJNMMI Res 2020; 10:73. [PMID: 32607918 PMCID: PMC7326875 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-020-00655-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have shown potential for treatment of different diseases. However, their working mechanism is still unknown. To elucidate this, the non-invasive and longitudinal tracking of MSCs would be beneficial. Both iron oxide-based nanoparticles (Fe3O4 NPs) for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radiotracers for positron emission tomography (PET) have shown potential as in vivo cell imaging agents. However, they are limited by their negative contrast and lack of spatial information as well as short half-life, respectively. In this proof-of-principle study, we evaluated the potential of Fe3O4@Al(OH)3 NPs as dual PET/MRI contrast agents, as they allow stable binding of [18F]F- ions to the NPs and thus, NP visualization and quantification with both imaging modalities. RESULTS 18F-labeled Fe3O4@Al(OH)3 NPs (radiolabeled NPs) or mouse MSCs (mMSCs) labeled with these radiolabeled NPs were intravenously injected in healthy C57Bl/6 mice, and their biodistribution was studied using simultaneous PET/MRI acquisition. While liver uptake of radiolabeled NPs was seen with both PET and MRI, mMSCs uptake in the lungs could only be observed with PET. Even some initial loss of fluoride label did not impair NPs/mMSCs visualization. Furthermore, no negative effects on blood cell populations were seen after injection of either the NPs or mMSCs, indicating good biocompatibility. CONCLUSION We present the application of novel 18F-labeled Fe3O4@Al(OH)3 NPs as safe cell tracking agents for simultaneous PET/MRI. Combining both modalities allows fast and easy NP and mMSC localization and quantification using PET at early time points, while MRI provides high-resolution, anatomic background information and long-term NP follow-up, hereby overcoming limitations of the individual imaging modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Belderbos
- Biomedical MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Manuel Antonio González-Gómez
- NANOMAG Group, Department of Applied Physics, Technological Research Institute, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Frederik Cleeren
- Radiopharmaceutical Research, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jens Wouters
- Molecular Small Animal Imaging Center (MoSAIC), KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Yolanda Piñeiro
- NANOMAG Group, Department of Applied Physics, Technological Research Institute, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Christophe M Deroose
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven/UZ Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - An Coosemans
- Laboratory for Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, ImmunOvar Research Group, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Willy Gsell
- Biomedical MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Guy Bormans
- Radiopharmaceutical Research, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jose Rivas
- NANOMAG Group, Department of Applied Physics, Technological Research Institute, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Uwe Himmelreich
- Biomedical MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Coosemans A, Baert T, Ceusters J, Busschaert P, Landolfo C, Verschuere T, Van Rompuy AS, Vanderstichele A, Froyman W, Neven P, Van Calster B, Vergote I, Timmerman D. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells at diagnosis may discriminate between benign and malignant ovarian tumors. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 29:1381-1388. [PMID: 31685557 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2019] [Revised: 07/19/2019] [Accepted: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The behavior of the immune system as a driver in the progression of ovarian cancer has barely been studied. Our knowledge is mainly limited to the intra-tumoral adaptive immune system. Because of the widespread metastases of ovarian cancer, an assessment of the circulating immune system seems more accurate.To demonstrate the presence of immune cells in blood samples of patients with ovarian neoplasms. METHODS In this exploratory prospective cohort study, peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected at diagnosis from 143 women, including 62 patients with benign cysts, 13 with borderline tumor, 41 with invasive ovarian cancer, and 27 age-matched healthy controls. Immune profile analyses, based on the presence of CD4 (cluster of differentiation), CD8, natural killer cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and regulatory T cells, were performed by fluorescence activated cell sorting. RESULTS In a multivariable analysis, six immune cells (activated regulatory T cells, natural killer cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells, exhausted monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and total myeloid cells) were selected as independent predictors of malignancy, with an optimism-corrected area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.858. In contrast, a profile based on CD8 and regulatory T cells, the current standard in ovarian cancer immunology, resulted in an AUC of 0.639. CONCLUSIONS Our immune profile in blood suggests an involvement of innate immunosuppression driven by myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the development of ovarian cancer. This finding could contribute to clinical management of patients and in selection of immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- An Coosemans
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, ImmunOvar Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium .,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thaïs Baert
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, ImmunOvar Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte gGmbH, Essen, Germany
| | - Jolien Ceusters
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, ImmunOvar Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pieter Busschaert
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Chiara Landolfo
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, ImmunOvar Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, London, UK
| | - Tina Verschuere
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Adriaan Vanderstichele
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Wouter Froyman
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Development and Regeneration, Women and Child, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Patrick Neven
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ben Van Calster
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Women and Child, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, ImmunOvar Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dirk Timmerman
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Development and Regeneration, Women and Child, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Bulle A, Dekervel J, Deschuttere L, Nittner D, Libbrecht L, Janky R, Plaisance S, Topal B, Coosemans A, Lambrechts D, Van Cutsem E, Verslype C, van Pelt J. Gemcitabine Recruits M2-Type Tumor-Associated Macrophages into the Stroma of Pancreatic Cancer. Transl Oncol 2020; 13:100743. [PMID: 32145636 PMCID: PMC7058407 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2020.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2019] [Revised: 01/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a very lethal disease that can develop therapy resistance over time. The dense stroma in PDAC plays a critical role in tumor progression and resistance. How this stroma interacts with the tumor cells and how this is influenced by chemotherapy remain poorly understood. METHODS: The backbone of this study is the parallel transcriptome analysis of human tumor and mouse stroma in two molecular and clinical representative patient-derived tumor xenografts models. Mice (8 animals per group) were treated for 4 weeks with gemcitabine or control. We studied tumor growth, RNA expression in the stroma, tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) with immunofluorescence, and cytokines in the serum. RESULTS: A method for parallel transcriptome analysis was optimized. We found that the tumor (differentiation, gene expression) determines the infiltration of macrophages into the stroma. In aggressive PDAC (epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition high), we find more M2 polarized TAMs and the activation of cytokines and growth factors (TNFα, TGFβ1, and IL6). There are increased stromal glycolysis, reduced fatty acid oxidation, and reduced mitochondrial oxidation (tricarboxylic acid cycle and oxidative phosphorylation). Treatment with gemcitabine results in a shift of innate immune cells, especially additional infiltration of protumoral M2 TAMs (P < .001) and metabolic reprogramming. CONCLUSIONS: Gemcitabine treatment of PDAC xenografts stimulates a protumoral macrophage phenotype, and this, in combination with a shift of the tumor cells to a mesenchymal phenotype that we reported previously, contributes to tumor progression and therapeutic resistance. Targeting M2-polarized TAMs may benefit PDAC patients at risk to become refractory to current anticancer regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashenafi Bulle
- Laboratory of Clinical Digestive Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven & University Hospitals Leuven and Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jeroen Dekervel
- Laboratory of Clinical Digestive Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven & University Hospitals Leuven and Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lise Deschuttere
- Laboratory of Clinical Digestive Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven & University Hospitals Leuven and Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - David Nittner
- Histopathology Expertise Center, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, and Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Louis Libbrecht
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Saint-Luc, Hippokrateslaan 10, 1200 Sint-Lambrechts-Woluwe, Belgium
| | - Rekin's Janky
- VIB Nucleomics Core, VIB, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Baki Topal
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, ImmunOvar Research Group, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Diether Lambrechts
- Laboratory for Translational Genetics, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium and Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Eric Van Cutsem
- Laboratory of Clinical Digestive Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven & University Hospitals Leuven and Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Chris Verslype
- Laboratory of Clinical Digestive Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven & University Hospitals Leuven and Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jos van Pelt
- Laboratory of Clinical Digestive Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven & University Hospitals Leuven and Leuven Cancer Institute (LKI), Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Uterine cancer comprises endometrial carcinoma and the uterine sarcoma. Endometrial carcinomas are the most frequent variant and have early symptoms and a solid diagnostic work up, resulting in a rather fair prognosis. However, in case of advanced stage disease and relapse, treatment options are limited and prognosis is impaired. Uterine sarcomas are rare, often lacking symptoms and no diagnostic tool for correct pre-operative diagnosis are available. Prognosis is poor. RECENT FINDINGS Circulating biomarkers as a liquid biopsy could be beneficial as a diagnostic tool in uterine sarcomas. For both carcinomas and sarcomas, circulating biomarkers could be of use in predicting early disease recurrence. This review in endometrial carcinoma and uterine sarcoma focus on circulating biomarkers; such as proteins; circulating tumor cells; circulating tumor DNA; microRNA; and immune cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine De Bruyn
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, ImmunOvar Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Thaïs Baert
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, ImmunOvar Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen Mitte (KEM), Essen, Germany
| | - Thierry Van den Bosch
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, ImmunOvar Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, ImmunOvar Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Riva M, Wouters R, Weerasekera A, Belderbos S, Nittner D, Thal DR, Baert T, Giovannoni R, Gsell W, Himmelreich U, Van Ranst M, Coosemans A. CT-2A neurospheres-derived high-grade glioma in mice: a new model to address tumor stem cells and immunosuppression. Biol Open 2019; 8:bio.044552. [PMID: 31511246 PMCID: PMC6777368 DOI: 10.1242/bio.044552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Recently, several promising treatments for high-grade gliomas (HGGs) failed to provide significant benefit when translated from the preclinical setting to patients. Improving the animal models is fundamental to overcoming this translational gap. To address this need, we developed and comprehensively characterized a new in vivo model based on the orthotopic implantation of CT-2A cells cultured in neurospheres (NS/CT-2A). Murine CT-2A methylcholanthrene-induced HGG cells (C57BL/6 background) were cultured in monolayers (ML) or NS and orthotopically inoculated in syngeneic animals. ML/CT-2A and NS/CT-2A tumors' characterization included the analysis of tumor growth, immune microenvironment, glioma stem cells (GSCs), vascularization and metabolites. The immuno-modulating properties of NS/CT-2A and ML/CT-2A cells on splenocytes were tested in vitro. Mice harboring NS/CT-2A tumors had a shorter survival than those harboring ML/CT-2A tumors (P=0.0033). Compared to standard ML/CT-2A tumors, NS/CT-2A tumors showed more abundant GSCs (P=0.0002 and 0.0770 for Nestin and CD133, respectively) and regulatory T cells (Tregs, P=0.0074), and a strong tendency towards an increased vascularization (P=0.0503). There were no significant differences in metabolites' composition between NS/ and ML/CT-2A tumors. In vitro, NS were able to drive splenocytes towards a more immunosuppressive status by reducing CD8+ T cells (P=0.0354) and by promoting Tregs (P=0.0082), macrophages (MF, P=0.0019) and their M2 subset (P=0.0536). Compared to standard ML/CT-2A tumors, NS/CT-2A tumors show a more aggressive phenotype with increased immunosuppression and GSCs proliferation. Because of these specific features, the NS/CT-2A model represents a clinically relevant platform in the search for new HGG treatments aimed at reducing immunosuppression and eliminating GSCs. Summary: The NS/CT-2A tumor model represents a valuable research platform for the study of innovative treatments aimed at eliminating GSCs and reversing the tumor-induced immunosuppression in HGGs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Riva
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium .,Department of Neurosurgery, Erasme Hospital, Bruxelles 1070, Belgium
| | - Roxanne Wouters
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Akila Weerasekera
- Biomedical MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology and Molecular Small Animal Imaging Center (MoSAIC), KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Sarah Belderbos
- Biomedical MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology and Molecular Small Animal Imaging Center (MoSAIC), KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - David Nittner
- Center for the Biology of Disease, KU Leuven Center for Human Genetics - InfraMouse, VIB, University of Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Dietmar R Thal
- Laboratory of Neuropathology, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.,Department of Pathology, UZ-Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Thaïs Baert
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.,Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen Mitte (KEM), Essen 2910, Germany
| | - Roberto Giovannoni
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza 20900, Italy
| | - Willy Gsell
- Biomedical MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology and Molecular Small Animal Imaging Center (MoSAIC), KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Uwe Himmelreich
- Biomedical MRI, Department of Imaging and Pathology and Molecular Small Animal Imaging Center (MoSAIC), KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Marc Van Ranst
- Laboratory for Clinical and Epidemiological Virology, Rega Institute for Medical Research, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.,Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Leuven Cancer Institute, UZ Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Sprooten J, Ceusters J, Coosemans A, Agostinis P, De Vleeschouwer S, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G, Galluzzi L, Garg AD. Trial watch: dendritic cell vaccination for cancer immunotherapy. Oncoimmunology 2019; 8:e1638212. [PMID: 31646087 PMCID: PMC6791419 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2019.1638212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 06/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Dendritic- cells (DCs) have received considerable attention as potential targets for the development of anticancer vaccines. DC-based anticancer vaccination relies on patient-derived DCs pulsed with a source of tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) in the context of standardized maturation-cocktails, followed by their reinfusion. Extensive evidence has confirmed that DC-based vaccines can generate TAA-specific, cytotoxic T cells. Nonetheless, clinical efficacy of DC-based vaccines remains suboptimal, reflecting the widespread immunosuppression within tumors. Thus, clinical interest is being refocused on DC-based vaccines as combinatorial partners for T cell-targeting immunotherapies. Here, we summarize the most recent preclinical/clinical development of anticancer DC vaccination and discuss future perspectives for DC-based vaccines in immuno-oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Sprooten
- Cell Death Research & Therapy (CDRT) unit, Department of Cellular & Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jolien Ceusters
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, ImmunOvar Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, ImmunOvar Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Patrizia Agostinis
- Cell Death Research & Therapy (CDRT) unit, Department of Cellular & Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Center for Cancer Biology (CCB), VIB, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steven De Vleeschouwer
- Research Group Experimental Neurosurgery and Neuroanatomy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Neurosurgery, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Laurence Zitvogel
- Gustave Roussy Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Villejuif, France
- INSERM, Villejuif, France
- Center of Clinical Investigations in Biotherapies of Cancer (CICBT) 1428, Villejuif, France
- Université Paris Sud/Paris XI, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Guido Kroemer
- Equipe labellisée par la Ligue contre le cancer, Université de Paris, Sorbonne Université, INSERM U1138, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Paris, France
- Metabolomics and Cell Biology Platforms, Gustave Roussy Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Villejuif, France
- Pôle de Biologie, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP, Paris, France
- Suzhou Institute for Systems Medicine, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, China
- Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lorenzo Galluzzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Université de Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Abhishek D. Garg
- Cell Death Research & Therapy (CDRT) unit, Department of Cellular & Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Baert T, Vankerckhoven A, Riva M, Van Hoylandt A, Thirion G, Holger G, Mathivet T, Vergote I, Coosemans A. Myeloid Derived Suppressor Cells: Key Drivers of Immunosuppression in Ovarian Cancer. Front Immunol 2019; 10:1273. [PMID: 31214202 PMCID: PMC6558014 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2019] [Accepted: 05/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The presence of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) is associated with a longer overall survival in advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer. Despite the prognostic impact of TILs, response to checkpoint-inhibitors and antigen-specific active immunotherapy is limited in ovarian cancer. The goal of our study was to investigate the interaction between ovarian cancer and the innate and adaptive immune system in the ID8-fLuc syngeneic ovarian cancer mouse model. For the in vivo experiments C57BL/6, B6.129S7-Rag1tm1Mom/J, and B6.129P2(SJL)-Myd88tm1.1Defr/J mice were inoculated with ID8-fLuc. In vivo depletion experiments were performed using clodronate liposomes (CL), anti-CD8a, anti-GR1, anti-colony stimulating factor 1 (anti-CSF1), and TMβ1 (anti-CD122). Immune read out was performed by fluorescent activated cell sorting analysis for effector T cells, regulatory T cells, natural killer cells, B cells, macrophages, and myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC), immunohistochemistry for MDSC and tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) and immunofluorescence for M1 and M2 TAM in the vascular context. The effect of MDSC on T cell proliferation and phenotype were studied in vitro. We discovered that the absence of T and B cells did not influence tumor growth or survival of B6.129S7-Rag1tm1Mom/J mice compared to immunocompetent C57BL/6 mice. CL-induced macrophage depletion promoted tumor proliferation and shortened survival in C57BL/6 mice (p = 0.004) and in B6.129S7-Rag1tm1Mom/J mice (p = 0.0005). During CL treatment, we observed a clear increase of pro-inflammatory cytokines (p ≤ 0.02) and monocytic MDSC (p ≤ 0.01). Selective depletion of MDSC by anti-GR1 improved survival, certainly in comparison to mice treated with anti-CSF1 (p = 0.01-median survival 91 vs. 67.5 days). B6.129P2(SJL)-Myd88tm1.1Defr/J mice displayed to a longer median survival compared to C57BL/6 mice (90 vs. 76 days). MDSC activated by ID8-fLuc conditioned medium or ascites of tumor-bearing mice showed T cell suppressive functions in vitro. Based on these findings, we conclude that the adaptive immune system does not efficiently control tumor growth in the ID8-fLuc model. In addition, we discovered a prominent role for MDSC as the driver of immunosuppression in the ID8-fLuc ovarian cancer mouse model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thaïs Baert
- ImmunOvar Research Group, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Ann Vankerckhoven
- ImmunOvar Research Group, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Matteo Riva
- Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anaïs Van Hoylandt
- ImmunOvar Research Group, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gitte Thirion
- ImmunOvar Research Group, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gerhardt Holger
- Vascular Patterning Lab, Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thomas Mathivet
- Vascular Patterning Lab, Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,PARCC, HEGP Institute (team 9), INSERM U970, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Ignace Vergote
- ImmunOvar Research Group, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven (UZ Leuven), Leuven, Belgium
| | - An Coosemans
- ImmunOvar Research Group, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven (UZ Leuven), Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Coosemans A, Vankerckhoven A, Baert T, Boon L, Ruts H, Riva M, Blagden S, Delforge M, Concin N, Mirza M, Ledermann J, du Bois A, Vergote I. Combining conventional therapy with immunotherapy: A risky business? Eur J Cancer 2019; 113:41-44. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2019] [Accepted: 02/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
41
|
Landolfo C, Valentin L, Franchi D, Van Holsbeke C, Fruscio R, Froyman W, Sladkevicius P, Kaijser J, Ameye L, Bourne T, Savelli L, Coosemans A, Testa A, Timmerman D. Differences in ultrasound features of papillations in unilocular-solid adnexal cysts: a retrospective international multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018; 52:269-278. [PMID: 29119698 DOI: 10.1002/uog.18951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2017] [Revised: 09/26/2017] [Accepted: 10/25/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify ultrasound features of papillations or of the cyst wall that can discriminate between benign and malignant unilocular-solid cysts with papillations but no other solid components. METHODS From the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) database derived from seven ultrasound centers, we identified patients with an adnexal lesion described at ultrasonography as unilocular-solid with papillations but no other solid components. All patients had undergone transvaginal ultrasound between 1999 and 2007 or 2009 and 2012, by an experienced examiner following the IOTA research protocol. Information on four ultrasound features of papillations had been collected prospectively. Information on a further seven ultrasound features was collected retrospectively from electronic or paper ultrasound images of good quality. The histological diagnosis of the surgically removed adnexal lesion was considered the gold standard. RESULTS Of 204 masses included, 131 (64.2%) were benign, 42 (20.6%) were borderline tumors, 30 (14.7%) were primary invasive tumors and one (0.5%) was a metastasis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed the following ultrasound features to be associated independently with malignancy: height of the largest papillation, presence of blood flow in papillations, papillation confluence or dissemination, and shadows behind papillations. Shadows decreased the odds of malignancy, while the other features increased them. CONCLUSION We have identified ultrasound features that can help to discriminate between benign and malignant unilocular-solid cysts with papillations but no other solid components. Our results need to be confirmed in prospective studies. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Landolfo
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - L Valentin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - D Franchi
- Preventive Gynecology Unit, Division of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - C Van Holsbeke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium
| | - R Fruscio
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milan-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - W Froyman
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - P Sladkevicius
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - J Kaijser
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ikazia Hospital Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - L Ameye
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - T Bourne
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - L Savelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - A Coosemans
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, ImmunOvar Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - A Testa
- Department of Woman and Child Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - D Timmerman
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Ženka J, Caisová V, Uher O, Nedbalová P, Kvardová K, Masáková K, Krejčová G, Paďouková L, Jochmanová I, Wolf KI, Chmelař J, Kopecký J, Loumagne L, Mestadier J, D’agostino S, Rohaut A, Ruffin Y, Croize V, Lemaître O, Sidhu SS, Althammer S, Steele K, Rebelatto M, Tan T, Wiestler T, Spitzmueller A, Korn R, Schmidt G, Higgs B, Li X, Shi L, Jin X, Ranade K, Koeck S, Amann A, Gamerith G, Zwierzina M, Lorenz E, Zwierzina H, Kern J, Riva M, Baert T, Coosemans A, Giovannoni R, Radaelli E, Gsell W, Himmelreich U, Van Ranst M, Xing F, Qian W, Dong C, Xu X, Guo S, Shi Q, Quandt D, Seliger B, Plett C, Amberger DC, Rabe A, Deen D, Stankova Z, Hirn A, Vokac Y, Werner J, Krämer D, Rank A, Schmid C, Schmetzer H, Guerin M, Weiss JM, Regnier F, Renault G, Vimeux L, Peranzoni E, Feuillet V, Thoreau M, Guilbert T, Trautmann A, Bercovici N, Amberger DC, Doraneh-Gard F, Boeck CL, Plett C, Gunsilius C, Kugler C, Werner J, Schmohl J, Kraemer D, Ismann B, Rank A, Schmid C, Schmetzer HM, Markota A, Ochs C, May P, Gottschlich A, Gosálvez JS, Karches C, Wenk D, Endres S, Kobold S, Hilmenyuk T, Klar R, Jaschinski F, Gamerith G, Augustin F, Lorenz E, Manzl C, Hoflehner E, Moser P, Zelger B, Köck S, Amann A, Kern J, Schäfer G, Öfner D, Maier H, Zwierzina H, Sopper S, Prado-Garcia H, Romero-Garcia S, Sandoval-Martínez R, Puerto-Aquino A, Lopez-Gonzalez J, Rumbo-Nava U, Klar R, Hilmenyuk T, Jaschinski F, Coosemans A, Baert T, Van Hoylandt A, Busschaert P, Vergote I, Baert T, Van Hoylandt A, Busschaert P, Vergote I, Coosemans A, Laengle J, Pilatova K, Budinska E, Bencsikova B, Sefr R, Nenutil R, Brychtova V, Fedorova L, Hanakova B, Zdrazilova-Dubska L, Allen C, Ku YC, Tom W, Sun Y, Pankov A, Looney T, Hyland F, Au-Young J, Mongan A, Becker A, Tan JBL, Chen A, Lawson K, Lindsey E, Powers JP, Walters M, Schindler U, Young S, Jaen JC, Yin S, Chen Y, Gullo I, Gonçalves G, Pinto ML, Athelogou M, Almeida G, Huss R, Oliveira C, Carneiro F, Merz C, Sykora J, Hermann K, Hussong R, Richards DM, Fricke H, Hill O, Gieffers C, Pinho MP, Barbuto JAM, McArdle SE, Foulds G, Vadakekolathu JN, Abdel-Fatah TMA, Johnson C, Hood S, Moseley P, Rees RC, Chan SYT, Pockley AG, Rutella S, Geppert C, Hartmann A, Kumar KS, Gokilavani M, Wang S, Merz C, Richards DM, Sykora J, Redondo-Müller M, Heinonen K, Marschall V, Thiemann M, Fricke H, Gieffers C, Hill O, Zhang L, Mao B, Jin Y, Zhai G, Li Z, Wang Z, Qian W, An X, Qiao M, Zhang J, Shi Q, Weber J, Kluger H, Halaban R, Sznol M, Roder H, Roder J, Grigorieva J, Asmellash S, Oliveira C, Meyer K, Steingrimsson A, Blackmon S, Sullivan R, Boeck CL, Amberger DC, Doraneh-Gard F, Sutanto W, Guenther T, Schmohl J, Schuster F, Salih H, Babor F, Borkhardt A, Schmetzer H, Kim Y, Oh I, Park C, Ahn S, Na K, Song S, Choi Y, Fedorova L, Poprach A, Lakomy R, Selingerova I, Demlova R, Pilatova K, Kozakova S, Valik D, Petrakova K, Vyzula R, Zdrazilova-Dubska L, Aguilar-Cazares D, Galicia-Velasco M, Camacho-Mendoza C, Islas-Vazquez L, Chavez-Dominguez R, Gonzalez-Gonzalez C, Prado-Garcia H, Lopez-Gonzalez JS, Yang S, Moynihan KD, Noh M, Bekdemir A, Stellacci F, Irvine DJ, Volz B, Kapp K, Oswald D, Wittig B, Schmidt M, Chavez-Dominguez R, Aguilar-Cazares D, Prado-Garcia H, Islas-Vazquez L, Lopez-Gonzalez JS, Kleef R, Bohdjalian A, McKee D, Moss RW, Saeed M, Zalba S, Debets R, ten Hagen TLM, Javed S, Becher J, Koch-Nolte F, Haag F, Gordon EM, Sankhala KK, Stumpf N, Tseng W, Chawla SP, Suárez NG, Báez GB, Rodríguez MC, Pérez AG, García LC, Fernández DH, Pous JR, Ramírez BS, Jacoberger-Foissac C, Saliba H, Seguin C, Brion A, Frisch B, Fournel S, Heurtault B, Otterhaug T, Håkerud M, Nedberg A, Edwards V, Selbo P, Høgset A, Jaitly T, Dörrie J, Schaft N, Gross S, Schuler-Thurner B, Gupta S, Taher L, Schuler G, Vera J, Rataj F, Kraus F, Grassmann S, Chaloupka M, Lesch S, Heise C, Endres S, Kobold S, Cadilha BML, Dorman K, Heise C, Rataj F, Endres S, Kobold S. Abstracts from the 4th ImmunoTherapy of Cancer Conference. J Immunother Cancer 2017. [PMCID: PMC5374589 DOI: 10.1186/s40425-017-0219-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
|
43
|
Cuppens T, Annibali D, Coosemans A, Trovik J, ter Haar N, Colas E, Garcia-Jimenez A, Van de Vijver K, Kruitwagen RP, Brinkhuis M, Zikan M, Dundr P, Huvila J, Carpén O, Haybaeck J, Moinfar F, Salvesen HB, Stukan M, Mestdagh C, Zweemer RP, Massuger LF, Mallmann MR, Wardelmann E, Mints M, Verbist G, Thomas D, Gommé E, Hermans E, Moerman P, Bosse T, Amant F. Potential Targets' Analysis Reveals Dual PI3K/mTOR Pathway Inhibition as a Promising Therapeutic Strategy for Uterine Leiomyosarcomas—an ENITEC Group Initiative. Clin Cancer Res 2017; 23:1274-1285. [DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-2149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2016] [Revised: 11/03/2016] [Accepted: 11/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
44
|
Abstract
Short communication in response to the review of Turner et al. entitled “Ovarian cancer and the immune system - the role of targeted therapies” published in Gynecological Oncology. We believe systemic immune parameters might be a good alternative to tumor biopsy to gain insight in the immunological background of ovarian cancer. The immune system is an important player in ovarian cancer behaviour. Intratumoral studies of the immune system show an overwhelming immunosuppression. The immune signature in the blood can be important as a new biomarker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thaïs Baert
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, Laboratory for Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, ImmunOvar Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynaecological Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, Laboratory for Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, ImmunOvar Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Vanderstichele A, Busschaert P, Smeets D, Landolfo C, Van Nieuwenhuysen E, Leunen K, Neven P, Amant F, Mahner S, Braicu EI, Zeilinger R, Coosemans A, Timmerman D, Lambrechts D, Vergote I. Chromosomal Instability in Cell-Free DNA as a Highly Specific Biomarker for Detection of Ovarian Cancer in Women with Adnexal Masses. Clin Cancer Res 2016; 23:2223-2231. [PMID: 27852697 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-1078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2016] [Revised: 09/21/2016] [Accepted: 10/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: Chromosomal instability is a hallmark of ovarian cancer. Here, we explore copy-number alteration (CNA) profiling in cell-free DNA as a potential biomarker to detect malignancy in patients presenting with an adnexal mass.Experimental Design: We prospectively enrolled 68 patients with an adnexal mass, of which 57 were diagnosed with invasive or borderline carcinoma and 11 with benign disease. Cell-free DNA was extracted from plasma and analyzed by low-coverage whole-genome sequencing.Results: Patterns of chromosomal instability were detectable in cell-free DNA using 44 healthy individuals as a reference. Profiles were representative of those observed in matching tumor tissue and contained CNAs enriched in two large datasets of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). Quantitative measures of chromosomal instability, referred to as genome-wide z-scores, were significantly higher in patients with ovarian carcinoma than in healthy individuals or patients with benign disease. Cell-free DNA testing improved malignancy detection (AUC 0.89) over serum CA-125 (AUC 0.78) or the risk of malignancy index (RMI, AUC 0.81). AUC values of cell-free DNA testing even further increased for HGSOC patients specifically (AUC 0.94). At a specificity of 99.6%, a theoretical threshold required for ovarian cancer screening, sensitivity of cell-free DNA testing was 2- to 5-fold higher compared with CA-125 and RMI testing.Conclusions: This is the first study evaluating the potential of cell-free DNA for the diagnosis of primary ovarian cancer using chromosomal instability as a read-out. We present a promising method to increase specificity of presurgical prediction of malignancy in patients with adnexal masses. Clin Cancer Res; 23(9); 2223-31. ©2016 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriaan Vanderstichele
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Division of Gynaecological Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pieter Busschaert
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Division of Gynaecological Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dominiek Smeets
- Vesalius Research Center, VIB, Leuven, Belgium.,Laboratory for Translational Genetics, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Chiara Landolfo
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Els Van Nieuwenhuysen
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Division of Gynaecological Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karin Leunen
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Division of Gynaecological Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Patrick Neven
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Division of Gynaecological Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Frédéric Amant
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Division of Gynaecological Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sven Mahner
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, University Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UCCH), Hamburg, Germany.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Munich - LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Elena Ioana Braicu
- Department of Gynecology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité University Hospital, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Berlin, Germany
| | - Robert Zeilinger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Molecular Oncology Group, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Gynecologic Cancer Unit, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Division of Gynaecological Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dirk Timmerman
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Diether Lambrechts
- Vesalius Research Center, VIB, Leuven, Belgium. .,Laboratory for Translational Genetics, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Division of Gynaecological Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Guerriero S, Van Calster B, Somigliana E, Ajossa S, Froyman W, De Cock B, Coosemans A, Fischerová D, Van Holsbeke C, Alcazar JL, Testa AC, Valentin L, Bourne T, Timmerman D. Age-related differences in the sonographic characteristics of endometriomas. Hum Reprod 2016; 31:1723-31. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2015] [Accepted: 04/21/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
|
47
|
Baert T, Storme N, Van Nieuwenhuysen E, Uyttebroeck A, Van Damme N, Vergote I, Coosemans A. Ovarian cancer in children and adolescents: A rare disease that needs more attention. Maturitas 2016; 88:3-8. [PMID: 27105689 DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2016] [Revised: 02/28/2016] [Accepted: 03/03/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is rare in childhood. This explains why there are only scattered reports on it in the literature and why there is a lack of specific pediatric treatment. This paper gives an overview of the Belgian data from 2004 to 2013 and reviews the literature. To index ovarian masses and malignancies in children better in the future, worldwide data collection should be improved and reproducible definitions of 'childhood', 'malignancy' and 'ovarian mass' need to be adopted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Baert
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Belgium.
| | - N Storme
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - E Van Nieuwenhuysen
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Belgium
| | - A Uyttebroeck
- Department of Paediatric Haemato-oncology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - I Vergote
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Belgium
| | - A Coosemans
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Froyman W, Landolfo C, Amant F, Van den Bosch T, Vergote I, Coosemans A, Testa A, Valentin L, Bourne T, Calster BV, Timmerman D. Morcellation and risk of malignancy in presumed ovarian fibromas/fibrothecomas. Lancet Oncol 2016; 17:273-274. [PMID: 26972853 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(16)00022-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2015] [Revised: 12/15/2015] [Accepted: 01/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Wouter Froyman
- Department of Development and Regeneration and Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics and Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Chiara Landolfo
- Department of Development and Regeneration and Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Frédéric Amant
- Department of Development and Regeneration and Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics and Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Center for Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thierry Van den Bosch
- Department of Development and Regeneration and Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics and Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tienen Regional Hospital, Tienen, Belgium
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Development and Regeneration and Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics and Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Development and Regeneration and Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics and Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Antonia Testa
- Department of Oncology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Lil Valentin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Tom Bourne
- Department of Development and Regeneration and Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics and Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Ben Van Calster
- Department of Development and Regeneration and Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dirk Timmerman
- Department of Development and Regeneration and Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics and Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Coosemans A, Decoene J, Baert T, Laenen A, Kasran A, Verschuere T, Seys S, Vergote I. Immunosuppressive parameters in serum of ovarian cancer patients change during the disease course. Oncoimmunology 2015; 5:e1111505. [PMID: 27141394 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2015.1111505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2015] [Revised: 10/15/2015] [Accepted: 10/17/2015] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Neoplastic cells can escape immune control leading to cancer growth. Regulatory T cells (Treg), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) and tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) are crucial in immune escape. TAM are divided based on their immune profile, M1 are immunostimulatory while M2 are immunosuppressive. Research so far has mainly focused on the intratumoral behavior of these cells. This study, on the other hand, explored the systemic changes of the key metabolites [IL-4 (interleukin), IL-13, arginase, IL-10, VEGF-A (vascular endothelial growth factor), CCL-2 (chemokine (C-C) motif ligand 2) and TGF-β (transforming growth factor)] linked to Treg, MDSC and TAM during the course of the disease in ovarian and fallopian tube cancer patients. Serum samples were therefore analyzed at diagnosis, after (interval)-debulking surgery and after chemotherapy (paclitaxel-carboplatin). We also determined galectin-1 (gal-1), involved in angiogenesis and tumor-mediated immune evasion. We found significantly lower levels of IL-10, VEGF-A, TGF-β and arginase and higher levels of gal-1 after chemotherapy compared to diagnosis. After debulking surgery, a decrease in IL-10 was significant. Gal-1 and CCL-2 appeared independent prognostic factors for progression-free and overall survival (OS) (multivariate analysis). These results will help us in the decision making of future therapies in order to further modulate the immune system in a positive way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- An Coosemans
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, ImmunOvar Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Judit Decoene
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven , Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thaïs Baert
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, ImmunOvar Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Annouschka Laenen
- Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics Center of Leuven, KU Leuven , Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ahmad Kasran
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Laboratory of Clinical Immunology, KU Leuven , Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tina Verschuere
- Department of Neuroscience, Laboratory of Experimental Neurosurgery, KU Leuven , Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sven Seys
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Laboratory of Clinical Immunology, KU Leuven , Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, ImmunOvar Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Baert T, Verschuere T, Van Hoylandt A, Gijsbers R, Vergote I, Coosemans A. The dark side of ID8-Luc2: pitfalls for luciferase tagged murine models for ovarian cancer. J Immunother Cancer 2015; 3:57. [PMID: 26676113 PMCID: PMC4678634 DOI: 10.1186/s40425-015-0102-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2015] [Accepted: 11/09/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Reliable mouse models are key in the discovery and development of novel anticancer treatments. Non-invasive monitoring techniques such as bioluminescence imaging (BLI) are useful tools to determine tumor engraftment and evaluate tumor growth. However, the development of ascites in ovarian cancer mouse models leads to possible difficulties. Ascites can interfere with the set-up of correct end points and can interfere with the evaluation of tumor volume using BLI. We provide optimized euthanasia criteria and in vivo data underlining the pitfalls of BLI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thaïs Baert
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium ; Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tina Verschuere
- Department of Neuroscience, Laboratory of Experimental Neurosurgery, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anaïs Van Hoylandt
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rik Gijsbers
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Laboratory of Molecular Virology and Gene Therapy and Leuven Viral Vector Core, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium ; Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium ; Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|