1
|
Monjé N, Dragomir MP, Sinn BV, Hoffmann I, Makhmut A, Simon T, Kunze CA, Ihlow J, Schmitt WD, Pohl J, Piwonski I, Marchenko S, Keunecke C, Calina TG, Tiso F, Kulbe H, Kreuzinger C, Cacsire Castillo-Tong D, Sehouli J, Braicu EI, Denkert C, Darb-Esfahani S, Kübler K, Capper D, Coscia F, Morkel M, Horst D, Sers C, Taube ET. AHRR and SFRP2 in primary versus recurrent high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma and their prognostic implication. Br J Cancer 2024; 130:1249-1260. [PMID: 38361045 PMCID: PMC11014847 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02550-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2022] [Revised: 12/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to analyse transcriptomic differences between primary and recurrent high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) to identify prognostic biomarkers. METHODS We analysed 19 paired primary and recurrent HGSOC samples using targeted RNA sequencing. We selected the best candidates using in silico survival and pathway analysis and validated the biomarkers using immunohistochemistry on a cohort of 44 paired samples, an additional cohort of 504 primary HGSOCs and explored their function. RESULTS We identified 233 differential expressed genes. Twenty-three showed a significant prognostic value for PFS and OS in silico. Seven markers (AHRR, COL5A2, FABP4, HMGCS2, ITGA5, SFRP2 and WNT9B) were chosen for validation at the protein level. AHRR expression was higher in primary tumours (p < 0.0001) and correlated with better patient survival (p < 0.05). Stromal SFRP2 expression was higher in recurrent samples (p = 0.009) and protein expression in primary tumours was associated with worse patient survival (p = 0.022). In multivariate analysis, tumour AHRR and SFRP2 remained independent prognostic markers. In vitro studies supported the anti-tumorigenic role of AHRR and the oncogenic function of SFRP2. CONCLUSIONS Our results underline the relevance of AHRR and SFRP2 proteins in aryl-hydrocarbon receptor and Wnt-signalling, respectively, and might lead to establishing them as biomarkers in HGSOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nanna Monjé
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mihnea P Dragomir
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Bruno V Sinn
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Inga Hoffmann
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anuar Makhmut
- Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Spatial Proteomics Group, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tincy Simon
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Catarina A Kunze
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jana Ihlow
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Wolfgang D Schmitt
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jonathan Pohl
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Iris Piwonski
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sofya Marchenko
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carlotta Keunecke
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department for Gynecology with the Center for Oncologic Surgery Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Francesca Tiso
- Center of Functional Genomics, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hagen Kulbe
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department for Gynecology with the Center for Oncologic Surgery Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Caroline Kreuzinger
- Translational Gynecology Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Dan Cacsire Castillo-Tong
- Translational Gynecology Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department for Gynecology with the Center for Oncologic Surgery Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Elena I Braicu
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department for Gynecology with the Center for Oncologic Surgery Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Gießen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Silvia Darb-Esfahani
- Institute of Pathology, Berlin-Spandau, Stadtrandstraße 555, 13589, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kirsten Kübler
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Center of Functional Genomics, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany
- Cancer Program, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School Teaching Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - David Capper
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neuropathology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Fabian Coscia
- Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Spatial Proteomics Group, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus Morkel
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - David Horst
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Christine Sers
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Eliane T Taube
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Torres-Esquius S, Llop-Guevara A, Gutiérrez-Enríquez S, Romey M, Teulé À, Llort G, Herrero A, Sánchez-Henarejos P, Vallmajó A, González-Santiago S, Chirivella I, Cano JM, Graña B, Simonetti S, Díaz de Corcuera I, Ramon Y Cajal T, Sanz J, Serrano S, Otero A, Churruca C, Sánchez-Heras AB, Servitja S, Guillén-Ponce C, Brunet J, Denkert C, Serra V, Balmaña J. Prevalence of Homologous Recombination Deficiency Among Patients With Germline RAD51C/D Breast or Ovarian Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e247811. [PMID: 38648056 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.7811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance RAD51C and RAD51D are involved in DNA repair by homologous recombination. Germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in these genes are associated with an increased risk of ovarian and breast cancer. Understanding the homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status of tumors from patients with germline PVs in RAD51C/D could guide therapeutic decision-making and improve survival. Objective To characterize the clinical and tumor characteristics of germline RAD51C/D PV carriers, including the evaluation of HRD status. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study included 91 index patients plus 90 relatives carrying germline RAD51C/D PV (n = 181) in Spanish hospitals from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2021. Genomic and functional HRD biomarkers were assessed in untreated breast and ovarian tumor samples (n = 45) from June 2022 to February 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures Clinical and pathologic characteristics were assessed using descriptive statistics. Genomic HRD by genomic instability scores, functional HRD by RAD51, and gene-specific loss of heterozygosity were analyzed. Associations between HRD status and tumor subtype, age at diagnosis, and gene-specific loss of heterozygosity in RAD51C/D were investigated using logistic regression or the t test. Results A total of 9507 index patients were reviewed, and 91 patients (1.0%) were found to carry a PV in RAD51C/D; 90 family members with a germline PV in RAD51C/D were also included. A total of 157 of carriers (86.7%) were women and 181 (55.8%) had received a diagnosis of cancer, mainly breast cancer or ovarian cancer. The most prevalent PVs were c.1026+5_1026+7del (11 of 56 [19.6%]) and c.709C>T (9 of 56 [16.1%]) in RAD51C and c.694C>T (20 of 35 [57.1%]) in RAD51D. In untreated breast cancer and ovarian cancer, the prevalence of functional and genomic HRD was 55.2% (16 of 29) and 61.1% (11 of 18) for RAD51C, respectively, and 66.7% (6 of 9) and 90.0% (9 of 10) for RAD51D. The concordance between HRD biomarkers was 91%. Tumors with the same PV displayed contrasting HRD status, and age at diagnosis did not correlate with the occurrence of HRD. All breast cancers retaining the wild-type allele were estrogen receptor positive and lacked HRD. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of germline RAD51C/D breast cancer and ovarian cancer, less than 70% of tumors displayed functional HRD, and half of those that did not display HRD were explained by retention of the wild-type allele, which was more frequent among estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers. Understanding which tumors are associated with RAD51C/D and HRD is key to identify patients who can benefit from targeted therapies, such as PARP (poly [adenosine diphosphate-ribose] polymerase) inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Torres-Esquius
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alba Llop-Guevara
- Experimental Therapeutics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
- Translational Medicine, DNA Damage Response Department, AstraZeneca, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Marcel Romey
- Institute of Pathology, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Àlex Teulé
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Gemma Llort
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Spain
| | - Ana Herrero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Miguel Servet de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | - Anna Vallmajó
- Genetic Counseling Unit, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, Lleida, Spain
| | | | - Isabel Chirivella
- Cancer Genetic Counseling, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Juana Maria Cano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, Spain
| | - Begoña Graña
- Department of Medical Oncology, Xerencia de Xestión Integrada de A Coruña, Coruña, Spain
| | - Sara Simonetti
- Molecular Oncology Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Teresa Ramon Y Cajal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Judit Sanz
- Unidad de Cáncer Familiar y Hereditario, Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa, Manresa, Spain
| | - Sara Serrano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology of Southern Catalonia (IOCS), Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, Reus, Spain
| | - Andrea Otero
- Institute of Oncology and Molecular Medicine of Asturias (IMOMA) S. A., Oviedo, Spain
| | - Cristina Churruca
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián, Gipuzkoa, Spain
| | - Ana Beatriz Sánchez-Heras
- Cancer Genetic Counselling Unit, Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Elche, Spain
| | - Sonia Servitja
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital del Mar-CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carmen Guillén-Ponce
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain
| | - Joan Brunet
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Girona, Spain
- Precision Oncology Group (OncoGIR-Pro), Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Violeta Serra
- Experimental Therapeutics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Judith Balmaña
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Krug D, Vladimirova V, Untch M, Kühn T, Schneeweiss A, Denkert C, Ataseven B, Solbach C, Gerber B, Tesch H, Golatta M, Seiler S, Heil J, Nekljudova V, Holtschmidt J, Loibl S. Breast-conserving surgery is not associated with increased local recurrence in patients with early-stage node-negative triple-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast 2024; 74:103701. [PMID: 38422624 PMCID: PMC10910157 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Revised: 02/10/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is routinely used for patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Upfront breast-conserving therapy (BCT) consisting of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) has been shown to be associated with improved outcome in patients with early TNBC as compared to mastectomy. METHODS We identified 2632 patients with early TNBC from the German Breast Group meta-database. Patients with cT1-2 cN0 and ypN0, available surgery and follow-up data were enrolled. Data of 1074 patients from 8 prospective NACT trials were available. Endpoints of interest were locoregional recurrence as first site of relapse (LRR), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). We performed univariate and multivariate Fine-Gray analysis and Cox regression models. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 64 months, there were 94 (8.8%) locoregional events as first site of relapse. Absence of pathologic complete response (pCR) was associated with increased LRR upon uni- and multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.28; p < 0.001 and HR = 2.22; p = 0.001). Type of surgery was not associated with LRR. Patients in the BCS-group had better DFS and OS (DFS: HR = 0.47; p < 0.001 and OS: HR = 0.40; p < 0.001). BCS was associated with improved DFS and OS upon multivariate analysis (DFS: HR = 0.51; p < 0.001; and OS HR = 0.43; p < 0.001), whereas absence of pCR was associated with worse DFS and OS (DFS: HR = 2.43; p < 0.001; and OS: HR = 3.15; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In this retrospective analysis of patients with early stage node-negative TNBC treated with NACT, BCS was not associated with an increased risk of LRR but with superior DFS and OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Krug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
| | | | | | - Thorsten Kühn
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Department of Gynecology and Obstectrics, Die Filderklinik, Filderstadt, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - Beyhan Ataseven
- Department of Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology and Obstetrics, Bielefeld University, Medical School and University Medical Center OWL, Klinikum Lippe, Detmold, Germany
| | - Christine Solbach
- Goethe University Frankfurt, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Center for Hematology and Oncology Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Michael Golatta
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Brustzentrum Heidelberg Klinik St. Elisabeth, Max-Reger-Straße 5-7, 69121 Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Jörg Heil
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Brustzentrum Heidelberg Klinik St. Elisabeth, Max-Reger-Straße 5-7, 69121 Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Center for Hematology and Oncology Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Grass A, Kasajima A, Foersch S, Kriegsmann M, Brobeil A, Schmitt M, Wagner D, Poppinga J, Wiese D, Maurer E, Kirschbaum A, Muley T, Winter H, Rinke A, Gress TM, Kremer M, Evert M, Märkl B, Quaas A, Eckstein M, Tschurtschenthaler M, Klöppel G, Denkert C, Bartsch DK, Jesinghaus M. PITX2 as a Sensitive and Specific Marker of Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors: Results from a Cohort of 1157 Primary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. Mod Pathol 2024; 37:100442. [PMID: 38309431 DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/05/2024]
Abstract
As neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) often present as metastatic lesions, immunohistochemical assignment to a site of origin is one of the most important tasks in their pathologic assessment. Because a fraction of NETs eludes the typical expression profiles of their primary localization, additional sensitive and specific markers are required to improve diagnostic certainty. We investigated the expression of the transcription factor Pituitary Homeobox 2 (PITX2) in a large-scale cohort of 909 NET and 248 neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) according to the immunoreactive score (IRS) and correlated PITX2 expression groups with general tumor groups and primary localization. PITX2 expression (all expression groups) was highly sensitive (98.1%) for midgut-derived NET, but not perfectly specific, as non-midgut NET (especially pulmonary/duodenal) were quite frequently weak or moderately positive. The specificity rose to 99.5% for a midgut origin of NET if only a strong PITX2 expression was considered, which was found in only 0.5% (one pancreatic/one pulmonary) of non-midgut NET. In metastases of midgut-derived NET, PITX2 was expressed in all cases (87.5% strong, 12.5% moderate), whereas CDX2 was negative or only weakly expressed in 31.3% of the metastases. In NEC, a fraction of cases (14%) showed a weak or moderate PITX2 expression, which was not associated with a specific tumor localization. Our study independently validates PITX2 as a very sensitive and specific immunohistochemical marker of midgut-derived NET in a very large collective of neuroendocrine neoplasms. Therefore, our data argue toward implementation into diagnostic panels applied for NET as a firstline midgut marker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert Grass
- Department of Pathology, Phillips University Marburg und University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Atsuko Kasajima
- Department of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Mark Kriegsmann
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander Brobeil
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maxime Schmitt
- Department of Pathology, Phillips University Marburg und University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Wagner
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Jelte Poppinga
- Department of Surgery, Phillips University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Dominik Wiese
- Department of Surgery, Phillips University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Elisabeth Maurer
- Department of Surgery, Phillips University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Kirschbaum
- Department of Surgery, Phillips University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Muley
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Heidelberg, Germany; Translational Research Unit, Thoraxklinik at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hauke Winter
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Heidelberg, Germany; Translational Research Unit, Thoraxklinik at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxklinik at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anja Rinke
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Infectious Diseases, Phillips University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Thomas M Gress
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Infectious Diseases, Phillips University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Markus Kremer
- Institute of Pathology, Städtisches Klinikum München, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Evert
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Bruno Märkl
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Quaas
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Markus Eckstein
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus Tschurtschenthaler
- Institute for Translational Cancer Research, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Günter Klöppel
- Department of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Department of Pathology, Phillips University Marburg und University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Detlef K Bartsch
- Department of Surgery, Phillips University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Moritz Jesinghaus
- Department of Pathology, Phillips University Marburg und University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Romey M, Rodepeter F, Hattesohl A, Kaiser K, Teply-Szymanski J, Heitz F, Staebler A, Serra V, Grass A, Marmé F, Timms KM, Harter P, Llop-Guevara A, Kommoss S, Boekhoff J, Denkert C. Systematic Analysis of Homologous Recombination Deficiency Testing in Ovarian Cancer-Development of Recommendations for Optimal Assay Performance. Mod Pathol 2024; 37:100445. [PMID: 38341130 DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) assays are an important element of personalized oncology in ovarian carcinomas, but the optimal tissue requirements for these complex molecular assays remain unclear. As a result, a considerable percentage of assays are not successful, leading to suboptimal diagnoses for these patients. In this study, we have systematically analyzed tumor and tissue parameters for HRD analysis in a large cohort of real-world cancer samples. The aim of this study is to give recommendations for pathologists and gynecologic oncologists for selection of tissue samples to maximize the success rate of HRD analyses. Tumor samples from 2702 patients were sent to the Institute of Pathology of the Philipps-University Marburg between October 2020 and September 2022, of which 2654 were analyzed using the Myriad MyChoice HRD+ CDx assay. A total of 2396 of 2654 samples (90.3%) were successfully tested, of which 984 of 2396 (41.1%) were HRD positive and 1412 (58.9%) were HRD negative. Three hundred sixty-three of 2396 samples (15.2%) were BRCA1/2-mutated; 27 samples had a BRCA1/2 mutation and a genomic instability score (GIS) < 42. Twenty-two samples (0.9%) failed GIS measurement but displayed a BRCA1/2 mutation. BRCA1/2-mutated samples showed significantly (P < .0001) higher GIS values than those with a wild-type BRCA1/2 status. Tumor cell content, tumor area, and histology significantly (P < .0001) affected the probability of successfully analyzing a sample. Based on a systematic analysis of tumor cell content and tumor area, we recommend selecting patient high-grade serous ovarian cancer samples that display a tumor cell content ≥30% and a tumor area ≥0.5 cm2 (based on their hematoxylin and eosin) for HRD testing to allow for optimal chances of a successful analysis and conclusive results. Considering histologic and sample conditions, success rates of up to 98% can be achieved. Our comprehensive evaluation contributes to further standardization of recommendations on HRD testing in ovarian cancer, which will have a large impact on personalized therapeutic strategies in this highly aggressive tumor type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcel Romey
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg University Hospital, and University Cancer Center Frankfurt-Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Fiona Rodepeter
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg University Hospital, and University Cancer Center Frankfurt-Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Akira Hattesohl
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg University Hospital, and University Cancer Center Frankfurt-Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | | | - Julia Teply-Szymanski
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg University Hospital, and University Cancer Center Frankfurt-Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Florian Heitz
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany; Department of Gynecology with the Centre of Oncologic Surgery Charite Campus, Virchow Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Annette Staebler
- Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, Tübingen University Hospital, Tubingen, Germany
| | - Violeta Serra
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Albert Grass
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg University Hospital, and University Cancer Center Frankfurt-Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Frederik Marmé
- Medical Faculty Mannheim, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Heidelberg University, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | - Philipp Harter
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Stefan Kommoss
- Department of Women's Health, Tübingen University Hospital, Tubingen, Germany; Clinic for Gynecology, Diakonie-Klinikum Schwäbisch Hall, Schwabisch Hall, Germany
| | - Jelena Boekhoff
- Institute of Gynecology, Philipps-University Marburg and Marburg University Hospital, Marburg, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg University Hospital, and University Cancer Center Frankfurt-Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rezqallah A, Torres-Esquius S, Llop-Guevara A, Cruellas M, Martinez MT, Romey M, Denkert C, Serra V, Chirivella I, Balmaña J. Two Germline Pathogenic Variants in Cancer Susceptibility Genes and Their Null Implication in Breast Cancer Pathogenesis: The Importance of Tumoral Homologous Recombination Deficiency Testing. JCO Precis Oncol 2024; 8:e2300446. [PMID: 38513169 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Revised: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Homologous recombination proficiency in patients with breast cancer despite germline PALB2/RAD51C pathogenic variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandra Rezqallah
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sara Torres-Esquius
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alba Llop-Guevara
- Experimental Therapeutics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mara Cruellas
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - María T Martinez
- Medical Oncology Department, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico de València, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Marcel Romey
- Institute of Pathology, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Violeta Serra
- Experimental Therapeutics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Isabel Chirivella
- Medical Oncology Department, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clínico de València, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Judith Balmaña
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jahangir CA, Page DB, Broeckx G, Gonzalez CA, Burke C, Murphy C, Reis-Filho JS, Ly A, Harms PW, Gupta RR, Vieth M, Hida AI, Kahila M, Kos Z, van Diest PJ, Verbandt S, Thagaard J, Khiroya R, Abduljabbar K, Acosta Haab G, Acs B, Adams S, Almeida JS, Alvarado-Cabrero I, Azmoudeh-Ardalan F, Badve S, Baharun NB, Bellolio ER, Bheemaraju V, Blenman KR, Botinelly Mendonça Fujimoto L, Burgues O, Chardas A, Cheang MCU, Ciompi F, Cooper LA, Coosemans A, Corredor G, Dantas Portela FL, Deman F, Demaria S, Dudgeon SN, Elghazawy M, Fernandez-Martín C, Fineberg S, Fox SB, Giltnane JM, Gnjatic S, Gonzalez-Ericsson PI, Grigoriadis A, Halama N, Hanna MG, Harbhajanka A, Hart SN, Hartman J, Hewitt S, Horlings HM, Husain Z, Irshad S, Janssen EA, Kataoka TR, Kawaguchi K, Khramtsov AI, Kiraz U, Kirtani P, Kodach LL, Korski K, Akturk G, Scott E, Kovács A, Laenkholm AV, Lang-Schwarz C, Larsimont D, Lennerz JK, Lerousseau M, Li X, Madabhushi A, Maley SK, Manur Narasimhamurthy V, Marks DK, McDonald ES, Mehrotra R, Michiels S, Kharidehal D, Minhas FUAA, Mittal S, Moore DA, Mushtaq S, Nighat H, Papathomas T, Penault-Llorca F, Perera RD, Pinard CJ, Pinto-Cardenas JC, Pruneri G, Pusztai L, Rajpoot NM, Rapoport BL, Rau TT, Ribeiro JM, Rimm D, Vincent-Salomon A, Saltz J, Sayed S, Hytopoulos E, Mahon S, Siziopikou KP, Sotiriou C, Stenzinger A, Sughayer MA, Sur D, Symmans F, Tanaka S, Taxter T, Tejpar S, Teuwen J, Thompson EA, Tramm T, Tran WT, van der Laak J, Verghese GE, Viale G, Wahab N, Walter T, Waumans Y, Wen HY, Yang W, Yuan Y, Bartlett J, Loibl S, Denkert C, Savas P, Loi S, Specht Stovgaard E, Salgado R, Gallagher WM, Rahman A. Image-based multiplex immune profiling of cancer tissues: translational implications. A report of the International Immuno-oncology Biomarker Working Group on Breast Cancer. J Pathol 2024; 262:271-288. [PMID: 38230434 DOI: 10.1002/path.6238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
Recent advances in the field of immuno-oncology have brought transformative changes in the management of cancer patients. The immune profile of tumours has been found to have key value in predicting disease prognosis and treatment response in various cancers. Multiplex immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence have emerged as potent tools for the simultaneous detection of multiple protein biomarkers in a single tissue section, thereby expanding opportunities for molecular and immune profiling while preserving tissue samples. By establishing the phenotype of individual tumour cells when distributed within a mixed cell population, the identification of clinically relevant biomarkers with high-throughput multiplex immunophenotyping of tumour samples has great potential to guide appropriate treatment choices. Moreover, the emergence of novel multi-marker imaging approaches can now provide unprecedented insights into the tumour microenvironment, including the potential interplay between various cell types. However, there are significant challenges to widespread integration of these technologies in daily research and clinical practice. This review addresses the challenges and potential solutions within a structured framework of action from a regulatory and clinical trial perspective. New developments within the field of immunophenotyping using multiplexed tissue imaging platforms and associated digital pathology are also described, with a specific focus on translational implications across different subtypes of cancer. © 2024 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chowdhury Arif Jahangir
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - David B Page
- Earle A Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Glenn Broeckx
- Department of Pathology PA2, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
- Centre for Oncological Research (CORE), MIPPRO, Faculty of Medicine, Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Claudia A Gonzalez
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Caoimbhe Burke
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Clodagh Murphy
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jorge S Reis-Filho
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amy Ly
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Paul W Harms
- Departments of Pathology and Dermatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Rajarsi R Gupta
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Michael Vieth
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Akira I Hida
- Department of Pathology, Matsuyama Shimin Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Mohamed Kahila
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Zuzana Kos
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sara Verbandt
- Digestive Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jeppe Thagaard
- Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
- Visiopharm A/S, Hørsholm, Denmark
| | - Reena Khiroya
- Department of Cellular Pathology, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Khalid Abduljabbar
- Centre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Balazs Acs
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sylvia Adams
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Manhattan, NY, USA
| | - Jonas S Almeida
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (DCEG), National Cancer Institute (NCI), Rockville, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Sunil Badve
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Enrique R Bellolio
- Departamento de Anatomía Patológica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile
| | | | - Kim Rm Blenman
- Department of Internal Medicine Section of Medical Oncology and Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Computer Science, Yale School of Engineering and Applied Science, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Octavio Burgues
- Pathology Department, Hospital Cliníco Universitario de Valencia/Incliva, Valencia, Spain
| | - Alexandros Chardas
- Department of Pathobiology & Population Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, London, UK
| | - Maggie Chon U Cheang
- Head of Integrative Genomics Analysis in Clinical Trials, ICR-CTSU, Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Francesco Ciompi
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lee Ad Cooper
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Germán Corredor
- Biomedical Engineering Department, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Frederik Deman
- Department of Pathology PA2, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Sandra Demaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pathology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sarah N Dudgeon
- Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Mahmoud Elghazawy
- University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
- Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Claudio Fernandez-Martín
- Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Tecnología Centrada en el Ser Humano, HUMAN-tech, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain
| | - Susan Fineberg
- Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Stephen B Fox
- Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Sacha Gnjatic
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Medicine Hem/Onc, and Pathology, Tisch Cancer Institute - Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Anita Grigoriadis
- Cancer Bioinformatics, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Niels Halama
- Department of Translational Immunotherapy, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Steven N Hart
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Johan Hartman
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Stephen Hewitt
- Laboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Hugo M Horlings
- Division of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sheeba Irshad
- King's College London & Guys & St Thomas NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Emiel Am Janssen
- Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Chemistry, Bioscience and Environmental Technology, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | | | - Kosuke Kawaguchi
- Department of Breast Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Andrey I Khramtsov
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Umay Kiraz
- Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Chemistry, Bioscience and Environmental Technology, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Pawan Kirtani
- Histopathology, Aakash Healthcare Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Liudmila L Kodach
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Konstanty Korski
- Data, Analytics and Imaging, Product Development, F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Guray Akturk
- Translational Molecular Biomarkers, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA
| | - Ely Scott
- Translational Medicine, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Anikó Kovács
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anne-Vibeke Laenkholm
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
- Department of Surgical Pathology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Corinna Lang-Schwarz
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Denis Larsimont
- Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jochen K Lennerz
- Center for Integrated Diagnostics, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marvin Lerousseau
- Centre for Computational Biology (CBIO), Mines Paris, PSL University, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France
- INSERM U900, Paris, France
| | - Xiaoxian Li
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Anant Madabhushi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Biomedical Informatics, Pathology, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sai K Maley
- NRG Oncology/NSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Douglas K Marks
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth S McDonald
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Group, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ravi Mehrotra
- Indian Cancer Genomic Atlas, Pune, India
- Centre for Health, Innovation and Policy Foundation, Noida, India
| | - Stefan Michiels
- Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, Inserm, University Paris-Saclay, Ligue Contre le Cancer labeled Team, Villejuif, France
| | - Durga Kharidehal
- Department of Pathology, Narayana Medical College and Hospital, Nellore, India
| | - Fayyaz Ul Amir Afsar Minhas
- Tissue Image Analytics Centre, Warwick Cancer Research Centre, PathLAKE Consortium, Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Shachi Mittal
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - David A Moore
- CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, UCL and Cellular Pathology Department, UCLH, London, UK
| | - Shamim Mushtaq
- Department of Biochemistry, Ziauddin University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Hussain Nighat
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, India
| | - Thomas Papathomas
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Drammen Sykehus, Vestre Viken HF, Drammen, Norway
| | - Frederique Penault-Llorca
- Service de Pathologie et Biopathologie, Centre Jean PERRIN, INSERM U1240 Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies Théranostiques (IMoST), Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Rashindrie D Perera
- School of Electrical, Mechanical and Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christopher J Pinard
- Radiogenomics Laboratory, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Lakeshore Animal Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
- Centre for Advancing Responsible and Ethical Artificial Intelligence (CARE-AI), University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Giancarlo Pruneri
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Bernardo Leon Rapoport
- The Medical Oncology Centre of Rosebank, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Department of Immunology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Tilman T Rau
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Düsseldorf and Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - David Rimm
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Anne Vincent-Salomon
- Department of Diagnostic and Theranostic Medicine, Institut Curie, University Paris-Sciences et Lettres, Paris, France
| | - Joel Saltz
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shahin Sayed
- Department of Pathology, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Evangelos Hytopoulos
- Department of Pathology, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya
- iRhythm Technologies Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sarah Mahon
- Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Kalliopi P Siziopikou
- Department of Pathology, Section of Breast Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Christos Sotiriou
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory J.-C. Heuson, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Albrecht Stenzinger
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Centers for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Daniel Sur
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Iuliu Hatieganu", Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Fraser Symmans
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Sabine Tejpar
- Digestive Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jonas Teuwen
- AI for Oncology Lab, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Trine Tramm
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - William T Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jeroen van der Laak
- Head of Integrative Genomics Analysis in Clinical Trials, ICR-CTSU, Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Gregory E Verghese
- Cancer Bioinformatics, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Department of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology & University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Noorul Wahab
- Tissue Image Analytics Centre, Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Thomas Walter
- Centre for Computational Biology (CBIO), Mines Paris, PSL University, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France
- INSERM U900, Paris, France
| | | | - Hannah Y Wen
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wentao Yang
- Fudan Medical University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Yinyin Yuan
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Sibylle Loibl
- Department of Medicine and Research, German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Peter Savas
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sherene Loi
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Roberto Salgado
- Department of Pathology PA2, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - William M Gallagher
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Arman Rahman
- UCD School of Medicine, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Krug D, Banys-Paluchowski M, Brucker SY, Denkert C, Ditsch N, Fasching PA, Haidinger R, Harbeck N, Heil J, Huober J, Jackisch C, Janni W, Kolberg HC, Loibl S, Lüftner D, van Mackelenbergh M, Radosa JC, Reimer T, Welslau M, Würstlein R, Untch M, Budach W. Radiotherapy statements of the 18th St. Gallen International Breast Cancer Consensus Conference-a German expert perspective. Strahlenther Onkol 2024:10.1007/s00066-024-02209-7. [PMID: 38393398 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02209-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To summarize the radiotherapy-relevant statements of the 18th St. Gallen Breast Cancer Consensus Conference and interpret the findings in light of German guideline recommendations. METHODS Statements and voting results from the 18th St. Gallen International Breast Cancer Consensus Conference were collected and analyzed according to their relevance for the radiation oncology community. The voting results were discussed in two hybrid meetings among the authors of this manuscript on March 18 and 19, 2023, in light of the German S3 guideline and the 2023 version of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) guidelines. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION There was a high level of agreement between the radiotherapy-related statements of the 18th St. Gallen International Breast Cancer Consensus Conference and the German S3 and AGO guidelines. Discrepancies include the impact of number of lymph node metastases for the indication for postmastectomy radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, Haus L, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Brustzentrum, Campus Lübeck, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | | | - Carsten Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Brustzentrum, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Frauenklinik des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Frauenklinik, LMU Klinikum München, Munich, Germany
| | - Jörg Heil
- Brustzentrum Heidelberg, Klinik St. Elisabeth, Heidelberg, Germany
- Medizinische Fakultät, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- Brustzentrum, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana-Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Offenbach, Germany
| | | | | | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group (GBG), Neu-Isenburg, Germany
- Centrum für Hämatologie und Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Immanuel Klinik Märkische Schweiz, Buckow, Germany
- Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg, Rüdersdorf/Berlin, Germany
| | - Marion van Mackelenbergh
- Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Campus Kiel, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Julia C Radosa
- Klinik für Gynäkologie, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum Südstadt Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Manfred Welslau
- Onkologie Aschaffenburg, Hämato-Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Klinikum Aschaffenburg-Alzenau, Aschaffenburg, Germany
| | - Rachel Würstlein
- Brustzentrum, Frauenklinik, LMU Klinikum München, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, interdisziplinäres Brustzentrum, HELIOS Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pusztai L, Denkert C, O'Shaughnessy J, Cortes J, Dent R, McArthur H, Kümmel S, Bergh J, Park YH, Hui R, Harbeck N, Takahashi M, Untch M, Fasching PA, Cardoso F, Zhu Y, Pan W, Tryfonidis K, Schmid P. Event-free survival by residual cancer burden with pembrolizumab in early-stage TNBC: exploratory analysis from KEYNOTE-522. Ann Oncol 2024:S0923-7534(24)00046-2. [PMID: 38369015 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND KEYNOTE-522 demonstrated statistically significant improvements in pathological complete response (pCR) with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and event-free survival (EFS) with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab in patients with high-risk, early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Prior studies have shown the prognostic value of the residual cancer burden (RCB) index to quantify the extent of residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In this preplanned exploratory analysis, we assessed RCB distribution and EFS within RCB categories by treatment group. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 1174 patients with stage T1c/N1-2 or T2-4/N0-2 TNBC were randomized 2 : 1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks given with four cycles of paclitaxel + carboplatin, followed by four cycles of doxorubicin or epirubicin + cyclophosphamide. After surgery, patients received pembrolizumab or placebo for nine cycles or until recurrence or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoints are pCR and EFS. RCB is a prespecified exploratory endpoint. The association between EFS and RCB was assessed using a Cox regression model. RESULTS Pembrolizumab shifted patients into lower RCB categories across the entire spectrum compared with placebo. There were more patients in the pembrolizumab group with RCB-0 (pCR), and fewer patients in the pembrolizumab group with RCB-1, RCB-2, and RCB-3. The corresponding hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for EFS were 0.70 (0.38-1.31), 0.92 (0.39-2.20), 0.52 (0.32-0.82), and 1.24 (0.69-2.23). The most common first EFS events were distant recurrences, with fewer in the pembrolizumab group across all RCB categories. Among patients with RCB-0/1, more than half [21/38 (55.3%)] of all events were central nervous system recurrences, with 13/22 (59.1%) in the pembrolizumab group and 8/16 (50.0%) in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS Addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy resulted in fewer EFS events in the RCB-0, RCB-1, and RCB-2 categories, with the greatest benefit in RCB-2. These findings demonstrate that pembrolizumab not only increased pCR rates, but also improved EFS among most patients who do not have a pCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Pusztai
- Yale School of Medicine, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, USA.
| | - C Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - J O'Shaughnessy
- Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology Network, Dallas, USA
| | - J Cortes
- International Breast Cancer Center, Quironsalud Group, Barcelona; Universidad Europea de Madrid, Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Dent
- National Cancer Center Singapore, Duke - National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - H McArthur
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
| | - S Kümmel
- Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Berlin, Germany
| | - J Bergh
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and Breast Cancer Centre, Cancer Theme, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Center, Solna, Sweden
| | - Y H Park
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - R Hui
- Westmead Breast Cancer Institute, Westmead Hospital and the University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - N Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - M Takahashi
- Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - M Untch
- Breast Cancer Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin
| | - P A Fasching
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | - F Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Y Zhu
- Oncology, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, USA
| | - W Pan
- Oncology, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, USA
| | | | - P Schmid
- Centre for Experimental Cancer Medicine, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Loibl S, André F, Bachelot T, Barrios CH, Bergh J, Burstein HJ, Cardoso MJ, Carey LA, Dawood S, Del Mastro L, Denkert C, Fallenberg EM, Francis PA, Gamal-Eldin H, Gelmon K, Geyer CE, Gnant M, Guarneri V, Gupta S, Kim SB, Krug D, Martin M, Meattini I, Morrow M, Janni W, Paluch-Shimon S, Partridge A, Poortmans P, Pusztai L, Regan MM, Sparano J, Spanic T, Swain S, Tjulandin S, Toi M, Trapani D, Tutt A, Xu B, Curigliano G, Harbeck N. Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2024; 35:159-182. [PMID: 38101773 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- S Loibl
- GBG Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg; Centre for Haematology and Oncology, Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - F André
- Breast Cancer Unit, Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| | - T Bachelot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - C H Barrios
- Oncology Department, Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group and Oncoclínicas, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - J Bergh
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Bioclinicum, Karolinska Institutet and Breast Cancer Centre, Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Centre and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - H J Burstein
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - M J Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Foundation, Champalimaud Cancer Centre, Lisbon; Faculty of Medicine, Lisbon University, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - L A Carey
- Division of Medical Oncology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - S Dawood
- Department of Oncology, Mediclinic City Hospital, Dubai, UAE
| | - L Del Mastro
- Medical Oncology Clinic, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialities, School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - C Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Marburg
| | - E M Fallenberg
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine & Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - P A Francis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - H Gamal-Eldin
- Department of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - K Gelmon
- Department of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
| | - C E Geyer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - M Gnant
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - V Guarneri
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova; Oncology 2 Unit, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - S Gupta
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - S B Kim
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - D Krug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - M Martin
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon, Universidad Complutense, GEICAM, Madrid, Spain
| | - I Meattini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence; Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences 'M. Serio', University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - M Morrow
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - W Janni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - S Paluch-Shimon
- Sharett Institute of Oncology Department, Hadassah University Hospital & Faculty of Medicine Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - A Partridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - P Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - L Pusztai
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven
| | - M M Regan
- Division of Biostatistics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - J Sparano
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - T Spanic
- Europa Donna Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - S Swain
- Medicine Department, Georgetown University Medical Centre and MedStar Health, Washington, USA
| | - S Tjulandin
- N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Centre of Oncology, Moscow, Russia
| | - M Toi
- Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Disease Center, Komagome Hospital, Bunkyo-ku, Japan
| | - D Trapani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - A Tutt
- Breast Cancer Research Division, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Division of Cancer Studies, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - B Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - G Curigliano
- Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies Division, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milan; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - N Harbeck
- Breast Centre, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Comprehensive Cancer Centre Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Graf SD, Keber CU, Hattesohl A, Teply-Szymanski J, Hattesohl S, Guder M, Gercke N, Di Fazio P, Slater EP, Jesinghaus M, Denkert C, Bartsch DK, Lehman B. Mesenteric fibrosis in patients with small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors is associated with enrichment of alpha-smooth muscle actin-positive fibrosis and COMP-expressing stromal cells. J Neuroendocrinol 2024; 36:e13364. [PMID: 38246597 DOI: 10.1111/jne.13364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
Neuroendocrine tumors of the small intestine (SI-NETs) often develop lymph node metastasis (LNM)-induced mesenteric fibrosis (MF). MF can cause intestinal obstruction as well as ischemia and render surgical resection technically challenging. The underlying pathomechanisms of MF are still not well understood. We examined mesenteric LNM and the surrounding stroma compartment from 24 SI-NET patients, including 11 with in situ presentation of strong MF (MF+) and 13 without MF (MF-). Differential gene expression was assessed with the HTG EdgeSeq Oncology Biomarker Panel comparing MF+ with MF- within LNM and paired stromal samples, respectively. Most interesting differentially expressed genes were validated by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) in combination with validation of associated protein levels utilizing immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining of MF+ and MF- formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) patient samples. Overall, 14 genes measured with a 2549-gene expression panel were differentially expressed in MF+ patients compared to MF-. Of those, nine were differentially expressed genes in LNM and five genes in the stromal tissue (>2-fold change, p < .05). The top hits included increased COMP and COL11A1 expression in the stroma of MF+ patients compared to MF-, as well as decreased HMGA2, COL6A6, and SLC22A3 expression in LNM of MF+ patients compared to LNM of MF- patients. RT-qPCR confirmed high levels of COMP and COL11A1 in stroma samples of MF+ compared to MF- patients. IHC staining confirmed the enrichment of α-smooth muscle actin-positive fibrosis in MF+ compared to MF- patients with corresponding increase of COMP-expressing stromal cells in MF+. Since COMP is associated with the known driver for fibrosis development transforming growth factor beta and with a cancer-associated fibroblasts enriched environment, it seems to be a promising new target for MF research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian D Graf
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Corinna U Keber
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Akira Hattesohl
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Julia Teply-Szymanski
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Sophia Hattesohl
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Marc Guder
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Norman Gercke
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Pietro Di Fazio
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Emily P Slater
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Moritz Jesinghaus
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Detlef K Bartsch
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Bettina Lehman
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Marmé F, Krieghoff-Henning E, Gerber B, Schmitt M, Zahm DM, Bauerschlag D, Forstbauer H, Hildebrandt G, Ataseven B, Brodkorb T, Denkert C, Stachs A, Krug D, Heil J, Golatta M, Kühn T, Nekljudova V, Gaiser T, Schönmehl R, Brochhausen C, Loibl S, Reimer T, Brinker TJ. Deep learning to predict breast cancer sentinel lymph node status on INSEMA histological images. Eur J Cancer 2023; 195:113390. [PMID: 37890350 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Revised: 10/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sentinel lymph node (SLN) status is a clinically important prognostic biomarker in breast cancer and is used to guide therapy, especially for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative cases. However, invasive lymph node staging is increasingly omitted before therapy, and studies such as the randomised Intergroup Sentinel Mamma (INSEMA) trial address the potential for further de-escalation of axillary surgery. Therefore, it would be helpful to accurately predict the pretherapeutic sentinel status using medical images. METHODS Using a ResNet 50 architecture pretrained on ImageNet and a previously successful strategy, we trained deep learning (DL)-based image analysis algorithms to predict sentinel status on hematoxylin/eosin-stained images of predominantly luminal, primary breast tumours from the INSEMA trial and three additional, independent cohorts (The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and cohorts from the University hospitals of Mannheim and Regensburg), and compared their performance with that of a logistic regression using clinical data only. Performance on an INSEMA hold-out set was investigated in a blinded manner. RESULTS None of the generated image analysis algorithms yielded significantly better than random areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves on the test sets, including the hold-out test set from INSEMA. In contrast, the logistic regression fitted on the Mannheim cohort retained a better than random performance on INSEMA and Regensburg. Including the image analysis model output in the logistic regression did not improve performance further on INSEMA. CONCLUSIONS Employing DL-based image analysis on histological slides, we could not predict SLN status for unseen cases in the INSEMA trial and other predominantly luminal cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik Marmé
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Krieghoff-Henning
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Max Schmitt
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Dirk Bauerschlag
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | | | - Guido Hildebrandt
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medicine Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Beyhan Ataseven
- Department of Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Lippe, Bielefeld University, Medical School and University Medical Center East Westphalia-Lippe, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Tobias Brodkorb
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, University Clinic Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Angrit Stachs
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Jörg Heil
- Brustzentrum Heidelberg - Klinik St. Elisabeth, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Uniklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Golatta
- Brustzentrum Heidelberg - Klinik St. Elisabeth, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Uniklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Esslingen, Neckar, Germany
| | | | - Timo Gaiser
- Institute of Pathology, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rebecca Schönmehl
- Institute of Pathology, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Brochhausen
- Institute of Pathology, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Institute of Pathology, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group, GBG Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Decker T, Lüdtke-Heckenkamp K, Melnichuk L, Hirmas N, Lübbe K, Zahn MO, Schmidt M, Denkert C, Lorenz R, Müller V, Zahm DM, Mundhenke C, Bauer S, Thill M, Seropian P, Filmann N, Loibl S. Anti-hormonal maintenance treatment with the CDK4/6 inhibitor ribociclib after 1st line chemotherapy in hormone receptor positive / HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer: A phase II trial (AMICA). Breast 2023; 72:103575. [PMID: 37690320 PMCID: PMC10507224 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This phase II study evaluated the impact of adding ribociclib to maintenance endocrine therapy (ET) treatment of physicians' choice following the first palliative chemotherapy in pre- and post-menopausal women with hormone receptor positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor 2 negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS The initial randomized study design was later amended into a single-arm study, and all subsequent patients received ribociclib and ET. The primary end point was locally assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), clinical benefit rate (CBR), safety, compliance, and quality of life (QoL). RESULTS A total of 43 patients received ribociclib + ET and 10 patients received ET only. Median PFS was 12.4 months [95% CI 8.7-24.4] for patients who received ribociclib + ET and 4.75 months [95% CI 1.0-10.3] for those who received ET only. Median OS was not reached for patients who received ribociclib + ET, and 28 (65.1%) patients experienced clinical benefit [95% CI 49.1-79.0]. For patients who received ribociclib + ET, grade 3-4 hematological adverse events (AEs) occurred in 25 (58.1%) patients, and grade 3-4 non-hematological AEs occurred in 17 (39.5%) patients. During the study, 15 patients died - 14 of whom due to tumor-related reasons, and one patient due to pneumonia, which was not treatment-related. CONCLUSION The results of the AMICA study show a promising efficacy and safety of maintenance treatment with ribociclib added to ET after at least stable disease following the first metastatic chemotherapy in patients with HR+/HER2-mBC. TRIAL REGISTRATION Anti-hormonal Therapy With Ribociclib in HR-positive/HER2- Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer (AMICA), NCT03555877, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03555877.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Nader Hirmas
- German Breast Group (GBG) Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - Kristina Lübbe
- Diakovere Henriettenstift, Breast Center, Hannover, Germany
| | | | | | - Carsten Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Philipps Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg (UKGM), Germany
| | - Ralf Lorenz
- Frauenärztliche Gemeinschaftspraxis Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Stefan Bauer
- Gemeinschaftspraxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie, Lebach, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Natalie Filmann
- German Breast Group (GBG) Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group (GBG) Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Centre for Haematology and Oncology/Bethanien Frankfurt/M Freudenstadt, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Link T, Blohmer JU, Schmitt WD, Kuhlmann JD, Just M, Untch M, Stotzer O, Fasching PA, Thill M, Reinisch M, Schneeweiss A, Wimberger P, Seiler S, Huober J, Jackisch C, Rhiem K, Hanusch C, Sinn BV, Nekljudova V, Loibl S, Denkert C. RANK Expression as an Independent Predictor for Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Luminal-Like Breast Cancer: A Translational Insight from the GeparX Trial. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:4606-4612. [PMID: 37725572 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-1801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The GeparX study investigated whether denosumab as add-on treatment to nab-paclitaxel-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with two different schedules (125 mg/m² weekly vs. day 1, 8 every 22 days) may increase pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. The addition of denosumab to NACT did not improve pCR rates as recently published. In this study, we investigated whether receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B (RANK) expression, as part of the denosumab target pathway: (i) may retrospectively identify a subgroup of patients with additional clinical benefit of denosumab or (ii) may predict response to nab-paclitaxel NACT. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN RANK protein was IHC-stained on pre-therapeutic core biopsies from patients of the GeparX study (n = 667) with the antibody RANK/Envision System HRP (DAB) and was analyzed for the percentage of membranous RANK tumor cell staining (>5% RANKhigh vs. ≤5% RANKlow). RESULTS We could not identify any patient subgroup with differential response under denosumab add-on treatment in patients with RANKhigh expression [139/667, 20.8%; OR, 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.44-1.68; P = 0.667] or RANKlow expression (528/667 (79.2%) OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.78-1.56; P = 0.589; Pinteraction = 0.528). However, the pCR rate was higher in the RANKhigh subgroup compared with RANKlow (50% vs. 39%; OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.04-2.21; P = 0.037). RANK expression constituted an independent predictor of response to NACT frequently in patients with luminal-like subtype (HR+/HER2-; OR, 2.98; 95% CI, 1.30-6.79; P = 0.010). No predictive value of RANK expression among the different nab-paclitaxel regimens was observed. CONCLUSION We report RANK expression to be an independent predictive biomarker for response to NACT in patients with luminal-like breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa Link
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumour Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- National Center for Tumour Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Wolfgang D Schmitt
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jan Dominik Kuhlmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumour Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marianne Just
- Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
| | | | - Oliver Stotzer
- Gemeinschaftspraxis Hämatologie/Intern. Onkologie, München, Germany
| | | | - Marc Thill
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Mattea Reinisch
- National Center for Tumour Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen, Universitätsklinikum und Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumour Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Jens Huober
- Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Brustzentrum, Departement Interdisziplinäre medizinische Dienste, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | | | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Germany Universität Köln, Zentrum familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Köln, Germany
| | | | - Bruno V Sinn
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kolb S, Hoffmann I, Monjé N, Dragomir MP, Jank P, Bischoff P, Keunecke C, Pohl J, Kunze CA, Marchenko S, Schmitt WD, Kulbe H, Sers C, Sehouli J, Braicu EI, Denkert C, Darb-Esfahani S, Horst D, Sinn BV, Taube ET. LRP1B-a prognostic marker in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma. Hum Pathol 2023; 141:158-168. [PMID: 37742945 DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2023.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor-related protein 1B (LRP1B) is a member of the LDL receptor family and has often been discussed as a tumor suppressor gene, as its down-regulation is correlated with a poor prognosis in multiple carcinoma entities. Due to the high metastasis rate into the fatty peritoneal cavity and current research findings showing a dysregulation of lipid metabolism in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), we questioned the prognostic impact of the LRP1B protein expression. We examined a well-characterized large cohort of 571 patients with primary HGSC and analyzed the LRP1B protein expression via immunohistochemical staining (both in tumor and stroma cells separately), performed precise bioimage analysis with QuPath, and calculated the prognostic impact using SPSS. Our results demonstrate that LRP1B functions as a significant prognostic marker for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in HGSC on the protein level. High cytoplasmic expression of LRP1B in tumor, stroma, and combined tumor and stroma cells has a significantly positive association with a mean prolongation of the OS by 42 months (P = .005), 29 months (P = .005), and 25 months (P = .001), respectively. Additionally, the mean PFS was 18 months longer in tumor (P = .002), 19 months in stroma (P = .004), and 19 months in both cell types combined (P = .01). Our results remained significant in multivariate analysis. We envision LRP1B as a potential prognostic tool that could help us understand the functional role of lipid metabolism in advanced HGSC, especially regarding liposomal medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Svenja Kolb
- Department of Gynecology, Vivantes Netzwerk für Gesundheit GmbH Berlin, Vivantes Hospital Neukölln, 12351, Berlin, Germany
| | - Inga Hoffmann
- Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nanna Monjé
- Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mihnea P Dragomir
- Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Paul Jank
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany
| | - Philip Bischoff
- Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carlotta Keunecke
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Jonathan Pohl
- Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Catarina Alisa Kunze
- Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sofya Marchenko
- Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wolfgang D Schmitt
- Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hagen Kulbe
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany; Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Christine Sers
- Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany; Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Elena Ioana Braicu
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany; Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany
| | - Silvia Darb-Esfahani
- MVZ Pathologie Spandau, 13589 Berlin, Spandau, Germany; MVZ Pathologie Berlin-Buch, 13125 Berlin, Germany
| | - David Horst
- Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bruno V Sinn
- Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Eliane T Taube
- Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Curigliano G, Burstein HJ, Gnant M, Loibl S, Cameron D, Regan MM, Denkert C, Poortmans P, Weber WP, Thürlimann B. Understanding breast cancer complexity to improve patient outcomes: The St Gallen International Consensus Conference for the Primary Therapy of Individuals with Early Breast Cancer 2023. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:970-986. [PMID: 37683978 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The 18th St Gallen International Breast Cancer Conference held in March 2023, in Vienna, Austria, assessed significant new findings for local and systemic therapies for early breast cancer with a focus on the evaluation of multimodal treatment options. The emergence of more effective, innovative agents in both the preoperative (primary or neoadjuvant) and post-operative (adjuvant) settings has underscored the pivotal role of a multidisciplinary approach in treatment decision making, particularly when selecting systemic therapy for an individual patient. The importance of multidisciplinary discussions regarding the clinical benefits of interventions was explicitly emphasized by the consensus panel as an integral part of developing an optimal treatment plan with the 'right' degree of intensity and duration. The panelists focused on controversies surrounding the management of common ductal/no special type and lobular breast cancer histology, which account for the vast majority of breast tumors. The expert opinion of the panelists was based on interpretations of available data, as well as current practices in their professional environments, personal and socioeconomic factors affecting patients, and cognizant of varying reimbursement and accessibility constraints around the world. The panelists strongly advocated patient participation in well-designed clinical studies whenever feasible. With these considerations in mind, the St Gallen Consensus Conference aims to offer guidance to clinicians regarding appropriate treatments for early-stage breast cancer and assist in balancing the realistic trade-offs between treatment benefit and toxicity, enabling patients and clinicians to make well-informed choices through a shared decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Curigliano
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| | - H J Burstein
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
| | - M Gnant
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna; Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Vienna, Austria
| | - S Loibl
- Center for Hematology and Oncology Bethanien, Frankfurt; German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - D Cameron
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, University of Edinburgh and NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - M M Regan
- International Breast Cancer Study Group Statistical Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - C Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - P Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk-Antwerp; University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
| | - W P Weber
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - B Thürlimann
- SwissBreastCare, Bethanienspital, Zürich, Switzerland; SONK Foundation, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Denkert C, Lebeau A, Schildhaus HU, Jackisch C, Rüschoff J. New treatment options for metastatic HER2-low breast cancer : Consequences for histopathological diagnosis. Pathologie (Heidelb) 2023; 44:53-60. [PMID: 36472635 PMCID: PMC10713687 DOI: 10.1007/s00292-022-01139-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
The overexpression of HER2 in breast cancer is a classic example for molecular targeted therapy, and it has been shown that classical anti-HER2 therapeutics were only effective in patients with HER2 overexpressing tumors. Therefore, in recent decades, pathologists have been focused on the reliable identification of HER2 overexpressing tumors. Based on the results of recent clinical trials in metastatic breast cancer with antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), this diagnostic strategy for evaluation of HER2 is currently changing. It has been shown that the ADC trastuzumab-deruxtecan is effective not only against tumors with classical HER2 overexpression, but also against HER2-low tumors. These clinical trial results lead to a paradigm shift in the treatment of patients whose tumours were previously classified as HER2 negative. In addition to the identification of HER2 (score 3+) overexpressing tumors, it is necessary to identify HER2-low expressing tumors (defined as an immunohistochemistry (IHC) score of 1+ or IHC2+ with negative in situ hybridization).Due to the therapeutic consequences, it is important to quickly adapt the diagnostic workup and reporting to the new requirements. In addition, the new therapeutic options for anti-HER2 therapy lead to new challenges for standardization as well as to new scientific questions for the characterization of tumors with low HER2 expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carsten Denkert
- Institute of für Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Baldingerstr. 1, 35043, Marburg, Germany.
| | - Annette Lebeau
- Institute of Pathology, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
- Private Group Practice for Pathology, Lübeck, Germany
| | | | - Christian Jackisch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Sana Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Josef Rüschoff
- Discovery Life Sciences, Kassel, Germany
- Pathologie Nordhessen, Kassel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Litmeyer A, Konukiewitz B, Kasajima A, Foersch S, Schicktanz F, Schmitt M, Kellers F, Grass A, Jank P, Lehman B, Gress TM, Rinke A, Bartsch DK, Denkert C, Weichert W, Klöppel G, Jesinghaus M. High expression of insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) distinguishes colorectal mixed and pure neuroendocrine carcinomas from conventional adenocarcinomas with diffuse expression of synaptophysin. J Pathol Clin Res 2023; 9:498-509. [PMID: 37608427 PMCID: PMC10556265 DOI: 10.1002/cjp2.339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
Complementary to synaptophysin and chromogranin A, insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) has emerged as a sensitive marker for the diagnosis of neuroendocrine neoplasms. Since there are no comparative data regarding INSM1 expression in conventional colorectal adenocarcinomas (CRCs) and colorectal mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas/neuroendocrine carcinomas (MANECs/NECs), we examined INSM1 in a large cohort of conventional CRCs and MANECs/NECs. In conventional CRC, we put a special focus on conventional CRC with diffuse expression of synaptophysin, which carry the risk of being misinterpreted as a MANEC or a NEC. We investigated INSM1 according to the immunoreactive score in our main cohort of 1,033 conventional CRCs and 21 MANECs/NECs in comparison to the expression of synaptophysin and chromogranin A and correlated the results with clinicopathological parameters and patient survival. All MANECs/NECs expressed INSM1, usually showing high or moderate expression (57% high, 34% moderate, and 9% low), which distinguished them from conventional CRCs, which were usually INSM1 negative or low, even if they diffusely expressed synaptophysin. High expression of INSM1 was not observed in conventional CRCs. Chromogranin A was negative/low in most conventional CRCs (99%), but also in most MANECs/NECs (66%). Comparable results were observed in our independent validation cohorts of conventional CRC (n = 274) and MANEC/NEC (n = 19). Similar to synaptophysin, INSM1 expression had no prognostic relevance in conventional CRCs, while true MANEC/NEC showed a highly impaired survival in univariate and multivariate analyses (e.g. disease-specific survival: p < 0.001). MANECs/NECs are a highly aggressive variant of colorectal cancer, which must be reliably identified. High expression of INSM1 distinguishes MANEC/NEC from conventional CRCs with diffuse expression of the standard neuroendocrine marker synaptophysin, which do not share the same dismal prognosis. Therefore, high INSM1 expression is a highly specific/sensitive marker that is supportive for the diagnosis of true colorectal MANEC/NEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne‐Sophie Litmeyer
- Institute of PathologyPhillips University Marburg and University Hospital MarburgMarburgGermany
| | - Björn Konukiewitz
- Department of PathologyUniversity Hospital Schleswig‐Holstein, Campus Kiel, Christian‐Albrechts‐Universität zu KielKielGermany
- Institute of PathologyTechnical University of MunichMunichGermany
| | - Atsuko Kasajima
- Institute of PathologyTechnical University of MunichMunichGermany
| | | | - Felix Schicktanz
- Institute of PathologyTechnical University of MunichMunichGermany
| | - Maxime Schmitt
- Institute of PathologyTechnical University of MunichMunichGermany
| | - Franziska Kellers
- Department of PathologyUniversity Hospital Schleswig‐Holstein, Campus Kiel, Christian‐Albrechts‐Universität zu KielKielGermany
| | - Albert Grass
- Institute of PathologyPhillips University Marburg and University Hospital MarburgMarburgGermany
| | - Paul Jank
- Institute of PathologyPhillips University Marburg and University Hospital MarburgMarburgGermany
| | - Bettina Lehman
- Department of SurgeryPhillips University Marburg and University Hospital MarburgMarburgGermany
| | - Thomas M Gress
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Infectious DiseasesPhillips University Marburg and University Hospital MarburgMarburgGermany
| | - Anja Rinke
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Infectious DiseasesPhillips University Marburg and University Hospital MarburgMarburgGermany
| | - Detlef K Bartsch
- Department of SurgeryPhillips University Marburg and University Hospital MarburgMarburgGermany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of PathologyPhillips University Marburg and University Hospital MarburgMarburgGermany
| | - Wilko Weichert
- Institute of PathologyTechnical University of MunichMunichGermany
| | - Günter Klöppel
- Institute of PathologyTechnical University of MunichMunichGermany
| | - Moritz Jesinghaus
- Institute of PathologyPhillips University Marburg and University Hospital MarburgMarburgGermany
- Institute of PathologyTechnical University of MunichMunichGermany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Takahashi M, Cortés J, Dent R, Pusztai L, McArthur H, Kümmel S, Denkert C, Park YH, Im SA, Ahn JH, Mukai H, Huang CS, Chen SC, Kim MH, Jia L, Li XT, Tryfonidis K, Karantza V, Iwata H, Schmid P. Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Pembrolizumab in Patients With Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2342107. [PMID: 37966841 PMCID: PMC10652156 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.42107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance In the phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 study, addition of pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab significantly increased pathologic complete response (pCR) and event-free survival (EFS) vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early triple-negative breast cancer. Objective To evaluate efficacy and safety outcomes for patients enrolled in East/Southeast Asia (Asia) in KEYNOTE-522. Design, Setting, and Participants KEYNOTE-522, a multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial, enrolled 1174 patients between March 7, 2017, and September 13, 2018. For interim EFS and overall survival (OS) analyses (data cutoff, March 23, 2021), median follow-up was 39.8 months (range, 30.4-46.9 months) for pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and 40.8 months (range, 30.1-46.9 months) for placebo plus chemotherapy. Data cutoff for pCR analysis was September 24, 2018. This secondary analysis included adults enrolled in Asia with newly diagnosed, previously untreated, nonmetastatic triple-negative breast cancer (tumor stage T1c and nodal stage N1-2 or tumor stage T2-4 and nodal stage N0-2) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1, regardless of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status. Intervention Patients were randomized 2:1 to 4 cycles of pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) or placebo plus carboplatin and paclitaxel and another 4 cycles of pembrolizumab or placebo plus doxorubicin or epirubicin and cyclophosphamide before surgery. After definitive surgery, patients received pembrolizumab or placebo every 3 weeks for 9 cycles or until recurrence or unacceptable toxic effects. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcome was pCR (no evidence of primary tumor after neoadjuvant therapy or carcinoma in situ after neoadjuvant therapy and no regional lymph node involvement after neoadjuvant therapy) at the time of definitive surgery and EFS. Results A total of 216 of 1174 randomized patients (all female; median [range] age, 46.0 [24.0-71.0] years) were from Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and Singapore (136 in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group and 80 in the placebo plus chemotherapy group). Of these patients, 104 (76.5%) in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group and 60 (75.0%) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group had a tumor PD-L1 combined positive score of 1 or greater. Pathologic complete response was 58.7% (95% CI, 46.7%-69.9%) with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and 40.0% (95% CI, 26.4%-54.8%) with placebo plus chemotherapy; benefit was observed regardless of PD-L1 status. Thirteen patients (9.6%) in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group and 20 patients (25.0%) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group had EFS events (hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17-0.71). The 36-month EFS rate was 91.2% (95% CI, 85.0%-94.9%) with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and 77.2% (95% CI, 66.3%-85.0%) with placebo plus chemotherapy. Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 109 patients (80.1%) receiving pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and 64 patients (81.0%) receiving placebo plus chemotherapy. Conclusions and Relevance In this subgroup analysis of patients enrolled in Asia in KEYNOTE-522, neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab led to clinically meaningful improvements in pCR and EFS vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. These findings support the use of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab as a standard-of-care therapy for patients in Asian countries with early triple-negative breast cancer. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03036488.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masato Takahashi
- Department of Breast Surgery, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Javier Cortés
- International Breast Cancer Center, Pangaea Oncology, Quironsalud Group, Barcelona, Spain
- Medical Scientia Innovation Research (MEDSIR), Barcelona, Spain
- Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rebecca Dent
- National Cancer Center Singapore, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Heather McArthur
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Sherko Kümmel
- Breast Unit, Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
- Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - Yeon Hee Park
- Hematology-Oncology, Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seock-Ah Im
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin-Hee Ahn
- Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hirofumi Mukai
- National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa-shi, Japan
| | | | | | - Min Hwan Kim
- Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Liyi Jia
- Merck & Co Inc, Rahway, New Jersey
| | | | | | | | | | - Peter Schmid
- Centre for Experimental Cancer Medicine, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Loibl S, Azim HA, Bachelot T, Berveiller P, Bosch A, Cardonick E, Denkert C, Halaska MJ, Hoeltzenbein M, Johansson ALV, Maggen C, Markert UR, Peccatori F, Poortmans P, Saloustros E, Saura C, Schmid P, Stamatakis E, van den Heuvel-Eibrink M, van Gerwen M, Vandecaveye V, Pentheroudakis G, Curigliano G, Amant F. ESMO Expert Consensus Statements on the management of breast cancer during pregnancy (PrBC). Ann Oncol 2023; 34:849-866. [PMID: 37572987 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/14/2023] Open
Abstract
The management of breast cancer during pregnancy (PrBC) is a relatively rare indication and an area where no or little evidence is available since randomized controlled trials cannot be conducted. In general, advances related to breast cancer (BC) treatment outside pregnancy cannot always be translated to PrBC, because both the interests of the mother and of the unborn should be considered. Evidence remains limited and/or conflicting in some specific areas where the optimal approach remains controversial. In 2022, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) held a virtual consensus-building process on this topic to gain insights from a multidisciplinary group of experts and develop statements on controversial topics that cannot be adequately addressed in the current evidence-based ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline. The aim of this consensus-building process was to discuss controversial issues relating to the management of patients with PrBC. The virtual meeting included a multidisciplinary panel of 24 leading experts from 13 countries and was chaired by S. Loibl and F. Amant. All experts were allocated to one of four different working groups. Each working group covered a specific subject area with two chairs appointed: Planning, preparation and execution of the consensus process was conducted according to the ESMO standard operating procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Loibl
- GBG c/o GBG Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg; Centre for Haematology and Oncology Bethanien, Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt; Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - H A Azim
- Breast Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Tecnologico de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza Garcia, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
| | - T Bachelot
- Department of medical oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - P Berveiller
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Poissy-Saint Germain Hospital, Poissy; UMR 1198 - BREED, INRAE, Paris Saclay University, RHuMA, Montigny-Le-Bretonneux, France
| | - A Bosch
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund; Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - E Cardonick
- Cooper Medical School at Rowan University, Camden, USA
| | - C Denkert
- Philipps-University Marburg and Marburg University Hospital (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - M J Halaska
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Universital Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - M Hoeltzenbein
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Embryotox Center of Clinical Teratology and Drug Safety in Pregnancy, Berlin, Germany
| | - A L V Johansson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - C Maggen
- Department of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - U R Markert
- Placenta Lab, Department of Obstetrics, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - F Peccatori
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - P Poortmans
- Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp; University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - E Saloustros
- Department of Oncology, University General Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece
| | - C Saura
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Schmid
- Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| | - E Stamatakis
- Department of Anesthesiology, 'Alexandra' General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - M van Gerwen
- Gynecologic Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychosocial Care, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam; Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - V Vandecaveye
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - G Pentheroudakis
- European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - G Curigliano
- Division of Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - F Amant
- Gynecologic Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Division Gynaecologic Oncology, UZ Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hoffmann I, Dragomir MP, Monjé N, Keunecke C, Kunze CA, Schallenberg S, Marchenko S, Schmitt WD, Kulbe H, Sehouli J, Braicu IE, Jank P, Denkert C, Darb-Esfahani S, Horst D, Sinn BV, Sers C, Bischoff P, Taube ET. Increased expression of IDO1 is associated with improved survival and increased number of TILs in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Neoplasia 2023; 44:100934. [PMID: 37703626 PMCID: PMC10502412 DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2023.100934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The enzyme indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) plays a crucial role in regulating the immune system's response to tumors, but its exact role in cancer, especially in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), remains controversial. We aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of IDO1 expression and its correlation with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in HGSOC. METHODS Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining and bioimage analysis using the QuPath software were employed to assess IDO1 protein expression in a well-characterized cohort of 507 patients with primary HGSOC. Statistical evaluation was performed using SPSS, and in silico validation considering IDO1 mRNA expression in bulk and single-cell gene expression datasets was conducted. Additionally, IDO1 expression in interferon-gamma (IFNG) stimulated HGSOC cell lines was analyzed. RESULTS Our findings revealed that IDO1 protein and mRNA expression serve as positive prognostic markers for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in HGSOC. High IDO1 expression was associated with a significant improvement in OS by 21 months (p < 0.001) and PFS by 6 months (p = 0.016). Notably, elevated IDO1 expression correlated with an increased number of CD3+ (p < 0.001), CD4+ (p < 0.001), and CD8+ TILs (p < 0.001). Furthermore, high IDO1 mRNA expression and protein level were found to be associated with enhanced responsiveness to pro-inflammatory cytokines, particularly IFNG. CONCLUSIONS Our study provides evidence that IDO1 expression serves as a positive prognostic marker in HGSOC and is associated with an increased number of CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ TILs. Understanding the intricate relationship between IDO1, TILs, and the tumor microenvironment may hold the key to improving outcomes in HGSOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inga Hoffmann
- Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Mihnea P Dragomir
- Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nanna Monjé
- Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Carlotta Keunecke
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Catarina Alisa Kunze
- Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Simon Schallenberg
- Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Sofya Marchenko
- Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Wolfgang D Schmitt
- Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Hagen Kulbe
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany; Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Jalid Sehouli
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany; Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Ioana Elena Braicu
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany; Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Paul Jank
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35043 Marburg, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35043 Marburg, Germany
| | - Silvia Darb-Esfahani
- MVZ Pathologie Spandau, Stadtrandstr. 555, 13589 Berlin Spandau; MVZ Pathologie Berlin-Buch, Lindenberger Weg 27, Haus 207, 13125 Berlin
| | - David Horst
- Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Bruno V Sinn
- Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Christine Sers
- Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Philip Bischoff
- Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eliane T Taube
- Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Litton JK, Regan MM, Pusztai L, Rugo HS, Tolaney SM, Garrett-Mayer E, Amiri-Kordestani L, Basho RK, Best AF, Boileau JF, Denkert C, Foster JC, Harbeck N, Jacene HA, King TA, Mason G, O'Sullivan CC, Prowell TM, Richardson AL, Sepulveda KA, Smith ML, Tjoe JA, Turashvili G, Woodward WA, Butler LP, Schwartz EI, Korde LA. Standardized Definitions for Efficacy End Points in Neoadjuvant Breast Cancer Clinical Trials: NeoSTEEP. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:4433-4442. [PMID: 37433103 PMCID: PMC10522109 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The Standardized Definitions for Efficacy End Points (STEEP) criteria, established in 2007 and updated in 2021 (STEEP 2.0), provide standardized definitions of adjuvant breast cancer (BC) end points. STEEP 2.0 identified a need to separately address end points for neoadjuvant clinical trials. The multidisciplinary NeoSTEEP working group of experts was convened to critically evaluate and align neoadjuvant BC trial end points. METHODS The NeoSTEEP working group concentrated on neoadjuvant systemic therapy end points in clinical trials with efficacy outcomes-both pathologic and time-to-event survival end points-particularly for registrational intent. Special considerations for subtypes and therapeutic approaches, imaging, nodal staging at surgery, bilateral and multifocal diseases, correlative tissue collection, and US Food and Drug Administration regulatory considerations were contemplated. RESULTS The working group recommends a preferred definition of pathologic complete response (pCR) as the absence of residual invasive cancer in the complete resected breast specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes (ypT0/Tis ypN0 per AJCC staging). Residual cancer burden should be a secondary end point to facilitate future assessment of its utility. Alternative end points are needed for hormone receptor-positive disease. Time-to-event survival end point definitions should pay particular attention to the measurement starting point. Trials should include end points originating at random assignment (event-free survival and overall survival) to capture presurgery progression and deaths as events. Secondary end points adapted from STEEP 2.0, which are defined from starting at curative-intent surgery, may also be appropriate. Specification and standardization of biopsy protocols, imaging, and pathologic nodal evaluation are also crucial. CONCLUSION End points in addition to pCR should be selected on the basis of clinical and biologic aspects of the tumor and the therapeutic agent investigated. Consistent prespecified definitions and interventions are paramount for clinically meaningful trial results and cross-trial comparison.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer K. Litton
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Meredith M. Regan
- Division of Biostatistics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Breast Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Hope S. Rugo
- University of California, San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Sara M. Tolaney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Reva K. Basho
- The Lawrence J. Ellison Institute for Transformative Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Ana F. Best
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | | | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - Jared C. Foster
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- The Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Tari A. King
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Ginny Mason
- The Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation, Broadway, VA
| | | | - Tatiana M. Prowell
- US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
- Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | | | - Judy A. Tjoe
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Novant Health, Greensboro, NC
| | - Gulisa Turashvili
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA
| | - Wendy A. Woodward
- Department of Breast Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Elena I. Schwartz
- Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Larissa A. Korde
- Cancer Therapy and Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Untch M, Banys-Paluchowski M, Brucker SY, Budach W, Denkert C, Ditsch N, Fasching PA, Haidinger R, Heil J, Jackisch C, Janni W, Kolberg HC, Krug D, Loibl S, Lüftner D, van Mackelenbergh M, Radosa JC, Reimer T, Welslau M, Würstlein R, Harbeck N, Huober J. Treatment of Early Breast Cancer: The 18th St. Gallen International Breast Cancer Consensus Conference against the Background of Current German Treatment Recommendations. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2023; 83:1102-1116. [PMID: 37706057 PMCID: PMC10497346 DOI: 10.1055/a-2121-2495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023] Open
Abstract
This year's 18th St. Gallen (SG) consensus conference on the treatment of early breast cancer (SGBCC: St. Gallen International Breast Cancer Conference) focused on practice-oriented questions. The individual situation and risk-benefit assessment were discussed in great detail. As in previous years, a German working group of leading breast cancer experts presented the results of the international SGBCC 2023 against the background of German treatment recommendations - especially the updated treatment recommendations of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie e. V. (AGO) - for everyday clinical practice in Germany. The German treatment recommendations of AGO are based on the current evidence. The comparison with the clinical approach in Germany has proven useful, as the SGBCC panel consists of experts from different countries and disciplines. That is why country-specific characteristics can be incorporated into the SGBCC recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Untch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, interdisziplinäres Brustzentrum, HELIOS Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Brustzentrum, Campus Lübeck, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | | | - Wilfried Budach
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Brustzentrum, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Frauenklinik des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Jörg Heil
- Brustzentrum Heidelberg, Klinik St. Elisabeth, Heidelberg, Germany
- Medizinische Fakultät Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana-Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Offenbach, Germany
| | | | | | - David Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie (Radioonkologie), Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group (GBG), Neu-Isenburg, Germany
- Centrum für Hämatologie und Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Immanuel Klinik Märkische Schweiz, Buckow, Germany
- Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg, Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Germany
| | - Marion van Mackelenbergh
- Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Campus Kiel, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Julia C. Radosa
- Klinik für Gynäkologie, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Manfred Welslau
- Onkologie Aschaffenburg, Hämato-Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis am Klinikum Aschaffenburg-Alzenau, Aschaffenburg, Germany
| | - Rachel Würstlein
- Brustzentrum, Frauenklinik, LMU Klinikum München, München, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Frauenklinik, LMU Klinikum München, München, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- Brustzentrum Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Williams TM, Schneeweiss A, Jackisch C, Shen C, Weber KE, Fasching PA, Denkert C, Furlanetto J, Heinmöller E, Schmatloch S, Karn T, Szeto CW, van Mackelenbergh MT, Nekljudova V, Stickeler E, Soon-Shiong P, Schem C, Mairinger T, Müller V, Marmé F, Untch M, Loibl S. Caveolin Gene Expression Predicts Clinical Outcomes for Early-Stage HER2-Negative Breast Cancer Treated with Paclitaxel-Based Chemotherapy in the GeparSepto Trial. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:3384-3394. [PMID: 37432976 PMCID: PMC10530448 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Revised: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Caveolin-1 and -2 (CAV1/2) dysregulation are implicated in driving cancer progression and may predict response to nab-paclitaxel. We explored the prognostic and predictive potential of CAV1/2 expression for patients with early-stage HER2-negative breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant paclitaxel-based chemotherapy regimens, followed by epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We correlated tumor CAV1/2 RNA expression with pathologic complete response (pCR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) in the GeparSepto trial, which randomized patients to neoadjuvant paclitaxel- versus nab-paclitaxel-based chemotherapy. RESULTS RNA sequencing data were available for 279 patients, of which 74 (26.5%) were hormone receptor (HR)-negative, thus triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Patients treated with nab-paclitaxel with high CAV1/2 had higher probability of obtaining a pCR [CAV1 OR, 4.92; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.70-14.22; P = 0.003; CAV2 OR, 5.39; 95% CI, 1.76-16.47; P = 0.003] as compared with patients with high CAV1/2 treated with solvent-based paclitaxel (CAV1 OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.11-0.95; P = 0.040; CAV2 OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.12-1.13; P = 0.082). High CAV1 expression was significantly associated with worse DFS and OS in paclitaxel-treated patients (DFS HR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.08-4.87; P = 0.030; OS HR, 4.97; 95% CI, 1.73-14.31; P = 0.003). High CAV2 was associated with worse DFS and OS in all patients (DFS HR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.23-3.63; P = 0.006; OS HR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.22-5.17; P = 0.013), in paclitaxel-treated patients (DFS HR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.12-5.43; P = 0.025; OS HR, 4.24; 95% CI, 1.48-12.09; P = 0.007) and in patients with TNBC (DFS HR, 4.68; 95% CI, 1.48-14.85; P = 0.009; OS HR, 10.43; 95% CI, 1.22-89.28; P = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate high CAV1/2 expression is associated with worse DFS and OS in paclitaxel-treated patients. Conversely, in nab-paclitaxel-treated patients, high CAV1/2 expression is associated with increased pCR and no significant detriment to DFS or OS compared with low CAV1/2 expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terence M. Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | | | | | - Changxian Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | | | - Peter A. Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Thomas Karn
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Volkmar Müller
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
- Centre for Haematology and Oncology, Bethanien Frankfurt/M, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Thagaard J, Broeckx G, Page DB, Jahangir CA, Verbandt S, Kos Z, Gupta R, Khiroya R, Abduljabbar K, Acosta Haab G, Acs B, Akturk G, Almeida JS, Alvarado‐Cabrero I, Amgad M, Azmoudeh‐Ardalan F, Badve S, Baharun NB, Balslev E, Bellolio ER, Bheemaraju V, Blenman KRM, Botinelly Mendonça Fujimoto L, Bouchmaa N, Burgues O, Chardas A, Chon U Cheang M, Ciompi F, Cooper LAD, Coosemans A, Corredor G, Dahl AB, Dantas Portela FL, Deman F, Demaria S, Doré Hansen J, Dudgeon SN, Ebstrup T, Elghazawy M, Fernandez‐Martín C, Fox SB, Gallagher WM, Giltnane JM, Gnjatic S, Gonzalez‐Ericsson PI, Grigoriadis A, Halama N, Hanna MG, Harbhajanka A, Hart SN, Hartman J, Hauberg S, Hewitt S, Hida AI, Horlings HM, Husain Z, Hytopoulos E, Irshad S, Janssen EAM, Kahila M, Kataoka TR, Kawaguchi K, Kharidehal D, Khramtsov AI, Kiraz U, Kirtani P, Kodach LL, Korski K, Kovács A, Laenkholm A, Lang‐Schwarz C, Larsimont D, Lennerz JK, Lerousseau M, Li X, Ly A, Madabhushi A, Maley SK, Manur Narasimhamurthy V, Marks DK, McDonald ES, Mehrotra R, Michiels S, Minhas FUAA, Mittal S, Moore DA, Mushtaq S, Nighat H, Papathomas T, Penault‐Llorca F, Perera RD, Pinard CJ, Pinto‐Cardenas JC, Pruneri G, Pusztai L, Rahman A, Rajpoot NM, Rapoport BL, Rau TT, Reis‐Filho JS, Ribeiro JM, Rimm D, Roslind A, Vincent‐Salomon A, Salto‐Tellez M, Saltz J, Sayed S, Scott E, Siziopikou KP, Sotiriou C, Stenzinger A, Sughayer MA, Sur D, Fineberg S, Symmans F, Tanaka S, Taxter T, Tejpar S, Teuwen J, Thompson EA, Tramm T, Tran WT, van der Laak J, van Diest PJ, Verghese GE, Viale G, Vieth M, Wahab N, Walter T, Waumans Y, Wen HY, Yang W, Yuan Y, Zin RM, Adams S, Bartlett J, Loibl S, Denkert C, Savas P, Loi S, Salgado R, Specht Stovgaard E. Pitfalls in machine learning-based assessment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer: A report of the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group on Breast Cancer. J Pathol 2023; 260:498-513. [PMID: 37608772 PMCID: PMC10518802 DOI: 10.1002/path.6155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
The clinical significance of the tumor-immune interaction in breast cancer is now established, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have emerged as predictive and prognostic biomarkers for patients with triple-negative (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2-negative) breast cancer and HER2-positive breast cancer. How computational assessments of TILs might complement manual TIL assessment in trial and daily practices is currently debated. Recent efforts to use machine learning (ML) to automatically evaluate TILs have shown promising results. We review state-of-the-art approaches and identify pitfalls and challenges of automated TIL evaluation by studying the root cause of ML discordances in comparison to manual TIL quantification. We categorize our findings into four main topics: (1) technical slide issues, (2) ML and image analysis aspects, (3) data challenges, and (4) validation issues. The main reason for discordant assessments is the inclusion of false-positive areas or cells identified by performance on certain tissue patterns or design choices in the computational implementation. To aid the adoption of ML for TIL assessment, we provide an in-depth discussion of ML and image analysis, including validation issues that need to be considered before reliable computational reporting of TILs can be incorporated into the trial and routine clinical management of patients with triple-negative breast cancer. © 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeppe Thagaard
- Technical University of DenmarkKongens LyngbyDenmark
- Visiopharm A/SHørsholmDenmark
| | - Glenn Broeckx
- Department of PathologyGZA‐ZNA HospitalsAntwerpBelgium
- Centre for Oncological Research (CORE), MIPPRO, Faculty of MedicineAntwerp UniversityAntwerpBelgium
| | - David B Page
- Earle A Chiles Research InstituteProvidence Cancer InstitutePortlandORUSA
| | - Chowdhury Arif Jahangir
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway InstituteUniversity College DublinDublinIreland
| | - Sara Verbandt
- Digestive Oncology, Department of OncologyKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Zuzana Kos
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineBC Cancer Vancouver Centre, University of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Rajarsi Gupta
- Department of Biomedical InformaticsStony Brook UniversityStony BrookNYUSA
| | - Reena Khiroya
- Department of Cellular PathologyUniversity College Hospital LondonLondonUK
| | | | | | - Balazs Acs
- Department of Oncology and PathologyKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer DiagnosticsKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
| | - Guray Akturk
- Translational Molecular Biomarkers, Merck & Co IncRahwayNJUSA
| | - Jonas S Almeida
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (DCEG)National Cancer Institute (NCI)Rockville, MDUSA
| | | | - Mohamed Amgad
- Department of PathologyNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoILUSA
| | | | - Sunil Badve
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of MedicineEmory University Winship Cancer InstituteAtlantaGAUSA
| | | | - Eva Balslev
- Department of PathologyHerlev and Gentofte HospitalHerlevDenmark
| | - Enrique R Bellolio
- Departamento de Anatomía Patológica, Facultad de MedicinaUniversidad de La FronteraTemucoChile
| | | | - Kim RM Blenman
- Department of Internal Medicine Section of Medical Oncology and Yale Cancer CenterYale School of MedicineNew HavenCTUSA
- Department of Computer ScienceYale School of Engineering and Applied ScienceNew HavenCTUSA
| | | | - Najat Bouchmaa
- Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Medical SciencesMohammed VI Polytechnic University (UM6P)Ben‐GuerirMorocco
| | - Octavio Burgues
- Pathology DepartmentHospital Cliníco Universitario de Valencia/InclivaValenciaSpain
| | - Alexandros Chardas
- Department of Pathobiology & Population SciencesThe Royal Veterinary CollegeLondonUK
| | - Maggie Chon U Cheang
- Head of Integrative Genomics Analysis in Clinical Trials, ICR‐CTSU, Division of Clinical StudiesThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Francesco Ciompi
- Radboud University Medical CenterDepartment of PathologyNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Lee AD Cooper
- Department of PathologyNorthwestern Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoILUSA
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and ImmunotherapyKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Germán Corredor
- Biomedical Engineering DepartmentEmory UniversityAtlantaGAUSA
| | - Anders B Dahl
- Technical University of DenmarkKongens LyngbyDenmark
| | | | | | - Sandra Demaria
- Department of Radiation OncologyWeill Cornell MedicineNew YorkNYUSA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineWeill Cornell MedicineNew YorkNYUSA
| | | | - Sarah N Dudgeon
- Conputational Biology and BioinformaticsYale UniversityNew HavenCTUSA
| | | | | | - Claudio Fernandez‐Martín
- Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Tecnología Centrada en el Ser Humano, HUMAN‐techUniversitat Politècnica de ValènciaValenciaSpain
| | - Stephen B Fox
- Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - William M Gallagher
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway InstituteUniversity College DublinDublinIreland
| | | | - Sacha Gnjatic
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Medicine Hem/Onc, and Pathology, Tisch Cancer Institute – Precision Immunology InstituteIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNYUSA
| | | | - Anita Grigoriadis
- Cancer Bioinformatics, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Niels Halama
- Department of Translational ImmunotherapyGerman Cancer Research CenterHeidelbergGermany
| | - Matthew G Hanna
- Department of PathologyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkUSA
| | | | - Steven N Hart
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and PathologyMayo ClinicRochester, MNUSA
| | - Johan Hartman
- Department of Oncology and PathologyKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer DiagnosticsKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
| | - Søren Hauberg
- Technical University of DenmarkKongens LyngbyDenmark
| | - Stephen Hewitt
- Laboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthBethesdaMDUSA
| | - Akira I Hida
- Department of PathologyMatsuyama Shimin HospitalMatsuyamaJapan
| | - Hugo M Horlings
- Division of PathologyNetherlands Cancer Institute (NKI)AmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | | | - Sheeba Irshad
- King's College London & Guy's & St Thomas’ NHS TrustLondonUK
| | - Emiel AM Janssen
- Department of PathologyStavanger University HospitalStavangerNorway
- Department of Chemistry, Bioscience and Environmental TechnologyUniversity of StavangerStavangerNorway
| | | | | | - Kosuke Kawaguchi
- Department of Breast SurgeryKyoto University Graduate School of MedicineKyotoJapan
| | | | - Andrey I Khramtsov
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineAnn & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoChicagoILUSA
| | - Umay Kiraz
- Department of PathologyStavanger University HospitalStavangerNorway
- Department of Chemistry, Bioscience and Environmental TechnologyUniversity of StavangerStavangerNorway
| | - Pawan Kirtani
- Department of HistopathologyAakash Healthcare Super Speciality HospitalNew DelhiIndia
| | - Liudmila L Kodach
- Department of PathologyNetherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek HospitalAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Konstanty Korski
- Data, Analytics and Imaging, Product DevelopmentF. Hoffmann‐La Roche AGBaselSwitzerland
| | - Anikó Kovács
- Department of Clinical PathologySahlgrenska University HospitalGothenburgSweden
- Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | - Anne‐Vibeke Laenkholm
- Department of Surgical PathologyZealand University HospitalRoskildeDenmark
- Department of Surgical PathologyUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Corinna Lang‐Schwarz
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbHFriedrich‐Alexander‐University Erlangen‐NurembergBayreuthGermany
| | - Denis Larsimont
- Institut Jules BordetUniversité Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium
| | - Jochen K Lennerz
- Center for Integrated DiagnosticsMassachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUSA
| | - Marvin Lerousseau
- Centre for Computational Biology (CBIO)Mines Paris, PSL UniversityParisFrance
- Institut CuriePSL UniversityParisFrance
- INSERMParisFrance
| | - Xiaoxian Li
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineEmory UniversityAtlantaGAUSA
| | - Amy Ly
- Department of PathologyMassachusetts General HospitalBostonMAUSA
| | - Anant Madabhushi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Biomedical Informatics, PathologyGeorgia Institute of Technology and Emory UniversityAtlantaGAUSA
| | - Sai K Maley
- NRG Oncology/NSABP FoundationPittsburghPAUSA
| | | | | | - Elizabeth S McDonald
- Breast Cancer Translational Research GroupUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPAUSA
| | - Ravi Mehrotra
- Indian Cancer Genomic AtlasPuneIndia
- Centre for Health, Innovation and Policy FoundationNoidaIndia
| | - Stefan Michiels
- Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, InsermUniversity Paris‐Saclay, Ligue Contre le Cancer labeled TeamVillejuifFrance
| | - Fayyaz ul Amir Afsar Minhas
- Tissue Image Analytics Centre, Warwick Cancer Research Centre, PathLAKE Consortium, Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK
| | - Shachi Mittal
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Department of Laboratory Medicine and PathologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattle, WAUSA
| | - David A Moore
- CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, UCL and Cellular Pathology DepartmentUCLHLondonUK
| | - Shamim Mushtaq
- Department of BiochemistryZiauddin UniversityKarachiPakistan
| | - Hussain Nighat
- Pathology and Laboratory MedicineAll India Institute of Medical sciencesRaipurIndia
| | - Thomas Papathomas
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems ResearchUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
- Department of Clinical PathologyDrammen Sykehus, Vestre Viken HFDrammenNorway
| | - Frederique Penault‐Llorca
- Centre Jean Perrin, Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM, U1240 Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies ThéranostiquesClermont FerrandFrance
| | - Rashindrie D Perera
- School of Electrical, Mechanical and Infrastructure EngineeringUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Division of Cancer ResearchPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Christopher J Pinard
- Radiogenomics LaboratorySunnybrook Health Sciences CentreTorontoOntarioCanada
- Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary CollegeUniversity of GuelphGuelphOntarioCanada
- Department of OncologyLakeshore Animal Health PartnersMississaugaOntarioCanada
- Centre for Advancing Responsible and Ethical Artificial Intelligence (CARE‐AI)University of GuelphGuelphOntarioCanada
| | | | - Giancarlo Pruneri
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei TumoriMilanItaly
- Faculty of Medicine and SurgeryUniversity of MilanMilanItaly
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Yale Cancer CenterYale UniversityNew HavenCTUSA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yale School of MedicineYale UniversityNew HavenCTUSA
| | - Arman Rahman
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway InstituteUniversity College DublinDublinIreland
| | | | - Bernardo Leon Rapoport
- The Medical Oncology Centre of RosebankJohannesburgSouth Africa
- Department of Immunology, Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa
| | - Tilman T Rau
- Institute of PathologyUniversity Hospital Düsseldorf and Heinrich‐Heine‐University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Jorge S Reis‐Filho
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Joana M Ribeiro
- Département de Médecine OncologiqueGustave RoussyVillejuifFrance
| | - David Rimm
- Department of PathologyYale University School of MedicineNew HavenCTUSA
- Department of MedicineYale University School of MedicineNew HavenCTUSA
| | - Anne Roslind
- Department of PathologyHerlev and Gentofte HospitalHerlevDenmark
| | - Anne Vincent‐Salomon
- Department of Diagnostic and Theranostic Medicine, Institut CurieUniversity Paris‐Sciences et LettresParisFrance
| | - Manuel Salto‐Tellez
- Integrated Pathology UnitThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
- Precision Medicine CentreQueen's University BelfastBelfastUK
| | - Joel Saltz
- Department of Biomedical InformaticsStony Brook UniversityStony BrookNYUSA
| | - Shahin Sayed
- Department of PathologyAga Khan UniversityNairobiKenya
| | - Ely Scott
- Translational PathologyTranslational Sciences and Diagnostics/Translational Medicine/R&D, Bristol Myers SquibbPrincetonNJUSA
| | - Kalliopi P Siziopikou
- Department of Pathology, Section of Breast PathologyNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoILUSA
| | - Christos Sotiriou
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory J.‐C. Heuson, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB)Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB)BrusselsBelgium
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB)Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB)BrusselsBelgium
| | - Albrecht Stenzinger
- Institute of PathologyUniversity Hospital HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
- Centers for Personalized Medicine (ZPM)HeidelbergGermany
| | | | - Daniel Sur
- Department of Medical OncologyUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hatieganu”Cluj‐NapocaRomania
| | - Susan Fineberg
- Montefiore Medical CenterBronxNYUSA
- Albert Einstein College of MedicineBronxNYUSA
| | - Fraser Symmans
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTXUSA
| | | | | | - Sabine Tejpar
- Digestive Oncology, Department of OncologyKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Jonas Teuwen
- AI for Oncology Lab, The Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | - Trine Tramm
- Department of PathologyAarhus University HospitalAarhusDenmark
- Institute of Clinical MedicineAarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark
| | - William T Tran
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Toronto and Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Jeroen van der Laak
- Department of PathologyRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of PathologyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtThe Netherlands
- Johns Hopkins Oncology CenterBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Gregory E Verghese
- Cancer Bioinformatics, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Department of PathologyEuropean Institute of OncologyMilanItaly
- Department of PathologyUniversity of MilanMilanItaly
| | - Michael Vieth
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbHFriedrich‐Alexander‐University Erlangen‐NurembergBayreuthGermany
| | - Noorul Wahab
- Tissue Image Analytics Centre, Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK
| | - Thomas Walter
- Centre for Computational Biology (CBIO)Mines Paris, PSL UniversityParisFrance
- Institut CuriePSL UniversityParisFrance
- INSERMParisFrance
| | | | - Hannah Y Wen
- Department of PathologyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkUSA
| | - Wentao Yang
- Fudan Medical University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiPR China
| | - Yinyin Yuan
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTXUSA
| | - Reena Md Zin
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of MedicineUniversiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaKuala LumpurMalaysia
| | - Sylvia Adams
- Perlmutter Cancer CenterNYU Langone HealthNew YorkNYUSA
- Department of MedicineNYU Grossman School of MedicineManhattanNYUSA
| | | | - Sibylle Loibl
- Department of Medicine and ResearchGerman Breast GroupNeu‐IsenburgGermany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institut für PathologiePhilipps‐Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum MarburgMarburgGermany
| | - Peter Savas
- Division of Cancer ResearchPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical OncologyUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Sherene Loi
- Division of Cancer ResearchPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical OncologyUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Department of PathologyGZA‐ZNA HospitalsAntwerpBelgium
- Division of Cancer ResearchPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Elisabeth Specht Stovgaard
- Department of PathologyHerlev and Gentofte HospitalHerlevDenmark
- Department of Clinical MedicineUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Tarantino P, Viale G, Press MF, Hu X, Penault-Llorca F, Bardia A, Batistatou A, Burstein HJ, Carey LA, Cortes J, Denkert C, Diéras V, Jacot W, Koutras AK, Lebeau A, Loibl S, Modi S, Mosele MF, Provenzano E, Pruneri G, Reis-Filho JS, Rojo F, Salgado R, Schmid P, Schnitt SJ, Tolaney SM, Trapani D, Vincent-Salomon A, Wolff AC, Pentheroudakis G, André F, Curigliano G. ESMO expert consensus statements (ECS) on the definition, diagnosis, and management of HER2-low breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:645-659. [PMID: 37269905 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2023] [Revised: 05/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer has recently emerged as a targetable subset of breast tumors, based on the evidence from clinical trials of novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates. This evolution has raised several biological and clinical questions, warranting the establishment of consensus to optimally treat patients with HER2-low breast tumors. Between 2022 and 2023, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) held a virtual consensus-building process focused on HER2-low breast cancer. The consensus included a multidisciplinary panel of 32 leading experts in the management of breast cancer from nine different countries. The aim of the consensus was to develop statements on topics that are not covered in detail in the current ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline. The main topics identified for discussion were (i) biology of HER2-low breast cancer; (ii) pathologic diagnosis of HER2-low breast cancer; (iii) clinical management of HER2-low metastatic breast cancer; and (iv) clinical trial design for HER2-low breast cancer. The expert panel was divided into four working groups to address questions relating to one of the four topics outlined above. A review of the relevant scientific literature was conducted in advance. Consensus statements were developed by the working groups and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment before voting. This article presents the developed statements, including findings from the expert panel discussions, expert opinion, and a summary of evidence supporting each statement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Tarantino
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan
| | - G Viale
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - M F Press
- Department of Pathology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - X Hu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - F Penault-Llorca
- Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Centre Jean PERRIN, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - A Bardia
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - A Batistatou
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - H J Burstein
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - L A Carey
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - J Cortes
- International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Pangaea Oncology, Quironsalud Group, Barcelona; Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - C Denkert
- Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - V Diéras
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes
| | - W Jacot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier University, INSERM U1194, Montpellier, France
| | - A K Koutras
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, Greece
| | - A Lebeau
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg
| | - S Loibl
- German Breast Group/GBG Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg; Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - S Modi
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - M F Mosele
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - E Provenzano
- Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University NHS Foundation Trust and NIH Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - G Pruneri
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan; Department of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - J S Reis-Filho
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - F Rojo
- Department of Pathology, IIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz University Hospital-CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Salgado
- Department of Pathology, ZAS, Antwerp, Belgium; Division of Research, Peter Mac Callum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - P Schmid
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| | - S J Schnitt
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - S M Tolaney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - D Trapani
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan; European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - A Vincent-Salomon
- Department of Pathology, Diagnostic and Theranostic Medicine Division, Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France
| | - A C Wolff
- The Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, USA
| | | | - F André
- INSERM U981 - Molecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, PRISM Center for Precision Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - G Curigliano
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan; European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Page DB, Broeckx G, Jahangir CA, Verbandt S, Gupta RR, Thagaard J, Khiroya R, Kos Z, Abduljabbar K, Acosta Haab G, Acs B, Akturk G, Almeida JS, Alvarado-Cabrero I, Azmoudeh-Ardalan F, Badve S, Baharun NB, Bellolio ER, Bheemaraju V, Blenman KR, Botinelly Mendonça Fujimoto L, Bouchmaa N, Burgues O, Cheang MCU, Ciompi F, Cooper LA, Coosemans A, Corredor G, Dantas Portela FL, Deman F, Demaria S, Dudgeon SN, Elghazawy M, Ely S, Fernandez-Martín C, Fineberg S, Fox SB, Gallagher WM, Giltnane JM, Gnjatic S, Gonzalez-Ericsson PI, Grigoriadis A, Halama N, Hanna MG, Harbhajanka A, Hardas A, Hart SN, Hartman J, Hewitt S, Hida AI, Horlings HM, Husain Z, Hytopoulos E, Irshad S, Janssen EA, Kahila M, Kataoka TR, Kawaguchi K, Kharidehal D, Khramtsov AI, Kiraz U, Kirtani P, Kodach LL, Korski K, Kovács A, Laenkholm AV, Lang-Schwarz C, Larsimont D, Lennerz JK, Lerousseau M, Li X, Ly A, Madabhushi A, Maley SK, Manur Narasimhamurthy V, Marks DK, McDonald ES, Mehrotra R, Michiels S, Minhas FUAA, Mittal S, Moore DA, Mushtaq S, Nighat H, Papathomas T, Penault-Llorca F, Perera RD, Pinard CJ, Pinto-Cardenas JC, Pruneri G, Pusztai L, Rahman A, Rajpoot NM, Rapoport BL, Rau TT, Reis-Filho JS, Ribeiro JM, Rimm D, Vincent-Salomon A, Salto-Tellez M, Saltz J, Sayed S, Siziopikou KP, Sotiriou C, Stenzinger A, Sughayer MA, Sur D, Symmans F, Tanaka S, Taxter T, Tejpar S, Teuwen J, Thompson EA, Tramm T, Tran WT, van der Laak J, van Diest PJ, Verghese GE, Viale G, Vieth M, Wahab N, Walter T, Waumans Y, Wen HY, Yang W, Yuan Y, Adams S, Bartlett JMS, Loibl S, Denkert C, Savas P, Loi S, Salgado R, Specht Stovgaard E. Spatial analyses of immune cell infiltration in cancer: current methods and future directions: A report of the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group on Breast Cancer. J Pathol 2023; 260:514-532. [PMID: 37608771 DOI: 10.1002/path.6165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
Modern histologic imaging platforms coupled with machine learning methods have provided new opportunities to map the spatial distribution of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. However, there exists no standardized method for describing or analyzing spatial immune cell data, and most reported spatial analyses are rudimentary. In this review, we provide an overview of two approaches for reporting and analyzing spatial data (raster versus vector-based). We then provide a compendium of spatial immune cell metrics that have been reported in the literature, summarizing prognostic associations in the context of a variety of cancers. We conclude by discussing two well-described clinical biomarkers, the breast cancer stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes score and the colon cancer Immunoscore, and describe investigative opportunities to improve clinical utility of these spatial biomarkers. © 2023 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David B Page
- Earle A Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Glenn Broeckx
- Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
- Centre for Oncological Research (CORE), MIPPRO, Faculty of Medicine, Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Chowdhury Arif Jahangir
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Sara Verbandt
- Digestive Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rajarsi R Gupta
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Jeppe Thagaard
- Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
- Visiopharm A/S, Hørsholm, Denmark
| | - Reena Khiroya
- Department of Cellular Pathology, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Zuzana Kos
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, BC Cancer Vancouver Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Khalid Abduljabbar
- Centre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Balazs Acs
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Guray Akturk
- Translational Molecular Biomarkers, Merck & Co Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA
| | - Jonas S Almeida
- National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (DCEG), Rockville, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Sunil Badve
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Enrique R Bellolio
- Departamento de Anatomía Patológica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile
| | | | - Kim Rm Blenman
- Internal Medicine Section of Medical Oncology and Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Computer Science, Yale School of Engineering and Applied Science, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Najat Bouchmaa
- Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Mohammed VI Polytechnic University (UM6P), Ben-Guerir, Morocco
| | - Octavio Burgues
- Pathology Department, Hospital Cliníco Universitario de Valencia/Incliva, Valencia, Spain
| | - Maggie Chon U Cheang
- Head of Integrative Genomics Analysis in Clinical Trials, ICR-CTSU, Division of Clinical Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Francesco Ciompi
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lee Ad Cooper
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Germán Corredor
- Biomedical Engineering Department, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Frederik Deman
- Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Sandra Demaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pathology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sarah N Dudgeon
- Conputational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Mahmoud Elghazawy
- University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
- Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Scott Ely
- Translational Pathology, Translational Sciences and Diagnostics/Translational Medicine/R&D, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Claudio Fernandez-Martín
- Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Tecnología Centrada en el Ser Humano, HUMAN-tech, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain
| | - Susan Fineberg
- Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Stephen B Fox
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - William M Gallagher
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Sacha Gnjatic
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Medicine Hem/Onc, and Pathology, Tisch Cancer Institute - Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Anita Grigoriadis
- Cancer Bioinformatics, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
- Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Niels Halama
- Translational Immunotherapy, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Alexandros Hardas
- Pathobiology & Population Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, London, UK
| | - Steven N Hart
- Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Johan Hartman
- Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Stephen Hewitt
- Department of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Akira I Hida
- Department of Pathology, Matsuyama Shimin Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Hugo M Horlings
- Division of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Sheeba Irshad
- King's College London & Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Emiel Am Janssen
- Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Chemistry, Bioscience and Environmental Technology, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Mohamed Kahila
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Kosuke Kawaguchi
- Department of Breast Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Durga Kharidehal
- Department of Pathology, Narayana Medical College, Nellore, India
| | - Andrey I Khramtsov
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Umay Kiraz
- Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Chemistry, Bioscience and Environmental Technology, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Pawan Kirtani
- Department of Histopathology, Aakash Healthcare Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Liudmila L Kodach
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Konstanty Korski
- Data, Analytics and Imaging, Product Development, F.Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Anikó Kovács
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anne-Vibeke Laenkholm
- Surgical Pathology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
- Surgical Pathology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Corinna Lang-Schwarz
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Denis Larsimont
- Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jochen K Lennerz
- Center for Integrated Diagnostics, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marvin Lerousseau
- Centre for Computational Biology (CBIO), Mines Paris, PSL University, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France
- INSERM, U900, Paris, France
| | - Xiaoxian Li
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Amy Ly
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anant Madabhushi
- Biomedical Engineering, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Biomedical Informatics, Pathology, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sai K Maley
- NRG Oncology/NSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Douglas K Marks
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth S McDonald
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Group, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ravi Mehrotra
- Indian Cancer Genome Atlas, Pune, India
- Centre for Health, Innovation and Policy Foundation, Noida, India
| | - Stefan Michiels
- Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, Inserm, University Paris-Saclay, Ligue Contre le Cancer labeled Team, Villejuif, France
| | - Fayyaz Ul Amir Afsar Minhas
- Tissue Image Analytics Centre, Warwick Cancer Research Centre, PathLAKE Consortium, Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Shachi Mittal
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - David A Moore
- CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, UCLH, London, UK
| | - Shamim Mushtaq
- Department of Biochemistry, Ziauddin University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Hussain Nighat
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, India
| | - Thomas Papathomas
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Drammen Sykehus, Vestre Viken HF, Drammen, Norway
| | - Frederique Penault-Llorca
- Centre Jean Perrin, INSERM U1240, Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies Théranostiques, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Rashindrie D Perera
- School of Electrical, Mechanical and Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Christopher J Pinard
- Radiogenomics Laboratory, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Lakeshore Animal Health Partners, Mississauga, ON, Canada
- Centre for Advancing Responsible and Ethical Artificial Intelligence (CARE-AI), University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | | | - Giancarlo Pruneri
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Arman Rahman
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Bernardo Leon Rapoport
- The Medical Oncology Centre of Rosebank, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Department of Immunology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Tilman T Rau
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Düsseldorf and Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Jorge S Reis-Filho
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joana M Ribeiro
- Département de Médecine Oncologique, Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - David Rimm
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Anne Vincent-Salomon
- Department of Diagnostic and Theranostic Medicine, Institut Curie, University Paris-Sciences et Lettres, Paris, France
| | - Manuel Salto-Tellez
- Integrated Pathology Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Precision Medicine Centre, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Joel Saltz
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shahin Sayed
- Department of Pathology, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Kalliopi P Siziopikou
- Department of Pathology, Section of Breast Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Christos Sotiriou
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory J.-C. Heuson, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Albrecht Stenzinger
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Centers for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Daniel Sur
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Iuliu Hatieganu", Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Fraser Symmans
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Sabine Tejpar
- Digestive Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jonas Teuwen
- AI for Oncology Lab, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Trine Tramm
- Pathology, and Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - William T Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jeroen van der Laak
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Gregory E Verghese
- Cancer Bioinformatics, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
- Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Department of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology & University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Michael Vieth
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Noorul Wahab
- Tissue Image Analytics Centre, Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Thomas Walter
- Centre for Computational Biology (CBIO), Mines Paris, PSL University, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France
- INSERM, U900, Paris, France
| | | | - Hannah Y Wen
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wentao Yang
- Fudan Medical University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Yinyin Yuan
- Translational Molecular Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sylvia Adams
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Manhattan, NY, USA
| | | | - Sibylle Loibl
- Department of Medicine and Research, German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Peter Savas
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sherene Loi
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Elisabeth Specht Stovgaard
- Department of Pathology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Jank P, Leichsenring J, Kolb S, Hoffmann I, Bischoff P, Kunze CA, Dragomir MP, Gleitsmann M, Jesinghaus M, Schmitt WD, Kulbe H, Sers C, Stenzinger A, Sehouli J, Braicu IE, Westhoff C, Horst D, Denkert C, Gröschel S, Taube ET. High EVI1 and PARP1 expression as favourable prognostic markers in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. J Ovarian Res 2023; 16:150. [PMID: 37525239 PMCID: PMC10388497 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-023-01239-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mechanisms of development and progression of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) are poorly understood. EVI1 and PARP1, part of TGF-ß pathway, are upregulated in cancers with DNA repair deficiencies with DNA repair deficiencies and may influce disease progression and survival. Therefore we questioned the prognostic significance of protein expression of EVI1 alone and in combination with PARP1 and analyzed them in a cohort of patients with HGSOC. METHODS For 562 HGSOC patients, we evaluated EVI1 and PARP1 expression by immunohistochemical staining on tissue microarrays with QuPath digital semi-automatic positive cell detection. RESULTS High EVI1 expressing (> 30% positive tumor cells) HGSOC were associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.504-0.852, p = 0.002) and overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.352-0.563, p < 0.001), including multivariate analysis. Most interestingly, mutual high expression of both proteins identifies a group with particularly good prognosis. Our findings were proven technically and clinically using bioinformatical data sets for single-cell sequencing, copy number variation and gene as well as protein expression. CONCLUSIONS EVI1 and PARP1 are robust prognostic biomarkers for favorable prognosis in HGSOC and imply further research with respect to their reciprocity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Jank
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - Jonas Leichsenring
- Institute of Pathology, Zytologie Und Molekulare Diagnostik, REGIOMED, Klinikum Coburg, Coburg, Germany
| | - Svenja Kolb
- Department of Gynecology, Vivantes Netzwerk Für Gesundheit GmbH Berlin, Vivantes Hospital Neukölln, Rudower Straße 48, 12351, Berlin, Germany
| | - Inga Hoffmann
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, CCM, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Philip Bischoff
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, CCM, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Catarina Alisa Kunze
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, CCM, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mihnea P Dragomir
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, CCM, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Moritz Gleitsmann
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - Moritz Jesinghaus
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang D Schmitt
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, CCM, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hagen Kulbe
- Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christine Sers
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, CCM, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Jalid Sehouli
- Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ioana Elena Braicu
- Tumorbank Ovarian Cancer Network, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christina Westhoff
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - David Horst
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, CCM, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | | | - Eliane T Taube
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, CCM, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kaidar-Person O, Pfob A, Gentilini OD, Borisch B, Bosch A, Cardoso MJ, Curigliano G, De Boniface J, Denkert C, Hauser N, Heil J, Knauer M, Kühn T, Lee HB, Loibl S, Mannhart M, Meattini I, Montagna G, Pinker K, Poulakaki F, Rubio IT, Sager P, Steyerova P, Tausch C, Tramm T, Vrancken Peeters MJ, Wyld L, Yu JH, Weber WP, Poortmans P, Dubsky P. The Lucerne Toolbox 2 to optimise axillary management for early breast cancer: a multidisciplinary expert consensus. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 61:102085. [PMID: 37528842 PMCID: PMC10388578 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Clinical axillary lymph node management in early breast cancer has evolved from being merely an aspect of surgical management and now includes the entire multidisciplinary team. The second edition of the "Lucerne Toolbox", a multidisciplinary consortium of European cancer societies and patient representatives, addresses the challenges of clinical axillary lymph node management, from diagnosis to local therapy of the axilla. Five working packages were developed, following the patients' journey and addressing specific clinical scenarios. Panellists voted on 72 statements, reaching consensus (agreement of 75% or more) in 52.8%, majority (51%-74% agreement) in 43.1%, and no decision in 4.2%. Based on the votes, targeted imaging and standardized pathology of lymph nodes should be a prerequisite to planning local and systemic therapy, axillary lymph node dissection can be replaced by sentinel lymph node biopsy ( ± targeted approaches) in a majority of scenarios; and positive patient outcomes should be driven by both low recurrence risks and low rates of lymphoedema.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orit Kaidar-Person
- Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - André Pfob
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Bettina Borisch
- Department of Histopathology, University of Geneva, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ana Bosch
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lasarettsgatan 23A, 22241, Lund, Sweden
| | - Maria João Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Foundation and University of Lisbon Faculty of Medicine, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti, 435, 20141 Milano MI, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Jana De Boniface
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Breast Centre, Capio St Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Nik Hauser
- Breast Center, Hirslanden Clinic Aarau, Frauenarztzentrum Aargau AG, Baden, Switzerland
| | - Jörg Heil
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany
- Breast Center Heidelberg, Klinik St. Elisabeth, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Knauer
- Breast Center Eastern Switzerland, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Ulm, Germany
| | - Han-Byoel Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group (GBG), C/o GBG Forschungs GmbH 63263 - Neu-Isenberg/, Germany
- Centre for Haematology and Oncology Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Icro Meattini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “M. Serio”, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Giacomo Montagna
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Katja Pinker
- Breast Imaging Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Isabel T. Rubio
- Breast Surgical Oncology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Patrizia Sager
- Breast Center Bern-Biel, Hirslanden Clinic Salem, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Petra Steyerova
- Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnostic Center, Clinic of Radiology, General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Trine Tramm
- Department of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Marie-Jeanne Vrancken Peeters
- Department of Surgical Oncology Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek & Amsterdam University Medical Center, Netherlands
| | - Lynda Wyld
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, The University of Sheffield, The Medical School, Sheffield, UK
| | - Jong Han Yu
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea
| | - Walter Paul Weber
- Breast Center, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp 2610, Belgium
- University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Peter Dubsky
- Breast Center, Hirslanden Clinic St Anna, 6006, Lucerne, Switzerland
- University of Lucerne, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Lucerne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Squifflet P, Saad ED, Loibl S, van Mackelenbergh MT, Untch M, Rastogi P, Gianni L, Schneeweiss A, Conte P, Piccart M, Bonnefoi H, Jackisch C, Nekljudova V, Tang G, Valagussa P, Neate C, Gelber R, Poncet C, Heinzmann D, Denkert C, Geyer CE, Cortes J, Guarneri V, de Azambuja E, Cameron D, Ismael G, Wolmark N, Cortazar P, Buyse M. Re-Evaluation of Pathologic Complete Response as a Surrogate for Event-Free and Overall Survival in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive, Early Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Therapy Including Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Therapy. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:2988-2997. [PMID: 36977286 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Pathologic complete response (pCR) has prognostic importance and is frequently used as a primary end point, but doubts remain about its validity as a surrogate for event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive, early breast cancer. METHODS We obtained individual-patient data from randomized trials of neoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapy that enrolled at least 100 patients, had data for pCR, EFS, and OS, and a median follow-up of at least 3 years. We quantified the patient-level association between pCR (defined as ypT0/Tis ypN0) and both EFS and OS using odds ratios (ORs, with ORs >1.00 indicating a benefit from achieving a pCR). We quantified the trial-level association between treatment effects on pCR and on EFS and OS using R2 (with values above 0.75 considered as indicating strong associations). RESULTS Eleven of 15 eligible trials had data for analysis (3,980 patients, with a median follow-up of 62 months). Considering all trials, we found strong patient-level associations, with ORs of 2.64 (95% CI, 2.20 to 3.07) for EFS and 3.15 (95% CI, 2.38 to 3.91) for OS; however, trial-level associations were weak, with an unadjusted R2 of 0.23 (95% CI, 0 to 0.66) for EFS and 0.02 (95% CI, 0 to 0.17) for OS. We found qualitatively similar results when grouping trials according to different clinical questions, when analyzing only patients with hormone receptor-negative disease, and when using a more stringent definition of pCR (ypT0 ypN0). CONCLUSION Although pCR may be useful for patient management, it cannot be considered as a surrogate for EFS or OS in neoadjuvant trials of HER2-positive, operable breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Squifflet
- International Drug Development Institute (IDDI), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Everardo D Saad
- International Drug Development Institute (IDDI), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | - Luca Gianni
- San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Pierfranco Conte
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova and Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Martine Piccart
- Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hervé Bonnefoi
- Institut Bergonié and Université de Bordeaux INSERM U916, Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | - Gong Tang
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Colin Neate
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Richard Gelber
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health and Frontier Science and Technology Research Foundation, Boston, MA
| | - Coralie Poncet
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Dominik Heinzmann
- Product Development-Oncology, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | | | - Javier Cortes
- IOB Institute of Oncology, Quiron Group, Madrid & Barcelona and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Valentina Guarneri
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova and Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Evandro de Azambuja
- Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - David Cameron
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, University of Edinburgh and NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Marc Buyse
- International Drug Development Institute (IDDI), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
- Data Science Institute, I-BioStat, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
van Mackelenbergh MT, Loibl S, Untch M, Buyse M, Geyer CE, Gianni L, Schneeweiss A, Conte P, Piccart M, Bonnefoi H, Jackisch C, Nekljudova V, Tang G, Valagussa P, Neate C, Gelber R, Poncet C, Squifflet P, Saad ED, Heinzmann D, Denkert C, Rastogi P, Cortes J, Guarneri V, de Azambuja E, Cameron D, Ismael G, Wolmark N, Cortazar P. Pathologic Complete Response and Individual Patient Prognosis After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Therapy of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Early Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:2998-3008. [PMID: 37075276 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/21/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The achievement of pathologic complete response (pCR) is strongly prognostic for event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with early breast cancer (EBC), and adapting postneoadjuvant therapy improves long-term outcomes for patients with HER2-positive disease not achieving pCR. We sought to investigate prognostic factors for EFS and OS among patients with and without pCR after neoadjuvant systemic treatment consisting of chemotherapy plus anti-HER2 therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We used individual data from 3,710 patients randomly assigned in 11 neoadjuvant trials for HER2-positive EBC with ≥100 patients enrolled, available data for pCR, EFS, and OS, and follow-up ≥3 years. We assessed baseline clinical tumor size (cT) and clinical nodal status (cN) as prognostic factors using stratified (by trial and treatment) Cox models separately for hormone receptor-positive versus hormone receptor-negative disease, and for patients who had pCR (pCR+; ypT0/is, ypN0) versus patients who did not achieve a pCR (pCR-). RESULTS The median follow-up overall was 61.2 months. In pCR+ patients, cT and cN were significant independent prognostic factors for EFS, whereas only cT was a significant predictor for OS. In pCR- patients, cT, cN, and hormone receptor status were significant independent predictors for both EFS and OS. Regardless of hormone receptor status, cT, and cN, the 5-year EFS/OS rates were higher in pCR+ patients than in pCR- patients. In most subsets with regards to hormone receptor and pCR status, cT and cN were independent prognostic factors for both EFS and OS, including pCR+ patients. CONCLUSION These results confirm that patients achieving pCR have far better survival outcomes than patients who do not. The traditional poor prognostic features, namely tumor size and nodal status, remain important even after a pCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Marc Buyse
- International Drug Development Institute (IDDI), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Charles E Geyer
- NSABP Foundation and University of Pittsburgh/Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Luca Gianni
- San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Pierfranco Conte
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova and Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Martine Piccart
- Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Herve Bonnefoi
- Institut Bergonié and Université de Bordeaux INSERM U916, Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | - Gong Tang
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Colin Neate
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Richard Gelber
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health and Frontier Science and Technology Research Foundation, Boston, MA
| | - Coralie Poncet
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Pierre Squifflet
- International Drug Development Institute (IDDI), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Everardo D Saad
- International Drug Development Institute (IDDI), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Dominik Heinzmann
- Product Development-Oncology, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Priya Rastogi
- NSABP Foundation and University of Pittsburgh/Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Javier Cortes
- IOB Institute of Oncology, Quiron Group, Madrid & Barcelona and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Valentina Guarneri
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova and Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Evandro de Azambuja
- Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - David Cameron
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, University of Edinburgh and NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | | | - Norman Wolmark
- NSABP Foundation and University of Pittsburgh/Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Riecke K, Müller V, Neunhöffer T, Park-Simon TW, Weide R, Polasik A, Schmidt M, Puppe J, Mundhenke C, Lübbe K, Hesse T, Thill M, Wuerstlein R, Denkert C, Decker T, Fehm T, Nekljudova V, Rey J, Loibl S, Laakmann E, Witzel I. Long-term survival of breast cancer patients with brain metastases: subanalysis of the BMBC registry. ESMO Open 2023; 8:101213. [PMID: 37075697 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 02/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Up to 30% of metastatic breast cancer (BC) patients develop brain metastases (BM). Prognosis of patients with BM is poor and long-term survival is rare. Identification of factors associated with long-term survival is important for improving treatment modalities. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 2889 patients of the national registry for BM in BC (BMBC) were available for this analysis. Long-term survival was defined as overall survival (OS) in the upper third of the failure curve resulting in a cut-off of 15 months. A total of 887 patients were categorized as long-term survivors. RESULTS Long-term survivors compared to other patients were younger at BC and BM diagnosis (median 48 versus 54 years and 53 versus 59 years), more often had HER2-positive tumors (59.1% versus 36.3%), less frequently luminal-like (29.1% versus 35.7%) or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (11.9% versus 28.1%), showed better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) at the time of BM diagnosis (ECOG 0-1, 76.9% versus 51.0%), higher pathological complete remission rates after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (21.6% versus 13.7%) and lower number of BM (n = 1, BM 40.9% versus 25.4%; n = 2-3, BM 26.5% versus 26.7%; n ≥4, BM 32.6% versus 47.9%) (P < 0.001). Long-term survivors had leptomeningeal metastases (10.4% versus 17.5%) and extracranial metastases (ECM, 73.6% versus 82.5%) less frequently, and asymptomatic BM more often at the time of BM diagnosis (26.5% versus 20.1%), (P < 0.001). Median OS in long-term survivors was about two times higher than the cut-off of 15 months: 30.9 months [interquartile range (IQR) 30.3] overall, 33.9 months (IQR 37.1) in HER2-positive, 26.9 months (IQR 22.0) in luminal-like and 26.5 months (IQR 18.2) in TNBC patients. CONCLUSIONS In our analysis, long-term survival of BC patients with BM was associated with better ECOG PS, younger age, HER2-positive subtype, lower number of BM and less extended visceral metastases. Patients with these clinical features might be more eligible for extended local brain and systemic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Riecke
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - V Müller
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - T Neunhöffer
- Frauenärzte am Dom, Mainz, Germany; HELIOS Dr. Horst Schmidt Clinic Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - T-W Park-Simon
- Hanover Medical School (MHH University), Hanover, Germany
| | - R Weide
- Institute for Health Services Research in Oncology, Koblenz, Germany
| | - A Polasik
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - M Schmidt
- The University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - J Puppe
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - C Mundhenke
- Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH/Medizincampus Oberfranken, Bayreuth, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-Europäische Metropolregion Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - K Lübbe
- Diakovere Henriettenstift, Breast Center, Hannover, Germany
| | - T Hesse
- Agaplesion Diakonieklinikum Rotenburg, Rotenburg, Germany
| | - M Thill
- Department of Gynecology and Gyneacological Oncology, Agaplesion Markus Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - R Wuerstlein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - C Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - T Decker
- Onkology, Haematology Ravensburg, Ravensburg, Germany
| | - T Fehm
- Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - J Rey
- GBG Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - S Loibl
- GBG Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - E Laakmann
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - I Witzel
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Denkert C, Lambertini C, Fasching PA, Pogue-Geile KL, Mano MS, Untch M, Wolmark N, Huang CS, Loibl S, Mamounas EP, Geyer CE, Lucas PC, Boulet T, Song C, Lewis GD, Nowicka M, de Haas S, Basik M. Biomarker Data from the Phase III KATHERINE Study of Adjuvant T-DM1 versus Trastuzumab for Residual Invasive Disease after Neoadjuvant Therapy for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:1569-1581. [PMID: 36730339 PMCID: PMC10102844 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-1989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In KATHERINE, adjuvant T-DM1 reduced risk of disease recurrence or death by 50% compared with trastuzumab in patients with residual invasive breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) comprised of HER2-targeted therapy and chemotherapy. This analysis aimed to identify biomarkers of response and differences in biomarker expression before and after NAT. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Exploratory analyses investigated the relationship between invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and HER2 protein expression/gene amplification, PIK3CA hotspot mutations, and gene expression of HER2, PD-L1, CD8, predefined immune signatures, and Prediction Analysis of Microarray 50 intrinsic molecular subtypes, classified by Absolute Intrinsic Molecular Subtyping. HER2 expression on paired pre- and post-NAT samples was examined. RESULTS T-DM1 appeared to improve IDFS versus trastuzumab across most biomarker subgroups, except the HER2 focal expression subgroup. High versus low HER2 gene expression in residual disease was associated with worse outcomes with trastuzumab [HR, 2.02; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.32-3.11], but IDFS with T-DM1 was independent of HER2 expression level (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.56-1.83). Low PD-L1 gene expression in residual disease was associated with worse outcomes with trastuzumab (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44-1.00), but not T-DM1 (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.59-1.87). PIK3CA mutations were not prognostic. Increased variability in HER2 expression was observed in post-NAT versus paired pre-NAT samples. CONCLUSIONS T-DM1 appears to overcome HER2 resistance. T-DM1 benefit does not appear dependent on immune activation, but these results do not rule out an influence of the tumor immune microenvironment on the degree of response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | | | - Peter A. Fasching
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Max S. Mano
- Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Michael Untch
- AGO-B and HELIOS Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Norman Wolmark
- NSABP Foundation and University of Pittsburgh/UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Chiun-Sheng Huang
- National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Centre for Haematology and Oncology Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Charles E. Geyer
- NSABP Foundation and University of Pittsburgh/UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Peter C. Lucas
- NSABP Foundation and University of Pittsburgh/UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Chunyan Song
- Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California
| | | | | | | | - Mark Basik
- NSABP Foundation and Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Huober J, van Mackelenbergh M, Schneeweiss A, Seither F, Blohmer JU, Denkert C, Tesch H, Hanusch C, Salat C, Rhiem K, Solbach C, Fasching PA, Jackisch C, Reinisch M, Lederer B, Mehta K, Link T, Nekljudova V, Loibl S, Untch M. Identifying breast cancer patients at risk of relapse despite pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy. NPJ Breast Cancer 2023; 9:23. [PMID: 37029138 PMCID: PMC10082019 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-023-00525-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023] Open
Abstract
This retrospective pooled analysis aims to identify factors predicting relapse despite a pathologic complete response (pCR) in patients with breast cancer (BC). 2066 patients with a pCR from five neoadjuvant GBG/AGO-B trials fulfill the inclusion criteria of this analysis. Primary endpoint is disease-free survival (DFS); secondary endpoints is distant DFS (DDFS) and overall survival (OS). After a median follow-up of 57.6 months, DFS is significantly worse for patients with positive lymph nodes (cN+ vs cN0 hazard ratio [HR] 1.94, 95%CI 1.48-2.54; p < 0.001). In patients with triple-negative tumors, lobular histology (lobular vs other HR 3.55, 95%CI 1.53-8.23; p = 0.003), and clinical nodal involvement (cN+ vs cN0 HR 2.45, 95%CI 1.59-3.79; p < 0.001) predict a higher risk of DFS events. Patients with HER2-positive cT3/4 tumors have a significantly higher risk of relapse (cT3/4 vs cT1 HR 2.07, 95%CI 1.06-4.03; p = 0.033). Initial tumor load and histological type predict relapse in patients with a pCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Huober
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Ulm, Brustzentrum, Germany
- Kantonsspital St.Gallen, Brustzentrum, Departement Interdisziplinäre medizinische Dienste, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Marion van Mackelenbergh
- Brustzentrum, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
| | | | | | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Centrum für Hämatologie und Onkologie Bethanien Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Christoph Salat
- Hämatologisch-Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis Salat/Stötzer, München, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Uniklinik Köln, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Theresa Link
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Fasching PA, Szeto C, Denkert C, Benz S, Weber K, Spilman P, Budczies J, Schneeweiss A, Stickeler E, Schmatloch S, Jackisch C, Karn T, Sinn HP, Warm M, van Mackelenbergh M, Rabizadeh S, Schem C, Heinmoeller E, Mueller V, Marme F, Soon-Shiong P, Nekljudova V, Untch M, Loibl S. Inferred immune-cell activity is an independent predictor of HER2 negative breast cancer prognosis and response to paclitaxel-based therapy in the GeparSepto trial. Clin Cancer Res 2023:725123. [PMID: 37014668 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-2213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Revised: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Tumor microenvironment (TME) immune markers have been correlated with both response to neoadjuvant therapy and prognosis in breast cancer (BC) patients. Here, immune-cell activity of BC tumors was inferred by expression-based analysis to determine if it is prognostic and/or predictive of response to neoadjuvant paclitaxel-based therapy in the GeparSepto (G7) trial (NCT01583426). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Pre-study biopsies from 279 HER2 negative BC patients in the G7 trial underwent RNAseq-based profiling of 104 immune-cell specfic genes to assess inferred Immune Cell Activity (iICA) of 23 immune-cell types. Hierarchical clustering was used to classify tumors as iICA 'hot', 'warm' or 'cold' by comparison of iICA in the G7 cohort relative to that of 1467 samples from a tumor database established by Nantomics LLC. Correlations between iICA cluster, pathology-assessed TILs, and hormone receptor (HR) status for pathologic complete response (pCR), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), were determined. RESULTS iICA cluster correlated with TIL levels. The highest pCR rates were observed in hot cluster tumors, and those with relatively higher TILs. Greater inferred activity of several T-cell types was significantly associated with pCR and survival. DFS and OS were prolonged in patients with hot or warm cluster tumors, the latter particularly for HR negative tumors, even if TILs were relatively low. CONCLUSIONS Overall, TIL level better predicted pCR, but iICA cluster better predicted survival. Differences in associations between TILs, cluster, pCR and survival were observed for HR positive versus negative tumors, suggesting expanded study of the implication of these findings is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter A Fasching
- Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Carsten Denkert
- Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Stephen Benz
- ImmunityBio, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, United States
| | - Karsten Weber
- German Breast Group, Neu Isenburg. Germany, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | | | - Jan Budczies
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Sabine Schmatloch
- Brustzentrum Kassel, Elisabeth Krankenhaus, Kassel, Germany, Germany
| | | | - Thomas Karn
- Goethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Frederik Marme
- Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Hessen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Denkert C. SA 3.2 Tumor microenvironment in early breast cancer. Breast 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9776(23)00079-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
|
37
|
Kümmel S, Schmid P, Harbeck N, Takahashi M, Untch M, Boileau JF, Cortes J, McArthur H, Dent R, O’Shaughnessy J, Pusztai L, Foukakis T, Park Y, Hui R, Cardoso F, Denkert C, Zhu Y, Pan W, Karantza V, Fasching P. P125 Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab + chemotherapy vs placebo + chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab vs placebo for early TNBC: surgical outcomes from the phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 study. Breast 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9776(23)00242-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
|
38
|
Virassamy B, Caramia F, Savas P, Sant S, Wang J, Christo SN, Byrne A, Clarke K, Brown E, Teo ZL, von Scheidt B, Freestone D, Gandolfo LC, Weber K, Teply-Szymanski J, Li R, Luen SJ, Denkert C, Loibl S, Lucas O, Swanton C, Speed TP, Darcy PK, Neeson PJ, Mackay LK, Loi S. Intratumoral CD8 + T cells with a tissue-resident memory phenotype mediate local immunity and immune checkpoint responses in breast cancer. Cancer Cell 2023; 41:585-601.e8. [PMID: 36827978 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2023.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Revised: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes with a tissue-resident memory T (TRM) cell phenotype are associated with favorable prognosis in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, the relative contribution of CD8+ TRM cells to anti-tumor immunity and immune checkpoint blockade efficacy in breast cancer remains unknown. Here, we show that intratumoral CD8+ T cells in murine mammary tumors transcriptionally resemble those from TNBC patients. Phenotypic and transcriptional studies established two intratumoral sub-populations: one more enriched in markers of terminal exhaustion (TEX-like) and the other with a bona fide resident phenotype (TRM-like). Treatment with anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 therapy resulted in expansion of these intratumoral populations, with the TRM-like subset displaying significantly enhanced cytotoxic capacity. TRM-like CD8+ T cells could also provide local immune protection against tumor rechallenge and a TRM gene signature extracted from tumor-free tissue was significantly associated with improved clinical outcomes in TNBC patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Balaji Virassamy
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Franco Caramia
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Peter Savas
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sneha Sant
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jianan Wang
- Bioinformatics Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Susan N Christo
- Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Ann Byrne
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Kylie Clarke
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Emmaline Brown
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Zhi Ling Teo
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Bianca von Scheidt
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - David Freestone
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Luke C Gandolfo
- Bioinformatics Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Karsten Weber
- German Breast Cancer Group, GBG-Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - Julia Teply-Szymanski
- German Breast Cancer Group, GBG-Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Department of Pathology, University Marburg-Giessen, Campus Marburg, Germany
| | - Ran Li
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Stephen J Luen
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Carsten Denkert
- German Breast Cancer Group, GBG-Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Department of Pathology, University Marburg-Giessen, Campus Marburg, Germany
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Cancer Group, GBG-Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - Olivia Lucas
- Cancer Evolution and Genome Instability Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK; Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK; Computational Cancer Genomics Research Group, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | - Charles Swanton
- Cancer Evolution and Genome Instability Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK; Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | - Terence P Speed
- Bioinformatics Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Phillip K Darcy
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - Paul J Neeson
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - Laura K Mackay
- Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - Sherene Loi
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Denkert C, Schneeweiss A, Rey J, Hattesohl A, Karn T, Braun M, Jank P, Huober J, Sinn HP, Zahm DM, Hanusch C, Marmé F, Furlanetto J, Thomalla J, Blohmer JU, van Mackelenbergh M, Stiewe T, Staib P, Jackisch C, Teply-Szymanski J, Fasching PA, Sinn BV, Untch M, Weber K, Loibl S. Abstract PD4-02: PD4-02 Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of predictive and prognostic signatures in triple-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant combination immune-chemotherapy. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-pd4-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: It is well known that immunological pathways are relevant for response to classical neoadjuvant chemotherapy as well as combined chemo-immunotherapy. In addition, it has been shown that combined chemo-immunotherapy significantly improves survival, even in the context of only moderate effects on pCR. Due to the window therapy with durvalumab-alone and the option to analyze multiple consecutive biopsies, the GeparNuevo trial offers the opportunity to 1) determine gene expression patterns for pCR and DDFS endpoints 2) identify pathways most relevant for pCR and DDFS 3) identify genes specifically regulated by immunotherapy (comparison of samples pre-and post-window) 4) identify genes specifically regulated by chemotherapy (comparison of samples pre-Tx and after 4 cycles of chemotherapy 5) identify longitudinal patterns of gene expression by comparison of up to four time points and 6) identify changes in the tumor microenvironment by spatial sequencing of tumor cell and stroma areas. Methods: 292 tumor samples were evaluated by gene expression analysis: 162 pretherapeutic core biopsies, 79 post-window biopsies, 32 biopsies during chemotherapy and 19 biopsies of the residual tumor after therapy. These samples were analyzed by HTG OBP panel targeting 2549 genes which are assigned to 25 different biological mechanisms or cellular pathways. In addition, spatial profiling was compared in a subset of pre-and post-window samples using Nanostring GeoMx spatial profiling system. Endpoints were pCR and DDFS. Results: A total of more than 600 genes were significantly associated with either the pCR or the DDFS endpoint in either the complete GeparNuevo cohort or one of the two therapy arms. Interestingly, there was a large number of predictive or prognostic genes (n=247 for pCR and n=179 for DDFS) in the durvalumab arm, while the number of genes in the placebo arm was considerably lower (n=113 for pCR and n=61 for DDFS). We used existing pathway information for HTG OBP panel to analyze the contribution of different cellular processes to pCR and DDFS signatures in different therapy arms. Immune pathways were particularly relevant for durvalumab signatures (pCR and DDFS), while cell cycle related gene expression patterns were particularly involved in signatures predictive of pCR in both therapy arms. To further assign genes to the cellular response to durvalumab-alone or chemotherapy-alone, we compared gene expression patterns in durvalumab arm before and after the window phase (gene expression patterns induced by one dose of durvalumab) with gene expression patterns in placebo arm before and after 4 cycles of chemotherapy. Further longitudinal alterations were analyzed by comparison of longitudinal samples for 4 different time-points (a: before NACT, n=162; b: after window phase, n=79; c: after 4 cycles, n=31 and d: at surgery, n=19). Using the Nanostring GeoMx spatial RNA profiling system guided by cytokeratine immunofluorescence, we compared areas with high tumor cell content with stromal areas with or without TILs. In combination with the HTG gene expression data, we were able allocate the changes induced by durvalumab vs chemotherapy to the stromal cell and tumor cell compartment, indicating a re-organization of the tumor-microenvironment. Conclusions: In our analysis, we show that immune gene signatures are particularly relevant for neoadjuvant response to durvalumab as well as prognosis after durvalumab treatment, while proliferation signatures are involved in pCR-signatures after durvalumab as well as chemotherapy. The spatial analysis showed that relevant changes occur in the stromal compartment, indicating a re-organization of the tumor microenvironment. The parallel targeting of immune- and proliferation pathways might explain why a combined immunotherapy-chemotherapy approach is more successful than each single therapy strategy alone.
Citation Format: Carsten Denkert, Andreas Schneeweiss, Julia Rey, Akira Hattesohl, Thomas Karn, Michael Braun, Paul Jank, Jens Huober, Hans-Peter Sinn, Dirk-Michael Zahm, Claus Hanusch, Frederik Marmé, Jenny Furlanetto, Jörg Thomalla, Jens-Uwe Blohmer, Marion van Mackelenbergh, Thorsten Stiewe, Peter Staib, Christian Jackisch, Julia Teply-Szymanski, Peter A. Fasching, Bruno V. Sinn, Michael Untch, Karsten Weber, Sibylle Loibl. PD4-02 Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of predictive and prognostic signatures in triple-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant combination immune-chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD4-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carsten Denkert
- 1Institut für Pathologie, Philipps Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg (UKGM), Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- 2National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Akira Hattesohl
- 4Institut für Pathologie, Philipps Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg (UKGM), Germany
| | - Thomas Karn
- 5Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Michael Braun
- 6Abteilung für Senologie Leiter Interdisziplinäres Brustzentrum - Rotkreuzklinikum München, Germany
| | - Paul Jank
- 7Institut für Pathologie, Philipps Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg (UKGM), Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- 8Kantonsspital St.Gallen, Brustzentrum, Departement Interdisziplinäre medizinische Dienste, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Hans-Peter Sinn
- 9Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Frederik Marmé
- 12Med. Fakultät Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | - Jörg Thomalla
- 14Institut für Versorgungsforschung in der Oncologie Koblenz am Rhein, Germany
| | | | - Marion van Mackelenbergh
- 16Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
| | - Thorsten Stiewe
- 17Institut für Molekulare Onkologie, Genomics Core Facility, Philipps Universität Marburg, Germany
| | | | - Christian Jackisch
- 19Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Germany
| | - Julia Teply-Szymanski
- 20Institut für Pathologie, Philipps Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg (UKGM), Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- 21Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
McArthur H, Cortés J, Dent R, O’Shaughnessy J, Pusztai L, Küemmel S, Foukakis T, Park YH, Hui R, Harbeck N, Takahashi M, Untch M, Fasching PA, Cardoso F, Denkert C, Zhu Y, Ding Y, Pan W, Schmid P. Abstract PD3-01: Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab + chemotherapy vs placebo + chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab vs placebo for early TNBC: Post hoc analysis of adjuvant radiation therapy in the phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 study. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-pd3-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 study (NCT03036488) showed that pembrolizumab (pembro) administered in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (chemo) and then continued as adjuvant monotherapy resulted in statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in pathological complete response (pCR) and event-free survival (EFS) in patients with early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). In this post hoc analysis, we assessed outcomes by patterns of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) administration.
Methods: Patients with previously untreated, nonmetastatic, stage T1c/N1-2 or T2-4/N0-2 TNBC were randomized 2:1 to pembro 200 mg Q3W or placebo, both given with 4 cycles of paclitaxel + carboplatin, then 4 cycles of doxorubicin or epirubicin + cyclophosphamide (neoadjuvant phase). After definitive surgery, patients received pembro or placebo for 9 cycles or until recurrence or unacceptable toxicity (adjuvant phase). Dual primary endpoints are pCR, defined as ypT0/Tis ypN0, and EFS. EFS and adverse events (AEs) that occurred during the adjuvant phase were examined in patient subgroups defined by receipt of adjuvant RT (yes or no) and the pattern of adjuvant RT and pembro administration, either concurrent (the last adjuvant RT exposure was after the first dose of adjuvant pembro or placebo) or sequential (the last adjuvant RT exposure was before the first dose of adjuvant pembro or placebo).
Results: Among 1174 randomized patients, 715 (60.9%) received adjuvant RT (n=454 pembro; n=261 placebo) and 459 (39.1%) did not (n=330 pembro; n=129 placebo). At data cutoff (March 23, 2021), median follow-up was similar (~38 months) in both subgroups. EFS was longer in the pembro arm compared to the placebo arm in patients who received adjuvant RT (either concurrently or sequentially) and those who did not (Table). Grade 3-5 treatment-related AE rates for pembro vs placebo were 5.9% vs 2.7% with adjuvant RT (4.9% vs 2.2% with concurrent RT; 6.8% vs 3.1% with sequential RT) and 7.5% vs 2.9% without adjuvant RT. Treatment-related AEs led to death in 2 patients (0.4%); both occurred in the pembro arm in patients who received adjuvant RT. Immune-mediated AE rates were 10.6% vs 5.0% with adjuvant RT (9.7% vs 4.4% with concurrent RT; 11.8% vs 5.7% with sequential RT) and 9.0% vs 10.0% without adjuvant RT in the two treatment arms, respectively.
Conclusion: In this post hoc analysis, the addition of pembro to neoadjuvant chemo followed by adjuvant pembro provided a clinically meaningful EFS benefit, independent of adjuvant RT administration. An EFS benefit was observed in patients who received pembro with either concurrent or sequential adjuvant RT. The addition of pembro to adjuvant RT was generally well tolerated. Similar rates of treatment-related AEs and immune-mediated AEs were seen in patients who received adjuvant RT and pembro either concurrently or sequentially, although the sample sizes are modest. These results are consistent with the therapeutic benefit seen with neoadjuvant pembro plus chemo followed by adjuvant pembro in the intention-to-treat population of patients with early TNBC randomized in KEYNOTE-522.
Table: EFS by Adjuvant RT in KEYNOTE-522
Citation Format: Heather McArthur, Javier Cortés, Rebecca Dent, Joyce O’Shaughnessy, Lajos Pusztai, Sherko Küemmel, Theodoros Foukakis, Yeon Hee Park, Rina Hui, Nadia Harbeck, Masato Takahashi, Michael Untch, Peter A. Fasching, Fatima Cardoso, Carsten Denkert, Yalin Zhu, Yu Ding, Wilbur Pan, Peter Schmid. Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab + chemotherapy vs placebo + chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab vs placebo for early TNBC: Post hoc analysis of adjuvant radiation therapy in the phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD3-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Javier Cortés
- 2International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Pangaea Oncology, Quironsalud Group, Madrid and Barcelona, Spain & Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Joyce O’Shaughnessy
- 4Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Rina Hui
- 9Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Peter A. Fasching
- 13Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Fatima Cardoso
- 14Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Carsten Denkert
- 15Institut für Pathologie, Philipps Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg (UKGM), Germany
| | - Yalin Zhu
- 16Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA
| | - Yu Ding
- 17Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA
| | | | - Peter Schmid
- 19Bart’s Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Fasching PA, Schmatloch S, Hauke J, Rey J, Jackisch C, Klare P, Link T, Hanusch C, Huober J, Stefek A, Seiler S, Schmitt WD, Uleer C, Doering G, Rhiem K, Schneeweiss A, Denkert C, Schmutzler RK, Hahnen E, Untch M, Nekljudova V, Blohmer JU, Loibl S. Abstract P4-06-13: Neoadjuvant paclitaxel/olaparib in comparison to paclitaxel/carboplatinum in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer and homologous recombination deficiency – long-term survival of the GeparOLA study. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-p4-06-13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The GeparOLA study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of paclitaxel (P) plus olaparib (O) as part of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, either hormone receptor (HR)-positive or HR-negative and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) defined as having a g/tBRCA mutation and/or a high HRD score. Primary analysis showed a pCR rate of 55.1% (90% CI 44.5%-65.3%) with PO and 48.6% (90% CI 34.3%-63.2%) with P plus carboplatinum (Cb). The PO combination could not exclude a pCR rate of ≤55% in the PO arm but was significantly better tolerated. Analysis on the stratified subgroups showed higher pCR rates with PO in the cohorts of patients < 40 years and HR-positive tumors (Fasching Ann Oncol 2020). Here, we report long-term data. Methods: GeparOLA (NCT02789332) was a non-comparative, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, phase II trial. Patients with primary HER2-negative breast cancer, HRD and indication for chemotherapy (cT2-cT4a-d or cT1c and cN+ or cT1c and pNSLN+ or cT1c and TNBC or cT1c and Ki-67 >20%) were randomly assigned to receive either P 80 mg/m2 weekly plus O 100 mg twice daily for 12 weeks or P plus Cb area under the curve 2 (AUC2) weekly for 12 weeks, both followed by four cycles of either 2-weekly or 3-weekly epirubicin 90 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2. Primary endpoint was pCR (ypT0/is ypN0) rate after NACT with PO followed by EC. Long-term efficacy endpoints included invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and overall survival (OS). The time-to-event endpoints analysis is planned with median follow-up of at least 4 years and a follow-up completeness of at least 80%. Results: Between September 2016 and July 2018, 274 patients were screened, of whom 107 were randomized and 106 (PO N=69; PCb N=37) started treatment. The median age was 47.0 years (range 25.0-71.0); 32 patients were aged < 40 years; 36.2% of patients had cT1 tumors and 31.8% were cN-positive; the majority (86.8%) had grade 3 tumors and a Ki-67>20% (89.6%). Seventy-seven patients (72.6%) had TNBC. After a median follow-up of 49.8 months (range 0.1-69.1), 18 (15 in PO; 3 in PCb) iDFS events and 7 (6 in PO; 1 in PCb) deaths were reported. The 4-year survival rates are shown in the table below. iDFS (HR PO to PCb=2.86 [95%CI 0.83-9.9], log-rank p=0.081), DDFS (HR =3.03 [95%CI 0.67-13.67], log-rank p=0.129), and OS (HR=3.27 [95%CI 0.39-27.2], log-rank p=0.244) tended to be inferior with olaparib. Patients without g/tBRCA mutation seem to benefit from the use of carboplatinum (7/30 iDFS/DDFS events in PO; 0/16 in PCb, log-rank p=0.037, HR n.a.). Conclusions: In patients with HER2-negative and HRD breast cancer the use of olaparib instead of carboplatinum although showing comparable pCR rates, tended to result in an overall inferior outcome. This was mainly driven by the patients without a g/tBRCA mutation. In patients with a g/t BRCA mutation no difference between olaparib and carboplatinum was seen. Key words: Olaparib, HER2-negative breast cancer, HRD, survival Funding: The study was financially supported by AstraZeneca
Citation Format: Peter A. Fasching, Sabine Schmatloch, Jan Hauke, Julia Rey, Christian Jackisch, Peter Klare, Theresa Link, Claus Hanusch, Jens Huober, Andrea Stefek, Sabine Seiler, Wolfgang D. Schmitt, Christoph Uleer, Gabriele Doering, Kerstin Rhiem, Andreas Schneeweiss, Carsten Denkert, Rita K. Schmutzler, Eric Hahnen, Michael Untch, Valentina Nekljudova, Jens-Uwe Blohmer, Sibylle Loibl. Neoadjuvant paclitaxel/olaparib in comparison to paclitaxel/carboplatinum in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer and homologous recombination deficiency – long-term survival of the GeparOLA study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-06-13.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter A. Fasching
- 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Jan Hauke
- 3Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Uniklinik Köln, Germany
| | | | - Christian Jackisch
- 5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Germany
| | | | - Theresa Link
- 7Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Jens Huober
- 9Kantonsspital St.Gallen, Brustzentrum, Departement Interdisziplinäre medizinische Dienste, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | | | - Sabine Seiler
- 11German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany, Hessen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang D. Schmitt
- 12Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Kerstin Rhiem
- 15Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Uniklinik Köln, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- 16National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- 17Institut für Pathologie, Philipps Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg (UKGM), Germany
| | - Rita K. Schmutzler
- 18und Eierstockkrebs - Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Uniklinik Köln, Germany
| | - Eric Hahnen
- 19Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Uniklinik Köln, Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Krug D, Vladimirova V, Untch M, Kühn T, Schneeweiss A, Denkert C, Ataseven B, Solbach C, Gerber B, Tesch H, Golatta M, Seiler S, Heil J, Nekljudova V, Loibl S. Abstract PD15-06: PD15-06 Pathologic complete response and breast-conserving surgery are associated with improved prognosis in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-pd15-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is standard of care for patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Treatment response, especially pathologic complete response (pCR), is a strong predictive factor for treatment outcome. In the setting of up-front surgery, retrospective data have suggested improved outcome in patients with early TNBC that received breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy (BCT) as compared to mastectomy. Methods: We identified 2632 patients with early TNBC from the German Breast Group meta-database. Patients with cT1-2 cN0 and ypN0, available surgery and follow-up data were eligible for this project. A total of 1074 patients from 8 prospective NACT trials were analyzed. Endpoints of interest were locoregional recurrence as first site of relapse (LRR, other sites of recurrence were considered competing events), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS); analyses were performed using univariate and multivariate Fine-Gray (for LRR) and Cox models including study, age, cT, surgery type and pCR. For the analyses including pCR as covariable, only patients at risk at the landmark time were evaluated. Results: Median age was 48 years, 69.6% of patients had cT2 tumors and 85.3% underwent BCS. Of the 1074 analyzed patients, 48.8% achieved pCR. After a median follow-up of 64 months, there were 94 (8.8%) locoregional events as first site of relapse. Upon univariate analysis, absence of pCR (hazard ratio [HR]=2.28; 95%CI 1.44-3.61; p< 0.001) and ypT-stage (ypT0/is vs. ypT1-3, HR=0.61; 95%CI 0.40-0.95; p=0.028) were significantly associated with LRR, while type of surgery, age and cT-stage were not. Upon multivariate analysis, absence of pCR was the only factor associated with increased risk of LRR (HR=2.22; 95%CI 1.38-3.58; p=0.001). Patients that underwent mastectomy (N=158) were significantly younger (age ≤ 50 years 72.8% vs. 59.9% for BCT [N=916]; p=0.002) DFS and OS was significantly better in patients who underwent BCT compared to mastectomy (DFS: HR=0.47; 95%CI 0.34-0.66; p< 0.001 and OS: HR=0.40; 95%CI 0.26-0.63; p< 0.001). In multivariate analysis, BCT was associated with a significantly better DFS and OS as compared to mastectomy (DFS: HR=0.51; 95%CI 0.36-0.72; p< 0.001; and OS HR=0.43; 95%CI 0.27-0.68; p< 0.001), whereas absence of pCR was associated with significantly worse DFS and OS (DFS: HR=2.43; 95%CI 1.78-3.31; p< 0.001; and OS: HR=3.15; 95%CI 1.94-5.10; p< 0.001). Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis from the GBG meta-database, treatment response, e.g. pCR, was the main determinant of locoregional recurrence in patients with early stage TNBC treated with NACT. BCT was associated with improved DFS and OS compared to mastectomy, which may at least in part reflect favorable patient selection.
Citation Format: David Krug, Valentina Vladimirova, Michael Untch, Thorsten Kühn, Andreas Schneeweiss, Carsten Denkert, Beyhan Ataseven, Christine Solbach, Bernd Gerber, Hans Tesch, Michael Golatta, Sabine Seiler, Jörg Heil, Valentina Nekljudova, Sibylle Loibl. PD15-06 Pathologic complete response and breast-conserving surgery are associated with improved prognosis in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD15-06.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Krug
- 1Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | | | | | - Thorsten Kühn
- 4Department of Gynecology, Hospital Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- 5National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- 6Institut für Pathologie, Philipps Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg (UKGM), Germany, Germany
| | | | | | - Bernd Gerber
- 9Universitätsfrauenklinik am Klinikum Südstadt Rostock
| | - Hans Tesch
- 10Onkologie Bethanien Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | | | - Sabine Seiler
- 12German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany, Hessen, Germany
| | - Jörg Heil
- 13Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Unit, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Loibl S, Denkert C, Liu Y, Knudsen ES, DeMichele A, Zhang Z, Teply-Szymanski J, Filipits M, Fasching PA, Gnant M, Deng S, Balic M, Rojo F, Watson M, Deshpande C, Turner N, Metzger O, Theall KP, Witkiewicz A, Valota O, Symmans WF, Mayer EL. Abstract PD17-05: Development and Validation of a Composite Biomarker Predictive of Palbociclib + Endocrine Treatment Benefit in Early Breast Cancer: PENELOPE-B and PALLAS Trials. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-pd17-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The PENELOPE-B (NCT01864746) and PALLAS (NCT02513394) trials are large prospective, randomized, phase III trials that evaluated adjuvant palbociclib (PAL) + endocrine treatment (ET) vs ET in patients with hormone receptor–positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2–) early breast cancer (EBC). Both studies did not meet the primary endpoint of improving invasive disease-free survival (iDFS). We conducted biomarker analyses to identify patients who might benefit from PAL + ET in EBC. Methods: Resected tumor tissue was collected from consenting patients. Gene expression analyses were conducted using the HTG EdgeSeq Oncology Biomarker Panel including 2549 genes. Based on 91 genes from the HTG panel, the intrinsic molecular subtypes were calculated using Absolute Intrinsic Molecular Subtyping (AIMS). Potential predictive treatment biomarkers were established in PENELOPE-B (n=906 with resected tissue) as the development set using an outcome-oriented approach based on iDFS with a selection procedure that maximized the log-rank statistic to estimate a standard Z score–based optimal cutoff. Independent validation was conducted on PALLAS (n=2085; PENELOPE-B-like with resected tissue and HTG data). Hazard ratios and corresponding 95% CIs were calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model, and iDFS distributions between treatment arms were compared using the log-rank test. Interaction between treatment and biomarker status was assessed. Results: Patient baseline characteristics were well balanced, with no differences in iDFS between the intent-to-treat set and the biomarker set for both trials. Approximately 73% of patients (PENELOPE-B [n=663] and PALLAS [n=1516]) had luminal A subtypes whereas only 7.1 % (PENELOPE-B [n=64]) and 8.3 % (PALLAS [n=172]) had a luminal B subtype. AIMS subtypes showed overall similar prognostic patterns for iDFS between PENELOPE-B and PALLAS. The biomarker-defined subgroup found in PENELOPE-B with optimal cutoff demonstrated a preferential benefit from PAL + ET (n=364 [96 events]; hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.63 [0.42, 0.95]; P=0.025). Independent validation of the PALLAS subgroup using the pre-defined optimal cutoff confirmed a significant benefit from PAL + ET (n=916 [70 events]; 0.55 [0.34–0.90]; P=0.015) while not in the rest of the patients (interaction p=0.0025). Significant treatment effects remained (0.55 [0.34–0.89]; P=0.015) after adjusting for the randomization stratification factors of PALLAS. Conclusions: The composite predictive biomarker defined from PENELOPE-B was independently validated in a prospectively defined retrospective analysis of a subset of patients selected from PALLAS. The composite biomarker identified a subset of EBC patients deriving benefit from the addition of PAL to ET. This patient stratification approach can potentially be applied to future adjuvant clinical trials for treatment of hormone receptor–positive/HER2– EBC.
Citation Format: Sibylle Loibl, Carsten Denkert, Yuan Liu, Erik S. Knudsen, Angela DeMichele, Zhe Zhang, Julia Teply-Szymanski, Martin Filipits, Peter A. Fasching, Michael Gnant, Shibing Deng, Marija Balic, Federico Rojo, Mark Watson, Chetan Deshpande, Nicholas Turner, Otto Metzger, Kathy Puyana Theall, Agnieszka Witkiewicz, Olga Valota, W. Fraser Symmans, Erica L. Mayer. Development and Validation of a Composite Biomarker Predictive of Palbociclib + Endocrine Treatment Benefit in Early Breast Cancer: PENELOPE-B and PALLAS Trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD17-05.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carsten Denkert
- 2Institut für Pathologie, Philipps Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg (UKGM), Germany
| | - Yuan Liu
- 3Pfizer Inc, San Diego, California
| | - Erik S. Knudsen
- 4Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | | | | | | | - Martin Filipits
- 8Center for Cancer Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- 9Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | - Marija Balic
- 12Divison of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University Graz, Austria
| | | | | | | | | | - Otto Metzger
- 17Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Fasching PA, Schmatloch S, Hauke J, Rey J, Jackisch C, Klare P, Link T, Hanusch C, Huober J, Stefek A, Seiler S, Schmitt WD, Uleer C, Doering G, Rhiem K, Schneeweiss A, Denkert C, Schmutzler RK, Hahnen E, Untch M, Nekljudova V, Blohmer JU, Loibl S. Abstract GS5-02: Neoadjuvant paclitaxel/olaparib in comparison to paclitaxel/carboplatinum in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer and homologous recombination deficiency – long-term survival of the GeparOLA study. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-gs5-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The GeparOLA study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of paclitaxel (P) plus olaparib (O) as part of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, either hormone receptor (HR)-positive or HR-negative and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) defined as having a g/tBRCA mutation and/or a high HRD score. Primary analysis showed a pCR rate of 55.1% (90% CI 44.5%-65.3%) with PO and 48.6% (90% CI 34.3%-63.2%) with P plus carboplatinum (Cb). The PO combination could not exclude a pCR rate of ≤55% in the PO arm but was significantly better tolerated. Analysis on the stratified subgroups showed higher pCR rates with PO in the cohorts of patients < 40 years and HR-positive tumors (Fasching Ann Oncol 2020). Here, we report long-term data. Methods: GeparOLA (NCT02789332) was a non-comparative, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, phase II trial. Patients with primary HER2-negative breast cancer, HRD and indication for chemotherapy (cT2-cT4a-d or cT1c and cN+ or cT1c and pNSLN+ or cT1c and TNBC or cT1c and Ki-67 >20%) were randomly assigned to receive either P 80 mg/m2 weekly plus O 100 mg twice daily for 12 weeks or P plus Cb area under the curve 2 (AUC2) weekly for 12 weeks, both followed by four cycles of either 2-weekly or 3-weekly epirubicin 90 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2. Primary endpoint was pCR (ypT0/is ypN0) rate after NACT with PO followed by EC. Long-term efficacy endpoints included invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and overall survival (OS). The time-to-event endpoints analysis is planned with median follow-up of at least 4 years and a follow-up completeness of at least 80%. Results: Between September 2016 and July 2018, 274 patients were screened, of whom 107 were randomized and 106 (PO N=69; PCb N=37) started treatment. The median age was 47.0 years (range 25.0-71.0); 32 patients were aged < 40 years; 36.2% of patients had cT1 tumors and 31.8% were cN-positive; the majority (86.8%) had grade 3 tumors and a Ki-67>20% (89.6%). Seventy-seven patients (72.6%) had TNBC. After a median follow-up of 49.8 months (range 0.1-69.1), 18 (15 in PO; 3 in PCb) iDFS events and 7 (6 in PO; 1 in PCb) deaths were reported. The 4-year survival rates are shown in the table below. iDFS (HR PO to PCb=2.86 [95%CI 0.83-9.9], log-rank p=0.081), DDFS (HR =3.03 [95%CI 0.67-13.67], log-rank p=0.129), and OS (HR=3.27 [95%CI 0.39-27.2], log-rank p=0.244) tended to be inferior with olaparib. Patients without g/tBRCA mutation seem to benefit from the use of carboplatinum (7/30 iDFS/DDFS events in PO; 0/16 in PCb, log-rank p=0.037, HR n.a.). Conclusions: In patients with HER2-negative and HRD breast cancer the use of olaparib instead of carboplatinum although showing comparable pCR rates, tended to result in an overall inferior outcome. This was mainly driven by the patients without a g/tBRCA mutation. In patients with a g/t BRCA mutation no difference between olaparib and carboplatinum was seen. Key words: Olaparib, HER2-negative breast cancer, HRD, survival Funding: The study was financially supported by AstraZeneca
Citation Format: Peter A. Fasching, Sabine Schmatloch, Jan Hauke, Julia Rey, Christian Jackisch, Peter Klare, Theresa Link, Claus Hanusch, Jens Huober, Andrea Stefek, Sabine Seiler, Wolfgang D. Schmitt, Christoph Uleer, Gabriele Doering, Kerstin Rhiem, Andreas Schneeweiss, Carsten Denkert, Rita K. Schmutzler, Eric Hahnen, Michael Untch, Valentina Nekljudova, Jens-Uwe Blohmer, Sibylle Loibl. Neoadjuvant paclitaxel/olaparib in comparison to paclitaxel/carboplatinum in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer and homologous recombination deficiency – long-term survival of the GeparOLA study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr GS5-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter A. Fasching
- 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Jan Hauke
- 3Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Uniklinik Köln, Germany
| | | | - Christian Jackisch
- 5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Germany
| | | | - Theresa Link
- 7Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Jens Huober
- 9Kantonsspital St.Gallen, Brustzentrum, Departement Interdisziplinäre medizinische Dienste, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | | | - Sabine Seiler
- 11German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Hessen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang D. Schmitt
- 12Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Kerstin Rhiem
- 15Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Uniklinik Köln, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- 16National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- 17Institut für Pathologie, Philipps Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg (UKGM), Germany
| | - Rita K. Schmutzler
- 18und Eierstockkrebs - Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Uniklinik Köln, Germany
| | - Eric Hahnen
- 19Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Uniklinik Köln, Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Denkert C, Martín M, Untch M, Bonnefoi HR, Knudsen ES, Im SA, DeMichele A, Witkiewicz A, Van ’t Veer L, Kim SB, Bear HD, McCarthy N, Gelmon K, Marmé F, García-Sáenz JÁ, Turner N, Rojo F, Filipits M, Martin LA, Fasching PA, Schem C, Kelly CM, Reimer T, Toi M, Rugo H, Gnant M, Makris A, Liu Y, Weber K, Rachakonda S, Loibl S. Abstract HER2-06: HER2-06 Outcome analysis of HER2-zero or HER2-low hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer patients - characterization of the molecular phenotype in combination with molecular subtyping. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-her2-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer with low HER2 expression (HER2-low) is of high clinical relevance because of new therapeutic options with antibody-drug conjugates. We have recently shown in a large cohort from neoadjuvant clinical trials that HER2-low breast cancer has different molecular characteristics as well as different clinical outcomes compared to HER2-zero. Considering the positive correlation between HER2-low expression and hormone receptor positivity observed consistently in many investigations, we have extended our analysis to HR+ tumors from the post-neoadjuvant PenelopeB trial. In PenelopeB, patients with HR+ breast cancer and residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) were randomized to post-neoadjuvant palbociclib versus placebo in addition to endocrine therapy. We evaluated the molecular phenotype and clinical outcomes of HER2-low compared to HER2-zero patients. Methods: A total of 1250 patients were randomized, HER2 status was available for 1151 tumors from pretherapeutic core biopsy, determined mainly by local pathology, and from 1213 tumors from the post-NACT sample, determined as part of central pathology. For 1119 patients a paired HER2-status was both available. HER2-zero was defined as IHC0 and HER2-low-positive was defined as IHC1+ or IHC2+/ISH-. Gene expression analysis of 2549 genes using the HTG oncology biomarker panel was performed in 620 pretherapeutic biopsies and 780 post-NACT residual tumor samples, with 539 paired gene expression samples. Breast cancer subtypes were determined using the AIMS approach. Results: In pretherapeutic biopsies, 695 tumors (60%) were HER2-low and 457 (40%) were HER2-zero. A HER2-low status in the biopsy was significantly linked to improved iDFS (HR 0.76 (0.60-0.96; p=0.02). In residual tumors, 632 tumors (60%) were HER2-low and 581 (40%) were HER2-zero, without any prognostic impact of HER2 low status. In addition, a shift of HER2-low-status comparing core biopsy and residual tumor was observed in 415 (37%) of 1119 tumors. 161 (14%) had a shift from HER2-zero to HER2-low and 254 (23%) shifted from HER2-low to HER2-zero. A shift from HER2-zero to HER2-low in the post-NACT samples was significantly linked to reduced iDFS (HR 1.43 [95%CI 1.01-2.01]), p=0.04), compared to HER2-low group, while a shift from HER2-low to HER2-zero was associated with better iDFS compared to HER2-zero group, although not statistically significant (p=0.17). We did not observe a significant correlation of HER2-low status and AIMS molecular subtypes. In particular, the HER2-enriched (HER2E) subtype was assigned to only 4.3% of HER2-zero and 3.1% of HER2-low tumors. Significant iDFS differences were observed for HER2-low-status in combination with AIMS subtypes (lumB/basal/HER2E vs. lumA/normL; overall p-value < 0.0001) for both pretherapeutic biopsies and residual tumor. Patients with post-NACT HER2-low tumors had an improved survival in the subgroups of aggressive AIMS subtypes (lumB/basal/HER2E), but not in the less aggressive AIMs subtypes (lumA/normL), with a positive test for interaction (p=0.02). For the pre-NACT samples a similar, but non-significant trend was observed. We evaluated a total of 620 core biopsies for differences in gene expression comparing HER2-low and HER2-zero tumors. A total of 417 genes were statistically significantly different, but in a hierarchical clustering there was no clear separation of HER2-low and HER2-zero tumors. Conclusions: In the PenelopeB cohort of HR+ tumors, a HER2-low status in pretherapeutic core biopsies is related to improved disease-free survival, especially for those tumors that have a more aggressive intrinsic subtype. A shift of HER2-low status was observed before and after chemotherapy, indicating an adaptation of the pathway activity to therapy-induced stress, which might become relevant for future diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.
Citation Format: Carsten Denkert, Miguel Martín, Michael Untch, Hervé R. Bonnefoi, Erik S. Knudsen, Seock-Ah Im, Angela DeMichele, Agnieszka Witkiewicz, Laura Van ’t Veer, Sung-Bae Kim, Harry D. Bear, Nicole McCarthy, Karen Gelmon, Frederik Marmé, José Ángel García-Sáenz, Nicholas Turner, Federico Rojo, Martin Filipits, Lesley-Ann Martin, Peter A. Fasching, Christian Schem, Catherine M. Kelly, Toralf Reimer, Masakazu Toi, Hope Rugo, Michael Gnant, Andreas Makris, Yuan Liu, Karsten Weber, Sivaramakrishna Rachakonda, Sibylle Loibl. HER2-06 Outcome analysis of HER2-zero or HER2-low hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer patients - characterization of the molecular phenotype in combination with molecular subtyping [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr HER2-06.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carsten Denkert
- 1Institut für Pathologie, Philipps Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg (UKGM), Germany
| | - Miguel Martín
- 2Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Hervé R. Bonnefoi
- 4Institut Bergonié Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM U1312, and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Bordeaux, France
| | - Erik S. Knudsen
- 5Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Seock-Ah Im
- 6Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South), Republic of Korea
| | | | | | | | | | - Harry D. Bear
- 11Virginia Commonwealth University, Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Nicole McCarthy
- 12Breast Cancer Trials Australia and New Zealand and University of Queensland Australia
| | - Karen Gelmon
- 13BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Frederik Marmé
- 14Med. Fakultät Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | - Nicholas Turner
- 16The Institute of Cancer Research: Royal Cancer Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Martin Filipits
- 18Center for Cancer Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Lesley-Ann Martin
- 19Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- 20Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | - Toralf Reimer
- 23Breast Center, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Masakazu Toi
- 24Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hope Rugo
- 25University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Michael Gnant
- 26Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andreas Makris
- 27Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, England, United Kingdom
| | - Yuan Liu
- 28Pfizer Inc, San Diego, California
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Knudsen ES, Rachakonda S, Marmé F, Martín M, Untch M, Bonnefoi HR, Schmitt WD, Kim SB, Bear HD, Witkiewicz A, Im SA, DeMichele A, Van’t Veer L, McCarthy N, Sinn BV, Gelmon K, García-Sáenz JÁ, Kelly CM, Reimer T, Turner N, Rojo F, Filipits M, Fasching PA, Schem C, Martin LA, Liu Y, Toi M, Rugo H, Gnant M, Makris A, Furlanetto J, Weber K, Denkert C, Loibl S. Abstract PD17-06: Immunohistochemical markers and determinants of clinical response in the Penelope-B trial. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-pd17-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The Penelope-B trial did not show improvement in invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) with the addition of palbociclib to endocrine therapy (ET) in patients with high-risk early breast cancer (BC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Biomarkers may be able to identify subgroups of patients deriving benefit from Palbociclib and guide future studies. Estrogen-receptor (ER), progesterone-receptor (PgR) and Ki-67 might be helpful in identifying patients benefiting from palbociclib. Concordantly, tumors with elevated expression of Cyclin D1 and phosphorylated retinoblastoma protein (phospho-RB) may harbor more dependency on CDK4/6 and thus higher sensitivity to palbociclib. Methods: The percentage of positive ER and PgR cells and Ki-67 assessed in surgical specimens after NACT were combined to obtain the immunohistochemical score 3 (IHC3, Cuzick et al JCO 2011, low vs high based on the median IHC3 value). Cyclin D1 and phospho-RB Ser 807/811 immunoreactive (phospho-RB) scores were analyzed in residual tumors after NACT (range 0-12 each). Proportional hazard regression model was used to assess the predictive and prognostic value of IHC3 and treatment on iDFS. Subgroup analysis was performed according to BC intrinsic subtypes (luminal-A/normal-like, luminal-B/HER2-enriched/basal) and HER2-status (HER2 0, HER2 low). Cox/Fine-Gray regression was used to define the predictive and prognostic value of CyclinD1 (≤1, >1), phospho-RB (≤2, >2) as dichotomized and continuous variables on iDFS, distant DFS (DDFS), locoregional invasive recurrence-free interval (LRRFI) and overall survival (OS). Multivariate analyses (MVA) were adjusted for age (≤50 vs >50), Ki-67 (≤15 vs >15), region (non-Asian vs Asian), ypN (ypN0-1 vs ypN2-3), risk status (CPS-EG=2 ypN+ vs ≥3), cT (cT1-2 vs cT3-4), ypT (ypT0-2 vs ypT3-4), and grade (G1-2 vs G3). The MVA for IHC3 includes all the covariates above except Ki-67. p< 0.05 was defined as statistically significant. Results: Data for ER, PgR, Ki-67, HER2, Cyclin D1 and phospho-RB were available for 1250 patients. Overall, 98.9% of the patients had ER+ tumors, 75.0% PgR+, 52.2% had HER2 low, 25.5% Ki-67>15, 50% had IHC3 score higher than median, 93.9% had Cyclin D1 >1, 57.8% had phospho-RB >2. Patients with IHC3 score high had a worse iDFS compared to patients with IHC3 score low (MVA HR 2.28 95%CI (1.78-2.91), p< 0.0001). Patients with luminal-A/normal-like tumors and IHC3 low had an improved iDFS with the addition of palbociclib to ET (MVA HR 0.35 95%CI (0.14-0.90), test for interaction p=0.01). No difference was observed according to HER2 status. Cyclin D1>1 has no predictive value but is prognostic for better iDFS (MVA HR 0.62 95%CI (0.41-0.94), p=0.023), LRRFI (MVA HR 0.30 95%CI (0.15-0.63), p=0.001) and OS (MVA HR 0.50 95%CI (0.28-0.89), p=0.019). Similar results were obtained when Cyclin D1 was analysed as a continuous variable. Phospho-RB had neither predictive nor prognostic value. Phospho-RB highly correlates with Ki-67 (p< 0.001, Spearman correlation 0.248). Conclusions: Patients with high Cyclin D1 expression had a favorable prognosis independent of treatment arm, but patients with luminal-A/normal-like tumors and IHC3 low after NACT had an improved outcome when receiving palbociclib in addition to adjuvant ET. Theses exploratory studies suggest specific signatures/phenotypes could predict benefit from Palbociclib in high-risk early breast cancer.
Citation Format: Erik S. Knudsen, Sivaramakrishna Rachakonda, Frederik Marmé, Miguel Martín, Michael Untch, Hervé R. Bonnefoi, Wolfgang D. Schmitt, Sung-Bae Kim, Harry D. Bear, Agnieszka Witkiewicz, Seock-Ah Im, Angela DeMichele, Laura Van’t Veer, Nicole McCarthy, Bruno V. Sinn, Karen Gelmon, José Ángel García-Sáenz, Catherine M. Kelly, Toralf Reimer, Nicholas Turner, Federico Rojo, Martin Filipits, Peter A. Fasching, Christian Schem, Lesley-Ann Martin, Yuan Liu, Masakazu Toi, Hope Rugo, Michael Gnant, Andreas Makris, Jenny Furlanetto, Karsten Weber, Carsten Denkert, Sibylle Loibl. Immunohistochemical markers and determinants of clinical response in the Penelope-B trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD17-06.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik S. Knudsen
- 1Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | | | - Frederik Marmé
- 3Med. Fakultät Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Miguel Martín
- 4Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Hervé R. Bonnefoi
- 6Institut Bergonié Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM U1312, and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC),, Bordeaux, France
| | - Wolfgang D. Schmitt
- 7Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Harry D. Bear
- 9Virginia Commonwealth University, Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, Virginia
| | | | - Seock-Ah Im
- 11Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | - Nicole McCarthy
- 14Icon Cancer Center, Wesley Medical Centre, Auchenflower, Australia
| | | | - Karen Gelmon
- 16BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | - Toralf Reimer
- 19Breast Center, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Nicholas Turner
- 20The Institute of Cancer Research: Royal Cancer Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Martin Filipits
- 22Center for Cancer Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- 23Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Lesley-Ann Martin
- 25Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Yuan Liu
- 26Pfizer Inc, San Diego, California
| | - Masakazu Toi
- 27Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hope Rugo
- 28University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Michael Gnant
- 29Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andreas Makris
- 30Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, England, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Carsten Denkert
- 33Institut für Pathologie, Philipps Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg (UKGM), Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Schmitt WD, Jank P, Hoffmann I, Pfitzner BM, Lenz L, Clegg W, Keil E, Ratzel S, Cogan ES, Blohmer JU, Wimberger P, Kronenwett R, Horst D, Denkert C. Abstract P2-03-23: Retrospective evaluation of outcomes in a real-world, prospective cohort using EndoPredict: Results from the Charité registry. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-p2-03-23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: EndoPredict is a prognostic and predictive gene expression assay that provides an EPclin risk score, which can be used to identify individuals with low enough risk of distant breast cancer recurrence that they may forgo chemotherapy. In clinical studies, EndoPredict has been validated to predict risk of distant recurrence up to 15 years and chemotherapy benefit. To date, real-world studies evaluating patient outcomes after prospective EndoPredict testing have been limited. Here, we report on outcomes collected via survey from patients enrolled in a registry created to generate real-world evidence from over 800 patients routinely tested with EndoPredict at Charité University Hospital Berlin. Methods: Female patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative primary breast cancer with up to three positive lymph nodes who received prospective EndoPredict testing at Charité University Hospital Institute of Pathology between 2011 and 2016 were contacted to complete a survey for participation in this study. Surveys included questions on treatment and recurrence history. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics of the cancer, and EndoPredict results were retrieved from Charité records. All patients received EndoPredict test results before decision making on systemic treatment. After testing, treatment included either adjuvant endocrine therapy or adjuvant endocrine therapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy, and may have included radiotherapy. Cox proportional hazards models were fit with binary EPclin risk category (high, low) or continuous EPclin risk score predicting 5-year distant recurrence or recurrence of any kind. Analyses were performed across all survey responses, and in subsets of patients stratified by adjuvant chemotherapy treatment. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 5-year risk of recurrence were also calculated. Results: 842 patient survey responses were returned with informed consent and met study inclusion criteria. The median age at diagnosis was 54 years (IQR 49, 63), and across survey responses, 63.5% (N=535/842) of patients were lymph node negative, 60.9% (N=513/842) were T1, and 43.9% (N=370/842) were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Among included patients, 49.5% (N=417/842) were classified as EPclin low-risk and 50.5% (N=425/842) were high-risk. The concordance between EPclin risk category and chemotherapy status was 0.89 with 5.5% (N=23/417) of EPclin low-risk and 81.6% (N=347/425) of EPclin high-risk patients receiving treatment with chemotherapy. In the subset of patients not treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (N=472/842, 55.7%), continuous EPclin score was a significant predictor of distant recurrence (N=469; HR: 4.34, 95% CI 1.75-9.58); p = 2.4 × 10-3), and recurrence of any kind (N=468; HR: 3.39, 95% CI 1.61-6.58); p = 1.9 × 10-3). In EPclin low-risk patients treated with endocrine therapy alone, there was a low risk of 5-year distant recurrence (1.6%, 95% CI 0.7%-3.4%). In EPclin high-risk patients the risk of distant recurrence at 5 years was 6.8% (95% CI 2.6%-17.4%) in patients without chemotherapy and 3.6% (95% CI 2.1%-6.3%) in patients treated with chemotherapy. In an exploratory subgroup analysis in patients with node negative and node positive disease, risk of 5-year distant recurrence in EPclin low-risk patients without chemotherapy was 1.3% (95% CI 0.5%-3.5%) and 2.4% (95% CI 0.6%-9.2%), respectively. Conclusion: In this real-world cohort of patients with prospective routine testing with EndoPredict, EPclin scores were a significant predictor for patient-reported outcomes. Patients with EPclin low-risk scores had a low risk of 5-year distant recurrence even in the absence of chemotherapy treatment. This real-world result supports previous clinical studies demonstrating that patients with EPclin low-risk scores can safely forgo chemotherapy.
Citation Format: Wolfgang D. Schmitt, Paul Jank, Inga Hoffmann, Berit M. Pfitzner, Lauren Lenz, Wyatt Clegg, Elke Keil, Sarah Ratzel, Elizabeth S. Cogan, Jens-Uwe Blohmer, Pauline Wimberger, Ralf Kronenwett, David Horst, Carsten Denkert. Retrospective evaluation of outcomes in a real-world, prospective cohort using EndoPredict: Results from the Charité registry [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-03-23.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang D. Schmitt
- 1Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Pathology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Paul Jank
- 2Institut für Pathologie, Philipps Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg (UKGM), Germany
| | - Inga Hoffmann
- 3Institute of Pathology, Charité – Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Germany
| | - Berit M. Pfitzner
- 4DRK Kliniken Berlin Westend, Institute of Pathology, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Elke Keil
- 7Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin
| | | | | | | | - Pauline Wimberger
- 11Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Sachsen, Germany
| | - Ralf Kronenwett
- 12Myriad International GmbH, Cologne, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - David Horst
- 13Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- 14Institut für Pathologie, Philipps Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg (UKGM), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Massa C, Karn T, Weber K, Schneeweiss A, Hanusch C, Blohmer JU, Zahm DM, Jackisch C, van Mackelenbergh M, Thomalla J, Marmé F, Huober J, Müller V, Schem C, Müller A, Stickeler E, Biehl K, Fasching PA, Untch M, Loibl S, Denkert C, Seliger B. Abstract PD9-04: Immunological and clinical consequences of durvalumab treatment in combination to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer patients. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-pd9-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The implementation of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the therapy of different cancer types has provided promising results, but only a limited number of patients respond. Therefore, biomarkers to identify these responding patients are urgently needed. Methods: The GeparNuevo was a randomized, double-blind phase II trial in which triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) consisting of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel in an initial phase followed by treatment with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. Placebo or durvalumab were given throughout the neo-adjuvant treatment and in the “window” sub-cohort also prior to chemotherapy. Primary objective of this report was to evaluate changes in the blood immune cell repertoires of TNBC patients receiving durvalumab (anti-PD-L1) versus placebo in combination with NACT. At up to 4 different time points during therapy, blood samples were taken and underwent immunomonitoring using multicolor flow cytometry. The absolute counts of the major immune cell subtypes in the blood as well as the frequencies of different immune cell subpopulations and their functional phenotypes along treatment were determined and correlated to clinico-pathologic characteristics of the patients and to treatment response. Results: 120 out of 174 patients included in the GeparNuevo trial underwent blood immunomonitoring; 63 patients belonged to the “window” sub-cohort. Durvalumab administration almost completely blocked the detection of the inhibitory ligand PD-L1 and induced changes in the composition of the immune cell subpopulations. Evaluation of the “window” sub-cohort, in which an enhanced, but not significant pathological clinical response was observed within the immunomonitored patients, identified different markers correlating with clinical response to durvalumab. Higher frequencies of CD4+ T cells at recruitment as well as increased frequencies of T cells bearing the gamma delta TCR along treatment were some of the characteristics of patients responding to durvalumab treatment. Conclusions: The flow cytometry-based immunomonitoring of the clinical trial identified different immune-relevant biomarkers at recruitment as well as during treatment that predict clinical response to durvalumab. After validation of this data in an independent patient cohort, these markers could be implemented for an improved patient stratification to immunotherapy.
Citation Format: Chiara Massa, Thomas Karn, Karsten Weber, Andreas Schneeweiss, Claus Hanusch, Jens-Uwe Blohmer, Dirk-Michael Zahm, Christian Jackisch, Marion van Mackelenbergh, Jörg Thomalla, Frederik Marmé, Jens Huober, Volkmar Müller, Christian Schem, Anja Müller, Elmar Stickeler, Katharina Biehl, Peter A. Fasching, Michael Untch, Sibylle Loibl, Carsten Denkert, Barbara Seliger. Immunological and clinical consequences of durvalumab treatment in combination to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD9-04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Massa
- 1Institute of Medical Immunology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Thomas Karn
- 2Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- 4National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Christian Jackisch
- 8Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Germany
| | - Marion van Mackelenbergh
- 9Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
| | - Jörg Thomalla
- 10Institut für Versorgungsforschung in der Oncologie Koblenz am Rhein, Germany
| | - Frederik Marmé
- 11Med. Fakultät Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- 12Kantonsspital St.Gallen, Brustzentrum, Departement Interdisziplinäre medizinische Dienste, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Volkmar Müller
- 13Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Anja Müller
- 15Institute of Medical Immunology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- 16Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Germany
| | - Katharina Biehl
- 17Institute of Medical Immunology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- 18Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | - Carsten Denkert
- 21Institut für Pathologie, Philipps Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg (UKGM), Germany
| | - Barbara Seliger
- 22Institute of Medical Immunology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Gonçalves JPL, Bollwein C, Noske A, Jacob A, Jank P, Loibl S, Nekljudova V, Fasching PA, Karn T, Marmé F, Müller V, Schem C, Sinn BV, Stickeler E, van Mackelenbergh M, Schmitt WD, Denkert C, Weichert W, Schwamborn K. Characterization of Hormone Receptor and HER2 Status in Breast Cancer Using Mass Spectrometry Imaging. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24032860. [PMID: 36769215 PMCID: PMC9918176 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24032860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2022] [Revised: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Immunohistochemical evaluation of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 status stratify the different subtypes of breast cancer and define the treatment course. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), which does not register receptor overexpression, is often associated with worse patient prognosis. Mass spectrometry imaging transcribes the molecular content of tissue specimens without requiring additional tags or preliminary analysis of the samples, being therefore an excellent methodology for an unbiased determination of tissue constituents, in particular tumor markers. In this study, the proteomic content of 1191 human breast cancer samples was characterized by mass spectrometry imaging and the epithelial regions were employed to train and test machine-learning models to characterize the individual receptor status and to classify TNBC. The classification models presented yielded high accuracies for estrogen and progesterone receptors and over 95% accuracy for classification of TNBC. Analysis of the molecular features revealed that vimentin overexpression is associated with TNBC, supported by immunohistochemistry validation, revealing a new potential target for diagnosis and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliana Pereira Lopes Gonçalves
- Institute of Pathology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Trogerstraße 18, 81675 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Christine Bollwein
- Institute of Pathology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Trogerstraße 18, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Aurelia Noske
- Institute of Pathology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Trogerstraße 18, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Anne Jacob
- Institute of Pathology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Trogerstraße 18, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Paul Jank
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), 35043 Marburg, Germany
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group (GBG), 63263 Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | | | - Peter A. Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Thomas Karn
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Goethe-University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Frederik Marmé
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Elmar Stickeler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Marion van Mackelenbergh
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, 24105 Kiel, Germany
| | | | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), 35043 Marburg, Germany
| | - Wilko Weichert
- Institute of Pathology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Trogerstraße 18, 81675 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Kristina Schwamborn
- Institute of Pathology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Trogerstraße 18, 81675 Munich, Germany
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Westhoff CC, Ramaswamy A, Kalder M, Lebeau A, Sinn P, Denkert C. [Immunohistology in breast diagnostics : Strategies for efficient diagnostics]. Pathologie (Heidelb) 2023; 44:17-31. [PMID: 36576522 DOI: 10.1007/s00292-022-01174-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Immunohistological examinations are useful for the histopathological diagnosis of breast carcinoma in various clinical situations. This review article aims to summarize the different immunohistological options. A distinction is made between diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive markers. Especially when a therapeutic decision results from the immunohistological expression pattern, a quantitative, quality-controlled, and validated diagnostic approach is essential.This is relevant, for example, for the classical markers ER, PR, and HER2, but also for Ki-67 and additional markers such as PD-L1. This article provides a practice-oriented summary of the most important immunohistochemical markers in routine breast cancer diagnosis and for the distinction of malignant findings from benign alterations or precursor lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina C Westhoff
- Institut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (UKGM), Baldingerstr., 35043, Marburg, Deutschland.
| | - Annette Ramaswamy
- Institut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (UKGM), Baldingerstr., 35043, Marburg, Deutschland
| | - Matthias Kalder
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Deutschland
| | - Annette Lebeau
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Deutschland.,Gemeinschaftspraxis für Pathologie, Lübeck, Deutschland
| | - Peter Sinn
- Institut für Pathologie, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (UKGM), Baldingerstr., 35043, Marburg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|