1
|
Trapani D, Murthy SS, Hammad N, Casolino R, Moreira DC, Roitberg F, Blay JY, Curigliano G, Ilbawi AM. Policy strategies for capacity building and scale up of the workforce for comprehensive cancer care: a systematic review. ESMO Open 2024; 9:102946. [PMID: 38507895 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.102946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2023] [Revised: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with cancer in low- and middle-income countries experience worse outcomes as a result of the limited capacity of health systems to deliver comprehensive cancer care. The health workforce is a key component of health systems; however, deep gaps exist in the availability and accessibility of cancer care providers. MATERIALS AND METHODS We carried out a systematic review of the literature evaluating the strategies for capacity building of the cancer workforce. We studied how the policy strategies addressed the availability, accessibility, acceptability, and quality (AAAQ) of the workforce. We used a strategic planning framework (SWOT: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) to identify actionable areas of capacity building. We contextualized our findings based on the WHO 2030 Global Strategy on Human Resources for Health, evaluating how they can ultimately be framed in a labour market approach and inform strategies to improve the capacity of the workforce (PROSPERO: CRD42020109377). RESULTS The systematic review of the literature yielded 9617 records, and we selected 45 eligible papers for data extraction. The workforce interventions identified were delivered mostly in the African and American Regions, and in two-thirds of cases, in high-income countries. Many strategies have been shown to increase the number of competent oncology providers. Optimization of the existing workforce through role delegation and digital health interventions was reported as a short- to mid-term solution to optimize cancer care, through quality-oriented, efficiency-improving, and acceptability-enforcing workforce strategies. The increased workload alone was potentially detrimental. The literature on retaining the workforce and reducing brain drain or attrition in underserved areas was commonly limited. CONCLUSIONS Workforce capacity building is not only a quantitative problem but can also be addressed through quality-oriented, organizational, and managerial solutions of human resources. The delivery of comprehensive, acceptable, and impact-oriented cancer care requires an available, accessible, and competent workforce for comprehensive cancer care. Efficiency-improving strategies may be instrumental for capacity building in resource-constrained settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Trapani
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milano; European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - S S Murthy
- Global Cancer Disparities Initiative, Division of Surgical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - N Hammad
- Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - R Casolino
- Department of Noncommunicable Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - D C Moreira
- Department of Global Pediatric Medicine, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, USA
| | - F Roitberg
- Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - J-Y Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France
| | - G Curigliano
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milano; European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - A M Ilbawi
- Department of Noncommunicable Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pourmir I, Van Halteren HK, Elaidi R, Trapani D, Strasser F, Vreugdenhil G, Clarke M. A conceptual framework for cautious escalation of anticancer treatment: How to optimize overall benefit and obviate the need for de-escalation trials. Cancer Treat Rev 2024; 124:102693. [PMID: 38330752 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The developmental workflow of the currently performed phase 1, 2 and 3 cancer trial stages lacks essential information required for the determination of the optimal efficacy threshold of new anticancer regimens. Due to this there is a serious risk of overdosing and/or treating for an unnecessary long time, leading to excess toxicity and a higher financial burden for society. But often post-approval de-escalation trials for dose-optimization and treatment de-intensification are not performed due to failing resources and time. Therefore, the developmental workflow needs to be restructured toward cautious systemic cancer treatment escalation, in order to guarantee optimal efficacy and sustainability. METHODS In this manuscript we discuss opportunities to produce the information needed for cautious escalation, based on models of cancer growth and cancer kill kinetics as well as exploratory biomarkers, for the purpose of designing the optimal phase 3 superiority trial. Subsequently, we compare the sample size needed for a phase 3 superiority trial, followed by a necessary de-escalation trial with the sample size needed for a multi-arm phase 3 trial with intervention arms of differing intensity. All essential items are structured within a Framework for Cautious Escalation (FCE). The discussion uses illustrations from the breast cancer setting, but aims to be applicable for all cancers. RESULTS The FCE is a promising model of clinical development in oncology to prevent overtreatment and associated issues, especially with regard to the number of repetitive treatment cycles. It will hopefully increase the relevance and success rate of clinical trials, to deliver improved patient-centric outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Pourmir
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, European Hospital Georges Pompidou, Paris, France; INSERM U970, Paris Research Cardiovascular Center, Paris, France
| | - H K Van Halteren
- Department of Medical Oncology, Adrz Hospital, Goes, the Netherlands.
| | - R Elaidi
- Consultant/advisor in Clinical Trials Methodology and Biostatistic, Paris, France
| | - D Trapani
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Haematology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - F Strasser
- Center for Integrative Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Gallen, St. Gallen University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - G Vreugdenhil
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| | - M Clarke
- Professor and Director of Northern Ireland Methodology Hub, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Trapani D, Garcia PJ, Schroeder L, Abdul-Ghani R, Hansali A, Offutalu PN, Sewell W, Shakoor S, Yunfeng L, Hashimoto N, Moussy FG, Aceves Capri A, Fleming K. WHO model list of essential in vitro diagnostics: strengthening diagnostics capacity to transform health care for all. Lancet Glob Health 2024; 12:e364-e365. [PMID: 38365406 DOI: 10.1016/s2214-109x(23)00568-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Dario Trapani
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan 20141, Italy.
| | - Patricia J Garcia
- School of Public Health, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| | - Lee Schroeder
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Rashad Abdul-Ghani
- Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sana'a University, Sana'a, Yemen; Tropical Disease Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Science and Technology, Sana'a, Yemen
| | - Amina Hansali
- Institut National d'Hygiène Ministère de la Santé et de la Protection Sociale, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Paulinus Nnamdi Offutalu
- Public Health In-Vitro Diagnostics Control Laboratory, Medical Laboratory Science Council of Nigeria, Lagos, Nigeria
| | - William Sewell
- St Vincent's Healthcare Clinical Campus, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; St Vincent's Pathology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Precision Immunology Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sadia Shakoor
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Lyu Yunfeng
- Center for Medical Device Evaluation, National Medical Products Administration, Beijing, China
| | - Naofumi Hashimoto
- Health Products Policy and Standards Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Francis G Moussy
- Health Products Policy and Standards Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ana Aceves Capri
- Health Products Policy and Standards Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Natangelo S, Trapani D, Koukoutzeli C, Boscolo Bielo L, Marvaso G, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Curigliano G. Radiation therapy, tissue radiosensitization, and potential synergism in the era of novel antibody-drug conjugates. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 195:104270. [PMID: 38272150 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a therapeutic class of agents designed to selectively deliver cytotoxic payloads to cancer cells. With the increasingly positioning of ADCs in the clinical practice, combinations with other treatment modalities, including radiation therapy (RT), will open new opportunities but also challenges. This review evaluates ADC-RT interactions, examining therapeutic synergies and potential caveats. ADC payloads can be radiosensitizing, enhancing cytotoxicity when used in combination with RT. Antigens targeted by ADCs can have various tissue expressions, resulting in possible off-target toxicities by tissue radiosensitization. Notably, the HER-2-directed ADC trastuzumab emtansine has appeared to increase the risk of radionecrosis when used concomitantly with brain RT, as glial cells can express HER2, too. Other possible organ-specific effects are discussed, such as pulmonary and cardiac toxicities. The lack of robust clinical data on the ADC-RT combination raises concerns regarding specific side effects and the ultimate trade-off of toxicity and safety of some combined approaches. Clinical studies are needed to assess ADC-RT combination safety and efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Natangelo
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Trapani
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Chrysanthi Koukoutzeli
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Boscolo Bielo
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Katrini J, Boldrini L, Santoro C, Valenza C, Trapani D, Curigliano G. Biomarkers for antibody-drug conjugates in solid tumors. Mol Cancer Ther 2024:734653. [PMID: 38363729 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-23-0482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
The clinical development and then the progressive entry in clinical practice of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have marked a transformative advancement in the overall cancer treatment. ADCs have been extensively tested for a large number of tumors, reporting heterogeneous clinical efficacy and safety results. In some diseases, the advent of ADCs has yielded significant changes in the prognostic trajectory, portending an improvement of the survival and/or quality of life. ADCs are targeted agents, capable of delivering highly cytotoxic payloads selectively to antigen-expressing cancer cells. As such, they have been intended as perfect 'bullets' to enable the promise of precision medicine, toward high-efficacy and limited-toxicity treatment options. However, only some approved ADCs are intended for the use in biomarker-selected patient populations, restricting potentially the opportunity to be more precise. Yet, key characteristics of modern ADCs might allow the activity of ADCs in tumors with heterogeneous or low expression of cancer antigens, resulting in a clinical activity that could sublimate the classic paradigm of a drug-to-target perfect match. In our review, we portrayed the current landscape of approved ADCs, reporting data of activity as related to the expression of the cancer antigens, and elucidating possible determinants of the safety and efficacy, including when used in a therapeutic sequence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jalissa Katrini
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milano, Italy, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Celeste Santoro
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milano, Italy, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Dario Trapani
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milano, Italy, Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Valenza C, Guidi L, Battaiotto E, Trapani D, Sartore Bianchi A, Siena S, Curigliano G. Targeting HER2 heterogeneity in breast and gastrointestinal cancers. Trends Cancer 2024; 10:113-123. [PMID: 38008666 DOI: 10.1016/j.trecan.2023.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Revised: 10/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/28/2023]
Abstract
About 20% of breast and gastric cancers and 3% of colorectal carcinomas overexpress the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and are sensitive to HER2-directed agents. The expression of HER2 may differ within the same tumoral lesion (spatial intralesional heterogeneity), from different tumor locations (spatial interlesional heterogeneity), and throughout treatments (temporal heterogeneity). Spatial and temporal heterogeneity may impact on response and resistance to HER2-targeting agents and its prevalence and predictive role changes across HER2-overexpressing solid tumors. Therefore, the definition and the characterization of HER2 heterogeneity pose many challenges and its implementation as a reproducible predictive biomarker would help in guiding treatment modulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmine Valenza
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Guidi
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Battaiotto
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Trapani
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Sartore Bianchi
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Salvatore Siena
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Loibl S, André F, Bachelot T, Barrios CH, Bergh J, Burstein HJ, Cardoso MJ, Carey LA, Dawood S, Del Mastro L, Denkert C, Fallenberg EM, Francis PA, Gamal-Eldin H, Gelmon K, Geyer CE, Gnant M, Guarneri V, Gupta S, Kim SB, Krug D, Martin M, Meattini I, Morrow M, Janni W, Paluch-Shimon S, Partridge A, Poortmans P, Pusztai L, Regan MM, Sparano J, Spanic T, Swain S, Tjulandin S, Toi M, Trapani D, Tutt A, Xu B, Curigliano G, Harbeck N. Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2024; 35:159-182. [PMID: 38101773 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- S Loibl
- GBG Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg; Centre for Haematology and Oncology, Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - F André
- Breast Cancer Unit, Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| | - T Bachelot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - C H Barrios
- Oncology Department, Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group and Oncoclínicas, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - J Bergh
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Bioclinicum, Karolinska Institutet and Breast Cancer Centre, Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Centre and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - H J Burstein
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - M J Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Foundation, Champalimaud Cancer Centre, Lisbon; Faculty of Medicine, Lisbon University, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - L A Carey
- Division of Medical Oncology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - S Dawood
- Department of Oncology, Mediclinic City Hospital, Dubai, UAE
| | - L Del Mastro
- Medical Oncology Clinic, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialities, School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - C Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Marburg
| | - E M Fallenberg
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine & Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - P A Francis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - H Gamal-Eldin
- Department of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - K Gelmon
- Department of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
| | - C E Geyer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - M Gnant
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - V Guarneri
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova; Oncology 2 Unit, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - S Gupta
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - S B Kim
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - D Krug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - M Martin
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon, Universidad Complutense, GEICAM, Madrid, Spain
| | - I Meattini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence; Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences 'M. Serio', University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - M Morrow
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - W Janni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - S Paluch-Shimon
- Sharett Institute of Oncology Department, Hadassah University Hospital & Faculty of Medicine Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - A Partridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - P Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - L Pusztai
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven
| | - M M Regan
- Division of Biostatistics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - J Sparano
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - T Spanic
- Europa Donna Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - S Swain
- Medicine Department, Georgetown University Medical Centre and MedStar Health, Washington, USA
| | - S Tjulandin
- N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Centre of Oncology, Moscow, Russia
| | - M Toi
- Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Disease Center, Komagome Hospital, Bunkyo-ku, Japan
| | - D Trapani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - A Tutt
- Breast Cancer Research Division, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Division of Cancer Studies, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - B Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - G Curigliano
- Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies Division, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milan; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - N Harbeck
- Breast Centre, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Comprehensive Cancer Centre Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cantini L, Trapani D, Guidi L, Boscolo Bielo L, Scafetta R, Koziej M, Vidal L, Saini KS, Curigliano G. Neoadjuvant therapy in hormone Receptor-Positive/HER2-Negative breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 2024; 123:102669. [PMID: 38141462 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
Neoadjuvant therapy is commonly used in patients with locally advanced or inoperable breast cancer (BC). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) represents an established treatment modality able to downstage tumours, facilitate breast-conserving surgery, yet also achieve considerable pathologic complete response (pCR) rates in HER2-positive and triple-negative BC. For patients with HR+/HER2- BC, the choice between NACT and neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) is still based on clinical and pathological features and not guided by biomarkers of defined clinical utility, differently from the adjuvant setting where gene-expression signatures have been widely adopted to drive decision-making. In this review, we summarize the evidence supporting the choice of NACT vs NET in HR+/HER2- BC, discussing the issues surrounding clinical trial design and proper selection of patients for every treatment. It is time to question the binary paradigm of responder vs non-responders as well as the "one size fits all" approach in luminal BC, supporting the utilization of continuous endpoints and the adoption of tissue and plasma-based biomarkers at multiple timepoints. This will eventually unleash the full potential of neoadjuvant therapy which is to modulate patient treatment based on treatment sensitivity and surgical outcomes. We also reviewed the current landscape of neoadjuvant studies for HR+/HER2- BC, focusing on antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and immunotherapy combinations. Finally, we proposed a roadmap for future neoadjuvant approaches in HR+/HER2- BC, which should be based on a staggered biomarker-driven treatment selection aiming at impacting long-term relevant endpoints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dario Trapani
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Guidi
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Boscolo Bielo
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Roberta Scafetta
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of medical oncology, Campus Bio-Medico, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy; Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Piggott T, Moja L, Jenei K, Kredo T, Skoetz N, Banzi R, Trapani D, Leong T, McCaul M, Lavis JN, Akl EA, Nonino F, Iorio A, Laurson-Doube J, Huttner BD, Schünemann HJ. GRADE Concept 7: Issues and Insights Linking Guideline Recommendations to Trustworthy Essential Medicine Lists. J Clin Epidemiol 2024; 166:111241. [PMID: 38123105 PMCID: PMC10939133 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.111241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Revised: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Guidelines and essential medicine lists (EMLs) bear similarities and differences in the process that lead to decisions. Access to essential medicines is central to achieve universal health coverage. The World Health Organization (WHO) EML has guided prioritization of essential medicines globally for nearly 50 years, and national EMLs (NEMLs) exist in over 130 countries. Guideline and EML decisions, at WHO or national levels, are not always coordinated and aligned. We sought to explore challenges, and potential solutions, for decision-making to support trustworthy medicine selection for EMLs from a Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) Working Group perspective. We primarily focus on the WHO EML; however, our findings may be applicable to NEML decisions as well. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING We identified key challenges in connecting the EML to health guidelines by involving a broad group of stakeholders and assessing case studies including real applications to the WHO EML, South Africa NEML, and a multiple sclerosis guideline connected to a WHO EML application for multiple sclerosis treatments. To address challenges, we utilized the results of a survey and feedback from the stakeholders, and iteratively met as a project group. We drafted a conceptual framework of challenges and potential solutions. We presented a summary of the results for feedback to all attendees of the GRADE Working Group meetings in November 2022 (approximately 120 people) and in May 2023 (approximately 100 people) before finalizing the framework. RESULTS We prioritized issues and insights/solutions that addressed the connections between the EML and health guidelines. Our suggested solutions include early planning alignment of guideline groups and EMLs, considering shared participation to strengthen linkage, further clarity on price/cost considerations, and using explicit shared criteria to make guideline and EML decisions. We also provide recommendations to strengthen the connection between WHO EML and NEMLs including through contextualization methods. CONCLUSION This GRADE concept article, jointly developed by key stakeholders from the guidelines and EMLs field, identified key conceptual issues and potential solutions to support the continued advancement of trustworthy EMLs. Adopting structured decision criteria that can be linked to guideline recommendations bears the potential to advance health equity and gaps in availability of essential medicines within and between countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Piggott
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Department of Family Medicine, Queens University, Kingston, Canada.
| | - Lorenzo Moja
- Department of Health Product Policy and Standards, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Kristina Jenei
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tamara Kredo
- Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa; Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine and Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| | - Nicole Skoetz
- Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Rita Banzi
- Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Trapani
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; European institute of oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Trudy Leong
- Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Michael McCaul
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Global Health, Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - John N Lavis
- McMaster Health Forum, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Africa Centre for Evidence, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Elie A Akl
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Francesco Nonino
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Unit of Epidemiology and Statistics, Bologna, Italy; WHO Collaborating Centre in Evidence-Based Research Synthesis and Guideline Development, Regione Emilia-Romagna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alfonso Iorio
- Department of Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Mike Gent Chair in Healthcare Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | | | - Benedikt D Huttner
- Department of Health Product Policy and Standards, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Holger J Schünemann
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Horgan D, Van den Bulcke M, Malapelle U, Troncone G, Normanno N, Capoluongo ED, Prelaj A, Rizzari C, Trapani D, Singh J, Kozaric M, Longshore J, Ottaviano M, Boccia S, Pravettoni G, Cattaneo I, Malats N, Buettner R, Lekadir K, de Lorenzo F, Hofman P, De Maria R. Tackling the implementation gap for the uptake of NGS and advanced molecular diagnostics into healthcare systems. Heliyon 2024; 10:e23914. [PMID: 38234913 PMCID: PMC10792189 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 12/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) and liquid biopsy (LB) showed positive results in the fight against different cancer types. This paper aims to assess the uptake of advanced molecular diagnostics/NGS for quick and efficient genetic profiles of tumour cells. For that purpose, the European Alliance for Personalised Medicine conducted a series of expert interviews to ascertain the current status across member states. One stakeholder meeting was additionally conducted to prioritize relevant factors by stakeholders. Seven common pillars were identified, and twenty-five measures were defined based on these pillars. Results showed that a multi-faceted approach is necessary for successful NGS implementation and that regional differences may be influenced by healthcare policies, resources, and infrastructure. It is important to consider different correlations when interpreting the results and to use them as a starting point for further discussion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denis Horgan
- European Alliance for Personalised Medicine, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Engineering, Jacob Institute of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj - 211007, Uttar Pradesh India
| | | | - Umberto Malapelle
- Department of Public Health, University Federico II of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Troncone
- Department of Public Health, University Federico II of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Nicola Normanno
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori "Fondazione G. Pascale" - IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - Ettore D Capoluongo
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnologies, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Genomics, Azienda Ospedaliera Per L'Emergenza Cannizzaro, Catania, Italy
| | - Arsela Prelaj
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Carmelo Rizzari
- Unità di Ematologia Pediatrica, Fondazione MBBM, Università di Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Dario Trapani
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Jaya Singh
- European Alliance for Personalised Medicine, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marta Kozaric
- European Alliance for Personalised Medicine, Brussels, Belgium
| | - John Longshore
- Astra Zeneca, 1800 Concord Pike, Wilmington, DE 19803, USA
| | - Manuel Ottaviano
- Departamento de Tecnología Fotónica y Bioingeniería, Universidad Politècnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Stefania Boccia
- Section of Hygiene, Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Departments of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriella Pravettoni
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Núria Malats
- Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid 28029, Spain
| | - Reinhard Buettner
- Lung Cancer Group Cologne, Institute of Pathology, Center for Integrated Oncology Cologne/Bonn, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Karim Lekadir
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Lab (BCN-AIM), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Paul Hofman
- Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Pasteur Hospital, Université Côte d'Azur, 06000 Nice, France
| | - Ruggero De Maria
- Institute of General Pathology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nicolò E, Tarantino P, D’Ecclesiis O, Antonarelli G, Boscolo Bielo L, Marra A, Gandini S, Crimini E, Giugliano F, Zagami P, Corti C, Trapani D, Morganti S, Criscitiello C, Locatelli M, Belli C, Esposito A, Minchella I, Cristofanilli M, Tolaney SM, Curigliano G. Baseline Tumor Size as Prognostic Index in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors Receiving Experimental Targeted Agents. Oncologist 2024; 29:75-83. [PMID: 37548439 PMCID: PMC10769799 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Baseline tumor size (BTS) has been associated with outcomes in patients with cancer treated with immunotherapy. However, the prognostic impact of BTS on patients receiving targeted therapies (TTs) remains undetermined. METHODS We reviewed data of patients with advanced solid tumors consecutively treated within early-phase clinical trials at our institution from 01/2014 to 04/2021. Treatments were categorized as immunotherapy-based or TT-based (biomarker-matched or not). BTS was calculated as the sum of RECIST1.1 baseline target lesions. RESULTS A total of 444 patients were eligible; the median BTS was 69 mm (IQR 40-100). OS was significantly longer for patients with BTS lower versus higher than the median (16.6 vs. 8.2 months, P < .001), including among those receiving immunotherapy (12 vs. 7.5 months, P = .005). Among patients receiving TT, lower BTS was associated with longer PFS (4.7 vs. 3.1 months, P = .002) and OS (20.5 vs. 9.9 months, P < .001) as compared to high BTS. However, such association was only significant among patients receiving biomarker-matched TT, with longer PFS (6.2 vs. 3.3 months, P < .001) and OS (21.2 vs. 6.7 months, P < .001) in the low-BTS subgroup, despite a similar ORR (28% vs. 22%, P = .57). BTS was not prognostic among patients receiving unmatched TT, with similar PFS (3.7 vs. 4.4 months, P = .30), OS (19.3 vs. 11.8 months, P = .20), and ORR (33% vs. 28%, P = .78) in the 2 BTS groups. Multivariate analysis confirmed that BTS was independently associated with PFS (P = .03) and OS (P < .001) but not with ORR (P = .11). CONCLUSIONS Higher BTS is associated with worse survival outcomes among patients receiving biomarker-matched, but not biomarker-unmatched TT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleonora Nicolò
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Tarantino
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Oriana D’Ecclesiis
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriele Antonarelli
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Boscolo Bielo
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Marra
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Gandini
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Edoardo Crimini
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Giugliano
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Zagami
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Corti
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Trapani
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Morganti
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Carmen Criscitiello
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Marzia Locatelli
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Carmen Belli
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Angela Esposito
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Ida Minchella
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Cristofanilli
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sara M Tolaney
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zagami P, Trapani D, Nicolò E, Corti C, Valenza C, Criscitiello C, Curigliano G, Carey LA. Cardiotoxicity of Agents Used in Patients With Breast Cancer. JCO Oncol Pract 2024; 20:38-46. [PMID: 37983586 PMCID: PMC10827297 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Revised: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer and cardiovascular diseases are the two major causes of mortality, morbidity, and disability worldwide. The improvement in effective therapeutic options for the management of breast cancer (BC) has led to an increased number of BC survivors, who can experience long-term toxicities from cancer treatments. Adverse events including cardiovascular toxicities must be considered in light of effectiveness of recently approved drugs for BC treatment, including elacestrant, tucatinib, neratinib, olaparib, the immune checkpoint inhibitors, trastuzumab deruxtecan, or sacituzumab govitecan. Many cancer drugs affect the cardiovascular system with a range of clinical manifestations. Prompt diagnosis and treatment as well as a multidisciplinary approach involving a cardio-oncologist is optimal for management of these cardiovascular events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola Zagami
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Trapani
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Eleonora Nicolò
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Corti
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Carmine Valenza
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Carmen Criscitiello
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Lisa Anne Carey
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Valenza C, De Pas TM, Gaeta A, Castellano G, Santoro C, Corona A, Chiappini G, Vivanet G, Trapani D, Coppola S, Conforti F, Mattar D, Gandini S, Veronesi P, Pennacchioli E, Curigliano G. Primary malignant phyllodes tumors of the breast: A retrospective analysis from a referral center. Eur J Cancer 2024; 196:113423. [PMID: 37977104 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The treatment for primary malignant phyllodes tumors of the breast (B-MPT) consists of wide local excision with negative margins (≥1 cm). However, because of their rarity, prognostic factors, type of surgery and adjuvant treatments are still a matter of debate. METHODS We conducted a single-center retrospective study to describe outcomes and prognostic factors of patients with primary B-MPT, who underwent breast surgery from January 2000 to December 2021. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of any recurrence. Secondary endpoints were the cumulative incidences of distant and local recurrences. RESULTS 131 patients were included, of whom all received surgery, 5 adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy and 15 radiation therapy. After a median follow-up of 6.4 years, the cumulative incidences at 5-years of any, local and distant recurrences were of 26% (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 4-34%), 16% (95%CI, 10-24%) and 10% (95%CI, 5.3-16%), respectively. Tumor size ≥ 5 cm was associated with higher distant recurrences (p = 0.05); instead, among small tumors (<5 cm), distant recurrences were higher in those with heterologous differentiation and/or multifocal disease (p = 0.06). Type of breast surgery (mastectomy vs. lumpectomy/excision) was not found to be significantly associated with distant (p = 0.32) or local (p = 0.17) recurrence, even after controlling local recurrence incidence for negative pathologic prognostic factors (p = 0.17). CONCLUSIONS The natural history of B-MPT is burdened by local and distant recurrences. Pathologic prognostic factors (i.e., tumor size, heterologous differentiation and multifocal disease) more than the type of wide breast surgery (mastectomy vs. lumpectomy) seem to represent the most significant prognostic factor for recurrences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmine Valenza
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Aurora Gaeta
- Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Grazia Castellano
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Celeste Santoro
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Amedeo Corona
- Division of Melanoma, Soft Tissue Sarcomas and Rare Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Chiappini
- Division of Melanoma, Soft Tissue Sarcomas and Rare Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Grazia Vivanet
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Trapani
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Coppola
- Division of Melanoma, Soft Tissue Sarcomas and Rare Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Conforti
- Medical Oncology Division, Cliniche Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Denise Mattar
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Gandini
- Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Veronesi
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Pennacchioli
- Division of Melanoma, Soft Tissue Sarcomas and Rare Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
El Bairi K, Madariaga A, Trapani D, Al Jarroudi O, Afqir S. New horizons for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: insights from the 2023 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Annual Meetings. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023:ijgc-2023-004927. [PMID: 38101815 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Platinum-resistant ovarian cancer is difficult to treat and has a poor prognosis. Patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer have limited treatment options and often have a limited benefit from existing chemotherapeutic agents. There is a lack of contemporary effective anticancer drugs and reliable predictive biomarkers for this aggressive cancer. Recent cutting-edge research presented at the 2023 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Annual Meetings has provided insights into several potential therapeutic targets, such as DNA damage repair proteins, cell-cycle regulators, and immune-modulating agents. In addition, antibody-drug conjugates have provided new practice-changing results in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Here, we review the results of research presented at this annual event, with a focus on clinical trials investigating novel treatment approaches for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, in addition to predictive and prognostic biomarkers for optimal patient selection, and other topics, such as real-world evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khalid El Bairi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mohammed VI University Hospital, Oujda, Morocco
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, University Mohammed 6 Polytechnic, Ben Guerir, Morocco
| | - Ainhoa Madariaga
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Dario Trapani
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Ouissam Al Jarroudi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mohammed VI University Hospital, Oujda, Morocco
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed Ist University, Oujda, Morocco
| | - Said Afqir
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mohammed VI University Hospital, Oujda, Morocco
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed Ist University, Oujda, Morocco
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Antonarelli G, Taurelli Salimbeni B, Marra A, Esposito A, Locatelli MA, Trapani D, Pescia C, Fusco N, Curigliano G, Criscitiello C. The CDK4/6 inhibitors biomarker landscape: The most relevant biomarkers of response or resistance for further research and potential clinical utility. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2023; 192:104148. [PMID: 37783318 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) in combination with Endocrine Therapy (ET) represent the standard frontline therapy for patients with Hormone Receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic Breast Cancer (mBC). Clinical activity and efficacy of CDK4/6is-based therapies have been proven both in the endocrine sensitive and resistant settings. Therapy resistance eventually underpins clinical progression to any CDK4/6is-based therapies, yet there is a lack of validated molecular biomarkers predictive of either intrinsic or acquired resistance to CDK4/6is in clinical practice. As the "post-CDK4/6is" landscape for the management of HR-positive/HER2-negative mBC is rapidly evolving with the introduction of novel therapies, there is an urgent need for the definition of clinically relevant molecular biomarkers of intrinsic/acquired resistance mechanisms to CDK4/6is. This narrative review outlines the role of currently approved CDK4/6is-based therapies, describes the most relevant molecular biomarkers of CDK4/6is-resistance, and ultimately provides a perspective on the clinical and research scenario.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Antonarelli
- Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapy, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Beatrice Taurelli Salimbeni
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapy, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Marra
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapy, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Angela Esposito
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapy, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Marzia Adelia Locatelli
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapy, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Trapani
- Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapy, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Pescia
- Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Fusco
- Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapy, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Carmen Criscitiello
- Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapy, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Boscolo Bielo L, Trapani D, Repetto M, Crimini E, Valenza C, Belli C, Criscitiello C, Marra A, Subbiah V, Curigliano G. Variant allele frequency: a decision-making tool in precision oncology? Trends Cancer 2023; 9:1058-1068. [PMID: 37704501 DOI: 10.1016/j.trecan.2023.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
Precision oncology requires additional predictive biomarkers for targeted therapy selection. Variant allele frequency (VAF), measuring the proportion of variant alleles within a genomic locus, provides insights into tumor clonality in somatic genomic testing, yielding a strong rationale for targeting dominant cancer cell populations. The prognostic and predictive roles of VAF have been evaluated across different studies. Yet, the absence of validated VAF thresholds and a lack of standardization between sequencing assays currently hampers its clinical utility. Therefore, analytical and clinical validation must be further examined. This Review summarizes the evidence regarding the use of VAF as a predictive biomarker and discusses challenges and opportunities for its clinical implementation as a decision-making tool for targeted therapy selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Boscolo Bielo
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Trapani
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Repetto
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Early Drug Development service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Edoardo Crimini
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Carmine Valenza
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Carmen Belli
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Carmen Criscitiello
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Marra
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Vivek Subbiah
- Drug Development Unit, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ascione L, Crimini E, Trapani D, Marra A, Criscitiello C, Curigliano G. Predicting Response to Antibody Drug Conjugates: A Focus on Antigens' Targetability. Oncologist 2023; 28:944-960. [PMID: 37665782 PMCID: PMC10628585 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a cornerstone in the treatment of many cancers nowadays. ADCs fulfill their function by binding a target on tumor cell membrane to deliver a cytotoxic payload; in addition, those moieties capable of crossing cancer cell membranes can achieve near-by cells that do not express the target antigen, exerting the so-called "bystander" cytotoxic effect. The presence of a specific target antigen expressed on cancer cells has been for long considered crucial for ADCs and commonly required for the inclusion of patients in clinical trials with ADCs. To date, only ado-trastuzumab-emtansine, fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki, and mirvetuximab soravtansine-gynx are approved according to the expression of a target antigen in solid tumors, while the clinical use of other ADCs (eg, sacituzumab govitecan) is not conditioned by the presence of a specific biomarker. Given the ever-growing number of approved ADCs and those under investigation, it is essential to find new biomarkers to guide their use, especially in those settings for which different ADCs are approved to establish the best therapeutic sequence based on robust biomarkers. Hence, this work addresses the role of target antigens in predicting response to ADCs, focusing on examples of antigens' targetability according to their expression on cancer cells' surface or to the presence of specific target aberrations (eg, mutation or over-expression). New methods for the assessment and quantification of targets' expression, like molecular imaging and in vitro assays, might be key tools to improve biomarker analysis and eventually deliver better outcomes by refined patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liliana Ascione
- Division of Early Drug Development, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hematology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Edoardo Crimini
- Division of Early Drug Development, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hematology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Trapani
- Division of Early Drug Development, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hematology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Marra
- Division of Early Drug Development, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Carmen Criscitiello
- Division of Early Drug Development, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hematology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of Early Drug Development, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hematology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Horgan D, Capoluongo E, Dube F, Trapani D, Malapelle U, Rovite V, Omar MI, Alix-Panabières C, Rutkowski P, Bayle A, Hackshaw A, Hofman P, Subbiah V. Clouds across the new dawn for clinical, diagnostic and biological data: accelerating the development, delivery and uptake of personalized medicine. Diagnosis (Berl) 2023; 10:356-362. [PMID: 37036891 DOI: 10.1515/dx-2023-0022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023]
Abstract
Growing awareness of the genetic basis of disease is transforming the opportunities for improving patient care by accelerating the development, delivery and uptake of personalised medicine and diseases diagnostics. This can mean more precise treatments reaching the right patients at the right time at the right cost. But it will be possible only with a coherent European Union (EU) approach to regulation. For clinical and biological data, on which the EU is now legislating with its planned European Health Data Space (EHDS), it is crucial that the design of this new system respects the constraints also implicit in the testing which generates data. The current EHDS proposal may fail to meet this requirement. It risks being over-ambitious, while taking insufficient account of the demanding realities of data access in daily practice and current economics/business models. It is marred by imprecision and ambiguity, by overlaps with other EU legislation, and by lack of clarity on funding. This paper identifies key issues where legislators should ensure that the opportunities are not squandered by the adoption of over-hasty or ill-considered provisions that jeopardise the gains that could be made in improved healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denis Horgan
- European Alliance for Personalised Medicine, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Engineering, Jacob Institute of Biotechnology and Bioengineering Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj, India
| | - Ettore Capoluongo
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliera per l'Emergenza Cannizzaro, Catania, Italy
| | | | - Dario Trapani
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Umberto Malapelle
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Vita Rovite
- Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Riga, Latvia
| | | | - Catherine Alix-Panabières
- Laboratory of Rare Human Circulating Cells (LCCRH), University medical center of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- European Liquid Biopsy Society, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Piotr Rutkowski
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Arnaud Bayle
- Drug Development Department (DITEP) Gustave Roussy-Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
- Faculté de Médicine, Université Paris Saclay, Université Paris-Sud, Paris, France
- Labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Allan Hackshaw
- Cancer Research UK & UCL Cancer Trials Centre, University College London, London, UK
| | - Paul Hofman
- European Liquid Biopsy Society, Hamburg, Germany
- Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, FHU OncoAge, BB-0033-00025, IRCAN, Nice Hospital Centre, University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Vivek Subbiah
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Leone AG, Casolino R, Trapani D, Miceli R, Massagrande M, Morano F, La Verde N, Dalu D, Berardi R, Marsoni S, Lambertini M, Iula B, Carieri E, Converti M, Di Maio M, Beretta GD, Perrone F, Pietrantonio F, Cinieri S. Position paper of the Italian association of medical oncology on health disparities among transgender and gender-diverse people: the Assisi recommendations. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 65:102277. [PMID: 37877000 PMCID: PMC10590834 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2023] [Revised: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Transgender and gender-diverse individuals experience substantial health disparities across the cancer care continuum. Despite well recognized unique healthcare needs, there are barriers in accessing cancer prevention and treatment services, influenced by disadvantages in key social-economic determinants of health which result in worse clinical outcomes, as compared to the general population. The Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) acknowledges the critical relevance of this issue. The "Assisi Recommendations" here summarize the outcomes of the "AIOM Oncology Ethics Day" dedicated to gender differences in oncology and cancer care of transgender and gender-diverse people. The recommendations generated during a 2-day multidisciplinary discussion address the various aspects of cancer care experience of transgender and gender-diverse people. The promotion of research in this field, through the generation of new evidence and the collection of prospective data, has been identified as a priority action to mitigate these disparities. By acknowledging the challenges of cancer care in transgender and gender-diverse people and recognizing the need for dedicated policy and clinical recommendations, AIOM demonstrates its commitment to improving the health and well-being of all patients with cancer, regardless of their gender identity or any other personal or social circumstances, as part of health-for-all societal vision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Giovanni Leone
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via G. Venezian 1, Milan 21033, Italy
| | - Raffaella Casolino
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Dario Trapani
- European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Rosalba Miceli
- Department of Biostatistics for Clinical Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via G. Venezian 1, Milan 21033, Italy
| | | | - Federica Morano
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via G. Venezian 1, Milan 21033, Italy
| | - Nicla La Verde
- Department of Oncology, Luigi Sacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Dalu
- Department of Oncology, Luigi Sacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | - Rossana Berardi
- Oncology Clinic, Università Politecnica delle Marche, AOU delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Silvia Marsoni
- IFOM - the FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Bianca Iula
- ACET - Associazione per la Cultura e l’etica Transgenere (Association for Transgender Culture and Ethics), Milan, Italy Degree: N/A
| | | | - Manlio Converti
- AMIGAY Aps - Associazione Italiana Medici e Personale Sanitario, LGBTQIA+ e Friendly (Italian Association of LGBTQIA+ Medical care Providers), Italy
| | - Massimo Di Maio
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin, Italy
- National Secretary of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM), Italy
| | - Giordano Domenico Beretta
- UOC Oncologia Medica, ASL Pescara P.O., Pescara, Italy
- National President of the Italian Foundation of Medical Oncology (Fondazione AIOM), Italy
| | - Francesco Perrone
- Clinical Trial Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
- President-elect of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM), Italy
| | - Filippo Pietrantonio
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via G. Venezian 1, Milan 21033, Italy
| | - Saverio Cinieri
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale di Summa A. Perrino, Brindisi, Italy
- National President of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM), Italy
| | - the Italian Foundation of Medical Oncology (Fondazione AIOM)
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via G. Venezian 1, Milan 21033, Italy
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
- European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biostatistics for Clinical Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via G. Venezian 1, Milan 21033, Italy
- ELMA Research, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology, Luigi Sacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy
- Oncology Clinic, Università Politecnica delle Marche, AOU delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
- IFOM - the FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- ACET - Associazione per la Cultura e l’etica Transgenere (Association for Transgender Culture and Ethics), Milan, Italy Degree: N/A
- Independent Researcher, Italy Degree: N/A
- AMIGAY Aps - Associazione Italiana Medici e Personale Sanitario, LGBTQIA+ e Friendly (Italian Association of LGBTQIA+ Medical care Providers), Italy
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin, Italy
- National Secretary of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM), Italy
- UOC Oncologia Medica, ASL Pescara P.O., Pescara, Italy
- National President of the Italian Foundation of Medical Oncology (Fondazione AIOM), Italy
- Clinical Trial Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
- President-elect of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM), Italy
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale di Summa A. Perrino, Brindisi, Italy
- National President of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM), Italy
| | - Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM)
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via G. Venezian 1, Milan 21033, Italy
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
- European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biostatistics for Clinical Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via G. Venezian 1, Milan 21033, Italy
- ELMA Research, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology, Luigi Sacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy
- Oncology Clinic, Università Politecnica delle Marche, AOU delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
- IFOM - the FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- ACET - Associazione per la Cultura e l’etica Transgenere (Association for Transgender Culture and Ethics), Milan, Italy Degree: N/A
- Independent Researcher, Italy Degree: N/A
- AMIGAY Aps - Associazione Italiana Medici e Personale Sanitario, LGBTQIA+ e Friendly (Italian Association of LGBTQIA+ Medical care Providers), Italy
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin, Italy
- National Secretary of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM), Italy
- UOC Oncologia Medica, ASL Pescara P.O., Pescara, Italy
- National President of the Italian Foundation of Medical Oncology (Fondazione AIOM), Italy
- Clinical Trial Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
- President-elect of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM), Italy
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale di Summa A. Perrino, Brindisi, Italy
- National President of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Valenza C, Trapani D, Curigliano G. Immunotherapy for inflammatory breast cancer: current evidences and future perspectives. Curr Opin Oncol 2023; 35:507-512. [PMID: 37621167 DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000000967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is the most fatal type presentation of clinical breast cancer. The immune tumor microenvironment (TME) of IBC is characterized by signals of immune evasion but suggests actionable vulnerability to immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). In this review, we aimed to summarize the most important preclinical evidences of IBC immune-vulnerability and the first data from clinical trials evaluating ICIs in IBC. RECENT FINDINGS IBC is characterized by a preexisting active immune TME suppressed by mechanisms of immune-escape, including inhibitory immune-checkpoints, whose expression is higher than in non-IBC. Clinical trials evaluating ICIs in patients with IBC are burdened by slow accrual and low enrollment. SUMMARY Because of the limited data from clinical trials, no conclusions about the activity of ICIs in IBC can be drawn. Ongoing clinical trials are assessing many promising ICI-based combination approaches. An enhanced multicenter collaboration to evaluate ICIs in patients with this aggressive form of disease and to improve clinical outcomes is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmine Valenza
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Trapani
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Roitberg F, Amaral T, Cherny NI, Giuliani R, Latino NJ, Galotti M, Bricalli G, Curigliano G, Pentheroudakis G, Trapani D. Essential cancer medicines: adding feasibility to the magnitude of clinical benefit value chain. ESMO Open 2023; 8:101617. [PMID: 37672862 PMCID: PMC10594014 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Revised: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer is a global public health problem, requiring efficient health system investments to deliver sustainable impact on population health. Access to medicines is a critical component of health systems, having a crucial role in delivering therapeutic benefits. Since 1977, the World Health Organization (WHO) has published a Model List of Essential Medicines (EML) that includes key health interventions for the prevention and control of conditions of public health relevance. Essential medicines are selected for inclusion in the EML based on the evidence of efficacy, safety, therapeutic value, and the potential to impact population health. With the rapid changes in the therapeutic landscape of cancer treatment with new medicine approvals, there is a critical need to select and prioritise specific cancer interventions based on their intrinsic value. MATERIALS AND METHODS The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) has developed a decisional methodology based on a threshold with a minimum set of technical specifications and a consensus-based procedure for decisions to select candidate cancer medicines to be submitted to the WHO for consideration for the WHO EML. RESULTS ESMO recognises the WHO EML as an important reference guide for medicines that all countries should include in their national EMLs. Cancer medicines on the WHO EML are used in the treatment of the majority of cancers, and are recommended in the evidence-based ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines that medical oncologists use to treat patients. ESMO's submissions to the WHO EML in 2019 and 2021 and their respective outcomes are presented in the manuscript. CONCLUSION Due to the rising costs associated with newly available therapies, structured, reproducible, and field-tested tools to evaluate the added clinical benefit from these therapies need to be implemented in pre-selecting potential candidate medicines to be included in the WHO EML. ESMO is proud to collaborate closely with WHO on this important global public health initiative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Roitberg
- Hospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
| | - T Amaral
- Interdisciplinary Skin Cancer Center, Department of Dermatology, University Medical Centre Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. https://twitter.com/TeresaSAmaral
| | - N I Cherny
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel. https://twitter.com/ChernyNathan
| | - R Giuliani
- Guy's and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), Lugano, Switzerland. https://twitter.com/RosGiuliani
| | - N J Latino
- European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), Lugano, Switzerland. https://twitter.com/NicolaJaneLatino
| | - M Galotti
- European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), Lugano, Switzerland. https://twitter.com/MartinaGalotti
| | - G Bricalli
- European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - G Curigliano
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy. https://twitter.com/curijoey
| | - G Pentheroudakis
- European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), Lugano, Switzerland. https://twitter.com/GPentheroudakis
| | - D Trapani
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy. https://twitter.com/darioT_
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Trapani D, Girardi F, Cinieri S, Curigliano G. There is no such a thing as a ' biological' basis for cancer disparities: A call to end misreporting of the ultimate determinants of health outcomes. Tumori 2023:3008916231196369. [PMID: 37688414 DOI: 10.1177/03008916231196369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/10/2023]
Abstract
Improved strategies of cancer prevention and control have resulted in tangible benefits for patients with cancer. Disparities in outcome have been reported as a result of inequal access to health care. Historically, differences in health outcomes at population level have been reported according to key characteristics, including race, ethnicity and, more recently, ancestry. These population descriptors have been used to display the differences in the outcome and highlight actionable areas of health disparities, through policy and population health interventions. Yet, they have been commonly mis-intended as ultimate determinants of health outcomes, as recapitulating intrinsic biological differences. A plethora of past literature has described "biological" differences in patients belonging to a specific racial, ethnical or ancestral group, with certain cancers - commonly overlooking the social and economic contextures. The attention has ultimately focused on the existence of intrinsic differences and biological reasons, as opposed to social and economic determinants of disparities in the outcome in disadvantaged or excluded communities, thus nurturing double stigma. In our editorial, we evaluate some key roots of racial attitudes in displaying patient outcomes in oncology epidemiological studies, and call to report ultimate determinants of health - that are, primarily social and economic determinants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dario Trapani
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Girardi
- Division of Medical Oncology 2, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Saverio Cinieri
- Department of Medical Oncology, Perrino Hospital, ASL Brindisi, Brindisi, Italy
- Associazione Italiana di Oncologia Medica (AIOM), Milan, Italy (President)
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kiesewetter B, Dafni U, de Vries EGE, Barriuso J, Curigliano G, González-Calle V, Galotti M, Gyawali B, Huntly BJP, Jäger U, Latino NJ, Malcovati L, Oosting SF, Ossenkoppele G, Piccart M, Raderer M, Scarfò L, Trapani D, Zielinski CC, Wester R, Zygoura P, Macintyre E, Cherny NI. ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale for haematological malignancies (ESMO-MCBS:H) version 1.0. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:734-771. [PMID: 37343663 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO)-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (MCBS) has been accepted as a robust tool to evaluate the magnitude of clinical benefit reported in trials for oncological therapies. However, the ESMO-MCBS hitherto has only been validated for solid tumours. With the rapid development of novel therapies for haematological malignancies, we aimed to develop an ESMO-MCBS version that is specifically designed and validated for haematological malignancies. METHODS ESMO and the European Hematology Association (EHA) initiated a collaboration to develop a version for haematological malignancies (ESMO-MCBS:H). The process incorporated five landmarks: field testing of the ESMO-MCBS version 1.1 (v1.1) to identify shortcomings specific to haematological diseases, drafting of the ESMO-MCBS:H forms, peer review and revision of the draft based on re-scoring (resulting in a second draft), assessment of reasonableness of the scores generated, final review and approval by ESMO and EHA including executive boards. RESULTS Based on the field testing results of 80 haematological trials and extensive review for feasibility and reasonableness, five amendments to ESMO-MCBS were incorporated in the ESMO-MCBS:H addressing the identified shortcomings. These concerned mainly clinical trial endpoints that differ in haematology versus solid oncology and the very indolent nature of nevertheless incurable diseases such as follicular lymphoma, which hampers presentation of mature data. In addition, general changes incorporated in the draft version of the ESMO-MCBS v2 were included, and specific forms for haematological malignancies generated. Here we present the final approved forms of the ESMO-MCBS:H, including instructions. CONCLUSION The haematology-specific version ESMO-MCBS:H allows now full applicability of the scale for evaluating the magnitude of clinical benefit derived from clinical studies in haematological malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Kiesewetter
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - U Dafni
- Laboratory of Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens; Frontier Science Foundation-Hellas, Athens, Greece
| | - E G E de Vries
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - J Barriuso
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - G Curigliano
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Division of Early Drug Development, Milan; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - V González-Calle
- Servicio de Hematología, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca-IBSAL, CIBERONC and Centro de Investigación del Cáncer-IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), Salamanca, Spain
| | - M Galotti
- ESMO Head Office, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - B Gyawali
- Departments of Oncology, Oncology; Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston; Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - B J P Huntly
- Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge & Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
| | - U Jäger
- Department of Medicine I, Clinical Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - L Malcovati
- Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia; Department of Hematology Oncology, IRCCS S. Matteo Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - S F Oosting
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - G Ossenkoppele
- Department of Haematology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Piccart
- Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - M Raderer
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - L Scarfò
- Strategic Research Program on CLL, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele and IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - D Trapani
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Division of Early Drug Development, Milan; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - C C Zielinski
- Wiener Privatklinik, Central European Academy Cancer Center, Vienna, Austria
| | - R Wester
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P Zygoura
- Frontier Science Foundation-Hellas, Athens, Greece
| | - E Macintyre
- Onco-hématologie Biologique, AP-HP, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, Paris; Université Paris Cité, INSERM, CNRS, INEM F-75015, Paris, France
| | - N I Cherny
- Cancer Pain and Palliative Medicine Service, Department of Medical Oncology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Valenza C, Trapani D, Gandini S, Sposetti C, Boscolo Bielo L, Marra A, Giarratano T, Favero D, Cortesi L, Moscetti L, Pistelli M, Berardi R, Zambelli A, Lambertini M, Del Mastro L, Guarneri V, Vernieri C, Curigliano G. Platinum-based chemotherapy and PARP inhibitors for patients with a germline BRCA pathogenic variant and advanced breast cancer (LATER-BC): retrospective multicentric analysis of post-progression treatments. Eur J Cancer 2023; 190:112944. [PMID: 37437366 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.112944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2023] [Revised: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with breast cancer (BC) harbouring a germinal BRCA pathogenic variant (gBRCA-PV) may have an enhanced sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) and PARP inhibitors (PARPi). As reported in ovarian cancer, however, sensitivity and resistance to these treatments could partially overlap. In patients with a gBRCA-PV and advanced BC (aBC), it remains unclear whether prior exposure to PARPi/PBC affects tumour response to subsequent PBC/PARPi, respectively. METHODS We conducted a retrospective, multicentric study to investigate the clinical benefit of post-PBC PARPi and vice versa in patients with a gBRCA-PV and aBC. Patients included had received (neo)adjuvant PBC and then PARPi in advanced setting (group 1), PBC followed by PARPi (group 2) or PARPi followed by PBC (group 3), both in advanced setting. We reported median progression-free survival (mPFS) and disease control rate (DCR) in each group. RESULTS A total of 67 patients from six centres were included. PARPi-mPFS in advanced setting was 6.1 months in patients in group 1 (N = 12), while PARPi-DCR was 67%. In group 2 (N = 36), PARPi-mPFS was 3.4 months and PARPi-DCR was 64%. Age < 65 years and platinum-free interval (PFI) > 6 months were associated with longer PARPi-PFS; previous PBC-PFS > 6 months and PBC in first to second line were associated with longer PARPi-DCR. Patients in group 3 (N = 21) reported a PBC-mPFS of 1.8 months and a PBC-DCR of 14%. PARPi-PFS ≥ 9 months and PARPi-FI ≥ 6 months were associated with better PBC-DCR. CONCLUSIONS Sensitivity and resistance to PARPi and PBC partially overlap in patients with a gBRCA-PV and aBC. Evidence of PARPi activity emerged in patients who progressed on previous PBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmine Valenza
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan 20141, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Trapani
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan 20141, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Gandini
- Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Caterina Sposetti
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Boscolo Bielo
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan 20141, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Marra
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan 20141, Italy
| | - Tommaso Giarratano
- Division of Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Diletta Favero
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
| | - Laura Cortesi
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Luca Moscetti
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Mirco Pistelli
- Department of Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Rossana Berardi
- Department of Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, Italy; Department of Clinical and Molecular Science, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Alberto Zambelli
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Rozzano, MI, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Lucia Del Mastro
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Valentina Guarneri
- Division of Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padova, Italy; Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Claudio Vernieri
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy; IFOM ETS, the AIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan 20141, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Valenza C, Trapani D, Fusco N, Wang X, Cristofanilli M, Ueno NT, Curigliano G. The immunogram of inflammatory breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 2023; 119:102598. [PMID: 37437342 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Revised: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is the most aggressive and fatal clinical presentation of breast cancer. Despite the term "inflammatory", based on the clinical presentation, IBC is biologically driven by an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Whether IBC can be switched into an immune-inflamed TME by immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is a matter of debate. Presently, measurable biomarkers of IBC-TME have never been synthetized into a comprehensive portray of the immune-milieu (i.e., an immunogram), describing the immune-vulnerability of IBC and potentially predicting the response to ICIs. We propose an immunogram for IBC, based on preclinical and clinical studies, including six parameters: the presence of immune-effector cells, of immune-suppressive cells and of immune checkpoints, the general immune status, the activation of immune-suppressive pathways, the tumor foreignness. The IBC immunogram suggests the existence of a preexisting immune TME that is suppressed by mechanisms of immune-escape but might be restored by ICIs. The combination of chemotherapy and ICIs in patients with IBC is based on a strong biological rationale. However, the design and the development of clinical trials assessing the incorporation of ICIs raise many methodological and practical issues. In parallel with the further comprehension of IBC biology, the prospective validation and integration of biomarkers predictive of response to ICIs are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmine Valenza
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Trapani
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Fusco
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Xiaoping Wang
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Massimo Cristofanilli
- Division of Medical Oncology, Internal Medicine Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Naoto T Ueno
- University of Hawai'i Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Booth CM, Sengar M, Goodman A, Wilson B, Aggarwal A, Berry S, Collingridge D, Denburg A, Eisenhauer EA, Ginsburg O, Goldstein D, Gunasekera S, Hammad N, Honda K, Jackson C, Karikios D, Knopf K, Koven R, Marini BL, Maskens D, Moraes FY, Mohyuddin GR, Poudyal BS, Pramesh CS, Roitberg F, Rubagumya F, Schott S, Sirohi B, Soto-Perez-de-Celis E, Sullivan R, Tannock IF, Trapani D, Tregear M, van der Graaf W, Vanderpuye V, Gyawali B. Common Sense Oncology: outcomes that matter. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:833-835. [PMID: 37467768 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00319-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Revised: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Aaron Goodman
- University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Scott Berry
- Queen's University, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Nazik Hammad
- Queen's University, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Kevin Knopf
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ian F Tannock
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Verna Vanderpuye
- National Center for Radiotherapy, Oncology, and Nuclear Medicine, Accra, Ghana
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Rodin G, Skelton M, Bhoo-Pathy N, Dewachi O, Li M, Trapani D, Smyth E, Banegas M, Salins N, Unger-Saldaña K, Zimmermann C, Sullivan R. Establishing a Lancet Oncology Commission on the humanitarian crisis of cancer. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:835-837. [PMID: 37541269 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00346-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Gary Rodin
- Cancer Experience Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 2C1; Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and Princess Margaret Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Departments of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Global Institute of Psychosocial Oncology, Palliative and End-of-Life Care (GIPPEC), University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Mac Skelton
- Institute of Regional and International Studies, American University of Iraq, Sulaimani, Iraq
| | - Nirmala Bhoo-Pathy
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; Universiti Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Omar Dewachi
- Medical Anthropology and Global Health, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Madeline Li
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and Princess Margaret Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Departments of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Global Institute of Psychosocial Oncology, Palliative and End-of-Life Care (GIPPEC), University of Toronto and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Elizabeth Smyth
- Cambridge University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Matthew Banegas
- Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences Member, Cancer Control Program, Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Naveen Salins
- Department of Palliative Medicine and Supportive Care and Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Care Centre, Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
| | | | - Camilla Zimmermann
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and Princess Margaret Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Departments of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Departments of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Palliative Care Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Richard Sullivan
- Institute of Cancer Policy and Global Health, King's College London, London, UK; Centre for Conflict and Health Research, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Antonarelli G, Corti C, Tarantino P, Salimbeni BT, Zagami P, Marra A, Trapani D, Tolaney S, Cortes J, Curigliano G. Management of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer after trastuzumab deruxtecan failure. ESMO Open 2023; 8:101608. [PMID: 37467660 PMCID: PMC10372550 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2023] [Revised: 06/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The current treatment of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) has been greatly impacted in the past decade by the introduction of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), which represent a relatively novel therapeutic class with the peculiar ability to deliver otherwise overtly toxic chemotherapeutics to tumor sites by exploiting the specificities of monoclonal antibodies. Indeed, drug engineering refinements in ADC design, such as through the introduction of cleavable linkers and hydrophobic payloads, resulted in improved patient outcomes in recent years. Two different ADCs, namely trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), have already entered clinical practice for the treatment of HER2-positive ABC. In this scenario, T-DXd has shown to portend better survival outcomes compared to T-DM1, while leaving a large unsought area of unmet medical need upon T-DXd failure. Treatment decision and benefit of cancer drugs following T-DXd still represent an area of clinical controversy, where a preclinical investigation and clinical development should be prioritized. As the pace of innovation is currently accelerating, and with novel ADC formulations advancing in early-phase clinical trials, the whole BC field is changing at an unprecedented rate, with potential broadenings of therapeutic indications. In this review, we present the clinical landscape of HER2-positive advanced BC and discuss our vision on how to tackle T-DXd resistance, providing a perspective on the priority areas of the cancer research in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Antonarelli
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan; Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy. https://twitter.com/GabrAnton
| | - C Corti
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan; Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy. https://twitter.com/CCortiMD
| | - P Tarantino
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan; Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA. https://twitter.com/PTarantinoMD
| | - B T Salimbeni
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan; Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - P Zagami
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan; Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy. https://twitter.com/paolazagam
| | - A Marra
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy. https://twitter.com/antoniomarraMD
| | - D Trapani
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan; Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy. https://twitter.com/darioT_
| | - S Tolaney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA. https://twitter.com/stolaney1
| | - J Cortes
- International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Pangaea Oncology, Quironsalud Group, Barcelona; Medical Scientia Innovation Research (MedSIR), Barcelona; Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
| | - G Curigliano
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan; Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Tarantino P, Viale G, Press MF, Hu X, Penault-Llorca F, Bardia A, Batistatou A, Burstein HJ, Carey LA, Cortes J, Denkert C, Diéras V, Jacot W, Koutras AK, Lebeau A, Loibl S, Modi S, Mosele MF, Provenzano E, Pruneri G, Reis-Filho JS, Rojo F, Salgado R, Schmid P, Schnitt SJ, Tolaney SM, Trapani D, Vincent-Salomon A, Wolff AC, Pentheroudakis G, André F, Curigliano G. ESMO expert consensus statements (ECS) on the definition, diagnosis, and management of HER2-low breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:645-659. [PMID: 37269905 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2023] [Revised: 05/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer has recently emerged as a targetable subset of breast tumors, based on the evidence from clinical trials of novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates. This evolution has raised several biological and clinical questions, warranting the establishment of consensus to optimally treat patients with HER2-low breast tumors. Between 2022 and 2023, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) held a virtual consensus-building process focused on HER2-low breast cancer. The consensus included a multidisciplinary panel of 32 leading experts in the management of breast cancer from nine different countries. The aim of the consensus was to develop statements on topics that are not covered in detail in the current ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline. The main topics identified for discussion were (i) biology of HER2-low breast cancer; (ii) pathologic diagnosis of HER2-low breast cancer; (iii) clinical management of HER2-low metastatic breast cancer; and (iv) clinical trial design for HER2-low breast cancer. The expert panel was divided into four working groups to address questions relating to one of the four topics outlined above. A review of the relevant scientific literature was conducted in advance. Consensus statements were developed by the working groups and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment before voting. This article presents the developed statements, including findings from the expert panel discussions, expert opinion, and a summary of evidence supporting each statement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Tarantino
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan
| | - G Viale
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - M F Press
- Department of Pathology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - X Hu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - F Penault-Llorca
- Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Centre Jean PERRIN, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - A Bardia
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - A Batistatou
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - H J Burstein
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - L A Carey
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - J Cortes
- International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Pangaea Oncology, Quironsalud Group, Barcelona; Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - C Denkert
- Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - V Diéras
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes
| | - W Jacot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier University, INSERM U1194, Montpellier, France
| | - A K Koutras
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, Greece
| | - A Lebeau
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg
| | - S Loibl
- German Breast Group/GBG Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg; Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - S Modi
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - M F Mosele
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - E Provenzano
- Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University NHS Foundation Trust and NIH Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - G Pruneri
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan; Department of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - J S Reis-Filho
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - F Rojo
- Department of Pathology, IIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz University Hospital-CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Salgado
- Department of Pathology, ZAS, Antwerp, Belgium; Division of Research, Peter Mac Callum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - P Schmid
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| | - S J Schnitt
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - S M Tolaney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - D Trapani
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan; European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - A Vincent-Salomon
- Department of Pathology, Diagnostic and Theranostic Medicine Division, Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France
| | - A C Wolff
- The Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, USA
| | | | - F André
- INSERM U981 - Molecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, PRISM Center for Precision Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - G Curigliano
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan; European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Trapani D, Jin Q, Block CC, Freedman RA, Lin NU, Tarantino P, Mittendorf EA, King TA, Lester SC, Brock JE, Tayob N, Bunnell CA, Tolaney SM, Burstein HJ. Identifying Patterns and Barriers in OncotypeDX Recurrence Score Testing in Older Patients With Early-Stage, Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: Implications for Guidance and Reimbursement. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:560-570. [PMID: 37192427 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Revised: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the clinical patterns of utilization of OncotypeDX Recurrence Score (RS) in early-stage, hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer (BC) at an academic center with previously established internal reflex testing guidelines. METHODS RS testing in accordance with preexisting reflex criteria and predictors of utilization outside of reflex criteria were retrospectively analyzed for the years 2019-2021 in a quality improvement evaluation. Patients were grouped according to OncotypeDX testing within (cohort A) or outside (cohort B) of predefined criteria which included a cap at age older than 65 years. RESULTS Of 1,687 patients whose tumors had RS testing, 1,087 were in cohort A and 600 in cohort B. In cohort B, nearly half of patients were older than 65 years (n = 279; IQR, 67-72 years). For patients older than 65 years, those with RS testing were younger (median age: 69 v 73 years), with higher grade cancers (G2-3: 84.9% v 54.7%) and were more likely to be treated with chemotherapy (15.4% v 4.1%). Issues for implementation of RS testing in older patients were identified, including potential structural barriers related to the current policy on the reimbursements of genomic tests. CONCLUSION Internal guidelines may facilitate standardized utilization of the RS in early-BC. Our data suggest that clinicians preferred broader utilization of RS across the age spectrum, with therapeutically important consequences. Modifying the current policy for reimbursement of RS testing and in internal reflexive testing criteria for those older than 65 years is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dario Trapani
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Qingchun Jin
- Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Caroline C Block
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Rachel A Freedman
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Paolo Tarantino
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Elizabeth A Mittendorf
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Tari A King
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Susan C Lester
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Breast Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Jane E Brock
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Breast Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Nabihah Tayob
- Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Craig A Bunnell
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Sara M Tolaney
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Harold J Burstein
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Guidi L, Valenza C, Trapani D, Curigliano G. Antibody-drug conjugates targeting HER2-mutant or HER2-(non) amplified solid tumors: is HER2 an agnostic target? Expert Opin Biol Ther 2023; 23:1039-1042. [PMID: 37897696 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2023.2277915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Guidi
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Carmine Valenza
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Trapani
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Boscolo Bielo L, Natangelo S, Katrini J, Trapani D, Curigliano G. A comprehensive update of hormone-related pharmacokinetic variations associated with breast cancer drugs. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2023; 19:389-403. [PMID: 37695692 DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2023.2244870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Drugs available for the treatment of breast cancer are increasing, yielding improved oncological outcomes. The efficacy and safety of anticancer drugs significantly depend on pharmacokinetic profiles, which could be influenced by several factors, such as sex hormones. AREAS COVERED This article discusses the potential hormone-related pharmacokinetic influences on novel breast cancer pharmacotherapies. EXPERT OPINION Recently approved drugs for the treatment of breast cancer belong to different classes, each with unique pharmacokinetic profile. The impact of hormones, such as estrogen and progesterone, may occur at different steps of drug metabolism. Key effects of sex hormones ha ve been reported on multidrug-resistant transporters and enzymes involved in the liver metabolism of drugs, such as cytochromes. Nevertheless, no data is currently available to establish hormone-related metabolic interactions that may account for variability in drug scheduling and selection. Whereas we recognize influences may occur, we do not assume hormones alone can yield clinically significant metabolic changes. Rather, we believe that hormonal influences should be considered along with other elements that may affect drugs metabolism, such as concomitant medications, age-related pharmacokinetic changes, and genetic polymorphisms, in order to deliver treatment personalization and ensure better tolerability and safety of anticancer treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Boscolo Bielo
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Natangelo
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Jalissa Katrini
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Trapani
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kotteas E, Bielo LB, Valenza C, Santoro C, Koukoutzeli C, Trapani D, Curigliano G. Treatment optimization in early triple negative breast cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2023; 23:1107-1116. [PMID: 37873652 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2023.2268840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The treatment of early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has radically changed in recent years. Response to neoadjuvant treatment has provided prognostic information, and the achievement of a pathological complete response (pCR) is associated with improved prognosis. An exact treatment algorithm that embraces the trade-off of efficacy and toxicity in a risk-adapted manner has, however, not been consolidated. AREAS COVERED In this review, we focused on the current treatments used for patients with early triple negative breast cancer, aiming at framing a therapeutic approach toward risk-adapted treatment optimization. We reviewed the clinical trials and other evidence at the foundation of the current clinical practice in early TNBC and identified possible areas of clinical implementation. EXPERT OPINION In our opinion, treatment optimization will ensure improved patient-centric outcomes, with less toxicities, better long-term quality of life and risk-adapted treatment modulation. Presently, treatment modulation can be applied in some patients through de-intensification, for small TNBC, informed by novel biomarkers and based on the response to neoadjuvant treatments, especially in the case of pCR. Innovative approaches should incorporate baseline risk and cancer biology, treatment response, and post-surgery biomarkers of prognosis, to deliver risk-adapted treatments for patients with early TNBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias Kotteas
- Oncology Unit, 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Luca Boscolo Bielo
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Carmine Valenza
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Celeste Santoro
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Chrysanthi Koukoutzeli
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Trapani
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Leone AG, Miceli R, Trapani D, Massagrande M, Morano F, Marsoni S, La Verde N, Berardi R, Casolino R, Lambertini M, Dalu D, Di Maio M, Beretta GD, Perrone F, Cinieri S, Pietrantonio F. Cancer care in transgender and gender-diverse persons: results from two national surveys among providers and health service users by the Italian Association of Medical Oncology. ESMO Open 2023; 8:101578. [PMID: 37270870 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2023] [Revised: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) population represents an underserved group across the cancer care continuum. To assess the perspective of both oncology health care providers (OHPs) and TGD individuals in Italy, we conducted two national surveys: one among 2407 OHPs about their attitudes, knowledge and behavior toward TGD patients, and one among TGD persons about their health needs, experiences and barriers encountered in the use of health services across the cancer continuum. MATERIALS AND METHODS The surveys were self-compiled web-based computer-aided web interview, conducted in Italy within the 'OncoGender-Promoting Inclusion in Oncology' project, led by the Italian national cancer society [Associazione Italiana di Oncologia Medica (AIOM)]-associated researchers. All members of AIOM were invited by e-mail to participate in the OHP survey. TGD persons were reached through advocacy groups and consumers' panel. The recruitment was completed on a voluntary basis. Survey data were collected and managed using an online platform managed by ELMA Research, an independent pharmaceutical marketing agency. RESULTS A total of 305 OHPs (13% of AIOM members) and 190 TGD individuals participated in the surveys. Only 19% of OHPs felt competent in providing care to TGD patients and 21% declared not to feel comfortable in treating TGD patients. Seventy-one percent of TGD persons reported that they had never joined any cancer screening program; 32% reported one or more acts of discrimination by health care providers. Seventy-two percent of OHPs recognized the lack of specific education on cancer care for TGD patients and deemed it necessary to receive adequate training. CONCLUSIONS A general lack of knowledge among OHPs about TGD health issues seems to be the main driver of difficulties in providing assistance and of discriminatory attitudes against TGD individuals. Ultimately, this whole issue generates access barriers and contributes to lack of trust in health care services. Educational interventions and an implementation of person-centric cancer policies are urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A G Leone
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - R Miceli
- Department of Biostatistics for Clinical Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - D Trapani
- European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - F Morano
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - S Marsoni
- IFOM-The FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - N La Verde
- Department of Oncology, Luigi Sacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | - R Berardi
- Oncology Clinic, Università Politecnica delle Marche, AOU delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - R Casolino
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - M Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - D Dalu
- Department of Oncology, Luigi Sacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | - M Di Maio
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, Turin, Italy
| | - G D Beretta
- UOC Oncologia Medica, ASL Pescara P.O., Pescara, Italy
| | - F Perrone
- Clinical Trial Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - S Cinieri
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale di Summa A. Perrino, Brindisi, Italy
| | - F Pietrantonio
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Jenei K, Raymakers AJN, Bayle A, Berger-Thürmel K, Cherla A, Honda K, Jackson CCGA, Karikios D, Trapani D, Berry S, Gyawali B. Health technology assessment for cancer medicines across the G7 countries and Oceania: an international, cross-sectional study. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:624-635. [PMID: 37269843 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00175-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Criticisms have emerged that cancer medicines offer modest benefits at increasingly high prices. Reimbursement decisions made by health technology assessment (HTA) agencies have become a complex endeavour for cancer medicines. Most high-income countries (HICs) use HTA criteria to identify high-value medicines for reimbursement under public drug coverage plans. We compared HTA criteria specific for cancer medicines in economically similar HICs, to understand how these criteria contribute to reimbursement decisions. METHODS We did an international, cross-sectional analysis in collaboration with author investigators across eight HICs, from the Group of Seven (known as G7; Canada, England, France, Germany, Italy, and Japan) and Oceania (Australia and New Zealand). Publicly available data from HTA agency reports and official documentation were extracted and analysed between Aug 15, 2021, and July 31, 2022. We collected data pertaining to the decision-making criteria used by the national HTA agency; HTA reimbursement status for 34 medicine-indication pairs corresponding to 15 unique US top-selling cancer medicines; and HTA reimbursement status for 18 cancer medicine-indication pairs (13 unique medicines) with minimal clinical benefit (score of 1 on the European Society of Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale). Descriptive statistics were used to compare HTA decision criteria and drug reimbursement recommendations (or for Germany and Japan, final reimbursement status) across the eight countries. FINDINGS Therapeutic impact related to clinical outcomes of the new medicine was a uniform criterion across the eight countries, whereas quality of evidence (under the remit of therapeutic impact assessment) and equity were infrequently cited criteria. Only the German HTA agency mandated that surrogate endpoints be validated in therapeutic impact assessment. All countries except Germany included formal cost-effectiveness analyses within HTA reports. England and Japan were the only countries that specified a cost-effectiveness threshold. Of the 34 medicine-indication pairs corresponding to US top-selling cancer medicines, Germany reimbursed the maximum (34 [100%]), followed by Italy (32 [94%] recommended for reimbursement), Japan (28 [82%] reimbursed), Australia, Canada, England, and France (27 [79%] recommended for reimbursement), and New Zealand (12 [35%] recommended for reimbursement). Of the 18 cancer medicine-indication pairs with marginal clinical benefit, Germany reimbursed 15 (83%) and Japan reimbursed 12 (67%). France recommended nine (50%) for reimbursement, followed by Italy (seven [39%]), Canada (five [28%]), and Australia and England (three [17%] each). New Zealand did not recommend any medicine-indications with marginal clinical benefit for reimbursement. Considering the overall cumulative proportion across the eight countries, 58 (21%) of 272 indications for the US top-selling medicines and 90 (63%) of 144 marginally beneficial medicine-indications were not recommended for reimbursement or reimbursed. INTERPRETATION Our findings indicate discordance in public reimbursement decisions across economically similar countries, despite overlapping HTA decision criteria. This suggests a need for improved transparency around the nuances of the criteria to ensure improved access to high-value cancer medicines, and deprioritisation of low-value cancer medicines. Health systems have opportunities to improve their HTA decision-making processes by learning from the systems in other countries. FUNDING None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina Jenei
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Adam J N Raymakers
- Program on Regulation, Therapeutics, and Law, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Arnaud Bayle
- Oncostat U1018, Inserm, Paris-Saclay University, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Karin Berger-Thürmel
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Avi Cherla
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Kazunori Honda
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | | | - Deme Karikios
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Dario Trapani
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Haematology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Scott Berry
- Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Bishal Gyawali
- Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Lythgoe MP, Lewison G, Aggarwal A, Booth C, Lawler M, Trapani D, Sengar M, Sullivan R. The rise of immuno-oncology in China: a challenge to western dominance? Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:439-441. [PMID: 37142369 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00026-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mark P Lythgoe
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - Grant Lewison
- King's College London, Institute of Cancer Policy (Global Oncology Group), London, UK
| | - Ajay Aggarwal
- Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Chris Booth
- Departments of Oncology & Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Mark Lawler
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Dario Trapani
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Manju Sengar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - Richard Sullivan
- King's College London, Institute of Cancer Policy (Global Oncology Group), London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
Prior authorization (PA) is a type of utilization review that health insurers apply to control service delivery, payments, and reimbursements of health interventions. The original stated intent of PA was to ensure high-quality standards in treatment delivery while encouraging evidence-based and cost-effective therapeutic choices. However, as currently implemented in clinical practice, PA has been shown to affect the health workforce, adding administrative burden to authorize needed health interventions for patients and often requiring time-consuming peer-to-peer reviews to challenge initial denials. PA is presently required for a wide range of interventions, including supportive care medicines and other essential cancer care interventions. Patients who are denied coverage are commonly forced to receive second-choice options, including less effective or less tolerable options, or are exposed to financial toxicity because of substantial out-of-pocket expenditures, affecting patient-centric outcomes. The development of tools informed by national clinical guidelines to identify standard-of-care interventions for patients with specific cancer diagnoses and the implementation of evidence-based clinical pathways as part of quality improvement efforts of cancer centers have improved patient outcomes and may serve to establish new payment models for health insurers, thereby also reducing administrative burden and delays. The definition of a set of essential interventions and guidelines- or pathways-driven decisions could facilitate reimbursement decisions and thus reduce the need for PAs. Structural changes in how PA is applied and implemented, including a redefinition of its real need, are needed to optimize patient-centric outcomes and support high-quality care of patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dario Trapani
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapy, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology (DIPO), University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Lianne Kraemer
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Insittute, Boston, MA
| | - Hope S Rugo
- University of California, San Francisco, CA
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Elkefi S, Trapani D, Ryan S. The role of digital health in supporting cancer patients' mental health and psychological well-being for a better quality of life: A systematic literature review. Int J Med Inform 2023; 176:105065. [PMID: 37224644 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Revised: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This work aims to evaluate the role of digital health in supporting the mental and psychological well-being of patients with cancer and identify the associated challenges of use and implementation. METHODS Eligibility criteria: We included peer-reviewed studies (quantitative/qualitative) published between January 2011 and July 2022, that are written in English using technology to support cancer patients' mental health. We excluded opinion papers, editorials, and commentaries. INFORMATION SOURCES The systematic review was conducted across ProQuest CENTRAL, Scopus, PubMed, PsycInfo, Web Of Science, and IEEE Xplore. The study selection followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews, meta-Analysis Reviews, and meta-Analysis guidelines (PRISMA). Risk of bias: All screening steps followed a consensus between the authors to minimize bias or discrepancy. Synthesis of the results: Data were extracted following the Six-factor Model of Psychological Well-being (SMPW). The technology challenges are summarized following the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model (SEIPS), focusing on design, impact on processes, and outcomes. RESULTS We included 25 studies satisfying our inclusion criteria. The studies had little interest in minorities and sociodemographic factors' assessment within their results. The review showed that mental health and psychological well-being tools cover many applications. In addition to allowing personal growth, digital health can help cancer patients gain more autonomy and self-acceptance. Moreover, these health technologies can aid in mastering the environment, shaping social relationships, and pursuing life goals. Many challenges were identified related to the environment, organization, users, and tasks. DISCUSSION Digital health applications for cancer care cover a broad spectrum of mental health interventions. Challenges warrant analyzing the needs and usability. Lessons learned during COVID-19 may help refine technology interventions for mental health in cancer care. More interest in minorities is needed when designing technologies for patients to ensure more access to equitable care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Safa Elkefi
- School of Systems and Enterprises, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, USA.
| | - Dario Trapani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sean Ryan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Boscolo Bielo L, Trapani D, Curigliano G. Pharmacoeconomics of novel pharmacotherapies in triple-negative breast cancer. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2023; 24:789-801. [PMID: 37029518 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2023.2201372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents the most aggressive breast-cancer subtype carrying unfavorable clinical outcomes. Despite traditionally chemotherapy has represented the only systemic treatment option available, novel drugs have changed the treatment landscape, granting approval by regulatory agencies worldwide, while determining new economic struggles on health systems for their high prices. AREAS COVERED In this review, we provided a comprehensive analysis of pharmacoeconomic studies of drugs recently approved in the early and advanced setting of TNBC. EXPERT OPINION novel systemic treatment options redefined the therapeutic algorithms for TNBC by establishing new paradigms, based on substantial clinical benefits. Pembrolizumab and Olaparib in the curative setting portend high-value, as shown with the use of value-frameworks, resulting in cost-effective interventions. In the metastatic setting, new drugs have demonstrated mixed improvements of patient-centric endpoints, resulting often in interventions unlikely to have good value for money. We believe that cost-effectiveness alone is not a metric to inform the opportunity to invest on new interventions, while the intrinsic value of medicines should be the driver of the decisions. We endorse a patient-centric priority-setting that can ensure health system sustainability, to timely deliver innovative cancer care to all in need and positively impact on population health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Boscolo Bielo
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Trapani
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Affiliation(s)
- Dario Trapani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Erica L Mayer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Alder L, Trapani D, Bradbury C, Van Swearingen AED, Tolaney SM, Khasraw M, Anders CK, Lascola CD, Hsu L, Lin NU, Sammons S. Durable responses in patients with HER2+ breast cancer and leptomeningeal metastases treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan. NPJ Breast Cancer 2023; 9:19. [PMID: 36997605 PMCID: PMC10063529 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-023-00519-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are a devastating complication of HER2 + metastatic breast cancer (MBC), with no effective treatments. In a case series of 8 patients with heavily pretreated HER2 + MBC and progressing LM, all 8 patients (100%) derived clinical benefit from Trastuzumab deruxtecan (TDXd), and 4 patients (50%) had an objective partial response based on formal neuroradiology MRI reads using the EORTC/RANO-LM Revised-Scorecard. T-DXd warrants further study in LM in HER2 + MBC and solid tumors where T-DXd may be active.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Alder
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Dario Trapani
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Claire Bradbury
- Department of Biostatistics, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Amanda E D Van Swearingen
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Sara M Tolaney
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mustafa Khasraw
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Carey K Anders
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Liangge Hsu
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sarah Sammons
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Trapani D. Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Older Women With Early Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:1652-1658. [PMID: 36716418 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.The clinical discussion on the adjuvant chemotherapy in older patients with breast cancer (BC) should routinely include comprehensive considerations of the health implications of competitive comorbidities, the safety of the treatment itself, and the likelihood that an appropriate dose intensity will be received (ie, relative dose intensity > 85%). All these factors have prognostic implications, as recently confirmed in the secondary analysis of the Hurria Older PatiEnts clinical trial. Full-informed, shared decision making is essential to provide best care. Our clinical approach for women with BC age ≥ 65 years is based on a standardized screening for frailty, triggering comprehensive geriatric assessment, as appropriate. We only recommend evidence-based regimens that have showed to reduce the risk of cancer recurrence and potentially increase overall survival. We frequently prefer docetaxel-cyclophosphamide, for hormone receptor-positive BC, on the basis of the subgroup analysis of the USOR-9735 study in older population. We avoid single agents (eg, capecitabine or weekly docetaxel), as showed to be inferior treatments in the CALGB-49907 and ELDA trials, and modified nonstandard regimens, for the lack of strong evidence in support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dario Trapani
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IEO, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Freedman R, Ren S, Tayob N, Gelman R, Smith KL, Davis R, Pereslete A, Attaya V, Cotter C, Chen WY, Santa-Maria CA, Van Poznak C, Moy B, Brufsky AM, Melisko M, O’Sullivan CC, Ashai N, Rauf Y, Nangia J, Trapani D, Savoie J, Burns R, Wolff AC, Winer E, Rimawi M, Krop I, Lin NU. Abstract PD7-03: Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium Trial 022: Neratinib and Trastuzumab-Emtansine for HER2+ Breast Cancer Brain Metastases (BCBM). Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-pd7-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
PURPOSE: Treatment options for patients (pts) with HER2+ BCBM remain limited. We previously reported that neratinib monotherapy is associated with a volumetric central nervous system objective response rate (CNS ORR) of 8%, whereas the combination of neratinib and capecitabine resulted in a volumetric CNS ORR of 49% (in lapatinib-naïve pts). Preclinical data suggest that neratinib may overcome resistance to trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) and that the combination has potential CNS efficacy. Here, we report results of neratinib plus T-DM1 in pts with HER2+ BCBM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective, multicenter, phase II study, pts with measurable HER2+ BCBM received neratinib 160 mg orally once daily plus T-DM1 3.6 mg/kg IV every 21 days in three parallel-enrolling cohorts. Cohort 4A enrolled pts with previously untreated brain metastases. Cohort 4B enrolled pts with BCBM progressing after prior local CNS-directed therapy without prior exposure to T-DM1. Cohort 4C enrolled pts with BCBM progressing after prior local CNS-directed therapy who had previous exposure to T-DM1. Diarrhea prophylaxis with colestipol and loperamide was required during cycle 1. Cohorts 4A and 4B were single-stage with a planned enrollment of 20 patients; cohort 4C had a two-stage design, with a requirement for at least 1 of the first 9 pts to achieve a response in order to enroll a total of 24 patients. The primary endpoint was Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology-Brain Metastases (RANO BM) in each cohort separately. Correlative studies included patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for gastrointestinal toxicity. RESULTS: We enrolled 6, 17, and 21 patients to cohorts 4A, 4B, and 4C, during 11/07/2018 – 11/01/2021. Enrollment was stopped prematurely due to slow accrual. Across Cohorts 4A-4C, the median number of prior lines of chemotherapy prior to enrollment was 2 (range 1-10); 25% received prior lapatinib and no patients received prior tucatinib. In cohorts 4B and 4C (prior CNS-treated cohorts), 33% had prior CNS surgery and >94% had prior CNS radiation. Among evaluable patients, CNS ORR in cohorts 4A (n=6), 4B (n=16), and 4C (n=21) was 50.0% (95% CI 18.8- 81.2%), 25.0% (95% CI 8.3-52.6%), and 38.1% (95% CI 19.0-61.3%), respectively. Median (range) number of cycles completed for 4A, 4B, and 4C was 4.5 (1-15), 4 (range 0-49+), and 6 (0-23); three patients on Cohort 4B remain on protocol therapy (cycles 14, 45, and 49). The overall survival at 12-months for cohorts 4A, 4B, and 4C was 83.3% (95% CI, 58.3-100%), 86.2% (95% CI 70-100%), and 83.3% (95% CI 67.6-100%). Diarrhea was the most common grade 3 toxicity (19.0–33.3% across cohorts); one grade 4 liver function event occurred in cohort 4B. Updated efficacy results will be reported at the meeting; PRO analyses are ongoing. CONCLUSION: Intracranial activity was observed for the combination of neratinib plus T-DM1 across all three enrolled cohorts, including those with prior T-DM1 exposure, suggesting synergistic effects of this treatment combination. Our data provide additional evidence for consideration of neratinib-based combinations in pts with HER2+ BCBM.
Citation Format: Rachel Freedman, Siyang Ren, Nabihah Tayob, Rebecca Gelman, Karen L. Smith, Raechel Davis, Alyssa Pereslete, Victoria Attaya, Christine Cotter, Wendy Y. Chen, Cesar Augusto Santa-Maria, Catherine Van Poznak, Beverly Moy, Adam M. Brufsky, Michelle Melisko, Ciara C. O’Sullivan, Nadia Ashai, Yasmeen Rauf, Julie Nangia, Dario Trapani, Jennifer Savoie, Robyn Burns, Antonio C. Wolff, Eric Winer, Mothaffar Rimawi, Ian Krop, Nancy U. Lin. Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium Trial 022: Neratinib and Trastuzumab-Emtansine for HER2+ Breast Cancer Brain Metastases (BCBM) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD7-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Karen L. Smith
- 5Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Adam M. Brufsky
- 14UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
| | - Michelle Melisko
- 15University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Robyn Burns
- 22Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium
| | | | | | | | - Ian Krop
- 26Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Nancy U. Lin
- 27Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Valenza C, Giachetti PPMB, Zagami P, Nicolò E, Trapani D, Boldrini L, Salimbeni BT, Ascione L, Antonarelli G, Corti C, Esposito A, Criscitiello C, Fusco N, Curigliano G. Abstract P1-14-05: Pembrolizumab and Oral Metronomic Cyclophosphamide in Patients with Chest Wall Breast Cancer (PERICLES): an immune-biomarker analysis of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and programmed cell death ligand protein 1 (PD-L1). Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-p1-14-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer (BC) with lymphangitic spread to the chest wall is a rare clinical entity affecting about 2% of pts, with poorer survival outcomes. A brisk immune infiltrate is typically reported, with up-regulation of inflammation and immune-tolerogenic genes. PERICLES clinical trial is testing the administration of pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3w plus cyclophosphamide 50 mg daily for BC with chest wall disease. In this exploratory biomarker analysis, we assessed the prevalence of the TILs score and the PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) obtained from skin biopsies performed at screening.
Methods: PERICLES (NCT03971045) is a single-center, single-arm, interventional phase 2 trial. Main inclusion criteria: histologically confirmed, inoperable, locally recurrent and/or metastatic BC with lymphangitic spread to the chest wall (including and not limited to inflammatory BC); PD-L1 positive (CPS≥1; 22C3 pharmDx®) and/or TILs positive (≥1% of CD3 or CD20-positive cells) disease on skin biopsy obtained at screening; progression to at least one prior cytotoxic treatment; no prior immune checkpoint inhibitors. The primary endpoint is objective response rate as per immune-related RECIST criteria. 46 pts will be required for the study to power for the primary hypothesis. In this analysis, we describe the baseline immune-biomarker status, in the overall population enrolled based on hormone receptor status and HER2. Correlative analyses were provided (significance at p-value< 0.05).
Results: 37 pts were screened with skin biopsy of the chest wall disease (June 2020-June 2022). Biopsy and biomarker analysis were successful in 35 pts. Median age was 58 years (range: 35-79). Among the 35 pts included in the biomarker analysis, 25 (71%) pts had visceral disease and 20 (57%) had skin metastases at the diagnosis of metastatic disease; median number of previous lines of therapies was 4 (range: 1-12) and of chemotherapies was 4 (range: 1-10). 2 (6%) pts had HER2-positive disease, 13 (37%) HR-positive/HER2-negative disease, and 20 (20%) had triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).
TILs and PD-L1 CPS were < 1 in 15 (43%) pts; 20 pts (57%) were eligible for CPS and/or TILs criteria: 16 (43%) were both PD-L1 positive and TILs positive, 4 only PD-L1 positive. Median PD-L1 CPS score was 5 (range: 0-80%) in the overall population and 17 (range: 2-80%) in eligible patients; 16/35 pts (43%) had CPS≥10. Median TILs score was 0% (range: 0-55%) in the overall population, 0% (range: 0-40%) in the HER2-negative (n=16), 0% (range 0-20%) in the HER2-low (n=18), and 37.5% (range 20-55%) in the HER2-positive (n=2).
No significant differences in baseline characteristics were found between positive and negative biopsies (Table). Considering only the TILs, a statistically significant correlation between HER2-positive status and TILs score was demonstrated (p< 0.001); no other correlations between receptor status (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2) and PD-L1 CPS or TILs emerged.
Conclusions: 57% of patients with chest wall BC have skin metastases positive for PD-L1 CPS and/or TILs score ≥1%. To our knowledge, these are the first prospective data on the prevalence of PD-L1 and TILs in metastatic BC with lymphangitic spread to the chest wall, highlighting potential actionability through therapeutic strategies with new immune-oncology agents in this setting.
Table: Characteristics of patients included in the biomarker analysis (n=35) *Calculated with T test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Keys: BC, breast cancer; CPS, combined positive score; CT, chemotherapy; HR; hormone receptor; n, number; NA; not available; PD-L1, Programmed cell death ligand protein 1; TILs, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes; TNBC, triple negative breast cancer.
Citation Format: Carmine Valenza, Pier Paolo Maria Berton Giachetti, Paola Zagami, Eleonora Nicolò, Dario Trapani, Laura Boldrini, Beatrice Taurelli Salimbeni, Liliana Ascione, Gabriele Antonarelli, Chiara Corti, Angela Esposito, Carmen Criscitiello, Nicola Fusco, Giuseppe Curigliano. Pembrolizumab and Oral Metronomic Cyclophosphamide in Patients with Chest Wall Breast Cancer (PERICLES): an immune-biomarker analysis of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and programmed cell death ligand protein 1 (PD-L1) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-14-05.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmine Valenza
- 1European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Paola Zagami
- 3European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Eleonora Nicolò
- 4European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Trapani
- 5European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Boldrini
- 6European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, University of Milano, Milan, Lombardia, Italy
| | | | - Liliana Ascione
- 8European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, University of Milano, Milan, Lombardia, Italy
| | | | - Chiara Corti
- 10European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, University of Milano, Milan, Pusiano (CO), Lombardia, Italy
| | - Angela Esposito
- 11European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Nicola Fusco
- 13European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Trillo P, Sandoval J, Trapani D, Nicolò E, Zagami P, Giugliano F, Tarantino P, Vivanet G, Ascione L, Friedlaender A, Esposito A, Criscitiello C, Curigliano G. Evolution of biological features of invasive lobular breast cancer: comparison between primary tumor and metastases. Eur J Cancer 2023; 185:119-130. [PMID: 36989828 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.02.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Revised: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) has unique clinical-biological features. Phenotypical differences between primary tumours (PTs) and metastases (M) have been described for invasive ductal carcinoma, but data on ILC are limited. METHODS We retrospectively analysed patients with recurrent ILC from our institution from 2013 to 2020. We evaluated the discordance of the oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR) and HER2 between PT and M, to understand prognostic and therapeutic implications. RESULTS Thirteen percent (n = 91) of all patients had ILC. We observed 15%, 44% and 5% of ER, PgR and HER2 status discordance between PT and M. ER/PgR discordance was related to receptor loss and HER2 mainly due to gain. PT presented a luminal-like phenotype (93%); 6% and 1% were triple-negative (TNBC) and HER2-positive. In M, there was an increase in TNBC (16%) and HER2-positive (5%). Metastasis-free survival and overall survival (OS) were different according to clinical phenotype, with poorer prognosis for HER2+ and TNBC (p < 0.001); OS after metastatic progression did not differ across phenotypes (p = 0.079). In luminal-like ILC (n = 85) at diagnosis, we found that OS after relapse was poorer in patients experiencing a phenotype switch to TNBC but improved in patients with HER2 gain (p = 0.0028). Poorer survival was reported in patients with a PgR and/or ER expression loss of ≥25%. There was HER2-low enrichment in M1 (from 37% to 58%): this change was not associated with OS (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION Our results suggest that phenotype switch after metastatic progression may be associated with patients' outcomes. Tumour biopsy in recurrent ILC could drive treatment decision-making, with prognostic implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela Trillo
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Josè Sandoval
- Unit of Population Epidemiology, Division and Department of Primary Care Medicine, 1205 Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland; Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Dario Trapani
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Eleonora Nicolò
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Zagami
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Giugliano
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Tarantino
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 02115 Boston, USA; Harvard Medical School, 02115 Boston, USA
| | - Grazia Vivanet
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Liliana Ascione
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Alex Friedlaender
- Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Angela Esposito
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Carmen Criscitiello
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Leone AG, Trapani D, Schabath MB, Safer JD, Scout NFN, Lambertini M, Berardi R, Marsoni S, Perrone F, Cinieri S, Miceli R, Morano F, Pietrantonio F. Cancer in Transgender and Gender-Diverse Persons: A Review. JAMA Oncol 2023; 9:556-563. [PMID: 36757703 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.7173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
Importance Transgender and gender-diverse individuals face unique challenges, including barriers to health care access and inequities in treatment, that may influence cancer risk and outcomes. Observations In this narrative review, a scoping review was conducted focusing on primary and secondary prevention and epidemiology of cancer, barriers to health care services, and health care practitioners' knowledge about specific issues pertaining to transgender and gender-diverse individuals. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase, were reviewed for citations from their inception to December 31, 2021. This review revealed that transgender and gender-diverse people had a high prevalence of tobacco consumption and alcohol use and high rates of infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) and HIV. Transgender and gender-diverse individuals were less likely to adhere to cancer screening programs and had a higher incidence of HIV- and HPV-associated cancers. Social and economic determinants seemed to drive these disparities in risk factors and outcomes. A lack of knowledge about gender minorities' health needs among health care practitioners was evidenced, and it represented a major hurdle to cancer prevention, care, and survivorship for transgender and gender-diverse individuals. Discrimination, discomfort caused by gender-labeled oncological services, stigma, and lack of cultural sensitivity of health care practitioners were other barriers met by transgender and gender-diverse persons in the oncology setting. Conclusions and Relevance The findings suggest that transgender and gender-diverse peoples' needs in the cancer care continuum are not optimally addressed. Effective solutions are needed to offer the best care to every patient in a person-centric and gender diversity-sensitive environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dario Trapani
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Joshua D Safer
- Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.,Mount Sinai Center for Transgender Medicine and Surgery, New York, New York
| | - N F N Scout
- National LGBT Cancer Network, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Department of Medical Oncology, Unità Operativa Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Rossana Berardi
- Oncology Clinic, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | - Silvia Marsoni
- IFOM, FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Perrone
- Clinical Trial Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Saverio Cinieri
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale di Summa A. Perrino, Brindisi, Italy
| | - Rosalba Miceli
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Morano
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Trapani D, Aizer AA, Lin NU. Multidisciplinary Management of Brain Metastasis from Breast Cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2023; 37:183-202. [PMID: 36435610 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2022.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
The management of patients with breast cancer and brain metastases (BMs) is exquisitely multidisciplinary. Patients presenting with a symptomatic BM may be offered neurosurgical resection, followed by radiation. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is preferred over whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in most patients presenting with a limited number of BMs, whereas WBRT with hippocampal-sparing and concomitant memantine is preferred for patients with multiple BMs. There is a growing role for systemic therapy, in some cases in lieu of local therapy, particularly in patients with HER2+ breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dario Trapani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Ayal A Aizer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Valenza C, Taurelli Salimbeni B, Santoro C, Trapani D, Antonarelli G, Curigliano G. Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes across Breast Cancer Subtypes: Current Issues for Biomarker Assessment. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030767. [PMID: 36765724 PMCID: PMC9913599 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) represent a surrogate biomarker of anti-tumor, lymphocyte-mediated immunity. In early, triple-negative breast cancer, TILs have level 1B of evidence to predict clinical outcomes. TILs represent a promising biomarker to select patients who can experience a better prognosis with de-intensified cancer treatments and derive larger benefits from immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, the assessment and the validation of TILs as a biomarker require a prospective and rigorous demonstration of its clinical validity and utility, provided reproducible analytical performance. With pending data about the prospective validation of TILs' clinical validity to modulate treatments in early breast cancer, this review summarizes the most important current issues and future challenges related to the implementation of TILs assessments across all breast cancer subtypes and their potential integration into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmine Valenza
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Beatrice Taurelli Salimbeni
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Celeste Santoro
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Trapani
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriele Antonarelli
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-02-5748-9599
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Valenza C, Rizzo G, Passalacqua MI, Boldrini L, Corti C, Trapani D, Curigliano G. Evolving treatment landscape of immunotherapy in breast cancer: current issues and future perspectives. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2023; 15:17588359221146129. [PMID: 36743524 PMCID: PMC9893403 DOI: 10.1177/17588359221146129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) deeply changed the treatment landscape of breast cancer (BC). In particular, anti-programmed-death (ligand) 1 antibodies were approved for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), both in first line for metastatic disease and in neoadjuvant setting, on the basis of a demonstrated improvement of the survival outcomes. In light of these results, current clinical trials aim at improving this benefit investigating novel combinations and strategies, at exploring the role of ICIs beyond TNBC, and at better selecting the patients in order to spare non-responders from avoidable toxicities. This narrative review aims at summarizing and discussing the evolving landscape of immunotherapeutic treatments for BC, highlighting the current challenges and the future perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmine Valenza
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milano, Italy,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milano
| | - Graziella Rizzo
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy,Department of Human Pathology “G. Barresi”, Medical Oncology Unit, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Maria Ilenia Passalacqua
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy,Department of Human Pathology “G. Barresi”, Medical Oncology Unit, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Laura Boldrini
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milano, Italy,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milano
| | - Chiara Corti
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milano, Italy,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milano
| | - Dario Trapani
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milano, Italy,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milano
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Marra A, Trapani D, Ferraro E, Curigliano G. Mechanisms of Endocrine Resistance in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer. Cancer Treat Res 2023; 188:219-235. [PMID: 38175348 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-33602-7_9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC) accounts for approximately 70% of all breast invasive tumors. Endocrine therapy (ET) represents the standard treatment for HR + BC. Most patients, however, eventually develop resistance to ET, which limits their effectiveness and poses a major challenge for the management of HR + BC. Several mechanisms that contribute to ET resistance have been described. One of the most common mechanisms is the upregulation of alternative signaling pathways that can bypass estrogen dependency, such as activation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR as well as mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R) pathways. Another common mechanism of endocrine resistance is the acquisition of activating mutations of ESR1, which encodes for the estrogen receptor, that lead to structural changes of the receptor, prevent the binding to anti-estrogen drugs and result in constitutive activation of the receptor, even in the absence of estrogens. Epigenetic changes, such as DNA methylation and histone modifications, can also contribute to ET resistance by altering the expression of genes that are involved in estrogen signaling. Understanding the mechanisms of resistance to ET is crucial for the development of new therapies that can overcome resistance and improve outcomes for patients with HR + BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Marra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Dario Trapani
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuela Ferraro
- Breast Cancer Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|