ONEST (Observers Needed to Evaluate Subjective Tests) Analysis of Stromal Tumour-Infiltrating Lymphocytes (sTILs) in Breast Cancer and Its Limitations

Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) reflect antitumour immunity. Their evaluation of histopathology specimens is influenced by several factors and is subject to issues of reproducibility. ONEST (Observers Needed to Evaluate Subjective Tests) helps in determining the number of observers that would be sufficient for the reliable estimation of inter-observer agreement of TIL categorisation. This has not been explored previously in relation to TILs. ONEST analyses, using an open-source software developed by the first author, were performed on TIL quantification in breast cancers taken from two previous studies. These were one reproducibility study involving 49 breast cancers, 23 in the first circulation and 14 pathologists in the second circulation, and one study involving 100 cases and 9 pathologists. In addition to the estimates of the number of observers required, other factors influencing the results of ONEST were examined. The analyses reveal that between six and nine observers (range 2-11) are most commonly needed to give a robust estimate of reproducibility. In addition, the number and experience of observers, the distribution of values around or away from the extremes, and outliers in the classification also influence the results. Due to the simplicity and the potentially relevant information it may give, we propose ONEST to be a part of new reproducibility analyses.

“Dum spiro spero”: clinicopathologic characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 infection

Összefoglaló. Bevezetés: A kórboncolás hozzájárul a súlyos akut légzőszervi szindrómát okozó koronavírus-2 (SARS-CoV-2-) fertőzés klinikopatológiai vonatkozásainak megismeréséhez. Célkitűzés: A SARS-CoV-2-fertőzöttek boncolása során gyűjtött tapasztalatok bemutatása. Módszer: Egymást követően boncolt, védőoltásban nem részesült, SARS-CoV-2-fertőzött elhunytak klinikai adatait, makro- és mikroszkópos észleleteit összegeztük; a tüdőkimetszéseket SARS-CoV-2-nukleokapszid-immunfestéssel vizsgáltuk. Eredmények: A boncolást a halálok megállapítására (n = 14), tumorgyanú (n = 9), illetve törvényi kötelezettség (n = 3) miatt végeztük. A fertőzést a klinikai észlelés vagy a boncolás során (n = 4) végzett SARS-CoV-2-nukleinsav-teszt igazolta. A tünetes betegség átlagos hossza 12,9 nap volt. 21 betegnél (medián életkor 69 év; 18 férfi) állt fenn COVID-19-pneumonia, mely 16 esetben önmagában, 4 esetben bakteriális pneumoniával vagy álhártyás colitisszel szövődve okozott halált; 1 antikoagulált pneumoniás beteg heveny retroperitonealis vérzésben halt meg. 3 betegnél a halált disszeminálódott malignus tumor, 1 betegnél coronariathrombosis, 1 mentálisan retardált betegnél pedig pulmonalis emboliás szövődmény okozta. A COVID-19-pneumoniás tüdők nehezek, tömöttek és vörösen foltozottak voltak. Szövettanilag a betegség időtartamától függően diffúz alveolaris károsodás korai exsudativ vagy későbbi proliferativ fázisa látszott atípusos pneumocytákkal; gyakori volt a microthrombosis (n = 7), a macrothrombosis (n = 5), illetve a pulmonalis embolia (n = 4). A SARS-CoV-2-immunfestés pozitívnak bizonyult az esetek 38,5%-ában, dominálóan az exsudativ fázisban. Minden elhunyt társbetegség(ek)ben szenvedett, így magasvérnyomás-betegségben (n = 17), érelmeszesedésben (n = 14), 2-es típusú diabetesben (n = 8), rosszindulatú daganatban (n = 6), krónikus obstruktív tüdőbetegségben (n = 4), elhízásban (n = 3), vesetranszplantáció utáni immunszuppresszióban (n = 3). Következtetés: Az irodalmi adatokkal összhangban, halálos COVID-19-pneumonia túlnyomóan idős, társbetegség(ek)től sújtott férfiakban alakult ki. A boncolási gyakorlatban a SARS-CoV-2-nukleokapszid-immunfestéstől a diffúz alveolaris károsodás korai fázisában várható pozitivitás. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(45): 1791-1802.

SUMMARY

INTRODUCTION

Autopsy is an important tool for the evaluation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Objectice: The aim of this study was to present our experience with autopsies of patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

METHOD

Clinical data, macroscopic and microscopic findings of consecutive postmortems of non-vaccinated SARS-CoV-2 patients are summarized. Lung samples were evaluated with SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Autopsies were performed to determine the cause of death (n = 14), suspected tumours (n = 9) or due to legal obligation (n = 3). SARS-CoV-2 infection was verified by ante mortem (n = 22) and post mortem (n = 4) polymerase chain reaction. The mean duration of symptomatic disease was 12.9 days. Of 21 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, 16 died of respiratory failure, 4 had additional bacterial pneumonia or Clostridioides difficile infection, and 1 developed hemorrhagic complication (n = 1). Other causes of death included disseminated malignancies (n = 3), coronary thrombosis (n = 1) and pulmonary embolism (n = 1). The affected lungs were heavy and had patchy red appearance. Exudative or proliferative phases of diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) were detected with atypical pneumocytes. Microthrombosis (n = 7), macrothrombosis (n = 5) and pulmonary embolism (n = 4) were frequent. The SARS-CoV-2 immunohistochemical reaction was positive in 38.5% of cases. All patients had co-morbidities, namely, hypertension (n = 17), atherosclerosis (n = 14), diabetes (n = 8), malignancies (n = 6), chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (n = 4), obesity (n = 3) and immunosuppression after kidney transplantation (n = 3).

CONCLUSION

Fatal COVID-19 pneumonia occurred mostly in elderly males with co-morbidities. In the autopsy practice, the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid immunohistochemical reaction may confirm the infectious etiology in the early phase of DAD. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(45): 1791-1802.

The additional value of ONEST (Observers Needed to Evaluate Subjective Tests) in assessing reproducibility of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and Ki67 classification in breast cancer

The reproducibility of assessing potential biomarkers is crucial for their implementation. ONEST (Observers Needed to Evaluate Subjective Tests) has been recently introduced as a new additive evaluation method for the assessment of reliability, by demonstrating how the number of observers impact on interobserver agreement. Oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and Ki67 proliferation marker immunohistochemical stainings were assessed on 50 core needle biopsy and 50 excision samples from breast cancers by 9 pathologists according to daily practice. ER and PR statuses based on the percentages of stained nuclei were the most consistently assessed parameters (intraclass correlation coefficients, ICC 0.918-0.996), whereas Ki67 with 5 different theoretical or St Gallen Consensus Conference-proposed cut-off values demonstrated moderate to good reproducibility (ICC: 0.625-0.760). ONEST highlighted that consistent tests like ER and PR assessment needed only 2 or 3 observers for optimal evaluation of reproducibility, and the width between plots of the best and worst overall percent agreement values for 100 randomly selected permutations of observers was narrow. In contrast, with less consistently evaluated tests of Ki67 categorization, ONEST suggested at least 5 observers required for more trustful assessment of reliability, and the bandwidth of the best and worst plots was wider (up to 34% difference between two observers). ONEST has additional value to traditional calculations of the interobserver agreement by not only highlighting the number of observers needed to trustfully evaluate reproducibility but also by highlighting the rate of agreement with an increasing number of observers and disagreement between the better and worse ratings.

Is intraoperative touch imprint cytology indicated in the surgical treatment of early breast cancers?

INTRODUCTION

Intraoperative touch imprint cytology (TIC) of the sentinel lymph node(s) (SLN(s)) in the treatment of breast cancer has significantly reduced the number of axillary block dissections (ABD) required during second surgeries. Based on recent studies, ABD was not considered necessary if the presence of tumor cells/micrometastasis was confirmed in the SLN(s) or in the case of macrometastases in a patient group meeting the inclusion criteria for the ACOSOG Z0011 study. Our aim was to determine the sensitivity and usefulness of TIC with regard to these results.

METHODS

TICs of the SLN(s) were examined in 1168 patients operated on for breast cancer. The method was also analyzed retrospectively based on the guidelines for the Z0011 study. During TIC, new samples were cut every 250 μm; impression smears were evaluated after being stained with hematoxylin eosin.

RESULTS

TIC confirmed metastasis in 202 cases (202/1168, 17.29%). Metastasis was confirmed in SLN(s) in 149 additional cases during a final histological examination. The sensitivity of TIC was found to be 57.18%, and its specificity was 99.63%. An analysis was then performed except for cases that met the inclusion criteria for the Z0011 study and with metastasis smaller than 2 mm (micrometastasis/isolated tumor cells) considered to be positive during intraoperative cytology. The sensitivity of the method decreased to 34.23%, while its specificity was still high at 99.76%.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the new guidelines for ABD, imprint cytology cannot be considered a beneficial and cost-effective intervention in the surgical treatment of early breast cancer.

An intra- and interobserver reproducibility analysis of the Ki-67 proliferation marker assessment on core biopsies of breast cancer patients and its potential clinical implications

OBJECTIVE

The Ki-67 proliferation index has received an important role in treatment tailoring and molecular classification of estrogen receptor-positive breast carcinomas. The aim was to analyze the reproducibility of assessing proliferation on the basis of Ki-67 immunohistochemistry.

METHODS

Thirty core biopsy samples of breast cancer patients were analyzed after immunostaining with B56, SP6 and MIB-1 monoclonal Ki-67 antibodies. All samples were evaluated twice and independently by 3 pathologists, with each observer performing his daily routine practice. The ratio of Ki-67-positive cells was estimated with 5% accuracy. Correlation was calculated for the results of each investigator for all pairs of antibodies and for the results of each antibody for all pairs of investigators. Ki-67 scores were divided into categories of either 4 quarters or into 3 groups reflecting the St. Gallen consensus recommendations with 15 and 30% as cutoff values. The reproducibility of classifying the tumors into these categories was assessed with ĸ statistics.

RESULTS

Altogether, 540 evaluations were made. Good to excellent correlation (Spearman's and Pearson's coefficient range 0.74-0.92 and 0.73-0.93, respectively) was noted for the pairwise comparison of antibodies by observer and of observers by antibody. The inter- and intraobserver reproducibility of the Ki-67 score classification into equal quarters (1-25, 26-50, 51-75 and 76-100%) or into 3 categories with cutoffs at 15 and 30% was fair to poor in the middle categories, but moderate to substantial in the low and high ranges. Interobserver differences in practice potentially impacted on less consistent classification.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that the three different Ki-67 antibodies tested do not substantially influence the reproducibility of the estimated proliferation rates. Although reproducibility is better in the clinically more relevant distinction of high versus low proliferation, without standardization, the current practice of Ki-67 assessment in many laboratories does not allow proper and consistent therapeutic decision-making.