3-year invasive disease-free survival with chemotherapy de-escalation using an 18F-FDG-PET-based, pathological complete response-adapted strategy in HER2-positive early breast cancer (PHERGain): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

PHERGain was designed to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a chemotherapy-free treatment based on a dual human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC). It used an 18fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET-based, pathological complete response (pCR)-adapted strategy.

METHODS

PHERGain was a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial that took place in 45 hospitals in seven European countries. It randomly allocated patients in a 1:4 ratio with centrally confirmed, HER2-positive, stage I-IIIA invasive, operable breast cancer with at least one PET-evaluable lesion to either group A, where patients received docetaxel (75 mg/m2, intravenous), carboplatin (area under the curve 6 mg/mL per min, intravenous), trastuzumab (600 mg fixed dose, subcutaneous), and pertuzumab (840 mg loading dose followed by 420 mg maintenance doses, intravenous; TCHP), or group B, where patients received trastuzumab and pertuzumab with or without endocrine therapy, every 3 weeks. Random allocation was stratified by hormone receptor status. Centrally reviewed PET was conducted at baseline and after two treatment cycles. Patients in group B were treated according to on-treatment PET results. Patients in group B who were PET-responders continued with trastuzumab and pertuzumab with or without endocrine therapy for six cycles, while PET-non-responders were switched to receive six cycles of TCHP. After surgery, patients in group B who were PET-responders who did not achieve a pCR received six cycles of TCHP, and all patients completed up to 18 cycles of trastuzumab and pertuzumab. The primary endpoints were pCR in patients who were group B PET-responders after two treatment cycles (the results for which have been reported previously) and 3-year invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) in patients in group B. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03161353) and is ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between June 26, 2017, and April 24, 2019, a total of 356 patients were randomly allocated (71 patients in group A and 285 patients in group B), and 63 (89%) and 267 (94%) patients proceeded to surgery in groups A and B, respectively. At this second analysis (data cutoff: Nov 4, 2022), the median duration of follow-up was 43·3 months (range 0·0-63·0). In group B, the 3-year iDFS rate was 94·8% (95% CI 91·4-97·1; p=0·001), meeting the primary endpoint. No new safety signals were identified. Treatment-related adverse events and serious adverse events (SAEs) were numerically higher in patients allocated to group A than to group B (grade ≥3 62% vs 33%; SAEs 28% vs 14%). Group B PET-responders with pCR presented the lowest incidence of treatment-related grade 3 or higher adverse events (1%) without any SAEs.

INTERPRETATION

Among HER2-positive EBC patients, a PET-based, pCR-adapted strategy was associated with an excellent 3-year iDFS. This strategy identified about a third of patients who had HER2-positive EBC who could safely omit chemotherapy.

FUNDING

F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Correlation between trophoblast cell-surface antigen-2 (Trop-2) expression and pathological complete response in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel, carboplatin, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab

PURPOSE

The prognostic and predictive role of trophoblast cell-surface antigen-2 (Trop-2) overexpression in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2-positive) breast cancer is currently unknown. We retrospectively analyzed Trop-2 expression and its correlation with clinicopathologic features and pathological complete response (pCR) in HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC) patients treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel, carboplatin, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab in the PHERGain study.

METHODS

Trop-2 expression at baseline was determined in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded primary tumor biopsies by immunohistochemistry and was first classified into expressing (Trop-2-positive) or not-expressing (Trop-2-negative) tumors. Then, it was classified by histochemical score (H-score) according to its intensity into low (0-9), intermediate (10-49), and high (≥ 50). The association between clinicopathologic features, pCR, and Trop-2 expression was performed with Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients with tissue evaluable for Trop-2 expression were included, with 28 (68.3%) Trop-2-positive tumors. Overall, 17 (41.46%), 14 (34.15%), and 10 (24.40%) tumors were classified as low, intermediate, and high, respectively. Trop-2 expression was significantly associated with decreased pCR rates (50.0% vs. 92.3%; odds ratio [OR] 0.05; 95% CI, 0.002-0.360]; p adjusted = 0.01) but was not correlated with any clinicopathologic features (p ≥ 0.05). Tumors with the highest Trop-2 H-score were less likely to obtain a pCR (OR 0.03; 95% CI, 0.001-0.290, p adjusted < 0.01). This association was confirmed in univariate and multivariate regression analyses.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest a potential role of Trop-2 expression as a biomarker of resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus dual HER2 blockade and may become a strategic target for future combinations in HER2-positive EBC patients.

Immune-Related Adverse Event Likelihood Score Identifies "Pure" IRAEs Strongly Associated With Outcome in a Phase I-II Trial Population

BACKGROUND

Immune-related adverse events (IRAE) pose a significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in patients treated with immune-oncology (IO) drugs. IRAEs have been suggested to correlate with better outcome, but studies are conflicting. Estimating the true incidence of IRAEs is particularly difficult in the early phase I/II trial setting. A key issue is the lack of IRAE diagnostic criteria, necessary to discriminate "pure" IRAEs from other treatment-related adverse events not sustained by an autoimmune process.

METHODS

In patients treated with immune-oncology (IO) drugs in phases I-II trials at our institute, we identified high confidence (HC) or low confidence (LC) IRAEs by clinical consensus. We empirically developed an IRAE likelihood score (ILS) based on commonly available clinical data. Correlation with outcome was explored by multivariate Cox analysis. To mitigate immortal time-bias, analyses were conducted (1) at 2-month landmark and (2) modeling IRAEs as time-dependent covariate.

RESULTS

Among 202 IO-treated patients, 29.2% developed >1 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE). Based on ILS >5, we classified patients in no IRAE (n = 143), HC IRAE (n = 24), or LC IRAE (n = 35). hazard ratios (HR) for HC were significantly lower than LC patients (HR for PFS ranging 0.24-0.44, for OS 0.18-0.23, all P < .01).

CONCLUSION

ILS provides a simple system to identify bona fide IRAEs, pruning for other treatment-related events likely due to different pathophysiology. Applying stringent criteria leads to lower and more reliable estimates of IRAE incidence and identifies events with significant impact on survival.

Beyond PD(L)-1 Blockade in Microsatellite-Instable Cancers: Current Landscape of Immune Co-Inhibitory Receptor Targeting

High microsatellite instability (MSI-H) derives from genomic hypermutability due to deficient mismatch repair function. Colorectal (CRC) and endometrial cancers (EC) are the tumor types that more often present MSI-H. Anti-PD(L)-1 antibodies have been demonstrated to be agnostically effective in patients with MSI-H cancer, but 50-60% of them do not respond to single-agent treatment, highlighting the necessity of expanding their treatment opportunities. Ipilimumab (anti-CTLA4) is the only immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) non-targeting PD(L)-1 that has been approved so far by the FDA for MSI-H cancer, namely, CRC in combination with nivolumab. Anti-TIM3 antibody LY3321367 showed interesting clinical activity in combination with anti-PDL-1 antibody in patients with MSI-H cancer not previously treated with anti-PD(L)-1. In contrast, no clinical evidence is available for anti-LAG3, anti-TIGIT, anti-BTLA, anti-ICOS and anti-IDO1 antibodies in MSI-H cancers, but clinical trials are ongoing. Other immunotherapeutic strategies under study for MSI-H cancers include vaccines, systemic immunomodulators, STING agonists, PKM2 activators, T-cell immunotherapy, LAIR-1 immunosuppression reversal, IL5 superagonists, oncolytic viruses and IL12 partial agonists. In conclusion, several combination therapies of ICIs and novel strategies are emerging and may revolutionize the treatment paradigm of MSI-H patients in the future. A huge effort will be necessary to find reliable immune biomarkers to personalize therapeutical decisions.

Baseline Tumor Size as Prognostic Index in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors Receiving Experimental Targeted Agents

BACKGROUND

Baseline tumor size (BTS) has been associated with outcomes in patients with cancer treated with immunotherapy. However, the prognostic impact of BTS on patients receiving targeted therapies (TTs) remains undetermined.

METHODS

We reviewed data of patients with advanced solid tumors consecutively treated within early-phase clinical trials at our institution from 01/2014 to 04/2021. Treatments were categorized as immunotherapy-based or TT-based (biomarker-matched or not). BTS was calculated as the sum of RECIST1.1 baseline target lesions.

RESULTS

A total of 444 patients were eligible; the median BTS was 69 mm (IQR 40-100). OS was significantly longer for patients with BTS lower versus higher than the median (16.6 vs. 8.2 months, P < .001), including among those receiving immunotherapy (12 vs. 7.5 months, P = .005). Among patients receiving TT, lower BTS was associated with longer PFS (4.7 vs. 3.1 months, P = .002) and OS (20.5 vs. 9.9 months, P < .001) as compared to high BTS. However, such association was only significant among patients receiving biomarker-matched TT, with longer PFS (6.2 vs. 3.3 months, P < .001) and OS (21.2 vs. 6.7 months, P < .001) in the low-BTS subgroup, despite a similar ORR (28% vs. 22%, P = .57). BTS was not prognostic among patients receiving unmatched TT, with similar PFS (3.7 vs. 4.4 months, P = .30), OS (19.3 vs. 11.8 months, P = .20), and ORR (33% vs. 28%, P = .78) in the 2 BTS groups. Multivariate analysis confirmed that BTS was independently associated with PFS (P = .03) and OS (P < .001) but not with ORR (P = .11).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher BTS is associated with worse survival outcomes among patients receiving biomarker-matched, but not biomarker-unmatched TT.

The CDK4/6 inhibitors biomarker landscape: The most relevant biomarkers of response or resistance for further research and potential clinical utility

Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) in combination with Endocrine Therapy (ET) represent the standard frontline therapy for patients with Hormone Receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic Breast Cancer (mBC). Clinical activity and efficacy of CDK4/6is-based therapies have been proven both in the endocrine sensitive and resistant settings. Therapy resistance eventually underpins clinical progression to any CDK4/6is-based therapies, yet there is a lack of validated molecular biomarkers predictive of either intrinsic or acquired resistance to CDK4/6is in clinical practice. As the "post-CDK4/6is" landscape for the management of HR-positive/HER2-negative mBC is rapidly evolving with the introduction of novel therapies, there is an urgent need for the definition of clinically relevant molecular biomarkers of intrinsic/acquired resistance mechanisms to CDK4/6is. This narrative review outlines the role of currently approved CDK4/6is-based therapies, describes the most relevant molecular biomarkers of CDK4/6is-resistance, and ultimately provides a perspective on the clinical and research scenario.

Management of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer after trastuzumab deruxtecan failure

The current treatment of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) has been greatly impacted in the past decade by the introduction of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), which represent a relatively novel therapeutic class with the peculiar ability to deliver otherwise overtly toxic chemotherapeutics to tumor sites by exploiting the specificities of monoclonal antibodies. Indeed, drug engineering refinements in ADC design, such as through the introduction of cleavable linkers and hydrophobic payloads, resulted in improved patient outcomes in recent years. Two different ADCs, namely trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), have already entered clinical practice for the treatment of HER2-positive ABC. In this scenario, T-DXd has shown to portend better survival outcomes compared to T-DM1, while leaving a large unsought area of unmet medical need upon T-DXd failure. Treatment decision and benefit of cancer drugs following T-DXd still represent an area of clinical controversy, where a preclinical investigation and clinical development should be prioritized. As the pace of innovation is currently accelerating, and with novel ADC formulations advancing in early-phase clinical trials, the whole BC field is changing at an unprecedented rate, with potential broadenings of therapeutic indications. In this review, we present the clinical landscape of HER2-positive advanced BC and discuss our vision on how to tackle T-DXd resistance, providing a perspective on the priority areas of the cancer research in this setting.

The rare entity of gastrointestinal leiomyosarcomas: An Italian multicenter retrospective study in high-volume referral centers

BACKGROUND

After a huge efficacy of imatinib in treating patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) was proven, a maximum effort was made to make a differential diagnosis between GISTs and gastrointestinal leiomyosarcomas (GI-LMS), showing the latter to be an extremely rare tumor entity. Limited data on GI-LMS biology, clinical behavior and drug-sensibility are available, and the clinical decision-making in this subgroup of patients is usually challenging.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, retrospective observational study on patients with diagnosed GI-LMS from 2004 to 2020 within six high-volume referral centers in Italy.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients had diagnosis of KIT-negative GI-LMS confirmed by sarcoma-expert pathologist. The most common site of origin was the intestine. Twenty-two patients had localized disease and underwent surgery: with a median follow-up of 72 months, median disease-free survival was 42 months. Overall survival (OS)-rate at 5 years was 73% and median OS was 193 months. Five out of 10 patients with local relapse received a salvage surgery, and 2/5 remained with no evidence of disease. Thirteen patients received neoadjuvant (6) or adjuvant (7) chemotherapy, and 2/13 patients remained free from relapse. The median OS for patients with metastatic LMS was 16.4 months.

CONCLUSION

GI-LMS is very rare and extremely aggressive subgroup of sarcomas with a high tendency to systemic spread. Localized GI-LMS at diagnosis may be cured if treated with adequate surgery with or without (neo) adjuvant chemotherapy, while de-novo metastatic disease appeared to have a poor prognosis. Clinical effort to understand GI-LMS biology and clinical behavior and to develop active treatment strategy, especially for metastatic-disease, is warranted.

Targeting Post-Translational Modifications to Improve Combinatorial Therapies in Breast Cancer: The Role of Fucosylation

Various tumors rely on post-translational modifications (PTMs) to promote invasiveness and angiogenesis and to reprogram cellular energetics to abate anti-cancer immunity. Among PTMs, fucosylation is a particular type of glycosylation that has been linked to different aspects of immune and hormonal physiological functions as well as hijacked by many types of tumors. Multiple tumors, including breast cancer, have been linked to dismal prognoses and increased metastatic potential due to fucosylation of the glycan core, namely core-fucosylation. Pre-clinical studies have examined the molecular mechanisms regulating core-fucosylation in breast cancer models, its negative prognostic value across multiple disease stages, and the activity of in vivo pharmacological inhibition, instructing combinatorial therapies and translation into clinical practice. Throughout this review, we describe the role of fucosylation in solid tumors, with a particular focus on breast cancer, as well as physiologic conditions on the immune system and hormones, providing a view into its potential as a biomarker for predicating or predicting cancer outcomes, as well as a potential clinical actionability as a biomarker.

Abstract P1-14-05: Pembrolizumab and Oral Metronomic Cyclophosphamide in Patients with Chest Wall Breast Cancer (PERICLES): an immune-biomarker analysis of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and programmed cell death ligand protein 1 (PD-L1)

Background: Breast cancer (BC) with lymphangitic spread to the chest wall is a rare clinical entity affecting about 2% of pts, with poorer survival outcomes. A brisk immune infiltrate is typically reported, with up-regulation of inflammation and immune-tolerogenic genes. PERICLES clinical trial is testing the administration of pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3w plus cyclophosphamide 50 mg daily for BC with chest wall disease. In this exploratory biomarker analysis, we assessed the prevalence of the TILs score and the PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) obtained from skin biopsies performed at screening.

Methods: PERICLES (NCT03971045) is a single-center, single-arm, interventional phase 2 trial. Main inclusion criteria: histologically confirmed, inoperable, locally recurrent and/or metastatic BC with lymphangitic spread to the chest wall (including and not limited to inflammatory BC); PD-L1 positive (CPS≥1; 22C3 pharmDx®) and/or TILs positive (≥1% of CD3 or CD20-positive cells) disease on skin biopsy obtained at screening; progression to at least one prior cytotoxic treatment; no prior immune checkpoint inhibitors. The primary endpoint is objective response rate as per immune-related RECIST criteria. 46 pts will be required for the study to power for the primary hypothesis. In this analysis, we describe the baseline immune-biomarker status, in the overall population enrolled based on hormone receptor status and HER2. Correlative analyses were provided (significance at p-value&lt; 0.05).

Results: 37 pts were screened with skin biopsy of the chest wall disease (June 2020-June 2022). Biopsy and biomarker analysis were successful in 35 pts. Median age was 58 years (range: 35-79). Among the 35 pts included in the biomarker analysis, 25 (71%) pts had visceral disease and 20 (57%) had skin metastases at the diagnosis of metastatic disease; median number of previous lines of therapies was 4 (range: 1-12) and of chemotherapies was 4 (range: 1-10). 2 (6%) pts had HER2-positive disease, 13 (37%) HR-positive/HER2-negative disease, and 20 (20%) had triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

TILs and PD-L1 CPS were &lt; 1 in 15 (43%) pts; 20 pts (57%) were eligible for CPS and/or TILs criteria: 16 (43%) were both PD-L1 positive and TILs positive, 4 only PD-L1 positive. Median PD-L1 CPS score was 5 (range: 0-80%) in the overall population and 17 (range: 2-80%) in eligible patients; 16/35 pts (43%) had CPS≥10. Median TILs score was 0% (range: 0-55%) in the overall population, 0% (range: 0-40%) in the HER2-negative (n=16), 0% (range 0-20%) in the HER2-low (n=18), and 37.5% (range 20-55%) in the HER2-positive (n=2).

No significant differences in baseline characteristics were found between positive and negative biopsies (Table). Considering only the TILs, a statistically significant correlation between HER2-positive status and TILs score was demonstrated (p&lt; 0.001); no other correlations between receptor status (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2) and PD-L1 CPS or TILs emerged.

Conclusions: 57% of patients with chest wall BC have skin metastases positive for PD-L1 CPS and/or TILs score ≥1%. To our knowledge, these are the first prospective data on the prevalence of PD-L1 and TILs in metastatic BC with lymphangitic spread to the chest wall, highlighting potential actionability through therapeutic strategies with new immune-oncology agents in this setting.

Table: Characteristics of patients included in the biomarker analysis (n=35) *Calculated with T test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Keys: BC, breast cancer; CPS, combined positive score; CT, chemotherapy; HR; hormone receptor; n, number; NA; not available; PD-L1, Programmed cell death ligand protein 1; TILs, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes; TNBC, triple negative breast cancer.

Citation Format: Carmine Valenza, Pier Paolo Maria Berton Giachetti, Paola Zagami, Eleonora Nicolò, Dario Trapani, Laura Boldrini, Beatrice Taurelli Salimbeni, Liliana Ascione, Gabriele Antonarelli, Chiara Corti, Angela Esposito, Carmen Criscitiello, Nicola Fusco, Giuseppe Curigliano. Pembrolizumab and Oral Metronomic Cyclophosphamide in Patients with Chest Wall Breast Cancer (PERICLES): an immune-biomarker analysis of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and programmed cell death ligand protein 1 (PD-L1) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-14-05.

Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes across Breast Cancer Subtypes: Current Issues for Biomarker Assessment

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) represent a surrogate biomarker of anti-tumor, lymphocyte-mediated immunity. In early, triple-negative breast cancer, TILs have level 1B of evidence to predict clinical outcomes. TILs represent a promising biomarker to select patients who can experience a better prognosis with de-intensified cancer treatments and derive larger benefits from immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, the assessment and the validation of TILs as a biomarker require a prospective and rigorous demonstration of its clinical validity and utility, provided reproducible analytical performance. With pending data about the prospective validation of TILs' clinical validity to modulate treatments in early breast cancer, this review summarizes the most important current issues and future challenges related to the implementation of TILs assessments across all breast cancer subtypes and their potential integration into clinical practice.

Continuous sunitinib schedule in advanced platinum refractory thymic epithelial neoplasms: A retrospective analysis from the ThYmic MalignanciEs (TYME) Italian collaborative group

BACKGROUND

Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are rare diseases, with diverse clinical behaviour and prognosis. Intermittent dosing sunitinib represents the gold-standard systemic treatment following platinum-based chemotherapy. To ensure more homogeneous drug exposure, continuous daily dosing (CDD) sunitinib is utilised in other malignancies; however, no data exist in patients with TETs.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined data from patients with platinum-resistant TETs receiving CDD sunitinib 37.5 mg between 1 May 2017 and 31 May 2022 within the Italian collaborative group for ThYmic MalignanciEs. Primary end-points were median progression-free survival, overall response rate (ORR), median duration of response and major treatment-related adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 20 consecutive patients (12 thymic carcinoma [TC], 6 B3, and 2 B2 thymoma) were evaluated. Among the 19 patients evaluable for response, ORR was 31.6% (95% CI, 12.5%-56.5%). Among patients with TC, one complete response, four partial responses, and four stable diseases were observed (ORR 41%).The overall median progression-free survival was 7.3 months (95% CI, 4.5-10.3): 7.3 months (95% CI, 4.4-NA) within patients with thymoma and 6.8 months (95% CI, 2.8-10.3) in patients with TC; median duration of response was 10.3 months (95% CI, 2.8-NA). CDD was associated with a manageable toxicity profile. Six patients (30%) experienced >G2 toxicity, nine required dose reduction and three discontinued treatment due to adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

CDD sunitinib showed a relevant antitumor activity and confirmed a good toxicity profile. Similar effectiveness and a better toxicity profile as compared with intermittent dosing historical data suggest that this schedule should be considered.

Comparison of real-world data (RWD) analysis on efficacy and post-progression outcomes with pembrolizumab plus chemo vs chemo alone in metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer with PD-L1 < 50%

Background

Following the introduction of immunotherapy (IO) in the first-line (1L) treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without sensitizing EGFR/ALK mutations, increasing real-world data depict how difficult it is to replicate data from clinical trials to clinical practice, with high rates of early treatment failure. In the context of chemo-IO, our study aims to compare platinum-pemetrexed-pembrolizumab combination to platinum-doublet alone in patients with low PD-L1 (&lt;50%).

Methods

We retrospectively collected medical records from patients with stage IV non-squamous NSCLC with PD-L1&lt;50%, consecutively treated at our Centre from 2016 to 2021. Patients were grouped according to 1L treatment received: chemo-IO (group A) or platinum-doublet (group B). Survival outcomes were analyzed and compared among the two groups.

Results

Overall, 105 patients were included: 49 in group A and 56 in group B. At data cut-off, median follow-up was 12.4 and 34.8 months, with 32/49 and 52/56 events for progression-free survival (PFS) and 21/49 and 29/56 events for overall survival (OS), respectively. No difference in PFS was observed between group B and group A (6.6 versus 8 months, HR 1.12, 95%CI 0.57-1.40). Patients receiving 1L platinum-doublet had significantly longer OS compared to those receiving chemo-IO (median OS 23.8 vs 14.9 months, HR 0.47, 95% CI 1.15- 3.98, p=0.01). 12 month-OS was 58% (95% CI 44-76%) in group A and 78% (95% CI 68-91%) in group B (p=0.040). Subgroup analysis identified KRAS G12C mutation as potentially affecting PFS in patients receiving chemo-IO (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0-10-0.91). The OS benefit of platinum-doublet was consistent across subgroups, with particular benefit in female sex, liver or pleural metastases, PD-L1 negative. Overall, only 46.9% of patients with progression received subsequent treatment in group A (15/32), compared to 86.5% in group B (45/52, all receiving 2L IO), with no difference in PFS to 2L (group A 3.7months, group B 4.1months, p=0.3).

Conclusions

Despite small study population and differential follow-up, our study demonstrates that sequential use of 1L platinum-doublet and 2L IO is not inferior to 1L chemo-IO in non-squamous NSCLC with PD-L1&lt;50%. In addition, we identified subgroups who might benefit differentially from the two approaches.

Challenges and Obstacles in Applying Therapeutical Indications Formulated in Molecular Tumor Boards

Considering the rapid improvement of cancer drugs' efficacy and the discovery of new molecular targets, the formulation of therapeutical indications based on the multidisciplinary approach of MTB is becoming increasingly important for attributing the correct salience to the targets identified in a single patient. Nevertheless, one of the biggest stumbling blocks faced by MTBs is not the bare indication, but its implementation in the clinical practice. Indeed, administering the drug suggested by MTB deals with some relevant difficulties: the economical affordability and geographical accessibility represent some of the major limits in the patient's view, while bureaucracy and regulatory procedures are often a disincentive for the physicians. In this review, we explore the current literature reporting MTB experiences and precision medicine clinical trials, focusing on the challenges that authors face in applying their therapeutical indications. Furthermore, we analyze and discuss some of the solutions devised to overcome these difficulties to support the MTBs in finding the most suitable solution for their specific situation. In conclusion, we strongly encourage regulatory agencies and pharmaceutical companies to develop effective strategies with medical centers implementing MTBs to facilitate access to innovative drugs and thereby allow broader therapeutical opportunities to patients.

Histology-agnostic approvals for antibody-drug conjugates in solid tumours: is the time ripe?

Several antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have been recently approved to treat solid tumours. Since ADCs seem to have activity in multiple malignancies sharing the expression of a specific antigen, they may be mirroring the experience of histology-agnostic-targeted treatments. So, the possibility to interpret the activity of some ADCs across different cancer types in a biomarker-driven perspective arises. However, relevant biological, methodological, and regulatory challenges should be highlighted and addressed, in order to grant ADCs biomarker-driven regulatory approvals in the next future. In this review, we discuss challenges and opportunities posed by the pan-histological expansion of ADCs in solid tumours. In particular, we provide an overview about technological and manufacturing advancements; we offer up-to-date highlights of the current evidence from clinical trials investigating ADCs in solid tumours; we discuss the need for the identification of optimal predictive biomarkers, as well as major methodological, statistical, and regulatory considerations for a biomarker-driven histology-agnostic approach.

Baseline tumor size as prognostic index in patients with cancer receiving experimental targeted agents

3063

Background: Several studies showed that high baseline tumor size (BTS) is associated with worse outcomes in cancer patients treated with immunotherapy (IO). However, the prognostic impact of BTS for patients receiving targeted therapies (TT) remains uncertain. Methods: We collected clinical data for patients with solid tumors consecutively treated within early phase trials at our institution from 01/2014 to 04/2021. Treatments were categorized as IO-based (if any IO-agent was included) or TT-based (biomarker-matched or not). BTS was calculated as the sum of RECIST 1.1 baseline target lesions. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and objective-response rate (ORR) were compared between patients with high BTS (> median) and low BTS (≤median). Results: 444 patients were eligible for the analysis (220 IO, 151 TT biomarker-matched, 73 TT biomarker-unmatched). Median age was 56 years (interquartile range, IQR 48-64) and median BTS was 69 mm (IQR 40-100). Most represented tumor types were breast (49%), lung (9%), melanoma (5%) stomach, colorectal, head and neck and ovarian (4% each). Patients with low BTS were more often female (p < 0.001), had a better performance status (PS, p = 0.008), lower LDH (p < 0.001), lower neutrophile/lymphocyte ratio (NLR, p < 0.001) and higher albumin (p = 0.003). OS was significantly longer for patients with low BTS (16.6 vs 8.2 months, p < 0.001), including when restricting at those receiving IO (12 vs 7.5 months, p = 0.005). Among patients receiving TT, those with lower BTS experienced longer PFS (4.7 vs 3.1 months, p = 0.002) and OS (20.5 vs 9.9 months, p < 0.001) as compared with those with high BTS. However, BTS was only prognostic among patients receiving biomarker-matched TT, with improved PFS (6.2 vs 3.3 months, p < 0.001) and OS (21.2 vs 6.7 months, p < 0.001) in the low-BTS subgroup, despite a similar ORR (28% vs 22%, p = 0.57). BTS was instead not prognostic among patients receiving unmatched TT, with similar PFS (3.7 vs 4.4 months, p = 0.30), OS (19.3 vs 11.8 months, p = 0.20) and ORR (33% vs 28%, p = 0.78) in the two BTS groups. Multivariate analysis confirmed that BTS was independently associated with PFS (p = 0.03) and OS (p < 0.001) but not with ORR (p = 0.11), regardless of tumor site, treatment category, PS, NLR, sites of metastases and number of prior lines. Conclusions: Patients receiving biomarker-matched TT experience longer PFS and OS if having a lower BTS, whereas response rate is not affected by this variable. This difference may reflect the faster emergence of molecular mechanisms of resistance among patients with higher baseline burden. Lower BTS is also confirmed to be associated with longer survival among patients receiving experimental IO. BTS has instead no prognostic value among patients receiving unmatched TT.

Emerging treatment landscape of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

INTRODUCTION

Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) accounts for 70-75% of all bladder cancers and is a heterogeneous disease characterized by a wide spectrum of recurrences and progression. Adjuvant treatment for intermediate- and high-risk NMIBC is mainly represented by Bacillus Calmette Guerin (BCG). However, 20%-40% of patients develop disease recurrences or persistence following BCG treatment and are classified as "BCG unresponsive' (BCGu), thus representing a therapeutic challenge due to their worse prognosis and unavailability of effective intravesical treatments.

AREAS COVERED

We provide an overview of completed and ongoing clinical trials assessing the role of innovative immunological and target agents in patients with BCGu and BCG naive (BCGn) NMIBCs. New treatment options are emerging, demonstrating promising clinical activity, namely, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, oportuzumab monatox, nadofaragene firadenovec, and N-803.

EXPERT OPINION

The increasing number of newer therapeutic agents for patients with NMIBC poses challenges regarding the choice of the most suited treatment option for each patient and the best treatment sequence, given their diverse mechanisms of action and varying degrees of activity. Tailored treatment approaches are advocated, based on a deeper comprehension of disease features, available therapies, patient's characteristics, and consequently, on the identification and validation of prognostic and predictive biomarkers.

Systemic Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a noninvasive breast cancer (BC), whose diagnosis significatively increased with the diffusion of BC screening programs. DCIS actually represents roughly 20% of new BC diagnoses (1). About 70% of DCIS shows positivity for hormone receptor (HR), while HER2 is overexpressed in 25-30% of the cases (2,3). Concerning the systemic approach, the only one that should be considered for HR-positive DCIS is adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET), according to NCCN guidelines (4). In fact, the excellent prognosis of this neoplasm does not justify the utilization of more aggressive treatment strategies, such as HER2- directed therapies or chemotherapy. Here we discuss the results of the most important clinical trials enrolling DCIS patients in the adjuvant and in the preoperative setting; in addition, we report the chemoprevention studies utilizing ET which demonstrated a reduction of the risk of DCIS development. On balance, the choice to undertake or not an adjuvant ET, which is often burdened by adverse events that could impact on the quality of life of the patients and on their adherence to the therapy, should be discussed with the patient, taking into account that no survival advantage has been demonstrated so far.

Targeting brain metastases in breast cancer

Brain metastases (BMs) are an important source of morbidity and mortality in patients with metastatic breast cancer (BC). As survival of patients with advanced BC considerably improved thanks to research advancements and new therapeutic approaches, the apparent incidence of BMs is increasing. Local interventions, in the form of either surgical resection or radiation therapy, remain the mainstay in the management of BMs. Systemic treatments are typically used to complement local strategies to further improve and maintain control of central nervous system (CNS) disease. Although high-level evidence data about the impact of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), as well as the efficacy of anti-cancer agents on BMs and differentials between the systemic compartment and CNS are still scant, our understanding of the activity of systemic treatments with impact on BMs is rapidly evolving. Novel anti-HER2 agents, such as tucatinib, ado-trastuzumab emtansine, trastuzumab deruxtecan and neratinib, have shown intracranial efficacy. Current research efforts are ongoing not only to clarify the activity of existing treatments on the CNS, as well as to develop new drugs and innovative multi-modality approaches. This review will encompass the current treatment landscape of BMs arising from BC, with a focus on recent advancements in the field and investigational approaches.

Therapeutic cancer vaccines revamping: technology advancements and pitfalls

Cancer vaccines (CVs) represent a long-sought therapeutic and prophylactic immunotherapy strategy to obtain antigen (Ag)-specific T-cell responses and potentially achieve long-term clinical benefit. However, historically, most CV clinical trials have resulted in disappointing outcomes, despite promising signs of immunogenicity across most formulations. In the past decade, technological advances regarding vaccine delivery platforms, tools for immunogenomic profiling, and Ag/epitope selection have occurred. Consequently, the ability of CVs to induce tumor-specific and, in some cases, remarkable clinical responses have been observed in early-phase clinical trials. It is notable that the record-breaking speed of vaccine development in response to the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic mainly relied on manufacturing infrastructures and technological platforms already developed for CVs. In turn, research, clinical data, and infrastructures put in place for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic can further speed CV development processes. This review outlines the main technological advancements as well as major issues to tackle in the development of CVs. Possible applications for unmet clinical needs will be described, putting into perspective the future of cancer vaccinology.

Safety of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines in Patients with Cancer Enrolled in Early-Phase Clinical Trials

Simple Summary

We investigated for the first time the safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines in patients receiving new antineoplastic agents in early-stage clinical trials, including new immuno-regulatory anti-cancer investigational compounds and drug combinations. We found that about three-quarters of the patients under active anticancer treatments experienced mild to moderate adverse effects (AEs) related to COVID-19 vaccines. Patients enrolled in early-phase trials or receiving experimental immunotherapy agents did not experience worse AEs related to the vaccine than patients with cancer not enrolled in these trials, receiving approved drugs. The safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines in patients enrolled in early-phase clinical trials, including those treated with new immune checkpoint inhibitors, does not seem to differ from that of the general population of patients with cancer. Our data support the current vaccine prioritization of all cancer patients with active treatment and calls for data sharing from vaccinated patients enrolled in early-phase clinical trials.

Abstract

Pivotal trials of COVID-19 vaccines did not include cancer patients, with questions remaining about their safety and efficacy in this population. Patients enrolled in early-phase clinical trials receive novel treatments with unknown efficacy and safety profiles. Studies on the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in these patients are urgently required. This is a retrospective, real-world, cohort study of patients receiving anticancer treatments and COVID-19 vaccines between 1 February and 25 June 2021 at the Division of New Drugs Development for Innovative Therapies of the European Institute of Oncology. One hundred thirteen patients were enrolled, 40 in early-phase clinical trials, and 20 under novel immunotherapy agents. Nearly three-quarters of the patients experienced at least one adverse event (AE) after the first dose (1D) (74.3%) and second dose (2D) (72.6%). Most of the AEs were local (67.3% 1D and 61.9% after 2D), while 31.8% (1D) and 38.1% (2D) of the patients had systemic AEs. No AEs above grade 2 were observed. Therefore, COVID-19 vaccines appear to be safe in patients enrolled in early-phase clinical trials, including patients receiving novel immunotherapy compounds. All cancer patients should be prioritized for COVID-19 vaccination, regardless of ongoing treatments or enrollment in early-phase trials.

CTIM-19. TEM-GBM: A PHASE I-IIA DOSE-ESCALATION STUDY DELIVERING IFN-Α WITHIN GLIOBLASTOMA MULTIFORME TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT BY GENETICALLY MODIFIED TIE-2 EXPRESSING MONOCYTES

Temferon is an ex vivo gene therapy consisting of autologous HSPCs genetically modified to deliver IFN-α2 within the tumor microenvironment (TME) by Tie-2 expressing macrophages. TEM-GBM is an open-label, Phase I/IIa dose-escalation study evaluating safety and efficacy of Temferon in up to 21 newly diagnosed GBM patients with unmethylated MGMT. Autologous HSPCs are transduced with a LVV encoding for IFN-a2 gene. As of 30th April 2021, 18 patients have been enrolled; 13 received Temferon (D+0) with follow-up of 8 – 662 days. After conditioning and Temferon infusion, a rapid engraftment and hematological recovery occurred, with median neutrophil and platelet engraftment at D+13 and D+12, respectively. No dose limiting toxicities were reported. Temferon-derived cells were found within 14 days post treatment and persisted albeit at lower levels in the long-term. Five deaths occurred: one at +478, three at +322, +340 and +402 days due to PD, and the fourth at +60 due to complications following the conditioning regimen. Eight patients had PD (-12 to +239). SAEs include respiratory tract infections, pulmonary embolism, CMV and C.Diff infections, febrile neutropenia, hemiparesis, seizure, brain abscess, worsening of performance status and respiratory failure compatible with ASCT, concomitant medications and PD. Four patients underwent second surgery. Recurrent tumors had gene-marked cells present and increased expression of ISGs compared to diagnosis, indicative of local IFNa release by TEMs. In one patient, a stable lesion had a higher proportion of T cells and TEMs within the myeloid infiltrate and an increased IFN-response signature than in a progressing lesion. Characterization of T-cell immune repertoire suggests the expansion of tumor-associated clones. TME characterization by scRNA and TCR sequencing is ongoing. Interim results show that Temferon is well tolerated, with no dose limiting toxicities identified to date and provide initial evidence of potential immune system activation within the TME.

Seroconversion rate after vaccination against COVID-19 in cancer patients-a systematic review

Background

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has affected >210 million people worldwide. An optimal therapeutic approach for COVID-19 remains uncertain, to date. Since the history of cancer was linked to higher mortality rates due to COVID-19, the establishment of a safe and effective vaccine coverage is crucial in these patients. However, patients with cancer (PsC) were mostly excluded from vaccine candidates' clinical trials. This systematic review aims to investigate the current available evidence about the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in PsC.

Patients and methods

All prospective studies that evaluated the safety and efficacy of vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) were included, with immunogenicity after the first and the second dose as the primary endpoint, when available.

Results

Vaccination against COVID-19 for PsC seems overall safe and immunogenic after well-conducted vaccination schedules. Yet the seroconversion rate remains lower, lagged or both compared to the general population. Patients with hematologic malignancies, especially those receiving B-cell-depleting agents in the past 12 months, are the most at risk of poor seroconversion.

Conclusion

A tailored approach to vaccination may be proposed to PsC, especially on the basis of the type of malignancy and of the specific oncologic treatments received.

Myeloid cell-based delivery of IFN-γ reprograms the leukemia microenvironment and induces anti-tumoral immune responses

The immunosuppressive microenvironment surrounding tumor cells represents a key cause of treatment failure. Therefore, immunotherapies aimed at reprogramming the immune system have largely spread in the past years. We employed gene transfer into hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells to selectively express anti-tumoral cytokines in tumor-infiltrating monocytes/macrophages. We show that interferon-γ (IFN-γ) reduced tumor progression in mouse models of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and colorectal carcinoma (MC38). Its activity depended on the immune system's capacity to respond to IFN-γ and drove the counter-selection of leukemia cells expressing surrogate antigens. Gene-based IFN-γ delivery induced antigen presentation in the myeloid compartment and on leukemia cells, leading to a wave of T cell recruitment and activation, with enhanced clonal expansion of cytotoxic CD8+ T lymphocytes. The activity of IFN-γ was further enhanced by either co-delivery of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) or by drugs blocking immunosuppressive escape pathways, with the potential to obtain durable responses.

Investigational immunomodulatory drugs for enhancement of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) immunotherapy: early phase development

INTRODUCTION

Immunotherapy through the blockade of PD1-PDL1 axis has shown to improve outcomes in advanced and early triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). To further enhance immune-stimulation, and ultimately improve patient outcomes, a wide variety of next-generation immunotherapies (NGIO) is being developed for this disease.

AREAS COVERED

In the present article, we discuss the immune landscape of TNBC and recapitulate the rationale and available clinical evidence of NGIO under early phase development for TNBC, highlighting challenges and opportunities in this emerging field of research.

EXPERT OPINION

Multiple immunotherapeutic strategies beyond PD-(L)1 blockade have been tested for TNBC, including the targeting of further inhibitory checkpoints, the agonism of costimulatory molecules, the intratumoral administration of immunotherapies and cancer vaccines. Most of these strategies have demonstrated to be safe in early clinical trials, with some exhibiting early signs of antitumor activity. To optimally harness the potential of NGIO, a refined patient selection based on emerging immune biomarkers will be required, through an adaptation of immunotherapeutic strategies based on patient and tumor characteristics. More mature data from ongoing clinical trials, added to the progressively increasing knowledge on breast cancer immune landscape, will hopefully clarify the role of NGIO for the treatment of TNBC.

IMMU-01. TEM-GBM: AN OPEN-LABEL, PHASE I/IIA DOSE-ESCALATION STUDY EVALUATING THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED TIE-2 EXPRESSING MONOCYTES TO DELIVER IFN-A WITHIN GLIOBLASTOMA TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT

Temferon is a macrophage-based treatment relying on ex-vivo transduction of autologous HSPCs to express immune-payloads within the TME. Temferon targets the immune-modulatory molecule IFN-a, to a subset of tumor infiltrating macrophages known as Tie-2 expressing macrophages (TEMs) due to the Tie2 promoter and a post-transcriptional regulation layer represented by miRNA-126 target sequences. As of 31st May 2021, 15-patients received Temferon (D+0) with follow-up of 3 – 693 days. After conditioning neutrophil and platelet engraftment occurred at D+13 and D+13.5, respectively. Temferon-derived differentiated cells, as determined be the number of vector copy per genome, were found within 14 days post treatment and persisted albeit at lower levels up to 18-months. Very low concentrations of IFN-a in the plasma (8.7 pg/ml-D+30) and in the CSF (1.6 pg/ml-D+30) were detected, suggesting tight regulation of transgene expression. Five-deaths occurred at D+322, +340, +402, +478 and +646 due to PD, and one at D+60 due to complications following the conditioning regimen. Eight-patients had progressive disease (range: D-11 to +239) as expected for this tumor type. SAEs include GGT elevation (possibly related to Temferon) and infections, venous thromboembolism, brain abscess, hemiparesis, seizures, anemia and general physical condition deterioration, compatible with ASCT, concomitant medications and PD. Four-patients underwent 2ndsurgery. Recurrent tumors had gene-marked cells and increased expression of ISGs compared to first surgery, indicative of local IFNa release by TEMs. In one patient, a stable lesion had a higher proportion of T cells and TEMs within the myeloid infiltrate and an increased ISGs than in the progressing lesion, detected in the same patient. Tumor-associated clones expanded in the periphery. TME characterization by scRNA and TCR-sequencing is ongoing. To date, Temferon is well tolerated, with no DLTs identified. The results provide initial evidence of Temferon potential to activate the immune system of GBM patients, as predicted by preclinical studies.

Research and Clinical Landscape of Bispecific Antibodies for the Treatment of Solid Malignancies

Solid tumors adopt multiple mechanisms to grow, evade immune responses, and to withstand therapeutic approaches. A major breakthrough in the armamentarium of anti-cancer agents has been the introduction of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), able to inhibit aberrantly activated pathways and/or to unleash antigen (Ag)-specific immune responses. Nonetheless, mAb-mediated targeted pressure often fails due to escape mechanisms, mainly Ag loss/downregulation, ultimately providing therapy resistance. Hence, in order to target multiple Ag at the same time, and to facilitate cancer-immune cells interactions, bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) have been developed and are being tested in clinical trials, yielding variable safety/efficacy results based on target selection and their structure. While in hematologic cancers the bsAb blinatumomab recently reached the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approval for B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, bsAbs use in solid tumors faces considerable challenges, such as target Ag selection, biodistribution, and the presence of an immune-suppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). This review will focus on the state-of-the art, the design, and the exploitation of bsAbs against solid malignancies, delineating their mechanisms of action, major pitfalls, and future directions.

Abstract CT180: Changes in immunologic responses and in the tumor microenvironment in patients with glioblastoma multiforme treated with IFN-a immune cell and gene therapy (TEM-GBM_001 Study)

Genetically modified cell-based therapies are of increasing relevance in immuno-oncology due to their potential for tumor specificity, long term efficacy & limiting off-target effects. We have developed a genetically modified cell-based platform, with ex-vivo transduction of autologous hematopoietic stem & progenitor cells with a lentiviral vector expressing the IFN-α transgene (Temferon) & delivery by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Specific control mechanisms restrict transgene expression to Tie-2 expressing macrophages (TEMs) thanks to a specific Tie-2 promoter & a post-transcriptional regulation layer represented by miRNA target sequences.

TEM-GBM is an ongoing open-label, Phase I/IIa dose-escalation study evaluating safety & efficacy of Temferon in newly diagnosed patients with glioblastoma & unmethylated MGMT promoter. Part A includes 15 patients to optimize the dose & conditioning regimen (completion expected end of Q2/21), & Part B includes 6 patients.

By 10th Nov 2020, 13 patients had enrolled; 8 received Temferon with a median follow up of 298 days (53-491). One patient died from progressive disease (PD) at D+403. PD occurred in 6 patients after a median 123 days (83-229) from treatment, within expectations for this tumor type. 4 patients underwent second surgery. Temferon was well tolerated, with median neutrophil & platelet engraftment occurring at D+13 & D+12, respectively, post submyeloablative BCNU + Thiotepa conditioning, & without dose-limiting toxicities. SAEs attributed to ASCT, concomitant medications & GBM progression included febrile neutropenia & other infectious complications, venous thromboembolism, poor performance status, liver enzyme elevation, brain abscess & hemiparesis. Temferon-derived differentiated cells, as determined by the presence of vector genomes in peripheral blood & bone marrow, were evident within 14 days from treatment & persisted, albeit at lower levels, in the long term (up to 1 year). The built-in transgene expression control mechanism was effective as suggested by the very low concentrations of IFN-α detected in the plasma & cerebrospinal fluid. The T-cell immune repertoire changed after treatment, with evidence for expansion of tumor-associated clones in peripheral blood. Preliminary data on tumor specimens from second surgery confirmed the presence of TEMs & increased expression of IFN-responsive gene signatures compared to diagnosis indicative of local IFN-α release. Biopsies of a stable as compared to a progressing lesion in 1 patient had a higher proportion of T cells & TEMs within the myeloid infiltrate & a markedly increased IFN-response signature. Comprehensive characterization of the tumor microenvironment by scRNA sequencing is ongoing. The results provide initial evidence of the biological effects of Temferon in patients with GBM.

Citation Format: Bernhard Gentner, Gaetano Finocchiaro, Francesca Farina, Alessia Capotondo, Marica Eoli, Elena Anghileri, Maya Ganzetti, Matteo Carabba, Valeria Cuccarini, Francesco Di Meco, Federico Legnani, Bianca Pollo, Maria Grazia Bruzzone, Marco Saini, Paolo Ferroli, Roberto Pallini, Alessandro Olivi, Rosina Paterra, Mariagrazia Garramone, Stefania Mazzoleni, Valentina Brambilla, Tiziana Magnani, Gabriele Antonarelli, Matteo Naldini, Matteo Barcella, Carlo Russo, Luigi Naldini, Fabio Ciceri. Changes in immunologic responses and in the tumor microenvironment in patients with glioblastoma multiforme treated with IFN-a immune cell and gene therapy (TEM-GBM_001 Study) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT180.