1
|
Ríos-Hoyo A, Cobain E, Huppert LA, Beitsch PD, Buchholz TA, Esserman L, van 't Veer LJ, Rugo HS, Pusztai L. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy for Estrogen Receptor-Positive Human Epidermal Growth Factor 2-Negative Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2024:JCO2302614. [PMID: 38593393 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.02614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Laura A Huppert
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | - Laura Esserman
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Laura J van 't Veer
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Hope S Rugo
- University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wallach I, Bernard D, Nguyen K, Ho G, Morrison A, Stecula A, Rosnik A, O’Sullivan AM, Davtyan A, Samudio B, Thomas B, Worley B, Butler B, Laggner C, Thayer D, Moharreri E, Friedland G, Truong H, van den Bedem H, Ng HL, Stafford K, Sarangapani K, Giesler K, Ngo L, Mysinger M, Ahmed M, Anthis NJ, Henriksen N, Gniewek P, Eckert S, de Oliveira S, Suterwala S, PrasadPrasad SVK, Shek S, Contreras S, Hare S, Palazzo T, O’Brien TE, Van Grack T, Williams T, Chern TR, Kenyon V, Lee AH, Cann AB, Bergman B, Anderson BM, Cox BD, Warrington JM, Sorenson JM, Goldenberg JM, Young MA, DeHaan N, Pemberton RP, Schroedl S, Abramyan TM, Gupta T, Mysore V, Presser AG, Ferrando AA, Andricopulo AD, Ghosh A, Ayachi AG, Mushtaq A, Shaqra AM, Toh AKL, Smrcka AV, Ciccia A, de Oliveira AS, Sverzhinsky A, de Sousa AM, Agoulnik AI, Kushnir A, Freiberg AN, Statsyuk AV, Gingras AR, Degterev A, Tomilov A, Vrielink A, Garaeva AA, Bryant-Friedrich A, Caflisch A, Patel AK, Rangarajan AV, Matheeussen A, Battistoni A, Caporali A, Chini A, Ilari A, Mattevi A, Foote AT, Trabocchi A, Stahl A, Herr AB, Berti A, Freywald A, Reidenbach AG, Lam A, Cuddihy AR, White A, Taglialatela A, Ojha AK, Cathcart AM, Motyl AAL, Borowska A, D’Antuono A, Hirsch AKH, Porcelli AM, Minakova A, Montanaro A, Müller A, Fiorillo A, Virtanen A, O’Donoghue AJ, Del Rio Flores A, Garmendia AE, Pineda-Lucena A, Panganiban AT, Samantha A, Chatterjee AK, Haas AL, Paparella AS, John ALS, Prince A, ElSheikh A, Apfel AM, Colomba A, O’Dea A, Diallo BN, Ribeiro BMRM, Bailey-Elkin BA, Edelman BL, Liou B, Perry B, Chua BSK, Kováts B, Englinger B, Balakrishnan B, Gong B, Agianian B, Pressly B, Salas BPM, Duggan BM, Geisbrecht BV, Dymock BW, Morten BC, Hammock BD, Mota BEF, Dickinson BC, Fraser C, Lempicki C, Novina CD, Torner C, Ballatore C, Bon C, Chapman CJ, Partch CL, Chaton CT, Huang C, Yang CY, Kahler CM, Karan C, Keller C, Dieck CL, Huimei C, Liu C, Peltier C, Mantri CK, Kemet CM, Müller CE, Weber C, Zeina CM, Muli CS, Morisseau C, Alkan C, Reglero C, Loy CA, Wilson CM, Myhr C, Arrigoni C, Paulino C, Santiago C, Luo D, Tumes DJ, Keedy DA, Lawrence DA, Chen D, Manor D, Trader DJ, Hildeman DA, Drewry DH, Dowling DJ, Hosfield DJ, Smith DM, Moreira D, Siderovski DP, Shum D, Krist DT, Riches DWH, Ferraris DM, Anderson DH, Coombe DR, Welsbie DS, Hu D, Ortiz D, Alramadhani D, Zhang D, Chaudhuri D, Slotboom DJ, Ronning DR, Lee D, Dirksen D, Shoue DA, Zochodne DW, Krishnamurthy D, Duncan D, Glubb DM, Gelardi ELM, Hsiao EC, Lynn EG, Silva EB, Aguilera E, Lenci E, Abraham ET, Lama E, Mameli E, Leung E, Christensen EM, Mason ER, Petretto E, Trakhtenberg EF, Rubin EJ, Strauss E, Thompson EW, Cione E, Lisabeth EM, Fan E, Kroon EG, Jo E, García-Cuesta EM, Glukhov E, Gavathiotis E, Yu F, Xiang F, Leng F, Wang F, Ingoglia F, van den Akker F, Borriello F, Vizeacoumar FJ, Luh F, Buckner FS, Vizeacoumar FS, Bdira FB, Svensson F, Rodriguez GM, Bognár G, Lembo G, Zhang G, Dempsey G, Eitzen G, Mayer G, Greene GL, Garcia GA, Lukacs GL, Prikler G, Parico GCG, Colotti G, De Keulenaer G, Cortopassi G, Roti G, Girolimetti G, Fiermonte G, Gasparre G, Leuzzi G, Dahal G, Michlewski G, Conn GL, Stuchbury GD, Bowman GR, Popowicz GM, Veit G, de Souza GE, Akk G, Caljon G, Alvarez G, Rucinski G, Lee G, Cildir G, Li H, Breton HE, Jafar-Nejad H, Zhou H, Moore HP, Tilford H, Yuan H, Shim H, Wulff H, Hoppe H, Chaytow H, Tam HK, Van Remmen H, Xu H, Debonsi HM, Lieberman HB, Jung H, Fan HY, Feng H, Zhou H, Kim HJ, Greig IR, Caliandro I, Corvo I, Arozarena I, Mungrue IN, Verhamme IM, Qureshi IA, Lotsaris I, Cakir I, Perry JJP, Kwiatkowski J, Boorman J, Ferreira J, Fries J, Kratz JM, Miner J, Siqueira-Neto JL, Granneman JG, Ng J, Shorter J, Voss JH, Gebauer JM, Chuah J, Mousa JJ, Maynes JT, Evans JD, Dickhout J, MacKeigan JP, Jossart JN, Zhou J, Lin J, Xu J, Wang J, Zhu J, Liao J, Xu J, Zhao J, Lin J, Lee J, Reis J, Stetefeld J, Bruning JB, Bruning JB, Coles JG, Tanner JJ, Pascal JM, So J, Pederick JL, Costoya JA, Rayman JB, Maciag JJ, Nasburg JA, Gruber JJ, Finkelstein JM, Watkins J, Rodríguez-Frade JM, Arias JAS, Lasarte JJ, Oyarzabal J, Milosavljevic J, Cools J, Lescar J, Bogomolovas J, Wang J, Kee JM, Kee JM, Liao J, Sistla JC, Abrahão JS, Sishtla K, Francisco KR, Hansen KB, Molyneaux KA, Cunningham KA, Martin KR, Gadar K, Ojo KK, Wong KS, Wentworth KL, Lai K, Lobb KA, Hopkins KM, Parang K, Machaca K, Pham K, Ghilarducci K, Sugamori KS, McManus KJ, Musta K, Faller KME, Nagamori K, Mostert KJ, Korotkov KV, Liu K, Smith KS, Sarosiek K, Rohde KH, Kim KK, Lee KH, Pusztai L, Lehtiö L, Haupt LM, Cowen LE, Byrne LJ, Su L, Wert-Lamas L, Puchades-Carrasco L, Chen L, Malkas LH, Zhuo L, Hedstrom L, Hedstrom L, Walensky LD, Antonelli L, Iommarini L, Whitesell L, Randall LM, Fathallah MD, Nagai MH, Kilkenny ML, Ben-Johny M, Lussier MP, Windisch MP, Lolicato M, Lolli ML, Vleminckx M, Caroleo MC, Macias MJ, Valli M, Barghash MM, Mellado M, Tye MA, Wilson MA, Hannink M, Ashton MR, Cerna MVC, Giorgis M, Safo MK, Maurice MS, McDowell MA, Pasquali M, Mehedi M, Serafim MSM, Soellner MB, Alteen MG, Champion MM, Skorodinsky M, O’Mara ML, Bedi M, Rizzi M, Levin M, Mowat M, Jackson MR, Paige M, Al-Yozbaki M, Giardini MA, Maksimainen MM, De Luise M, Hussain MS, Christodoulides M, Stec N, Zelinskaya N, Van Pelt N, Merrill NM, Singh N, Kootstra NA, Singh N, Gandhi NS, Chan NL, Trinh NM, Schneider NO, Matovic N, Horstmann N, Longo N, Bharambe N, Rouzbeh N, Mahmoodi N, Gumede NJ, Anastasio NC, Khalaf NB, Rabal O, Kandror O, Escaffre O, Silvennoinen O, Bishop OT, Iglesias P, Sobrado P, Chuong P, O’Connell P, Martin-Malpartida P, Mellor P, Fish PV, Moreira POL, Zhou P, Liu P, Liu P, Wu P, Agogo-Mawuli P, Jones PL, Ngoi P, Toogood P, Ip P, von Hundelshausen P, Lee PH, Rowswell-Turner RB, Balaña-Fouce R, Rocha REO, Guido RVC, Ferreira RS, Agrawal RK, Harijan RK, Ramachandran R, Verma R, Singh RK, Tiwari RK, Mazitschek R, Koppisetti RK, Dame RT, Douville RN, Austin RC, Taylor RE, Moore RG, Ebright RH, Angell RM, Yan R, Kejriwal R, Batey RA, Blelloch R, Vandenberg RJ, Hickey RJ, Kelm RJ, Lake RJ, Bradley RK, Blumenthal RM, Solano R, Gierse RM, Viola RE, McCarthy RR, Reguera RM, Uribe RV, do Monte-Neto RL, Gorgoglione R, Cullinane RT, Katyal S, Hossain S, Phadke S, Shelburne SA, Geden SE, Johannsen S, Wazir S, Legare S, Landfear SM, Radhakrishnan SK, Ammendola S, Dzhumaev S, Seo SY, Li S, Zhou S, Chu S, Chauhan S, Maruta S, Ashkar SR, Shyng SL, Conticello SG, Buroni S, Garavaglia S, White SJ, Zhu S, Tsimbalyuk S, Chadni SH, Byun SY, Park S, Xu SQ, Banerjee S, Zahler S, Espinoza S, Gustincich S, Sainas S, Celano SL, Capuzzi SJ, Waggoner SN, Poirier S, Olson SH, Marx SO, Van Doren SR, Sarilla S, Brady-Kalnay SM, Dallman S, Azeem SM, Teramoto T, Mehlman T, Swart T, Abaffy T, Akopian T, Haikarainen T, Moreda TL, Ikegami T, Teixeira TR, Jayasinghe TD, Gillingwater TH, Kampourakis T, Richardson TI, Herdendorf TJ, Kotzé TJ, O’Meara TR, Corson TW, Hermle T, Ogunwa TH, Lan T, Su T, Banjo T, O’Mara TA, Chou T, Chou TF, Baumann U, Desai UR, Pai VP, Thai VC, Tandon V, Banerji V, Robinson VL, Gunasekharan V, Namasivayam V, Segers VFM, Maranda V, Dolce V, Maltarollo VG, Scoffone VC, Woods VA, Ronchi VP, Van Hung Le V, Clayton WB, Lowther WT, Houry WA, Li W, Tang W, Zhang W, Van Voorhis WC, Donaldson WA, Hahn WC, Kerr WG, Gerwick WH, Bradshaw WJ, Foong WE, Blanchet X, Wu X, Lu X, Qi X, Xu X, Yu X, Qin X, Wang X, Yuan X, Zhang X, Zhang YJ, Hu Y, Aldhamen YA, Chen Y, Li Y, Sun Y, Zhu Y, Gupta YK, Pérez-Pertejo Y, Li Y, Tang Y, He Y, Tse-Dinh YC, Sidorova YA, Yen Y, Li Y, Frangos ZJ, Chung Z, Su Z, Wang Z, Zhang Z, Liu Z, Inde Z, Artía Z, Heifets A. AI is a viable alternative to high throughput screening: a 318-target study. Sci Rep 2024; 14:7526. [PMID: 38565852 PMCID: PMC10987645 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-54655-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
High throughput screening (HTS) is routinely used to identify bioactive small molecules. This requires physical compounds, which limits coverage of accessible chemical space. Computational approaches combined with vast on-demand chemical libraries can access far greater chemical space, provided that the predictive accuracy is sufficient to identify useful molecules. Through the largest and most diverse virtual HTS campaign reported to date, comprising 318 individual projects, we demonstrate that our AtomNet® convolutional neural network successfully finds novel hits across every major therapeutic area and protein class. We address historical limitations of computational screening by demonstrating success for target proteins without known binders, high-quality X-ray crystal structures, or manual cherry-picking of compounds. We show that the molecules selected by the AtomNet® model are novel drug-like scaffolds rather than minor modifications to known bioactive compounds. Our empirical results suggest that computational methods can substantially replace HTS as the first step of small-molecule drug discovery.
Collapse
|
3
|
Jahangir CA, Page DB, Broeckx G, Gonzalez CA, Burke C, Murphy C, Reis-Filho JS, Ly A, Harms PW, Gupta RR, Vieth M, Hida AI, Kahila M, Kos Z, van Diest PJ, Verbandt S, Thagaard J, Khiroya R, Abduljabbar K, Acosta Haab G, Acs B, Adams S, Almeida JS, Alvarado-Cabrero I, Azmoudeh-Ardalan F, Badve S, Baharun NB, Bellolio ER, Bheemaraju V, Blenman KR, Botinelly Mendonça Fujimoto L, Burgues O, Chardas A, Cheang MCU, Ciompi F, Cooper LA, Coosemans A, Corredor G, Dantas Portela FL, Deman F, Demaria S, Dudgeon SN, Elghazawy M, Fernandez-Martín C, Fineberg S, Fox SB, Giltnane JM, Gnjatic S, Gonzalez-Ericsson PI, Grigoriadis A, Halama N, Hanna MG, Harbhajanka A, Hart SN, Hartman J, Hewitt S, Horlings HM, Husain Z, Irshad S, Janssen EA, Kataoka TR, Kawaguchi K, Khramtsov AI, Kiraz U, Kirtani P, Kodach LL, Korski K, Akturk G, Scott E, Kovács A, Laenkholm AV, Lang-Schwarz C, Larsimont D, Lennerz JK, Lerousseau M, Li X, Madabhushi A, Maley SK, Manur Narasimhamurthy V, Marks DK, McDonald ES, Mehrotra R, Michiels S, Kharidehal D, Minhas FUAA, Mittal S, Moore DA, Mushtaq S, Nighat H, Papathomas T, Penault-Llorca F, Perera RD, Pinard CJ, Pinto-Cardenas JC, Pruneri G, Pusztai L, Rajpoot NM, Rapoport BL, Rau TT, Ribeiro JM, Rimm D, Vincent-Salomon A, Saltz J, Sayed S, Hytopoulos E, Mahon S, Siziopikou KP, Sotiriou C, Stenzinger A, Sughayer MA, Sur D, Symmans F, Tanaka S, Taxter T, Tejpar S, Teuwen J, Thompson EA, Tramm T, Tran WT, van der Laak J, Verghese GE, Viale G, Wahab N, Walter T, Waumans Y, Wen HY, Yang W, Yuan Y, Bartlett J, Loibl S, Denkert C, Savas P, Loi S, Specht Stovgaard E, Salgado R, Gallagher WM, Rahman A. Image-based multiplex immune profiling of cancer tissues: translational implications. A report of the International Immuno-oncology Biomarker Working Group on Breast Cancer. J Pathol 2024; 262:271-288. [PMID: 38230434 DOI: 10.1002/path.6238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
Recent advances in the field of immuno-oncology have brought transformative changes in the management of cancer patients. The immune profile of tumours has been found to have key value in predicting disease prognosis and treatment response in various cancers. Multiplex immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence have emerged as potent tools for the simultaneous detection of multiple protein biomarkers in a single tissue section, thereby expanding opportunities for molecular and immune profiling while preserving tissue samples. By establishing the phenotype of individual tumour cells when distributed within a mixed cell population, the identification of clinically relevant biomarkers with high-throughput multiplex immunophenotyping of tumour samples has great potential to guide appropriate treatment choices. Moreover, the emergence of novel multi-marker imaging approaches can now provide unprecedented insights into the tumour microenvironment, including the potential interplay between various cell types. However, there are significant challenges to widespread integration of these technologies in daily research and clinical practice. This review addresses the challenges and potential solutions within a structured framework of action from a regulatory and clinical trial perspective. New developments within the field of immunophenotyping using multiplexed tissue imaging platforms and associated digital pathology are also described, with a specific focus on translational implications across different subtypes of cancer. © 2024 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chowdhury Arif Jahangir
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - David B Page
- Earle A Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Glenn Broeckx
- Department of Pathology PA2, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
- Centre for Oncological Research (CORE), MIPPRO, Faculty of Medicine, Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Claudia A Gonzalez
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Caoimbhe Burke
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Clodagh Murphy
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jorge S Reis-Filho
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amy Ly
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Paul W Harms
- Departments of Pathology and Dermatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Rajarsi R Gupta
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Michael Vieth
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Akira I Hida
- Department of Pathology, Matsuyama Shimin Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Mohamed Kahila
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Zuzana Kos
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sara Verbandt
- Digestive Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jeppe Thagaard
- Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
- Visiopharm A/S, Hørsholm, Denmark
| | - Reena Khiroya
- Department of Cellular Pathology, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Khalid Abduljabbar
- Centre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Balazs Acs
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sylvia Adams
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Manhattan, NY, USA
| | - Jonas S Almeida
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (DCEG), National Cancer Institute (NCI), Rockville, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Sunil Badve
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Enrique R Bellolio
- Departamento de Anatomía Patológica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile
| | | | - Kim Rm Blenman
- Department of Internal Medicine Section of Medical Oncology and Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Computer Science, Yale School of Engineering and Applied Science, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Octavio Burgues
- Pathology Department, Hospital Cliníco Universitario de Valencia/Incliva, Valencia, Spain
| | - Alexandros Chardas
- Department of Pathobiology & Population Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, London, UK
| | - Maggie Chon U Cheang
- Head of Integrative Genomics Analysis in Clinical Trials, ICR-CTSU, Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Francesco Ciompi
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lee Ad Cooper
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Germán Corredor
- Biomedical Engineering Department, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Frederik Deman
- Department of Pathology PA2, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Sandra Demaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pathology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sarah N Dudgeon
- Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Mahmoud Elghazawy
- University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
- Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Claudio Fernandez-Martín
- Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Tecnología Centrada en el Ser Humano, HUMAN-tech, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain
| | - Susan Fineberg
- Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Stephen B Fox
- Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Sacha Gnjatic
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Medicine Hem/Onc, and Pathology, Tisch Cancer Institute - Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Anita Grigoriadis
- Cancer Bioinformatics, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Niels Halama
- Department of Translational Immunotherapy, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Steven N Hart
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Johan Hartman
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Stephen Hewitt
- Laboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Hugo M Horlings
- Division of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sheeba Irshad
- King's College London & Guys & St Thomas NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Emiel Am Janssen
- Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Chemistry, Bioscience and Environmental Technology, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | | | - Kosuke Kawaguchi
- Department of Breast Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Andrey I Khramtsov
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Umay Kiraz
- Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Chemistry, Bioscience and Environmental Technology, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Pawan Kirtani
- Histopathology, Aakash Healthcare Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Liudmila L Kodach
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Konstanty Korski
- Data, Analytics and Imaging, Product Development, F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Guray Akturk
- Translational Molecular Biomarkers, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA
| | - Ely Scott
- Translational Medicine, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Anikó Kovács
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anne-Vibeke Laenkholm
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
- Department of Surgical Pathology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Corinna Lang-Schwarz
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Denis Larsimont
- Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jochen K Lennerz
- Center for Integrated Diagnostics, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marvin Lerousseau
- Centre for Computational Biology (CBIO), Mines Paris, PSL University, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France
- INSERM U900, Paris, France
| | - Xiaoxian Li
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Anant Madabhushi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Biomedical Informatics, Pathology, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sai K Maley
- NRG Oncology/NSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Douglas K Marks
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth S McDonald
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Group, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ravi Mehrotra
- Indian Cancer Genomic Atlas, Pune, India
- Centre for Health, Innovation and Policy Foundation, Noida, India
| | - Stefan Michiels
- Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, Inserm, University Paris-Saclay, Ligue Contre le Cancer labeled Team, Villejuif, France
| | - Durga Kharidehal
- Department of Pathology, Narayana Medical College and Hospital, Nellore, India
| | - Fayyaz Ul Amir Afsar Minhas
- Tissue Image Analytics Centre, Warwick Cancer Research Centre, PathLAKE Consortium, Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Shachi Mittal
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - David A Moore
- CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, UCL and Cellular Pathology Department, UCLH, London, UK
| | - Shamim Mushtaq
- Department of Biochemistry, Ziauddin University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Hussain Nighat
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, India
| | - Thomas Papathomas
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Drammen Sykehus, Vestre Viken HF, Drammen, Norway
| | - Frederique Penault-Llorca
- Service de Pathologie et Biopathologie, Centre Jean PERRIN, INSERM U1240 Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies Théranostiques (IMoST), Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Rashindrie D Perera
- School of Electrical, Mechanical and Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christopher J Pinard
- Radiogenomics Laboratory, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Lakeshore Animal Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
- Centre for Advancing Responsible and Ethical Artificial Intelligence (CARE-AI), University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Giancarlo Pruneri
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Bernardo Leon Rapoport
- The Medical Oncology Centre of Rosebank, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Department of Immunology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Tilman T Rau
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Düsseldorf and Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - David Rimm
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Anne Vincent-Salomon
- Department of Diagnostic and Theranostic Medicine, Institut Curie, University Paris-Sciences et Lettres, Paris, France
| | - Joel Saltz
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shahin Sayed
- Department of Pathology, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Evangelos Hytopoulos
- Department of Pathology, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya
- iRhythm Technologies Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sarah Mahon
- Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Kalliopi P Siziopikou
- Department of Pathology, Section of Breast Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Christos Sotiriou
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory J.-C. Heuson, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Albrecht Stenzinger
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Centers for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Daniel Sur
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Iuliu Hatieganu", Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Fraser Symmans
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Sabine Tejpar
- Digestive Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jonas Teuwen
- AI for Oncology Lab, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Trine Tramm
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - William T Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jeroen van der Laak
- Head of Integrative Genomics Analysis in Clinical Trials, ICR-CTSU, Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Gregory E Verghese
- Cancer Bioinformatics, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Department of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology & University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Noorul Wahab
- Tissue Image Analytics Centre, Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Thomas Walter
- Centre for Computational Biology (CBIO), Mines Paris, PSL University, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France
- INSERM U900, Paris, France
| | | | - Hannah Y Wen
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wentao Yang
- Fudan Medical University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Yinyin Yuan
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Sibylle Loibl
- Department of Medicine and Research, German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Peter Savas
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sherene Loi
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Roberto Salgado
- Department of Pathology PA2, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - William M Gallagher
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Arman Rahman
- UCD School of Medicine, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pusztai L, Denkert C, O'Shaughnessy J, Cortes J, Dent R, McArthur H, Kümmel S, Bergh J, Park YH, Hui R, Harbeck N, Takahashi M, Untch M, Fasching PA, Cardoso F, Zhu Y, Pan W, Tryfonidis K, Schmid P. Event-free survival by residual cancer burden with pembrolizumab in early-stage TNBC: exploratory analysis from KEYNOTE-522. Ann Oncol 2024:S0923-7534(24)00046-2. [PMID: 38369015 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND KEYNOTE-522 demonstrated statistically significant improvements in pathological complete response (pCR) with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and event-free survival (EFS) with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab in patients with high-risk, early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Prior studies have shown the prognostic value of the residual cancer burden (RCB) index to quantify the extent of residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In this preplanned exploratory analysis, we assessed RCB distribution and EFS within RCB categories by treatment group. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 1174 patients with stage T1c/N1-2 or T2-4/N0-2 TNBC were randomized 2 : 1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks given with four cycles of paclitaxel + carboplatin, followed by four cycles of doxorubicin or epirubicin + cyclophosphamide. After surgery, patients received pembrolizumab or placebo for nine cycles or until recurrence or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoints are pCR and EFS. RCB is a prespecified exploratory endpoint. The association between EFS and RCB was assessed using a Cox regression model. RESULTS Pembrolizumab shifted patients into lower RCB categories across the entire spectrum compared with placebo. There were more patients in the pembrolizumab group with RCB-0 (pCR), and fewer patients in the pembrolizumab group with RCB-1, RCB-2, and RCB-3. The corresponding hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for EFS were 0.70 (0.38-1.31), 0.92 (0.39-2.20), 0.52 (0.32-0.82), and 1.24 (0.69-2.23). The most common first EFS events were distant recurrences, with fewer in the pembrolizumab group across all RCB categories. Among patients with RCB-0/1, more than half [21/38 (55.3%)] of all events were central nervous system recurrences, with 13/22 (59.1%) in the pembrolizumab group and 8/16 (50.0%) in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS Addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy resulted in fewer EFS events in the RCB-0, RCB-1, and RCB-2 categories, with the greatest benefit in RCB-2. These findings demonstrate that pembrolizumab not only increased pCR rates, but also improved EFS among most patients who do not have a pCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Pusztai
- Yale School of Medicine, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, USA.
| | - C Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - J O'Shaughnessy
- Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology Network, Dallas, USA
| | - J Cortes
- International Breast Cancer Center, Quironsalud Group, Barcelona; Universidad Europea de Madrid, Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Dent
- National Cancer Center Singapore, Duke - National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - H McArthur
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
| | - S Kümmel
- Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Berlin, Germany
| | - J Bergh
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and Breast Cancer Centre, Cancer Theme, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Center, Solna, Sweden
| | - Y H Park
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - R Hui
- Westmead Breast Cancer Institute, Westmead Hospital and the University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - N Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - M Takahashi
- Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - M Untch
- Breast Cancer Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin
| | - P A Fasching
- University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Erlangen, Germany
| | - F Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Y Zhu
- Oncology, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, USA
| | - W Pan
- Oncology, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, USA
| | | | - P Schmid
- Centre for Experimental Cancer Medicine, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Albain KS, Yau C, Petricoin EF, Wolf DM, Lang JE, Chien AJ, Haddad T, Forero-Torres A, Wallace AM, Kaplan H, Pusztai L, Euhus D, Nanda R, Elias AD, Clark AS, Godellas C, Boughey JC, Isaacs C, Tripathy D, Lu J, Yung RL, Gallagher RI, Wulfkuhle JD, Brown-Swigart L, Krings G, Chen YY, Potter DA, Stringer-Reasor E, Blair S, Asare SM, Wilson A, Hirst GL, Singhrao R, Buxton M, Clennell JL, Sanil A, Berry S, Asare AL, Matthews JB, DeMichele AM, Hylton NM, Melisko M, Perlmutter J, Rugo HS, Symmans WF, van’t Veer LJ, Yee D, Berry DA, Esserman LJ. Neoadjuvant Trebananib plus Paclitaxel-based Chemotherapy for Stage II/III Breast Cancer in the Adaptively Randomized I-SPY2 Trial-Efficacy and Biomarker Discovery. Clin Cancer Res 2024; 30:729-740. [PMID: 38109213 PMCID: PMC10956403 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-2256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Revised: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The neutralizing peptibody trebananib prevents angiopoietin-1 and angiopoietin-2 from binding with Tie2 receptors, inhibiting angiogenesis and proliferation. Trebananib was combined with paclitaxel±trastuzumab in the I-SPY2 breast cancer trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS I-SPY2, a phase II neoadjuvant trial, adaptively randomizes patients with high-risk, early-stage breast cancer to one of several experimental therapies or control based on receptor subtypes as defined by hormone receptor (HR) and HER2 status and MammaPrint risk (MP1, MP2). The primary endpoint is pathologic complete response (pCR). A therapy "graduates" if/when it achieves 85% Bayesian probability of success in a phase III trial within a given subtype. Patients received weekly paclitaxel (plus trastuzumab if HER2-positive) without (control) or with weekly intravenous trebananib, followed by doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide and surgery. Pathway-specific biomarkers were assessed for response prediction. RESULTS There were 134 participants randomized to trebananib and 133 to control. Although trebananib did not graduate in any signature [phase III probabilities: Hazard ratio (HR)-negative (78%), HR-negative/HER2-positive (74%), HR-negative/HER2-negative (77%), and MP2 (79%)], it demonstrated high probability of superior pCR rates over control (92%-99%) among these subtypes. Trebananib improved 3-year event-free survival (HR 0.67), with no significant increase in adverse events. Activation levels of the Tie2 receptor and downstream signaling partners predicted trebananib response in HER2-positive disease; high expression of a CD8 T-cell gene signature predicted response in HR-negative/HER2-negative disease. CONCLUSIONS The angiopoietin (Ang)/Tie2 axis inhibitor trebananib combined with standard neoadjuvant therapy increased estimated pCR rates across HR-negative and MP2 subtypes, with probabilities of superiority >90%. Further study of Ang/Tie2 receptor axis inhibitors in validated, biomarker-predicted sensitive subtypes is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathy S. Albain
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Christina Yau
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Denise M. Wolf
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - A. Jo Chien
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Debu Tripathy
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Janice Lu
- University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | | | | | - Gregor Krings
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Yunn Yi Chen
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | - Sarah Blair
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Smita M. Asare
- Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA
| | - Amy Wilson
- Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Ruby Singhrao
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | | | - Adam L. Asare
- Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | - Nola M. Hylton
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | - Hope S. Rugo
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Loibl S, André F, Bachelot T, Barrios CH, Bergh J, Burstein HJ, Cardoso MJ, Carey LA, Dawood S, Del Mastro L, Denkert C, Fallenberg EM, Francis PA, Gamal-Eldin H, Gelmon K, Geyer CE, Gnant M, Guarneri V, Gupta S, Kim SB, Krug D, Martin M, Meattini I, Morrow M, Janni W, Paluch-Shimon S, Partridge A, Poortmans P, Pusztai L, Regan MM, Sparano J, Spanic T, Swain S, Tjulandin S, Toi M, Trapani D, Tutt A, Xu B, Curigliano G, Harbeck N. Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2024; 35:159-182. [PMID: 38101773 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- S Loibl
- GBG Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg; Centre for Haematology and Oncology, Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - F André
- Breast Cancer Unit, Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| | - T Bachelot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - C H Barrios
- Oncology Department, Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group and Oncoclínicas, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - J Bergh
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Bioclinicum, Karolinska Institutet and Breast Cancer Centre, Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Centre and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - H J Burstein
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - M J Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Foundation, Champalimaud Cancer Centre, Lisbon; Faculty of Medicine, Lisbon University, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - L A Carey
- Division of Medical Oncology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - S Dawood
- Department of Oncology, Mediclinic City Hospital, Dubai, UAE
| | - L Del Mastro
- Medical Oncology Clinic, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialities, School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - C Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Marburg
| | - E M Fallenberg
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine & Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - P A Francis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - H Gamal-Eldin
- Department of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - K Gelmon
- Department of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, Canada
| | - C E Geyer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - M Gnant
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - V Guarneri
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova; Oncology 2 Unit, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - S Gupta
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - S B Kim
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - D Krug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - M Martin
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon, Universidad Complutense, GEICAM, Madrid, Spain
| | - I Meattini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence; Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences 'M. Serio', University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - M Morrow
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - W Janni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - S Paluch-Shimon
- Sharett Institute of Oncology Department, Hadassah University Hospital & Faculty of Medicine Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - A Partridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - P Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - L Pusztai
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven
| | - M M Regan
- Division of Biostatistics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - J Sparano
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - T Spanic
- Europa Donna Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - S Swain
- Medicine Department, Georgetown University Medical Centre and MedStar Health, Washington, USA
| | - S Tjulandin
- N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Centre of Oncology, Moscow, Russia
| | - M Toi
- Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Disease Center, Komagome Hospital, Bunkyo-ku, Japan
| | - D Trapani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - A Tutt
- Breast Cancer Research Division, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Division of Cancer Studies, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - B Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - G Curigliano
- Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies Division, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milan; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - N Harbeck
- Breast Centre, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Comprehensive Cancer Centre Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Coman MM, Pusztai L, Hooley R, Andreveja L, Kim L, Joshi N, Bersenev A, Krause D, Park TS. Core Needle Biopsies as an Alternative Source for Ex Vivo Expanded TIL for Adoptive Cell Therapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. J Immunother 2024; 47:49-53. [PMID: 37991241 DOI: 10.1097/cji.0000000000000495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
Adoptive transfer of ex vivo expanded tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have produced long-term response in metastatic cancers. TILs have traditionally been expanded from surgically resected specimens. Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) is an alternative method that avoids the morbidity of surgery and have added benefits which may include patients not amenable to surgery as well as the potential to produce TILs from multiple lesions in the same patient. We assessed the ability to produce and expand TILs from primary triple-negative breast cancer tumors from CNB (n=7) and demonstrate comparable expansion, phenotype and cytokine secretion after phorbol myristate acetate-ionomycin stimulation to TILs expanded from surgery (n=6). T cell Receptor clonality and diversity were also comparable between the two cohorts throughout the TIL culture. CNB is a safe and feasible method to obtain tumor tissue for TIL generation in patients with triple-negative breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalena M Coman
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Department of Medicine, Yale Cancer Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT
| | - Regina Hooley
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT
| | - Liva Andreveja
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT
| | - Leah Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT
| | - Nikhil Joshi
- Department of Immunobiology, Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Alexey Bersenev
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Diane Krause
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Tristen S Park
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Licata L, Barreca M, Galbardi B, Dugo M, Viale G, Győrffy B, Karn T, Pusztai L, Gianni L, Callari M, Bianchini G. Breast cancers with high proliferation and low ER-related signalling have poor prognosis and unique molecular features with implications for therapy. Br J Cancer 2023; 129:2025-2033. [PMID: 37935787 PMCID: PMC10703787 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02477-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Luminal breast cancers with high proliferation (MKShi) and low ER-related signalling (ERSlo) have a poor prognosis. We investigated treatment responses and molecular features of MKShi/ERSlo tumours to inform potential therapies. METHODS Gene expression data from patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) without (MDACC, N = 199) or with pembrolizumab (I-SPY2, N = 40), or endocrine therapy (NET) without (POETIC, N = 172) or with palbociclib (NeoPalAna, N = 32) were analyzed to assess treatment response by MKS/ERS-subgroups. TCGA was used to assess the mutational landscape and biomarkers associated with palbociclib-resistance (Cyclin-E, RBsig, IRPR) and immunotherapy-response (TMB, TILs, T-cell inflamed) by MKS/ERS-subgroups. RESULTS Compared to MKShi/ERShi tumours, MKShi/ERSlo tumours had higher pathological response rates to NAC (22% vs 8%, p = 0.06) but a higher recurrence risk (4-year metastasis-free survival 70% vs 94%, p = 0.01). MKShi/ERSlo tumours frequently harboured TP53 (34%) and PIK3CA (33%) mutations, and showed high expression of Cyclin-E, RBsig and IRPR, high TMB and elevated TIL and T-cell inflamed metagene expression. MKShi/ERSlo tumours retained high proliferation after NET with or without palbociclib but had higher pathological complete response rates when pembrolizumab was added to NAC (42% vs 21%, p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS MKShi/ERSlo tumours have dismal outcomes and are enriched in chemotherapy-sensitive but ET- and palbociclib-resistant tumours. Biomarker analysis and clinical data suggest a potential role for immunotherapy in this group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Licata
- Department of Medical Oncology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Barbara Galbardi
- Department of Medical Oncology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Dugo
- Department of Medical Oncology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Viale
- Department of Medical Oncology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Balàzs Győrffy
- Department of Bioinformatics, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- Cancer Biomarker Research Group, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Thomas Karn
- Goethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | | | - Giampaolo Bianchini
- Department of Medical Oncology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
- School of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pusztai L, Rozenblit M, Dubsky P, Bachelot T, Kirby AM, Linderholm BK, White JR, Chmura SJ, Carey LA, Chua BH, Miller KD. De Novo Oligometastatic Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:5237-5241. [PMID: 37607325 PMCID: PMC10691789 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023] Open
Abstract
De novo oligometastatic breast cancer, a unique disease needing new treatment paradigms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lajos Pusztai
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | | | - Peter Dubsky
- Breast Center Hirslanden Klinik St Anna & Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Bachelot
- Département de Cancérologie Médicale, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Anna M. Kirby
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust & Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Barbro K. Linderholm
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska Academy and University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Julia R. White
- Department of Radiology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, KA
| | - Steven J. Chmura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Lisa A. Carey
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Boon H. Chua
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kathy D. Miller
- Department of Medicine Hematology/Oncology Division, University of Indiana, School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bosi C, Bartha Á, Galbardi B, Notini G, Naldini MM, Licata L, Viale G, Mariani M, Pistilli B, Ali HR, André F, Piras M, Callari M, Barreca M, Locatelli A, Viganò L, Criscitiello C, Pusztai L, Curigliano G, Győrffy B, Dugo M, Bianchini G. Pan-cancer analysis of antibody-drug conjugate targets and putative predictors of treatment response. Eur J Cancer 2023; 195:113379. [PMID: 37913680 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a rapidly expanding class of compounds in oncology. Our goal was to assess the expression of ADC targets and potential downstream determining factors of activity across pan-cancer and normal tissues. MATERIALS AND METHODS ADCs in clinical trials (n = 121) were identified through ClinicalTrials.gov, corresponding to 54 targets. Genes potentially implicated in treatment response were identified in the literature. Gene expression from The Cancer Genome Atlas (9000+ cancers of 31 cancer types), the Genotype-Tissue Expression database (n = 19,000 samples from 31 normal tissue types), and the TNMplot.com (n = 12,494 unmatched primary and metastatic samples) were used in this analysis. To compare relative expression across and within tumour types we used pooled normal tissues as reference. RESULTS For most ADC targets, mRNA levels correlated with protein expression. Pan-cancer target expression distributions identified appealing cancer types for each ADC development. Co-expression of multiple targets was common and suggested opportunities for ADC combinations. Expression levels of genes potentially implicated in ADC response downstream of the target might provide additional information (e.g. TOP1 was highly expressed in many tumour types, including breast and lung cancers). Metastatic compared to primary tissues overexpressed some ADCs targets. Single sample "targetgram" plots were generated to visualise the expression of potentially competing ADC targets and resistance/sensitivity markers highlighting high inter-patient heterogeneity. Off-cancer target expression only partially explains adverse events, while expression of determinants of payload activity explained more of the observed toxicities. CONCLUSION Our findings draw attention to new therapeutic opportunities for ADCs that can be tested in the clinic and our web platform (https://tnmplot.com) can assist in prioritising upcoming ADC targets for clinical development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Bosi
- Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Áron Bartha
- Department of Bioinformatics, Semmelweis University, Tűzoltó Utca 7-9, 1094 Budapest, Hungary; Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Oncology Biomarker Research Group, Institute of Molecular Life Sciences, Eötvös Loránd Research Network, Magyar Tudósok Körútja 2, 1117 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Barbara Galbardi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Notini
- Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo M Naldini
- Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Licata
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Viale
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Mariani
- Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Pistilli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, Villejuif, France
| | - H Raza Ali
- CRUK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Histopathology, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Fabrice André
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, Villejuif, France
| | - Marta Piras
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Alberta Locatelli
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Lucia Viganò
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Carmen Criscitiello
- Division of Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milano, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milano, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Balázs Győrffy
- Department of Bioinformatics, Semmelweis University, Tűzoltó Utca 7-9, 1094 Budapest, Hungary; Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Oncology Biomarker Research Group, Institute of Molecular Life Sciences, Eötvös Loránd Research Network, Magyar Tudósok Körútja 2, 1117 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Matteo Dugo
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
| | - Giampaolo Bianchini
- Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kyalwazi B, Yau C, Campbell MJ, Yoshimatsu TF, Chien AJ, Wallace AM, Forero-Torres A, Pusztai L, Ellis ED, Albain KS, Blaes AH, Haley BB, Boughey JC, Elias AD, Clark AS, Isaacs CJ, Nanda R, Han HS, Yung RL, Tripathy D, Edmiston KK, Viscusi RK, Northfelt DW, Khan QJ, Asare SM, Wilson A, Hirst GL, Lu R, Symmans WF, Yee D, DeMichele AM, van ’t Veer LJ, Esserman LJ, Olopade OI. Race, Gene Expression Signatures, and Clinical Outcomes of Patients With High-Risk Early Breast Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2349646. [PMID: 38153734 PMCID: PMC10755617 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.49646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance There has been little consideration of genomic risk of recurrence by breast cancer subtype despite evidence of racial disparities in breast cancer outcomes. Objective To evaluate associations between clinical trial end points, namely pathologic complete response (pCR) and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), and race and examine whether gene expression signatures are associated with outcomes by race. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study used data from the Investigation of Serial Studies to Predict Your Therapeutic Response With Imaging and Molecular Analysis 2 (I-SPY 2) multicenter clinical trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with novel agents and combinations for patients with previously untreated stage II/III breast cancer. Analyses were conducted of associations between race and short- and long-term outcomes, overall and by receptor subtypes, and their association with 28 expression biomarkers. The trial enrolled 990 female patients between March 30, 2010, and November 5, 2016, with a primary tumor size of 2.5 cm or greater and clinical or molecular high risk based on MammaPrint or hormone receptor (HR)-negative/ERBB2 (formerly HER2 or HER2/neu)-positive subtyping across 9 arms. This data analysis was performed between June 10, 2021, and October 20, 2022. Exposure Race, tumor receptor subtypes, and genomic biomarker expression of early breast cancer. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcomes were pCR and DRFS assessed by race, overall, and by tumor subtype using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression models. The interaction between 28 expression biomarkers and race, considering pCR and DRFS overall and within subtypes, was also evaluated. Results The analytic sample included 974 participants (excluding 16 self-reporting as American Indian or Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, or multiple races due to small sample sizes), including 68 Asian (7%), 120 Black (12%), and 786 White (81%) patients. Median (range) age at diagnosis was 47 (25-71) years for Asian, 49 (25-77) for Black, and 49 (23-73) years for White patients. The pCR rates were 32% (n = 22) for Asian, 30% for Black (n = 36), and 32% for White (n = 255) patients (P = .87). Black patients with HR-positive/ERBB2-negative tumors not achieving pCR had significantly worse DRFS than their White counterparts (hazard ratio, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.24-4.21; P = .01), with 5-year DRFS rates of 55% (n = 32) and 77% (n = 247), respectively. Black patients with HR-positive/ERBB2-negative tumors, compared with White patients, had higher expression of an interferon signature (mean [SD], 0.39 [0.87] and -0.10 [0.99]; P = .007) and, compared with Asian patients, had a higher mitotic score (mean [SD], 0.07 [1.08] and -0.69 [1.06]; P = .01) and lower estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor signature (mean [SD], 0.31 [0.90] and 1.08 [0.95]; P = .008). A transforming growth factor β signature had a significant association with race relative to pCR and DRFS, with a higher signature associated with lower pCR and worse DRFS outcomes among Black patients only. Conclusions and Relevance The findings show that women with early high-risk breast cancer who achieve pCR have similarly good outcomes regardless of race, but Black women with HR-positive/ERBB2-negative tumors without pCR may have worse DRFS than White women, highlighting the need to develop and test novel biomarker-informed therapies in diverse populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beverly Kyalwazi
- Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | - Christina Yau
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | | | - Toshio F. Yoshimatsu
- Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
- Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - A. Jo Chien
- Department of Hematology Oncology and Surgery, University of California, San Francisco Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco
| | - Anne M. Wallace
- Division of Breast Surgery and the Comprehensive Breast Health Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla
| | | | - Lajos Pusztai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | - Kathy S. Albain
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Anne H. Blaes
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Barbara B. Haley
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | | | | | - Amy S. Clark
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
| | | | - Rita Nanda
- Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Hyo S. Han
- Department of Breast Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Rachel L. Yung
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Debasish Tripathy
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | | | - Rebecca K. Viscusi
- Department of Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson
| | | | - Qamar J. Khan
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
| | - Smita M. Asare
- Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, California
| | - Amy Wilson
- Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, California
| | | | - Ruixiao Lu
- Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative, San Francisco, California
| | - William Fraser Symmans
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Douglas Yee
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Angela M. DeMichele
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
| | - Laura J. van ’t Veer
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco
| | | | - Olufunmilayo I. Olopade
- Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
- Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rediti M, Fernandez-Martinez A, Venet D, Rothé F, Hoadley KA, Parker JS, Singh B, Campbell JD, Ballman KV, Hillman DW, Winer EP, El-Abed S, Piccart M, Di Cosimo S, Symmans WF, Krop IE, Salgado R, Loi S, Pusztai L, Perou CM, Carey LA, Sotiriou C. Immunological and clinicopathological features predict HER2-positive breast cancer prognosis in the neoadjuvant NeoALTTO and CALGB 40601 randomized trials. Nat Commun 2023; 14:7053. [PMID: 37923752 PMCID: PMC10624889 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-42635-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The identification of prognostic markers in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy is crucial for treatment optimization in HER2-positive breast cancer, with the immune microenvironment being a key factor. Here, we investigate the complexity of B and T cell receptor (BCR and TCR) repertoires in the context of two phase III trials, NeoALTTO and CALGB 40601, evaluating neoadjuvant paclitaxel with trastuzumab and/or lapatinib in women with HER2-positive breast cancer. BCR features, particularly the number of reads and clones, evenness and Gini index, are heterogeneous according to hormone receptor status and PAM50 subtypes. Moreover, BCR measures describing clonal expansion, namely evenness and Gini index, are independent prognostic factors. We present a model developed in NeoALTTO and validated in CALGB 40601 that can predict event-free survival (EFS) by integrating hormone receptor and clinical nodal status, breast pathological complete response (pCR), stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte levels (%) and BCR repertoire evenness. A prognostic score derived from the model and including those variables, HER2-EveNT, allows the identification of patients with 5-year EFS > 90%, and, in those not achieving pCR, of a subgroup of immune-enriched tumors with an excellent outcome despite residual disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mattia Rediti
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - David Venet
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Françoise Rothé
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Katherine A Hoadley
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Joel S Parker
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - Jordan D Campbell
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Karla V Ballman
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - David W Hillman
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Eric P Winer
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Martine Piccart
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet and l'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Serena Di Cosimo
- Integrated biology platform unit, Department of Applied Research and Technological Development, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - William Fraser Symmans
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Ian E Krop
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA Ziekenhuizen, Antwerp, Belgium
- Division of Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sherene Loi
- Division of Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Breast Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Charles M Perou
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Lisa A Carey
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Christos Sotiriou
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Takahashi M, Cortés J, Dent R, Pusztai L, McArthur H, Kümmel S, Denkert C, Park YH, Im SA, Ahn JH, Mukai H, Huang CS, Chen SC, Kim MH, Jia L, Li XT, Tryfonidis K, Karantza V, Iwata H, Schmid P. Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Pembrolizumab in Patients With Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2342107. [PMID: 37966841 PMCID: PMC10652156 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.42107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance In the phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 study, addition of pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab significantly increased pathologic complete response (pCR) and event-free survival (EFS) vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early triple-negative breast cancer. Objective To evaluate efficacy and safety outcomes for patients enrolled in East/Southeast Asia (Asia) in KEYNOTE-522. Design, Setting, and Participants KEYNOTE-522, a multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial, enrolled 1174 patients between March 7, 2017, and September 13, 2018. For interim EFS and overall survival (OS) analyses (data cutoff, March 23, 2021), median follow-up was 39.8 months (range, 30.4-46.9 months) for pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and 40.8 months (range, 30.1-46.9 months) for placebo plus chemotherapy. Data cutoff for pCR analysis was September 24, 2018. This secondary analysis included adults enrolled in Asia with newly diagnosed, previously untreated, nonmetastatic triple-negative breast cancer (tumor stage T1c and nodal stage N1-2 or tumor stage T2-4 and nodal stage N0-2) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1, regardless of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status. Intervention Patients were randomized 2:1 to 4 cycles of pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) or placebo plus carboplatin and paclitaxel and another 4 cycles of pembrolizumab or placebo plus doxorubicin or epirubicin and cyclophosphamide before surgery. After definitive surgery, patients received pembrolizumab or placebo every 3 weeks for 9 cycles or until recurrence or unacceptable toxic effects. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcome was pCR (no evidence of primary tumor after neoadjuvant therapy or carcinoma in situ after neoadjuvant therapy and no regional lymph node involvement after neoadjuvant therapy) at the time of definitive surgery and EFS. Results A total of 216 of 1174 randomized patients (all female; median [range] age, 46.0 [24.0-71.0] years) were from Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and Singapore (136 in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group and 80 in the placebo plus chemotherapy group). Of these patients, 104 (76.5%) in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group and 60 (75.0%) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group had a tumor PD-L1 combined positive score of 1 or greater. Pathologic complete response was 58.7% (95% CI, 46.7%-69.9%) with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and 40.0% (95% CI, 26.4%-54.8%) with placebo plus chemotherapy; benefit was observed regardless of PD-L1 status. Thirteen patients (9.6%) in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group and 20 patients (25.0%) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group had EFS events (hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17-0.71). The 36-month EFS rate was 91.2% (95% CI, 85.0%-94.9%) with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and 77.2% (95% CI, 66.3%-85.0%) with placebo plus chemotherapy. Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 109 patients (80.1%) receiving pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and 64 patients (81.0%) receiving placebo plus chemotherapy. Conclusions and Relevance In this subgroup analysis of patients enrolled in Asia in KEYNOTE-522, neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab led to clinically meaningful improvements in pCR and EFS vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. These findings support the use of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab as a standard-of-care therapy for patients in Asian countries with early triple-negative breast cancer. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03036488.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masato Takahashi
- Department of Breast Surgery, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Javier Cortés
- International Breast Cancer Center, Pangaea Oncology, Quironsalud Group, Barcelona, Spain
- Medical Scientia Innovation Research (MEDSIR), Barcelona, Spain
- Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rebecca Dent
- National Cancer Center Singapore, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Heather McArthur
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Sherko Kümmel
- Breast Unit, Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
- Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - Yeon Hee Park
- Hematology-Oncology, Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seock-Ah Im
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin-Hee Ahn
- Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hirofumi Mukai
- National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa-shi, Japan
| | | | | | - Min Hwan Kim
- Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Liyi Jia
- Merck & Co Inc, Rahway, New Jersey
| | | | | | | | | | - Peter Schmid
- Centre for Experimental Cancer Medicine, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chen CS, Zirpoli G, Barlow WE, Budd GT, McKiver B, Pusztai L, Hortobagyi GN, Albain KS, Damaj MI, Godwin AK, Thompson A, Henry NL, Ambrosone CB, Stringer KA, Hertz DL. Vitamin D Insufficiency as a Risk Factor for Paclitaxel-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in SWOG S0221. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2023; 21:1172-1180.e3. [PMID: 37935109 PMCID: PMC10976748 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.7062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prior work suggests that patients with vitamin D insufficiency may have a higher risk of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) from paclitaxel. The objective of this study was to validate vitamin D insufficiency as a CIPN risk factor. METHODS We used data and samples from the prospective phase III SWOG S0221 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00070564) trial that compared paclitaxel-containing chemotherapy regimens for early-stage breast cancer. We quantified pretreatment 25-hydroxy-vitamin D in banked serum samples using a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry targeted assay. We tested the association between vitamin D insufficiency (≤20 ng/mL) and grade ≥3 sensory CIPN via multiple logistic regression and then adjusted for self-reported race, age, body mass index, and paclitaxel schedule (randomization to weekly or every-2-week dosing). We also tested the direct effect of vitamin D deficiency on mechanical hypersensitivity in mice randomized to a regular or vitamin D-deficient diet. RESULTS Of the 1,191 female patients in the analysis, 397 (33.3%) had pretreatment vitamin D insufficiency, and 195 (16.4%) developed grade ≥3 CIPN. Patients with vitamin D insufficiency had a higher incidence of grade ≥3 CIPN than those who had sufficient vitamin D (20.7% vs 14.2%; odds ratio [OR], 1.57; 95% CI, 1.14-2.15; P=.005). The association retained significance after adjusting for age and paclitaxel schedule (adjusted OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.18-2.30; P=.003) but not race (adjusted OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.98-1.97; P=.066). In the mouse experiments, the vitamin D-deficient diet caused mechanical hypersensitivity and sensitized mice to paclitaxel (both P<.05). CONCLUSIONS Pretreatment vitamin D insufficiency is the first validated potentially modifiable predictive biomarker of CIPN from paclitaxel. Prospective trials are needed to determine whether vitamin D supplementation prevents CIPN and improves treatment outcomes in patients with breast and other cancer types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ciao-Sin Chen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Gary Zirpoli
- Slone Epidemiology Center, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - G. Thomas Budd
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Bryan McKiver
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology and Translational Research Initiative for Pain and Neuropathy, Virginia Commonwealth University, USA
| | | | - Gabriel N. Hortobagyi
- Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - M. Imad Damaj
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology and Translational Research Initiative for Pain and Neuropathy, Virginia Commonwealth University, USA
| | - Andrew K. Godwin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
- Kansas Institute for Precision Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | | | - N. Lynn Henry
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Christine B. Ambrosone
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Kathleen A. Stringer
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- NMR Metabolomics Laboratory, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Daniel L. Hertz
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lin HK, Can T, Kahn A, Flannery CA, Hoag J, Akkunuri A, Bailey H, Baehner R, Pusztai L, Rozenblit M. Molecular Characterization of HER2-Low Invasive Breast Carcinoma by Quantitative RT-PCR Using Oncotype DX Assay. Oncologist 2023; 28:e973-e976. [PMID: 37656608 PMCID: PMC10546821 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) reproducibility is suboptimal for HER-low cases (IHC 1+ or 2+). METHODS The Yale cohort included 214 stages I-II estrogen receptor positive breast cancers with IHC scores 0, 1+, and 2+ and routine Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS) results. The Exact Sciences (ES) cohort included 9 57 624 patients who had an Oncotype DX RS assay that assigns HER2-negative, equivocal, or positive status based on HER2 mRNA levels. RESULTS HER2 mRNA levels varied across IHC categories but with increasing medians of 9.10 (n = 89), 9.20 (n = 71), and 9.45 (n = 54) in IHC 0, 1+, and 2+, respectively. 22.4% of HER2-low (1+/2+) cancer had RS > 25. Over 98% of HER-low cancers were HER2-negative by Oncotype DX assignment. CONCLUSIONS Cancers with higher mRNA levels exist within IHC 0 and low categories, most of the HER2-low patients by IHC have low RS indicating no benefit from current adjuvant chemotherapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao-Kuen Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Thuy Can
- Exact Sciences Corporation, Redwood City, CA, USA
| | - Adriana Kahn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Jess Hoag
- Exact Sciences Corporation, Redwood City, CA, USA
| | | | - Helen Bailey
- Exact Sciences Corporation, Redwood City, CA, USA
| | - Rick Baehner
- Exact Sciences Corporation, Redwood City, CA, USA
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Mariya Rozenblit
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kim L, Coman M, Pusztai L, Park TS. Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Early, Triple-Negative Breast Cancers: Catching Up with the Rest. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:6441-6449. [PMID: 37349612 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13714-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
Despite breast cancer being long thought to be "immunologically cold," within early, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), there has been exciting advances with the use of immune checkpoint modulation combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We review the major trials that have investigated combination immunochemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting, reviewing both the pathological complete response rates and the maturing data regarding event-free and overall survival. Strategies to deescalate adjuvant therapy in patients with preserving excellent clinical outcome, as well as exploration of combinatorial adjuvant therapies to improve outcome in those with extensive residual are the next-generation challenges. In addition to refinement of existing biomarkers, such as PD-L1, TILs, and tumor mutational burden (TMB), exploration of topics like the microbiome as both a biomarker and a therapeutic has shown promise in other cancer types, which motivates investigating these in breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leah Kim
- Section of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Magdalena Coman
- Section of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Yale School of Medicine, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Tristen S Park
- Section of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kim L, Coman M, Pusztai L, Park TS. ASO Visual Abstract: Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancers-Catching up with the Rest. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:6452-6453. [PMID: 37400619 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13842-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Leah Kim
- Section of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Magdalena Coman
- Section of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Tristen S Park
- Section of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Zyla J, Papiez A, Zhao J, Qu R, Li X, Kluger Y, Polanska J, Hatzis C, Pusztai L, Marczyk M. Evaluation of zero counts to better understand the discrepancies between bulk and single-cell RNA-Seq platforms. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2023; 21:4663-4674. [PMID: 37841335 PMCID: PMC10568495 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.09.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent advances in sample preparation and sequencing technology have made it possible to profile the transcriptomes of individual cells using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-Seq). Compared to bulk RNA-Seq data, single-cell data often contain a higher percentage of zero reads, mainly due to lower sequencing depth per cell, which affects mostly measurements of low-expression genes. However, discrepancies between platforms are observed regardless of expression level. Using four paired datasets with multiple samples each, we investigated technical and biological factors that can contribute to this expression shift. Using two separate machine learning models we found that, in addition to expression level, RNA integrity, gene or UTR3 length, and the number of transcripts potentially also influence the occurrence of zeros. These findings could enable the development of novel analytical methods for cross-platform expression shift correction. We also identified genes and biological pathways in our diverse datasets that consistently showed differences when assessed at the single cell versus bulk level to assist in interpreting analysis across transcriptomic platforms. At the gene level, 25 genes (0.12%) were found in all datasets as discordant, but at the pathway level, 7 pathways (2.02%) showed shared enrichment in discordant genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Zyla
- Department of Data Science and Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice 44-100, Poland
| | - Anna Papiez
- Department of Data Science and Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice 44-100, Poland
| | - Jun Zhao
- Computational Biology and Bioinformatics Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Rihao Qu
- Computational Biology and Bioinformatics Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Xiaotong Li
- Breast Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Yuval Kluger
- Computational Biology and Bioinformatics Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
- Applied Mathematics Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Joanna Polanska
- Department of Data Science and Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice 44-100, Poland
| | - Christos Hatzis
- Breast Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Breast Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Michal Marczyk
- Department of Data Science and Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice 44-100, Poland
- Breast Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Litton JK, Regan MM, Pusztai L, Rugo HS, Tolaney SM, Garrett-Mayer E, Amiri-Kordestani L, Basho RK, Best AF, Boileau JF, Denkert C, Foster JC, Harbeck N, Jacene HA, King TA, Mason G, O'Sullivan CC, Prowell TM, Richardson AL, Sepulveda KA, Smith ML, Tjoe JA, Turashvili G, Woodward WA, Butler LP, Schwartz EI, Korde LA. Standardized Definitions for Efficacy End Points in Neoadjuvant Breast Cancer Clinical Trials: NeoSTEEP. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:4433-4442. [PMID: 37433103 PMCID: PMC10522109 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The Standardized Definitions for Efficacy End Points (STEEP) criteria, established in 2007 and updated in 2021 (STEEP 2.0), provide standardized definitions of adjuvant breast cancer (BC) end points. STEEP 2.0 identified a need to separately address end points for neoadjuvant clinical trials. The multidisciplinary NeoSTEEP working group of experts was convened to critically evaluate and align neoadjuvant BC trial end points. METHODS The NeoSTEEP working group concentrated on neoadjuvant systemic therapy end points in clinical trials with efficacy outcomes-both pathologic and time-to-event survival end points-particularly for registrational intent. Special considerations for subtypes and therapeutic approaches, imaging, nodal staging at surgery, bilateral and multifocal diseases, correlative tissue collection, and US Food and Drug Administration regulatory considerations were contemplated. RESULTS The working group recommends a preferred definition of pathologic complete response (pCR) as the absence of residual invasive cancer in the complete resected breast specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes (ypT0/Tis ypN0 per AJCC staging). Residual cancer burden should be a secondary end point to facilitate future assessment of its utility. Alternative end points are needed for hormone receptor-positive disease. Time-to-event survival end point definitions should pay particular attention to the measurement starting point. Trials should include end points originating at random assignment (event-free survival and overall survival) to capture presurgery progression and deaths as events. Secondary end points adapted from STEEP 2.0, which are defined from starting at curative-intent surgery, may also be appropriate. Specification and standardization of biopsy protocols, imaging, and pathologic nodal evaluation are also crucial. CONCLUSION End points in addition to pCR should be selected on the basis of clinical and biologic aspects of the tumor and the therapeutic agent investigated. Consistent prespecified definitions and interventions are paramount for clinically meaningful trial results and cross-trial comparison.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer K. Litton
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Meredith M. Regan
- Division of Biostatistics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Breast Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Hope S. Rugo
- University of California, San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Sara M. Tolaney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Reva K. Basho
- The Lawrence J. Ellison Institute for Transformative Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Ana F. Best
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | | | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - Jared C. Foster
- Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- The Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Tari A. King
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Ginny Mason
- The Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation, Broadway, VA
| | | | - Tatiana M. Prowell
- US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
- Women's Malignancies Disease Group, Johns Hopkins Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | | | - Judy A. Tjoe
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Novant Health, Greensboro, NC
| | - Gulisa Turashvili
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA
| | - Wendy A. Woodward
- Department of Breast Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Elena I. Schwartz
- Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| | - Larissa A. Korde
- Cancer Therapy and Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Nathanson SD, Dieterich LC, Zhang XHF, Chitale DA, Pusztai L, Reynaud E, Wu YH, Ríos-Hoyo A. Associations amongst genes, molecules, cells, and organs in breast cancer metastasis. Clin Exp Metastasis 2023:10.1007/s10585-023-10230-w. [PMID: 37688650 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-023-10230-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/11/2023]
Abstract
This paper is a cross fertilization of ideas about the importance of molecular aspects of breast cancer metastasis by basic scientists, a pathologist, and clinical oncologists at the Henry Ford Health symposium. We address four major topics: (i) the complex roles of lymphatic endothelial cells and the molecules that stimulate them to enhance lymph node and systemic metastasis and influence the anti-tumor immunity that might inhibit metastasis; (ii) the interaction of molecules and cells when breast cancer spreads to bone, and how bone metastases may themselves spread to internal viscera; (iii) how molecular expression and morphologic subtypes of breast cancer assist clinicians in determining which patients to treat with more or less aggressive therapies; (iv) how the outcomes of patients with oligometastases in breast cancer are different from those with multiple metastases and how that could justify the aggressive treatment of these patients with the hope of cure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S David Nathanson
- Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Health, 2799 W. Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.
- Cancer Center, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, USA.
| | - Lothar C Dieterich
- European Center for Angioscience (ECAS), Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Xiang H-F Zhang
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Lajos Pusztai
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Emma Reynaud
- European Center for Angioscience (ECAS), Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Yi-Hsuan Wu
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Stecklein SR, Barlow W, Pusztai L, Timms K, Kennedy R, Logan GE, Seitz R, Badve S, Gökmen-Polar Y, Porter P, Linden H, Tripathy D, Hortobagyi GN, Godwin AK, Thompson A, Hayes DF, Sharma P. Dual Prognostic Classification of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer by DNA Damage Immune Response and Homologous Recombination Deficiency. JCO Precis Oncol 2023; 7:e2300197. [PMID: 37972336 PMCID: PMC10681491 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous disease. We previously showed that homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and the DNA damage immune response (DDIR) signature are prognostic in TNBC. We hypothesized that these biomarkers reflect related but not completely interdependent biological processes, that their combined use would be prognostic, and that simultaneous assessment of the immunologic microenvironment and susceptibility to DNA damaging therapies might be able to identify subgroups with distinct therapeutic vulnerabilities. METHODS We analyzed the dual DDIR/HRD classification in 341 patients with TNBC treated with adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy on the SWOG S9313 trial and corroborated our findings in The Cancer Genome Atlas breast cancer data set. RESULTS DDIR/HRD classification is highly prognostic in TNBC and identifies biologically and immunologically distinct subgroups. Immune-enriched DDIR+/HRD+ TNBCs have the most favorable prognosis, and DDIR+/HRD- and DDIR-/HRD+ TNBCs have favorable intermediate prognosis, despite the latter being immune-depleted. DDIR-/HRD- TNBCs have the worst prognosis and represent an internally heterogeneous group of immune-depleted chemoresistant tumors. CONCLUSION Our findings propose DDIR/HRD classification as a potentially clinically relevant approach to categorize tumors on the basis of therapeutic vulnerabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Richard Kennedy
- Almac Diagnostic Services, Craigavon, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Gemma E Logan
- Almac Diagnostic Services, Craigavon, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
| | | | - Sunil Badve
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Chen CS, Zirpoli G, Thomas Budd G, Barlow WE, Pusztai L, Hortobagyi GN, Albain KS, Godwin AK, Thompson A, Lynn Henry N, Ambrosone CB, Stringer KA, Hertz DL. Pre-treatment Amino Acids and Risk of Paclitaxel-induced Peripheral Neuropathy in SWOG S0221. Res Sq 2023:rs.3.rs-3242513. [PMID: 37693586 PMCID: PMC10491324 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3242513/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
Background Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a treatment-limiting and debilitating neurotoxicity of many commonly used anti-cancer agents, including paclitaxel. The objective of this study was to confirm the previously found inverse association between pre-treatment blood concentrations of histidine and CIPN occurrence and examine relationships of other amino acids with CIPN severity. Methods Pre-treatment levels of 20 amino acid concentrations were measured via a targeted mass spectrometry assay in banked serum from the SWOG S0221 (NCT00070564) trial of patients with early-stage breast cancer receiving paclitaxel. The associations between amino acid levels and CIPN occurrence or severity were tested in regression analysis adjusted for paclitaxel schedule, age, self-reported race, and body mass index with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. The network of metabolic pathways of amino acids was analyzed using over-representation analysis in MetaboAnalyst. The partial correlation network of amino acids was evaluated using a debiased sparse partial correlation algorithm and Cytoscape. Results In the primary analysis, histidine concentration was not associated with CIPN occurrence (odds ratio (OR) = 0.97 [0.83, 1.13], p = 0.72). In a secondary analysis, no amino acid was associated with CIPN occurrence (all p > 0.0025). Higher concentrations of four amino acids, glutamate (β = 0.58 [0.23, 0.93], p = 0.001), phenylalanine (β = 0.54 [0.19, 0.89], p = 0.002), tyrosine (β = 0.57 [0.23, 0.91], p = 0.001), and valine (β = 0.58 [0.24, 0.92], p = 0.001) were associated with more severe CIPN, but none of these associations retained significance after adjustment. In the over-representation analysis, no amino acid metabolic pathways were significantly enriched (all FDR > 0.05). In the network of enriched pathways, glutamate metabolism had the highest centrality. Conclusions This analysis showed that pre-treatment serum amino acid concentrations are not strongly predictive of CIPN severity. Future prospectively designed studies that assess non-amino acid metabolomics predictors are encouraged.
Collapse
|
23
|
Chehayeb RJ, Kahn A, Pusztai L. Treatment efficacy score: a better surrogate for arm-level survival differences in neoadjuvant breast cancer trials? Future Oncol 2023; 19:1945-1951. [PMID: 37767612 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2022-1203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is widely used in the therapy of stage II-III breast cancers and pathologic complete response (pCR; ypT0/is, ypN0) predicts excellent long-term survival. However, the correlation between improvement in pCR rate and survival is highly variable across trials. A major limitation of pCR is that it does not capture downstaging in patients with residual disease. We previously introduced the residual cancer burden score that measures pathologic response on a continuous scale. Comparison of residual cancer burden score distributions between trial arms reflects treatment efficacy more accurately than differences in pCR rate. We developed the treatment efficacy score as a new statistical metric that appears to be a better surrogate for trial arm-level survival improvement than pCR rate difference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Adriana Kahn
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Pusztai L. Systemic Staging of Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: How Hard to Look? J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:3891-3894. [PMID: 37348030 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lajos Pusztai
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rutherford DV, Medley S, Henderson NC, Gersch CL, Vandenberg TA, Albain KS, Dakhil SR, Tirumali NR, Gralow JR, Hortobagyi GN, Pusztai L, Mehta RS, Hayes DF, Kidwell KM, Henry NL, Barlow WE, Rae JM, Hertz DL. Effects of CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 genotype on systemic anastrozole and fulvestrant concentrations in SWOG S0226. Pharmacogenomics 2023; 24:665-673. [PMID: 37615099 PMCID: PMC10565537 DOI: 10.2217/pgs-2023-0097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective & methods: This study tested associations of genotype-predicted activity of CYP3A4, other pharmacogenes, SLC28A7 (rs11648166) and ALPPL2 (rs28845026) with systemic concentrations of the endocrine therapies anastrozole and fulvestrant in SWOG S0226 trial participants. Results: Participants in the anastrozole-only arm with low CYP3A4 activity (i.e. CYP3A4*22 carriers) had higher systemic anastrozole concentrations than patients with high CYP3A4 activity (β-coefficient = 10.03; 95% CI: 1.42, 18.6; p = 0.025). In an exploratory analysis, participants with low CYP2C9 activity had lower anastrozole concentrations and higher fulvestrant concentrations than participants with high CYP2C9 activity. Conclusion: Inherited genetic variation in CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 may affect concentrations of endocrine therapy and may be useful to personalize dosing and improve treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Delaney V Rutherford
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Sarah Medley
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Nicholas C Henderson
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Christina L Gersch
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Ted A Vandenberg
- Western University/Canadian Cancer Trials Group, London, ON, N5X 3K8, Canada
| | - Kathy S Albain
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL 60153, USA
| | | | | | - Julie R Gralow
- American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, 22314, Virginia
| | | | | | - Rita S Mehta
- University of California Irvine Medical Center, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| | - Daniel F Hayes
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Kelley M Kidwell
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - N Lynn Henry
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | | | - James M Rae
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Daniel L Hertz
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Thagaard J, Broeckx G, Page DB, Jahangir CA, Verbandt S, Kos Z, Gupta R, Khiroya R, Abduljabbar K, Acosta Haab G, Acs B, Akturk G, Almeida JS, Alvarado‐Cabrero I, Amgad M, Azmoudeh‐Ardalan F, Badve S, Baharun NB, Balslev E, Bellolio ER, Bheemaraju V, Blenman KRM, Botinelly Mendonça Fujimoto L, Bouchmaa N, Burgues O, Chardas A, Chon U Cheang M, Ciompi F, Cooper LAD, Coosemans A, Corredor G, Dahl AB, Dantas Portela FL, Deman F, Demaria S, Doré Hansen J, Dudgeon SN, Ebstrup T, Elghazawy M, Fernandez‐Martín C, Fox SB, Gallagher WM, Giltnane JM, Gnjatic S, Gonzalez‐Ericsson PI, Grigoriadis A, Halama N, Hanna MG, Harbhajanka A, Hart SN, Hartman J, Hauberg S, Hewitt S, Hida AI, Horlings HM, Husain Z, Hytopoulos E, Irshad S, Janssen EAM, Kahila M, Kataoka TR, Kawaguchi K, Kharidehal D, Khramtsov AI, Kiraz U, Kirtani P, Kodach LL, Korski K, Kovács A, Laenkholm A, Lang‐Schwarz C, Larsimont D, Lennerz JK, Lerousseau M, Li X, Ly A, Madabhushi A, Maley SK, Manur Narasimhamurthy V, Marks DK, McDonald ES, Mehrotra R, Michiels S, Minhas FUAA, Mittal S, Moore DA, Mushtaq S, Nighat H, Papathomas T, Penault‐Llorca F, Perera RD, Pinard CJ, Pinto‐Cardenas JC, Pruneri G, Pusztai L, Rahman A, Rajpoot NM, Rapoport BL, Rau TT, Reis‐Filho JS, Ribeiro JM, Rimm D, Roslind A, Vincent‐Salomon A, Salto‐Tellez M, Saltz J, Sayed S, Scott E, Siziopikou KP, Sotiriou C, Stenzinger A, Sughayer MA, Sur D, Fineberg S, Symmans F, Tanaka S, Taxter T, Tejpar S, Teuwen J, Thompson EA, Tramm T, Tran WT, van der Laak J, van Diest PJ, Verghese GE, Viale G, Vieth M, Wahab N, Walter T, Waumans Y, Wen HY, Yang W, Yuan Y, Zin RM, Adams S, Bartlett J, Loibl S, Denkert C, Savas P, Loi S, Salgado R, Specht Stovgaard E. Pitfalls in machine learning-based assessment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer: A report of the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group on Breast Cancer. J Pathol 2023; 260:498-513. [PMID: 37608772 PMCID: PMC10518802 DOI: 10.1002/path.6155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
The clinical significance of the tumor-immune interaction in breast cancer is now established, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have emerged as predictive and prognostic biomarkers for patients with triple-negative (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2-negative) breast cancer and HER2-positive breast cancer. How computational assessments of TILs might complement manual TIL assessment in trial and daily practices is currently debated. Recent efforts to use machine learning (ML) to automatically evaluate TILs have shown promising results. We review state-of-the-art approaches and identify pitfalls and challenges of automated TIL evaluation by studying the root cause of ML discordances in comparison to manual TIL quantification. We categorize our findings into four main topics: (1) technical slide issues, (2) ML and image analysis aspects, (3) data challenges, and (4) validation issues. The main reason for discordant assessments is the inclusion of false-positive areas or cells identified by performance on certain tissue patterns or design choices in the computational implementation. To aid the adoption of ML for TIL assessment, we provide an in-depth discussion of ML and image analysis, including validation issues that need to be considered before reliable computational reporting of TILs can be incorporated into the trial and routine clinical management of patients with triple-negative breast cancer. © 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeppe Thagaard
- Technical University of DenmarkKongens LyngbyDenmark
- Visiopharm A/SHørsholmDenmark
| | - Glenn Broeckx
- Department of PathologyGZA‐ZNA HospitalsAntwerpBelgium
- Centre for Oncological Research (CORE), MIPPRO, Faculty of MedicineAntwerp UniversityAntwerpBelgium
| | - David B Page
- Earle A Chiles Research InstituteProvidence Cancer InstitutePortlandORUSA
| | - Chowdhury Arif Jahangir
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway InstituteUniversity College DublinDublinIreland
| | - Sara Verbandt
- Digestive Oncology, Department of OncologyKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Zuzana Kos
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineBC Cancer Vancouver Centre, University of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Rajarsi Gupta
- Department of Biomedical InformaticsStony Brook UniversityStony BrookNYUSA
| | - Reena Khiroya
- Department of Cellular PathologyUniversity College Hospital LondonLondonUK
| | | | | | - Balazs Acs
- Department of Oncology and PathologyKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer DiagnosticsKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
| | - Guray Akturk
- Translational Molecular Biomarkers, Merck & Co IncRahwayNJUSA
| | - Jonas S Almeida
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (DCEG)National Cancer Institute (NCI)Rockville, MDUSA
| | | | - Mohamed Amgad
- Department of PathologyNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoILUSA
| | | | - Sunil Badve
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of MedicineEmory University Winship Cancer InstituteAtlantaGAUSA
| | | | - Eva Balslev
- Department of PathologyHerlev and Gentofte HospitalHerlevDenmark
| | - Enrique R Bellolio
- Departamento de Anatomía Patológica, Facultad de MedicinaUniversidad de La FronteraTemucoChile
| | | | - Kim RM Blenman
- Department of Internal Medicine Section of Medical Oncology and Yale Cancer CenterYale School of MedicineNew HavenCTUSA
- Department of Computer ScienceYale School of Engineering and Applied ScienceNew HavenCTUSA
| | | | - Najat Bouchmaa
- Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Medical SciencesMohammed VI Polytechnic University (UM6P)Ben‐GuerirMorocco
| | - Octavio Burgues
- Pathology DepartmentHospital Cliníco Universitario de Valencia/InclivaValenciaSpain
| | - Alexandros Chardas
- Department of Pathobiology & Population SciencesThe Royal Veterinary CollegeLondonUK
| | - Maggie Chon U Cheang
- Head of Integrative Genomics Analysis in Clinical Trials, ICR‐CTSU, Division of Clinical StudiesThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Francesco Ciompi
- Radboud University Medical CenterDepartment of PathologyNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Lee AD Cooper
- Department of PathologyNorthwestern Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoILUSA
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and ImmunotherapyKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Germán Corredor
- Biomedical Engineering DepartmentEmory UniversityAtlantaGAUSA
| | - Anders B Dahl
- Technical University of DenmarkKongens LyngbyDenmark
| | | | | | - Sandra Demaria
- Department of Radiation OncologyWeill Cornell MedicineNew YorkNYUSA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineWeill Cornell MedicineNew YorkNYUSA
| | | | - Sarah N Dudgeon
- Conputational Biology and BioinformaticsYale UniversityNew HavenCTUSA
| | | | | | - Claudio Fernandez‐Martín
- Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Tecnología Centrada en el Ser Humano, HUMAN‐techUniversitat Politècnica de ValènciaValenciaSpain
| | - Stephen B Fox
- Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - William M Gallagher
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway InstituteUniversity College DublinDublinIreland
| | | | - Sacha Gnjatic
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Medicine Hem/Onc, and Pathology, Tisch Cancer Institute – Precision Immunology InstituteIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNYUSA
| | | | - Anita Grigoriadis
- Cancer Bioinformatics, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Niels Halama
- Department of Translational ImmunotherapyGerman Cancer Research CenterHeidelbergGermany
| | - Matthew G Hanna
- Department of PathologyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkUSA
| | | | - Steven N Hart
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and PathologyMayo ClinicRochester, MNUSA
| | - Johan Hartman
- Department of Oncology and PathologyKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer DiagnosticsKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
| | - Søren Hauberg
- Technical University of DenmarkKongens LyngbyDenmark
| | - Stephen Hewitt
- Laboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthBethesdaMDUSA
| | - Akira I Hida
- Department of PathologyMatsuyama Shimin HospitalMatsuyamaJapan
| | - Hugo M Horlings
- Division of PathologyNetherlands Cancer Institute (NKI)AmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | | | - Sheeba Irshad
- King's College London & Guy's & St Thomas’ NHS TrustLondonUK
| | - Emiel AM Janssen
- Department of PathologyStavanger University HospitalStavangerNorway
- Department of Chemistry, Bioscience and Environmental TechnologyUniversity of StavangerStavangerNorway
| | | | | | - Kosuke Kawaguchi
- Department of Breast SurgeryKyoto University Graduate School of MedicineKyotoJapan
| | | | - Andrey I Khramtsov
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineAnn & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoChicagoILUSA
| | - Umay Kiraz
- Department of PathologyStavanger University HospitalStavangerNorway
- Department of Chemistry, Bioscience and Environmental TechnologyUniversity of StavangerStavangerNorway
| | - Pawan Kirtani
- Department of HistopathologyAakash Healthcare Super Speciality HospitalNew DelhiIndia
| | - Liudmila L Kodach
- Department of PathologyNetherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek HospitalAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Konstanty Korski
- Data, Analytics and Imaging, Product DevelopmentF. Hoffmann‐La Roche AGBaselSwitzerland
| | - Anikó Kovács
- Department of Clinical PathologySahlgrenska University HospitalGothenburgSweden
- Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | - Anne‐Vibeke Laenkholm
- Department of Surgical PathologyZealand University HospitalRoskildeDenmark
- Department of Surgical PathologyUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Corinna Lang‐Schwarz
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbHFriedrich‐Alexander‐University Erlangen‐NurembergBayreuthGermany
| | - Denis Larsimont
- Institut Jules BordetUniversité Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium
| | - Jochen K Lennerz
- Center for Integrated DiagnosticsMassachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUSA
| | - Marvin Lerousseau
- Centre for Computational Biology (CBIO)Mines Paris, PSL UniversityParisFrance
- Institut CuriePSL UniversityParisFrance
- INSERMParisFrance
| | - Xiaoxian Li
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineEmory UniversityAtlantaGAUSA
| | - Amy Ly
- Department of PathologyMassachusetts General HospitalBostonMAUSA
| | - Anant Madabhushi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Biomedical Informatics, PathologyGeorgia Institute of Technology and Emory UniversityAtlantaGAUSA
| | - Sai K Maley
- NRG Oncology/NSABP FoundationPittsburghPAUSA
| | | | | | - Elizabeth S McDonald
- Breast Cancer Translational Research GroupUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPAUSA
| | - Ravi Mehrotra
- Indian Cancer Genomic AtlasPuneIndia
- Centre for Health, Innovation and Policy FoundationNoidaIndia
| | - Stefan Michiels
- Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, InsermUniversity Paris‐Saclay, Ligue Contre le Cancer labeled TeamVillejuifFrance
| | - Fayyaz ul Amir Afsar Minhas
- Tissue Image Analytics Centre, Warwick Cancer Research Centre, PathLAKE Consortium, Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK
| | - Shachi Mittal
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Department of Laboratory Medicine and PathologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattle, WAUSA
| | - David A Moore
- CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, UCL and Cellular Pathology DepartmentUCLHLondonUK
| | - Shamim Mushtaq
- Department of BiochemistryZiauddin UniversityKarachiPakistan
| | - Hussain Nighat
- Pathology and Laboratory MedicineAll India Institute of Medical sciencesRaipurIndia
| | - Thomas Papathomas
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems ResearchUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
- Department of Clinical PathologyDrammen Sykehus, Vestre Viken HFDrammenNorway
| | - Frederique Penault‐Llorca
- Centre Jean Perrin, Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM, U1240 Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies ThéranostiquesClermont FerrandFrance
| | - Rashindrie D Perera
- School of Electrical, Mechanical and Infrastructure EngineeringUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Division of Cancer ResearchPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Christopher J Pinard
- Radiogenomics LaboratorySunnybrook Health Sciences CentreTorontoOntarioCanada
- Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary CollegeUniversity of GuelphGuelphOntarioCanada
- Department of OncologyLakeshore Animal Health PartnersMississaugaOntarioCanada
- Centre for Advancing Responsible and Ethical Artificial Intelligence (CARE‐AI)University of GuelphGuelphOntarioCanada
| | | | - Giancarlo Pruneri
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei TumoriMilanItaly
- Faculty of Medicine and SurgeryUniversity of MilanMilanItaly
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Yale Cancer CenterYale UniversityNew HavenCTUSA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yale School of MedicineYale UniversityNew HavenCTUSA
| | - Arman Rahman
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway InstituteUniversity College DublinDublinIreland
| | | | - Bernardo Leon Rapoport
- The Medical Oncology Centre of RosebankJohannesburgSouth Africa
- Department of Immunology, Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa
| | - Tilman T Rau
- Institute of PathologyUniversity Hospital Düsseldorf and Heinrich‐Heine‐University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Jorge S Reis‐Filho
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Joana M Ribeiro
- Département de Médecine OncologiqueGustave RoussyVillejuifFrance
| | - David Rimm
- Department of PathologyYale University School of MedicineNew HavenCTUSA
- Department of MedicineYale University School of MedicineNew HavenCTUSA
| | - Anne Roslind
- Department of PathologyHerlev and Gentofte HospitalHerlevDenmark
| | - Anne Vincent‐Salomon
- Department of Diagnostic and Theranostic Medicine, Institut CurieUniversity Paris‐Sciences et LettresParisFrance
| | - Manuel Salto‐Tellez
- Integrated Pathology UnitThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
- Precision Medicine CentreQueen's University BelfastBelfastUK
| | - Joel Saltz
- Department of Biomedical InformaticsStony Brook UniversityStony BrookNYUSA
| | - Shahin Sayed
- Department of PathologyAga Khan UniversityNairobiKenya
| | - Ely Scott
- Translational PathologyTranslational Sciences and Diagnostics/Translational Medicine/R&D, Bristol Myers SquibbPrincetonNJUSA
| | - Kalliopi P Siziopikou
- Department of Pathology, Section of Breast PathologyNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoILUSA
| | - Christos Sotiriou
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory J.‐C. Heuson, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB)Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB)BrusselsBelgium
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB)Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB)BrusselsBelgium
| | - Albrecht Stenzinger
- Institute of PathologyUniversity Hospital HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
- Centers for Personalized Medicine (ZPM)HeidelbergGermany
| | | | - Daniel Sur
- Department of Medical OncologyUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hatieganu”Cluj‐NapocaRomania
| | - Susan Fineberg
- Montefiore Medical CenterBronxNYUSA
- Albert Einstein College of MedicineBronxNYUSA
| | - Fraser Symmans
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTXUSA
| | | | | | - Sabine Tejpar
- Digestive Oncology, Department of OncologyKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Jonas Teuwen
- AI for Oncology Lab, The Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | - Trine Tramm
- Department of PathologyAarhus University HospitalAarhusDenmark
- Institute of Clinical MedicineAarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark
| | - William T Tran
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Toronto and Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Jeroen van der Laak
- Department of PathologyRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of PathologyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtThe Netherlands
- Johns Hopkins Oncology CenterBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Gregory E Verghese
- Cancer Bioinformatics, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Department of PathologyEuropean Institute of OncologyMilanItaly
- Department of PathologyUniversity of MilanMilanItaly
| | - Michael Vieth
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbHFriedrich‐Alexander‐University Erlangen‐NurembergBayreuthGermany
| | - Noorul Wahab
- Tissue Image Analytics Centre, Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK
| | - Thomas Walter
- Centre for Computational Biology (CBIO)Mines Paris, PSL UniversityParisFrance
- Institut CuriePSL UniversityParisFrance
- INSERMParisFrance
| | | | - Hannah Y Wen
- Department of PathologyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkUSA
| | - Wentao Yang
- Fudan Medical University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiPR China
| | - Yinyin Yuan
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTXUSA
| | - Reena Md Zin
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of MedicineUniversiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaKuala LumpurMalaysia
| | - Sylvia Adams
- Perlmutter Cancer CenterNYU Langone HealthNew YorkNYUSA
- Department of MedicineNYU Grossman School of MedicineManhattanNYUSA
| | | | - Sibylle Loibl
- Department of Medicine and ResearchGerman Breast GroupNeu‐IsenburgGermany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institut für PathologiePhilipps‐Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum MarburgMarburgGermany
| | - Peter Savas
- Division of Cancer ResearchPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical OncologyUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Sherene Loi
- Division of Cancer ResearchPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical OncologyUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Department of PathologyGZA‐ZNA HospitalsAntwerpBelgium
- Division of Cancer ResearchPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Elisabeth Specht Stovgaard
- Department of PathologyHerlev and Gentofte HospitalHerlevDenmark
- Department of Clinical MedicineUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Page DB, Broeckx G, Jahangir CA, Verbandt S, Gupta RR, Thagaard J, Khiroya R, Kos Z, Abduljabbar K, Acosta Haab G, Acs B, Akturk G, Almeida JS, Alvarado-Cabrero I, Azmoudeh-Ardalan F, Badve S, Baharun NB, Bellolio ER, Bheemaraju V, Blenman KR, Botinelly Mendonça Fujimoto L, Bouchmaa N, Burgues O, Cheang MCU, Ciompi F, Cooper LA, Coosemans A, Corredor G, Dantas Portela FL, Deman F, Demaria S, Dudgeon SN, Elghazawy M, Ely S, Fernandez-Martín C, Fineberg S, Fox SB, Gallagher WM, Giltnane JM, Gnjatic S, Gonzalez-Ericsson PI, Grigoriadis A, Halama N, Hanna MG, Harbhajanka A, Hardas A, Hart SN, Hartman J, Hewitt S, Hida AI, Horlings HM, Husain Z, Hytopoulos E, Irshad S, Janssen EA, Kahila M, Kataoka TR, Kawaguchi K, Kharidehal D, Khramtsov AI, Kiraz U, Kirtani P, Kodach LL, Korski K, Kovács A, Laenkholm AV, Lang-Schwarz C, Larsimont D, Lennerz JK, Lerousseau M, Li X, Ly A, Madabhushi A, Maley SK, Manur Narasimhamurthy V, Marks DK, McDonald ES, Mehrotra R, Michiels S, Minhas FUAA, Mittal S, Moore DA, Mushtaq S, Nighat H, Papathomas T, Penault-Llorca F, Perera RD, Pinard CJ, Pinto-Cardenas JC, Pruneri G, Pusztai L, Rahman A, Rajpoot NM, Rapoport BL, Rau TT, Reis-Filho JS, Ribeiro JM, Rimm D, Vincent-Salomon A, Salto-Tellez M, Saltz J, Sayed S, Siziopikou KP, Sotiriou C, Stenzinger A, Sughayer MA, Sur D, Symmans F, Tanaka S, Taxter T, Tejpar S, Teuwen J, Thompson EA, Tramm T, Tran WT, van der Laak J, van Diest PJ, Verghese GE, Viale G, Vieth M, Wahab N, Walter T, Waumans Y, Wen HY, Yang W, Yuan Y, Adams S, Bartlett JMS, Loibl S, Denkert C, Savas P, Loi S, Salgado R, Specht Stovgaard E. Spatial analyses of immune cell infiltration in cancer: current methods and future directions: A report of the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group on Breast Cancer. J Pathol 2023; 260:514-532. [PMID: 37608771 DOI: 10.1002/path.6165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
Modern histologic imaging platforms coupled with machine learning methods have provided new opportunities to map the spatial distribution of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. However, there exists no standardized method for describing or analyzing spatial immune cell data, and most reported spatial analyses are rudimentary. In this review, we provide an overview of two approaches for reporting and analyzing spatial data (raster versus vector-based). We then provide a compendium of spatial immune cell metrics that have been reported in the literature, summarizing prognostic associations in the context of a variety of cancers. We conclude by discussing two well-described clinical biomarkers, the breast cancer stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes score and the colon cancer Immunoscore, and describe investigative opportunities to improve clinical utility of these spatial biomarkers. © 2023 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David B Page
- Earle A Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Glenn Broeckx
- Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
- Centre for Oncological Research (CORE), MIPPRO, Faculty of Medicine, Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Chowdhury Arif Jahangir
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Sara Verbandt
- Digestive Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rajarsi R Gupta
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Jeppe Thagaard
- Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
- Visiopharm A/S, Hørsholm, Denmark
| | - Reena Khiroya
- Department of Cellular Pathology, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Zuzana Kos
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, BC Cancer Vancouver Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Khalid Abduljabbar
- Centre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Balazs Acs
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Guray Akturk
- Translational Molecular Biomarkers, Merck & Co Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA
| | - Jonas S Almeida
- National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (DCEG), Rockville, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Sunil Badve
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Enrique R Bellolio
- Departamento de Anatomía Patológica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile
| | | | - Kim Rm Blenman
- Internal Medicine Section of Medical Oncology and Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Computer Science, Yale School of Engineering and Applied Science, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Najat Bouchmaa
- Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Mohammed VI Polytechnic University (UM6P), Ben-Guerir, Morocco
| | - Octavio Burgues
- Pathology Department, Hospital Cliníco Universitario de Valencia/Incliva, Valencia, Spain
| | - Maggie Chon U Cheang
- Head of Integrative Genomics Analysis in Clinical Trials, ICR-CTSU, Division of Clinical Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Francesco Ciompi
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lee Ad Cooper
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Germán Corredor
- Biomedical Engineering Department, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Frederik Deman
- Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Sandra Demaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pathology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sarah N Dudgeon
- Conputational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Mahmoud Elghazawy
- University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
- Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Scott Ely
- Translational Pathology, Translational Sciences and Diagnostics/Translational Medicine/R&D, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Claudio Fernandez-Martín
- Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Tecnología Centrada en el Ser Humano, HUMAN-tech, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain
| | - Susan Fineberg
- Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Stephen B Fox
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - William M Gallagher
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Sacha Gnjatic
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Medicine Hem/Onc, and Pathology, Tisch Cancer Institute - Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Anita Grigoriadis
- Cancer Bioinformatics, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
- Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Niels Halama
- Translational Immunotherapy, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Alexandros Hardas
- Pathobiology & Population Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, London, UK
| | - Steven N Hart
- Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Johan Hartman
- Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Stephen Hewitt
- Department of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Akira I Hida
- Department of Pathology, Matsuyama Shimin Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Hugo M Horlings
- Division of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Sheeba Irshad
- King's College London & Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Emiel Am Janssen
- Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Chemistry, Bioscience and Environmental Technology, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Mohamed Kahila
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Kosuke Kawaguchi
- Department of Breast Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Durga Kharidehal
- Department of Pathology, Narayana Medical College, Nellore, India
| | - Andrey I Khramtsov
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Umay Kiraz
- Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Chemistry, Bioscience and Environmental Technology, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Pawan Kirtani
- Department of Histopathology, Aakash Healthcare Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Liudmila L Kodach
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Konstanty Korski
- Data, Analytics and Imaging, Product Development, F.Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Anikó Kovács
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anne-Vibeke Laenkholm
- Surgical Pathology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
- Surgical Pathology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Corinna Lang-Schwarz
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Denis Larsimont
- Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jochen K Lennerz
- Center for Integrated Diagnostics, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marvin Lerousseau
- Centre for Computational Biology (CBIO), Mines Paris, PSL University, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France
- INSERM, U900, Paris, France
| | - Xiaoxian Li
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Amy Ly
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anant Madabhushi
- Biomedical Engineering, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Biomedical Informatics, Pathology, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sai K Maley
- NRG Oncology/NSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Douglas K Marks
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth S McDonald
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Group, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ravi Mehrotra
- Indian Cancer Genome Atlas, Pune, India
- Centre for Health, Innovation and Policy Foundation, Noida, India
| | - Stefan Michiels
- Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, Inserm, University Paris-Saclay, Ligue Contre le Cancer labeled Team, Villejuif, France
| | - Fayyaz Ul Amir Afsar Minhas
- Tissue Image Analytics Centre, Warwick Cancer Research Centre, PathLAKE Consortium, Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Shachi Mittal
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - David A Moore
- CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, UCLH, London, UK
| | - Shamim Mushtaq
- Department of Biochemistry, Ziauddin University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Hussain Nighat
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, India
| | - Thomas Papathomas
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Drammen Sykehus, Vestre Viken HF, Drammen, Norway
| | - Frederique Penault-Llorca
- Centre Jean Perrin, INSERM U1240, Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies Théranostiques, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Rashindrie D Perera
- School of Electrical, Mechanical and Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Christopher J Pinard
- Radiogenomics Laboratory, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Lakeshore Animal Health Partners, Mississauga, ON, Canada
- Centre for Advancing Responsible and Ethical Artificial Intelligence (CARE-AI), University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | | | - Giancarlo Pruneri
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Arman Rahman
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Bernardo Leon Rapoport
- The Medical Oncology Centre of Rosebank, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Department of Immunology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Tilman T Rau
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Düsseldorf and Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Jorge S Reis-Filho
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joana M Ribeiro
- Département de Médecine Oncologique, Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - David Rimm
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Anne Vincent-Salomon
- Department of Diagnostic and Theranostic Medicine, Institut Curie, University Paris-Sciences et Lettres, Paris, France
| | - Manuel Salto-Tellez
- Integrated Pathology Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Precision Medicine Centre, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Joel Saltz
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shahin Sayed
- Department of Pathology, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Kalliopi P Siziopikou
- Department of Pathology, Section of Breast Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Christos Sotiriou
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory J.-C. Heuson, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Albrecht Stenzinger
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Centers for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Daniel Sur
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Iuliu Hatieganu", Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Fraser Symmans
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Sabine Tejpar
- Digestive Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jonas Teuwen
- AI for Oncology Lab, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Trine Tramm
- Pathology, and Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - William T Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jeroen van der Laak
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Gregory E Verghese
- Cancer Bioinformatics, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
- Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Department of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology & University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Michael Vieth
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Noorul Wahab
- Tissue Image Analytics Centre, Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Thomas Walter
- Centre for Computational Biology (CBIO), Mines Paris, PSL University, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France
- INSERM, U900, Paris, France
| | | | - Hannah Y Wen
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wentao Yang
- Fudan Medical University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Yinyin Yuan
- Translational Molecular Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sylvia Adams
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Manhattan, NY, USA
| | | | - Sibylle Loibl
- Department of Medicine and Research, German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Peter Savas
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sherene Loi
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Elisabeth Specht Stovgaard
- Department of Pathology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Jagsi R, Barlow WE, Woodward WA, Connolly E, Mahtani R, Shumway D, Speers C, Stecklein SR, Zeidan Y, Zhang H, Sharma P, Pusztai L, Hortobagyi GN, Kalinsky K. Radiotherapy Use and Incidence of Locoregional Recurrence in Patients With Favorable-Risk, Node-Positive Breast Cancer Enrolled in the SWOG S1007 Trial. JAMA Oncol 2023; 9:1083-1089. [PMID: 37410451 PMCID: PMC10326730 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.1984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
Importance Little is known about regional nodal irradiation (RNI) practice patterns or rates of locoregional recurrence (LRR) with and without RNI in patients with limited nodal disease and favorable biology treated with modern surgical and systemic therapy, including approaches that de-escalate those latter treatments. Objective To investigate how often patients with low-recurrence score breast cancer with 1 to 3 nodes involved receive RNI, incidence and predictors of LRR, and associations between locoregional therapy and disease-free survival. Design, Setting, and Participants In this secondary analysis of the SWOG S1007 trial, patients with hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2-negative breast cancer, and a Oncotype DX 21-gene Breast Recurrence Score assay result of no more than 25, were randomized to endocrine therapy alone vs chemotherapy then endocrine therapy. Prospectively collected radiotherapy information was collected from 4871 patients treated in diverse settings. Data were analyzed June 2022 to April 2023. Exposure Receipt of RNI (targeting at least the supraclavicular region). Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s) Cumulative incidence of LRR was calculated by locoregional treatment received. Analyses were assessed for associations between invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and locoregional therapy, adjusted for menopausal status, treatment group, recurrence score, tumor size, nodes involved, and axillary surgery. Radiotherapy information was recorded in the first year after randomization, so survival analyses were landmarked as starting at 1 year among those still at risk. Results Of 4871 female patients (median [range] age, 57 [18-87] years) with radiotherapy forms, 3947 (81.0%) reported radiotherapy receipt. Of 3852 patients who received radiotherapy and had complete information on targets, 2274 (59.0%) received RNI. With a median follow-up of 6.1 years, the cumulative incidence of LRR by 5 years was 0.85% among patients who received breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy with RNI; 0.55% after breast-conserving surgery with radiotherapy without RNI; 0.11% after mastectomy with postmastectomy radiotherapy; and 1.7% after mastectomy without radiotherapy. Similarly low LRR was observed within the group assigned to endocrine therapy without chemotherapy. The rate of IDFS did not differ by RNI receipt (premenopausal: hazard ratio [HR], 1.03; 95% CI, 0.74-1.43; P = .87; postmenopausal: HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.68-1.07; P = .16). Conclusions and Relevance In this secondary analysis of a clinical trial, RNI use was divided in the setting of biologically favorable N1 disease, and rates of LRR were low even in patients who did not receive RNI. Disease-free survival was not associated with RNI receipt; omission of chemotherapy among patients similar to those enrolled in the S1007 trial is not an independent indication for use of RNI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reshma Jagsi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Corey Speers
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | | | - Hong Zhang
- University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | | | | | | | - Kevin Kalinsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Minteer CJ, Thrush K, Gonzalez J, Niimi P, Rozenblit M, Rozowsky J, Liu J, Frank M, McCabe T, Sehgal R, Higgins-Chen AT, Hofstatter E, Pusztai L, Beckman K, Gerstein M, Levine ME. More than bad luck: Cancer and aging are linked to replication-driven changes to the epigenome. Sci Adv 2023; 9:eadf4163. [PMID: 37467337 PMCID: PMC10355820 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adf4163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
Aging is a leading risk factor for cancer. While it is proposed that age-related accumulation of somatic mutations drives this relationship, it is likely not the full story. We show that aging and cancer share a common epigenetic replication signature, which we modeled using DNA methylation from extensively passaged immortalized human cells in vitro and tested on clinical tissues. This signature, termed CellDRIFT, increased with age across multiple tissues, distinguished tumor from normal tissue, was escalated in normal breast tissue from cancer patients, and was transiently reset upon reprogramming. In addition, within-person tissue differences were correlated with predicted lifetime tissue-specific stem cell divisions and tissue-specific cancer risk. Our findings suggest that age-related replication may drive epigenetic changes in cells and could push them toward a more tumorigenic state.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kyra Thrush
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine,
New Haven, CT, USA
- San Diego Institute of Science, Altos Labs, San
Diego, CA, USA
| | - John Gonzalez
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine,
New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Peter Niimi
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine,
New Haven, CT, USA
- San Diego Institute of Science, Altos Labs, San
Diego, CA, USA
| | - Mariya Rozenblit
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of
Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Joel Rozowsky
- Department of Molecular Biophysics and
Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Jason Liu
- Department of Molecular Biophysics and
Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Mor Frank
- Department of Molecular Biophysics and
Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Thomas McCabe
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine,
New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Raghav Sehgal
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine,
New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Erin Hofstatter
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of
Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of
Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Kenneth Beckman
- Biomedical Genomics Center, University of
Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Mark Gerstein
- Department of Molecular Biophysics and
Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Morgan E. Levine
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine,
New Haven, CT, USA
- San Diego Institute of Science, Altos Labs, San
Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Park TS, Pusztai L. ASO Author Reflections: Immunotherapy and Breast Cancer-Spotlight on Early Stage TNBC. Ann Surg Oncol 2023:10.1245/s10434-023-13957-8. [PMID: 37474698 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13957-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Tristen S Park
- Section of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Foldi J, Tsagianni A, Salganik M, Schnabel CA, Brufsky A, van Londen GJ, Pusztai L, Sanft T. Persistence to extended adjuvant endocrine therapy following Breast Cancer Index (BCI) testing in women with early-stage hormone receptor-positive (HR +) breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:606. [PMID: 37391697 PMCID: PMC10314405 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11104-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Extending adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) beyond the standard 5 years offers added protection against late breast cancer recurrences in women with early-stage hormone receptor-positive (HR +) breast cancer. Little is known about treatment persistence to extended ET (EET) and the role that genomic assays may play. In this study, we evaluated persistence to EET in women who had Breast Cancer Index (BCI) testing. METHODS Women with stage I-III HR + breast cancer who had BCI testing after at least 3.5 years of adjuvant ET and ≥ 7 years of follow-up after diagnosis were included (n = 240). Data on medication persistence was based on prescriptions in the electronic health record. RESULTS BCI predicted 146 (61%) patients to have low - BCI (H/I)-low - and 94 (39%) patients to have high likelihood of benefit from EET (BCI (H/I)-high). Continuation of ET after BCI occurred in 76 (81%) (H/I)-high and 39 (27%) (H/I)-low patients. Non-persistence rates were 19% in the (H/I)-high and 38% in the (H/I)-low group. The most common reason for non-persistence was intolerable side effects. Patients on EET underwent more DXA bone density scans than those who stopped ET at 5 years (mean 2.09 versus 1.27; p < 0.001). At a median follow-up of 10 years from diagnosis, there were 6 metastatic recurrences. CONCLUSIONS In patients who continued ET after BCI testing, the rates of persistence to EET were high, particularly in patients with predicted high likelihood of benefit from EET. Use of EET is associated with increased use of DXA scans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Foldi
- Section of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
| | - Anastasia Tsagianni
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Max Salganik
- Biotheranostics Inc, A Hologic Company, San Diego, CA, 92121, USA
| | | | - Adam Brufsky
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - G J van Londen
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Section of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA
| | - Tara Sanft
- Section of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Curigliano G, Dent R, Llombart-Cussac A, Pegram M, Pusztai L, Turner N, Viale G. Incorporating clinicopathological and molecular risk prediction tools to improve outcomes in early HR+/HER2- breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer 2023; 9:56. [PMID: 37380659 PMCID: PMC10307886 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-023-00560-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Stratification of recurrence risk is a cornerstone of early breast cancer diagnosis that informs a patient's optimal treatment pathway. Several tools exist that combine clinicopathological and molecular information, including multigene assays, which can estimate risk of recurrence and quantify the potential benefit of different adjuvant treatment modalities. While the tools endorsed by treatment guidelines are supported by level I and II evidence and provide similar prognostic accuracy at the population level, they can yield discordant risk prediction at the individual patient level. This review examines the evidence for these tools in clinical practice and offers a perspective of potential future risk stratification strategies. Experience from clinical trials with cyclin D kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors in the setting of hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) early breast cancer is provided as an illustrative example of risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Curigliano
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Giuseppe Viale
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kahn AM, Golestani R, Harigopal M, Pusztai L. Intratumor spatial heterogeneity in programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein expression in early-stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023:10.1007/s10549-023-06977-1. [PMID: 37378695 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-06977-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is required for benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). In contrast, in the neoadjuvant setting patients benefited regardless of PD-L1 expression. We hypothesized that, in stages II-III breast cancers, low levels of PD-L1 expression may be sufficient to confer sensitivity to therapy and focal expression could be missed by a biopsy. METHODS In this study, we examined intratumor spatial heterogeneity of PD-L1 protein expression in multiple biopsies from different regions of breast cancers in 57 primary breast tumors (n = 33 TNBC, n = 19 estrogen receptor-positive [ER-positive], n = 5 human epidermal receptor 2-positive [HER2 +]). E1L3N antibody was used to assess PD-L1 status and staining was scored using the combined positivity score (CPS) with PD-L1 positive defined as CPS ≥ 10. RESULTS Overall, 19% (11/57) of tumors were PD-L1 positive based on positivity in at least 1 biopsy. Among TNBC, PD-L1 positivity was 27% (9/33). The discordance rate, defined as the same tumor yielding PD-L1 positive and negative samples in different regions, was 16% (n = 9) in the whole study population and 23% (n = 7) in TNBC. Cohen's kappa coefficient of agreement was 0.214 for the whole study and 0.239 for TNBC, both of which falling into a non-statistically significant fair agreement range. Among all PD-L1 positive cases, 82% (n = 9/11) had positivity in only one of the tissue assessments. CONCLUSION These results indicate that the overall 84% concordance is driven by concordant negative results. In PD-L1 positive cancers, within-tumor heterogeneity in PD-L1 expression exists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriana Matutino Kahn
- Section of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA
| | - Reza Golestani
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA
| | - Malini Harigopal
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Section of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
- Breast Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, 300 George St, Suite 120, Rm 133, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Licata L, Viale G, Giuliano M, Curigliano G, Chavez-MacGregor M, Foldi J, Oke O, Collins J, Del Mastro L, Puglisi F, Montemurro F, Vernieri C, Gerratana L, Giordano S, Rognone A, Sica L, Gentilini OD, Cascinu S, Pusztai L, Giordano A, Criscitiello C, Bianchini G. Oncotype DX results increase concordance in adjuvant chemotherapy recommendations for early-stage breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer 2023; 9:51. [PMID: 37291235 PMCID: PMC10250312 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-023-00559-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Adjuvant chemotherapy recommendations for ER+/HER2- early-stage breast cancers (eBC) involve integrating prognostic and predictive information which rely on physician judgment; this can lead to discordant recommendations. In this study we aim to evaluate whether Oncotype DX improves confidence and agreement among oncologists in adjuvant chemotherapy recommendations. We randomly select 30 patients with ER+/HER2- eBC and recurrence score (RS) available from an institutional database. We ask 16 breast oncologists with varying years of clinical practice in Italy and the US to provide recommendation for the addition of chemotherapy to endocrine therapy and their degree of confidence in the recommendation twice; first, based on clinicopathologic features only (pre-RS), and then with RS result (post-RS). Pre-RS, the average rate of chemotherapy recommendation is 50.8% and is higher among junior (62% vs 44%; p < 0.001), but similar by country. Oncologists are uncertain in 39% of cases and recommendations are discordant in 27% of cases (interobserver agreement K 0.47). Post-RS, 30% of physicians change recommendation, uncertainty in recommendation decreases to 5.6%, and discordance decreases to 7% (interobserver agreement K 0.85). Interpretation of clinicopathologic features alone to recommend adjuvant chemotherapy results in 1 out of 4 discordant recommendations and relatively high physician uncertainty. Oncotype DX results decrease discordancy to 1 out of 15, and reduce physician uncertainty. Genomic assay results reduce subjectivity in adjuvant chemotherapy recommendations for ER +/HER2- eBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Licata
- Department of Medical Oncology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Viale
- Department of Medical Oncology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario Giuliano
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Mariana Chavez-MacGregor
- Departments of Breast Medical Oncology and Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Julia Foldi
- Section of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Oluchi Oke
- Department of General Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Lucia Del Mastro
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Clinical Unit of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Hospital Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Fabio Puglisi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Unit of Medical Oncology and Cancer Prevention, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
- Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Filippo Montemurro
- Breast Surgery Strategic Program, Candiolo Cancer Institute, Fondazione del Piemonte per l'Oncologia - IRCCS, Torino, Italy
| | - Claudio Vernieri
- Breast Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
- IFOM ETS - the AIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Gerratana
- Department of Medical Oncology, Aviano Oncology Reference Center (IRCCS), Aviano, Italy
| | - Sara Giordano
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alessia Rognone
- Department of Medical Oncology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Sica
- Department of Medical Oncology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Stefano Cascinu
- Department of Medical Oncology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Antonio Giordano
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Carmen Criscitiello
- Division of New Drugs and Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Bianchini
- Department of Medical Oncology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
- School of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Fanucci KA, Bai Y, Pelekanou V, Nahleh ZA, Shafi S, Burela S, Barlow WE, Sharma P, Thompson AM, Godwin AK, Rimm DL, Hortobagyi GN, Liu Y, Wang L, Wei W, Pusztai L, Blenman KRM. Image analysis-based tumor infiltrating lymphocytes measurement predicts breast cancer pathologic complete response in SWOG S0800 neoadjuvant chemotherapy trial. NPJ Breast Cancer 2023; 9:38. [PMID: 37179362 PMCID: PMC10182981 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-023-00535-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
We assessed the predictive value of an image analysis-based tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) score for pathologic complete response (pCR) and event-free survival in breast cancer (BC). About 113 pretreatment samples were analyzed from patients with stage IIB-IIIC HER-2-negative BC randomized to neoadjuvant chemotherapy ± bevacizumab. TILs quantification was performed on full sections using QuPath open-source software with a convolutional neural network cell classifier (CNN11). We used easTILs% as a digital metric of TILs score defined as [sum of lymphocytes area (mm2)/stromal area(mm2)] × 100. Pathologist-read stromal TILs score (sTILs%) was determined following published guidelines. Mean pretreatment easTILs% was significantly higher in cases with pCR compared to residual disease (median 36.1 vs.14.8%, p < 0.001). We observed a strong positive correlation (r = 0.606, p < 0.0001) between easTILs% and sTILs%. The area under the prediction curve (AUC) was higher for easTILs% than sTILs%, 0.709 and 0.627, respectively. Image analysis-based TILs quantification is predictive of pCR in BC and had better response discrimination than pathologist-read sTILs%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina A Fanucci
- Department of Internal Medicine Section of Medical Oncology and Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - Yalai Bai
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, 310 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - Vasiliki Pelekanou
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, 310 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
- Bayer Pharmaceuticals, 245 First St Cambridge Science Center 100 and 200 Floors 1 and 2, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA
| | - Zeina A Nahleh
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Maroone Cancer Center, 2950 Cleveland Clinic Blvd, Weston, FL, 33331, USA
| | - Saba Shafi
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, 310 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
- Department of Pathology, Ohio State University, 6100 Optometry Clinic & Health Sciences Faculty Office Building, 1664 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Sneha Burela
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, 310 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - William E Barlow
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, 1730 Minor Avenue Suite 1900, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA
| | - Priyanka Sharma
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA
| | - Alastair M Thompson
- Section of Breast Surgery, 1 Baylor Plaza, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Andrew K Godwin
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA
| | - David L Rimm
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, 310 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - Gabriel N Hortobagyi
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Yihan Liu
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - Leona Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - Wei Wei
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Department of Internal Medicine Section of Medical Oncology and Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - Kim R M Blenman
- Department of Internal Medicine Section of Medical Oncology and Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
- Department of Computer Science, Yale School of Engineering and Applied Science, 17 Hillhouse Avenue, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Marczyk M, Fu C, Lau R, Du L, Trevarton AJ, Sinn BV, Gould RE, Pusztai L, Hatzis C, Symmans WF. Assessment of stained direct cytology smears of breast cancer for whole transcriptome and targeted messenger RNA sequencing. Cancer Cytopathol 2023; 131:289-299. [PMID: 36650408 PMCID: PMC10614161 DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rather than surgical resection, cytologic specimens are often used as first-line clinical diagnostic procedures due to higher safety, speed, and cost-effectiveness. Archival diagnostic cytology slides containing cancer can be equivalent to tissue biopsies for DNA mutation testing, but the accuracy of transcriptomic profiling by RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) is less understood. METHODS This study compares the results from whole transcriptome RNA-seq and a targeted RNA-seq assay of stained cytology smears (CS) versus matched tumor tissue samples preserved fresh-frozen (FF) and processed as formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections. Cellular cytology scrapes from all 11 breast cancers were fixed and stained using three common protocols: Carnoy's (CS_C) or 95% ethanol (CS_E) fixation and then Papanicolaou stain or air-dried then methanol fixation and DiffQuik stain (CS_DQ). Agreement between samples was assessed using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient. RESULTS Library yield for CS_DQ was too low, therefore it was not sequenced. The distributions of concordance correlation coefficient of gene expression levels in comparison to FF were comparable between CS_C and CS_E, but expression of genes enriched in stroma was lower in cytosmear samples than in FF or FFPE. Six signatures showed similar concordance to FF for all methods and two were slightly worse in CS_C and CS_E. Genomic signatures were highly concordant using targeted RNA-seq. The allele fraction of selected mutations calculated on cytosmear specimens was highly correlated with FF tissues using both RNA-seq methods. CONCLUSION RNA can be reliably extracted from cytology smears and is suitable for transcriptome profiling or mutation detection, except for signatures of tumor stroma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michal Marczyk
- Yale Cancer Center Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Data Science and Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Chunxiao Fu
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Rosanna Lau
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Lili Du
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alexander J. Trevarton
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Bruno V. Sinn
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rebekah E. Gould
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Yale Cancer Center Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Christos Hatzis
- Yale Cancer Center Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - William Fraser Symmans
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Bergqvist M, Nordmark A, Williams A, Paoletti C, Barlow W, Cobain EF, Mehta RS, Gralow JR, Hortobagyi GN, Albain KS, Pusztai L, Sharma P, Godwin AK, Thompson AM, Hayes DF, Rae JM. Thymidine kinase activity levels in serum can identify HR+ metastatic breast cancer patients with a low risk of early progression (SWOG S0226). Biomarkers 2023; 28:313-322. [PMID: 36647745 PMCID: PMC10681159 DOI: 10.1080/1354750x.2023.2168063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Some patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) stay on endocrine therapy (ET) for years and others progress quickly. Serum thymidine kinase activity (TKa), an indicator of cell-proliferation, is a potential biomarker for monitoring ET and predicting MBC outcome. We have previously reported TKa as being prognostic in MBC in SWOG S0226. Here, new data on progression within 30/60 days post sampling, with a new, FDA approved version of DiviTum®TKa highlighting differences vs. a Research Use Only version is reported. METHODS 1,546 serum samples from 454 patients were assessed, collected at baseline and at 4 subsequent timepoints during treatment. A new predefined cut-off tested the ability to predict disease progression. A new measuring unit, DuA (DiviTum® unit of Activity) is adopted. RESULTS A DiviTum®TKa score <250 DuA provides a much lower risk of progression within 30/60 days after blood draw, the negative predictive value (NPV) was 96.7% and 93.5%, respectively. Patients <250 DuA experienced significantly longer progression-free survival and overall survival, demonstrated at baseline and for all time intervals. CONCLUSIONS DiviTum®TKa provides clinically meaningful information for patients with HR+ MBC. Low TKa levels provide such a high NPV for rapid progression that such patients might forego additional therapy added to single agent ET.Trial registration: NCT00075764.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Erin F. Cobain
- University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Rita S. Mehta
- Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Julie R. Gralow
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance and University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Gabriel N. Hortobagyi
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kathy S. Albain
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL, USA
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Breast Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Priyanka Sharma
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Andrew K. Godwin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Alastair M. Thompson
- Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Daniel F. Hayes
- University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - James M. Rae
- University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Danziger N, Sokol ES, Graf RP, Hiemenz MC, Maule J, Parimi V, Palmieri C, Pusztai L, Ross JS, Huang RSP. Variable Landscape of PD-L1 Expression in Breast Carcinoma as Detected by the DAKO 22C3 Immunohistochemistry Assay. Oncologist 2023; 28:319-326. [PMID: 36866462 PMCID: PMC10078903 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2020, pembrolizumab was approved as a therapy for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with the companion diagnostic DAKO 22C3 programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry assay. The study aimed to determine the landscape of PD-L1 expression as detected by the DAKO 22C3 PD-L1 assay in breast cancer subtypes and compare the clinicopathologic and genomic characteristics of PD-L1 positive and negative TNBC. METHODS PD-L1 expression using the DAKO 22C3 antibody was scored using a combined positive score (CPS) and positive status was defined as CPS ≥10. Comprehensive genomic profiling was performed using the FoundationOne CDx assay. RESULTS Of the 396 BC patients stained with DAKO 22C3, the majority were HR+/HER2- and TNBC (42% and 36%, respectively). Median PD-L1 expression and frequency of CPS ≥10 was highest in TNBC cases (median: 7.5, 50% CPS ≥10) and lowest in the HR+/HER2- group (median: 1.0, 15.5% CPS ≥10) (P < .0001). A comparison of PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative TNBC demonstrated no significant differences in clinicopathologic or genomic characteristics. TNBC tissue samples from the breast did have an observed enrichment for PD-L1 positivity compared to TNBC tissue samples from a metastatic site (57% vs. 44%), but this was not statistically significant (P = .1766). In the HR+/HER2- group, genomic alterations in TP53, CREBBP, and CCNE1 were more prevalent and genomic loss of heterozygosity was higher in the PD-L1(+) group compared to the PD-L1(-) group. CONCLUSIONS The subtypes of breast cancer have distinct patterns of PD-L1 expression, supporting that further research of immunotherapies may include specific evaluation of optimum cutoffs for non-TNBC patients. In TNBC, PD-L1 positivity is not associated with other clinicopathologic or genomic features and should be integrated into future studies of immunotherapy efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ryon P Graf
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | - Jake Maule
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | - Carlo Palmieri
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Jeffrey S Ross
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA
- Departments of Pathology and Urology, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Bardia A, Pusztai L, Albain K, Kalinsky K, Hershman D, Barlow W, Tokunaga E, Ciruelos E, Loirat D, Isaacs C, Testa L, Dry H, Kozarski R, Maxwell M, Harbeck N, Sharma P. P018 TROPION-Breast03: Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) ± durvalumab vs investigator’s choice of therapy (ICT) for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with residual disease following neoadjuvant therapy. Breast 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9776(23)00137-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/17/2023] Open
|
40
|
Liedtke C, Mazouni C, Hess KR, André F, Tordai A, Mejia JA, Symmans WF, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Hennessy B, Green M, Cristofanilli M, Hortobagyi GN, Pusztai L. Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy and Long-Term Survival in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:1809-1815. [PMID: 36989609 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is defined by the lack of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) expression. In this study, we compared response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival between patients with TNBC and non-TNBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Analysis of a prospectively collected clinical database was performed. We included 1,118 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center for stage I-III breast cancer from 1985 to 2004 and for whom complete receptor information were available. Clinical and pathologic parameters, pathologic complete response rates (pCR), survival measurements, and organ-specific relapse rates were compared between patients with TNBC and non-TNBC. RESULTS Two hundred fifty-five patients (23%) had TNBC. Patients with TNBC compared with non-TNBC had significantly higher pCR rates (22% v 11%; P = .034), but decreased 3-year progression-free survival rates (P < .0001) and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates (P < .0001). TNBC was associated with increased risk for visceral metastases (P = .0005), lower risk for bone recurrence (P = .027), and shorter postrecurrence survival (P < .0001). Recurrence and death rates were higher for TNBC only in the first 3 years. If pCR was achieved, patients with TNBC and non-TNBC had similar survival (P = .24). In contrast, patients with residual disease (RD) had worse OS if they had TNBC compared with non-TNBC (P < .0001). CONCLUSION Patients with TNBC have increased pCR rates compared with non-TNBC, and those with pCR have excellent survival. However, patients with RD after neoadjuvant chemotherapy have significantly worse survival if they have TNBC compared with non-TNBC, particularly in the first 3 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cornelia Liedtke
- From the Departments of Breast Medical Oncology, Biostatistics and Applied Mathematics, and Pathology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Marseille Public Hospital System, Marseille; and Breast Cancer Unit and Translational Research Unit UPRES03535, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Chafika Mazouni
- From the Departments of Breast Medical Oncology, Biostatistics and Applied Mathematics, and Pathology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Marseille Public Hospital System, Marseille; and Breast Cancer Unit and Translational Research Unit UPRES03535, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Kenneth R Hess
- From the Departments of Breast Medical Oncology, Biostatistics and Applied Mathematics, and Pathology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Marseille Public Hospital System, Marseille; and Breast Cancer Unit and Translational Research Unit UPRES03535, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Fabrice André
- From the Departments of Breast Medical Oncology, Biostatistics and Applied Mathematics, and Pathology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Marseille Public Hospital System, Marseille; and Breast Cancer Unit and Translational Research Unit UPRES03535, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Attila Tordai
- From the Departments of Breast Medical Oncology, Biostatistics and Applied Mathematics, and Pathology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Marseille Public Hospital System, Marseille; and Breast Cancer Unit and Translational Research Unit UPRES03535, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Jaime A Mejia
- From the Departments of Breast Medical Oncology, Biostatistics and Applied Mathematics, and Pathology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Marseille Public Hospital System, Marseille; and Breast Cancer Unit and Translational Research Unit UPRES03535, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - W Fraser Symmans
- From the Departments of Breast Medical Oncology, Biostatistics and Applied Mathematics, and Pathology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Marseille Public Hospital System, Marseille; and Breast Cancer Unit and Translational Research Unit UPRES03535, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo
- From the Departments of Breast Medical Oncology, Biostatistics and Applied Mathematics, and Pathology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Marseille Public Hospital System, Marseille; and Breast Cancer Unit and Translational Research Unit UPRES03535, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Bryan Hennessy
- From the Departments of Breast Medical Oncology, Biostatistics and Applied Mathematics, and Pathology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Marseille Public Hospital System, Marseille; and Breast Cancer Unit and Translational Research Unit UPRES03535, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Marjorie Green
- From the Departments of Breast Medical Oncology, Biostatistics and Applied Mathematics, and Pathology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Marseille Public Hospital System, Marseille; and Breast Cancer Unit and Translational Research Unit UPRES03535, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Massimo Cristofanilli
- From the Departments of Breast Medical Oncology, Biostatistics and Applied Mathematics, and Pathology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Marseille Public Hospital System, Marseille; and Breast Cancer Unit and Translational Research Unit UPRES03535, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Gabriel N Hortobagyi
- From the Departments of Breast Medical Oncology, Biostatistics and Applied Mathematics, and Pathology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Marseille Public Hospital System, Marseille; and Breast Cancer Unit and Translational Research Unit UPRES03535, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- From the Departments of Breast Medical Oncology, Biostatistics and Applied Mathematics, and Pathology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Marseille Public Hospital System, Marseille; and Breast Cancer Unit and Translational Research Unit UPRES03535, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kümmel S, Schmid P, Harbeck N, Takahashi M, Untch M, Boileau JF, Cortes J, McArthur H, Dent R, O’Shaughnessy J, Pusztai L, Foukakis T, Park Y, Hui R, Cardoso F, Denkert C, Zhu Y, Pan W, Karantza V, Fasching P. P125 Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab + chemotherapy vs placebo + chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab vs placebo for early TNBC: surgical outcomes from the phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 study. Breast 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9776(23)00242-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
|
42
|
Speers CW, Symmans WF, Barlow WE, Trevarton A, The S, Du L, Rae JM, Shak S, Baehner R, Sharma P, Pusztai L, Hortobagyi GN, Hayes DF, Albain KS, Godwin A, Thompson A. Evaluation of the Sensitivity to Endocrine Therapy Index and 21-Gene Breast Recurrence Score in the SWOG S8814 Trial. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:1841-1848. [PMID: 36649570 PMCID: PMC10082279 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Revised: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Chemotherapy has not demonstrated benefit over adjuvant endocrine therapy alone for postmenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer with a 21-gene breast recurrence score (RS) of 25 or below (RS ≤ 25). We tested whether combined results from RS and the sensitivity to endocrine therapy (SET2,3) index of endocrine-related transcription (SETER/PR) adjusted for baseline prognostic index (BPI) improve prognostic assessment, and whether SET2,3 predicted benefit from anthracycline-based chemotherapy. METHODS A blinded retrospective clinical validation of SET2,3 in two randomized treatment arms from the SWOG S8814 trial comparing adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy followed by tamoxifen endocrine therapy for 5 years, versus tamoxifen alone. SET2,3 assay was calibrated and measured using whole-transcriptome RNA sequence of tumor samples already tested for RS. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS There were 106 events in 283 patients over a median follow-up of 8.99 years. Proportional hazards assumptions were met during the first 5 years only. SET2,3 index and RS were not correlated (r = -0.04) and were independently prognostic (SET2,3: hazard ratio [HR], 0.48 per unit; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.68; P < .001; RS: HR, 1.28 per 10 units; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.44; P < .001). SET2,3 index did not predict chemotherapy benefit (interaction P = .77). SET2,3 was high in 93/175 (53%) patients with RS ≤ 25 (concordant low-risk), with 5-year DFS 97%. SET2,3 was low in 55/108 (51%) patients with RS > 25 (concordant high-risk), with 5-year DFS 53%. Both components of SET2,3 index were prognostic after adjustment for RS: SETER/PR (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.92) and BPI (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.64). CONCLUSION SET2,3 index was not correlated with RS, demonstrated additive prognostic performance, and was not chemopredictive in this subset of patients from S8814. The SETER/PR and BPI components of SET2,3 each added prognostic information to RS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Alex Trevarton
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Lili Du
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Kathy S Albain
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Maywood, IL
| | - Andrew Godwin
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Hood A, Mukallari B, Majeski J, Pusztai L, Adelson K, Amin K. BPI23-012: Real-World Frequency of ECHO Monitoring and Incidence of Anti-HER2 Therapy Related Cardiac Events in HER2+ Breast Cancer Patients. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2023. [DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.7224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/03/2023]
|
44
|
Lu L, Ma W, Johnson CH, Khan SA, Irwin ML, Pusztai L. In silico designed mRNA vaccines targeting CA-125 neoantigen in breast and ovarian cancer. Vaccine 2023; 41:2073-2083. [PMID: 36813666 PMCID: PMC10064809 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.02.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2022] [Revised: 02/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023]
Abstract
Somatic mutation-derived neoantigens are associated with patient survival in breast and ovarian cancer. These neoantigens are targets for cancer, as shown by the implementation of neoepitope peptides as cancer vaccines. The success of cost-effective multi-epitope mRNA vaccines against SARS-Cov-2 in the pandemic established a model for reverse vaccinology. In this study, we aimed to develop an in silico pipeline designing an mRNA vaccine of the CA-125 neoantigen against breast and ovarian cancer, respectively. Using immuno-bioinformatics tools, we predicted cytotoxic CD8+ T cell epitopes based on somatic mutation-driven neoantigens of CA-125 in breast or ovarian cancer, constructed a self-adjuvant mRNA vaccine with CD40L and MHC-I -targeting domain to enhance cross-presentation of neoepitopes by dendritic cells. With an in silico ImmSim algorithm, we estimated the immune responses post-immunization, showing IFN-γ and CD8+ T cell response. The strategy described in this study may be scaled up and implemented to design precision multi-epitope mRNA vaccines by targeting multiple neoantigens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lingeng Lu
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA; Yale Cancer Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
| | - Wenxue Ma
- Department of Medicine, Moores Cancer Center and Sanford Stem Cell Clinical Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Caroline H Johnson
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA; Department of Environmental Health Science, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Sajid A Khan
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA; Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Melinda L Irwin
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA; Yale Cancer Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
McArthur H, Cortés J, Dent R, O’Shaughnessy J, Pusztai L, Küemmel S, Foukakis T, Park YH, Hui R, Harbeck N, Takahashi M, Untch M, Fasching PA, Cardoso F, Denkert C, Zhu Y, Ding Y, Pan W, Schmid P. Abstract PD3-01: Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab + chemotherapy vs placebo + chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab vs placebo for early TNBC: Post hoc analysis of adjuvant radiation therapy in the phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 study. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-pd3-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 study (NCT03036488) showed that pembrolizumab (pembro) administered in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (chemo) and then continued as adjuvant monotherapy resulted in statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in pathological complete response (pCR) and event-free survival (EFS) in patients with early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). In this post hoc analysis, we assessed outcomes by patterns of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) administration.
Methods: Patients with previously untreated, nonmetastatic, stage T1c/N1-2 or T2-4/N0-2 TNBC were randomized 2:1 to pembro 200 mg Q3W or placebo, both given with 4 cycles of paclitaxel + carboplatin, then 4 cycles of doxorubicin or epirubicin + cyclophosphamide (neoadjuvant phase). After definitive surgery, patients received pembro or placebo for 9 cycles or until recurrence or unacceptable toxicity (adjuvant phase). Dual primary endpoints are pCR, defined as ypT0/Tis ypN0, and EFS. EFS and adverse events (AEs) that occurred during the adjuvant phase were examined in patient subgroups defined by receipt of adjuvant RT (yes or no) and the pattern of adjuvant RT and pembro administration, either concurrent (the last adjuvant RT exposure was after the first dose of adjuvant pembro or placebo) or sequential (the last adjuvant RT exposure was before the first dose of adjuvant pembro or placebo).
Results: Among 1174 randomized patients, 715 (60.9%) received adjuvant RT (n=454 pembro; n=261 placebo) and 459 (39.1%) did not (n=330 pembro; n=129 placebo). At data cutoff (March 23, 2021), median follow-up was similar (~38 months) in both subgroups. EFS was longer in the pembro arm compared to the placebo arm in patients who received adjuvant RT (either concurrently or sequentially) and those who did not (Table). Grade 3-5 treatment-related AE rates for pembro vs placebo were 5.9% vs 2.7% with adjuvant RT (4.9% vs 2.2% with concurrent RT; 6.8% vs 3.1% with sequential RT) and 7.5% vs 2.9% without adjuvant RT. Treatment-related AEs led to death in 2 patients (0.4%); both occurred in the pembro arm in patients who received adjuvant RT. Immune-mediated AE rates were 10.6% vs 5.0% with adjuvant RT (9.7% vs 4.4% with concurrent RT; 11.8% vs 5.7% with sequential RT) and 9.0% vs 10.0% without adjuvant RT in the two treatment arms, respectively.
Conclusion: In this post hoc analysis, the addition of pembro to neoadjuvant chemo followed by adjuvant pembro provided a clinically meaningful EFS benefit, independent of adjuvant RT administration. An EFS benefit was observed in patients who received pembro with either concurrent or sequential adjuvant RT. The addition of pembro to adjuvant RT was generally well tolerated. Similar rates of treatment-related AEs and immune-mediated AEs were seen in patients who received adjuvant RT and pembro either concurrently or sequentially, although the sample sizes are modest. These results are consistent with the therapeutic benefit seen with neoadjuvant pembro plus chemo followed by adjuvant pembro in the intention-to-treat population of patients with early TNBC randomized in KEYNOTE-522.
Table: EFS by Adjuvant RT in KEYNOTE-522
Citation Format: Heather McArthur, Javier Cortés, Rebecca Dent, Joyce O’Shaughnessy, Lajos Pusztai, Sherko Küemmel, Theodoros Foukakis, Yeon Hee Park, Rina Hui, Nadia Harbeck, Masato Takahashi, Michael Untch, Peter A. Fasching, Fatima Cardoso, Carsten Denkert, Yalin Zhu, Yu Ding, Wilbur Pan, Peter Schmid. Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab + chemotherapy vs placebo + chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab vs placebo for early TNBC: Post hoc analysis of adjuvant radiation therapy in the phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD3-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Javier Cortés
- 2International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Pangaea Oncology, Quironsalud Group, Madrid and Barcelona, Spain & Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Joyce O’Shaughnessy
- 4Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Rina Hui
- 9Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Peter A. Fasching
- 13Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Fatima Cardoso
- 14Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Carsten Denkert
- 15Institut für Pathologie, Philipps Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg (UKGM), Germany
| | - Yalin Zhu
- 16Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA
| | - Yu Ding
- 17Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA
| | | | - Peter Schmid
- 19Bart’s Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kang I, Forschmiedt JK, Loch MM, Barlow WE, Lew DL, Gralow JR, Meric-Bernstam F, Albain KS, Hayes DF, Lin NU, Perez EA, Goldstein LJ, Rastogi P, Schott AF, Shak S, Sharma P, Miao J, Tripathy D, Pusztai L, Hortobagyi GN, Kalinsky K, Henry NL. Abstract GS1-04: Patient-reported cognitive impairment in women participating in the RxPONDER trial (SWOG S1007) by menopausal status. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-gs1-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Breast cancer treatment is associated with cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI). However, the differential effect of endocrine therapy (ET) vs chemotherapy followed by endocrine therapy (CET), including the impact of menopausal status, on CRCI is not well understood.
Methods: Participants (pts) with hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer with 1-3 positive lymph nodes and an Oncotype DX recurrence score of 0-25 enrolled in the RxPONDER trial were randomly assigned to ET alone versus CET. Until the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) accrual goal was reached, English speaking pts in the US were invited to complete HRQoL questionnaires including the 8-item PROMIS Perceived Cognitive Function Concerns (PCF) Short Form questionnaire shortly after randomization (baseline), as well as 6, 12, and 36 months after baseline. Analysis of measures of anxiety and fatigue is presented separately. Standardized T scores (mean 50; SD 10) for PCF were computed with higher scores indicating less cognitive impairment. The primary endpoint of this exploratory analysis was to compare mean PCF T scores by treatment arm and menopausal status. Separately by menopausal status, a generalized estimating equations (GEE) model was fit to the three timepoints adjusting for baseline to estimate the difference between treatment arms and whether there was a time trend over the three follow-up measures.
Results: The HRQoL accrual exceeded the goal of 500 patients, with 74% of pts participating voluntarily until the QOL invitation was removed from the protocol (Dec 1, 2012). A total of 139 pre and 429 postmenopausal pts completed the questionnaires at baseline. T scores were similar between ET and CET arms at baseline [Table 1]. In the ET arm, T scores decreased from baseline to 6 and 12 months but recovered to baseline at 36 months. In the CET arm, T scores decreased from baseline to 6 months and 12 months but did not return to baseline at 36 months. The mean score difference between CET and ET over time was -3.02 (p=0.01) and -2.36 (p=0.003) for pre and postmenopausal pts, respectively. Adjusting for baseline, there was no significant time trend over the three follow-up periods for either premenopausal (p=0.12) or postmenopausal (p=0.49) pts. Dropoff occurred over time with 79%, 76%, 60% of pts at baseline participating at 6, 12, and 36 months. Complete endocrine treatment adherence data are not yet available at each timepoint.
Conclusion: Chemoendocrine therapy has a greater negative effect on patient-reported CRCI compared to ET alone in both pre- and post-menopausal pts and it is sustained over 36 months. Interventions to prevent or treat CRCI are needed to improve the long-term quality of life of patients treated with CET.
Table 1. Comparisons of mean Cognitive Function score by treatment arm and menopausal status.
Citation Format: Irene Kang, Jamie K. Forschmiedt, Michelle M. Loch, William E. Barlow, Danika L. Lew, Julie R. Gralow, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Kathy S. Albain, Daniel F. Hayes, Nancy U. Lin, Edith A. Perez, Lori J. Goldstein, Priya Rastogi, Anne F. Schott, Steven Shak, Priyanka Sharma, Jieling Miao, Debu Tripathy, Lajos Pusztai, Gabriel N. Hortobagyi, Kevin Kalinsky, N. Lynn Henry. Patient-reported cognitive impairment in women participating in the RxPONDER trial (SWOG S1007) by menopausal status [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr GS1-04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Kathy S. Albain
- 8Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center
| | - Daniel F. Hayes
- 9University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Nancy U. Lin
- 10Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Priya Rastogi
- 13UPMC Hillman Cancer Center and NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Anne F. Schott
- 14Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan Health, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Priyanka Sharma
- 16University of Kansas Medical Center Westwood, Westwood, KS
| | - Jieling Miao
- 17Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Debu Tripathy
- 18The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | - Kevin Kalinsky
- 21Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Chavez M, Miao J, Pusztai L, Goetz MP, Rastogi P, Ganz PA, Mamounas E(T, Paik S, Bandos H, Razaq W, O’Dea A, Kaklamani V, Silber AL, Flaum LE, Andreopolu E, Baar J, Wendt AG, Carney JF, Sharma P, Gralow JR, Lew DL, Barlow WE, Hortobagyi GN. Abstract GS1-07: Results from a phase III randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating adjuvant endocrine therapy +/- 1 year of everolimus in patients with high-risk hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer: SWOG S1207. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-gs1-07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Abnormalities of the PI3kinase/AKT/mTOR signaling network are common in breast cancer (BC) and are associated with endocrine resistance. Everolimus, an mTOR-inhibitor increased PFS when combined with endocrine therapy (ET) in the metastatic setting and is thought to revert endocrine resistance. S1207 is a phase III randomized, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the role of everolimus in combination with ET in the adjuvant setting among patients with high-risk hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative BC (NCT01674140). METHODS: Eligible patients were >18 years of age with histologically confirmed invasive hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative high-risk BC. Four risk groups were defined as: 1) > 2cm node-negative disease (or pN1mi), and either an Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score (RS) > 25 or MammaPrint® high-risk category (MP high); 2) 1-3 positive nodes and either RS >25, MP high or a pathological grade 3 tumor; 3) >4 positive lymph nodes. Patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were eligible if: 4) after surgery had >1 lymph node involvement. Patients were randomized 1:1 to physician’s choice adjuvant ET in combination with one year of everolimus (10 mg PO daily) or ET plus placebo stratified by risk group. The primary endpoint was invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) evaluated by a stratified log-rank test. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety. The hazard ratio (HR) for treatment efficacy was estimated using Cox regression with stratification by risk groups. Subset analyses included preplanned evaluation within risk group and exploratory analyses of menopausal status and age. RESULTS: 1,939 patients were randomized between September 2013 and May 2019, of them 1,792 were eligible and included in the analysis (896 per arm). Primary reason for ineligibility was timing after chemotherapy/radiation or not high risk. Median age was 54 years (22-85) and 32% were premenopausal. With a median follow-up of 50.5 months, there were 389 IDFS events as of May 2022 (data cutoff). 5-year IDFS was 74.8% among patients treated with everolimus and 73.9% among patients treated with placebo, HR=0.93 (95% CI 0.76-1.14). However, the proportional hazards assumption was violated (p=0.02) suggesting differential treatment effect over time. The HR during the one year of treatment was 0.72 (95% CI 0.47-1.10) while after one year it was 1.00 (95% CI 0.80-1.26). The 5-year OS was 87.6% in the everolimus arm and 85.5% in the placebo arm, HR=0.98 (95% CI 0.75-1.28). Analysis by risk group did not show higher everolimus benefit as risk increased. No difference in IDFS or OS was seen among postmenopausal patients (IDFS HR=1.08 [95% CI 0.85-1.36], OS HR=1.19 [95% CI 0.87-1.61]). Among premenopausal patients, everolimus was associated with improved IDFS (HR=0.63 [95% CI 0.43-0.93]) and OS (HR=0.48 [95% CI 0.26-0.88]). Treatment completion of randomized therapy was lower in the everolimus arm compared to placebo (47.9% v 72.7%). Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were noted in 6.5% and 0.5% of patients in the placebo arm and in 31.2% and 3.7% in the everolimus arm respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of one year of adjuvant everolimus to standard adjuvant ET did not improve IDFS or OS and was associated with low completion rate and increased AEs. Among premenopausal patients there was a benefit in IDFS and OS that is hypothesis generating. Future translational studies will evaluate potential predictors of everolimus benefit and drug toxicity.
Citation Format: Marianna Chavez, Jieling Miao, Lajos Pusztai, Matthew P. Goetz, Priya Rastogi, Patricia A. Ganz, Eleftherios (Terry) Mamounas, Soonmyung Paik, Hanna Bandos, Wajeeha Razaq, Anne O’Dea, Virginia Kaklamani, Andrea L.M. Silber, Lisa E. Flaum, Eleni Andreopolu, Joseph Baar, Albert G. Wendt, Jennifer F. Carney, Priyanka Sharma, Julie R. Gralow, Danika L. Lew, William E. Barlow, Gabriel N. Hortobagyi. Results from a phase III randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating adjuvant endocrine therapy +/- 1 year of everolimus in patients with high-risk hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer: SWOG S1207 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr GS1-07.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jieling Miao
- 2Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | | | | | - Priya Rastogi
- 5UPMC Hillman Cancer Center and NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Patricia A. Ganz
- 6UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, and UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Soonmyung Paik
- 8NRG Oncology, Division of Pathology, Pittsburgh, PA/NRG Oncology
| | - Hanna Bandos
- 9NRG Oncology Biostatistical Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Wajeeha Razaq
- 10Oklahoma university of health Sciences, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | | | | | | | | | - Eleni Andreopolu
- 15New York Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center/Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Joseph Baar
- 16Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | - Albert G. Wendt
- 17Cancer Center at Saint Joseph’s, Phoenix AZ; CORA CommonSpirit Health Research Institute
| | | | - Priyanka Sharma
- 19University of Kansas Medical Center Westwood, Westwood, KS
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Spring LM, Barlow WE, Bardia A, Sharma P, Pusztai L, Hortobagyi GN, Kalinsky K. Abstract HER2-19: HER2-19 Impact of HER2 low status on clinical outcomes in participants with 1-3 positive lymph nodes, HR+/HER2- breast cancer with recurrence score </25 randomized to endocrine therapy +/- chemotherapy: results from SWOG S1007 (RxPONDER). Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-her2-19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: HER2 low breast cancer, defined as tumors with HER2 IHC expression 1+ or 2+ without HER2 gene amplification, represents a potential new therapeutic subgroup of metastatic breast cancer (BC). However, the clinical significance of HER2 low status in early BC remains unclear. Previously, the RxPONDER trial (NCT01272037), a prospective, randomized trial of endocrine therapy (ET) vs. chemoendocrine therapy (CET) in women with lymph node positive (LN+) BC, demonstrated invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) with ET vs CET varies by menopausal status. We evaluated the impact of HER2 low vs zero status in the RxPONDER trial (SWOG S1007), stratified by menopausal status and treatment groups.
Methods: Eligibility criteria included women >/18 years of age with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-) BC, Recurrence Score (RS) </25, 1-3+ LN and no contraindications to taxane and/or anthracycline based CT. The impact of HER2 low status and other baseline clinicopathological features on clinical outcomes were evaluated using covariates in Cox regression analysis. HER2 IHC status was per local testing. HER2 low was defined as IHC 1+ or IHC 2+ without HER2 gene amplification, and HER2 zero was defined as IHC 0. The primary endpoint was IDFS, defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of a first invasive recurrence (local, regional, or distant), a new invasive primary cancer (breast cancer or another type of cancer), or death from any cause. Secondary objectives included distant-relapse free survival (DRFS).
Results: Among the 4,983 eligible participants, 4,588 had IHC HER2 status available. 52% of 2,052 pre-menopausal women had HER2 low BC and 57% of 3,042 post-menopausal women had HER2 low BC. There was a small, but statistically significant (p=0.03) difference, in RS between HER2 low (mean 14.5) and HER2 zero (mean 14.1) status. The proportion of participants with HER2 low and zero were balanced between treatment group assignment (CET vs ET). Among pre-menopausal women adjusting for RS, CET led to an observed improvement in IDFS among both HER2 low (HR=0.67; 95% CI 0.43-1.04) and HER2 zero subgroups (HR=0.57; 95% CI 0.36-0.89) (interaction p=0.55). Similarly, among post-menopausal women, there was no difference in IDFS between CET vs ET among both HER2 low (HR=0.98; 95% CI 0.75-1.29) and HER2 zero (HR=1.12; 95% CI 0.80-1.56) subgroups (interaction p=0.57). In multivariable analysis, adjusting for treatment arm, RS, and menopausal status, HER2 low status was not associated with worse IDFS compared to HER2 zero status (HR=0.93; 95% CI 0.78-1.11). Additionally, no differences were noted in DRFS.
Conclusion: HER2 low or zero status had no impact on clinical outcomes with CET vs ET among pre-menopausal or post-menopausal women with HR+/HER- BC with 1-3+ LNs and RS </25. HER2 low evaluation should not be currently used for CET vs ET clinical decision making among patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer with 1-3+ LN and RS </25. Further research on the role of HER2 low status in other settings may be warranted.
Citation Format: Laura M. Spring, William E. Barlow, Aditya Bardia, Priyanka Sharma, Lajos Pusztai, Gabriel N. Hortobagyi, Kevin Kalinsky. HER2-19 Impact of HER2 low status on clinical outcomes in participants with 1-3 positive lymph nodes, HR+/HER2- breast cancer with recurrence score </25 randomized to endocrine therapy +/- chemotherapy: results from SWOG S1007 (RxPONDER) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr HER2-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura M. Spring
- 1Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Aditya Bardia
- 3Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Priyanka Sharma
- 4University of Kansas Medical Center Westwood, Westwood, KS, USA
| | | | | | - Kevin Kalinsky
- 7Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Chen Y, Barlow WE, Li H, Lu C, Janowczyk A, Corredor G, Ganesan S, Feldman M, Fu P, Gilmore H, Albain KS, Pusztai L, Rae J, Hayes D, Godwin AK, Thompson AM, Madabhushi A. Abstract P2-11-16: Computerized Measurements of Nuclear Morphology Features, Mitosis Rate, and Tubule Formation from H&E Images Predicts Disease-Free Survival in Patients with HR+ & LN+ Invasive Breast Cancer from SWOG S8814. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-p2-11-16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Lymph node (LN) involvement is a strong indicator of poor prognosis for breast cancer (BC), with adjuvant chemotherapy remaining fundamental to management of these patients. SWOG S8814 was a Phase III randomized trial of postmenopausal patients with pathologic LN-positive BC who were hormone receptor positive (HR+). The objectives of the clinical trial were to compare disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of 1) these postoperative patients treated with a combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, fluorouracil (CAF) plus tamoxifen versus tamoxifen alone; and 2) patients treated with CAF followed by tamoxifen versus CAF plus concurrent tamoxifen. In this study we sought to evaluate the potential of applying computational image analysis on whole slide images (WSI) for predicting DFS and OS in SWOG S8814. Methods: A cohort of 135 patients (N=53 DFS event) diagnosed with HR+ & LN+ BC from clinical trial ECOG 2197 was utilized as training set D1. Validation set D2 comprised 630 patients (N=260 DFS event, N=195 death) with HR+& LN+ BC from SWOG S8814. Three deep learning models were employed to respectively detect nuclei, mitosis, and tubules in WSIs. Subsequently, a total of 1,810 features relating to nuclear morphology (e.g., spatial distribution, shape, texture, orientation), mitotic activity (e.g., mitosis hotspot, mitotic rates) and tubule formation (e.g., tubular nuclei distribution, ratio of tubule to non-tubule area) were extracted from each WSI. A lasso regularized Cox regression model (IbRiS) was trained on D1 to respectively identify four features from each of the feature categories (nuclei morphology, mitotic activity, and tubule formation) most strongly associated with DFS, a continuous risk score based on the selected features was then constructed. An optimal risk threshold was identified on D1 to dichotomize the risk scores into high vs. low risk of recurrence categories. Blinded validation of the machine learning model on SWOG S8814 using Cox regression was performed by SWOG to evaluate its performance in terms of DFS and OS. Results: In D2, patients identified as high risk of recurrence by IbRiS had a significantly worse prognosis in terms of DFS with hazard ratio=1.30 (p=0.039, 95% CI=1.01-1.66). IbRiS was also found to be significantly prognostic of OS with hazard ratio=1.38 (p=0.026, 95% CI=1.04-1.83). IbRiS was however, neither prognostic of DFS (HR = 1.20; 95% CI 0.93-1.54) nor OS (HR = 1.28; 95% CI 0.96-1.71) in multivariable analysis adjusting for treatment, tumor size, and number of positive nodes. IbRiS was also not a significant predictor of chemotherapy benefit (DFS p=0.45; OS p=0.25). Conclusion: We developed a prognostic model (IbRiS) based on the combined features of nuclear morphology, mitosis count, and tubule formation that can help further risk stratify HR+ & LN+ BC patients by only using H&E slides.
Citation Format: Yuli Chen, William E. Barlow, Haojia Li, Cheng Lu, Andrew Janowczyk, German Corredor, Shridar Ganesan, Michael Feldman, Pingfu Fu, Hannah Gilmore, Kathy S. Albain, Lajos Pusztai, James Rae, Daniel Hayes, Andrew K. Godwin, Alastair M. Thompson, Anant Madabhushi. Computerized Measurements of Nuclear Morphology Features, Mitosis Rate, and Tubule Formation from H&E Images Predicts Disease-Free Survival in Patients with HR+ & LN+ Invasive Breast Cancer from SWOG S8814 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-11-16.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuli Chen
- 1Shanxi Normal University, School of Computer Science
| | | | - Haojia Li
- 3Case Western Reserve University, Department of Biomedical Engineering
| | - Cheng Lu
- 4Case Western Reserve University, Department of Biomedical Engineering
| | - Andrew Janowczyk
- 5Case Western Reserve University/Lausanne University Hospital, Precision Oncology Center
| | - German Corredor
- 6Case Western Reserve University, Department of Biomedical Engineering
| | | | - Michael Feldman
- 8University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Pingfu Fu
- 9Case Western Reserve University, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences
| | | | - Kathy S. Albain
- 11Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center
| | | | - James Rae
- 13University of Michigan Medical School
| | - Daniel Hayes
- 14University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | - Andrew K. Godwin
- 15University of Kansas Medical Center; Kansas Institute for Precision Medicine; The University of Kansas Cancer Center
| | | | - Anant Madabhushi
- 17Case Western Reserve University, Department of Biomedical Engineering/Louis Stokes, Cleveland Veterans Administration Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Wolf DM, Yau C, Wulfkuhle J, Gallagher RI, Swigart LAB, Hirst GL, Coppe JP, Magbanua MJM, Sayaman R, Investigators ISPY, Sit L, Hylton NM, DeMichele A, Berry DA, Pusztai L, Yee D, Esserman LJ, Petricoin EF, Van ’t Veer L. Abstract PD5-04: PD5-04 Characterizing the HER2-/Immune-/DNA repair (DRD-) response predictive breast cancer subtype: the hunt for new protein targets in a high-needs population with low response to all I-SPY2 agents. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-pd5-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: In previous work we leveraged the I-SPY2 trial to create treatment response predictive subtypes (RPS) incorporating tumor biology beyond clinical HR/HER2, to better predict drug responses in an expanded treatment landscape that includes platinum agents, dual HER2-targeting regimens and immunotherapy [1]. We showed that best performing schemas incorporate Immune, DRD and HER2/Luminal phenotypes, and that treatment allocation based on these would increase the overall pCR rate to 63% from 51% using HR/HER2-based treatment selection. The RPS schema has been selected for prospective evaluation in I-SPY2. Using the RPS, one would prioritize platinum-based therapy for HER2-/Immune-/DRD+, immunotherapy for HER2-/Immune+, and dual-anti-HER2 for HER2+ that are not luminal. HER2+/Luminal patients have low response rates to dual-anti-HER2 therapy but may respond better to anti-AKT. However, there is still a considerable ‘biomarker-negative’ group of resistant cancers (HER2-/Immune-/DRD-) with very low pCR rates to all tested agents, that require a new therapeutic approach. Here we characterize the protein signaling architecture of these tumors to identify new target candidates. Methods: 987 I-SPY 2 patients from 10 arms of the trial were considered for this analysis. All have gene expression, pCR and RPS; 944 have distant recurrence free survival (DRFS) data; and 736 have reverse phase protein array (RPPA) data from laser capture microdissected tumor epithelium. These data – known collectively as the I-SPY2-990 mRNA/RPPA Data Resource - were recently made public on NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus [GEO: GSE196096]. We focus on HER2-/Immune-/DRD- tumors, applying Wilcoxon and t-tests to identify phosphoproteins that differ between HR+HER2-/Immune-/DRD- and other HR+HER2- tumors; and between TN/Immune-/DRD- and other TNs. The Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) method is used to adjust p-values for multiple hypothesis testing. In addition, the Kaplan-Meier method is used to estimate DRFS. Results: 201/736 I-SPY 2 patients with RPPA data are classified HER2-/Immune-/DRD- (HR+HER2-: n=138; TN: n=63). Of these, 8.5% (17/201) achieved pCR. Non-responding HER2-/Immune-DRD- had worse outcomes than responders (~75% vs. ~95% DRFS at 5 years). 60/139 phospho-proteins differ significantly between HR+HER2-/Immune-/DRD- and other HR+HER2- tumors (n=122). These tumors are relatively ‘cold’, in that 90% (54/60) of the phosphoprotein activities characterizing this group are at lower levels than in the overall HR+HER2- population; including immune (e.g. pPDL1, pJAK/STAT) and proliferation (e.g., Ki67, CyclinB1, pAURK) endpoints. Phosphoproteins showing higher levels in this subset include ERBB2 (BH p=1.7E-06), Cyclin D1 (BH p=1.4E-05), pAR (BH p=1.4E-05), and ER (BH p=3E-04). Within the TN subset, only 3/139 phospho-proteins differed significantly between TN/Immune-/DRD- and other TN tumors (n=189). These were all immune-related (pPDL1, pSTAT1, and HLA DR), with lower expression in the TN/Immune-/DRD- group. Conclusion: HR+HER2- and TN patients who are Immune-Low and DRD-Low have very low pCR rates to all tested therapeutics in I-SPY2 including standard chemotherapy, platinum, and immunotherapy. Senolytics (possibly targeting Cyclin D1), HER2low agents, and AR modulators may overcome resistance in HR+HER2-/Immune-/DRD-, whereas an immune activator beyond checkpoint inhibition is suggested for TN/Immune-/DRD- patients. [1] Wolf et. al., Redefining Breast Cancer Subtypes to Guide Treatment Prioritization and Maximize Response: Predictive Biomarkers across 10 Cancer Therapies. Cancer Cell 2022
Citation Format: Denise M. Wolf, Christina Yau, Julia Wulfkuhle, Rosa I. Gallagher, Lamorna A. Brown Swigart, Gillian L. Hirst, Jean-Philippe Coppe, Mark Jesus M. Magbanua, Rosalyn Sayaman, I-SPY2 Investigators, Laura Sit, Nola M. Hylton, Angela DeMichele, Donald A. Berry, Lajos Pusztai, Douglas Yee, Laura J. Esserman, Emanuel F. Petricoin, Laura Van ’t Veer. PD5-04 Characterizing the HER2-/Immune-/DNA repair (DRD-) response predictive breast cancer subtype: the hunt for new protein targets in a high-needs population with low response to all I-SPY2 agents [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD5-04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christina Yau
- 2University of California, San Francisco and Buck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, California
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Laura Sit
- 11University of California, San Francisco
| | | | | | | | | | - Douglas Yee
- 16Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minnesota
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|