1
|
Ly A, Garcia V, Blenman KRM, Ehinger A, Elfer K, Hanna MG, Li X, Peeters DJE, Birmingham R, Dudgeon S, Gardecki E, Gupta R, Lennerz J, Pan T, Saltz J, Wharton KA, Ehinger D, Acs B, Dequeker EMC, Salgado R, Gallas BD. Training pathologists to assess stromal tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer synergises efforts in clinical care and scientific research. Histopathology 2024; 84:915-923. [PMID: 38433289 PMCID: PMC10990791 DOI: 10.1111/his.15140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/31/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
A growing body of research supports stromal tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) density in breast cancer to be a robust prognostic and predicive biomarker. The gold standard for stromal TIL density quantitation in breast cancer is pathologist visual assessment using haematoxylin and eosin-stained slides. Artificial intelligence/machine-learning algorithms are in development to automate the stromal TIL scoring process, and must be validated against a reference standard such as pathologist visual assessment. Visual TIL assessment may suffer from significant interobserver variability. To improve interobserver agreement, regulatory science experts at the US Food and Drug Administration partnered with academic pathologists internationally to create a freely available online continuing medical education (CME) course to train pathologists in assessing breast cancer stromal TILs using an interactive format with expert commentary. Here we describe and provide a user guide to this CME course, whose content was designed to improve pathologist accuracy in scoring breast cancer TILs. We also suggest subsequent steps to translate knowledge into clinical practice with proficiency testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Ly
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Victor Garcia
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Division of Imaging, Diagnostics, and Software Reliability, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Kim RM Blenman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology and Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Computer Science, Yale School of Engineering and Applied Science, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Anna Ehinger
- Department of Genetics, Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Laboratory Medicine, Region Skane, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Katherine Elfer
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Division of Imaging, Diagnostics, and Software Reliability, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Matthew G Hanna
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Xiaoxian Li
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Dieter JE Peeters
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
- Department of Pathology, Algemeen Ziekenhuis (AZ) Sint-Maarten, Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Ryan Birmingham
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Division of Imaging, Diagnostics, and Software Reliability, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sarah Dudgeon
- Center for Computational Health, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Emma Gardecki
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Division of Imaging, Diagnostics, and Software Reliability, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Rajarsi Gupta
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Jochen Lennerz
- Department of Pathology, Center for Integrated Diagnostics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; currently at BostonGene, Boston, MA
| | - Tony Pan
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Joel Saltz
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | | | - Daniel Ehinger
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Oncology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Genetics, Pathology, and Molecular Diagnostics, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Balazs Acs
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Cancer Centre Karolinska, Karolinksa Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Elisabeth MC Dequeker
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Biomedical Quality Assurance Research Unit, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Department of Pathology, Gasthuiszusters Antwerpen-Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen (GZA-ZNA) Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
- Division of Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Brandon D Gallas
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Division of Imaging, Diagnostics, and Software Reliability, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Palmquist E, Sevilimedu V, Garcia P, Le T, Zhang X, Pinker-Domenig K, Hanna MG, Nelson JA, Morrow M, El-Tamer M. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Lumpectomy With and Without Defect Closure. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:1615-1622. [PMID: 38063989 PMCID: PMC10923194 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14584-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effect of lumpectomy defect repair (a level 1 oncoplastic technique) on patient-reported breast satisfaction among patients undergoing lumpectomy has not yet been investigated. METHODS Patients undergoing lumpectomy at our institution between 2018 and 2020 with or without repair of their lumpectomy defect during index operation, comprised our study population. The BREAST-Q quality-of-life questionnaire was administered preoperatively, and at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Satisfaction and quality-of-life domains were compared between those who did and did not have closure of their lumpectomy defect, and compared with surgeon-reported outcomes. RESULTS A total of 487 patients met eligibility criteria, 206 (42%) had their partial mastectomy defect repaired by glandular displacement. Median breast volume, as calculated from the mammogram, was smaller in patients undergoing defect closure (826 cm3 vs. 895 cm3, p = 0.006). There were no statistically significant differences in satisfaction with breasts (SABTR), physical well-being of the chest (PWB-CHEST), or psychosocial well-being (PsychWB) scores between the two cohorts at any time point. While patients undergoing defect closure had significantly higher sexual well-being (SexWB) scores compared with no closure (66 vs. 59, p = 0.021), there were no predictors of improvement in SexWB scores over time on multivariable analysis. Patients' self-reported scores positively correlated with physician-reported outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Despite a larger lumpectomy-to-breast volume ratio among patients undergoing defect repair, satisfaction was equivalent among those whose defects were or were not repaired at 2 years postsurgery. Defect repair was associated with clinically relevant improvement in patient-reported sexual well-being.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Palmquist
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Varadan Sevilimedu
- Biostatistics Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paula Garcia
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tiana Le
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Xinyi Zhang
- Biostatistics Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Katja Pinker-Domenig
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew G Hanna
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jonas A Nelson
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgical Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Monica Morrow
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mahmoud El-Tamer
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jahangir CA, Page DB, Broeckx G, Gonzalez CA, Burke C, Murphy C, Reis-Filho JS, Ly A, Harms PW, Gupta RR, Vieth M, Hida AI, Kahila M, Kos Z, van Diest PJ, Verbandt S, Thagaard J, Khiroya R, Abduljabbar K, Acosta Haab G, Acs B, Adams S, Almeida JS, Alvarado-Cabrero I, Azmoudeh-Ardalan F, Badve S, Baharun NB, Bellolio ER, Bheemaraju V, Blenman KR, Botinelly Mendonça Fujimoto L, Burgues O, Chardas A, Cheang MCU, Ciompi F, Cooper LA, Coosemans A, Corredor G, Dantas Portela FL, Deman F, Demaria S, Dudgeon SN, Elghazawy M, Fernandez-Martín C, Fineberg S, Fox SB, Giltnane JM, Gnjatic S, Gonzalez-Ericsson PI, Grigoriadis A, Halama N, Hanna MG, Harbhajanka A, Hart SN, Hartman J, Hewitt S, Horlings HM, Husain Z, Irshad S, Janssen EA, Kataoka TR, Kawaguchi K, Khramtsov AI, Kiraz U, Kirtani P, Kodach LL, Korski K, Akturk G, Scott E, Kovács A, Laenkholm AV, Lang-Schwarz C, Larsimont D, Lennerz JK, Lerousseau M, Li X, Madabhushi A, Maley SK, Manur Narasimhamurthy V, Marks DK, McDonald ES, Mehrotra R, Michiels S, Kharidehal D, Minhas FUAA, Mittal S, Moore DA, Mushtaq S, Nighat H, Papathomas T, Penault-Llorca F, Perera RD, Pinard CJ, Pinto-Cardenas JC, Pruneri G, Pusztai L, Rajpoot NM, Rapoport BL, Rau TT, Ribeiro JM, Rimm D, Vincent-Salomon A, Saltz J, Sayed S, Hytopoulos E, Mahon S, Siziopikou KP, Sotiriou C, Stenzinger A, Sughayer MA, Sur D, Symmans F, Tanaka S, Taxter T, Tejpar S, Teuwen J, Thompson EA, Tramm T, Tran WT, van der Laak J, Verghese GE, Viale G, Wahab N, Walter T, Waumans Y, Wen HY, Yang W, Yuan Y, Bartlett J, Loibl S, Denkert C, Savas P, Loi S, Specht Stovgaard E, Salgado R, Gallagher WM, Rahman A. Image-based multiplex immune profiling of cancer tissues: translational implications. A report of the International Immuno-oncology Biomarker Working Group on Breast Cancer. J Pathol 2024; 262:271-288. [PMID: 38230434 DOI: 10.1002/path.6238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
Recent advances in the field of immuno-oncology have brought transformative changes in the management of cancer patients. The immune profile of tumours has been found to have key value in predicting disease prognosis and treatment response in various cancers. Multiplex immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence have emerged as potent tools for the simultaneous detection of multiple protein biomarkers in a single tissue section, thereby expanding opportunities for molecular and immune profiling while preserving tissue samples. By establishing the phenotype of individual tumour cells when distributed within a mixed cell population, the identification of clinically relevant biomarkers with high-throughput multiplex immunophenotyping of tumour samples has great potential to guide appropriate treatment choices. Moreover, the emergence of novel multi-marker imaging approaches can now provide unprecedented insights into the tumour microenvironment, including the potential interplay between various cell types. However, there are significant challenges to widespread integration of these technologies in daily research and clinical practice. This review addresses the challenges and potential solutions within a structured framework of action from a regulatory and clinical trial perspective. New developments within the field of immunophenotyping using multiplexed tissue imaging platforms and associated digital pathology are also described, with a specific focus on translational implications across different subtypes of cancer. © 2024 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chowdhury Arif Jahangir
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - David B Page
- Earle A Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Glenn Broeckx
- Department of Pathology PA2, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
- Centre for Oncological Research (CORE), MIPPRO, Faculty of Medicine, Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Claudia A Gonzalez
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Caoimbhe Burke
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Clodagh Murphy
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jorge S Reis-Filho
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amy Ly
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Paul W Harms
- Departments of Pathology and Dermatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Rajarsi R Gupta
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Michael Vieth
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Akira I Hida
- Department of Pathology, Matsuyama Shimin Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Mohamed Kahila
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Zuzana Kos
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sara Verbandt
- Digestive Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jeppe Thagaard
- Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
- Visiopharm A/S, Hørsholm, Denmark
| | - Reena Khiroya
- Department of Cellular Pathology, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Khalid Abduljabbar
- Centre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Balazs Acs
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sylvia Adams
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Manhattan, NY, USA
| | - Jonas S Almeida
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (DCEG), National Cancer Institute (NCI), Rockville, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Sunil Badve
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Enrique R Bellolio
- Departamento de Anatomía Patológica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile
| | | | - Kim Rm Blenman
- Department of Internal Medicine Section of Medical Oncology and Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Computer Science, Yale School of Engineering and Applied Science, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Octavio Burgues
- Pathology Department, Hospital Cliníco Universitario de Valencia/Incliva, Valencia, Spain
| | - Alexandros Chardas
- Department of Pathobiology & Population Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, London, UK
| | - Maggie Chon U Cheang
- Head of Integrative Genomics Analysis in Clinical Trials, ICR-CTSU, Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Francesco Ciompi
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lee Ad Cooper
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Germán Corredor
- Biomedical Engineering Department, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Frederik Deman
- Department of Pathology PA2, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Sandra Demaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pathology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sarah N Dudgeon
- Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Mahmoud Elghazawy
- University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
- Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Claudio Fernandez-Martín
- Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Tecnología Centrada en el Ser Humano, HUMAN-tech, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain
| | - Susan Fineberg
- Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Stephen B Fox
- Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Sacha Gnjatic
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Medicine Hem/Onc, and Pathology, Tisch Cancer Institute - Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Anita Grigoriadis
- Cancer Bioinformatics, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Niels Halama
- Department of Translational Immunotherapy, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Steven N Hart
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Johan Hartman
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Stephen Hewitt
- Laboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Hugo M Horlings
- Division of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sheeba Irshad
- King's College London & Guys & St Thomas NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Emiel Am Janssen
- Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Chemistry, Bioscience and Environmental Technology, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | | | - Kosuke Kawaguchi
- Department of Breast Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Andrey I Khramtsov
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Umay Kiraz
- Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Chemistry, Bioscience and Environmental Technology, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Pawan Kirtani
- Histopathology, Aakash Healthcare Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Liudmila L Kodach
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Konstanty Korski
- Data, Analytics and Imaging, Product Development, F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Guray Akturk
- Translational Molecular Biomarkers, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA
| | - Ely Scott
- Translational Medicine, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Anikó Kovács
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anne-Vibeke Laenkholm
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
- Department of Surgical Pathology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Corinna Lang-Schwarz
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Denis Larsimont
- Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jochen K Lennerz
- Center for Integrated Diagnostics, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marvin Lerousseau
- Centre for Computational Biology (CBIO), Mines Paris, PSL University, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France
- INSERM U900, Paris, France
| | - Xiaoxian Li
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Anant Madabhushi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Biomedical Informatics, Pathology, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sai K Maley
- NRG Oncology/NSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Douglas K Marks
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth S McDonald
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Group, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ravi Mehrotra
- Indian Cancer Genomic Atlas, Pune, India
- Centre for Health, Innovation and Policy Foundation, Noida, India
| | - Stefan Michiels
- Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, Inserm, University Paris-Saclay, Ligue Contre le Cancer labeled Team, Villejuif, France
| | - Durga Kharidehal
- Department of Pathology, Narayana Medical College and Hospital, Nellore, India
| | - Fayyaz Ul Amir Afsar Minhas
- Tissue Image Analytics Centre, Warwick Cancer Research Centre, PathLAKE Consortium, Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Shachi Mittal
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - David A Moore
- CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, UCL and Cellular Pathology Department, UCLH, London, UK
| | - Shamim Mushtaq
- Department of Biochemistry, Ziauddin University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Hussain Nighat
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, India
| | - Thomas Papathomas
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Drammen Sykehus, Vestre Viken HF, Drammen, Norway
| | - Frederique Penault-Llorca
- Service de Pathologie et Biopathologie, Centre Jean PERRIN, INSERM U1240 Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies Théranostiques (IMoST), Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Rashindrie D Perera
- School of Electrical, Mechanical and Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christopher J Pinard
- Radiogenomics Laboratory, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Lakeshore Animal Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
- Centre for Advancing Responsible and Ethical Artificial Intelligence (CARE-AI), University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Giancarlo Pruneri
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Bernardo Leon Rapoport
- The Medical Oncology Centre of Rosebank, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Department of Immunology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Tilman T Rau
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Düsseldorf and Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - David Rimm
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Anne Vincent-Salomon
- Department of Diagnostic and Theranostic Medicine, Institut Curie, University Paris-Sciences et Lettres, Paris, France
| | - Joel Saltz
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shahin Sayed
- Department of Pathology, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Evangelos Hytopoulos
- Department of Pathology, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya
- iRhythm Technologies Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sarah Mahon
- Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Kalliopi P Siziopikou
- Department of Pathology, Section of Breast Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Christos Sotiriou
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory J.-C. Heuson, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Albrecht Stenzinger
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Centers for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Daniel Sur
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Iuliu Hatieganu", Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Fraser Symmans
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Sabine Tejpar
- Digestive Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jonas Teuwen
- AI for Oncology Lab, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Trine Tramm
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - William T Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jeroen van der Laak
- Head of Integrative Genomics Analysis in Clinical Trials, ICR-CTSU, Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Gregory E Verghese
- Cancer Bioinformatics, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Department of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology & University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Noorul Wahab
- Tissue Image Analytics Centre, Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Thomas Walter
- Centre for Computational Biology (CBIO), Mines Paris, PSL University, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France
- INSERM U900, Paris, France
| | | | - Hannah Y Wen
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wentao Yang
- Fudan Medical University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Yinyin Yuan
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Sibylle Loibl
- Department of Medicine and Research, German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Peter Savas
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sherene Loi
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Roberto Salgado
- Department of Pathology PA2, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - William M Gallagher
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Arman Rahman
- UCD School of Medicine, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Palmquist E, Sevilimedu V, Garcia P, Le T, Zhang X, Pinker-Domenig K, Hanna MG, Nelson JA, Morrow M, El-Tamer M. ASO Visual Abstract: Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Lumpectomy With and Without Defect Closure. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:1661-1662. [PMID: 38105382 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14732-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Palmquist
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Varadan Sevilimedu
- Biostatistics Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paula Garcia
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tiana Le
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Xinyi Zhang
- Biostatistics Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Katja Pinker-Domenig
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew G Hanna
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jonas A Nelson
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgical Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Monica Morrow
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mahmoud El-Tamer
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Elfer K, Gardecki E, Garcia V, Ly A, Hytopoulos E, Wen S, Hanna MG, Peeters DJE, Saltz J, Ehinger A, Dudgeon SN, Li X, Blenman KRM, Chen W, Green U, Birmingham R, Pan T, Lennerz JK, Salgado R, Gallas BD. Reproducible Reporting of the Collection and Evaluation of Annotations for Artificial Intelligence Models. Mod Pathol 2024; 37:100439. [PMID: 38286221 DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/21/2024] [Indexed: 01/31/2024]
Abstract
This work puts forth and demonstrates the utility of a reporting framework for collecting and evaluating annotations of medical images used for training and testing artificial intelligence (AI) models in assisting detection and diagnosis. AI has unique reporting requirements, as shown by the AI extensions to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) and Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) checklists and the proposed AI extensions to the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) and Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) checklists. AI for detection and/or diagnostic image analysis requires complete, reproducible, and transparent reporting of the annotations and metadata used in training and testing data sets. In an earlier work by other researchers, an annotation workflow and quality checklist for computational pathology annotations were proposed. In this manuscript, we operationalize this workflow into an evaluable quality checklist that applies to any reader-interpreted medical images, and we demonstrate its use for an annotation effort in digital pathology. We refer to this quality framework as the Collection and Evaluation of Annotations for Reproducible Reporting of Artificial Intelligence (CLEARR-AI).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Elfer
- United States Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Division of Imaging Diagnostics and Software Reliability, Silver Spring, Maryland; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention, Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Bethesda, Maryland.
| | - Emma Gardecki
- United States Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Division of Imaging Diagnostics and Software Reliability, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Victor Garcia
- United States Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Division of Imaging Diagnostics and Software Reliability, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Amy Ly
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Si Wen
- United States Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Division of Imaging Diagnostics and Software Reliability, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Matthew G Hanna
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Dieter J E Peeters
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Antwerp/University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of Pathology, Sint-Maarten Hospital, Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Joel Saltz
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Anna Ehinger
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sarah N Dudgeon
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Xiaoxian Li
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Kim R M Blenman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine and Yale Cancer Center, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Computer Science, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Weijie Chen
- United States Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Division of Imaging Diagnostics and Software Reliability, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Ursula Green
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ryan Birmingham
- United States Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Division of Imaging Diagnostics and Software Reliability, Silver Spring, Maryland; Department of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Tony Pan
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jochen K Lennerz
- Department of Pathology, Center for Integrated Diagnostics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Division of Research, Peter Mac Callum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Brandon D Gallas
- United States Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Division of Imaging Diagnostics and Software Reliability, Silver Spring, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hanna MG, Olson NH, Zarella M, Dash RC, Herrmann MD, Furtado LV, Stram MN, Raciti PM, Hassell L, Mays A, Pantanowitz L, Sirintrapun JS, Krishnamurthy S, Parwani A, Lujan G, Evans A, Glassy EF, Bui MM, Singh R, Souers RJ, de Baca ME, Seheult JN. Recommendations for Performance Evaluation of Machine Learning in Pathology: A Concept Paper From the College of American Pathologists. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2023:497389. [PMID: 38041522 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2023-0042-cp] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— Machine learning applications in the pathology clinical domain are emerging rapidly. As decision support systems continue to mature, laboratories will increasingly need guidance to evaluate their performance in clinical practice. Currently there are no formal guidelines to assist pathology laboratories in verification and/or validation of such systems. These recommendations are being proposed for the evaluation of machine learning systems in the clinical practice of pathology. OBJECTIVE.— To propose recommendations for performance evaluation of in vitro diagnostic tests on patient samples that incorporate machine learning as part of the preanalytical, analytical, or postanalytical phases of the laboratory workflow. Topics described include considerations for machine learning model evaluation including risk assessment, predeployment requirements, data sourcing and curation, verification and validation, change control management, human-computer interaction, practitioner training, and competency evaluation. DATA SOURCES.— An expert panel performed a review of the literature, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidance, and laboratory and government regulatory frameworks. CONCLUSIONS.— Review of the literature and existing documents enabled the development of proposed recommendations. This white paper pertains to performance evaluation of machine learning systems intended to be implemented for clinical patient testing. Further studies with real-world clinical data are encouraged to support these proposed recommendations. Performance evaluation of machine learning models is critical to verification and/or validation of in vitro diagnostic tests using machine learning intended for clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew G Hanna
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (Hanna, Sirintrapun)
| | - Niels H Olson
- The Defense Innovation Unit, Mountain View, California (Olson)
- The Department of Pathology, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland (Olson)
| | - Mark Zarella
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Zarella, Seheult)
| | - Rajesh C Dash
- Department of Pathology, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina (Dash)
| | - Markus D Herrmann
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston (Herrmann)
| | - Larissa V Furtado
- Department of Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee (Furtado)
| | - Michelle N Stram
- The Department of Forensic Medicine, New York University, and Office of Chief Medical Examiner, New York (Stram)
| | | | - Lewis Hassell
- Department of Pathology, Oklahoma University Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (Hassell)
| | - Alex Mays
- The MITRE Corporation, McLean, Virginia (Mays)
| | - Liron Pantanowitz
- Department of Pathology & Clinical Labs, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Pantanowitz)
| | - Joseph S Sirintrapun
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (Hanna, Sirintrapun)
| | | | - Anil Parwani
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus (Parwani, Lujan)
| | - Giovanni Lujan
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus (Parwani, Lujan)
| | - Andrew Evans
- Laboratory Medicine, Mackenzie Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Evans)
| | - Eric F Glassy
- Affiliated Pathologists Medical Group, Rancho Dominguez, California (Glassy)
| | - Marilyn M Bui
- Departments of Pathology and Machine Learning, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida (Bui)
| | - Rajendra Singh
- Department of Dermatopathology, Summit Health, Summit Woodland Park, New Jersey (Singh)
| | - Rhona J Souers
- Department of Biostatistics, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois (Souers)
| | | | - Jansen N Seheult
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Zarella, Seheult)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hart S, Garcia V, Dudgeon SN, Hanna MG, Li X, Blenman KRM, Elfer K, Ly A, Salgado R, Saltz J, Gupta R, Hytopoulos E, Larsimont D, Lennerz J, Gallas BD. Initial interactions with the FDA on developing a validation dataset as a medical device development tool. J Pathol 2023; 261:378-384. [PMID: 37794720 PMCID: PMC10841854 DOI: 10.1002/path.6208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
Quantifying tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer tumors is a challenging task for pathologists. With the advent of whole slide imaging that digitizes glass slides, it is possible to apply computational models to quantify TILs for pathologists. Development of computational models requires significant time, expertise, consensus, and investment. To reduce this burden, we are preparing a dataset for developers to validate their models and a proposal to the Medical Device Development Tool (MDDT) program in the Center for Devices and Radiological Health of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). If the FDA qualifies the dataset for its submitted context of use, model developers can use it in a regulatory submission within the qualified context of use without additional documentation. Our dataset aims at reducing the regulatory burden placed on developers of models that estimate the density of TILs and will allow head-to-head comparison of multiple computational models on the same data. In this paper, we discuss the MDDT preparation and submission process, including the feedback we received from our initial interactions with the FDA and propose how a qualified MDDT validation dataset could be a mechanism for open, fair, and consistent measures of computational model performance. Our experiences will help the community understand what the FDA considers relevant and appropriate (from the perspective of the submitter), at the early stages of the MDDT submission process, for validating stromal TIL density estimation models and other potential computational models. © 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Hart
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, USA
| | - Victor Garcia
- Division of Imaging, Diagnostics, and Software Reliability, Office Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Sarah N. Dudgeon
- Computational Biology and Bioinformatics Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Xiaoxian Li
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Kim RM Blenman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Computer Science, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Katherine Elfer
- Division of Imaging, Diagnostics, and Software Reliability, Office Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Amy Ly
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, MA, USA
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
- Division of Research, Peter Mac Callum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Joel Saltz
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook School of Medicine, Stony Brook NY, USA
| | - Rajarsi Gupta
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook School of Medicine, Stony Brook NY, USA
| | | | - Denis Larsimont
- Department of Pathology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jochen Lennerz
- Massachusetts General Hospital/Massachusetts General Hospital, Center for Integrated Diagnostics, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Brandon D. Gallas
- Division of Imaging, Diagnostics, and Software Reliability, Office Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nadeem S, Hanna MG, Viswanathan K, Marino J, Ahadi M, Alzumaili B, Bani MA, Chiarucci F, Chou A, De Leo A, Fuchs TL, Lubin DJ, Luxford C, Magliocca K, Martinez G, Shi Q, Sidhu S, Ghuzlan AA, Gill AJ, Tallini G, Ghossein R, Xu B. Ki67 proliferation index in medullary thyroid carcinoma: a comparative study of multiple counting methods and validation of image analysis and deep learning platforms. Histopathology 2023; 83:981-988. [PMID: 37706239 PMCID: PMC10840805 DOI: 10.1111/his.15048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The International Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma Grading System, introduced in 2022, mandates evaluation of the Ki67 proliferation index to assign a histological grade for medullary thyroid carcinoma. However, manual counting remains a tedious and time-consuming task. METHODS AND RESULTS We aimed to evaluate the performance of three other counting techniques for the Ki67 index, eyeballing by a trained experienced investigator, a machine learning-based deep learning algorithm (DeepLIIF) and an image analysis software with internal thresholding compared to the gold standard manual counting in a large cohort of 260 primarily resected medullary thyroid carcinoma. The Ki67 proliferation index generated by all three methods correlate near-perfectly with the manual Ki67 index, with kappa values ranging from 0.884 to 0.979 and interclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.969 to 0.983. Discrepant Ki67 results were only observed in cases with borderline manual Ki67 readings, ranging from 3 to 7%. Medullary thyroid carcinomas with a high Ki67 index (≥ 5%) determined using any of the four methods were associated with significantly decreased disease-specific survival and distant metastasis-free survival. CONCLUSIONS We herein validate a machine learning-based deep-learning platform and an image analysis software with internal thresholding to generate accurate automatic Ki67 proliferation indices in medullary thyroid carcinoma. Manual Ki67 count remains useful when facing a tumour with a borderline Ki67 proliferation index of 3-7%. In daily practice, validation of alternative evaluation methods for the Ki67 index in MTC is required prior to implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saad Nadeem
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew G. Hanna
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kartik Viswanathan
- Department of Pathology, Emory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Joseph Marino
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mahsa Ahadi
- Royal North Shore Hospital and Northern Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Cancer Diagnosis and Pathology Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Australia
- NSW Health Pathology, Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonard, Australia
| | - Bayan Alzumaili
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mohamed-Amine Bani
- Medical Pathology and Biology Department, Gustave Roussy Campus Cancer, Villejuif, France
| | - Federico Chiarucci
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna Medical Center; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Angela Chou
- Royal North Shore Hospital and Northern Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Cancer Diagnosis and Pathology Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Australia
- NSW Health Pathology, Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonard, Australia
| | - Antonio De Leo
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna Medical Center; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Talia L. Fuchs
- Royal North Shore Hospital and Northern Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Cancer Diagnosis and Pathology Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Australia
- NSW Health Pathology, Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonard, Australia
| | - Daniel J Lubin
- Department of Pathology, Emory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Catherine Luxford
- Royal North Shore Hospital and Northern Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Cancer Diagnosis and Pathology Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Australia
- NSW Health Pathology, Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonard, Australia
| | - Kelly Magliocca
- Department of Pathology, Emory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Germán Martinez
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Qiuying Shi
- Department of Pathology, Emory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Stan Sidhu
- Royal North Shore Hospital and Northern Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Cancer Diagnosis and Pathology Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Australia
- NSW Health Pathology, Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonard, Australia
| | - Abir Al Ghuzlan
- Medical Pathology and Biology Department, Gustave Roussy Campus Cancer, Villejuif, France
| | - Anthony J. Gill
- Royal North Shore Hospital and Northern Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Cancer Diagnosis and Pathology Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Australia
- NSW Health Pathology, Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonard, Australia
| | - Giovanni Tallini
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna Medical Center; IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Ronald Ghossein
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bin Xu
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hanna MG, Ardon O. Digital pathology systems enabling quality patient care. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2023; 62:685-697. [PMID: 37458325 DOI: 10.1002/gcc.23192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Pathology laboratories are undergoing digital transformations, adopting innovative technologies to enhance patient care. Digital pathology systems impact clinical, education, and research use cases where pathologists use digital technologies to perform tasks in lieu of using glass slides and a microscope. Pathology professional societies have established clinical validation guidelines, and the US Food and Drug Administration have also authorized digital pathology systems for primary diagnosis, including image analysis and machine learning systems. Whole slide images, or digital slides, can be viewed and navigated similar to glass slides on a microscope. These modern tools not only enable pathologists to practice their routine clinical activities, but can potentially enable digital computational discovery. Assimilation of whole slide images in pathology clinical workflow can further empower machine learning systems to support computer assisted diagnostics. The potential enrichment these systems can provide is unprecedented in the field of pathology. With appropriate integration, these clinical decision support systems will allow pathologists to increase the delivery of quality patient care. This review describes the digital pathology transformation process, applicable clinical use cases, incorporation of image analysis and machine learning systems in the clinical workflow, as well as future technologies that may further disrupt pathology modalities to deliver quality patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew G Hanna
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Orly Ardon
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hanna MG, Brogi E. Future Practices of Breast Pathology Using Digital and Computational Pathology. Adv Anat Pathol 2023; 30:421-433. [PMID: 37737690 DOI: 10.1097/pap.0000000000000414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
Pathology clinical practice has evolved by adopting technological advancements initially regarded as potentially disruptive, such as electron microscopy, immunohistochemistry, and genomic sequencing. Breast pathology has a critical role as a medical domain, where the patient's pathology diagnosis has significant implications for prognostication and treatment of diseases. The advent of digital and computational pathology has brought about significant advancements in the field, offering new possibilities for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and improving patient care. Digital slide scanning enables to conversion of glass slides into high-fidelity digital images, supporting the review of cases in a digital workflow. Digitization offers the capability to render specimen diagnoses, digital archival of patient specimens, collaboration, and telepathology. Integration of image analysis and machine learning-based systems layered atop the high-resolution digital images offers novel workflows to assist breast pathologists in their clinical, educational, and research endeavors. Decision support tools may improve the detection and classification of breast lesions and the quantification of immunohistochemical studies. Computational biomarkers may help to contribute to patient management or outcomes. Furthermore, using digital and computational pathology may increase standardization and quality assurance, especially in areas with high interobserver variability. This review explores the current landscape and possible future applications of digital and computational techniques in the field of breast pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew G Hanna
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ardon O, Labasin M, Friedlander M, Manzo A, Corsale L, Ntiamoah P, Wright J, Elenitoba-Johnson K, Reuter VE, Hameed MR, Hanna MG. Quality Management System in Clinical Digital Pathology Operations at a Tertiary Cancer Center. J Transl Med 2023; 103:100246. [PMID: 37659445 PMCID: PMC10841911 DOI: 10.1016/j.labinv.2023.100246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Digital pathology workflows can improve pathology operations by allowing reliable and fast retrieval of digital images, digitally reviewing pathology slides, enabling remote work and telepathology, use of computer-aided tools, and sharing of digital images for research and educational purposes. The need for quality systems is a prerequisite for successful clinical-grade digital pathology adoption and patient safety. In this article, we describe the development of a structured digital pathology laboratory quality management system (QMS) for clinical digital pathology operations at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK). This digital pathology-specific QMS development stemmed from the gaps that were identified when MSK integrated digital pathology into its clinical practice. The digital scan team in conjunction with the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine quality team developed a QMS tailored to the scanning operation to support departmental and institutional needs. As a first step, systemic mapping of the digital pathology operations identified the prescan, scan, and postscan processes; instrumentation; and staffing involved in the digital pathology operation. Next, gaps identified in quality control and quality assurance measures led to the development of standard operating procedures and training material for the different roles and workflows in the process. All digital pathology-related documents were subject to regulatory review and approval by departmental leadership. The quality essentials were developed into an extensive Digital Pathology Quality Essentials framework to specifically address the needs of the growing clinical use of digital pathology technologies. Using the unique digital experience gained at MSK, we present our recommendations for QMS for large-scale digital pathology operations in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orly Ardon
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| | - Marc Labasin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Maria Friedlander
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Allyne Manzo
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Lorraine Corsale
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Peter Ntiamoah
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jeninne Wright
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kojo Elenitoba-Johnson
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Victor E Reuter
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Meera R Hameed
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Matthew G Hanna
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Thagaard J, Broeckx G, Page DB, Jahangir CA, Verbandt S, Kos Z, Gupta R, Khiroya R, Abduljabbar K, Acosta Haab G, Acs B, Akturk G, Almeida JS, Alvarado‐Cabrero I, Amgad M, Azmoudeh‐Ardalan F, Badve S, Baharun NB, Balslev E, Bellolio ER, Bheemaraju V, Blenman KRM, Botinelly Mendonça Fujimoto L, Bouchmaa N, Burgues O, Chardas A, Chon U Cheang M, Ciompi F, Cooper LAD, Coosemans A, Corredor G, Dahl AB, Dantas Portela FL, Deman F, Demaria S, Doré Hansen J, Dudgeon SN, Ebstrup T, Elghazawy M, Fernandez‐Martín C, Fox SB, Gallagher WM, Giltnane JM, Gnjatic S, Gonzalez‐Ericsson PI, Grigoriadis A, Halama N, Hanna MG, Harbhajanka A, Hart SN, Hartman J, Hauberg S, Hewitt S, Hida AI, Horlings HM, Husain Z, Hytopoulos E, Irshad S, Janssen EAM, Kahila M, Kataoka TR, Kawaguchi K, Kharidehal D, Khramtsov AI, Kiraz U, Kirtani P, Kodach LL, Korski K, Kovács A, Laenkholm A, Lang‐Schwarz C, Larsimont D, Lennerz JK, Lerousseau M, Li X, Ly A, Madabhushi A, Maley SK, Manur Narasimhamurthy V, Marks DK, McDonald ES, Mehrotra R, Michiels S, Minhas FUAA, Mittal S, Moore DA, Mushtaq S, Nighat H, Papathomas T, Penault‐Llorca F, Perera RD, Pinard CJ, Pinto‐Cardenas JC, Pruneri G, Pusztai L, Rahman A, Rajpoot NM, Rapoport BL, Rau TT, Reis‐Filho JS, Ribeiro JM, Rimm D, Roslind A, Vincent‐Salomon A, Salto‐Tellez M, Saltz J, Sayed S, Scott E, Siziopikou KP, Sotiriou C, Stenzinger A, Sughayer MA, Sur D, Fineberg S, Symmans F, Tanaka S, Taxter T, Tejpar S, Teuwen J, Thompson EA, Tramm T, Tran WT, van der Laak J, van Diest PJ, Verghese GE, Viale G, Vieth M, Wahab N, Walter T, Waumans Y, Wen HY, Yang W, Yuan Y, Zin RM, Adams S, Bartlett J, Loibl S, Denkert C, Savas P, Loi S, Salgado R, Specht Stovgaard E. Pitfalls in machine learning-based assessment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer: A report of the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group on Breast Cancer. J Pathol 2023; 260:498-513. [PMID: 37608772 PMCID: PMC10518802 DOI: 10.1002/path.6155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
The clinical significance of the tumor-immune interaction in breast cancer is now established, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have emerged as predictive and prognostic biomarkers for patients with triple-negative (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2-negative) breast cancer and HER2-positive breast cancer. How computational assessments of TILs might complement manual TIL assessment in trial and daily practices is currently debated. Recent efforts to use machine learning (ML) to automatically evaluate TILs have shown promising results. We review state-of-the-art approaches and identify pitfalls and challenges of automated TIL evaluation by studying the root cause of ML discordances in comparison to manual TIL quantification. We categorize our findings into four main topics: (1) technical slide issues, (2) ML and image analysis aspects, (3) data challenges, and (4) validation issues. The main reason for discordant assessments is the inclusion of false-positive areas or cells identified by performance on certain tissue patterns or design choices in the computational implementation. To aid the adoption of ML for TIL assessment, we provide an in-depth discussion of ML and image analysis, including validation issues that need to be considered before reliable computational reporting of TILs can be incorporated into the trial and routine clinical management of patients with triple-negative breast cancer. © 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeppe Thagaard
- Technical University of DenmarkKongens LyngbyDenmark
- Visiopharm A/SHørsholmDenmark
| | - Glenn Broeckx
- Department of PathologyGZA‐ZNA HospitalsAntwerpBelgium
- Centre for Oncological Research (CORE), MIPPRO, Faculty of MedicineAntwerp UniversityAntwerpBelgium
| | - David B Page
- Earle A Chiles Research InstituteProvidence Cancer InstitutePortlandORUSA
| | - Chowdhury Arif Jahangir
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway InstituteUniversity College DublinDublinIreland
| | - Sara Verbandt
- Digestive Oncology, Department of OncologyKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Zuzana Kos
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineBC Cancer Vancouver Centre, University of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Rajarsi Gupta
- Department of Biomedical InformaticsStony Brook UniversityStony BrookNYUSA
| | - Reena Khiroya
- Department of Cellular PathologyUniversity College Hospital LondonLondonUK
| | | | | | - Balazs Acs
- Department of Oncology and PathologyKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer DiagnosticsKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
| | - Guray Akturk
- Translational Molecular Biomarkers, Merck & Co IncRahwayNJUSA
| | - Jonas S Almeida
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (DCEG)National Cancer Institute (NCI)Rockville, MDUSA
| | | | - Mohamed Amgad
- Department of PathologyNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoILUSA
| | | | - Sunil Badve
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of MedicineEmory University Winship Cancer InstituteAtlantaGAUSA
| | | | - Eva Balslev
- Department of PathologyHerlev and Gentofte HospitalHerlevDenmark
| | - Enrique R Bellolio
- Departamento de Anatomía Patológica, Facultad de MedicinaUniversidad de La FronteraTemucoChile
| | | | - Kim RM Blenman
- Department of Internal Medicine Section of Medical Oncology and Yale Cancer CenterYale School of MedicineNew HavenCTUSA
- Department of Computer ScienceYale School of Engineering and Applied ScienceNew HavenCTUSA
| | | | - Najat Bouchmaa
- Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Medical SciencesMohammed VI Polytechnic University (UM6P)Ben‐GuerirMorocco
| | - Octavio Burgues
- Pathology DepartmentHospital Cliníco Universitario de Valencia/InclivaValenciaSpain
| | - Alexandros Chardas
- Department of Pathobiology & Population SciencesThe Royal Veterinary CollegeLondonUK
| | - Maggie Chon U Cheang
- Head of Integrative Genomics Analysis in Clinical Trials, ICR‐CTSU, Division of Clinical StudiesThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Francesco Ciompi
- Radboud University Medical CenterDepartment of PathologyNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Lee AD Cooper
- Department of PathologyNorthwestern Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoILUSA
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and ImmunotherapyKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Germán Corredor
- Biomedical Engineering DepartmentEmory UniversityAtlantaGAUSA
| | - Anders B Dahl
- Technical University of DenmarkKongens LyngbyDenmark
| | | | | | - Sandra Demaria
- Department of Radiation OncologyWeill Cornell MedicineNew YorkNYUSA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineWeill Cornell MedicineNew YorkNYUSA
| | | | - Sarah N Dudgeon
- Conputational Biology and BioinformaticsYale UniversityNew HavenCTUSA
| | | | | | - Claudio Fernandez‐Martín
- Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Tecnología Centrada en el Ser Humano, HUMAN‐techUniversitat Politècnica de ValènciaValenciaSpain
| | - Stephen B Fox
- Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - William M Gallagher
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway InstituteUniversity College DublinDublinIreland
| | | | - Sacha Gnjatic
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Medicine Hem/Onc, and Pathology, Tisch Cancer Institute – Precision Immunology InstituteIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNYUSA
| | | | - Anita Grigoriadis
- Cancer Bioinformatics, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Niels Halama
- Department of Translational ImmunotherapyGerman Cancer Research CenterHeidelbergGermany
| | - Matthew G Hanna
- Department of PathologyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkUSA
| | | | - Steven N Hart
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and PathologyMayo ClinicRochester, MNUSA
| | - Johan Hartman
- Department of Oncology and PathologyKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer DiagnosticsKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
| | - Søren Hauberg
- Technical University of DenmarkKongens LyngbyDenmark
| | - Stephen Hewitt
- Laboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthBethesdaMDUSA
| | - Akira I Hida
- Department of PathologyMatsuyama Shimin HospitalMatsuyamaJapan
| | - Hugo M Horlings
- Division of PathologyNetherlands Cancer Institute (NKI)AmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | | | - Sheeba Irshad
- King's College London & Guy's & St Thomas’ NHS TrustLondonUK
| | - Emiel AM Janssen
- Department of PathologyStavanger University HospitalStavangerNorway
- Department of Chemistry, Bioscience and Environmental TechnologyUniversity of StavangerStavangerNorway
| | | | | | - Kosuke Kawaguchi
- Department of Breast SurgeryKyoto University Graduate School of MedicineKyotoJapan
| | | | - Andrey I Khramtsov
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineAnn & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoChicagoILUSA
| | - Umay Kiraz
- Department of PathologyStavanger University HospitalStavangerNorway
- Department of Chemistry, Bioscience and Environmental TechnologyUniversity of StavangerStavangerNorway
| | - Pawan Kirtani
- Department of HistopathologyAakash Healthcare Super Speciality HospitalNew DelhiIndia
| | - Liudmila L Kodach
- Department of PathologyNetherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek HospitalAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Konstanty Korski
- Data, Analytics and Imaging, Product DevelopmentF. Hoffmann‐La Roche AGBaselSwitzerland
| | - Anikó Kovács
- Department of Clinical PathologySahlgrenska University HospitalGothenburgSweden
- Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | - Anne‐Vibeke Laenkholm
- Department of Surgical PathologyZealand University HospitalRoskildeDenmark
- Department of Surgical PathologyUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Corinna Lang‐Schwarz
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbHFriedrich‐Alexander‐University Erlangen‐NurembergBayreuthGermany
| | - Denis Larsimont
- Institut Jules BordetUniversité Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium
| | - Jochen K Lennerz
- Center for Integrated DiagnosticsMassachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUSA
| | - Marvin Lerousseau
- Centre for Computational Biology (CBIO)Mines Paris, PSL UniversityParisFrance
- Institut CuriePSL UniversityParisFrance
- INSERMParisFrance
| | - Xiaoxian Li
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineEmory UniversityAtlantaGAUSA
| | - Amy Ly
- Department of PathologyMassachusetts General HospitalBostonMAUSA
| | - Anant Madabhushi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Biomedical Informatics, PathologyGeorgia Institute of Technology and Emory UniversityAtlantaGAUSA
| | - Sai K Maley
- NRG Oncology/NSABP FoundationPittsburghPAUSA
| | | | | | - Elizabeth S McDonald
- Breast Cancer Translational Research GroupUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPAUSA
| | - Ravi Mehrotra
- Indian Cancer Genomic AtlasPuneIndia
- Centre for Health, Innovation and Policy FoundationNoidaIndia
| | - Stefan Michiels
- Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, InsermUniversity Paris‐Saclay, Ligue Contre le Cancer labeled TeamVillejuifFrance
| | - Fayyaz ul Amir Afsar Minhas
- Tissue Image Analytics Centre, Warwick Cancer Research Centre, PathLAKE Consortium, Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK
| | - Shachi Mittal
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Department of Laboratory Medicine and PathologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattle, WAUSA
| | - David A Moore
- CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, UCL and Cellular Pathology DepartmentUCLHLondonUK
| | - Shamim Mushtaq
- Department of BiochemistryZiauddin UniversityKarachiPakistan
| | - Hussain Nighat
- Pathology and Laboratory MedicineAll India Institute of Medical sciencesRaipurIndia
| | - Thomas Papathomas
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems ResearchUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
- Department of Clinical PathologyDrammen Sykehus, Vestre Viken HFDrammenNorway
| | - Frederique Penault‐Llorca
- Centre Jean Perrin, Université Clermont Auvergne, INSERM, U1240 Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies ThéranostiquesClermont FerrandFrance
| | - Rashindrie D Perera
- School of Electrical, Mechanical and Infrastructure EngineeringUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Division of Cancer ResearchPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Christopher J Pinard
- Radiogenomics LaboratorySunnybrook Health Sciences CentreTorontoOntarioCanada
- Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary CollegeUniversity of GuelphGuelphOntarioCanada
- Department of OncologyLakeshore Animal Health PartnersMississaugaOntarioCanada
- Centre for Advancing Responsible and Ethical Artificial Intelligence (CARE‐AI)University of GuelphGuelphOntarioCanada
| | | | - Giancarlo Pruneri
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei TumoriMilanItaly
- Faculty of Medicine and SurgeryUniversity of MilanMilanItaly
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Yale Cancer CenterYale UniversityNew HavenCTUSA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yale School of MedicineYale UniversityNew HavenCTUSA
| | - Arman Rahman
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway InstituteUniversity College DublinDublinIreland
| | | | - Bernardo Leon Rapoport
- The Medical Oncology Centre of RosebankJohannesburgSouth Africa
- Department of Immunology, Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa
| | - Tilman T Rau
- Institute of PathologyUniversity Hospital Düsseldorf and Heinrich‐Heine‐University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
| | - Jorge S Reis‐Filho
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Joana M Ribeiro
- Département de Médecine OncologiqueGustave RoussyVillejuifFrance
| | - David Rimm
- Department of PathologyYale University School of MedicineNew HavenCTUSA
- Department of MedicineYale University School of MedicineNew HavenCTUSA
| | - Anne Roslind
- Department of PathologyHerlev and Gentofte HospitalHerlevDenmark
| | - Anne Vincent‐Salomon
- Department of Diagnostic and Theranostic Medicine, Institut CurieUniversity Paris‐Sciences et LettresParisFrance
| | - Manuel Salto‐Tellez
- Integrated Pathology UnitThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
- Precision Medicine CentreQueen's University BelfastBelfastUK
| | - Joel Saltz
- Department of Biomedical InformaticsStony Brook UniversityStony BrookNYUSA
| | - Shahin Sayed
- Department of PathologyAga Khan UniversityNairobiKenya
| | - Ely Scott
- Translational PathologyTranslational Sciences and Diagnostics/Translational Medicine/R&D, Bristol Myers SquibbPrincetonNJUSA
| | - Kalliopi P Siziopikou
- Department of Pathology, Section of Breast PathologyNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoILUSA
| | - Christos Sotiriou
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory J.‐C. Heuson, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB)Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB)BrusselsBelgium
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB)Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB)BrusselsBelgium
| | - Albrecht Stenzinger
- Institute of PathologyUniversity Hospital HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
- Centers for Personalized Medicine (ZPM)HeidelbergGermany
| | | | - Daniel Sur
- Department of Medical OncologyUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hatieganu”Cluj‐NapocaRomania
| | - Susan Fineberg
- Montefiore Medical CenterBronxNYUSA
- Albert Einstein College of MedicineBronxNYUSA
| | - Fraser Symmans
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTXUSA
| | | | | | - Sabine Tejpar
- Digestive Oncology, Department of OncologyKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Jonas Teuwen
- AI for Oncology Lab, The Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | - Trine Tramm
- Department of PathologyAarhus University HospitalAarhusDenmark
- Institute of Clinical MedicineAarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark
| | - William T Tran
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Toronto and Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreTorontoOntarioCanada
| | - Jeroen van der Laak
- Department of PathologyRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of PathologyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtThe Netherlands
- Johns Hopkins Oncology CenterBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Gregory E Verghese
- Cancer Bioinformatics, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
- The Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Department of PathologyEuropean Institute of OncologyMilanItaly
- Department of PathologyUniversity of MilanMilanItaly
| | - Michael Vieth
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbHFriedrich‐Alexander‐University Erlangen‐NurembergBayreuthGermany
| | - Noorul Wahab
- Tissue Image Analytics Centre, Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK
| | - Thomas Walter
- Centre for Computational Biology (CBIO)Mines Paris, PSL UniversityParisFrance
- Institut CuriePSL UniversityParisFrance
- INSERMParisFrance
| | | | - Hannah Y Wen
- Department of PathologyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkUSA
| | - Wentao Yang
- Fudan Medical University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiPR China
| | - Yinyin Yuan
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTXUSA
| | - Reena Md Zin
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of MedicineUniversiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaKuala LumpurMalaysia
| | - Sylvia Adams
- Perlmutter Cancer CenterNYU Langone HealthNew YorkNYUSA
- Department of MedicineNYU Grossman School of MedicineManhattanNYUSA
| | | | - Sibylle Loibl
- Department of Medicine and ResearchGerman Breast GroupNeu‐IsenburgGermany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institut für PathologiePhilipps‐Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum MarburgMarburgGermany
| | - Peter Savas
- Division of Cancer ResearchPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical OncologyUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Sherene Loi
- Division of Cancer ResearchPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical OncologyUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Department of PathologyGZA‐ZNA HospitalsAntwerpBelgium
- Division of Cancer ResearchPeter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Elisabeth Specht Stovgaard
- Department of PathologyHerlev and Gentofte HospitalHerlevDenmark
- Department of Clinical MedicineUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Page DB, Broeckx G, Jahangir CA, Verbandt S, Gupta RR, Thagaard J, Khiroya R, Kos Z, Abduljabbar K, Acosta Haab G, Acs B, Akturk G, Almeida JS, Alvarado-Cabrero I, Azmoudeh-Ardalan F, Badve S, Baharun NB, Bellolio ER, Bheemaraju V, Blenman KR, Botinelly Mendonça Fujimoto L, Bouchmaa N, Burgues O, Cheang MCU, Ciompi F, Cooper LA, Coosemans A, Corredor G, Dantas Portela FL, Deman F, Demaria S, Dudgeon SN, Elghazawy M, Ely S, Fernandez-Martín C, Fineberg S, Fox SB, Gallagher WM, Giltnane JM, Gnjatic S, Gonzalez-Ericsson PI, Grigoriadis A, Halama N, Hanna MG, Harbhajanka A, Hardas A, Hart SN, Hartman J, Hewitt S, Hida AI, Horlings HM, Husain Z, Hytopoulos E, Irshad S, Janssen EA, Kahila M, Kataoka TR, Kawaguchi K, Kharidehal D, Khramtsov AI, Kiraz U, Kirtani P, Kodach LL, Korski K, Kovács A, Laenkholm AV, Lang-Schwarz C, Larsimont D, Lennerz JK, Lerousseau M, Li X, Ly A, Madabhushi A, Maley SK, Manur Narasimhamurthy V, Marks DK, McDonald ES, Mehrotra R, Michiels S, Minhas FUAA, Mittal S, Moore DA, Mushtaq S, Nighat H, Papathomas T, Penault-Llorca F, Perera RD, Pinard CJ, Pinto-Cardenas JC, Pruneri G, Pusztai L, Rahman A, Rajpoot NM, Rapoport BL, Rau TT, Reis-Filho JS, Ribeiro JM, Rimm D, Vincent-Salomon A, Salto-Tellez M, Saltz J, Sayed S, Siziopikou KP, Sotiriou C, Stenzinger A, Sughayer MA, Sur D, Symmans F, Tanaka S, Taxter T, Tejpar S, Teuwen J, Thompson EA, Tramm T, Tran WT, van der Laak J, van Diest PJ, Verghese GE, Viale G, Vieth M, Wahab N, Walter T, Waumans Y, Wen HY, Yang W, Yuan Y, Adams S, Bartlett JMS, Loibl S, Denkert C, Savas P, Loi S, Salgado R, Specht Stovgaard E. Spatial analyses of immune cell infiltration in cancer: current methods and future directions: A report of the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group on Breast Cancer. J Pathol 2023; 260:514-532. [PMID: 37608771 DOI: 10.1002/path.6165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
Modern histologic imaging platforms coupled with machine learning methods have provided new opportunities to map the spatial distribution of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. However, there exists no standardized method for describing or analyzing spatial immune cell data, and most reported spatial analyses are rudimentary. In this review, we provide an overview of two approaches for reporting and analyzing spatial data (raster versus vector-based). We then provide a compendium of spatial immune cell metrics that have been reported in the literature, summarizing prognostic associations in the context of a variety of cancers. We conclude by discussing two well-described clinical biomarkers, the breast cancer stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes score and the colon cancer Immunoscore, and describe investigative opportunities to improve clinical utility of these spatial biomarkers. © 2023 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David B Page
- Earle A Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Glenn Broeckx
- Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
- Centre for Oncological Research (CORE), MIPPRO, Faculty of Medicine, Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Chowdhury Arif Jahangir
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Sara Verbandt
- Digestive Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rajarsi R Gupta
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Jeppe Thagaard
- Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
- Visiopharm A/S, Hørsholm, Denmark
| | - Reena Khiroya
- Department of Cellular Pathology, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Zuzana Kos
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, BC Cancer Vancouver Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Khalid Abduljabbar
- Centre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Balazs Acs
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Guray Akturk
- Translational Molecular Biomarkers, Merck & Co Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA
| | - Jonas S Almeida
- National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (DCEG), Rockville, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Sunil Badve
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Enrique R Bellolio
- Departamento de Anatomía Patológica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile
| | | | - Kim Rm Blenman
- Internal Medicine Section of Medical Oncology and Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Computer Science, Yale School of Engineering and Applied Science, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Najat Bouchmaa
- Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Mohammed VI Polytechnic University (UM6P), Ben-Guerir, Morocco
| | - Octavio Burgues
- Pathology Department, Hospital Cliníco Universitario de Valencia/Incliva, Valencia, Spain
| | - Maggie Chon U Cheang
- Head of Integrative Genomics Analysis in Clinical Trials, ICR-CTSU, Division of Clinical Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Francesco Ciompi
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lee Ad Cooper
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - An Coosemans
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Germán Corredor
- Biomedical Engineering Department, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Frederik Deman
- Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Sandra Demaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pathology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sarah N Dudgeon
- Conputational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Mahmoud Elghazawy
- University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
- Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Scott Ely
- Translational Pathology, Translational Sciences and Diagnostics/Translational Medicine/R&D, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Claudio Fernandez-Martín
- Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Tecnología Centrada en el Ser Humano, HUMAN-tech, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain
| | - Susan Fineberg
- Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Stephen B Fox
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - William M Gallagher
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Sacha Gnjatic
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Medicine Hem/Onc, and Pathology, Tisch Cancer Institute - Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Anita Grigoriadis
- Cancer Bioinformatics, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
- Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Niels Halama
- Translational Immunotherapy, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Alexandros Hardas
- Pathobiology & Population Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, London, UK
| | - Steven N Hart
- Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Johan Hartman
- Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Stephen Hewitt
- Department of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Akira I Hida
- Department of Pathology, Matsuyama Shimin Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Hugo M Horlings
- Division of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Sheeba Irshad
- King's College London & Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Emiel Am Janssen
- Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Chemistry, Bioscience and Environmental Technology, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Mohamed Kahila
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Kosuke Kawaguchi
- Department of Breast Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Durga Kharidehal
- Department of Pathology, Narayana Medical College, Nellore, India
| | - Andrey I Khramtsov
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Umay Kiraz
- Department of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Chemistry, Bioscience and Environmental Technology, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Pawan Kirtani
- Department of Histopathology, Aakash Healthcare Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Liudmila L Kodach
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Konstanty Korski
- Data, Analytics and Imaging, Product Development, F.Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Anikó Kovács
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anne-Vibeke Laenkholm
- Surgical Pathology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
- Surgical Pathology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Corinna Lang-Schwarz
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Denis Larsimont
- Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jochen K Lennerz
- Center for Integrated Diagnostics, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marvin Lerousseau
- Centre for Computational Biology (CBIO), Mines Paris, PSL University, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France
- INSERM, U900, Paris, France
| | - Xiaoxian Li
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Amy Ly
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anant Madabhushi
- Biomedical Engineering, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Biomedical Informatics, Pathology, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sai K Maley
- NRG Oncology/NSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Douglas K Marks
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth S McDonald
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Group, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ravi Mehrotra
- Indian Cancer Genome Atlas, Pune, India
- Centre for Health, Innovation and Policy Foundation, Noida, India
| | - Stefan Michiels
- Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, Oncostat U1018, Inserm, University Paris-Saclay, Ligue Contre le Cancer labeled Team, Villejuif, France
| | - Fayyaz Ul Amir Afsar Minhas
- Tissue Image Analytics Centre, Warwick Cancer Research Centre, PathLAKE Consortium, Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Shachi Mittal
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - David A Moore
- CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, UCLH, London, UK
| | - Shamim Mushtaq
- Department of Biochemistry, Ziauddin University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Hussain Nighat
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, India
| | - Thomas Papathomas
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Drammen Sykehus, Vestre Viken HF, Drammen, Norway
| | - Frederique Penault-Llorca
- Centre Jean Perrin, INSERM U1240, Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies Théranostiques, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Rashindrie D Perera
- School of Electrical, Mechanical and Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Christopher J Pinard
- Radiogenomics Laboratory, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Lakeshore Animal Health Partners, Mississauga, ON, Canada
- Centre for Advancing Responsible and Ethical Artificial Intelligence (CARE-AI), University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | | | - Giancarlo Pruneri
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Arman Rahman
- UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Bernardo Leon Rapoport
- The Medical Oncology Centre of Rosebank, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Department of Immunology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Tilman T Rau
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Düsseldorf and Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Jorge S Reis-Filho
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joana M Ribeiro
- Département de Médecine Oncologique, Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - David Rimm
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Anne Vincent-Salomon
- Department of Diagnostic and Theranostic Medicine, Institut Curie, University Paris-Sciences et Lettres, Paris, France
| | - Manuel Salto-Tellez
- Integrated Pathology Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Precision Medicine Centre, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Joel Saltz
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shahin Sayed
- Department of Pathology, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Kalliopi P Siziopikou
- Department of Pathology, Section of Breast Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Christos Sotiriou
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory J.-C. Heuson, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Albrecht Stenzinger
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Centers for Personalized Medicine (ZPM), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Daniel Sur
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Iuliu Hatieganu", Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Fraser Symmans
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Sabine Tejpar
- Digestive Oncology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jonas Teuwen
- AI for Oncology Lab, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Trine Tramm
- Pathology, and Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - William T Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jeroen van der Laak
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Gregory E Verghese
- Cancer Bioinformatics, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
- Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Department of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology & University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Michael Vieth
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Noorul Wahab
- Tissue Image Analytics Centre, Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Thomas Walter
- Centre for Computational Biology (CBIO), Mines Paris, PSL University, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France
- INSERM, U900, Paris, France
| | | | - Hannah Y Wen
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wentao Yang
- Fudan Medical University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Yinyin Yuan
- Translational Molecular Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sylvia Adams
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Manhattan, NY, USA
| | | | - Sibylle Loibl
- Department of Medicine and Research, German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Peter Savas
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Medical Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sherene Loi
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Elisabeth Specht Stovgaard
- Department of Pathology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ardon O, Klein E, Manzo A, Corsale L, England C, Mazzella A, Geneslaw L, Philip J, Ntiamoah P, Wright J, Sirintrapun SJ, Lin O, Elenitoba-Johnson K, Reuter VE, Hameed MR, Hanna MG. Digital pathology operations at a tertiary cancer center: Infrastructure requirements and operational cost. J Pathol Inform 2023; 14:100318. [PMID: 37811334 PMCID: PMC10550754 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpi.2023.100318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Revised: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Whole slide imaging is revolutionizing the field of pathology and is currently being used for clinical, educational, and research initiatives by an increasing number of institutions. Pathology departments have distinct needs for digital pathology systems, yet the cost of digital workflows is cited as a major barrier for widespread adoption by many organizations. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) is an early adopter of whole slide imaging with incremental investments in resources that started more than 15 years ago. This experience and the large-scale scan operations led to the identification of required framework components of digital pathology operations. The cost of these components for the 2021 digital pathology operations at MSK were studied and calculated to enable an understanding of the operation and benchmark the accompanying costs. This paper describes the unique infrastructure cost and the costs associated with the digital pathology clinical operation use cases in a large, tertiary cancer center. These calculations can serve as a blueprint for other institutions to provide the necessary concepts and offer insights towards the financial requirements for digital pathology adoption by other institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orly Ardon
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric Klein
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Allyne Manzo
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lorraine Corsale
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christine England
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Allix Mazzella
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Luke Geneslaw
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - John Philip
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter Ntiamoah
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jeninne Wright
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Oscar Lin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kojo Elenitoba-Johnson
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Victor E. Reuter
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Meera R. Hameed
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew G. Hanna
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Calle C, Zhong E, Hanna MG, Ventura K, Friedlander MA, Morrow M, Cody H, Brogi E. Changes in the Diagnoses of Breast Core Needle Biopsies on Second Review at a Tertiary Care Center: Implications for Surgical Management. Am J Surg Pathol 2023; 47:172-182. [PMID: 36638314 PMCID: PMC10464622 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000002002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Core needle biopsy (CNB) of breast lesions is routine for diagnosis and treatment planning. Despite refinement of diagnostic criteria, the diagnosis of breast lesions on CNB can be challenging. At many centers, including ours, confirmation of diagnoses rendered in other laboratories is required before treatment planning. We identified CNBs first diagnosed elsewhere that were reviewed in our department over the course of 1 year because the patients sought care at our center and in which a change in diagnosis had been recorded. The outside and in-house CNB diagnoses were then classified based on Breast WHO Fifth Edition diagnostic categories. The impact of the change in diagnosis was estimated based on the subsequent surgical management. Findings in follow-up surgical excisions (EXCs) were used for validation. In 2018, 4950 outside cases with CNB were reviewed at our center. A total of 403 CNBs diagnoses were discrepant. Of these, 147 had a change in the WHO diagnostic category: 80 (54%) CNBs had a more severe diagnosis and 44 (30%) a less severe diagnosis. In 23 (16%) CNBs, the change of diagnostic category had no impact on management. Intraductal proliferations (n=54), microinvasive carcinoma (n=18), and papillary lesions (n=35) were the most disputed diagnoses. The in-house CNB diagnosis was confirmed in most cases with available excisions. Following CNB reclassification, 22/147 (15%) lesions were not excised. A change affecting the surgical management at our center occurred in 2.5% of all CNBs. Our results support routine review of outside breast CNB as a clinically significant practice before definitive treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catarina Calle
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, 10065 USA
- Faculdade de Ciencias da Saude da Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilha, Portugal
| | - Elaine Zhong
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, 10065 USA
| | - Matthew G. Hanna
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, 10065 USA
| | - Katia Ventura
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, 10065 USA
| | - Maria A. Friedlander
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, 10065 USA
| | - Monica Morrow
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Hiram Cody
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Edi Brogi
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, 10065 USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Schüffler PJ, Stamelos E, Ahmed I, Yarlagadda DVK, Ardon O, Hanna MG, Reuter VE, Klimstra DS, Hameed M. Efficient Visualization of Whole Slide Images in Web-based Viewers for Digital Pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2022; 146:1273-1280. [PMID: 34979569 PMCID: PMC10060618 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2021-0197-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— Wide adoption of digital pathology requires efficient visualization and navigation in Web-based digital slide viewers, which is poorly defined. OBJECTIVE.— To define and quantify relevant performance metrics for efficient visualization of cases and slides in digital slide viewers. DESIGN.— With a universal slide viewer used in clinical routine diagnostics, we evaluated the impact of slide caching, compression type, tile, and block size of whole slide images generated from Philips, Leica, and 3DHistech scanners on streaming performance on case, slide, and field of view levels. RESULTS.— Two hundred thirty-nine pathologists routinely reviewed 60 080 whole slide images over 3 months. The median time to open a case's slides from the laboratory information system was less than 4 seconds, the time to change to a slide within the case was less than 1 second, and the time to render the adjacent field of view when navigating the slide was less than one-quarter of a second. A whole slide image's block size and a viewer tile size of 1024 pixels showed best performance to display a field of view and was preferrable over smaller tiles due to fewer mosaic effects. For Philips, fastest median slide streaming pace was 238 ms per field of view and for 3DHistech, 125 ms. For Leica, the fastest pace of 108 ms per field of view was established with block serving without decompression. CONCLUSIONS.— This is the first study to systematically assess user-centric slide visualization performance metrics for digital viewers, including time to open a case, time to change a slide, and time to change a field of view. These metrics help to improve the viewer's configuration, leading to an efficient visualization baseline that is widely accepted among pathologists using routine digital pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J Schüffler
- From the Institute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany (Schüffler)
| | - Evangelos Stamelos
- From the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York (Schüffler, Stamelos, Ahmed, Yarlagadda, Ardon, Hanna, Reuter, Klimstra, Hameed)
| | - Ishtiaque Ahmed
- From the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York (Schüffler, Stamelos, Ahmed, Yarlagadda, Ardon, Hanna, Reuter, Klimstra, Hameed)
| | - D Vijay K Yarlagadda
- From the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York (Schüffler, Stamelos, Ahmed, Yarlagadda, Ardon, Hanna, Reuter, Klimstra, Hameed)
| | - Orly Ardon
- From the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York (Schüffler, Stamelos, Ahmed, Yarlagadda, Ardon, Hanna, Reuter, Klimstra, Hameed)
| | - Matthew G Hanna
- From the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York (Schüffler, Stamelos, Ahmed, Yarlagadda, Ardon, Hanna, Reuter, Klimstra, Hameed)
| | - Victor E Reuter
- From the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York (Schüffler, Stamelos, Ahmed, Yarlagadda, Ardon, Hanna, Reuter, Klimstra, Hameed)
| | - David S Klimstra
- From the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York (Schüffler, Stamelos, Ahmed, Yarlagadda, Ardon, Hanna, Reuter, Klimstra, Hameed)
| | - Meera Hameed
- From the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York (Schüffler, Stamelos, Ahmed, Yarlagadda, Ardon, Hanna, Reuter, Klimstra, Hameed)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zhong E, Pareja F, Hanna MG, Jungbluth AA, Rekhtman N, Brogi E. Expression of novel neuroendocrine markers in breast carcinomas: a study of INSM1, ASCL1, and POU2F3. Hum Pathol 2022; 127:102-111. [PMID: 35690220 PMCID: PMC10227884 DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2022.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Revised: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INSM1, ASCL1, and POU2F3 are novel transcription factors involved in neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation of neoplasms in several organs, but data on their expression in breast carcinomas (BCs) are limited. We retrospectively evaluated the expression of these markers in a series of 97 BCs (58 with NE morphology and 39 with otherwise uncommon morphology) tested prospectively using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Nuclear staining in >50% of the cells was used as the positive cut-off. Thirty-two of the 97 BCs (33%) were INSM1-positive. INSM1-positivity correlated significantly with histologic type and presence of stromal mucin. INSM1 also correlated with synaptophysin and chromogranin, established markers of NE differentiation (P < .0001 and P = .0023, respectively). In BC with NE morphology, the expression of INSM1 supported NE differentiation, and INSM1 was more specific than synaptophysin and more sensitive and specific than chromogranin. INSM1 was the most expressed NE marker in 17 BCs. INSM1-positive BCs included 56% of solid papillary BCs, 88% of BCs with solid papillary features, and 75% of high-grade NE carcinomas. Of 35 BCs tested for POU2F3 and ASCL1, only 1 and 4 cases were positive, respectively. Our results show that INSM1 is a sensitive marker of NE differentiation in BC and should be included with synaptophysin and chromogranin in the IHC panel used to evaluate NE differentiation in BC with NE morphology. ASCL1 and POU2F3 are uncommon in BC and their routine assessment is not warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elaine Zhong
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, 10065 USA
| | - Fresia Pareja
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, 10065 USA
| | - Matthew G Hanna
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, 10065 USA
| | - Achim A Jungbluth
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, 10065 USA
| | - Natasha Rekhtman
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, 10065 USA
| | - Edi Brogi
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, 10065 USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Elfer K, Dudgeon S, Garcia V, Blenman K, Hytopoulos E, Wen S, Li X, Ly A, Werness B, Sheth MS, Amgad M, Gupta R, Saltz J, Hanna MG, Ehinger A, Peeters D, Salgado R, Gallas BD. Pilot study to evaluate tools to collect pathologist annotations for validating machine learning algorithms. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2022; 9:047501. [PMID: 35911208 PMCID: PMC9326105 DOI: 10.1117/1.jmi.9.4.047501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Validation of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms in digital pathology with a reference standard is necessary before widespread clinical use, but few examples focus on creating a reference standard based on pathologist annotations. This work assesses the results of a pilot study that collects density estimates of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in breast cancer biopsy specimens. This work will inform the creation of a validation dataset for the evaluation of AI algorithms fit for a regulatory purpose. Approach: Collaborators and crowdsourced pathologists contributed glass slides, digital images, and annotations. Here, "annotations" refer to any marks, segmentations, measurements, or labels a pathologist adds to a report, image, region of interest (ROI), or biological feature. Pathologists estimated sTILs density in 640 ROIs from hematoxylin and eosin stained slides of 64 patients via two modalities: an optical light microscope and two digital image viewing platforms. Results: The pilot study generated 7373 sTILs density estimates from 29 pathologists. Analysis of annotations found the variability of density estimates per ROI increases with the mean; the root mean square differences were 4.46, 14.25, and 26.25 as the mean density ranged from 0% to 10%, 11% to 40%, and 41% to 100%, respectively. The pilot study informs three areas of improvement for future work: technical workflows, annotation platforms, and agreement analysis methods. Upgrades to the workflows and platforms will improve operability and increase annotation speed and consistency. Conclusions: Exploratory data analysis demonstrates the need to develop new statistical approaches for agreement. The pilot study dataset and analysis methods are publicly available to allow community feedback. The development and results of the validation dataset will be publicly available to serve as an instructive tool that can be replicated by developers and researchers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Elfer
- United States Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Division of Imaging Diagnostics & Software Reliability, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States
- National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention, Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Bethesda, Maryland, United States
| | - Sarah Dudgeon
- Yale University Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
- Yale New Haven Hospital, Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
| | - Victor Garcia
- United States Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Division of Imaging Diagnostics & Software Reliability, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States
| | - Kim Blenman
- School of Medicine, Yale Cancer Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
- Yale University, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Department of Computer Science, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
| | | | - Si Wen
- United States Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Division of Imaging Diagnostics & Software Reliability, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States
| | - Xiaoxian Li
- Emory University School of Medicine, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
| | - Amy Ly
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Bruce Werness
- Inova Health System Department of Pathology, Falls Church, Virginia, United States
- Arrive Bio LLC, San Francisco, California, United States
| | - Manasi S. Sheth
- United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Center for Devices and Radiologic Health, Office of Product Evaluation and Quality, Office of Clinical Evidence and Analysis, Division of Biostatistics, White Oak, Maryland, United States
| | - Mohamed Amgad
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Chicago, Illinois, United States
| | - Rajarsi Gupta
- SUNY Stony Brook Medicine, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook, New York, United States
| | - Joel Saltz
- SUNY Stony Brook Medicine, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook, New York, United States
- SUNY Stony Brook Medicine, Department of Pathology, Stony Brook, New York, United States
| | - Matthew G. Hanna
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States
| | - Anna Ehinger
- Lund University, Laboratory Medicine, Region Skåne, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Lund, Sweden
| | - Dieter Peeters
- Sint-Maarten Hospital, Department of Pathology, Mechelen, Belgium
- University of Antwerp, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Peter Mac Callum Cancer Centre, Division of Research, Melbourne, Australia
- GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Department of Pathology, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Brandon D. Gallas
- United States Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Division of Imaging Diagnostics & Software Reliability, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States
- Address all correspondence to Brandon D. Gallas,
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Suetterlin KJ, Männikkö R, Matthews E, Greensmith L, Hanna MG, Bostock H, Tan SV. Excitability properties of mouse and human skeletal muscle fibres compared by muscle velocity recovery cycles. Neuromuscul Disord 2022; 32:347-357. [PMID: 35339342 PMCID: PMC7614892 DOI: 10.1016/j.nmd.2022.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2021] [Revised: 01/27/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Mouse models of skeletal muscle channelopathies are not phenocopies of human disease. In some cases (e.g. Myotonia Congenita) the phenotype is much more severe, whilst in others (e.g. Hypokalaemic periodic paralysis) rodent physiology is protective. This suggests a species' difference in muscle excitability properties. In humans these can be measured indirectly by the post-impulse changes in conduction velocity, using Muscle Velocity Recovery Cycles (MVRCs). We performed MVRCs in mice and compared their muscle excitability properties with humans. Mouse Tibialis Anterior MVRCs (n = 70) have only one phase of supernormality (increased conduction velocity), which is smaller in magnitude (p = 9 × 10-21), and shorter in duration (p = 3 × 10-24) than human (n = 26). This abbreviated supernormality is followed by a period of late subnormality (reduced velocity) in mice, which overlaps in time with the late supernormality seen in human MVRCs. The period of late subnormality suggests increased t-tubule Na+/K+-pump activity. The subnormal phase in mice was converted to supernormality by blocking ClC-1 chloride channels, suggesting relatively higher chloride conductance in skeletal muscle. Our findings help explain discrepancies in phenotype between mice and humans with skeletal muscle channelopathies and potentially other neuromuscular disorders. MVRCs are a valuable new tool to compare in vivo muscle membrane properties between species and will allow further dissection of the molecular mechanisms regulating muscle excitability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K J Suetterlin
- Department of Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom; AGE Research Group, NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
| | - R Männikkö
- Department of Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
| | - E Matthews
- Department of Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom; Atkinson Morley Neuromuscular Centre, Department of Neurology, St Georges University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - L Greensmith
- Department of Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
| | - M G Hanna
- Department of Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
| | - H Bostock
- Department of Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom
| | - S V Tan
- Department of Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Division of Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hanna MG, Raciti P, Bozkurt A, Godrich R, Viret J, Lee D, Mathieu P, Lee M, Vorontsov E, Sabo T, Geyer FC, Reis-Filho JS, Grady L, Fuchs T, Kanan C. Abstract PD11-02: Subtyping invasive carcinomas and high-risk lesions for machine learning based breast pathology. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-pd11-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background. The female mammary gland can develop a myriad of epithelial proliferative lesions including, high risk lesions, in-situ and invasive carcinomas. Identification of these pre-neoplastic and neoplastic conditions in biopsy specimens is crucial for proper patient management and may sometimes pose diagnostic challenges for pathologists. Recent research has shown that machine learning algorithms applied to whole slide images (WSI) can accurately detect and grade various cancers; herein, we devise and test a system that classifies the most common preneoplastic and neoplastic conditions of the female breast from WSIs. Design. De-identified slides were scanned on Leica AT2 whole slide scanners (20x; 0.5 µm/pixel) from MSK database were retrieved. Clinical diagnostic metadata were extracted from the pathology reports. Using a multi-label multiple-instance learning (ML-MIL) approach, a SE-ResNet50 Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) was trained to classify atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH), atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). In additional morphological subtypes including apocrine, mucinous, solid papillary, micropapillary, and tubular carcinoma were trained. The system uses the WSI as an input and outputs a slide level class and heatmap for the presence of the trained classes. A validation dataset separate from the training set was used to assess performance of the trained model. Results. The CNN was trained on 9,751 surgical specimens (biopsy, 6,289; excision, 3,462) comprising 40,637 slides. The system was validated on 3,183 breast specimens (biopsy, 1,934; excision, 1,249) comprising 11,447 digital slides that were not included in the training of the CNN model. Validation performance in terms of Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC) for each class is shown in Table 1. Conclusion. The trained CNN had a high performance in identifying the presence of ADH, ALH, DCIS, IDC, ILC, LCIS, and, apocrine, micropapillary, mucinous, solid papillary, and tubular carcinomas. Further studies expanding classes to include all clinically relevant lesions and morphologies are underway. In addition, the same approach can be used to detect microinvasions and calcifications in breast tissue.
Table 1.Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve for Breast Lesion ClassesClassNum. Positive (specimens)Num. Negative (specimens)AUROCADH24718640.903ALH20918860.950LCIS17520080.958DCIS81920920.956IDC52126620.956ILC7131120.934Apocrine2431590.931Micropapillary17230110.927Mucinous1231710.994Solid Papillary1531680.908Tubular carcinoma831750.990
Citation Format: Matthew G Hanna, Patricia Raciti, Alican Bozkurt, Ran Godrich, Julian Viret, Donghun Lee, Philippe Mathieu, Matthew Lee, Eugene Vorontsov, Tomer Sabo, Felipe C Geyer, Jorge S Reis-Filho, Leo Grady, Thomas Fuchs, Christopher Kanan. Subtyping invasive carcinomas and high-risk lesions for machine learning based breast pathology [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD11-02.
Collapse
|
21
|
Reis-Filho JS, Pareja F, Derakhshan F, Brown DN, Sue J, Selenica P, Wang YK, Paula ADC, Banerjee M, Ebrahimzadeh Z, Isava M, Lee M, Godrich R, Casson A, Padron R, Shaikovski G, van Eck A, Marra A, Dopeso H, Wen HY, Brogi E, Hanna MG, Kanan C, Kunz JD, Geyer FC, Leibowitz C, Klimstra D, Grady L, Fuchs TJ. Abstract PD11-01: An artificial intelligence-based predictor of CDH1 biallelic mutations and invasive lobular carcinoma. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-pd11-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the most frequent special histologic subtype of breast cancer (BC). ILC is identifiable by pathologic assessment given its distinctive discohesive growth pattern, largely caused by CDH1 inactivation. Compared to common forms of BC, ILCs display lower responses to chemotherapy and selective estrogen receptor modulators. The low interobserver agreement for the diagnosis of ILC, however, renders the inclusion of histologic subtyping in therapeutic decision-making challenging. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithms hold promise for improving pathologic diagnosis; their performance, however, depends on the ground truth labeling used. Here, we seek to develop an AI-based methodology for detection of ILC using ‘CDH1 biallelic mutations’ (i.e., mutation + loss-of-heterozygosity of the wild-type allele or two pathogenic somatic mutations) as ground truth, reasoning that in BC, >95% of CDH1 bi-allelic inactivation is found in ILCs.Materials and methods: We developed a convolutional neural network system to detect CDH1 biallelic genetic inactivation (AI-CDH1) using whole slide images (WSI) of 1,100 primary BCs with available targeted sequencing data. The model was trained using a 10-fold cross-validation method to detect biallelic mutations. The mean number of positive and negative samples in the training set was 85.2 (SD=2.57) and 562.8 (SD=10.51) per fold, respectively. The evaluation set consisted of a mean of 14.2 (SD=2.04) positive and 93.8 (SD=9.13) negative samples. We evaluated the performance of the AI-CDH1 classifier to predict the lobular phenotype and CDH1 status using original and revised labels, following a histopathologic re-review of the histologic type and CDH1 status curation. The latter was conducted by incorporating information on biallelic CDH1 inactivation beyond CDH1 mutations (homozygous deletions, deleterious structural rearrangements, and loss-of-heterozygosity and gene promoter methylation).Results: The AI-CDH1 classifier predicted biallelic CDH1 mutations with an area under the curve (AUC)=0.944 (95 CI: 0.925-0.963), sensitivity=91.6% and specificity=85.9%, PPV=49.8%, NPV=98.5% and accuracy=86.7%, and the original ‘lobular phenotype’ with an AUC=0.941 (95 CI: 0.922-0.960), sensitivity=89%, specificity=86.7%, PPV=55.6%, NPV=97.7% and accuracy=87.1%. Review of the CDH1 gene status revealed that 7/957 BCs lacking CDH1 biallelic mutations harbored biallelic CDH1 inactivation by promoter methylation, homozygous deletions or structural rearrangements. The AI-CDH1 classifier detected all seven reclassified BCs and predicted the revised CDH1 biallelic inactivation with an AUC=0.948 (95 CI: 0.930-0.966), sensitivity=92%, specificity=86.5%, PPV=52.3%, NPV=98.5% and accuracy=87.2%. Upon histologic re-review, which resulted in reclassification of 36/927 non-lobular BCs as ‘lobular’ and 5/173 ‘lobular’ BCs as ‘non-lobular’, the AI-CDH1 classifier detected the ‘lobular phenotype’ with an AUC=0.953 (95 CI: 0.935-0.971), sensitivity=90.7%, specificity=89.7%, PPV=66.8%, NPV=97.7% and accuracy=89.9%. Using the revised histologic re-classification and CDH1 biallelic inactivation status labels, the AI-CDH1 classifier predicted the lobular phenotype irrespective of CDH1 status (P>0.05).Conclusions: By training a machine learning system to detect ‘CDH1 biallelic mutations’, as ground truth rather than histologic diagnosis of lobular carcinoma, which might be confounded by human subjectivity, we developed an AI-based system that can detect ILCs accurately, providing a new paradigm for the development of AI-based cancer classification systems.
Citation Format: Jorge S Reis-Filho, Fresia Pareja, Fatemeh Derakhshan, David N Brown, Jillian Sue, Pier Selenica, Yi Kan Wang, Arnaud Da Cruz Paula, Monami Banerjee, Zahra Ebrahimzadeh, Manuel Isava, Matthew Lee, Ran Godrich, Adam Casson, Ruben Padron, George Shaikovski, Alexander van Eck, Antonio Marra, Higinio Dopeso, Hannah Y Wen, Edi Brogi, Matthew G Hanna, Chris Kanan, Jeremy D Kunz, Felipe C Geyer, Carla Leibowitz, David Klimstra, Leo Grady, Thomas J Fuchs. An artificial intelligence-based predictor of CDH1 biallelic mutations and invasive lobular carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD11-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fresia Pareja
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - David N Brown
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Pier Selenica
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Antonio Marra
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Hannah Y Wen
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Edi Brogi
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hanna MG, Ardon O, Reuter VE, Sirintrapun SJ, England C, Klimstra DS, Hameed MR. Integrating digital pathology into clinical practice. Mod Pathol 2022; 35:152-164. [PMID: 34599281 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-021-00929-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Revised: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 09/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
The field of anatomic pathology has been evolving in the last few decades and the advancements have been largely fostered by innovative technology. Immunohistochemistry enabled a paradigm shift in discovery and diagnostic evaluation, followed by booming genomic advancements which allowed for submicroscopic pathologic characterization, and now the field of digital pathology coupled with machine learning and big data acquisition is paving the way to revolutionize the pathology medical domain. Whole slide imaging (WSI) is a disruptive technology where glass slides are digitized to produce on-screen whole slide images. Specifically, in the past decade, there have been significant advances in digital pathology systems that have allowed this technology to promote integration into clinical practice. Whole slide images (WSI), or digital slides, can be viewed and navigated comparable to glass slides on a microscope, as digital files. Whole slide imaging has increased in adoption among pathologists, pathology departments, and scientists for clinical, educational, and research initiatives. Integration of digital pathology systems requires a coordinated effort with numerous stakeholders, not only within the pathology department, but across the entire enterprise. Each pathology department has distinct needs, use cases and blueprints, however the framework components and variables for successful clinical integration can be generalized across any organization seeking to undergo a digital transformation at any scale. This article will review those components and considerations for integrating digital pathology systems into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew G Hanna
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Orly Ardon
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Victor E Reuter
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Christine England
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David S Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Meera R Hameed
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hanna MG, Ardon O, Reuter VE, England C, Klimstra DS, Hameed MR. Publisher Correction: Integrating digital pathology into clinical practice. Mod Pathol 2022; 35:287. [PMID: 34645985 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-021-00948-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew G Hanna
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Orly Ardon
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Victor E Reuter
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christine England
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David S Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Meera R Hameed
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hanna MG, Ardon O, Reuter VE, Sirintrapun SJ, England C, Klimstra DS, Hameed MR. Correction: Integrating digital pathology into clinical practice. Mod Pathol 2022; 35:286. [PMID: 34754075 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-021-00968-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew G Hanna
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Orly Ardon
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Victor E Reuter
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Christine England
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David S Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Meera R Hameed
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Salama AM, Hanna MG, Giri D, Kezlarian B, Jean MH, Lin O, Vallejo C, Brogi E, Edelweiss M. Digital validation of breast biomarkers (ER, PR, AR, and HER2) in cytology specimens using three different scanners. Mod Pathol 2022; 35:52-59. [PMID: 34518629 PMCID: PMC8702445 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-021-00908-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Revised: 08/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Progression in digital pathology has yielded new opportunities for a remote work environment. We evaluated the utility of digital review of breast cancer immunohistochemical prognostic markers (IHC) using whole slide images (WSI) from formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) cytology cell block specimens (CB) using three different scanners.CB from 20 patients with breast cancer diagnosis and available IHC were included. Glass slides including 20 Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), 20 Estrogen Receptor (ER), 20 Progesterone Receptor (PR), 16 Androgen Receptor (AR), and 20 Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) were scanned on 3 different scanners. Four breast pathologists reviewed the WSI and recorded their semi-quantitative scoring for each marker. Kappa concordance was defined as complete agreement between glass/digital pairs. Discordances between microscopic and digital reads were classified as a major when a clinically relevant change was seen. Minor discordances were defined as differences in scoring percentages/staining pattern that would not have resulted in a clinical implication. Scanner precision was tabulated according to the success rate of each scan on all three scanners.In total, we had 228 paired glass/digital IHC reads on all 3 scanners. There was strong concordance kappa ≥0.85 for all pathologists when comparing paired microscopic/digital reads. Strong concordance (kappa ≥0.86) was also seen when comparing reads between scanners.Twenty-three percent of the WSI required rescanning due to barcode detection failures, 14% due to tissue detection failures, and 2% due to focus issues. Scanner 1 had the best average precision of 92%. HER2 IHC had the lowest intra-scanner precision (64%) among all stains.This study is the first to address the utility of WSI in breast cancer IHC in CB and to validate its reporting using 3 different scanners. Digital images are reliable for breast IHC assessment in CB and offer similar reproducibility to microscope reads.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abeer M Salama
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Matthew G Hanna
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Dilip Giri
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Brie Kezlarian
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Marc-Henri Jean
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Oscar Lin
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Christina Vallejo
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Edi Brogi
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Marcia Edelweiss
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Dudgeon SN, Wen S, Hanna MG, Gupta R, Amgad M, Sheth M, Marble H, Huang R, Herrmann MD, Szu CH, Tong D, Werness B, Szu E, Larsimont D, Madabhushi A, Hytopoulos E, Chen W, Singh R, Hart SN, Sharma A, Saltz J, Salgado R, Gallas BD. A Pathologist-Annotated Dataset for Validating Artificial Intelligence: A Project Description and Pilot Study. J Pathol Inform 2021; 12:45. [PMID: 34881099 PMCID: PMC8609287 DOI: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_83_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Revised: 01/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Validating artificial intelligence algorithms for clinical use in medical images is a challenging endeavor due to a lack of standard reference data (ground truth). This topic typically occupies a small portion of the discussion in research papers since most of the efforts are focused on developing novel algorithms. In this work, we present a collaboration to create a validation dataset of pathologist annotations for algorithms that process whole slide images. We focus on data collection and evaluation of algorithm performance in the context of estimating the density of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in breast cancer. Methods: We digitized 64 glass slides of hematoxylin- and eosin-stained invasive ductal carcinoma core biopsies prepared at a single clinical site. A collaborating pathologist selected 10 regions of interest (ROIs) per slide for evaluation. We created training materials and workflows to crowdsource pathologist image annotations on two modes: an optical microscope and two digital platforms. The microscope platform allows the same ROIs to be evaluated in both modes. The workflows collect the ROI type, a decision on whether the ROI is appropriate for estimating the density of sTILs, and if appropriate, the sTIL density value for that ROI. Results: In total, 19 pathologists made 1645 ROI evaluations during a data collection event and the following 2 weeks. The pilot study yielded an abundant number of cases with nominal sTIL infiltration. Furthermore, we found that the sTIL densities are correlated within a case, and there is notable pathologist variability. Consequently, we outline plans to improve our ROI and case sampling methods. We also outline statistical methods to account for ROI correlations within a case and pathologist variability when validating an algorithm. Conclusion: We have built workflows for efficient data collection and tested them in a pilot study. As we prepare for pivotal studies, we will investigate methods to use the dataset as an external validation tool for algorithms. We will also consider what it will take for the dataset to be fit for a regulatory purpose: study size, patient population, and pathologist training and qualifications. To this end, we will elicit feedback from the Food and Drug Administration via the Medical Device Development Tool program and from the broader digital pathology and AI community. Ultimately, we intend to share the dataset, statistical methods, and lessons learned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah N Dudgeon
- Division of Imaging Diagnostics and Software Reliability, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiologic Health, United States Food and Drug Administration, White Oak, MD, USA
| | - Si Wen
- Division of Imaging Diagnostics and Software Reliability, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiologic Health, United States Food and Drug Administration, White Oak, MD, USA
| | | | - Rajarsi Gupta
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Mohamed Amgad
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Manasi Sheth
- Division of Biostatistics, Center for Devices and Radiologic Health, United States Food and Drug Administration, White Oak, MD, USA
| | - Hetal Marble
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Richard Huang
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Markus D Herrmann
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Evan Szu
- Arrive Bio, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Denis Larsimont
- Department of Pathology, Institute Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Anant Madabhushi
- Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Administration Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Weijie Chen
- Division of Imaging Diagnostics and Software Reliability, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiologic Health, United States Food and Drug Administration, White Oak, MD, USA
| | - Rajendra Singh
- Northwell Health and Zucker School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Steven N Hart
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ashish Sharma
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Joel Saltz
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Division of Research, Peter Mac Callum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Brandon D Gallas
- Division of Imaging Diagnostics and Software Reliability, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiologic Health, United States Food and Drug Administration, White Oak, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Schüffler PJ, Geneslaw L, Yarlagadda DVK, Hanna MG, Samboy J, Stamelos E, Vanderbilt C, Philip J, Jean MH, Corsale L, Manzo A, Paramasivam NHG, Ziegler JS, Gao J, Perin JC, Kim YS, Bhanot UK, Roehrl MHA, Ardon O, Chiang S, Giri DD, Sigel CS, Tan LK, Murray M, Virgo C, England C, Yagi Y, Sirintrapun SJ, Klimstra D, Hameed M, Reuter VE, Fuchs TJ. Integrated digital pathology at scale: A solution for clinical diagnostics and cancer research at a large academic medical center. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28:1874-1884. [PMID: 34260720 PMCID: PMC8344580 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocab085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Revised: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Broad adoption of digital pathology (DP) is still lacking, and examples for DP connecting diagnostic, research, and educational use cases are missing. We blueprint a holistic DP solution at a large academic medical center ubiquitously integrated into clinical workflows; researchapplications including molecular, genetic, and tissue databases; and educational processes. MATERIALS AND METHODS We built a vendor-agnostic, integrated viewer for reviewing, annotating, sharing, and quality assurance of digital slides in a clinical or research context. It is the first homegrown viewer cleared by New York State provisional approval in 2020 for primary diagnosis and remote sign-out during the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic. We further introduce an interconnected Honest Broker for BioInformatics Technology (HoBBIT) to systematically compile and share large-scale DP research datasets including anonymized images, redacted pathology reports, and clinical data of patients with consent. RESULTS The solution has been operationally used over 3 years by 926 pathologists and researchers evaluating 288 903 digital slides. A total of 51% of these were reviewed within 1 month after scanning. Seamless integration of the viewer into 4 hospital systems clearly increases the adoption of DP. HoBBIT directly impacts the translation of knowledge in pathology into effective new health measures, including artificial intelligence-driven detection models for prostate cancer, basal cell carcinoma, and breast cancer metastases, developed and validated on thousands of cases. CONCLUSIONS We highlight major challenges and lessons learned when going digital to provide orientation for other pathologists. Building interconnected solutions will not only increase adoption of DP, but also facilitate next-generation computational pathology at scale for enhanced cancer research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J Schüffler
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Institute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Luke Geneslaw
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - D Vijay K Yarlagadda
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Matthew G Hanna
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jennifer Samboy
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Evangelos Stamelos
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Chad Vanderbilt
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - John Philip
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Health Informatics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Marc-Henri Jean
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Lorraine Corsale
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Allyne Manzo
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Neeraj H G Paramasivam
- Department of Information Systems, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - John S Ziegler
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jianjiong Gao
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Juan C Perin
- Department of Information Systems, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Young Suk Kim
- School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Umeshkumar K Bhanot
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Michael H A Roehrl
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Orly Ardon
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sarah Chiang
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dilip D Giri
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Carlie S Sigel
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Lee K Tan
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Melissa Murray
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Christina Virgo
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Christine England
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Yukako Yagi
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - S Joseph Sirintrapun
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - David Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Meera Hameed
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Victor E Reuter
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Thomas J Fuchs
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Kim D, Hanna MG, Vanderbilt C, Sirintrapun SJ. Pathology Informatics Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC). Acta Med Acad 2021; 50:136-142. [PMID: 34075769 DOI: 10.5644/ama2006-124.331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
This review details the development and structure of a four-week rotation in pathology informatics for a resident trainee at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) in New York City so that other programs interested in such a rotation can refer to. The role of pathology informatics is exponentially increasing in research and clinical practice. With an ever-expanding role, training in pathology informatics is paramount as pathology training programs and training accreditation bodies recognize the need for pathology informatics in training future pathologists. However, due to its novelty, many training programs are unfamiliar with implementing pathology informatics training. The rotation incorporates educational resources for pathology informatics, guidance in the development, and general topics relevant to pathology informatics training. Informatics topics include anatomic pathology related aspects such as whole slide imaging, laboratory information systems, image analysis, and molecular pathology associated issues such as the bioinformatics pipeline and data processing. Additionally, we highlight how the rotation pivoted to meet the department's informatics needs while still providing an educational experience during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSION: As pathology informatics continues to grow and integrate itself into practice, informatics education must also grow to meet the future needs of pathology. As informatics programs develop across institutions, such as the one detailed in this paper, these programs will better equip future pathologists with informatics to approach disease and pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Kim
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
| | - Matthew G Hanna
- Department of Pathology and Warren Alpert Center for Computational and Digital Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Chad Vanderbilt
- Department of Pathology and Warren Alpert Center for Computational and Digital Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - S Joseph Sirintrapun
- Department of Pathology and Warren Alpert Center for Computational and Digital Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Li J, Duran MA, Dhanota N, Chatila WK, Bettigole SE, Kwon J, Sriram RK, Humphries MP, Salto-Tellez M, James JA, Hanna MG, Melms JC, Vallabhaneni S, Litchfield K, Usaite I, Biswas D, Bareja R, Li HW, Martin ML, Dorsaint P, Cavallo JA, Li P, Pauli C, Gottesdiener L, DiPardo BJ, Hollmann TJ, Merghoub T, Wen HY, Reis-Filho JS, Riaz N, Su SSM, Kalbasi A, Vasan N, Powell SN, Wolchok JD, Elemento O, Swanton C, Shoushtari AN, Parkes EE, Izar B, Bakhoum SF. Metastasis and Immune Evasion from Extracellular cGAMP Hydrolysis. Cancer Discov 2021; 11:1212-1227. [PMID: 33372007 PMCID: PMC8102348 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-0387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 128] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Revised: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Cytosolic DNA is characteristic of chromosomally unstable metastatic cancer cells, resulting in constitutive activation of the cGAS-STING innate immune pathway. How tumors co-opt inflammatory signaling while evading immune surveillance remains unknown. Here, we show that the ectonucleotidase ENPP1 promotes metastasis by selectively degrading extracellular cGAMP, an immune-stimulatory metabolite whose breakdown products include the immune suppressor adenosine. ENPP1 loss suppresses metastasis, restores tumor immune infiltration, and potentiates response to immune checkpoint blockade in a manner dependent on tumor cGAS and host STING. Conversely, overexpression of wild-type ENPP1, but not an enzymatically weakened mutant, promotes migration and metastasis, in part through the generation of extracellular adenosine, and renders otherwise sensitive tumors completely resistant to immunotherapy. In human cancers, ENPP1 expression correlates with reduced immune cell infiltration, increased metastasis, and resistance to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment. Thus, cGAMP hydrolysis by ENPP1 enables chromosomally unstable tumors to transmute cGAS activation into an immune-suppressive pathway. SIGNIFICANCE: Chromosomal instability promotes metastasis by generating chronic tumor inflammation. ENPP1 facilitates metastasis and enables tumor cells to tolerate inflammation by hydrolyzing the immunotransmitter cGAMP, preventing its transfer from cancer cells to immune cells.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 995.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Li
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Mercedes A Duran
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ninjit Dhanota
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Walid K Chatila
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Tri-Institutional Program in Computational Biology and Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | | | - John Kwon
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Roshan K Sriram
- Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Matthew P Humphries
- Precision Medicine Centre of Excellence, Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Manuel Salto-Tellez
- Precision Medicine Centre of Excellence, Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
- Medical Sciences Division, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jacqueline A James
- Precision Medicine Centre of Excellence, Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew G Hanna
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Johannes C Melms
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, New York, New York
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Sreeram Vallabhaneni
- Laboratory for Systems Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kevin Litchfield
- Cancer Evolution and Genome Instability Laboratory, Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ieva Usaite
- Cancer Evolution and Genome Instability Laboratory, Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Dhruva Biswas
- Cancer Evolution and Genome Instability Laboratory, Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rohan Bareja
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Hao Wei Li
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, New York, New York
| | - Maria Laura Martin
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Princesca Dorsaint
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Julie-Ann Cavallo
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Peng Li
- Immunology Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Chantal Pauli
- Institute for Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lee Gottesdiener
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Benjamin J DiPardo
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Travis J Hollmann
- Medical Sciences Division, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Taha Merghoub
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
- Ludwig Collaborative and Swim Across America Laboratory, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Hannah Y Wen
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jorge S Reis-Filho
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nadeem Riaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Anusha Kalbasi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Neil Vasan
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Simon N Powell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jedd D Wolchok
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
- Ludwig Collaborative and Swim Across America Laboratory, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Olivier Elemento
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Charles Swanton
- Cancer Evolution and Genome Instability Laboratory, Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alexander N Shoushtari
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Eileen E Parkes
- Precision Medicine Centre of Excellence, Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
- Medical Sciences Division, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Benjamin Izar
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, New York, New York
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Samuel F Bakhoum
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sun J, Luo S, Suetterlin KJ, Song J, Huang J, Zhu W, Xi J, Zhou L, Lu J, Lu J, Zhao C, Hanna MG, Männikkö R, Matthews E, Qiao K. Clinical and genetic spectrum of a Chinese cohort with SCN4A gene mutations. Neuromuscul Disord 2021; 31:829-838. [PMID: 33965302 DOI: 10.1016/j.nmd.2021.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Revised: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Skeletal muscle sodium channelopathies due to SCN4A gene mutations have a broad clinical spectrum. However, each phenotype has been reported in few cases of Chinese origin. We present detailed phenotype and genotype data from a cohort of 40 cases with SCN4A gene mutations seen in neuromuscular diagnostic service in Huashan hospital, Fudan University. Cases were referred from 6 independent provinces from 2010 to 2018. A questionnaire covering demographics, precipitating factors, episodes of paralysis and myotonia was designed to collect the clinical information. Electrodiagnostic studies and muscle MRI were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical spectrum of patients included: 6 Hyperkalemic periodic paralysis (15%), 18 Hypokalemic periodic paralysis (45%), 7 sodium channel myotonia (17.5%), 4 paramyotonia congenita (10%) and 5 heterozygous asymptomatic mutation carriers (12.5%). Review of clinical information highlights a significant delay to diagnosis (median 15 years), reports of pain and myalgia in the majority of patients, male predominance, circadian rhythm and common precipitating factors. Electrodiagnostic studies revealed subclinical myotonic discharges and a positive long exercise test in asymptomatic carriers. Muscle MRI identified edema and fatty infiltration in gastrocnemius and soleus. A total of 13 reported and 2 novel SCN4A mutations were identified with most variants distributed in the transmembrane helix S4 to S6, with a hotspot mutation p.Arg675Gln accounting for 32.5% (13/40) of the cohort. Our study revealed a higher proportion of periodic paralysis in SCN4A-mutated patients compared with cohorts from England and the Netherlands. It also highlights the importance of electrodiagnostic studies in diagnosis and segregation studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Sun
- Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - S Luo
- Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China; Department of Neurology, North Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - K J Suetterlin
- Department of Neuromuscular Diseases, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom
| | - J Song
- Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - J Huang
- Department of Clinical Electrophysiology, Institute of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - W Zhu
- Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - J Xi
- Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - L Zhou
- Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - J Lu
- Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - J Lu
- Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - C Zhao
- Department of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - M G Hanna
- Department of Neuromuscular Diseases, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom
| | - R Männikkö
- Department of Neuromuscular Diseases, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom
| | - E Matthews
- Department of Neuromuscular Diseases, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom; Atkinson Morley Neuromuscular Centre, Regional Neurosciences Centre, Department of Neurology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - K Qiao
- Department of Clinical Electrophysiology, Institute of Neurology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Lujan G, Quigley JC, Hartman D, Parwani A, Roehmholdt B, Meter BV, Ardon O, Hanna MG, Kelly D, Sowards C, Montalto M, Bui M, Zarella MD, LaRosa V, Slootweg G, Retamero JA, Lloyd MC, Madory J, Bowman D. Dissecting the Business Case for Adoption and Implementation of Digital Pathology: A White Paper from the Digital Pathology Association. J Pathol Inform 2021; 12:17. [PMID: 34221633 PMCID: PMC8240548 DOI: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_67_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2020] [Revised: 09/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
We believe the switch to a digital pathology (DP) workflow is imminent and it is essential to understand the economic implications of conversion. Many aspects of the adoption of DP will be disruptive and have a direct financial impact, both in short term costs, such as investment in equipment and personnel, and long term revenue potential, such as improved productivity and novel tests. The focus of this whitepaper is to educate pathologists, laboratorians and other stakeholders about the business and monetary considerations of converting to a digital pathology workflow. The components of a DP business plan will be thoroughly summarized, and guidance will be provided on how to build a case for adoption and implementation as well as a roadmap for transitioning from an analog to a digital pathology workflow in various laboratory settings. It is important to clarify that this publication is not intended to list prices although some financials will be mentioned as examples. The authors encourage readers who are evaluating conversion to a DP workflow to use this paper as a foundational guide for conducting a thorough and complete assessment while incorporating in current market pricing. Contributors to this paper analyzed peer-reviewed literature and data collected from various institutions, some of which are mentioned. Digital pathology will change the way we practice through facilitating patient access to expert pathology services and enabling image analysis tools and assays to aid in diagnosis, prognosis, risk stratification and therapeutic selection. Together, they will result in the delivery of valuable information from which to make better decisions and improve the health of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Lujan
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Douglas Hartman
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Anil Parwani
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Brian Roehmholdt
- Department of Pathology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, La Canada Flintridge, CA, USA
| | | | - Orly Ardon
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew G. Hanna
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Marilyn Bui
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Mark D. Zarella
- Johns Hopkins Medicine Pathology Informatics, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Victoria LaRosa
- Education Services Department, Oracle Corp, Austin, Texas, USA
| | | | | | | | - James Madory
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ho DJ, Yarlagadda DVK, D'Alfonso TM, Hanna MG, Grabenstetter A, Ntiamoah P, Brogi E, Tan LK, Fuchs TJ. Deep Multi-Magnification Networks for multi-class breast cancer image segmentation. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2021; 88:101866. [PMID: 33485058 PMCID: PMC7975990 DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2021.101866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Revised: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Pathologic analysis of surgical excision specimens for breast carcinoma is important to evaluate the completeness of surgical excision and has implications for future treatment. This analysis is performed manually by pathologists reviewing histologic slides prepared from formalin-fixed tissue. In this paper, we present Deep Multi-Magnification Network trained by partial annotation for automated multi-class tissue segmentation by a set of patches from multiple magnifications in digitized whole slide images. Our proposed architecture with multi-encoder, multi-decoder, and multi-concatenation outperforms other single and multi-magnification-based architectures by achieving the highest mean intersection-over-union, and can be used to facilitate pathologists' assessments of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Joon Ho
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065 USA.
| | - Dig V K Yarlagadda
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065 USA
| | - Timothy M D'Alfonso
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065 USA
| | - Matthew G Hanna
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065 USA
| | - Anne Grabenstetter
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065 USA
| | - Peter Ntiamoah
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065 USA
| | - Edi Brogi
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065 USA
| | - Lee K Tan
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065 USA
| | - Thomas J Fuchs
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065 USA; Weill Cornell Graduate School for Medical Sciences, New York, NY 10065 USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hanna MG, Raciti P, Godrich R, Casson A, Viret J, Lee D, Lee M, Bozkurt A, Sue J, Dogdas B, Rothrock B, Grady L, Kanan C, Fuchs T. Abstract PD6-03: Clinical-grade detection of breast cancer in biopsies and excisions using machine learning. Cancer Res 2021. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs20-pd6-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Pathologists reviewing breast tissue slides must identify the presence of many salient features within each slide, including invasive and in situ breast cancer as well as various forms of atypia. In breast pathology particularly, the large volume of slides poses significant challenges for workload management and pathologist productivity (Johnson et al. 2019). The shift to a digital workflow in pathology, augmented by machine learning algorithms, has the potential to increase the efficiency, and productivity of pathologists by identifying cancer and pre-cancerous lesions in digitized slides. While there has been extensive work using machine learning algorithms to detect breast cancer metastasis in lymph nodes (Liu et al. 2018; Steiner et al. 2018), almost no research has been done on using such systems to detect breast cancer in biopsies and excisions.
Methods: We created and assessed Paige Breast Alpha, a machine learning system for the detection of breast cancer in hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained whole slide images (WSIs) of glass slides. The system is a binary classifier, intended to draw a pathologist’s attention to concerning features. Concerning features (the positive category) consisted of invasive breast cancer, in situ breast cancer, and various forms of atypia (atypical ductal hyperplasia, atypical lobular hyperplasia, etc. ). The deep learning system is based on the method proposed in Campanella et al. (2019). It learns directly from diagnosis using multiple instance learning, without the need for pixel-wise annotations. Paige Breast Alpha was trained on 17354 images from 3378 patients, and was assessed on 7921 images from 2443 patients. All slides were scanned on a Leica Aperio AT2.
Results: For detecting invasive or in situ cancer at the part level, the system achieved an overall sensitivity of 97.3% and a specificity of 98.0% in biopsies and 96.1% sensitivity and 91.5% specificity in excisions. Each part had between 1—10 slides.
Conclusions: We hypothesized that a machine learning system trained to detect predefined types of breast cancer and pre-cancerous lesions could be applied to a range of breast biopsy and resection WSIs to detect for the presence of these lesions. Herein we showed that the presence of these predefined features can be detected with high accuracy. Future studies are being initiated to assess the potential benefits of such a system when used by a pathologist. Additional systems are under development that would have the capability of subtyping the lesion present, in addition to acting as an overall binary classifier.
Citation Format: Matthew G Hanna, Patricia Raciti, Ran Godrich, Adam Casson, Julian Viret, Donghun Lee, Matthew Lee, Alican Bozkurt, Jillian Sue, Belma Dogdas, Brandon Rothrock, Leo Grady, Christopher Kanan, Thomas Fuchs. Clinical-grade detection of breast cancer in biopsies and excisions using machine learning [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD6-03.
Collapse
|
34
|
Harrison JH, Gilbertson JR, Hanna MG, Olson NH, Seheult JN, Sorace JM, Stram MN. Introduction to Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2021; 145:1228-1254. [PMID: 33493264 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0541-cp] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— Recent developments in machine learning have stimulated intense interest in software that may augment or replace human experts. Machine learning may impact pathology practice by offering new capabilities in analysis, interpretation, and outcomes prediction using images and other data. The principles of operation and management of machine learning systems are unfamiliar to pathologists, who anticipate a need for additional education to be effective as expert users and managers of the new tools. OBJECTIVE.— To provide a background on machine learning for practicing pathologists, including an overview of algorithms, model development, and performance evaluation; to examine the current status of machine learning in pathology and consider possible roles and requirements for pathologists in local deployment and management of machine learning systems; and to highlight existing challenges and gaps in deployment methodology and regulation. DATA SOURCES.— Sources include the biomedical and engineering literature, white papers from professional organizations, government reports, electronic resources, and authors' experience in machine learning. References were chosen when possible for accessibility to practicing pathologists without specialized training in mathematics, statistics, or software development. CONCLUSIONS.— Machine learning offers an array of techniques that in recent published results show substantial promise. Data suggest that human experts working with machine learning tools outperform humans or machines separately, but the optimal form for this combination in pathology has not been established. Significant questions related to the generalizability of machine learning systems, local site verification, and performance monitoring remain to be resolved before a consensus on best practices and a regulatory environment can be established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James H Harrison
- From the Department of Pathology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville (Harrison)
| | - John R Gilbertson
- the Departments of Biomedical Informatics and Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Gilbertson)
| | - Matthew G Hanna
- the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (Hanna)
| | - Niels H Olson
- the Defense Innovation Unit, Mountain View, California (Olson).,the Department of Pathology, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland (Olson)
| | - Jansen N Seheult
- the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, and Vitalant Specialty Labs, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Seheult)
| | - James M Sorace
- the US Department of Health and Human Services, retired, Lutherville, Maryland (Sorace)
| | - Michelle N Stram
- the Department of Forensic Medicine, New York University, and Office of Chief Medical Examiner, New York, New York (Stram)
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Hoda RS, Brogi E, D'Alfonso TM, Grabenstetter A, Giri D, Hanna MG, Kuba MG, Murray MP, Vallejo CE, Zhang H, Reis-Filho JS, Wen HY. Interobserver Variation of PD-L1 SP142 Immunohistochemistry Interpretation in Breast Carcinoma: A Study of 79 Cases Using Whole Slide Imaging. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2021; 145:1132-1137. [PMID: 33417715 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0451-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— The Ventana programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) SP142 immunohistochemical assay (IHC) is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as the companion diagnostic assay to identify patients with locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer for immunotherapy with atezolizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting PD-L1. OBJECTIVE.— To determine interobserver variability in PD-L1 SP142 IHC interpretation in invasive breast carcinoma. DESIGN.— The pathology database was interrogated for all patients diagnosed with primary invasive, locally recurrent, or metastatic breast carcinoma on which PD-L1 SP142 IHC was performed from November 2018 to June 2019 at our institution. A subset of cases was selected using a computerized random-number generator. PD-L1 IHC was evaluated in stromal tumor-infiltrating immune cells using the IMpassion130 trial criteria, with positive cases defined as immunoreactivity in immune cells 1% or more of the tumor area. IHC was interpreted on whole slide images by staff pathologists with breast pathology expertise. Interobserver variability was calculated using unweighted κ. RESULTS.— A total of 79 cases were assessed by 8 pathologists. Interobserver agreement was substantial (κ = 0.727). There was complete agreement among all 8 pathologists in 62% (49 of 79) of cases, 7 pathologists or more in 84% (66 of 79) of cases and 6 pathologists or more in 92% (73 of 79) of cases. In 4% (3 of 79) of cases, all of which were small biopsies, pathologists' interpretations were evenly split between scores of positive and negative. CONCLUSIONS.— The findings show substantial agreement in PD-L1 SP142 IHC assessment of breast carcinoma cases among 8 pathologists at a single institution. Further study is warranted to define the basis for discrepant results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raza S Hoda
- From the Department of Pathology at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Hoda is currently located in the Department of Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Edi Brogi
- From the Department of Pathology at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Timothy M D'Alfonso
- From the Department of Pathology at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Anne Grabenstetter
- From the Department of Pathology at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Dilip Giri
- From the Department of Pathology at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Matthew G Hanna
- From the Department of Pathology at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - M Gabriela Kuba
- From the Department of Pathology at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Melissa P Murray
- From the Department of Pathology at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Christina E Vallejo
- From the Department of Pathology at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Hong Zhang
- From the Department of Pathology at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jorge S Reis-Filho
- From the Department of Pathology at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Hannah Y Wen
- From the Department of Pathology at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ardon O, Reuter VE, Hameed M, Corsale L, Manzo A, Sirintrapun SJ, Ntiamoah P, Stamelos E, Schueffler PJ, England C, Klimstra DS, Hanna MG. Digital Pathology Operations at an NYC Tertiary Cancer Center During the First 4 Months of COVID-19 Pandemic Response. Acad Pathol 2021; 8:23742895211010276. [PMID: 35155745 PMCID: PMC8819741 DOI: 10.1177/23742895211010276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Revised: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Implementation of an infrastructure to support digital pathology began in 2006 at
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. The public health emergency and COVID-19
pandemic regulations in New York City required a novel workflow to sustain
existing operations. While regulatory enforcement discretions offered faculty
workspace flexibility, a substantial portion of laboratory and digital pathology
workflows require on-site presence of staff. Maintaining social distancing and
offering staggered work schedules. Due to a decrease in patients seeking health
care at the onset of the pandemic, a temporary decrease in patient specimens was
observed. Hospital and travel regulations impacted onsite vendor technical
support. Digital glass slide scanning activities onsite proceeded without
interruption throughout the pandemic, with challenges including staff who
required quarantine due to virus exposure, unrelated illness, family support, or
lack of public transportation. During the public health emergency, we validated
digital pathology systems for a remote pathology operation. Since March 2020,
the departmental digital pathology staff were able to maintain scanning volumes
of over 100 000 slides per month. The digital scanning team reprioritized
archival slide scanning and participated in a remote sign-out validation and
successful submission of New York State approval for a laboratory developed
test. Digital pathology offers a health care delivery model where pathologists
can perform their sign out duties at remote location and prevent disruptions to
critical pathology services for patients seeking care at our institution during
emergencies. Development of standard operating procedures to support digital
workflows will maintain turnaround times and enable clinical operations during
emergency or otherwise unanticipated events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orly Ardon
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Victor E Reuter
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,The Warren Alpert Center for Digital and Computational Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Meera Hameed
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,The Warren Alpert Center for Digital and Computational Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lorraine Corsale
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Allyne Manzo
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sahussapont J Sirintrapun
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,The Warren Alpert Center for Digital and Computational Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter Ntiamoah
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Evangelos Stamelos
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter J Schueffler
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,The Warren Alpert Center for Digital and Computational Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christine England
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David S Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,The Warren Alpert Center for Digital and Computational Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew G Hanna
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Perron M, Wen HY, Hanna MG, Brogi E, Ross DS. HER2 Immunohistochemistry in Invasive Micropapillary Breast Carcinoma: Complete Assessment of an Incomplete Pattern. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2020; 145:979-987. [PMID: 33212478 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0288-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— Invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) is a rare variant of breast carcinoma, composed of avascular morula-like tumor clusters surrounded by stromal spaces, which can affect the HER2 immunohistochemical (IHC) staining pattern. The 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) HER2 testing guideline suggests moderate to intense but incomplete (basolateral) staining be considered equivocal. OBJECTIVES.— To perform a detailed assessment of HER2 IHC staining patterns in IMPC. DESIGN.— Hematoxylin-eosin and HER2 IHC slides were retrospectively reviewed to assess the morphology and HER2 IHC characteristics of IMPC. The 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline was applied. RESULTS.— The cohort consisted of 187 IMPCs from 181 patients with median age of 58 years. Homogeneous (≥90%) micropapillary component was found in 40% (75 of 187) of cases. Receptor profile was as follows: 75% (140 of 187) ER+ HER2-, 19% (37 of 187) ER+ HER2+, 4% (7 of 187) ER- HER2+, and 2% (3 of 187) ER- HER2-. Of 26 cases with HER2 IHC 3+, 65% (17 of 26) showed a basolateral staining pattern with strong intensity. HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) showed amplification in 26% (17 of 66) of HER2 IHC equivocal cases: 76% (13 of 17) showed basolateral staining pattern and 24% (4 of 17) complete staining, with weak to moderate (2), moderate (14), or moderate to strong (1) intensity. CONCLUSIONS.— The most frequent staining pattern was basolateral, seen in 49% of cases, including 65% HER2 IHC positive and 76% HER2 IHC equivocal/FISH amplified. If a basolateral pattern and weak to moderate staining is observed in IMPC, alternative testing should be performed to confirm the HER2 status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjorie Perron
- From the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Hannah Y Wen
- From the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Matthew G Hanna
- From the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Edi Brogi
- From the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Dara S Ross
- From the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kim D, Pantanowitz L, Schüffler P, Yarlagadda DVK, Ardon O, Reuter VE, Hameed M, Klimstra DS, Hanna MG. (Re) Defining the High-Power Field for Digital Pathology. J Pathol Inform 2020; 11:33. [PMID: 33343994 PMCID: PMC7737490 DOI: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_48_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Revised: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The microscope high-power field (HPF) is the cornerstone for histopathology diagnostic evaluation such as the quantification of mitotic figures, lymphocytes, and tumor grading. With traditional light microscopy, HPFs are typically evaluated by quantifying histologic events in 10 fields of view at × 400 magnification. In the era of digital pathology, new variables are introduced that may affect HPF evaluation. The aim of this study was to determine the parameters that influence HPF in whole slide images (WSIs). MATERIALS AND METHODS Glass slides scanned on various devices (Leica's Aperio GT450, AT2, and ScanScope XT; Philips UltraFast Scanner; Hamamatsu's Nanozoomer 2.0HT; and 3DHistech's P1000) were compared to acquired digital slides reviewed on each vendor's respective WSI viewer software (e.g., Aperio ImageScope, ImageScope DX, Philips IMS, 3DHistech CaseViewer, and Hamamatsu NDP.view) and an in-house developed vendor-agnostic viewer. WSIs were reviewed at "×40" equivalent HPF on different sized monitors with varying display resolutions (1900 × 1080-4500 × 3000) and aspect ratios (e.g., Food and Drug Administration [FDA]-cleared 27" Philips PS27QHDCR, FDA-cleared 24" Dell MR2416, 24" Hewlett Packard Z24n G2, and 28" Microsoft Surface Studio). Digital and microscopic HPF areas were calculated and compared. RESULTS A significant variation of HPF area occurred between differing monitor size and display resolutions with minor differences between WSI viewers. No differences were identified by scanner or WSIs scanned at different resolutions (e.g., 0.5, 0.25, 0.24, and 0.12 μm/pixel). CONCLUSION Glass slide HPF at × 400 magnification with conventional light microscopy was not equivalent to "×40" digital HPF areas. Digital HPF quantification may vary due to differences in the tissue area displayed by monitor sizes, display resolutions, and WSI viewers but not by scanner or scanning resolution. These findings will need to be further clinically validated with potentially new digital metrics for evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Kim
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Liron Pantanowitz
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Peter Schüffler
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Warren Alpert Center for Digital and Computational Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Orly Ardon
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Victor E. Reuter
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Warren Alpert Center for Digital and Computational Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Meera Hameed
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Warren Alpert Center for Digital and Computational Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David S. Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Warren Alpert Center for Digital and Computational Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew G. Hanna
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Marble HD, Huang R, Dudgeon SN, Lowe A, Herrmann MD, Blakely S, Leavitt MO, Isaacs M, Hanna MG, Sharma A, Veetil J, Goldberg P, Schmid JH, Lasiter L, Gallas BD, Abels E, Lennerz JK. A Regulatory Science Initiative to Harmonize and Standardize Digital Pathology and Machine Learning Processes to Speed up Clinical Innovation to Patients. J Pathol Inform 2020; 11:22. [PMID: 33042601 PMCID: PMC7518200 DOI: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_27_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Revised: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Unlocking the full potential of pathology data by gaining computational access to histological pixel data and metadata (digital pathology) is one of the key promises of computational pathology. Despite scientific progress and several regulatory approvals for primary diagnosis using whole-slide imaging, true clinical adoption at scale is slower than anticipated. In the U.S., advances in digital pathology are often siloed pursuits by individual stakeholders, and to our knowledge, there has not been a systematic approach to advance the field through a regulatory science initiative. The Alliance for Digital Pathology (the Alliance) is a recently established, volunteer, collaborative, regulatory science initiative to standardize digital pathology processes to speed up innovation to patients. The purpose is: (1) to account for the patient perspective by including patient advocacy; (2) to investigate and develop methods and tools for the evaluation of effectiveness, safety, and quality to specify risks and benefits in the precompetitive phase; (3) to help strategize the sequence of clinically meaningful deliverables; (4) to encourage and streamline the development of ground-truth data sets for machine learning model development and validation; and (5) to clarify regulatory pathways by investigating relevant regulatory science questions. The Alliance accepts participation from all stakeholders, and we solicit clinically relevant proposals that will benefit the field at large. The initiative will dissolve once a clinical, interoperable, modularized, integrated solution (from tissue acquisition to diagnostic algorithm) has been implemented. In times of rapidly evolving discoveries, scientific input from subject-matter experts is one essential element to inform regulatory guidance and decision-making. The Alliance aims to establish and promote synergistic regulatory science efforts that will leverage diverse inputs to move digital pathology forward and ultimately improve patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hetal Desai Marble
- Department of Pathology, Center for Integrated Diagnostics, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Richard Huang
- Department of Pathology, Center for Integrated Diagnostics, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sarah Nixon Dudgeon
- Division of Imaging, Diagnostics, and Software Reliability, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | | | - Markus D Herrmann
- Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Mike Isaacs
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Matthew G Hanna
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ashish Sharma
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jithesh Veetil
- Medical Device Innovation Consortium, Arlington, VA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Brandon D Gallas
- Division of Imaging, Diagnostics, and Software Reliability, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | | | - Jochen K Lennerz
- Department of Pathology, Center for Integrated Diagnostics, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Dhakal A, Antony Thomas R, Levine EG, Brufsky A, Takabe K, Hanna MG, Attwood K, Miller A, Khoury T, Early AP, Soniwala S, O'Connor T, Opyrchal M. Outcome of Everolimus-Based Therapy in Hormone-Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients After Progression on Palbociclib. Breast Cancer (Auckl) 2020; 14:1178223420944864. [PMID: 32753876 PMCID: PMC7378710 DOI: 10.1177/1178223420944864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Background Despite the approval of mTOR inhibitor everolimus and CDK4/6 inhibitors in the management of hormone-receptor-positive HER2 non-amplified metastatic breast cancer (HR+ HER2-MBC), the optimal sequence of therapy is unclear. There are no clinical data on efficacy of everolimus in HR+ HER2-MBC after cancer progresses on CDK4/6 inhibitors. Objective The objective of this study is to find the efficacy of everolimus in HR+ HER2-MBC after they progress on a CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib. Methods This is a retrospective, 2-institute review of HR+ HER2-MBC from Jan 2015 to March 2018 treated with everolimus after progression on palbociclib. Primary end point was median progression-free survival (PFS), secondary end points objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit ratio (CBR), and overall survival (OS). Results Out of 41 women with median age 61 years (33, 87) enrolled, 66% had received adjuvant systemic therapy, 61% had visceral disease, and 95% had prior nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors. About 83% women had 3 or more chemotherapy or hormonal therapies prior to everolimus. Kaplan-Meier estimates showed a median PFS of 4.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.2-6.2). The median OS was 18.7 months (95% CI 9.5 to not reached). Objective response rate and CBR were both 17.1%. Conclusion Everolimus was associated with modest PFS and ORR in HR+ HER2-MBCs postprogression on palbociclib.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajay Dhakal
- Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Roby Antony Thomas
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ellis G Levine
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Adam Brufsky
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kazuaki Takabe
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Matthew G Hanna
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kristopher Attwood
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Austin Miller
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Thaer Khoury
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Amy P Early
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Saif Soniwala
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Tracy O'Connor
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Mateusz Opyrchal
- Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Williams BJ, Fraggetta F, Hanna MG, Huang R, Lennerz J, Salgado R, Sirintrapun SJ, Pantanowitz L, Parwani A, Zarella M, Treanor DE. The Future of Pathology: What can we Learn from the COVID-19 Pandemic? J Pathol Inform 2020; 11:15. [PMID: 32685256 PMCID: PMC7363060 DOI: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_29_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Revised: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Bethany J Williams
- Department of Histopathology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Filippo Fraggetta
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Matthew G Hanna
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Richard Huang
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jochen Lennerz
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Division of Research, Peter Mac Callum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia and Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA Ziekenhuizen, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | - Liron Pantanowitz
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Anil Parwani
- Department of Pathology, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Mark Zarella
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Maryland, UK
| | - Darren E Treanor
- Department of Histopathology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Kos Z, Roblin E, Kim RS, Michiels S, Gallas BD, Chen W, van de Vijver KK, Goel S, Adams S, Demaria S, Viale G, Nielsen TO, Badve SS, Symmans WF, Sotiriou C, Rimm DL, Hewitt S, Denkert C, Loibl S, Luen SJ, Bartlett JMS, Savas P, Pruneri G, Dillon DA, Cheang MCU, Tutt A, Hall JA, Kok M, Horlings HM, Madabhushi A, van der Laak J, Ciompi F, Laenkholm AV, Bellolio E, Gruosso T, Fox SB, Araya JC, Floris G, Hudeček J, Voorwerk L, Beck AH, Kerner J, Larsimont D, Declercq S, Van den Eynden G, Pusztai L, Ehinger A, Yang W, AbdulJabbar K, Yuan Y, Singh R, Hiley C, Bakir MA, Lazar AJ, Naber S, Wienert S, Castillo M, Curigliano G, Dieci MV, André F, Swanton C, Reis-Filho J, Sparano J, Balslev E, Chen IC, Stovgaard EIS, Pogue-Geile K, Blenman KRM, Penault-Llorca F, Schnitt S, Lakhani SR, Vincent-Salomon A, Rojo F, Braybrooke JP, Hanna MG, Soler-Monsó MT, Bethmann D, Castaneda CA, Willard-Gallo K, Sharma A, Lien HC, Fineberg S, Thagaard J, Comerma L, Gonzalez-Ericsson P, Brogi E, Loi S, Saltz J, Klaushen F, Cooper L, Amgad M, Moore DA, Salgado R. Pitfalls in assessing stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer 2020; 6:17. [PMID: 32411819 PMCID: PMC7217863 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-020-0156-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2019] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) are important prognostic and predictive biomarkers in triple-negative (TNBC) and HER2-positive breast cancer. Incorporating sTILs into clinical practice necessitates reproducible assessment. Previously developed standardized scoring guidelines have been widely embraced by the clinical and research communities. We evaluated sources of variability in sTIL assessment by pathologists in three previous sTIL ring studies. We identify common challenges and evaluate impact of discrepancies on outcome estimates in early TNBC using a newly-developed prognostic tool. Discordant sTIL assessment is driven by heterogeneity in lymphocyte distribution. Additional factors include: technical slide-related issues; scoring outside the tumor boundary; tumors with minimal assessable stroma; including lymphocytes associated with other structures; and including other inflammatory cells. Small variations in sTIL assessment modestly alter risk estimation in early TNBC but have the potential to affect treatment selection if cutpoints are employed. Scoring and averaging multiple areas, as well as use of reference images, improve consistency of sTIL evaluation. Moreover, to assist in avoiding the pitfalls identified in this analysis, we developed an educational resource available at www.tilsinbreastcancer.org/pitfalls.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zuzana Kos
- Department of Pathology, BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, BC Canada
| | - Elvire Roblin
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Oncostat U1018, Inserm, University Paris-Saclay, labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France
| | - Rim S. Kim
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP)/NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA USA
| | - Stefan Michiels
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Oncostat U1018, Inserm, University Paris-Saclay, labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France
| | - Brandon D. Gallas
- Division of Imaging, Diagnostics, and Software Reliability (DIDSR); Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories (OSEL); Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH), US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA), Silver Spring, MD USA
| | - Weijie Chen
- Division of Imaging, Diagnostics, and Software Reliability (DIDSR); Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories (OSEL); Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH), US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA), Silver Spring, MD USA
| | - Koen K. van de Vijver
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium
| | - Shom Goel
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC Australia
- Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
| | - Sylvia Adams
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Medical School, New York, NY USA
| | - Sandra Demaria
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY USA
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Department of Pathology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Torsten O. Nielsen
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Sunil S. Badve
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, USA
| | - W. Fraser Symmans
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Christos Sotiriou
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - David L. Rimm
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT USA
| | - Stephen Hewitt
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD USA
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Standort Marburg and Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | | | - Stephen J. Luen
- Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
- Division of Research and Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | - John M. S. Bartlett
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON Canada
- University of Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Peter Savas
- Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
- Division of Research and Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | - Giancarlo Pruneri
- Department of Pathology, IRCCS Fondazione Instituto Nazionale Tumori and University of Milan, School of Medicine, Milan, Italy
| | - Deborah A. Dillon
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
- Department of Pathology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA
| | - Maggie Chon U. Cheang
- Institute of Cancer Research Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey, UK
| | - Andrew Tutt
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Marleen Kok
- Department of Medical Oncology and Division of Tumor Biology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hugo M. Horlings
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anant Madabhushi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH USA
- Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, OH USA
| | - Jeroen van der Laak
- Computational Pathology Group, Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Francesco Ciompi
- Computational Pathology Group, Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | - Enrique Bellolio
- Departamento de Anatomía Patológica, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile
| | | | - Stephen B. Fox
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC Australia
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Department of Pathology, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | | | - Giuseppe Floris
- KU Leuven- Univerisity of Leuven, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research and KU Leuven- University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Pathology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan Hudeček
- Department of Research IT, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leonie Voorwerk
- Division of Tumor Biology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Denis Larsimont
- Department of Pathology, Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | - Lajos Pusztai
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT USA
| | - Anna Ehinger
- Department of Clinical Genetics and Pathology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Wentao Yang
- Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Centre, Shanghai, China
| | - Khalid AbdulJabbar
- Centre for Evolution and Cancer; Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Yinyin Yuan
- Centre for Evolution and Cancer; Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Rajendra Singh
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai, New York, NY 10029 USA
| | - Crispin Hiley
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Maise al Bakir
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Alexander J. Lazar
- Departments of Pathology, Genomic Medicine, Dermatology, and Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Stephen Naber
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, USA
| | - Stephan Wienert
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Pathology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Miluska Castillo
- Department of Medical Oncology and Research, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, 15038 Peru
| | | | - Maria-Vittoria Dieci
- Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Fabrice André
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Charles Swanton
- Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
- Francis Crick Institute, Midland Road, London, UK
| | - Jorge Reis-Filho
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Joseph Sparano
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY USA
| | - Eva Balslev
- Department of Pathology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - I-Chun Chen
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Oncology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | - Katherine Pogue-Geile
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP)/NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA USA
| | - Kim R. M. Blenman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT USA
| | | | - Stuart Schnitt
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Sunil R. Lakhani
- The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research and Pathology Queensland, Brisbane, QLD Australia
| | - Anne Vincent-Salomon
- Institut Curie, Paris Sciences Lettres Université, Inserm U934, Department of Pathology, Paris, France
| | - Federico Rojo
- Pathology Department, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Fundación Jiménez Díaz (IIS-FJD) - CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
- GEICAM-Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jeremy P. Braybrooke
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford and Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Matthew G. Hanna
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - M. Teresa Soler-Monsó
- Department of Pathology, Bellvitge University Hospital, IDIBELL. Breast Unit. Catalan Institut of Oncology. L ‘Hospitalet del Llobregat’, Barcelona, 08908 Catalonia Spain
| | - Daniel Bethmann
- University Hospital Halle (Saale), Institute of Pathology, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Carlos A. Castaneda
- Department of Medical Oncology and Research, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, Lima, 15038 Peru
| | - Karen Willard-Gallo
- Molecular Immunology Unit, Institut Jules Bordet, Universitè Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ashish Sharma
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - Huang-Chun Lien
- Department of Pathology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Susan Fineberg
- Department of Pathology, Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY USA
| | - Jeppe Thagaard
- DTU Compute, Department of Applied Mathematics, Technical University of Denmark; Visiopharm A/S, Hørsholm, Denmark
| | - Laura Comerma
- GEICAM-Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group, Madrid, Spain
- Pathology Department, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paula Gonzalez-Ericsson
- Breast Cancer Program, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA
| | - Edi Brogi
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Sherene Loi
- Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
- Division of Research and Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | - Joel Saltz
- Biomedical Informatics Department, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY USA
| | - Frederick Klaushen
- Institute of Pathology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lee Cooper
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Mohamed Amgad
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - David A. Moore
- Department of Pathology, UCL Cancer Institute, UCL, London, UK
- University College Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Division of Research and Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia
- Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Amgad M, Stovgaard ES, Balslev E, Thagaard J, Chen W, Dudgeon S, Sharma A, Kerner JK, Denkert C, Yuan Y, AbdulJabbar K, Wienert S, Savas P, Voorwerk L, Beck AH, Madabhushi A, Hartman J, Sebastian MM, Horlings HM, Hudeček J, Ciompi F, Moore DA, Singh R, Roblin E, Balancin ML, Mathieu MC, Lennerz JK, Kirtani P, Chen IC, Braybrooke JP, Pruneri G, Demaria S, Adams S, Schnitt SJ, Lakhani SR, Rojo F, Comerma L, Badve SS, Khojasteh M, Symmans WF, Sotiriou C, Gonzalez-Ericsson P, Pogue-Geile KL, Kim RS, Rimm DL, Viale G, Hewitt SM, Bartlett JMS, Penault-Llorca F, Goel S, Lien HC, Loibl S, Kos Z, Loi S, Hanna MG, Michiels S, Kok M, Nielsen TO, Lazar AJ, Bago-Horvath Z, Kooreman LFS, van der Laak JAWM, Saltz J, Gallas BD, Kurkure U, Barnes M, Salgado R, Cooper LAD. Report on computational assessment of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes from the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group. NPJ Breast Cancer 2020; 6:16. [PMID: 32411818 PMCID: PMC7217824 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-020-0154-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2019] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Assessment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) is increasingly recognized as an integral part of the prognostic workflow in triple-negative (TNBC) and HER2-positive breast cancer, as well as many other solid tumors. This recognition has come about thanks to standardized visual reporting guidelines, which helped to reduce inter-reader variability. Now, there are ripe opportunities to employ computational methods that extract spatio-morphologic predictive features, enabling computer-aided diagnostics. We detail the benefits of computational TILs assessment, the readiness of TILs scoring for computational assessment, and outline considerations for overcoming key barriers to clinical translation in this arena. Specifically, we discuss: 1. ensuring computational workflows closely capture visual guidelines and standards; 2. challenges and thoughts standards for assessment of algorithms including training, preanalytical, analytical, and clinical validation; 3. perspectives on how to realize the potential of machine learning models and to overcome the perceptual and practical limits of visual scoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Amgad
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA USA
| | | | - Eva Balslev
- Department of Pathology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Jeppe Thagaard
- DTU Compute, Department of Applied Mathematics, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
- Visiopharm A/S, Hørsholm, Denmark
| | - Weijie Chen
- FDA/CDRH/OSEL/Division of Imaging, Diagnostics, and Software Reliability, Silver Spring, MD USA
| | - Sarah Dudgeon
- FDA/CDRH/OSEL/Division of Imaging, Diagnostics, and Software Reliability, Silver Spring, MD USA
| | - Ashish Sharma
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA USA
| | | | - Carsten Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Standort Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Yinyin Yuan
- Centre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Khalid AbdulJabbar
- Centre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Stephan Wienert
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Standort Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Peter Savas
- Division of Research and Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Leonie Voorwerk
- Department of Tumor Biology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Anant Madabhushi
- Case Western Reserve University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland, OH USA
- Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Administration Medical Center, Cleveland, OH USA
| | - Johan Hartman
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
| | - Manu M. Sebastian
- Departments of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Hugo M. Horlings
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Hudeček
- Department of Research IT, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Ciompi
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - David A. Moore
- Department of Pathology, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | - Rajendra Singh
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY USA
| | - Elvire Roblin
- Université Paris-Saclay, Univ. Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France
| | - Marcelo Luiz Balancin
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marie-Christine Mathieu
- Department of Medical Biology and Pathology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - Jochen K. Lennerz
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Pawan Kirtani
- Department of Histopathology, Manipal Hospitals Dwarka, New Delhi, India
| | - I-Chun Chen
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jeremy P. Braybrooke
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Giancarlo Pruneri
- Pathology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori and University of Milan, School of Medicine, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Sylvia Adams
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Stuart J. Schnitt
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Sunil R. Lakhani
- The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research and Pathology Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Federico Rojo
- Pathology Department, CIBERONC-Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Fundación Jiménez Díaz (IIS-FJD), Madrid, Spain
- GEICAM-Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group, Madrid, Spain
| | - Laura Comerma
- Pathology Department, CIBERONC-Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Fundación Jiménez Díaz (IIS-FJD), Madrid, Spain
- GEICAM-Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sunil S. Badve
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN USA
| | | | - W. Fraser Symmans
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Christos Sotiriou
- Breast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
- ULB-Cancer Research Center (U-CRC) Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Paula Gonzalez-Ericsson
- Breast Cancer Program, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA
| | | | | | - David L. Rimm
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT USA
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Department of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS & State University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Stephen M. Hewitt
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD USA
| | - John M. S. Bartlett
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON Canada
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Frédérique Penault-Llorca
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France
- UMR INSERM 1240, Universite Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Shom Goel
- Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre building, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
| | - Huang-Chun Lien
- Department of Pathology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group, c/o GBG-Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - Zuzana Kos
- Department of Pathology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia Canada
| | - Sherene Loi
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Matthew G. Hanna
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Stefan Michiels
- Gustave Roussy, Universite Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
- Université Paris-Sud, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Villejuif, France
| | - Marleen Kok
- Division of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Alexander J. Lazar
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
- Department of Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | | | - Loes F. S. Kooreman
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen A. W. M. van der Laak
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Joel Saltz
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY USA
| | - Brandon D. Gallas
- FDA/CDRH/OSEL/Division of Imaging, Diagnostics, and Software Reliability, Silver Spring, MD USA
| | - Uday Kurkure
- Roche Tissue Diagnostics, Digital Pathology, Santa Clara, CA USA
| | - Michael Barnes
- Roche Diagnostics Information Solutions, Belmont, CA USA
| | - Roberto Salgado
- Division of Research and Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA Ziekenhuizen, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Lee A. D. Cooper
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Hanna MG, Grabenstetter A, Ross DS, Tan LK. Abstract P5-02-09: The prevalence of invasive lobular carcinomas with unconventional immunohistochemical phenotypes. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-p5-02-09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background The prognosis of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is controversial. Some studies report equivalent or better outcomes than invasive ductal carcinoma, likely due to ILC’s favorable prognostic phenotype. Classic ILC (CL) is typically of low histologic grade, estrogen receptor (ER) positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) negative. However, worse long term outcomes have been observed because ILC tends to be multicentric, bilateral, and to show higher rates of late metastases in uncommon sites. Additionally, subtypes of ILC, including solid (SOL) and pleomorphic (PL), have been reported to display more aggressive behavior. Yet current treatment paradigms are distinguished by hormone receptor profile and stage, not by tumor morphology. This study aimed to evaluate the clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical (IHC) characteristics of ILC, particularly those with unusual patterns.
Methods
From 2009-2018, consecutive in-house biopsy and resection specimens with the diagnosis of ILC were identified by a retrospective review of our institutional database. Demographic, morphologic, and IHC data were obtained from pathology reports. Cases with equivocal HER2 IHC results are sent for fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis at our Center. CL ILC was defined by small cells with low nuclear grade and discohesive growth arranged in single file or cords. PL ILC is composed of larger, more atypical cells, which still exhibit discohesion typical of lobular phenotype. SOL ILC consists of tumors growing in large sheets with minimal intervening stroma.
Results
Over the nine year study period, a total of 3,028 ILCs from 2,322 patients were identified. Most (74%, 2229/3028) cases were classified as CL while 22% (665/3028) were PL and 4% (134/3028) SOL (Table 1). The median patient age was 60 years (range 32-95). The median tumor size was larger for PL (2.3 cm) and SOL (2.4 cm) subtypes than CL (1.1 cm). IHC results were available for 896 specimens. The majority of all ILCs showed an expected phenotype: ER positive and HER2 negative (99% CL, 84% PL, 97% SOL). A smaller subset of ER positive ILC were also HER2 positive (1% CL, 8% PL, 3% SOL). No CL or SOL ILC were ER negative; in contrast 8% (21/270) of PL ILC were ER negative. Twelve (5%) PL ER negative cases were also HER2 negative. Overall, 15% of ILC were HER2 positive, with the PL variant showing the highest incidence (11%, 30/270). Lymph node (LN) metastases were seen in 22% (66/291) of CL cases, 55% (53/96) PL and 29% (17/58) SOL. Metastases in 10 or more LN (N3) was seen only in PL and SOL cases (13% and 5%, respectively).
Conclusions
In this study, up to 8% of ILC cases were found to be ER negative, a finding unique to the PL variant. No CL or SOL ILC was ER negative. HER2 positivity, not typically expected in ILC, was seen in 15% of cases, most commonly in the PL type. ILC that was both negative for ER and HER2 was observed in 5% of cases, and only within the PL subgroup. PL ILC showed higher median tumor size at presentation than CL and nodal metastases were also more common in PL than in CL or SOL ILC (55% vs 22% and 29%, respectively). Our findings are in keeping with prior observations that compared to CL ILC. PL ILC exhibits features associated with unfavorable clinicopathologic features, such as higher tumor and nodal stage at presentation. Additionally, this is the first study to systematically examine the prevalence of unconventional IHC phenotypes of ILC (ER negativity and/or HER2 positivity) in a large series from one institution.
Table 1. Summary of Clinicopathologic FeaturesClassicPleomorphicSolidILC types (n=3028)2229665134Median age, (range)60 yrs (32-94)61 yrs (31-95)66 yrs (44-93)Median size, cm 1.12.32.4Immunophenotype (n=896)ER+/HER2-99% (551/559)84% (228/270)97% (65/67)ER+/HER2+1% (8/559)8% (21/270)3% (2/67)ER-/HER2+0% (0/559)3% (9/270)0% (0/67)ER-/HER2-0% (0/559)5% (12/270)0% (0/67)Lymph node status (n=445)N077% (225/291)45% (43/96)71% (41/58)N120% (59/291)31% (30/96)19% (11/58)N22% (7/291)11% (11/96)5% (3/58)N30% (0/291)13% (12/96)5% (3/58)
Citation Format: Matthew G Hanna, Anne Grabenstetter, Dara S Ross, Lee K Tan. The prevalence of invasive lobular carcinomas with unconventional immunohistochemical phenotypes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-02-09.
Collapse
|
45
|
Hossain MS, Hanna MG, Uraoka N, Nakamura T, Edelweiss M, Brogi E, Hameed MR, Yamaguchi M, Ross DS, Yagi Y. Automatic quantification of HER2 gene amplification in invasive breast cancer from chromogenic in situ hybridization whole slide images. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2019; 6:047501. [PMID: 31763355 PMCID: PMC6868351 DOI: 10.1117/1.jmi.6.4.047501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2019] [Accepted: 10/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), a transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor encoded by the ERBB2 gene on chromosome 17q12, is a predictive and prognostic biomarker in invasive breast cancer (BC). Approximately 20% of BC are HER2-positive as a result of ERBB2 gene amplification and overexpression of the HER2 protein. Quantification of HER2 is performed routinely on all invasive BCs, to assist in clinical decision making for prognosis and treatment for HER2-positive BC patients by manually counting gene signals. We propose an automated system to quantify the HER2 gene status from chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) whole slide images (WSI) in invasive BC. The proposed method selects untruncated and nonoverlapped singular nuclei from the cancer regions using color unmixing and machine learning techniques. Then, HER2 and chromosome enumeration probe 17 (CEP17) signals are detected based on the RGB intensity and counted per nucleus. Finally, the HER2-to-CEP17 signal ratio is calculated to determine the HER2 amplification status following the ASCO/CAP 2018 guidelines. The proposed method reduced the labor and time for the quantification. In the experiment, the correlation coefficient between the proposed automatic CISH quantification method and pathologist manual enumeration was 0.98. The p -values larger than 0.05 from the one-sided paired t -test ensured that the proposed method yields statistically indifferent results to the reference method. The method was established on WSI scanned by two different scanners. Through the experiments, the capability of the proposed system has been demonstrated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Md. Shakhawat Hossain
- Tokyo Institute of Technology, School of Engineering, Department of Information and Communications Engineering, Yokohama, Japan
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology, New York, New York, United States
- Address all correspondence to Md. Shakhawat Hossain, E-mail:
| | - Matthew G. Hanna
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology, New York, New York, United States
| | - Naohiro Uraoka
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology, New York, New York, United States
| | - Tomoya Nakamura
- Tokyo Institute of Technology, School of Engineering, Department of Information and Communications Engineering, Yokohama, Japan
- Japan Science and Technology Agency, PRESTO, Saitama, Japan
| | - Marcia Edelweiss
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology, New York, New York, United States
| | - Edi Brogi
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology, New York, New York, United States
| | - Meera R. Hameed
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology, New York, New York, United States
| | - Masahiro Yamaguchi
- Tokyo Institute of Technology, School of Engineering, Department of Information and Communications Engineering, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Dara S. Ross
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology, New York, New York, United States
| | - Yukako Yagi
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology, New York, New York, United States
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Campanella G, Hanna MG, Geneslaw L, Miraflor A, Werneck Krauss Silva V, Busam KJ, Brogi E, Reuter VE, Klimstra DS, Fuchs TJ. Clinical-grade computational pathology using weakly supervised deep learning on whole slide images. Nat Med 2019; 25:1301-1309. [PMID: 31308507 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-019-0508-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 885] [Impact Index Per Article: 177.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2018] [Accepted: 06/03/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The development of decision support systems for pathology and their deployment in clinical practice have been hindered by the need for large manually annotated datasets. To overcome this problem, we present a multiple instance learning-based deep learning system that uses only the reported diagnoses as labels for training, thereby avoiding expensive and time-consuming pixel-wise manual annotations. We evaluated this framework at scale on a dataset of 44,732 whole slide images from 15,187 patients without any form of data curation. Tests on prostate cancer, basal cell carcinoma and breast cancer metastases to axillary lymph nodes resulted in areas under the curve above 0.98 for all cancer types. Its clinical application would allow pathologists to exclude 65-75% of slides while retaining 100% sensitivity. Our results show that this system has the ability to train accurate classification models at unprecedented scale, laying the foundation for the deployment of computational decision support systems in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Campanella
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Weill Cornell Graduate School of Medical Sciences, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew G Hanna
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Luke Geneslaw
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Allen Miraflor
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Klaus J Busam
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Edi Brogi
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Victor E Reuter
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David S Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thomas J Fuchs
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. .,Weill Cornell Graduate School of Medical Sciences, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Hanna MG, Pantanowitz L. Feasibility of using the Omnyx digital pathology system for cytology practice. J Am Soc Cytopathol 2019; 8:182-189. [PMID: 31272601 DOI: 10.1016/j.jasc.2019.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2018] [Revised: 01/14/2019] [Accepted: 01/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Whole slide imaging systems have focused mostly on surgical pathologic evaluation. However, for pathology laboratories to become fully digital, cytology slides will also need to be digitized, managed, viewed, and analyzed. Our aim was to determine the feasibility of using the Omnyx whole slide imaging system for various purposes in cytology. MATERIALS AND METHODS Our institution implemented the Omnyx digital pathology system, which was tested for feasibility and not implemented for clinical use in cytology. Glass slides (n = 18), scanned using various whole slide scanners, were uploaded into the Omnyx system. The system was evaluated for its feasibility with cytology case management, digital slide navigation and annotation, telecytology, and cytologic-histologic correlation. RESULTS The Omnyx software was able to manage cases similar to a laboratory information system. Users were able to electronically distribute, search, and sort the clinical cases. A graphic dashboard approach and virtual slide tray is available for end users to evaluate cases. The ability to create custom folders and drag-and-drop images into these folders fulfilled clinical, quality assurance, education, and research needs. Innovative tools for digital slide navigation and annotation (eg, auto-pan, adding text to annotation, hiding annotations, image coregistration) offered innovative methods to work with slides. Omnyx also provided a mechanism for sharing images with others to perform teleconsultation. CONCLUSIONS We have demonstrated the feasibility of using the Omnyx whole slide imaging system for various purposes in cytology practice. The application supported, not only case management, but also the ability to perform cytologic-histologic correlation and telecytology. The viewer offered many features that improved digital slide navigation and annotation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew G Hanna
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Liron Pantanowitz
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Tabata K, Uraoka N, Benhamida J, Hanna MG, Sirintrapun SJ, Gallas BD, Gong Q, Aly RG, Emoto K, Matsuda KM, Hameed MR, Klimstra DS, Yagi Y. Validation of mitotic cell quantification via microscopy and multiple whole-slide scanners. Diagn Pathol 2019; 14:65. [PMID: 31238983 PMCID: PMC6593538 DOI: 10.1186/s13000-019-0839-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2018] [Accepted: 06/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The establishment of whole-slide imaging (WSI) as a medical diagnostic device allows that pathologists may evaluate mitotic activity with this new technology. Furthermore, the image digitalization provides an opportunity to develop algorithms for automatic quantifications, ideally leading to improved reproducibility as compared to the naked eye examination by pathologists. In order to implement them effectively, accuracy of mitotic figure detection using WSI should be investigated. In this study, we aimed to measure pathologist performance in detecting mitotic figures (MFs) using multiple platforms (multiple scanners) and compare the results with those obtained using a brightfield microscope. METHODS Four slides of canine oral melanoma were prepared and digitized using 4 WSI scanners. In these slides, 40 regions of interest (ROIs) were demarcated, and five observers identified the MFs using different viewing modes: microscopy and WSI. We evaluated the inter- and intra-observer agreements between modes with Cohen's Kappa and determined "true" MFs with a consensus panel. We then assessed the accuracy (agreement with truth) using the average of sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS In the 40 ROIs, 155 candidate MFs were detected by five pathologists; 74 of them were determined to be true MFs. Inter- and intra-observer agreement was mostly "substantial" or greater (Kappa = 0.594-0.939). Accuracy was between 0.632 and 0.843 across all readers and modes. After averaging over readers for each modality, we found that mitosis detection accuracy for 3 of the 4 WSI scanners was significantly less than that of the microscope (p = 0.002, 0.012, and 0.001). CONCLUSIONS This study is the first to compare WSIs and microscopy in detecting MFs at the level of individual cells. Our results suggest that WSI can be used for mitotic cell detection and offers similar reproducibility to the microscope, with slightly less accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuhiro Tabata
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065 USA
- Department of Pathology, Nagasaki University Hospital, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, Nagasaki 8528501 Japan
| | - Naohiro Uraoka
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065 USA
| | - Jamal Benhamida
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065 USA
| | - Matthew G. Hanna
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065 USA
| | | | - Brandon D. Gallas
- Center For Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA
| | - Qi Gong
- Center For Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20993 USA
| | - Rania G. Aly
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065 USA
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria university, 22 El-Guish Road, El-Shatby, Alexandria, 21526 Egypt
| | - Katsura Emoto
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065 USA
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, 10065 NY USA
| | - Kant M. Matsuda
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065 USA
| | - Meera R. Hameed
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065 USA
| | - David S. Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065 USA
| | - Yukako Yagi
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065 USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Hanna MG, Reuter VE, Samboy J, England C, Corsale L, Fine SW, Agaram NP, Stamelos E, Yagi Y, Hameed M, Klimstra DS, Sirintrapun SJ. Implementation of Digital Pathology Offers Clinical and Operational Increase in Efficiency and Cost Savings. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2019; 143:1545-1555. [PMID: 31173528 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0514-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— Digital pathology (DP) implementations vary in scale, based on aims of intended operation. Few laboratories have completed a full-scale DP implementation, which may be due to high overhead costs that disrupt the traditional pathology workflow. Neither standardized criteria nor benchmark data have yet been published showing practical return on investment after implementing a DP platform. OBJECTIVE.— To provide benchmark data and practical metrics to support operational efficiency and cost savings in a large academic center. DESIGN.— Metrics reviewed include archived pathology asset retrieval; ancillary test request for recurrent/metastatic disease; cost analysis and turnaround time (TAT); and DP experience survey. RESULTS.— Glass slide requests from the department slide archive and an off-site surgery center showed a 93% and 97% decrease, respectively. Ancillary immunohistochemical orders, compared in 2014 (52%)-before whole slide images (WSIs) were available in the laboratory information system-and 2017 (21%) showed $114 000/y in anticipated savings. Comprehensive comparative cost analysis showed a 5-year $1.3 million savings. Surgical resection cases with prior WSIs showed a 1-day decrease in TAT. A DP experience survey showed 80% of respondents agreed WSIs improved their clinical sign-out experience. CONCLUSIONS.— Implementing a DP operation showed a noteworthy increase in efficiency and operational utility. Digital pathology deployments and operations may be gauged by the following metrics: number of glass slide requests as WSIs become available, decrease in confirmatory testing for patients with metastatic/recurrent disease, long-term decrease in off-site pathology asset costs, and faster TAT. Other departments may use our benchmark data and metrics to enhance patient care and demonstrate return on investment to justify adoption of DP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew G Hanna
- From the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Victor E Reuter
- From the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jennifer Samboy
- From the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Christine England
- From the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Lorraine Corsale
- From the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Samson W Fine
- From the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Narasimhan P Agaram
- From the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Evangelos Stamelos
- From the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yukako Yagi
- From the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Meera Hameed
- From the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - David S Klimstra
- From the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - S Joseph Sirintrapun
- From the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Poole OV, Uchiyama T, Skorupinska I, Skorupinska M, Germain L, Kozyra D, Holmes S, James N, Bugiardini E, Woodward C, Quinlivan R, Emmanuel A, Hanna MG, Panicker JN, Pitceathly RDS. Urogenital symptoms in mitochondrial disease: overlooked and undertreated. Eur J Neurol 2019; 26:1111-1120. [PMID: 30884027 PMCID: PMC6767393 DOI: 10.1111/ene.13952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2018] [Accepted: 03/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background and purpose Bowel symptoms are well documented in mitochondrial disease. However, data concerning other pelvic organs is limited. A large case–control study has therefore been undertaken to determine the presence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and sexual dysfunction in adults with genetically confirmed mitochondrial disease. Methods Adults with genetically confirmed mitochondrial disease and control subjects were recruited from a specialist mitochondrial clinic. The presence and severity of LUTS and their impact on quality of life, in addition to sexual dysfunction and bowel symptoms, were captured using four validated questionnaires. Subgroup analysis was undertaken in patients harbouring the m.3243A>G MT‐TL1 mitochondrial DNA mutation. A subset of patients underwent urodynamic studies to further characterize their LUTS. Results Data from 58 patients and 19 controls (gender and age matched) were collected. Adults with mitochondrial disease had significantly more overactive bladder (81.5% vs. 56.3%, P = 0.039) and low stream (34.5% vs. 5.3%, P = 0.013) urinary symptoms than controls. Urodynamic studies in 10 patients confirmed that bladder storage symptoms predominate. Despite high rates of LUTS, none of the patient group was receiving treatment. Female patients and those harbouring the m.3243A>G MT‐TL1 mutation experienced significantly more sexual dysfunction than controls (53.1% vs. 11.1%, P = 0.026, and 66.7% vs. 26.3%, P = 0.011, respectively). Conclusions Lower urinary tract symptoms are common but undertreated in adult mitochondrial disease, and female patients and those harbouring the m.3243A>G MT‐TL1 mutation experience sexual dysfunction. Given their impact on quality of life, screening for and treating LUTS and sexual dysfunction in adults with mitochondrial disease are strongly recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O V Poole
- MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - T Uchiyama
- Department of Uro-Neurology, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.,Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Chiba, Japan.,Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare Ichikawa Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - I Skorupinska
- MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - M Skorupinska
- MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - L Germain
- MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - D Kozyra
- MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - S Holmes
- MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - N James
- MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - E Bugiardini
- MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - C Woodward
- Neurogenetics Unit, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - R Quinlivan
- MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.,Dubowitz Neuromuscular Centre, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
| | - A Emmanuel
- Gastro-Intestinal Physiology Unit, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - M G Hanna
- MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - J N Panicker
- Department of Uro-Neurology, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - R D S Pitceathly
- MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|