Tumor Intrinsic Subtypes and Gene Expression Signatures in Early-Stage ERBB2/HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of CALGB 40601, NeoALTTO, and NSABP B-41 Trials

Importance

Biologic features may affect pathologic complete response (pCR) and event-free survival (EFS) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus ERBB2/HER2 blockade in ERBB2/HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC).

Objective

To define the quantitative association between pCR and EFS by intrinsic subtype and by other gene expression signatures in a pooled analysis of 3 phase 3 trials: CALGB 40601, NeoALTTO, and NSABP B-41.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this retrospective pooled analysis, 1289 patients with EBC received chemotherapy plus either trastuzumab, lapatinib, or the combination, with a combined median follow-up of 5.5 years. Gene expression profiling by RNA sequencing was obtained from 758 samples, and intrinsic subtypes and 618 gene expression signatures were calculated. Data analyses were performed from June 1, 2020, to January 1, 2023.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The association of clinical variables and gene expression biomarkers with pCR and EFS were studied by logistic regression and Cox analyses.

Results

In the pooled analysis, of 758 women, median age was 49 years, 12% were Asian, 6% Black, and 75% were White. Overall, pCR results were associated with EFS in the ERBB2-enriched (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% CI, 0.29-0.70; P < .001) and basal-like (HR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.04-0.86; P = .03) subtypes but not in luminal A or B tumors. Dual trastuzumab plus lapatinib blockade over trastuzumab alone had a trend toward EFS benefit in the intention-to-treat population; however, in the ERBB2-enriched subtype there was a significant and independent EFS benefit of trastuzumab plus lapatinib vs trastuzumab alone (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.27-0.83; P = .009). Overall, 275 of 618 gene expression signatures (44.5%) were significantly associated with pCR and 9 of 618 (1.5%) with EFS. The ERBB2/HER2 amplicon and multiple immune signatures were significantly associated with pCR. Luminal-related signatures were associated with lower pCR rates but better EFS, especially among patients with residual disease and independent of hormone receptor status. There was significant adjusted HR for pCR ranging from 0.45 to 0.81 (higher pCR) and 1.21-1.94 (lower pCR rate); significant adjusted HR for EFS ranged from 0.71 to 0.94.

Conclusions and relevance

In patients with ERBB2/HER2-positive EBC, the association between pCR and EFS differed by tumor intrinsic subtype, and the benefit of dual ERBB2/HER2 blockade was limited to ERBB2-enriched tumors. Immune-activated signatures were concordantly associated with higher pCR rates and better EFS, whereas luminal signatures were associated with lower pCR rates.

Breast Cancer Index and Prediction of Extended Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy Benefit in Hormone Receptor-positive Breast Cancer from the NRG Oncology/NSABP B-42 Trial

PURPOSE

BCI (H/I) has been shown to predict extended endocrine therapy (EET) benefit. We examined BCI (H/I) for EET benefit prediction in NSABP B-42, which evaluated extended letrozole therapy (ELT) in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients after 5 years of ET.

METHODS

Stratified Cox model was used to analyze RFI as primary endpoint, with DR, BCFI, and DFS, as secondary endpoints. Due to a non-proportional effect of ELT on DR, time-dependent analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The translational cohort included 2,178 patients (45% BCI (H/I)-High, 55% BCI (H/I)-Low). ELT showed an absolute 10-year RFI benefit of 1.6% (P=0.10), resulting in an underpowered primary analysis (50% power). ELT benefit and BCI (H/I) did not show a significant interaction for RFI (BCI [(H/I])-Low: 10y absolute benefit 1.1% [HR=0.70, 0.43-1.12, P=0.13]; BCI [(H/I])-High: 2.4% [HR=0.83, 0.55-1.26, p=0.38]; Pinteraction=0.56). Time-dependent DR analysis showed that after 4y, BCI (H/I)-High patients had significant ELT benefit (HR=0.29, 0.12-0.69, P<0.01), whereas BCI (H/I)-Low patients were less likely to benefit (HR=0.68, 0.33-1.39, P=0.29) (Pinteraction=0.14). Prediction of ELT benefit by BCI (H/I) was more apparent in the HER2- subset after 4y (ELT-by-BCI (H/I) Pinteraction=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

BCI(H/I)-High vs -Low did not show a statistically significant difference in ELT benefit for the primary endpoint (RFI). However, in time-dependent DR analysis, BCI (H/I)-High patients experienced statistically significant benefit from ELT after 4y, whereas (H/I)-Low patients did not. Because BCI (H/I) has been validated as a predictive marker of EET benefit in other trials, additional follow-up may enable further characterization of BCI's predictive ability.

Machine Learning Predicts Oxaliplatin Benefit in Early Colon Cancer

PURPOSE

A combination of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) is the standard for adjuvant therapy of resected early-stage colon cancer (CC). Oxaliplatin leads to lasting and disabling neurotoxicity. Reserving the regimen for patients who benefit from oxaliplatin would maximize efficacy and minimize unnecessary adverse side effects.

METHODS

We trained a new machine learning model, referred to as the colon oxaliplatin signature (COLOXIS) model, for predicting response to oxaliplatin-containing regimens. We examined whether COLOXIS was predictive of oxaliplatin benefits in the CC adjuvant setting among 1,065 patients treated with 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin (FULV; n = 421) or FULV + oxaliplatin (FOLFOX; n = 644) from NSABP C-07 and C-08 phase III trials. The COLOXIS model dichotomizes patients into COLOXIS+ (oxaliplatin responder) and COLOXIS- (nonresponder) groups. Eight-year recurrence-free survival was used to evaluate oxaliplatin benefits within each of the groups, and the predictive value of the COLOXIS model was assessed using the P value associated with the interaction term (int P) between the model prediction and the treatment effect.

RESULTS

Among 1,065 patients, 526 were predicted as COLOXIS+ and 539 as COLOXIS-. The COLOXIS+ prediction was associated with prognosis for FULV-treated patients (hazard ratio [HR], 1.52 [95% CI, 1.07 to 2.15]; P = .017). The model was predictive of oxaliplatin benefits: COLOXIS+ patients benefited from oxaliplatin (HR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.48 to 0.89]; P = .0065; int P = .03), but COLOXIS- patients did not (COLOXIS- HR, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.77 to 1.52]; P = .65).

CONCLUSION

The COLOXIS model is predictive of oxaliplatin benefits in the CC adjuvant setting. The results provide evidence supporting a change in CC adjuvant therapy: reserve oxaliplatin only for COLOXIS+ patients, but further investigation is warranted.

iGenSig-Rx: an integral genomic signature based white-box tool for modeling cancer therapeutic responses using multi-omics data

Multi-omics sequencing is expected to become clinically routine within the next decade and transform clinical care. However, there is a paucity of viable and interpretable genome-wide modeling methods that can facilitate rational selection of patients for tailored intervention. Here we develop an integral genomic signature-based method called iGenSig-Rx as a white-box tool for modeling therapeutic response based on clinical trial datasets with improved cross-dataset applicability and tolerance to sequencing bias. This method leverages high-dimensional redundant genomic features to address the challenges of cross-dataset modeling, a concept similar to the use of redundant steel rods to reinforce the pillars of a building. Using genomic datasets for HER2 targeted therapies, the iGenSig-Rx model demonstrates stable predictive power across four independent clinical trials. More importantly, the iGenSig-Rx model offers the level of transparency much needed for clinical application, allowing for clear explanations as to how the predictions are produced, how the features contribute to the prediction, and what are the key underlying pathways. We expect that iGenSig-Rx as a class of biologically interpretable multi-omics modeling methods will have broad applications in big-data based precision oncology. The R package is available: https://github.com/wangxlab/iGenSig-Rx. NOTE: the Github website will be released upon publication and the R package is available for review through google drive: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1KgecmUoon9-h2Dg1rPCyEGFPOp28Ols3?usp=sharing.

WCRC-25: A novel luminal Invasive Lobular Carcinoma cell line model

Breast cancer is categorized by the molecular and histologic presentation of the tumor, with the major histologic subtypes being No Special Type (NST) and Invasive Lobular Carcinoma (ILC). ILC are characterized by growth in a single file discohesive manner with stromal infiltration attributed to their hallmark pathognomonic loss of E-cadherin ( CDH1 ). Few ILC cell line models are available to researchers. Here we report the successful establishment and characterization of a novel ILC cell line, WCRC-25, from a metastatic pleural effusion from a postmenopausal Caucasian woman with metastatic ILC. WCRC-25 is an ER-negative luminal epithelial ILC cell line with both luminal and Her2-like features. It exhibits anchorage independent growth and haptotactic migration towards Collagen I. Sequencing revealed a CDH1 Q706* truncating mutation, together with mutations in FOXA1, CTCF, BRCA2 and TP53 , which were also seen in a series of metastatic lesions from the patient. Copy number analyses revealed amplification and deletion of genes frequently altered in ILC while optical genome mapping revealed novel structural rearrangements. RNA-seq analysis comparing the primary tumor, metastases and the cell line revealed signatures for cell cycle progression and receptor tyrosine kinase signaling. To assess targetability, we treated WCRC-25 with AZD5363 and Alpelisib confirming WCRC-25 as susceptible to PI3K/AKT signaling inhibition as predicted by our RNA sequencing analysis. In conclusion, we report WCRC-25 as a novel ILC cell line with promise as a valuable research tool to advance our understanding of ILC and its therapeutic vulnerabilities.

Financial support

The work was in part supported by a Susan G Komen Leadership Grant to SO (SAC160073) and NCI R01 CA252378 (SO/AVL). AVL and SO are Komen Scholars, Hillman Foundation Fellows and supported by BCRF. This project used the UPMC Hillman Cancer Center and Tissue and Research Pathology/Pitt Biospecimen Core shared resource which is supported in part by award P30CA047904. This research was also supported in part by the University of Pittsburgh Center for Research Computing, RRID:SCR_022735, through the resources provided. Specifically, this work used the HTC cluster, which is supported by NIH award number S10OD028483. Finally, partial support was provided by the Magee-Womens Research Institute and Foundation, The Shear Family Foundation, and The Metastatic Breast Cancer Network.

Identification of tumor-intrinsic drivers of immune exclusion in acral melanoma

Background

Acral melanoma (AM) has distinct characteristics as compared to cutaneous melanoma and exhibits poor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Tumor-intrinsic mechanisms of immune exclusion have been identified in many cancers but less studied in AM.

Methods

We characterized clinically annotated tumors from patients diagnosed with AM at our institution in correlation with ICI response using whole transcriptome RNAseq, whole exome sequencing, CD8 immunohistochemistry, and multispectral immunofluorescence imaging. A defined interferon-γ-associated T cell-inflamed gene signature was used to categorize tumors into non-T cell-inflamed and T cell-inflamed phenotypes. In combination with AM tumors from two published studies, we systematically assessed the immune landscape of AM and detected differential gene expression and pathway activation in a non-T cell-inflamed tumor microenvironment (TME). Two single-cell(sc) RNAseq AM cohorts and 11 bulk RNAseq cohorts of various tumor types were used for independent validation on pathways associated with lack of ICI response. In total, 892 specimens were included in this study.

Results

72.5% of AM tumors showed low expression of the T cell-inflamed gene signature, with 23.9% of total tumors categorized as the non-T cell-inflamed phenotype. Patients of low CD3 + CD8 + PD1 + intratumoral T cell density showed poor prognosis. We identified 11 oncogenic pathways significantly upregulated in non-T cell-inflamed relative to T cell-inflamed TME shared across all three acral cohorts (MYC, HGF, MITF, VEGF, EGFR, SP1, ERBB2, TFEB, SREBF1, SOX2, and CCND1). scRNAseq analysis revealed that tumor cell-expressing pathway scores were significantly higher in low vs high T cell-infiltrated AM tumors. We further demonstrated that the 11 pathways were enriched in ICI non-responders compared to responders across cancers, including acral melanoma, cutaneous melanoma, triple-negative breast cancer, and non-small cell lung cancer. Pathway activation was associated with low expression of interferon stimulated genes, suggesting suppression of antigen presentation. Across the 11 pathways, fatty acid synthase and CXCL8 were unifying downstream target molecules suggesting potential nodes for therapeutic intervention.

Conclusions

A unique set of pathways is associated with immune exclusion and ICI resistance in AM. These data may inform immunotherapy combinations for immediate clinical translation.

Vascular endothelial profilin-1 drives a protumorigenic tumor microenvironment and tumor progression in renal cancer

Overexpression of actin-binding protein profilin-1 (Pfn1) correlates with advanced disease features and adverse clinical outcome of patients with clear cell renal carcinoma, the most prevalent form of renal cancer. We previously reported that Pfn1 is predominantly overexpressed in tumor-associated vascular endothelial cells in human clear cell renal carcinoma. In this study, we combined in vivo strategies involving endothelial cell-specific depletion and overexpression of Pfn1 to demonstrate a role of vascular endothelial Pfn1 in promoting tumorigenicity and enabling progressive growth and metastasis of renal carcinoma cells in a syngeneic orthotopic mouse model of kidney cancer. We established an important role of endothelial Pfn1 in tumor angiogenesis and further identified endothelial Pfn1-dependent regulation of several pro- (VEGF, SERPINE1, CCL2) and anti-angiogenic factors (platelet factor 4) in vivo. Endothelial Pfn1 overexpression increases tumor infiltration by macrophages and concomitantly diminishes tumor infiltration by T cells including CD8+ T cells in vivo, correlating with the pattern of endothelial Pfn1-dependent changes in tumor abundance of several prominent immunomodulatory cytokines. These data were also corroborated by multiplexed quantitative immunohistochemistry and immune deconvolution analyses of RNA-seq data of clinical samples. Guided by Upstream Regulator Analysis of tumor transcriptome data, we further established endothelial Pfn1-induced Hif1α elevation and suppression of STAT1 activation. In conclusion, this study demonstrates for the first time a direct causal relationship between vascular endothelial Pfn1 dysregulation, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, and disease progression with mechanistic insights in kidney cancer. Our study also provides a conceptual basis for targeting Pfn1 for therapeutic benefit in kidney cancer.

Biomarker Data from the Phase III KATHERINE Study of Adjuvant T-DM1 versus Trastuzumab for Residual Invasive Disease after Neoadjuvant Therapy for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

In KATHERINE, adjuvant T-DM1 reduced risk of disease recurrence or death by 50% compared with trastuzumab in patients with residual invasive breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) comprised of HER2-targeted therapy and chemotherapy. This analysis aimed to identify biomarkers of response and differences in biomarker expression before and after NAT.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Exploratory analyses investigated the relationship between invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and HER2 protein expression/gene amplification, PIK3CA hotspot mutations, and gene expression of HER2, PD-L1, CD8, predefined immune signatures, and Prediction Analysis of Microarray 50 intrinsic molecular subtypes, classified by Absolute Intrinsic Molecular Subtyping. HER2 expression on paired pre- and post-NAT samples was examined.

RESULTS

T-DM1 appeared to improve IDFS versus trastuzumab across most biomarker subgroups, except the HER2 focal expression subgroup. High versus low HER2 gene expression in residual disease was associated with worse outcomes with trastuzumab [HR, 2.02; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.32-3.11], but IDFS with T-DM1 was independent of HER2 expression level (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.56-1.83). Low PD-L1 gene expression in residual disease was associated with worse outcomes with trastuzumab (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44-1.00), but not T-DM1 (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.59-1.87). PIK3CA mutations were not prognostic. Increased variability in HER2 expression was observed in post-NAT versus paired pre-NAT samples.

CONCLUSIONS

T-DM1 appears to overcome HER2 resistance. T-DM1 benefit does not appear dependent on immune activation, but these results do not rule out an influence of the tumor immune microenvironment on the degree of response.

Abstract 1762: MALT1 is activated by doxorubicin and mediates therapy resistance in triple-negative breast cancer

Background: Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy in American women. The triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype has among the worst prognosis due to high rates of recurrence and metastasis. Since TNBC lacks targetable receptor proteins, treatment relies upon non-specific chemotherapy, which can become ineffective upon onset of resistance. One potential driver of TNBC treatment resistance is MALT1, the effector component of the CARMA-BCL10-MALT1 signaling complex, which activates NF-κB in multiple cancer cell types, including TNBC. Notably, breast cancer cells demonstrate increased sensitivity to chemotherapies such as doxorubicin and cisplatin when MALT1 is depleted. NF-κB activation has been suggested to promote DNA repair and the MALT1-NF-κB inducible factor, IL-6 has been shown to repress the immunogenic effects of doxorubicin. Hence, we hypothesize that MALT1 is a pharmaceutically targetable driver of TNBC treatment resistance. Mechanistically, we hypothesize that MALT1 promotes chemotherapy resistance by enhancing DNA repair and suppressing immunogenic cell death.

Methods/Results: We analyzed RNAseq and proteomic data from TCGA and CPTAC, respectively, and found that MALT1 is highly expressed in basal breast cancer (a subtype largely composed of TNBC) and its expression level in this context is associated with reduced pathological complete response and survival. With the purpose of evaluating the effect of MALT1 protease inhibition on chemotherapy sensitivity, we first sought to identify TNBC cell lines that were most resistant to doxorubicin using GDSC and CTRP databases. Results indicated that MDA-MB-231, BT20 and HCC1143 were highly resistant. We then performed western blots to assess MALT1 expression and CellTiter-Glo assays to determine the doxorubicin IC50s for these cell lines. Results indicate that MALT1 expression correlates with the degree of doxorubicin resistance among these cell lines. To determine if MALT1 blockade, via siRNA-knockdown or MALT1 protease inhibitor treatment (JNJ-67856633 or MLT-748), increased doxorubicin sensitivity, CellTiter-Glo and Incucyte Caspase-3/7 assays were performed. Findings indicated that MALT1 blockade results in decreased cell viability and increased apoptosis in response to doxorubicin. Mechanistically, MALT1 protease is activated by doxorubicin and MALT1 inhibition increases expression of the immunogenic cell death protein, calreticulin (CRT) in response to doxorubicin.

Conclusions and Future Directions: Initial studies suggest that targeting MALT1 enhances TNBC sensitivity to doxorubicin. We will next assess the effect of MALT1 blockade on DNA repair mechanisms in doxorubicin-treated TNBC cells. Additionally, we will test the role of MALT1 in suppressing immunogenic cell death. Through these studies, we hope to inform new approaches for improving treatment response in TNBC.

Citation Format: Maria Beecher, Dong Hu, Linda Klei, Jack Little, Linda M. McAllister-Lucas, Peter C. Lucas. MALT1 is activated by doxorubicin and mediates therapy resistance in triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 1762.

Abstract 836: Enabling mRNA medicine for brain tumors

mRNA is a new class of drugs that has the potential to revolutionize the treatment of brain tumors. Thanks to the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines and numerous therapy-based clinical trials, it is now clear that lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are a clinically viable means to deliver RNA therapeutics. However, LNP-mediated mRNA delivery to brain tumors remains elusive. Over the past decade, numerous studies have shown that tumor cells communicate with each other via small extracellular vesicles, which are around 100 nm in diameter and consist of lipid bilayer membrane similar to synthetic lipid-based nanocarriers. We hypothesized that rationally designed LNPs based on extracellular vesicle mimicry would enable efficient delivery of RNA therapeutics to brain tumors without undue toxicity. We synthesized LNPs using four components similar to the formulation used in the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (Moderna and Pfizer): ionizable lipid, cholesterol, helper lipid and polyethylene glycol (PEG)-lipid. For the in vitro screen, we tested ten classes of helper lipids based on their abundance in extracellular vesicle membranes, commercial availability, and large-scale production feasibility while keeping rest of the LNP components unchanged. The transfection kinetics of GFP mRNA encapsulated in LNPs and doped with 16 mol% of helper lipids was tested using GL261, U87 and SIM-A9 cell lines. Several LNP formations resulted in stable transfection (upto 5 days) of GFP mRNA in all the cell lines tested in vitro. The successful LNP candidates (enabling &gt;80% transfection efficacy) were then tested in vivo to deliver luciferase mRNA to brain tumors via intrathecal administration in a syngeneic glioblastoma (GBM) mouse model, which confirmed luciferase expression in brain tumors in the cortex. LNPs were then tested to deliver Cre recombinase mRNA in syngeneic GBM mouse model genetically modified to express tdTomato under LoxP marker cassette that enabled identification of LNP targeted cells. mRNA was successfully delivered to tumor cells (70-80% transfected) and a range of different cells in the tumor microenvironment, including tumor-associated macrophages (80-90% transfected), neurons (31-40% transfected), neural stem cells (39-62% transfected), oligodendrocytes (70-80% transfected) and astrocytes (44-76% transfected). Then, LNP formulations were assessed for delivering Cas9 mRNA and CD81 sgRNA (model protein) in murine syngeneic GBM model to enable gene editing in brain tumor cells. Sanger sequencing showed that CRISPR-Cas9 editing was successful in ~94% of brain tumor cells in vivo. In conclusion, we have developed a library of safe LNPs that can transfect GBM cells in vivo with high efficacy. This technology can potentially be used to develop novel mRNA therapies for GBM by delivering single or multiple mRNAs and holds great potential as a tool to study brain tumor biology.

Citation Format: Saigopalakrishna S. Yerneni, Juliana H. Azambuja, Peter C. Lucas, Linda McAllister-Lucas, Kathryn A. Whitehead. Enabling mRNA medicine for brain tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 836.

Immune landscape in invasive ductal and lobular breast cancer reveals a divergent macrophage-driven microenvironment

T cell-centric immunotherapies have shown modest clinical benefit thus far for estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. Despite accounting for 70% of all breast cancers, relatively little is known about the immunobiology of ER+ breast cancer in women with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). To investigate this, we performed phenotypic, transcriptional and functional analyses for a cohort of treatment-naive IDC (n = 94) and ILC (n = 87) tumors. We show that macrophages, and not T cells, are the predominant immune cells infiltrating the tumor bed and the most transcriptionally diverse cell subset between IDC and ILC. Analysis of cellular neighborhoods revealed an interplay between macrophages and T cells associated with longer disease-free survival in IDC but not ILC. Our datasets provide a rich resource for further interrogation into immune cell dynamics in ER+ IDC and ILC and highlight macrophages as a potential target for ER+ breast cancer.

Mixed invasive ductal lobular carcinoma is clinically and pathologically more similar to invasive lobular than ductal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Mixed invasive ductal lobular carcinoma (mDLC) remains a poorly understood subtype of breast cancer composed of coexisting ductal and lobular components.

METHODS

We sought to describe clinicopathologic characteristics and determine whether mDLC is clinically more similar to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) or invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), using data from patients seen at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

RESULTS

We observed a higher concordance in clinicopathologic characteristics between mDLC and ILC, compared to IDC. There is a trend for higher rates of successful breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with mDLC compared to patients with ILC, in which it is known to be lower than in those with IDC. Metastatic patterns of mDLC demonstrate a propensity to develop in sites characteristic of both IDC and ILC. A meta-analysis evaluating mDLC showed shared features with both ILC and IDC with significantly more ER-positive and fewer high grades in mDLC compared to IDC, although mDLCs were significantly smaller and included fewer late-stage tumours compared to ILC.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support clinicopathologic characteristics of mDLC driven by individual ductal vs lobular components and given the dominance of lobular pathology, mDLC features are often more similar to ILC than IDC. This study exemplifies the complexity of mixed disease.

CRISPRa-induced upregulation of human LAMA1 compensates for LAMA2-deficiency in Merosin-deficient congenital muscular dystrophy

Merosin-deficient congenital muscular dystrophy (MDC1A) is an autosomal recessive disorder caused by mutations in the LAMA2 gene, resulting in a defective form of the extracellular matrix protein laminin-α2 (LAMA2). Individuals diagnosed with MDC1A exhibit progressive muscle wasting and declining neuromuscular functions. No treatments for this disorder are currently available. We previously showed that postnatal Lama1 upregulation, achieved through CRISPR activation (CRISPRa), compensates for Lama2 deficiency and prevents neuromuscular pathophysiology in a mouse model of MDC1A. In this study, we assessed the feasibility of upregulating human LAMA1 as a potential therapeutic strategy for individuals with MDC1A, regardless of their mutations. We hypothesized that CRISPRa-mediated upregulation of human LAMA1 would compensate for the lack of LAMA2 and rescue cellular abnormalities in MDC1A fibroblasts. Global transcriptomic and pathway enrichment analyses of fibroblasts collected from individuals carrying pathogenic LAMA2 mutations, compared with healthy controls, indicated higher expression of transcripts encoding proteins that contribute to wound healing, including Transforming Growth Factor-β (TGF-β) and Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF). These findings were supported by wound-healing assays indicating that MDC1A fibroblasts migrated significantly more rapidly than the controls. Subsequently, we treated the MDC1A fibroblasts with SadCas9-2XVP64 and sgRNAs targeting the LAMA1 promoter. We observed robust LAMA1 expression, which was accompanied by significant decreases in cell migration and expression of FGFR2, TGF-β2, and ACTA2, which are involved in the wound-healing mechanism in MDC1A fibroblasts. Collectively, our data suggest that CRISPRa-mediated LAMA1 upregulation may be a feasible mutation-independent therapeutic approach for MDC1A. This strategy might be adapted to address other neuromuscular diseases and inherited conditions in which strong compensatory mechanisms have been identified.

Abstract P1-04-10: Association of stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in pretreatment biopsies in different molecular subtypes of HER2+/ER+ breast cancer: Assessment of NRG Oncology/NSABP B-52

Background: The primary aim of the NRG Oncology/NSABP B-52 clinical trial was to test if estrogen deprivation (ED) administered concomitantly with neoadjuvant docetaxel, carboplatin, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab (TCHP), would improve the pCR rate in patients with HER2+/ER+ early breast cancer. A numerical increase in the pCR rate was observed with ED (46.1% v 40.9%), but the difference was not statistically significant. The purposes of this study were to assess the association of sTILs in pretreatment biopsies with pCR in the total population and within the molecular subtypes of breast cancer and to assess changes in sTILs between pre- and on-treatment biopsies. The secondary endpoints of recurrence-free interval (RFI) and overall survival (OS) are currently being analyzed and will be presented along with association of these endpoints with sTILs in pretreatment biopsies in the total cohort and within molecular subtypes. Methods: Scoring of sTILs on routine H&E slides from pre-treatment biopsies with sufficient tumor from 249 of the 315 patients (79%) entered in B-52 were performed by one of two pathologists (SKM, RSM). Both pathologists scored sTILs on a subset of 64 patients to document concordance. Wilcoxon two-sided test, box and whisker plots, and forest plots were used to assess associations with pCR. Molecular subtypes were determined utilizing RNA-seq data and AIMS subtyping method. On-treatment biopsies were available in 46 patients and were scored and compared to paired baseline samples. Results: Good concordance between pathologists was established with an inter-pathologist difference of ˂20% difference between scores in 92% of cases. sTILs in pre-treatment samples were associated with pCR across both arms of the trial (p=0.0074) and in the TCHP+ED arm (p=0.033), but not in the TCHP arm (p=0.093). The distribution of intrinsic subtypes was 34% luminal B, 29% luminal A, 28% HER2E, 5.8% normal, and 2.7% basal, with no significant differences between the arms. Presence of sTILs showed a trend for association with pCR in HER2E pre-treatment samples (p=0.054) but not in non-HER2E (p=0.75). Similarly, sTILs were associated with pCR in non-luminal tumors (p=0.055) but not in luminal tumors (p=0.44). Stratification by treatment arm and menopausal status suggested sTILs are associated with pCR in premenopausal women treated with TCHP (OR: 1.04, 95% CI=1.00-1.09). Interestingly, decreases in the sTIL scores with treatment were associated with pCR in the TCHP+ED arm (p=0.01) but not in the TCHP arm. Analysis of RFI and OS on B-52 is ongoing and will be presented along with associations of sTILs with intrinsic subtypes for RFI and OS. Conclusions: Although a positive correlation between sTILs and pCR was observed, the clinical utility appears limited because of the extensive overlap in the TIL scores between pCR and non-pCR tumors. Significance for a positive association of sTILs with pCR was detected in HER2E but not in luminal tumors. This may be due to the molecular differences of the subtypes, or the make-up of the TILs, or both. The association of a decrease in sTILs with TCHP+ED treatment needs further investigation. The small number of samples is a limitation of the study; however, the B-52 protocol specified that the collection of the B-52 samples was for the purpose of exploratory analysis. Our results highlight the molecular heterogeneity of the HER+/ER+ patient population and suggests that different treatment strategies may be required in future treatment regimens for this patient population. Support: NSABP Foundation; BCRF; 3U10CA180868-03S2, -180822; UG1CA189867; Genentech.

Citation Format: Katherine L. Pogue-Geile, Sai K. Maley, Rim S. Kim, Ying Wang, Roberto Salgado, Corey Lipchik, Huichen Feng, Reena S. Cecchini, Samuel A. Jacobs, Ashok Srinivasan, Eleftherios (Terry) Mamounas, Charles E. Geyer Jr, Priya Rastogi, C. Kent Osborne, Soonmyung Paik, Norman Wolmark, Peter C. Lucas, Mothaffar Rimawi. Association of stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in pretreatment biopsies in different molecular subtypes of HER2+/ER+ breast cancer: Assessment of NRG Oncology/NSABP B-52 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-04-10.

Abstract PD4-07: PD4-07 Uncovering molecular heterogeneity of mixed ductal and lobular carcinoma using digital spatial profiling

Background Mixed invasive ductal and lobular carcinoma (mDLC) is a rare special subtype (3-6%, ~10,000 cases/annually in US) of invasive breast cancer with elusive pathophysiology. This entity exhibits a mix of ductal-like and lobular-like tumor sub-components within the same tumor. With few seminal studies, mDLC remains poorly understood with little molecular understanding of its sub-components including their origin and implications on disease evolution, prognosis, and treatment response. With increasing recognition of no special type (NST) and invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) as distinct diseases with unique biology, it is important to understand whether this mixed entity, and its sub-components are like NST and ILC subtypes or a distinct disease. Methods We identified mDLC cases from the UPMC cancer registry. These underwent comprehensive evaluation by a panel of expert pathologists. Three cases (each with a ductal and lobular sub-component on the same FFPE block) were shortlisted. These cases underwent digital spatial profiling (DSP) using Nanostring GeoMX Human Whole Transcriptome Atlas. Briefly, 5um slides were stained using RNAscope morphology marker probes (E-cadherin and PanCK) and GeoMX DSP oligo-conjugated RNA detection probes. Between 3-6 ductal and lobular regions of interest (ROI) per tumor were selected by pathologists. DSP barcodes were cleaved off using UV light and collected into 96-well plate. These underwent library preparation and sequencing. Raw reads were aligned to reference probes to quantify RNA counts. Q3 normalized counts were used in downstream analyses using R version 4.1. Linear modeling was used to assess differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Hypergeometric enrichment tests were used for geneset enrichment. T-tests was used to compare gene expression between two groups. Results In total 26 ROIs (14 ductal and 15 lobular) were profiled across the three mDLC FFPE slides. Overall data quality was excellent with &gt; 90% sequencing saturation across profiled ROIs. Principle component analysis and consensus clustering showed that lobular and ductal ROIs clustered separately indicating distinct molecular profiles. Similarly, PAM50 analysis showed that ductal and lobular ROIs within each patient tumor had distinct PAM50 subtypes. To further investigate the molecular differences between ductal vs lobular ROIs, we performed differential gene expression analysis. We identified 38 up-regulated and 78 down-regulated genes in lobular compared to ductal ROIs. To assess whether mDLC sub-components share any molecular similarities to pure counterparts i.e., ILC and NST, we compared mDLC lobular vs ductal DEGs with those from TCGA ILC vs NST comparison. SHROOM1, KLK10 and KLK11 were up-regulated while CDH1, DCD, and CPB1 were down-regulated in both mDLC lobular ROIs and ILC vs mDLC ductal ROIs and NST, respectively. Pathway analysis revealed estrogen response, adhesion, and metabolism related differences between mDLC lobular vs ductal ROIs. Furthermore, key transcription factor signatures enriched in the up-regulated genes in lobular vs ductal ROIs included ESR1, FOXA2, GATA1/2 and AR signatures while those enriched in the down-regulated genes in lobular vs ductal ROIs included RCOR1, MYC, ZBTB7A, NELFE, and SPI1 signatures. Conclusion and Future Work Using DSP, we uncovered the molecular heterogeneity of mDLC. We revealed that lobular and ductal sub-components have distinct biology with differences in transcriptional signatures and hormone signaling, adhesion and metabolism related pathways. Our pilot study is the first to shed light on this elusive mixed entity using spatial profiling. Our future work will focus on DNA sequencing of mDLC sub-components to identify sub-component specific driver mutations. Our findings will need further investigation in larger mDLC cohorts to better understand their clinical implications in terms of evolution of this disease and its prognosis.

Citation Format: Osama Shiraz Shah, Azadeh Nasrazadani, Jennifer M. Atkinson, Celina Kleer, Priscilla F. McAuliffe, Rohit Bhargava, Jorge Reis-Filho, Peter C. Lucas, ADRIAN V. LEE, Steffi Oesterreich. PD4-07 Uncovering molecular heterogeneity of mixed ductal and lobular carcinoma using digital spatial profiling [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD4-07.

NRG-GI004/SWOG-S1610: Colorectal Cancer Metastatic dMMR Immuno-Therapy (COMMIT) study—A randomized phase III study of atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy versus mFOLFOX6/bevacizumab/atezo in the first-line treatment of patients (pts) with deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) or microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

TPS258

Background: Despite the superiority in progression-free survival (PFS) of inhibition of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) pathway in dMMR/MSI-H as compared to chemotherapy with either anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFr) or anti-epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFr) antibodies in mCRC, more pts had progressive disease as the best response in the anti-PD1 monotherapy arm (29.4% v 12.3%) with mean PFS of 13.7 mos, with ~45% of pts in the immunotherapy arm progressed at 12 mos (KEYNOTE 177). We hypothesize that dMMR/MSI-H mCRC pts may be more effectively treated with the combination of PD-1 pathway blockade and mFOLFOX6/bevacizumab (bev) rather than with anti-PD-1 therapy (atezo) alone. Preclinical work demonstrated synergistic effects between anti-PD-1/anti-VEGF and between oxaliplatin/anti-PD-1 in murine CRC models and phase II data, which showed activity of anti-PD-1/anti-VEGF in chemotherapy refractory colon cancer. A recent randomized trial subgroup analysis of 8 pts with dMMR metastatic colon cancer treated with FOLFOXIRI+bev+atezo, with the first patient having progression ~16 mos (AtezoTRIBE). Additionally, in other solid tumor malignancies, anti-PD1 plus anti-VEGFr (i.e., HCC and RCC) as well as anti-PD1 plus chemotherapy (i.e., gastric and esophageal cancers) combinations are standard first-line treatments. Methods: The redesigned COMMIT study was reactivated on 1/29/2021 as a two-arm prospective phase III open-label trial randomizing (1:1) mCRC dMMR/MSI-H to atezo monotherapy v mFOLFOX6/bev+atezo combination. Assuming our control arm, atezo monotherapy (48% PFS at 24 mos as assessed by site investigator), we have 80% power to detect a hazard ratio of 0.6 (equivalent to 64.4% PFS at 24 mos) with alpha 0.025 one-sided. Stratification factors include BRAFV600E status, metastatic site, and prior adjuvant CRC therapy. Secondary endpoints include OS, objective response rate, safety profile, disease control rate, and duration of response. Health-related quality of life is an exploratory objective. Archived tumor tissue and blood samples will be collected for correlative studies. Key inclusion criteria are: mCRC without prior chemotherapy for advanced disease; dMMR tumor determined by local CLIA-certified IHC assay (MLH1/MSH2/MSH6/PMS2) or MSI-H by local CLIA-certified PCR or NGS panel; and measurable disease per RECIST. Enrollment actively continues to the target accrual of 211 patients randomized between the two immunotherapy arms. Clinical trial: NCT02997228. Support: U10CA180868, -180822, -180888, UG1CA189867, U24CA196067; Genentech, Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT05080673 .

Phase II/III study of circulating tumor DNA as a predictive biomarker in adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II colon cancer: NRG-GI005 (COBRA)

TPS259

Background: Detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) shed into the bloodstream represents a highly specific and sensitive approach for identifying microscopic or residual tumor cells after surgical resection. For patients (pts) with colon cancer (CC), the detection of ctDNA is associated with persistent disease after resection and outperforms traditional clinical and pathological features in prognosticating risk for recurrence. However, for pts with stage II CC, there are currently no validated biomarkers predicting benefit in identifying pts whose residual disease cancer be cleared by adjuvant chemotherapy. We hypothesize that for pts whose stage II colon cancer has been resected and who have no traditional high-risk features, a positive ctDNA status may identify those who will benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: In this prospective phase II/III clinical trial, pts (N=1,408) with resected stage II CC without traditional high-risk features and whom the evaluating oncologist deems suitable for active surveillance (i.e., not needing adjuvant chemotherapy) will be randomized 1:1 into 2 arms: standard-of-care/observation (Arm A), or prospective testing for ctDNA (Arm B). Postoperative blood will be analyzed for ctDNA with the Guardant Reveal assay, covering CC-relevant mutations and CC-specific methylation profiling. Pts in Arm B with ctDNA detected will be treated with 6 months of adjuvant (FOLFOX) chemotherapy. For all pts in Arm A, ctDNA status will be analyzed retrospectively at the time of endpoint analysis. The primary endpoints are clearance of ctDNA with adjuvant chemotherapy (phase II) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) for “ctDNA-detected” pts treated with or without adjuvant chemotherapy (phase III). Secondary endpoints will include time-to-event outcomes (OS, RFS, TTR) by ctDNA marker status and treatment, prevalence of detectable ctDNA in stage II CC, and rates of compliance with assigned intervention. Archived normal and matched tumor and blood samples will be collected for exploratory correlative research. Enrollment continues across North America to the 540-patient phase II endpoint. Support: U10CA180868, -180822; UG1CA189867; GuardantHealth. Clinical trial information: NCT04068103 .

Long-term results from NRG-GI002: A phase II clinical trial platform using total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC)

7

Background: This NCTN multi-arm randomized phase II modular clinical trial platform utilizes TNT with parallel experimental arms (EAs) in LARC. EAs are not intended for direct comparison, but rather to concurrently randomized control arm (CA) patients. Primary endpoint (EP) and available secondary EPs (from EA1 using veliparib [V], PARPi; and EA2 using pembrolizumab [P], anti-PD-1) have been previously reported. We present long-term outcomes of all pts enrolled (NCT02921256). Methods: Stage II/III pts with MSS LARC (with any ONE of the following: distal location [cT3-4 ≤5cm from anal verge, any N]; bulky [any cT4 or tumor within 3mm of mesorectal fascia]; high risk for metastatic disease [cN2]; or not a sphincter-sparing surgery [SSS] candidate) were randomized to CA (neoadjuvant FOLFOX [x 4mo] → chemoRT [capecitabine with 50.4Gy] → surgery 8-12 wks later). EA1 added V (400mg PO BID) and EA2 added P (200mg IV Q3 wks x 6 doses) each concurrent with chemoRT. Primary EP: 4-point reduction in Neoadjuvant Rectal Cancer (NAR) score with a one-sided α=0.10, 80% power. NAR compared by linear model controlling for clinical T4 at entry (Y/N). Secondary EPs: OS, DFS. p-values are two-sided. Results: From 10/2016-2/2018, 178 pts were randomized (88 CA, 90 EA1). From 8/2018-5/2019, 185 pts were randomized (95 CA, 90 EA2). Baseline characteristics were previously reported. Median follow-up is 3.50 yrs for the 1st comparison. Median follow-up is 3.15 yrs for the 2nd comparison. Updated primary and long-term secondary outcomes are in the table. Conclusions: With longer follow-up, addition of V to TNT provided no significant differences in the NAR score or 3yr outcomes. The addition of P to TNT was associated with a statistically significant improvement in 3yr OS, but not DFS. Correlative molecular analyses are ongoing. Support: U10CA180868, -180822; UG1-189867; U24-196067; AbbVie; Merck. Clinical trial information: NCT02921256 . [Table: see text]

NRG GI008: Colon adjuvant chemotherapy based on evaluation of residual disease (CIRCULATE-US)

TPS260

Background: Currently, there are no biomarkers validated prospectively in randomized studies for resected colon cancer (CC) to determine need for adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). However, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) represents a highly specific and sensitive approach (especially with serial monitoring) for identifying minimal/molecular residual disease (MRD) post-surgery in CC patients (pts), and may outperform traditional clinical and pathological features in prognosticating risk for recurrence. CC pts who do not have detectable ctDNA (ctDNA-) are at a much lower risk of recurrence and may be spared the toxicities associated with AC. Furthermore, for CC pts with detectable ctDNA (ctDNA+) who are at a very high risk of recurrence, the optimal AC regimen has not been established. We hypothesize that for pts whose CC has been resected, ctDNA status may be used to risk-stratify for making decisions about AC. Methods: In this prospective phase II/III trial, up to 1,912 pts with resected stage III A, B (all pts) and stage II, IIIC (ctDNA+ only) CC will be enrolled. Based on the post-operative ctDNA status using personalized and tumor-informed assay (Signatera™, bespoke assay), those who are ctDNA- (Cohort A) will be randomized to immediate AC with fluoropyrimidine (FP) + oxaliplatin (Ox) for 3-6 mos per established guidelines vs . serial ctDNA monitoring. Patients who are ctDNA+ post-operatively or with serial monitoring (Cohort B) will be randomized to FP+Ox vs . more intensive AC with addition of irinotecan (I) for 6 mos. The primary endpoints for Cohort A are time to ctDNA+ status (phase II) and disease-free survival (DFS) (phase III) in the immediate vs . delayed AC arms. The primary endpoint for Cohort B is DFS in the FP+Ox vs FP+Ox+I arms for both phase II and phase III portions of the trial. Secondary endpoints include prevalence of detectable ctDNA post-operatively, time-to-event outcomes (overall survival and time to recurrence) by ctDNA status, and the assessment of compliance to adjuvant therapy. Biospecimens including archival tumor tissue, as well as post-operative plus serial matched/normal blood samples, will be collected for exploratory correlative research. Active enrollment across the NCTN started in June, 2022. Support: U10-CA-180868, -180822; UG1CA-189867; Natera, Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT05174169 .

The Great Immune Escape: Understanding the Divergent Immune Response in Breast Cancer Subtypes

Breast cancer, the most common type of cancer affecting women, encompasses a collection of histologic (mainly ductal and lobular) and molecular subtypes exhibiting diverse clinical presentation, disease trajectories, treatment options, and outcomes. Immunotherapy has revolutionized treatment for some solid tumors but has shown limited promise for breast cancers. In this review, we summarize recent advances in our understanding of the complex interactions between tumor and immune cells in subtypes of breast cancer at the cellular and microenvironmental levels. We aim to provide a perspective on opportunities for future immunotherapy agents tailored to specific features of each subtype of breast cancer.

SIGNIFICANCE

Although there are currently over 200 ongoing clinical trials testing immunotherapeutics, such as immune-checkpoint blockade agents, these are largely restricted to the triple-negative and HER2+ subtypes and primarily focus on T cells. With the rapid expansion of new in vitro, in vivo, and clinical data, it is critical to identify and highlight the challenges and opportunities unique for each breast cancer subtype to drive the next generation of treatments that harness the immune system.

Minimal Residual Disease-Directed Adjuvant Therapy for Patients With Early-Stage Colon Cancer: CIRCULATE-US

BACKGROUND

The ability to detect circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), a novel surrogate for minimal residual disease (MRD) for patients with solid tumors, has significantly evolved over the past decade. Several studies have shown that ctDNA may provide clinical insight into the biological dynamics of MRD. The CIRCULATE-US (NRG-GI008; NCT05174169) trial will aim to address the role of ctDNA for risk stratification to intensify and deintensify adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with early-stage colon cancer.

METHODS

CIRCULATE-US, a prospective phase 2/3 randomized trial, is investigating the molecular dynamics and prognostic role of ctDNA (evaluated by Natera's Signatera assay) for patients with resected colon cancer. Patients with negative postoperative ctDNA will be enrolled in cohort A and randomized to receive either immediate treatment with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid or capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX6 or CAPEOX; Arm 1) or serial ctDNA surveillance with delayed adjuvant therapy (Arm 2). Patients randomized to Arm 2 with subsequent positive ctDNA results will be enrolled in cohort B for a second randomization to receive either FOLFOX6/CAPEOX (Arm 3) or 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX; Arm 4) for 6 months. Patients with positive postoperative ctDNA results will be directly enrolled in cohort B and randomized to receive either FOLFOX6/CAPEOX (Arm 3) or FOLFIRINOX (Arm 4). Patients with stage II or stage IIIC colon cancer with positive ctDNA results (tested as standard of care with commercial testing) will be eligible for enrollment in cohort B. The primary end point for cohort A is time to positive ctDNA status for phase 2 and disease-free survival for phase 3 with a noninferiority design. The primary end point for cohort B is disease-free survival for both phase 2 and phase 3 with a superiority design.

DISCUSSION

CIRCULATE-US will aim to understand postoperative ctDNA dynamics in early-stage colon cancer and will investigate escalation and de-escalation approaches by using ctDNA status as a surrogate for MRD status.

Abstract A18: GRK2, an inhibitor of MALT1-dependent oncogenic signaling, is downregulated by microRNA in ABC-DLBCL

Introduction and Background: The “CBM” complex is composed of the scaffolding protein CARMA1, the adaptor protein BCL10, and the effector protein MALT1. This complex performs multiple pivotal functions as a mediator of antigen receptor-dependent induction of the NF-κB transcription factor and subsequent lymphocyte activation. The key downstream effector of the CBM complex, MALT1, regulates downstream signaling via both scaffolding and proteolytic functions. Inappropriate activation of MALT1, which can result from somatic gain-of-function mutation in upstream regulators of MALT1 or chromosomal translocation involving the MALT1 gene, underlies the pathogenesis of a variety of lymphoid malignancies including activated B cell type-diffuse large B cell lymphoma (ABC-DLBCL) and mucosa associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma. We recently discovered that G-protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) binds to MALT1 and inhibits MALT1 scaffold and proteolytic activities. Further, we found that knockdown of GRK2 in ABC-DLBCL enhances tumor growth in vivo, suggesting that GRK2 may act as a tumor suppressor in MALT1-dependent lymphomas. Interestingly, we found that GRK2 mRNA levels are markedly lower in a subset of DLBCL cases in comparison to normal B-cell controls and that lower GRK2 level is associated with reduced survival in ABC-DLBCL patients. We thus sought to investigate how GRK2 expression is regulated in ABC-DLBCL. Methods and Results: We first investigated whether mutations/deletions in the ADRBK1 gene (GRK2) account for the lower levels of GRK2 expression in a subset of DLBCL cases. Only one mutation among 6 published DLBCL sequencing datasets (334 cases total) was identified. We next considered that other mechanisms, such as regulation by microRNA (miRNA), could play a role in downregulating GRK2. Using DICER-deficient HEK 293T cells, we demonstrated that GRK2 protein level significantly increases when miRNA processing is impaired. We then used mirDIP, a microRNA Data Integration Portal, to screen for candidate miRNAs predicted to target the 3’UTR of GRK2. We identified 4 top candidate hits, 2 of which were also identified in bioinformatic analysis as miRNA whose level inversely correlates with GRK2 mRNA level in ABC-DLBCL patient tumor specimens. Using a GRK2 3’ UTR reporter system, we confirmed direct targeting of GRK2 by these miRNAs. Next, we generated stable ABC-DLBCL cell lines (TMD8, OCI-Ly3) overexpressing candidate miRNAs. Our results demonstrate that candidate miRNA overexpression results in reduced GRK2 expression and increased MALT1 scaffolding and proteolytic activities, NF-κB transcriptional activity and ABC-DLBCL cell proliferation. Conclusions: Together, our data suggest that miRNAs down-regulate expression of GRK2 in ABC-DLBCL which in turn enhances MALT1 scaffolding and proteolytic activities, leading to increased tumor cell proliferation. Future studies are aimed at identifying potential miRNA inhibitors which enhance GRK2 expression and thereby suppress MALT1 pro-tumorigenic activity in ABC-DLBCL.

Citation Format: Jing Cheng, Mei Smyers, Matt Trotta, Neil M Carleton, Lisa M Maurer, Peter C Lucas, Linda M McAllister-Lucas. GRK2, an inhibitor of MALT1-dependent oncogenic signaling, is downregulated by microRNA in ABC-DLBCL [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Third AACR International Meeting: Advances in Malignant Lymphoma: Maximizing the Basic-Translational Interface for Clinical Application; 2022 Jun 23-26; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Blood Cancer Discov 2022;3(5_Suppl):Abstract nr A18.

Role of ERK signaling in bladder urothelium in response to cyclophosphamide injury

Mice with inducible urothelial deletion of fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (ShhCreERT2;Fgfr2^Fl/Fl ) injured with cyclophosphamide had aberrant basal cell endoreplication and poor regeneration. The endoreplication correlated with an absence of phosphorylated (activated) ERK expression in urothelium. We assessed whether inhibiting ERK activity phenocopied the urothelial defects in injured Fgfr2 mutant mice. We co-administered cyclophosphamide and an ERK inhibitor (ERKi) systemically in mice and assessed general histology and immunofluorescence for various markers post injury. Since AKT also signals downstream of FGFR2, we assessed effects of an AKT inhibitor (AKTi) on cyclophosphamide injury. ERK knockdown did not affect urothelial injury or proliferation 24 h after cyclophosphamide. Conversely, ERK inhibition led to larger basal cell nuclei, more submucosal hemorrhage and attenuated uroplakin staining 3 days after injury versus vehicle-treated mice. Compared to vehicle-treated mice, ERKi-treated mice had a trend for more Ki67⁺ urothelial cells and had statistically fewer phospho-Histone H3⁺ cells normalized to Ki67 and higher basal cell DNA content, consistent with endoreplication 3 days after injury. Ten days after injury, ERKi-treated mice still had signs of poor urothelial regeneration with absent or aberrant expression of differentiation markers and ectopic lumenal expression of keratin 14 (basal progenitor marker). Co-administration of the AKTi led to no apparent urothelial defects 3 days after cyclophosphamide. Thus, ERK knockdown (but not AKT knockdown) leads to urothelial regenerative responses after cyclophosphamide reminiscent of Fgfr2 mutant mice. Together, it appears that FGFR2 acts through ERK to prevent aberrant urothelial basal cell endoreplication and ensure normal regeneration after cyclophosphamide.

Abstract 81: In depth single cell profiling of a case of breast cancer bone metastases with associated organoid models reveal a precision medicine approach to treatment

Occurring in 65-80% of metastatic breast cancer (BC), bone metastasis (BoM) is the major cause of BC related mortality. Lack of understanding of BoM evolution and heterogeneity at patient specific levels and precise application of targeted therapies are major challenges of managing BoM. In this study, we described in depth histologic and molecular characterization of a case of invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) bilateral metastasis to bone, and identified and tested potential targets for treating BoM. H&E/IHC staining, whole exome sequencing (WES), and RNAseq were performed on FFPE primary tumor and pelvis and tibia BoMs collected from our study case. Organoids were derived from the two BoMs and single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) undertaken on the organoids and their originating tumors. H&E/IHC demonstrated evolution of the disease from an ER+ primary ILC to ER- BoM with mixed lobular and ductal carcinoma features. WES revealed two druggable mutations including PIK3CA (E545K) and BRCA1 (D1813H/H399P). RNAseq revealed upregulation of TGF-β, Wnt/beta-catenin and PI3K pathways, epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) and angiogenesis in BoM compared to primary tumor, representing promising targets for BoM. scRNAseq revealed 5 major cell types including epithelial, fibroblasts, immune, osteoclasts and endothelial cells, and pronounced intracellular heterogeneity. Six epithelial clusters were identified, featuring high TNF-α signaling, high partial EMT signatures regulated by PRRX1/2, TWIST1/2, and FOXS1, high proliferation, and endocrine resistance signatures. In fibroblasts, 9 clusters were identified representing ECM remodeling, angiogenesis, osteoclast-like, MSC, IFN response and myofibroblasts. Immune cells majorly composed of monocytes/macrophages, CD4+, CD8+ and Treg T cells, and NK cell. WES and scRNAseq analysis demonstrated that organoids preserved mutational landscape and cellular heterogeneity of matched BoMs. Consistent with the BRCA1 and PIK3CA mutations, organoids were responsive to a PARP (Talazoparib: IC50 1.3uM) and PI3K (Alpelisib: IC50 4-9uM) inhibitors. In summary, we have identified potential therapeutic targets from understanding evolution and heterogeneity of BC BoM, and evaluated these in patient-specific organoids, thereby providing insights for the design of a precision medicine based clinical treatment strategy.

Citation Format: Kai Ding, Fangyuan Chen, Nolan Priedigkeit, Daniel D. Brown, Tanya Heim, Rebecca Watters, Kurt Weiss, Peter C. Lucas, Jennifer M. Atkinson, Steffi Oesterreich, Adrian V. Lee. In depth single cell profiling of a case of breast cancer bone metastases with associated organoid models reveal a precision medicine approach to treatment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 81.

Colon adjuvant chemotherapy based on evaluation of residual disease (CIRCULATE-US): NRG-GI008

TPS3643

Background: Currently, there are no biomarkers validated prospectively in randomized studies for resected colon cancer (CC) to determine need for adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). However, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) represents a highly specific and sensitive approach (especially with serial monitoring) for identifying minimal/molecular residual disease (MRD) post-surgery in CC patients (pts), and may outperform traditional clinical and pathological features in prognosticating risk for recurrence. CC pts who do not have detectable ctDNA (ctDNA-) are at a much lower risk of recurrence and may be spared the toxicities associated with AC. Furthermore, for CC pts with detectable ctDNA (ctDNA+) who are at a very high risk of recurrence, the optimal AC regimen has not been established. We hypothesize that for pts whose CC has been resected, ctDNA status may be used to risk stratify for making decisions about AC. Methods: In this prospective phase II/III trial, up to 1,912 pts with resected stage III A, B (all pts) and stage II, IIIC (ctDNA+ only) CC will be enrolled. Based on the post-operative ctDNA status using personalized and tumor informed assay (SignateraTM, bespoke assay), those who are ctDNA- (Cohort A) will be randomized to immediate AC with fluoropyrimidine (FP) + oxaliplatin (Ox) for 3-6 mos per established guidelines vs . serial ctDNA monitoring. Patients who are ctDNA+ post-operatively or with serial monitoring (Cohort B) will be randomized to FP+Ox vs . more intensive AC with addition of irinotecan (I) for 6 mos. The primary endpoints for Cohort A are time to ctDNA+ status (phase II) and disease-free survival (DFS) in phase III in the immediate vs . delayed AC arms. The primary endpoint for Cohort B is DFS in the FP+Ox vs FP+Ox+I arms for both phase II and phase III portions of the trial. Secondary endpoints include prevalence of detectable ctDNA post-operatively, time-to-event outcomes (overall survival and time to recurrence) by ctDNA status, and the assessment of compliance to adjuvant therapy. Biospecimens including archival tumor tissue, post-operative and serial matched/normal blood samples will be collected for exploratory correlative research. Active enrollment across the NCTN started in early 2022. Support: U10-CA-180868, -180822; UG1CA-189867; Clinical trial information: NCT05174169.

Testing of a machine learning (ML) model for ability to predict oxaliplatin and bevacizumab (bev) benefit in NRG Oncology/NSABP C-07 and C-08

3607

Background: Through mining The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data and a large set of transcriptomes of CRC in GEO, we constructed 15 metagenes reflecting the transcriptomic impact of major driver genes of CRC. Independent of any clinical information, we used metagenes as features to further develop an ML model, then tested it using gene expression (GE) data from C-07 and C-08. Methods: We carried out a prospectively designed and double-blind study to evaluate the clinical utility of the ML model in the adjuvant setting. Samples were classified as Sig+ or Sig-. Association of signatures with recurrence free interval were tested using log-rank test, and significance was set at P<0.05. Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios in univariate and multivariate models and for significance testing in multivariate models. Clinical variables included in multivariate models were nodal status, age, sex, and T stage. Results: We tested the ML model for its ability to predict oxaliplatin benefit in all C-07 pts with available GE data (n=846). Sig+ pts received significant benefit from oxaliplatin (HR=0.68, 95% CI=0.48-0.95, p=0.025) but Sig- did not (Sig- HR=1.05, 95% CI=0.72-1.53, p=0.79), however, the int p value showed only a trend for significance (int p=0.091). Sig+ remained significant for oxaliplatin benefit in multivariate analysis (HR=0.67, 95% CI=0.48-0.95, p=0.024). When we combined all C-07 pts (C-07 FULV-trtd n=298, FLOX n=304) with C-08 FOLFOX-treated pts (n=226) the Sig+ was significantly associated with oxaliplatin benefit (HR=0.65, 95% CI=0.48-0.89, p=0.0065) with a significant int p=0.03. We also tested the signature for association with bev benefit in C-08 (n=438), using a different cut off. Sig+ showed only a trend for an association with bev benefit (HR=0.63, 95% CI=0.35-1.12, p=0.11). To increase the power to detect bev benefit, we also tested the signature for association with bev benefit in all C-08 patients and C-07 pts treated with FLOX. The Sig+ group received significant benefit from bev (HR=0.58, 95% CI=0.36-0.94, p=0.025) but the Sig- group did not (HR=1.02, 95% CI=0.64-1.63, p=0.94), however, the int p was not significant (p=0.101). The model also showed an association with prognosis within the FULV treatment arm in C-07 (HR=1.51, 95% CI=1.07-2.14, p=0.018) and the FOLFOX+bev arm in C-08 (HR=0.55, 95% CI=0.30-1.01, p=0.049). Conclusions: Although our study is not optimally powered, our analyses indicate that the ML model was predictive for oxaliplatin benefit in stage II and III CC and may be useful for detecting bev benefit. Importantly, the Sig- population is candidate for omitting oxaliplatin (de-escalation) in adjuvant setting but will require further validation. Support: PA DOH, U10CA-180868, -180822, -196067, Genentech, Sanofi; NSABP. Clinical trial information: 00096278, 00004931.

Prognostic and predictive implications of the intrinsic subtypes and gene expression signatures in early-stage HER2+ breast cancer: A pooled analysis of CALGB 40601, NeoALTTO, and NSABP B-41 trials

509

Background: Several biologic features are implicated in the differences in response and survival to dual (trastuzumab and lapatinib [HL]) vs. single (trastuzumab [H]) HER2-blockade across neoadjuvant trials in early-stage HER2+ breast cancer. We evaluated the association of intrinsic subtypes and gene expression signatures with pathologic complete response (pCR) and event-free survival (EFS) in a pooled analysis of three independent phase III neoadjuvant studies with similar designs: CALGB 40601 (Alliance), NeoALTTO, and NSABP B-41. Methods: Gene expression profiling by RNA sequencing was assessed on 761 pre-treatment samples (264 from CALGB 40601, 249 from NeoALTTO, 248 from NSABP B-41). Intrinsic subtypes and 759 gene expression signatures were calculated. We studied the association of pCR and the benefit of dual (HL) vs. single (H) HER2-blockade by tumor intrinsic subtype in the pooled set. The ability of multiple gene expression signatures to predict pCR and EFS across the three studies was also tested by logistic and Cox regression analyses. Results: pCR status was associated with EFS only in HER2-Enriched (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.29-0.71, p-value < 0.001) and Basal-like (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04-0.86, p-value 0.031) intrinsic subtypes, but not in Luminal and/or ER+ tumors. The EFS benefit of dual vs. single HER2-blockade was limited to HER2-Enriched tumors (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.27-0.81, p-value 0.007). When evaluating the three clinical trials separately, we found 89/759 (11.7%) gene expression signatures in common for the prediction of pCR across the three clinical trials, including HER2-amplicon and immune activation signatures. Luminal-related signatures were associated with lower pCR rates but better EFS outcomes, especially in patients with residual disease. Stratified Cox regression models by study showed a significant and strong association of NK, B and plasma cells, as well as Ig-related signatures with a better EFS outcome, while vascular, proliferation, and metastasis signatures were associated with poor EFS. Conclusions: In early-stage HER2+ breast cancer, the relationship between pCR and EFS differs by tumor intrinsic subtype, and the benefit of dual vs. single HER2-blockade seems to be limited to HER2-Enriched subtype tumors. Immune signatures were associated with higher pCR rates and better EFS, luminal signatures were associated with lower pCR rates but good EFS outcomes, and vascular/proliferation/metastasis signatures were associated with poor EFS across the three clinical trials. Clinical trial identification: CALGB 40601: NCT00770809. (CALGB is part of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology). NeoALTTO: NCT00553358 NSABP B-41: NCT00486668

Colorectal cancer metastatic dMMR immuno-therapy (COMMIT) study: A randomized phase III study of atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy versus mFOLFOX6/bevacizumab/atezo in the first-line treatment of patients (pts) with deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) or microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)—NRG-GI004/SWOG-S1610

TPS3647

Background: Despite the superiority in progression-free survival (PFS) of inhibition of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) pathway in dMMR/MSI-H as compared to chemotherapy with either anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFr) or anti-epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFr) antibodies in mCRC, more pts had progressive disease as the best response in the anti-PD1 monotherapy arm (29.4% v 12.3%) with mean PFS of 13.7 mos, with ̃45% of pts in the IO arm progressed at 12 mos ( N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2207). We hypothesize that the dMMR/MSI-H mCRC pts may be more effectively treated with the combination of PD-1 pathway blockade and mFOLFOX6/bevacizumab (bev) rather than with anti-PD-1 therapy (atezo) alone. Preclinical work demonstrated synergistic effects between anti-PD-1/anti-VEGF and between oxaliplatin/anti-PD-1 in murine CRC models and phase II data, which showed activity of anti-PD-1/anti-VEGF in chemotherapy refractory colon cancer. A recent randomized trial subgroup analyses of 8 pts with dMMR metastatic colon cancer treated with FOLFOXIRI+bev+atezo, with the first patient having progression ̃16 mos ( ESMO 2021, Abstt LBA20). Additionally, in other solid tumor malignancies, anti-PD1 plus anti-VEGFr (i.e., HCC and RCC) as well as anti-PD1 plus chemotherapy (i.e., gastric and esophageal cancers) combinations are standard first-line treatments. Methods: The redesigned COMMIT study was reactivated on 1/29/2021 as a two-arm prospective phase III open-label trial randomizing (1:1) mCRC dMMR/MSI-H to atezo monotherapy v mFOLFOX6/bev+atezo combination. Assuming our control arm, atezo monotherapy (48% PFS at 24 mos as assessed by site investigator), we have 80% power to detect a hazard ratio of 0.6 (equivalent to 64.4% PFS at 24 mos) with alpha 0.025 one-sided. Stratification factors include BRAFV600E status, metastatic site, and prior adjuvant CRC therapy. Secondary endpoints include OS, objective response rate, safety profile, disease control rate, and duration of response. Health-related quality of life is an exploratory objective. Archived tumor tissue and blood samples will be collected for correlative studies. Key inclusion criteria are: mCRC without prior chemotherapy for advanced disease; dMMR tumor determined by local CLIA-certified IHC assay (MLH1/MSH2/MSH6/PMS2) or MSI-H by local CLIA-certified PCR or NGS panel; and measurable disease per RECIST. Enrollment actively continues to the target accrual of 211 patients randomized between the two immunotherapy arms. Support: U10CA180868, -180822, -180888, UG1CA189867, U24CA196067. Clinical trial information: NCT02997228.

BRCA1-associated RING domain-1 (BARD1) loss and GBP1 expression enhance sensitivity to DNA damage in Ewing sarcoma

Ewing sarcoma is a fusion oncoprotein-driven primary bone tumor. A subset of patients (~10%) with Ewing sarcoma are known to harbor germline variants in a growing number of genes involved in DNA damage repair. We recently reported our discovery of a germline mutation in the DNA damage repair protein BARD1 (BRCA1-associated RING domain-1) in a patient with Ewing sarcoma. BARD1 is recruited to the site of DNA double stranded breaks via the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) protein and plays a critical role in DNA damage response pathways including homologous recombination. We thus questioned the impact of BARD1 loss on Ewing cell sensitivity to DNA damage and the Ewing sarcoma transcriptome. We demonstrate that PSaRC318 cells, a novel patient-derived cell line harboring a pathogenic BARD1 variant, are sensitive to PARP inhibition and by testing the effect of BARD1 depletion in additional Ewing sarcoma cell lines, we confirm that BARD1 loss enhances cell sensitivity to PARP inhibition plus radiation. Additionally, RNA-seq analysis revealed that loss of BARD1 results in the upregulation of GBP1 (guanylate-binding protein 1), a protein whose expression is associated with variable response to therapy depending on the adult carcinoma subtype examined. Here, we demonstrate that GBP1 contributes to the enhanced sensitivity of BARD1 deficient Ewing cells to DNA damage. Together, our findings demonstrate the impact of loss-of function mutations in DNA damage repair genes, such as BARD1, on Ewing sarcoma treatment response.

Hotspot ESR1 Mutations Are Multimodal and Contextual Modulators of Breast Cancer Metastasis

Constitutively active estrogen receptor α (ER/ESR1) mutations have been identified in approximately one-third of ER+ metastatic breast cancers. Although these mutations are known as mediators of endocrine resistance, their potential role in promoting metastatic disease has not yet been mechanistically addressed. In this study, we show the presence of ESR1 mutations exclusively in distant but not local recurrences in five independent breast cancer cohorts. In concordance with transcriptomic profiling of ESR1-mutant tumors, genome-edited ESR1 Y537S and D538G-mutant cell models exhibited a reprogrammed cell adhesive gene network via alterations in desmosome/gap junction genes and the TIMP3/MMP axis, which functionally conferred enhanced cell-cell contacts while decreasing cell-extracellular matrix adhesion. In vivo studies showed ESR1-mutant cells were associated with larger multicellular circulating tumor cell (CTC) clusters with increased compactness compared with ESR1 wild-type CTCs. These preclinical findings translated to clinical observations, where CTC clusters were enriched in patients with ESR1-mutated metastatic breast cancer. Conversely, context-dependent migratory phenotypes revealed cotargeting of Wnt and ER as a vulnerability in a D538G cell model. Mechanistically, mutant ESR1 exhibited noncanonical regulation of several metastatic pathways, including secondary transcriptional regulation and de novo FOXA1-driven chromatin remodeling. Collectively, these data provide evidence for ESR1 mutation-modulated metastasis and suggest future therapeutic strategies for targeting ESR1-mutant breast cancer.

SIGNIFICANCE

Context- and allele-dependent transcriptome and cistrome reprogramming in mutant ESR1 cell models elicit diverse metastatic phenotypes related to cell adhesion and migration, which can be pharmacologically targeted in metastatic breast cancer.

Abstract P1-07-04: Potential role of the antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) in tumors achieving pCR in NRG Oncology/NSABP B-52

Background: The NRG Oncology/NSABP B-52 neoadjuvant clinical trial was conducted to test if the addition of estrogen deprivation (ED) would improve the pCR rate in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer patients (pts) treated with docetaxel, carboplatin, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab (TCHP). A numerical increase in pCR rate was observed with ED (46.1% v 40.9%), but the difference was not statistically significant. We have previously quantitated T cells (CD8, FOXP3), macrophages (CD68), and immune checkpoint proteins (PD-1, PD-L1) with multiplex immunofluorescence in B-52 and shown that CD68 and FOXP3 cells were associated with pCR but not CD8 cells. Our purpose was to determine the associations of FCGR genotypes and immune cells with pCR. Methods: A single baseline, pre-treatment FFFPE tissue section per case (N=181) was used to perform a 7-plex multiplex immunofluorescence procedure using opal fluorophores for staining. The Vectra Pathology System and inForm analysis software (Akoya Biosciences) was used for imaging and quantitation of CD8, CD68, FOXP3, PD-1, and PD-L1 cells in both the tumoral and stromal regions. Stromal data is reported here. Favorable- and unfavorable- FcGγR genotypes for FCGR2A-131H/R and FCGR3A-158V/F alleles were determined via the Sequenom MassARRAY iPLEX platform. Rates of pCR with pts with 1 or 2 favorable alleles was compared to pts who were homozygous for the unfavorable allele. Within each genotype, Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to test the association of markers with pCR and within each treatment. Results: No significant association of FCGR2A and 3A alleles with pCR was detected in the entire B-52 cohort, however, among pts with favorable FCGR genotypes (FCGR2A-131-HH, or H/R, FCGR3A-158- VV, or VF HR) the median value of the % CD68 cells was significantly higher in tumors that achieved pCR v those that did not (p=0.0004, p=0.0006), respectively. In pts who were homozygous for the FCGR2A or FCGR3A unfavorable alleles, there was no significant difference in the median values of the % of CD68 cells between pCR and no-pCR tumors. Further stratification of tumors by treatment showed that pts with an FCGR2A or FCGR3A favorable genotype and whose tumors achieved pCR had a higher median value of CD68 only in the TCHP + ED arm (p=0.0007, p=0.0003), respectively and not in the TCHP arm (p=0.059; p=0.21). Higher levels of PD-L1 were associated with pCR in pts with FCGR3A- favorable genotypes, but higher levels of FOXP3 were associated with pCR regardless of genotype. In contrast to the other cell types, higher PD-1 or CD8 cells showed no association with genotypes. Conclusions: This is an exploratory study examining the potential role of ADCP in HER2+/ER+ breast cancer and supports the notion that ADCP may be one mechanism that promotes the elimination of tumor cells in a subset of pts in the neoadjuvant setting. Tumors that achieve pCR have higher % of CD68 cells, in pts with favorable FCGR2A and 3A genotypes than pts who do not. However, in pts with unfavorable FCGR3A or FCGR2A genotypes there was no difference in the median CD68 levels in pCR v no-pCR tumors. When tumors were further stratified by CD68 levels, FCGR3A genotypes, and treatment, the association of pCR in tumors with high CD68 and FCGR3A favorable genotypes was seen only in the TCHP+ED arm. This may indicate that ED may improve pCR rates in some tumors with more macrophages and favorable genotypes. Macrophages are known to have estrogen receptors, and estrogen has been shown to promote the alternative activation of macrophages, potentially dampening down the immune response. Thus, one could speculate that ED may block the estrogen-induced alternative activation of macrophages, allowing the classically activated macrophages to phagocytize tumor cells. Support: BCRF, U10CA180868 & Admin Sup, U24CA196067, Genentech, NSABP Foun.

Citation Format: Katherine L Pogue-Geile, Ying Wang, Huichen Feng, Corey Lipchick, Patrick Gavin, Rim S Kim, Reena S Cecchini, Samuel A Jacobs, Ashok Srinivasan, Sandra M Swain, Eleftherios Mamounas, Charles E Geyer, Jr, Priya Rastogi, Peter C Lucas, C. Kent Osborne, Soonmyung Paik, Norman Wolmark, Mothaffar F Rimawi. Potential role of the antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) in tumors achieving pCR in NRG Oncology/NSABP B-52 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-07-04.

Abstract PD15-05: Assessment of estrogen receptor (ESR1) mRNA expression for prediction of extended aromatase inhibitor benefit in HR-positive breast cancer using NRG Oncology/NSABP B-42

Background: In NSABP B-14, the quantitative levels of ESR1 mRNA, assessed using the standardized 21-gene assay and qRT-PCR platform predicted tamoxifen benefit (interaction p-value &lt;0.001). NSABP B-42 evaluated the effect of extended letrozole in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer who have completed 5 years of hormonal therapy with either an aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen followed by an aromatase inhibitor. We proposed to determine if ESR1 mRNA, reported as the quantitative ER single gene score, is predictive of the magnitude of benefit from extended adjuvant endocrine therapy with letrozole in patients enrolled in NSABP B-42. Methods: This prospectively planned retrospective study used a stratified cohort sample drawn from the 2,589 B-42 patients with available tumor tissue blocks and appropriate consent. All 133 patients who experienced distant recurrence and 48 patients who experienced local/regional but not distant recurrence were included along with a stratified random sample of 547/2,408 patients without recurrence. The primary endpoint was distant recurrence. The primary analysis tested for the interaction between the continuous ER single gene score and the effect of extended letrozole treatment using a weighted Cox proportional hazards regression model. A secondary analysis considered the ER single gene score categorized using the prespecified cutoff of ≤9.1 versus &gt;9.1. Recurrence-free interval was a secondary endpoint. Results: The results of the assay were available for 587 patients. The median ER score was 10.2 (IQR 9.3-11.0). There were 131 patients (23.2% weighted) with ER ≤9.1 and 456 (76.8% weighted) with ER &gt;9.1. No significant interaction of the effect of extended letrozole treatment was found for either the ER single gene score (interaction hazard ratio letrozole vs. placebo with an IQR change in ER score 1.10, 95% CI 0.66 - 1.82, p=.72) or the categories ER ≤9.1 (treatment HR=0.40, 95% CI 0.15-1.06) or ER &gt;9.1 (treatment HR=0.70, 95% CI 0.43-1.12) (interaction p=.32). There was also no apparent prognostic effect of the ER single gene score for distant recurrence with placebo treatment after 5 years of endocrine therapy (p=.12). Results were similar in analyses of any recurrence, analyses adjusting for the proliferation axis from the 21-gene assay, and subgroup analyses by nodal and HER2-status. Conclusions: The B-42 study provided no evidence that ESR1 mRNA as measured by the ER single gene score can inform decisions regarding extended letrozole therapy after 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy. Confidence intervals were relatively wide but rule out a strong predictive effect of the ER single gene score in the expected direction. Support: U10CA180868, -180822, U24CA196067; Novartis; Exact Sciences

Citation Format: Eleftherios Mamounas, Hanna Bandos, Priya Rastogi, Michael R Crager, Carolyn Mies, Peter C Lucas, Charles E Geyer, Jr, Louis Fehrenbacher, Mark L Graham, Stephen KL Chia, Adam M Brufsky, Janice M Walshe, Gamini S Soori, Shaker R Dakhil, Soonmyung Paik, Sandra M Swain, Frederick L Baehner, Steven Shak, Norman Wolmark. Assessment of estrogen receptor (ESR1) mRNA expression for prediction of extended aromatase inhibitor benefit in HR-positive breast cancer using NRG Oncology/NSABP B-42 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD15-05.

Abstract P5-12-03: Wcrc-25: A novel luminal invasive lobular carcinoma cell line model

Breast cancer is categorized by the molecular and histologic presentation of the tumor; with the major histologic subtypes observed in patients being Invasive Ductal Carcinoma (IDC) and Invasive Lobular Carcinoma (ILC). ILC are characterized by growth in a single file discohesive manner with stromal infiltration attributed to their hallmark loss of E-cadherin. The lower incidence of ILC, relative to IDC, resulted in this subtype being understudied in the field. The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) currently only lists 2 ILC cell lines; emphasizing the need to expand the inventory of models available to researchers. To that end, here we report the successful establishment and characterization of a novel ILC cell line from a metastatic pleural aspirate from a postmenopausal Caucasian woman with ER+ metastatic ILC. The patient underwent a bilateral mastectomy, several pleural fluid aspirations and multiple treatment changes as her disease progressed until she succumbed to the disease. Various cell culture methods were attempted with the pleural aspirate and a standard practice of DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS in normoxic conditions was deemed effective. A cell line was developed, WCRC-25 which is ER-. WCRC-25 appears to be E2 unresponsive in vitro and is morphologically larger than other ILC cells currently in use, namely, MDA-MB-134, BCK4 and IPH-926, while exhibiting better adherence to 2D plates and a less rounded morphology. Sequencing revealed a CDH1 Q706 truncating mutation in the cells, which was also observed in the patient’s cfDNA with its enrichment increasing over time, supporting elevated disease burden. RNA-seq analysis comparing the primary tumor to metastases and the cell line reveal a signature for cell cycle progression and Akt signaling. To assess targetability, we subjected WCRC-25 to AZD5363 and Alpelisib which confirmed WCRC-25 as susceptible to PI3K/Akt signaling inhibition. Finally, we generated mouse xenograft models of WCRC-25 through mammary fat pad injection and observed small, but palpable tumors and metastasis to several sites. In conclusion, we report WCRC-25 as a novel ILC cell line with much promise as an invaluable research tool to advance our understanding of ILC and its therapeutic vulnerabilities.

Citation Format: Ashuvinee Elangovan, Emily A Bossart, Ahmed Basudan, Nilgun Tasdemir, Osama Shiraz Shah, Kai Ding, Carolin Meier, Tanya Heim, Lori Miller, Tiantong Liu, Shannon L Puhalla, Grzegorz Gurda, Peter C Lucas, Priscilla F McAuliffe, Jennifer M Atkinson, Adrian V Lee, Steffi Oesterreich. Wcrc-25: A novel luminal invasive lobular carcinoma cell line model [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-12-03.

Association of multiplex-immunofluorescence (m-IF) and gene expression signature with prognosis and bevacizumab (bev) treatment outcomes in NRG oncology/NSABP C-08: Implications for combining immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and bev

140

Background: NRG Oncology/NSABP C-08 tested the efficacy of adding bev to mFOLFOX in patients (pts) with stage II or III colon cancer. In an unplanned analysis we showed that MMR status was predictive of bev benefit with dMMR pts receiving statistically significant bev benefit. More recently, we showed that immune cells and immune checkpoint proteins have differential effects on prognosis and bev benefit in C-08 (ASC0 2021). As part of a preplanned secondary objective of an NCTN-CCSC approved protocol, we tested the association of VEGFR, VEGFA, and CD31, with clinical outcomes and treatment benefit in dMMR and pMMR pts enrolled in C-08. To determine what subset of pts within C-08 received bev benefit, we tested the 10-gene IFNɣ signature (Ayers et al 2017), which has been shown to associate with response to ICB in other studies. Methods: VEGFR, VEGFA, and CD31 were quantitated in tumors from C-08 pts (N=1,485) using m-IF and the Vectra Pathology System and inForm software. Gene expression data of C-08 (n=387) via DASLR microarrays was used to test the IFNɣ signature for association with bev benefit in dMMR and pMMR pts. All markers were tested for associations with prognosis and bev benefit in dMMR and pMMR pts using recurrence-free interval, median cut points, and Cox models. Results: VEGFR, VEGFA, and CD31 were not prognostic in the total C-08 cohort nor in dMMR or pMMR subsets. However, high VEGFR was associated with bev benefit in dMMR pts p=0.0012, HR=0.08 [95% CI; 0.025-0.224], n=117) but not in pts with pMMR (n=555) (int p=0.03). Pts whose tumors showed higher expression of the IFNɣ signature had a better prognosis than did pts with a low signature. Importantly, in the entire C-08 cohort with available DASL data, pts with low IFNɣ signatures received bev benefit (p=0.034, HR=0.59 [95% CI: 0.36-0.97], n=211). When low IFNɣ tumors were further split by MMR status both dMMR and pMMR pts showed a trend to receive bev benefit, however, numbers of pts were too small to make firm conclusions (dMMR no bev vs. bev p=0.02, n=11; pMMR no bev vs. bev, p=0.051, n=167). Conclusions: High VEGFR is associated with bev benefit in dMMR pts. In agreement with other studies, we observe that the IFNɣ signature is associated with a good prognosis in C-08, however, unique to this study is the observation that IFNɣ low is associated with bev benefit in the entire C-08 cohort. The association of high IFNɣ signature with ICB response seen in several other studies, plus our observation that low IFNɣ is associated with bev benefit in C-08, suggests that bev and ICB are most efficacious on different subsets of pts. Current clinical trial, GI-004, is testing the efficacy of the bev + atezolizumab combination. Examination of these markers may be informative. Support: PA DOH, U10CA-180868, -180822, -196067, Genentech, Sanofi; NSABP Clinical trial information: 00096278.

Phase II/III study of circulating tumor DNA as a predictive biomarker in adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II colon cancer: NRG-GI005 (COBRA)

TPS233

Background: There are currently no validated predictive biomarkers for stage II resected colon cancer (CC) after adjuvant chemotherapy. However, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) shed into the bloodstream represents a highly specific and sensitive approach for identifying microscopic or residual tumor cells. For patients (pts) with CC, the detection of ctDNA is associated with persistent disease after resection and may outperform traditional clinical and pathological features in prognosticating risk for recurrence. We hypothesize that for pts whose stage II colon cancer has been resected and who have no traditional high-risk features, a positive ctDNA status may identify those who will benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: In this prospective phase II/III clinical trial, pts (N = 1,408) with resected stage II CC without traditional high-risk features and whom the evaluating oncologist deems suitable for active surveillance (i.e., not needing adjuvant chemotherapy) will be randomized 1:1 into 2 arms: standard-of-care/observation (Arm A), or prospective testing for ctDNA (Arm B). Postoperative blood will be analyzed for ctDNA with the Guardant Reveal assay, covering CC-relevant mutations and CC-specific methylation profiling. Pts in Arm B with ctDNA detected will be treated with 6 months of adjuvant (FOLFOX) chemotherapy. For all pts in Arm A, ctDNA status will be analyzed retrospectively at the time of endpoint analysis. The primary endpoints are clearance of ctDNA with adjuvant chemotherapy (phase II) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) for “ctDNA-detected” pts treated with or without adjuvant chemotherapy (phase III). Secondary endpoints will include time-to-event outcomes (OS, RFS, TTR) by ctDNA marker status and treatment, prevalence of detectable ctDNA in stage II CC, and rates of compliance with assigned intervention. Archived normal and matched tumor and blood samples will be collected for exploratory correlative research. Enrollment continues across North America to the 540-patient phase II endpoint. Support: U10-CA-180868, -180822; UG1CA-189867; GuardantHealth. Clinical trial information: NCT04068103.

NRG-GI008: Colon adjuvant chemotherapy based on evaluation of residual disease (CIRCULATE-US)

TPS212

Background: Currently, there are no biomarkers validated prospectively in randomized studies for resected colon cancer (CC) to determine need for adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). However, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) shed into the bloodstream represents a highly specific and sensitive approach (especially with serial monitoring) for identifying microscopic or residual tumor cells in CC patients (pts) and may outperform traditional clinical and pathological features in prognosticating risk for recurrence. CC pts who do not have detectable ctDNA (ctDNA-) are at a much lower risk of recurrence and may not need AC. Furthermore, for CC pts with detectable ctDNA (ctDNA+) who are at a very high risk of recurrence, the optimal AC regimen has not been established. We hypothesize that for pts whose colon cancer has been resected, ctDNA status may be used to risk stratify for making decisions about AC. Methods: In this prospective phase II/III trial, up to 1,912 pts with resected stage III A, B (all pts) and stage II, IIIC (ctDNA+ only) CC will be enrolled. Based on the post-operative ctDNA status using Natera’s Signatera assay, those who are ctDNA- (Cohort A) will be randomized to immediate AC with fluoropyrimidine (FP) + oxaliplatin (Ox) for 3-6 mos per established guidelines vs serial ctDNA monitoring. Patients who are ctDNA+ post-operatively or with serial monitoring (Cohort B) will be randomized to FP + Ox vs more intensive AC with addition of irinotecan (I) for 6 mos. The primary objectives for Cohort A are time to ctDNA+ status (phase II) and disease-free survival (DFS) in phase III in the immediate vs delayed AC arms. The primary objective for Cohort B is DFS in the FP + Ox vs FP + Ox + I arms for both phase II and phase III portions of the trial. Secondary objectives include prevalence of detectable ctDNA post-operatively, time-to event outcomes (overall survival & time to recurrence) by ctDNA status, and the assessment of compliance to adjuvant therapy. Biospecimens including archival tumor tissue, post-operative and serial matched/ normal blood samples will be collected for exploratory correlative research. Study will activate in early 2022 across the NCTN. NCT#: Pending. Support: U10-CA-180868, -180822; UG1CA-189867; Natera.

NRG-GI004/SWOG-S1610: Colorectal cancer metastatic dMMR immuno-therapy (COMMIT) study—A randomized phase III study of atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy versus mFOLFOX6/bevacizumab/atezo in the first-line treatment of patients (pts) with deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) or microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

TPS232

Background: Despite the superiority in progression-free survival (PFS) of inhibition of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) pathway in dMMR/MSI-H as compared to chemotherapy with either anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFr) or anti-epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFr) antibodies in mCRC, more pts had progressive disease as the best response in the anti-PD1 monotherapy arm (29.4% vs. 12.3%) with mean PFS of 13.7 months ( N Engl J Med 2020; 383:2207). We hypothesize that the dMMR/MSI-H mCRC pts may be more effectively treated by the combination of PD-1 pathway blockade and mFOLFOX6/bevacizumab (bev) rather than with anti-PD-1 therapy (atezo) alone. Preclinical work demonstrated synergistic effects between anti-PD-1/anti-VEGF and between oxaliplatin/anti-PD-1 in murine CRC models and phase II data showed activity of anti-PD-1/anti-VEGF in chemotherapy refractory colon cancer. Additionally, in other solid tumor malignancies, anti-PD1 plus anti-VEGFr (i.e., HCC and RCC) as well as anti-PD1 plus chemotherapy (i.e., gastric and esophageal cancers) combinations are standard first-line treatments. Methods: The redesigned COMMIT study was reactivated on 1/29/2021 as a two-arm prospective phase III open-label trial randomizing (1:1) mCRC dMMR/MSI-H (211 pts) to atezo monotherapy versus mFOLFOX6/bev+atezo combination. Assuming our control arm, atezo monotherapy, 48% PFS at 24 months, as assessed by site investigator, we have 80% power to detect a hazard ratio of 0.6 (equivalent to 64.4% PFS at 24 months) with alpha 0.025 one-sided. Stratification factors include BRAFV600E status, metastatic site, and prior adjuvant CRC therapy. Secondary endpoints include OS, objective response rate, safety profile, disease control rate, duration of response, and centrally-reviewed PFS. Health-related quality of life is an exploratory objective. Archived tumor tissue and blood samples will be collected for correlative studies. Key inclusion criteria are: mCRC without prior chemotherapy for advanced disease; dMMR tumor determined by local CLIA-certified IHC assay (MLH1/MSH2/MSH6/PMS2) or MSI-H by local CLIA-certified PCR or NGS panel; and measurable disease per RECIST. Enrollment actively continues to the target accrual of 211 patients randomized between the two immunotherapy arms. Support: U10CA180868, -180822, -180888, UG1CA189867, U24CA196067; Genentech, Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT02997228.

MALT1 is a Targetable Driver of Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Claudin-low, Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

MALT1 is the effector protein of the CARMA/Bcl10/MALT1 (CBM) signalosome, a multi-protein complex that drives pro-inflammatory signaling pathways downstream of a diverse set of receptors. While CBM activity is best known for its role in immune cells, emerging evidence suggests that it plays a key role in the pathogenesis of solid tumors, where it can be activated by selected G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Here, we demonstrated that overexpression of GPCRs implicated in breast cancer pathogenesis, specifically the receptors for Angiotensin II and thrombin (AT1R and PAR1), drove a strong epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) program in breast cancer cells that is characteristic of claudin-low, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). In concert, MALT1 was activated in these cells and contributed to the dramatic EMT phenotypic changes through regulation of master EMT transcription factors including Snail and ZEB1. Importantly, blocking MALT1 signaling, through either siRNA-mediated depletion of MALT1 protein or pharmacologic inhibition of its activity, was effective at partially reversing the molecular and phenotypic indicators of EMT. Treatment of mice with mepazine, a pharmacologic MALT1 inhibitor, reduced growth of PAR1+, MDA-MB-231 xenografts and had an even more dramatic effect in reducing the burden of metastatic disease. These findings highlight MALT1 as an attractive therapeutic target for claudin-low TNBCs harboring overexpression of one or more selected GPCRs. Implications: This study nominates a GPCR/MALT1 signaling axis as a pathway that can be pharmaceutically targeted to abrogate EMT and metastatic progression in TNBC, an aggressive form of breast cancer that currently lacks targeted therapies.

Prognostic factors and survival of patients undergoing surgical intervention for breast cancer bone metastases

INTRODUCTION

Bone is the most common distant site of breast cancer metastasis. Skeletal lesions can cause significant morbidity due to pain, pathologic fracture, and electrolyte abnormalities. Current treatment for patients with bone metastases (BoM) from breast cancer is highly personalized and often involves a multidisciplinary approach with chemotherapy, hormone therapy, bone-targeted antiresorptive agents, radiation therapy, and surgery. We have retrospectively collected clinical data from a series of patients with bone metastases to evaluate the clinical characteristics, prognostic factors, and survival patterns of patients with breast cancer BoM receiving standard multimodal therapy.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 167 patients with breast cancer BoM treated at a single institution between August 2013 and March 2020 were identified. Clinical information was obtained from the medical record and survival analyses were performed to evaluate patient outcomes and identify prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients (22%) presented with de novo BoM - bone metastases at the time of breast cancer diagnosis - and were 2.6 times more likely to die within the study period than those with asynchronous BoM (HR = 2.62, p = <0.0001). Patients who received bone-targeted medical therapy were 61% less likely to die after BoM diagnosis than those who did not (HR = 0.39, p = 0.001). Operative stabilization of BoM was more frequently employed in patients with lytic (p = 0.02) or mixed (p = 0.02) tumors than it was for those with blastic lesions. Patients treated with surgery had a lower overall bone metastasis survival than those treated without (p < 0.03).

DISCUSSION

These findings reflect the current patterns in metastatic breast cancer treatment and associated outcomes. In a series of 167 consecutive patients, we demonstrate the natural history of breast cancer with BoM being treated with modern multimodal therapy. Understanding these treatment patterns and prognostic factors enhances the provider's ability to counsel patients and direct appropriate treatments.

A Novel Mouse Model for SNP in Steroid Receptor Co-Activator-1 Reveals Role in Bone Density and Breast Cancer Metastasis

The steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1) is a nuclear receptor co-activator, known to play key roles in both estrogen response in bone and in breast cancer metastases. We previously demonstrated that the P1272S single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP; P1272S; rs1804645) in SRC-1 decreases the activity of estrogen receptor in the presence of selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and that it is associated with a decrease in bone mineral density (BMD) after tamoxifen therapy, suggesting it may disrupt the agonist action of tamoxifen. Given such dual roles of SRC-1 in the bone microenvironment and in tumor cell-intrinsic phenotypes, we hypothesized that SRC-1 and a naturally occurring genetic variant, P1272S, may promote breast cancer bone metastases. We developed a syngeneic, knock-in mouse model to study if the SRC-1 SNP is critical for normal bone homeostasis and bone metastasis. Our data surprisingly reveal that the homozygous SRC-1 SNP knock-in increases tamoxifen-induced bone protection after ovariectomy. The presence of the SRC-1 SNP in mammary glands resulted in decreased expression levels of SRC-1 and reduced tumor burden after orthotopic injection of breast cancer cells not bearing the SRC-1 SNP, but increased metastases to the lungs in our syngeneic mouse model. Interestingly, the P1272S SNP identified in a small, exploratory cohort of bone metastases from breast cancer patients was significantly associated with earlier development of bone metastasis. This study demonstrates the importance of the P1272S SNP in both the effect of SERMs on BMD and the development of tumor in the bone.

Use of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Initial Results From the Pembrolizumab Arm of a Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is often used to downstage locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and decrease locoregional relapse; however, more than one-third of patients develop recurrent metastatic disease. As such, novel combinations are needed.

Objective

To assess whether the addition of pembrolizumab during and after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy can lead to an improvement in the neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score compared with treatment with FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) and chemoradiotherapy alone.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this open-label, phase 2, randomized clinical trial (NRG-GI002), patients in academic and private practice settings were enrolled. Patients with stage II/III LARC with distal location (cT3-4 ≤ 5 cm from anal verge, any N), with bulky disease (any cT4 or tumor within 3 mm of mesorectal fascia), at high risk for metastatic disease (cN2), and/or who were not candidates for sphincter-sparing surgery (SSS) were stratified based on clinical tumor and nodal stages. Trial accrual opened on August 1, 2018, and ended on May 31, 2019. This intent-to-treat analysis is based on data as of August 2020.

Interventions

Patients were randomized (1:1) to neoadjuvant FOLFOX for 4 months and then underwent chemoradiotherapy (capecitabine with 50.4 Gy) with or without intravenous pembrolizumab administered at a dosage of 200 mg every 3 weeks for up to 6 doses before surgery.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was the NAR score. Secondary end points included pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, SSS, disease-free survival, and overall survival. This report focuses on end points available after definitive surgery (NAR score, pCR, SSS, clinical complete response rate, margin involvement, and safety).

Results

A total of 185 patients (126 [68.1%] male; mean [SD] age, 55.7 [11.1] years) were randomized to the control arm (CA) (n = 95) or the pembrolizumab arm (PA) (n = 90). Of these patients, 137 were evaluable for NAR score (68 CA patients and 69 PA patients). The mean (SD) NAR score was 11.53 (12.43) for the PA patients (95% CI, 8.54-14.51) vs 14.08 (13.82) for the CA patients (95% CI, 10.74-17.43) (P = .26). The pCR rate was 31.9% in the PA vs 29.4% in the CA (P = .75). The clinical complete response rate was 13.9% in the PA vs 13.6% in the CA (P = .95). The percentage of patients who underwent SSS was 59.4% in the PA vs 71.0% in the CA (P = .15). Grade 3 to 4 adverse events were slightly increased in the PA (48.2%) vs the CA (37.3%) during chemoradiotherapy. Two deaths occurred during FOLFOX: sepsis (CA) and pneumonia (PA). No differences in radiotherapy fractions, FOLFOX, or capecitabine doses were found.

Conclusions and Relevance

Pembrolizumab added to chemoradiotherapy as part of total neoadjuvant therapy was suggested to be safe; however, the NAR score difference does not support further study.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02921256.

Abstract 532: Association of pCR and the 8-gene signature: NRG Oncology/NSABP B-41

Background: Lapatinib (L), a HER2 signaling, tyrosine kinase inhibitor, demonstrated numerically higher pCR in NSABP B-41 when added to paclitaxel (AC→P) and trastuzumab (T) following doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide (62% v 52.5%). We previously validated an 8-gene signature that predicted the degree of T benefit in NSABP B-31 and NCCTG9831. The purpose of this study is to determine the association of pCR with the 8- gene T-benefit groups, enabling the possibility of stratifying patients (pts) who do or do not receive benefit from L.

Methods: Normalized B-41 nCounter® Breast Cancer 360 gene expression data was used to define the three T-benefit groups: large-, moderate-, and no-. The 8-gene signature was modified to use only 7 genes because one of the 8 genes was not included in the nCounter code set. The ability of the 7-gene signature to predict T benefit was equivalent to the 8-gene signature when tested in B-31. Comparisons within each treatment arm were made with Fisher's exact test.

Results: The pCR rates were significantly different among the three groups in the AC→P+T arm: Large: 24/28 (86%); Moderate: 13/32 (41%); and No: 1/9 (11%); p&lt;0.001, but were not significantly different in the other two arms; a trend for significance was seen in the AC→P+T+L arm (Table 1). We also tested if L would improve pCR when added to AC→P+T in any of the 7-gene benefit groups compared to T. There was a non-significant, numerical increase in pCR in the no-benefit group in the AC→P+T+L arm (44%) v the AC→P+T arm (11%) (p=0.29).

Conclusions: The significant association of the modified 8-gene benefit groups with pCR in the AC→P+T arm suggests this signature could identify pts who may benefit from dual HER2-targeted neoadjuvant therapy. This could be tested in a meta-analysis including other neoadjuvant trials.

Support: Lombardi CCC; BCRF; GSK; P30CA051008; Genentech; NSABP

Table 1.pCR rates in trastuzumab benefit groups in NSABP B-41pCR rates in Breast and NodesTreatmentNo BenefitIntermediateLarge BenefitEntire Cohortp valueAC→P+T1/9 (11.1%)13/32(40.6%)24/28 (85.7%)38/69 (55.1%)&lt;0.001AC→P+L2/7 (28.6%)11/26 (42.3%)14/31 (45.2%)27/64 (42.2%)0.82AC→P+T+L4/9 (44.4%)11/25 (44.0%)20/27 (74.1%)35/61 (57.4%)0.051

Citation Format: Nan Song, Xiaoqing E. Tan, Ying Wang, Rim S. Kim, Hanna Bandos, Gong Tang, Eleftherios Mamounas, Charles E. Geyer, Priya Rastogi, Samuel A. Jacobs, Ashok Srinivasan, Peter C. Lucas, Soonmyung Paik, Norman Wolmark, Sandra M. Swain, Katherine L. Pogue-Geile. Association of pCR and the 8-gene signature: NRG Oncology/NSABP B-41 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 532.

Adjuvant Olaparib for Patients with BRCA1- or BRCA2-Mutated Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors target cancers with defects in homologous recombination repair by synthetic lethality. New therapies are needed to reduce recurrence in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutation-associated early breast cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a phase 3, double-blind, randomized trial involving patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative early breast cancer with BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants and high-risk clinicopathological factors who had received local treatment and neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) to 1 year of oral olaparib or placebo. The primary end point was invasive disease-free survival.

RESULTS

A total of 1836 patients underwent randomization. At a prespecified event-driven interim analysis with a median follow-up of 2.5 years, the 3-year invasive disease-free survival was 85.9% in the olaparib group and 77.1% in the placebo group (difference, 8.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.5 to 13.0; hazard ratio for invasive disease or death, 0.58; 99.5% CI, 0.41 to 0.82; P<0.001). The 3-year distant disease-free survival was 87.5% in the olaparib group and 80.4% in the placebo group (difference, 7.1 percentage points; 95% CI, 3.0 to 11.1; hazard ratio for distant disease or death, 0.57; 99.5% CI, 0.39 to 0.83; P<0.001). Olaparib was associated with fewer deaths than placebo (59 and 86, respectively) (hazard ratio, 0.68; 99% CI, 0.44 to 1.05; P = 0.02); however, the between-group difference was not significant at an interim-analysis boundary of a P value of less than 0.01. Safety data were consistent with known side effects of olaparib, with no excess serious adverse events or adverse events of special interest.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with high-risk, HER2-negative early breast cancer and germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants, adjuvant olaparib after completion of local treatment and neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with significantly longer survival free of invasive or distant disease than was placebo. Olaparib had limited effects on global patient-reported quality of life. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and AstraZeneca; OlympiA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02032823.).

MAF Amplification and Adjuvant Clodronate Outcomes in Early-Stage Breast Cancer in NSABP B-34 and Potential Impact on Clinical Practice

Background

The Adjuvant Zoledronic Acid (ZA) study in early breast cancer (AZURE) showed correlation between a nonamplified MAF gene in the primary tumor and benefit from adjuvant ZA. Adverse ZA outcomes occurred in MAF-amplified patients. NSABP B-34 is a validation study.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of MAF gene status in NSABP B-34 was performed. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to standard adjuvant systemic treatment plus 3 years oral clodronate (1600 mg/daily) or placebo. Tumors were tested for MAF gene amplification and analyzed for their relationship to clodronate for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in MAF nonamplified patients. All statistical tests were 2-sided .

Results

MAF status was assessed in 2533 available primary tumor samples from 3311 patients. Of these, 37 withdrew consent; in 77 samples, no tumor was found; 536 assays did not meet quality standards, leaving 1883 (77.8%) evaluable for MAF assay by fluorescence in situ hybridization (947 from placebo and 936 from clodronate arms). At 5 years, in MAF nonamplified patients receiving clodronate, DFS improved by 30% (hazard ratio = 0.70, 95% confidence interval = 0.51 to 0.94; P = .02). OS improved at 5 years (hazard ratio = 0.59, 95% confidence interval = 0.37 to 0.93; P = .02) remaining statistically significant for clodronate throughout study follow-up. Conversely, adjuvant clodronate in women with MAF-amplified tumors was not associated with benefit but rather possible harm in some subgroups. Association between MAF status and menopausal status was not seen.

Conclusions

Nonamplified MAF showed statistically significant benefits (DFS and OS) with oral clodronate, supporting validation of the AZURE study.

Breast Cancer Index (BCI) and prediction of benefit from extended aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy (tx) in HR+ breast cancer: NRG oncology/NSABP B-42

501

Background: The BCI HOXB13/IL17BR ratio (BCI-H/I) has been shown to predict endocrine tx (ET) and extended ET (EET) benefit. We examined the effect of BCI-H/I for EET benefit prediction in NSABP B-42, evaluating extended letrozole tx (ELT) in HR+ breast cancer patients (pts) who completed 5 yrs of ET. Methods: All pts with available primary tumor tissue were eligible. Primary endpoint was recurrence-free interval (RFI). Secondary endpoints were distant recurrence (DR), breast cancer-free interval (BCFI), and disease-free survival (DFS). Stratified Cox proportional hazards model was used. Due to a non-proportional effect of ELT on DR, time-dependent secondary analyses (≤4y, >4y) were performed. Likelihood ratio test evaluated treatment by BCI-H/I interaction. Results: In 2,179 pts analyzed (60% N0; 62% AI only; 80% HER2-), 45% were BCI-H/I-High and 55% BCI-H/I-Low. ELT showed an absolute 10y benefit of 1.6% for RFI (HR=0.77, 95% CI 0.57-1.05, p=0.10) (BCI-H/I-Low: 1.1% [HR=0.69, 0.43-1.11, p=0.13]; BCI-H/I-High: 2.4% [HR=0.83, 0.55-1.26, p=0.38]; interaction p=0.55). There was no statistically significant ELT by BCI-H/I interaction for BCFI (BCI-H/I-Low: HR=0.53, 0.36-0.78, p=0.001; BCI-H/I-High: HR=0.85, 0.60-1.21, p=0.36; interaction p=0.07) or for DFS (BCI-H/I-Low: HR=0.75, 0.58-0.95, p=0.017; BCI-H/I-High: HR=0.81, 0.64-1.04, p=0.09; interaction p=0.62). Before 4y, there was no statistically significant ELT benefit on DR in either BCI-H/I group. After 4y, BCI-H/I-High pts had statistically significant ELT benefit on DR (HR: 0.29, 0.12-0.69, p=0.003), while BCI-H/I-Low pts were less likely to benefit (HR: 0.68, 0.33-1.39, p=0.28) (interaction p=0.14). Conclusions: BCI-H/I prediction of ELT benefit on RFI was not confirmed. In time-dependent DR analyses, BCI-H/I-High pts had statistically significant benefit from ELT after 4y, while BCI-H/I-Low pts did not. Observed ELT benefit on BCFI in BCI-H/I-Low pts was primarily driven by second primary breast cancers. Additional follow-up is needed to further characterize BCI-H/I predictive ability in this study. Support: U10CA180868, -180822, U24CA196067; Novartis; Biotheranostics. Clinical trial information: NCT00382070. [Table: see text]

Examination of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) with multispectral immunofluorescence (m-IF): Association of markers with prognosis and bevacizumab (bev) benefit in NRG Oncology/NSABP C-08

3516

Background: The purpose of this study was to quantify different molecules of TIME including T cells, macrophages, and immune checkpoint proteins (ICPs), and determine their association with clinical outcomes and treatment benefit in pts enrolled in C-08, which tested the efficacy of adding bev to 5-fluoruracil+leucovorin+oxaliplatin. Our pre-specified, NCTN-CCSC approved primary objective hypothesized that pts with more CD8 cells would have a better prognosis and receive benefit from bev. Methods: Tissue microarrays were used to assess TIME of 1,509 C-08 pts using m-IF and the Vectra Pathology System. Three m-IF panels were used to quantitatively assess T cells (CD3, CD8, CD45RO, FOXP3), macrophages (CD68, CD163), and ICPs (PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA4, TIM3, LAG3, OX40) in stromal and tumor (panCK) regions. The primary objective was to determine the association between overall survival (OS) and high (top 3rd) v low CD8 expression in both stromal and tumor regions. All markers were tested for associations with OS and recurrence-free interval (RFI) and with bev prediction using Cox models and median cut points. Results: Based on our pre-specified analysis, pts with high CD8 cells had better OS, HR=0.66 (95%CI: 0.49-0.88), p=0.005 but pts with high CD8 cells did not receive bev benefit. All T cells and double stained CD8/PD-1 were associated with better RFI. CD3, CD8, CD68, PD-1, PD-L1, and LAG3 cells were associated with better OS. PD-1 and CD8/PD-1 were associated with RFI in pts with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) and proficient (p)MMR but TIM3, CD3/CD45RO and CD163 were only associated with RFI in dMMR. Association of CD8 cells with bev benefit (RFI) was seen in dMMR pts, HR 0.27 (95% CI: 0.1-0.73), p=.01 and OS, HR=0.27, (95% CI: 0.12-0.64), p=0.0028 but there was no significant interaction. Single staining CD8, PD-1, and double staining CD8/PD-1 cells were associated with bev benefit in dMMR pts but with bev harm in pMMR pts. However, pts with tumors having >1% of PD-1 and PD-L1 cells (n=197 including 76 dMMR, 100 pMMR, and 21 unknown), received significant bev benefit (int p=.0056). Conclusions: CD8 cells were associated with better OS but were not associated with bev benefit. All T cells and PD-1, PD-L1, and LAG3 cells, were associated with better prognosis in the entire cohort but when pts were stratified for MMR status differences in their association with prognosis and bev benefit emerged. PD-1, CD8, and CD8/PD-1 cells were associated with bev harm in pMMR but bev benefit in dMMR. A significant interaction for the association of high % PD-1 and PD-L1 with bev benefit regardless of MMR status may be a chance finding. However, VEGF has immunosuppressive effects and bev may block these effects in tumors with high PD-L1 and PD-1, regardless of MMR status. NCT: 00096278 PA DOH, U10CA-180868, -180822, -196067, Genentech, Sanofi; NSABP. Clinical trial information: 00096278.

Utility of the 70-gene MammaPrint assay for prediction of benefit from extended letrozole therapy (ELT) in the NRG Oncology/NSABP B-42 trial

502

Background: The 70-gene MammaPrint (MP) assay predicts risk of distant recurrence (DR) in hormone-receptor positive early-stage breast cancer and classifies cancers as Low Risk or High Risk. NSABP B-42 evaluated ELT in patients (pts) who had completed 5 yrs of adjuvant endocrine therapy (tx). The primary objective was to determine the utility of MP to identify pts enrolled in NSABP B-42 who are likely to benefit from ELT. Methods: A total of 1,866 pts from B-42 had available MP results. Primary endpoint is DR. Secondary endpoints are disease-free survival (DFS) and breast cancer-free interval (BCFI). For the primary analysis, pts were classified as High Risk (MP-H) (MP score ≤0.000) or Low Risk (MP-L) (MP score > 0.000). Exploratory analyses were performed for MP-L subcategories: MP Ultralow Risk (MP-UL) (MP score > 0.355) and MP-L but not MP-UL (MP-LNUL) (MP score > 0.000, ≤0.355). Likelihood ratio test based on stratified Cox proportional hazards (PH) model was used for treatment by risk group interaction. Stratified log-rank test was used to compare treatment groups. Hazard ratios and 95% CI were computed based on the stratified Cox PH model. Results: Among 1,866 pts, 706 (38%) were MP-H and 1,160 (62%) were MP-L. Of the MP-L, 252 (22%) were MP-UL. There were no significant differences in the distribution of patient and tumor characteristics between the MP group and the rest of the B-42 cohort, except for HER2 status. ELT effect was more pronounced in the MP cohort than in the overall B-42 population. For DR, there was statistically significant ELT benefit in MP-L (HR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.25-0.74, p = 0.002), but not MP-H (HR = 0.65, 0.34-1.24, p = 0.19) (interaction p = 0.38). For DFS, there was statistically significant ELT benefit in MP-L, but not MP-H (interaction p = 0.015). Similar findings were observed for BCFI (interaction p = 0.006). Within subcategories of MP-L, there was statistically significant ELT benefit in MP-LNUL, but not in MP-UL for all three endpoints, however the power in MP-UL was limited due to low number of pts (Table). Clinical trial information: 00382070. Conclusions: Statistically significant ELT benefit was observed for MP-L, but not MP-H. The treatment by risk group interaction was not statistically significant for DR, but it was for DFS and BCFI. The benefit appears to be stronger in MP-LNUL than in MP-UL. NCT: 00382070. Support: U10CA180868, -180822, U24CA196067; Novartis; Agendia.[Table: see text]