1
|
Wolff J, Smollich M, Wuelfing P, Mitchell J, Wuerstlein R, Harbeck N, Baumann F. App-Based Lifestyle Intervention (PINK! Coach) in Breast Cancer Patients-A Real-World-Data Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1020. [PMID: 38473378 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16051020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Overweight and a lack of physical activity not only increase the risk of recurrence in breast cancer patients but also negatively impact overall and long-term survival, as well as quality of life. The results presented here are the first real-world data from the DiGA PINK! Coach examining the physical activity and BMI of app users. Based on the literature, an approximate weight gain of 10% over 6 months and a decrease in physical activity can be expected. The purpose of this study is to retrospectively investigate the effects of the PINK! Coach in a real-world setting on patients' BMI and physical activity level during acute therapies. such as chemotherapy (CHT) and antihormone therapy (AHT). MATERIAL AND METHODS The PINK! Coach app accompanies breast cancer patients during and after acute therapy to bring about a sustainable lifestyle change. The patients are encouraged to establish a healthy diet, become physically active, and make informed decisions. In this study, real-world data from the app were analyzed over 6 months from baseline to T1 (after 12 weeks) and T2 (after 24 weeks). The patients were under acute therapy or in follow-up care receiving either CHT or AHT. RESULTS The analyzed data indicate that all patients were able to maintain a consistent BMI over 6 months independent of pre-defined subgroups such as AHT, CHT, or BMI subgroups. In the subgroup of patients undergoing AHT, overweight patients were even able to significantly reduce their BMI by 1-score-point over 6 months (p < 0.01). The subgroup of patients undergoing CHT also showed an significant overall reduction in BMI (p = 0.01). All patients were also able to significantly increase their daily step count as well as their physical activity minutes per day. After the first 12 weeks, 41.4% of patients experienced weight gain, 33.4% were able to maintain their weight, and 24.2% reduced their weight. CONCLUSION The presented data provides intriguing insights into the users of the PINK! Coach app and the impact of this usage in regards to BMI and physical activity. At the current time, there are only a few effective concepts for encouraging all breast cancer patients to engage in moderate physical activity and reduce body weight. Often, these concepts apply to selected patient groups. The data presented here include all age groups, tumor stages, and therapies, providing an initial insight into a comprehensive approach. Data over an even longer period would be one way to better contextualize the results in current research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josefine Wolff
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center, LMU University Hospital, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Martin Smollich
- Institute of Nutritional Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 23538 Luebeck, Germany
| | - Pia Wuelfing
- Department Clinical Research, PINK! gegen Brustkrebs GmbH, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jack Mitchell
- Department Clinical Research, PINK! gegen Brustkrebs GmbH, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center, LMU University Hospital, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center, LMU University Hospital, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Freerk Baumann
- Department I of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gennari A, Brain E, De Censi A, Nanni O, Wuerstlein R, Frassoldati A, Cortes J, Rossi V, Palleschi M, Alberini JL, Matteucci F, Piccardo A, Sacchetti G, Ilhan H, D'Avanzo F, Ruffilli B, Nardin S, Monti M, Puntoni M, Fontana V, Boni L, Harbeck N. Early prediction of endocrine responsiveness in ER+/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC): Pilot study with 18F-Fluoroestradiol (18F-FES) CT/PET. Ann Oncol 2024:S0923-7534(24)00057-7. [PMID: 38423389 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND 18F-FES PET/CT is considered an accurate diagnostic tool to determine whole-body endocrine responsiveness. In the ET-FES trial, we evaluated 18F-FES PET/CT as a predictive tool in ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS Eligible patients underwent a 18F-FES PET/CT at baseline. Patients with SUV≥2 received single agent ET until PD; patients with SUV<2 were randomized to single agent ET (Arm A) or chemotherapy (CT) (Arm B). Primary objective was to compare the activity of first line ET versus CT in patients with 18F-FES SUV <2. RESULTS Overall, 147 patients were enrolled; 117 presented with 18F-FES SUV≥2 and received ET; 30 pts with SUV<2 were randomized to ET or CT. After a median follow up of 62.4 months, 104 patients (73.2%) had disease progression and 53 died (37.3%). Median PFS was 12.4 months (95%CI 3.1-59.6) in patients with SUV <2 randomised to Arm A versus 23.0 months (95%CI 7.7-30.0) in Arm B, (HR = 0.71, 95%CI 0.3 - 1.7); median PFS was 18.0 months (95%CI 11.2-23.1) in patients with SUV≥2 treated with ET. Median OS was 28.2 months (95%CI 14.2-NE) in patients with SUV <2 randomized to ET (Arm A) versus 52.8 months (95%CI 16.2-NE) in Arm B (CT). Median OS was not reached in patients with SUV≥2. 60-month OS rate was 41.6% (95%CI 10.4-71.1%) in Arm A, 42.0% (95%CI 14.0-68.2%) in Arm B and 59.6% (95%CI 48.6-69.0%) in patients with SUV≥2. In patients with SUV≥2, 60-months OS rate was 72.6% if treated with aromatase inhibitors versus 40.6% in case of fulvestrant or tamoxifen (p<0.005). CONCLUSIONS The ET-FES trial demonstrated that ER+/HER2- MBC patients are a heterogeneous population, with different levels of endocrine responsiveness based on 18F-FES CT/PET SUV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Gennari
- Department of Traslational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy;; Division of Medical Oncology, Maggiore University Hospital, Novara, Italy.
| | - E Brain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie - Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - A De Censi
- Medical Oncology, E.O. "Ospedali Galliera, Genova, Italy
| | - O Nanni
- Biostatistics and Clinical Trials Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - R Wuerstlein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - A Frassoldati
- Clinical Oncology, S. Anna University Hospital, Ferrara, Italy
| | - J Cortes
- International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Pangaea Oncology, Quironsalud Group, Barcelona, Spain; Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - V Rossi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Maggiore University Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - M Palleschi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - J L Alberini
- Nuclear Medicine Department Centre Georges-Francois Leclerc, Dijon Cedex, France
| | - F Matteucci
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo studio dei tumori (IRST)- Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy
| | - A Piccardo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, E.O. "Ospedali Galliera, Genova, Italy
| | - G Sacchetti
- Division of Nuclear Medicine Unit, Maggiore University Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - H Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - F D'Avanzo
- Division of Medical Oncology, Maggiore University Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - B Ruffilli
- Department of Traslational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - S Nardin
- Medical Oncology Unit 1, IRCCS - Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - M Monti
- Biostatistics and Clinical Trials Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - M Puntoni
- Clinical and Epidemiological Research Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - V Fontana
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, IRCSS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa 20900, Italy
| | - L Boni
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, IRCSS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa 20900, Italy
| | - N Harbeck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kraus FBT, Sultova E, Heinrich K, Jung A, Westphalen CB, Tauber CV, Kumbrink J, Rudelius M, Klauschen F, Greif PA, König A, Chelariu-Raicu A, Czogalla B, Burges A, Mahner S, Wuerstlein R, Trillsch F. Genetics and beyond: Precision Medicine Real-World Data for Patients with Cervical, Vaginal or Vulvar Cancer in a Tertiary Cancer Center. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:2345. [PMID: 38397025 PMCID: PMC10888648 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25042345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2024] [Revised: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Advances in molecular tumor diagnostics have transformed cancer care. However, it remains unclear whether precision oncology has the same impact and transformative nature across all malignancies. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-related gynecologic malignancies who underwent comprehensive molecular profiling and subsequent discussion at the interdisciplinary Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) of the University Hospital, LMU Munich, between 11/2017 and 06/2022. We identified a total cohort of 31 patients diagnosed with cervical (CC), vaginal or vulvar cancer. Twenty-two patients (fraction: 0.71) harbored at least one mutation. Fifteen patients (0.48) had an actionable mutation and fourteen (0.45) received a recommendation for a targeted treatment within the MTB. One CC patient received a biomarker-guided treatment recommended by the MTB and achieved stable disease on the mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus for eight months. Factors leading to non-adherence to MTB recommendations in other patient cases included informed patient refusal, rapid deterioration, stable disease, or use of alternative targeted but biomarker-agnostic treatments such as antibody-drug conjugates or checkpoint inhibitors. Despite a remarkable rate of actionable mutations in HPV-related gynecologic malignancies at our institution, immediate implementation of biomarker-guided targeted treatment recommendations remained low, and access to targeted treatment options after MTB discussion remained a major challenge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian B. T. Kraus
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Elena Sultova
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Kathrin Heinrich
- Department of Medicine III, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas Jung
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - C. Benedikt Westphalen
- Department of Medicine III, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Christina V. Tauber
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Jörg Kumbrink
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Martina Rudelius
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Frederick Klauschen
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Philipp A. Greif
- Department of Medicine III, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69121 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander König
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Anca Chelariu-Raicu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Bastian Czogalla
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Burges
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Sven Mahner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Fabian Trillsch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Harbeck N, Wrobel D, Zaiss M, Terhaag J, Guth D, Distelrath A, Zahn MO, Wuerstlein R, Lorenz A, Bartsch R, Breitenstein U, Schwitter M, Balic M, Jackisch C, Müller V, Rinnerthaler G, Schmidt M, Zaman K, Schinköthe T, Resch A, Valenti R, Lüftner D. Neratinib as Extended Adjuvant Treatment of HER2-Positive/HR-Positive Early Breast Cancer Patients in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland: Interim Results of the Prospective, Observational ELEANOR Study. Breast Care (Basel) 2024; 19:1-9. [PMID: 38384488 PMCID: PMC10878708 DOI: 10.1159/000533657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Prognosis of patients diagnosed with HER2+ early breast cancer (eBC) has substantially improved, but distant recurrences impacting quality of life and survival still occur. One treatment option for extended adjuvant treatment of patients with HER2+/HR+ eBC is neratinib, available in Europe for patients who completed adjuvant trastuzumab-based therapy within 1 year. The ELEANOR study is investigating the real-world use of neratinib in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Results from an interim analysis of the first 200 patients observed for ≥3 months are reported. Methods The primary objective of this prospective, multicenter, observational study is to assess patient adherence to neratinib (defined as the percentage of patients taking neratinib on ≥75% prescribed days). Secondary objectives are patient characteristics and treatment outcomes. Results At cut-off (May 2, 2022), a total of 202 patients had been observed for ≥3 months, with neratinib treatment documented for 187 patients (median age: 53.0 years; 67.9% at increased risk of disease recurrence). In total, 151 (80.7%) patients had received prior neoadjuvant treatment; of these, 82 (54.3%) patients achieved a pathologically complete response. Neratinib was initiated at a median 3.6 months after trastuzumab-based treatment, with 36.4% starting at a dose <240 mg/day. Treatment is ongoing for 46.0% of patients, with median treatment duration of 11.2 (interquartile range 0.9-12.0) months. Diarrhea was the most common adverse event (78.6% any grade, 20.3% grade ≥3); pharmacologic prophylaxis was used in 85.6% of patients. Conclusions The pattern of anti-HER2 pretreatment observed reflected the current treatment for HER2+/HR+ eBC in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. These interim results suggest that neratinib as an extended adjuvant is a feasible option after various anti-HER2 pretreatments and that its tolerability can be managed and improved with proactive diarrhea management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Harbeck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CCC Munich, Breast Center, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Denise Wrobel
- Sozialstiftung Bamberg Klinikum am Bruderwald, Bamberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Zaiss
- Praxis fuer Interdisziplinaere Onkologie, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Dagmar Guth
- Gyneco-Oncological Practice Dr. Guth, Plauen, Germany
| | | | | | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CCC Munich, Breast Center, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas Lorenz
- Gyneco-Oncological Practice Dr. Lorenz, Hildburghausen, Germany
| | - Rupert Bartsch
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | - Marija Balic
- Divison of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Gabriel Rinnerthaler
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Khalil Zaman
- Breast Center, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Anna Resch
- Pierre Fabre Pharma GmbH, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Diana Lüftner
- Immanuel Hospital Märkische Schweiz & Medical University of Brandenburg Theodor-Fontane, Brandenburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ziegler C, Sotlar K, Hofmann DM, Kolben T, Harbeck N, Wuerstlein R. Use of the Gene Expression Test Prosigna ® in Premenopausal Patients with HR+, HER2- Early Breast Cancer: Correlation of the Results with the Proliferation Marker Ki-67. Breast Care (Basel) 2024; 19:34-42. [PMID: 38384489 PMCID: PMC10878706 DOI: 10.1159/000534634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction In hormone receptor-positive (ER+/PR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) early-stage breast cancer (EBC), gene expression tests such as the Prosigna are increasingly used since classic clinicopathological parameters and the proliferation factor Ki-67 often do not allow a definite therapy decision regarding an adjuvant chemotherapy. While the Prosigna test has been validated for postmenopausal patients, few data are available regarding its use in premenopausal patients. The present study compared the Prosigna test with the Ki-67 index in premenopausal patients. Materials and Methods Premenopausal patients with HR+ HER2-, pN0-1, G1-2 EBC were retrospectively enrolled (n = 55). The Prosigna assay was performed in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples of surgical resection specimens. Ki-67 was reassessed in original diagnostic core needle biopsy specimens and defined as low, intermediate, or high with the threshold of <10%, 10-24%, ≥25%. Results According to Ki-67, patients were in the low (LR)-, intermediate (IR)-, and high-risk (HR) groups in 40%, 36%, and 24% of the cases. The Prosigna gene signature assay assessed the risk of recurrence as LR for 45% of the patients, IR for 35%, and HR for 20%. The most frequent intrinsic subtypes were luminal A in 73% and luminal B in 24% of the patients. A moderate correlation was found between Prosigna and Ki-67 scores with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.51. In the overall cohort, 47% of the Ki-67-based therapy decision would correspond to those based on the Prosigna score. After exclusion of IR patients, matching of low/low or high/high results was observed in 57% of the cases. Conclusion According to the present study, there is only limited concordance regarding the risk group stratification between Ki-67 and Prosigna-based risk assessment. The relevance and frequency of premenopausal breast cancer emphasizes the need for further evaluation of gene expression analyses in this setting and the correlation with classic clinicopathological parameters regarding therapy decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cordula Ziegler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, BreastCenter and CCC Munich LMU, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Karl Sotlar
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
- Institute of Pathology, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel Maria Hofmann
- Institute of Pathology, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany
- University Clinics Munich (LMU), Division of Hand, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Kolben
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, BreastCenter and CCC Munich LMU, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, BreastCenter and CCC Munich LMU, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, BreastCenter and CCC Munich LMU, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wuerstlein R, Cardoso MJ, Ribeiro JM, Haidinger R, Müller V, Lambertini M, Schumacher-Wulf E. Interview ABC7: Bridging the Gap. Breast Care (Basel) 2024; 19:77-83. [PMID: 38384486 PMCID: PMC10878703 DOI: 10.1159/000535632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Wuerstlein
- Breast Center and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Joana M. Ribeiro
- Gustave Roussy, Département de médecine oncologique, Villejuif, France
| | - Renate Haidinger
- Brustkrebs Deutschland e.V. (German Breast Cancer Association), Hohenbrunn, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinical di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Harbeck N, Kates R, Schinköthe T, Schumacher J, Wuerstlein R, Degenhardt T, Lüftner D, Räth P, Hoffmann O, Lorenz R, Decker T, Reinisch M, Göhler T, Staib P, Gluz O, Fasching PA, Schmidt M. Favorable impact of therapy management by an interactive eHealth system on severe adverse events in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer treated by palbociclib and endocrine therapy. Cancer Treat Rev 2023; 121:102631. [PMID: 37862832 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oral cancer medications offer advantages but also pose challenges for therapy management and adherence. An eHealth-based platform such as CANKADO can help to support therapy management by probing the patient's quality of life (QoL) continuously throughout the course of treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS AGO-B WSG PreCycle (NCT03220178) is a multicenter, randomized phase IV intergroup trial evaluating the impact of eHealth-based Patient-Reported Outcome (ePRO) assessment on QoL in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR + )/HER2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer treated with palbociclib and endocrine therapy. Patients were randomized (2:1) to CANKADO-active arm (supported by CANKADO PRO-React) or CANKADO-inform arm (drug intake documentation only) This exploratory analysis reports the impact of CANKADO PRO-React on safety. Time to first serious adverse event (SAE) was estimated taking competing risks into account. RESULTS While distributions of adverse events (AEs) were similar by arm overall, patients in the CANKADO-active arm had a favorable hazard ratio of 0.67 (95%CI 0.46-0.97; p = 0.04) for time to first SAE and were significantly less likely overall to suffer an SAE than patients in the inform arm. At 24 months, 22.9% [17.9%-27.8%] of patients in CANKADO-active had suffered an SAE vs. 30.3% [22.6%-38.0%] in CANKADO-inform. AE-related dose reductions affected approximately 20% of patients (CANKADO-active: 18.2%, CANKADO-inform: 21.1%). CONCLUSION Exploratory safety analysis of PreCycle demonstrates for the first time in a randomized prospective trial that interactive autonomous eHealth-based support has a substantial favorable impact on the risk of SAEs and mitigates their severity for patients with advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer on oral tumor therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany; West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.
| | - Ronald Kates
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Timo Schinköthe
- CANKADO GmbH, Ottobrunn, Germany; Research Center Smart Digital Health, University of the Bundeswehr Munich, Neubiberg, Germany
| | | | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany; West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Tom Degenhardt
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany; Hausarztpraxis Wolfratshausen, Wolfratshausen, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Immanuel Hospital Märkische, Schweiz Buckow, Germany; Immanuel Hospital Rüdersdorf and Medical University of Brandenburg Theodor Fontane, Germany
| | | | | | - Ralf Lorenz
- Studien GbR Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Thomas Decker
- Onkologie Ravensburg, Hematology / Oncology, Ravensburg, Germany
| | - Mattea Reinisch
- Breast Center, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Peter Staib
- St.-Antonius Hospital gGmbH, Clinic for Hematology and Oncology, Eschweiler, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- University Hospital Erlangen, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Forster M, Wuerstlein R, Koenig A, Stefan A, Wiegershausen E, Batz F, Trillsch F, Mahner S, Harbeck N, Chelariu-Raicu A. Health-related quality of life and patient-centred outcomes with COVID-19 vaccination in patients with breast cancer and gynaecological malignancies. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1217805. [PMID: 37901314 PMCID: PMC10602875 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1217805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Safety and tolerability of COVID-19 vaccines were demonstrated by several clinical trials which led to the first FDA/EMA approvals in 2021. Because of mass immunizations, most social restrictions were waived with effects on quality of life. Therefore, our a-priori hypothesis was that COVID-19 vaccination impacted the health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) in patients with breast and gynecological cancer. Methods From March 15th until August 11th, 2022, fully vaccinated patients with breast and gynecological cancer treated in the oncological outpatient clinics of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany filled out a vaccine related QoL survey. Patients were asked about demographics (age, comorbidities), clinical parameters related to previous COVID-19 infections, and HR-QoL related parameters (living situation, responsibilities in everyday life). Subsequently, a questionnaire with 12 items was designed using a 5-point Likert scale (0 - strongly disagree/4 - strongly agree), covering the aspects health and therapy, social environment, participation in everyday life and overall assessment. Results By August 11th, 2022, 108 out of 114 (94.7%) patients had received at least three doses of COVID-19 vaccine and six patients at least two doses. More than half of the surveyed patients were >55y (52.6%; mean: 55.1y, range 29-86y). Patients with breast cancer (n= 83) had early (59.0%) or metastatic cancer (41.0%); gynecological cancers (n=31) also included metastatic (54.8%) and non-metastatic cancer (45.2%). 83.3% of the patients stated that COVID-19 vaccination had a positive impact on their HR-QoL. Furthermore, 29 patients (25.4%) had undergone a COVID-19 infection. These patients reported self-limiting symptoms for a median duration of 5.9 days and no hospital admissions were registered. Conclusions Our study demonstrates that vaccination against COVID-19 was positively associated with HR-QoL in patients with breast and gynecological cancer. Furthermore, vaccinated patients who underwent COVID-19 disease experienced only self-limiting symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Anca Chelariu-Raicu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center, Gynecologic Oncology Center and CCC Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wolff J, Wuelfing P, Koenig A, Ehrl B, Damsch J, Smollich M, Baumann FT, Harbeck N, Wuerstlein R. App-Based Lifestyle Coaching (PINK!) Accompanying Breast Cancer Patients and Survivors to Reduce Psychological Distress and Fatigue and Improve Physical Activity: A Feasibility Pilot Study. Breast Care (Basel) 2023; 18:354-365. [PMID: 37901047 PMCID: PMC10601684 DOI: 10.1159/000531495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction This pilot study aimed to investigate the effects of using an app-based certified medical product named PINK! on breast cancer patients and survivors. The objectives were to measure psychological distress, physical activity, and therapy-related fatigue of patients using PINK! to identify trends and develop a study design for a subsequent multicentric proof of efficacy RCT. Materials and Methods PINK! offers individualized, evidence-based therapy and side-effect management, mindfulness-based stress reduction, nutritional and psychological education, physical activity tracking, and motivational exercises to implement lifestyle changes sustainably in daily routine. A prospective, intraindividual RCT was performed with n = 60 patients in 2021 at Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich. Patients with BC were included independent of the stage of diseases. The intervention group got access to PINK! over 12 weeks. Control group served as a waiting-list comparison to "standard of care." Results Primary efficacy variable analysis revealed a relative average decrease of 32.9% in psychological distress, which corresponds to a statistically significant reduction (p < 0.001) within 12 weeks compared to the control group. Linear regressions within usage groups showed a correlation of high app usage and a reduction of psychological distress. Fatigue data presented a statistically significant antifatigue efficacy (p < 0.001) and physical activity increased by 63.9%. Conclusion App-based supportive care offers a promising, low-threshold, and cost-efficient opportunity to improve psychological well-being, quality of life, fatigue, and physical activity. More research is needed to implement eHealth solutions in clinical cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josefine Wolff
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Pia Wuelfing
- PINK! gegen Brustkrebs GmbH, Department Clinical Research, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Koenig
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Brigitte Ehrl
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Jana Damsch
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Martin Smollich
- Institute of Nutritional Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | | | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Debes AM, Koenig A, Strobach D, Schinkoethe T, Forster M, Harbeck N, Wuerstlein R. Biologically Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use in Breast Cancer Patients and Possible Drug-Drug Interactions. Breast Care (Basel) 2023; 18:327-335. [PMID: 37901050 PMCID: PMC10601661 DOI: 10.1159/000531346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Biologically based complementary and alternative medicine (BB-CAM) is gaining importance. Cancer patients in particular are at risk of interactions between the prescribed medications (intravenous or oral anticancer therapy, concomitant medication, medication for pre-existing illnesses) and BB-CAM. This investigation aims to identify potentially clinically relevant interactions between both BB-CAM and conventional medicine and two BB-CAM products in breast cancer patients (n = 47). Methods From March 2020 to January 2021, consecutive breast cancer patients (n = 47) completed a questionnaire about their medication and BB-CAM intake at the beginning of a new intravenous or oral tumor therapy (time point 1) and again after 10 to 12 weeks (time point 2) at the LMU Breast Center in Munich. The collective was divided into two subgroups based on the time after initial diagnosis; a cutoff of 6 months was used. The survey was available through an eHealth application called CANKADO as electronic patient-reported outcome only. Lexicomp® and AiD Klinik® databases were used for evaluating potentially clinically relevant interactions. As part of routine care, the collected data were evaluated and cross-checked in interdisciplinary cooperation with the University Hospital Pharmacy LMU. Results 43 of the 47 included breast cancer patients (91%) used BB-CAM at some point during their treatment period. We found a significant increase from time point 1 (n = 27) to time point 2 (n = 40) (p = 0.004). Moreover, in the subgroup of newly diagnosed patients, the number significant rose from 17 at time point 1 to 28 at time point 2 (p = 0.007). Overall, we found potentially clinically relevant interactions in 30 of 43 patients (70%). Sixty interactions were detected at both times of investigations. Twenty-three different kinds of BB-CAM-to-BB-CAM (time point 1 [n = 12], time point 2 [n = 11]) or conventional medicine-to-BB-CAM interactions (time point 1 [n = 15], time point 2 [n = 22]) were discovered. Importantly, there was not a single interaction between BB-CAM and an anticancer drug. Conclusion Breast cancer patients frequently use BB-CAM. Interactions were detected at both time points of investigation (time point 1 [n = 27], time point 2 [n = 33]). Interactions were particularly evident between BB-CAM substances as well as between BB-CAM and the patients' medication for pre-existing illnesses. Although no interaction between BB-CAM and an anticancer therapy was found, the use of BB-CAM should be evaluated at the beginning and regularly during therapy in view of the substantial number of interactions detected and the large number of upcoming targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Marie Debes
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Koenig
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Dorothea Strobach
- Hospital Pharmacy and Doctoral Program Clinical Pharmacy, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Timo Schinkoethe
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- CANKADO Service GmbH, Cologne, Germany
| | - Marie Forster
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Schindler F, Schinkoethe T, Mahner S, Kolben T, Wuerstlein R, Culmsee C, Harbeck N, Eggersmann TK. Clinical relevance of potential self-medication drug interactions in antineoplastic and immune-modulating therapy among online pharmacy customers. Ther Adv Drug Saf 2023; 14:20420986231188845. [PMID: 37636837 PMCID: PMC10460262 DOI: 10.1177/20420986231188845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Modern oral antineoplastic and immune-modulating drugs offer an array of therapeutic advantages, and yet pose challenges in daily use for patients, physicians and pharmacists. In contrast to intravenous administration, these drugs are not subject to direct medical control. Recently, we have seen a huge rise in sales of non-prescription over-the-counter (OTC) medicines via the internet without any advice from a healthcare professional. Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate whether the risk of known potential drug-drug interactions between modern oral antineoplastic and immune-modulating drugs and OTC drugs differs between sales in traditional community pharmacies versus online pharmacies. Design Real-life sales data from community and online pharmacies were used as basis for the analysis. Methods We determined the most frequently purchased antineoplastic and immune-modulating drug-substances in 14 local community pharmacies within the Munich area, Germany and identified the OTC substance groups that could potentially cause interactions with oncological therapies. Using sales data from 11 local community pharmacies and three online pharmacies, we investigated whether OTC purchases differed between the two sales channels. Results We identified 10 relevant OTC substance classes and detected significant variations in patients' preferred sales channels between the drug classes. Certain OTC drugs, which seem to be bought more often over the internet, pose risks during antineoplastic and immune-modulating therapy. Conclusion Patients should therefore be proactively made aware of the corresponding risks in order not to jeopardize the activity of the antineoplastic and immune-modulating drugs and thus the success of their therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Schindler
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Timo Schinkoethe
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- CANKADO, Kirchheim, Germany
| | - Sven Mahner
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Kolben
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Carsten Culmsee
- Institute for Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Biochemical-Pharmacological Center Marburg, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistrasse 15, Munich 80333, Germany
| | - Tanja K. Eggersmann
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- Department of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Park-Simon TW, Müller V, Jackisch C, Albert US, Banys-Paluchowski M, Bauerfeind I, Blohmer JU, Budach W, Dall P, Ditsch N, Fallenberg EM, Fasching PA, Fehm T, Friedrich M, Gerber B, Gluz O, Harbeck N, Hartkopf AD, Heil J, Huober J, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Kreipe HH, Krug D, Kühn T, Kümmel S, Loibl S, Lüftner D, Lux MP, Maass N, Mundhenke C, Reimer T, Rhiem K, Rody A, Schmidt M, Schneeweiss A, Schütz F, Sinn HP, Solbach C, Solomayer EF, Stickeler E, Thomssen C, Untch M, Witzel I, Wöckel A, Wuerstlein R, Janni W, Thill M. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Update 2023. Breast Care (Basel) 2023; 18:289-305. [PMID: 37900552 PMCID: PMC10601667 DOI: 10.1159/000531578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Each year the interdisciplinary Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO), German Gynecological Oncology Group Breast Committee on Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer provides updated state-of-the-art recommendations for early and metastatic breast cancer. Summary The updated evidence-based treatment recommendation for early and metastatic breast cancer has been released in March 2023. Key Messages This paper concisely captures the updated recommendations for early breast cancer chapter by chapter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tjoung-Won Park-Simon
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Ute-Susann Albert
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Kiel, Germany
| | - Ingo Bauerfeind
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Landshut gemeinnützige GmbH, Landshut, Germany
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Brustzentrum des Universitätsklinikums der Charite, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Peter Dall
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Eva Maria Fallenberg
- Institut für diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum der Technischen Universität München, Rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Tanja Fehm
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Michael Friedrich
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Krefeld GmbH, Krefeld, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- Brustzentrum, Evang. Krankenhaus Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Joerg Heil
- Brustzentrum Heidelberg, Klinik St. Elisabeth und Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Sektion Senologie, Universitäts-Klinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- Brustzentrum, Kantonspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Phaon GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Hans H. Kreipe
- Institut für Pathologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - Sherko Kümmel
- Klinik für Senologie, Evangelische Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Immanuel Klinik Märkische Schweiz (Buckow) & Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf/Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane (Rüdersdorf), Rüdersdorf, Germany
| | - Michael Patrick Lux
- Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn und St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus GmbH, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Nicolai Maass
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | | | - Toralf Reimer
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Centrum für Integrierte Onkologie (CIO), Universitätsklinikum Köln, Cologne, Germany
| | - Achim Rody
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Kiel, Germany
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Geburtshilfe und Frauengesundheit der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen, Universitätsklinikum und Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - Hans Peter Sinn
- Sektion Gynäkopathologie, Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Solbach
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Erich-Franz Solomayer
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Michael Untch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gluz O, Kuemmel S, Nitz U, Braun M, Lüdtke-Heckenkamp K, von Schumann R, Darsow M, Forstbauer H, Potenberg J, Uleer C, Grischke EM, Aktas B, Schumacher C, Zu Eulenburg C, Kates R, Jóźwiak K, Graeser M, Wuerstlein R, Baehner R, Christgen M, Kreipe HH, Harbeck N. Nab-paclitaxel weekly versus dose-dense solvent-based paclitaxel followed by dose-dense epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide in high-risk HR+/HER2- early breast cancer: results from the neoadjuvant part of the WSG-ADAPT-HR+/HER2- trial. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:531-542. [PMID: 37062416 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Revised: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In high-risk hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) early breast cancer (EBC), nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel showed promising efficacy versus solvent-based (sb)-paclitaxel in neoadjuvant trials; however, optimal patient and therapy selection remains a topic of ongoing research. Here, we investigate the potential of Oncotype DX® recurrence score (RS) and endocrine therapy (ET) response (low post-endocrine Ki67) for therapy selection. PATIENTS AND METHODS Within the WSG-ADAPT trial (NCT01779206), high-risk HR+/HER2- EBC patients were randomized to (neo)adjuvant 4× sb-paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 q2w or 8× nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 q1w, followed by 4× epirubicin + cyclophosphamide (90 mg + 600 mg) q2w; inclusion criteria: (i) cN0-1, RS 12-25, and post-ET Ki67 >10%; (ii) cN0-1 with RS >25. Patients with cN2-3 or (G3, baseline Ki67 ≥40%, and tumor size >1 cm) were allowed to be included without RS and/or ET response testing. Associations of key factors with pathological complete response (pCR) (primary) and survival (secondary) endpoints were analyzed using statistical mediation and moderation models. RESULTS Eight hundred and sixty-four patients received neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel (n= 437) or sb-paclitaxel (n = 427); nab-paclitaxel was superior for pCR (20.8% versus 12.9%, P = 0.002). pCR was higher for RS >25 versus RS ≤25 (16.0% versus 8.4%, P = 0.021) and for ET non-response versus ET response (15.1% versus 6.0%, P = 0.027); no factors were predictive for the relative efficacy of nab-paclitaxel versus sb-paclitaxel. Patients with pCR had longer distant disease-free survival [dDFS; hazard ratio 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20-0.91, P = 0.024]. Despite favorable prognostic association of RS >25 versus RS ≤25 with pCR (odds ratio 3.11, 95% CI 1.71-5.63, P ≤ 0.001), higher RS was unfavorably associated with dDFS (hazard ratio 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05, P = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS In high-risk HR+/HER2- EBC, neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel q1w appears superior to sb-paclitaxel q2w regarding pCR. Combining RS and ET response assessment appears to select patients with highest pCR rates. The disadvantage of higher RS for dDFS is reduced in patients with pCR. These are the first results from a large neoadjuvant randomized trial supporting the use of RS to help select patients for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk HR+/HER2- EBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Gluz
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach; Breast Center Niederrhein, Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Moenchengladbach; University Clinics Cologne, Cologne.
| | - S Kuemmel
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach; Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen; Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin
| | - U Nitz
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach; Breast Center Niederrhein, Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Moenchengladbach
| | - M Braun
- Breast Center, Rotkreuz Clinics Munich, Munich
| | - K Lüdtke-Heckenkamp
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Niels Stensen-Kliniken, Georgsmarienhütte
| | - R von Schumann
- Breast Center Niederrhein, Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Moenchengladbach
| | - M Darsow
- Breast Center, Luisenhospital, Duesseldorf; Practice for Senologic Oncology, Duesseldorf
| | | | | | - C Uleer
- Frauenaerzte am Bahnhofsplatz, Practice of Gynecology and Oncology, Hildesheim
| | - E M Grischke
- Women's Clinic, University Clinics Tuebingen, Tuebingen
| | - B Aktas
- Women's Clinic, University Clinics Essen, Essen; University Clinics Leipzig, Women's Clinic, Leipzig
| | - C Schumacher
- Breast Center, St. Elisabeth Hospital Cologne, Cologne
| | - C Zu Eulenburg
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach; Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg
| | - R Kates
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach
| | - K Jóźwiak
- Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin
| | - M Graeser
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach; Breast Center Niederrhein, Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Moenchengladbach; Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg
| | - R Wuerstlein
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach; Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | | | - M Christgen
- Institute of Pathology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - H H Kreipe
- Institute of Pathology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - N Harbeck
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach; Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Degenhardt T, Fasching PA, Lüftner D, Müller V, Thomssen C, Schem C, Witzel I, Decker T, Tesch H, Kümmel S, Uleer C, Wuerstlein R, Hoffmann O, Warm M, Marschner N, Schinköthe T, Kates RE, Schumacher J, Otremba B, Zaiss M, Harbeck N, Schmidt M. PRECYCLE: multicenter, randomized phase IV intergroup trial to evaluate the impact of eHealth-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment on quality of life in patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer treated with palbociclib and an aromatase inhibitor or palbociclib and fulvestrant. Trials 2023; 24:338. [PMID: 37198674 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07306-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Efficacy and quality of life (QoL) are key criteria for therapy selection in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In hormone receptor positive (HR +) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2 -) MBC, addition of targeted oral agents such as everolimus or a cycline-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK 4/6) inhibitor (e.g., palbociclib, ribociclib, abemaciclib) to endocrine therapy substantially prolongs progression-free survival and in the case of a CDK 4/6i also overall survival. However, the prerequisite is adherence to therapy over the entire course of treatment. However, particularly with new oral drugs, adherence presents a challenge to disease management. In this context, factors influencing adherence include maintaining patients' satisfaction and early detection/management of side effects. New strategies for continuous support of oncological patients are needed. An eHealth-based platform can help to support therapy management and physician-patient interaction. METHODS PreCycle is a multicenter, randomized, phase IV trial in HR + HER2 - MBC. All patients (n = 960) receive the CDK 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib either in first (62.5%) or later line (37.5%) together with endocrine therapy (AI, fulvestrant) according to national guidelines. PreCycle evaluates and compares the time to deterioration (TTD) of QoL in patients supported by eHealth systems with substantially different functionality: CANKADO active vs. inform. CANKADO active is the fully functional CANKADO-based eHealth treatment support system. CANKADO inform is a CANKADO-based eHealth service with a personal login, documentation of daily drug intake, but no further functions. To evaluate QoL, the FACT-B questionnaire is completed at every visit. As little is known about relationships between behavior (e.g., adherence), genetic background, and drug efficacy, the trial includes both patient-reported outcome and biomarker screening for discovery of forecast models for adherence, symptoms, QoL, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). DISCUSSION The primary objective of PreCycle is to test the hypothesis of superiority for time to deterioration (TTD) in terms of DQoL = "Deterioration of quality of life" (FACT-G scale) in patients supported by an eHealth therapy management system (CANKADO active) versus in patients merely receiving eHealth-based information (CANKADO inform). EudraCT Number: 2016-004191-22.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Degenhardt
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- Hausarztpraxis Wolfratshausen, Wolfratshausen, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Immanuel Hospital Märkische Schweiz, Buckow, Germany
- Immanuel Hospital Rüdersdorf and Medical University of Brandenburg Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Clinic and Polyclinic for Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Gynecology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle-Saale, Germany
| | | | - Isabell Witzel
- Clinic and Polyclinic for Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Decker
- Hematology/Oncology, Onkologie Ravensburg, Ravensburg, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Hämatologisch-Onkologische Gemeinschaftspraxis, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | | | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Mathias Warm
- Breast Center, Academic Hospital Cologne-Holweide, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Timo Schinköthe
- CANKADO Service GmbH, Kirchheim, Germany
- Research Center Smart Digital Health, University of the Bundeswehr, Neubiberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Matthias Zaiss
- Praxis Interdisziplinäre Onkologie U. Hämatologie, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gluz O, Nitz UA, Christgen M, Kuemmel S, Holtschmidt J, Schumacher J, Hartkopf A, Potenberg J, Lüedtke-Heckenkamp K, Just M, Schem C, von Schumann R, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Eulenburg CZ, Schinköthe T, Graeser M, Wuerstlein R, Kates RE, Kreipe HH, Harbeck N. Efficacy of Endocrine Therapy Plus Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab vs De-escalated Chemotherapy in Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive/ERBB2-Positive Early Breast Cancer: The Neoadjuvant WSG-TP-II Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2023:2804892. [PMID: 37166817 PMCID: PMC10176180 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.0646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
Importance Combination of chemotherapy with (dual) ERBB2 blockade is considered standard in hormone receptor (HR)-positive/ERBB2-positive early breast cancer (EBC). Despite some promising data on endocrine therapy (ET) combination with dual ERBB2 blockade in HR-positive/ERBB2-positive BC, to our knowledge, no prospective comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs ET plus ERBB2 blockade in particular with focus on molecular markers has yet been performed. Objective To determine whether neoadjuvant de-escalated chemotherapy is superior to endocrine therapy, both in combination with pertuzumab and trastuzumab, in a highly heterogeneous HR-positive/ERBB2-positive EBC. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective, multicenter, neoadjuvant randomized clinical trial allocated 207 patients with centrally confirmed estrogen receptor-positive and/or progesterone receptor-positive (>1%) HR-positive/ERBB2-positive EBC to 12 weeks of standard ET (n = 100) vs paclitaxel (n = 107) plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab. A total of 186 patients were required to detect a statistically significant difference in pathological complete response (pCR) (assumptions: 19% absolute difference in pCR; power, ≥80%; 1-sided Fisher exact test, 2.5% significance level). Interventions Standard ET (aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen) or paclitaxel, 80 mg/m2, weekly plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab every 21 days. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was pCR (ypT0/is, ypN0). Secondary end points included safety, translational research, and health-related quality of life. Omission of further chemotherapy was allowed in patients with pCR. PAM50 analysis was performed on baseline tumor biopsies. Results Of the 207 patients included (median [range] age, 53 [25-83] years), 121 (58%) had cT2 to cT4 tumors, and 58 (28%) had clinically node-positive EBC. The pCR rate in the ET plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab arm was 23.7% (95% CI, 15.7%-33.4%) vs 56.4% (95% CI, 46.2%-66.3%) in the paclitaxel plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab arm (odds ratio, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.12-0.46; P < .001). Both immunohistochemical ERBB2 score of 3 or higher and ERBB2-enriched subtype were independent predictors for pCR in both arms. Paclitaxel was superior to ET only in the first through third quartiles but not in the highest ERBB2 quartile by messenger RNA. In contrast with the paclitaxel plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab arm, no decrease in health-related quality of life after 12 weeks was observed in the ET plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab arm. Conclusions and Relevance The WSG-TP-II randomized clinical trial is, to our knowledge, the first prospective trial comparing 2 neoadjuvant de-escalation treatments in HR-positive/ERBB2-positive EBC and demonstrated an excellent pCR rate after 12 weeks of paclitaxel plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab that was clearly superior to the pCR rate after ET plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03272477.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany
- Breast Center Niederrhein, Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
- University Clinics Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ulrike A Nitz
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany
- Breast Center Niederrhein, Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Sherko Kuemmel
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany
- Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
- Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johannes Holtschmidt
- Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
- Breast Center, St Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Köln-Hohenlind, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Hartkopf
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tüebingen University Hospital, Tüebingen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke
- Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Women's Clinic, University Clinics Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christine Zu Eulenburg
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany
- Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Timo Schinköthe
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- CANKADO Service GmbH, Kirchheim bei München, Germany
| | - Monika Graeser
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany
- Breast Center Niederrhein, Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Nadia Harbeck
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Riecke K, Müller V, Neunhöffer T, Park-Simon TW, Weide R, Polasik A, Schmidt M, Puppe J, Mundhenke C, Lübbe K, Hesse T, Thill M, Wuerstlein R, Denkert C, Decker T, Fehm T, Nekljudova V, Rey J, Loibl S, Laakmann E, Witzel I. Long-term survival of breast cancer patients with brain metastases: subanalysis of the BMBC registry. ESMO Open 2023; 8:101213. [PMID: 37075697 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 02/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Up to 30% of metastatic breast cancer (BC) patients develop brain metastases (BM). Prognosis of patients with BM is poor and long-term survival is rare. Identification of factors associated with long-term survival is important for improving treatment modalities. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 2889 patients of the national registry for BM in BC (BMBC) were available for this analysis. Long-term survival was defined as overall survival (OS) in the upper third of the failure curve resulting in a cut-off of 15 months. A total of 887 patients were categorized as long-term survivors. RESULTS Long-term survivors compared to other patients were younger at BC and BM diagnosis (median 48 versus 54 years and 53 versus 59 years), more often had HER2-positive tumors (59.1% versus 36.3%), less frequently luminal-like (29.1% versus 35.7%) or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (11.9% versus 28.1%), showed better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) at the time of BM diagnosis (ECOG 0-1, 76.9% versus 51.0%), higher pathological complete remission rates after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (21.6% versus 13.7%) and lower number of BM (n = 1, BM 40.9% versus 25.4%; n = 2-3, BM 26.5% versus 26.7%; n ≥4, BM 32.6% versus 47.9%) (P < 0.001). Long-term survivors had leptomeningeal metastases (10.4% versus 17.5%) and extracranial metastases (ECM, 73.6% versus 82.5%) less frequently, and asymptomatic BM more often at the time of BM diagnosis (26.5% versus 20.1%), (P < 0.001). Median OS in long-term survivors was about two times higher than the cut-off of 15 months: 30.9 months [interquartile range (IQR) 30.3] overall, 33.9 months (IQR 37.1) in HER2-positive, 26.9 months (IQR 22.0) in luminal-like and 26.5 months (IQR 18.2) in TNBC patients. CONCLUSIONS In our analysis, long-term survival of BC patients with BM was associated with better ECOG PS, younger age, HER2-positive subtype, lower number of BM and less extended visceral metastases. Patients with these clinical features might be more eligible for extended local brain and systemic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Riecke
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - V Müller
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - T Neunhöffer
- Frauenärzte am Dom, Mainz, Germany; HELIOS Dr. Horst Schmidt Clinic Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - T-W Park-Simon
- Hanover Medical School (MHH University), Hanover, Germany
| | - R Weide
- Institute for Health Services Research in Oncology, Koblenz, Germany
| | - A Polasik
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - M Schmidt
- The University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - J Puppe
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - C Mundhenke
- Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH/Medizincampus Oberfranken, Bayreuth, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-Europäische Metropolregion Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - K Lübbe
- Diakovere Henriettenstift, Breast Center, Hannover, Germany
| | - T Hesse
- Agaplesion Diakonieklinikum Rotenburg, Rotenburg, Germany
| | - M Thill
- Department of Gynecology and Gyneacological Oncology, Agaplesion Markus Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - R Wuerstlein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - C Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - T Decker
- Onkology, Haematology Ravensburg, Ravensburg, Germany
| | - T Fehm
- Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - J Rey
- GBG Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - S Loibl
- GBG Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - E Laakmann
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - I Witzel
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bartsch R, Harbeck N, Wrobel D, Zaiss M, Terhaag J, Guth D, Distelrath A, Wuerstlein R, Zahn MO, Lüftner D, Schwitter M, Balic M, Jackisch C, Müller V, Rinnerthaler G, Schmidt M, Zaman K, Schinköthe T, Resch A, Breitenstein U. Abstract P2-01-01: Interim analysis (n=200) from ELEANOR: a multi-national, prospective, non-interventional study among patients with HER2+ and HR+ early breast cancer treated with extended adjuvant neratinib in the clinical routine. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-p2-01-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background Recent advances in the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor positive (HER2+) early breast cancer (eBC) have led to a reduction in recurrence risk; still a relevant percentage of patients relapses over time, predominantly presenting with distant recurrence. Neratinib is registered in Europe as extended adjuvant treatment for adult patients with HER2+, hormone receptor positive (HR+) eBC, who completed adjuvant trastuzumab-based therapy within one year prior to start of neratinib. In the ExteNET study, neratinib improved the absolute 5-year invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) rate by 5.1% versus placebo in this population (90.8% vs. 85.7%; HR 0.58 [95% CI 0.41-0.82]), mainly by reducing the rate of distant metastases. According to explorative analyses from ExteNET, the effect may be even more pronounced in patients with non-pCR after neoadjuvant trastuzumab treatment and/or in patients completing the full duration of neratinib therapy (i.e. ≥11 months of neratinib treatment). Diarrhea, the most common grade 3 adverse event (neratinib: 39% without primary diarrhea prophylaxis, median cumulative duration 5 days; placebo: 1%; no grade 4 events) can generally be managed through adequate prophylaxis and treatment management. ELEANOR is the first non-interventional study (NIS) of real-world use of neratinib and its management in eBC patients in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Methods Enrollment of 300 adult female patients with HER2+/HR+ eBC is planned in accordance with the SmPC specifications. Primary endpoint is the rate of patients adherent to neratinib treatment (i.e. neratinib use for ≥75% of treatment days). Secondary objectives include characterization of patients scheduled to receive neratinib, details on neratinib treatment, recurrences, safety/tolerability, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). CANKADO, an eHealth application developed to support patient/physician communication, is an integral part of the NIS. Here, we report results of the preplanned interim analysis based on 200 enrolled patients. Results At data cut-off (May 2022), 202 patients had been observed for 3 months; patient enrollment is ongoing. Median age was 53.0 years and 66.3% of patients were at increased risk of disease recurrence (defined as non-pCR or AJCC stage > I). Most patients had received prior neoadjuvant treatment (79.7%). Post-neoadjuvant treatment included dual HER2 blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab (38.8%/23.9% of pCR/non-pCR patients) and trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1, 53.5% of non-pCR patients). Neratinib treatment had been documented for 187 patients, treatment was ongoing for 46.0% of patients. Diarrhea was the most common adverse event (78.6% any grade, 19.3% grade 3, 2 patients grade 4), but was markedly lower when indirectly compared to ExteNET (39% grade 3). The neratinib dose escalation schedule was chosen for 36.4% of patients and led to a decreased incidence of severe diarrhea (16.2% grade 3, no grade 4 events). 93.9% (95% CI: 87.9-97.5%) of 115 evaluable patients adhered to neratinib treatment. Conclusion The results of this preplanned interim analysis reflect the current treatment landscape in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. These results confirm, in line with the observed adherence data, that extended adjuvant neratinib use is feasible in typical clinical practice settings. Furthermore, treatment management strategies such as diarrhea prophylaxis or neratinib dose escalation are routinely used and can increase treatment tolerability markedly. The study is funded by Pierre Fabre Pharma GmbH (Freiburg, Germany), Pierre Fabre Pharma Austria (Wels, Austria) and Pierre Fabre Pharma AG (Allschwil, Switzerland).
Citation Format: Rupert Bartsch, Nadia Harbeck, Denise Wrobel, Matthias Zaiss, Jürgen Terhaag, Dagmar Guth, Andrea Distelrath, Rachel Wuerstlein, Mark-Oliver Zahn, Diana Lüftner, Michael Schwitter, Marija Balic, Christian Jackisch, Volkmar Müller, Gabriel Rinnerthaler, Marcus Schmidt, Khalil Zaman, Timo Schinköthe, Anna Resch, Urs Breitenstein. Interim analysis (n=200) from ELEANOR: a multi-national, prospective, non-interventional study among patients with HER2+ and HR+ early breast cancer treated with extended adjuvant neratinib in the clinical routine [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-01-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rupert Bartsch
- 1Medical University of Vienna, Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Denise Wrobel
- 3Sozialstiftung Bamberg Klinikum am Bruderwald, Bamberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Dagmar Guth
- 6Gyneco-oncological practice Dr. Guth, Plauen, Germany
| | | | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- 8Breast Center, Dept. OB&GYN and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Diana Lüftner
- 10Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité University Hospital, Brandenburg, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Marija Balic
- 12Divison of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University Graz, Austria
| | - Christian Jackisch
- 13Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- 14Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Gabriel Rinnerthaler
- 15Department of internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute – Laboratory for Immunological an Molecular Cancer Research (SCI-LIMCR), Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg Austria, Cancer Cluster Salzburg, Austria
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- 16Universität Mainz, Klinik und Poliklinik für Geburtshilfe und Frauengesundheit, Mainz, Germany
| | - Khalil Zaman
- 17Breast Center, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Schinköthe T, Tonk CH, Harbeck N, Carmelo V, Feliciano JG, Wuerstlein R, Küemmel S, Schmidt A. Abstract P1-05-36: AI-Based Smartphone App Using a Single-Lead ECG for Automated QTc Diagnostics in Oncology. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-p1-05-36] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Long QT syndrome is a common cardiotoxic side effect of various anti-tumor drugs. Previous cardiological monitoring of oncological patients is primarily complex and requires for non-internal oncologists a consultation. Therefore, the QTc-Tracker smartphone APP was developed, which enabled a tele-cardiological diagnosis of the QTc time with standard single-lead ECG devices. As a result, diagnosis times could already be reduced by 99%. The further development examined an automatic determination of the QT time using the smartphone APP. However, since single-lead ECG devices are significantly more susceptible to interference, the determination of the QT time is more complex than with 12-lead ECGs. Methods: The QTc-Tracker smartphone APP was developed to determine the QT time. Self-tracker single-lead ECG devices were used to record the lead I signal. The ECG recordings were analyzed in the APP and passed on to an external cardiologist as reference. The APP used artificial intelligence and was trained in the first phase and validated in the second phase. The first phase aimed to improve QT time detection. The results of the APP were compared with the findings of the external cardiologist. In both phases, ECGs from breast cancer patients receiving ribociclib were used. Results: A total of 1889 single-lead ECGs were carried out. 248 of these could not be evaluated (13%). QTc prolongation, according to CTCAE, was diagnosed in 41 cases (2.5%). 878 of the evaluable ECGs were used for the training phase and 763 for the evaluation phase. In the first group (before the improvement), the sensitivity to automatically detect a prolongation of the QT time was 36%, and the specificity was 96%. In the evaluation collective (after the training), the sensitivity went up to 85%, and the specificity was unchanged at 96%. Conclusions: The trained method of the QTc tracker is able to reliably detect a QT time lengthening even without a cardiological diagnosis only by using single-lead self-tracker ECG’s. In the rare cases in which an elongation was not detected, the cardiac diagnosis was only a few milliseconds above the threshold value. This artificial intelligence-based smartphone APP is not intended to replace the cardiological diagnosis, but it can simplify routine processes and help to decide which patients need a cardiological examination more urgently.
Citation Format: Timo Schinköthe, Christian Horst Tonk, Nadia Harbeck, Vanda Carmelo, Joana Gomes Feliciano, Rachel Wuerstlein, Sherko Küemmel, Annette Schmidt. AI-Based Smartphone App Using a Single-Lead ECG for Automated QTc Diagnostics in Oncology [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-05-36.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timo Schinköthe
- 1CANKADO GmbH, Digital Health, Alte Landstraße 23, 85521, Ottobrunn, Germany
| | | | | | - Vanda Carmelo
- 4Cardiology Department, Hospital da Luz, Av. Lusíada 100, 1500-650 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Joana Gomes Feliciano
- 5Heart Center, Hospital Cruz Vermelha, R. Duarte Galvão 54, 1549-008 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- 6Breast Center, Dept. OB&GYN and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Annette Schmidt
- 8Sports Biology, Institute for Sports Science, University of the Bundeswehr Munich, Werner- Heisenberg-Weg 39, 85577, Neubiberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Harbeck N, Nitz UA, Christgen M, Kümmel S, Braun M, Schumacher C, Potenberg J, Tio J, Aktas B, Forstbauer H, Grischke EM, Scheffen I, Malter W, von Schumann R, Just M, Zu Eulenburg C, Biehl C, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Deurloo R, de Haas S, Jóźwiak K, Hauptmann M, Kates R, Graeser M, Wuerstlein R, Kreipe HH, Gluz O. De-Escalated Neoadjuvant Trastuzumab-Emtansine With or Without Endocrine Therapy Versus Trastuzumab With Endocrine Therapy in HR+/HER2+ Early Breast Cancer: 5-Year Survival in the WSG-ADAPT-TP Trial. J Clin Oncol 2023:JCO2201816. [PMID: 36809046 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/23/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is standard of care in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) early breast cancer (EBC), irrespective of the hormone receptor status. Trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1), antibody-drug conjugate, is highly effective in HER2+ EBC; however, no survival data are available for de-escalated antibody-drug conjugate-based neoadjuvant therapy without conventional chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS In the WSG-ADAPT-TP (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01779206) phase II trial, 375 centrally reviewed patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2+ EBC (clinical stage I-III) were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of T-DM1 with or without endocrine therapy (ET) or trastuzumab + ET once every 3 weeks (ratio 1:1:1). Adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) omission was allowed in patients with pathologic complete response (pCR). In this study, we report the secondary survival end points and biomarker analysis. Patients who received at least one dose of study treatment were analyzed. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, two-sided log-rank statistics, and Cox regression models stratified for nodal and menopausal status. P values < .05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS T-DM1, T-DM1 + ET, and trastuzumab + ET induced similar 5-year invasive disease-free survival (iDFS; 88.9%, 85.3%, 84.6%; Plog-rank = .608) and overall survival rates (97.2%, 96.4%, 96.3%; Plog-rank = .534). Patients with pCR versus non-pCR had improved 5-year iDFS rates (92.7% v 82.7%; hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.85). Among the 117 patients with pCR, 41 did not receive ACT; 5-year iDFS rates were similar in those with (93.0%; 95% CI, 84.0 to 97.0) and without ACT (92.1%; 95% CI, 77.5 to 97.4; Plog-rank = .848). Translational research revealed that tumors with PIK3CA wild type, high immune marker expression, and luminal-A tumors (by PAM50) had an excellent prognosis with de-escalated anti-HER2 therapy. CONCLUSION The WSG-ADAPT-TP trial demonstrated that pCR after 12 weeks of chemotherapy-free de-escalated neoadjuvant therapy was associated with excellent survival in HR+/HER2+ EBC without further ACT. Despite higher pCR rates for T-DM1 ± ET versus trastuzumab + ET, all trial arms had similar outcomes because of mandatory standard chemotherapy after non-pCR. WSG-ADAPT-TP demonstrated that such de-escalation trials in HER2+ EBC are feasible and safe for patients. Patient selection on the basis of biomarkers or molecular subtypes may increase the efficacy of systemic chemotherapy-free HER2-targeted approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Harbeck
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCCMunich, Breast Center, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Ulrike A Nitz
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Breast Center Niederrhein, Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Sherko Kümmel
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.,Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Braun
- Breast Center, Rotkreuz Clinics Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Joke Tio
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Bahriye Aktas
- Women's Clinic, University Clinics Essen, Essen, Germany.,University Clinics Leipzig, Women's Clinic, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | | | - Iris Scheffen
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Breast Center Niederrhein, Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Wolfram Malter
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center, University Hospital, Cologne, Germany
| | | | | | - Christine Zu Eulenburg
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Claudia Biehl
- Westphalian Brest Center Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke
- Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Women's Clinic, University Clinics Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | | | - Katarzyna Jóźwiak
- Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Michael Hauptmann
- Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Ronald Kates
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Monika Graeser
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Breast Center Niederrhein, Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCCMunich, Breast Center, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Hans H Kreipe
- Institute of Pathology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Breast Center Niederrhein, Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,University Clinics Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Graeser M, Gluz O, Biehl C, Ulbrich-Gebauer D, Christgen M, Palatty J, Kuemmel S, Grischke EM, Augustin D, Braun M, Potenberg J, Wuerstlein R, Krauss K, Schumacher C, Forstbauer H, Reimer T, Stefek A, Fischer HH, Pelz E, zu Eulenburg C, Kates R, Ni H, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Feuerhake F, Kreipe HH, Nitz U, Harbeck N. Impact of RNA Signatures on pCR and Survival after 12-Week Neoadjuvant Pertuzumab plus Trastuzumab with or without Paclitaxel in the WSG-ADAPT HER2+/HR- Trial. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:805-814. [PMID: 36441798 PMCID: PMC9932580 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-1587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Revised: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify associations of biological signatures and stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL) with pathological complete response (pCR; ypT0 ypN0) and survival in the Phase II WSG-ADAPT HER2+/HR- trial (NCT01817452). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Patients with cT1-cT4c, cN0-3 HER2+/HR- early breast cancer (EBC) were randomized to pertuzumab+trastuzumab (P+T, n = 92) or P+T+paclitaxel (n = 42). Gene expression signatures were analyzed in baseline biopsies using NanoString Breast Cancer 360 panel (n = 117); baseline and on-treatment (week 3) sTIL levels were available in 119 and 76 patients, respectively. Impacts of standardized gene expression signatures on pCR and invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) were estimated by logistic and Cox regression. RESULTS In all patients, ERBB2 [OR, 1.70; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.08-2.67] and estrogen receptor (ER) signaling (OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.13-2.61) were favorable, whereas PTEN (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.38-0.87) was unfavorable for pCR. After 60 months median follow-up, 13 invasive events occurred (P+T: n = 11, P+T+paclitaxel: n = 2), none following pCR. Gene signatures related to immune response (IR) and ER signaling were favorable for iDFS, all with similar HR about 0.43-0.55. These patterns were even more prominent in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy-free group, where additionally BRCAness signature was unfavorable (HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.04-3.84). IR signatures were strongly intercorrelated. sTILs (baseline/week 3/change) were not associated with pCR or iDFS, though baseline sTILs correlated positively with IR signatures. CONCLUSIONS Distinct gene signatures were associated with pCR versus iDFS in HER2+/HR- EBC. The potential role of IR in preventing recurrence suggests that patients with upregulated IR signatures could be candidates for de-escalation concepts in HER2+ EBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Graeser
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.,Corresponding Author: Monika Graeser, Bethesda Hospital, West German Study Group, University Medical Center Hamburg—Eppendorf, Moenchengladbach and Hamburg 41061, Germany. Phone: 49-216-1981-2330; Fax: 49-216-1566-2319; E-mail:
| | - Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,University Clinics Cologne, Women's Clinic and Breast Center, Cologne, Germany
| | - Claudia Biehl
- Westphalian Brest Center Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Sherko Kuemmel
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.,Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, University Hospital Charité, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Michael Braun
- Department of Gynecology, Breast Center, Red Cross Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCCLMU, Breast Center, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Katja Krauss
- University Hospital Aachen, Breast Center, Aachen, Germany
| | | | | | - Toralf Reimer
- University Hospital Gynecology and Policlinic Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Andrea Stefek
- Johanniter Women's Clinic Stendal, Breast Center, Stendal, Germany
| | | | | | - Christine zu Eulenburg
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ronald Kates
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Hua Ni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCCLMU, Breast Center, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke
- Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, University Hospital Charité, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.,University Clinics Essen, Women's Clinic, Essen, Germany
| | - Friedrich Feuerhake
- Medical School Hannover, Institute of Pathology, Hannover, Germany.,Institute of Neuropathology, University Clinic Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCCLMU, Breast Center, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Blobner J, Dengler L, Blobner S, Eberle C, Weller J, Teske N, Karschnia P, Rühlmann K, Heinrich K, Ziemann F, Greif PA, Jeremias I, Wuerstlein R, Hasselmann K, Dorostkar M, Harter PN, Quach S, Stoecklein V, Albert NL, Niyazi M, Tonn JC, Thon N, Christoph Westphalen B, von Baumgarten L. Significance of molecular diagnostics for therapeutic decision-making in recurrent glioma. Neurooncol Adv 2023; 5:vdad060. [PMID: 37287694 PMCID: PMC10243988 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdad060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Targeted therapies have substantially improved survival in cancer patients with malignancies outside the brain. Whether in-depth analysis for molecular alterations may also offer therapeutic avenues in primary brain tumors remains unclear. We herein present our institutional experience for glioma patients discussed in our interdisciplinary molecular tumor board (MTB) implemented at the Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich (LMU). Methods We retrospectively searched the database of the MTB for all recurrent glioma patients after previous therapy. Recommendations were based on next-generation sequencing results of individual patient's tumor tissue. Clinical and molecular information, previous therapy regimens, and outcome parameters were collected. Results Overall, 73 consecutive recurrent glioma patients were identified. In the median, advanced molecular testing was initiated with the third tumor recurrence. The median turnaround time between initiation of molecular profiling and MTB case discussion was 48 ± 75 days (range: 32-536 days). Targetable mutations were found for 50 recurrent glioma patients (68.5%). IDH1 mutation (27/73; 37%), epidermal growth factor receptor amplification (19/73; 26%), and NF1 mutation (8/73; 11%) were the most detected alterations and a molecular-based treatment recommendation could be made for all of them. Therapeutic recommendations were implemented in 12 cases (24%) and one-third of these heavily pretreated patients experienced clinical benefit with at least disease stabilization. Conclusions In-depth molecular analysis of tumor tissue may guide targeted therapy also in brain tumor patients and considerable antitumor effects might be observed in selected cases. However, future studies to corroborate our results are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Blobner
- Jens Blobner, MD, Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Neuro-Oncology, Ludwigs Maximilians University School of Medicine, 81377 Munich, Germany ()
| | - Laura Dengler
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Sven Blobner
- MedicalFaculty Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelburg, Germany
| | - Constantin Eberle
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Jonathan Weller
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Nico Teske
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Philipp Karschnia
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Katharina Rühlmann
- Comprehensive Cancer Center München (CCC München), LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Kathrin Heinrich
- Department of Medicine, Hematology and Oncology Division and Cellular Immunotherapy Program, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Frank Ziemann
- Department of Medicine, Hematology and Oncology Division and Cellular Immunotherapy Program, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Philipp A Greif
- Department of Medicine, Hematology and Oncology Division and Cellular Immunotherapy Program, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Irmela Jeremias
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
- Dr. von Haunersches Children Hospital, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CCC Munich LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Korbinian Hasselmann
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
- Department of Medicine, Hematology and Oncology Division and Cellular Immunotherapy Program, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center München (CCC München), LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Mario Dorostkar
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center München (CCC München), LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany
- Center for Neuropathology and Prion Research, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Patrick N Harter
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center München (CCC München), LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Stefanie Quach
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Veit Stoecklein
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Joerg-Christian Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Niklas Thon
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Benedikt Christoph Westphalen
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
- Department of Medicine, Hematology and Oncology Division and Cellular Immunotherapy Program, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center München (CCC München), LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Louisa von Baumgarten
- Corresponding Authors: Louisa von Baumgarten, MD, Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Neuro-Oncology, Ludwig Maximilians University School of Medicine, 81377 Munich, Germany ()
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gluz O, Nitz U, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Prat A, Christgen M, Kuemmel S, Mohammadian MP, Gebauer D, Kates R, Paré L, Grischke EM, Forstbauer H, Braun M, Warm M, Hackmann J, Uleer C, Aktas B, Schumacher C, Wuerstlein R, Graeser M, Pelz E, Jóźwiak K, Zu Eulenburg C, Kreipe HH, Harbeck N. De-escalated Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC): Impact of Molecular Markers and Final Survival Analysis of the WSG-ADAPT-TN Trial. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:4995-5003. [PMID: 35797219 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-0482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2022] [Revised: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although optimal treatment in early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains unclear, de-escalated chemotherapy appears to be an option in selected patients within this aggressive subtype. Previous studies have identified several pro-immune factors as prognostic markers in TNBC, but their predictive impact regarding different chemotherapy strategies is still controversial. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN ADAPT-TN is a randomized neoadjuvant multicenter phase II trial in early patients with TNBC (n = 336) who were randomized to 12 weeks of nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 + gemcitabine or carboplatin d 1,8 q3w. Omission of further (neo-) adjuvant chemotherapy was allowed only in patients with pathological complete response [pCR, primary endpoint (ypT0/is, ypN0)]. Secondary invasive/distant disease-free and overall survival (i/dDFS, OS) and translational research objectives included quantification of a predictive impact of markers regarding selection for chemotherapy de-escalation, measured by gene expression of 119 genes (including PAM50 subtype) by nCounter platform and stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL). RESULTS After 60 months of median follow-up, 12-week-pCR was favorably associated (HR, 0.24; P = 0.001) with 5y-iDFS of 90.6% versus 62.8%. No survival advantage of carboplatin use was observed, despite a higher pCR rate [HR, 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.68-1.59]. Additional anthracycline-containing chemotherapy was not associated with a significant iDFS advantage in pCR patients (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.41-4.02). Beyond pCR rate, nodal status and high sTILs were independently associated with better iDFS, dDFS, and OS by multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS Short de-escalated neoadjuvant taxane/platinum-based combination therapy appears to be a promising strategy in early TNBC for using pCR rate as an early decision point for further therapy (de-) escalation together with node-negative status and high sTILs. See related commentary by Sharma, p. 4840.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,University Clinics Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Aleix Prat
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, August Pi I Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Mohammad Parsa Mohammadian
- Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School "Theodor Finane," Neuruppin, Germany
| | | | - Ronald Kates
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Laia Paré
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, August Pi I Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Michael Braun
- Rotkreuz Clinics Munich, Breast Center, Munich, Germany
| | - Mathias Warm
- City Hospital Holweide, Breast Center, Cologne, Germany
| | | | | | - Bahriye Aktas
- University Clinics Essen, Women's Clinic, Essen, Germany.,University Clinics Leipzig, Women's Clinic, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center, LMU University Hospital and CCC Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Monika Graeser
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Enrico Pelz
- Institute of Pathology Viersen, Viersen, Germany
| | - Katarzyna Jóźwiak
- Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School "Theodor Finane," Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Christine Zu Eulenburg
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Nadia Harbeck
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center, LMU University Hospital and CCC Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Henze F, Hester A, Koenig A, Harbeck N, Wuerstlein R. Evaluation and optimization of treatment for patients with metastatic breast cancer and receiving CDK4/6-inhibitors. Eur J Cancer 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(22)01441-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
24
|
Tonk C, Schinköthe T, Harbeck N, Carmelo V, Gomes Feliciano J, Wuerstlein R, Kümmel S, Schmidt A. AI-based smartphone App using a single-lead ECG for automated QTc diagnostics in oncology. Eur J Cancer 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(22)01540-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
25
|
Dimpfl M, Mayr D, Schmoeckel E, Degenhardt T, Eggersmann TK, Harbeck N, Wuerstlein R. Hormone Receptor and HER2 Status Switch in Non-pCR Breast Cancer Specimens after Neoadjuvant Therapy. Breast Care (Basel) 2022; 17:501-507. [PMID: 36684405 PMCID: PMC9851067 DOI: 10.1159/000524698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction This project aimed to identify the frequency of a switch of hormone receptor (HR) and/or HER2 status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for early breast cancer. Methods Tumor samples from patients without pathological complete response (non-pCR) were evaluated. Pathological complete response (pCR) was defined as no invasive tumor in breast and lymph nodes (ypT0/is ypN0). HR and HER2 status determined before NAC was compared with the corresponding receptor status determined in the surgical specimen after NAC. Results 245 consecutive patients with primary invasive breast cancer, treated with NAC with/without targeted therapy between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2019, at the LMU Breast Center, Munich, Germany, were identified. In 128 patients (52%), surgery revealed non-pCR after completed NAC. In 35 cases (27%), a switch of either HR and/or HER2 status between the initial biopsy and the surgical specimen was detected. Twenty cases had a switch in HR status, while 15 cases had a switch in HER2 status. Conclusion In a substantial number (27%) of non-pCR cases, a switch in biomarker status after completed neoadjuvant treatment was detected. These results are consistent with prior evidence. Yet, routine reevaluation of HR and HER2 status is not recommended in guidelines so far. Future research needs to address the impact of HR and HER2 status switch on therapy adaptation and on subsequent patient outcome. Particularly, in view of the recent therapy advances, it will be critical to evaluate whether individualization of treatment concepts based on the biology of the non-pCR specimens is preferable to the initial therapy concept based on the pathology at primary diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moritz Dimpfl
- aDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Doris Mayr
- bInstitute of Pathology and CCC Munich, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Elisa Schmoeckel
- bInstitute of Pathology and CCC Munich, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Tom Degenhardt
- aDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Tanja K. Eggersmann
- aDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- cDepartment of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- aDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- aDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wuerstlein R, Ellis P, Montemurro F, Antón Torres A, Delaloge S, Zhang Q, Wang X, Wang S, Shao Z, Li H, Rachman A, Vongsaisuwon M, Liu H, Fear S, Peña-Murillo C, Barrios C. Final results of the global and Asia cohorts of KAMILLA, a phase IIIB safety trial of trastuzumab emtansine in patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100561. [PMID: 36084395 PMCID: PMC9588895 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Revised: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background KAMILLA is a single-arm safety study of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced breast cancer (BC; NCT01702571). We report the final analysis of cohort 2 (Asia) within the context of published cohort 1 (Global) findings. Methods Patients had HER2-positive, locally advanced, or metastatic BC progressing after chemotherapy and anti-HER2 therapy or ≤6 months after adjuvant therapy. The primary objective was to further evaluate T-DM1 (3.6 mg/kg, administered intravenously every 3 weeks) safety/tolerability, including the following adverse events of primary interest (AEPIs): grade ≥3 AEPIs (hepatic events, allergic reactions, thrombocytopenia, hemorrhage events), all grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs, and all-grade pneumonitis. Results KAMILLA enrolled 2185 patients (cohort 1, n = 2003; cohort 2, n = 182) as of 31 July 2019. Of these, 2002 and 181 per cohort were treated and included in the safety population. Approximately 70% of patients had two or more previous treatment lines in the metastatic setting. Median T-DM1 exposure was 5.6 and 5.0 months per cohort; median follow-up was 20.6 and 15.1 months. The overall AEPI rate was higher in cohort 2 (93/181; 51.4%) versus cohort 1 (462/2002; 23.1%), mostly driven by a higher grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia rate in cohort 2. In cohort 2, grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia was not associated with grade ≥3 hemorrhagic events and most (128/138) fully resolved. Grade ≥3 treatment-related AEPI rates were 18.4% (cohort 1) and 48.6% (cohort 2), the latter mainly due to thrombocytopenia. Any-grade pneumonitis rates were 1.0% and 2.2%. No new safety signals were identified. Median (95% confidence interval) progression-free survival was 6.8 months (5.8-7.6 months) and 5.7 months (5.5-7.0 months) in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively; median overall survival was 27.2 months (25.5-28.7 months) and 29.5 months (21.1 months to non-estimable). In both cohorts, median progression-free survival and overall survival decreased with increasing prior therapy lines. Conclusions Cohort 2 results aligned with previous findings in Asian patients, supporting the manageable safety profile and use of T-DM1 in advanced BC. KAMILLA safety results for cohorts 1 (global; n = 2002) and 2 (Asia; n = 181) aligned with results from prior T-DM1 mBC trials. The overall rate of adverse events of primary interest (AEPIs) was higher in cohort 2 (51.4%) versus cohort 1 (23.1%). The higher AEPI rate was mostly due to a higher grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia event rate in cohort 2, most of which resolved. Median PFS and OS were similar for both cohorts, and decreased with increasing prior therapy lines. The manageable safety profile and efficacy of T-DM1 further support its favorable benefit/risk balance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Wuerstlein
- University Hospital Munich, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center and CCC Munich, LMU, Munich, Germany.
| | - P Ellis
- Guy's Hospital and Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, UK
| | - F Montemurro
- Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | - A Antón Torres
- Miguel Servet University Hospital and Aragon Health Research Institute (IISA), Zaragoza, Spain
| | - S Delaloge
- Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Q Zhang
- Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nangang, Harbin
| | - X Wang
- Zheijang Cancer Hospital, Gonghshu District, Hangzhou
| | - S Wang
- Sun Yet-sen University Cancer Center, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou
| | - Z Shao
- Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Xuhui District, Shanghai
| | - H Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Hai-Dian District, Beijing, China
| | - A Rachman
- MRCCC Siloam Semanggi Hospital, Daerah Khusus Ibukota, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - M Vongsaisuwon
- King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Pathum Wan, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - H Liu
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland
| | - S Fear
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - C Barrios
- Oncology Research Center HSL, PUCRS, Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kolberg-Liedtke C, Feuerhake F, Garke M, Christgen M, Kates R, Grischke EM, Forstbauer H, Braun M, Warm M, Hackmann J, Uleer C, Aktas B, Schumacher C, Kuemmel S, Wuerstlein R, Graeser M, Nitz U, Kreipe H, Gluz O, Harbeck N. Impact of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) on response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative early breast cancer in the WSG-ADAPT TN trial. Breast Cancer Res 2022; 24:58. [PMID: 36056374 PMCID: PMC9438265 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-022-01552-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Higher density of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) at baseline has been associated with increased rates of pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). While evidence supports favorable association of pCR with survival in TNBC, an independent impact of sTILs (after adjustment for pCR) on survival is not yet established. Moreover, the impact of sTIL dynamics during NACT on pCR and survival in TNBC is unknown. METHODS The randomized WSG-ADAPT TN phase II trial compared efficacy of 12-week nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine versus carboplatin. This preplanned translational analysis assessed impacts of sTIL measurements at baseline (sTIL-0) and after 3 weeks of chemotherapy (sTIL-3) on pCR and invasive disease-free survival (iDFS). Predictive performance of sTIL-0 and sTIL-3 for pCR was quantified by ROC analysis and logistic regression; Kaplan-Meier estimation and Cox regression (with mediation analysis) were used to determine their impact on iDFS. RESULTS For prediction of pCR, the AUC statistics for sTIL-0 and sTIL-3 were 0.60 and 0.63, respectively, in all patients; AUC for sTIL-3 was higher in NP/G. The positive predictive value (PPV) of "lymphocyte-predominant" status (sTIL-0 ≥ 60%) at baseline was 59.3%, though only 13.0% of patients had this status. To predict non-pCR, the cut point sTIL-0 ≤ 10% yielded PPV = 69.5% while addressing 33.8% of patients. Higher sTIL levels (particularly at 3 weeks) were independently and favorably associated with better iDFS, even after adjusting for pCR. For example, the adjusted hazard ratio for 3-week sTILs ≥ 60% (vs. < 60%) was 0.48 [0.23-0.99]. Low cellularity in 3-week biopsies was the strongest individual predictor for pCR (in both therapy arms), but not for iDFS. CONCLUSION The independent impact of sTILs on iDFS suggests that favorable immune response can influence key tumor biological processes for long-term survival. The results suggest that the reliability of pCR following neoadjuvant therapy as a surrogate for survival could vary among subgroups in TNBC defined by immune response or other factors. Dynamic measurements of sTILs under NACT could support immune response-guided patient selection for individualized therapy approaches for both very low levels (more effective therapies) and very high levels (de-escalation concepts). TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical trials No: NCT01815242, retrospectively registered January 25, 2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
| | | | | | | | - Ronald Kates
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | | | | | - Michael Braun
- Breast Center, Rotkreuz Clinics Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mathias Warm
- Breast Center, City Hospital Holweide, Cologne, Germany
| | | | | | - Bahriye Aktas
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Sherko Kuemmel
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany.,Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.,Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany.,Breast Center, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Monika Graeser
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany.,University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,Breast Center Niederrhein, Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany.,Breast Center Niederrhein, Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Hans Kreipe
- Institute of Pathology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany.,Breast Center Niederrhein, Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany.,Breast Center, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Engler T, Fasching PA, Lüftner D, Hartkopf AD, Müller V, Kolberg HC, Hadji P, Tesch H, Häberle L, Ettl J, Wallwiener M, Beckmann MW, Hein A, Belleville E, Uhrig S, Wimberger P, Hielscher C, Kurbacher CM, Wuerstlein R, Untch M, Taran FA, Enzinger HM, Krabisch P, Welslau M, Maasberg M, Hempel D, Lux MP, Michel LL, Janni W, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY, Fehm TN, Schneeweiss A. Implementation of CDK4/6 Inhibitors and its Influence on the Treatment Landscape of Advanced Breast Cancer Patients - Data from the Real-World Registry PRAEGNANT. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2022; 82:1055-1067. [PMID: 36186151 PMCID: PMC9525148 DOI: 10.1055/a-1880-0087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Comprehensive data from prospective clinical trials have led to a high level of evidence establishing CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with endocrine treatment (CDK4/6i + ET) as a standard for the treatment of HER2-negative, hormone receptor-positive (HER2- HR+) breast cancer patients in the first-line advanced therapy setting. Data on patient populations that have been treated in the real-world setting may provide an insight into changes of patient characteristics and prognosis over time. Methods The data were extracted from the prospective real-world registry PRAEGNANT (NCT02338167). Patients had to have HER2- HR+ advanced breast cancer in the first-line metastatic setting. The chosen therapies were described as well as progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in relation to the given therapies and time periods during which they were indicated. Results CDK4/6 inhibitors have been rapidly implemented since their introduction in November 2016. In recent years (2018 - 2022), about 70 - 80% of the patient population have been treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors, while endocrine monotherapy was given to about 10% and chemotherapy to about 15% of all patients. The prognosis was worst in patients treated with chemotherapy. Recently, mainly patients with a good prognosis are being treated with endocrine monotherapy, and patients who are treated with chemotherapy have an unfavorable prognosis. The PFS and OS of patients treated with CDK4/6i + ET have remained similar over time despite changes in patient characteristics. Conclusion A treatment with CDK4/6i + ET has rapidly become the therapy standard for patients in the first-line advanced breast cancer setting. After the implementation of CDK4/6i + ET, endocrine monotherapy is only given to patients with a very favorable prognosis, while chemotherapy is provided to patients with a rather unfavorable prognosis. These changes in patient characteristics did not seem to influence the prognosis of patients treated with CDK4/6i + ET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Engler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Erlangen,
Germany,Correspondence Peter A. Fasching, MD Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University HospitalComprehensive Cancer
Center Erlangen EMNFriedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–NurembergUniversitätsstraße 21 – 2391054
ErlangenGermany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Immanuel Hospital Märkische Schweiz & Medical University of Brandenburg Theodor-Fontane, Brandenburg, Germany
| | - Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Peyman Hadji
- Frankfurt Center for Bone Health, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Philips-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Lothar Häberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Erlangen,
Germany,Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Johannes Ettl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Markus Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias W. Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Erlangen,
Germany
| | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Erlangen,
Germany
| | | | - Sabrina Uhrig
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Erlangen,
Germany
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine and University
Hospital, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carsten Hielscher
- Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum – Onkologisches Zentrum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany
| | - Christian M. Kurbacher
- Department of Gynecology I (Gynecologic Oncology), Gynecologic Center Bonn-Friedensplatz, Bonn, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Center and CCC Munich, Munich University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Helios Clinics Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Florin-Andrei Taran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Freiburg University Hospital, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Hans-Martin Enzinger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Bamberg, Sozialstiftung Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany
| | - Petra Krabisch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | | | | | - Dirk Hempel
- Onkologiezentrum Donauwörth, Donauwörth, Germany
| | - Michael P. Lux
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn, Germany; Frauenklinik St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, Germany; Kooperatives Brustzentrum
Paderborn, St. Vincenz Krankenhaus GmbH, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Laura L. Michel
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Diethelm Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sara Y. Brucker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Tanja N. Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Heinrich K, Miller-Phillips L, Ziemann F, Hasselmann K, Rühlmann K, Flach M, Biro D, von Bergwelt-Baildon M, Holch J, Herold T, von Baumgarten L, Greif PA, Jeremias I, Wuerstlein R, Casuscelli J, Spitzweg C, Seidensticker M, Renz B, Corradini S, Baumeister P, Goni E, Tufman A, Jung A, Kumbrink J, Kirchner T, Klauschen F, Metzeler KH, Heinemann V, Westphalen CB. Lessons learned: the first consecutive 1000 patients of the CCCMunich LMU Molecular Tumor Board. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2022; 149:1905-1915. [PMID: 35796778 PMCID: PMC9261163 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04165-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Purpose In 2016, the University of Munich Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) was implemented to initiate a precision oncology program. This review of cases was conducted to assess clinical implications and functionality of the program, to identify current limitations and to inform future directions of these efforts. Methods Charts, molecular profiles, and tumor board decisions of the first 1000 consecutive cases (01/2016–03/2020) were reviewed. Descriptive statistics were applied to describe relevant findings. Results Of the first 1000 patients presented to the MTB; 914 patients received comprehensive genomic profiling. Median age of patients was 56 years and 58% were female. The most prevalent diagnoses were breast (16%) and colorectal cancer (10%). Different types of targeted or genome-wide sequencing assays were used; most of them offered by the local department of pathology. Testing was technically successful in 88%. In 41% of cases, a genomic alteration triggered a therapeutic recommendation. The fraction of patients receiving a tumor board recommendation differed significantly between malignancies ranging from over 50% in breast or biliary tract to less than 30% in pancreatic cancers. Based on a retrospective chart review, 17% of patients with an MTB recommendation received appropriate treatment. Conclusion Based on these retrospective analyses, patients with certain malignancies (breast and biliary tract cancer) tend to be more likely to have actionable variants. The low rate of therapeutic implementation (17% of patients receiving a tumor board recommendation) underscores the importance of meticulous follow-up for these patients and ensuring broad access to innovative therapies for patients receiving molecular tumor profiling. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-022-04165-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathrin Heinrich
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Lisa Miller-Phillips
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Frank Ziemann
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Korbinian Hasselmann
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Katharina Rühlmann
- Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Madeleine Flach
- Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Dorottya Biro
- Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael von Bergwelt-Baildon
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Julian Holch
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Tobias Herold
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Louisa von Baumgarten
- Department of Neurology and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Philipp A Greif
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Irmela Jeremias
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Apoptosis in Hematopoietic Stem Cells, Helmholtz Center Munich, German Center for Environmental Health (HMGU), Munich, Germany
- Department of Pediatrics, Dr Von Hauner Children's Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jozefina Casuscelli
- Department of Urology and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christine Spitzweg
- Department of Medicine IV and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Renz
- Department of General, Visceral und Transplantation Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Philipp Baumeister
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Elisabetta Goni
- Department of Medicine II and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Amanda Tufman
- Department of Medicine V and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas Jung
- Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Jörg Kumbrink
- Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Kirchner
- Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Frederick Klauschen
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Klaus H Metzeler
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Hematology, Cell Therapy and Hemostaseology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Volker Heinemann
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - C Benedikt Westphalen
- Department of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.
- Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC Munich LMU), LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Pinato DJ, Aguilar-Company J, Ferrante D, Hanbury G, Bower M, Salazar R, Mirallas O, Sureda A, Plaja A, Cucurull M, Mesia R, Townsend S, Jackson A, Dalla Pria A, Newsom-Davis T, Handford J, Sita-Lumsden A, Apthorp E, Vincenzi B, Bertuzzi A, Brunet J, Lambertini M, Maluquer C, Pedrazzoli P, Biello F, Sinclair A, Bawany S, Khalique S, Rossi S, Rogers L, Murphy C, Belessiotis K, Carmona-García MC, Sharkey R, García-Illescas D, Rizzo G, Perachino M, Saoudi-Gonzalez N, Doonga K, Fox L, Roldán E, Gaidano G, Ruiz-Camps I, Bruna R, Patriarca A, Martinez-Vila C, Cantini L, Zambelli A, Giusti R, Mazzoni F, Caliman E, Santoro A, Grosso F, Parisi A, Queirolo P, Aujayeb A, Rimassa L, Prat A, Tucci M, Libertini M, Grisanti S, Mukherjee U, Diamantis N, Fusco V, Generali D, Provenzano S, Gennari A, Tabernero J, Cortellini A, Evans JS, Swallow J, Chung C, Patel M, Dettorre G, Ottaviani D, Chowdhury A, Merry E, Chopra N, Lee AJX, Sng CCT, Yu T, Shawe-Taylor M, Bain HDC, Wong YNS, Galazi M, Benafif S, Dileo P, Earnshaw I, Patel G, Wu A, Soosaipillai G, Cooper L, Andaleeb R, Dolly S, Apthorp E, Srikandarajah K, Jones E, Van Hemelrijck M, Moss C, Russell B, Chester J, Loizidou A, Piccart M, Cruz CA, Reyes R, Segui E, Marco-Hernández J, Viladot M, Eremiev S, Fort-Culillas R, Garcia I, Liñan R, Roqué Lloveras A, Harbeck N, Wuerstlein R, Henze F, Mahner S, Felip E, Pous A, D'Avanzo F, Scotti L, Krengli M, Marrari A, Delfanti S, Maconi A, Betti M, Tonini G, Di Fazio GR, Tondini C, Chiudinelli L, Franchi M, Libertini M, Bertulli R, Baggi A, Tovazzi V, Ficorella C, Porzio G, Saponara M, Filetti M, Zoratto F, Paoloni F, Berardi R, Guida A, Bracarda S, Iglesias M, Sanchez de Torre A, Tagliamento M, Colomba E, Pommeret F. Outcomes of the SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529) variant outbreak among vaccinated and unvaccinated patients with cancer in Europe: results from the retrospective, multicentre, OnCovid registry study. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:865-875. [PMID: 35660139 PMCID: PMC9162476 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00273-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Revised: 04/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The omicron (B.1.1.529) variant of SARS-CoV-2 is highly transmissible and escapes vaccine-induced immunity. We aimed to describe outcomes due to COVID-19 during the omicron outbreak compared with the prevaccination period and alpha (B.1.1.7) and delta (B.1.617.2) waves in patients with cancer in Europe. METHODS In this retrospective analysis of the multicentre OnCovid Registry study, we recruited patients aged 18 years or older with laboratory-confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2, who had a history of solid or haematological malignancy that was either active or in remission. Patient were recruited from 37 oncology centres from UK, Italy, Spain, France, Belgium, and Germany. Participants were followed up from COVID-19 diagnosis until death or loss to follow-up, while being treated as per standard of care. For this analysis, we excluded data from centres that did not actively enter new data after March 1, 2021 (in France, Germany, and Belgium). We compared measures of COVID-19 morbidity, which were complications from COVID-19, hospitalisation due to COVID-19, and requirement of supplemental oxygen and COVID-19-specific therapies, and COVID-19 mortality across three time periods designated as the prevaccination (Feb 27 to Nov 30, 2020), alpha-delta (Dec 1, 2020, to Dec 14, 2021), and omicron (Dec 15, 2021, to Jan 31, 2022) phases. We assessed all-cause case-fatality rates at 14 days and 28 days after diagnosis of COVID-19 overall and in unvaccinated and fully vaccinated patients and in those who received a booster dose, after adjusting for country of origin, sex, age, comorbidities, tumour type, stage, and status, and receipt of systemic anti-cancer therapy. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04393974, and is ongoing. FINDINGS As of Feb 4, 2022 (database lock), the registry included 3820 patients who had been diagnosed with COVID-19 between Feb 27, 2020, and Jan 31, 2022. 3473 patients were eligible for inclusion (1640 [47·4%] were women and 1822 [52·6%] were men, with a median age of 68 years [IQR 57-77]). 2033 (58·5%) of 3473 were diagnosed during the prevaccination phase, 1075 (31·0%) during the alpha-delta phase, and 365 (10·5%) during the omicron phase. Among patients diagnosed during the omicron phase, 113 (33·3%) of 339 were fully vaccinated and 165 (48·7%) were boosted, whereas among those diagnosed during the alpha-delta phase, 152 (16·6%) of 915 were fully vaccinated and 21 (2·3%) were boosted. Compared with patients diagnosed during the prevaccination period, those who were diagnosed during the omicron phase had lower case-fatality rates at 14 days (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0·32 [95% CI 0·19-0·61) and 28 days (0·34 [0·16-0·79]), complications due to COVID-19 (0·26 [0·17-0·46]), and hospitalisation due to COVID-19 (0·17 [0·09-0·32]), and had less requirements for COVID-19-specific therapy (0·22 [0·15-0·34]) and oxygen therapy (0·24 [0·14-0·43]) than did those diagnosed during the alpha-delta phase. Unvaccinated patients diagnosed during the omicron phase had similar crude case-fatality rates at 14 days (ten [25%] of 40 patients vs 114 [17%] of 656) and at 28 days (11 [27%] of 40 vs 184 [28%] of 656) and similar rates of hospitalisation due to COVID-19 (18 [43%] of 42 vs 266 [41%] of 652) and complications from COVID-19 (13 [31%] of 42 vs 237 [36%] of 659) as those diagnosed during the alpha-delta phase. INTERPRETATION Despite time-dependent improvements in outcomes reported in the omicron phase compared with the earlier phases of the pandemic, patients with cancer remain highly susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 if they are not vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. Our findings support universal vaccination of patients with cancer as a protective measure against morbidity and mortality from COVID-19. FUNDING National Institute for Health and Care Research Imperial Biomedical Research Centre and the Cancer Treatment and Research Trust.
Collapse
|
31
|
Müller V, Hein A, Hartkopf AD, Fasching PA, Kolberg HC, Hadji P, Tesch H, Häberle L, Ettl J, Lüftner D, Wallwiener M, Beckmann MW, Schneeweiss A, Belleville E, Uhrig S, Wimberger P, Hielscher C, Meyer J, Wurmthaler LA, Kurbacher CM, Wuerstlein R, Untch M, Janni W, Taran FA, Lux MP, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY, Fehm TN, Michel LL. Occurrence and characteristics of patients with de novo advanced breast cancer according to patient and tumor characteristics - A retrospective analysis of a real world registry. Eur J Cancer 2022; 172:13-21. [PMID: 35728342 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Revised: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) may have different clinical and pathological characteristics. In studies concerned with first-line metastatic patients, the proportion of these patients without secondary resistance mechanisms may have a large influence ont the study results. The aim of this study was to identify patient and tumor characteristics that are associated with dnMBC vs. recurrent MBC (rMBC). METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of data prospectively collected in the PRAEGNANT metastatic breast cancer registry (NCT02338167). Firs line treated patients were eligible. Patient and tumor characteristics were compared with common disease and tumor characteristics relative to de novo metastatic status, as well as early and late recurrences after primary disease without metastases. RESULTS Among the 947 patients identified, 355 were included with de novo metastatic disease (37.5%). Older age and HER2-positive disease were significantly associated with a higher frequency of dnMBC. Patients younger than 50, 50-69, or 70 years or older had dnMBC frequencies of 22.7%, 44.0%, and 57.6%, respectively. HER2-positive patients had dnMBC at initial presentation in 49.1% of cases, in comparison with 21.9%, 35.5%, and 37.6% in patients with triple-negative, luminal A-like and luminal B-like breast cancer, respectively. CONCLUSION Age and breast cancer subtype are associated with the frequency of first-line MBC patients. Inclusion criteria concerning age or breast cancer subtype can influence the frequency of these patients in a selected patient population and can therefore modify the number of patients with secondary resistance to specific therapies in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Andreas D Hartkopf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany.
| | | | - Peyman Hadji
- Frankfurt Center for Bone Health, Frankfurt am Main, Ühilips-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Lothar Häberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany; Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Johannes Ettl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany; Immanuel Hospital Märkische Schweiz & Medical University of Brandenburg Theodor-Fontane, Brandenburg, Germany
| | - Markus Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Sabrina Uhrig
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Julia Meyer
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany; Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lena A Wurmthaler
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Christian M Kurbacher
- Department of Gynecology I (Gynecologic Oncology), Gynecologic Center Bonn-Friedensplatz, Bonn, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Center and CCC Munich, Munich University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Helios Clinics Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | | | - Michael P Lux
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, Germany; Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Diethelm Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sara Y Brucker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Tanja N Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Laura L Michel
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Gluz O, Christgen M, Kuemmel S, zu Eulenburg C, Braun M, Aktas B, Luedtke-Heckenkamp K, Forstbauer H, Grischke EM, Schumacher C, Krauss K, Thill M, Warm M, Graeser MK, Wuerstlein R, Kates RE, Baehner FL, Nitz U, Kreipe HH, Harbeck N. Concordance and clinical impact of ER, PR, HER2 expression by local and central immunohistochemistry versus RT-PCR in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer (EBC): Results from the ADAPT trial. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
536 Background: We evaluated concordance of ER, PR and HER2 status between local, central, and RT-PCR/mRNA assessments and its clinical impact in the ADAPT trial collective in HR+ HER2- EBC (NCT01779206). Particularly, validity of borderline ER-positivity (expression level 1-10%) has great clinical relevance as treatment concepts between luminal-like and triple negative (TNBC) EBC differ substantially. Methods: Patients (pts) with clinically high-risk HR+/HER2- EBC (ER and/or PR >1%) were initially treated by 3 (+/-1) weeks of endocrine therapy (ET) before surgery or sequential core biopsy (CB) and then allocated to an ET-alone or chemotherapy (ET) trial, depending on risk and endocrine response. OncotypeDX (incl. RT-PCR for ER, PR, HER2) and central IHC for ER, PR, HER2 were performed on the initial 1.CB. ER-low cohort was defined as 1-10% expression by local OR central lab (ASCO-CAP). Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios. Results: In ADAPT, 5149 pts from 81 centers in Germany with locally ER and/or PR positive (known quantitative levels) EBC were screened 2012-2018. Median follow-up was 59 months. For ER (positive vs. negative), overall concordance measured as agreement (κ) was high between all three assessments: Local vs. central IHC: 99.3% (κ = 0.45), RT-PCR vs. central IHC: 99% (κ = 0.48). Concordance was lower for PR: RT-PCR vs. central IHC: 90.5% (κ = 0.58), local vs. central IHC: 93.1% (κ = 0.56). 3% were centrally found as HER2+ in 1.CB (73% of them were negative by RT-PCR) and/or 2. Sample. Regarding HER2-low status (1+ or 2+ but ISH negative), concordance between local and central IHC was only 53.8% (κ = 0.09). Of all pts, only 2% (n=109; n=85 with both measurements available) had low ER expression (1-10%) by either local or central pathology. Only 9 of them were concordantly identified as ER-low (11%); 8/58 (14%) ER-low by local lab had TNBC by central lab. 17/47 ER-low cases (36.2%) with known post-endocrine Ki67post had Ki67post <10% vs. 59.7% in ER>10%. 41.8% of ER-low cases had RS<25 vs. 76.7% in ER>10%. All cases with ER <10% by both assessments and those with Ki-67≥40% had RS >25. We observed worse iDFS (HR 1.91, p=0.034) in the ER-low group vs. ER>10%. Conclusions: Although we have confirmed high agreement between local and central IHC and RT-PCR for ER, PR, HER2 assessment in locally HR+/HER2- EBC, there are still a few clinically relevant discordances. Regarding HER2-low status, standardization and quality assurance are needed if this becomes clinically relevant. Treatment of the heterogeneous ER-low group as TNBC appears reasonable only if “ER-low” is confirmed by a second assessment and in cases with Ki-67>40%. Preoperative ET response assessment may be helpful if an endocrine-based therapy concept is intended. Clinical trial information: NCT01779206.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group and Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Sherko Kuemmel
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany and Clinics Essen-Mitte, Breast Center, Essen, Germany and Women’s Clinic, Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Michael Braun
- Interdisciplinary Breast Center, Rotkreuz-Clinics Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Bahriye Aktas
- University of Leipzig Medical Center, Department of Gynecology, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | | | - Eva-Maria Grischke
- University Women´s Clinic Tuebingen, Eberhard Karls University, Tubingen, Germany
| | | | - Katja Krauss
- Breast Center, Dept. Obstetrics & Gynecology, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Breast Center, Agaplesion Markus Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Mathias Warm
- Breast Center Cologne-Holweide, Municipal Hospital Holweide, Cologne, Germany
| | - Monika Karla Graeser
- West German Study Group and Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany and Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Breast Center, Dept. OB&GYN, University of Munich (LMU) and CCCLMU, West German Study Group, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study Group and Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Harbeck N, Gluz O, Christgen M, Braun M, Thill M, Wimberger P, Luedtke-Heckenkamp K, Graeser M, Hilpert F, Bjelic-Radisic V, Krauss K, Warm M, Zaiss MR, Hartkopf AD, Just M, Kreipe HH, Nitz U, zu Eulenburg C, Wuerstlein R, Kuemmel S. Adjuvant dynamic marker-adjusted personalized therapy comparing endocrine therapy plus ribociclib versus chemotherapy in intermediate-risk HR+/HER2- early breast cancer: ADAPTcycle. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.tps609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
TPS609 Background: The WSG ADAPT trial program focusses on individualization of (neo)-adjuvant decision-making in EBC in a subtype-specific manner. Clinical feasibility of the WSG ADAPT trial goals - early response assessment and subtype-specific therapy tailoring to those patients (pts) who are most likely to benefit - has recently been confirmed by the 5-years survival data of the ADAPT HR+/HER2- clinical trial. Methods: WSG-ADAPTcycle is a prospective, multi-center, interventional, two-arm, (neo)adjuvant, non-blinded, randomized, controlled phase III trial (NCT04055493) investigating whether treatment with the CDK4/6 inhibitor ribociclib (600mg/day) together with ET is superior to standard-chemotherapy (CT) in intermediate-risk HR+/HER2- EBC. Definition of intermediate-risk is either based on Oncotype DX and endocrine responder status (measured by Ki67-response after 2-4 weeks of induction endocrine therapy (ET)) or on low-intermediate baseline Ki67 and high estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR)-expression (Dowsett et al. NPJ Breast Cancer 2020). Co-primary endpoints are DFS and dDFS. It is planned to screen 5600 pts and to randomize 1670 pts (1002 to ribociclib + ET; 668 to standard CT followed by ET). Study start was in July 2019 (88 sites, enrollment period 42 months) and until date of submission, 3079 pts have been screened and 811 randomized (490 ribociclib / 321 CT). Pre-/postmenopausal pts with histologically confirmed invasive HR+/HER2- EBC with high clinical risk (cT2-4 or Ki-67 20% or G3 or cN+) are eligible if they fulfil the ADAPT intermediate-risk criteria: Recurrence Score (RS) ≤25 plus several risk factors and poor ET responder, RS >25 and ET-responder in p/cN0-1 pts, or RS ≤25 with c/pN2-3 in ET-responder. Direct randomization of premenopausal patients (irrespective of ET-response) with c/pN0 and RS 16-25 or c/pN1 with RS 0-25 is allowed according to investigator´s decision; however, based on the ADAPT results, ET+ovarian function suppression alone is strongly recommended in ET-responders. Treatment duration is 2 years for the ribociclib + aromatase inhibitor (AI) (premenopausal: AI + GnRH)-arm and 16-24 weeks for the CT-arm; neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment is allowed. The minimum 5-year follow-up phase includes standard adjuvant ET. ePROs are collected using CANKADO; ECG monitoring is performed using a novel eHealth method. Translational analyses: Tumor tissue will be collected prior to ET, after at least 3 weeks of ET, if residual tumor is diagnosed (neoadjuvant treatment), and at recurrence, to identify potential resistance markers. Exploratory tissue biomarker research will be conducted to assess alterations in molecular markers. In addition, ctDNA/ctRNA from optional blood samples will be assessed for mutations and gene expression relevant for HR+/HER2- EBC. Clinical trial information: NCT04055493.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Dept. Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Munich (LMU) and CCCLMU and West German Study Group, Munich, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group and Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Michael Braun
- Interdisciplinary Breast Center, Rotkreuz-Clinics Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Breast Center, Agaplesion Markus Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Monika Graeser
- Breast Center Niederrhein, Ev. Bethesda Hospital and Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg and West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Felix Hilpert
- Breast Center Hamburg International, Hospital Jerusalem, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Vesna Bjelic-Radisic
- Breast Unit, Helios University Clinic, University Witten-Herdecke, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Katja Krauss
- Breast Center, Dept. Obstetrics & Gynecology, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Mathias Warm
- Breast Center Cologne-Holweide, Municipal Hospital Holweide, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Tuebingen and University of Ulm, Tuebingen and Ulm, Germany
| | - Marianne Just
- Oncological Specialist Practice Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
| | | | - Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study Group/Breast Center Niederrhein, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Breast Center, Dept. OB&GYN, University of Munich (LMU) and CCCLMU, West German Study Group, Munich, Germany
| | - Sherko Kuemmel
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany and Clinics Essen-Mitte, Breast Center, Essen, Germany and Women’s Clinic, Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany, Essen, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Nitz U, Gluz O, Graeser M, Christgen M, Kuemmel S, Grischke EM, Braun M, Augustin D, Potenberg J, Krauss K, Schumacher C, Forstbauer H, Reimer T, Stefek A, Fischer HH, Pelz E, zu Eulenburg C, Kates R, Wuerstlein R, Kreipe HH, Harbeck N, von Schumann R, Kuhn W, Polata S, Bielecki W, Meyer R, Just M, Kraudelt S, Siggelkow W, Wortelmann H, Kleine-Tebbe A, Leitzen L, Kirchhof H, Krabisch P, Hackmann J, Depenbusch R, Gnauert K, Staib P, Lehnert A, Hoffmann O, Briest S, Lindner C, Heyl V, Bauer L, Uleer C, Mohrmann S, Viehstaedt N, Malter W, Link T, Buendgen N, Tio J. De-escalated neoadjuvant pertuzumab plus trastuzumab therapy with or without weekly paclitaxel in HER2-positive, hormone receptor-negative, early breast cancer (WSG-ADAPT-HER2+/HR–): survival outcomes from a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:625-635. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00159-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
35
|
Stefan A, Petkovic M, König A, Koch J, Hagemann F, Wuerstlein R, Harbeck N, Mahner S, Kaltofen T. Increased risk for thromboembolic events from combination of a gynecologic malignancy with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2022; 16:119. [PMID: 35313981 PMCID: PMC8937821 DOI: 10.1186/s13256-022-03340-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE During the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic, several patient groups are at particular risk. Mortality is higher among cancer patients and may be increased further by thromboembolic events, which are more common in coronavirus 2019 patients according to recent publications. We discuss the association of gynecologic malignancies, Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, and thromboembolism by reporting a case study and summarizing available literature. CASE REPORT A 71-year-old Caucasian patient with ovarian cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy was diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Routine screening revealed infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in absence of specific symptoms. After uneventful recovery, oncologic treatment could be continued a few weeks later. METHODS We performed a systematic review of the literature on PubMed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The search included articles ahead of print, published between 1 December 2019 and 1 June 2020. Cross-searches were conducted on all relevant articles. RESULTS We identified five articles meeting the defined criteria, including two retrospective studies, a review, a position paper, as well as a letter to the editor. CONCLUSION Cancer patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 have a relatively poor outcome, which may partially be due to a higher rate of thromboembolic events. Thromboprophylaxis is recommended, and scoring systems are helpful in early detection. In cancer patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, individual risk for thromboembolic events should be taken into account when considering interruption versus continuation of antitumoral therapy. However, further data and studies are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Stefan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Marija Petkovic
- Department of Medicine IV, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander König
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Julian Koch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Friederike Hagemann
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sven Mahner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Till Kaltofen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Kuemmel S, Gluz O, Reinisch M, Kostara A, Scheffen I, Graeser M, Wuerstlein R, Nitz U, Luedtke-Heckenkamp K, Hartkopf A, Hilpert F, Kentsch A, Ziske C, Depenbusch R, Braun M, Blohmer J, zu Eulenburg C, Christgen M, Bartels S, Kreipe H, Pelz E, Schmid P, Harbeck N. Abstract PD10-11: Keyriched-1- A prospective, multicenter, open label, neoadjuvant phase ii single arm study with pembrolizumab in combination with dual anti-HER2 blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab in early breast cancer patients with molecular HER2-enriched intrinsic subtype. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-pd10-11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: De-escalating strategies seem promising in HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC) and chemo-free regimens are thus of key interest. Recent data have underlined the role of tumor immunogenicity in response to de-escalated neoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapy. Therefore, the prospective single arm hypothesis-generating phase II KEYRICHED-1 trial (NCT03988036) investigates the pCR-rate in patients with HER2-enriched EBC receiving four cycles of the dual anti-HER2 blockade in combination with the checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab. Initial studies with dual antibody-based HER2 blockade alone were able to achieve pCR-rates of 20-40%, which did not quite match the pCR-rates obtained with concurrent chemotherapy. KEYRICHED-1 aims at achieving pCR-rates comparable to standard chemotherapy-containing regimens by incorporating appropriate molecular selection and immune oncology.. Methods: A total of 48 pre- and postmenopausal patients with newly diagnosed HER2 2+ or 3+ EBC (stage I-III) and HER2-enriched (HER2-E) subtype by PAM50 were enrolled in this single-arm study. All patients received four cycles of study treatment with pembrolizumab (200mg), trastuzumab biosimilar (Trazimera®, loading dose 8mg/kg bodyweight (BW), maintenance dose 6mg/kg BW), and pertuzumab (loading dose 840mg/kg BW, maintenance dose 420mg/kg BW) q21d. Primary endpoint was centrally confirmed pCR (ypT0/is, ypN0). The trial was planned as a Simon's two-stage design (null and alternative pCR were 40% and 60%); interim analysis after 16 patients had to show a pCR rate of at least 50% to continue recruitment.. Results: Between 05/2020 and 03/2021, 98 patients were screened. N=52 (55%) had HER2-E subtype, of whom 48 patients entered the treatment phase. Median patient age was 57 years (28-83). 65% had tumors > 2 cm and 30% positive lymph node status. Centrally confirmed pCR-rate in surgical specimens was 46% (95% CI 0.31-0.62) in the 43 patients of the per-protocol-population, and 52% (95%CI 0.37-0.67) in all 46 evaluable patients (local assessment; two pCRs verified only by core biopsy) (p=0.22 and p=0.06 for null hypothesis, respectively). Despite HER2-E subtype, no pCR was observed in the four patients with immunohistochemical (IHC) HER2 2+/ISH-positive status in contrast to 20/39 (51.2%) pCR in IHC HER2 3+ tumors. Centrally confirmed pCR-rate in HR+/HER2+ tumors was 38.5% compared to 58.5% in HR-/HER2+ tumors. No new safety signals were observed.. Conclusions: These are the first results of a neoadjuvant chemotherapy-free 12-week de-escalation anti-HER2-regimen with trastuzumab and pertuzumab in combination with the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in patients with a HER2-E EBC. In the context of the WSG ADAPT HER2+ de-escalation trials the observed pCR-rates compare favorably in HR+ as well as HR- HER2+ EBC. Moreover, KEYRICHED-1 demonstrates that with appropriate molecular patient selection clinically meaningful pCR-rates in the range of those obtained with longer, more toxic chemotherapy-containing regimens can be achieved.
Citation Format: Sherko Kuemmel, Oleg Gluz, Mattea Reinisch, Athina Kostara, Iris Scheffen, Monika Graeser, Rachel Wuerstlein, Ulrike Nitz, Kerstin Luedtke-Heckenkamp, Andreas Hartkopf, Felix Hilpert, Angela Kentsch, Carsten Ziske, Reinhard Depenbusch, Michael Braun, Jens Blohmer, Christine zu Eulenburg, Matthias Christgen, Stephan Bartels, Hans Kreipe, Enrico Pelz, Peter Schmid, Nadia Harbeck. Keyriched-1- A prospective, multicenter, open label, neoadjuvant phase ii single arm study with pembrolizumab in combination with dual anti-HER2 blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab in early breast cancer patients with molecular HER2-enriched intrinsic subtype [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD10-11.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Breast Center, Dept. OB&GYN and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Hartkopf
- University Clinics Tuebingen, Department for Senology, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Felix Hilpert
- Breast Center Hamburg at Hospital Jerusalem, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Angela Kentsch
- Diakovere Henriettenstift, Dept. for Gynecology, Hanover, Germany
| | - Carsten Ziske
- Praxis Dr. H. Forstbauer, C. Ziske, R. Reihs, E. Rodermann, A. Diel, Troisdorf, Germany
| | | | | | - Jens Blohmer
- Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Dept. of Gynecology with Breast Center, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Stephan Bartels
- Hanover Medical School, Institute of Pathology, Hanover, Germany
| | - Hans Kreipe
- Hanover Medical School, Institute of Pathology, Hanover, Germany
| | | | - Peter Schmid
- Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Dept. OB&GYN and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Monti M, Degenhardt T, Brain E, Wuerstlein R, Argusti A, Puntoni M, Rollandi GA, Corradengo D, Boni L, Ilhan H, Nanni O, Cortes J, Piris-Gimenez A, Piccardo A, Iacozzi M, Matteucci F, Di Iorio V, Alberini JL, Schröder C, Harbeck N, Gennari A. ERANET JTC 2011: Submission and Activation of an International Academic Translational Project in Advanced Breast Cancer. Experience From the ET-FES Study. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 8:817678. [PMID: 35096909 PMCID: PMC8794579 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.817678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Academic research is important to face unmet medical needs. The Oncological community encounters many hurdles in setting up multicenter investigator-driven trials mainly due to administrative complexity. The purpose of a network organization at a multinational level is to facilitate clinical trials through standardization, coordination, and education for drug development and regulatory approval. Methods: The application of an European grant foresees the creation of a consortium which aims at facilitating multi-center academic clinical trials. Results: The ERA-NET TRANSCAN Call 2011 on “Validation of biomarkers for personalized cancer medicine” was released on December 2011. This project included Italian, Spanish, French and German centers. The approval process included Consortium constitution, project submission, Clinical Trial Submission, and activation on a national level. The different timescales for submitting study documents in each Country and the misalignment of objections by each Competent Authority CA, generated several requests for changes to the study documents which meant amendments had to be made; as requested by the 2001/20/EC Directive, the alignment of core documents is mandatory. This procedure impacted significantly on study activation timelines. Time to first patient in was 14, 10, 28, and 31 months from the date of submission in Italy, France, Spain, and Germany, respectively. Accrual was stopped on 22nd January 2021 due to an 18F FES shortage as the primary reason but also for having exceeded the project deadlines with consequent exhaustion of the funds allocated for the project. Conclusions: Pharmaceutical companies might be reluctant to fund research projects aimed at treatment individualization if the approval for a wider indication has already been achieved. Academic trials therefore become fundamental for promoting trials which are not attractive to big pharma. It was very difficult and time consuming to activate an academic clinical trial, for this reason, a study may become “old” as new drugs entered into the market. National institutions should promote the development of clinical research infrastructures and network with competence in regulatory, ethical, and legal skills to speed up academic research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuela Monti
- Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scienteifico Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "DinoAmadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Tom Degenhardt
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ludwig Maximilians University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Etienne Brain
- Department of Clinical Research and Medical Oncology, Institut Curie-Hopital "René Huguenin", Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ludwig Maximilians University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alessandra Argusti
- Clinical Trial Research Unit, Ente Ospedaliero Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | - Matteo Puntoni
- Clinical Trial Research Unit, Ente Ospedaliero Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Davide Corradengo
- Clinical Trial Research Unit, Ente Ospedaliero Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | - Luca Boni
- Clinical Trials Unit, Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro Istituto Scientifico Tumori, Genoa, Italy
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Die Radiologie (Centre for Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Radiotherapy), Munich, Germany
| | - Oriana Nanni
- Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scienteifico Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "DinoAmadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Javier Cortes
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alejandro Piris-Gimenez
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Arnoldo Piccardo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ente Ospedaliero Galliera Hospitals, Genoa, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Iacozzi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ente Ospedaliero Galliera Hospitals, Genoa, Italy
| | - Federica Matteucci
- Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scienteifico Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "DinoAmadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Valentina Di Iorio
- Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scienteifico Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "DinoAmadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Jean Louis Alberini
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Centre "Georges-François Leclerc", Dijon, France
| | - Carolien Schröder
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dutch Cancer Institute Nederlands Kanker Instituut - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ludwig Maximilians University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alessandra Gennari
- Department of Translational Oncology, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Wuerstlein R, Cardoso F, Haidinger R. Expert Discussion: Highlights from ABC6: Bridging the Gap and Insights in This First Virtual ABC Conference and from 10 Years ABC Consensus. Breast Care (Basel) 2022; 17:107-112. [PMID: 35355694 PMCID: PMC8914231 DOI: 10.1159/000521342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Wuerstlein
- Breast Center and CCC Munich, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany,*Rachel Wuerstlein,
| | - Fatima Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Nitz U, Gluz O, Christgen M, Grischke EM, Augustin D, Kuemmel S, Braun M, Potenberg J, Kohls A, Krauss K, Stefek A, Schumacher C, Forstbauer H, Reimer T, Fischer H, Liedtke C, Wuerstlein R, Schumacher J, Kates R, Kreipe H, Harbeck N. Corrigendum to “De-escalation strategies in HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC): final analysis of the WSG-ADAPT HER2+/HR− phase II trial: efficacy, safety, and predictive markers for 12weeks of neoadjuvant dual blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab ± weekly paclitaxel”. Ann Oncol 2022; 33:355. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
40
|
Grote I, Bartels S, Kandt L, Bollmann L, Christgen H, Gronewold M, Raap M, Lehmann U, Gluz O, Nitz U, Kuemmel S, Zu Eulenburg C, Braun M, Aktas B, Grischke EM, Schumacher C, Luedtke-Heckenkamp K, Kates R, Wuerstlein R, Graeser M, Harbeck N, Christgen M, Kreipe H. TP53 mutations are associated with primary endocrine resistance in luminal early breast cancer. Cancer Med 2021; 10:8581-8594. [PMID: 34779146 PMCID: PMC8633262 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Revised: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Whereas the genomic landscape of endocrine‐resistant breast cancer has been intensely characterized in previously treated cases with local or distant recurrence, comparably little is known about genomic alterations conveying primary non‐responsiveness to endocrine treatment in luminal early breast cancer. Methods In this study, 622 estrogen receptor‐expressing breast cancer cases treated with short‐term preoperative endocrine therapy (pET) from the WSG‐ADAPT trial (NCT01779206) were analyzed for genetic alterations associated with impaired endocrine proliferative response (EPR) to 3‐week pET with tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors. EPR was categorized as optimal (post‐pET Ki67 <10%) versus slightly, moderately, and severely impaired (post‐pET Ki67 10%–19%, 20%–34%, and ≥35%, respectively). Recently described gene mutations frequently found in previously treated advanced breast cancer were analyzed (ARID1A, BRAF, ERBB2, ESR1, GATA3, HRAS, KRAS, NRAS, PIK3CA, and TP53) by next‐generation sequencing. Amplifications of CCND1, FGFR1, ERBB2, and PAK1 were determined by digital PCR or fluorescence in situ hybridization. Results ERBB2 amplification (p = 0.0015) and mutations of TP53 (p < 0.0001) were significantly associated with impaired EPR. Impaired EPR in TP53‐mutated breast cancer cases was independent from the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score group and was seen both with tamoxifen‐ and aromatase inhibitor‐based pET (p = 0.0005 each). Conclusion We conclude that impaired EPR to pET is suitable to identify cases with primary endocrine resistance in early luminal breast cancer and that TP53‐mutated luminal cancers might not be sufficiently treated by endocrine therapy alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Grote
- Hannover Medical School, Institute of Pathology, Hannover, Germany
| | - Stephan Bartels
- Hannover Medical School, Institute of Pathology, Hannover, Germany
| | - Leonie Kandt
- Hannover Medical School, Institute of Pathology, Hannover, Germany
| | - Laura Bollmann
- Hannover Medical School, Institute of Pathology, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Malte Gronewold
- Hannover Medical School, Institute of Pathology, Hannover, Germany
| | - Mieke Raap
- Hannover Medical School, Institute of Pathology, Hannover, Germany
| | - Ulrich Lehmann
- Hannover Medical School, Institute of Pathology, Hannover, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Ev. Bethesda Hospital, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,University Clinics Cologne, Women's Clinic and Breast Center, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Ev. Bethesda Hospital, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Sherko Kuemmel
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Clinics Essen-Mitte, Breast Unit, Essen, Germany.,Charité, Women's Clinic, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Bahriye Aktas
- University Clinics Essen, Women's Clinic, Essen, Germany.,University Clinics Leipzig, Women's Clinic, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Ronald Kates
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Department OB&GYN and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Breast Center, Munich, Germany
| | - Monika Graeser
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Ev. Bethesda Hospital, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Department OB&GYN and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Breast Center, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Hans Kreipe
- Hannover Medical School, Institute of Pathology, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Garrigós L, Saura C, Martinez-Vila C, Zambelli A, Bower M, Pistilli B, Lambertini M, Ottaviani D, Diamantis N, Lumsden A, Pernas S, Generali D, Seguí E, Viñas G, Felip E, Sanchez A, Rizzo G, Santoro A, Cortellini A, Perone Y, Chester J, Iglesias M, Betti M, Vincenzi B, Libertini M, Mazzoni F, Zoratto F, Berardi R, Guida A, Wuerstlein R, Loizidou A, Sharkey R, Aguilar Company J, Matas M, Saggia C, Chiudinelli L, Colomba-Blameble E, Galazi M, Mukherjee U, Van Hemelrijck M, Marin M, Strina C, Prat A, Pla H, Ciruelos EM, Bertuzzi A, Del Mastro L, Porzio G, Newsom-Davis T, Ruiz I, Delany MB, Krengli M, Fotia V, Viansone A, Chopra N, Romeo M, Salazar R, Perez I, d'Avanzo F, Franchi M, Milani M, Pommeret F, Tucci M, Pedrazzoli P, Harbeck N, Ferrante D, Pinato DJ, Gennari A. COVID-19 in breast cancer patients: a subanalysis of the OnCovid registry. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2021; 13:17588359211053416. [PMID: 34777582 PMCID: PMC8573484 DOI: 10.1177/17588359211053416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer patients are at higher risk of COVID-19 complications and mortality than the rest of the population. Breast cancer patients seem to have better prognosis when infected by SARS-CoV-2 than other cancer patients. METHODS We report a subanalysis of the OnCovid study providing more detailed information in the breast cancer population. RESULTS We included 495 breast cancer patients with a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Mean age was 62.6 years; 31.5% presented more than one comorbidity. The most frequent breast cancer subtype was luminal-like (n = 245, 49.5%) and 177 (35.8%) had metastatic disease. A total of 332 (67.1%) patients were receiving active treatment, with radical intent in 232 (47.6%) of them. Hospitalization rate was 58.2% and all-cause mortality rate was 20.3%. One hundred twenty-nine (26.1%) patients developed one COVID-19 complication, being acute respiratory failure the most common (n = 74, 15.0%). In the multivariable analysis, age older than 70 years, presence of COVID-19 complications, and metastatic disease were factors correlated with worse outcomes, while ongoing anticancer therapy at time of COVID-19 diagnosis appeared to be a protective factor. No particular oncological treatment was related to higher risk of complications. In the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection, 73 (18.3%) patients had some kind of modification on their oncologic treatment. At the first oncological reassessment (median time: 46.9 days ± 36.7), 255 (51.6%) patients reported to be fully recovered from the infection. There were 39 patients (7.9%) with long-term SARS-CoV-2-related complications. CONCLUSION In the context of COVID-19, our data confirm that breast cancer patients appear to have lower complications and mortality rate than expected in other cancer populations. Most breast cancer patients can be safely treated for their neoplasm during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Oncological treatment has no impact on the risk of SARS-CoV-2 complications, and, especially in the curative setting, the treatment should be modified as little as possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laia Garrigós
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cristina Saura
- Head Breast Cancer Unit, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Principal Investigator Breast Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Passeig Vall d'Hebrón 119-129, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Mark Bower
- Department of Oncology and National Centre for HIV Malignancy, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK
| | - Barbara Pistilli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, UOC Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | - Diego Ottaviani
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | | | - Ailsa Lumsden
- Translational Oncology & Urology Research (TOUR), School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sonia Pernas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, L'Hospitalet, Spain
| | - Daniele Generali
- Multidisciplinary Breast Pathology and Translational Research Unit, ASST Cremona, Casalmaggiore, Italy
| | - Elia Seguí
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gemma Viñas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, University Hospital Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | - Eudald Felip
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Badalona, Spain
| | - Ana Sanchez
- Department Medical Oncology, Hospital XII de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gianpiero Rizzo
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Armando Santoro
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessio Cortellini
- Department of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Ylenia Perone
- Medical Oncology, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
| | - John Chester
- Medical Oncology, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
| | - Maria Iglesias
- Department of Oncology, Hospital Universitario Son Llatzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Marta Betti
- Research Infrastructure, Research and Innovation Department, Azienda Ospedaliera "SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo", Alessandria, Italy
| | - Bruno Vincenzi
- Department of Oncology, University "Campus Bio-Medico", Rome, Italy
| | - Michela Libertini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
| | - Francesca Mazzoni
- Department of Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Rossana Berardi
- Oncology Clinic, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Ospedali Riuniti Di Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | - Annalisa Guida
- Struttura Complessa di Oncologia Medica e Traslazionale, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria di Terni, Italy
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Center and Gynecological Cancer Center and CCC Munich, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Angela Loizidou
- Department of Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Rachel Sharkey
- Department of Oncology and National Centre for HIV Malignancy, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK
| | - Juan Aguilar Company
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Matas
- Department of Oncology, Hospital Althaia Manresa, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Chiara Saggia
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy
| | | | | | - Myria Galazi
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Uma Mukherjee
- Medical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Mieke Van Hemelrijck
- Translational Oncology & Urology Research (TOUR), School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Mar Marin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, L'Hospitalet (Barcelona), Spain
| | - Carla Strina
- Multidisciplinary Breast Pathology and Translational Research Unit, ASST Cremona, Casalmaggiore, Italy
| | - Aleix Prat
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Helena Pla
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, University Hospital Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | | | - Alexia Bertuzzi
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Milan, Italy
| | - Lucia Del Mastro
- Breast Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Thomas Newsom-Davis
- Department of Oncology and National Centre for HIV Malignancy, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK
| | - Isabel Ruiz
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Marco Krengli
- Division of Radiotherapy, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont and Hospital "Maggiore della Carità", Novara, Italy
| | | | | | - Neha Chopra
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Margarita Romeo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Badalona, Spain
| | - Ramon Salazar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, L'Hospitalet (Barcelona), Spain
| | - Ignacio Perez
- Department of Oncology, Hospital Althaia Manresa, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesca d'Avanzo
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy
| | | | - Manuela Milani
- Multidisciplinary Breast Pathology and Translational Research Unit, ASST Cremona, Casalmaggiore, Italy
| | - Fanny Pommeret
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Marco Tucci
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Paolo Pedrazzoli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Center and Gynecological Cancer Center and CCC Munich, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniela Ferrante
- Department of Translational Medicine, Unit of Medical Statistics, University of Piemonte Orientale and Cancer Epidemiology, CPO Piemonte, Novara, Italy
| | - David J Pinato
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Alessandra Gennari
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Kolberg-Liedtke C, Wuerstlein R, Gluz O, Heitz F, Freudenberger M, Bensmann E, du Bois A, Nitz U, Pelz E, Warm M, Ortmann M, Sultova E, Brucker SY, Kates RE, Fehm T, Harbeck N. Phenotype Discordance between Primary Tumor and Metastasis Impacts Metastasis Site and Outcome: Results of WSG-DETECT-PriMet. Breast Care (Basel) 2021; 16:475-483. [PMID: 34720807 DOI: 10.1159/000512416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Tumor biological factors of breast cancer (BC) such as hormone receptor (HR) status, HER2 status, and grade can differ in the metastatic cascade from primary to lymph node (LN) metastasis and to distant metastatic tissue. Systematic data regarding therapeutic consequences are yet limited. Methods We conducted a prospectively planned, retrospective cohort study comparing BC phenotype in tissue from primary tumors (PTs), locoregional LN metastases, and disease recurrence (DR). HR and HER2 as well as tumor grade in PTs and DR were obtained by a database search. No centralized biomarker testing was performed. The impact of changes in tumor biological factors on post-recurrence survival (PRS) and overall survival was analyzed. Results PriMet comprises 635 patients (LN tissue in 142 patients). Discrepancies for HR or HER2 status between PT and DR were observed in 18.7 and 21.6% of cases, respectively. For HR status, positivity of PT and negativity of DR was seen more often (13.2%) than vice versa (5.5%). For HER2 status, negativity of the primary and positivity of DR was seen more often (14.9%) than vice versa (6.7%). Discordance was more often observed between PT and LN metastasis compared to LN versus DR. However, numbers were small. Compared to concordant non-triple-negative (TN) disease, concordant TN disease showed significantly inferior PRS. Conclusion We demonstrate receptor discordance to occur relatively frequently between PT, LN metastasis, and DR and to impact patient prognosis. However, clinical consequences of receptor discordance need to be drawn with caution considering clinical aspects as well as tumor biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Munich and CCCLMU, Munich, Germany.,West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany.,Evangelical Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Florian Heitz
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany.,Horst-Schmidt-Klinik Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | | | - Elena Bensmann
- Abteilung für Gynäkologie, Rotkreuzklinikum München, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas du Bois
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany.,Horst-Schmidt-Klinik Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany.,Evangelical Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Matthias Warm
- Brustzentrum, Krankenhaus Köln-Holweide, Cologne, Germany
| | - Monika Ortmann
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Cologne, Germany
| | - Elena Sultova
- Institut für Pathologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Sara Y Brucker
- Departement für Frauengesundheit, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Tanja Fehm
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Munich and CCCLMU, Munich, Germany.,West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Forster M, Wuerstlein R, Koenig A, Amann N, Beyer S, Kaltofen T, Degenhardt T, Burges A, Trillsch F, Mahner S, Harbeck N, Chelariu-Raicu A. COVID-19 vaccination in patients with breast cancer and gynecological malignancies: A German perspective. Breast 2021; 60:214-222. [PMID: 34736092 PMCID: PMC8555340 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The side effects of systemic cancer therapy and the lack of clinical data on safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination in cancer patients cause uncertainty among the patients about whether to get vaccinated or not. Here, we evaluated attitude towards and effects of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with breast and gynecological cancer undergoing systemic cancer therapy. METHODS Since March 15th, 2021, cancer patients who received one of the approved COVID-19 vaccines were routinely interviewed about immediate and late side effects. Clinical parameters such as current therapy, time interval between therapy administration and vaccination, and changes in the therapy schedule due to vaccination were documented. The collected data were analyzed de-identified as a part of routine quality assurance. RESULTS By July 27th, 2021, 218 patients (74.3% breast cancer patients) had received one of two COVID-19 vaccine doses, and 112 patients had received both doses: 77.5% received Conmirnaty (BioNTech/Pfizer), 16.1% Vaxzevria (Astra Zeneca) and 5.9% COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna. The COVID-19 vaccines had an acceptable safety profile with self-limiting local and systemic adverse events, which rarely lasted >48 h post vaccination. Symptoms occurred predominantly after the second dose of the vaccine and less frequently in older patients >55 years. No vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported, and only limited effects of vaccination on the therapy schedule were observed. CONCLUSIONS Breast and gynecologic cancer patients tolerate the COVID-19 vaccination while undergoing systemic cancer therapy without any additional side effects beyond those reported in the general population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Forster
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center, Gynecologic Oncology Center and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistraße 15, 81337, Munich, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center, Gynecologic Oncology Center and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistraße 15, 81337, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Koenig
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center, Gynecologic Oncology Center and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistraße 15, 81337, Munich, Germany
| | - Niklas Amann
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center, Gynecologic Oncology Center and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistraße 15, 81337, Munich, Germany
| | - Susanne Beyer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center, Gynecologic Oncology Center and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistraße 15, 81337, Munich, Germany
| | - Till Kaltofen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center, Gynecologic Oncology Center and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistraße 15, 81337, Munich, Germany
| | - Tom Degenhardt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center, Gynecologic Oncology Center and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistraße 15, 81337, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Burges
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center, Gynecologic Oncology Center and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistraße 15, 81337, Munich, Germany
| | - Fabian Trillsch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center, Gynecologic Oncology Center and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistraße 15, 81337, Munich, Germany
| | - Sven Mahner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center, Gynecologic Oncology Center and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistraße 15, 81337, Munich, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center, Gynecologic Oncology Center and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistraße 15, 81337, Munich, Germany
| | - Anca Chelariu-Raicu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center, Gynecologic Oncology Center and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistraße 15, 81337, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Kolben T, Beyer S, Ghasemi S, Hermelink K, Meister S, Degenhardt T, Himsl I, Edler von Koch F, Kolben TM, Wuerstlein R, Mahner S, Harbeck N, Hester A. Late Presentation at Primary Diagnosis of Breast Cancer: Patients' Personality Characteristics and Attitudes. Breast Care (Basel) 2021; 16:343-349. [PMID: 34602939 DOI: 10.1159/000509597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women worldwide. Despite screening and information efforts, about 10% of patients present with tumor size T3 or T4 at primary diagnosis. Late presentation is associated with more advanced tumor stage and consecutively with worse survival rates. Objective This study aimed to evaluate whether patients with a late presentation at primary BC diagnosis differ in their personality from those with early diagnosis. Methods In this bicentric, observational study, personality traits, positive and negative affectivity, anxiety, spirituality, illness beliefs, and sociodemographic characteristics were assessed in BC patients who presented with T-stages 3 or 4 (late presenters) and T-stages 1 or 2 (controls) at initial diagnosis. Results Forty patients (20 controls, 20 late presenters) were interviewed. "Late presenters" perceived their disease as long lasting and had significantly more "positive affectivity" in the current trait. Although no significant associations were found, there was a trend for late presenters to have higher education levels, less spiritual longing, less accurate explanation of their illness, less anxiety in the trait scale, and more conscientiousness than the controls. Conclusion As patients with late presentation for BC differ in specific psychological and sociodemographic characteristics from patients with early BC, the findings of this pilot project warrant additional investigations to identify further specific characteristics and motivations. Identifying patients at risk for late presentation and encouraging them to accept an earlier diagnosis could help to improve their therapy and, finally, their outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Kolben
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center and CCC LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Susanne Beyer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center and CCC LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sanaz Ghasemi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center and CCC LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kerstin Hermelink
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center and CCC LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sarah Meister
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center and CCC LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Tom Degenhardt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center and CCC LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Isabelle Himsl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum Dritter Orden, Munich, Germany
| | - Franz Edler von Koch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum Dritter Orden, Munich, Germany
| | - Theresa M Kolben
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center and CCC LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center and CCC LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sven Mahner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center and CCC LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center and CCC LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Anna Hester
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center and CCC LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Harbeck N, von Schumann R, Kates RE, Braun M, Kuemmel S, Schumacher C, Potenberg J, Malter W, Augustin D, Aktas B, Forstbauer H, Tio J, Grischke EM, Biehl C, Liedtke C, De Haas SL, Deurloo R, Wuerstlein R, Kreipe HH, Gluz O. Immune Markers and Tumor-Related Processes Predict Neoadjuvant Therapy Response in the WSG-ADAPT HER2-Positive/Hormone Receptor-Positive Trial in Early Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:4884. [PMID: 34638369 PMCID: PMC8508505 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Revised: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Prognostic or predictive biomarkers in HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC) may inform treatment optimization. The ADAPT HER2-positive/hormone receptor-positive phase II trial (NCT01779206) demonstrated pathological complete response (pCR) rates of ~40% following de-escalated treatment with 12 weeks neoadjuvant ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) ± endocrine therapy. In this exploratory analysis, we evaluated potential early predictors of response to neoadjuvant therapy. The effects of PIK3CA mutations and immune (CD8 and PD-L1) and apoptotic markers (BCL2 and MCL1) on pCR rates were assessed, along with intrinsic BC subtypes. Immune response and pCR were lower in PIK3CA-mutated tumors compared with wildtype. Increased BCL2 at baseline in all patients and at Cycle 2 in the T-DM1 arms was associated with lower pCR. In the T-DM1 arms only, the HER2-enriched subtype was associated with increased pCR rate (54% vs. 28%). These findings support further prospective pCR-driven de-escalation studies in patients with HER2-positive EBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CCCLMU, University of Munich (LMU), Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany;
- The West German Study Group, 41061 Mönchengladbach, Germany; (R.E.K.); (O.G.)
| | - Raquel von Schumann
- Evangelical Hospital Bethesda, 41061 Mönchengladbach, Germany; (R.v.S.); (S.K.)
| | - Ronald Ernest Kates
- The West German Study Group, 41061 Mönchengladbach, Germany; (R.E.K.); (O.G.)
| | | | - Sherko Kuemmel
- Evangelical Hospital Bethesda, 41061 Mönchengladbach, Germany; (R.v.S.); (S.K.)
- Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, 45136 Essen, Germany
- Klinik für Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum Charité-Universitätsmedizin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Wolfram Malter
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany;
| | - Doris Augustin
- Breast Center, Clinic Deggendorf, 94469 Deggendorf, Germany;
| | | | | | - Joke Tio
- University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany;
| | | | - Claudia Biehl
- Westphalian Breast Center, City Hospital Dortmund, 44137 Dortmund, Germany;
| | | | | | - Regula Deurloo
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., 4070 Basel, Switzerland; (S.L.D.H.); (R.D.)
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and CCCLMU, University of Munich (LMU), Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany;
| | | | - Oleg Gluz
- The West German Study Group, 41061 Mönchengladbach, Germany; (R.E.K.); (O.G.)
- Evangelical Hospital Bethesda, 41061 Mönchengladbach, Germany; (R.v.S.); (S.K.)
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Karsten N, Kolben T, Mahner S, Beyer S, Meister S, Kuhn C, Schmoeckel E, Wuerstlein R, Harbeck N, Ditsch N, Jeschke U, Friese K, Kolben TM. The role of E-Cadherin expression in primary site of breast cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2021; 305:913-920. [PMID: 34510244 PMCID: PMC8967771 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-021-06198-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The tumour's ability to metastasize is the major cause for fatal outcomes in cancer diseases. In breast cancer, aberrant E-Cadherin expression has been linked to invasiveness and poor prognosis. METHOD We assessed expression of E-Cadherin by immunohistochemistry in primary tumour tissue from 125 female breast cancer patients. Staining intensities were analysed using the immunoreactive score (IRS). We investigated E-Cadherin expression and its associations with clinicopathological parameters (age, tumour size, lymph node status, grade, hormone receptors, Her2 Status) as well as with recurrence and survival. RESULTS Increased, rather than aberrant E-Cadherin expression was found and was associated with poor outcome (p = 0.046). Our data show an association between elevated E-Cadherin in primary tumour tissue and an unfavourable negative prognosis in patients. CONCLUSION This association was somehow unexpected as loss of E-Cadherin has long been regarded as a prerequisite for development of invasiveness and metastases. Our findings support the notion that E-Cadherin promotes, rather than suppresses, development of metastasis and invasiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nora Karsten
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Breast Center and CCCLMU, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Kolben
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Breast Center and CCCLMU, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Sven Mahner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Breast Center and CCCLMU, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Susanne Beyer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Breast Center and CCCLMU, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Sarah Meister
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Breast Center and CCCLMU, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Christina Kuhn
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Elisa Schmoeckel
- Department of Pathology, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 27, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Breast Center and CCCLMU, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Breast Center and CCCLMU, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Udo Jeschke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Breast Center and CCCLMU, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. .,Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
| | - Klaus Friese
- Department of Oncology, Hospital Bad Trissl, Bad-Trissl-Straße 73, 83080, Oberaudorf, Germany
| | - Theresa Maria Kolben
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Breast Center and CCCLMU, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Hein A, Hartkopf AD, Emons J, Lux MP, Volz B, Taran FA, Overkamp F, Hadji P, Tesch H, Häberle L, Ettl J, Lüftner D, Wurmthaler LA, Wallwiener M, Müller V, Beckmann MW, Belleville E, Wimberger P, Hielscher C, Kurbacher CM, Wuerstlein R, Thomssen C, Untch M, Fasching PA, Janni W, Fehm TN, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY, Schneeweiss A, Kolberg HC. Prognostic effect of low-level HER2 expression in patients with clinically negative HER2 status. Eur J Cancer 2021; 155:1-12. [PMID: 34311211 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.06.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Revised: 06/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Assessment of HER2 overexpression using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or in situ hybridisation (ISH) for the detection of HER2 amplifications is standard to identify patients for established HER2-directed treatments. Patients with lower HER2 expression levels have recently also become candidates for novel therapies targeting HER2. This study aimed to assess tumour and patient characteristics and prognosis in patients with advanced breast cancer (aBC), relative to low HER2 expression levels. METHODS PRAEGNANT is a prospective aBC registry (NCT02338167), focusing on molecular biomarkers. Patients in all therapy lines receiving any kind of treatment are eligible. This analysis includes patients with conventionally HER2-negative aBC. Clinical outcome was compared in the groups with no (IHC score 0) or with low HER2 expression (IHC 1+, or IHC 2+/ISH negative). RESULTS Low HER2 expression levels in triple-negative aBC patients did not influence progression-free survival. Overall survival appeared poorer in patients with IHC 2+ compared with patients with no HER2 expression in the unadjusted analysis (hazard ratio 2.24, 95% confidence interval 0.1.12-4.47). However, this effect was not maintained in the adjusted analysis. In HER2-negative, hormone receptor-positive patients, low HER2 expression appeared to have no effect on prognosis, neither progression-free survival nor overall survival. CONCLUSIONS We could not demonstrate that HER2 expression at a low level and assessed in clinical routine can differentiate patients into prognostic groups. However, the prevalence of patients with a low expression makes this population interesting for clinical trials with potentially active treatments using HER2 as a target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Andreas D Hartkopf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Julius Emons
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael P Lux
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Frauenklinik St. Louise, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany; Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Bernhard Volz
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany; Ansbach University of Applied Sciences, Ansbach, Germany
| | - Florin-Andrei Taran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | | | - Peyman Hadji
- Frankfurt Center of Bone Health, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Lothar Häberle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany; Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Johannes Ettl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité University Hospital, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lena A Wurmthaler
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Christian M Kurbacher
- Gynäkologie I (Gynäkologische Onkologie), Gynäkologisches Zentrum Bonn-Friedensplatz, Bonn, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Center and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Department of Gynecology, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Helios Clinic Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Tanja N Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Diethelm Wallwiener
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sara Y Brucker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Pinato DJ, Scotti L, Gennari A, Colomba-Blameble E, Dolly S, Loizidou A, Chester J, Mukherjee U, Zambelli A, Aguilar-Company J, Bower M, Galazi M, Salazar R, Bertuzzi A, Brunet J, Mesia R, Sita-Lumsden A, Colomba J, Pommeret F, Seguí E, Biello F, Generali D, Grisanti S, Rizzo G, Libertini M, Moss C, Evans JS, Russell B, Wuerstlein R, Vincenzi B, Bertulli R, Ottaviani D, Liñan R, Marrari A, Carmona-García MC, Sng CCT, Tondini C, Mirallas O, Tovazzi V, Fotia V, Cruz CA, Saoudi-Gonzalez N, Felip E, R Lloveras A, Lee AJX, Newsom-Davis T, Sharkey R, Chung C, García-Illescas D, Reyes R, Sophia Wong YN, Ferrante D, Marco-Hernández J, Ruiz-Camps I, Gaidano G, Patriarca A, Sureda A, Martinez-Vila C, Sanchez de Torre A, Rimassa L, Chiudinelli L, Franchi M, Krengli M, Santoro A, Prat A, Tabernero J, V Hemelrijck M, Diamantis N, Cortellini A. Determinants of enhanced vulnerability to coronavirus disease 2019 in UK patients with cancer: a European study. Eur J Cancer 2021; 150:190-202. [PMID: 33932726 PMCID: PMC8023206 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.03.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2021] [Revised: 03/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite high contagiousness and rapid spread, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has led to heterogeneous outcomes across affected nations. Within Europe (EU), the United Kingdom (UK) is the most severely affected country, with a death toll in excess of 100,000 as of January 2021. We aimed to compare the national impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the risk of death in UK patients with cancer versus those in continental EU. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of the OnCovid study database, a European registry of patients with cancer consecutively diagnosed with COVID-19 in 27 centres from 27th February to 10th September 2020. We analysed case fatality rates and risk of death at 30 days and 6 months stratified by region of origin (UK versus EU). We compared patient characteristics at baseline including oncological and COVID-19-specific therapy across UK and EU cohorts and evaluated the association of these factors with the risk of adverse outcomes in multivariable Cox regression models. FINDINGS Compared with EU (n = 924), UK patients (n = 468) were characterised by higher case fatality rates (40.38% versus 26.5%, p < 0.0001) and higher risk of death at 30 days (hazard ratio [HR], 1.64 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.36-1.99]) and 6 months after COVID-19 diagnosis (47.64% versus 33.33%; p < 0.0001; HR, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.33-1.88]). UK patients were more often men, were of older age and have more comorbidities than EU counterparts (p < 0.01). Receipt of anticancer therapy was lower in UK than in EU patients (p < 0.001). Despite equal proportions of complicated COVID-19, rates of intensive care admission and use of mechanical ventilation, UK patients with cancer were less likely to receive anti-COVID-19 therapies including corticosteroids, antivirals and interleukin-6 antagonists (p < 0.0001). Multivariable analyses adjusted for imbalanced prognostic factors confirmed the UK cohort to be characterised by worse risk of death at 30 days and 6 months, independent of the patient's age, gender, tumour stage and status; number of comorbidities; COVID-19 severity and receipt of anticancer and anti-COVID-19 therapy. Rates of permanent cessation of anticancer therapy after COVID-19 were similar in the UK and EU cohorts. INTERPRETATION UK patients with cancer have been more severely impacted by the unfolding of the COVID-19 pandemic despite societal risk mitigation factors and rapid deferral of anticancer therapy. The increased frailty of UK patients with cancer highlights high-risk groups that should be prioritised for anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Continued evaluation of long-term outcomes is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Pinato
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK; Division of Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.
| | - Lorenza Scotti
- Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Department of Translational Medicine, CPO-Piemonte, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Alessandra Gennari
- Division of Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Emeline Colomba-Blameble
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Saoirse Dolly
- Medical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT), London, UK
| | - Angela Loizidou
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Internal Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - John Chester
- Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK; Medical Oncology, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
| | - Uma Mukherjee
- Medical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Juan Aguilar-Company
- Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain; Infectious Diseases, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mark Bower
- Department of Oncology and National Centre for HIV Malignancy, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK
| | - Myria Galazi
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Ramon Salazar
- Department of Medical Oncology, ICO L'Hospitalet, Oncobell Program (IDIBELL), CIBERONC, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Alexia Bertuzzi
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - Joan Brunet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, University Hospital Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | - Ricard Mesia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Badalona, Spain
| | - Ailsa Sita-Lumsden
- Medical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT), London, UK
| | - Johann Colomba
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Fanny Pommeret
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Elia Seguí
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Federica Biello
- Division of Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Daniele Generali
- Multidisciplinary Breast Pathology and Translational Research Unit, ASST Cremona, Italy; Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Italy
| | | | - Gianpiero Rizzo
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Michela Libertini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
| | - Charlotte Moss
- Translational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Joanne S Evans
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Beth Russell
- Translational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Center and Gynecological Cancer Center and CCC Munich, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Bruno Vincenzi
- Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Rossella Bertulli
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Diego Ottaviani
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Raquel Liñan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, University Hospital Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | - Andrea Marrari
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - M C Carmona-García
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, University Hospital Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | | | - Carlo Tondini
- Oncology Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Oriol Mirallas
- Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Claudia A Cruz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nadia Saoudi-Gonzalez
- Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eudald Felip
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Badalona, Spain
| | - Ariadna R Lloveras
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, University Hospital Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | - Alvin J X Lee
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Thomas Newsom-Davis
- Department of Oncology and National Centre for HIV Malignancy, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK
| | - Rachel Sharkey
- Department of Oncology and National Centre for HIV Malignancy, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK
| | - Chris Chung
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - David García-Illescas
- Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Roxana Reyes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Daniela Ferrante
- Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Department of Translational Medicine, CPO-Piemonte, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | | | - Isabel Ruiz-Camps
- Infectious Diseases, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gianluca Gaidano
- Division of Haematology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale and Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Andrea Patriarca
- Division of Haematology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale and Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Anna Sureda
- Haematology Department, ICO Hospitalet, Hospitalet de Llobregat, IDIBELL, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Lorenza Rimassa
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Marco Krengli
- Division of Radiotherapy, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale and Azienda Ospedaliera Maggiore Della Carita, Novara, Italy
| | - Armando Santoro
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - Aleix Prat
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Badalona, Spain; Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep Tabernero
- Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), IOB-Quiron, UVic-UCC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mieke V Hemelrijck
- Medical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT), London, UK; Translational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Alessio Cortellini
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK; Department of Biotechnology and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Gluz O, Nitz U, Christgen M, Braun M, Luedtke-Heckenkamp K, Darsow M, Forstbauer H, Potenberg J, Uleer C, Grischke EM, Aktas B, Schumacher C, zu Eulenburg C, Jozwiak K, Kates RE, Graeser M, Wuerstlein R, Kreipe HH, Kuemmel S, Harbeck N. Prognostic impact of recurrence score, endocrine response and clinical-pathological factors in high-risk luminal breast cancer: Results from the WSG-ADAPT HR+/HER2- chemotherapy trial. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
504 Background: In HR+/HER2- N0-1 early BC, postmenopausal patients (pts) with RS™ > 25 and a substantial proportion of premenopausal pts seem to benefit from addition of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) to endocrine therapy (ET). However, the magnitude of absolute benefit from this treatment intensification seems to depend on clinical-pathological and biological prognostic factors. For the first time, we present outcome from the CT part of the prospective phase III WSG-ADAPT HR+/HER- trial combining both static (RS in baseline core biopsy (CB) and dynamic (Ki67 response) biomarkers to optimize adjuvant therapy in luminal EBC. Methods: Pts with clinically high-risk HR+/HER2- EBC (cT2-4 OR clinically N+ OR G3 OR Ki67>15%) were initially treated by 3 (+/-1) weeks of standard ET (postmenopausal: mostly AI; premenopausal: TAM) before surgery or sequential CB. Pts with cN2-3 or G3/Ki67>40% were randomized directly to the CT trial. pN0-1 pts with RS0-11 OR RS12-25/ET-response (central Ki67postendocrine<10%) received ET alone; the remaining high-risk cohort was randomized to the CT trial: (neo)adjuvant dose-dense CT (4xPaclitaxelà4xEC q2w vs. 8xNab-Paclitaxel q1wà4xEC q2w) followed by ET. Primary endpoint is efficacy comparison of CT schedules for survival; secondary endpoints reported here involve impacts of key prognostic factors on survival. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate survival curves and hazard ratios. For this analysis, subgroups free of selection bias by RS/ET-response were defined. Results: 5625 pts were screened and 4621 (ITT) entered the trial. After 4.9y median follow-up, higher baseline and post-endocrine Ki-67 levels were associated with poorer iDFS (both p < 0.001). In the CT cohort (n = 2331), higher RS, nodal status, and tumor size were generally associated with poorer iDFS. However, iDFS differed between N1 and N0 status only among younger pts (<50 years). In pts with >4 positive LN (n = 390), lower RS was associated with improved iDFS (RS0-11 vs RS > 25: plog-rank= 0.016, 5y-iDFS 90% vs. 64%). In pts with RS > 25 (n = 965), low Ki67postendocrine, N0 status, and c/pT1 status were associated with improved iDFS. In particular, ET-responders had higher 5y-iDFS (84%) than ET-non-responders (77%; plog-rank= 0.040). Younger patients (<50 years old) with N0-1 RS 12-25/ ET-non-responders treated by CT had non-significantly poorer 5-year iDFS (89%) compared to those with ET-response treated by ET only (92%) (plog-rank= 0.249). Conclusion: First results from the prospective high risk cohort from a large prospective phase III ADAPT trial provide evidence for good prognosis in some pts with >4 positive LN and e.g. low RS. Moreover combination of lower post-endocrine Ki-67 and limited tumor burden may be a promising criterion for CT de-escalation strategies even in patients with high RS. Clinical trial information: NCT01779206.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group and Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study Group/Breast Center Niederrhein, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Michael Braun
- Interdisciplinary Breast Center, Rotkreuz-Clinics Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Maren Darsow
- Luisenhospital Duesseldorf, Practice for Senologic Oncology, Duesseldorf, Germany, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Eva-Maria Grischke
- University Women´s Clinic Tuebingen, Eberhard Karls University, Tubingen, Germany
| | - Bahriye Aktas
- University of Leipzig Medical Center, Department of Gynecology, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | | | - Katarzyna Jozwiak
- Medical School Brandenburg, Institute for Biometrics and Registry Research, Neuruppin, Neuruppin, Germany
| | | | | | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany and Breast Center, Dept. Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Munich (LMU) and CCCLMU, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Sherko Kuemmel
- Breast Center, Ev. Clinics Essen-Mitte and West German Study Group, Essen, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany and Breast Center, Dept. Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Munich (LMU) and CCCLMU, Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Richters LKK, Gluz O, Weber-Lassalle N, Christgen M, Haverkamp H, Kuemmel S, Kayali M, Kates RE, Grischke EM, Braun M, Warm M, Wuerstlein R, Ernst C, Graeser MK, Hauke J, Nitz U, Kreipe HH, Schmutzler RK, Hahnen E, Harbeck N. Pathological complete response rate and survival in patients with BRCA-associated triple-negative breast cancer after 12 weeks of de-escalated neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Translational results of the WSG-ADAPT TN randomized phase II trial (NCT01815242). J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
579 Background: The phase II trial WSG-ADAPT TN randomized triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients to receive 12 weeks of neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel (nab-pac) combined with carboplatin (carbo) vs gemcitabine (gem) and showed a substantial improvement of pathological complete response (pCR: ypT0/is, ypN0) with carbo (45.9% vs 28.7%). pCR had a strong favorable impact on iDFS after 3-year follow-up. Distribution of tumor mutations in BC-associated genes and impact of BRCA mutation status on pCR and outcome are analyzed here. Methods: NGS-based mutational analysis of BRCA1/2 and 18 further (potentially) BC-associated genes was performed on DNA derived from pretreatment FFPE samples (gem: n = 158, carbo: n = 108) using a customized gene panel. Variants with a variant fraction of ≥5% were included and classified according to IARC and ENIGMA guidelines. Results: In 42 of the 266 analyzed samples, at least one deleterious BRCA1/2-variant was found (15.8%; BRCA1 n = 37, BRCA2 n = 3, BRCA1+ BRCA2 n = 2) one of which displayed an additional STK11-mutation. In the BRCA1/2-negative cohort, a mutation in one of 14 further analyzed (potential) BC-risk genes was found in 19 samples (7.1%; BARD1 n = 3, CHEK2 n = 2, CDH1 n = 2, FANCM n = 3, PALB2 n = 5, RAD50 n = 1, RAD51C n = 1, RAD51D n = 1, XRCC2 n = 1; no deleterious mutations were found in ATM, BRIP1, MRE11A, NBN). At least one deleterious variant in TP53, PIK3CA, PTEN or MAP3K1 was seen in 89.1% (n = 237; TP53 n = 233, PIK3CA n = 22 PTEN n = 15, MAP3K1 n = 1). In 22 samples (8.3%) no deleterious mutation was identified in the analyzed genes. Overall, patients with tumor BRCA mutation (carbo n = 14, gem n = 28) had 45.2% vs 34.4% pCR (OR = 1.58, 95%-CI: 0.81-3.07, p =.18) without a mutation. pCR in the small group with mutation receiving carbo (n = 14) was 64.3% vs. 34.5% in all others (OR = 3.41, 95%-CI: 1.11-10.50; p =.03); direct comparison to BRCA-positive patients receiving gem (n = 28, 35.7%, OR = 3.2, 95%-CI: 0.85-12.36, p = 0.079) did not reach statistical significance. The results suggest that the strong favorable impact of pCR on iDFS is preserved even among BRCA-positive patients (n = 42, p =.07), as well as in the BRCA-negative subgroup (p <.001). No evidence for a predictive impact of BRCA mutation on efficacy of 4xEC additional chemotherapy was seen overall or within pCR subgroups. Conclusions: Twelve weeks of neoadjuvant nab-pac/carbo is a highly effective anthracycline-free regimen that leads to an excellent pCR-rate of 64% in tumor BRCA1/2-mutated cases. BRC A1/2 mutation status could support this de-escalation strategy in early TNBC, but further prospective validation of survival impacts in larger cohorts and with longer follow up is needed. More detailed survival analyses will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT01815242.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Katharina Katharina Richters
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group and Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Nana Weber-Lassalle
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Heinz Haverkamp
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sherko Kuemmel
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach and Breast Center, Ev. Clinics Essen-Mitte and Women’s Clinic, Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mohamad Kayali
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Eva-Maria Grischke
- University Women´s Clinic Tuebingen, Eberhard Karls University, Tubingen, Germany
| | - Michael Braun
- Interdisciplinary Breast Center, Rotkreuz-Clinics Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mathias Warm
- City Hospital Holweide, Breast Center, Cologne, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany and Breast Center, Dept. Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Munich (LMU) and CCCLMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Corinna Ernst
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Monika Karla Graeser
- West German Study Group and Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany and Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jan Hauke
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study Group and Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Rita K. Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Eric Hahnen
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany and Breast Center, Dept. Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Munich (LMU) and CCCLMU, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|