Comparison of the light transmission of new generation monolithic zirconia materials and lithium disilicate

PURPOSE

To compare the effects of different thicknesses of ceramic veneering on the light transmission of various monolithic zirconia and lithium disilicate materials used in esthetic restorations.

METHODS

Zirconia (i.e., Katana UT, Katana HT, Prozir Diamond, Prozir HT, and Zenostar MO) and lithium disilicate specimens (i.e., Emax HT and Emax MO) were prepared at thicknesses of 0.5 mm, 0.8 mm, and 1.2 mm. Additionally, 0.8 mm-thick specimens and 0.3 mm-thick ceramic veneer were prepared for veneering groups. The total transmittance of light values were measured using a spectrophotometer. The light transmission values were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and the post-hoc Dunnett tests (α= 0.05).

RESULTS

The Emax HT group defined significant differences from all groups (P< 0.05) at all thicknesses. The mean total transmittance of light ranged from 5.53% to 19.55%. There was no significant difference between the Katana UT and Prozir Diamond groups at the 0.5 mm, 0.8 mm, and 1.2 mm thicknesses (P> 0.05).

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The results of this study showed no significant effects of veneering ceramic on the light transmittance of the specimens at a thickness of 0.8 mm. Novel monolithic zirconia materials may be preferred over porcelain veneering in 0.8 mm-thick restorations, as the esthetic appearance of the restorations would not change.

Influence of anodized titanium abutment backgrounds on the color parameters of different zirconia materials

PURPOSE

To characterize the color outcome on different zirconia types of various colored titanium backgrounds produced with a newly developed anodized technique.

METHODS

Blue, green, pink and gold-colored titanium backgrounds were produced via different anodization voltage values. Non-anodized grey colored titanium was used as a control. A total of 40 disc-shaped zirconia specimens were prepared from four different zirconia types (Cercon HT, Noritake Alliance, Prettau, and Ice Zirkon). The zirconia specimens were placed on different titanium backgrounds to evaluate color differences (ΔE) by recording the L, a and b values. ΔE, ΔL, Δa and Δb values were compared for different titanium backgrounds and zirconia types. To analyze the results, repeated measures ANOVA and Bonferroni adjustments for pairwise comparison were used (α= 0.05).

RESULTS

The Cercon HT group had the highest ΔE value, while the Noritake group showed the lowest ΔE value (P< 0.05). ΔL, Δa and Δb values showed significant color changes depending on the color of the titanium background, the sintering procedure of zirconia and the zirconia ingredients (P< 0.05).

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Anodized titanium abutments may improve color in esthetic regions when a ceramic abutment cannot be used. The study showed that the gold-colored titanium produced via anodization was better than other colors at producing a tooth-like color for implant-supported zirconia restorations. Also, by adjusting the color of zirconia restorations, the effect of the background could be altered using the zirconia sintering protocol.

Effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of luting cements used with implant-supported prosthesis: An in vitro study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the shear bond strength of luting cements used with implant retained restorations on to titanium specimens after different surface treatments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred twenty disc shaped specimens were used. They were divided into three groups considering the surface treatments (no treatment, sandblasting, and oxygen plasma treatment). Water contact angle of specimens were determined. The specimens were further divided into four subgroups (n=10) according to applied cement types: polycarboxylate cement (Adhesor Carbofine-AC), temporary zinc oxide free cement (Temporary Cement-ZOC), non eugenol provisional cement for implant retained prosthesis (Premier Implant Cement-PI), and non eugenol acrylic-urethane polymer based provisional cement for implant luting (Cem Implant Cement-CI). Shear bond strength values were evaluated. Two-way ANOVA test and Regression analysis were used to statistical analyze the results.

RESULTS

Overall shear bond strength values of luting cements defined in sandblasting groups were considerably higher than other surfaces (P<.05). The cements can be ranked as AC > CI > PI > ZOC according to shear bond strength values for all surface treatment groups (P<.05). Water contact angles of surface treatments (control, sandblasting, and plasma treatment group) were 76.17° ± 3.99, 110.45° ± 1.41, and 73.80° ± 4.79, respectively. Regression analysis revealed that correlation between the contact angle of different surfaces and shear bond strength was not strong (P>.05).

CONCLUSION

The retentive strength findings of all luting cements were higher in sandblasting and oxygen plasma groups than in control groups. Oxygen plasma treatment can improve the adhesion ability of titanium surfaces without any mechanical damage to titanium structure.

Comparative radiopacity of conventional and full-contour Y-TZP ceramics

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiopacity of different yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystalline (Y-TZP) ceramics used in the fabrication of fixed dental prostheses. Disk-shaped specimens (N=120, n=30 per group) were fabricated with thicknesses of 0.3, 0.5, and 1 mm from the following four Y-TZP ceramics: Cercon ht (Degudent) (CZ), Prettau (Zirkonzahn) (ZZ), Alliance (Kuraray Noritake Dental) (NA), and Ice Zirkon (Zirkonzahn) (ICE). The optical densities of each material were measured from radiographic images, and each material (N=1) were characterized by using XRD and SEM. The results were analyzed with oneway analysis of variance and the Tukey-Kramer test (α=0.05). In the case of the ICE and NA specimens, the radiopacity significantly differed with thickness (p<0.05). However, the radiopacities of 0.5- and 0.3-mm-thick CZ and ZZ specimens were not significantly different (p>0.05). Full-contour Y-TZP materials have higher radiopacities than those of the conventional Y-TZP materials in decreased thicknesses.

Basic properties and types of zirconia: An overview

This paper describes types and characteristics of zirconia materials in relation to their applications in dentistry. The zirconia material typically used today by most manufacturers is a tetragonal polycrystalline zirconia, partially stabilized with yttrium oxide. The mechanical properties of zirconia have been extensively investigated in the scientific literature and zirconia clearly measures up to any other equivalent manufactured material. The biocompatibility of zirconia has also been extensively evaluated and no local or systemic adverse reactions or cytotoxic effects have been found in relation to it. However, ceramic bonding, ageing, light transmission and manufacturing processes are all factors that need to be further evaluated in order to guide the successful use of zirconia as a prosthetic restorative material. Milling zirconia to full-contour might be an alternative to traditionally veneered restorations. A potential adhesion mechanism appears to be the combination of air abrasion with aluminum oxide particles (silanated or not), followed by sintering with materials containing special reactive monomers. Changes in zirconia properties before and after the sintering process have also been investigated. It was found that after sintering, surface roughness was greater, and micro hardness was slightly reduced; however, accurate precision of fit was not affected by the sintering process. Currently, zirconia restorations are manufactured by either soft or hard-milling processes, with the manufacturer of each claiming advantages over the other. Chipping of the veneering porcelain is reported as a common problem and has been labeled as its main clinical setback. As zirconia has demonstrated good mechanical and biological performance, future technology is attempting to improve esthetics and minimize veneer fracture, aiming to create confidence in the dental community towards this all-ceramic system. Milling zirconia to full-contour might be an alternative to traditionally veneered restorations. Finally, implications are drawn for manufacturing, machining, and widespread use of these materials.

Fracture resistance of teeth restored with all-ceramic inlays and onlays: an in vitro study

Fracture resistance of inlays and onlays may be influenced by the quantity of the dental structure removed and the restorative materials used. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effects of two different cavity preparation designs and all-ceramic restorative materials on the fracture resistance of the tooth-restoration complex. Fifty mandibular third molar teeth were randomly divided into the following five groups: group 1: intact teeth (control); group 2: inlay preparations, lithium-disilicate glass-ceramic (IPS e.max Press, Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein); group 3: inlay preparations, zirconia ceramic (ICE Zirkon, Zirkonzahn SRL, Gais, Italy); group 4: onlay preparations, lithium-disilicate glass-ceramic (IPS e.max Press); and group 5: onlay preparations, zirconia ceramic (ICE Zirkon). The inlay and onlay restorations were adhesively cemented with dual polymerizing resin cement (Variolink II, Ivoclar Vivadent AG). After thermal cycling (5° to 55°C × 5000 cycles), specimens were subjected to a compressive load until fracture at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey HSD tests. The fracture strength values were significantly higher in the inlay group (2646.7 ± 360.4) restored with lithium-disilicate glass-ceramic than those of the onlay group (1673.6 ± 677) restored with lithium-disilicate glass-ceramic. The fracture strength values of teeth restored with inlays using zirconia ceramic (2849 ± 328) and onlays with zirconia ceramic (2796.3 ± 337.3) were similar to those of the intact teeth (2905.3 ± 398.8). In the IPS e.max Press groups, as the preparation amount was increased (from inlay to onlay preparation), the fracture resistance was decreased. In the ICE Zirkon ceramic groups, the preparation type did not affect the fracture resistance results.