1
|
De Schepper M, Koorman T, Richard F, Christgen M, Vincent-Salomon A, Schnitt SJ, van Diest PJ, Zels G, Mertens F, Maetens M, Vanden Bempt I, Harbeck N, Nitz U, Gräser M, Kümmel S, Gluz O, Weynand B, Floris G, Derksen PW, Desmedt C. Integration of pathological criteria and immunohistochemical evaluation for invasive lobular carcinoma diagnosis: recommendations from the European Lobular Breast Cancer Consortium. Mod Pathol 2024:100497. [PMID: 38641322 DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the second most frequent type of breast cancer (BC) and its peculiar morphology is mainly driven by inactivation of CDH1, the gene coding for E-cadherin cell adhesion protein. ILC-specific therapeutic and disease-monitoring approaches are gaining momentum in the clinic, increasing the importance of accurate ILC diagnosis. Several essential and desirable morphological diagnostic criteria are currently defined by the World Health Organization, the routine use of immunohistochemistry (IHC) for E-cadherin is not recommended. Disagreement in the diagnosis of ILC has been repeatedly reported, but inter-pathologist agreement increases with the use of E-cadherin IHC. In this study, we aimed to harmonize the pathological diagnosis of ILC by comparing five commonly used E-cadherin antibody clones (NCH-38, EP700Y, Clone 36, NCL-L-E-cad [Clone 36B5], and ECH-6). We determined their biochemical specificity for the E-cadherin protein and IHC staining performance according to type and location of mutation on the CDH1 gene. Western blot analysis on mouse cell lines with conditional E-cadherin expression revealed a reduced specificity of EP700Y and NCL-L-E-cad for E-cadherin, with cross-reactivity of Clone 36 to P-cadherin. The use of IHC improved inter-pathologist agreement both for ILC as well as for lobular carcinoma in situ and atypical lobular hyperplasia. The E-cadherin IHC staining pattern was associated with variant allele frequency and likelihood of non-sense mediated RNA decay but not with the type or position of CDH1 mutations. Based on these results, we make recommendations for the indication for E-cadherin staining, choice of antibodies, and their interpretation in order to standardize ILC diagnosis in current pathology practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxim De Schepper
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, UH Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thijs Koorman
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - François Richard
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Anne Vincent-Salomon
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Diagnostic and Theranostic Medicine Division, Paris, France
| | - Stuart J Schnitt
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Gitte Zels
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, UH Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Freya Mertens
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, UH Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marion Maetens
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Nadia Harbeck
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Center, University of Munich (LMU) and CCCLMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany; Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Monika Gräser
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany; Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Mönchengladbach, Germany; Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sherko Kümmel
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Berlin, Germany; Clinics Essen-Mitte, Breast Unit, Essen, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany; Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Mönchengladbach, Germany; University Clinics Cologne, Women's Clinic and Breast Center, Cologne, Germany
| | - Birgit Weynand
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, UH Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Giuseppe Floris
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, UH Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Patrick Wb Derksen
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Christine Desmedt
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schmidt M, Nitz U, Reimer T, Schmatloch S, Graf H, Just M, Stickeler E, Untch M, Runnebaum I, Belau A, Huober J, Jackisch C, Hofmann M, Krocker J, Nekljudova V, Loibl S. Adjuvant capecitabine versus nihil in older patients with node-positive/high-risk node-negative early breast cancer receiving ibandronate - The ICE randomized clinical trial. Eur J Cancer 2023; 194:113324. [PMID: 37797387 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Revised: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
AIM OF THE STUDY Evaluation of the impact of a de-escaleted chemotherapy regimen consisting of capecitabine (Cap) on invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) in patients ≥65 years with node-positive/high-risk node-negative early breast cancer (BC) receiving ibandronate (Ib). METHODS ICE (Ib with or without Cap in Elderly patients with early breast cancer) was a multicentre phase 3 clinical trial with a 2020 update of long-term follow-up for overall survival enroling node-positive/high-risk node-negative patients ≥65 years with early BC. Patients were randomised to Cap 2000 mg/m² day 1-14 q3w for 6 cycles plus Ib (50 mg p.o. daily or alternatively 6 mg intravenous q4w) or Ib alone for 2 years. Endocrine therapy was recommended for hormone receptor (HR)-positive patients. The primary endpoint was iDFS analysed using Cox proportional hazards regression and log-rank analysis. RESULTS 1358 (96.4%) of 1409 randomised patients started treatment. 564 (83.4%) completed 6 cycles of Cap. 513 (77.7%) and 516 (78.8%) completed Ib in the Cap+Ib and Ib alone arm, respectively. Median age was 71 (range 64-88) years, 1099 (81%) were HR-positive, 705 (51.9%) node-negative. At a median follow-up of 61.3 months, 5-year iDFS was 78.8% for Cap+Ib versus 75.0% for Ib alone (p = 0.80). Effects were independent of age, nodal, and HR status. The addition of Cap caused significantly higher skin and gastrointestinal toxicity. CONCLUSIONS The adjuvant combination of Cap+Ib did not show significantly better iDFS than Ib alone in node-positive/high-risk node-negative older BC patients, of whom HR-positive patients were also treated with endocrine therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION Study in elderly patients with early breast cancer (ICE), NCT00196859, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00196859?term=NCT00196859.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Klinikum Südstadt, Universitäts-Frauenklinik, Rostock, Germany
| | | | - Heiko Graf
- HELIOS Klinikum Meiningen GmbH, Meiningen, Germany
| | | | - Elmar Stickeler
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Uniklinik Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Ingo Runnebaum
- Universitätsklinikum Jena, Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Fortpflanzungsmedizin, Germany
| | | | - Jens Huober
- Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Germany; Kantonsspital St.Gallen, Brustzentrum, Departement Interdisziplinäre medizinische Dienste, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | | | - Manfred Hofmann
- Vinzenz-von-Paul-Kliniken, Marienhospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gluz O, Kuemmel S, Nitz U, Braun M, Lüdtke-Heckenkamp K, von Schumann R, Darsow M, Forstbauer H, Potenberg J, Uleer C, Grischke EM, Aktas B, Schumacher C, Zu Eulenburg C, Kates R, Jóźwiak K, Graeser M, Wuerstlein R, Baehner R, Christgen M, Kreipe HH, Harbeck N. Nab-paclitaxel weekly versus dose-dense solvent-based paclitaxel followed by dose-dense epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide in high-risk HR+/HER2- early breast cancer: results from the neoadjuvant part of the WSG-ADAPT-HR+/HER2- trial. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:531-542. [PMID: 37062416 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Revised: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In high-risk hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) early breast cancer (EBC), nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel showed promising efficacy versus solvent-based (sb)-paclitaxel in neoadjuvant trials; however, optimal patient and therapy selection remains a topic of ongoing research. Here, we investigate the potential of Oncotype DX® recurrence score (RS) and endocrine therapy (ET) response (low post-endocrine Ki67) for therapy selection. PATIENTS AND METHODS Within the WSG-ADAPT trial (NCT01779206), high-risk HR+/HER2- EBC patients were randomized to (neo)adjuvant 4× sb-paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 q2w or 8× nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 q1w, followed by 4× epirubicin + cyclophosphamide (90 mg + 600 mg) q2w; inclusion criteria: (i) cN0-1, RS 12-25, and post-ET Ki67 >10%; (ii) cN0-1 with RS >25. Patients with cN2-3 or (G3, baseline Ki67 ≥40%, and tumor size >1 cm) were allowed to be included without RS and/or ET response testing. Associations of key factors with pathological complete response (pCR) (primary) and survival (secondary) endpoints were analyzed using statistical mediation and moderation models. RESULTS Eight hundred and sixty-four patients received neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel (n= 437) or sb-paclitaxel (n = 427); nab-paclitaxel was superior for pCR (20.8% versus 12.9%, P = 0.002). pCR was higher for RS >25 versus RS ≤25 (16.0% versus 8.4%, P = 0.021) and for ET non-response versus ET response (15.1% versus 6.0%, P = 0.027); no factors were predictive for the relative efficacy of nab-paclitaxel versus sb-paclitaxel. Patients with pCR had longer distant disease-free survival [dDFS; hazard ratio 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20-0.91, P = 0.024]. Despite favorable prognostic association of RS >25 versus RS ≤25 with pCR (odds ratio 3.11, 95% CI 1.71-5.63, P ≤ 0.001), higher RS was unfavorably associated with dDFS (hazard ratio 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05, P = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS In high-risk HR+/HER2- EBC, neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel q1w appears superior to sb-paclitaxel q2w regarding pCR. Combining RS and ET response assessment appears to select patients with highest pCR rates. The disadvantage of higher RS for dDFS is reduced in patients with pCR. These are the first results from a large neoadjuvant randomized trial supporting the use of RS to help select patients for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk HR+/HER2- EBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Gluz
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach; Breast Center Niederrhein, Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Moenchengladbach; University Clinics Cologne, Cologne.
| | - S Kuemmel
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach; Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen; Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin
| | - U Nitz
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach; Breast Center Niederrhein, Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Moenchengladbach
| | - M Braun
- Breast Center, Rotkreuz Clinics Munich, Munich
| | - K Lüdtke-Heckenkamp
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Niels Stensen-Kliniken, Georgsmarienhütte
| | - R von Schumann
- Breast Center Niederrhein, Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Moenchengladbach
| | - M Darsow
- Breast Center, Luisenhospital, Duesseldorf; Practice for Senologic Oncology, Duesseldorf
| | | | | | - C Uleer
- Frauenaerzte am Bahnhofsplatz, Practice of Gynecology and Oncology, Hildesheim
| | - E M Grischke
- Women's Clinic, University Clinics Tuebingen, Tuebingen
| | - B Aktas
- Women's Clinic, University Clinics Essen, Essen; University Clinics Leipzig, Women's Clinic, Leipzig
| | - C Schumacher
- Breast Center, St. Elisabeth Hospital Cologne, Cologne
| | - C Zu Eulenburg
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach; Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg
| | - R Kates
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach
| | - K Jóźwiak
- Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin
| | - M Graeser
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach; Breast Center Niederrhein, Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Moenchengladbach; Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg
| | - R Wuerstlein
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach; Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | | | - M Christgen
- Institute of Pathology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - H H Kreipe
- Institute of Pathology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - N Harbeck
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach; Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Braybrooke J, Bradley R, Gray R, Hills RK, Pan H, Peto R, Dodwell D, McGale P, Taylor C, Aihara T, Anderson S, Blum J, Cardoso F, Chen X, Crown JP, Ejlertsen B, Friedl TWP, Harbeck N, Janni W, Jensen MB, Mamounas E, Narui K, Nitz U, Norton L, O'Shaughnessy J, Piccart M, Robert N, Shao ZM, Slamon D, Sparano J, Watanabe T, Yothers G, Yu KD, Berry R, Boddington C, Clarke M, Davies C, Davies L, Duane F, Evans V, Gay J, Gettins L, Godwin J, James S, Lui H, Lui Z, MacKinnon E, Mannu G, McHugh T, Morris P, Read S, Straiton E, Buzdar A, Suman VJ, Hunt KK, Leonard RCF, Mansi J, Delbaldo C, Piedbois P, Quinaux E, Fesl C, Gnant M, Sölkner L, Steger G, Eikesdal HP, Lønning PE, Bee V, Fung H, Mackey J, Martin M, Press M, De Azambuja E, Gelber R, Regan M, Di Leo A, Van Dooren V, Nogaret JM, Bartlett J, Chen BE, Gelmon K, Goss PE, Levine MN, Parulekar W, Pritchard KI, Shepherd L, Berry D, Cirrincione C, Shulman LN, Winer E, Gelman RS, Harris JR, Henderson C, Shapiro CL, Christiansen P, Ewertz M, Mouridsen HT, Van Leeuwen E, Linn S, Van Rossum AGJ, Van Tinteren H, Van Werkhoven E, Goldstein L, Gray R, Eiermann W, Gianni L, Valagussa P, Bogaerts J, Bonnefoi H, Poncet C, Huovinen R, Joensuu H, Bonneterre J, Fargeot P, Fumoleau P, Kerbrat P, Luporsi E, Namer M, Carrasco EM, Segui MA, Meisner C, Loibl S, Nekljudova V, Thomssen C, Von Minckwitz G, Kümmel S, Lopez M, Vici P, Fountzilas G, Koliou G, Mavroudis D, Saloustros E, Brain E, Delaloge S, Michiels S, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Bines J, Sarmento RMB, Bonadonna G, Brambilla C, Rossi A, Bliss J, Coombes RC, Kilburn L, Marty M, Amadori D, Boccardo F, Nanni O, Rubagotti A, Scarpi E, Masuda N, Toi M, Ueno T, Ishikawa T, Matsumoto K, Takao S, Sommer H, Foroglou P, Giokas G, Kondylis D, Lissaios B, Reinisch M, Lee KS, Nam BH, Ro JS, De Matteis A, Perrone F, Tang G, Wolmark N, Hozumi Y, Nomura Y, Earl H, Hiller L, Vallier AL, De Mastro L, Venturini M, Delozier T, Lemonnier J, Martin AL, Roché H, Spielmann M, Chen X, Shen K, Albain K, Barlow W, Budd GT, Gralow J, Hayes D, Bartlett-Lee P, Ellis P, Bianco AR, De Laurentiis M, De Placido S, Wildiers H, Hsu L, Eremin O, Walker LG, Ahlgren J, Blomqvist C, Holmberg L, Lindman H, Asmar L, Jones SE, Gluz O, Liedtke C, Arriagada R, Bergsten-Nordström E, Carey L, Coleman R, Cuzick J, Davidson N, Dignam J, Dowsett M, Francis PA, Goetz MP, Goodwin P, Halpin-Murphy P, Hill C, Jagsi R, Mukai H, Ohashi Y, Pierce L, Poortmans P, Raina V, Rea D, Robertson J, Rutgers E, Salgado R, Spanic T, Tutt A, Viale G, Wang X, Whelan T, Wilcken N, Cameron D, Bergh J, Swain SM. Anthracycline-containing and taxane-containing chemotherapy for early-stage operable breast cancer: a patient-level meta-analysis of 100 000 women from 86 randomised trials. Lancet 2023; 401:1277-1292. [PMID: 37061269 PMCID: PMC11023015 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)00285-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Revised: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anthracycline-taxane chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer substantially improves survival compared with no chemotherapy. However, concerns about short-term and long-term side-effects of anthracyclines have led to increased use of taxane chemotherapy without anthracycline, which could compromise efficacy. We aimed to better characterise the benefits and risks of including anthracycline, and the comparative benefits of different anthracycline-taxane regimens. METHODS We did an individual patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing taxane regimens with versus without anthracycline, and updated our previous meta-analysis of anthracycline regimens with versus without taxane, as well as analysing 44 trials in six related comparisons. We searched databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and meeting abstracts to identify trials assessing anthracycline and taxane chemotherapy. Adjuvant or neoadjuvant trials were eligible if they began before Jan 1, 2012. Primary outcomes were breast cancer recurrence and cause-specific mortality. Log-rank analyses yielded first-event rate ratios (RRs) and CIs. FINDINGS 28 trials of taxane regimens with or without anthracycline were identified, of which 23 were deemed eligible, and 15 provided data on 18 103 women. Across all 15 trials that provided individual data, recurrence rates were 14% lower on average (RR 0·86, 95% CI 0·79-0·93; p=0·0004) with taxane regimens including anthracycline than those without. Non-breast cancer deaths were not increased but there was one additional acute myeloid leukaemia case per 700 women treated. The clearest reductions in recurrence were found when anthracycline was added concurrently to docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide versus the same dose of docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide (10-year recurrence risk 12·3% vs 21·0%; risk difference 8·7%, 95% CI 4·5-12·9; RR 0·58, 0·47-0·73; p<0·0001). 10-year breast cancer mortality in this group was reduced by 4·2% (0·4-8·1; p=0·0034). No significant reduction in recurrence risk was found for sequential schedules of taxane plus anthracycline when compared with docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide (RR 0·94, 0·83-1·06; p=0·30). For the analysis of anthracycline regimens with versus without taxane, 35 trials (n=52 976) provided individual patient data. Larger recurrence reductions were seen from adding taxane to anthracycline regimens when the cumulative dose of anthracycline was the same in each group (RR 0·87, 0·82-0·93; p<0·0001; n=11 167) than in trials with two-fold higher cumulative doses of non-taxane (mostly anthracycline) in the control group than in the taxane group (RR 0·96, 0·90-1·03; p=0·27; n=14 620). Direct comparisons between anthracycline and taxane regimens showed that a higher cumulative dose and more dose-intense schedules were more efficacious. The proportional reductions in recurrence for taxane plus anthracycline were similar in oestrogen receptor-positive and oestrogen receptor-negative disease, and did not differ by age, nodal status, or tumour size or grade. INTERPRETATION Anthracycline plus taxane regimens are most efficacious at reducing breast cancer recurrence and death. Regimens with higher cumulative doses of anthracycline plus taxane provide the greatest benefits, challenging the current trend in clinical practice and guidelines towards non-anthracycline chemotherapy, particularly shorter regimens, such as four cycles of docetaxel-cyclophosphamide. By bringing together data from almost all relevant trials, this meta-analysis provides a reliable evidence base to inform individual treatment decisions, clinical guidelines, and the design of future clinical trials. FUNDING Cancer Research UK, UK Medical Research Council.
Collapse
|
5
|
Graeser M, Gluz O, Biehl C, Ulbrich-Gebauer D, Christgen M, Palatty J, Kuemmel S, Grischke EM, Augustin D, Braun M, Potenberg J, Wuerstlein R, Krauss K, Schumacher C, Forstbauer H, Reimer T, Stefek A, Fischer HH, Pelz E, zu Eulenburg C, Kates R, Ni H, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Feuerhake F, Kreipe HH, Nitz U, Harbeck N. Impact of RNA Signatures on pCR and Survival after 12-Week Neoadjuvant Pertuzumab plus Trastuzumab with or without Paclitaxel in the WSG-ADAPT HER2+/HR- Trial. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:805-814. [PMID: 36441798 PMCID: PMC9932580 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-1587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Revised: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify associations of biological signatures and stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL) with pathological complete response (pCR; ypT0 ypN0) and survival in the Phase II WSG-ADAPT HER2+/HR- trial (NCT01817452). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Patients with cT1-cT4c, cN0-3 HER2+/HR- early breast cancer (EBC) were randomized to pertuzumab+trastuzumab (P+T, n = 92) or P+T+paclitaxel (n = 42). Gene expression signatures were analyzed in baseline biopsies using NanoString Breast Cancer 360 panel (n = 117); baseline and on-treatment (week 3) sTIL levels were available in 119 and 76 patients, respectively. Impacts of standardized gene expression signatures on pCR and invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) were estimated by logistic and Cox regression. RESULTS In all patients, ERBB2 [OR, 1.70; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.08-2.67] and estrogen receptor (ER) signaling (OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.13-2.61) were favorable, whereas PTEN (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.38-0.87) was unfavorable for pCR. After 60 months median follow-up, 13 invasive events occurred (P+T: n = 11, P+T+paclitaxel: n = 2), none following pCR. Gene signatures related to immune response (IR) and ER signaling were favorable for iDFS, all with similar HR about 0.43-0.55. These patterns were even more prominent in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy-free group, where additionally BRCAness signature was unfavorable (HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.04-3.84). IR signatures were strongly intercorrelated. sTILs (baseline/week 3/change) were not associated with pCR or iDFS, though baseline sTILs correlated positively with IR signatures. CONCLUSIONS Distinct gene signatures were associated with pCR versus iDFS in HER2+/HR- EBC. The potential role of IR in preventing recurrence suggests that patients with upregulated IR signatures could be candidates for de-escalation concepts in HER2+ EBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Graeser
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.,Corresponding Author: Monika Graeser, Bethesda Hospital, West German Study Group, University Medical Center Hamburg—Eppendorf, Moenchengladbach and Hamburg 41061, Germany. Phone: 49-216-1981-2330; Fax: 49-216-1566-2319; E-mail:
| | - Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,University Clinics Cologne, Women's Clinic and Breast Center, Cologne, Germany
| | - Claudia Biehl
- Westphalian Brest Center Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Sherko Kuemmel
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.,Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, University Hospital Charité, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Michael Braun
- Department of Gynecology, Breast Center, Red Cross Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCCLMU, Breast Center, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Katja Krauss
- University Hospital Aachen, Breast Center, Aachen, Germany
| | | | | | - Toralf Reimer
- University Hospital Gynecology and Policlinic Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Andrea Stefek
- Johanniter Women's Clinic Stendal, Breast Center, Stendal, Germany
| | | | | | - Christine zu Eulenburg
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ronald Kates
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Hua Ni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCCLMU, Breast Center, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke
- Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, University Hospital Charité, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.,University Clinics Essen, Women's Clinic, Essen, Germany
| | - Friedrich Feuerhake
- Medical School Hannover, Institute of Pathology, Hannover, Germany.,Institute of Neuropathology, University Clinic Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCCLMU, Breast Center, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gluz O, Nitz U, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Prat A, Christgen M, Kuemmel S, Mohammadian MP, Gebauer D, Kates R, Paré L, Grischke EM, Forstbauer H, Braun M, Warm M, Hackmann J, Uleer C, Aktas B, Schumacher C, Wuerstlein R, Graeser M, Pelz E, Jóźwiak K, Zu Eulenburg C, Kreipe HH, Harbeck N. De-escalated Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC): Impact of Molecular Markers and Final Survival Analysis of the WSG-ADAPT-TN Trial. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:4995-5003. [PMID: 35797219 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-0482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2022] [Revised: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although optimal treatment in early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains unclear, de-escalated chemotherapy appears to be an option in selected patients within this aggressive subtype. Previous studies have identified several pro-immune factors as prognostic markers in TNBC, but their predictive impact regarding different chemotherapy strategies is still controversial. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN ADAPT-TN is a randomized neoadjuvant multicenter phase II trial in early patients with TNBC (n = 336) who were randomized to 12 weeks of nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 + gemcitabine or carboplatin d 1,8 q3w. Omission of further (neo-) adjuvant chemotherapy was allowed only in patients with pathological complete response [pCR, primary endpoint (ypT0/is, ypN0)]. Secondary invasive/distant disease-free and overall survival (i/dDFS, OS) and translational research objectives included quantification of a predictive impact of markers regarding selection for chemotherapy de-escalation, measured by gene expression of 119 genes (including PAM50 subtype) by nCounter platform and stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL). RESULTS After 60 months of median follow-up, 12-week-pCR was favorably associated (HR, 0.24; P = 0.001) with 5y-iDFS of 90.6% versus 62.8%. No survival advantage of carboplatin use was observed, despite a higher pCR rate [HR, 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.68-1.59]. Additional anthracycline-containing chemotherapy was not associated with a significant iDFS advantage in pCR patients (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.41-4.02). Beyond pCR rate, nodal status and high sTILs were independently associated with better iDFS, dDFS, and OS by multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS Short de-escalated neoadjuvant taxane/platinum-based combination therapy appears to be a promising strategy in early TNBC for using pCR rate as an early decision point for further therapy (de-) escalation together with node-negative status and high sTILs. See related commentary by Sharma, p. 4840.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,University Clinics Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Aleix Prat
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, August Pi I Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Mohammad Parsa Mohammadian
- Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School "Theodor Finane," Neuruppin, Germany
| | | | - Ronald Kates
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Laia Paré
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, August Pi I Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Michael Braun
- Rotkreuz Clinics Munich, Breast Center, Munich, Germany
| | - Mathias Warm
- City Hospital Holweide, Breast Center, Cologne, Germany
| | | | | | - Bahriye Aktas
- University Clinics Essen, Women's Clinic, Essen, Germany.,University Clinics Leipzig, Women's Clinic, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center, LMU University Hospital and CCC Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Monika Graeser
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Enrico Pelz
- Institute of Pathology Viersen, Viersen, Germany
| | - Katarzyna Jóźwiak
- Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School "Theodor Finane," Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Christine Zu Eulenburg
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Nadia Harbeck
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Center, LMU University Hospital and CCC Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Banys-Paluchowski M, Thill M, Kühn T, Ditsch N, Heil J, Wöckel A, Fallenberg E, Friedrich M, Kümmel S, Müller V, Janni W, Albert US, Bauerfeind I, Blohmer JU, Budach W, Dall P, Fasching P, Fehm T, Gluz O, Harbeck N, Huober J, Jackisch C, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Kreipe HH, Krug D, Loibl S, Lüftner D, Lux MP, Maass N, Mundhenke C, Nitz U, Park-Simon TW, Reimer T, Rhiem K, Rody A, Schmidt M, Schneeweiss A, Schütz F, Sinn HP, Solbach C, Solomayer EF, Stickeler E, Thomssen C, Untch M, Witzel I, Gerber B. AGO Recommendations for the Surgical Therapy of Breast Cancer: Update 2022. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2022; 82:1031-1043. [PMID: 36186147 PMCID: PMC9525149 DOI: 10.1055/a-1904-6231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The recommendations of the AGO Breast Committee on the surgical therapy of breast cancer were last updated in March 2022 (www.ago-online.de). Since surgical therapy is one of several partial steps in the treatment of breast cancer, extensive diagnostic and oncological expertise of a breast surgeon and good interdisciplinary cooperation with diagnostic radiologists is of great importance. The most important changes concern localization techniques, resection margins, axillary management in the neoadjuvant setting and the evaluation of the meshes in reconstructive surgery. Based on meta-analyses of randomized studies, the level of recommendation of an intraoperative breast ultrasound for the localization of non-palpable lesions was elevated to "++". Thus, the technique is considered to be equivalent to wire localization, provided that it is a lesion which can be well represented by sonography, the surgeon has extensive experience in breast ultrasound and has access to a suitable ultrasound device during the operation. In invasive breast cancer, the aim is to reach negative resection margins ("no tumor on ink"), regardless of whether an extensive intraductal component is present or not. Oncoplastic operations can also replace a mastectomy in selected cases due to the large number of existing techniques, and are equivalent to segmental resection in terms of oncological safety at comparable rates of complications. Sentinel node excision is recommended for patients with cN0 status receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy after completion of chemotherapy. Minimally invasive biopsy is recommended for initially suspect lymph nodes. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, patients with initially 1 - 3 suspicious lymph nodes and a good response (ycN0) can receive the targeted axillary dissection and the axillary dissection as equivalent options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany,Correspondence/Korrespondenzadresse Priv.-Doz. Dr. med. Maggie Banys-Paluchowski Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und GeburtshilfeUniversitätsklinikum
Schleswig-Holstein Campus LübeckRatzeburger Allee 16023538
LübeckGermany
| | - Marc Thill
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Jörg Heil
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Sektion Senologie, Universitäts-Klinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Eva Fallenberg
- Institut für Radiologie, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Michael Friedrich
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | - Sherko Kümmel
- Klinik für Senologie, Evangelische Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Ute-Susann Albert
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Ingo Bauerfeind
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Landshut gemeinnützige GmbH, Landshut, Germany
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Klinik für Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum des Universitätsklinikums der Charite, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Strahlentherapie, Radiologie Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Peter Dall
- Frauenklinik, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Peter Fasching
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Tanja Fehm
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- Brustzentrum, Evang. Krankenhaus Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- Brustzentrum, Kantonspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Schweiz
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Offenbach, Germany
| | | | - Hans H. Kreipe
- Institut für Pathologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group c/o GBG Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Neu-Isenburg, Germany,Zentrum für Hämatologie und Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt am Main, Goethe Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Medical University of Brandenburg Theodor-Fontane & Immanuel Hospital Märkische Schweiz, Buckow, Germany
| | - Michael Patrick Lux
- Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn und St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus
GmbH, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Nicolai Maass
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Christoph Mundhenke
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- Brustzentrum, Evang. Krankenhaus Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Tjoung Won Park-Simon
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - Achim Rody
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Geburtshilfe und Frauengesundheit der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen, Universitätsklinikum und Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - H. Peter Sinn
- Sektion Gynäkopathologie, Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Solbach
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Erich-Franz Solomayer
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Universitätsfrauenklinik, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kolberg-Liedtke C, Feuerhake F, Garke M, Christgen M, Kates R, Grischke EM, Forstbauer H, Braun M, Warm M, Hackmann J, Uleer C, Aktas B, Schumacher C, Kuemmel S, Wuerstlein R, Graeser M, Nitz U, Kreipe H, Gluz O, Harbeck N. Impact of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) on response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative early breast cancer in the WSG-ADAPT TN trial. Breast Cancer Res 2022; 24:58. [PMID: 36056374 PMCID: PMC9438265 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-022-01552-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Higher density of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) at baseline has been associated with increased rates of pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). While evidence supports favorable association of pCR with survival in TNBC, an independent impact of sTILs (after adjustment for pCR) on survival is not yet established. Moreover, the impact of sTIL dynamics during NACT on pCR and survival in TNBC is unknown. METHODS The randomized WSG-ADAPT TN phase II trial compared efficacy of 12-week nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine versus carboplatin. This preplanned translational analysis assessed impacts of sTIL measurements at baseline (sTIL-0) and after 3 weeks of chemotherapy (sTIL-3) on pCR and invasive disease-free survival (iDFS). Predictive performance of sTIL-0 and sTIL-3 for pCR was quantified by ROC analysis and logistic regression; Kaplan-Meier estimation and Cox regression (with mediation analysis) were used to determine their impact on iDFS. RESULTS For prediction of pCR, the AUC statistics for sTIL-0 and sTIL-3 were 0.60 and 0.63, respectively, in all patients; AUC for sTIL-3 was higher in NP/G. The positive predictive value (PPV) of "lymphocyte-predominant" status (sTIL-0 ≥ 60%) at baseline was 59.3%, though only 13.0% of patients had this status. To predict non-pCR, the cut point sTIL-0 ≤ 10% yielded PPV = 69.5% while addressing 33.8% of patients. Higher sTIL levels (particularly at 3 weeks) were independently and favorably associated with better iDFS, even after adjusting for pCR. For example, the adjusted hazard ratio for 3-week sTILs ≥ 60% (vs. < 60%) was 0.48 [0.23-0.99]. Low cellularity in 3-week biopsies was the strongest individual predictor for pCR (in both therapy arms), but not for iDFS. CONCLUSION The independent impact of sTILs on iDFS suggests that favorable immune response can influence key tumor biological processes for long-term survival. The results suggest that the reliability of pCR following neoadjuvant therapy as a surrogate for survival could vary among subgroups in TNBC defined by immune response or other factors. Dynamic measurements of sTILs under NACT could support immune response-guided patient selection for individualized therapy approaches for both very low levels (more effective therapies) and very high levels (de-escalation concepts). TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical trials No: NCT01815242, retrospectively registered January 25, 2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
| | | | | | | | - Ronald Kates
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | | | | | - Michael Braun
- Breast Center, Rotkreuz Clinics Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mathias Warm
- Breast Center, City Hospital Holweide, Cologne, Germany
| | | | | | - Bahriye Aktas
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Sherko Kuemmel
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany.,Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.,Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany.,Breast Center, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Monika Graeser
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany.,University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,Breast Center Niederrhein, Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany.,Breast Center Niederrhein, Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Hans Kreipe
- Institute of Pathology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany.,Breast Center Niederrhein, Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany.,Breast Center, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ditsch N, Wöcke A, Untch M, Jackisch C, Albert US, Banys-Paluchowski M, Bauerfeind I, Blohmer JU, Budach W, Dall P, Fallenberg EM, Fasching PA, Fehm TN, Friedrich M, Gerber B, Gluz O, Harbeck N, Heil J, Huober J, Kreipe HH, Krug D, Kühn T, Kümmel S, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Loibl S, Lüftner D, Lux MP, Maass N, Mundhenke C, Nitz U, Park-Simon TW, Reimer T, Rhiem K, Rody A, Schmidt M, Schneeweiss A, Schütz F, Sinn HP, Solbach C, Solomayer EF, Stickeler E, Thomssen C, Witzel I, Müller V, Janni W, Thill M. AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Update 2022. Breast Care (Basel) 2022; 17:403-420. [PMID: 36156915 PMCID: PMC9453658 DOI: 10.1159/000524879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The AGO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie, German Gynecological Oncology Group) Task Force on Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer as an interdisciplinary team consists of specialists from gynecological oncology, pathology, diagnostic radiology, medical oncology, and radiation oncology with a special focus on breast cancer. Methods The updated evidence-based treatment recommendation 2022 for early breast cancer (EBC) and metastatic breast cancer of the AGO Task Force has been released. Results and Conclusion This paper captures the update of EBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Ditsch
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Achim Wöcke
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Ute-Susann Albert
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Ingo Bauerfeind
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Landshut gemeinnützige GmbH, Landshut, Germany
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Klinik für Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum des Universitätsklinikums der Charite, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Radiologie Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Peter Dall
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Eva Maria Fallenberg
- Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Klinikum der Technischen Universität München, Rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Tanja N. Fehm
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Michael Friedrich
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- Brustzentrum, Evang. Krankenhaus Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Germany
| | - Jörg Heil
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Sektion Senologie, Universitäts-Klinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- Brustzentrum, Kantonspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Hans H. Kreipe
- Institut für Pathologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - Sherko Kümmel
- Klinik für Senologie, Evangelische Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Phaon GmbH, Essen, Germany
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, Charite, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Patrick Lux
- Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn und St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus GmbH, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Nicolai Maass
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Christoph Mundhenke
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- Brustzentrum, Evang. Krankenhaus Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Tjoung-Won Park-Simon
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - Achim Rody
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Geburtshilfe und Frauengesundheit der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen, Universitätsklinikum und Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Sinn
- Sektion Gynäkopathologie, Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Solbach
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Erich-Franz Solomayer
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Universitätsfrauenklinik, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Thill M, Lüftner D, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Albert US, Banys-Paluchowski M, Bauerfeind I, Blohmer JU, Budach W, Dall P, Fallenberg EM, Fasching PA, Fehm T, Friedrich M, Gerber B, Gluz O, Harbeck N, Heil J, Huober J, Jackisch C, Kreipe HH, Krug D, Kühn T, Kümmel S, Loibl S, Lux M, Maass N, Mundhenke C, Nitz U, Park-Simon TW, Reimer T, Rhiem K, Rody A, Schmidt M, Schneeweiss A, Schütz F, Sinn HP, Solbach C, Solomayer EF, Stickeler E, Thomssen C, Untch M, Witzel I, Wöckel A, Müller V, Janni W, Ditsch N. AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Locally Advanced and Metastatic Breast Cancer: Update 2022. Breast Care (Basel) 2022; 17:421-429. [PMID: 36156913 PMCID: PMC9453659 DOI: 10.1159/000524789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 08/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The Breast Committee of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (German Gynecological Oncology Group, AGO) presents the 2022 update of the evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Thill
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Ute-Susann Albert
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Ingo Bauerfeind
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Landshut gemeinnützige GmbH, Landshut, Germany
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Klinik für Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum des Universitätsklinikums der Charite, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Strahlentherapie, Radiologie Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Peter Dall
- Frauenklinik, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Eva Maria Fallenberg
- Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München Campus Großhadern, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Tanja Fehm
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Michael Friedrich
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- Brustzentrum, Evang, Krankenhaus Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Germany
| | - Jörg Heil
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Sektion Senologie, Universitäts-Klinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- Brustzentrum, Kantonspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | | | - David Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - Sherko Kümmel
- Klinik für Senologie, Evangelische Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Michael Lux
- Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn und St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Nicolai Maass
- St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus GmbH, Paderborn, Germany
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Christoph Mundhenke
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- Brustzentrum, Evang, Krankenhaus Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Tjoung-Won Park-Simon
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hanover, Germany
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Cologne, Germany
| | - Achim Rody
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Geburtshilfe und Frauengesundheit der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen, Universitätsklinikum und Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Sinn
- Sektion Gynäkopathologie, Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Solbach
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Erich-Franz Solomayer
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Universitätsfrauenklinik, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gluz O, Christgen M, Kuemmel S, zu Eulenburg C, Braun M, Aktas B, Luedtke-Heckenkamp K, Forstbauer H, Grischke EM, Schumacher C, Krauss K, Thill M, Warm M, Graeser MK, Wuerstlein R, Kates RE, Baehner FL, Nitz U, Kreipe HH, Harbeck N. Concordance and clinical impact of ER, PR, HER2 expression by local and central immunohistochemistry versus RT-PCR in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer (EBC): Results from the ADAPT trial. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
536 Background: We evaluated concordance of ER, PR and HER2 status between local, central, and RT-PCR/mRNA assessments and its clinical impact in the ADAPT trial collective in HR+ HER2- EBC (NCT01779206). Particularly, validity of borderline ER-positivity (expression level 1-10%) has great clinical relevance as treatment concepts between luminal-like and triple negative (TNBC) EBC differ substantially. Methods: Patients (pts) with clinically high-risk HR+/HER2- EBC (ER and/or PR >1%) were initially treated by 3 (+/-1) weeks of endocrine therapy (ET) before surgery or sequential core biopsy (CB) and then allocated to an ET-alone or chemotherapy (ET) trial, depending on risk and endocrine response. OncotypeDX (incl. RT-PCR for ER, PR, HER2) and central IHC for ER, PR, HER2 were performed on the initial 1.CB. ER-low cohort was defined as 1-10% expression by local OR central lab (ASCO-CAP). Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios. Results: In ADAPT, 5149 pts from 81 centers in Germany with locally ER and/or PR positive (known quantitative levels) EBC were screened 2012-2018. Median follow-up was 59 months. For ER (positive vs. negative), overall concordance measured as agreement (κ) was high between all three assessments: Local vs. central IHC: 99.3% (κ = 0.45), RT-PCR vs. central IHC: 99% (κ = 0.48). Concordance was lower for PR: RT-PCR vs. central IHC: 90.5% (κ = 0.58), local vs. central IHC: 93.1% (κ = 0.56). 3% were centrally found as HER2+ in 1.CB (73% of them were negative by RT-PCR) and/or 2. Sample. Regarding HER2-low status (1+ or 2+ but ISH negative), concordance between local and central IHC was only 53.8% (κ = 0.09). Of all pts, only 2% (n=109; n=85 with both measurements available) had low ER expression (1-10%) by either local or central pathology. Only 9 of them were concordantly identified as ER-low (11%); 8/58 (14%) ER-low by local lab had TNBC by central lab. 17/47 ER-low cases (36.2%) with known post-endocrine Ki67post had Ki67post <10% vs. 59.7% in ER>10%. 41.8% of ER-low cases had RS<25 vs. 76.7% in ER>10%. All cases with ER <10% by both assessments and those with Ki-67≥40% had RS >25. We observed worse iDFS (HR 1.91, p=0.034) in the ER-low group vs. ER>10%. Conclusions: Although we have confirmed high agreement between local and central IHC and RT-PCR for ER, PR, HER2 assessment in locally HR+/HER2- EBC, there are still a few clinically relevant discordances. Regarding HER2-low status, standardization and quality assurance are needed if this becomes clinically relevant. Treatment of the heterogeneous ER-low group as TNBC appears reasonable only if “ER-low” is confirmed by a second assessment and in cases with Ki-67>40%. Preoperative ET response assessment may be helpful if an endocrine-based therapy concept is intended. Clinical trial information: NCT01779206.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group and Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Sherko Kuemmel
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany and Clinics Essen-Mitte, Breast Center, Essen, Germany and Women’s Clinic, Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Michael Braun
- Interdisciplinary Breast Center, Rotkreuz-Clinics Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Bahriye Aktas
- University of Leipzig Medical Center, Department of Gynecology, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | | | - Eva-Maria Grischke
- University Women´s Clinic Tuebingen, Eberhard Karls University, Tubingen, Germany
| | | | - Katja Krauss
- Breast Center, Dept. Obstetrics & Gynecology, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Breast Center, Agaplesion Markus Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Mathias Warm
- Breast Center Cologne-Holweide, Municipal Hospital Holweide, Cologne, Germany
| | - Monika Karla Graeser
- West German Study Group and Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany and Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Breast Center, Dept. OB&GYN, University of Munich (LMU) and CCCLMU, West German Study Group, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study Group and Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Harbeck N, Gluz O, Christgen M, Braun M, Thill M, Wimberger P, Luedtke-Heckenkamp K, Graeser M, Hilpert F, Bjelic-Radisic V, Krauss K, Warm M, Zaiss MR, Hartkopf AD, Just M, Kreipe HH, Nitz U, zu Eulenburg C, Wuerstlein R, Kuemmel S. Adjuvant dynamic marker-adjusted personalized therapy comparing endocrine therapy plus ribociclib versus chemotherapy in intermediate-risk HR+/HER2- early breast cancer: ADAPTcycle. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.tps609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
TPS609 Background: The WSG ADAPT trial program focusses on individualization of (neo)-adjuvant decision-making in EBC in a subtype-specific manner. Clinical feasibility of the WSG ADAPT trial goals - early response assessment and subtype-specific therapy tailoring to those patients (pts) who are most likely to benefit - has recently been confirmed by the 5-years survival data of the ADAPT HR+/HER2- clinical trial. Methods: WSG-ADAPTcycle is a prospective, multi-center, interventional, two-arm, (neo)adjuvant, non-blinded, randomized, controlled phase III trial (NCT04055493) investigating whether treatment with the CDK4/6 inhibitor ribociclib (600mg/day) together with ET is superior to standard-chemotherapy (CT) in intermediate-risk HR+/HER2- EBC. Definition of intermediate-risk is either based on Oncotype DX and endocrine responder status (measured by Ki67-response after 2-4 weeks of induction endocrine therapy (ET)) or on low-intermediate baseline Ki67 and high estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR)-expression (Dowsett et al. NPJ Breast Cancer 2020). Co-primary endpoints are DFS and dDFS. It is planned to screen 5600 pts and to randomize 1670 pts (1002 to ribociclib + ET; 668 to standard CT followed by ET). Study start was in July 2019 (88 sites, enrollment period 42 months) and until date of submission, 3079 pts have been screened and 811 randomized (490 ribociclib / 321 CT). Pre-/postmenopausal pts with histologically confirmed invasive HR+/HER2- EBC with high clinical risk (cT2-4 or Ki-67 20% or G3 or cN+) are eligible if they fulfil the ADAPT intermediate-risk criteria: Recurrence Score (RS) ≤25 plus several risk factors and poor ET responder, RS >25 and ET-responder in p/cN0-1 pts, or RS ≤25 with c/pN2-3 in ET-responder. Direct randomization of premenopausal patients (irrespective of ET-response) with c/pN0 and RS 16-25 or c/pN1 with RS 0-25 is allowed according to investigator´s decision; however, based on the ADAPT results, ET+ovarian function suppression alone is strongly recommended in ET-responders. Treatment duration is 2 years for the ribociclib + aromatase inhibitor (AI) (premenopausal: AI + GnRH)-arm and 16-24 weeks for the CT-arm; neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment is allowed. The minimum 5-year follow-up phase includes standard adjuvant ET. ePROs are collected using CANKADO; ECG monitoring is performed using a novel eHealth method. Translational analyses: Tumor tissue will be collected prior to ET, after at least 3 weeks of ET, if residual tumor is diagnosed (neoadjuvant treatment), and at recurrence, to identify potential resistance markers. Exploratory tissue biomarker research will be conducted to assess alterations in molecular markers. In addition, ctDNA/ctRNA from optional blood samples will be assessed for mutations and gene expression relevant for HR+/HER2- EBC. Clinical trial information: NCT04055493.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Dept. Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Munich (LMU) and CCCLMU and West German Study Group, Munich, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group and Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Michael Braun
- Interdisciplinary Breast Center, Rotkreuz-Clinics Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Breast Center, Agaplesion Markus Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Monika Graeser
- Breast Center Niederrhein, Ev. Bethesda Hospital and Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg and West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Felix Hilpert
- Breast Center Hamburg International, Hospital Jerusalem, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Vesna Bjelic-Radisic
- Breast Unit, Helios University Clinic, University Witten-Herdecke, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Katja Krauss
- Breast Center, Dept. Obstetrics & Gynecology, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Mathias Warm
- Breast Center Cologne-Holweide, Municipal Hospital Holweide, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Tuebingen and University of Ulm, Tuebingen and Ulm, Germany
| | - Marianne Just
- Oncological Specialist Practice Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
| | | | - Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study Group/Breast Center Niederrhein, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Breast Center, Dept. OB&GYN, University of Munich (LMU) and CCCLMU, West German Study Group, Munich, Germany
| | - Sherko Kuemmel
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany and Clinics Essen-Mitte, Breast Center, Essen, Germany and Women’s Clinic, Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany, Essen, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nitz U, Gluz O, Graeser M, Christgen M, Kuemmel S, Grischke EM, Braun M, Augustin D, Potenberg J, Krauss K, Schumacher C, Forstbauer H, Reimer T, Stefek A, Fischer HH, Pelz E, zu Eulenburg C, Kates R, Wuerstlein R, Kreipe HH, Harbeck N, von Schumann R, Kuhn W, Polata S, Bielecki W, Meyer R, Just M, Kraudelt S, Siggelkow W, Wortelmann H, Kleine-Tebbe A, Leitzen L, Kirchhof H, Krabisch P, Hackmann J, Depenbusch R, Gnauert K, Staib P, Lehnert A, Hoffmann O, Briest S, Lindner C, Heyl V, Bauer L, Uleer C, Mohrmann S, Viehstaedt N, Malter W, Link T, Buendgen N, Tio J. De-escalated neoadjuvant pertuzumab plus trastuzumab therapy with or without weekly paclitaxel in HER2-positive, hormone receptor-negative, early breast cancer (WSG-ADAPT-HER2+/HR–): survival outcomes from a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:625-635. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00159-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
14
|
van Mackelenbergh MT, Seither F, Möbus V, O'Shaughnessy J, Martin M, Joensuu H, Untch M, Nitz U, Steger GG, Miralles JJ, Barrios CH, Toi M, Bear HD, Muss H, Reimer T, Nekljudova V, Loibl S. Effects of capecitabine as part of neo-/adjuvant chemotherapy - A meta-analysis of individual breast cancer patient data from 13 randomised trials including 15,993 patients. Eur J Cancer 2022; 166:185-201. [PMID: 35305453 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Revised: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the large number of patients with early breast cancer (EBC) who have been treated with capecitabine in randomised trials, no individual patient data meta-analysis has been conducted. The primary objective was to examine the effect of capecitabine on disease-free survival (DFS), and the secondary objectives were to analyse distant DFS (DDFS), overall survival (OS), pathological complete response (for neoadjuvant studies) and the interaction between capecitabine-related toxicity and treatment effect. METHODS www. CLINICALTRIALS gov and www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov were searched using the following criteria: use of capecitabine for EBC as adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy; multicentre randomised trial with >100 patients; recruitment completed, and outcomes available. Required data were available for 13 trials. RESULTS Individual data from 15,993 patients were collected. Cox regression analyses of all included patients revealed that the addition of capecitabine did not alter DFS significantly compared with treatment without capecitabine (hazard ratio [HR] 0.952; 95% CI 0.895-1.012; P value = 0.115). There was also no effect on DFS in the subset of studies where capecitabine was given instead of another drug (HR 1.035; 95% CI 0.945-1.134; P = 0.455). However, capecitabine administered in addition to the standard systemic treatment improved DFS (HR 0.888; 95% CI 0.817-0.965; P = 0.005). An OS improvement was observed in the entire cohort (HR 0.892; 95% CI 0.824-0.965, P = 0.005) and in the subset of capecitabine addition (HR 0.837; 95% CI 0.751, 0.933, P = 0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed that triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients benefitted from treatment with capecitabine overall and in addition to other systemic treatments in terms of DFS and OS. CONCLUSION Capecitabine was able to improve DFS and OS in patients with TNBC and in all patients with EBC when administered in addition to systemic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marion T van Mackelenbergh
- German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
| | | | - Volker Möbus
- University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Joyce O'Shaughnessy
- US Oncology Research, Inc., The Woodlands, TX, USA; Texas Oncology/Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Miguel Martin
- Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria Gregorio Marañon, CIBERONC, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; Spanish Breast Cancer Group, GEICAM, Madrid, Spain
| | - Heikki Joensuu
- Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Ulrike Nitz
- Breast Center Niederrhein, Evangelical Hospital Johanniter Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Guenther G Steger
- Department of Internal Medicine I and Gaston H. Glock Research Centre, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Carlos H Barrios
- Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil; Grupo Oncoclinicas, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Masakazu Toi
- Breast Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Harry D Bear
- NRG Oncology and Division of Surgical Oncology, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, VCU Health, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Hyman Muss
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Breast Center, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Christgen M, Kandt LD, Antonopoulos W, Bartels S, Van Bockstal MR, Bredt M, Brito MJ, Christgen H, Colpaert C, Cserni B, Cserni G, Daemmrich ME, Danebrock R, Dedeurwaerdere F, van Deurzen CH, Erber R, Fathke C, Feist H, Fiche M, Gonzalez CA, Ter Hoeve ND, Kooreman L, Krech T, Kristiansen G, Kulka J, Laenger F, Lafos M, Lehmann U, Martin-Martinez MD, Mueller S, Pelz E, Raap M, Ravarino A, Reineke-Plaass T, Schaumann N, Schelfhout AM, De Schepper M, Schlue J, Van de Vijver K, Waelput W, Wellmann A, Graeser M, Gluz O, Kuemmel S, Nitz U, Harbeck N, Desmedt C, Floris G, Derksen PW, van Diest PJ, Vincent-Salomon A, Kreipe H. Inter-observer agreement for the histological diagnosis of invasive lobular breast carcinoma. J Pathol Clin Res 2022; 8:191-205. [PMID: 34889530 PMCID: PMC8822373 DOI: 10.1002/cjp2.253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Revised: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Invasive lobular breast carcinoma (ILC) is the second most common breast carcinoma (BC) subtype and is mainly driven by loss of E‐cadherin expression. Correct classification of BC as ILC is important for patient treatment. This study assessed the degree of agreement among pathologists for the diagnosis of ILC. Two sets of hormone receptor (HR)‐positive/HER2‐negative BCs were independently reviewed by participating pathologists. In set A (61 cases), participants were provided with hematoxylin/eosin (HE)‐stained sections. In set B (62 cases), participants were provided with HE‐stained sections and E‐cadherin immunohistochemistry (IHC). Tumor characteristics were balanced. Participants classified specimens as non‐lobular BC versus mixed BC versus ILC. Pairwise inter‐observer agreement and agreement with a pre‐defined reference diagnosis were determined with Cohen's kappa statistics. Subtype calls were correlated with molecular features, including CDH1/E‐cadherin mutation status. Thirty‐five pathologists completed both sets, providing 4,305 subtype calls. Pairwise inter‐observer agreement was moderate in set A (median κ = 0.58, interquartile range [IQR]: 0.48–0.66) and substantial in set B (median κ = 0.75, IQR: 0.56–0.86, p < 0.001). Agreement with the reference diagnosis was substantial in set A (median κ = 0.67, IQR: 0.57–0.75) and almost perfect in set B (median κ = 0.86, IQR: 0.73–0.93, p < 0.001). The median frequency of CDH1/E‐cadherin mutations in specimens classified as ILC was 65% in set A (IQR: 56–72%) and 73% in set B (IQR: 65–75%, p < 0.001). Cases with variable subtype calls included E‐cadherin‐positive ILCs harboring CDH1 missense mutations, and E‐cadherin‐negative ILCs with tubular elements and focal P‐cadherin expression. ILCs with trabecular growth pattern were often misclassified as non‐lobular BC in set A but not in set B. In conclusion, subtyping of BC as ILC achieves almost perfect agreement with a pre‐defined reference standard, if assessment is supported by E‐cadherin IHC. CDH1 missense mutations associated with preserved E‐cadherin protein expression, E‐ to P‐cadherin switching in ILC with tubular elements, and trabecular ILC were identified as potential sources of discordant classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Stephan Bartels
- Institute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Martin Bredt
- Institute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Maria Jose Brito
- Pathology and Breast Unit, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Cecile Colpaert
- Department of Pathology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Gábor Cserni
- Department of Pathology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | | | | | | | | | - Ramona Erber
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), and Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christine Fathke
- Institute of Pathology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Henning Feist
- Institute of Pathology, Diakonissenkrankenhaus Flensburg, Flensburg, Germany
| | - Maryse Fiche
- Institute of Pathology Aurigen, Aurigen SA, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Claudia Aura Gonzalez
- Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Natalie D Ter Hoeve
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Loes Kooreman
- Institute of Pathology and GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Till Krech
- Institute of Pathology, University Clinics Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,Germany and Pathocom Network for Pathology, Osnabrück, Germany
| | | | - Janina Kulka
- 2nd Department of Pathology, Semmelweis University Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Florian Laenger
- Institute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Marcel Lafos
- Institute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Ulrich Lehmann
- Institute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Sophie Mueller
- Institute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Enrico Pelz
- Institute of Pathology Viersen, Viersen, Germany
| | - Mieke Raap
- Institute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | | | | - Nora Schaumann
- Institute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Maxim De Schepper
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.,Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jerome Schlue
- Institute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Koen Van de Vijver
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Wim Waelput
- Department of Pathology, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Monika Graeser
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Gynecologic University Clinic Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Sherko Kuemmel
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany, and Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Center, University of Munich (LMU) and CCCLMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Christine Desmedt
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Giuseppe Floris
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Imaging and Radiology, Laboratory for Cell and Tissue Translational Research, KU-Leuven/UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Patrick Wb Derksen
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anne Vincent-Salomon
- Pathology-Genetics-Immunology Department, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Hans Kreipe
- Institute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kuemmel S, Gluz O, Reinisch M, Kostara A, Scheffen I, Graeser M, Wuerstlein R, Nitz U, Luedtke-Heckenkamp K, Hartkopf A, Hilpert F, Kentsch A, Ziske C, Depenbusch R, Braun M, Blohmer J, zu Eulenburg C, Christgen M, Bartels S, Kreipe H, Pelz E, Schmid P, Harbeck N. Abstract PD10-11: Keyriched-1- A prospective, multicenter, open label, neoadjuvant phase ii single arm study with pembrolizumab in combination with dual anti-HER2 blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab in early breast cancer patients with molecular HER2-enriched intrinsic subtype. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-pd10-11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: De-escalating strategies seem promising in HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC) and chemo-free regimens are thus of key interest. Recent data have underlined the role of tumor immunogenicity in response to de-escalated neoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapy. Therefore, the prospective single arm hypothesis-generating phase II KEYRICHED-1 trial (NCT03988036) investigates the pCR-rate in patients with HER2-enriched EBC receiving four cycles of the dual anti-HER2 blockade in combination with the checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab. Initial studies with dual antibody-based HER2 blockade alone were able to achieve pCR-rates of 20-40%, which did not quite match the pCR-rates obtained with concurrent chemotherapy. KEYRICHED-1 aims at achieving pCR-rates comparable to standard chemotherapy-containing regimens by incorporating appropriate molecular selection and immune oncology.. Methods: A total of 48 pre- and postmenopausal patients with newly diagnosed HER2 2+ or 3+ EBC (stage I-III) and HER2-enriched (HER2-E) subtype by PAM50 were enrolled in this single-arm study. All patients received four cycles of study treatment with pembrolizumab (200mg), trastuzumab biosimilar (Trazimera®, loading dose 8mg/kg bodyweight (BW), maintenance dose 6mg/kg BW), and pertuzumab (loading dose 840mg/kg BW, maintenance dose 420mg/kg BW) q21d. Primary endpoint was centrally confirmed pCR (ypT0/is, ypN0). The trial was planned as a Simon's two-stage design (null and alternative pCR were 40% and 60%); interim analysis after 16 patients had to show a pCR rate of at least 50% to continue recruitment.. Results: Between 05/2020 and 03/2021, 98 patients were screened. N=52 (55%) had HER2-E subtype, of whom 48 patients entered the treatment phase. Median patient age was 57 years (28-83). 65% had tumors > 2 cm and 30% positive lymph node status. Centrally confirmed pCR-rate in surgical specimens was 46% (95% CI 0.31-0.62) in the 43 patients of the per-protocol-population, and 52% (95%CI 0.37-0.67) in all 46 evaluable patients (local assessment; two pCRs verified only by core biopsy) (p=0.22 and p=0.06 for null hypothesis, respectively). Despite HER2-E subtype, no pCR was observed in the four patients with immunohistochemical (IHC) HER2 2+/ISH-positive status in contrast to 20/39 (51.2%) pCR in IHC HER2 3+ tumors. Centrally confirmed pCR-rate in HR+/HER2+ tumors was 38.5% compared to 58.5% in HR-/HER2+ tumors. No new safety signals were observed.. Conclusions: These are the first results of a neoadjuvant chemotherapy-free 12-week de-escalation anti-HER2-regimen with trastuzumab and pertuzumab in combination with the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in patients with a HER2-E EBC. In the context of the WSG ADAPT HER2+ de-escalation trials the observed pCR-rates compare favorably in HR+ as well as HR- HER2+ EBC. Moreover, KEYRICHED-1 demonstrates that with appropriate molecular patient selection clinically meaningful pCR-rates in the range of those obtained with longer, more toxic chemotherapy-containing regimens can be achieved.
Citation Format: Sherko Kuemmel, Oleg Gluz, Mattea Reinisch, Athina Kostara, Iris Scheffen, Monika Graeser, Rachel Wuerstlein, Ulrike Nitz, Kerstin Luedtke-Heckenkamp, Andreas Hartkopf, Felix Hilpert, Angela Kentsch, Carsten Ziske, Reinhard Depenbusch, Michael Braun, Jens Blohmer, Christine zu Eulenburg, Matthias Christgen, Stephan Bartels, Hans Kreipe, Enrico Pelz, Peter Schmid, Nadia Harbeck. Keyriched-1- A prospective, multicenter, open label, neoadjuvant phase ii single arm study with pembrolizumab in combination with dual anti-HER2 blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab in early breast cancer patients with molecular HER2-enriched intrinsic subtype [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD10-11.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Breast Center, Dept. OB&GYN and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Hartkopf
- University Clinics Tuebingen, Department for Senology, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Felix Hilpert
- Breast Center Hamburg at Hospital Jerusalem, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Angela Kentsch
- Diakovere Henriettenstift, Dept. for Gynecology, Hanover, Germany
| | - Carsten Ziske
- Praxis Dr. H. Forstbauer, C. Ziske, R. Reihs, E. Rodermann, A. Diel, Troisdorf, Germany
| | | | | | - Jens Blohmer
- Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Dept. of Gynecology with Breast Center, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Stephan Bartels
- Hanover Medical School, Institute of Pathology, Hanover, Germany
| | - Hans Kreipe
- Hanover Medical School, Institute of Pathology, Hanover, Germany
| | | | - Peter Schmid
- Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Dept. OB&GYN and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Grote I, Bartels S, Christgen H, Radner M, Gronewold M, Kandt L, Raap M, Lehmann U, Gluz O, Graeser M, Kuemmel S, Nitz U, Harbeck N, Kreipe H, Christgen M. ERBB2 mutation is associated with sustained tumor cell proliferation after short-term preoperative endocrine therapy in early lobular breast cancer. Mod Pathol 2022; 35:1804-1811. [PMID: 35842479 PMCID: PMC9708567 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-022-01130-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Revised: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) is a special breast cancer (BC) subtype and is mostly hormone receptor (HR)-positive and ERBB2 non-amplified. Endocrine therapy restrains tumor proliferation and is the mainstay of lobular BC treatment. Mutation of ERBB2 has been associated with recurrent ILC. However, it is unknown whether ERBB2 mutation impacts on the otherwise exquisite responsiveness of early ILC to endocrine therapy. We have recently profiled n = 622 HR-positive early BCs from the ADAPT trial for mutations in candidate genes involved in endocrine resistance, including ERBB2. All patients were treated with short-term preoperative endocrine therapy (pET, tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors) before tumor resection. Tumor proliferation after endocrine therapy (post-pET Ki67 index) was determined prospectively by standardized central pathology assessment supported by computer-assisted image analysis. Sustained or suppressed proliferation were defined as post-pET Ki67 ≥10% or <10%. Here, we report a subgroup analysis pertaining to ILCs in this cohort. ILCs accounted for 179/622 (28.8%) cases. ILCs were enriched in mutations in CDH1 (124/179, 69.3%, P < 0.0001) and ERBB2 (14/179, 7.8%, P < 0.0001), but showed fewer mutations in TP53 (7/179, 3.9%, P = 0.0048) and GATA3 (11/179, 6.1%, P < 0.0001). Considering all BCs irrespective of subtypes, ERBB2 mutation was not associated with proliferation. In ILCs, however, ERBB2 mutations were 3.5-fold more common in cases with sustained post-pET proliferation compared to cases with suppressed post-pET proliferation (10/75, 13.3% versus 4/104, 3.8%, P = 0.0248). Moreover, ERBB2 mutation was associated with high Oncotype DX recurrence scores (P = 0.0087). In summary, our findings support that ERBB2 mutation influences endocrine responsiveness in early lobular BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Grote
- grid.10423.340000 0000 9529 9877Institute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Stephan Bartels
- grid.10423.340000 0000 9529 9877Institute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Henriette Christgen
- grid.10423.340000 0000 9529 9877Institute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Martin Radner
- grid.10423.340000 0000 9529 9877Institute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Malte Gronewold
- grid.10423.340000 0000 9529 9877Institute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Leonie Kandt
- grid.10423.340000 0000 9529 9877Institute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Mieke Raap
- grid.10423.340000 0000 9529 9877Institute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Ulrich Lehmann
- grid.10423.340000 0000 9529 9877Institute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- grid.476830.eWest German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany ,Ev. Bethesda Hospital, Moenchengladbach, Germany ,University Clinics Cologne, Women’s Clinic and Breast Center, Cologne, Germany
| | - Monika Graeser
- grid.476830.eWest German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany ,Ev. Bethesda Hospital, Moenchengladbach, Germany ,grid.13648.380000 0001 2180 3484University Medical Center Hamburg, Department of Gynecology, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sherko Kuemmel
- grid.476830.eWest German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany ,Clinics Essen-Mitte, Breast Unit, Essen, Germany ,grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Charité, Women’s Clinic, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- grid.476830.eWest German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany ,Ev. Bethesda Hospital, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- grid.476830.eWest German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany ,grid.5252.00000 0004 1936 973XLMU University Hospital, Breast Center, Department OB&GYN and CCC Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Hans Kreipe
- grid.10423.340000 0000 9529 9877Institute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Grote I, Bartels S, Kandt L, Bollmann L, Christgen H, Gronewold M, Raap M, Lehmann U, Gluz O, Nitz U, Kuemmel S, Zu Eulenburg C, Braun M, Aktas B, Grischke EM, Schumacher C, Luedtke-Heckenkamp K, Kates R, Wuerstlein R, Graeser M, Harbeck N, Christgen M, Kreipe H. TP53 mutations are associated with primary endocrine resistance in luminal early breast cancer. Cancer Med 2021; 10:8581-8594. [PMID: 34779146 PMCID: PMC8633262 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Revised: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Whereas the genomic landscape of endocrine‐resistant breast cancer has been intensely characterized in previously treated cases with local or distant recurrence, comparably little is known about genomic alterations conveying primary non‐responsiveness to endocrine treatment in luminal early breast cancer. Methods In this study, 622 estrogen receptor‐expressing breast cancer cases treated with short‐term preoperative endocrine therapy (pET) from the WSG‐ADAPT trial (NCT01779206) were analyzed for genetic alterations associated with impaired endocrine proliferative response (EPR) to 3‐week pET with tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors. EPR was categorized as optimal (post‐pET Ki67 <10%) versus slightly, moderately, and severely impaired (post‐pET Ki67 10%–19%, 20%–34%, and ≥35%, respectively). Recently described gene mutations frequently found in previously treated advanced breast cancer were analyzed (ARID1A, BRAF, ERBB2, ESR1, GATA3, HRAS, KRAS, NRAS, PIK3CA, and TP53) by next‐generation sequencing. Amplifications of CCND1, FGFR1, ERBB2, and PAK1 were determined by digital PCR or fluorescence in situ hybridization. Results ERBB2 amplification (p = 0.0015) and mutations of TP53 (p < 0.0001) were significantly associated with impaired EPR. Impaired EPR in TP53‐mutated breast cancer cases was independent from the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score group and was seen both with tamoxifen‐ and aromatase inhibitor‐based pET (p = 0.0005 each). Conclusion We conclude that impaired EPR to pET is suitable to identify cases with primary endocrine resistance in early luminal breast cancer and that TP53‐mutated luminal cancers might not be sufficiently treated by endocrine therapy alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Grote
- Hannover Medical School, Institute of Pathology, Hannover, Germany
| | - Stephan Bartels
- Hannover Medical School, Institute of Pathology, Hannover, Germany
| | - Leonie Kandt
- Hannover Medical School, Institute of Pathology, Hannover, Germany
| | - Laura Bollmann
- Hannover Medical School, Institute of Pathology, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Malte Gronewold
- Hannover Medical School, Institute of Pathology, Hannover, Germany
| | - Mieke Raap
- Hannover Medical School, Institute of Pathology, Hannover, Germany
| | - Ulrich Lehmann
- Hannover Medical School, Institute of Pathology, Hannover, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Ev. Bethesda Hospital, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,University Clinics Cologne, Women's Clinic and Breast Center, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Ev. Bethesda Hospital, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Sherko Kuemmel
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Clinics Essen-Mitte, Breast Unit, Essen, Germany.,Charité, Women's Clinic, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Bahriye Aktas
- University Clinics Essen, Women's Clinic, Essen, Germany.,University Clinics Leipzig, Women's Clinic, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Ronald Kates
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Department OB&GYN and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Breast Center, Munich, Germany
| | - Monika Graeser
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Ev. Bethesda Hospital, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Department OB&GYN and CCC Munich, LMU University Hospital, Breast Center, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Hans Kreipe
- Hannover Medical School, Institute of Pathology, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Friedrich M, Kühn T, Janni W, Müller V, Banys-Paluchowski M, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Jackisch C, Krug D, Albert US, Bauerfeind I, Blohmer J, Budach W, Dall P, Fallenberg EM, Fasching PA, Fehm T, Gerber B, Gluz O, Hanf V, Harbeck N, Heil J, Huober J, Kreipe HH, Kümmel S, Loibl S, Lüftner D, Lux MP, Maass N, Möbus V, Mundhenke C, Nitz U, Park-Simon TW, Reimer T, Rhiem K, Rody A, Schmidt M, Schneeweiss A, Schütz F, Sinn HP, Solbach C, Solomayer EF, Stickeler E, Thomssen C, Untch M, Witzel I, Wöckel A, Thill M, Ditsch N. Correction: AGO Recommendations for the Surgical Therapy of the Axilla After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: 2021 Update. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2021; 81:e31. [PMID: 34720743 PMCID: PMC8548988 DOI: 10.1055/a-1674-1114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1055/a-1499-8431.].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Friedrich
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, HELIOS Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | | | - Wolfgang Janni
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, UK-SH, Lübeck, Germany.,Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Christian Jackisch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Ute-Susann Albert
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Ingo Bauerfeind
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Landshut gemeinnützige GmbH, Landshut, Germany
| | - Jens Blohmer
- Klinik für Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum des Universitätsklinikums der Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Strahlentherapie, Radiologie Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Peter Dall
- Frauenklinik, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Eva M Fallenberg
- Klinikum der Universität München, Campus Großhadern, Institut für Klinische Radiologie, München, Germany
| | | | - Tanja Fehm
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Klinikum Südstadt Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bethesda, Brustzentrum, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Volker Hanf
- Frauenklinik, Nathanstift Klinikum Fürth, Fürth, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Germany
| | - Jörg Heil
- Universitäts-Klinikum Heidelberg, Brustzentrum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | | | | | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Patrick Lux
- Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik, St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz Krankenhaus GmbH, Germany
| | - Nicolai Maass
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Volker Möbus
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Christoph Mundhenke
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bethesda, Brustzentrum, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Tjoung-Won Park-Simon
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Universitätsfrauenklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Klinikum Südstadt Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - Achim Rody
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Geburtshilfe und Frauengesundheit der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Florian Schütz
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Sinn
- Sektion Gynäkopathologie, Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Solbach
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Erich-Franz Solomayer
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Universitätsfrauenklinik, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle-Wittenberg, Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kolberg-Liedtke C, Wuerstlein R, Gluz O, Heitz F, Freudenberger M, Bensmann E, du Bois A, Nitz U, Pelz E, Warm M, Ortmann M, Sultova E, Brucker SY, Kates RE, Fehm T, Harbeck N. Phenotype Discordance between Primary Tumor and Metastasis Impacts Metastasis Site and Outcome: Results of WSG-DETECT-PriMet. Breast Care (Basel) 2021; 16:475-483. [PMID: 34720807 DOI: 10.1159/000512416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Tumor biological factors of breast cancer (BC) such as hormone receptor (HR) status, HER2 status, and grade can differ in the metastatic cascade from primary to lymph node (LN) metastasis and to distant metastatic tissue. Systematic data regarding therapeutic consequences are yet limited. Methods We conducted a prospectively planned, retrospective cohort study comparing BC phenotype in tissue from primary tumors (PTs), locoregional LN metastases, and disease recurrence (DR). HR and HER2 as well as tumor grade in PTs and DR were obtained by a database search. No centralized biomarker testing was performed. The impact of changes in tumor biological factors on post-recurrence survival (PRS) and overall survival was analyzed. Results PriMet comprises 635 patients (LN tissue in 142 patients). Discrepancies for HR or HER2 status between PT and DR were observed in 18.7 and 21.6% of cases, respectively. For HR status, positivity of PT and negativity of DR was seen more often (13.2%) than vice versa (5.5%). For HER2 status, negativity of the primary and positivity of DR was seen more often (14.9%) than vice versa (6.7%). Discordance was more often observed between PT and LN metastasis compared to LN versus DR. However, numbers were small. Compared to concordant non-triple-negative (TN) disease, concordant TN disease showed significantly inferior PRS. Conclusion We demonstrate receptor discordance to occur relatively frequently between PT, LN metastasis, and DR and to impact patient prognosis. However, clinical consequences of receptor discordance need to be drawn with caution considering clinical aspects as well as tumor biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Munich and CCCLMU, Munich, Germany.,West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany.,Evangelical Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Florian Heitz
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany.,Horst-Schmidt-Klinik Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | | | - Elena Bensmann
- Abteilung für Gynäkologie, Rotkreuzklinikum München, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas du Bois
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany.,Horst-Schmidt-Klinik Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany.,Evangelical Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Matthias Warm
- Brustzentrum, Krankenhaus Köln-Holweide, Cologne, Germany
| | - Monika Ortmann
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Cologne, Germany
| | - Elena Sultova
- Institut für Pathologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Sara Y Brucker
- Departement für Frauengesundheit, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Tanja Fehm
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Munich and CCCLMU, Munich, Germany.,West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Friedrich M, Kühn T, Janni W, Müller V, Banys-Pachulowski M, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Jackisch C, Krug D, Albert US, Bauerfeind I, Blohmer J, Budach W, Dall P, Fallenberg EM, Fasching PA, Fehm T, Gerber B, Gluz O, Hanf V, Harbeck N, Heil J, Huober J, Kreipe HH, Kümmel S, Loibl S, Lüftner D, Lux MP, Maass N, Möbus V, Mundhenke C, Nitz U, Park-Simon TW, Reimer T, Rhiem K, Rody A, Schmidt M, Schneeweiss A, Schütz F, Sinn HP, Solbach C, Solomayer EF, Stickeler E, Thomssen C, Untch M, Witzel I, Wöckel A, Thill M, Ditsch N. AGO Recommendations for the Surgical Therapy of the Axilla After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: 2021 Update. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2021; 81:1112-1120. [PMID: 34629490 PMCID: PMC8494519 DOI: 10.1055/a-1499-8431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
For many decades, the standard procedure to treat breast cancer included complete dissection of the axillary lymph nodes. The aim was to determine histological node status, which was then used as the basis for adjuvant therapy, and to ensure locoregional tumour control. In addition to the debate on how to optimise the therapeutic strategies of systemic treatment and radiotherapy, the current discussion focuses on improving surgical procedures to treat breast cancer. As neoadjuvant chemotherapy is becoming increasingly important, the surgical procedures used to treat breast cancer, whether they are breast surgery or axillary dissection, are changing. Based on the currently available data, carrying out SLNE prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not recommended. In contrast, surgical axillary management after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is considered the procedure of choice for axillary staging and can range from SLNE to TAD and ALND. To reduce the rate of false negatives
during surgical staging of the axilla in pN+
CNB
stage before NACT and ycN0 after NACT, targeted axillary dissection (TAD), the removal of > 2 SLNs (SLNE, no untargeted axillary sampling), immunohistochemistry to detect isolated tumour cells and micro-metastases, and marking positive lymph nodes before NACT should be the standard approach. This most recent update on surgical axillary management describes the significance of isolated tumour cells and micro-metastasis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the clinical consequences of low volume residual disease diagnosed using SLNE and TAD and provides an overview of this yearʼs AGO recommendations for surgical management of the axilla during primary surgery and in relation to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Friedrich
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, HELIOS Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | | | - Wolfgang Janni
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maggie Banys-Pachulowski
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, UK-SH, Lübeck, Germany.,Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Christian Jackisch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Ute-Susann Albert
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Ingo Bauerfeind
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Landshut gemeinnützige GmbH, Landshut, Germany
| | - Jens Blohmer
- Klinik für Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum des Universitätsklinikums der Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Strahlentherapie, Radiologie Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Peter Dall
- Frauenklinik, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Eva M Fallenberg
- Klinikum der Universität München, Campus Großhadern, Institut für Klinische Radiologie, München, Germany
| | | | - Tanja Fehm
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Klinikum Südstadt Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bethesda, Brustzentrum, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Volker Hanf
- Frauenklinik, Nathanstift Klinikum Fürth, Fürth, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Germany
| | - Jörg Heil
- Universitäts-Klinikum Heidelberg, Brustzentrum, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | | | | | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Patrick Lux
- Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik, St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz Krankenhaus GmbH, Germany
| | - Nicolai Maass
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Volker Möbus
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Christoph Mundhenke
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bethesda, Brustzentrum, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Tjoung-Won Park-Simon
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Universitätsfrauenklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Klinikum Südstadt Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - Achim Rody
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Geburtshilfe und Frauengesundheit der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Florian Schütz
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Sinn
- Sektion Gynäkopathologie, Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Solbach
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Erich-Franz Solomayer
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Universitätsfrauenklinik, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle-Wittenberg, Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Thill M, Friedrich M, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Albert US, Banys-Paluchowski M, Bauerfeind I, Blohmer JU, Budach W, Dall P, Fallenberg EM, Fasching PA, Fehm T, Gerber B, Gluz O, Harbeck N, Heil J, Huober J, Jackisch C, Kreipe HH, Krug D, Kühn T, Kümmel S, Loibl S, Lüftner D, Lux MP, Maass N, Mundhenke C, Nitz U, Park-Simon TW, Reimer T, Rhiem K, Rody A, Schmidt M, Schneeweiss A, Schütz F, Sinn HP, Solbach C, Solomayer EF, Stickeler E, Thomssen C, Untch M, Witzel I, Wöckel A, Müller V, Janni W, Ditsch N. AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Locally Advanced and Metastatic Breast Cancer: Update 2021. Breast Care (Basel) 2021; 16:228-235. [PMID: 34248463 PMCID: PMC8248779 DOI: 10.1159/000516420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 04/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Thill
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Michael Friedrich
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | | | - Ute-Susann Albert
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
- Brustzentrum, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Ingo Bauerfeind
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Landshut gemeinnützige GmbH, Landshut, Germany
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Klinik für Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum des Universitätsklinikums der Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Strahlentherapie, Radiologie Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Peter Dall
- Frauenklinik, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Eva M. Fallenberg
- Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München Campus Großhadern, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Tanja Fehm
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- Brustzentrum, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Jörg Heil
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Sektion Senologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- Brustzentrum, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | | | - David Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - Sherko Kümmel
- Klinik für Senologie, Evangelische Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael P. Lux
- Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn und St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus GmbH, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Nicolai Maass
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Christoph Mundhenke
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- Brustzentrum, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Tjoung-Won Park-Simon
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Achim Rody
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Landshut gemeinnützige GmbH, Landshut, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Sinn
- Klinik für Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum des Universitätsklinikums der Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christine Solbach
- Strahlentherapie, Radiologie Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Erich-Franz Solomayer
- Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München Campus Großhadern, Munich, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Brustzentrum, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Brustzentrum, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Sektion Senologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ditsch N, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Friedrich M, Jackisch C, Albert US, Banys-Paluchowski M, Bauerfeind I, Blohmer JU, Budach W, Dall P, Fallenberg EM, Fasching PA, Fehm T, Gerber B, Gluz O, Harbeck N, Heil J, Huober J, Kreipe HH, Krug D, Kühn T, Kümmel S, Loibl S, Lüftner D, Lux MP, Maass N, Mundhenke C, Nitz U, Park-Simon TW, Reimer T, Rhiem K, Rody A, Schmidt M, Schneeweiss A, Schütz F, Sinn HP, Solbach C, Solomayer EF, Stickeler E, Thomssen C, Untch M, Witzel I, Wöckel A, Müller V, Janni W, Thill M. AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Update 2021. Breast Care (Basel) 2021; 16:214-227. [PMID: 34248462 DOI: 10.1159/000516419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 04/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Ditsch
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | | | - Michael Friedrich
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Ute-Susann Albert
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.,Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Ingo Bauerfeind
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Landshut gemeinnützige GmbH, Landshut, Germany
| | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Klinik für Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum des Universitätsklinikums der Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Strahlentherapie, Radiologie Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Peter Dall
- Frauenklinik, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Eva M Fallenberg
- Institut für klinische Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Campus Großhadern, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Tanja Fehm
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- Brustzentrum, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Jörg Heil
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Sektion Senologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- Brustzentrum, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | | | - David Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - Sherko Kümmel
- Klinik für Senologie, Evangelische Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael P Lux
- Kooperatives Brustzentrum Paderborn, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn und St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus GmbH, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Nicolai Maass
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Mundhenke
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- Brustzentrum, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Tjoung-Won Park-Simon
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Achim Rody
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Sinn
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Landshut gemeinnützige GmbH, Landshut, Germany
| | - Christine Solbach
- Strahlentherapie, Radiologie Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Elmar Stickeler
- Institut für klinische Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Campus Großhadern, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Michael Untch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Universitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Brustzentrum, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Gluz O, Nitz U, Christgen M, Braun M, Luedtke-Heckenkamp K, Darsow M, Forstbauer H, Potenberg J, Uleer C, Grischke EM, Aktas B, Schumacher C, zu Eulenburg C, Jozwiak K, Kates RE, Graeser M, Wuerstlein R, Kreipe HH, Kuemmel S, Harbeck N. Prognostic impact of recurrence score, endocrine response and clinical-pathological factors in high-risk luminal breast cancer: Results from the WSG-ADAPT HR+/HER2- chemotherapy trial. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
504 Background: In HR+/HER2- N0-1 early BC, postmenopausal patients (pts) with RS™ > 25 and a substantial proportion of premenopausal pts seem to benefit from addition of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) to endocrine therapy (ET). However, the magnitude of absolute benefit from this treatment intensification seems to depend on clinical-pathological and biological prognostic factors. For the first time, we present outcome from the CT part of the prospective phase III WSG-ADAPT HR+/HER- trial combining both static (RS in baseline core biopsy (CB) and dynamic (Ki67 response) biomarkers to optimize adjuvant therapy in luminal EBC. Methods: Pts with clinically high-risk HR+/HER2- EBC (cT2-4 OR clinically N+ OR G3 OR Ki67>15%) were initially treated by 3 (+/-1) weeks of standard ET (postmenopausal: mostly AI; premenopausal: TAM) before surgery or sequential CB. Pts with cN2-3 or G3/Ki67>40% were randomized directly to the CT trial. pN0-1 pts with RS0-11 OR RS12-25/ET-response (central Ki67postendocrine<10%) received ET alone; the remaining high-risk cohort was randomized to the CT trial: (neo)adjuvant dose-dense CT (4xPaclitaxelà4xEC q2w vs. 8xNab-Paclitaxel q1wà4xEC q2w) followed by ET. Primary endpoint is efficacy comparison of CT schedules for survival; secondary endpoints reported here involve impacts of key prognostic factors on survival. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate survival curves and hazard ratios. For this analysis, subgroups free of selection bias by RS/ET-response were defined. Results: 5625 pts were screened and 4621 (ITT) entered the trial. After 4.9y median follow-up, higher baseline and post-endocrine Ki-67 levels were associated with poorer iDFS (both p < 0.001). In the CT cohort (n = 2331), higher RS, nodal status, and tumor size were generally associated with poorer iDFS. However, iDFS differed between N1 and N0 status only among younger pts (<50 years). In pts with >4 positive LN (n = 390), lower RS was associated with improved iDFS (RS0-11 vs RS > 25: plog-rank= 0.016, 5y-iDFS 90% vs. 64%). In pts with RS > 25 (n = 965), low Ki67postendocrine, N0 status, and c/pT1 status were associated with improved iDFS. In particular, ET-responders had higher 5y-iDFS (84%) than ET-non-responders (77%; plog-rank= 0.040). Younger patients (<50 years old) with N0-1 RS 12-25/ ET-non-responders treated by CT had non-significantly poorer 5-year iDFS (89%) compared to those with ET-response treated by ET only (92%) (plog-rank= 0.249). Conclusion: First results from the prospective high risk cohort from a large prospective phase III ADAPT trial provide evidence for good prognosis in some pts with >4 positive LN and e.g. low RS. Moreover combination of lower post-endocrine Ki-67 and limited tumor burden may be a promising criterion for CT de-escalation strategies even in patients with high RS. Clinical trial information: NCT01779206.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group and Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study Group/Breast Center Niederrhein, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Michael Braun
- Interdisciplinary Breast Center, Rotkreuz-Clinics Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Maren Darsow
- Luisenhospital Duesseldorf, Practice for Senologic Oncology, Duesseldorf, Germany, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Eva-Maria Grischke
- University Women´s Clinic Tuebingen, Eberhard Karls University, Tubingen, Germany
| | - Bahriye Aktas
- University of Leipzig Medical Center, Department of Gynecology, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | | | - Katarzyna Jozwiak
- Medical School Brandenburg, Institute for Biometrics and Registry Research, Neuruppin, Neuruppin, Germany
| | | | | | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany and Breast Center, Dept. Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Munich (LMU) and CCCLMU, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Sherko Kuemmel
- Breast Center, Ev. Clinics Essen-Mitte and West German Study Group, Essen, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany and Breast Center, Dept. Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Munich (LMU) and CCCLMU, Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Richters LKK, Gluz O, Weber-Lassalle N, Christgen M, Haverkamp H, Kuemmel S, Kayali M, Kates RE, Grischke EM, Braun M, Warm M, Wuerstlein R, Ernst C, Graeser MK, Hauke J, Nitz U, Kreipe HH, Schmutzler RK, Hahnen E, Harbeck N. Pathological complete response rate and survival in patients with BRCA-associated triple-negative breast cancer after 12 weeks of de-escalated neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Translational results of the WSG-ADAPT TN randomized phase II trial (NCT01815242). J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
579 Background: The phase II trial WSG-ADAPT TN randomized triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients to receive 12 weeks of neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel (nab-pac) combined with carboplatin (carbo) vs gemcitabine (gem) and showed a substantial improvement of pathological complete response (pCR: ypT0/is, ypN0) with carbo (45.9% vs 28.7%). pCR had a strong favorable impact on iDFS after 3-year follow-up. Distribution of tumor mutations in BC-associated genes and impact of BRCA mutation status on pCR and outcome are analyzed here. Methods: NGS-based mutational analysis of BRCA1/2 and 18 further (potentially) BC-associated genes was performed on DNA derived from pretreatment FFPE samples (gem: n = 158, carbo: n = 108) using a customized gene panel. Variants with a variant fraction of ≥5% were included and classified according to IARC and ENIGMA guidelines. Results: In 42 of the 266 analyzed samples, at least one deleterious BRCA1/2-variant was found (15.8%; BRCA1 n = 37, BRCA2 n = 3, BRCA1+ BRCA2 n = 2) one of which displayed an additional STK11-mutation. In the BRCA1/2-negative cohort, a mutation in one of 14 further analyzed (potential) BC-risk genes was found in 19 samples (7.1%; BARD1 n = 3, CHEK2 n = 2, CDH1 n = 2, FANCM n = 3, PALB2 n = 5, RAD50 n = 1, RAD51C n = 1, RAD51D n = 1, XRCC2 n = 1; no deleterious mutations were found in ATM, BRIP1, MRE11A, NBN). At least one deleterious variant in TP53, PIK3CA, PTEN or MAP3K1 was seen in 89.1% (n = 237; TP53 n = 233, PIK3CA n = 22 PTEN n = 15, MAP3K1 n = 1). In 22 samples (8.3%) no deleterious mutation was identified in the analyzed genes. Overall, patients with tumor BRCA mutation (carbo n = 14, gem n = 28) had 45.2% vs 34.4% pCR (OR = 1.58, 95%-CI: 0.81-3.07, p =.18) without a mutation. pCR in the small group with mutation receiving carbo (n = 14) was 64.3% vs. 34.5% in all others (OR = 3.41, 95%-CI: 1.11-10.50; p =.03); direct comparison to BRCA-positive patients receiving gem (n = 28, 35.7%, OR = 3.2, 95%-CI: 0.85-12.36, p = 0.079) did not reach statistical significance. The results suggest that the strong favorable impact of pCR on iDFS is preserved even among BRCA-positive patients (n = 42, p =.07), as well as in the BRCA-negative subgroup (p <.001). No evidence for a predictive impact of BRCA mutation on efficacy of 4xEC additional chemotherapy was seen overall or within pCR subgroups. Conclusions: Twelve weeks of neoadjuvant nab-pac/carbo is a highly effective anthracycline-free regimen that leads to an excellent pCR-rate of 64% in tumor BRCA1/2-mutated cases. BRC A1/2 mutation status could support this de-escalation strategy in early TNBC, but further prospective validation of survival impacts in larger cohorts and with longer follow up is needed. More detailed survival analyses will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT01815242.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Katharina Katharina Richters
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group and Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Nana Weber-Lassalle
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Heinz Haverkamp
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sherko Kuemmel
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach and Breast Center, Ev. Clinics Essen-Mitte and Women’s Clinic, Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mohamad Kayali
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Eva-Maria Grischke
- University Women´s Clinic Tuebingen, Eberhard Karls University, Tubingen, Germany
| | - Michael Braun
- Interdisciplinary Breast Center, Rotkreuz-Clinics Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mathias Warm
- City Hospital Holweide, Breast Center, Cologne, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany and Breast Center, Dept. Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Munich (LMU) and CCCLMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Corinna Ernst
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Monika Karla Graeser
- West German Study Group and Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany and Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jan Hauke
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study Group and Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Rita K. Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Eric Hahnen
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany and Breast Center, Dept. Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Munich (LMU) and CCCLMU, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Harbeck N, Gluz O, Christgen M, Kuemmel S, Grischke EM, Braun M, Potenberg J, Krauss K, Schumacher C, Forstbauer H, Reimer T, Stefek A, Fischer HH, Pelz E, Graeser M, zu Eulenburg C, Kates RE, Wuerstlein R, Kreipe HH, Nitz U. De-escalated neoadjuvant pertuzumab+trastuzumab with or without paclitaxel weekly in HR-/HER2+ early breast cancer: ADAPT-HR-/HER2+ biomarker and survival results. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
503 Background: Optimal use of de-escalated, particularly chemotherapy(CT)-free, neoadjuvant regimens in HER2+ early breast cancer (EBC) is currently unclear as there are limited survival data so far. In ADAPT-HR-/HER2+, we previously showed an excellent pCR rate of 90% after 12-week neoadjuvant paclitaxel (Pac) +pertuzumab (P) +trastuzumab (T) and a substantial and clinically meaningful pCR rate of 34% after P+T alone in HR-/HER2+ EBC. Here, we present first survival data. Methods: The prospective multicenter WSG-ADAPT-HR-/HER2+ phase II-trial is part of the ADAPT-umbrella protocol. Patients with cT1-cT4c, cN0-3 HR-/HER2+ EBC (n = 134) were randomized to 4 cycles of P+T +/- pac d1,8,15 q3w. All tumors were HR-negative (ER and PR < 1%) and HER2-positive (central lab, i.e., 2+ FISH positive or 3+ by immunohistochemistry. Primary endpoint was pCR (ypT0/is/ypN0); omission of further CT was allowed in pts with pCR. Trial objective was to compare pCR in P+T+pac arm vs. early responders in P+T arm (defined as low cellularity and/or Ki67 decrease >30% after 3 weeks). The trial was stopped early due to the observed pCR superiority in the P+T+pac arm. Secondary endpoints included safety, 5-y (distant)-DFS, OS and translational research. Cox-regression analysis was applied. PAM50 subtype was assessed using the BC360 panel. Results: 134 patients were randomized to P+T (n = 92) or P+T+pac (n = 42). 60% of tumors were cT2-4, 42% clinically node-positive. After a median follow-up of 5 years, no significant differences between study arms were observed regarding DFS, dDFS, and OS; only 13 iDFS events (7 dDFS) were observed in the whole ITT population. pCR (vs. non-pCR) after the 12-week study treatment (irrespective of study arm) was strongly associated with improved iDFS (5y DFS 98.5% vs. 82%, HR = 0.14, 95% CI 0.03-0.64). Of the 69 patients with pCR, 39 (56.5%) received no further CT (P+T arm: n = 9, 29% vs. (P+T+pac arm n = 30, 79%); only 1 distant relapse (1.4%) was observed in these patients. In the CT-free P+T arm, no pCR was observed in patients with low HER2 expression (IHC 1+/2+ and FISH positive) and/or basal-like subtype by PAM50 (n = 17, 19%). In the total study population, low HER2 expression and/or no early response was strongly associated with worse dDFS (p =.029) and iDFS (p =.068). No new safety signals were observed. Conclusions: For the first time, we have shown both excellent pCR and survival in patients treated by de-escalated neoadjuvant CT+P+T irrespective of further CT use in a prospective multicenter study. Investigation of CT-free regimens may need to be focussed on selected patients only (e.g. with high HER2 expression/non-basal-like tumors). In ADAPT HR-/HER2+, early pCR after only 12 weeks of neoadjuvant P+T+pac was strongly associated with improved outcome and may thus serve as a predictive clinical marker for further treatment (de)-escalation. Clinical trial information: NCT01779206.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Dept. Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Munich (LMU) and CCCLMU and West German Study Group, Munich, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group and Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Sherko Kuemmel
- Breast Center, Ev. Clinics Essen-Mitte and Women’s Clinic, Charité Berlin and West German Study Group, Essen, Germany
| | - Eva-Maria Grischke
- Universitӓts-Frauenklinik Tuebingen, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Michael Braun
- Interdisciplinary Breast Center, Rotkreuz-Clinics Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Katja Krauss
- Breast Center, Dept. Obstetrics & Gynecology, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | | | | | - Toralf Reimer
- University Hospital Gynecology and Policlinic Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Monika Graeser
- Breast Center Niederrhein, Ev. Bethesda Hospital and Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg and West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | | | | | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Breast Center, Dept. OB&GYN, University of Munich (LMU) and CCCLMU, West German Study Group, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study Group/Breast Center Niederrhein, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Gluz O, Scheffen I, Degenhardt T, Marschner NW, Christgen M, Kreipe HH, Nitz U, Kates RE, Schinkoethe T, Graeser MK, Wuerstlein R, Kuemmel S, Bauer L, Schem C, Fehm TN, Neubauer H, Harbeck N. ADAPTlate: A randomized, controlled, open-label, phase III trial on adjuvant dynamic marker—Adjusted personalized therapy comparing abemaciclib combined with standard adjuvant endocrine therapy versus standard adjuvant endocrine therapy in (clinical or genomic) high-risk, HR+/HER2- early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.tps598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
TPS598 Background: The WSG ADAPT trial program addresses the individualization of (neo)adj. decision-making in EBC. The ADAPT umbrella trial established early predictive molecular surrogate markers for response after a 3-wk endocrine treatment (ET) to omit chemotherapy (CT) in a cohort of early high-risk HR+/HER2- pts. ADAPTlate seeks to improve adj. therapy for pts. at high risk for late disease recurrence, who completed definite locoregional therapy (with / without (neo-)adj. CT) and are under adj. ET. This high-risk population does not derive optimal benefit from standard ET, develops secondary ET resistance, and late recurrences. Methods: Prospective, multi-center, interventional, two-arm, open, randomized, controlled adj. phase III trial (NCT04565054) to investigate additional benefit from 2 years of the CDK4/6-inhibitor abemaciclib combined with ET compared to ET alone in pts. with high-risk HR+/HER2- EBC. Abemaciclib demonstrated to improve outcome in metastatic BC and even in EBC when given as part of primary therapy. Primary objective is to demonstrate superiority of iDFS of abemaciclib + ET vs. standard ET. Secondary objectives include OS, dDFS, occurrence of CNS metastases, QoL, and translational research. Recruitment started in 9/2020 to screen 1250 pts. and to randomize 903 pts. in a ratio 3:2. Until date of submission, 33 pts. were screened and 22 randomized. Pre-/postmenopausal pts. with histologically confirmed invasive HR+/HER2- EBC, 2-6 y after primary diagnosis, with either known high clinical risk (c/pN 2-3 OR high CTS score in pN 0-1 OR non-pCR after neoadj. CT in cN 1 or G3 tumors OR G3 and Ki-67 ≥ 40% in pN 0-1) or known high genomic risk (RS >25 in c/pN 0, RS >18 in c/pN 1 OR high risk Prosigna, EPclin or Mammaprint in pN 0-1) or intermediate clinical, but unknown genomic risk (luminal B-like (G3 or Ki-67 ≥20%) in c/pN 0-1 AND either RS >25 in c/pN 0 or RS >18 in c/p N1 in screening) will be eligible. Treatment duration is 2 years for the abemaciclib + ET (premenopausal: AI + GnRH) arm, followed by at least 3-6 years ET alone. Pts. in control arm will receive 5-8-years ET at investigator´s choice. ePROs are collected using CANKADO. Translational analyses: Exploratory tissue biomarker research to assess alterations in molecular markers. Liquid biopsies (CTC/ctDNA/ctRNA) will be assessed for mutations and gene expression relevant for HR+/HER2- EBC using an appropriate technology at time of testing. Conclusions: ADAPTlate seeks to evaluate whether Abemaciclib + ET is superior to ET alone in pts. with clinical or genomic high-risk EBC even 2-6 years after initial diagnosis. Translational research aims at assessing potential mechanisms of resistance to endocrine and/or CDK4/6 targeted therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT04565054.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group and Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Iris Scheffen
- Westdeutsche Studiengruppe GmbH, Evangelical Hospital Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Tom Degenhardt
- Breast Center, Dept. LMU-Clinics and CCCLMU, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study Group/Breast Center Niederrhein, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | | | | | - Monika Karla Graeser
- West German Study Group and Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany and Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Breast Center, Dept. OB&GYN, University of Munich (LMU) and CCCLMU, West German Study Group, Munich, Germany
| | - Sherko Kuemmel
- Breast Center, Ev. Clinics Essen-Mitte and West German Study Group, Essen, Germany
| | - Lelia Bauer
- GRN Clinics, Breast Center, Weinheim, Germany
| | - Christian Schem
- Mammazentrum Hamburg–Brustklinik am Krankenhaus Jerusalem, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tanja N. Fehm
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Hans Neubauer
- University of Duesseldorf, Dept. Gynecology & Obstetrics, Scientific Laboratories, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Dept. Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Munich (LMU) and CCCLMU and West German Study Group, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Graeser M, Schrading S, Gluz O, Strobel K, Würstlein R, Kümmel S, Schumacher C, Grischke E, Forstbauer H, Braun M, Christgen M, Adams J, Nitzsche H, Just M, Fischer HH, Aktas B, Potenberg J, von Schumann R, Kolberg‐Liedtke C, Harbeck N, Kuhl CK, Nitz U. Early response by MR imaging and ultrasound as predictor of pathologic complete response to 12-week neoadjuvant therapy for different early breast cancer subtypes: Combined analysis from the WSG ADAPT subtrials. Int J Cancer 2021; 148:2614-2627. [PMID: 33533487 PMCID: PMC8048810 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Revised: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
We evaluated the role of early response after 3 weeks of neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) assessed by ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and Ki-67 dynamics for prediction of pathologic complete response (pCR) in different early breast cancer subtypes. Patients with HR+/HER2+, HR-/HER2- and HR-/HER2+ tumors enrolled into three neoadjuvant WSG ADAPT subtrials underwent US, MRI and Ki-67 assessment at diagnosis and after 3 weeks of NAT. Early response was defined as complete or partial response (US, MRI) and ≥30% proliferation decrease or <500 invasive tumor cells (Ki-67). Predictive values and area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curves for prediction of pCR (ypT0/is ypN0) after 12-week NAT were calculated. Two hundred twenty-six had MRI and 401 US; 107 underwent both MRI and US. All three methods yielded a similar AUC in HR+/HER2+ (0.66-0.67) and HR-/HER2- tumors (0.53-0.63), while MRI and Ki-67 performed better than US in HR-/HER2+ tumors (0.83 and 0.79 vs 0.56). Adding MRI+/-Ki-67 increased AUC of US in HR-/HER2+ tumors to 0.64 to 0.75. MRI and Ki-67 demonstrated highest sensitivity in HR-/HER2- (0.8-1) and HR-/HER2+ tumors (1, both). Negative predictive value was similar for all methods in HR+/HER2+ (0.71-0.74) and HR-/HER2- tumors (0.85-1), while it was higher for MRI and Ki-67 compared to US in HR-/HER2+ subtype (1 vs 0.5). Early response assessed by US, MRI and Ki-67 is a strong predictor for pCR after 12-week NAT. Strength of pCR prediction varies according to tumor subtype. Adding MRI+/-Ki-67 to US did not improve pCR prediction in majority of our patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Graeser
- West German Study GroupMoenchengladbachGermany
- Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center NiederrheinMoenchengladbachGermany
- Department of GynecologyUniversity Medical Center HamburgHamburgGermany
| | - Simone Schrading
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional RadiologyHospital of the University of Aachen, RWTHAachenGermany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- West German Study GroupMoenchengladbachGermany
- Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center NiederrheinMoenchengladbachGermany
- University Hospital CologneCologneGermany
| | - Kevin Strobel
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional RadiologyHospital of the University of Aachen, RWTHAachenGermany
| | - Rachel Würstlein
- West German Study GroupMoenchengladbachGermany
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCCLMULMU University HospitalMunichGermany
| | - Sherko Kümmel
- West German Study GroupMoenchengladbachGermany
- Breast UnitKliniken Essen‐MitteEssenGermany
- University Hospital Charité, Humboldt University BerlinBerlinGermany
| | | | | | | | - Michael Braun
- Department of GynecologyBreast Center, Red Cross Hospital MunichMunichGermany
| | | | | | - Henrik Nitzsche
- Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center NiederrheinMoenchengladbachGermany
| | | | | | - Bahriye Aktas
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsUniversity Clinics EssenEssenGermany
- Department of GynecologyUniversity Hospital LeipzigLeipzigGermany
| | | | | | - Cornelia Kolberg‐Liedtke
- University Hospital Charité, Humboldt University BerlinBerlinGermany
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsUniversity Clinics EssenEssenGermany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- West German Study GroupMoenchengladbachGermany
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCCLMULMU University HospitalMunichGermany
| | - Christiane K. Kuhl
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional RadiologyHospital of the University of Aachen, RWTHAachenGermany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study GroupMoenchengladbachGermany
- Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center NiederrheinMoenchengladbachGermany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Graeser M, Feuerhake F, Gluz O, Volk V, Hauptmann M, Jozwiak K, Christgen M, Kuemmel S, Grischke EM, Forstbauer H, Braun M, Warm M, Hackmann J, Uleer C, Aktas B, Schumacher C, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Kates R, Wuerstlein R, Nitz U, Kreipe HH, Harbeck N. Immune cell composition and functional marker dynamics from multiplexed immunohistochemistry to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the WSG-ADAPT-TN trial. J Immunother Cancer 2021; 9:e002198. [PMID: 33963012 PMCID: PMC8108653 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2020-002198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The association of early changes in the immune infiltrate during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with pathological complete response (pCR) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains unexplored. METHODS Multiplexed immunohistochemistry was performed in matched tumor biopsies obtained at baseline and after 3 weeks of NACT from 66 patients from the West German Study Group Adjuvant Dynamic Marker-Adjusted Personalized Therapy Trial Optimizing Risk Assessment and Therapy Response Prediction in Early Breast Cancer - Triple Negative Breast Cancer (WSG-ADAPT-TN) trial. Association between CD4, CD8, CD73, T cells, PD1-positive CD4 and CD8 cells, and PDL1 levels in stroma and/or tumor at baseline, week 3 and 3-week change with pCR was evaluated with univariable logistic regression. RESULTS Compared with no change in immune cell composition and functional markers, transition from 'cold' to 'hot' (below-median and above-median marker level at baseline, respectively) suggested higher pCR rates for PD1-positive CD4 (tumor: OR=1.55, 95% CI 0.45 to 5.42; stroma: OR=2.65, 95% CI 0.65 to 10.71) and PD1-positive CD8 infiltrates (tumor: OR=1.77, 95% CI 0.60 to 5.20; stroma: OR=1.25, 95% CI 0.41 to 3.84; tumor+stroma: OR=1.62, 95% CI 0.51 to 5.12). No pCR was observed after 'hot-to-cold' transition in PD1-positive CD8 cells. pCR rates appeared lower after hot-to-cold transitions in T cells (tumor: OR=0.26, 95% CI 0.03 to 2.34; stroma: OR=0.35, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.25; tumor+stroma: OR=0.00, 95% CI 0.00 to 1.04) and PD1-positive CD4 cells (tumor: OR=0.60, 95% CI 0.11 to 3.35; stroma: OR=0.22, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.92; tumor+stroma: OR=0.32, 95% CI 0.04 to 2.94). Higher pCR rates collated with 'altered' distribution (levels below-median and above-median in tumor and stroma, respectively) of T cell (OR=3.50, 95% CI 0.84 to 14.56) and PD1-positive CD4 cells (OR=4.50, 95% CI 1.01 to 20.14). CONCLUSION Our exploratory findings indicate that comprehensive analysis of early immune infiltrate dynamics complements currently investigated predictive markers for pCR and may have a potential to improve guidance for individualized de-escalation/escalation strategies in TNBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Graeser
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
- Breast Center Niederrhein, Bethesda Protestant Hospital Monchengladbach, Monchengladbach, Germany
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Friedrich Feuerhake
- Institute of Pathology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
- Institute of Neuropathology, University Clinic Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
- Breast Center Niederrhein, Bethesda Protestant Hospital Monchengladbach, Monchengladbach, Germany
- University Clinics Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Valery Volk
- Institute of Pathology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Michael Hauptmann
- Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Katarzyna Jozwiak
- Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany
| | | | - Sherko Kuemmel
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
- Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
- University Hospital Charité, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Michael Braun
- Breast Center, Rotkreuz Clinics Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mathias Warm
- Breast Center, City Hospital Holweide, Cologne, Germany
| | | | | | - Bahriye Aktas
- Women's Clinic, University Clinics Essen, Essen, Germany
- Women's Clinic, University Clinics Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke
- University Hospital Charité, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany
- Women's Clinic, University Clinics Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Ronald Kates
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCCLMU, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
- Breast Center Niederrhein, Bethesda Protestant Hospital Monchengladbach, Monchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Nadia Harbeck
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCCLMU, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Graeser M, Schrading S, Gluz O, Strobel K, Herzog C, Umutlu L, Frydrychowicz A, Rjosk-Dendorfer D, Würstlein R, Culemann R, Eulenburg C, Adams J, Nitzsche H, Prange A, Kümmel S, Grischke EM, Forstbauer H, Braun M, Potenberg J, von Schumann R, Aktas B, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Harbeck N, Kuhl CK, Nitz U. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound for prediction of residual tumor size in early breast cancer within the ADAPT subtrials. Breast Cancer Res 2021; 23:36. [PMID: 33736679 PMCID: PMC7977310 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-021-01413-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Prediction of histological tumor size by post-neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was evaluated in different breast cancer subtypes. Methods Imaging was performed after 12-week NAT in patients enrolled into three neoadjuvant WSG ADAPT subtrials. Imaging performance was analyzed for prediction of residual tumor measuring ≤10 mm and summarized using positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values. Results A total of 248 and 588 patients had MRI and ultrasound, respectively. Tumor size was over- or underestimated by < 10 mm in 4.4% and 21.8% of patients by MRI and in 10.2% and 15.8% by ultrasound. Overall, NPV (proportion of correctly predicted tumor size ≤10 mm) of MRI and ultrasound was 0.92 and 0.83; PPV (correctly predicted tumor size > 10 mm) was 0.52 and 0.61. MRI demonstrated a higher NPV and lower PPV than ultrasound in hormone receptor (HR)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and in HR−/HER2+ tumors. Both methods had a comparable NPV and PPV in HR−/HER2− tumors. Conclusions In HR+/HER2+ and HR−/HER2+ breast cancer, MRI is less likely than ultrasound to underestimate while ultrasound is associated with a lower risk to overestimate tumor size. These findings may help to select the most optimal imaging approach for planning surgery after NAT. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01815242 (registered on March 21, 2013), NCT01817452 (registered on March 25, 2013), and NCT01779206 (registered on January 30, 2013). Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13058-021-01413-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Graeser
- West German Study Group, Ludwig-Weber-Strasse 15, 41061, Moenchengladbach, Germany. .,Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Ludwig-Weber-Strasse 15, 41061, Moenchengladbach, Germany. .,Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg, Martinistrasse 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Simone Schrading
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hospital of the University of Aachen, RWTH, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group, Ludwig-Weber-Strasse 15, 41061, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Ludwig-Weber-Strasse 15, 41061, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Kevin Strobel
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hospital of the University of Aachen, RWTH, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Lale Umutlu
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - Alex Frydrychowicz
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Schleswig-Holstein University Hospital, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Dorothea Rjosk-Dendorfer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Rachel Würstlein
- West German Study Group, Ludwig-Weber-Strasse 15, 41061, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Center, University of Munich (LMU) and CCCLMU, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Ralph Culemann
- Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum Radiologie Rhein-Sieg, GFO Kliniken Troisdorf, Hospitalstrasse 45, 53840, Troisdorf, Germany
| | - Christine Eulenburg
- West German Study Group, Ludwig-Weber-Strasse 15, 41061, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Jascha Adams
- Alcedis GmbH, Winchesterstrasse 3, 35394, Giessen, Germany
| | - Henrik Nitzsche
- Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Ludwig-Weber-Strasse 15, 41061, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Anna Prange
- Department of Radiology, Clinics Essen-Mitte, Breast Centre, Henricistrasse 92, 45136, Essen, Germany
| | - Sherko Kümmel
- West German Study Group, Ludwig-Weber-Strasse 15, 41061, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Clinics Essen-Mitte, Breast Centre, Henricistrasse 92, 45136, Essen, Germany.,University Hospital Charité, Women's Clinic, Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Eva-Maria Grischke
- University Clinic Tuebingen, Women's Clinic, Calwerstrasse 7, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Helmut Forstbauer
- Practice Network Troisdorf, Schlossstrasse 18, 53840, Troisdorf, Germany
| | - Michael Braun
- Red Cross Women's Hospital, Nymphenburger Strasse 163, 80634, Munich, Germany
| | - Jochem Potenberg
- Ev. Waldkrankenhaus Berlin, Stadtrandstrasse 555, 13589, Berlin, Germany
| | - Raquel von Schumann
- Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Ludwig-Weber-Strasse 15, 41061, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Bahriye Aktas
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.,Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebeigstrasse 20A, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke
- University Hospital Charité, Women's Clinic, Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- West German Study Group, Ludwig-Weber-Strasse 15, 41061, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Center, University of Munich (LMU) and CCCLMU, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Christiane K Kuhl
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hospital of the University of Aachen, RWTH, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study Group, Ludwig-Weber-Strasse 15, 41061, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Ludwig-Weber-Strasse 15, 41061, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Wuerstlein R, Harbeck N, Grischke EM, Forstmeyer D, von Schumann R, Krabisch P, Lüdtke-Heckenkamp K, Stefek A, Stoetzer O, Grafe A, Kaltenecker G, Forstbauer H, Augustin D, Schrader I, Tio J, Nitz U, Gluz O, Kates RE, Graeser MK. Protroca: A Noninterventional Study on Prophylactic Lipegfilgrastim against Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia in Nonselected Breast Cancer Patients. Breast Care (Basel) 2021; 16:50-58. [PMID: 33716632 DOI: 10.1159/000506622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2019] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Protroca evaluated the efficacy and safety of primary and secondary prophylaxis of neutropenia with lipegfilgrastim (Lonquex®) in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy (CT). Patients and Methods Of the 255 patients enrolled, 248 patients were evaluable for the intent-to-treat (ITT) and 194 patients for the per-protocol set. Primary and secondary end points after lipegfilgrastim treatment were assessed. Results Nine patients of the ITT set receiving lipegfilgrastim as primary prophylaxis (n = 222) had febrile neutropenia of grade 3-4 (5 patients) or infection of grade 3-4 (4 patients); 1/26 of those receiving secondary prophylaxis had an event. Dose reductions were performed in 9.5% of the patients. Postponement of cancer CT cycles for >3 days occurred in <15% of patients; 10.8% (92/851 AEs) and 8% (2/25 SAEs) of documented adverse events and serious adverse events, respectively, were related to lipegfilgrastim. Conclusions Application of lipegfilgrastim was effective as primary and secondary prophylaxis in the prevention of CT-induced neutropenia in breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Wuerstlein
- Breast Center and CCC Munich, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.,West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center and CCC Munich, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.,West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Dirk Forstmeyer
- University Clinic Leipzig, University Cancer Center Leipzig (UCCL), Leipzig, Germany
| | - Raquel von Schumann
- Evangelical Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | | | | | - Andrea Stefek
- Johanniter Clinics Stendal, Breast Center Altmark, Stendal, Germany
| | - Oliver Stoetzer
- Medical Center for Hematology and Oncology Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Doris Augustin
- Donau-Isar Clinic Deggendorf, Breast Center, Deggendorf, Germany
| | - Iris Schrader
- Gynecological Oncological Practice Hanover, Hanover, Germany
| | - Joke Tio
- University Clinic Münster, Breast Center, Münster, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany.,Evangelical Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany.,Evangelical Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Mönchengladbach, Germany.,University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Monika Karla Graeser
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany.,Evangelical Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Gluz O, Degenhardt T, Marschner N, Christgen M, Kreipe HH, Nitz U, Kates R, Schinkoethe T, Graeser M, Würstlein R, Kuemmel S, Harbeck N. Abstract OT-01-02: Adaptlate -a randomized, controlled, open-label, phase-iii trial on adjuvant dynamic marker - adjusted personalized therapy comparing abemaciclib combined with standard adjuvant endocrine therapy versus standard adjuvant endocrine therapy in (clinical or genomic) high risk, hr+/her2- early breast cancer. Cancer Res 2021. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs20-ot-01-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Goals: The WSG ADAPT trial program is one of the first new generation trials addressing the issue of individualization of (neo)-adjuvant decision-making in early breast cancer (EBC) in a subtype-specific manner. The first WSG ADAPT umbrella trial (NCT01779206) aimed to establish early predictive molecular surrogate markers for response after a short 3-week induction treatment and to omit chemotherapy in a large cohort of early high risk HR+/HER2- patients. The aim of the ADAPTlate phase-III-trial is to improve adjuvant therapy for patients at high risk for late disease recurrence, who have completed definite locoregional therapy (with or without neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy) and are under adjuvant endocrine treatment. This high-risk population does not derive optimal benefit from standard ET, often develops secondary resistance against ET and consequently late recurrences. With ADAPTlate, it is planned to evaluate whether patients with high-risk EBC derive additional benefit from adding abemaciclib to ET even 2-6 year after their initial diagnosis. Abemaciclib has been shown to improve outcome in metastatic breast cancer and recently, even in early breast cancer when given as part of primary therapy. Methods: WSG-ADAPTcycle is a prospective, multi-center, interventional, two-arm, non-blinded, randomized, controlled adjuvant phase III trial (NCT not yet assigned). It investigates whether patients with HR+/HER2- EBC identified as high-risk during screening (based on clinical or genomic risk) derive additional benefit from 2 years of the CDK4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib combined with ET compared to ET alone. Starting Q3 2020 (enrollment 36 months, 50 sites), 1250 patients will be screened and 903 randomized in a ratio 3:2 (602 to abemaciclib + ET; 301 to standard ET). Pre-/postmenopausal patients with histologically confirmed invasive HR+/HER2- EBC and 2-6 years after primary diagnosis, with either known high clinical risk (c/pN 2-3 OR high CTS score in pN 0-1 OR non-pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cN 1 or G3 tumors OR G3 and Ki-67 ≥ 40% in pN 0-1) or known high genomic risk (Oncotype Dx® / RS >25 in c/pN 0, RS >18 in c/pN 1 OR high risk Prosigna®, EPclin® or Mammaprint® in pN 0-1) or intermediate clinical, but unknown genomic risk (luminal B-like (G3 or Ki-67 ≥20%) in c/pN 0-1 AND Oncotype DX® in screening either RS >25 in c/pN 0 or RS >18 in c/p N1) will be eligible. Treatment duration is 2 years for the interventional abemaciclib + ET (premenopausal: AI+GnRH) arm, followed by at least 3-6 years ET alone. Patients in control arm will receive 5-8-years ET at investigator´s choice. ePROs are collected using CANKADO. Primary objective is to demonstrate superiority of invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) of abemaciclib + ET vs. standard ET. Secondary objectives include overall survival (OS), distant disease-free survival (dDFS), occurrence of CNS metastases, quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-BR23, EQ-5D-5L) and translational research. Translational analyses: Exploratory tissue biomarker research will be conducted to assess alterations in molecular markers (e.g., ESR1, PIK3CA, CCND1, CDKN2A, RB1). In addition, ctDNA/ctRNA from optional blood samples will be assessed for mutations and gene expression relevant for HR+/HER2- EBC using the most appropriate technology at the time of testing. Conclusions: ADAPTlate seeks to evaluate whether enhancing ET with a CDK 4/6 inhibitor is superior to ET alone in patients with clinical or genomic high risk EBC even 2-6 years after their initial diagnosis. Translational research aims at assessing potential mechanisms of resistance to endocrine and/or CDK4/6 targeted therapy.
Citation Format: Oleg Gluz, Tom Degenhardt, Norbert Marschner, Matthias Christgen, Hans Heinrich Kreipe, Ulrike Nitz, Ronald Kates, Timo Schinkoethe, Monika Graeser, Rachel Würstlein, Sherko Kuemmel, Nadia Harbeck, West German Study Group. Adaptlate -a randomized, controlled, open-label, phase-iii trial on adjuvant dynamic marker - adjusted personalized therapy comparing abemaciclib combined with standard adjuvant endocrine therapy versus standard adjuvant endocrine therapy in (clinical or genomic) high risk, hr+/her2- early breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT-01-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oleg Gluz
- 1Breast Center Niederrhein, Johanniter Bethesda Moenchengladbach and West German Study Group and University of Cologne, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Tom Degenhardt
- 2Breast Center, Dept. OB&GYN and CCCLMU, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Matthias Christgen
- 4Medical College of Hannover, Institute for Pathology, Hannover, Germany, Hannover, Germany
| | - Hans Heinrich Kreipe
- 4Medical College of Hannover, Institute for Pathology, Hannover, Germany, Hannover, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- 5Breast Center Niederrhein, Johanniter Bethesda Moenchengladbach and West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Ronald Kates
- 6West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Monika Graeser
- 5Breast Center Niederrhein, Johanniter Bethesda Moenchengladbach and West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Rachel Würstlein
- 2Breast Center, Dept. OB&GYN and CCCLMU, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany, Munich, Germany
| | - Sherko Kuemmel
- 8Breast Unit, Clinics Essen-Mitte, Essen and West German Study Group, Essen, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- 2Breast Center, Dept. OB&GYN and CCCLMU, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany, Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kuemmel S, Gluz O, Nitz U, Braun M, Christgen M, Luedtke-Heckenkamp K, von Schumann R, Darsow M, Forstbauer H, Potenberg J, Grischke EM, Aktas B, Schumacher C, Kates R, Graeser M, Wuerstlein R, Uleer C, Hauptmann M, Shak S, Baehner R, Kreipe H, Harbeck N. Abstract GS4-03: Neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel weekly versus dose-dense paclitaxel followed by dose-dense EC in high risk HR+/HER2- early BC by: Results from the neoadjuvant part of ADAPT HR+/HER2- trial. Cancer Res 2021. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs20-gs4-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Pathological complete response (pCR) is associated with improved outcome in patients with high-risk HR+/HER2- breast cancer (BC) but the use of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy in early HR+/HER2- BC remains controversial. Oncotype DX / Recurrence Score (RS) and dynamic Ki67 response after short preoperative endocrine therapy are potentially predictive for pCR. Still, no prospective data are available so far to predict chemotherapy efficacy in this key patient group. Use of dose-dense chemotherapy is associated with improved outcome in meta-analysis, but its use in the neoadjuvant setting is less studied. Furthermore, use of nab-paclitaxel instead of solvent-based paclitaxel has shown promising results in some studies. Here, we present for the first time data from a randomized prospective trial comparing these risk-selection strategies according to RS and Ki67 decrease in high-risk HR+/HER2- BC. Methods: High-risk BC patients [cN0-1 with RS>25 or (RS 12-25 AND (centrally measured) post-endocrine Ki67 >10%] OR [cN2-3 status] OR [G3 AND Ki67>40%] were randomized to (neo)adjuvant 4x paclitaxel175 q2w or 8xnab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2q1w followed by 4x E90C600 q2w. pCR was defined as no invasive tumor in breast and lymph nodes. Results: 858 patients with available surgery data randomized to neoadjuvant Pac-EC (N=423) or nab-Pac-EC (N=435) were analyzed. Median age was 51 years; median RS was 30 (N=572); 34% had node-positive; 46% (locally) G3 tumors. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between study arms. Patients receiving nab-Pac-EC had higher pCR than those with Pac-EC (20.3% vs. 12.3%, p=.002); patients with RS<25 (about 27%) had a lower pCR rate than those with RS>25 (6.5% vs. 15.8%, p=.003). The association of RS with pCR appeared more pronounced in premenopausal women, but a test of interaction was not significant; RS was about 3 points higher (mean 32.9 vs. 29.8, p<.001) in postmenopausal cases (p=.001). Clinical tumor stage cT2-4 was reported in 65%, with a lower pCR rate than in cT1 tumors (14% vs. 20%, p=.02). RS was moderately correlated (R=.45) with baseline Ki67. In multivariable analysis with tumor stage, RS, Ki67, menopausal status, and ER and PR positivity, higher RS and cT1 stage were favorable for pCR. Excluding RS, higher Ki67 and lower ER (as well as cT1) were favorable. In patients with RS<25, there was no pCR with Pac-EC (0/72 pCR); pCR was almost 20% with RS>25 and nab-Pac-EC. Further details and data including impacts of Ki67 dynamics and additional markers on pCR will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Use of neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel instead of solvent-based paclitaxel appears promising within a short (16-weeks) dose-dense chemotherapy schedule in high-risk HR+/HER2- BC. For the first time, data from a large neoadjuvant randomized trial confirm RS could help to select patients for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk HR+/HER2- breast cancer (BC).
Citation Format: Sherko Kuemmel, Oleg Gluz, Ulrike Nitz, Michael Braun, Matthias Christgen, Kerstin Luedtke-Heckenkamp, Raquel von Schumann, Maren Darsow, Helmut Forstbauer, Jochem Potenberg, Eva-Maria Grischke, Bahriye Aktas, Claudia Schumacher, Ronald Kates, Monika Graeser, Rachel Wuerstlein, Christoph Uleer, Michael Hauptmann, Steve Shak, Rick Baehner, Hans Kreipe, Nadia Harbeck, West German Study Group. Neoadjuvant nab-paclitaxel weekly versus dose-dense paclitaxel followed by dose-dense EC in high risk HR+/HER2- early BC by: Results from the neoadjuvant part of ADAPT HR+/HER2- trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherko Kuemmel
- 1Breast Unit, Clinics Essen-Mitte, Essen and West German Study Group, Essen, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- 2Breast Center Niederrhein, Johanniter Bethesda Moenchengladbach and West German Study Group and University of Cologne, Moenchengaldbach, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- 3Breast Center Niederrhein, Johanniter Bethesda Moenchengladbach and West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Matthias Christgen
- 5Medical College of Hannover, Institute for Pathology, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Raquel von Schumann
- 7Breast Center Niederrhein, Johanniter Bethesda Moenchengladbach, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Maren Darsow
- 8Luisenhospital Duesseldorf, Practice for Senologic Oncology, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Bahriye Aktas
- 12University Clinics Leipzig, Women’s Clinic, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Ronald Kates
- 14West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Monika Graeser
- 3Breast Center Niederrhein, Johanniter Bethesda Moenchengladbach and West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- 15Breast Center, Dept. OB&GYN and CCCLMU, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Steve Shak
- 18Genomic Health, Inc., Redwood City, CA
| | | | - Hans Kreipe
- 5Medical College of Hannover, Institute for Pathology, Hannover, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- 15Breast Center, Dept. OB&GYN and CCCLMU, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Nitz U, Gluz O, Kreipe HH, Christgen M, Kuemmel S, Baehner FL, Shak S, Aktas B, Braun M, Lüdtke-Heckenkamp K, Forstbauer H, Grischke EM, Nuding B, Darsow M, Schumacher C, Krauss K, Malter W, Thill M, Warm M, Wuerstlein R, Kates RE, Harbeck N. The run-in phase of the prospective WSG-ADAPT HR+/HER2- trial demonstrates the feasibility of a study design combining static and dynamic biomarker assessments for individualized therapy in early breast cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2020; 12:1758835920973130. [PMID: 33281950 PMCID: PMC7692353 DOI: 10.1177/1758835920973130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Endocrine sensitivity, as determined by response of the proliferation marker Ki-67 to short-term preoperative endocrine therapy (ET), is currently not included in adjuvant treatment decisions in hormone receptor (HR)+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)− breast cancer (BC). Methods: The prospective WSG-ADAPT HR+/HER2− trial included patients with N0/N1 early BC who were candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy based on clinical–pathological criteria alone. The trial utilized a genomic assessment [the Recurrence Score (RS)] plus endocrine sensitivity testing to guide treatment. All patients received 3 (±1) weeks of preoperative induction ET. According to protocol, patients with RS 0–11 or RS 12–25 plus endocrine proliferation response (EPR, post-induction Ki-67 ⩽ 10%) were to be spared adjuvant chemotherapy. Results: The ADAPT HR+/HER2− trial run-in phase included 407 patients with baseline RS, of whom 386 (median age: 54 years) had complete data for Ki-67 at both baseline and post-induction. RS distribution: 23.1% RS 0–11, 58.3% RS 12–25, and 18.7% RS 26–100. EPR occurred in 84.3%, 76.0%, and 36.1% of these RS groups, respectively. Differences in EPR proportions (RS 26–100 versus others, RS 0–11 versus others) were significant (both p < 0.001); Ki-67 quotients were higher for RS 26–100 (p = 0.02, Mann–Whitney). In premenopausal women (n = 146, mostly tamoxifen-treated), median quotient of Ki-67 level (post/pre) was significantly higher than in postmenopausal women (n = 222, mostly aromatase-inhibitor treated; 0.67 versus 0.25, p < 0.001). EPR was significantly associated with baseline estrogen-receptor status as determined by immunohistochemistry (p = 0.002) or real-time polymerase chain reaction (p < 0.001). Also, a strong correlation was observed between RS measured pre- and post-ET (RS = 0.7, n = 181). Conclusions: This phase of the WSG-ADAPT HR+/HER2− trial confirms trial design estimates of RS and EPR. It indicates that the ADAPT concept of combining static and dynamic biomarker assessment for individualized therapy decisions in early BC is feasible using the EPR criterion post-induction Ki-67 ⩽ 10%. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01779206.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Hans H Kreipe
- Medical College of Hannover, Institute for Pathology, Hannover, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Bahriye Aktas
- University Clinics Essen, Women's Clinic, Essen, Germany University Clinics Leipzig, Women's Clinic, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Benno Nuding
- Ev. Hospital Bergisch Gladbach, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany
| | - Maren Darsow
- Luisenhospital Duesseldorf, Practice for Senologic Oncology, Duessedorf, Germany
| | | | - Katja Krauss
- University Clinics Aachen, Women's Clinic, Aachen, Germany
| | - Wolfram Malter
- University Clinics Cologne, Women's Clinic and Breast Center, Cologne, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Markus Hospital, Breast Center, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Mathias Warm
- City Hospital Holweide, Breast Center, Cologne, Germany
| | | | | | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department OB&GYN and CCCLMU, LMU University Hospital, Marchioninistrasse 15, Munich DE-81377, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Christgen M, Harbeck N, Gluz O, Raap M, Christgen H, Clemens M, Malter W, Nuding B, Aktas B, Kuemmel S, Reimer T, Stefek A, Krabisch P, Just M, Graeser M, Baehner R, Wuerstlein R, Nitz U, Kates R, Kreipe H. Differential impact of prognostic parameters in hormone receptor-positive lobular early breast cancer in the WSG PlanB trial. Eur J Cancer 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(20)30531-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
36
|
Harbeck N, Nitz U, Christgen M, Kuemmel S, Braun M, Schumacher C, Potenberg J, Tio J, Aktas B, Malter W, Forstbauer H, von Schumann R, Just M, Jóźwiak K, Hauptmann M, Kates R, Gräser M, Wuerstlein R, Kreipe H. LBA14 De-escalated neoadjuvant T-DM1 with or without endocrine therapy (ET) vs trastuzumab+ET in early HR+/HER2+ breast cancer (BC): ADAPT-TP survival results. Ann Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.2242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
37
|
Christgen M, Gluz O, Harbeck N, Kates RE, Raap M, Christgen H, Clemens M, Malter W, Nuding B, Aktas B, Kuemmel S, Reimer T, Stefek A, Krabisch P, Just M, Augustin D, Graeser M, Baehner F, Wuerstlein R, Nitz U, Kreipe H. Differential impact of prognostic parameters in hormone receptor-positive lobular breast cancer. Cancer 2020; 126:4847-4858. [PMID: 32780421 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Revised: 06/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Invasive lobular breast cancer (BC) is the second most common BC subtype. Prognostic parameters (tumor classification, lymph node status, histologic grade, Oncotype DX recurrence score [RS], progesterone receptor status, and Ki67 index) were retrospectively studied in a large, prospective clinical trial encompassing 2585 patients who had hormone receptor-positive early BC (the West German Study Group PlanB trial). METHODS BCs were centrally reviewed and classified as lobular (n = 353; 14%) or nonlobular (n = 2232; 86%). The median follow-up was 60 months. Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) estimates were obtained using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic parameters were evaluated using Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS Lobular BC was associated with higher tumor classification, higher lymph node status, lower histologic grade, lower Ki67 index, and low or intermediate RS. The prevalence of high RS (RS range, 26-100) was 3-fold lower in patients who had lobular BC compared with those who had nonlobular BC (8% vs 24%; P < .001). However, 5-year DFS estimates for lobular and nonlobular BC were similar (92.1% and 92.3%, respectively; P = .673). In multivariate analyses, prognostic parameters for DFS in lobular BC included grade 3 (hazard ratio, 5.06; 95% CI, 1.91-13.39) and a pathologic lymph node status (pN) of pN3 (hazard ratio, 12.16; 95% CI, 3.87-38.24), but not RS. By contrast, prognostic parameters in nonlobular BC included grade 3 (hazard ratio, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.11-2.44), pN3 (hazard ratio, 3.68; 95% CI, 1.60-8.46), and high RS (hazard ratio, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.69-3.68). CONCLUSIONS Lobular BC is associated with low and intermediate RS, although 5-year DFS is similar to that of nonlobular BC. The effect of the RS in lobular BC appears to be distinct from that in nonlobular BC. For risk assessment, the RS needs to be complemented by clinicopathologic parameters for therapy decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Evangelical Hospital Bethesda, Lower Rhine Breast Center, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Center, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital of the Ludwig Maximillian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Mieke Raap
- Institute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Michael Clemens
- Department of Oncology, Motherhouse of the Sisters of Mercy of St Charles Borromeo Clinics, Trier, Germany
| | - Wolfram Malter
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Benno Nuding
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Evangelical Hospital Bergisch Gladbach, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany
| | - Bahriye Aktas
- Department of Gynecology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Sherko Kuemmel
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Breast Center, Essen-Mitte Clinics, Essen, Germany
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Suedstadt Clinics, Rostock, Germany
| | - Andrea Stefek
- Altmark Breast Center, Johanniter Clinics Stendal, Stendal, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Monika Graeser
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Evangelical Hospital Bethesda, Lower Rhine Breast Center, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Center, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital of the Ludwig Maximillian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany.,Evangelical Hospital Bethesda, Lower Rhine Breast Center, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Hans Kreipe
- Institute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Dowsett M, Ellis MJ, Dixon JM, Gluz O, Robertson J, Kates R, Suman VJ, Turnbull AK, Nitz U, Christgen M, Kreipe H, Kuemmel S, Bliss JM, Barry P, Johnston SR, Jacobs SA, Ma CX, Smith IE, Harbeck N. Evidence-based guidelines for managing patients with primary ER+ HER2- breast cancer deferred from surgery due to the COVID-19 pandemic. NPJ Breast Cancer 2020; 6:21. [PMID: 32550266 PMCID: PMC7280290 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-020-0168-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 05/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Many patients with ER+ HER2- primary breast cancer are being deferred from surgery to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NeoET) during the COVID-19 pandemic. We have collated data from multiple international trials of presurgical endocrine therapy in order to provide guidance on the identification of patients who may have insufficiently endocrine-sensitive tumors and should be prioritised for early surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy rather than NeoET during or in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic for safety or when surgical activity needs to be prioritized. For postmenopausal patients, our data provide strong support for the use of ER and PgR status at diagnosis for triaging of patients into three groups in which (taking into account clinical factors): (i) NeoET is likely to be inappropriate (Allred ER <6 or ER 6 and PgR <6) (ii) a biopsy for Ki67 analysis (on-treatment Ki67) could be considered after 2-4 weeks of NeoET (a: ER 7 or 8 and PgR <6 or b: ER 6 or 7 and PgR ≥6) or (iii) NeoET is an acceptable course of action (ER 8 and PgR ≥6). Cut-offs for percentage of cells positive are also given. For group (ii), a high early on-treatment level of Ki67 (>10%) indicates a higher priority for early surgery. Too few data were available for premenopausal patients to provide a similar treatment algorithm. These guidelines should be helpful for managing patients with early ER+ HER2- breast cancer during and in the aftermath of the COVID-19 crisis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitch Dowsett
- Ralph Lauren Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
- Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Matthew J. Ellis
- Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center and Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX USA
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX USA
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX USA
| | | | - Oleg Gluz
- Bethesda Hospital, Breast Center Niederrhein, Mönchengladbach, Germany
- Westdeutsche Studiengruppe, Mönchengladbach, Germany
- Uniklinik Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - John Robertson
- University of Nottingham, Royal Derby Hospital, Uttoxeter Road, Derby, UK
| | - Ronald Kates
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Vera J. Suman
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA
| | - Arran K. Turnbull
- CRUK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- Bethesda Hospital, Breast Center Niederrhein, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Hans Kreipe
- Medical School Hannover, Institute of Pathology, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Judith M. Bliss
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Peter Barry
- Breast Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Samuel A. Jacobs
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA USA
| | - Cynthia X. Ma
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110 USA
| | | | - Nadia Harbeck
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and CCCLMU, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Harbeck N, Gluz O, Christgen M, Graeser M, Hilpert F, Krauss K, Thill M, Warm M, Müller V, Braun MW, Just M, Kreipe HH, Nitz U, Kates RE, Schinkoethe T, Wuerstlein R, Kuemmel S. ADAPTcycle: Adjuvant dynamic marker-adjusted personalized therapy (ADAPT) comparing endocrine therapy plus ribociclib versus chemotherapy in intermediate-risk HR+/HER2- early breast cancer (EBC). J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.tps601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
TPS601 Background: The WSG ADAPT trial program represents the concept of individualization of (neo)-adjuvant decision-making in EBC in a subtype-specific manner. The first WSG ADAPT umbrella trial aimed to establish early predictive molecular surrogate markers for response after a short 3-week induction treatment. The goals of the WSG ADAPT trial program are early response assessment and subtype-specific therapy tailoring to those patients who are most likely to benefit. Methods: WSG-ADAPTcycle is a prospective, multi-center, interventional, two-arm, open-label, (neo)adjuvant, non-blinded, randomized, controlled phase III trial (NCT04055493). It investigates whether patients (pts.) with HR+/HER2- EBC identified during screening as intermediate risk (based on Oncotype DX and response to 3 weeks of preoperative endocrine therapy [ET]) derive additional benefit from 2 years of the CDK4/6 inhibitor ribociclib combined with ET compared to chemotherapy (CT) (followed by standard ET). Co-primary endpoints are disease-free survival (DFS) and distant DFS. It is planned to screen 5600 pts and to randomize 1670 pts in a 3:2 ratio (ribociclib + ET/CT). Study start was in July 2019 (80 sites, enrollment period 36 months) and until date of submission, 180 pts. have been screened and 40 randomized. Pts with HR+/HER2- EBC with clinically enhanced risk (cT2-4 or Ki67 20% or G3 or cN+) are eligible if they fulfill the ADAPT intermediate-risk group criteria: either Recurrence Score (RS) ≤25 and Ki67postendocrine>10%, RS >25 and Ki67postendocrine<10% in p/cN0-1 pts, or RS ≤25 and Ki67postendocrine<10% in c/pN2-3 pts. Treatment duration is 2 years for the ribociclib + ET (premenopausal: AI + GnRH) arm and 16-24 weeks for the CT arm; treatment is possible either in the neoadjuvant (ET + ribociclib duration 16 – 32 weeks) or adjuvant setting. ePROs are collected using CANKADO; ECG monitoring is performed using a novel cardiology-supported CANKADO-based eHealth method. Translational analyses: Exploratory tissue biomarker research will be conducted to assess alterations in molecular markers. In addition, ctDNA/ctRNA from optional blood samples will be assessed for mutations and gene expression. Conclusions: ADAPTcycle seeks to evaluate whether endocrine-based therapy with ET and a CDK 4/6 inhibitor is superior to CT followed by ET in patients with luminal EBC who may be undertreated with ET alone (based on either lack of endocrine responsiveness or high tumor burden). Clinical trial information: 2018-003749-40 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Dept. Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Munich (LMU) and CCCLMU and West German Study Group, Munich, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- Breast Center Niederrhein, University Clinics Cologne and West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Monika Graeser
- Breast Center Niederrhein, Ev. Bethesda Hospital and West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Felix Hilpert
- Breast Center Hamburg International, Hospital Jerusalem, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Katja Krauss
- Breast Center, Dept. Obstetrics & Gynecology, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Breast Center, Agaplesion Markus Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Mathias Warm
- Breast Center Cologne-Holweide, Municipal Hospital Holweide, Cologne, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Marianne Just
- Oncological Specialist Practice Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
| | | | - Ulrike Nitz
- Breast Center, Dept. Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Munich (LMU) and CCCLMU and West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | | | | | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Breast Center, Dept. Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Munich (LMU) and CCCLMU and West German Study Group, Munich, Germany
| | - Sherko Kuemmel
- Breast Center, Ev. Clinics Essen-Mitte and West German Study Group, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Gluz O, Nitz U, Christgen M, Kuemmel S, Holtschmidt J, Priel J, Hartkopf A, Potenberg J, Luedtke-Heckenkamp K, Just M, Wuelfing P, von Schumann R, Graeser M, Wuerstlein R, Kates RE, Kreipe HH, Harbeck N. De-escalated chemotherapy versus endocrine therapy plus pertuzumab+ trastuzumab for HR+/HER2+ early breast cancer (BC): First efficacy results from the neoadjuvant WSG-TP-II study. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
515 Background: HR+/HER2+ breast cancer (BC) is a distinct entity associated with better prognosis compared to HR-/HER2+ BC. However, combination of chemotherapy (CT) with (dual) anti-HER2 blockade is standard in HER2+ early BC (EBC), irrespective of HR-status. Despite of some promising data on combination of endocrine therapy (ET) with dual anti-HER2 blockade in EBC and metastatic HR+/HER2+ BC, no prospective comparison of neoadjuvant CT vs. ET + dual HER2-blockade has yet been performed. Methods: In the prospective WSG TP-II phase II-trial (NCT03272477; Sponsor: Palleos GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany), 207 patients (pts) (257 screened; 40 centers) with centrally confirmed HR+/HER2+ EBC were randomized to 12 weeks of standard ET (n=100) vs. paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly (n=107) +trastuzumab+pertuzumab q3w for all pts. Primary endpoint was pCR (ypT0/is/ypN0). Secondary endpoints include safety, disease-free and overall survival, translational research, and quality of life (QoL). Omission of further CT was allowed in all pts with pCR; dual HER2-blockade was administered in the adjuvant setting in all pts. Results: Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the arms. Median age was 53 years; 58% had cT2-4, 28% had cN+; 43% had G3 tumors. pCR data were available in 198 pts (ET: n=96; Pac: n=102). pCR was observed in 24% (95% CI: 16-34%) with ET+T+P vs. 57% (95% CI:47-67%) with Pac+T+P (OR 0.24, 95% CI: 0-0.46, p<0.001). In multivariable logistic regression analysis and corresponding sensitivity analysis (bootstrap/subsample inclusion frequencies and lasso regression) including study arm, BMI, menopausal, cT, and cN status, histological grade, HER2-status, Ki67, ER, PR as continuous variables, only study arm and HER2 3+ status were significantly associated with pCR. Neoadjuvant treatment was well tolerated in both study arms and completed per protocol in 93/92 (ET+P+T/Pac+P+T) patients. Only 9/13 SAEs (ET+P+T/Pac+P+T) were reported during neoadjuvant therapy. PAM50 and QoL analysis are ongoing. Conclusions: WSG TP-II is the first randomized prospective trial comparing two neoadjuvant de-escalation treatments in HR+/HER2+ EBC. The excellent pCR rate of 57% after only 12 weeks of Pac+P+T was clearly superior to the still promising 24% pCR rate in pts treated by ET+P+T. In both arms, treatment efficacy was most pronounced in HER2 3+ tumors. Survival results need to be awaited before definite recommendations for a de-escalated regimen in HR+/HER2+ EBC can be made. Clinical trial information: 2016-005157-21 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oleg Gluz
- Breast Center Niederrhein, University Clinics Cologne and West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study Group/Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Jan Priel
- Palleos Healthcare GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Pia Wuelfing
- Mammazentrum Hamburg – Brustklinik am Krankenhaus Jerusalem, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Breast Center, Dept. OB&GYN, University of Munich (LMU) and CCCLMU, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum der Universität München (LMU), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kolberg-Liedtke C, Gluz O, Heinisch F, Feuerhake F, Kreipe H, Clemens M, Nuding B, Malter W, Reimer T, Wuerstlein R, Graeser M, Shak S, Nitz U, Kates R, Christgen M, Harbeck N. Association of TILs with clinical parameters, Recurrence Score® results, and prognosis in patients with early HER2-negative breast cancer (BC)-a translational analysis of the prospective WSG PlanB trial. Breast Cancer Res 2020; 22:47. [PMID: 32408905 PMCID: PMC7227091 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-020-01283-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2019] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes has been associated with prognosis and chemotherapy response, particularly in high-risk breast cancer subtypes. There is limited data so far as to (i) how tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) measurements correlate with genomic measurements such as the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score® and (ii) whether the survival impact of TIL measurements varies according to different adjuvant systemic therapies. METHODS The WSG PlanB trial compared an anthracycline-free chemotherapy regimen (6x docetaxel/cyclophosphamide, TC) to an anthracycline-taxane sequence (4xEC followed by 4x docetaxel) in patients with intermediate-risk, HER2-negative early breast cancer (EBC). Patients with HR-positive HER2-negative EBC were further stratified to receive endocrine therapy alone vs. chemotherapy followed by endocrine therapy based on Recurrence Score results and nodal status. In this analysis, three independent observers quantified and categorized the presence of TILs among tumor samples from patients in PlanB. TIL measurements were correlated with clinical/pathological parameters and treatment outcome overall and according to the treatment arm. RESULTS Disease-free survival (DFS) rates were significantly better (p = .04) in HR-negative patients with high vs. intermediate TIL levels and were higher in low vs. intermediate TIL patients, however with borderline significance only (p = .06). There were no significant differences among TIL categories in HR+ patients. High RS categories, HR-negative status, and high KI67 were independently and significantly associated with high TIL categories. There was no significant impact of TIL category on DFS in patients treated by endocrine therapy only; however, in patients receiving chemotherapy, DFS in the intermediate TIL category was lower than that in the other categories. CONCLUSION Although the presence of high TILs is associated with negative prognostic parameters such as high KI67 and HR-negative status among patients with HR-positive HER2-negative EBC, patients with high TILs show a favorable 5-year DFS in both HR-positive/HER2-negative and triple-negative breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany.,Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Fred Heinisch
- Institute of Pathology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Friedrich Feuerhake
- Department of Oncology, Clinics Mutterhaus der Borromaeerinnen, Trier, Germany
| | - Hans Kreipe
- Department of Oncology, Clinics Mutterhaus der Borromaeerinnen, Trier, Germany
| | - Michael Clemens
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Evangelical Hospital, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany
| | - Benno Nuding
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstertrics, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Wolfram Malter
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Clinics Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Munich (LMU) and CCCLMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany.,Genomic Health, Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA
| | - Monika Graeser
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany.,Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Steve Shak
- Genomic Health, Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany.,Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Ronald Kates
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Matthias Christgen
- Department of Oncology, Clinics Mutterhaus der Borromaeerinnen, Trier, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany.,Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Munich (LMU) and CCCLMU, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Kuemmel S, Gluz O, Christgen M, Potenberg J, Hackmann J, von Schumann R, Graeser M, Mangold M, Wuerstlein R, Kates R, Kreipe HH, Nitz U, Harbeck N. Abstract P2-16-05: Efficacy of response- and toxicity-guided neoadjuvant chemotherapy in elderly early breast cancer patients: Results of WSG ADAPT elderly sub-trial. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-p2-16-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: More than 1/3 of early breast cancers (EBC) are diagnosed in women ≥ 70 years. Although polychemotherapy has been shown to be more effective than monochemotherapy also in these patients, only limited prospective data on efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy are available so far. Here, we present results of the prospective ADAPT Elderly sub-study from the WSG ADAPT umbrella protocol.
Methods: Patients ≥70 years with high-risk HR+/HER2- EBC (i.e. Recurrence Score (RS)>25 or RS 12-25 with post-endocrine Ki67 of >10% or ≥cN2) or HR-/HER2- EBC were treated by 2 cycles of liposomal doxorubicin (Myocet® 60 mg/m2)/cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 (MC). In case of clinical response by ultrasound (>50% reduction in the sum of two largest diameters) and no AE grade 3-4, patients received an additional 2 cycles MC, otherwise they were switched to 6 cycles of paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) weekly. A sample size of n=150 was planned to demonstrate non-inferiority of the response- and toxicity-guided regimen vs. 4 cycles MC in responding patients (25% assumed pCR). The study was stopped early due to slow recruitment.
Results: Between 09/2014 and 10/2015, 83 EBC patients from 31 centers were registered; 78 started with therapy (40 HR+/HER2-; 38 HR-/HER2-). Median age was 74 years. 64% had G3 tumors, 66% cT24, and 34% cN+. Median Ki67 was 40%. 75/78 pts underwent stratification after 2 cycles; 1 pt withdrew consent: 45(61%) were responders with no severe toxicities, 29 (39%) non-responders or suffered toxicity grade 3-4. Surgical information is available in 72 patients (43 responder/no toxicity, 29 no response/toxicity groups respectively). pCR was observed in 7 patients in the responder/no toxicity group (i.e. 16% irrespective of HR status) and in n=3 patients in the no response/toxicity group (10%). Updated efficacy and safety data will be presented at the meeting.
Discussion: In one of the largest neoadjuvant chemotherapy-studies specifically for elderly pts with HER2- EBC, we observed a lower than expected pCR rate after 4 cycles of anthracycline-containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Taxane-based standard chemotherapy may thus be preferable in this population. Nevertheless, neoadjuvant chemotherapy seems feasible in elderly pts with high-risk HER2- EBC and should further be explored in the context of potential pCR-based (de)escalation strategies.
Citation Format: Sherko Kuemmel, Oleg Gluz, Matthias Christgen, Jochem Potenberg, John Hackmann, Raquel von Schumann, Monika Graeser, Marina Mangold, Rachel Wuerstlein, Ronald Kates, Hans H. Kreipe, Ulrike Nitz, Nadia Harbeck, West German Study Group. Efficacy of response- and toxicity-guided neoadjuvant chemotherapy in elderly early breast cancer patients: Results of WSG ADAPT elderly sub-trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-16-05.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Oleg Gluz
- 2West German Study Group and Breast Center Niederrhein Johanniter Clincs Moenchengladbach and University Hospital Cologne, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Jochem Potenberg
- 4Ev. Waldkrankenhaus Spandau, Department of Oncology, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Monika Graeser
- 7West German Study Group and Breast Center Niederrhein Johanniter Clinics, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- 9Breast Center, Dept. OB&GYN, University of Munich (LMU) and CCCLMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Ronald Kates
- 8West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Hans H. Kreipe
- 3Medical School Hannover, Institute of Pathology, Hannover, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- 7West German Study Group and Breast Center Niederrhein Johanniter Clinics, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- 9Breast Center, Dept. OB&GYN, University of Munich (LMU) and CCCLMU, Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Gluz O, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Biehl C, Christgen M, Kuemmel S, Grischke EM, Augustin D, Braun M, Potenberg J, Graeser M, Kates R, Wuerstlein R, Feuerhake F, Nitz U, Kreipe H, Harbeck N, Group WGS. Abstract P4-10-05: Predictive value of HER2 expression, early response and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) on efficacy of de-escalated pertuzumab+trastuzumab in the neoadjuvant WSG-ADAPT-HER2+/HR- trial. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-p4-10-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose: Only limited data are available on predictive markers for use of chemotherapy-free, anti-HER2 combinations in HER2-positive early breast cancer (eBC), in particular within the molecularly distinct HER2+/HR- subgroup.
Background: In the ADAPT HER2+/HR- trial, a promising pCR of about 43-45% was found in patients treated by 4 cycles of pertuzumab and trastuzumab with either defined early response (low tumor cellularity or relative Ki-67 decrease ≥30%) or indeterminate early response (e.g. no visible tumor by ultrasound), compared to under 10% in early non-responders. In addition to early response, HER2 protein expression and stromal TIL (s-TIL) dynamics after one cycle of therapy are promising tools for identification of patients with high likelihood of pathological complete response (pCR) after therapy with double anti-HER2 blockade (e.g. by lapatinib+trastuzumab) or T-DM1.
Methods: Patients with cT1-cT4c, cN0-3 early HER2+/HR- BC (n=134) were treated with 4 cycles of P+T +/- paclitaxel d1,8,15 q3w. Primary endpoint of the study was pCR (ypT0/is, ypN0). All tumors were HR-negative (ER and PR<1%) and locally HER2 positive, i.e., 2+ with positive FISH or 3+ by immunohistochemistry (IHC). HR and HER2 status were confirmed by central pathology prior to randomization.
Tumors were classified as “HER2-low” if HER2-1+ or HER2-2+ by either local or central IHC assessment, otherwise “HER2-high”. s-TILs were measured semi-quantitively according to current international consensus in triplicate at baseline and on-treatment (at cycle 2); the median of the three measurements was taken to define the quantities TIL-0 and TIL-3, respectively. “Lymphocyte-dominant subtype” at baseline and cycle 2 were defined as TIL-0≥40% and TIL-3≥40%, respectively.
The present analysis characterizes the predictive impact of early response HER2 protein expression, and s-TILs on pCR under dual anti-HER2 therapy for the first time within a prospective neoadjuvant trial specific to the HER2+/HR- BC subtype.
Results: As previously reported, pCR was 34.4% without chemotherapy and 90.5% with chemotherapy. TIL-0 and TIL-3 were available in n=119/134 and n=103/134 patients, respectively. TIL-0 and TIL-3 were not significantly associated with pCR in the whole cohort or within the T+P arm, either modeled as a continuous variable or in terms of binary variables representing lymphocyte-dominant subtype or defined by the respective population medians.
HER2-high expression was found in 87% of patients. In the T+P arm, pCR was much higher in HER2-high than HER2-low patients (40.3% vs. 0%, p=.003).
In the T+P arm, 24 and 38 of 92 patients were classified as non- and responders, unclassified early response was observed in 30 of 92 patients. pCR in these groups were 8.3% vs. 44.7% vs. 42.9% respectively. Higher baseline TILs were positively associated with early response.
Clinically meaningful pCR of 49% after only 4 cycles of chemotherapy-free P+T was seen in those patients with early response after one cycle of therapy and HER2-high classification, compared to 11.8% in the HER2-high/non-responder group).
Conclusions: At present, a combination of baseline high HER2 expression with low cellularity after one cycle of neoadjuvant therapy – rather than s-TIL determination (at baseline or in response to therapy) – appears to be a simple and feasible tool for identification of candidates for de-escalated treatment in HER2+/HR- disease. Further research on high-precision determination of HER2-high expression (by immunohistochemistry vs. mRNA-based tools) is strongly needed for optimal patient selection for future chemotherapy de-escalation trials.
Citation Format: Oleg Gluz, Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke, Claudia Biehl, Matthias Christgen, Sherko Kuemmel, Eva-Maria Grischke, Doris Augustin, Michael Braun, Jochem Potenberg, Monika Graeser, Ronald Kates, Rachel Wuerstlein, Friedrich Feuerhake, Ulrike Nitz, Hans Kreipe, Nadia Harbeck, West German Study Group. Predictive value of HER2 expression, early response and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) on efficacy of de-escalated pertuzumab+trastuzumab in the neoadjuvant WSG-ADAPT-HER2+/HR- trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-10-05.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oleg Gluz
- 1West German Study Group and Breast Center Niederrhein Johanniter Clinics and University Clinics of Cologne, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Claudia Biehl
- 3Westphalian Breast Center, City Hospital Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Doris Augustin
- 7DONAUISAR Clinics Deggendorf, Breast Center Ostbayern, Deggendorf, Germany
| | - Michael Braun
- 8Breast Center, Rotkreuzklinikum Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jochem Potenberg
- 9Department of Oncology, Evangelical Waldkrankenhaus, Berlin, Germany
| | - Monika Graeser
- 10West German Study Group and Breast Center Niederrhein Johanniter Clinics, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Ronald Kates
- 11West German Study Group, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- 12Breast Center, University of Munich (LMU) and CCCLMU, München, Germany
| | - Friedrich Feuerhake
- 13Medical School Hannover, Institute of Pathology, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- 10West German Study Group and Breast Center Niederrhein Johanniter Clinics, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Hans Kreipe
- 4Medical School Hannover, Institute of Pathology, Hannover, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- 14Breast Center, University of Munich (LMU) and CCCLMU, Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ditsch N, Untch M, Thill M, Müller V, Janni W, Albert US, Bauerfeind I, Blohmer J, Budach W, Dall P, Diel I, Fasching PA, Fehm T, Friedrich M, Gerber B, Hanf V, Harbeck N, Huober J, Jackisch C, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Kreipe HH, Krug D, Kühn T, Kümmel S, Loibl S, Lüftner D, Lux MP, Maass N, Möbus V, Müller-Schimpfle M, Mundhenke C, Nitz U, Rhiem K, Rody A, Schmidt M, Schneeweiss A, Schütz F, Sinn HP, Solbach C, Solomayer EF, Stickeler E, Thomssen C, Wenz F, Witzel I, Wöckel A. AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Update 2019. Breast Care (Basel) 2019; 14:224-245. [PMID: 31558897 PMCID: PMC6751475 DOI: 10.1159/000501000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2019] [Accepted: 05/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Ditsch
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Untch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Ute-Susann Albert
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Kassel, Kassel, Germany
| | | | - Jens Blohmer
- Klinik für Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Strahlentherapie, Radiologie Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Peter Dall
- Frauenklinik Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Ingo Diel
- Praxisklinik am Rosengarten, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | - Tanja Fehm
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Michael Friedrich
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Volker Hanf
- Frauenklinik Nathanstift, Klinikum Fürth, Fürth, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | | | | | - David Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - Sherko Kümmel
- Klinik für Senologie, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie und Onkologie, Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Patrick Lux
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, St. Vinzenz-Krankenhaus GmbH Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Nicolai Maass
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Volker Möbus
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Markus Müller-Schimpfle
- Klinik für Radiologie, Neuroradiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Christoph Mundhenke
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- Senologie, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - Achim Rody
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Geburtshilfe und Frauengesundheit der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Gynäkologische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Sinn
- Sektion Gynäkopathologie, Pathologisches Institut, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Solbach
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Erich-Franz Solomayer
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Universitätsfrauenklinik, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle/Saale, Germany
| | | | - Isabell Witzel
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Thill M, Jackisch C, Janni W, Müller V, Albert US, Bauerfeind I, Blohmer J, Budach W, Dall P, Diel I, Fasching PA, Fehm T, Friedrich M, Gerber B, Hanf V, Harbeck N, Huober J, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Kreipe HH, Krug D, Kühn T, Kümmel S, Loibl S, Lüftner D, Lux MP, Maass N, Möbus V, Müller-Schimpfle M, Mundhenke C, Nitz U, Rhiem K, Rody A, Schmidt M, Schneeweiss A, Schütz F, Sinn HP, Solbach C, Solomayer EF, Stickeler E, Thomssen C, Untch M, Wenz F, Witzel I, Wöckel A, Ditsch N. AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Locally Advanced and Metastatic Breast Cancer: Update 2019. Breast Care (Basel) 2019; 14:247-255. [PMID: 31558898 DOI: 10.1159/000500999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2019] [Accepted: 05/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Every year the Breast Committee of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (German Gynecological Oncology Group, AGO), a group of gynecological oncologists specialized in breast cancer and interdisciplinary members specialized in pathology, radiologic diagnostics, medical oncology, and radiation oncology, prepares and updates evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with early and metastatic breast cancer. Every update is performed according to a documented rule-fixed algorithm, by thoroughly reviewing and scoring the recent publications for their scientific validity and clinical relevance. This current publication presents the 2019 update on the recommendations for metastatic breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Thill
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Gynäkologische Onkologie, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ute-Susann Albert
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Kassel, Kassel, Germany
| | | | - Jens Blohmer
- Klinik für Gynäkologie mit Brustzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Strahlentherapie, Radiologie Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Peter Dall
- Frauenklinik Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Ingo Diel
- Praxisklinik am Rosengarten, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | - Tanja Fehm
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Michael Friedrich
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Volker Hanf
- Frauenklinik Nathanstift, Klinikum Fürth, Fürth, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Huober
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | | | | | - David Krug
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - Sherko Kümmel
- Klinik für Senologie, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie und Onkologie, Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Patrick Lux
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, St. Vinzenz-Krankenhaus GmbH Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Nicolai Maass
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Volker Möbus
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst GmbH, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Markus Müller-Schimpfle
- Klinik für Radiologie, Neuroradiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst GmbH, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Christoph Mundhenke
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- Senologie, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - Achim Rody
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Geburtshilfe und Frauengesundheit der Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Gynäkologische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Sinn
- Sektion Gynäkopathologie, Pathologisches Institut, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Solbach
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Erich-Franz Solomayer
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Universitätsfrauenklinik, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle/Saale, Germany
| | | | - Frederik Wenz
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Achim Wöckel
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Brustzentrum, Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kümmel A, Kümmel S, Blohmer JU, Faridi A, Nitz U, Loibl S, von Fritschen U, Rezek D, Hagemann F, Holtschmidt J, Botzenhardt S, Reinisch M. Autologous Lipotransfer - Daily Therapeutic Practice in Breast Cancer: An Intergroup Analysis Encompassing NOGGO, WSG, GBG, AWO Gyn and DGPRÄC. Breast Care (Basel) 2019; 14:165-169. [PMID: 31316315 DOI: 10.1159/000490040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Autologous fat transfer in breast reconstruction has become increasingly important in breast reconstructive surgery. Although the indication to obtain fat, the various operative procedures, and the risks for the patient have been addressed in a large number of studies, detailed information on the everyday use of autologous lipotransfer in breast units in Germany is still lacking. Methods The objective of the study was to obtain primary data on the use of autologous lipotransfer to treat breast cancer patients in Germany and to determine measures for quality assurance in the daily practice. An online questionnaire concerning breast cancer and lipofilling was sent to specialists in gynecology and plastic surgery. Results Two-thirds of the specialists who responded to the questionnaire use autologous lipotransfer for breast reconstruction and did not report an increase of local recurrence following lipotransfer. There were only small differences between gynecologists and plastic surgeons regarding the procedure and indication for lipotransfer. The method is highly accepted by patients and physicians, and both gynecologists and plastic surgeons rated the improvement achieved through lipofilling as 'high'. Conclusions The lack of randomized controlled data, especially in high-risk patients, demonstrates the necessity for a registry study on this topic. Our survey describes, in detail, the indications for lipofilling as well as its appropriate application in breast cancer patients in Germany and may thereby reduce the present therapeutic uncertainties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aylin Kümmel
- Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Jens-Uwe Blohmer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Breast Unit, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andree Faridi
- Brustzentrum Universitätsklinik Bonn, Universitätskliniken Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- Brustzentrum Niederrhein, Evangelisches Bethesda-Krankenhaus, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Sibylle Loibl
- German Breast Group, GBG Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - Uwe von Fritschen
- Plastische und Ästhetische Chirurgie, HELIOS Klinikum Emil von Behring, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Gluz O, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Prat A, Christgen M, Gebauer D, Kates R, Paré L, Grischke EM, Forstbauer H, Braun M, Warm M, Hackmann J, Uleer C, Aktas B, Schumacher C, Kuemmel S, Wuerstlein R, Pelz E, Nitz U, Kreipe HH, Harbeck N. Efficacy of deescalated chemotherapy according to PAM50 subtypes, immune and proliferation genes in triple-negative early breast cancer: Primary translational analysis of the WSG-ADAPT-TN trial. Int J Cancer 2019; 146:262-271. [PMID: 31162838 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2018] [Revised: 05/04/2019] [Accepted: 05/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
In the neoadjuvant WSG-ADAPT-TN trial, 12-week nab-paclitaxel + carboplatin (nab-pac/carbo) was highly effective and superior to nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine (nab-pac/gem) in triple-negative breast cancer regarding pathological complete response (pCR). Predictive markers for deescalated taxane/carbo use in TNBC need to be identified. Patients received 4 × nab-pac 125 mg/m2 (plus carbo AUC2 or gem 1,000 mg/m2 d1,8 q21). Expression of 119 genes and PAM50 scores by nCounter were available in 306/336 pretherapeutic samples. Interim survival analysis was planned after 36 months median follow-up. Basal-like (83.3%) compared to other subtypes was positively associated with pCR (38% vs. 20%, p = 0.015), as was lower HER2 score (p < 0.001). Proliferation biomarkers were positively associated with pCR, that is, PAM50 proliferation, ROR scores (all p < 0.004), higher Ki-67 (IHC; p < 0.001). For nab-pac/carbo, expression of immunological (CD8, PD1 and PFDL1) genes and proliferation markers (proliferation and ROR scores, MKI67, CDC20, NUF2, KIF2C, CENPF, EMP3 and TYMS) were positively associated with pCR (p < 0.05 for all). For nab-pac/gem, angiogenesis genes were negatively associated with pCR (ANGPTL4: p = 0.05; FGFR4: p = 0.02; VEGFA: p = 0.03). pCR after 12 weeks was strongly associated with favorable outcome (3y event-free survival: 92% vs. 71%, p < 0.001). In early TNBC, basal-like subtype, higher Ki-67 (IHC) and lower HER2 score were, associated with chemosensitivity. Chemoresistance pathways differed between the two taxane based combinations. Combination of proliferation/immune markers and PAM50 subtype could allow patient selection for further deescalated chemotherapy and/or immune treatment approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oleg Gluz
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany.,Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Mönchengladbach, Germany.,University Clinics Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Aleix Prat
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapeutics in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Ronald Kates
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Laia Paré
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapeutics in Solid Tumors, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Michael Braun
- Rotkreuz Clinics Munich, Breast Center, Munich, Germany
| | - Mathias Warm
- City Hospital Holweide, Breast Center, Cologne, Germany
| | | | | | - Bahriye Aktas
- University Clinics Essen, Women's Clinic, Essen, Germany.,University Clinics Leipzig, Women's Clinic, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | | | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany.,Breast Center, Dept. OB&GYN, University of Munich (LMU) and CCCLMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Enrico Pelz
- Institute of Pathology Viersen, Viersen, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany.,Ev. Hospital Bethesda, Breast Center Niederrhein, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Nadia Harbeck
- West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany.,Breast Center, Dept. OB&GYN, University of Munich (LMU) and CCCLMU, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Harbeck N, Gluz O, Christgen M, Graeser M, Hilpert F, Krauss K, Kreipe HH, Nitz U, Kates RE, Schinkoethe T, Wuerstlein R, Kuemmel S. ADAPTcycle: Adjuvant dynamic marker-adjusted personalized therapy comparing endocrine therapy plus ribociclib versus chemotherapy in intermediate-risk HR+/HER2- early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.tps596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
TPS596 Background: WSG (West German Study Group)-ADAPTcycle is a prospective, multi-center, interventional, two-arm, open-label, controlled (neo)adjuvant, non-blinded, randomized phase III trial (EudraCT 2018-003749-40). It investigates whether HR+/HER2- intermediate-risk patients (pts) (about 20 % of HR+/HER2- early breast cancer, EBC) identified during screening (OncotypeDX and 3-week endocrine therapy (ET)) derive additional benefit from 2-years of the CDK4/6 inhibitor ribociclib plus ET compared to chemotherapy (CT) (followed by adjuvant ET). Co-primary endpoints are disease-free and distant disease-free survival. Methods: Starting Q1 2019 (enrollment 36 months, 80 sites), 5600 pts will be screened and 1670 randomized in a 3:2 ratio (1002 to ribociclib + ET; 668 to standard CT followed by ET). Pre-/postmenopausal pts with histologically confirmed invasive HR+/HER2- EBC at clinically enhanced risk (cT2-4 or Ki67 > 20 % or G3 or cN+) are eligible if they fulfill the ADAPT intermediate-risk group criteria: Recurrence Score (RS) ≤ 25 and poor endocrine response or RS > 25 and good endocrine response in p/cN0-1 pts or RS ≤ 25 with good endocrine response in c/pN2-3 pts. Endocrine responsiveness is determined by Ki67 response (drop to ≤ 10 %) after 3-week ET. Treatment duration is 2 years for the ribociclib + ET (premenopausal: AI + GnRH) arm and 16-24 weeks for the CT arm; treatment can be given in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting. 5-year follow-up consists of standard adjuvant ET. Patient reported outcomes (ePROs) are collected using CANKADO; ECG monitoring is performed using a novel CANKADO-based methodology. For translational analyses, tumor tissue will be collected at baseline (prior to ET), after 3-weeks ET (+/- 1w). Additional samples are required if residual tumor is diagnosed in case of neoadjuvant treatment and at time of recurrence. Exploratory tissue biomarker research will be conducted to assess alterations of molecular markers (e. g., ESR1, PIK3CA, CCND1, CDKN2A, RB1). Circulating DNA and tumor cells from blood samples will be used to assess mutations, gene expression, etc. Clinical trial information: 2018-003749-40.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- Breast Center Niederrhein and University Clinics Cologne, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | | | | | - Felix Hilpert
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Jerusalem, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Katja Krauss
- Breast Center, Dept. OB&GYN, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Ulrike Nitz
- West German Study Group/Breast Center Niederrhein, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | | | | | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Breast Center, Dept. OB&GYN, University of Munich (LMU) and CCCLMU, Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Hennigs A, Riedel F, Feißt M, Köpke M, Rezai M, Nitz U, Moderow M, Golatta M, Sohn C, Heil J. Evolution of the Use of Completion Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with T1/2N0M0 Breast Cancer and Tumour-Involved Sentinel Lymph Nodes Undergoing Mastectomy: A Cohort Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:2435-2443. [PMID: 31049766 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07388-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In breast cancer, completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) was previously recommended for patients with at least one tumour-affected sentinel lymph node (SLN). Several prospective trials predominantly in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery showed no benefit and increased arm morbidity with this procedure. We report the influence of these trials on clinical practice of patients undergoing mastectomy. METHODS We analysed prospectively collected data from patients with primary invasive breast cancer treated at German breast cancer units between January 2008 and December 2015. Time trends of cALND rates were analysed in patients undergoing mastectomy for T1/2N0M0 breast cancer with one or two tumour-involved SLNs. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine factors influencing the decision not to perform cALND. RESULTS Among the entire study cohort of 166,074 patients treated at 179 breast cancer units, 4093 patients (2%) had T1/2N0M0 breast cancer with one or two tumour-involved SLNs and underwent mastectomy. cALND rates decreased from 89.9% in 2010 to 55.5% in 2015 (p < 0.001). Rates decreased from 82% to 8% in patients with micrometastatic SLN disease and from 93% to 63% in those with macrometastasis (p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, factors associated with omission of cALND were treatment at a general, nonacademic hospital, pT1 status, older age, higher number of removed SLNs, fewer tumour-affected SLNs, and SLN micrometastasis (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Despite limited evidence from prospective trials relating to the omission of cALND specifically in patients undergoing mastectomy, our nationwide data show that use of cALND decreased in these patients in routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André Hennigs
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Riedel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Manuel Feißt
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Melitta Köpke
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mahdi Rezai
- European Breast Center, Luisen Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Ulrike Nitz
- Breast Center Niederrhein, Evangelical Hospital Johanniter Bethesda, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | | | - Michael Golatta
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christof Sohn
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jörg Heil
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Wuerstlein R, Harbeck N, Grischke EM, Forstmeyer D, von Schumann R, Krabisch P, Nitz U, Gluz O, Kates R, Graeser M. Protroca: A non-interventional study on prophylaxis of chemotherapy induced neutropenia using lipegfilgrastim in non-selected breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz101.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|