1
|
Binkley MS, Flerlage JE, Savage KJ, Akhtar S, Steiner R, Zhang XY, Dickinson M, Prica A, Major A, Hendrickson PG, Hopkins D, Ng A, Casulo C, Baron J, Roberts KB, Al Kendi J, Balogh A, Ricardi U, Torka P, Specht L, De Silva R, Pickard K, Blazin LJ, Henry M, Smith CM, Halperin D, Brady J, Brennan B, Senchenko MA, Reeves M, Hoppe BS, Terezakis S, Talaulikar D, Picardi M, Kirova Y, Fergusson P, Hawkes EA, Lee D, Doo NW, Barraclough A, Cheah CY, Ku M, Hamad N, Mutsando H, Gilbertson M, Marconi T, Viiala N, Maurer MJ, Eichenauer DA, Hoppe RT. International Prognostic Score for Nodular Lymphocyte-Predominant Hodgkin Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2024:JCO2301655. [PMID: 38531001 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) is a rare cancer, and large international cooperative efforts are needed to evaluate the significance of clinical risk factors and immunoarchitectural patterns (IAPs) for all stages of pediatric and adult patients with NLPHL. METHODS Thirty-eight institutions participated in the Global nLPHL One Working Group retrospective study of NLPHL cases from 1992 to 2021. We measured progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), transformation rate, and lymphoma-specific death rate. We performed uni- and multivariable (MVA) Cox regression stratified by management to select factors for the lymphocyte-predominant international prognostic score (LP-IPS) validated by five-fold cross-validation. RESULTS We identified 2,243 patients with a median age of 37 years (IQR, 23-51). The median follow-up was 6.3 years (IQR, 3.4-10.8). Most had stage I to II (72.9%) and few B symptoms (9.9%) or splenic involvement (5.4%). IAP was scored for 916 (40.8%). Frontline management included chemotherapy alone (32.4%), combined modality therapy (30.5%), radiotherapy alone (24.0%), observation after excision (4.6%), rituximab alone (4.0%), active surveillance (3.4%), and rituximab and radiotherapy (1.1%). The PFS, OS, transformation, and lymphoma-specific death rates at 10 years were 70.8%, 91.6%, 4.8%, and 3.3%, respectively. On MVA, IAPs were not associated with PFS or OS, but IAP E had higher risk of transformation (hazard ratio [HR], 1.81; P < .05). We developed the LP-IPS with 1 point each for age ≥45 years, stage III-IV, hemoglobin <10.5 g/dL, and splenic involvement. Increasing LP-IPS was significantly associated with worse PFS (HR, 1.52) and OS (HR, 2.31) and increased risk of lymphoma-specific death (HR, 2.63) and transformation (HR, 1.41). CONCLUSION In this comprehensive study of all ages of patients with NLPHL, we develop the LP-IPS to identify high-risk patients and inform upcoming prospective clinical trials evaluating de-escalation of therapy for patients with low LP-IPS scores (<2).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Sargent Binkley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Jamie E Flerlage
- Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | | | - Saad Akhtar
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Raphael Steiner
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Anca Prica
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | - David Hopkins
- Department of Haematology, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Andrea Ng
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Pallawi Torka
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | - Lena Specht
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ravindu De Silva
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norfolk, United Kingdom
| | - Keir Pickard
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Lindsay J Blazin
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | | | - Daniel Halperin
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Jessica Brady
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Maria Anatolevna Senchenko
- Oncology and Immunology, Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Marie Reeves
- Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Bradford S Hoppe
- University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
- Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | | | - Dipti Talaulikar
- Canberra Health Services, Canberra, Australia
- College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Marco Picardi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, AOU Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | | | | | - Eliza A Hawkes
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Centre at Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
- Lymphoma and Related Diseases Registry, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Denise Lee
- Austin Hospital, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nicole Wong Doo
- Lymphoma and Related Diseases Registry, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Haematology, Concord Hospital, Concord Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Chan Y Cheah
- Department of Haematology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia
- Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Matthew Ku
- Department of Haematology, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nada Hamad
- Department of Haematology, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame, Sydney, Australia
| | - Howard Mutsando
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- University of Queensland Rural Clinical School, Toowoomba, Australia
| | | | | | - Nicholas Viiala
- Department of Haematology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, Australia
- South West Sydney Clinical School, UNSW Medicine, Liverpool, Australia
| | - Matthew J Maurer
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Dennis A Eichenauer
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Dusseldorf, University Hospital Cologne, German Hodgkin Study Group, Cologne, Germany
| | - Richard T Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Christ SM, Alongi F, Ricardi U, Scorsetti M, Livi L, Balermpas P, Lievens Y, Braam P, Alicja Jereczek-Fossa B, Stellamans K, Ratosa I, Widder J, Peulen H, Dirix P, Bral S, Ramella S, Hemmatazad H, Khanfir K, Geets X, Jeene P, Zilli T, Fournier B, Battista Ivaldi G, Clementel E, Fortpied C, Boakye Oppong F, Ost P, Guckenberger M. Cancer-specific dose and fractionation schedules in stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic disease: An interim analysis of the EORTC-ESTRO E 2-RADIatE OligoCare study. Radiother Oncol 2024:110235. [PMID: 38508239 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Revised: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION Optimal dose and fractionation in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for oligometastatic cancer patients remain unknown. In this interim analysis of OligoCare, we analyzed factors associated with SBRT dose and fractionation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Analysis was based on the first 1,099 registered patients. SBRT doses were converted to biological effective doses (BED) using α/β of 10 Gy for all primaries, and cancer-specific α/β of 10 Gy for non-small cell lung and colorectal cancer (NSCLC, CRC), 2.5 Gy for breast cancer (BC), or 1.5 Gy for prostate cancer (PC). RESULTS Of the interim analysis population of 1,099 patients, 999 (99.5 %) fulfilled inclusion criteria and received metastasis-directed SBRT for NSCLC (n = 195; 19.5 %), BC (n = 163; 16.3 %), CRC (n = 184; 18.4 %), or PC (n = 457; 47.5 %). Two thirds of patients were treated for single metastasis. Median number of fractions was 5 (IQR, 3-5) and median dose per fraction was 9.7 (IQR, 7.7-12.4) Gy. The most frequently treated sites were non-vertebral bone (22.8 %), lung (21.0 %), and distant lymph node metastases (19.0 %). On multivariate analysis, the dose varied significantly for primary cancer type (BC: 237.3 Gy BED, PC 300.6 Gy BED, and CRC 84.3 Gy BED), and metastatic sites, with higher doses for lung and liver lesions. CONCLUSION This real-world analysis suggests that SBRT doses are adjusted to the primary cancers and oligometastasis location. Future analysis will address safety and efficacy of this site- and disease-adapted SBRT fractionation approach (NCT03818503).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian M Christ
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Filippo Alongi
- IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, Negrar-Verona, Italy & University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Marta Scorsetti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20090 Milan, Italy; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Radiation Oncology, Florence, Italy
| | - Panagiotis Balermpas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Yolande Lievens
- Radiation Oncology Department, Ghent University Hospital and University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Pètra Braam
- Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Radiation Oncology, Nijmengen, the Netherlands
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Ivica Ratosa
- Division of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia & Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Joachim Widder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Heike Peulen
- Catharina Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Piet Dirix
- Iridium Network, Radiation Oncology, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Samuel Bral
- Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Ziekenhuis, Radiation Oncology, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Sara Ramella
- Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico-Oncology Center, Radiation Oncology, Roma, Italy
| | - Hossein Hemmatazad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Kaouthar Khanfir
- Hopital de Sion, Hopital du Valais, Radiation Oncology, Sion, Switzerland
| | - Xavier Geets
- Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Paul Jeene
- Radiotherapiegroep, Deventer, the Netherlands
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève (HUG), site de Cluse-Roseraie, Radiation Oncology, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Beatrice Fournier
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Enrico Clementel
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Catherine Fortpied
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Felix Boakye Oppong
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Piet Ost
- Iridium Network, Radiation Oncology, Wilrijk, Belgium; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Timmermann B, Alapetite C, Dieckmann K, Kortmann RD, Lassen-Ramshad Y, Maduro JH, Ramos Albiac M, Ricardi U, Weber DC. ESTRO-SIOPE guideline: Clinical management of radiotherapy in atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (AT/RTs). Radiother Oncol 2024:110227. [PMID: 38492671 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2024] [Accepted: 03/10/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Treatment of patients with atypical teratoid/rhabdoid (AT/RT) is challenging, especially when very young (below the age of three years). Radiotherapy (RT) is part of a complex trimodality therapy. The purpose of this guideline is to provide appropriate recommendations for RT in the clinical management of patients not enrolled in clinical trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS Nine European experts were nominated to form a European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) guideline committee. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science. They discussed and analyzed the evidence concerning the role of RT in the clinical management of AT/RT. RESULTS Recommendations on diagnostic imaging, therapeutic principles, RT considerations regarding timing, dose, techniques, target volume definitions, dose constraints of radiation-sensitive organs at risk, concomitant chemotherapy, and follow-up were considered. Treating children with AT/RT within the framework of prospective trials or prospective registries is of utmost importance. CONCLUSION The present guideline summarizes the evidence and clinical-based recommendations for RT in patients with AT/RT. Prospective clinical trials and international, large registries evaluating modern treatment approaches will contribute to a better understanding of the best treatment for these children in future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beate Timmermann
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Germany, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Germany.
| | - Claire Alapetite
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Therapy Center, Institut Curie, Paris-Orsay, France
| | - Karin Dieckmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Rolf-Dieter Kortmann
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Germany, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Germany; University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - John H Maduro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands; Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Damien C Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, ETH Domain, Villigen-PSI, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology. Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dogliotti I, Levis M, Martin A, Bartoncini S, Felicetti F, Cavallin C, Maffini E, Cerrano M, Bruno B, Ricardi U, Giaccone L. Maintain Efficacy and Spare Toxicity: Traditional and New Radiation-Based Conditioning Regimens in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:865. [PMID: 38473227 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16050865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Novelty in total body irradiation (TBI) as part of pre-transplant conditioning regimens lacked until recently, despite the developments in the field of allogeneic stem cell transplants. Long-term toxicities have been one of the major concerns associated with TBI in this setting, although the impact of TBI is not so easy to discriminate from that of chemotherapy, especially in the adult population. More recently, lower-intensity TBI and different approaches to irradiation (namely, total marrow irradiation, TMI, and total marrow and lymphoid irradiation, TMLI) were implemented to keep the benefits of irradiation and limit potential harm. TMI/TMLI is an alternative to TBI that delivers more selective irradiation, with healthy tissues being better spared and the control of the radiation dose delivery. In this review, we discussed the potential radiation-associated long-term toxicities and their management, summarized the evidence regarding the current indications of traditional TBI, and focused on the technological advances in radiotherapy that have resulted in the development of TMLI. Finally, considering the most recent published trials, we postulate how the role of radiotherapy in the setting of allografting might change in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Dogliotti
- Allogeneic Transplant and Cellular Therapy Unit, Division of Hematology, Department of Oncology, University Hospital A.O.U. "Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino", University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy
- Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Torino, Italy
| | - Mario Levis
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Torino, Italy
| | - Aurora Martin
- Allogeneic Transplant and Cellular Therapy Unit, Division of Hematology, Department of Oncology, University Hospital A.O.U. "Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino", University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy
- Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Torino, Italy
| | - Sara Bartoncini
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Torino, Italy
| | - Francesco Felicetti
- Division of Oncological Endocrinology, Department of Oncology, University Hospital A.O.U. "Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino", 10126 Torino, Italy
| | - Chiara Cavallin
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Torino, Italy
| | - Enrico Maffini
- Hematology Institute "Seràgnoli", IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Marco Cerrano
- Division of Hematology, University Hospital A.O.U. "Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino", 10126 Torino, Italy
| | - Benedetto Bruno
- Allogeneic Transplant and Cellular Therapy Unit, Division of Hematology, Department of Oncology, University Hospital A.O.U. "Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino", University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy
- Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Torino, Italy
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Torino, Italy
| | - Luisa Giaccone
- Allogeneic Transplant and Cellular Therapy Unit, Division of Hematology, Department of Oncology, University Hospital A.O.U. "Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino", University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy
- Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Guckenberger M, Andratschke N, Belka C, Bellut D, Cuccia F, Dahele M, Guninski RS, Josipovic M, Mancosu P, Minniti G, Niyazi M, Ricardi U, Munck Af Rosenschold P, Sahgal A, Tsang Y, Verbakel W, Alongi F. ESTRO clinical practice guideline: Stereotactic body radiotherapy for spine metastases. Radiother Oncol 2024; 190:109966. [PMID: 37925107 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Recent progress in diagnostics and treatment of metastatic cancer patients have improved survival substantially. These developments also affect local therapies, with treatment aims shifting from short-term palliation to long-term symptom or disease control. There is consequently a need to better define the value of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for the treatment of spinal metastases. METHODS This ESTRO clinical practice guideline is based on a systematic literature review conducted according to PRISMA standards, which formed the basis for answering four key questions about the indication and practice of SBRT for spine metastases. RESULTS The analysis of the key questions based on current evidence yielded 22 recommendations and 5 statements with varying levels of endorsement, all achieving a consensus among experts of at least 75%. In the majority, the level of evidence supporting the recommendations and statements was moderate or expert opinion, only, indicating that spine SBRT is still an evolving field of clinical research. Recommendations were established concerning the selection of appropriate patients with painful spine metastases and oligometastatic disease. Recommendations about the practice of spinal SBRT covered technical planning aspects including dose and fractionation, patient positioning, immobilization and image-guided SBRT delivery. Finally, recommendations were developed regarding quality assurance protocols, including description of potential SBRT-related toxicity and risk mitigation strategies. CONCLUSIONS This ESTRO clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations and statements regarding the selection of patients with spinal metastases for SBRT and its safe implementation and practice. Enrollment of patients into well-designed prospective clinical trials addressing clinically relevant questions is considered important.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - N Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - C Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, Munich, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - D Bellut
- University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Department of Neurosurgery, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - F Cuccia
- ARNAS Civico Hospital, Radiation Oncology Unit, Palermo, Italy
| | - M Dahele
- Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Center Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R S Guninski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M Josipovic
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - P Mancosu
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Medical Physics Unit, Radiation Oncology department, via Manzoni 56 I-20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - G Minniti
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, IS, Italy
| | - M Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - U Ricardi
- University of Turin, Department of Oncology, Turin, Italy
| | | | - A Sahgal
- Odette Cancer Center of the Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Toronto, Canada
| | - Y Tsang
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, Toronto, Canada
| | - Wfar Verbakel
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - F Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Department, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Negrar-Verona, Italy; University of Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Federico M, Fortpied C, Stepanishyna Y, Gotti M, van der Maazen R, Cristinelli C, Re A, Plattel W, Lazarovici J, Merli F, Specht L, Schiano de Colella JM, Hutchings M, Versari A, Edeline V, Stamatoulas A, Girinsky T, Ricardi U, Aleman B, Meulemans B, Tonino S, Raemaekers J, André M. Long-Term Follow-Up of the Response-Adapted Intergroup EORTC/LYSA/FIL H10 Trial for Localized Hodgkin Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:19-25. [PMID: 37967311 PMCID: PMC10730029 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Revised: 09/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.The primary analysis of the Early positron emission tomography (ePET) Response-Adapted Treatment in localized Hodgkin Lymphoma H10 Trial demonstrated that in ePET-negative patients, the risk of relapse increased when involved-node radiotherapy (INRT) was omitted and that in ePET-positive patients, switching from doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) to bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPPesc) significantly improved 5-year progression-free survival (PFS). Here, we report the final results of a preplanned analysis at a 10-year follow-up. In the favorable (F) ePET-negative group, the 10-year PFS rates were 98.8% versus 85.4% (hazard ratio [HR], 13.2; 95% CI, 3.1 to 55.8; P value for noninferiority = .9735; difference test P < .0001) in favor of ABVD + INRT; in the unfavorable (U) ePET-negative group, the 10-year PFS rates were 91.4% and 86.5% (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 0.84 to 2.75; P value for noninferiority = .8577; difference test P = .1628). In ePET-positive patients, the difference in terms of PFS between standard ABVD and intensified BEACOPPesc was no longer statistically significant (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.37 to 1.20; P = .1777). In conclusion, the present long-term analysis confirms that in ePET-negative patients, the omission of INRT is associated with lower 10-year PFS. Instead, in ePET-positive patients, no significant difference between standard and experimental arms emerged although intensification with BEACOPPesc was safe, with no increase in late adverse events, namely, second malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Manuel Gotti
- Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Wouter Plattel
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Francesco Merli
- Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale- IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Annibale Versari
- Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale- IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - Berthe Aleman
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoekziekenhuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Sanne Tonino
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - John Raemaekers
- Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Guninski RS, Cuccia F, Alongi F, Andratschke N, Belka C, Bellut D, Dahele M, Josipovic M, Kroese TE, Mancosu P, Minniti G, Niyazi M, Ricardi U, Munck Af Rosenschold P, Sahgal A, Tsang Y, Verbakel WFAR, Guckenberger M. Efficacy and safety of SBRT for spine metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis for preparation of an ESTRO practice guideline. Radiother Oncol 2024; 190:109969. [PMID: 37922993 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Advances in characterizing cancer biology and the growing availability of novel targeted agents and immune therapeutics have significantly changed the prognosis of many patients with metastatic disease. Palliative radiotherapy needs to adapt to these developments. In this study, we summarize the available evidence for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the treatment of spinal metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using PRISMA methodology, including publications from January 2005 to September 2021, with the exception of the randomized phase III trial RTOG-0631 which was added in April 2023. Re-irradiation was excluded. For meta-analysis, a random-effects model was used to pool the data. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I2-test, assuming substantial and considerable as I2 > 50 % and I2 > 75 %, respectively. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS A total of 69 studies assessing the outcomes of 7236 metastases in 5736 patients were analyzed. SBRT for spine metastases showed high efficacy, with a pooled overall pain response rate of 83 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 68 %-94 %), pooled complete pain response of 36 % (95 % CI: 20 %-53 %), and 1-year local control rate of 94 % (95 % CI: 86 %-99 %), although with high levels of heterogeneity among studies (I2 = 93 %, I2 = 86 %, and 86 %, respectively). Furthermore, SBRT was safe, with a pooled vertebral fracture rate of 9 % (95 % CI: 4 %-16 %), pooled radiation induced myelopathy rate of 0 % (95 % CI 0-2 %), and pooled pain flare rate of 6 % (95 % CI: 3 %-17 %), although with mixed levels of heterogeneity among the studies (I2 = 92 %, I2 = 0 %, and 95 %, respectively). Only 1.7 % of vertebral fractures required surgical stabilization. CONCLUSION Spine SBRT is characterized by a favorable efficacy and safety profile, providing durable results for pain control and disease control, which is particularly relevant for oligometastatic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R S Guninski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - F Cuccia
- ARNAS Civico Hospital, Radiation Oncology Unit, Palermo, Italy
| | - F Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Department, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Negrar-Verona, Italy. University of Brescia, Italy
| | - N Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - C Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, Munich, Germany. Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - D Bellut
- University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Department of Neurosurgery. Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M Dahele
- Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Center Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Josipovic
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - T E Kroese
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - P Mancosu
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Medical Physics Unit, Radiation Oncology department, via Manzoni 56, I-20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - G Minniti
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical PathologySapienza University of Rome, Rome; IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, IS, Italy
| | - M Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - U Ricardi
- University of Turin, Department of Oncology, Turin, Italy
| | - P Munck Af Rosenschold
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - A Sahgal
- Odette Cancer Center of the Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Toronto, Canada
| | - Y Tsang
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, Toronto, Canada
| | - W F A R Verbakel
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bergamaschi L, Vincini MG, Zaffaroni M, Pepa M, Angelicone I, Astone A, Bergamini C, Buonopane S, Conte M, De Rosa N, Deantoni C, Dell'Oca I, Di Gennaro D, Di Muzio N, Osti MF, Federico M, Ferini G, Franzese C, Gatti M, Grillo A, Iorio V, Manzo R, Marmiroli L, Martin G, Mazzuca F, Molinaro MA, Muto M, Pacelli R, Pepe A, Perillo A, Russo D, Salerno F, Spadaro P, Viola A, Iorio GC, Muto P, Ricardi U, Alterio D. Management of radiation-induced oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients: a real-life survey among 25 Italian radiation oncology centers. Support Care Cancer 2023; 32:38. [PMID: 38110572 PMCID: PMC10728275 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08185-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
AIM Radiation-induced oral mucositis (RIOM) is the most frequent side effect in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with curative radiotherapy (RT). A standardized strategy for preventing and treating RIOM has not been defined. Aim of this study was to perform a real-life survey on RIOM management among Italian RT centers. METHODS A 40-question survey was administered to 25 radiation oncologists working in 25 different RT centers across Italy. RESULTS A total of 1554 HNC patients have been treated in the participating centers in 2021, the majority (median across the centers 91%) with curative intent. Median treatment time was 41 days, with a mean percentage of interruption due to toxicity of 14.5%. Eighty percent of responders provide written oral cavity hygiene recommendations. Regarding RIOM prevention, sodium bicarbonate mouthwashes, oral mucosa barrier agents, and hyaluronic acid-based mouthwashes were the most frequent topic agents used. Regarding RIOM treatment, 14 (56%) centers relied on literature evidence, while internal guidelines were available in 13 centers (44%). Grade (G)1 mucositis is mostly treated with sodium bicarbonate mouthwashes, oral mucosa barrier agents, and steroids, while hyaluronic acid-based agents, local anesthetics, and benzydamine were the most used in mucositis G2/G3. Steroids, painkillers, and anti-inflammatory drugs were the most frequent systemic agents used independently from the RIOM severity. CONCLUSION Great variety of strategies exist among Italian centers in RIOM management for HNC patients. Whether different strategies could impact patients' compliance and overall treatment time of the radiation course is still unclear and needs further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Bergamaschi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Giulia Vincini
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy.
| | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Pepa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Ilaria Angelicone
- Radiotherapy Department, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Astone
- Division of Medical Oncology, Fatebenefratelli San Pietro Hospital, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Cristiana Bergamini
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Sergio Buonopane
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Mario Conte
- Fondazione Muto Onlus, Casavatore, Naples, Italy
| | - Nicola De Rosa
- Centro Aktis Diagnostica e Terapia, Marano, Naples, Italy
| | - Chiara Deantoni
- Radiotherapy Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita Salute S. Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Italo Dell'Oca
- Radiotherapy Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita Salute S. Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Nadia Di Muzio
- Radiotherapy Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita Salute S. Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Falchetto Osti
- Radiotherapy Department, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Manuela Federico
- Casa di cura Macchiarella, U.O. Radioterapia Oncologica, Palermo, Italy
| | | | - Ciro Franzese
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Gatti
- Radiotherapy Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Torino, Italy
| | - Antonietta Grillo
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico, Bari, Italy
| | | | - Roberto Manzo
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Luca Marmiroli
- U.O. Radioterapia, Ospedale Fatebenefratelli S. Giovanni Calibita, Isola Tiberina, 00186, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Federica Mazzuca
- Radiotherapy Department, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Matteo Muto
- Department of Onco-Hematological Diseases, U.O.C. Radiotherapy-Azienda Ospedaliera San Giuseppe Moscati-(AV), 83100, Avellino, Italy
| | - Roberto Pacelli
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University School of Medicine, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Annarita Perillo
- Centro Aktis Diagnostica e Terapia, Marano, Naples, Italy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, San Pio Hospital, Benevento, Italia
| | | | | | - Pietro Spadaro
- U.O. di Oncologia ed Ematologia, Casa di Cura Villa Salus, Messina, Italy
| | - Anna Viola
- Fondazione IOM, Viagrande, Catania, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Muto
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Daniela Alterio
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Aleman BMP, Ricardi U, van der Maazen RWM, Meijnders P, Beijert M, Boros A, Izar F, Janus CPM, Levis M, Martin V, Specht L, Corning C, Clementel E, Raemaekers JM, André MP, Federico M, Fortpied C, Girinsky T. A Quality Control Study on Involved Node Radiation Therapy in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Lymphoma Study Association/Fondazione Italiana Linfomi H10 Trial on Stages I and II Hodgkin Lymphoma: Lessons Learned. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:664-674. [PMID: 37179034 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Revised: 04/29/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Involved node radiation therapy (INRT) was introduced in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Lymphoma Study Association/Fondazione Italiana Linfomi H10 trial, a large multicenter trial in early-stage Hodgkin Lymphoma. The present study aimed to evaluate the quality of INRT in this trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS A retrospective, descriptive study was initiated to evaluate INRT in a representative sample encompassing approximately 10% of all irradiated patients in the H10 trial. Sampling was stratified by academic group, year of treatment, size of the treatment center, and treatment arm, and it was done proportional to the size of the strata. The sample was completed for all patients with known recurrences to enable future research on relapse patterns. Radiation therapy principle, target volume delineation and coverage, and applied technique and dose were evaluated using the EORTC Radiation Therapy Quality Assurance platform. Each case was reviewed by 2 reviewers and, in case of disagreement also by an adjudicator for a consensus evaluation. RESULTS Data were retrieved for 66 of 1294 irradiated patients (5.1%). Data collection and analysis were hampered more than anticipated by changes in archiving of diagnostic imaging and treatment planning systems during the running period of the trial. A review could be performed on 61 patients. The INRT principle was applied in 86.6%. Overall, 88.5% of cases were treated according to protocol. Unacceptable variations were predominately due to geographic misses of the target volume delineations. The rate of unacceptable variations decreased during trial recruitment. CONCLUSIONS The principle of INRT was applied in most of the reviewed patients. Almost 90% of the evaluated patients were treated according to the protocol. The present results should, however, be interpreted with caution because the number of patients evaluated was limited. Individual case reviews should be done in a prospective fashion in future trials. Radiation therapy Quality Assurance tailored to the clinical trial objectives is strongly recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berthe M P Aleman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | | | | | - Paul Meijnders
- Department of Radiotherapy, Iridium Network, Centre for Oncological Research of the University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Max Beijert
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Angela Boros
- Radiation Oncology Department, Center Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Benite, France
| | - Françoise Izar
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Cécile P M Janus
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mario Levis
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Valentine Martin
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Lena Specht
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Coreen Corning
- The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Enrico Clementel
- The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - John M Raemaekers
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, Netherlands
| | - Marc P André
- Department of Hematology, CHU UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - Massimo Federico
- CHIMOMO Department, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Catherine Fortpied
- The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Theodore Girinsky
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Destefanis N, Fiano V, Milani L, Vasapolli P, Fiorentino M, Giunchi F, Lianas L, Del Rio M, Frexia F, Pireddu L, Molinaro L, Cassoni P, Papotti MG, Gontero P, Calleris G, Oderda M, Ricardi U, Iorio GC, Fariselli P, Isaevska E, Akre O, Zelic R, Pettersson A, Zugna D, Richiardi L. Cohort profile: the Turin prostate cancer prognostication (TPCP) cohort. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1242639. [PMID: 37869094 PMCID: PMC10587560 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1242639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most frequent tumor among men in Europe and has both indolent and aggressive forms. There are several treatment options, the choice of which depends on multiple factors. To further improve current prognostication models, we established the Turin Prostate Cancer Prognostication (TPCP) cohort, an Italian retrospective biopsy cohort of patients with PCa and long-term follow-up. This work presents this new cohort with its main characteristics and the distributions of some of its core variables, along with its potential contributions to PCa research. Methods The TPCP cohort includes consecutive non-metastatic patients with first positive biopsy for PCa performed between 2008 and 2013 at the main hospital in Turin, Italy. The follow-up ended on December 31st 2021. The primary outcome is the occurrence of metastasis; death from PCa and overall mortality are the secondary outcomes. In addition to numerous clinical variables, the study's prognostic variables include histopathologic information assigned by a centralized uropathology review using a digital pathology software system specialized for the study of PCa, tumor DNA methylation in candidate genes, and features extracted from digitized slide images via Deep Neural Networks. Results The cohort includes 891 patients followed-up for a median time of 10 years. During this period, 97 patients had progression to metastatic disease and 301 died; of these, 56 died from PCa. In total, 65.3% of the cohort has a Gleason score less than or equal to 3 + 4, and 44.5% has a clinical stage cT1. Consistent with previous studies, age and clinical stage at diagnosis are important prognostic factors: the crude cumulative incidence of metastatic disease during the 14-years of follow-up increases from 9.1% among patients younger than 64 to 16.2% for patients in the age group of 75-84, and from 6.1% for cT1 stage to 27.9% in cT3 stage. Discussion This study stands to be an important resource for updating existing prognostic models for PCa on an Italian cohort. In addition, the integrated collection of multi-modal data will allow development and/or validation of new models including new histopathological, digital, and molecular markers, with the goal of better directing clinical decisions to manage patients with PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Destefanis
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Valentina Fiano
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Milani
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Vasapolli
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Michelangelo Fiorentino
- DIMEC Department of Medicine and Surgery, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesca Giunchi
- Department of Pathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Luca Lianas
- Visual and Data-intensive Computing, CRS4 (Center for Advanced Studies, Research and Development in Sardinia), Pula, Italy
| | - Mauro Del Rio
- Visual and Data-intensive Computing, CRS4 (Center for Advanced Studies, Research and Development in Sardinia), Pula, Italy
| | - Francesca Frexia
- Visual and Data-intensive Computing, CRS4 (Center for Advanced Studies, Research and Development in Sardinia), Pula, Italy
| | - Luca Pireddu
- Visual and Data-intensive Computing, CRS4 (Center for Advanced Studies, Research and Development in Sardinia), Pula, Italy
| | - Luca Molinaro
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Paola Cassoni
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Gontero
- Urology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Molinette Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Giorgio Calleris
- Urology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Molinette Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Oderda
- Urology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Molinette Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | | | | | - Piero Fariselli
- Computational Biomedicine Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Elena Isaevska
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Olof Akre
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Section of Urology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Renata Zelic
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet and Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Andreas Pettersson
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Daniela Zugna
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Richiardi
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Id Said B, Mutsaers A, Chen H, Husain ZA, Biswas T, Dagan R, Erler D, Foote M, Louie AV, Redmond K, Ricardi U, Sahgal A, Poon I. Outcomes for oligometastatic head and neck cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy: Results from an international multi-institutional consortium. Head Neck 2023; 45:2627-2637. [PMID: 37602655 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We report the results of an international multi-institutional cohort of oligometastatic (OMD) head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with SBRT. METHODS Patients with OMD HNC (≤5 metastases) treated with SBRT between 2008 and 2016 at six institutions were included. Treated metastasis control (TMC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by multivariable analysis (MVA). RESULTS Forty-two patients with 84 HNC oligometastases were analyzed. The TMC rate at 1 and 2 years were 80% and 66%, with a median time to recurrence of 10.1 months. The median PFS and OS were 4.7 and 23.3 months. MVA identified a PTV point maximum (BED)10 > 100 Gy as a predictor of improved TMC (HR = 0.31, p = 0.034), and a cumulative PTV > 48 cc as having worse PFS (HR = 2.99, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Favorable TMC and OS was observed in OMD HNCs treated with SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Badr Id Said
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Adam Mutsaers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hanbo Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zain A Husain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tithi Biswas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Roi Dagan
- University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Darby Erler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Alexander V Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kristin Redmond
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ian Poon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Levis M, Gastino A, De Giorgi G, Mantovani C, Bironzo P, Mangherini L, Ricci AA, Ricardi U, Cassoni P, Bertero L. Modern Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases from Lung Cancer: Current Trends and Future Perspectives Based on Integrated Translational Approaches. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4622. [PMID: 37760591 PMCID: PMC10526239 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Revised: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases (BMs) represent the most frequent metastatic event in the course of lung cancer patients, occurring in approximately 50% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and in up to 70% in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Thus far, many advances have been made in the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, allowing improvements in the prognosis of these patients. The modern approach relies on the integration of several factors, such as accurate histological and molecular profiling, comprehensive assessment of clinical parameters and precise definition of the extent of intracranial and extracranial disease involvement. The combination of these factors is pivotal to guide the multidisciplinary discussion and to offer the most appropriate treatment to these patients based on a personalized approach. Focal radiotherapy (RT), in all its modalities (radiosurgery (SRS), fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), adjuvant stereotactic radiotherapy (aSRT)), is the cornerstone of BM management, either alone or in combination with surgery and systemic therapies. We review the modern therapeutic strategies available to treat lung cancer patients with brain involvement. This includes an accurate review of the different technical solutions which can be exploited to provide a "state-of-art" focal RT and also a detailed description of the systemic agents available as effective alternatives to SRS/SRT when a targetable molecular driver is present. In addition to the validated treatment options, we also discuss the future perspective for focal RT, based on emerging clinical reports (e.g., SRS for patients with many BMs from NSCLC or SRS for BMs from SCLC), together with a presentation of innovative and promising findings in translational research and the combination of novel targeted agents with SRS/SRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Levis
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (M.L.); (A.G.); (G.D.G.); (C.M.); (U.R.)
| | - Alessio Gastino
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (M.L.); (A.G.); (G.D.G.); (C.M.); (U.R.)
| | - Greta De Giorgi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (M.L.); (A.G.); (G.D.G.); (C.M.); (U.R.)
| | - Cristina Mantovani
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (M.L.); (A.G.); (G.D.G.); (C.M.); (U.R.)
| | - Paolo Bironzo
- Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, 10043 Orbassano, Italy;
| | - Luca Mangherini
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (L.M.); (A.A.R.); (P.C.)
| | - Alessia Andrea Ricci
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (L.M.); (A.A.R.); (P.C.)
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (M.L.); (A.G.); (G.D.G.); (C.M.); (U.R.)
| | - Paola Cassoni
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (L.M.); (A.A.R.); (P.C.)
| | - Luca Bertero
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (L.M.); (A.A.R.); (P.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Iyengar P, All S, Berry MF, Boike TP, Bradfield L, Dingemans AMC, Feldman J, Gomez DR, Hesketh PJ, Jabbour SK, Jeter M, Josipovic M, Lievens Y, McDonald F, Perez BA, Ricardi U, Ruffini E, De Ruysscher D, Saeed H, Schneider BJ, Senan S, Widder J, Guckenberger M. Treatment of Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An ASTRO/ESTRO Clinical Practice Guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol 2023; 13:393-412. [PMID: 37294262 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This joint guideline by American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) and the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) was initiated to review evidence and provide recommendations regarding the use of local therapy in the management of extracranial oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Local therapy is defined as the comprehensive treatment of all known cancer-primary tumor, regional nodal metastases, and metastases-with definitive intent. METHODS ASTRO and ESTRO convened a task force to address 5 key questions focused on the use of local (radiation, surgery, other ablative methods) and systemic therapy in the management of oligometastatic NSCLC. The questions address clinical scenarios for using local therapy, sequencing and timing when integrating local with systemic therapies, radiation techniques critical for oligometastatic disease targeting and treatment delivery, and the role of local therapy for oligoprogression or recurrent disease. Recommendations were based on a systematic literature review and created using ASTRO guidelines methodology. RESULTS Based on the lack of significant randomized phase 3 trials, a patient-centered, multidisciplinary approach was strongly recommended for all decision-making regarding potential treatment. Integration of definitive local therapy was only relevant if technically feasible and clinically safe to all disease sites, defined as 5 or fewer distinct sites. Conditional recommendations were given for definitive local therapies in synchronous, metachronous, oligopersistent, and oligoprogressive conditions for extracranial disease. Radiation and surgery were the only primary definitive local therapy modalities recommended for use in the management of patients with oligometastatic disease, with indications provided for choosing one over the other. Sequencing recommendations were provided for systemic and local therapy integration. Finally, multiple recommendations were provided for the optimal technical use of hypofractionated radiation or stereotactic body radiation therapy as definitive local therapy, including dose and fractionation. CONCLUSIONS Presently, data regarding clinical benefits of local therapy on overall and other survival outcomes is still sparse for oligometastatic NSCLC. However, with rapidly evolving data being generated supporting local therapy in oligometastatic NSCLC, this guideline attempted to frame recommendations as a function of the quality of data available to make decisions in a multidisciplinary approach incorporating patient goals and tolerances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Puneeth Iyengar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern, Dallas, Texas.
| | - Sean All
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | - Mark F Berry
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Thomas P Boike
- Department of Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare/MHP Radiation Oncology, Troy, Michigan
| | - Lisa Bradfield
- American Society for Radiation Oncology, Arlington, Virginia
| | - Anne-Marie C Dingemans
- Department of Pulmonology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Daniel R Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Paul J Hesketh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts
| | - Salma K Jabbour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Melenda Jeter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Yolande Lievens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Fiona McDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Bradford A Perez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | | | - Enrico Ruffini
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Dirk De Ruysscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht and Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hina Saeed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baptist Health South Florida, Boca Raton, Florida
| | - Bryan J Schneider
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Suresh Senan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joachim Widder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cao Y, Chen H, Sahgal A, Erler D, Badellino S, Biswas T, Dagan R, Foote MC, Louie AV, Poon I, Ricardi U, Redmond KJ. The impact of local control on widespread progression and survival in oligometastasis-directed SBRT: Results from a large international database. Radiother Oncol 2023; 186:109769. [PMID: 37385379 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We investigated the impact of local control (LC) on widespread progression (WSP) and overall survival (OS) in patients treated to all extracranial oligometastases (OMs) at presentation to SBRT in this retrospective review across 6 international centers. MATERIALS/METHODS Relationships between LC status of SBRT-directed OMs and OS and WSP (>5 new active/untreated lesions) were explored using Cox and Fine-Gray regression models, adjusting for radioresistant histology and pre-SBRT systemic therapy receipt. The association between LC and dosimetric predictors was analyzed with competing risk regression using death as a competing risk and across a wide range of simulated α/βratios. RESULTS In total, 1700 OMs in 1033 patients were analyzed, with 25.2% NSCLC, 22.7% colorectal, 12.8% prostate, and 8.1% breast histology. Patients who failed locally in any SBRT-directed OM within 6 mo were at 3.6-fold higher risk of death and 2.7-fold higher risk of WSP compared to those who remained locally-controlled (p < 0.001). Similar associations existed for each duration of LC investigated through 3 yrs post-SBRT. There was no significant difference in risk of WSP or death between patients who failed in a subset of SBRT-treated lesions vs. patients who failed in all lesions. Minimum dose (Dmin) to the GTV/ITV was most predictive of LC when compared to prescription dose, PTV Dmin, and PTV Dmax. Sensitivity analysis for achieving 1-yr LC > 95% found thresholds of 41.2 Gy and 55.2 Gy in 5 fractions for smaller (< 27.7 cc) and larger radioresistant lesions, respectively. CONCLUSION This large multinational cohort suggests that the duration of LC following OM-directed SBRT strongly correlates with WSP and OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yilin Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hanbo Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Darby Erler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Tithi Biswas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Roi Dagan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Matthew C Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Alexander V Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ian Poon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Kristin J Redmond
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fiandra C, Rosati S, Arcadipane F, Dinapoli N, Fato M, Franco P, Gallio E, Scaffidi Gennarino D, Silvetti P, Zara S, Ricardi U, Balestra G. Active bone marrow segmentation based on computed tomography imaging in anal cancer patients: A machine-learning-based proof of concept. Phys Med 2023; 113:102657. [PMID: 37567068 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Different methods are available to identify haematopoietically active bone marrow (ActBM). However, their use can be challenging for radiotherapy routine treatments, since they require specific equipment and dedicated time. A machine learning (ML) approach, based on radiomic features as inputs to three different classifiers, was applied to computed tomography (CT) images to identify haematopoietically active bone marrow in anal cancer patients. METHODS A total of 40 patients was assigned to the construction set (training set + test set). Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (18FDG-PET) images were used to detect the active part of the pelvic bone marrow (ActPBM) and stored as ground-truth for three subregions: iliac, lower pelvis and lumbosacral bone marrow (ActIBM, ActLPBM, ActLSBM). Three parameters were used for the correspondence analyses between 18FDG-PET and ML classifiers: DICE index, Precision and Recall. RESULTS For the 40-patient cohort, median values [min; max] of the Dice index were 0.69 [0.20; 0.84], 0.76 [0.25; 0.89], and 0.36 [0.15; 0.67] for ActIBM, ActLSBM, and ActLPBM, respectively. The Precision/Recall (P/R) ratio median value for the ActLPBM structure was 0.59 [0.20; 1.84] (over segmentation), while for the other two subregions the P/R ratio median has values of 1.249 [0.43; 4.15] for ActIBM and 1.093 [0.24; 1.91] for ActLSBM (under segmentation). CONCLUSION A satisfactory degree of overlap compared to 18FDG-PET was found for 2 out of the 3 subregions within pelvic bones. Further optimization and generalization of the process is required before clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Fiandra
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
| | - S Rosati
- Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - F Arcadipane
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - N Dinapoli
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - M Fato
- Department of Informatics, Bioengineering, Robotics and System Engineering (DIBRIS), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - P Franco
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - E Gallio
- Medical Physics Unit, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - D Scaffidi Gennarino
- Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - P Silvetti
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - S Zara
- Tecnologie Avanzate, Torino, Italy
| | - U Ricardi
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - G Balestra
- Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Levis M, Ferrero S, Chiappella A, Bruno B, Ricardi U. Editorial: Implementation of novel drugs and modern radiotherapy in the treatment of lymphoma patients. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1273598. [PMID: 37664055 PMCID: PMC10470469 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1273598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Levis
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Simone Ferrero
- Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Hematology Division, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Annalisa Chiappella
- Division of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Benedetto Bruno
- Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Hematology Division, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
De Ornelas M, Iorio GC, Bossart E, Ricardi U, Seldon C, Dal Pra A, Butkus M. Bone marrow sparing in prostate cancer patients treated with Post-operative pelvic nodal radiotherapy - A proton versus photon comparison. Phys Med 2023; 112:102644. [PMID: 37487297 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Extending salvage radiotherapy to treat the pelvic lymph nodes (PLNRT) improves oncologic outcomes in prostate cancer (PCa). However, a larger treatment volume increases the extent of bone marrow (BM) exposure, which is associated with hematologic toxicity (HT). Given the potential long-term impact of BM dose in PCa, clinical studies on BM sparing (BMS) are warranted. Herein, we dosimetrically compared photon and proton plans for BMS. MATERIALS AND METHODS Treatment plans of 20 post-operative PCa patients treated with volumetric-modulated arc photon therapy (VMAT) PLNRT were retrospectively identified. Contours were added for the whole pelvis BM (WPBM) and BM sub-volumes: lumbar-sacral (LSBM), iliac (ILBM), and lower pelvis (LPBM). Three additional plans were created: VMAT_BMS, intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), and IMPT_BMS. Normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) for grade >3 hematologic toxicity (HT3+) were calculated for the WPBM volumes. RESULTS Compared to the original VMAT plan, mean doses to all BM sub-volumes were statistically significantly lower for VMAT_BMS, IMPT, and IMPT_BMS resulting in average NTCP percentages of 20.5 ± 5.9, 10.7 ± 4.2, 6.1 ± 2.0, and 2.5 ± 0.6, respectively. IMPT_BMS had significantly lower low dose metrics (V300cGy-V2000cGy) for WPBM and sub-volumes except for LPBM V2000cGy compared to VMAT_BMS and ILBM V20Gy compared to IMPT. In most cases, V4000cGy and V5000cGy within ILBM and LSBM were significantly higher for IMPT plans compared to VMAT plans. CONCLUSIONS BMS plans are achievable with VMAT and IMPT without compromising target coverage or OARs constraints. IMPT plans were overall better at reducing mean and NTCP for HT3+ as well as low dose volumes to BM. However, IMPT had larger high dose volumes within LSBM and ILBM. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the clinical implications of these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariluz De Ornelas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA.
| | | | - Elizabeth Bossart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, 10125 Torino, Italy
| | - Crystal Seldon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Alan Dal Pra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Michael Butkus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Engels B, De Paoli A, Delmastro E, Munoz F, Vagge S, Norkus D, Everaert H, Tabaro G, Gariboldi E, Ricardi U, Borsatti E, Gabriele P, Innocente R, Palazzari E, Dubaere E, Mahé MA, Van Laere S, Gevaert T, De Ridder M. Preoperative Radiotherapy with a Simultaneous Integrated Boost Compared to Chemoradiotherapy for cT3-4 Rectal Cancer: Long-Term Results of a Multicenter Randomized Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3869. [PMID: 37568685 PMCID: PMC10416952 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard treatment for T3-4 rectal cancer. Here, we compared image-guided and intensity-modulated RT (IG-IMRT) with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) (instead of concomitant chemotherapy) versus CRT in a multi-centric randomized trial. METHODS cT3-4 rectal cancer patients were randomly assigned to receive preoperative IG-IMRT 46 Gy/23 fractions plus capecitabine 825 mg/m² twice daily (CRT arm) or IG-IMRT 46 Gy/23 fractions with an SIB to the rectal tumor up to a total dose of 55.2 Gy (RTSIB arm). RESULTS A total of 174 patients were randomly assigned between April 2010 and May 2014. Grade 3 acute toxicities were 6% and 4% in the CRT and RTSIB arms, respectively. The mean fractional change in SUVmax at 5 weeks after completion of preoperative RT were -55.8% (±24.0%) and -52.9% (±21.6%) for patients in the CRT arm and RTSIB arm, respectively (p = 0.43). The pathologic complete response rate was 24% with CRT compared to 14% with RTSIB. There were no differences in 5-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) or local control (LC). CONCLUSIONS The preoperative RTSIB approach was not inferior to CRT in terms of metabolic response, toxicity, OS, PFS and LC, and could be considered an available option for patients unfit for fluorouracil-based CRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedikt Engels
- Department of Radiotherapy, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Antonino De Paoli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico (CRO)-IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy
| | - Elena Delmastro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCC Candiolo, 10060 Candiolo, Italy
| | - Fernando Munoz
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy
| | - Stefano Vagge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS San Martino-IST Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Darius Norkus
- Department of Radiotherapy, National Cancer Institute, 08406 Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Hendrik Everaert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gianna Tabaro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico (CRO)-IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy
| | | | - Umberto Ricardi
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy
| | - Eugenio Borsatti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico (CRO)-IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy
| | - Pietro Gabriele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCC Candiolo, 10060 Candiolo, Italy
| | - Roberto Innocente
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico (CRO)-IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy
| | - Elisa Palazzari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico (CRO)-IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy
| | - Emilie Dubaere
- Department of Radiotherapy, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marc-André Mahé
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, Nantes, 44800 Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Sven Van Laere
- Department of Radiotherapy, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Thierry Gevaert
- Department of Radiotherapy, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mark De Ridder
- Department of Radiotherapy, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rimini M, Franco P, Bertolini F, Berardino DB, Giulia ZM, Stefano V, Andrikou K, Arcadipane F, Napolitano M, Buno LV, Alessandra GM, Olivero F, Ferreri F, Ricardi U, Cascinu S, Casadei-Gardini A. The Prognostic Role of Baseline Eosinophils in HPV-Related Cancers: a Multi-institutional Analysis of Anal SCC and OPC Patients Treated with Radical CT-RT. J Gastrointest Cancer 2023; 54:662-671. [PMID: 35915202 PMCID: PMC9342937 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-022-00850-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) are rare tumors associated with HPV infection. Bioumoral predictors of response to chemoradiation (CT-RT) are lacking in these settings. With the aim to find new biomarkers, we investigated the role of eosinophils in both HPV-positive anal SCC and HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). METHODS We retrieved clinical and laboratory data of patients with HPV-positive anal SCC treated with CT-RT in 5 institutions, and patients with locally advanced OPC SCC treated with CT-RT in 2 institutions. We examined the association between baseline eosinophil count (the best cutoff has been evaluated by ROC curve analysis: 100 × 10^9/L) and disease-free survival (DFS). Unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios by baseline characteristics were calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS Three hundred four patients with HPV-positive anal SCCs and 168 patients with OPCs (122 HPV-positive, 46 HPV-negative diseases) were analyzed. In anal SCC, low eosinophil count (< 100 × 10^9/L) correlates to a better DFS (HR = 0.59; p = 0.0392); likewise, in HPV-positive OPC, low eosinophil count correlates to a better DFS (HR = 0.50; p = 0.0428). In HPV-negative OPC, low eosinophil count confers worse DFS compared to high eosinophil count (HR = 3.53; p = 0.0098). After adjustment for age and sex, eosinophils were confirmed to be independent prognostic factors for DFS (HR = 4.55; p = 0.0139). CONCLUSION Eosinophil count could be used as a prognostic factor in anal HPV-positive SCC. The worse prognosis showed in HPV-positive patients with high eosinophil count is likely to derive from an unfavorable interaction between the HPV-induced immunomodulation and eosinophils, which may hamper the curative effect of RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margherita Rimini
- Oncologic Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Hospital, 20019, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierfrancesco Franco
- Department of Oncology - Radiation Oncology, University of Turin School of Medicine, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.
| | - Federica Bertolini
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Division of Oncology, University Hospital Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - De Bari Berardino
- Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon, 25000, Besançon cedex, France
- Radiation Oncology, Réseau Hospitalier Neuchâtelois, CH-2300, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland
| | - Zampino Maria Giulia
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Vegge Stefano
- Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Kalliopi Andrikou
- Oncologic Department, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura Dei Tumori, IRCCS, Meldola (Forlì), Italy
| | - Francesca Arcadipane
- Department of Oncology - Radiation Oncology, University of Turin School of Medicine, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Martina Napolitano
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Division of Oncology, University Hospital Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Lavajo Vieira Buno
- Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon, 25000, Besançon cedex, France
| | | | - Francesco Olivero
- Department of Oncology - Radiation Oncology, University of Turin School of Medicine, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Filippo Ferreri
- Department of Oncology - Radiation Oncology, University of Turin School of Medicine, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Department of Oncology - Radiation Oncology, University of Turin School of Medicine, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Stefano Cascinu
- Oncologic Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Hospital, 20019, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Casadei-Gardini
- Oncologic Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Hospital, 20019, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gallio E, Sardo A, Badellino S, Mantovani C, Levis M, Fiandra C, Guarneri A, Arcadipane F, Richetto V, Ricardi U, Giglioli FR. Helical tomotherapy and two types of volumetric modulated arc therapy: dosimetric and clinical comparison for several cancer sites. Radiol Phys Technol 2023; 16:272-283. [PMID: 37084071 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-023-00716-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
Radiotherapy accelerators have undergone continuous technological developments. We investigated the differences between Radixact™ and VMAT treatment plans. Sixty patients were included in this study. Dosimetric comparison between the Radixact™ and VMAT plans was performed for six cancer sites: whole-brain, head and neck, lymphoma, lung, prostate, and rectum. The VMAT plans were generated with two Elekta linear accelerators (Synergy® and Versa HD™). The planning target volume (PTV) coverage, organs-at-risk dose constraints, and four dosimetric indexes were considered. The deliverability of the plans was assessed using quality assurance (gamma index evaluation) measurements; clinical judgment was included in the assessment. The mean AAPM TG218 (3%-2 mm, global normalization) gamma index values were 99.4%, 97.8%, and 96.6% for Radixact™, Versa HD™, and Synergy®, respectively. Radixact™ performed better than Versa HD™ in terms of dosimetric indexes, hippocampi D100%, spinal cord Dmax, rectum V38.4 Gy, bladder V30 Gy, and V40 Gy. Versa HD™ saved more of the (lungs-PTV) V5 Gy and (lungs-PTV) Dmean, heart Dmean, breasts V4 Gy, and bowel V45 Gy. Regarding Synergy®, the head and neck Radixact™ plan saved more of the parotid gland, oral cavity, and supraglottic larynx. From a clinical point of view, for the head and neck, prostate, and rectal sites, the Radixact™ and Versa HD™ plans were similar; Radixact™ plans were preferable for the head and neck and rectum to Synergy® plans. The quality of linac plans has improved, and differences with tomotherapy have decreased. However, tomotherapy continues to be an essential add-on in multi-machine departments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Gallio
- Medical Physics Unit, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza, Corso Bramante 88/90, 10126, Turin, TO, Italy.
| | - Anna Sardo
- Medical Physics Unit, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza, Corso Bramante 88/90, 10126, Turin, TO, Italy
| | - Serena Badellino
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Via Santena 5 Bis, 10126, Turin, TO, Italy
| | - Cristina Mantovani
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Via Santena 5 Bis, 10126, Turin, TO, Italy
| | - Mario Levis
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Via Santena 5 Bis, 10126, Turin, TO, Italy
| | - Christian Fiandra
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Via Santena 5 Bis, 10126, Turin, TO, Italy
| | - Alessia Guarneri
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Via Santena 5 Bis, 10126, Turin, TO, Italy
| | - Francesca Arcadipane
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Via Santena 5 Bis, 10126, Turin, TO, Italy
| | - Veronica Richetto
- Medical Physics Unit, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza, Corso Bramante 88/90, 10126, Turin, TO, Italy
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Via Santena 5 Bis, 10126, Turin, TO, Italy
| | - Francesca Romana Giglioli
- Medical Physics Unit, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza, Corso Bramante 88/90, 10126, Turin, TO, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Niyazi M, Andratschke N, Bendszus M, Chalmers AJ, Erridge SC, Galldiks N, Lagerwaard FJ, Navarria P, Munck Af Rosenschöld P, Ricardi U, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Belka C, Minniti G. ESTRO-EANO guideline on target delineation and radiotherapy details for glioblastoma. Radiother Oncol 2023; 184:109663. [PMID: 37059335 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Target delineation in glioblastoma is still a matter of extensive research and debate. This guideline aims to update the existing joint European consensus on delineation of the clinical target volume (CTV) in adult glioblastoma patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS The ESTRO Guidelines Committee identified 14 European experts in close interaction with the ESTRO clinical committee and EANO who discussed and analysed the body of evidence concerning contemporary glioblastoma target delineation, then took part in a two-step modified Delphi process to address open questions. RESULTS Several key issues were identified and are discussed including i) pre-treatment steps and immobilisation, ii) target delineation and the use of standard and novel imaging techniques, and iii) technical aspects of treatment including planning techniques and fractionation. Based on the EORTC recommendation focusing on the resection cavity and residual enhancing regions on T1-sequences with the addition of a reduced 15 mm margin, special situations are presented with corresponding potential adaptations depending on the specific clinical situation. CONCLUSIONS The EORTC consensus recommends a single clinical target volume definition based on postoperative contrast-enhanced T1 abnormalities, using isotropic margins without the need to cone down. A PTV margin based on the individual mask system and IGRT procedures available is advised; this should usually be no greater than 3 mm when using IGRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, Munich, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany.
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Martin Bendszus
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Sara C Erridge
- Edinburgh Centre for Neuro-Oncology, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, EH4 1EU, UK
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany; Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Frank J Lagerwaard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pierina Navarria
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Per Munck Af Rosenschöld
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, and Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | | | | | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, Munich, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Dept. of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gotti M, Sciarra R, Pulsoni A, Merli F, Luminari S, Zerbi C, Trentin L, Re A, Rusconi C, Viviani S, Rossi A, Cocito F, Botto B, Meli E, Pinto A, Dogliotti I, Gini G, Puccini B, Ricci F, Nassi L, Fabbri A, Liberati AM, Merli M, Filippi AR, Bonfichi M, Zoboli V, Tartaglia G, Annechini G, D’Elia GM, Del Giudice I, Alvarez I, Visentin A, Pravato S, Dalceggio D, Pagani C, Ferrari S, Cristinelli C, Lazic T, Ferretti VV, Ricardi U, Arcaini L. Role of Rituximab Addition to First-line Chemotherapy Regimens in Nodular Lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Study by Fondazione Italiana Linfomi. Hemasphere 2023; 7:e837. [PMID: 37034003 PMCID: PMC10079338 DOI: 10.1097/hs9.0000000000000837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 04/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) is a rare entity whose neoplastic cells retain a B-cell phenotype with expression of CD20. Radiotherapy is recommended for favorable stage IA disease while for other stages guidelines suggest therapeutic strategies similar to those used for classic HL. The role of rituximab, although quite widespread, is not completely elucidated. We retrospectively analyzed baseline characteristics of 308 consecutive patients with NLPHL diagnosed in 19 Italian centers from 2000 to 2018. With a median follow-up of 8.4 years (interquartile range: 4.5–12.4) for treated patients, median overall survival (OS) was not reached and estimated 5-year OS was 97.8% and 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 84.5%. Five-year cumulative incidence of histological transformation was 1.4%, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.5%-3.8%. After adjusting for lymphocyte count, splenic involvement, bulky disease and B symptoms (fever, drenching night sweats, unintentional loss >10% of body weight within the preceding 6 months), patients with stage II or more showed superior PFS with immunochemotherapy in comparison to chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio = 0.4, 95% CI, 0.2-0.8; P = 0.015). Our data suggest an advantage of the use of rituximab combined with chemotherapy ± radiotherapy in the treatment of stage II–III–IV NLPHL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Gotti
- Division of Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Roberta Sciarra
- Division of Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Italy
| | - Alessandro Pulsoni
- Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Merli
- Division of Hematology, Azienda USL-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Stefano Luminari
- Division of Hematology, Azienda USL-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, Italy
- Surgical, Medical and Dental Department of Morphological Sciences related to Transplant, Oncology and Regenerative Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Caterina Zerbi
- Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Italy
| | - Livio Trentin
- Hematology Unit, Department of Medicine - DIMED, University of Padova, Italy
| | - Alessandro Re
- Division of Hematology, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Chiara Rusconi
- Division of Hematology and Blood Marrow Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Simonetta Viviani
- Division of Hematology and Blood Marrow Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Rossi
- Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Federica Cocito
- Division of Hematology, ASST Monza, Ospedale S. Gerardo, Monza, Italy
| | - Barbara Botto
- Division of Hematology, Azienda Ospedale Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy
| | - Erika Meli
- Division of Hematology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milano, Italy
| | - Antonello Pinto
- Hematology-Oncology and Stem-Cell Transplantation Unit, Department of Hematology and Developmental Therapeutics, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione G. Pascale, IRCCS, Napoli, Italy
| | - Irene Dogliotti
- Division of Hematology, Department of Molecular Biotechnologies and Health Sciences, University of Torino, Italy
| | - Guido Gini
- Department of Hematology, Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Francesca Ricci
- Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milano, Italy
| | - Luca Nassi
- Hematology, Department of Translational Medicine, AOU Maggiore della Carità and University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
| | - Alberto Fabbri
- Division of Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero- Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy
| | - Anna Marina Liberati
- Division of Hematology, Azienda Ospedalaliera S. Maria di terni – Università degli Studi di Perugia, Italy
| | - Michele Merli
- Division of Hematology, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, Varese, Italy
| | - Andrea Riccardo Filippi
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Italy
| | - Maurizio Bonfichi
- Division of Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Valentina Zoboli
- Division of Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Germana Tartaglia
- Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgia Annechini
- Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
| | - Gianna Maria D’Elia
- Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
| | - Ilaria Del Giudice
- Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
| | - Isabel Alvarez
- Division of Hematology, Azienda USL-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Andrea Visentin
- Hematology Unit, Department of Medicine - DIMED, University of Padova, Italy
| | - Stefano Pravato
- Hematology Unit, Department of Medicine - DIMED, University of Padova, Italy
| | | | - Chiara Pagani
- Division of Hematology, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Silvia Ferrari
- Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | | | - Tanja Lazic
- Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Italy
| | - Virginia Valeria Ferretti
- Service of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Italy
| | - Luca Arcaini
- Division of Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Fiandra C, Cattani F, Leonardi M, Comi S, Zara S, Rossi L, Jereczek-Fossa B, Fariselli P, Ricardi U, Heijmen B. Machine learning for predicting clinician approval of treatment plans for left-sided whole breast radiotherapy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
|
24
|
Kroeze SGC, Pavic M, Stellamans K, Lievens Y, Becherini C, Scorsetti M, Alongi F, Ricardi U, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Westhoff P, But-Hadzic J, Widder J, Geets X, Bral S, Lambrecht M, Billiet C, Sirak I, Ramella S, Giovanni Battista I, Benavente S, Zapatero A, Romero F, Zilli T, Khanfir K, Hemmatazad H, de Bari B, Klass DN, Adnan S, Peulen H, Salinas Ramos J, Strijbos M, Popat S, Ost P, Guckenberger M. Metastases-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy in combination with targeted therapy or immunotherapy: systematic review and consensus recommendations by the EORTC-ESTRO OligoCare consortium. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:e121-e132. [PMID: 36858728 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00752-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Revised: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with metastatic cancer, especially when characterised by a low tumour burden (ie, oligometastatic disease), receiving targeted therapy or immunotherapy has become a frequently practised and guideline-supported treatment strategy. Despite the increasing use in routine clinical practice, there is little information on the safety of combining SBRT with modern targeted therapy or immunotherapy and a paucity of high-level evidence to guide clinical management. A systematic literature review was performed to identify the toxicity profiles of combined metastases-directed SBRT and targeted therapy or immunotherapy. These results served as the basis for an international Delphi consensus process among 28 interdisciplinary experts who are members of the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) OligoCare consortium. Consensus was sought about risk mitigation strategies of metastases-directed SBRT combined with targeted therapy or immunotherapy; a potential need for and length of interruption to targeted therapy or immunotherapy around SBRT delivery; and potential adaptations of radiation dose and fractionation. Results of this systematic review and consensus process compile the best available evidence for safe combination of metastases-directed SBRT and targeted therapy or immunotherapy for patients with metastatic or oligometastatic cancer and aim to guide today's clinical practice and the design of future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie G C Kroeze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Centre for Radiation Oncology KSA-KSB, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Matea Pavic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Karin Stellamans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, AZ Groeninge Campus Kennedylaan, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Yolande Lievens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| | - Carlotta Becherini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Paulien Westhoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Jasna But-Hadzic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Joachim Widder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Xavier Geets
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, MIRO-IREC Lab, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Samuel Bral
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Maarten Lambrecht
- Department of Radiotherapy-Oncology, Leuvens Kanker Instituut, Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Igor Sirak
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| | - Sara Ramella
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Sergi Benavente
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Almudena Zapatero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Health Research Institute, Madrid, Spain
| | - Fabiola Romero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Kaouthar Khanfir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Valais, Sion, Switzerland
| | - Hossein Hemmatazad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Berardino de Bari
- Service Radio-Oncologie Neuchåtel Hôpital Network, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland
| | - Desiree N Klass
- Institute of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Shaukat Adnan
- Department of Oncology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, UK
| | - Heike Peulen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Juan Salinas Ramos
- Radiation Oncology Department, Santa Lucia General University Hospital, Cartagena, Spain
| | - Michiel Strijbos
- Department of Oncology, GasthuisZusters Antwerpen, Antwerpen, Belgium
| | | | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zucca E, Arcaini L, Buske C, Johnson PW, Ponzoni M, Raderer M, Ricardi U, Salar A, Stamatopoulos K, Thieblemont C, Wotherspoon A, Ladetto M. Corrigendum to "Marginal zone lymphomas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up": [Annals of Oncology 31 (2020) 17-29]. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:325. [PMID: 36529567 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- E Zucca
- Division of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona; Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern; Institute of Oncology Research, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - L Arcaini
- Division of Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia; Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - C Buske
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - P W Johnson
- Cancer Research UK Centre, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - M Ponzoni
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University and Pathology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - M Raderer
- Internal Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - U Ricardi
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - A Salar
- Department of Hematology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - K Stamatopoulos
- Institute of Applied Biosciences, CERTH, the Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - C Thieblemont
- Department of Hematology, APHP-Saint-Louis Hospital, University Paris-Diderot, Paris, France
| | - A Wotherspoon
- Department of Histopathology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - M Ladetto
- Division of Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliera SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Levis M, Campbell BA, Matrone F, Grapulin L, Di Russo A, Buglione M, Iamundo De Cumis I, Simontacchi G, Ciammella P, Magli A, Pascale G, Meregalli S, MacManus M, Fanetti G, De Felice F, Furfaro G, Ciccone G, Ricardi U. Peritransplant Radiation Therapy in Patients With Refractory or Relapsed Hodgkin Lymphoma Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplant: Long-Term Results of a Retrospective Study of the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023:S0360-3016(23)00165-7. [PMID: 36822373 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.02.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In this multicenter collaboration, we report real-world data in the largest published series of long-term outcomes for patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) treated with peritransplant radiation therapy (pt-RT) and high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). METHODS AND MATERIALS We conducted a retrospective analysis including data from 12 institutions. Eligibility required histologic diagnosis of HL, receipt of ASCT plus pt-RT between 2004 and 2014 for r/r HL, and age ≥18 years at the time of ASCT. All patients received salvage chemotherapy for maximum debulking before ASCT. Metabolic responses were scored according to the Lugano Classification. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards were calculated to estimate the effect of covariates on patients' outcome. RESULTS One hundred thirty-one patients were eligible: 68 were male (52%), and median age at ASCT was 32 years (range, 18-70). At the time of diagnosis with r/r HL, 92 patients (70%) had limited (stage I-II) disease, and 10 patients (8%) had bulky disease. Pt-RT was given pre-ASCT in 32 patients (24%) and post-ASCT in 99 (76%); median prescribed dose was 30.6 Gy (range, 20-44 Gy). With median follow-up of 60 months, 3- and 5-year OS were 84% and 77%, while 3- and 5-year progression-free survival were 75% and 72%, respectively. On univariate and multivariate analysis, advanced stage at relapse (hazard ratio [HR], 2.18; P = .04), irradiation of >3 sites (HR, 3.69; P = .01), and incomplete metabolic response after salvage chemotherapy (HR, 2.24; P = .01) had a negative effect on OS. The sequencing of pt-RT (pre- vs post-ASCT) did not affect outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Overall, the addition of pt-RT to ASCT for patients with r/r HL is associated with very good outcomes. Limited relapsed disease with ≤3 sites involved and achievement of complete metabolic response after salvage chemotherapy were predictive of more favorable prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Levis
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
| | - Belinda A Campbell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Clinical Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Fabio Matrone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (CRO-IRCCS), Aviano, Italy
| | - Lavinia Grapulin
- Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Di Russo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Michela Buglione
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University and Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Ilenia Iamundo De Cumis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Hospital A. Businco, ARNAS G. Brotzu, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Gabriele Simontacchi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy
| | - Patrizia Ciammella
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (USL-IRCCS) di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Alessandro Magli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Giuliana Pascale
- Radiotherapy Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Sofia Meregalli
- Radiotherapy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo, Monza, Italy
| | - Michael MacManus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Giuseppe Fanetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (CRO-IRCCS), Aviano, Italy
| | - Francesca De Felice
- Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Giovannino Ciccone
- Clinical Epidemiology, Città della Salute e della Scienza and Centro Prevenzione Oncologica (CPO) Piemonte, Torino, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Di Muzio J, Chiofalo V, Grossi C, Olivero F, La Sala S, Mussano A, Ricardi U. Management of Breast Cancer during COVID-19 Pandemic: Trends of the Intervals to Radiotherapy in a Single Center Cohort. CLIN EXP OBSTET GYN 2022. [DOI: 10.31083/j.ceog4911253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
28
|
Fiandra C, Cattani F, Leonardi M, Comi S, Zara S, Rossi L, Jereczek-Fossa B, Ricardi U, Heijmen B. Machine Learning to Predict the Quality of a Left-Sided Whole Breast Radiotherapy Treatment Plan. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.2243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
29
|
Peng J, Erler D, Chen H, Dagan R, Redmond K, Foote M, Badellino S, Biswas T, Louie A, Ricardi U, Sahgal A, Poon I. Outcomes of Extracranial Oligorecurrence after Prior Metastases Directed Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Disease. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.1646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
|
30
|
Patel M, Meiyappan K, Noy M, Reis I, Eade T, Ricardi U, Iorio G, Abramowitz M, Bossart E, Pra AD. Dose to the Bladder Trigone and Acute Urinary Toxicity after Prostate SBRT in a Randomized Phase 3 Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.1206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
|
31
|
Chiofalo V, Di Muzio J, Grossi C, Olivero F, Peruzzo A, Madon E, Mussano A, Ricardi U. Radiotherapy Management of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer during the COVID-19 Era: A Single Centre Report on Treatment Approach, Brachytherapy Fractionation and Timing. CLIN EXP OBSTET GYN 2022. [DOI: 10.31083/j.ceog4911240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
|
32
|
Serafini A, Ruggeri V, Inchingolo R, Gatti M, Guarneri A, Maino C, Ippolito D, Grazioli L, Ricardi U, Faletti R. Liver magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of response to treatment after stereotactic body radiation therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Hepatol 2022; 14:1790-1803. [PMID: 36185716 PMCID: PMC9521449 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i9.1790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Revised: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is increasingly used, its application has not yet been regulated by the main international guidelines, leaving the decision to multidisciplinary teams.
AIM To assess magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with SBRT, highlighting the efficacy of the treatment and the main aspects of the lesion before and after the procedure.
METHODS As part of a retrospective study, 49 patients who underwent SBRT for HCC between January 2013 and November 2019 were recruited. Each patient underwent a pre-treatment MRI examination with a hepatospecific contrast agent and a similar follow-up examination within 6 mo of therapy. In addition, 22 patients underwent a second follow-up examination after the first 6 mo. The following characteristics were analysed: Features analysed compared to pre-treatment MRI examination, presence or absence of infield and outfield progression, ring-like enhancement, signal hyperintensity in T2-weighted sequences in the perilesional parenchyma, capsular retraction, and "band" signal hypointensity in T1-weighted gradient echo fat saturated sequences obtained during hepatobiliary excretion.
RESULTS Signal hyperintensity in the T2-weighted sequences showed a statistically significant reduction in the number of lesions at the post-SBRT first control (P = 0.0006). Signal hyperintensity in diffusion-weighted imaging-weighted sequences was decreased at MRI first control (P < 0.0001). A statistically significant increase of apparent diffusion coefficient values from a median of 1.01 to 1.38 at the first post-control was found (P < 0.0001). Capsular retraction was increased at the late evaluation (P = 0.006). Band-like signal hypointensity in the hepatobiliary phase was present in 94% at the late control (P = 0.006). The study of the risk of outfield progression vs infield progression revealed a hazard ratio of 9.
CONCLUSION The efficacy of SBRT should be evaluated not in the first 6 mo, but at least 9 mo post-SBRT, when infield progression persists at very low rates while the risk of outfield progression increases significantly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Valeria Ruggeri
- Department of Radiology, University of Brescia, Brescia 25123, Italy
| | - Riccardo Inchingolo
- Interventional Radiology Unit, Miulli Hospital, Acquaviva Delle Fonti 70124, Italy
| | - Marco Gatti
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin 10126, Italy
| | - Alessia Guarneri
- Department of Oncology-Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Turin 10126, Italy
| | - Cesare Maino
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza 20900, Italy
| | - Davide Ippolito
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza 20900, Italy
| | - Luigi Grazioli
- Department of Radiology, Spedali Civili, University of Brescia, Brescia 25023, Italy
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Department of Oncology-Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Turin 10126, Italy
| | - Riccardo Faletti
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin 10126, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Levis M, Dusi V, Magnano M, Cerrato M, Gallio E, Depaoli A, Ferraris F, De Ferrari GM, Ricardi U, Anselmino M. A case report of long-term successful stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation in a cardiac contractility modulation device carrier with giant left atrium, including a detailed dosimetric analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:934686. [PMID: 36072883 PMCID: PMC9441661 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.934686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Catheter ablation (CA) is the current standard of care for patients suffering drug-refractory monomorphic ventricular tachycardias (MMVTs). Yet, despite significant technological improvements, recurrences remain common, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) is increasingly being adopted to overcome the limitations of conventional CA, but its safety and efficacy are still under evaluation. Case presentation We hereby present the case of a 73-year-old patient implanted with a mitral valve prosthesis, a cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator, and a cardiac contractility modulation device, who was successfully treated with STAR for recurrent drug and CA-resistant MMVT in the setting of advanced heart failure and a giant left atrium. We report a 2-year follow-up and a detailed dosimetric analysis. Conclusion Our case report supports the early as well as the long-term efficacy of 25 Gy single-session STAR. Despite the concomitant severe heart failure, with an overall heart minus planned target volume mean dosage below 5 Gy, no major detrimental cardiac side effects were detected. To the best of our knowledge, our dosimetric analysis is the most accurate reported so far in the setting of STAR, particularly for what concerns cardiac substructures and coronary arteries. A shared dosimetric planning among centers performing STAR will be crucial in the next future to fully disclose its safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Levis
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Veronica Dusi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medical Sciences, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Massimo Magnano
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medical Sciences, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Marzia Cerrato
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Elena Gallio
- Medical Physics Unit, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Alessandro Depaoli
- Department of Radiology, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Federico Ferraris
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medical Sciences, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Gaetano Maria De Ferrari
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medical Sciences, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
- *Correspondence: Gaetano Maria De Ferrari
| | | | - Matteo Anselmino
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medical Sciences, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Pavlidis N, Madry R, Peeters M, Sandrucci S, Markowska J, Peccatori F, Costa A, Eriksen JG, Ricardi U, Poetter R, Schrijvers D, Vermorken JB. ESO-ESSO-ESTRO Multidisciplinary Course in Oncology for Medical Students: 4 Years of Experience (2016-2019). J Cancer Educ 2022; 37:1239-1244. [PMID: 33387267 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-020-01947-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
The ESO-ESSO-ESTRO Multidisciplinary Course in Oncology is intended to fill the gap of the undergraduate fragmented oncology education, to provide insight into all theoretical and practical aspects of oncology, and to encourage future professional choices towards an oncology discipline. Students are exposed to (a) preclinical cancer topics; (b) natural history of the disease; (c) laboratory diagnostic tests; (d) medical, radiation, surgical, and palliative treatment; and (e) direct or through multidisciplinary patients' approach. Students are obliged to attend (i) all theoretical lectures, (ii) clinical case presentations, (iii) laboratories and ward visits, and (iv) to prepare and present a specific project under supervision. Participation is limited to 24 medical students who are selected through a competitive application process. Between 2016 and 2019, 96 students from 29 countries have attended. Data analysis derived from a given questionnaire demonstrates that most of the participants have declared that (1) they have achieved their expectations and objectives, (2) they have highly rated both clinical and non-clinical teaching oncological topics, and (3) they have been stimulated in developing a professional career in the field of oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Pavlidis
- Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
- European School of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
| | - Radoslaw Madry
- Medical University K. Marcinkowski and Clinical Hospital of the Transfiguration, Poznan, Poland
| | - Marc Peeters
- Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
| | | | - Janina Markowska
- Department of Oncology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| | - Fedro Peccatori
- European School of Oncology, Milan, Italy
- Fertility and Procreation Unit, Gynecologic Oncology Programme, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Jesper Grau Eriksen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Richard Poetter
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Gatti M, Maino C, Darvizeh F, Serafini A, Tricarico E, Guarneri A, Inchingolo R, Ippolito D, Ricardi U, Fonio P, Faletti R. Role of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma after locoregional treatment. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28:3116-3131. [PMID: 36051340 PMCID: PMC9331537 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i26.3116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Revised: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Locoregional treatments, as alternatives to surgery, play a key role in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables a multiparametric assessment, going beyond the traditional dynamic computed tomography approach. Moreover, the use of hepatobiliary agents can improve diagnostic accuracy and are becoming important in the diagnosis and follow-up of HCC. However, the main challenge is to quickly identify classical responses to loco-regional treatments in order to determine the most suitable management strategy for each patient. The aim of this review is to provide a summary of the most common and uncommon liver MRI findings in patients who underwent loco-regional treatments for HCC, with a special focus on ablative therapies (radiofrequency, microwaves and cryoablation), trans-arterial chemoembolization, trans-arterial radio-embolization and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy techniques, considering the usefulness of gadoxetate disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA) contrast agent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Gatti
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin 10126, Italy
| | - Cesare Maino
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza 20900, Italy
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Ospedale San Gerardo, Monza 20900, Italy
| | - Fatemeh Darvizeh
- School of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan 20121, Italy
| | | | - Eleonora Tricarico
- Department of Radiology, "F. Perinei" Hospital, Altamura (BA) 70022, Italy
| | | | - Riccardo Inchingolo
- Interventional Radiology Unit, “F. Miulli” Regional General Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti (BA) 70021, Italy
| | - Davide Ippolito
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza 20900, Italy
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Ospedale San Gerardo, Monza 20900, Italy
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin 10126, Italy
| | - Paolo Fonio
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin 10126, Italy
| | - Riccardo Faletti
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin 10126, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Chen H, Badellino S, Biswas T, Dagan R, Erler D, Foote M, Poon I, Redmond KJ, Ricardi U, Sahgal A, Louie AV. Conditional Survival of Extracranial Oligometastatic Patients Treated with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT): An International Consortium Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 114:902-909. [PMID: 35753554 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.06.073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prolonged survivorship is increasingly observed in patients with oligometastases (OM) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). The purpose of this study was to study the conditional survival of OM patients, which can provide more detailed prognostic information over time by considering time already survived. METHODS A multi-institutional database consisting of 1,033 patients with OM (≤ 5 metastases) treated with SBRT between 2006 and 2017 was analyzed. Conditional overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in 3 years were obtained at multiple time points for all patients as well as by primary cancer type. Cox regression was used to determine trends in conditional OS/PFS. Changes in the predictors of OS and PFS over time were also determined by multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS Median follow-up was 24 months (0.3-105 months). Three-year OS and PFS at baseline were 56.7% and 23.2%, respectively. OS in 3 years conditional on having survived for 3, 6, 12, and 24 months did not significantly change over time (56.7%, 55.4%, 55.8% and 50.6%, respectively; p = 0.60). In contrast, PFS probability in 3 years conditional on having survived progression-free for 3, 6, 12 and 24 months significant increased over time (23.6%, 27.3%, 35.1% and 48.8%, respectively; p < 0.001). When stratified by primary site, conditional PFS significantly increased over time for patients with colorectal, breast and kidney cancer patients. Conditional OS remained stable for non-small cell lung cancer and kidney cancer patients but significantly decreased over time for prostate, breast and colorectal cancer patients. Changes in significant prognostic factors of OS and PFS over time were also observed. CONCLUSION Conditional survival analysis of OM patients showed that as patients survived longer, their prognosis for further survival remained stable or decreased. However, those patients that survived longer without disease progression could expect increased PFS over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanbo Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | - Tithi Biswas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Roi Dagan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Darby Erler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Ian Poon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kristin J Redmond
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alexander V Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Marra G, Shah TT, D’Agate D, Marquis A, Calleris G, Lunelli L, Filippini C, Oderda M, Gatti M, Valerio M, Sanchez-Salas R, Bossi A, Gomez-Rivas J, Conte F, Deandreis D, Cussenot O, Ricardi U, Gontero P. The SAFE Pilot Trial—SAlvage Focal Irreversible Electroporation—For Recurrent Localized Prostate Cancer: Rationale and Study Protocol. Front Surg 2022; 9:900528. [PMID: 35747441 PMCID: PMC9209638 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.900528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
IntroductionCurrently, the majority of prostate cancer (PCa) recurrences after non-surgical first-line treatment are managed with androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). Salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP) is a curative alternative to ADT but yields significant morbidity. Preliminary evidence from focal salvage treatments shows similar oncological control but lower morbidity compared to sRP. Among available ablative focal energies, irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a treatment modality that proved promising, especially in treating apical lesions, where PCa most often recurs. Our aim is to test the safety of salvage IRE for recurrent PCa.MethodsWe performed a single-arm pilot feasibility study (IDEAL stage 2a): SAFE, SAlvage Focal irreversible Electroporation for recurrent localized PCa. Twenty patients with biopsy-proven PCa recurrence after primary non-surgical (radiation or ablation) treatment were included. All men will undergo mpMRI ± targeted biopsies, pre-operative PSMA-PET staging before inclusion and sIRE. Outcomes will be evaluated through internationally validated questionnaires and morbidity scales. All men will undergo a control biopsy at one year.ResultsPrimary objectives were the evaluation of the safety of sIRE (and patients’ quality of life) after treatment. Secondary objectives were the evaluation of functional outcomes, namely, continence and erectile function changes and evaluation of short-term oncological efficacy.ConclusionsSAFE is the second pilot study to evaluate sIRE and the first one performed according to the most recent diagnostic and staging imaging standards. sIRE may provide a curative option for recurrent PCa together with lower comorbidities compared to sRP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giancarlo Marra
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Urology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
- Department of Urology and Clinical Research Group on Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Sorbonne University Paris, Paris, France
- Correspondence: Giancarlo Marra
| | - Taimur T. Shah
- Department of Urology, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daniele D’Agate
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Urology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Alessandro Marquis
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Urology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Giorgio Calleris
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Urology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Luca Lunelli
- Department of Urology and Clinical Research Group on Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Sorbonne University Paris, Paris, France
| | - Claudia Filippini
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Urology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Oderda
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Urology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Gatti
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Radiology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Massimo Valerio
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier-Universitaire Vaudois, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Alberto Bossi
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Juan Gomez-Rivas
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francesca Conte
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Urology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Desiree Deandreis
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Olivier Cussenot
- Department of Urology and Clinical Research Group on Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Sorbonne University Paris, Paris, France
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Division of Radiotherapy and Department of Oncology, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Urology Clinic, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Miccichè F, Chiloiro G, Longo S, Autorino R, Massaccesi M, Lenkowicz J, Bonomo P, Desideri I, Belgioia L, Bacigalupo A, D’Angelo E, Bertolini F, Merlotti A, Denaro N, Franco P, Bussu F, Paludetti G, Ricardi U, Valentini V. Development of a prognostic model of overall survival in oropharyngeal cancer from real-world data: PRO.M.E.THE.O. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2022; 42:205-214. [PMID: 35396587 PMCID: PMC9330744 DOI: 10.14639/0392-100x-n1672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Objective The PRO.M.E.THE.O. study (PredictiOn Models in Ent cancer for anti-EGFR based THErapy Optimization) aimed to develop a predictive model (PM) of overall survival (OS) for patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer (LAOC) treated with radiotherapy (RT) and cetuximab (Cet) from an Italian dataset. Methods We enrolled patients with LAOC from 6 centres treated with RT-Cet. Clinical and treatment variables were collected. Patients were randomly divided into training (TS) (80%) and validation (VS) (20%) sets. A binary logistic regression model was used on the TS with stepwise feature selection and then on VS. Timepoints of 2, 3 and 5 years were considered. The area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic of 2, 3 and 5 year and confusion matrix statistics at 5-threshold were used as performance criteria. Results Overall, 218 patients were enrolled and 174 (79.8%) were analysed. Age at diagnosis, gender, ECOG performance, clinical stage, dose to high-risk volume, overall treatment time and day of RT interruption were considered in the final PMs. The PMs were developed and represented by nomograms with AUC of 0.75, 0.73 and 0.73 for TS and 0.713, 0.713, 0.775 for VS at 2, 3 and 5 years, respectively. Conclusions PRO.M.E.THE.O. allows the creation of a PM for OS in patients with LAOC treated with RT-Cet.
Collapse
|
39
|
Maraldo MV, Levis M, Andreis A, Armenian S, Bates J, Brady J, Ghigo A, Lyon AR, Manisty C, Ricardi U, Aznar MC, Filippi AR. An integrated approach to cardioprotection in lymphomas. Lancet Haematol 2022; 9:e445-e454. [PMID: 35512725 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(22)00082-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
In potentially curable cancers, long-term survival depends not only on the successful treatment of the malignancy but also on the risks associated with treatment-related toxicity, especially cardiotoxicity. Malignant lymphomas affect patients at any age, with acute and late toxicity risks that could have a severe effect on morbidity, mortality, and quality of life. Although our understanding of chemotherapy-associated and radiotherapy-associated cardiovascular disease has advanced considerably, new drugs with potential cardiotoxicity have been introduced for the treatment of lymphomas. In this Review, we summarise the mechanisms of treatment-related cardiac injury, available clinical data, and protocols for optimising cardioprotection in lymphomas. We discuss ongoing research strategies to advance our knowledge of the molecular basis of drug-induced and radiation-induced toxicity. Additionally, we emphasise the potential for personalised follow-up and early detection, including the role of biomarkers and novel diagnostic tests, highlighting the role of the cardio-oncology team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maja V Maraldo
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mario Levis
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Alessandro Andreis
- Division of Cardiology, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Saro Armenian
- Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - James Bates
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jessica Brady
- Guy's Cancer Centre, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alessandra Ghigo
- Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Alexander R Lyon
- Imperial College London and Cardio-oncology Service, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
| | - Charlotte Manisty
- Department of Cardio-oncology, Barts Heart Centre and University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Marianne C Aznar
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, University of Manchester and Department of Radiotherapy-Related Research, The Christie NHS, Manchester, UK.
| | - Andrea Riccardo Filippi
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Cuffini E, Casale C, Mantovani C, Gastino A, Lo Zito B, Blasi L, Bongiovanni D, Orlandi E, Cerrato M, Vella A, Leardi S, Chiofalo V, Cavallin C, Iorio G, Ricardi U, Levis M. OC-0925 Early adjuvant RT as a predictor of improved outcomes in patients with grade II and III meningiomas. Radiother Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(22)02705-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
41
|
Fiandra C, Zara S, Alparone A, Loi G, Roggio A, Ciarmatori A, Benvenuto I, Poggiu A, Di Dio A, Verdolino E, Rosica F, Ren Kaiser S, Strigari L, Reversi L, Pierpaoli E, Ferrari P, Placidi L, Comi S, Infusino E, Coeli M, Gino E, Licciardello T, Romeo N, Ciscognetti N, Deotto G, Cora S, Pesente S, Rossi L, Ricardi U, Heijmen B, Marrocco M. OC-0128 multi-institutional real-world validation of autoplanning for breast cancer. Radiother Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(22)02504-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
42
|
Chiofalo V, Iorio G, Bonavero I, Bartoncini S, Richetto V, Grimaldi S, Dall'Armellina S, Deandreis D, Lillaz B, Oderda M, Gontero P, Guarneri A, Ricardi U. PO-1396 PSMA-PET management of prostate cancer patients relapsing after RP plus prostate-bed radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(22)03360-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
43
|
Guckenberger M, Alongi F, Ricardi U, Scorsetti M, Balermpas P, Livi L, Lievens Y, Braam P, Jereczek- Fossa B, Stellamans K, Ratosa I, Peulen H, Widder J, Ramella S, Verbeke L, Dirix P, Khanfir K, Zilli T, Hemmatazad H, Jeene P, Ivaldi G, Clementel E, Fournier B, Fortpied C, Ost P. OC-0599 Factors associated with SBRT doses in oligometastatic disease: an EORTC/ESTRO OligoCare analysis. Radiother Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(22)02621-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
44
|
Cerrato M, Badellino S, Menegatti F, Bonavero I, Grossi C, Lo Zito B, Orlandi E, Gastino A, Cuffini E, Blasi L, Mantovani C, Parise R, Ricardi U, Levis M. PD-0672 Cardiac toxicity predicts mortality in NSCLC patients: interim analysis of the LUNG-HEART Study. Radiother Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(22)02919-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
45
|
Levis M, Botto B, Andreis A, Gastino A, Blasi L, Bartoncini S, Giorgi M, Fava A, Cavallo F, Ferrero S, Boccomini C, Orsucci L, Ricardi U. OC-0293 Early detection of chemo and RT-related heart toxicity in lymphoma patients: The CARDIOCARE Project. Radiother Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(22)02551-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
46
|
Badellino S, Levis M, Cuffini EM, Cerrato M, Orlandi E, Chiovatero I, Aprile A, Gastino A, Cavallin C, Iorio GC, Parise R, Mantovani C, Ricardi U. Role of Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Non-Oncogene Addicted NSCLC. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14061465. [PMID: 35326616 PMCID: PMC8946847 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Revised: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Local ablative therapy (LAT), intended as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery, is a well-recognized effective treatment for selected patients with oligometastatic NSCLC. Current clinical evidence supports LAT alone or in combination with systemic therapies. Our retrospective mono-institutional study aims to assess the role of LAT with a peculiar focus on the largest series of non-oncogene addicted oligometastatic NSCLC patients to date. We included in this analysis all patients with the mentioned disease characteristics who underwent LAT for intracranial and/or extracranial metastases between 2011 and 2020. The main endpoints were local control (LC), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the whole population and after stratification for prognostic factors. We identified a series of 245 consecutive patients (314 lesions), included in this analysis (median age 69 years). In 77% of patients, a single metastasis was treated with LAT and intracranial involvement was the most frequent indication (53% of patients) in our series. The overall response rate (ORR) after LAT was 95%. In case of disease progression, 66 patients underwent new local treatments with curative intent. With a median follow-up of 18 months, median PFS was 13 months (1-year PFS 50%) and median OS was 32 months (1-year OS 75%). The median LC was not reached (1-year LC 89%). The presence of brain metastases was the only factor that negatively affected all clinical endpoints, with a 1-year LC, PFS and OS of 82%, 29% and 62% respectively, compared to 95%, 73% and 91%, respectively, for patients without BMs (p < 0.001 for each endpoint). At the multivariate analysis, mediastinal nodal involvement at baseline (p = 0.049), ECOG PS = 1 (p = 0.011), intracranial disease involvement (p = 0.001), administration of chemotherapy in combination with LAT (p = 0.020), and no delivery of further local treatment for progression or delivery of focal treatment for intracranial progression (p < 0.001) were related to a poorer OS. In our retrospective series, which is to our knowledge the largest to date, LAT showed encouraging results and confirmed the safety and effectiveness of focal treatments in non-oncogene addicted oligometastatic NSCLC patients.
Collapse
|
47
|
Zeng H, De Ruysscher DK, Hu X, Zheng D, Yang L, Ricardi U, Kong FM(S, Hendriks LE. Radiotherapy for small cell lung cancer in current clinical practice guidelines. Journal of the National Cancer Center 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2022.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|
48
|
Baydoun A, Chen H, Poon I, Badellino S, Dagan R, Erler D, Foote M, Louie A, Redmond K, Ricardi U, Sahgal A, Biswas T. Outcomes and toxicities in oligometastatic patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy for adrenal gland metastases: A multi-institutional retrospective study. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 33:159-164. [PMID: 35243027 PMCID: PMC8885400 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Revised: 08/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
SBRT to adrenal gland oligometastases achieves a satisfactory local control and OS. A minimum PTV dose BED10 > 46 Gy was associated with an improved OS and LRFS. A prescribed BED10 > 70 Gy was correlated with improved local control. High adrenal metastases volume should not preclude the delivery of SBRT.
Background Studies reporting SBRT outcomes in oligometastatic patients with adrenal gland metastases (AGM) are limited. Herein, we present a multi-institutional analysis of oligometastatic patients treated with SBRT for AGM. Material/methods The Consortium for Oligometastases Research (CORE) is among the largest retrospective series of patients with oligometastases. Among CORE patients, those treated with SBRT for AGM were included. Clinical and dosimetric data were collected. Adrenal metastatic burden (AMB) was defined as the sum of all adrenal GTV if more than one oligometastases is present. Competing risk analysis was used to estimate actuarial cumulative local recurrence (LR) and widespread progression (WP). Kaplan-Meier method was used to report overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Treatment related toxicities were also reported. Results The analysis included 47 patients with 57 adrenal lesions. Median follow-up was 18.2 months. Median LRFS, PFS, and OS were 15.3, 5.3, and 19.1 months, respectively. A minimum PTV dose BED10 > 46 Gy was associated with an improved OS and LRFS. A prescribed BED10 > 70 Gy was an independent predictor of a lower LR probability. AMB>10 cc was an independent predictor of a lower risk for WP. Only one patient developed an acute Grade 3 toxicity consisting of abdominal pain. Conclusion SBRT to AGM achieved a satisfactory local control and OS in oligometastatic patients. High minimum PTV dose and BED10 prescription doses were predictive of improved LR and OS, respectively. Prospective studies are needed to determine comprehensive criteria for patients SBRT eligibility and dosimetric planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Baydoun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - H. Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - I. Poon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - S. Badellino
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Via Genova 3, Turin 10126, Italy
| | - R. Dagan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL 32206, United States
| | - D. Erler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - M.C. Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD 4120, Australia
| | - A.V. Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - K.J. Redmond
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, United States
| | - U. Ricardi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Via Genova 3, Turin 10126, Italy
| | - A. Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - T. Biswas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
- Corresponding author at: Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland OH 44106, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ceci F, Rovera G, Iorio GC, Guarneri A, Chiofalo V, Passera R, Oderda M, Dall'Armellina S, Liberini V, Grimaldi S, Bellò M, Gontero P, Ricardi U, Deandreis D. Event-free survival after 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in recurrent hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC) patients eligible for salvage therapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022; 49:3257-3268. [PMID: 35217883 PMCID: PMC9250462 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-05741-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background/aim Prostate-specific-membrane-antigen/positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) detects with high accuracy disease-recurrence, leading to changes in the management of biochemically-recurrent (BCR) prostate cancer (PCa). However, data regarding the oncological outcomes of patients who performed PSMA-PET are needed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of clinically relevant events during follow-up in patients who performed PSMA-PET for BCR after radical treatment. Materials and methods This analysis included consecutive, hormone-sensitive, hormone-free, recurrent PCa patients (HSPC) enrolled through a prospective study. All patients were eligible for salvage therapy, having at least 24 months of follow-up after PSMA-PET. The primary endpoint was the Event-Free Survival (EFS), defined as the time between the PSMA-PET and the date of event/last follow-up. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate the EFS curves. EFS was also investigated by Cox proportional hazards regression. Events were defined as death, radiological progression, or PSA recurrence after therapy. Results One-hundred and seventy-six (n = 176) patients were analyzed (median PSA 0.62 [IQR: 0.43–1.00] ng/mL; median follow-up of 35.4 [IQR: 26.5–40.3] months). The EFS was 78.8% at 1 year, 65.2% (2 years), and 52.2% (3 years). Patients experiencing events during study follow-up had a significantly higher median PSA (0.81 [IQR: 0.53–1.28] vs 0.51 [IQR: 0.36–0.80] ng/mL) and a lower PSA doubling time (PSAdt) (5.4 [IQR: 3.7–11.6] vs 12.7 [IQR: 6.6–24.3] months) (p < 0.001) compared to event-free patients. The Kaplan–Meier curves showed that PSA > 0.5 ng/mL, PSAdt ≤ 6 months, and a positive PSMA-PET result were associated with a higher event rate (p < 0.01). No significant differences of event rates were observed in patients who received changes in therapy management after PSMA-PET vs. patients who did not receive therapy changes. Finally, PSA > 0.5 ng/mL and PSAdt ≤ 6 months were statistically significant event-predictors in multivariate model (p < 0.001). Conclusion Low PSA and long PSAdt were significant predictors of longer EFS. A lower incidence of events was observed in patients having negative PSMA-PET, since longer EFS was significantly more probable in case of a negative scan. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-022-05741-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Ceci
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy. .,Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy. .,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncolology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy. .,Nuclear Medicine Department, S. Croce E Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy.
| | - Guido Rovera
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.,Section of Nuclear Medicine, University Department of Radiological Sciences and Haematology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Carlo Iorio
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Alessia Guarneri
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Valeria Chiofalo
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Roberto Passera
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Oderda
- Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Sara Dall'Armellina
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Virginia Liberini
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Serena Grimaldi
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Marilena Bellò
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Section of Nuclear Medicine, University Department of Radiological Sciences and Haematology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.,Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Désirée Deandreis
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Popovic M, Fiano V, Moirano G, Chiusa L, Conway DI, Garzino Demo P, Gilardetti M, Iorio GC, Moccia C, Ostellino O, Pecorari G, Ramieri G, Ricardi U, Riva G, Virani S, Richiardi L. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Head and Neck Cancer Diagnosis in the Piedmont Region, Italy: Interrupted Time-Series Analysis. Front Public Health 2022; 10:809283. [PMID: 35265573 PMCID: PMC8899030 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.809283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The COVID-19 pandemic has likely affected the most vulnerable groups of patients and those requiring time-critical access to healthcare services, such as patients with cancer. The aim of this study was to use time trend data to assess the impact of COVID-19 on timely diagnosis and treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC) in the Italian Piedmont region. Methods This study was based on two different data sources. First, regional hospital discharge register data were used to identify incident HNC in patients ≥18 years old during the period from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2020. Interrupted time-series analysis was used to model the long-time trends in monthly incident HNC before COVID-19 while accounting for holiday-related seasonal fluctuations in the HNC admissions. Second, in a population of incident HNC patients eligible for recruitment in an ongoing clinical cohort study (HEADSpAcE) that started before the COVID-19 pandemic, we compared the distribution of early-stage and late-stage diagnoses between the pre-COVID-19 and the COVID-19 period. Results There were 4,811 incident HNC admissions in the 5-year period before the COVID-19 outbreak and 832 admissions in 2020, of which 689 occurred after the COVID-19 outbreak in Italy. An initial reduction of 28% in admissions during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.62-0.84) was largely addressed by the end of 2020 (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.89-1.03) when considering the whole population, although there were some heterogeneities. The gap between observed and expected admissions was particularly evident and had not completely recovered by the end of the year in older (≥75 years) patients (RR: 0.88, 0.76-1.01), patients with a Romano-Charlson comorbidity index below 2 (RR 0.91, 95% CI: 0.84-1.00), and primary surgically treated patients (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.80-0.97). In the subgroup of patients eligible for the ongoing active recruitment, we observed no evidence of a shift toward a more advanced stage at diagnosis in the periods following the first pandemic wave. Conclusions The COVID-19 pandemic has affected differentially the management of certain groups of incident HNC patients, with more pronounced impact on older patients, those treated primarily surgically, and those with less comorbidities. The missed and delayed diagnoses may translate into worser oncological outcomes in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maja Popovic
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
- SC Epidemiologia dei Tumori CRPT U, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria (A.O.U.) Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Centro di Riferimento per l'Epidemiologia e la Prevenzione Oncologica (CPO) Piemonte, Turin, Italy
| | - Valentina Fiano
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
- SC Epidemiologia dei Tumori CRPT U, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria (A.O.U.) Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Centro di Riferimento per l'Epidemiologia e la Prevenzione Oncologica (CPO) Piemonte, Turin, Italy
| | - Giovenale Moirano
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
- SC Epidemiologia dei Tumori CRPT U, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria (A.O.U.) Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Centro di Riferimento per l'Epidemiologia e la Prevenzione Oncologica (CPO) Piemonte, Turin, Italy
| | - Luigi Chiusa
- Pathology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria (A.O.U.) Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - David I. Conway
- School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Paolo Garzino Demo
- Maxillofacial Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria (A.O.U.) Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Gilardetti
- SC Epidemiologia dei Tumori CRPT U, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria (A.O.U.) Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Centro di Riferimento per l'Epidemiologia e la Prevenzione Oncologica (CPO) Piemonte, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Chiara Moccia
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
- SC Epidemiologia dei Tumori CRPT U, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria (A.O.U.) Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Centro di Riferimento per l'Epidemiologia e la Prevenzione Oncologica (CPO) Piemonte, Turin, Italy
| | - Oliviero Ostellino
- Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria (A.O.U.) Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Pecorari
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Guglielmo Ramieri
- Maxillofacial Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria (A.O.U.) Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Giuseppe Riva
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Shama Virani
- Genomic Epidemiology Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France
| | - Lorenzo Richiardi
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
- SC Epidemiologia dei Tumori CRPT U, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria (A.O.U.) Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Centro di Riferimento per l'Epidemiologia e la Prevenzione Oncologica (CPO) Piemonte, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|