Comparison between super-responders and non-super-responders in psoriasis under adalimumab treatment: a real-life cohort study on the effectiveness and drug survival over one-year

BACKGROUND

Data on the characteristics and treatment outcomes of super-responders and non-super-responders in psoriasis under adalimumab treatment are limited.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis from psoriatic patients treated with adalimumab was compared to characterize super-responders vs non-super-responders' groups, identify factors associated with super response, and assess treatment outcomes after switching.

RESULTS

15 out of 70 (21.4%) patients were categorized as super-responder. The proportion of patients achieving a PASI 100 response was significantly higher in super-responders than non-super-responders at weeks 12, 24, and 52. Female sex and Charlson Co-morbidity Index were significantly associated with super-responders. A high level of high-density lipoprotein was independently associated with PASI 90 response at weeks 24 and 52. Additionally, nearly 35%-43% of non-super-responders switching to interleukin-17A (IL-17A) inhibitors may achieve a PASI 100 response at week 12. In contrast, all super-responders switching to IL-17A inhibitors achieved a PASI 100 response at week 4.

CONCLUSIONS

Super-responders treated with adalimumab have a higher rate of being female and fewer comorbidities. And super-responders have better PASI responses than non-super-responders, whether the patients were treated with adalimumab or switched to IL-17A inhibitors.

Effect of treatment with original or biosimilar adalimumab on SARS-CoV2 vaccination antibody titers

The technological process of production of biosimilars determines the degree of biosimilarity to the original biological drug. In particular, the focus is on the similarity of immunogenic responses. The primary endpoint of our retrospective study was to find the differences in SARS-CoV-2 antibody amount between patients treated with original adalimumab and biosimilar adalimumab MSB11022 (Idacio) and the differences in the SARS-CoV-2 antibody amount between patients treated with and without biological treatment. We collected the gender, autoimmune disease type, age, and treatment data of the patients in the outpatient clinic MEDICAL PLUS, s.r.o., Uherske Hradiste. These patients suffer from autoimmune rheumatic diseases. All patients received the mRNA vaccine (Pfizer/BioNTech - BNT162b2), with a 21-day (interquartile range, 21-24) gap between the two vaccinations. Patients receiving adalimumab were able to develop cellular immune responses after the second vaccination dose, as well as the individuals without adalimumab. In the period of 6-23 weeks after the second vaccination dose (D63 - D182), the SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels did not change significantly in the patients receiving the original adalimumab, while in the patients receiving biosimilar adalimumab a significant decrease was revealed. A statistically significant difference in the SARS-CoV-2 antibody amount between the patients without biological treatment (median: 504.3 U/mL) and with biological treatment (Original and Biosimilar - median: 47.2 and 28.2 U/mL, respectively) was confirmed on day 182. According to our observation, the effect of the treatment type on the increase/decrease of antibodies over time is dominant, while the impact of other variables (gender, methotrexate treatment, autoimmune disease type, and age) was confirmed as insignificant or minor.

Anti-tumor necrosis factor (aTNF) weaning strategy in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA): does duration matter?

BACKGROUND

To compare outcomes of a short and long weaning strategy of anti-tumor necrosis factor (aTNF) in our prospective juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) cohort.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

JIA patients on subcutaneous adalimumab with at least 6 months of follow-up were recruited (May 2010-Jan 2022). Once clinical remission on medication (CRM) was achieved, adalimumab was weaned according to two protocols-short (every 4-weekly for 6 months and stopped) and long (extending dosing interval by 2 weeks for three cycles until 12-weekly intervals and thereafter stopped) protocols. Outcomes assessed were flare rates, time to flare, and predictors.

RESULTS

Of 110 JIA patients, 77 (83% male, 78% Chinese; 82% enthesitis-related arthritis) underwent aTNF weaning with 53% on short and 47% on long weaning protocol. The total flare rate during and after stopping aTNF was not different between the two groups. The time to flare after stopping aTNF was not different (p = 0.639). Positive anti-nuclear antibody increased flare risk during weaning in long weaning group (OR 7.0, 95%CI: 1.2-40.8). Positive HLA-B27 (OR 6.5, 95%CI: 1.1-30.4) increased flare risks after stopping aTNF.

CONCLUSION

Duration of weaning aTNF may not minimize flare rate or delay time to flare after stopping treatment in JIA patients. Recapture rates for inactive disease at 6 months remained high for patients who flared after weaning or discontinuing medication.

Vitiligo in a Patient Receiving Adalimumab for Idiopathic Uveitis

In recent years, adalimumab has been increasingly used in the chronic treatment of non-infectious uveitis. This case report aimed to describe a drug-induced adverse event in a 34-year-old man who presented with blurred vision and floaters in the right eye and was being treated for intermediate uveitis. The patient had started topical treatment with a diagnosis of uveitis at another center. Best corrected visual acuity at presentation was 0.8 (decimal) in the right eye and 1.0 in the left eye. On examination, the anterior chamber in the right eye was clear, with anterior vitreous cells and mild haze, and snow banking and vitreous opacities in the inferior periphery. Fluorescein angiography (FA) showed hyperfluorescence in the right disc and leakage in the inferior periphery. As the inflammation did not resolve with local treatment, systemic cyclosporine was administered, after which the patient exhibited vomiting and weakness. Cyclosporine was discontinued and adalimumab treatment was started. On examination 5 months later, bilateral vitreous cells and mild vitreous opacity were noted, and FA showed mild leakage in the inferior periphery bilaterally. In addition, a depigmented patchy vitiligo lesion was observed on the chin. Due to the persistence of intraocular inflammation and on the recommendation of the dermatology clinic, adalimumab treatment was continued and topical tacrolimus was started for the lesion. On examination 3 months later, the inflammatory findings had resolved and there was no progression of the vitiligo lesion. The patient's treatment was continued. Taken together with the previous literature findings, no pathology was found in the patient's systemic examination, suggesting that this lesion was a side effect of the treatment. Ophthalmologists should be alert for this side effect in patients receiving adalimumab.

Adalimumab as treatment for neurosarcoidosis: A case series

Sarcoidosis is a disease characterized by non-caseating granulomas that can involve the central nervous system as neurosarcoidosis. This challenging disease is currently managed with high dose steroids, and sometimes the addition of infliximab. Other TNA-alpha inhibitors have not been studied as rigorously. We discovered ten neurosarcoidosis patients who were on an alternative TNA-alpha inhibitor, adalimumab. Eight patients had a positive response clinically and radiographically to adalimumab.

A Prediction Model for Successful Increase of Adalimumab Dose Intervals in Patients with Crohn's Disease: Secondary Analysis of the Pragmatic Open-Label Randomised Controlled Non-inferiority LADI Trial

BACKGROUND

In the pragmatic open-label randomised controlled non-inferiority LADI trial we showed that increasing adalimumab (ADA) dose intervals was non-inferior to conventional dosing for persistent flares in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) in clinical and biochemical remission.

AIMS

To develop a prediction model to identify patients who can successfully increase their ADA dose interval based on secondary analysis of trial data.

METHODS

Patients in the intervention group of the LADI trial increased ADA intervals to 3 and then to 4 weeks. The dose interval increase was defined as successful when patients had no persistent flare (> 8 weeks), no intervention-related severe adverse events, no rescue medication use during the study, and were on an increased dose interval while in clinical and biochemical remission at week 48. Prediction models were based on logistic regression with relaxed LASSO. Models were internally validated using bootstrap optimism correction.

RESULTS

We included 109 patients, of which 60.6% successfully increased their dose interval. Patients that were active smokers (odds ratio [OR] 0.90), had previous CD-related intra-abdominal surgeries (OR 0.85), proximal small bowel disease (OR 0.92), an increased Harvey-Bradshaw Index (OR 0.99) or increased faecal calprotectin (OR 0.997) were less likely to successfully increase their dose interval. The model had fair discriminative ability (AUC = 0.63) and net benefit analysis showed that the model could be used to select patients who could increase their dose interval.

CONCLUSION

The final prediction model seems promising to select patients who could successfully increase their ADA dose interval. The model should be validated externally before it may be applied in clinical practice.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03172377.

Effect of adalimumab as an anti-inflammatory agent on gene expression of retinal pigment epithelial cells

Adalimumab (ADA) is an anti-inflammatory antibody that has FDA approval as a systemic medication for treating noninfectious uveitis. It is also provisionally being investigated as an intravitreal injection for various retinal conditions. This study aimed to assess the effect of ADA on apoptotic, inflammatory, and fibrogenesis gene expression at mRNA and protein levels in retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells. RPEs were treated with serial concentrations of ADA (0.5x, x, 2x, and 4x; [x = 250 µg/mL]) for 24 hours. MTT assay was done and the mRNA and protein expressions were quantified using real-time PCR and ELISA assay, respectively. The mRNA levels of IL-1b and IL-6 were significantly increased in ADA-treated RPEs at 0.5x and x concentrations. However, the increase in cytokine secretion was observed only in IL-1b at x concentration. TGF-β was significantly upregulated in the 0.5x and 4x doses of ADA both at mRNA and protein levels. MTT assay, along with an unchanged BCL-2/BAX ratio confirmed the safety of ADA on RPEs at all studied concentrations. In conclusion, despite its safety, the 2x concentration of ADA was the only dose that did not ignite the expression of any of the studied inflammatory and fibrogenesis genes. This dosage, which is roughly equal to 2 mg intravitreal dose in a clinical setting, might be referred to as a reference starting point for future in-vivo studies in ocular conditions.

A TNF-α inhibitor abolishes sepsis-induced cognitive impairment in mice by modulating acetylcholine and nitric oxide homeostasis, BDNF release, and neuroinflammation

Neurodegenerative disorders have a pathophysiology that heavily involves neuroinflammation. In this study, we used lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to create a model of cognitive impairment by inducing systemic and neuroinflammation in experimental animals. LPS was injected intraperitoneally at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg during the last seven days of the study. Adalimumab (ADA), a TNF-α inhibitor, was injected at a dose of 10 mg/kg a total of 3 times throughout the study. On the last two days of the experiment, 50 mg/kg of curcumin was administered orally as a positive control group. Open field (OF) and elevated plus maze tests (EPM) were used to measure anxiety-like behaviors. The tail suspension test (TST) was used to measure depression-like behaviors, while the novel object recognition test (NOR) was used to measure learning and memory activities. Blood and hippocampal TNF α and nitric oxide (NO) levels, hippocampal BDNF, CREB, and ACh levels, and AChE activity were measured by ELISA. LPS increased anxiety and depression-like behaviors while decreasing the activity of the learning-memory system. LPS exerted this effect by causing systemic and neuroinflammation, cholinergic dysfunction, and impaired BDNF release. ADA controlled LPS-induced behavioral changes and improved biochemical markers. ADA prevented cognitive impairment induced by LPS by inhibiting inflammation and regulating the release of BDNF and the cholinergic pathway.

Effectiveness and safety of adalimumab biosimilar in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Adalimumab biosimilar MSB11022 (Idacio ®) has been approved for the same indications as its originator (Humira ®), based on findings from clinical trials in plaque psoriasis. Data on its efficacy and safety in inflammatory bowel disease, however, are scarce.

METHODS

Retrospective, observational study of 44 patients with inflammatory bowel disease: 30 were treated with originator adalimumab, 5 were directly started on MSB11022, and 9 switched from originator to biosimilar adalimumab. To evaluate the effectiveness of the use of adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease, both laboratory markers (fecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein) and scales that measure the activity of inflammatory bowel disease using specific scales (Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) have been usEd.) for Crohn's disease and Mayo Score for Ulcerative Colitis. Efficacy was evaluated by recording the adverse effects that could occur with the administration of adalimumab (original or biosimilar). The success of the switch was determined by analyzing meaningful differences in effectiveness and safety criteria. Concomitant therapy and the need for dose intensification were also analyzed. Objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of biosimilar adalimumab in adalimumab-naïve patients and patients switched from originator adalimumab.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed in clinical disease activity (P=.317) or biochemical parameters [fecal calprotectin (P=.445) and C-reactive protein P=.661)] after the switch from the originator adalimumab to MSB11022. There was not a significant reduction in the concomitant use of corticosteroids and thiopurines (P=.157). No emergency room visits or hospitalizations were observed during the study period and none of the patients experienced serious adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Between originator adalimumab and biosimilar-start cohorts, no differences were observed, between originator adalimumab and switch cohorts, no significant differences were found either, and with the pre- and post-switch to biosimilar comparison, 2 of the 9 patients experienced AEs after the switch. The biosimilar showed a favorable safety profile (one patient with a serious adverse effect (rash) with biosimilar discontinued treatment) and no significant changes to clinical or biochemical parameters were observed after the switch.

Adalimumab-induced central nervous system demyelination in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis

Adalimumab (Humira) is a human monoclonal antibody that belongs to the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha antagonist class of medications. Central Nervous System (CNS) demyelination is a rare side effect of adalimumab, and only a few cases have been reported in the literature of patients who developed multiple sclerosis or other demyelinating patterns after using adalimumab. In this report, we present a case of CNS demyelination in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis that developed a few months after using adalimumab. Performing brain MRI for asymptomatic individuals prior to initiating anti-TNF alpha agents to exclude a pre-existing demyelinating disease may be worthwhile. Routine brain MRI for monitoring and surveillance may facilitate detecting cases early and avoid the development of permanent neurological disability. Further studies are needed to clarify the neurological safety of anti-TNF alpha agents.

Quantifying the Effect of Methotrexate on Adalimumab Response in Psoriasis by Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling

Previously, we showed that the combination of methotrexate and adalimumab treatment leads to less antidrug antibody development. In this study, we quantify the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of adalimumab and evaluate the influence of methotrexate cotreatment. A population PK-PD model was developed using prospective data from 59 patients with psoriasis (baseline PASI = 12.6) receiving adalimumab over 49 weeks. Typical PK and PD parameters and their corresponding interpatient variability were estimated. We performed a covariate analysis to assess whether interpatient variability could be explained by addition of methotrexate and other covariates. In total, 330 PASIs, 252 adalimumab serum concentrations, and 247 antidrug antibody titers were available. Presence of antidrug antibodies (adalimumab group = 46.7%, adalimumab + methotrexate group = 38.7%; P = .031) was correlated with increased adalimumab apparent clearance (P < .001). In the PD model, the use of concomitant methotrexate was borderline to significantly correlated with a decreased half-maximal inhibitory concentration (adalimumab concentration for which clinical response score is reduced by half; P < .10). On the basis of our PK-PD model, concomitant use of methotrexate indirectly increases adalimumab concentration, partially through less antidrug antibodies formation, which may result in better efficacy.

mRNA-1273 vaccinated inflammatory bowel disease patients receiving TNF inhibitors develop broad and robust SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T cell responses

SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T cells recognize conserved viral peptides and in the absence of cross-reactive antibodies form an important line of protection against emerging viral variants as they ameliorate disease severity. SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines induce robust spike-specific antibody and T cell responses in healthy individuals, but their effectiveness in patients with chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disorders (IMIDs) is less well defined. These patients are often treated with systemic immunosuppressants, which may negatively affect vaccine-induced immunity. Indeed, TNF inhibitor (TNFi)-treated inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients display reduced ability to maintain SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses post-vaccination, yet the effects on CD8+ T cells remain unclear. Here, we analyzed the impact of IBD and TNFi treatment on mRNA-1273 vaccine-induced CD8+ T cell responses compared to healthy controls in SARS-CoV-2 experienced and inexperienced patients. CD8+ T cells were analyzed for their ability to recognize 32 SARS-CoV-2-specific epitopes, restricted by 10 common HLA class I allotypes using heterotetramer combinatorial coding. This strategy allowed in-depth ex vivo profiling of the vaccine-induced CD8+ T cell responses using phenotypic and activation markers. mRNA vaccination of TNFi-treated and untreated IBD patients induced robust spike-specific CD8+ T cell responses with a predominant central memory and activated phenotype, comparable to those in healthy controls. Prominent non-spike-specific CD8+ T cell responses were observed in SARS-CoV-2 experienced donors prior to vaccination. Non-spike-specific CD8+ T cells persisted and spike-specific CD8+ T cells notably expanded after vaccination in these patient cohorts. Our data demonstrate that regardless of TNFi treatment or prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, IBD patients benefit from vaccination by inducing a robust spike-specific CD8+ T cell response.

'Totality of Evidence' Approach in the Development of GP2017, an Approved Adalimumab Biosimilar

INTRODUCTION

Hyrimoz®, (GP2017 [SDZ-ADL]), is a biosimilar to Humira® (REF-ADL). SDZ-ADL was approved in 2018 by both the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) for the indications of REF-ADL not protected by orphan exclusivity. In 2023, the US FDA and EMA also approved a citrate-free high-concentration formulation (HCF) of SDZ-ADL.

TOTALITY OF EVIDENCE-THE APPROACH

Approval of SDZ-ADL was based on data gathered using the US FDA, EMA and World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended step-wise Totality of Evidence approach. This approach is a robust dataset confirming high confidence in analytical, functional, pharmacokinetic (PK) and clinical biosimilarity between the biosimilar and reference medicine determined through analytical and clinical investigation.

EVIDENCE OF BIOSIMILARITY

Evidence supporting the biosimilarity of SDZ-ADL and REF-ADL was reported at each stage of investigation. Comprehensive comparative analytical and functional assessments demonstrated that SDZ-ADL was analytically indistinguishable from REF-ADL in required critical quality attributes, including receptor binding. Phase I clinical data showed PK similarity of SDZ-ADL and REF-ADL in healthy volunteers, with similar safety, tolerability and immunogenicity profiles. Phase III confirmatory efficacy and safety studies, ADACCESS (included in US/EU dossiers) and ADMYRA (separate to US/EU dossiers), both confirmed that SDZ-ADL's efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity matched REF-ADL in all patient groups with no clinically meaningful differences. More recently, this data package was the basis for a citrate-free HCF of SDZ-ADL to be developed, and its PK, safety and immunogenicity were confirmed against the initially approved formulation of SDZ-ADL.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the Totality of Evidence provided for biosimilar adalimumab, SDZ-ADL, confirmed the analytical, functional and clinical similarity of SDZ-ADL to REF-ADL, supporting its regulatory approval and providing a data bridge with which to evaluate and support the approval of citrate-free HCF SDZ-ADL for clinical use.

Long-term Efficacy and Safety Following Switch Between Upadacitinib and Adalimumab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: 5-Year Data from SELECT-COMPARE

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to describe the long-term efficacy and safety of upadacitinib and adalimumab through 228 weeks following immediate switch to the alternate therapy with a different mechanism of action (MoA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) not achieving treatment goals with their initial randomized therapy in the ongoing phase 3 SELECT-COMPARE study.

METHODS

Patients with non-response or incomplete response to initially prescribed upadacitinib 15 mg once daily or adalimumab 40 mg every other week were switched to the alternate therapy by week 26. Efficacy was evaluated through 228 weeks post-switch using validated outcome measures, including Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) low disease activity (LDA; ≤ 10)/remission (≤ 2.8); 28-joint Disease Activity Score based on C-reactive protein ≤ 3.2/< 2.6; ≥ 20%/50%/70% improvement in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria; and change from baseline in ACR core components. Data are reported as observed. Safety was assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) through week 264.

RESULTS

Of patients initially randomized to upadacitinib and adalimumab, 38.7% and 48.6%, respectively, switched to the alternate therapy by week 26. Clinically relevant improvements in all efficacy measures were observed through 228 weeks post-switch and were generally similar between groups, with small numeric differences mostly in favor of switching to upadacitinib. CDAI remission was achieved by 32.7% and 28.6% of initial non-responders, and 27.5% and 27.3% of incomplete responders, while CDAI LDA was achieved by 76.9% and 72.9% of non-responders, and 72.5% and 72.7% of incomplete responders switching to upadacitinib and to adalimumab, respectively. TEAE rates were similar between groups, although herpes zoster infection, lymphopenia, and creatine phosphokinase elevation were more frequent when switching to upadacitinib. No new safety signals were identified.

CONCLUSION

Switching to a different MoA may provide long-term benefit to patients with RA not achieving treatment goals with their initial therapy, with acceptable safety profiles.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02629159.

The Efficacy of Adalimumab in Children with Chronic Non-infectious Posterior Uveitis and Panuveitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of adalimumab in pediatric patients with chronic non-infectious posterior uveitis and panuveitis (not associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis).

METHODS

The medical records of children (< 18 years old) with chronic non-infectious posterior uveitis and panuveitis were collected and analyzed in this retrospective cohort study. Children were allocated to a conventional adalimumab-free treatment (CT) or adalimumab (ADA) group based on whether they additionally received adalimumab.

RESULTS

In total, 69 children (138 eyes) were included, with 21 (42 eyes) and 48 (96 eyes) in the CT and ADA groups, respectively. During the average follow-up period of 24 months, the improvement in all ocular parameters (best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular inflammation, fluorescein angiography score) was better in the ADA group than in the CT group, except for changes in central macular thickness, which did not significantly differ between the groups. The mean time of first alleviation, which was after 1.03 ± 0.12 months of therapy, was earlier in the ADA group than in the CT group (2.30 ± 0.46 months). In the ADA group, 90.6% of children had remission within 3 months, and 47.9% had no relapse during follow-up. Cough and cold were the most common adverse events in the ADA group; however, the number of adverse events was similar between both the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Adalimumab was effective in the treatment of chronic noninfectious posterior uveitis and panuveitis in pediatric patients, and disease inactivity was accomplished in the majority of the patients, thereby improving visual outcomes and maintaining disease stability. Adverse events were limited and tolerable.

Predictive biomarkers for anti-TNF alpha therapy in IBD patients

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic gastrointestinal condition characterized by severe gut inflammation, commonly presenting as Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis or categorized as IBD- unclassified. While various treatments have demonstrated efficacy in adult IBD patients, the advent of anti-TNF therapies has significantly revolutionized treatment outcomes and clinical management. These therapies have played a pivotal role in achieving clinical and endoscopic remission, promoting mucosal healing, averting disease progression, and diminishing the necessity for surgery. Nevertheless, not all patients exhibit positive responses to these therapies, and some may experience a loss of responsiveness over time. This review aims to present a comprehensive examination of predictive biomarkers for monitoring the therapeutic response to anti-TNF therapy in IBD patients. It will explore their limitations and clinical utilities, paving the way for a more personalized and effective therapeutic approach.

Stabilization of adalimumab Fab through the introduction of disulfide bonds between the variable and constant domains

Fab is a promising format for antibody drug. Therefore, efforts have been made to improve its thermal stability for therapeutic and commercial use. So far, we have attempted to introduce a disulfide bond into the Fab fragment to improve its thermal stability and demonstrated that it is possible to do this without sacrificing its biochemical function. In this study, to develop a novel stabilization strategy for Fab, we attempted to introduce a disulfide bond between the variable and constant domains and prepared three variants of Fab; H:G10C + H:P210C, L:P40C + L:E165C, and H:G10C + H:P210C + L:P40C + L:E165C. Differential scanning calorimetry measurements showed that each of these variants had improved thermal stability. In addition, the variants with two disulfide bonds demonstrated a 6.5 °C increase in their denaturation temperatures compared to wild-type Fab. The introduction of disulfide bonds was confirmed by X-ray crystallography, and the variants retained their antigen-binding activity. The variants were also found to be less aggregative than the wild type. Our results demonstrate that the introduction of a disulfide bond between the variable and constant domains significantly improves the thermal stability of Fab.

Relevance of Adalimumab Product Attributes to Patient Experience in the Biosimilar Era: A Narrative Review

Adalimumab (ADL, Humira®, reference product), an anti-TNF-α biologic, has transformed the treatment of chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. However, the high cost of ADL therapy has driven the development of more affordable ADL biosimilars, agents with no clinically meaningful differences from the reference product. This review summarizes the product attributes of reference ADL and the nine ADL biosimilars approved and available in the USA in relation to patient experience of injection-site pain (ISP). Product formulation, delivery volume and device features (e.g., type and needle gauge size) influence patient experience of ISP with potential clinical consequences. Citrate-free formulations generally cause less ISP; injection volumes of > 1.5 ml may be associated with increased ISP. Reference ADL and all ADL biosimilars offer a citrate-free formulation, and reference ADL and four ADL biosimilars offer a high-concentration solution that allows a smaller injection volume. All available ADL products are injected subcutaneously using either a pre-filled pen (PFP) or pre-filled syringe (PFS). Patients prefer the PFP, but the PFS permits better control over the speed and duration of injection. Smaller (29-gauge) needle outer diameter is associated with less ISP; reference ADL and seven ADL biosimilars offer a device with a 29-gauge needle. In the USA, an approved biosimilar can be designated "interchangeable," allowing pharmacy-level substitution, where state law permits. In the USA, two ADL biosimilars have received interchangeability designation; others are seeking interchangeability designation from the Food and Drug Administration (n = 2), are being evaluated in clinical studies to support interchangeability (n = 2), or do not have/are not seeking interchangeability designation (n = 3). Product-related attributes influence patient experience of ISP caused by subcutaneous ADL injection. Reference ADL and ADL biosimilar products differ in their attributes, so discussion with patients about treatment options is essential to optimize adherence and outcomes.

Adalimumab as a cause of kidney injury in patients with Crohn's disease

INTRODUCTION

Adalimumab (ADM) is a recombinant human monoclonal antibody (anti-TNFα) used to treat inflammatory bowel diseases. It can cause kidney injury (KI).

CASE DIAGNOSIS/TREATMENT

We describe two pediatric patients with Crohn's disease (CD) in whom ADM therapy was associated with kidney injury (KI). The drug was discontinued in both cases. For the first patient, changes were irreversible despite intensive glucocorticosteroid (GCS) therapy. For the second patient, discontinuation of ADM led to an improvement in kidney function.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the risk of KI in patients undergoing ADM therapy, careful assessment of kidney function and early specialist referral are required. Timely withdrawal of ADM can significantly reduce kidney damage, but in some cases, the kidney damage can be irreversible.

Effectiveness and safety of adalimumab compared with leflunomide in patients with Takayasu arteritis: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of adalimumab (ADA) compared with leflunomide (LEF) in patients with Takayasu arteritis (TAK).

METHOD

A retrospective cohort study was performed with the following inclusion criteria: the fulfilment of the 2022 American College Classification/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology criteria for TAK, age ≥18 years, and written informed consent. Forty-four patients were treated with LEF (n=28) or ADA (n=16) therapy due to relapsing/refractory disease or toxicity from previous therapy. Patients were evaluated at baseline (T0), at a median of 7.0 months (T1) and at 15.0 months of follow-up (T2). Data regarding disease activity, daily dose of prednisone, side effects and angiographic progression were analysed.

RESULTS

LEF and ADA groups had similar features on the baseline visit. However, intravenous methylprednisolone was more frequently prescribed for the ADA group (p=0.019). On T1 and T2 visits, complete response rates were similar for ADA and LEF groups (75.0% and 88.5%; p=0.397 and 62.5% vs 78.3%; p=0.307), respectively. The differences remained non-significant after adjusting for baseline variables by propensity score matching. Although the ADA group had a higher median daily prednisone on visit T1 (p=0.004), it was similar on visit T2 (p=0.595). Similar rates of angiographic progression were observed in ADA and LEF groups (40% vs 25%; p=0.467). Mild-to-moderate adverse events were observed only in the LEF group (17.9%).

CONCLUSION

LEF and ADA had comparable outcomes after a median of 15.0 months of follow-up. However, withdrawal from therapy and mild-to-moderate adverse events were only observed in the LEF group.

Treatment Persistence and Switching Patterns of Adalimumab Biosimilar ABP 501 in European Patients with Rheumatologic Diseases

INTRODUCTION

ABP 501 was an adalimumab (ADA) biosimilar approved for treating immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). In this retrospective study, we aimed to examine the treatment patterns of ABP 501 among patients with these IMIDs using German and French pharmacy claims databases.

METHODS

Patients with RA, PsA, or AS who initiated ABP 501 between October 2018 and March 2020 and were observed continuously for ≥ 365 days both before and after ABP 501 initiation were included. Descriptive analyses of persistence and switch after ABP 501 discontinuation were conducted and reported for each disease cohort by prior use of ADA products (patients naïve to ADA or patients experienced with ADA).

RESULTS

Median (95% confidence interval) persistence on ABP 501 was 9.4 (8.6-10.3), 10.2 (9.0-11.7), and 12.1 (11.0-13.1) months in German patients, and 11.7 (9.9-13.3), 7.1 (5.8-8.4), and 10.8 (9.6-11.9) months in French patients for RA, PsA, and AS, respectively. For patients who switched from ABP 501 to another targeted therapy during the first 12 months of follow-up, switching patterns varied between patients naïve to ADA and patients experienced with ADA in both Germany and France, with patients naïve to ADA switching most frequently to other targeted therapies including non-ADA tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), non-TNFi biologic, or Janus Kinase inhibitor (JAKi) and patients experienced with ADA switching most frequently back to ADA reference product (RP).

CONCLUSIONS

Across three rheumatologic diseases, about half of patients persisted on ABP 501 at the end of 12 months after treatment initiation in both Germany and France. Patients experienced with ADA were more likely to switch back to ADA RP, regardless of indication and country, suggesting a possible nocebo effect. Future studies are warranted to understand reasons of discontinuation and switching.

Efficacy and safety of proactive drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease treated with anti-TNF agents: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

A systematic review and a meta-analysis of the literature was conducted to assess efficacy and safety of proactive therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) versus conventional management during maintenance treatment with anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNFα) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

A search was conducted up to January 2022 (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library). The primary outcome was the ability to maintain clinical remission at 12 months. The certainty of evidence was determined using the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

Nine studies were identified: one systematic review, six randomised clinical trials, and two cohort studies. No superior efficacy of proactive TDM [relative risk 1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.98-1.37, n=528; I2=55%] was shown. Proactive TDM could improve the durability of anti-TNFα treatment [odds ratio (OR) 0.12; 95%CI: 0.05-0.27; n=390; I2=45%), prevent acute infusion reactions (OR 0.21; 95%CI: 0.05-0.82; n=390; I2=0%), decrease adverse events (OR 0.38; 95%CI: 0.15-0.98; n=390; I2=14%), and reduce the probability of surgery, at lower economical expenditure.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysed evidence did not confirm the superiority of proactive TDM of anti-TNFα treatment over conventional management in patients with IBD, so proactive TDM should not currently be recommended.

Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in pediatric patients with Crohn's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

There is currently no curative treatment for childhood Crohn's disease (CD). This meta-analysis aimed to validate the efficacy and safety of adalimumab (ADA) in pediatric patients with CD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched all relevant studies in the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. The primary outcomes were induction (≤ 12 weeks) and maintenance (up to 48 weeks) of remission and response. Secondary outcomes were severe adverse events and opportunistic infections to ADA. The Cochrane bias assessment tool was used to assess the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials. The methodological quality of the single-arm studies was assessed using the methodological index for non-randomized studies tool.

RESULTS

Ten clinical trials involving a total of 885 patients were included. Results indicated that 59% (95% confidence interval [CI] 39-80%) of the subjects treated with ADA achieved induction of remission, and 60% (95% CI 35-86%) of the subjects treated with ADA achieved induction of response, 57% (95% CI 44-70%) achieved maintenance of remission, and 63% (95% CI 26-69%) achieved maintenance of response.

CONCLUSION

Current evidence indicates that ADA is effective in children and adolescents with CD and that adverse events vary but are usually not severe.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ , identifier CRD42023402199.

Response Types and Factors Associated with Response Types to Biologic Therapies in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis from Two Randomized Clinical Trials

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to understand treatment response dynamics, including factors associated with favorable response, among patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who received guselkumab, adalimumab, or secukinumab.

METHODS

These post hoc analyses used data from the phase III clinical trials ECLIPSE and VOYAGE 1, which were conducted between September 2021 and November 2022. On the basis of absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (aPASI) scores, patients were divided into short-term response types (SRT1-6, based on week 20-48 response) and long-term response types (LRT1-4, based on week 52-252 response). Response types (RTs) were based on aPASI cutoffs deemed clinically relevant by the investigators; SRT1/LRT1 were the most favorable response types. Baseline characteristics were compared across RTs, and logistic regression analyses established factors associated with SRT1/LRT1.

RESULTS

Overall, 1045, 662, and 272 patients were included in the ECLIPSE short-term, VOYAGE 1 short-term, and VOYAGE 1 long-term analyses, respectively. Mean age, body mass index (BMI), baseline aPASI score, and body surface area were lower in SRT1 than SRT6. In VOYAGE 1, adalimumab treatment, high BMI, and current/former smoking status resulted in less favorable responses. In the VOYAGE 1 long-term analysis, patients in LRT4 had the highest baseline aPASI score, were older, and were more often obese compared with other LRT groups. Regression analyses showed that SRT1 (both treatments) in VOYAGE 1 and ECLIPSE, and LRT1 (guselkumab group) in the VOYAGE 1 long-term analysis, were associated with week 16 aPASI response. In VOYAGE 1, SRT1 was associated with psoriasis duration and smoking status.

CONCLUSIONS

Early treatment response and baseline characteristics, including smoking, psoriasis duration, and obesity, may be associated with longer-term response to biologics.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

ECLIPSE: NCT03090100, VOYAGE 1: NCT02207231.

Prospective Observational Evaluation of the Time-Dependency of Adalimumab Immunogenicity and Drug Concentration in Ulcerative Colitis Patients: the POETIC II Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Home self-injection of the human anti-tumour necrosis alpha [anti-TNFα] monoclonal adalimumab complicates prospective serial-sampling studies. Although a recent study examined adalimumab levels and immunogenicity in Crohn's disease [CD] patients, prospective real-world data from ulcerative colitis [UC] patients are lacking.

METHODS

A three-monthly home-visit programme from induction was established prospectively for UC patients. Clinical scores were determined at each visit, and sera were obtained for assessment of drug and anti-adalimumab antibody levels. Calprotectin was measured using a smartphone-based app. This cohort was compared to a parallel prospective cohort of adalimumab-treated CD patients [POETIC1].

RESULTS

Fifty UC patients starting adalimumab [median follow-up 28 weeks] were compared to 98 adalimumab-treated CD patients [median follow-up 44 weeks]. Only 11/50 UC patients [22%] continued treatment to the end of the follow-up compared with 50/98 [51%] CD patients (odds ratio [OR] = 0.27, p = 0.001). Loss of response was significantly more common in UC patients [OR = 3.2, p = 0.001]. Seventeen patients [34%] in the UC cohort developed anti-adalimumab antibodies, 9/17 [52.9%] as early as week 2. There was no difference between patient cohorts in the overall development of anti-adalimumab antibodies [34% vs 30.6%, respectively, OR = 1.67, p = 0.67], nor was there a difference in early immunogenicity [OR = 1.39, p = 0.35]. There was no difference in low drug levels [<3 µg/mL] between the two cohorts [OR = 0.87, p = 0.83].

CONCLUSIONS

Loss of response to adalimumab therapy was significantly more common in the UC compared to the CD cohort and was driven by a higher rate of non-immunogenic, pharmacodynamic parameters.

Biosimilars in IBD: What Every Clinician Needs to Know

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Biosimilars were introduced to decrease biologic-related expenditures, but their uptake in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains suboptimal. Herein, we review biosimilar concepts, current products available for IBD treatment, and resources to support biosimilar utilization.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although a cornerstone of IBD treatment, biologics are costly due to their development. Biosimilars, which are biologic products highly similar to a reference product, aim to decrease these expenditures. Infliximab, adalimumab, and ustekinumab biosimilars are approved for IBD, but uptake remains low due to biosimilar efficacy and safety concerns and delayed market entry. Clinicians can effectively address some of these barriers and help patients and healthcare systems reap the benefits of decreased costs and increased treatment access. Data shows comparable efficacy and safety outcomes with biosimilars in IBD. Several biosimilar products are available and in the pipeline, but efforts are needed from various stakeholders to bolster utilization and generate benefits.

Interstitial keratitis presenting as the ocular manifestation of undiagnosed hidradenitis suppurativa

Interstitial keratitis is defined as nonulcerative inflammation of the corneal stroma resulting from a bacterial or viral infection, parasitic antigen, or autoimmune response. Hidradenitis suppurativa is an inflammatory skin condition that presents with painful and inflamed boils in apocrine gland-bearing regions of the body, typically with onset around puberty, and ocular comorbidities exist in only a small percentage of these patients. Herein, we describe a unique ocular presentation of hidradenitis suppurativa including pronounced bilateral interstitial keratitis and association with high titer c-ANCA (antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies).

Is tumor necrosis factor-α monoclonal therapy with proactive therapeutic drug monitoring optimized for inflammatory bowel disease? Network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) monoclonal antibody therapy [adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab (IFX)] with therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), which has been proposed for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, are still controversial.

AIM

To determine the efficacy and safety of anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibody therapy with proactive TDM in patients with IBD and to determine which subtype of IBD patients is most suitable for proactive TDM interventions.

METHODS

As of July 2023, we searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to compare anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibody therapy with proactive TDM with therapy with reactive TDM or empiric therapy. Pairwise and network meta-analyses were used to determine the IBD patient subtype that achieved clinical remission and to determine the need for surgery.

RESULTS

This systematic review and meta-analysis yielded 13 studies after exclusion, and the baseline indicators were balanced. We found a significant increase in the number of patients who achieved clinical remission in the ADA [odds ratio (OR) = 1.416, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.196-1.676] and RCT (OR = 1.393, 95%CI: 1.182-1.641) subgroups and a significant decrease in the number of patients who needed surgery in the proactive vs reactive (OR = 0.237, 95%CI: 0.101-0.558) and IFX + ADA (OR = 0.137, 95%CI: 0.032-0.588) subgroups, and the overall risk of adverse events was reduced (OR = 0.579, 95%CI: 0.391-0.858) according to the pairwise meta-analysis. Moreover, the network meta-analysis results suggested that patients with IBD treated with ADA (OR = 1.39, 95%CI: 1.19-1.63) were more likely to undergo TDM, especially in comparison with patients with reactive TDM (OR = 1.38, 95%CI: 1.07-1.77).

CONCLUSION

Proactive TDM is more suitable for IBD patients treated with ADA and has obvious advantages over reactive TDM. We recommend proactive TDM in IBD patients who are treated with ADA.

Drug Retention Time of Immunosuppressive Therapy in Behcet's Uveitis

PURPOSE

Behcet's Disease is a chronic multisystem vasculitis associated with a blinding uveitis. Few comparative studies exist between conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biologic DMARDs in Behcet's uveitis (BU). We therefore used drug retention time (DRT), an accepted surrogate measure of pharmacological efficacy and tolerability, to compare these treatments in patients with BU.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of patients who met the revised International Criteria for Behcet's Disease (ICBD) treated at the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Australia, between 1985-2021. DRT was analysed with Kaplan-Meier plots and defined as total time on drug in the first medication-period for each DMARD in each patient.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients (37 males) with median age of 28.6 years were followed-up for a median of 8.0 years. At initial presentation, half had bilateral disease and median logMAR visual acuity was 0.176 (Snellen 6/9) in 62 uveitic eyes (16 anterior uveitis, 11 intermediate, 2 posterior, and 33 panuveitis). Thirty-three patients met ICBD initially. Prescribed corticosteroid-sparing agents were Cyclosporin (N = 24), Mycophenolate (N = 22), Azathioprine (N = 22), Methotrexate (N = 16), and Adalimumab (N = 15). Median DRT was 14.0, 27.4, 8.3, 24.0, and 52.0 months, respectively. DMARDs were discontinued 116 times and adverse effects (N = 37) were the main reason for cessation. Over time, patients were switched from Cyclosporin to Adalimumab earlier in the disease course due to poorer tolerance of adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Adalimumab's drug retention time was found to be similar to and possibly better than cDMARDs in patients with BU, who often suffer from vision-threatening disease at first presentation.

An Overview of Adalimumab Therapy for Ankylosing Spondylitis

BACKGROUND

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory disease known for causing pain, stiffness, and reduced mobility in the axial skeleton. Adalimumab, a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor, has emerged as a promising therapeutic option for AS.

METHODS

This systematic review involved a comprehensive search of randomized controlled trials related to AS treatment, conducted in major databases such as MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and PubMed. The search terms encompassed ankylosing spondylitis, adalimumab, methotrexate, other non-biologic DMARDs, glucocorticoids, NSAIDs, and analgesics. A total of 14 randomized controlled trials with 4,500 participants were included in the review.

RESULTS

The review's results revealed that adalimumab demonstrated notable superiority when compared to a placebo. It effectively reduced disease activity, improved physical function, and lowered inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Adalimumab demonstrated a favorable safety profile, with adverse events comparable to those observed with placebo.

CONCLUSION

Based on the results, adalimumab is deemed an effective treatment for AS, showcasing its potential as a first-line therapeutic option. Notably, no significant increase in adverse events was observed compared to placebo. However, the conclusion emphasizes the need for further studies with extended follow-up durations to ascertain the long-term efficacy and safety of adalimumab in AS management. This systematic review provides valuable insights supporting the use of adalimumab in the treatment of AS and underscores the importance of ongoing investigations into its long-term effects to optimize its clinical utilization in AS patients.

Cost-consequence analysis of tocilizumab versus adalimumab and etanercept among rheumatoid arthritis patients in Saudi Arabia: a single-center study

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to examine the direct medical cost and impact of tocilizumab (TOZ) versus adalimumab (ADM) and etanercept (ETC) on reducing the levels of two inflammatory markers (e.g., C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)) among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using real-world data from Saudi Arabia.

METHOD

This was a single-center retrospective cohort study in which data for biologic-naïve RA patients aged ≥ 18 years and treated with TOZ, ADM, ETC were retrieved from the electronic medical records (EMRs) of a university-affiliated tertiary care center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Patients were followed up at least one year after the treatment initiation. Bottom-up microcosting was utilized to estimate the direct medical costs. Additionally, inverse probability treatment weighting and bootstrapping with 10,000 replications were conducted to generate 95% confidence levels for costs and the mean reductions in CRP and ESR levels.

RESULTS

The number of patients who met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis was 150 patients (TOZ (n = 56), ADM (n = 41), ETC (n = 53)). Patients on TOZ had 3.96 mg/L (95% CI: -0.229-4.95) and 11.21 mm/hr (95% CI: 10.28-18.11) higher mean reductions in the CRP and ESR levels compared to their counterparts on ADM, ETC, respectively. However, this was associated with mean annual incremental costs of USD 10,087.88 (95% CI: 9494.50-11,441.63) in all cost-effectiveness bootstrap distributions.

CONCLUSION

Tocilizumab has shown better effectiveness in reducing the levels of CRP and ESR but with higher costs. Future studies should examine whether the reduction of these two inflammatory markers is associated with quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gains.

Challenges for further successful development of tumor necrosis factor targeting therapies for uveitis

INTRODUCTION

Uveitis is a heterogeneous group of ocular conditions characterized by inflammation of the uveal tract and is one of the leading causes of vision impairment. In developed countries, noninfectious uveitis (NIU) represents most cases and is challenging to treat due to its severity, chronicity, and high recurrence rates. The advent of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (anti-TNF-α) agents have dramatically improved outcomes and changed treatment paradigms in NIU.

AREAS COVERED

The index article summarizes the present experience of anti-TNF-α agents in NIU pharmacotherapy and highlights the barriers to further research and development of anti-TNF-α agents for uveitis. Common challenges faced in NIU clinical drugs trials, specific difficulties in anti-TNF-α drug development, and promising competitor drug candidates are discussed and evaluated.

EXPERT OPINION

Anti-TNF-α agents have revolutionized NIU pharmacotherapy and greatly improved outcomes with good safety profiles. The great success of systemic infliximab and adalimumab in NIU treatment has resulted in little impetus for further development of this class of medication. Attempts have been made to deliver anti-TNF-α agents intravitreally but that has not been successful thus far. With expiring patents, competition from biosimilars and newer, novel molecules, it may not be viable to continue pursuing anti-TNF-α drug development.

Adalimumab Effectively Decreases Inflammation Downstream of TNFα Signaling in Synoviocytes from Extended Oligoarticular Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS) play a critical role in inflammation that contributes to disease progression in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), FLS express tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα). TNFα signaling has been shown to be upstream of transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) signaling. Overexpression of TNFα and TGFβ, as well as related proteins, can cause increased inflammation in RA. In this study, we examine the effects of inhibiting TNFα signaling with adalimumab on FLS isolated from synovial fluid of patients with JIA.

METHODS

Synovial fluid samples were selected from 41 patients in our repository. Of these samples, 23 were diagnosed with persistent oligoarticular JIA and 18 were diagnosed with extended oligoarticular JIA. All samples were taken prior to patients extending to a polyarticular course, or what we termed extended-to-be (ETB), and were on no medications or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) only at the time of arthrocentesis. For cell studies, FLS were isolated from synovial fluid and treated with adalimumab for 24 h. Protein antibody arrays were performed by RayBiotech, Inc. according to their protocols.

RESULTS

In persistent FLS, TNFα (fold change [FC] = 1.2 p = 0.001), TGFβ (FC = 1.5 p = 0.001), lymphotoxin alpha (LTα) (FC = 4.3 p = 0.015), soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (sTNFRI) (FC = 5.1 p = 0.008), and soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 (sTNFRII) (FC = 3.8 p = 0.025) were significantly elevated in adalimumab treated cells compared to untreated cells. In ETB FLS, TNFα was significantly elevated (FC = 1.04 p = 0.023) while TGFβ (FC = 1.03 p = 0.037) was significantly decreased in adalimumab-treated cells compared to untreated cells.

CONCLUSIONS

This data suggests that, after only 24 h, adalimumab is effective at decreasing inflammation that occurs downstream of initial TNFα signaling in extended-to-be fibroblast-like synoviocytes.

Better efficacy, lower recurrence rate and decreased CD8+TRM with guselkumab treatment for generalized pustular psoriasis: A prospective cohort study from China

Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a severe and uncommon form of psoriasis, for which treatment options are limited. There is an urgent need to expand the treatment options for GPP. Currently, adalimumab, secukinumab, and guselkumab are considered effective for GPP, but there is a lack of prospective direct comparative studies on their efficacy for GPP. We conducted a prospective, single-center, observational study on 50 GPP patients to compare the efficacy, safety, and recurrence rates of these three biologics. Adalimumab, secukinumab, and guselkumab resulted in varying degrees of improvement in patients with GPP, but guselkumab exhibited superior efficacy and a lower recurrence rate than the other two drugs. This enhanced response may be attributed to the significant reduction in CD8+ tissue-resident memory T cells within GPP lesions caused by guselkumab.

Review of Adalimumab Biosimilar SB5 in Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases

SB5 is an approved biosimilar of adalimumab, a recombinant monoclonal anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antibody. The approval of SB5 was based on the comparison with reference adalimumab in analytical studies, pharmacokinetic (PK) and immunogenicity assessments, and randomized controlled trials. Efficacy data was primarily obtained in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and extended to include additional indications such as psoriasis, Crohn's disease, or ulcerative colitis by extrapolation. Following its approval, additional post-marketing data have been collected comparing SB5 with reference adalimumab. This review summarizes the clinical data on SB5 from randomized controlled trials and provides a comprehensive overview of the available post-approval data. In "real-world" settings, SB5 was as effective as its reference product across different indications and countries, treatment persistence was well maintained throughout studies, and no new safety concerns were identified. In both controlled and "real-world" settings, switching from reference adalimumab to SB5 was not associated with altered efficacy or clinical complications. In post-approval studies, the quality of SB5 was consistent over time, independent of the batch and process changes, and the SB5 autoinjector was preferred over other autoinjectors by both healthcare professionals and patients. Taken together, these data support the use of SB5 whenever reference adalimumab is appropriate and demonstrate that switching from reference adalimumab to SB5 is feasible.

Calcific constrictive pericarditis following tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibition

Background

Tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha inhibition is a core therapeutic avenue for a broad range of inflammatory and autoimmune disorders including rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease, as well as dermatological conditions such as hidradenitis suppurativa. Adalimumab has become one of the most common TNF-alpha-inhibiting agents, which is used for many of these conditions. Treatment with such agents is associated with numerous systemic side effects, though cardiac complications remain relatively rare. These include reports of pericarditis and pericardial effusions1-3.

Case summary

A 63-year-old lady was referred to the outpatient respiratory clinic with a 1-year history of increasing breathlessness, on a background of 4 years of treatment with adalimumab for Stage III hidradenitis suppurativa. A high-resolution computed tomography (CT) thorax revealed evidence of pericardial calcification. Subsequent left and right heart catheterization study revealed equalization of intraventricular pressures, consistent with constrictive pericarditis. A QuantiFERON test was negative, and rheumatological serology was unremarkable. The patient was initially managed conservatively with close follow-up, before undergoing surgical pericardectomy when she developed signs of cardiac failure.

Discussion

Adalimumab is associated with a range of systemic side effects, though cardiac complications are relatively rare. This case highlights a potentially novel complication associated with prolonged adalimumab therapy. Given that there are reports in the literature of pericarditis and pericardial effusions associated with TNF-alpha inhibition1-3, it is reasonable to hypothesize that the calcific constrictive pericarditis seen in this case may demonstrate a novel cardiac phenomenon associated with this therapy, given the lack of any traditional aetiological factors.

Prospective study of an adalimumab combined with partial enteral nutrition in the induction period of Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Adalimumab monotherapy can suppress gut inflammation and induce remission in active Crohn's disease but has some limitations. Exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) is recommended for patients with mild to moderate Crohn's disease (CD), but implementation is challenging.

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness of adalimumab combined with partial enteral nutrition (PEN) in the induction therapy for Crohn's disease.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was designed and a total of 56 patients with active CD who met the criteria for enteral nutrition (EN) treatment in our hospital were selected. The baseline data of all patients were collected including age, sex and other general information. The changes in fecal calprotectin, C-reactive protein (CRP), albumin(Alb), hemoglobin (Hb), platelets (Plt), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), Crohn's disease activity index score (CDAI), simple endoscopic score (SES-CD) and body mass index (BMI) were compared between the adalimumab combined with enteral nutrition (ADA+EN) group (N = 37) the adalimumab group (ADA) (N = 19) at week 0 (W0) and treatment outcomes at week 12(W12). Additionally, the differences between the two groups before and after treatment were evaluated. Then the ADA+EN group was divided into an adalimumab combined with exclusive enteral nutrition subgroup (ADA+EEN) and an adalimumab combined with partial nutrition subgroup (ADA+PEN) according to enteral nutrition intake. The changes in fecal calprotectin, CRP, Alb, Hb, Plt, ESR and CDAI, SES-CD and BMI were compared between the  ADA+EEN group and the ADA+PEN group at week 0 (W0) and treatment outcomes at week 12(W12). The differences between the two groups before and after treatment were evaluated. To evaluate the effectiveness of the two treatments on patients' quality of life, nutritional recovery and body composition, patients in the ADA+EN group were needed to complete the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ), EQ-5D-5L, the EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) and body composition analysis.A total of 28 patients completed all questionnaires and body composition analyses at week 0 and week 12, including 10 patients in the ADA+EEN group and 18 patients in the ADA+PEN group, respectively. The differences of in IBDQ, EQ-5D-5L and body composition analysis were compared between the two groups at week 0 (W0) and treatment outcomes at week 12(W12). Additionally, the differences between the two groups before and after treatment were evaluated.

RESULTS

These investigated indexes such as calprotectin, Hb, Plt, ESR, Alb, BMI, CRP, CDAI and SES-CD scores were significantly different before and after treatment  in the ADA+EN group (p < 0.01). However, fecal calprotectin, Hb, SES-CD scores and Alb in the ADA group were not statistically significantly different from W0 to W12 (p > 0.05). The fecal calprotectin and CDAI scores in the ADA+EN group were significantly lower than those in the ADA group after treatment. The differences in all factors before and after treatment between the ADA+PEN group and the ADA+EEN group were statistically significant (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups at week 12 (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Adalimumab combined with EN are more effective than ADA monotherapy in terms of endoscopy and clinical remission. By comparing the investigated indicators such as calprotectin, Hb, Plt, ESR ,CRP and SES-CD scores, it was proven that adalimumab combined with partial enteral nutrition or exclusive enteral nutrition has the same remission effect in induced Crohn's disease. The combination of biological agents and partial nutrition can improve medical order compliance, psychological burden and quality of life. Therefore, adalimumab combined with partial nutrition can be used as the first-line treatment for CD induced remission.

Pneumocystosis in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis on adalimumab therapy: a case-based review

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is a potentially fatal type of pneumonitis, which may have devastating consequences. Typically, it occurs in immunocompromised patients, with the natural history varying depending on the presence or not of HIV infection. Staining and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing in induced sputum or bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is the cornerstone of the diagnosis, while trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is the treatment of choice. The etiological association of biologic agents with the occurrence of PJP is not entirely clear. Adalimumab is a fully human monoclonal anti-TNF-alpha antibody, which has been introduced relatively recently in the treatment of autoimmune inflammatory diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis. In contrast to other biologic agents, such as Alemtuzumab or Infliximab, there are a small number of reports that support the drug's ability to trigger the occurrence of PJP. Hereby, we present a 53-year-old female patient with a medical history of rheumatoid arthritis on Adalimumab therapy, who developed PJP and we will discuss the main characteristics of PJP and the possible contribution of biologics to the occurrence of the infection.

Identification of patient endotypes and adalimumab treatment responders in axial spondyloarthritis using blood-derived extracellular matrix biomarkers

OBJECTIVE

To explore the potential of a panel of ECM remodelling markers as endotyping tools for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) by separating patients into subtypes and investigate how they differ among each other in disease activity scores and response to treatment with adalimumab.

METHODS

In three axSpA studies, a panel of 14 blood-based ECM biomarkers related to formation of collagen (PRO-C2, PRO-C3, PRO-C6), degradation of collagen by metalloproteinases (C1M, C2M, T2CM, C3M, C4M, C6M, C10C), matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-degraded prolargin (PROM), MMP-degraded and citrullinated vimentin (VICM), basement membrane turnover (PRO-C4) and neutrophil activity (CPa9-HNE) were assessed to enable patient clustering (endotyping). MASH (n=41) was a cross-sectional study, while Adalimumab in Axial Spondyloarthritis study (ASIM,n=45) and Danish Multicenter Study of Adalimumab in Spondyloarthritis (DANISH, n=49) were randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trials of adalimumab versus placebo every other week for 6 or 12 weeks, respectively, followed by active treatment. Biomarker data were log-transformed, standardised by mean centering and scaled by the SD prior to principal component analysis and K-means clustering.

RESULTS

Based on all three studies, we identified two orthogonal dimensions reflecting: (1) inflammation and neutrophil activity (driven by C1M and CPa9-HNE) and (2) collagen turnover (driven by PRO-C2). Three endotypes were identified: high inflammation endotype (Endotype1), low inflammation endotype (Endotype 2) and high collagen turnover endotype (Endotype3). Endotype1 showed higher disease activity (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)) at baseline compared with Endotype2 and Endotype3 and higher percentage of patients responding to adalimumab based on ASDAS clinical improvement at week 24. Endotype3 showed higher percentage of patients with 50% improvement in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index response at week 24 compared with Endotype2.

CONCLUSION

These endotypes differ in their tissue remodelling profile and may in the future have utility for patient stratification and treatment tailoring.

Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Adalimumab Originator to SB5, Adalimumab Biosimilar for Noninfectious Uveitis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of switching from adalimumab originator (Humira, AbbVie) to SB5, adalimumab biosimilar (Adalloce, Samsung Bioepis) in patients with noninfectious uveitis (NIU).

METHODS

Fifteen patients (29 eyes) with NIU who were switched from adalimumab originator to SB5 and followed up for 6 months or longer were retrospectively included. Data consisted of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR), intraocular pressure (IOP, mmHg), anterior chamber (AC) cell grade, anterior vitreous (AV) cell grade, vitreous haze grade, central macular thickness (CMT, μm), and macular volume (MV, mm3) at pre-switching, 2, 4, and 6 months post-switching.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in BCVA, AC and AV cell grades, and vitreous haze grades at 2, 4, and 6 months post- compared with pre-switching, and no significant differences in CMT and MV at 2 and 6 months post-switching. CMT and MV decreased from 260.55 ± 67.44 μm and 8.37 ± 1.14 mm3 at pre-switching to 244.14 ± 60.31 μm (p = 0.032) and 8.11 ± 1.20 mm3 (p = 0.027) at 4 months post-switching, respectively. There was no recurrence of uveitis, as defined by AC cell grade, vitreous haze, or BCVA. Four patients (27%) were switched back to adalimumab originator after a mean of 9 weeks, due to discomfort during the injection (three patients) and technical difficulty with the new injection device (one patient). No other adverse events occurred after switching to SB5.

CONCLUSION

Switching from adalimumab originator to SB5 for NIU does not result in clinically significant differences in treatment efficacy and safety.

Long-term follow-up of a bilateral acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy following COVID-19 infection: a case report

BACKGROUND

Acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy (APMPPE) is a rare inflammatory eye disorder that is characterized by the presence of multiple placoid lesions in the posterior pole of the eye. Relentless placoid chorioretinitis (RPC) is an inflammatory chorioretinopathy that combines clinical features of APMPPE and serpiginous chorioretinitis, which is a progressive condition with a high risk of visual disability. Patients with COVID-19 can develop various ocular manifestations, however, there have been limited reports of APMPPE and RPC associated with the infection. We report a case of a patient who developed APMPPE after a COVID-19 infection and subsequently progressed into RPC.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 17-year-old male presented with a one-week history of painless gradual visual loss in both eyes. Two months prior to the visual symptoms, the patient had a SARS CoV-2 infection, confirmed by polymerase chain reaction test. Clinical findings with fundoscopy, optical coherence tomography and fluorescein angiography were consistent with APMPPE. Due to the severely affected vision in both eyes, the patient was started on 50 mg oral prednisolone daily, after which vision began to improve rapidly. Two months after symptom onset during steroid taper, the impression of continued inflammatory activity and new lesions in the retinal periphery of both eyes suggested RPC. Adalimumab 40 mg every other week was initiated with 12.5 mg prednisolone daily followed by slow tapering. Vision improved and five months after the start of the adalimumab treatment, the steroid was discontinued and there were no signs of active inflammation. The patient has been followed for a total of 21 months since presentation, had full visual recovery and good tolerance of the immunosuppressive treatment.

CONCLUSION

COVID-19 might cause long-lasting activity of APMPPE. The scarcity of reports compared with the number of confirmed COVID-19 infections worldwide suggests a rare entity. The association of APMPPE with a variety of infections may suggest a common immunological aberrant response that might be triggered by various factors. Further examinations and case reports are needed to understand the role of biological therapy in the treatment of such cases.

Real-World Experience of Adalimumab Biosimilar (ABP 501) Use in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Europe

INTRODUCTION

Approval of adalimumab biosimilar ABP 501 (Amgevita®) for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) was based upon the principle of extrapolation. Real-world experience of ABP 501 utilization in IBD can provide useful information to healthcare providers and patients.

METHODS

Data were drawn from the 2020-2021 Adelphi IBD Disease Specific Programme™ conducted in five major European countries. Participating gastroenterologists completed a point-in-time survey to provide patient medical record data, and patients voluntarily completed questionnaires to report health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Descriptive analyses were conducted for "ABP 501 initiators" (received ABP 501 as first advanced therapy) and "RP-ABP 501 switchers" (switched to ABP 501 from reference product [RP; Humira®] as first advanced therapy).

RESULTS

This analysis included 239 ABP 501 initiators and 136 RP-ABP 501 switchers. At consultation, initiators had been on ABP 501 treatment for a median of 7.5 months and switchers had received ABP 501 for a median of 7.7 months following the switch from a median of 14.0 months treatment with RP. About 74% of initiators and 89% of switchers were reported by their treating physicians as being in clinical remission. Physicians and patients reported satisfaction with ABP 501 in the range of 92-99% across both groups. Patient self-assessment, including EuroQol visual analogue scale, Short IBD Questionnaire, and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment scores, suggested minimal impairment of HRQoL while on ABP 501. The most common reason for RP to ABP 501 switch was lower healthcare costs.

CONCLUSION

Both patients with IBD and treating physicians reported high levels of satisfaction with ABP 501 among initiators and switchers.

Behandlung der Acne fulminans mit Tumornekrosefaktor-α-Inhibitoren - eine Übersicht klinischer Fälle und der Literatur: Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor treatment of acne fulminans - a clinical and literature review

Acne fulminans (AF) ist eine seltene, schwerwiegende, plötzlich auftretende und lang andauernde Hauterkrankung, die Vernarbungen im Gesicht und am Körper verursacht. Die Standardbehandlung mit langfristiger Verabreichung einer Kombination aus Isotretinoin und Prednisolon reicht nicht immer aus und kann unerwünschten Wirkungen haben. Es gibt daher einen ungedeckten Bedarf an besseren Therapien. Fallberichte lassen darauf schließen, dass Tumornekrosefaktor‐α (TNF‐α)‐Inhibitoren eine Rolle bei der Behandlung von AF spielen könnten. In einer 3 Jahre abdeckenden retrospektiven Datenerhebung aus zwei dermatologischen Zentren sowie einer Literaturübersicht klinischer Fälle von Acne fulminans, die mit Anti‐TNF‐α‐Therapie behandelt wurden, konnten drei klinische Fälle und zwölf Literaturfälle ermittelt werden. Insgesamt wurden fünf verschiedene TNF‐α‐Inhibitoren eingesetzt, am häufigsten Adalimumab. Klinisches Ansprechen wurde nach 1 Monat bei 2/3 (67%) der klinischen Fälle beziehungsweise 5/12 (42%) der Literaturfälle beobachtet. Nach einer medianen Dauer von 3–7 Monaten war die Behandlung bei 2/3 (67%) und 11/12 (92%) der Betroffenen erfolgreich. Alle berichteten unerwünschten Wirkungen waren leicht und reversibel. Die Anti‐TNF‐α‐Behandlung kann zu schneller Verbesserung bei Patienten mit AF führen, wenn die Erstbehandlung mit Isotretinoin und Prednisolon versagt. Allerdings fehlen randomisierte, kontrollierte Studien, und die exakte Dosierung sowie der exakte Zeitablauf müssen vor der klinischen Umsetzung genauer geprüft werden.

Efficacy and Safety of Adalimumab in Patients with Behçet Uveitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To examine the long-term efficacy and safety of adalimumab (ADA) in patients with Behçet uveitis (BU).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies was performed. Pooled results are presented as mean difference or standardized mean difference (std diff) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Visual acuity (VA), intraocular inflammation grade, central macular thickness, corticosteroid (CS) sparing effect and adverse events were evaluated.

RESULTS

Ten studies were included finally for quantitative and qualitative synthesis. ADA therapy resulted in 0.124 (95%CI: 0.084, 0.165) logMAR improvement in VA. In addition, ADA therapy resulted in decreased grade of intraocular inflammation [std diff, -1.187 (95%CI: -1.508, -0.866)] and macular thickness [std diff, -0.564 (95%CI: -0.843, -0.286)] and caused a decrease in CS dosage [std diff, -1.809 (95%CI: -2.420, -1.198)]. The pooled rate of overall adverse events for ADA in 301 patients was 8.5% (95%CI: 0.039, 0.177).

CONCLUSION

ADA is an efficient therapy that improves VA and controls intraocular inflammation, macular edema and retinal vasculitis. As the disease exposure time increased, improvement in VA was less. The safety and CS-sparing effect of ADA were demonstrated with few adverse effects. The results provided evidence that ADA can be used safely and efficiently as the first-line drug in patients with BU.

The effectiveness of adalimumab as an add-on therapy in two cases with leg ulcers in Behçet's disease resistant to conventional immunosuppressive therapy alone and a review of the literature

The current report presents two cases with leg ulcers related to Behçet's disease (BD) resistant to conventional immunosuppressive therapy (CIST) but successfully treated with adalimumab (ADA). BD, which can affect vessels of any size and type, is a systemic vasculitis. In the vascular system, veins are the most predominantly affected blood vessels, with deep vein thrombosis and recurrent superficial vein thrombophlebitis being the most common vascular signs of the disease in the lower extremities. Leg ulcers, commonly associated with vasculitis or deep vein thrombosis, are rare in patients with BD. Conventional immunosuppressive therapy is very critical to prevent relapses and diminish the risk of post-thrombotic syndrome. In patients with BD-associated venous thrombosis (deep vein thrombosis or superficial vein thrombophlebitis) resistant to these treatments, tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors can be used alone or in combination with traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. In view of such information, add-on adalimumab treatment was considered appropriate for both patients. Response to this intervention was highly satisfying for the patients at the end of the 6-month treatment. Nonetheless, it warrants further studies directly evaluating the efficacy of tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors alone in leg ulcers in BD.

Rituximab as possible therapy in TNF inhibitor-induced IgA vasculitis with severe renal involvement

BACKGROUND

We observe the increasing use of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in patients affected by chronic inflammatory diseases. These drugs provide good control of symptoms, contributing to significant improvement in the quality of life in individuals with high disease burden. On the other hand, along with their wider use and longer follow-up periods the number of reports regarding their adverse effects is also increasing. The reported complications include drug-induced vasculitis with possible kidney involvement. In the literature we can distinguish more frequently described ANCA-associated vasculitis and more rarely occurring immunoglobulin A vasculitis. Although uncommon, such complications may present with potentially life-threatening vital organ dysfunction; therefore, adequate monitoring and effective therapy are necessary.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report two cases of TNF inhibitor-induced vasculitis with severe acute worsening of renal function and significant proteinuria. The first patient was receiving golimumab therapy for ankylosing spondylitis and the second patient was treated with adalimumab for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. In the second case dialysis treatment was necessary and the patient presented recurrence of vasculitis after rechallenge with adalimumab. Both patients underwent renal biopsy which showed findings compatible with drug-induced IgA vasculitis and both were treated successfully with corticosteroids and rituximab.

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge this is the first report of rituximab use in drug-induced IgA vasculitis with renal involvement. Combination of corticosteroids and rituximab can be an effective therapy in case of vasculitis with kidney failure and a preferable option for selected patients with drug-induced IgA vasculitis compared to cyclophosphamide. More studies are necessary to establish suitable short- and long-term treatment. Given the rarity of this disorder, case reports and case series can provide practical guidance until additional studies become available.