Herbal medicine for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: A prospective randomized controlled trial

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Chinese herbal medicine is increasingly used as complementary therapy to manage nausea and vomiting in different cultures. One such herbal recipe is the Hezhong granules, which contain classical antiemetic formulations, and are commonly used to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Modern pharmacological studies have shown that the key components of Hezhong granules, including Pinellia ternata (Thunb.), Evodia rutaecarpa (Juss.), and Zingiber officinale exhibit significant antiemetic and antitumor properties. Despite this promising evidence, controlling CINV remains a significant challenge in cancer treatment. Moreover, there is a lack of scientifically designed clinical trials to validate the efficacy and safety of classical antiemetic formulas for CINV interventions.

AIMS OF THE STUDY

To investigate the efficacy and safety of Hezhong granules in preventing CINV in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

This study was conducted between October 2020 and February 2022 in 12 hospital wards in Southwest China. In this multicenter, randomized controlled trial, we enrolled patients with advanced CRC who received fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. The patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the Hezhong granule group (receiving a 5-HT3-receptor antagonist, dexamethasone, and Hezhong granules) or the placebo group (receiving a 5-HT3-receptor antagonist, dexamethasone, and placebo) during the first and second courses of chemotherapy. A 5-day diary was provided to all patients. Acute and delayed CINV were defined as CINV occurring within 24 h or between 24 and 120 h after the start of treatment. The primary endpoints were complete response rate (CRR, defined as the proportion of patients without nausea/vomiting) and objective response rate (ORR, defined as the proportion of patients without nausea/vomiting plus mild nausea/vomiting) for both acute and delayed CINV. Secondary endpoints were the daily rates of CINV events and Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE). To identify the predictors of CINV, we conducted multivariate ordered logistic regression analysis. This study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial, number ChiCTR2100041643.

RESULTS

A total of 120 participants were randomly assigned, of whom 112 (56/56) completed two cycles and were included in the full analysis. In the acute phase, there were minor improvements in the Hezhong granule group, but there were no significant differences in the CRRs for nausea and vomiting (mean difference:10.7 %, P = 0.318, 0.324), while the ORRs increased by approximately 17.5 % (mean difference:16.1 %, P = 0.051; 17.9 %, P = 0.037, respectively). In the delayed phase, significant improvements of approximately 20 % were observed in both the CRRs (mean difference:19.6 %, P = 0.053; 21.4 %, P = 0.035) and ORRs (mean difference:17.9 %, P = 0.037, 0.043) for nausea and vomiting. Additionally, the daily rate of CINV events showed a mean difference of 19 % (P < 0.05). According to FLIE scores, approximately 70 % of patients who received Hezhong granules reported an improvement in their quality of life, with CINV symptoms having"no impact on daily life (NIDL)". No serious adverse events were attributed to herbal medicine.

CONCLUSIONS

Hezhong granules proved to be both effective and well-tolerated in preventing CINV in patients with advanced CRC, with notable benefits in preventing delayed CINV. These promising results set the stage for subsequent phase III clinical trials and experimental research on Hezhong Granules.

Mediating role of resilience between family functioning and quality of life in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

To better understand the relationship between family functioning, resilience, and quality of life (including physical and mental component score, PCS and MCS) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) to predict and improve their quality of life.

A cross-sectional study was conducted in which a total of 165 patients with advanced colorectal cancer participated in a one-time survey. Measures included the Family Functioning Assessment Device, the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, and the SF-12 Health Survey Assessment Scale. The data analysis methods included descriptive analysis, pearson's correlation analysis, t-tests, and nonparametric tests.

Of the patients with advanced CRC, 47.27% and 72.73% had moderate or low mental and physical health components, respectively. The results indicated that in patients with advanced CRC, family function was negatively correlated with resilience (p < 0.01), family functioning was negatively correlated with MCS (p < 0.01), and resilience was positively correlated with PCS (p < 0.05) and MCS (p < 0.01). The mediating analysis revealed that family functioning regulated MCS through resilience (effect value = 13.17%).

Our findings suggest that the MCS of patients with advanced CRC is influenced by both family functioning and resilience. PCS in patients with advanced CRC appears to be influenced by resilience but not by family functioning.

Different doses of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis and Bayesian analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to explore the incremental benefit of bevacizumab (Bev) in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) with different doses.

METHODS

A literature search of eight electronic databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang databases, Chinese Biomedical Database, VIP medicine information, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PubMed, and EMBASE) was conducted from database creation to December 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared Bev at various dosages + chemotherapy (CT) versus placebo (or blank control) + CT were selected. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR; complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]), and grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were integrated first by pooled analysis. The likelihood of ideal dosage of Bev was then ranked using random effects within Bayesian analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-six RCTs involving 18,261 patients met the inclusion criteria. OS increased significantly after using 5 mg (HR: 0.87, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.00) and 10 mg dosages of Bev (HR: 0.75, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.85) with CT, but statistical significance was not attained for the 7.5 mg dose (HR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.08). A significantly increased in PFS with doses of 5 mg (HR: 0.69, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.83), 7.5 mg (HR: 0.81, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.00), and 10 mg (HR: 0.60, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.68). ORR distinctly increased after 5 mg (RR: 1.34, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.55), 7.5 mg (RR: 1.25, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.50), and10 mg (RR: 2.27, 95% CI 1.82 to 2.84) doses were administered. Grade ≥ 3 AEs increased clearly in 5 mg (RR: 1.11, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.20) compared to 7.5 mg (RR: 1.05, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.35) and 10 mg (RR: 1.15, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.36). Bayesian analysis demonstrated that 10 mg Bev obtained the maximum time of OS (HR: 0.75, 95% CrI 0.58 to 0.97; probability rank = 0.05) indirectly compared to 5 mg and 7.5 mg Bev. Compared with 5 mg and 7.5 mg Bev, 10 mg Bev also holds the longest duration for PFS (HR: 0.59, 95% CrI 0.43 to 0.82; probability rank = 0.00). In terms of ORR, 10 mg Bev holds the maximum frequency (RR: 2.02, 95% CrI 1.52 to 2.66; probability rank = 0.98) in comparison to 5 mg and 7.5 mg Bev clearly. For grade ≥ 3 AEs, 10 mg Bev has the maximum incidence (RR: 1.15, 95% CrI 0.95 to 1.40, probability rank = 0.67) in comparison to other doses of Bev.

CONCLUSION

The study suggests that 10 mg dose Bev could be more effective in treating advanced CRC in efficacy, but 5 mg Bev could be more safer in terms of safety.

Retrospective efficacy analysis of olaparib combined with bevacizumab in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a highly prevalent malignancy of the digestive tract worldwide, characterized by a significant morbidity and mortality rate and subtle initial symptoms. Diarrhea, local abdominal pain, and hematochezia occur with the development of cancer, while systemic symptoms such as anemia and weight loss occur in patients with advanced CRC. Without timely interventions, the disease can have fatal consequences within a short span. The current therapeutic options for colon cancer include olaparib and bevacizumab, which are widely utilized. This study intends to evaluate the clinical efficacy of olaparib combined with bevacizumab in the treatment of advanced CRC, hoping to provide insights into advanced CRC treatment.

AIM

To investigate the retrospective efficacy of olaparib combined with bevacizumab in the treatment of advanced CRC.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of 82 patients with advanced colon cancer who were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of the University of South China between January 2018 and October 2019. Among them, 43 patients subjected to the classical FOLFOX chemotherapy regimen were selected as the control group, and 39 patients undergoing treatment with olaparib combined with bevacizumab were selected as the observation group. Subsequent to different treatment regimens, the short-term efficacy, time to progression (TTP), and incidence rate of adverse reactions between the two groups were compared. Changes in serum-related indicators [vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), matrix metalloprotein-9 (MMP-9), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2)] and tumor markers [human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199)] levels before and after treatment were compared between the two groups at the same time.

RESULTS

The objective response rate was discovered to be 82.05%, and the disease control rate was 97.44% in the observation group, which were significantly higher than the respective rates of 58.14% and 83.72% in the control group (P < 0.05). The median TTP was 24 mo (95%CI: 19.987-28.005) in the control group and 37 mo (95%CI: 30.854-43.870) in the observation group. The TTP in the observation group was significantly better than that in the control group, and the difference held statistical significance (log-rank test value = 5.009, P = 0.025). Before treatment, no substantial difference was detected in serum VEGF, MMP-9, and COX-2 levels and tumor markers HE4, CA125, and CA199 levels between the two groups (P > 0.05). Following treatment with different regimens, the above indicators in the two groups were remarkably promoted (P < 0.05), VEGF, MMP-9, and COX-2 in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05), and HE4, CA125, and CA199 levels were also lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Vis-à-vis the control group, the total incidence of gastrointestinal reactions, thrombosis, bone marrow suppression, liver and kidney function injury, and other adverse reactions in the observation group was notably lowered, with the difference considered statistically significant (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Olaparib combined with bevacizumab in the treatment of advanced CRC demonstrates a strong clinical effect of delaying disease progression and reducing the serum levels of VEGF, MMP-9, COX-2 and tumor markers HE4, CA125 and CA199. Moreover, given its fewer adverse reactions, it can be regarded as a safe and reliable treatment option.

Oral fruquintinib combined with tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil potassium for advanced colorectal cancer to obtain longer progression-free survival: A case report

BACKGROUND

After the failure of second-line standard therapy, effective treatment options for metastatic colorectal cancer are limited, and the duration of remission cannot meet clinical needs. In addition, associated drug toxicity may lead to treatment interruption that may affect patient outcomes. Therefore, more safe, effective and convenient treatments are urgently needed.

CASE SUMMARY

Here, we describe a patient with advanced colorectal cancer with multiple metastases in both lungs. Oxaliplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine was given as the first-line treatment, and bevacizumab combined with irinotecan was given as the second-line treatment after disease progression. However, treatment was interrupted due to recurrent grade 2 nausea and grade 1 diarrhea. He received targeted therapy with fruquintinib starting on August 26, 2020 and responded well for 12 mo. After slow progression of the lung metastases, progression-free survival was again achieved over 13.5 mo by continued treatment of fruquintinib in combination with tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil potassium chemotherapy. Overall treatment duration was more than 25.5 mo. The treatments delayed tumor progression, reduced drug side effects, maintained a good quality of life, and further extended overall survival.

CONCLUSION

This case report detailed preliminary evidence showing that the combination of fruquintinib with tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil potassium chemotherapy double oral therapy may result in longer progression-free survival in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Survival comparison of first-line treatment regimens in patients with braf-mutated advanced colorectal cancer: a multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Patients with V-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) V600E-mutated advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) have a poor prognosis, and treatment options that can improve outcome are still under investigation. The purpose of this study was to discuss the differences of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between patients with BRAF V600E-mutated advanced CRC who were treated with chemotherapy alone and chemotherapy combined with targeted therapy in advanced first-line therapy.

METHODS

Grouping of 61 patients according to first-line treatment regimen (chemotherapy alone/chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab). Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to compare OS and PFS. Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to measure the risk of first-line medication therapies while correcting for confounding factors that may affect PFS and OS.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in OS between patients treated with chemotherapy alone and those treated with chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab (P = 0.93; HR, 1.027; 95% CI, 0.555-1.901). Likewise, there was no significant difference in PFS between the two groups (P = 0.29; HR, 0.734; 95% CI, 0.413-1.304). Subgroup analysis showed that OS and PFS of different treatment regimens were not significantly different among subgroups. Multivariate analysis suggested that surgical treatment of primary tumor (P = 0.001; HR, 0.326; 95% CI, 0.169-0.631) and presence of liver metastasis (P = 0.009; HR, 2.399; 95% CI, 1.242-4.635) may serve as independent prognostic indicators in patients with BRAF-mutated advanced CRC. Surgical treatment of the primary tumor (P = 0.041; HR, 0.523; 95% CI, 0.280-0.974) was significantly associated with PFS too.

CONCLUSION

For patients with BRAF V600E-mutated advanced CRC, chemotherapy alone did not differ significantly in OS and PFS compared with chemotherapy + bevacizumab for advanced first-line therapy. Chemotherapy combined with targeted therapy did not render a survival benefit to these patients, demonstrating that the importance of developing new treatment options for this population.

Oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic versus open multivisceral resection for local advanced colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis

Laparoscopic (lap) colectomies for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) often require resection of other organs. We systematically reviewed currently available literature on lap multi-visceral resection for CRC, with regard to short- and long-term oncological outcomes, and compared them with open procedures. We performed a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar and PubMed from inception to November 30, 2020. The aim of this study was to synthesize short-term and oncological outcomes associated with laparoscopic versus open surgery. Pooled proportions and risk ratios (RRs) were calculated using an inverse variance method. We included six observational cohort studies published between 2012 and 2020 (lap procedures: n = 262; open procedures: n = 273). Collectively, they indicated that postoperative complications were significantly more common after open surgeries than lap surgeries (RR: 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39-0.72; P < 0.00001), but the two approaches did not significantly differ in positive resection margins (RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.38-1.50; P = 0.42), local recurrence (RR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.28-1.62; P = 0.37), or (based on two evaluable studies) 5-year OS (RR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.46-1.04; P = 0.08) or 5-year DFS (RR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.67-1.11) for T4b disease. In conclusion, laparoscopic and open multi-visceral resections for advanced CRC have comparable oncologic outcomes. Although a randomized study would be ideal for further research, no such studies are currently available.

Assessing demographic and socioeconomic factors in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to determine the socioeconomic and demographic factors associated with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) presentation at our institution.

METHODS

From January 2009 to January 2018, patients that underwent CRC surgery at our institution were included and retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to determine independent risk factors for presenting with advanced CRC.

RESULTS

A total of 277 patients were included, 53.5% presented with advanced CRC. The multivariate analysis identified that living in a rural area (odds ratio [OR] = 5.25; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 2.27-12-10; p < 0.001), weight loss (OR = 2.33; 95% CI: 1.35-4.09; p = 0.002), needing emergency surgery (OR = 4.68; 95% CI: 1.25-17.49; p = 0.022), location in the rectum in comparison with colon (OR = 2.66; 95% CI: 1.44-4.91; p = 0.002), and location in the mid rectum (OR = 6.10; 95% CI: 2.31-16.12; p < 0.001) were associated with higher odds of advanced CRC stage at presentation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with lower socioeconomic status, with symptoms, and needing emergency surgery were associated with advanced CRC stage at presentation. Special interventions to improve access to care in this population should be planned to enhance CRC outcomes.

Evaluating potential delays and outcomes of patients undergoing surgical resection for locally advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer during a pandemic

INTRODUCTION

The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a significant disruption of colorectal cancer (CRC) care pathways. This study evaluates the management and outcomes of patients with primary locally advanced or recurrent CRC during the pandemic in a single tertiary referral centre.

METHODS

Patients undergoing elective surgery for advanced or recurrent CRC with curative intent between March 2020 and March 2021 were identified. Following first multidisciplinary team discussion patients were broadly classified into two groups: straight to surgery (n=22, 45%) or neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery (n=27, 55%). Primary outcome was COVID-19-related complication rate.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients with a median age of 66 years (interquartile range: 54-73) were included. No patients developed a COVID-19 infection or related complication during hospital admission. Significant delays were identified in the treatment pathway of patients in the straight to surgery group, mostly due to delays in referral from external centres. Nine of 22 patients in the straight to surgery group had evidence of tumour progression compared with 3 of 27 in the neoadjuvant group (p=0.015839). Seven of 27 patients in the neoadjuvant group showed evidence of tumour regression. During the study, surgical waiting times were reduced, and more operations were performed during the second wave of COVID-19.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that it is possible to mitigate the risks of COVID-19-related complications in patients undergoing complex surgery for locally advanced and recurrent CRC. Delay in surgical intervention is associated with tumour progression, particularly in patients who may not have neoadjuvant therapy. Efforts should be made to prioritise resources for patients requiring time-sensitive surgery for advanced and recurrent CRC.

Blood transfusion has an adverse impact on the prognosis of patients receiving chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: experience from a single institution with a patient blood management program

PURPOSE

Perioperative blood transfusion in early stage cancer patients had a negative effect on the prognosis of patients, but the prognostic impact of transfusion in advanced cancer patients remains unclear. To minimize and guide rational transfusion, an institutional patient blood management (PBM) program was launched, and we evaluated the new program that has changed the practice and impacted on the prognosis of advanced cancer patients.

METHODS

We investigated the medical records of colorectal cancer patients who received chemotherapy from 2015 to 2020. The amount and frequency of transfusion, iron replacement and laboratory findings, and overall survival were compared before and after implementation of PBM.

RESULTS

The rate of transfusion in colorectal cancer patients was significantly decreased from 23.5/100 person-quarter in 2015 to 1.2/100 person-quarter in 2020, but iron supplementation therapy was frequently used, and the proportion of patients who received transfusion under hemoglobin 7 g/dL significantly increased from 15.9% in 2015 to 55.3% in 2020. Multivariate analysis revealed that transfusion was a significant risk factor affecting the overall survival of patients (HR 2.70, 95% CI: 1.93-3.78, p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that overall survival was significantly longer in non-transfused patients than in transfused patients (11.0 versus 22.4 months; HR 0.69, 95% CI: 0.56-0.86, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that minimized transfusion through an institutional PBM can positively affect the prognosis of patients who are receiving chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer.

CHFR-Promoter-Methylation Status Is Predictive of Response to Irinotecan-based Systemic Chemotherapy in Advanced Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

We investigated whether promoter methylation of the checkpoint-with-forkhead-and-ring-finger-domains (CHFR) gene is a predictor of the efficacy of irinotecan-based systemic chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CHFR-promoter methylation was measured by quantitative methylation-specific PCR (qMSP). The histoculture drug response assay (HDRA) was used in vitro to analyze the correlation between CHFR-promoter methylation and the efficacy of the irinotecan-active-metabolite SN38 in colorectal-cancer tissues from 44 CRC patients. CHFR promoter-methylation was also analyzed for its correlation with clinical response to irinotecan-based systemic chemotherapy of 49 CRC patients.

RESULTS

CHFR-promoter methylation significantly-positively correlated with inhibition of colon cancer by SN38 in the HDRA (p=0.002). CHFR-promoter methylation also significantly-positively correlated with clinical response to irinotecan-based systemic chemotherapy (p=0.04 for disease control). CHFR-promoter methylation also significantly-positively correlated (p=0.01) with increased progression-free survival for patients treated with irinotecan-containing FLOFIRI in combination with bevacizumab, the most-frequent regimen in the cohort.

CONCLUSION

Sensitivity of advanced CRC patients to irinotecan-based systemic chemotherapy can be predicted by the extent of CHFR-promoter methylation.

Effects of Circulating 25(OH)D Status in Advanced Colorectal Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND/AIM

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a disease of poor prognosis. An advantageous connection between vitamin D supplementation and prognostic improvement was depicted in CRC patients. However, the effects of circulating vitamin D on cancer outcomes are unclear for advanced CRC patients, especially for those receiving chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The review was registered on PROSPERO (register number: CRD42021243547). PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for English-language publications using relevant keywords. Two reviewers independently selected articles, assessed quality, and extracted data. We applied RevMan5.4 and Stata14 for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We included an RCT and three prospective cohort studies, which were of high overall quality. Higher circulating 25(OH)D level was related with better disease outcomes in advanced CRC patients undergoing chemotherapy: progression-free survival (HR=0.85, 95% CI=0.71-0.99; I²=34.4%), overall survival (OR=0.56, 95% CI=0.38-0.82; I²=0%).

CONCLUSION

High circulating 25(OH)D content is beneficial for improving prognosis of advanced CRC receiving chemotherapy.

Improving regorafenib's organ target precision via nano-assembly to change its delivery mode abolishes chemoresistance and liver metastasis of colorectal cancer

Distant metastases and chemotherapy repellency are the key causes of colorectal cancer (CRC)-related mortality. Regorafenib, an oral multi-kinase inhibitor approved for treating advanced CRC with distant metastases and/or chemo-resistance, however only improves median overall survival by 1.4 months. Such limited therapeutic effect is likely due to the low bioavailability of orally administered hydrophobic regorafenib. A regorafenib nanodrug is fabricated by one-step self-assembly with a clinically often-used fluorescent agent (indocyanine green) for overcoming regorafenib's limitations, towards improving regorafenib's therapeutic efficacy in advanced CRC. This nanodrug (nanoRF) was characterized, and its antitumor effects were assessed in three preclinical CRC models. NanoRF converts regorafenib's delivery approach from oral to intravenous with a significantly high encapsulation efficacy of regorafenib (96%) and a long-time colloidal stability. Nanodrug (nanoRF) markedly prolongs regorafenib's blood circulation by halving clearance rate, and enhances regorafenib's tumor accumulation. Across three preclinical CRC models (xenografted tumor, chemodrug-resistant xenografted tumor, and liver metastasis), nanoRF drastically enhances regorafenib's tumor inhibiting efficacy by 0.5-4 folds and effectively extends survival by 0.5-5 folds. This regorafenib nanodrug is a simple, safe, and efficient therapeutic nanodrug for treating advanced CRC with a ready-to-be-clinically-translated potential.

RNA-sequencing identification and validation of genes differentially expressed in high-risk adenoma, advanced colorectal cancer, and normal controls

Distinct gene expression patterns that occur during the adenoma-carcinoma sequence need to be determined to analyze the underlying mechanism in each step of colorectal cancer progression. Elucidation of biomarkers for colorectal polyps that harbor malignancy potential is important for prevention of colorectal cancer. Here, we use RNA sequencing to determine gene expression profile in patients with high-risk adenoma treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection by comparing with gene expression in patients with advanced colorectal cancer and normal controls. We collected 70 samples, which consisted of 27 colorectal polyps, 24 cancer tissues, and 19 normal colorectal mucosa. RNA sequencing was performed on an Illumina platform to select differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between colorectal polyps and cancer, polyps and controls, and cancer and normal controls. The Kyoto Gene and Genome Encyclopedia (KEGG) and gene ontology (GO) analysis, gene-concept network, GSEA, and a decision tree were used to evaluate the DEGs. We selected the most highly expressed genes in high-risk polyps and validated their expression using real-time PCR and immunohistochemistry. Compared to patients with colorectal cancer, 82 upregulated and 24 downregulated genes were detected in high-risk adenoma. In comparison with normal controls, 33 upregulated and 79 downregulated genes were found in high-risk adenoma. In total, six genes were retrieved as the highest and second highest expressed in advanced polyps and cancers among the three groups. Among the six genes, ANAX3 and CD44 expression in real-time PCR for validation was in good accordance with RNA sequencing. We identified differential expression of mRNAs among high-risk adenoma, advanced colorectal cancer, and normal controls, including that of CD44 and ANXA3, suggesting that this cluster of genes as a marker of high-risk colorectal adenoma.

Colon or Rectal Stent Positioning for Advanced Cancer Influences Quality of Life: A Critical Point of View

BACKGROUND/AIM

Endoluminal self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) may overcome the risk of mortality and morbidity of acute intestinal obstruction because of stage IV colon (CC) or rectal (RC) cancer. We evaluated the QoL in these groups of patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-eight patients were enrolled in a prospective longitudinal cohort single-center trial to undergo SEMS positioning. Twenty-five patients had a CC and 23 RC. Karnofsky performance scale, Visual Analogue Scale and the EQ-5D- 5L™ questionnaire were administered before treatment and at 1, 3 and 6 months.

RESULTS

Harmonized to the Italian population, the index values showed a statistically significant deterioration of the QoL in patients with RC when compared to those with CC at 1-, 3- and 6-months (1 month: p=0.001; 3- month: p=0.001; 6-month: p=0.045). Similarly, Visual Analogue Scale showed variations at 1- (p=0.008), 3- (p=0.001) and 6-months (p=0.020). Rectal stent deployment was the only independent predictor for a worse QoL in all domains (p<0.017; OR=0.196; 95%CI=0.51-0.749).

CONCLUSION

Patients affected with stage IV CC had a better QoL after SEMS placement when compared to those affected with RC. The persistency of the primary tumor at the rectal level, even if irradiated, might negatively affect QoL.

Minimally important differences for interpreting the EORTC QLQ-C30 in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with chemotherapy

AIM

The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) assesses the health-related quality of life of patients in cancer trials. There are currently no minimally important difference (MID) guidelines for the EORTC QLQ-C30 for colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aims to estimate MIDs for the EORTC QLQ-C30 scales in patients with advanced CRC treated with chemotherapy and enrolled in clinical trials.

METHOD

The data were obtained from three published EORTC trials that treated CRC patients using chemotherapy. Potential anchors were selected from clinical variables based on their correlation with EORTC QLQ-C30 scales. Anchor-based MIDs for within-group change and between-group change were estimated via the mean change method and linear regression, respectively, and summarized using weighted correlation. Distribution-based MIDs were also examined.

RESULTS

Anchor-based MIDs were determined for deterioration in 8 of the 14 EORTC QLQ-C30 scales and in 9 scales for improvement, and varied by scale, direction of change and anchor. MIDs for improvement (deterioration) ranged from 6 to 18 (-11 to -5) points for within-group change and 5 to 15 (-10 to -4) for between-group change. Summarized MIDs (in absolute values) per scale mostly ranged from 5 to 10 points.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings have clinical relevance for the interpretation of treatment efficacy and the design of clinical trials by informing sample size requirements.

A case of transverse colon cancer with a large liver abscess that could be treated with a radical operation after infection control

INTRODUCTION

Advanced colorectal cancer is known to be associated with liver abscesses. A strategy to treat liver abscesses as early as possible is necessary to ensure high surgical curability before the cancer progresses and to prevent worsening nutritional status of the patient during surgery.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

An 82-year-old woman was hospitalized due to fever. A 10 cm in diameter liver abscess and advanced colon cancer were diagnosed. After conservative treatment of the liver abscess with antibiotics and puncture drainage, colorectal cancer surgery was performed on a standby basis.

DISCUSSION

We propose that empiric antibiotic therapy should be administered early in cases of liver abscesses that may require early colorectal surgery. Abscess drainage should be performed promptly if the abscess is of a size that can be punctured easily.

CONCLUSION

In patients with advanced colorectal cancer complicated by liver abscesses that required early surgery, prompt drainage of the liver abscesses is mandatory.

Quality of Life for Patients With Incurable Stage IV Colorectal Cancer: Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Resection Versus Endoscopic Stenting

BACKGROUND/AIM

A prospective randomized open label parallel trial, comparing the quality of life (QoL) after endoscopic placement of a self-expandable metal stent or primary tumor resection, in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer was performed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-three patients affected with stage IV colorectal cancer and unresectable metastases were randomly assigned into two groups: Group 1 (16 patients), that underwent self-expandable metal stent positioning and Group 2 (17 patients), in which primary tumor resection was performed. Karnofsky performance scale and QoL assessment using the EQ-5D-5L™ questionnaire was administered before treatment and thereafter at 1, 3 and 6 months.

RESULTS

At 1 month, index values showed a statistically significant deterioration of the QoL in patients of Group 2 when compared to those of Group 1 (p=0.001; 95%CI=0.065-0.211) whereas, at 6 months, index values showed a statistically significant deterioration of the QoL in patients of Group 1 (p<0.025; 95%CI=0.017-0.238).

CONCLUSION

QoL in patients affected with stage IV colorectal cancer has a bimodal fluctuation pattern: at 1-month it was better in patients that received stent, but at 6-months it was significantly better in patients submitted to surgical resection.

Combining tumour response and progression free survival as surrogate endpoints for overall survival in advanced colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Progression free survival (PFS) and tumour response (TR) have been investigated as surrogate endpoints for overall survival (OS) in advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC), however their validity has been shown to be suboptimal. In recent years, meta-analytic methods allowing for use of multiple surrogate endpoints jointly have been proposed. Our aim was to assess if PFS and TR used jointly as surrogate endpoints to OS improve their predictive value.

METHODS

Data were obtained from a systematic review of randomised controlled trials investigating effectiveness of pharmacological therapies in aCRC, including systemic chemotherapies, anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapies and anti-angiogenic agents. Multivariate meta-analysis was used to model the association patterns between treatment effects on the surrogate endpoints (TR, PFS) and the final outcome (OS).

RESULTS

Analysis of 33 trials reporting treatment effects on all three outcomes showed reasonably strong association between treatment effects on PFS and OS, however the association parameters were obtained with a large uncertainty. A weak surrogate relationship was noted between the treatment effects on TR and OS. Modelling the two surrogate endpoints, TR and PFS, jointly as predictors of treatment effect on OS gave no marked improvement to surrogate association patterns. Modest improvement in the precision of the predicted treatment effects on the final outcome was noted in studies investigating anti-angiogenic therapy, however it was likely due to chance.

CONCLUSION

The joint use of two surrogate endpoints did not lead to marked improvement in the association between treatment effects on surrogate and final endpoints in advanced colorectal cancer.

Clinical efficacy and safety of nimotuzumab plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis

Objective

To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of nimotuzumab combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC).

Method

We retrospectively enrolled patients with ACRC treated with nimotuzumab plus chemotherapy (n = 40) or chemotherapy alone (n = 44). Responses were evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and adverse events according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 3.0.

Results

The objective overall response rate and disease control rate were higher in the combined-treatment group (55.0% vs 36.4% and 85.0% vs 75.0%, respectively), but the differences were not significant. There was no significant difference in median progression-free survival or median survival time between the combined-treatment and chemotherapy-alone groups (9.89 vs 7.86 months and 22.32 vs 18.10 months, respectively). There was no significant difference in adverse events between the two groups.

Conclusion

Nimotuzumab combined with chemotherapy had similar efficacy and safety to chemotherapy alone in patients with ACRC. The efficacy and safety of the combined treatment should be further studied in a randomized multicenter trial with a larger number of patients with ACRC.

A Phase II Study of Regorafenib With a Lower Starting Dose in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Exposure-Toxicity Analysis of Unbound Regorafenib and Its Active Metabolites (RESET Trial)

BACKGROUND

Regorafenib demonstrated survival benefits as salvage therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. However, severe toxicities frequently occurred early in the treatment with the standard dose (160 mg/day), resulting in a dose reduction or interruption. To improve the tolerability and maintain sufficient efficacy, we conducted a phase II study of regorafenib with a lower starting dose (120 mg/day).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Regorafenib was initiated at 120 mg/day, and the dosage was increased to 160 mg/day on day 15 of the first cycle for patients who had met the dose escalation criteria. The primary endpoint was the disease control rate (DCR). The pharmacokinetics of the total and unbound regorafenib and its active metabolites (M2, M5) were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 70 patients were enrolled from September 2016 to December 2017. Only 6 patients achieved dose escalation to 160 mg on day 15 as planned. For the 68 evaluable patients, the DCR was 32.4% (95% confidence interval, 21.5%-44.8%), which was less than the threshold (30%) of our statistical hypothesis. The serum concentrations of total regorafenib for patients whose dose was escalated to 160 mg/day were significantly lower than those of the patients whose dose was not escalated (median, 3978 vs. 7244 nM; P = .027). The serum unbound concentrations of the sum of regorafenib and the active metabolites correlated significantly with the maximum grade of regorafenib-related symptomatic adverse events in the first cycle (11,138 vs. 19,096 pM; P = .035).

CONCLUSION

Regorafenib with a low starting dose of 120 mg/day did not achieve the expected DCR. A relationship of unbound exposure with toxicity was found.

Predictive and prognostic implications of 4E-BP1, Beclin-1, and LC3 for cetuximab treatment combined with chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer with wild-type KRAS: Analysis from real-world data

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the main causes of cancer-related deaths in China and around the world. Advanced CRC (ACRC) patients suffer from a low cure rate though treated with targeted therapies. The response rate is about 50% to chemotherapy and cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and used for ACRC with wild-type KRAS. It is important to identify more predictors of cetuximab efficacy to further improve precise treatment. Autophagy, showing a key role in the cancer progression, is influenced by the EGFR pathway. Whether autophagy can predict cetuximab efficacy in ACRC is an interesting topic.

AIM

To investigate the effect of autophagy on the efficacy of cetuximab in colon cancer cells and ACRC patients with wild-type KRAS.

METHODS

ACRC patients treated with cetuximab plus chemotherapy, with detailed data and tumor tissue, at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from January 1, 2005, to October 1, 2015, were studied. Expression of autophagy-related proteins [Beclin1, microtubule-associated protein 1A/B-light chain 3 (LC3), and 4E-binding protein 1 (4E-BP1)] was examined by Western blot in CRC cells and by immunohistochemistry in cancerous and normal tissues. The effect of autophagy on cetuximab-treated cancer cells was confirmed by MTT assay. The associations between Beclin1, LC3, and 4E-BP1 expression in tumor tissue and the efficacy of cetuximab-based therapy were analyzed.

RESULTS

In CACO-2 cells exposed to cetuximab, LC3 and 4E-BP1 were upregulated, and P62 was downregulated. Autophagosome formation was observed, and autophagy increased the efficacy of cetuximab. In 68 ACRC patients, immunohistochemistry showed that Beclin1 levels were significantly correlated with those of LC3 (0.657, P < 0.001) and 4E-BP1 (0.211, P = 0.042) in ACRC tissues. LC3 was significantly overexpressed in tumor tissues compared to normal tissues (P < 0.001). In 45 patients with wild-type KRAS, the expression levels of these three proteins were not related to progression-free survival; however, the expression levels of Beclin1 (P = 0.010) and 4E-BP1 (P = 0.005), pathological grade (P = 0.002), and T stage (P = 0.004) were independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS).

CONCLUSION

The effect of cetuximab on colon cancer cells might be improved by autophagy. LC3 is overexpressed in tumor tissues, and Beclin1 and 4E-BP1 could be significant predictors of OS in ACRC patients treated with cetuximab.

Neuroendocrine Differentiation, Microsatellite Instability, and Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes in Advanced Colorectal Cancer With BRAF Mutation

BACKGROUND

Approximately 10% of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) cases will harbor the BRAF p.V600E mutation (BRAF-mCRC) and have been associated with a poor prognosis. Although they are usually considered a unique clinical entity, biologic heterogeneity has been described. We performed an extensive clinicopathologic study of a multicenter series of BRAF-mCRC to highlight differences between tumors with microsatellite instability (MSI) and microsatellite stable tumors, focusing on both inflammatory profiles and neuroendocrine differentiation.

METHODS

We included 59 BRAF-mCRC cases and collected the clinical data (ie, surgery, treatment, and follow-up). We evaluated MSI status, budding, lympho-angioinvasion, neuroinvasion, extent of active stroma, CD3⁺ and CD8⁺ intratumoral and peritumoral lymphocytes, programmed cell death ligand 1, p53, Ki-67, synaptophysin, and CDX2 expression.

RESULTS

The 22 MSI BRAF-mCRC cases were associated with the right side (P < .0001), an expansive grown pattern (P < .01), programmed cell death ligand 1 expression (P < .0001), high CD8 T-cell content (P = .0001), and lymph node metastases (P < .029). The 37 MSS BRAF-mCRC cases were characterized by a greater stromal component (P = .0002), pulmonary metastases (P = .095), and p53 and synaptophysin immunoreactivity (P = .004 and P = .001, respectively). Univariate analysis demonstrated that MSI and a high CD8 T-cell content were associated with a 34% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.34-1.28; P = .2) and 33% (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.45-0.99; P = .04) reduction in the risk of death, respectively. The combined presence of MSI and CD8 T-cell content decreased the hazard of mortality ≤ 63% (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.14-0.97; P = .2), which was slightly reduced after multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

A simultaneous evaluation of MSI, CD8 T-cell content, and neuroendocrine markers could allow for the identification of subsets of BRAF-mCRC with a different prognosis and potential eligibility for specific treatments.

Health related quality of life in older or frail patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with dose reduced capecitabine

OBJECTIVES

Palliative chemotherapy's role is to prolong survival while minimizing treatment toxicities to preserve or improve quality of life. We have recently published a phase II trial of dose reduced capecitabine in older or frail patients with advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC). We herein provide a robust analysis of the health related quality of life (HRQoL) data from our trial.

METHODS

A single arm multi-centered phase II trial of dose reduced capecitabine (1500 or 2000 mg/m² days one-fourteen q21 days) in older or frail patients. Participants (182 patients) were asked to complete Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy general questionnaire (FACT-G) at enrollment, after each cycle of capecitabine, and once upon completion, if possible.

RESULTS

157 patients completed a baseline questionnaire (86%), and 137 patients (75%) completed at least one subsequent questionnaire. The mean baseline score was 81.6, out of a possible 108. The mean score peaked at 92 after cycle 10. The mean change from baseline was always positive. Patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) ranged from 30% to 45% during treatment. Higher baseline FACT-G and Physical Well-being score were independently prognostic for improved survival (p = 0.006 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Time until definitive deterioration (TUDD) was insignificantly longer in patients with a higher baseline FACT-G (p = 0.18).

CONCLUSION

Baseline HRQoL scores were independently prognostic for survival, supporting their importance. Compared to full dose, reduced dose capecitabine has previously demonstrated equivalent efficacy and reduced toxicity. We have reported dose reduced capecitabine improves quality of life in older or frail patients with aCRC, further supporting its use in the management of aCRC.

Challenges of conducting a prospective clinical trial for older patients: Lessons learned from NCCTG N0949 (alliance)

OBJECTIVES

While the risk of developing colorectal cancer increases with age, there are limited prospective data regarding best treatment in the older adult population. We launched a phase III trial to evaluate difference in treatment outcome for older adults (aged ≥70years) with advanced colorectal cancer. Here we review the challenges faced and reasons for poor accrual to N0949.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We describe the conceptualization, development and limited results of N0949, a randomized phase III study of fluoropyrimidine/bevacizumab with or without oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX7 or XELOX) as first line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Fluoropyrimidine was physician choice (e.g., 5-FU/LV or capecitabine).

RESULTS

Of the projected 380 patients, only 32 patients were enrolled between the study activation in January 2011 until its closure in September 2012. Reasons for poor accrual included eligibility criteria that were too stringent, discomfort with randomizing older patients to regimens of varying intensity without considering their physical fitness, and discomfort with the use of bevacizumab in the older patient population. Several efforts were mounted to design a rationale and age-appropriate study, consider toxicities and varying study practices, and be responsive to stakeholder feedback.

CONCLUSIONS

Challenges were experienced in conducting the first prospective phase III study evaluating progression-free survival of older adults with advanced colorectal cancer receiving palliative chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine/bevacizumab with or without oxaliplatin in the USA. Future efforts to evaluate treatment outcomes in the older adult population should reflect on lessons learned in this large national effort.

A Review of Randomized Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacological costs of conversion chemotherapy with targeted biological agents in an unselected population of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) patients in order to achieve an R0 liver resection.

METHODS

Full reports and updates of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared at least two front-line therapy regimens with targeted biological agents for advanced CRC patients were selected. The present evaluation was restricted to randomized phase II and III trials. The costs of drugs are at the Pharmacy Hospital and are expressed in euros (€).

RESULTS

Our study began with the evaluation of 683 abstracts. Forty-eight trials were considered appropriate for further analysis. A more in-depth evaluation looking for the trials reporting the liver resection rates following conversion chemotherapy brought to the exclusion of other 37 trials, leaving 11 randomized trials (three phase II trials, including 522 patients and eight phase III trials, including 7191 patients). The pharmacological costs of conversion therapy increased with the substitution of prolonged infusion 5-Fluorouracil by capecitabine and, to a much higher extent, with the introduction of biologicals.

CONCLUSIONS

Two key issues are presented in this review. First, the pharmacological costs of commonly used front line regimens based on the targeted biological agents for the treatment of advanced CRC are highly variable. Second, the performance of the published schemes, in terms of resection rates, depends on patient's selection, tumor characteristics, and on the type of the scheme.

Meta-analysis of molecular targetted agents in the treatment of elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: does the age matter?

AIM

Patients aged 65 years and older are often under-represented in clinical trials of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and probably undertreated in clinical practice. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to assess the efficacy of molecular targetted agents (MTAs) in this population.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search for studies published up to December 2014 was performed. The endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated employing fixed- or random-effects models depending on the heterogeneity of the included trials.

RESULTS

Eleven randomized controlled trials involved 8,488 patients were ultimately identified. The pooled analysis demonstrated that the use of MTAs in elderly patients with mCRC significantly improved OS (HR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.76-0.92, p < 0.001) and PFS (HR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.64-0.96, p = 0.017) when compared to MTAs-free therapies. Similar results of OS were observed in sub-group analysis according to treatment line and regimes. No publication bias was detected by Begg's and Egger's tests.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of MTAs to therapies offers a survival benefit in elderly patients with mCRC. Further studies aimed at this specific patient population are still needed to monitor potential treatment-related toxicities to optimize the use of these drugs.

Synchronous hepatic metastasis and metachronous Krukenberg tumor from advanced colon cancer. A case report with an unexpected disease-free survival

•

The prognosis of a colon cancer with hepatic and ovarian metastasis is very poor.

•

A colon cancer patient with hepatic and ovarian metastases can heal.

•

In the literature we have never found a similar case.

•

An appropriate surgical approach, a tailored chemotherapy and an intensive follow-up are essential.

•

The degree to which HIPEC may have had an impact is still unknown.

Background

In the international literature we have never found a long survival in patients treated for a colon cancer with synchronous hepatic metastases and for a metachronous Krukenberg tumor.

Presentation of case

A 46-year old woman for an advanced colon cancer with a synchronous hepatic metastases was subjected to a left hemicolectomy and a resection of liver segment V (R0 resection; T4N2bM1; stage IVa according AJCC 2010). After one year a CT of the abdomen revealed an expansive formation of the left ovary. The patient was subjected to a bilateral ovariectomy, hysterectomy and hiperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The patient, after several cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy, is disease-free 13 years after surgery.

Discussion

To our knowledge, in the literature there do not appear to be cases of such disease-free survival. The survival of patient despite the prognostic indexes is discussed. The authors discus the importance of an adequate surgical treatment especially for liver metastases simultaneously treated to colon cancer. The authors also focus on chemotherapy (FOLFOX and then FOLFIRI) performed in a pre-biological era. Furthermore, the degree to which the HIPEC may have had an impact is still unknown, although it seems to be the gold standard for the treatment of the microscopic peritoneal neoplastic remnant.

Conclusion

The authors emphasize that the long term survival in colon cancer with hepatic and ovarian metastases is possible as long as it has an adequate surgical approach, a tailored chemotherapy and an intensive follow-up. Most likely new prognostic markers will have to be identified.

UGT1A1 gene polymorphism is associated with toxicity and clinical efficacy of irinotecan-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the relationship between uridine diphosphate glucoronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1)*28/*6 and toxicity and clinical efficacy of irinotecan-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) in Xinjiang Uygur and Han population.

METHODS

A total of 183 patients (Uygur, 114; Han, 69) with advanced CRC who received the irinotecan-based chemotherapy were enrolled in this retrospective analysis. Polymerase chain reaction amplification and direct sequencing method were used for UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6 polymorphism detection. The patients were followed up to analyze the relationship between different genotypes with adverse reactions and the clinical outcome of irinotecan-based chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Significant differences were found in genotype frequencies of UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*28/*6 between Uygur and Han (P = 0.02 and P = 0.002). Uygur and Han patients carrying wild UGT1A1*28 and *6 genotypes appeared to have significantly lower diarrhea incidence (I/II and III/IV) than those carrying mutant genotypes (all P < 0.05). In Uygur patients, UGT1A1*28 genotypes were related with objective response rate and disease control rate (P < 0.05). Compared with *1 allele *1/*1, *1 allele *1/*28*1/*28 mutant of UGT1A1*28 was associated with shorter OS in both Uygur and Han ethnicities (all P < 0.05). Compared with double allele variants (DW), single allele variants (SV), and double allele variants (DV) of UGT1A1*28/*6 were associated with shorter overall survival (OS) in Uygur and Han (all P < 0.05). Cox regression analysis revealed factors significantly influencing OS, including UGT1A1*28, UGT1A1*6, combined genotypes and chemotherapy line in Ugyur, and only combined genotypes in Han (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

UGT1A1 gene polymorphism predicts irinotecan-related adverse reactions in advanced CRC patients of Xinjiang Uygur and Han nationality; UGT1A1 gene polymorphism is correlated with efficacy and prognosis in Uygur nationality, but only related to prognosis in Han nationality in irinotecan-based chemotherapy.

Conditional survival in advanced colorectal cancer and surgery

BACKGROUND

Recent data show patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) are surviving longer. What is unknown is how specific treatment modalities affect long-term survival. Conditional survival, or survival prognosis based on time already survived, is becoming an acceptable means of estimating prognosis for long-term survivors. We evaluated the impact of cancer-directed surgery on long-term survival in patients with advanced CRC.

METHODS

We used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data to identify 64,956 patients with advanced (Stage IV) CRC diagnosed from 2000-2009. Conditional survival estimates by stage, age, and cancer-directed surgery were obtained based on Cox proportional hazards regression model of disease-specific survival.

RESULTS

A total of 64,956 (20.1%) patients had advanced disease at the time of diagnosis. The proportion of those patients who underwent cancer-directed surgery was 65.1% (n = 42,176). Cancer-directed surgery for patients with advanced stage disease was associated with a significant improvement in traditional survival estimates compared to patients who did not undergo surgery (hazard ratio = 2.22 [95% confidence interval, 2.17-2.27]). Conditional survival estimates show improvement in conditional 5-y disease-specific survival across all age groups, demonstrating sustained survival benefits for selected patients with advanced CRC.

CONCLUSIONS

Five-year disease-specific conditional survival improves dramatically over time for selected patients with advanced CRC who undergo cancer-directed surgery. This information is important in determining long-term prognosis and will help inform treatment planning for advanced CRC.

Randomised study of tegafur-uracil plus leucovorin versus capecitabine as first-line therapy in elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer--TLC study

BACKGROUND

Prospective data on chemotherapy for (frail) elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC) are scant. UFT/leucovorin might be as effective as and less toxic than capecitabine. We firstly randomized both agents in patients >65 years with aCRC not amenable to receive combination chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomised between first-line oral UFT/leucovorin and capecitabine in a Dutch multicentre trial. Primarily, efficacy and toxicity were determined. Secondary, quality of life (QoL) and abbreviated common geriatric assessment (aCGA) were analysed.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients were randomised with a median age of 77 years and 96% being frail. After interim analysis it was decided to stop recruitment because of low accrual. At a median follow up of 34 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were similar for both therapies, being 21 weeks (p=0.17) and 12 months (p=0.83), respectively. The overall response rates were 24% and 21%, respectively. Two patients died of possible treatment related complications in the UFT/leucovorin arm and 3 patients in the capecitabine arm. For UFT/leucovorin significantly less grade 3 or 4 hand/foot syndrome (0 vs 5) was observed. Overall, PFS was related to Charlson-comorbidity index (p=0.049), LDH (p=0.0011) and albumin (p=0.009). OS was related to LDH (p=0.0003), albumin (p=0.0001), QoLC30/CR38 (p=0.041), QoL visual analogue scale (VAS; p=0.016), and GFI (p=0.028).

CONCLUSION

UFT/leucovorin and capecitabine had similar efficacy and different toxicity profiles in frail elderly patients with aCRC. Baseline serum levels of albumin and LDH, Charlson-comorbidity index, GFI and QoL were prognostic for clinical outcome.

Quality of life across chemotherapy lines in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a prospective single-center observational study

BACKGROUND

Palliative chemotherapy in patients with nonresectable advanced colorectal carcinoma is performed to prolong survival, alleviate tumor-associated symptoms, and maintain or improve health-related quality of life (HRQOL). In this prospective single-center observational study, we assessed HRQOL across the various lines of palliative chemotherapy.

METHODS

HRQOL data were acquired using the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (QLQ-C30) questionnaire. The first assessment was performed at the beginning of each chemotherapy line, the second after three cycles, and the third at the end of chemotherapy. Further assessments were conducted during checkups every 3 months in our outpatient unit.

RESULTS

In total, 100 consecutive patients with colorectal carcinoma (mean age 66.4 years; 60 % men) treated with palliative chemotherapy were recruited. Generally, QOL deteriorated constantly across time. Physical functioning, fatigue, pain, dyspnea, and appetite worsened steadily from first-line chemotherapy to the later treatment phase. Global QOL, emotional functioning, and role functioning improved slightly after the end of first-line chemotherapy, deteriorated during second-line chemotherapy to the level of first-line chemotherapy, and further deteriorated in the later treatment phases. In additional analyses, we found the largest differences between patients with and without a treatment response for pain (19.0 vs. 37.2 points) and appetite loss (17.4 vs. 32.7 points).

CONCLUSION

The individual QOL domains deteriorated constantly across time. Our data indicate that patients undergoing first- and second-line palliative chemotherapy experience stabilization of global QOL and psychosocial symptoms. We also found that unselected patients who achieved a treatment response had a lower symptom burden and better QOL than did patients with progressive disease.

Clinical effects of camptothecin plus 5-fluorouracil in treating patients with 5-fluorouracil resistant advanced colorectal cancer

AIM: To evaluate the clinical effects of camptothecin plus 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu) in treating patients with 5-Fu resistant advanced colorectal cancer.

METHODS: Eighty-five patients with 5-Fu resistant advanced colorectal cancer were randomly into a study group (45 cases) and a control group (40 cases). The clinical effects, the scores of quality of life and side effects were compared for the two groups.

RESULTS: The partial remission (PR) rate, overall response rate (RR), and clinical benefit rate (CBR) for the study group were significantly higher than those for the control group (64.44% vs 35.00%, 64.44% vs 35.00%, 88.89% vs 57.50%; P < 0.05). The scores of physical function, role function, cognitive function, emotional function and social function for the two groups of patients after chemotherapy were significantly higher than those before chemotherapy (88.56 ± 7.24 vs 68.33 ± 9.24, 75.89 ± 7.03 vs 53.78 ± 9.67, 80.56 ± 7.24 vs 59.33 ± 9.24, 81.89 ± 7.03 vs 58.78 ± 9.67, 74.78 ± 7.86 vs 52.74 ± 9.46, 78.53 ± 7.55 vs 68.35 ± 9.33, 64.88 ± 7.02 vs 53.75 ± 9.80, 69.93 ± 7.55 vs 59.35 ± 9.33, 69.28 ± 7.00 vs 58.75 ± 9.80, 61.94 ± 7.89 vs 51.73 ± 9.85; P < 0.05). The scores of physical function, role function, cognitive function, emotional function and social function for the study group after chemotherapy were significantly higher than those for the control group (88.56 ± 7.24 vs 78.53 ± 7.55, 75.89 ± 7.03 vs 64.88 ± 7.02, 80.56 ± 7.24 vs 69.93 ± 7.55, 81.89 ± 7.03 vs 69.28 ± 7.00, 74.78 ± 7.86 vs 61.94 ± 7.89; P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the rates of gastrointestinal reaction, nausea and vomiting, neutropenia, acetylcholine syndrome, thrombocytopenia or anemia between the two groups (42.22% vs 52.50%, 4.44% vs 7.50%, 40.00% vs 60.00%, 0.00% vs 0.00%, 35.56% vs 42.50%, 11.11% vs 15.00%, 26.67% vs 20.00%, 0.00% vs 0.00%, 13.33% vs 12.50%, 2.22% vs 5.00%, 13.33% vs 17.50%, 0.00% vs 0.00%; P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Camptothecin plus 5-Fu in treating patients with 5-Fu resistant advanced colorectal cancer has appreciated curative effect and can improve the quality of life, without increasing adverse reactions.

Clinical effects of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer

AIM: To evaluate the clinical effects of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.

METHODS: One hundred and seventy-eight patients with advanced colorectal cancer were divided into either an observation group (85 cases) or a control group (93 cases). The observation group was treated by bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy, and the control group was treated by XELOX chemotherapy. The clinical effects, side effects, and quality of life were compared for the two groups.

RESULTS: The response rate for the observation group was significantly better than that for the control group (67.06% vs 47.31%, P < 0.05). The rate of bone marrow suppression for the observation group was significantly lower than that for the control group (26.32% vs 50.54%, P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the rates of bone marrow suppression, neurotoxicity, gastrointestinal reaction, liver and kidney toxicity, or immune system disorders (25.88% vs 26.88%, 17.65% vs 20.43%, 20.00% vs 23.66%, 15.29% vs 11.83%, 11.76% vs 8.60%, P > 0.05). The scores of quality of life for the observation group posttreatment were similar to prior-treatment values (65.62 ± 3.34 vs 67.83 ± 4.06, 67.67 ± 3.46 vs 69.26 ± 3.98, 66.15 ± 3.52 vs 68.11 ± 3.96, 66.58 ± 3.51 vs 68.02 ± 4.02, 66.83 ± 3.55 vs 68.39 ± 3.81, P > 0.05). The scores of quality of life for the control group were significantly lower after treatment than prior-treatment (51.57 ± 3.26 vs 67.89 ± 4.11, 54.62 ± 3.31 vs 69.30 ± 3.89, 53.24 ± 3.28 vs 68.15 ± 3.92, 52.26 ± 3.22 vs 67.97 ± 4.11, 53.16 ± 3.28 vs 68.41 ± 3.80, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy has better clinical effects than chemotherapy alone in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer, without significant impact on side effects and quality of life.

Does the addition of targeted biological agents to first-line chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer increase complete response? A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

The study assessed whether the addition of monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) to first-line chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) increases the complete response (CR) compared with controls.

METHOD

PubMed was reviewed for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with approved MoAbs (bevacizumab, cetuximab and panitumumab) vs non-MoAbs as first-line therapy for patients with advanced CRC. The incidence and ratio of CR events were calculated in patients assigned to MoAbs compared with controls.

RESULTS

A total of 3790 patients from nine RCTs were included for analysis. The overall incidence of CR in patients treated with MoAbs was 2.4% (95% CI: 1.7-3.3%) compared with 1.3% (95% CI: 0.8-2.2%) in controls. Comparison of the different types of MoAbs showed that the incidence of CR was higher for bevacizumab (3.1%, 95% CI: 2.1-4.3%) than for cetuximab (0.8%, 95% CI: 0.4-1.8%). The addition of MoAbs to chemotherapy significantly increased the OR of obtaining a CR compared with controls (OR = 1.96; 95% CI: 1.12-3.46; P = 0.02). No significant differences in the OR were observed in any of the subgroups.

CONCLUSION

The CR is a rare event in advanced CRC; however, the addition of MoAbs to first-line chemotherapy significantly increases the curative rate of metastatic disease compared with controls.

Which strategy after first-line therapy in advanced colorectal cancer?

Second-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer is an integral part of the treatment strategy that needs to be set from the beginning for each patient, bearing in mind the expected toxicities of chosen treatments, the patient's clinical condition, comorbidities, preferences, the aims of the treatment and the molecular status. Furthermore, the distinction between lines of therapy is no longer absolute. The perspective of “continuum of care” includes switching chemotherapy prior to disease progression, maintenance therapy, drug "holidays" if needed, surgical resection of metastases in selected patients, and seems to allow a tailored treatment, in which patients are more likely to benefit from exposure to all active agents, which is known to correlate with overall survival. The scenario of second-line treatment has changed dramatically over the years and could currently benefit from several options including chemotherapy with a single agent or in combination and the addition of molecular-targeted agents developed in the last decade, such as epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies (cetuximab, panitumumab) and vascular endothelial growth factor-targeting agents (bevacizumab, aflibercept), with the possibility of bevacizumab use even beyond first progression. The purpose of this review is to summarize the most important scientific data supporting the use of chemotherapy and the new biologic agents in the second-line setting in advanced colorectal cancer.

Gimeracil and oteracil porassium capsules as a single drug in adjuvant treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer: A randomized clinical study

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of gimeracil and oteracil porassium capsules (S-1) as a single drug in the adjuvant treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

METHODS: Eligible patients with advanced colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to either a control group or an experimental group. The patients of the control group received routine symptomatic treatment, while the experimental group was additionally given S-1 [60 mg/(m²•d), bid, P.O. on days 1-14, then drug withdrawal for 1 wk, repeated every 3 wk, stopped until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred] beside the routine symptomatic treatment.

RESULTS: A total of 83 eligible patients were enrolled, including 4 in the control group and 41 in the experimental arm. Median follow-up period was 54 wk. The baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. S-1 treatment improved the progression-free survival (PFS), though there was no statistical difference (HR = 0.52, 95%CI: 0.22-1.23, P = 0.1384). For all patients with advanced colorectal cancer, the 1-year PFS for the control arm and experimental arm was 78.6% and 97.6%, respectively, favoring the S-1 regimen. For patients with advanced colon cancer, the improvement of PFS did not differ significantly between the two arms (HR = 0.62, 95%CI: 0.20-1.95, P = 0.4156). The 1-year PFS for the control arm and experimental arm was 76.2% and 95.0%, favoring the S-1 regimen. For patients with advanced rectal cancer, the improvement of PFS did not differ significantly between the two arms (HR = 0.42, 95%CI: 0.11-1.58, P = 0.2005). The 1-year PFS for the control arm and experimental arm was 76.2% and 95.2%, respectively. Three cases developed S-1-induced adverse reactions, including one case of grade Ⅱ and two cases of grade Ⅰ, which, however, did not cause treatment discontinuation.

CONCLUSION: S-1 can improve the PFS in patients with advanced colorectal cancer, indicating that such patients may benefit from S-1 regimen in the adjuvant setting.

Randomized phase II open-label study of mFOLFOX6 in combination with linifanib or bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Although CRC is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in the United States, second-line CRC treatment is limited. In this trial we examined the efficacy and safety of linifanib, an oral, potent, selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor families, with mFOLFOX6, compared with bevacizumab and mFOLFOX6, in previously treated metastatic CRC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred forty-eight patients with advanced CRC previously treated with fluoropyrimidine or irinotecan received bevacizumab (10 mg/kg, intravenous), low-dose linifanib (7.5 mg), or high-dose linifanib (12.5 mg), with mFOLFOX6. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary objectives included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences in PFS occurred between bevacizumab and linifanib doses (low, hazard ratio [HR], 1.453 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.830-2.539]; high, HR, 1.257 [95% CI, 0.672-2.351]). Median OS values were similar for bevacizumab and high-dose linifanib (bevacizumab, 16.5 months [95% CI, 13.0-not available]; high-dose linifanib, 16.4 months [95% CI, 11.9-21.7]; low-dose linifanib, 12.0 months [95% CI, 10.1-13.0]). ORRs were similar (bevacizumab, 34.7% [95% CI, 21.7-49.6]; low-dose linifanib, 24.0% [95% CI, 13.1-38.2]; high-dose linifanib, 22.4% [95% CI, 11.8-36.6]). Median cycles of 5-fluorouracil were reduced in the linifanib arms, versus the bevacizumab arm. Grade 3/4 adverse event occurrences were more frequent with linifanib. Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, hypothyroidism, and thrombocytopenia were more common with high-dose linifanib than bevacizumab.

CONCLUSION

Combining linifanib with mFOLFOX6 as a second-line treatment for metastatic CRC did not improve PFS, radiographic findings, or duration of response versus bevacizumab and mFOLFOX6.

Predictive and prognostic biomarkers with therapeutic targets in advanced colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common human malignant diseases and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The treatment of advanced CRC has improved significantly in recent years. With the emergence of two targeted antibodies, cetuximab (Erbitux), an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody and bevacizumab (Avastin), a vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody, the treatment of metastatic CRC has entered the era of personalized therapy. Predictive and prognostic biomarkers have, and will continue to, facilitate the selection of suitable patients and the personalization of treatment for metastatic CRC (mCRC). In this review, we will focus primarily on the important progresses made in the personalized treatment of mCRC and discuss the potentially novel predictive and prognostic biomarkers for improved selection of patients for anti-cancer treatment in the future.

Raltitrexed-based chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer

AIMS

To evaluate the efficiency and safety profile of raltitrexed-based chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.

METHODS

An electronic search was undertaken to identify randomized controlled trials comparing raltitrexed-based regimen to 5-fluorouracil-based regimen in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. The outcomes included overall survival, overall response rate and toxicities.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 11 studies with 4622 patients. Overall, there were no significant differences between the two regimens in terms of overall survival (HR=1.06, 95% CI: 0.96-1.17, P=0.23) or overall response rate (RR=1.09, 95% CI: 0.86-1.38, P=0.47). In subgroup analysis, patients in raltitrexed/oxaliplatin group had significantly higher partial response (RR=1.53, 95% CI: 1.17-2.00, P=0.002), overall response rate (RR=1.42, 95% CI: 1.10-1.82, P=0.006), disease control rate (RR=1.16, 95% CI: 1.04-1.29, P=0.009) and lower progressive disease (RR=0.61, 95% CI: 0.45-0.84, P=0.002) when compared to 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin group. Occurrence of severe anemia (RR=2.23, 95% CI: 1.38-3.59, P=0.0001), asthenia (RR=2.29, 95% CI: 1.36-3.84, P=0.002), hepatic disorders (RR=7.51, 95% CI: 1.30-43.56, P=0.02), and nausea/vomit (RR=1.70, 95% CI: 1.03-2.81, P=0.04) were significantly higher with the raltitrexed arm treatment, while frequencies of grade 3/4 alopecia (RR=0.36, 95% CI: 0.26-0.50, P<0.00001) and stomatitis/mucositis (RR=0.14, 95% CI: 0.07-0.31, P<0.00001) were increased in the 5-fluorouracil group.

CONCLUSIONS

Raltitrexed-based chemotherapy regimen leads to an equivalent overall survival and response rates with acceptable toxicities compared to traditional 5-fluorouracil-based regimen in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Raltitrexed can be a treatment option for these patients when 5-fluorouracil-based regimens are not tolerated or inappropriate.

A systematic review of cost-effectiveness of monoclonal antibodies for metastatic colorectal cancer

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) imposes a substantial health burden on patients and society. In recent years, advances in the treatment of mCRC have mainly resulted from the introduction of monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs). However, the application of these MoAbs considerably increases treatment costs. The objective of this article is to review and assess the economic evidence of MoAB treatment in mCRC. A systematic literature review was conducted and cost-effectiveness (CE) as well as cost-utility-studies were identified. For this, Medline, Embase, SciSearch, Cochrane, and nine other databases were searched from 2000 through February 2013 for full-text publications. The quality of the studies was assessed via a validated assessment tool (Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES)). A total of 843 publications were screened. Of those, 15 studies involving the MoAbs bevacizumab, cetuximab and panitumumab met all inclusion criteria. Four studies analysed the CE of first-line treatment with bevacizumab and nine the CE of cetuximab in subsequent treatment lines. Two studies dealt with the CE of panitumumab. The analysis of sequential regimes and the direct comparison of two MoABs were analysed by only one study each. The quality of the included studies was high with the exception of one study.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment with bevacizumab, cetuximab and panitumumab is mainly considered to be not cost-effective in patients with mCRC. However, testing for Kirsten ras oncogene (KRAS) mutation prior to the treatment with cetuximab or panitumumab is found to be clearly cost-effective compared to no testing. Future research should focus on the CE of first-line treatment with cetuximab or panitumumab and studies on upcoming agents like regorafenib and aflibercept.

Angiogenic inhibitors for older patients with advanced colorectal cancer: Does the age hold the stage?

Although major progress has been achieved in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) with the employment of antiangiogenic agents, several questions remain on the use of these drugs in older patients. Since cardiovascular, renal and other comorbidities are common in the elderly, an accurate assessment of the patients’ conditions should be performed before a treatment decision is made. Since most CRC patients enrolled in clinical trials testing antiangiogenic drugs were aged < 65 years, the efficacy and tolerability of these agents in elderly patients has not been adequately explored. Data suggest that patients with advanced CRC derive similar benefit from bevacizumab treatment regardless of age, but the advantage of other antiangiogenic drugs in the same class of patients appears more blurred. Literature data suggest that specific antiangiogenic-related toxicities such as hypertension or arterial thromboembolic events may be higher in the elderly than in the younger patients. In addition, it should be emphasized that the patients included in the clinical studies discussed herein were selected and therefore may not be representative of the usual elderly population. Advanced age alone should not discourage the use of bevacizumab. However, a careful patients’ selection and watchful monitoring of toxicities are required to optimize the use of antiangiogenics in this population.

Kanglaite injection combined with FOLFOX4 regimen for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: An analysis of 20 cases

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of Kanglaite injection combined with FOLFOX4 regimen in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.

METHODS: In total, 40 patients with advanced colorectal cancer were randomly divided into treatment group and control group. The control group was treated using the FOLFOX4 regimen, and the treatment group were treated using the FOLFOX4 regimen combined with intravenous infusion of Kanglaite injection. After two cycles of therapy, the efficacy and toxicity were evaluated.

RESULTS: The objective response rate and disease control rate were higher in the treatment group than in the control group, but the differences were not significant (25.0% vs 20.0%, P > 0.05; 85.0% vs 75.0%, P > 0.05). The stable rate of TCM syndromes after chemotherapy was 85.0% for the treatment group and 50.0% for the control group (P < 0.05). KPS score and body weight increased significantly in the treatment group after therapy (both P < 0.05). QOL score did not differ significantly between the two groups. After therapy, the numbers of T lymphocytes (CD3+), T-assisted, induced lymphocytes (CD3+CD4+) and NK cells (CD16+CD56+) increased in the treatment group, but decreased in the control group (all P < 0.05). Leucopenia incidence in the treatment group was lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The incidences of other adverse reactions showed no significant differences between the two groups.

CONCLUSION: Kanglaite injection combined with FOLFOX4 regimen can improve physical condition, enhance immune function, and reduce chemotherapy toxicity in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.

Correlation between serum levels of CXCL8 and clinicopathological features in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

AIM: To investigate the correlation between serum levels of CXCL8 and clinicopathological features in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers and 16 patients with advanced colorectal cancer were recruited for this study. Serum samples were collected prior to operation and 10 days post-operation to measure the concentrations of CXCL8 by cytometric bead array.

RESULTS: The mean serum level of CXCL8 was significantly higher in pre-treated patients than in post-treated patients and healthy volunteers (13.06 μg/L vs 4.40 μg/L, 7.70 μg/L, both P < 0.05). No significant difference was noted in mean serum level of CXCL8 between post-treated patients and healthy volunteers. Age, tumor site, T and N stage, and tumor differentiation showed no significant influence on the levels of serum CXCL8. Preoperative and postoperative serum levels of CXCL8 were significantly lower in patients with tumor ≤5.0 cm in diameter than in those with tumor >5.0 cm. Serum CXCL8 levels were not associated with T and N stage, tumor differentiation, preoperative levels of CEA, CA19-9, or platelet count.

CONCLUSION: CXCL8 is involved in the evolution of colorectal cancer. Higher levels of serum CXCL8 were detected in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Serum CXCL8 is an important parameter for evaluation of treatment response and prognosis in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Chemoimmunotherapy of chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer with gemcitabine plus FOLFOX followed by subcutaneous granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor and interleukin-2

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus FOLFOX followed by subcutaneous granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor and interleukin-2 (GOLFIG-1 regimen) in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

METHODS: The patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer were given gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, levofolinic acid, and 5-fluorouracil, followed by subcutaneous granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor and interleukin-2. Each cycle lasted for 14 d. The primary endpoint was survival.

RESULTS: A total of 9 patients were enrolled, of which 2 could not be evaluated because of early death or refusal of treatment. No complete response was observed. Partial response was observed in 1 patient, stable diseases in 4, and progressive disease in 2. The median survival was 91 days (range: 23-325 days). Two patients with interstitial pneumonitis (considered as clinical signs of autoimmunity) had longer survival (325 and 250 days, respectively) than other patients.

CONCLUSION: GOLFIG-1 regimen is effective in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, especially in those suffering from autoimmune disorders.

The incremental value of dual modality PET/CT imaging over PET imaging alone in advanced colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

(18)Fluoro-2-Deoxy Glucose (18 FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) impacts upon the management of recurrent colorectal cancer (CRC) but is limited by anatomical localisation. The development of integrated positron emission and computerised tomography (PET/CT) yields high anatomical resolution combined with the PET data. We evaluate the added value of PET/CT over PET alone.

METHOD

Thirty-one consecutive patients had PET/CT for suspected recurrent CRC. Two blinded observers (A and B) reported images from PET alone and from integrated PET/CT. Lesion detection, lesion localisation, diagnostic certainty and impact on surgical management was assessed for each data set and then compared. The minimum clinical follow up was for 8 months (median 9.6 months) and 7 patients had histological confirmation of diagnosis.

RESULTS

Compared to PET alone, PET/CT the percentage of lesions accurately localised increased from 96% to 99% for observer A and 86% to 99% for Observer B. PET/CT increased the number of lesions reported as definitely abnormal or normal from 78% to 95% for Observer A and from 72% to 94% for Observer B. Surgical management was changed in 6 patients (19%). Inter-observer variability was reduced with PET/CT.

CONCLUSION

PET/CT improves the accuracy of reporting in recurrent colorectal cancer and influences surgical management in a significant proportion of patients when compared to PET only imaging.