First-In-Human Phase I Study of Tinengotinib (TT-00420), a Multiple Kinase Inhibitor, as a Single Agent in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

PURPOSE

This first-in-human phase I dose-escalation study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of tinengotinib (TT-00420), a multi-kinase inhibitor targeting fibroblast growth factor receptors 1-3 (FGFRs 1-3), Janus kinase 1/2, vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, and Aurora A/B, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received tinengotinib orally daily in 28-day cycles. Dose escalation was guided by Bayesian modeling using escalation with overdose control. The primary objective was to assess dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and dose recommended for dose expansion (DRDE). Secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics and efficacy.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients were enrolled (dose escalation, n = 40; dose expansion, n = 8). MTD was not reached; DRDE was 12 mg daily. DLTs were palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (8 mg, n = 1) and hypertension (15 mg, n = 2). The most common treatment-related adverse event was hypertension (50.0%). In 43 response-evaluable patients, 13 (30.2%) achieved partial response (PR; n = 7) or stable disease (SD) ≥ 24 weeks (n = 6), including 4/11 (36.4%) with FGFR2 mutations/fusions and cholangiocarcinoma (PR n = 3; SD ≥ 24 weeks n = 1), 3/3 (100.0%) with hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer (PR n = 2; SD ≥ 24 weeks n = 1), 2/5 (40.0%) with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC; PR n = 1; SD ≥ 24 weeks n = 1), and 1/1 (100.0%) with castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC; PR). Four of 12 patients (33.3%; HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer, TNBC, prostate cancer, and cholangiocarcinoma) treated at DRDE had PRs. Tinengotinib's half-life was 28-34 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

Tinengotinib was well tolerated with favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics. Preliminary findings indicated potential clinical benefit in FGFR inhibitor-refractory cholangiocarcinoma, HER2-negative breast cancer (including TNBC), and CRPC. Continued evaluation of tinengotinib is warranted in phase II trials.

Current issues in dose-finding designs: A response to the US Food and Drug Adminstrations's oncology center of excellence project optimus

With the advent of targeted agents and immunological therapies, the medical research community has become increasingly aware that conventional methods for determining the best dose or schedule of a new agent are inadequate. It has been well established that conventional phase I designs cannot reliably identify safe and effective doses. This problem applies, generally, for cytotoxic agents, radiation therapy, targeted agents, and immunotherapies. To address this, the US Food and Drug Administration's Oncology Center of Excellence initiated Project Optimus, with the goal "to reform the dose optimization and dose selection paradigm in oncology drug development." As a response to Project Optimus, the articles in this special issue of Clinical Trials review recent advances in methods for choosing the dose or schedule of a new agent with an overall objective of informing clinical trialists of these innovative designs. This introductory article briefly reviews problems with conventional methods, the regulatory changes that encourage better dose optimization designs, and provides brief summaries of the articles that follow in this special issue.

Duchenne muscular dystrophy: promising early-stage clinical trials to watch

INTRODUCTION

Current therapies are unable to cure Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), a severe and common form of muscular dystrophy, and instead aim to delay disease progression. Several treatments currently in phase I trials could increase the number of therapeutic options available to patients.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to provide an overview of current treatments undergoing or having recently undergone early-stage trials. Several exon-skipping and gene therapy approaches are currently being investigated at the clinical stage to address an unmet need for DMD treatments. This article also covers Phase I trials from the last 5 years that involve inhibitors, small molecules, a purified synthetic flavanol, a cell-based therapy, and repurposed cardiac or tumor medications.

EXPERT OPINION

With antisense oligonucleotide (AON) treatments making up the majority of conditionally approved DMD therapies, most of the clinical trials occurring within the last 5 years have also evaluated exon-skipping AONs. The approval of Elevidys, a micro-dystrophin therapy, is reflected in a recent trend toward gene transfer therapies in phase I DMD clinical trials, but their safety and efficacy are being established in this phase of development. Other Phase I clinical-stage approaches are diverse, but have a range in efficacy, safety, and endpoint measures.

Phase I study of peposertib and avelumab with or without palliative radiotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors

INTRODUCTION

We report results from a phase I, three-part, dose-escalation study of peposertib, a DNA-dependent protein kinase inhibitor, in combination with avelumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, with or without radiotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Peposertib 100-400 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) or 100-250 mg once daily (q.d.) was administered in combination with avelumab 800 mg every 2 weeks in Part A or avelumab plus radiotherapy (3 Gy/fraction × 10 days) in Part B. Part FE assessed the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of peposertib plus avelumab. The primary endpoint in Parts A and B was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Secondary endpoints were safety, best overall response per RECIST version 1.1, and pharmacokinetics. The recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) were determined in Parts A and B.

RESULTS

In Part A, peposertib doses administered were 100 mg (n = 4), 200 mg (n = 11), 250 mg (n = 4), 300 mg (n = 6), and 400 mg (n = 4) b.i.d. Of DLT-evaluable patients, one each had DLT at the 250-mg and 300-mg dose levels and three had DLT at the 400-mg b.i.d. dose level. In Part B, peposertib doses administered were 100 mg (n = 3), 150 mg (n = 3), 200 mg (n = 4), and 250 mg (n = 9) q.d.; no DLT was reported in evaluable patients. Peposertib 200 mg b.i.d. plus avelumab and peposertib 250 mg q.d. plus avelumab and radiotherapy were declared as the RP2D/MTD. No objective responses were observed in Part A or B; one patient had a partial response in Part FE. Peposertib exposure was generally dose proportional.

CONCLUSIONS

Peposertib doses up to 200 mg b.i.d. in combination with avelumab and up to 250 mg q.d. in combination with avelumab and radiotherapy were tolerable in patients with advanced solid tumors; however, antitumor activity was limited.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT03724890.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of oral formulation (CG-750) of ivaltinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, compared to IV formulation (CG-745)

AIMS

CG-750 is an oral formulation of ivaltinostat, a newly developing histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor. This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and safety of an oral formulation (CG-750) of ivaltinostat compared to an intravenous (IV) formulation (CG-745).

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in three cohorts. Subjects received either CG-745 (Cohorts 1 and 3: 125 mg; Cohort 2: 250 mg) or placebo followed by CG-750 (Cohort 1: 125 mg; Cohort 2: 375 mg; Cohort 3: 750 mg) or placebo. Blood samples for PK and PD assessment were collected up to 72 h post-dose. Histone H3 acetylation at sites K9, K9/K14 and K27 was assessed for area under the % acetylation induction versus time curve (AUEC).

RESULTS

A total of 25 subjects were randomized, and 23 subjects completed the study (Cohort 1, n = 6; Cohort 2, n = 6; Cohort 3, n = 6; placebo, n = 5). The mean bioavailability of CG-750 was 10.6% (range: 4.18%-21.33%) and displayed linear PK in the dose range of 125-750 mg. The comparison of AUEC between formulations and the evaluation of the dose-AUEC relationship were inconclusive, due to the small sample sizes and significant variability observed in PD markers. All adverse events (AEs) were transient and of mild or moderate intensity.

CONCLUSIONS

The oral formulation of ivaltinostat (CG-750) was generally well tolerated after a single dose. CG-750 displayed a mean bioavailability of 10.6%.

A phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending single- and multiple-dose study of the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of oral ceftibuten in healthy adult subjects

This was a phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending single- and multiple-dose study of oral ceftibuten to describe the pharmacokinetics (PK) of cis-ceftibuten (administered form) and trans-ceftibuten (metabolite), and to describe safety and tolerability at higher than licensed doses. Subjects received single 400, 600, or 800 mg doses of ceftibuten on Days 1 and 4, followed by 7 days of twice-daily dosing from Days 4 to 10. Non-compartmental methods were used to describe parent drug and metabolite PK in plasma and urine. Dose proportionality was examined using C max, AUC0-12, and AUC0-INF. Accumulation was calculated as the ratio of AUC0-12 on Days 4 and 10. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored throughout the study. Following single ascending doses, mean cis- and trans-ceftibuten C max were 17.6, 24.1, and 28.1 mg/L, and 1.1, 1.5, and 2.2 mg/L, respectively; cis-ceftibuten urinary recovery accounted for 64.3%-86.9% of the administered dose over 48 h. Following multiple ascending doses, mean cis- and trans-ceftibuten C max were 21.7, 28.1, and 38.8 mg/L, and 1.4, 1.9, and 2.8 mg/L, respectively; cis-ceftibuten urinary recovery accounted for 72.2%-96.4% of the administered dose at steady state. The exposure of cis- and trans-ceftibuten increased proportionally with increasing doses. Cis- and trans-ceftibuten accumulation factor was 1.14-1.19 and 1.28-1.32. The most common gastrointestinal treatment emergent AEs were mild and resolved without intervention. Ceftibuten was well tolerated. Dose proportionality and accumulation of cis- and trans-ceftibuten were observed. These results support the ongoing development of ceftibuten at doses up to 800 mg twice-daily. (The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT03939429.).

TQB2450 in patients with advanced malignant tumors: results from a phase I dose-escalation and expansion study

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy has demonstrated impressive clinical benefits in multiple tumor types. TQB2450, a novel monoclonal antibody targeting programmed cell death ligand 1, has shown safety and efficacy in preclinical studies.

Objectives

This first-in-human study aimed to evaluate the safety/tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), immunogenicity, and preliminary antitumor activity of TQB2450 in patients with advanced malignant tumors.

Design and methods

In this phase I study, eligible patients with advanced malignant tumors received intravenous TQB2450 once every 3 weeks. This study consisted of a 3 + 3 dose-escalation phase (1-30 mg/kg) and a specific dose-expansion phase (1200 mg). The primary endpoints were maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and safety. The secondary endpoints were PK, immunogenicity, and investigator-assessed response rate.

Results

Between April 2018 and February 2020, 40 patients were enrolled (22 in the dose-escalation phase and 18 in the dose-expansion phase). No DLT was reported and the MTD was not reached. Grade ⩾3 or worse treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 11 (27.50%) patients, with the most frequent being aspartate aminotransferase increased (5.00%), leukopenia (5.00%), and anemia (5.00%). Treatment-related serious AEs were reported in six patients, the most common of which was decompensated liver function (5.00%). No treatment-related death was reported. The maximum serum concentration of TQB2450 increased in a dose-proportional manner. Treatment-induced anti-drug antibodies were detected in 31.58% (12/38) of patients. The investigator assessed the objective response rate as 5.00% and the disease control rate was 52.50%, including 2 partial responses and 19 stable diseases. The median progression-free survival was 2.69 (95% confidence interval, 2.07-6.14) months.

Conclusion

TQB2450 has a manageable safety profile with favorable PK and immunogenicity and has shown early evidence of clinical activity in advanced malignant tumors.

ClinicalTrialsgov identifier

NCT03460457.

A Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of LY3405105, a Covalent Inhibitor of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 7, Administered to Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PKs), and preliminary activity of LY3405105, a covalent inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinase 7 (CDK7), in patients with advanced solid tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

LY3405105 monotherapy was given once daily (QD; part A1) or thrice weekly (TIW; part A2) starting at 1 and 2 mg orally, respectively, and escalated per a Bayesian design in adult patients. The primary endpoint was safety, and secondary endpoints included PKs and antitumor activity.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were enrolled: 43 in part A1 and 11 in part A2. Seven patients had dose-limiting toxicities, all in part A1 (45 mg: n = 3; 35 mg: n = 3; 25 mg: n = 1). Thirty-five patients (64.8%) reported at least one treatment-related adverse event (TRAE). TRAEs (≥10%) were diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, vomiting, abdominal pain, anemia, asthenia, and decreased platelet count. QD dosing showed sustained exposure with less peak-trough fluctuation compared to TIW dosing. Median time to maximum concentration was 1-2 hours and half-life was 15-19 hours. CDK7-target occupancy in skin and peripheral blood on day 15 was dose-dependent and reached near maximal occupancy of 75% at ≥15 mg QD. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 20 mg QD. Twelve patients in part A1 (27.9%) and 5 patients in part A2 (45.5%) had a best overall response of stable disease. No complete response or partial response was observed.

CONCLUSION

The MTD of LY3405105 monotherapy was 20 mg QD. The most common toxicities were gastrointestinal adverse events, myelosuppression, fatigue, and asthenia. Limited clinical activity was observed in this phase I trial, and there are no plans for further development.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT03770494.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the proposed biosimilar denosumab GP2411 and reference denosumab in healthy males

BACKGROUND

This Phase I study compared the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) similarity of GP2411 proposed denosumab biosimilar to reference denosumab (a monoclonal antibody for specific pro-resorptive conditions).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Healthy males (28-65 years, 50-90 kg) were randomized to a single sub-therapeutic subcutaneous injection of 35 mg GP2411, EU-Xgeva® or US-Xgeva®, and followed for 39 weeks. The primary endpoints were AUCinf, AUClast, and Cmax.

RESULTS

Four hundred ninety-two participants completed treatment. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) (AUCinf, AUClast, and Cmax) and 95% CI of the geometric mean ratios of AUEC of % change from baseline in serum CTX were fully contained within the prespecified equivalence margins (0.80, 1.25), demonstrating similarity. The occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) with GP2411, EU-Xgeva® and US-Xgeva® was similar (72.9%, 76.0%, and 71.0% of participants, respectively). Most were Grade 1 or 2, <30% were treatment-related, and there was only one TEAE-related study discontinuation. Rates of positive anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) were similar (57.8%, 64.9%, and 69.1% of participants respectively), but immunogenicity was only borderline detectable and of very low magnitude. Ninety-nine percent of positive ADAs were transient.

CONCLUSION

GP2411 demonstrated similarity with EU-Xgeva® and US-Xgeva® in PK, PD, safety, and immunogenicity in this population.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT 2019-001651-39.

A Phase I Trial of Weekly Nab-paclitaxel Plus Carboplatin With Thoracic Radiotherapy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and recommended dose of nab-paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin and thoracic radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Nab-paclitaxel was administered weekly with escalating doses, combined with carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 2 and concurrent standard thoracic radiotherapy. Escalating doses of nab-paclitaxel were as follows: level 0, 30 mg/m2; level 1, 35 mg/m2; level 2, 40 mg/m2; level 3, 45 mg/m2 Results: Twelve patients were enrolled and received the treatment according to the protocol; seven patients (58%) had squamous cell carcinoma and all cases had stage III disease. At level 1, none of the three patients experienced dose limiting toxicity (DLT). At level 2, one of the first three patients experienced a fatal DLT of bronchopulmonary hemorrhage. None of the three more additional patients experienced DLT. At level 3, two of the three patients experienced a DLT of grade 3 febrile neutropenia and grade 4 neutropenia, respectively. Consolidation chemotherapy was provided to 10 of 12 patients. Radiation pneumonitis developed in five of 12 patients (42%). Eight patients (66.7%) showed partial response, and four (33.3%) showed stable disease. For the above reasons, level 2 (40 mg/m2) was considered the recommended dose in this study.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with weekly nab-paclitaxel (40 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC 2) is a feasible and well-tolerated regimen in patients with previously untreated locally advanced NSCLC. A phase II trial with this regimen is warranted.

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of the maturation inhibitor GSK3640254 coadministered with darunavir/ritonavir and/or etravirine in healthy adults

AIMS

This phase I study investigated potential drug-drug interactions of the maturation inhibitor GSK3640254 (GSK'254) with darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/RTV) and/or etravirine (ETR).

METHODS

In this randomized, open-label, single-sequence, multiple-dose study, healthy participants received GSK'254 200 mg once daily alone or coadministered with DRV/RTV 600/100 mg twice daily (BID; n = 19), ETR 200 mg BID (n = 19) or DRV/RTV 600/100 mg + ETR 200 mg BID (n = 16) under fed conditions. Primary endpoints were steady-state area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the end of the dosing interval (AUC0-τ ) and maximum observed concentration (Cmax ). Secondary endpoints included trough concentration (Cτ ), safety and tolerability. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using standard noncompartmental analysis, and geometric least-squares mean ratios were derived from linear mixed-effects models.

RESULTS

GSK'254 AUC0-τ (geometric least-squares mean ratio [90% confidence interval], 1.14 [1.00-1.29]), Cmax (1.07 [0.92-1.24]) and Cτ (1.17 [1.01-1.35]) were similar when administered alone and with DRV/RTV. Etravirine coadministration decreased GSK'254 AUC0-τ (0.53 [0.48-0.59]), Cmax (0.60 [0.53-0.68]) and Cτ (0.51 [0.39-0.66]). Similar reductions were not observed with GSK'254 + DRV/RTV + ETR (AUC0-τ , 0.94 [0.82-1.09]; Cmax , 0.89 [0.75-1.07]; Cτ , 1.02 [0.89-1.18]). GSK'254 had no meaningful effect on DRV/RTV or ETR concentrations. All reported adverse events (AEs) were grade 1; 3 led to withdrawal and resolved (rash, asymptomatic electrocardiogram T-wave inversion, periorbital oedema). Most common AEs were diarrhoea (n = 9) and headache (n = 7). No deaths or serious AEs occurred.

CONCLUSION

GSK'254 pharmacokinetics was not meaningfully affected by DRV/RTV or DRV/RTV + ETR, but were reduced with only ETR; no new tolerability concerns were observed.

Randomized controlled dose-escalation design to evaluate the safety of a novel pharmacological cardiopulmonary resuscitation strategy

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The motivating randomized controlled phase I trial evaluates three sodium nitroprusside doses in a novel sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation strategy for improved end-organ perfusion relative to local standard of care. Sodium nitroprusside is a vasodilator with an established safety profile in other indications, whereas the local standard of care uses vasoconstrictors, typically epinephrine. The purpose of the proposed trial is to identify the highest safe dose of sodium nitroprusside in this new context as excessive doses may cause severe hypotension with compromised end-organ perfusion.

METHODS

The proposed phase I trial design expands upon traditional dose-finding designs to include a randomized control arm, which is needed to assess safety through the relative increase in serum lactate on hospital admission. For guiding dose escalation, we propose and compare six Bayesian models which characterize expected serum lactate as a function of sodium nitroprusside dose and randomization group. Each model makes a different assumption about the expected change in serum lactate across control cohorts concurrently randomized with each dose. Model selection aims to minimize the expected number of times that a dose is incorrectly classified as safe or unsafe while sample size selection targets an expected number of incorrectly classified doses. Randomization is 1:1 for the initial cohort, and for subsequent cohorts is chosen to maximize the lower confidence bound.

RESULTS

The spike-and-slab model minimizes the expected number of times that a dose is incorrectly classified as safe or unsafe under the most scenarios in the motivating three-dose trial, but all six models exhibit relatively similar performance. A 2:1 randomization ratio for the second and third cohorts maximizes the lower confidence bound when using the spike-and-slab model. With the optimal design, on average, 70 individuals will ensure 1 incorrectly classified dose in 6 opportunities.

CONCLUSION

We recommend that the motivating trial use the spike-and-slab model with a 1:1 randomization ratio for the initial cohort and 2:1 randomization ratio for subsequent cohorts; however, the simpler fixed effects approaches performed similarly well.

Effects of the HIV-1 maturation inhibitor GSK3640254 on QT interval in healthy participants

GSK3640254 (GSK'254) is a novel HIV-1 maturation inhibitor with pharmacokinetics supporting once-daily (QD) therapy for HIV-1 treatment. This thorough QT/corrected QT (QTc) study evaluated the effect of GSK'254 on cardiac repolarization. In this two-part, randomized study, healthy participants received GSK'254 or placebo QD for 7 days (part 1) to determine safety and pharmacokinetics of a 500-mg supratherapeutic dose. Four sequential treatment periods composed the main QTc study (part 2): GSK'254 100 mg, GSK'254 500 mg, placebo QD for 7 days, or placebo QD for 6 days with a 400-mg moxifloxacin dose on Day 7 (all with a moderate-fat meal). Concentration-QTc analyses modeled the relationship between GSK'254 plasma concentrations and placebo-adjusted change from baseline in QT interval corrected with Fridericia's formula (ΔΔQTcF). Of 50 participants enrolled, 48 completed the study (part 1, 8/8; part 2, 40/42). Least-squares (LS) mean change from baseline in QTcF for GSK'254 100 mg followed the placebo pattern across time points (maximum LS mean ΔΔQTcF, 1.7 ms); the upper bound of the 90% CI remained <10 ms. Maximum LS mean ΔΔQTcF for GSK'254 500 mg exceeded the 10-ms threshold: 10.6 ms (90% CI 7.75-13.38). Neither GSK'254 dose had clinically relevant effects on heart rate or cardiac conduction. By concentration-QTc analysis, no effect on ΔΔQTcF >10 ms is expected up to GSK'254 concentrations of ~3070 ng mL-1 . No clinically relevant effects on cardiac parameters were seen in healthy participants with GSK'254 at the 100-mg dose.

Predicting routes of phase I and II metabolism based on quantum mechanics and machine learning

1. Unexpected metabolism could lead to the failure of many late-stage drug candidates or even the withdrawal of approved drugs. Thus, it is critical to predict and study the dominant routes of metabolism in the early stages of research. In this study, we describe the development and validation of a 'WhichEnzyme' model that accurately predicts the enzyme families most likely to be responsible for a drug-like molecule's metabolism. Furthermore, we combine this model with our previously published regioselectivity models for Cytochromes P450, Aldehyde Oxidases, Flavin-containing Monooxygenases, UDP-glucuronosyltransferases and Sulfotransferases - the most important Phase I and Phase II drug metabolising enzymes - and a 'WhichP450' model that predicts the Cytochrome P450 isoform(s) responsible for a compound's metabolism. The regioselectivity models are based on a mechanistic understanding of these enzymes' actions, and use quantum mechanical simulations with machine learning methods to accurately predict sites of metabolism and the resulting metabolites. We train heuristic based on the outputs of the 'WhichEnzyme', 'WhichP450', and regioselectivity models to determine the most likely routes of metabolism and metabolites to be observed experimentally. Finally, we demonstrate that this combination delivers high sensitivity in identifying experimentally reported metabolites and higher precision than other methods for predicting in vivo metabolite profiles.

Phase I dose escalation and expansion study of golidocitinib, a highly selective JAK1 inhibitor, in relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphomas

BACKGROUND

Relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphomas (r/r PTCLs) are a group of rare and aggressive diseases that lack effective therapies. Constitutive activation of the Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway is reported to be associated with PTCLs. Golidocitinib is an oral, potent JAK1 selective inhibitor evaluated in a phase I/II multinational study in patients with r/r PTCLs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with r/r PTCLs were eligible. The primary objectives were to assess safety and tolerability of golidocitinib and to define its recommended phase II dose (RP2D). The secondary objectives were to evaluate its antitumor activity and pharmacokinetics (PK).

RESULTS

A total of 51 patients were enrolled and received golidocitinib treatment at 150 or 250 mg once daily (QD). The median prior lines of therapies were 2 (range: 1-8). Golidocitinib was tolerated at both doses tested, while a higher incidence of serious adverse events and dose modifications at 250 mg were observed. The most common grade ≥3 drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (27.5%) and thrombocytopenia (11.8%). An objective response rate of 39.2% and a complete response rate of 21.6% were observed. With median follow-up time of 14.7 and 15.9 months, the median duration of response (DoR) and progression-free survival were 8.0 and 3.3 months, respectively. Based on these data, 150 mg QD was defined as the RP2D. Golidocitinib demonstrated a favorable PK profile as an oral agent. Biomarker analysis suggested a potential correlation between JAK/STAT pathway aberrations and clinical activity of golidocitinib.

CONCLUSIONS

In this phase I study, golidocitinib demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and encouraging antitumor efficacy in heavily pretreated patients with r/r PTCLs. These results support the initiation of the multinational pivotal study in patients with r/r PTCLs.

A phase I, first-in-human study to evaluate the safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of MRG-001 in healthy subjects

Preclinical studies demonstrate that pharmacological mobilization and recruitment of endogenous bone marrow stem cells and immunoregulatory cells by a fixed-dose drug combination (MRG-001) improves wound healing, promotes tissue regeneration, and prevents allograft rejection. In this phase I, first-in-human study, three cohorts receive subcutaneous MRG-001 or placebo, every other day for 5 days. The primary outcome is safety and tolerability of MRG-001. Fourteen subjects received MRG-001 and seven received a placebo. MRG-001 is safe over the selected dose range. There are no clinically significant laboratory changes. The intermediate dose group demonstrates the most significant white blood cell, stem cell, and immunoregulatory cell mobilization. PBMC RNA sequencing and gene set enrichment analysis reveal 31 down-regulated pathways in the intermediate MRG-001 dose group compared with no changes in the placebo group. MRG-001 is safe across all dose ranges. MRG-001 may be a clinically useful therapy for immunoregulation and tissue regeneration (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04646603).

Phase I Study of [68Ga]Ga-Anti-CD206-sdAb for PET/CT Assessment of Protumorigenic Macrophage Presence in Solid Tumors (MMR Phase I)

Macrophages play an important role throughout the body. Antiinflammatory macrophages expressing the macrophage mannose receptor (MMR, CD206) are involved in disease development, ranging from oncology to atherosclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis. [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-anti-CD206 single-domain antibody (sdAb) is a PET tracer targeting CD206. This first-in-human study, as its primary objective, evaluated the safety, biodistribution, and dosimetry of this tracer. The secondary objective was to assess its tumor uptake. Methods: Seven patients with a solid tumor of at least 10 mm, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 0 or 1, and good renal and hepatic function were included. Safety was evaluated using clinical examination and blood sampling before and after injection. For biodistribution and dosimetry, PET/CT was performed at 11, 90, and 150 min after injection; organs showing tracer uptake were delineated, and dosimetry was evaluated. Blood samples were obtained at selected time points for blood clearance. Metabolites in blood and urine were assessed. Results: Seven patients were injected with, on average, 191 MBq of [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-anti-CD206-sdAb. Only 1 transient adverse event of mild severity was considered to be possibly, although unlikely, related to the study drug (headache, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 1). The blood clearance was fast, with less than 20% of the injected activity remaining after 80 min. There was uptake in the liver, kidneys, spleen, adrenals, and red bone marrow. The average effective dose from the radiopharmaceutical was 4.2 mSv for males and 5.2 mSv for females. No metabolites were detected. Preliminary data of tumor uptake in cancer lesions showed higher uptake in the 3 patients who subsequently progressed than in the 3 patients without progression. One patient could not be evaluated because of technical failure. Conclusion: [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-anti-CD206-sdAb is safe and well tolerated. It shows rapid blood clearance and renal excretion, enabling high contrast-to-noise imaging at 90 min after injection. The radiation dose is comparable to that of routinely used PET tracers. These findings and the preliminary results in cancer patients warrant further investigation of this tracer in phase II clinical trials.

A phase Ib/II dose expansion study of subcutaneous sasanlimab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer and urothelial carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Sasanlimab is an antibody to the programmed cell death protein 1 receptor. We report updated data of subcutaneous sasanlimab in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and urothelial carcinoma dose expansion cohorts from a first-in-human phase Ib/II study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were ≥18 years of age with NSCLC or urothelial carcinoma, and no prior immunotherapies, who progressed on or were intolerant to systemic therapy, or for whom systemic therapy was refused or unavailable. Patients received subcutaneous sasanlimab at 300 mg every 4 weeks (q4w). Primary objectives were to evaluate safety, tolerability, and clinical efficacy by objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Sixty-eight and 38 patients with NSCLC and urothelial carcinoma, respectively, received subcutaneous sasanlimab. Overall, sasanlimab was well tolerated; 13.2% of patients experienced grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events. Confirmed ORR was 16.4% and 18.4% in the NSCLC and urothelial carcinoma cohorts, respectively. ORR was generally higher in patients with high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (≥25%) and high tumor mutational burden (TMB; >75%). In the NSCLC and urothelial carcinoma cohorts, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.7 and 2.9 months, respectively; corresponding median overall survival (OS) was 14.7 and 10.9 months. Overall, longer median PFS and OS correlated with high PD-L1 expression and high TMB. Longer median PFS and OS were also associated with T-cell inflamed gene signature in the urothelial carcinoma cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Subcutaneous sasanlimab at 300 mg q4w was well tolerated with promising clinical efficacy observed. Phase II and III clinical trials of sasanlimab are ongoing to validate clinical benefit. Subcutaneous sasanlimab may be a potential treatment option for patients with NSCLC or urothelial carcinoma.

Corrigendum: Phase I trial outcome of amnion cell therapy in patients with ischemic stroke (I-ACT)

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1153231.].

TROP-2 directed antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs): The revolution of smart drug delivery in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

BACKGROUND

Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a revolutionary drug class in cancer therapy, combining the precision of targeted therapy with the cytotoxic effects of chemotherapy. Promising activity of novel ADCs, namely Trastuzumab Deruxtecan and Patritumab Deruxtecan, has been observed in hard-to treat molecular subtypes, such as HER2-positive and heavily pretreated EGFR-mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). However, therapeutic advances are expected in certain subgroups of lung cancer patients, including non-oncogene-addicted NSCLC after failure of current standard of care (e.g., immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy, chemo-antiangiogenic treatment). Trophoblastic Cell Surface Antigen 2 (TROP-2) is a surface transmembrane glycoprotein member of the epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) family. TROP-2 represents a promising therapeutic target in refractory non-oncogene-addicted NSCLC.

METHODOLOGY

We performed a systematic literature search of the clinical trials about TROP-2 directed ADCs in NSCLC referenced in the pubmed.gov database, Cochrane Library database and clinicaltrial.gov database.

RESULTS

First-in-humans ADCs targeting TROP-2, namely Sacituzumab Govitecan (SN-38) and Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dxd), yielded promising activity signals in NSCLC with a manageable safety profile. Most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) of Sacituzumab Govitecan included neutropenia (28 %), diarrhea (7 %), nausea (7 %), fatigue (6 %), and febrile neutropenia (4 %). Nausea and stomatitis were the most common all grade AEs with Datopotamab Deruxtecan; dyspnea, amylase increase, hyperglycemia and lymphopenia were reported as grade ≥ 3 AEs in less than 12 % of patients.

CONCLUSION

As more effective strategies are needed for patients with refractory non-oncogene-addicted NSCLC, the design of novel clinical trials with ADCs targeting TROP-2 is encouraged as both a monotherapy or combination strategy with existing agents (e.g., monoclonal antibodies targeting immune checkpoint inhibitors or chemotherapy).

Phase I trial outcome of amnion cell therapy in patients with ischemic stroke (I-ACT)

Background

We proposed a Phase I dose escalation trial to assess the safety of allogeneic human amniotic epithelial cells (hAECs) in stroke patients with a view to informing the design for a Phase II trial.

Methods

The design is based on 3 + 3 dose escalation design with additional components for measuring MR signal of efficacy as well as the effect of hAECs (2-8 × 106/kg, i.v.) on preventing immunosuppression after stroke.

Results

Eight patients (six males) were recruited within 24 h of ischemic stroke onset and were infused with hAECs. We were able to increase the dose of hAECs to 8 × 106 cells/kg (2 × 106/kg, n = 3; 4 × 106/kg, n = 3; 8 × 106/kg, n = 2). The mean age is 68.0 ± 10.9 (mean ± SD). The frequencies of hypertension and hyperlipidemia were 87.5%, diabetes was 37.5%, atrial fibrillation was 50%, ischemic heart disease was 37.5% and ever-smoker was 25%. Overall, baseline NIHSS was 7.5 ± 3.1, 7.8 ± 7.2 at 24 h, and 4.9 ± 5.4 at 1 week (n = 8). The modified Rankin scale at 90 days was 2.1 ± 1.2. Supplemental oxygen was given in five patients during hAEC infusion. Using pre-defined criteria, two serious adverse events occurred. One patient developed recurrent stroke and another developed pulmonary embolism whilst in rehabilitation. For the last four patients, infusion of hAECs was split across separate infusions on subsequent days to reduce the risk for fluid overload.

Conclusion

Our Phase I trial demonstrates that a maximal dose of 2 × 106/kg hAECs given intravenously each day over 2 days (a total of 4 × 106/kg) is safe and optimal for use in a Phase II trial.

Clinical trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier ACTRN12618000076279P.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Characteristics of Pelubiprofen Tromethamine vs. Pelubiprofen in Healthy Subjects

Compared to pelubiprofen, a cyclooxygenase-2-selective inhibitor, pelubiprofen tromethamine has been reported to exhibit improved solubility and absorption. Pelubiprofen tromethamine combines the anti-inflammatory effect of pelubiprofen with the gastric protective function of tromethamine salt, making it a relatively safe class of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with low levels of gastrointestinal side effects in addition to its original analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and antipyretic effects. This study assessed the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of pelubiprofen and pelubiprofen tromethamine in healthy subjects. Two independent clinical trials were performed in healthy subjects using a randomized, open-label, oral, single-dose, two-sequence, four-period, crossover design. In Study I and Study II, subjects received 25 mg of pelubiprofen tromethamine and 30 mg of pelubiprofen tromethamine, respectively, with 30 mg of pelubiprofen being the reference. Study I fell within the bioequivalence study criteria. A trend of increased absorption and exposure for 30 mg of pelubiprofen tromethamine vs. the reference in Study II was observed. The maximum cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitory effect of 25 mg of pelubiprofen tromethamine was approximately 98% compared to the reference, showing no significant pharmacodynamic variation. It is thus predicted that 25 mg of pelubiprofen tromethamine would show no clinically significant discrepancies in clinical analgesic and antipyretic effects from 30 mg of pelubiprofen.

A phase I trial of riluzole and sorafenib in patients with advanced solid tumors: CTEP #8850

BACKGROUND

Overexpression of metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 (GRM1) has been implicated in the pathogenesis of multiple cancers. Riluzole, an inhibitor of glutamate release, showed synergistic antitumor activity in combination with the multi-kinase inhibitor sorafenib in preclinical models. This phase I trial identified the toxicity profile, dose-limiting toxicities, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of riluzole combined with sorafenib in patients with advanced cancers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with refractory solid tumors were enrolled utilizing a 3+3 dose-escalation design. Riluzole was given at 100 mg PO BID in combination with sorafenib, beginning at 200 mg PO daily and escalating in 200 mg increments per level in 28-day cycles. Restaging evaluations were performed every 2 cycles.

RESULTS

35 patients were enrolled over 4 dose levels. The MTD was declared at dose level 3 (riluzole: 100 mg PO BID; sorafenib: 400 mg AM/200 mg PM). Pharmacokinetic analyses did not reveal definitive evidence of drug-drug interactions. Consistent decreases in phospho-forms of ERK and AKT in tumor tissue analyses with accompanying decrease in GRM1 expression and increase in pro-apoptotic BIM suggest target engagement by the combination. Best responses included a partial response in 1 (2.9%) patient with pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma with a KANK4-RAF1 fusion, and stable disease in 11 (36%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy with riluzole and sorafenib was safe and tolerable in patients with advanced solid tumors. The partial response in a patient with a RAF1 fusion suggests that further exploration in a genomically selected cohort may be warranted.

Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Escalating Study Evaluating the Safety and Immunogenicity of an Epitope-Specific Chemically Defined Nanoparticle RSV Vaccine

BACKGROUND

V-306 is a virus-like particle-based vaccine candidate displaying respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) F site II protein mimetics (FsIIm) as an antigenic epitope.

METHODS

This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-escalating, first-in-human study, conducted in 60 women aged 18-45 years. Twenty subjects per cohort (15 vaccine and five placebo) received two V-306 intramuscular administrations on Days 0 and 56 at 15 µg, 50 µg, or 150 µg. Safety and immunogenicity were assessed after each vaccination and for 1 year in total.

RESULTS

V-306 was safe and well tolerated at all dose levels, with no increase in reactogenicity and unsolicited adverse events between the first and second administrations. At 50 µg and 150 µg, V-306 induced an increase in FsIIm-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) titers, which lasted at least 4 months. This did not translate into an increase in RSV-neutralizing antibody titers, which were already high at baseline. No increase in the anti-F protein-specific IgG titers was observed, which were also high in most subjects at baseline due to past natural infections.

CONCLUSIONS

V-306 was safe and well-tolerated. Future modifications of the vaccine and assay conditions will likely improve the results of vaccination.

Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple ascending Oral doses of DA-8010 in healthy subjects: First-in-human phase I study

This study assessed the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple oral doses of DA-8010, a muscarinic M₃ receptor antagonist, in healthy subjects. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending single (Part A: 1, 2.5, 5, 20, and 40 mg QD fasted and 10 mg QD fasted and fed) and multiple doses (Part B: 5, 10, and 20 mg QD from Days 1 to 7 fasted), sequential-group study. Safety data were analyzed descriptively, time to maximum plasma concentration (t_max ) nonparametrically, and pharmacokinetic parameters using power and mixed models and ANOVA. Of 109 subjects randomized (Part A = 69 and Part B = 40; each part consisted a female group), 31 (44.9%) in Part A and 29 (72.5%) in Part B experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in a dose-related manner. Common drug-related TEAEs in Part A and B were dizziness (8.7% and 15.0%), headache (5.8% and 12.5%) and blurred vision (8.7% and 20%). One male (20 mg) and one female (10 mg) from Part B discontinued the study due to a confusional state, and nausea and vomiting. Irrespective of sex, DA-8010 was steadily absorbed following single and multiple doses in the fasted state with increased systemic exposure in a dose-proportional manner with maximum plasma concentration occurring at a median t_max between 4.0 and 6.0 h. A high-fat meal increased systemic exposure. DA-8010 was safe, well tolerated, and well absorbed at lower doses and moderately tolerated at higher doses without any notable effects of food and sex.

A phase I study of selinexor combined with weekly carfilzomib and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

We performed a phase I study of weekly selinexor, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone (wSKd) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). The primary objective was to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of wSKd. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Prior exposure/refractoriness to carfilzomib was permitted. Thirty patients were enrolled; 26 (87%) had triple-class exposed disease and 6 (20%) received chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Dose level 2 (carfilzomib 70 mg/m² Intravenous [IV] on Days 1, 8, and 15; selinexor 100 mg PO on Days 1, 8, 15, 22; dexamethasone 40 mg on Days 1, 8, 15, 22 of 28-day cycles) was chosen as the MTD, with no DLTs having occurred. The most common hematologic adverse events (AE) were thrombocytopenia (83%), anemia (70%), lymphopenia (50%), and neutropenia (50%). The most common nonhematologic AE were fatigue (70%), nausea (70%), diarrhea (53%), and anorexia (47%). The ORR was 21/30 (70%) overall and 18/23 (78%) at the MTD. At a median follow-up of 12.3 months, the median PFS was 5.3 months and median OS 23.3 months. Responses were similar in carfilzomib naïve and exposed patients. Long-term efficacy of wSKd is modest; wSKd could be employed as a bridging strategy to immunotherapies.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of CT-P17 (40 mg/0.4 ml) versus reference adalimumab: randomized study in healthy Japanese adults

Aim: Comparing pharmacokinetics and safety of CT-P17 and EU-approved reference adalimumab (EU-adalimumab) in Japan. Materials & methods: Double-blind, parallel-group phase I trial at three hospitals. Healthy Japanese adults were randomized (1:1) to CT-P17 or EU-adalimumab (single 40-mg subcutaneous dose). The primary end point was pharmacokinetic equivalence for area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity and maximum serum concentration. Results: Of the 205 randomized subjects (102 CT-P17, 103 EU-adalimumab), 204 received study drug. CT-P17 and EU-adalimumab were pharmacokinetically equivalent: 90% CIs for geometric least-squares mean ratios were within predefined 80-125% equivalence margins. Secondary pharmacokinetic end points, safety and immunogenicity were similar between the groups. Conclusion: CT-P17 had pharmacokinetics, safety and immunogenicity comparable to EU-adalimumab in healthy Japanese adults.

An innovative ethosuximide granule formulation designed for pediatric use: Comparative pharmacokinetics, safety, tolerability, and palatability profile versus reference syrup

Ethosuximide, the first-line therapy for childhood absence epilepsy, is currently formulated as a syrup (Zarontin®, Pfizer) with a bitter taste and high sugar content, poorly adapted to children, and a ketogenic diet. The collaborative European FP7 project KIEKIDS aimed at developing an innovative sugar-free, tasteless formulation convenient for pediatric use. This dual Phase-I study evaluated two granule formulations based on lipid multiparticulate (LMP) technology. Two panels of 6 healthy adult volunteers underwent a randomized, placebo-controlled, partly blinded, 3-way cross-over trial, comparing ethosuximide granules A or B with placebo granules and syrup at single 10 mg/kg doses. Corresponding plasma pharmacokinetic profiles of ethosuximide were compared, along with palatability, safety, and tolerability. The LMP granule A proved suboptimal due to bitterness and adherence to beaker walls, while the optimized granule B revealed excellent palatability, similar to placebo granules, and low adherence to glass. The relative bioavailability of granules A versus syrup, based on dose-normalized Cmax and AUC0-∞ was 93.7% [90% CI: 76.3-115.1] and 96.1% [91.0-101.5], respectively. For granules B it was 87.6% [81.6-94.0] and 92.5% [88.5-96.6], respectively, with slightly delayed tmax of 0.75 h [0.5-4.05] compared to syrup 0.5 h [0.3-0.8]. Tolerability visual analog scales revealed a trend for statistically non-significant improvement versus syrup at peak (30 min) for transient dizziness (both granules), fatigue (granules A), and anxiety (granules B). The innovative ethosuximide granule formulation B achieves a suitable profile for pediatric use, being sugar-free, tasteless, bioequivalent, and well-tolerated while enabling precise adjustment to body weight.

A phase I trial of metformin in combination with vincristine, irinotecan, and temozolomide in children with relapsed or refractory solid and central nervous system tumors: A report from the national pediatric cancer foundation

BACKGROUND

Patients with relapsed and refractory solid and central nervous system (CNS) tumors have poor outcomes and need novel therapeutic options. Vincristine, irinotecan, and temozolomide (VIT) is a common chemotherapy regimen in relapsed pediatric tumors with an established toxicity profile. Metformin shows preclinical anti-cancer activity through multiple pathways.

METHODS

The objective of this Phase I trial was to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) of metformin in combination with VIT in children with relapsed and refractory solid and CNS tumors. A 3 + 3 design was used to test the addition of metformin at five dose levels (666, 999, 1333, 1666, and 2000 mg/m² /day). Therapy toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and radiologic response to treatment were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients (median age 13 years, range 2-18 years) were enrolled with 22 evaluable for toxicity. The most common diagnoses were Ewing sarcoma (n = 8), rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 3) and atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (n = 3). The MTD was exceeded at Dose Level 5 due to two dose-limiting toxicities; both were Grade 3 diarrhea requiring prolonged hospitalization and intravenous fluids. The MTD was not determined due to study closure with less than six patients enrolled at Dose Level 4. Frequently observed toxicities were gastrointestinal (most notably diarrhea) and hematologic. Amongst 16 patients evaluable for best overall response, there was one complete response (Ewing sarcoma), three partial responses (Ewing sarcoma, glioblastoma multiforme, and alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma), and five patients with stable disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The MTD of VIT with metformin was not determined due to premature study closure. We recommend an RP2D of Dose Level 4, 1666 mg/m² /day. Radiographic responses were seen in multiple tumor types. Further evaluation for efficacy could be investigated in a Phase II trial.

Oncology phase I trial design and conduct: time for a change - MDICT Guidelines 2022

In 2021, the Food and Drug Administration Oncology Center of Excellence announced Project Optimus focusing on dose optimization for oncology drugs. The Methodology for the Development of Innovative Cancer Therapies (MDICT) Taskforce met to review and discuss the optimization of dosage for oncology trials and to develop a practical guide for oncology phase I trials. Defining a single recommended phase II dose based on toxicity may define doses that are neither the most effective nor the best tolerated. MDICT recommendations address the need for robust non-clinical data which are needed to inform trial design, as well as an expert team including statisticians and pharmacologists. The protocol must be flexible and adaptive, with clear definition of all endpoints. Health authorities should be consulted early and regularly. Strategies such as randomization, intrapatient dose escalation, and real-world eligibility criteria are encouraged whereas serial tumor sampling is discouraged in the absence of a strong rationale and appropriately validated assay. Endpoints should include consideration of all longitudinal toxicity. The phase I dose escalation trial should define the recommended dose range for later testing in randomized phase II trials, rather than a single recommended phase II dose, and consider scenarios where different populations may require different dosages. The adoption of these recommendations will improve dosage selection in early clinical trials of new anticancer treatments and ultimately, outcomes for patients.

A Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Dapagliflozin Formate, an Ester Prodrug of Dapagliflozin, to Dapagliflozin Propanediol Monohydrate in Healthy Subjects

Background

Dapagliflozin formate (DAP-FOR, DA-2811), an ester prodrug of dapagliflozin, was developed to improve the stability and pharmaceutical manufacturing process of dapagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor.

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and safety of dapagliflozin for DAP-FOR compared to those for dapagliflozin propanediol monohydrate (DAP-PDH, Forxiga) in healthy subjects.

Methods

This was an open-label, randomized, single-dose, two-period, two-sequence crossover study. The subjects received a single dose of DAP-FOR or DAP-PDH 10 mg in each period, with a 7-day washout. Serial blood samples for PK analysis were collected up to 48 hours after a single administration to determine plasma concentrations of DAP-FOR and dapagliflozin. PK parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental method and compared between the two drugs.

Results

In total, 28 subjects completed the study. DAP-FOR plasma concentrations were not detected in all of the blood sampling time points except for one time point in one subject, and the corresponding DAP-FOR plasma concentration in the subject was close to the lower limit of quantification. The mean plasma concentration-time profiles of dapagliflozin were comparable between the two drugs. The geometric mean ratios and its 90% confidence intervals of the maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve of dapagliflozin for DAP-FOR to DAP-PDH were within the conventional bioequivalence range of 0.80-1.25. Both drugs were well-tolerated, with a similar incidence of adverse drug reactions.

Conclusion

The rapid conversion of DAP-FOR into dapagliflozin led to the extremely low exposure of DAP-FOR and comparable PK profiles of dapagliflozin between DAP-FOR and DAP-PDH. The safety profiles were also similar between the two drugs. These results suggest that DAP-FOR can be used as an alternative to DAP-PDH.

Bintrafusp Alfa: A Bifunctional Fusion Protein Targeting PD-L1 and TGF-β, in Patients with Pretreated Colorectal Cancer: Results from a Phase I Trial

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous and complex disease with limited treatment options. Targeting transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) and programmed death ligand 1 pathways may enhance antitumor efficacy. Bintrafusp alfa is a first-in-class bifunctional fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of TGF-β receptor II (a TGF-β "trap") fused to a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody blocking programmed cell death ligand 1. We report results from an expansion cohort of a phase I study (NCT02517398) in patients with heavily pretreated advanced CRC treated with bintrafusp alfa. As of May 15, 2020, 32 patients with advanced CRC had received bintrafusp alfa for a median duration of 7.1 weeks. The objective response rate was 3.1% and the disease control rate was 6.3% (1 partial response, 1 stable disease); 2 patients were not evaluable. The safety profile was consistent with previously reported data.

Phase I study of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody-drug conjugate serclutamab talirine: Safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity in advanced glioblastoma

Background

Serclutamab talirine (Ser-T, formerly ABBV-321) is an antibody-drug conjugate consisting of an antibody (AM-1-ABT-806) directed against activated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and a pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer. We investigated Ser-T monotherapy in a phase I, first-in-human, dose-escalation, and dose-expansion study in patients with advanced solid tumors associated with EGFR overexpression.

Methods

Eligible patients (≥18 years) had advanced, histologically confirmed solid tumors associated with EGFR overexpression (centralized testing). Patients received Ser-T intravenously once every 4 weeks (Q4W; 5-50 μg/kg) in the dose-escalation phase. Herein, preliminary antitumor activity at the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) is reported only for patients with glioblastoma (n = 24); additional assessments included all treated patients.

Results

Sixty-two patients (median age: 58 years) were enrolled within the dose-escalation (n = 43) and dose-expansion (n = 19) phases. One dose-limiting toxicity, grade 3 aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase elevation, occurred at 20 μg/kg during dose escalation. The Ser-T RP2D regimen of 50 μg/kg × 1 (loading dose) followed by 25 μg/kg Q4W (maintenance dose) was administered during dose expansion. Fatigue (37%) was the only treatment-emergent adverse event (AE) occurring in >25% of patients. Two patients (3%) reported mild treatment-related ocular AEs (eye pruritus). Responses in patients with glioblastoma included 1 partial response (~33 months), 6 stable disease, and 14 progressive disease (not evaluable: n = 3).

Conclusions

Ser-T monotherapy at doses up to 50 μg/kg initial dose, followed by 25 μg/kg Q4W demonstrated a tolerable safety profile with minimal antitumor activity observed in patients with glioblastoma. The glioblastoma dose-expansion cohort was closed due to a lack of efficacy (NCT03234712).

Dose escalations in phase I studies: Feasibility of interpreting blinded pharmacodynamic data

AIMS

During phase I study conduct, blinded data are reviewed to predict the safety of increasing the dose level. The aim of the present study was to describe the probability that effects are observed in blinded evaluations of data in a simulated phase I study design.

METHODS

An application was created to simulate blinded pharmacological response curves over time for 6 common safety/efficacy measurements in phase I studies for 1 or 2 cohorts (6 active, 2 placebo per cohort). Effect sizes between 0 and 3 between-measurement standard deviations (SDs) were simulated. Each set of simulated graphs contained the individual response and mean ± SD over time. Reviewers (n = 34) reviewed a median of 100 simulated datasets and indicated whether an effect was present.

RESULTS

Increasing effect sizes resulted in a higher chance of the effect being identified by the blinded reviewer. On average, 6% of effect sizes of 0.5 between-measurement SD were correctly identified, increasing to 72% in 3.0 between-measurement SD effect sizes. In contrast, on average 92-95% of simulations with no effect were correctly identified, with little effect of between-measurement variability in single cohort simulations. Adding a dataset of a second cohort at half the simulated dose did not appear to improve the interpretation.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis showed that effect sizes <2× the between-measurement SD of the investigated outcome frequently go unnoticed by blinded reviewers, indicating that the weight given to these blinded analyses in current phase I practice is inappropriate and should be re-evaluated.

A phase I, open label, clinical study to assess the safety and immunogenicity of indigenously developed liquid (DTwP-HepB-IPV-Hib) hexavalent combination vaccine in healthy toddlers aged 16-24 months

This first in human study was designed as an open label clinical trial to assess the safety and immunogenicity of SIIPL DTwP-HepB-IPV-Hib (Hexavalent) combination vaccine in healthy toddlers, aged 16-24 months. A total of 24 healthy toddlers were administered a 0.5 ml single dose of SIIPL DTwP-HepB-IPV-Hib vaccine intramuscularly, and followed for 28 days for safety outcomes viz. immediate, solicited, unsolicited and serious adverse events. Blood samples were collected immediately prior to and 28 days after vaccination to assess the immunogenicity. Twenty four completed the study in compliance with the study protocol. None of the participants experienced any immediate or any serious adverse event. In terms of the frequency and intensity, the adverse events were comparable to DTwP-based combination vaccines. The vaccine elicited a strong booster response as demonstrated by a large increase in antibodies against all vaccine antigens. One month post booster vaccination seroprotection for diphtheria, tetanus, Hepatitis B, Haemophilus influenzae type b and polio virus type 1 and 3 was 100%. The percentage sero-response for pertussis was 75%. Four-fold increase in antibody concentration for pertussis was achieved in 87.5% subjects. Indigenously developed DTwP-HepB-IPV-Hib vaccine by Serum Institute of India Pvt. Ltd. was found to be safe, well tolerated and showed a robust immune response in toddlers. It was concluded that this vaccine should be assessed in the next phases of clinical development in the target population.Clinical Trial Registration - CTRI/2018/10/015875.

First-in-human study of ONO-4578, an antagonist of prostaglandin E2 receptor 4, alone and with nivolumab in solid tumors

EP4, a prostaglandin E₂ receptor, has shown an immunosuppressive activity on cancer cells. This first-in-human study evaluated ONO-4578, a highly selective EP4 antagonist, as monotherapy and in combination with nivolumab in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. A daily dose ranging from 30 mg to 100 mg of ONO-4578 monotherapy and that ranging from 2 mg to 60 mg of ONO-4578 with biweekly nivolumab 240 mg were administered. A total of 31 patients were enrolled, 10 receiving monotherapy and 21 receiving combination therapy. Overall, 26 patients experienced treatment-related adverse events. Dose-limiting toxicities were observed in three patients; one of six patients receiving 100 mg monotherapy developed grade 3 duodenal ulcer and two of six patients receiving 60 mg combination therapy developed either grade 3 erythema multiforme or grade 3 increased amylase and grade 4 increased lipase. One patient with small-cell lung cancer who received 40 mg combination therapy had a partial response, and three patients with monotherapy and six patients with combination therapy had stable disease. Pharmacodynamics analyses showed that ONO-4578 had EP4 antagonistic activity at doses as low as 2 mg. In conclusion, the maximum tolerated dose of ONO-4578 alone or in combination with nivolumab was not reached. ONO-4578 was well tolerated at the tested doses and showed signs of antitumor activity. Considering safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics results, ONO-4578 40 mg daily with nivolumab 240 mg biweekly was selected as the recommended dose for future clinical trials. (Registration: JapicCTI-173,496 and NCT03155061).

Preclinical characterization and phase I clinical trial of CT053PTSA targets MET, AXL, and VEGFR2 in patients with advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND

CT053PTSA is a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets MET, AXL, VEGFR2, FLT3 and MERTK. Here, we present preclinical data about CT053PTSA, and we conducted the first-in-human (FIH) study to evaluate the use of CT053PTSA in adult patients with pretreated advanced solid tumors.

METHODS

The selectivity and antitumor activity of CT053PTSA were assessed in cell lines in vitro through kinase and cellular screening panels and in cell line-derived tumor xenograft (CDX) and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models in vivo. The FIH, phase I, single-center, single-arm, dose escalation (3 + 3 design) study was conducted, patients received at least one dose of CT053PTSA (15 mg QD, 30 mg QD, 60 mg QD, 100 mg QD, and 150 mg QD). The primary objectives were to assess safety and tolerability, to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and the recommended dose of CT053PTSA for further study. Secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics, antitumor activity.

RESULTS

CT053 (free-base form of CT053PTSA) inhibited MET, AXL, VEGFR2, FLT3 and MERTK phosphorylation and suppressed tumor cell angiogenesis by blocking VEGF and HGF, respectively, in vitro. Moreover, cell lines with high MET expression exhibited strong sensitivity to CT053, and CT053 blocked the MET and AXL signaling pathways. In an in vivo study, CT053 significantly inhibited tumor growth in CDX and PDX models. Twenty eligible patients were enrolled in the FIH phase I trial. The most common treatment-related adverse events were transaminase elevation (65%), leukopenia (45%) and neutropenia (35%). DLTs occurred in 3 patients, 1/6 in the 100 mg group and 2/4 in the 150 mg group, so the MTD was set to 100 mg. CT053PTSA was rapidly absorbed after the oral administration of a single dose, and the Cmax and AUC increased proportionally as the dose increased. A total of 17 patients in this trial underwent tumor imaging evaluation, and 29.4% had stable disease.

CONCLUSIONS

CT053PTSA has potent antitumor and antiangiogenic activity in preclinical models. In this FIH phase I trial, CT053PTSA was well tolerated and had a satisfactory safety profile. Further trials evaluating the clinical activity of CT053PTSA are ongoing.

Assessment of 99mTc-NTP 15-5 uptake on cartilage, a new proteoglycan tracer: Study protocol for a phase I trial (CARSPECT)

Background

^99mTc-NTP 15-5 is a SPECT radiotracer targeting proteoglycans (PG), components of the cartilaginous extracellular matrix. Imaging of PGs would be useful for the early detection of cartilage disorders (osteoarthritis, arthritis and chondrosarcoma, Aromatase Inhibitor associated arthralgia (AIA) in breast cancer), and the follow-up of patients under treatment. According to preclinical study results, ^99mTc-NTP 15-5, is a good candidate for a specific functional molecular imaging of joints. We intend to initiate a first in-human study to confirm and quantify ^99mTc-NTP 15-5 uptake in healthy joints.

Methods

As the clinical development of this radiotracer would be oriented toward the functional imaging of joint pathologies, we have chosen to include patients with healthy joints (unilateral osteoarthritis of the knee or breast cancer with indication of AI treatment). This phase I study will be an open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation trial of a radiopharmaceutical orientation to determine the recommended level of activity of ^99mTc-NTP 15-5 to obtain the best joint tracer contrasts on images, without dose limiting toxicity (DLT). The secondary objectives will include the study of the pharmacology, biodistribution (using planar whole body and SPECT-CT acquisitions), toxicity, and dosimetry of this radiotracer. The dose escalation with 3 activity levels (5, 10, and 15 MBq/kg), will be conditioned by the absence at the previous level of DLT and of a visualized tracer accumulation on more than 80% of healthy joints as observed on scintigraphy performed at ≤ 2 h post-injection.

Discussion

This first in-human phase I trial will be proof-of-concept of the relevance of ^99mTc-NTP 15-5 as a cartilage tracer, with the determination of the optimal methodology (dose and acquisition time) to obtain the best contrast to provide a functional image of joints with SPECT-CT.

Trial registration number

Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04481230. Identifier in French National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products (ANSM): N°EudraCT 2020-000495-37.

Two phase I studies of BI 836880, a vascular endothelial growth factor/angiopoietin-2 inhibitor, administered once every 3 weeks or once weekly in patients with advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND

BI 836880 is a humanized bispecific nanobody® that inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor and angiopoietin-2. Here, we report results from two phase I, nonrandomized, dose-escalation studies (NCT02674152 and NCT02689505; funded by Boehringer Ingelheim) evaluating BI 836880 in patients with confirmed locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors, refractory to standard therapy, or for which standard therapy was ineffective.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients aged ≥18 years, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 and adequate organ function received escalating intravenous doses of BI 836880 once every 3 weeks (Q3W; Study 1336.1) or once weekly (QW; Study 1336.6). Primary objectives were maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose of BI 836880, based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during the first cycle.

RESULTS

Patients received one of five dosages of 40-1000 mg Q3W (29 patients) or 40-240 mg QW (24 patients). One DLT occurred with Q3W treatment [Grade (G) 3 pulmonary embolism (1000 mg)]. Five DLTs occurred in four patients treated QW [G2 proteinuria (120 mg); G3 hypertension (180 mg); G3 proteinuria and G3 hypertension (240 mg); and G4 respiratory distress (240 mg)]. All patients experienced adverse events, most commonly hypertension with Q3W treatment (89.7%; G3 41.4%), and asthenia with QW treatment (62.5%). Two patients treated Q3W (both 1000 mg) and three patients treated QW (120 mg, 2 patients; 180 mg, 1 patient) experienced partial response.

CONCLUSIONS

The MTD of BI 836880 was 720 mg Q3W and 180 mg QW. BI 836880 was generally manageable and demonstrated preliminary efficacy.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.govNCT02674152; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02674152 and NCT02689505; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02689505.

EPIC: an evaluation of the psychological impact of early-phase clinical trials in cancer patients

Background

Anxiety and depression in patients with cancer is associated with decreased quality of life and increased morbidity and mortality. However, these are often overlooked and untreated. Early-phase clinical trials (EPCTs) recruit patients with advanced cancers who frequently lack future treatment options, which may lead to increased anxiety and depression. Despite this, EPCTs do not routinely consider psychological screening for patients.

Patients and methods

This prospective observational study explored levels of anxiety and depression alongside impact of trial participation in the context of EPCTs. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Brief Illness Perceptions Questionnaire were completed at the point of EPCT consent, the end of screening and at pre-specified time points thereafter.

Results

Sixty-four patients (median age 56 years; median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 1) were recruited. At consent, 57 patients returned questionnaires; 39% reported clinically relevant levels of anxiety whilst 18% reported clinically relevant levels of depression. Sixty-three percent of patients experiencing psychological distress had never previously reported this. Males were more likely to be depressed (P = 0.037) and females were more likely to be anxious (P = 0.011). Changes in anxiety or depression were observed after trial enrolment on an individual level, but not significant on a population level.

Conclusions

Patients on EPCTs are at an increased risk of anxiety and depression but may not seek relevant support. Sites offering EPCTs should consider including psychological screening to encourage a more holistic approach to cancer care and consider the sex of individuals when tailoring psychological support to meet specific needs.

•

Early-phase cancer trial patients have an increased risk of anxiety and depression.

•

Patients at risk were not seeking support for anxiety and depression.

•

Male patients were more likely to be depressed; female patients were more likely to be anxious.

•

This work highlights the need to screen for psychological symptoms in patients entering early-phase trials.

A Phase I Study of Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel/S-1 Chemotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Systemic chemotherapy is the primary treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). More effective treatment options are highly awaited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the toxicity and feasibility of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel/S-1 (GAS) chemotherapy on a 21-day cycle in patients with locally advanced or metastatic PDAC, determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of S-1 in this regimen, and explore preliminary efficacy.

METHODS

Eligible patients with locally advanced or metastatic PDAC received GAS chemotherapy on a 21-day cycle. Fixed-dose nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) were given intravenously on days 1 and 8. Different doses of S-1 were given orally twice daily from day 1 to day 14 in a 3+3 dose escalation design. According to patients` body surface area, the dose-escalation design was as follows: patients with a body surface area of 1.25-1.5 m2 received S-1 40 mg/day initially and the dose was increased to 60 mg or 80 mg. Patients with a body surface area of more than 1.5 m2 received S-1 60 mg/day initially and the dose was increased to 80 mg or 100 mg. The primary endpoints were to evaluate the toxicity and determine the DLT and MTD of S-1. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate efficacy, including best objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). adverse events (AEs) were evaluated according to the NCI-CTCAE 5.0. Tumor response was assessed using the RECIST 1.1.

RESULTS

A total of 21 eligible patients were included. Due to the infrequence of patients with a body surface area of 1.25-1.5 m2, only 2 patients were included in cohort of S-1 40 mg. The dose-escalation for patients in this group failed to be enrolled completely. For patients with a body surface area of more than 1.5 m2, 3 DLTs in 7 patients were detected at cohort of S-1 100 mg (grade 3 thrombocytopenia with hemorrhage, grade 3 rash, and grade 3 mucositis/stomatitis). S-1 80 mg/day (body surface area: >1.5 m2) was considered to be the MTD in GAS chemotherapy on a 21-day cycle. No grade 4 AEs or treatment-related deaths were observed. The most commonly occurring hematologic AE of any grade was anemia (38.1%). The most frequent nonhematologic AEs of any grade were peripheral neuropathy (38.1%), dyspepsia (23.8%), constipation (23.8%), and alopecia (23.8%). Response assessment showed that the best ORR was 36.8% (7 of 19 patients) and the DCR was 94.7% (18 of 19 patients). The median PFS was 5.3 (95% CI, 4.6 to 6.0) months and the median OS was 10.3 (95% CI, 8.1 to 12.5) months.

CONCLUSION

GAS chemotherapy (21-day cycle) with nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, and S-1 80 mg/day (body surface area: >1.5 m2) was found to have acceptable toxicity and significant clinical control in patients with locally advanced or metastatic PDAC. We conclude that further trials with this combination are warranted. (Trial Identifier: ChiCTR1900027833 [chictr.org]).

Phase I study of adjuvant chemotherapy with nab-paclitaxel and S-1 for stage III Lauren's diffuse-type gastric cancer after D2 resection (NORDICA study)

PURPOSE

The prognosis of diffuse-type gastric cancer (DGC) is poorer than that of intestinal type, but S-1 is a potential treatment option in DGC. This study explored the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended dose for phase II study (RP2D) of nab-paclitaxel combined with S-1 (AS regimen) as adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III DGC.

METHODS

Patients with stage III DGC were recruited into this phase I dose-escalation study between July 2019 and June 2020 in Zhongshan Hospital. Nab-paclitaxel and S-1 (80-120 mg/day, d1-14, q3w) were administrated for 6 cycles, and then 8 cycles of S-1 monotherapy were applied. The patients received nab-paclitaxel at 180, 220, or 260 mg/m² according to the 3 + 3 design based on dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). The primary endpoint was RP2D. Secondary endpoints were the 1-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

One case experienced DLT in 180-mg/m² dose group, subsequently three additional subjects were enrolled. DLT was not observed in the 220- and 260-mg/m² dose groups (both n = 3). Therefore, the MTD has not reached, and the RP2D of nab-paclitaxel would be 260 mg/m² . Five participants showed progressive disease, with three and two participants in the 180- and 220-mg/m² dose groups, respectively. The 6-, 12-, and 18-month DFS rates were 100%, 63.6%, and 50.9%, respectively. The most frequently observed AEs were neutropenia (83.3%) and leukopenia (66.7%).

CONCLUSION

The RP2D of nab-paclitaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy in DGC was 260 mg/m² . The AS regimen had a tolerable AE profile in stage III DGC.

A two-part, single-arm, multicentre, phase I study of zanubrutinib, a selective Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in Chinese patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies

This single‐arm, multicentre, phase I study is the first study of zanubrutinib, a potent, specific, irreversible Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, in Chinese patients with relapsed/refractory B‐cell malignancies. The objectives were to evaluate safety and preliminary anti‐tumour activity. Forty‐four patients received zanubrutinib 320 mg once daily (QD) (n = 10) or 160 mg twice daily (BID) (n = 34) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. 29.5% of patients received zanubrutinib for at least two years. The most common adverse event (AE) and the most common grade 3 or higher AE was neutrophil count decreased (54.5% and 25.0% respectively). Two patients (4.5%) discontinued treatment due to AEs and one treatment‐emergent AE led to death. All haemorrhagic events were grade 1–2 (except for one non‐serious grade 3 purpura). No second primary malignancies, tumour lysis syndrome, or atrial fibrillation/flutter occurred. The overall response rate was 52.3% (complete response rate, 18.2%). Patients with all cancer subtypes benefited from treatment. BTK C481S/R or L528W mutations were found in zanubrutinib‐progressive patients. The safety/efficacy profiles of patients treated with 320 mg QD and 160 mg BID were comparable and similar daily area under the curve (AUC) was achieved. Overall, zanubrutinib was well tolerated and either of these two regimens is clinically practical. Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03189524, on 16 June 2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03189524).

Safety and preliminary activity results of the GATTO study, a phase Ib study combining the anti-TA-MUC1 antibody gatipotuzumab with the anti-EGFR tomuzotuximab in patients with refractory solid tumors

BACKGROUND

The phase I GATTO study (NCT03360734) explored the feasibility, tolerability and preliminary activity of combining gatipotuzumab, a novel humanized monoclonal antibody binding to the tumor-associated epitope of mucin 1 (TA-MUC1) and an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) antibody in refractory solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Initially the study enrolled primary phase (PP) patients with EGFR-positive metastatic solid tumors, for whom no standard treatment was available. Patients received gatipotuzumab administered at 1400 mg every 2 weeks, 6 weeks after the start of the glyco-optimized anti-EGFR antibody tomuzotuximab at 1200 mg every 2 weeks. As this regimen was proven safe, enrollment continued in an expansion phase (EP) of patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer, head and neck cancer and breast cancer. Tomuzotuximab and gatipotuzumab were given at the same doses and gatipotuzumab treatment started 1 week after the first dose of the anti-EGFR antibody. Additionally, investigators could use a commercial anti-EGFR antibody in place of tomuzotuximab.

RESULTS

A total of 52 patients were enrolled, 20 in the PP and 32 in the EP. The combined treatment was well tolerated and no dose-limiting toxicity was observed in the whole study, nor related serious adverse event or death. Preliminary activity of the combination was observed, with one and four RECIST partial responses in the PP and EP, all in colorectal cancer patients. The trial was accompanied by a comprehensive translational research program for identification of biomarkers, including soluble TA-MUC1 (sTA-MUC1) in serum. In the EP, patients with baseline sTA-MUC1 levels above the median appeared to have improved progression-free survival and overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of a TA-MUC1-targeting antibody and an EGFR-targeting antibody is safe and feasible. Interesting antitumor activity was observed in heavily pretreated patients. Future studies should test this combination together with chemotherapy and explore the potential of sTA-MUC1 as a companion biomarker for further development of the combination.

Phase I Trial of 99mTc-(HE)3-G3, a DARPin-Based Probe for Imaging of HER2 Expression in Breast Cancer

Radionuclide molecular imaging of human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) expression may enable a noninvasive discrimination between HER2-positive and HER2-negative breast cancers for stratification of patients for HER2-targeted treatments. DARPin (designed ankyrin repeat proteins) G3 is a small (molecular weight, 14 kDa) scaffold protein with picomolar affinity to HER2. The aim of this first-in-humans study was to evaluate the safety, biodistribution, and dosimetry of 99mTc-(HE)3-G3. Methods: Three cohorts of patients with primary breast cancer (each including at least 4 patients with HER2-negative and 5 patients with HER2-positive tumors) were injected with 1,000, 2,000, or 3,000 μg of 99mTc-(HE)3-G3 (287 ± 170 MBq). Whole-body planar imaging followed by SPECT was performed at 2, 4, 6, and 24 h after injection. Vital signs and possible side effects were monitored during imaging and up to 7 d after injection. Results: All injections were well tolerated. No side effects were observed. The results of blood and urine analyses did not differ before and after studies. 99mTc-(HE)3-G3 cleared rapidly from the blood. The highest uptake was detected in the kidneys and liver followed by the lungs, breasts, and small intestinal content. The hepatic uptake after injection of 2,000 or 3,000 μg was significantly (P < 0.05) lower than the uptake after injection of 1,000 μg. Effective doses did not differ significantly between cohorts (average, 0.011 ± 0.004 mSv/MBq). Tumor-to-contralateral site ratios for HER-positive tumors were significantly (P < 0.05) higher than for HER2-negative at 2 and 4 h after injection. Conclusion: Imaging of HER2 expression using 99mTc-(HE)3-G3 is safe and well tolerated and provides a low absorbed dose burden on patients. This imaging enables discernment of HER2-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer. Phase I study data justify further clinical development of 99mTc-(HE)3-G3.

Phase I/Ib dose-escalation study of avelumab in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors

Aim: Data for avelumab (anti-PD-L1 antibody) in Chinese patients are limited. Patients & methods: Phase I/Ib, open-label, dose-escalation study of Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors. Primary study objectives were to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics (PK) of avelumab. Results: 24 patients received avelumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (Q2W; n = 3), 10 mg/kg Q2W (n = 7), 20 mg/kg Q2W (n = 6) or 10 mg/kg weekly for 12 weeks and then Q2W thereafter (n = 8). MTD was not reached. Avelumab exposure was increased in higher dose groups. Partial responses occurred in two patients (confirmed in one patient); best overall response was stable disease in nine patients. Conclusion: Data for avelumab in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors were consistent with previous global studies.

A WIN Consortium phase I study exploring avelumab, palbociclib, and axitinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Background

The Worldwide Innovative Network (WIN) Consortium has developed the Simplified Interventional Mapping System (SIMS) to better define the cancer molecular milieu based on genomics/transcriptomics from tumor and analogous normal tissue biopsies. SPRING is the first trial to assess a SIMS‐based tri‐therapy regimen in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Patients with advanced NSCLC (no EGFR, ALK, or ROS1 alterations; PD‐L1 unrestricted; ≤2 prior therapy lines) received avelumab, axitinib, and palbociclib (3 + 3 dose escalation design).

Results

Fifteen patients were treated (five centers, four countries): six at each of dose levels 1 (DL1) and DL2; three at DL3. The most common ≥Grade 3 adverse events were neutropenia, hypertension, and fatigue. The recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) was DL1: avelumab 10 mg/kg IV q2weeks, axitinib 3 mg po bid, and palbociclib 75 mg po daily (7 days off/21 days on). Four patients (27%) achieved a partial response (PR) (progression‐free survival [PFS]: 14, 24, 25 and 144+ weeks), including two after progression on pembrolizumab. Four patients attained stable disease (SD) that lasted ≥24 weeks: 24, 27, 29, and 64 weeks. At DL1 (RP2D), four of six patients (66%) achieved stable disease (SD) ≥6 months/PR (2 each). Responders included patients with no detectable PD‐L1 expression and low tumor mutational burden.

Conclusions

Overall, eight of 15 patients (53%) achieved clinical benefit (SD ≥ 24 weeks/PR) on the avelumab, axitinib, and palbociclib combination. This triplet showed antitumor activity in NSCLC, including in tumors post‐pembrolizumab progression, and was active at the RP2D, which was well tolerated.

NCT03386929 clinicaltrial.gov

Evaluation of pharmacokinetics and safety of talazoparib in patients with advanced cancer and varying degrees of hepatic impairment

AIM

This phase I study investigated talazoparib pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety in patients with advanced solid tumors and varying degrees of hepatic function.

METHODS

Patients with advanced solid tumors and normal hepatic function or varying degrees of hepatic impairment (mild, moderate, and severe, based on NCI-ODWG classification) received talazoparib 0.5 mg once daily for 22 calendar days. Plasma and urine samples after single and multiple doses were collected and analyzed for talazoparib using validated assays. Plasma PK data from all patients were analyzed using population PK method. Plasma and urine PK parameters in PK-evaluable patients were calculated using non-compartmental analysis (NCA). Safety was monitored in all enrolled patients.

RESULTS

38 patients were enrolled; 37 had ≥1 PK concentration, among which 17 were evaluable for NCA. Population PK analysis (n = 37) indicated no significant impact of hepatic function on apparent clearance (CL/F) of talazoparib. Baseline creatinine clearance was the only significant covariate on CL/F (α=0.05). NCA of data (n = 17) showed no clear trend for increase in exposure on Day 22 with worsening hepatic function. Talazoparib protein binding was comparable in patients with varying hepatic function. Talazoparib was generally well tolerated, and the safety profile observed in this study was consistent with the known safety profile of the drug.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatic impairment (mild, moderate, and severe) has no impact on PK of talazoparib. No dose modification is recommended for patients with advanced solid tumors and various degrees of hepatic impairment, and this labeling language has been approved by US FDA and the EMA.

Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple topical ophthalmic administration of imatinib mesylate in healthy subjects

For the long‐term efficacy of dry eye disease treatment, relieving underlying inflammation is necessary. Imatinib mesylate is a novel ophthalmic formulation of imatinib mesylate, which is expected to alleviate inflammation by inhibiting the discoidin domain receptor 1 activity. This study aims to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of imatinib mesylate in healthy subjects. A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study was conducted. In a single ascending dose, 16 subjects received a single eye drop of imatinib mesylate 0.1%, 0.3%, or matching placebo. In the multiple ascending dose (MAD), subjects received multiple eye drops of imatinib mesylate 0.1%, 0.3%, or matching placebo once daily for 7 days. Safety and tolerability were assessed by ophthalmic examination, including the visual analog scale (VAS) to monitor the burning sensation in the eyes. A total of four treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred during the study. All TEAEs were mildly severe with no serious cases. VAS results in the 0.1% MAD group exhibited highest score of two points, whereas it was less than one point in others. Insignificant difference between the imatinib mesylate and placebo groups in the VAS results was seen. After a single dose administration of imatinib mesylate 0.1%, all plasma concentrations were below the lower limit of quantification. The peak plasma concentrations of imatinib were less than 0.54 µg/L in all groups. In conclusion, a single and multiple topical ophthalmic administration of imatinib mesylate was well‐tolerated in healthy subjects. Because there was minimal systemic exposure to imatinib, the adverse effect in the body seems to be insignificant.

Phase I Study of the Pharmacodynamics and Safety of Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate in Healthy Chinese Adults

Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) is an effective potassium binder for patients with hyperkalemia. This single‐center, open‐label, phase I study (NCT03283267) characterized the pharmacodynamics and safety of SZC in Chinese individuals. Twenty‐two healthy Chinese adults (mean age, 33.5 years) randomized 1:1 received daily oral SZC 5 or 10 g for 4 days, following 4 days on a low‐sodium, high‐potassium diet (continued throughout the study). End points were mean change from baseline in 24‐hour urinary potassium (primary) and sodium excretion, and serum potassium concentration. Urinary potassium excretion significantly decreased with SZC 5 g (mean change [mmol], –13.0; P < .001) and 10 g (–15.4; P < .001). Although urinary sodium excretion decreased significantly with SZC 5 g (–11.5; P = .030), there was no significant change with SZC 10 g (–5.1; P = .299). Serum potassium concentrations decreased significantly with SZC 5 g (–0.14; P = .031) and 10 g (–0.20; P = .002). All treatment‐emergent adverse events were mild, and none were considered causally related to SZC. Over 4 days, the pharmacodynamics and safety of SZC were consistent in healthy Chinese adults with global studies and patients of Japanese ethnicity.