Ultrasound-guided musculocutaneous nerve block: a description of a novel technique

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Localizing the musculocutaneous nerve for neural blockade is crucial to providing surgical anesthesia for the distal forearm. We present a novel approach for localizing and anesthetizing the musculocutaneous nerve.

CASE REPORTS

Ten patients underwent successful ultrasound-guided musculocutaneous nerve blocks. In this technique, either a 10-MHz or a 12-MHz linear probe was placed at the junction of the pectoralis major muscle and the biceps muscle such that the axillary artery was visualized in cross section. The probe was moved towards the biceps muscle until the musculocutaneous nerve was visualized lying between the coracobrachialis and biceps muscles. A 22-gauge, 50-mm b-bevel needle was inserted under direct vision until the needle was adjacent to the nerve. Local anesthetic was then injected, which generated surgical anesthetic conditions in all patients.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound can facilitate the localization and local anesthetic block of the musculocutaneous nerve.

The learning curve associated with a simulated ultrasound-guided interventional task by inexperienced anesthesia residents

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Ultrasound has become an increasingly popular modality in facilitating the performance of peripheral nerve blocks. There exists no literature that examines the learning curve of the ultrasound novice. In this prospective series, we evaluated the learning curve of inexperienced anesthesia residents in performing a simulated ultrasound-guided interventional procedure. In doing so, we hoped to identify reproducible patterns of human errors, which could potentially aid in the prevention of real-life iatrogenic injuries.

METHODS

Ten subjects were prospectively enrolled. After a brief introduction to the ultrasound system, the subjects were asked to perform 6 sequential trials of a simulated breast cyst aspiration. For the first 3 trials, each subject attempted to place a 22-gauge b-bevel needle into any aspect of an olive buried inside the turkey breast. After completion of these 3 trials, the subjects were asked to place the needle into the exact midpoint of the olive wall closest to the transducer. Trials were videotaped and analyzed for task performance in terms of speed and accuracy.

RESULTS

All subjects successfully completed the 6 interventional trials. The mean time to perform the task was reduced by 38% and 48%, respectively, for the second and third trials. A composite score of accuracy showed an improvement of 36% and 59%, respectively, for the second and third trials. The most common committed error, which occurred in 7 of 10 subjects, was the failure to accurately image the needle while advancing. This resulted in excessive depth of penetration and inadvertent transfixation of the olive in 5 of these subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Anesthesiology residents, with little or no ultrasound experience, can rapidly learn and improve their speed and accuracy in performing a simulated interventional ultrasound procedure. A concerning novice pattern was identified where the subjects advanced the needle even though it was not appropriately visualized in the ultrasound beam. This resulted in needle placement error, which could cause iatrogenic injury in the clinical setting.

A single injection ultrasound-assisted femoral nerve block provides side effect-sparing analgesia when compared with intrathecal morphine in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty

Postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is severe, and achieving adequate analgesia remains a clinical challenge. We tested the hypothesis that, in patients having unilateral TKA under intrathecal (IT) anesthesia, the addition of a femoral nerve block would provide superior analgesia when compared with IT morphine and demonstrate fewer adverse side effects. In a single-blinded and controlled trial, 41 ASA I-III patients undergoing unilateral TKA were randomized into 2 groups. Both groups received 15 mg of IT hyperbaric bupivacaine for the surgical anesthetic. Group ITM received 250 microg of IT morphine and group FNB received an ultrasound-assisted femoral nerve block with 40 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine, 5 microg/mL of epinephrine, and 75 microg of clonidine. At 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively, we measured visual analog scales for pain, cumulative IV morphine consumption, hemodynamics, and side effects. There were no statistically significant differences in morphine consumption, pain at rest, or pain with movement. However, group FNB had fewer perioperative side effects including nausea, vomiting, and pruritus (P < 0.05 for each event). This corresponded to a decrease in patient satisfaction in group ITM, in which 20% of the patients rated their experience as "unsatisfactory" (P < 0.05). We conclude that, in comparison with IT morphine, a single injection femoral nerve block provides equivalent analgesia but with a significant reduction in side effects for patients having TKA under bupivacaine intrathecal anesthesia.

The use of magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate the accuracy of a handheld ultrasound machine in localizing the sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Ultrasound has become an increasingly popular modality in facilitating the performance of peripheral nerve blocks. There is a paucity of data describing techniques of ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve blocks. By using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a gold standard, the objective of this study was to describe the ability of a handheld ultrasound machine to accurately locate the sciatic nerve.

METHODS

Ten patients were prospectively enrolled and placed in the prone position. By using a 4- to 7-MHz ultrasound transducer, the sciatic nerve was visualized in short axis between 5 to 10 cm above the popliteal crease. The distance from the skin to the nerve was measured by ultrasound, and a MRI lucent marker was placed at this site. This process was repeated in one additional location. The patient was then placed supine in the MRI scanner and short-axis T1-weighted images were obtained. On the MRI image, we recreated the 2 lines extending down from the markers using the distances previously measured by ultrasound. The point of intersection of these 2 lines represents the ultrasound-determined location of the sciatic nerve, which was then compared with the midpoint of the nerve complex on MRI.

RESULTS

The sciatic nerve was easily visualized by ultrasound in all 10 patients. MRI showed the division of the sciatic nerve in 9 out of 10 patients. Ultrasound was able to confirm this division in 7 patients. The mean distance between the MRI and ultrasound midpoint location of the sciatic nerve was 2.9 +/- 1.3 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

The data presented here suggest that the specific ultrasound machine evaluated in this study can accurately localize the sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa.

Ultrasound-guided popliteal block demonstrates an atypical motor response to nerve stimulation in 2 patients with diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Nerve stimulation is a useful technique to identify peripheral nerves before blockade. We report 2 cases of the failure of nerve stimulation to accurately localize the sciatic nerve in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing outpatient foot procedures. We also introduce a novel approach to performing a popliteal fossa block using ultrasound guidance.

CASE REPORT

Ultrasound-guided popliteal fossa blocks were performed in 2 patients with diabetes mellitus. Both patients failed to develop an appropriate motor response or paresthesia to nerve stimulation. The needle positions were confirmed by ultrasound guidance and injections of local anesthesia were made uneventfully. Appropriate surgical anesthesia was established and the procedures were performed uneventfully.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound facilitated the accurate localization of the sciatic nerve in 2 patients with diabetes mellitus. Neither patient had a paresthesia or muscle twitch below 2.4 mA. There is theoretical concern that patients with underlying neuropathy, such as patients with diabetes mellitus, may have an altered response to either motor or sensory stimulation.

Intrathecal clonidine added to a bupivacaine-morphine spinal anesthetic improves postoperative analgesia for total knee arthroplasty

Postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is severe and can complicate early physical therapy. We tested the hypothesis that intrathecal clonidine would improve postoperative analgesia for TKA using a hyperbaric bupivacaine spinal anesthetic. In a double-blinded, placebo-controlled protocol, 81 ASA physical status I-III patients undergoing either a single or bilateral TKA were randomized into 4 groups with the following 2-mL solutions added to 15 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine: 1) sterile saline, 2) morphine (250 microg), 3) morphine (250 microg) with clonidine (25 microg), and 4) morphine (250 microg) with clonidine (75 microg). At 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively, we measured visual analog scales (VAS), cumulative IV morphine consumption, hemodynamics, nausea, ancillary drugs, and side effects. Our primary comparison was between the clonidine with morphine groups versus the morphine group. We found that the combined administration of intrathecal clonidine and morphine decreased 24 h IV morphine consumption by 13 mg (P = 0.028) when compared with intrathecal morphine alone. This corresponded to a decrease in the VAS score of 1.3 cm at 24 h postoperatively (P = 0.047). Adverse side effects were similar among all groups with the exception of more relative hypotension in the clonidine groups through postoperative hour 6. We conclude that the coadministration of intrathecal clonidine and morphine decreases the 24-h IV morphine consumption and improves the 24-h VAS score when compared with intrathecal morphine alone.

IMPLICATIONS

In this prospective, randomized, double-blinded, and placebo-controlled trial, we identify an effective postoperative analgesic approach in total knee replacement surgery. Intrathecal morphine (250 microg) combined with clonidine (25 or 75 microg) provided superior analgesia compared with intrathecal morphine alone.

Single-dose caudal anaesthesia for two infants undergoing diagnostic brain magnetic resonance imaging: high risk and nonhigh risk

We present a case report of two infants given a bupivacaine caudal anaesthetic as a means of achieving sedation for a diagnostic brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patient 1 was born at 27 weeks of gestation and presented to our hospital at 39 weeks postconception with a history of bronchopulmonary dysplasia and apnoea/bradycardia spells. He was undergoing a brain MRI for the work up of persistent apnoea and craniofacial abnormalities. Patient 2 was a term infant at 42 weeks postconception undergoing a MRI for the work up of a seizure disorder. Both infants fell asleep shortly after placement of the caudal blocks and the studies were completed successfully without complications. Utilizing this technique, we avoided dealing with a potentially difficult airway (patient 1), exacerbating postoperative apnoea and the negative implications of intravenous sedation during a study where there is limited access to the patient's airway.