Surgical advantages of reduced-port laparoscopic gastrectomy in gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Although a few studies have reported the use of reduced-port laparoscopic gastrectomy (RPG) in gastric cancer patients, the feasibility of routinely using this technique remains unclear. It is therefore important to evaluate the surgical advantages of this technique in this patient group.

METHODS

Between August 2010 and July 2015, 165 patients underwent RPGs at our hospital, performed by a single surgeon. Of these patients, 88 underwent reduced-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (RPLDG) and 77 underwent reduced-port laparoscopic total gastrectomy (RPLTG). In addition to short-term surgical outcomes after RPG, survival times and the surgical learning curve were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Blood losses during lymph node dissection in the RPLDG and RPLTG groups were not significantly different (p = 0.160). Conversion to open surgery was necessary in only two patients. Postoperative morbidities were observed in 14.8 % of the RPLDG group and 14.3 % of the RPLTG group, but there were no deaths. Most patients expressed high cosmetic satisfaction in both groups. In the RPLDG group, operation time during reconstruction decreased over the first 50 cases and then plateaued, as the surgeon's experience of the technique increased. In contrast, in the RPLTG group, operation times dropped with surgical experience for both lymph node dissection, plateauing after 40 cases, and for reconstruction, plateauing after 30 cases. Only three patients died of gastric cancer in the follow-up period and three patients died of other diseases. Five-year overall survival and 5-year disease-specific survival were 95.6 and 98.0 %, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We have shown that reduced-port gastrectomy (RPG) could be an acceptable and satisfactory procedure for treating gastric cancer for an experienced laparoscopic gastric surgeon who has sufficient previous experience of conventional laparoscopic gastrectomies.

Feasibility and Safety of Transhiatal Approach and D2 Total Gastrectomy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophago-Gastric Junction: A Subset Analysis of the COMPASS Trial

BACKGROUND

It was unclear whether the transhiatal approach and D2 total gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for adenocarcinoma of the esophago-gastric (AEG) junction are as feasible and safe as D2 gastrectomy following NAC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We clarified the short-term surgical results in AEG and non-AEG patients in a subset analysis of the COMPASS trial.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients, 24 with AEG and 59 with non-AEG, were registered in the study. Among 24 patients with AEG, 5 were classified to have Siewert type I, 11 to have type II and 8 to have type III. The tumor progression, completion of NAC, and clinical and pathological responses were similar between the groups. Twenty-four AEG and 51 non-AEG patients proceeded to surgery. The extent of dissection (D1/D2) was 3/21 in the AEG and 3/48 in the non-AEG patients. The R0 resection rate was 69% in the non-AEG and 88% in the AEG patients. Neither grade 3b/4 morbidity nor surgical mortality was observed in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

The transhiatal approach and D2 total gastrectomy after NAC seem to be as safe and feasible as D2 gastrectomy for non-AEG cancer.

[A Case of Resected Advanced Gastric Cancer Exhibiting Pathological Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Che-motherapy(DTX/CDDP/S-1:DCS)]

A 71-year-old man was diagnosed with gastric cancer (LM, Less, type 2, T4aN2M0, cStageⅢb). A diagnostic laparoscopic surgery revealed serosal invasion without peritoneal dissemination. Two courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for locally advanced gastric cancer using DCS (DTX: 20 mg/m2 on day 1, CDDP: 50 mg/m2 on day 1, S-1: 120 mg/day, twice a day on days 1-14) was performed, which resulted in a clinical partial response. Consequently, distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection, and BillrothⅠreconstruction were carried out. Histopathological examination revealed no residual cancer cells both in the primary lesion and in the lymph nodes, indicating a pathological complete response (grade 3). Six courses of S-1 (120 mg/day on days 1-28, followed by 2 weeks of rest) were administered as adjuvant chemotherapy. At the 2 years 10 months follow-up after adjuvant therapy, the patient has had no recurrence. Combination chemotherapy with NAC-DCS can be a safe and effective regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer.

[A Case of Advanced Gastric Cancer Responding to Neoadjuvant Docetaxel/CDDP/S-1 Therapy with Metallic Stent Placement, Leading to Curative Surgery]

A 59-year-old man presented with epigastralgia. A diagnosis of advanced gastric cancer MLU, Circ, Type 3, 160 mm, tub2, cT4b (SI: panc), cN1, cM0, cH0, cP0, cCY0, cStage ⅢB was made. Because of difficulty with oral intake due to malignant outlet obstruction and tumor bleeding, endoscopic self-expanding metallic stent placement was performed. We administered chemotherapy involving docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1(DCS). After 2 courses of chemotherapy, the primary lesion and regional lymph nodes had reduced in size. His response was judged as SD according to the RECIST criteria. The patient elected to undergo explorative laparotomy for assessment of the gastric cancer. The intraoperative findings showed that there was no pancreatic invasion, peritoneal dissemination, or distal metastasis, so a total gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection was performed. The pathological findings showed that there were very few cancer cells in the primary lesion, and a lymph node metastasis was found. The final stage was gastric cancer MLU, Circ, Type 3, 100 mm, muc, ypT4a(SE), ypN3a (13/51), ypM0, ypH0, ypP0, ypCY0, ypStage ⅢC. The therapy evaluation was Grade 1b. In summary, we encountered a patient with gastric cancer in whom curative surgery was made possible by undergoing chemotherapy and metallic stent placement.

Signatures of tumour immunity distinguish Asian and non-Asian gastric adenocarcinomas

OBJECTIVE

Differences in gastric cancer (GC) clinical outcomes between patients in Asian and non-Asian countries has been historically attributed to variability in clinical management. However, recent international Phase III trials suggest that even with standardised treatments, GC outcomes differ by geography. Here, we investigated gene expression differences between Asian and non-Asian GCs, and if these molecular differences might influence clinical outcome.

DESIGN

We compared gene expression profiles of 1016 GCs from six Asian and three non-Asian GC cohorts, using a two-stage meta-analysis design and a novel biostatistical method (RUV-4) to adjust for technical variation between cohorts. We further validated our findings by computerised immunohistochemical analysis on two independent tissue microarray (TMA) cohorts from Asian and non-Asian localities (n=665).

RESULTS

Gene signatures differentially expressed between Asians and non-Asian GCs were related to immune function and inflammation. Non-Asian GCs were significantly enriched in signatures related to T-cell biology, including CTLA-4 signalling. Similarly, in the TMA cohorts, non-Asian GCs showed significantly higher expression of T-cell markers (CD3, CD45R0, CD8) and lower expression of the immunosuppressive T-regulatory cell marker FOXP3 compared to Asian GCs (p<0.05). Inflammatory cell markers CD66b and CD68 also exhibited significant cohort differences (p<0.05). Exploratory analyses revealed a significant relationship between tumour immunity factors, geographic locality-specific prognosis, and postchemotherapy outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Analyses of >1600 GCs suggest that Asian and non-Asian GCs exhibit distinct tumour immunity signatures related to T-cell function. These differences may influence geographical differences in clinical outcome, and the design of future trials particularly in immuno-oncology.

[Clinical Experience of Nutritional Support in Patients Treated with Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer]

BACKGROUND

We investigated the efficacy of nutritional support in patients treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC).

METHODS

Eleven patients treated with CRT for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were included. Oral intake energy expenditure (OIE) and total energy expenditure (TEE) of all patients were calculated. Oral nutrition supplementations (ONSs) were utilized as nutritional therapy for the patients with malnutrition (OIE/TEE<0.6). Enteral nutrition (EN) was used in the patients with tumor obstruction.

RESULT

Two patients (18.9%) received ONS and 2 other patients received EN. Seven patients were able to take enough energy in the meal. The mean energy charge was increased from 67.9%to 84.9%. Nine patients (81.8%) completed the treatment regimen. During the CRT period, the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and C-reactive protein level (mg/dL) were not significantly different. The body mass index decreased to 0.39 kg/m2 (p=0.039) and the mean weight loss was 1.57%. The overall response rate was 81.8%.

CONCLUSION

The nutritional support in the patients treated with CRT for LAEC is effective for maintaining nutritional status. Moreover, the response rate is satisfactory.

[A Case of Resected Gastric Cancer Invading the Esophagus with Esophageal Recurrence That Responded to Weekly Docetaxel／Cisplatin Chemotherapy]

A 77-year-old man underwent total gastrectomy with D1+ lymph node dissection after being diagnosed with cT4aN2M0, cStage ⅢB gastric cancer. Peritoneal dissemination was detected in the bursa omentalis. The pathological diagnosis after surgery was pT4aN3b (21/41) M1 (P1). He was treated with 6 courses of S-1 chemotherapy. Two years after surgery, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed the presence of a tumor in the mid-thoracic esophagus. It was diagnosed to as metastatic esophageal cancer and treated with combination chemotherapy consisting of docetaxel (25 mg/m2, days 1, 8, 15) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2, days 1, 8, 15) in a 28-day cycle. A clinically complete response was observed after 5 courses of chemotherapy. Currently, the patient is alive with no signs of recurrence 12 months after the initial recurrence.

HER2 expression in locally advanced gastric cancer with extensive lymph node (bulky N2 or paraaortic) metastasis (JCOG1005-A trial)

BACKGROUND

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is likely overexpressed and/or amplified in locally advanced gastric cancer with extensive (bulky N2 or paraaortic) lymph node metastasis, and patients may benefit from treatment with anti-HER2 antibodies. This study evaluated the frequency of HER2 overexpression and amplification in The Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA)-N3 and JGCA-bulky N2 tumors and the correlation between HER2 status and survival.

METHODS

HER2 status was assessed using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in tumor tissue samples from 89 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma enrolled in the phase II JCOG0001 and JCOG0405 trials. HER2 positivity was defined as IHC3+ or IHC2+ with confirmatory FISH results.

RESULTS

Of the 89 tumor samples, 24 (27 %) showed HER2 positivity, including 16 scored as IHC3+ and 8 as IHC2+ and FISH positive. Multivariate analysis showed that the HER2 positivity rate was significantly higher in evaluable differentiated tumors than in undifferentiated tumors [18/44 (40.9 %) vs. 5/42 (11.9 %)]. Although the apparent OS curve of HER2 positive was superior to that of HER2 negative patients, HER2 status was not a statistically significant prognostic factor in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

The HER2 positivity rate was relatively high in patients with JGCA-bulky N2 and JGCA-N3 gastric adenocarcinoma, suggesting that HER2 evaluation is essential to select the therapeutic regimen for neoadjuvant chemotherapy for this group of patients.

Randomised phase III trial of second-line irinotecan plus cisplatin versus irinotecan alone in patients with advanced gastric cancer refractory to S-1 monotherapy: TRICS trial

AIM

The optimal second-line regimen for treating advanced gastric cancer (AGC) remains unclear. While irinotecan (CPT-11) plus cisplatin (CDDP) combination therapy and CPT-11 monotherapy have been explored in the second-line setting, the superiority of second-line platinum-based therapies for AGC patients initially treated with S-1 monotherapy has not yet been evaluated; therefore, we aimed to examine the survival benefit of CPT-11/CDDP combination over CPT-11 monotherapy.

METHODS

AGC patients showing progression after S-1 monotherapy for advanced cancer or recurrence within 6 months after completion of S-1 adjuvant therapy were randomly allocated to CPT-11/CDDP (CPT-11, 60 mg/m(2); CDDP, 30 mg/m(2), q2w) or CPT-11 (150 mg/m(2), q2w).

RESULTS

Sixty-eight advanced and 95 recurrent cases were evaluated. The median overall survivals were 13.9 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.8-17.6) and 12.7 (95% CI: 10.3-17.2) months for CPT-11/CDDP and CPT-11, respectively (hazard ratio: 0.834; 95% CI: 0.596-1.167, P = 0.288). No significant differences were observed in the secondary end-points, including progression-free survival (4.6 [95% CI: 3.4-5.9] versus 4.1 [95% CI: 3.3-4.9]months) and response rate (16.9% [95% CI: 8.8-28.3] versus 15.4% [95% CI: 7.6-26.5]). The incidences of grade 3-4 anaemia (16% versus 4%) and elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase levels (5% versus 0%) were higher for CPT-11/CDDP than for CPT-11. Exploratory subgroup analysis revealed that CPT-11/CDDP was significantly more effective for intestinal-type AGC, compared with CPT-11 (overall survival: 15.8 versus 14.0 months; P = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

No survival benefit was observed upon adding CDDP to CPT-11 after S-1 monotherapy failure.

Technical reproducibility of single-nucleotide and size-based DNA biomarker assessment using DNA extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues

DNA extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues has been used in the past to analyze genetic polymorphisms. We evaluated the technical reproducibility of different types of assays for gene polymorphisms using DNA extracted from FFPE material. By using the MassARRAY iPLEX system, we investigated polymorphisms in DPYD (rs1801159 and rs3918290), UMPS (rs1801019), ERCC1 (rs11615), ERCC1 (rs3212986), and ERCC2 (rs13181) in 56 FFPE DNA samples. By using PCR, followed by size-based gel electrophoresis, we also examined TYMS 5' untranslated region 2R/3R repeats and GSTT1 deletions in 50 FFPE DNA samples and 34 DNAs extracted from fresh-frozen tissues and cell lines. Each polymorphism was analyzed by two independent runs. We found that iPLEX biomarker assays measuring single-nucleotide polymorphisms provided consistent concordant results. However, by using FFPE DNA, size-based PCR biomarkers (GSTT1 and TYMS 5' untranslated region) were discrepant in 32.7% (16/49, with exact 95% CI, 19.9%-47.5%; exact binomial confidence limit test) and 4.2% (2/48, with exact 95% CI, 0.5%-14.3%) of cases, respectively, whereas no discrepancies were observed using intact genomic DNA. Our findings suggest that DNA from FFPE material can be used to reliably test single-nucleotide polymorphisms. However, results based on size-based PCR biomarkers, and particularly GSTT1 deletions, using FFPE DNA need to be interpreted with caution. Independent repeated assays should be performed on all cases to assess potential discrepancies.

Validity of response assessment criteria in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer (JCOG0507-A)

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may improve outcomes in gastric cancer. Tumor responses can be evaluated with RECIST, Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma (JCGC), and histological criteria. These approaches have not yet been compared.

METHODS

We analyzed two phase II trials of neoadjuvant chemotherapy using S-1 plus cisplatin. JCOG0210 included patients with linitis plastica and large ulcero-invasive tumors, whereas JCOG0405 comprised those with para-aortic or bulky lymph node metastases. Radiologic evaluations were conducted using RECIST in JCOG0405 and JCGC criteria in JCOG0210, because the latter included many patients without measurable lesions. A histological responder was defined as a patient in whom one third or more of the tumor was affected. The hazard ratios (HR) for death between responders and non-responders and response rate differences between short- and long-term survivors were estimated.

RESULTS

In JCOG0210 (n = 49), HR was 0.54 in JCGC responders (P = 0.059) and 0.40 in histological responders (P = 0.005). The difference in response rates between short- and long-term survivors using histological criteria (34 %, P = 0.023) was greater than that using JCGC criteria (24 %, P = 0.15). In JCOG0405 (n = 51), HR was 0.67 in RECIST responders (P = 0.35) and 0.39 in histological responders (P = 0.030). In short- and long-term survivors, respectively, RECIST response rates were 62  and 67 % (P = 0.77), whereas histological response rates were 33  and 63 % (P = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

Histological criteria showed higher response assessment validity than RECIST or JCGC criteria and yielded the best surrogate endpoint for overall survival.

A phase II trial of capecitabine plus cisplatin (XP) for patients with advanced gastric cancer who relapsed after S-1 adjuvant therapy, XP after TS-1 adjuvant failure (XParTS)

124

Background: For gastric cancer, standard regimens including S-1 for adjuvant and first-line chemotherapy have been established in Japan, while for early relapse after adjuvant therapy there is no standard treatment. In our retrospective analysis, relapse-free interval of less than 6 months was associated with poor progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). To evaluate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine plus cisplatin (XP) treatment, for patients with advanced gastric cancer who relapsed within 6 months after S-1 adjuvant therapy, we conducted a multicenter phase II trial in Japan (NCT Identifier: NCT01412294). Methods: Patients who had received adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer including S-1 for more than 12 weeks, thereafter relapsed within 6 months, 20–74 years of age and HER2- negative, were assigned to receive capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 bid for 14 days plus cisplatin 80 mg/m2 (day 1) every 3-week. The primary endpoint was PFS and the secondary endpoints were OS, time to treatment failure, overall response rate (ORR) and safety. Planned sample size was 40 according to median PFS threshold of 2 months. Results: From June 2011 to April 2014, 40 patients were assigned. Median age was 64, 32 males (80%); adjuvant chemotherapy: regimen, S-1 monotherapy (n=34, 85%), and median number of course was 7.0 (3-18). In 40 patients median PFS was 20 weeks (95%CI, 17-24), which was longer than protocol-specified threshold of 2 months. Median OS was 77 weeks (95%CI, 34-NE), ORR was 8/40 (22% including 12 NE cases; 95%CI, 44-74). Most common grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (23%), anemia (18%), hypercreatinine (18%), fatigue (13%), diarrhea (7.5%), and anorexia (7.5%). Conclusions: XP was safe and effective for those patients with relatively poor prognosis after S-1 adjuvant failure. Since profile of S-1 and capecitabine was different, XP can be recommended rather than S-1 plus cisplatin, Japanese standard first- line regimen. Clinical trial information: NCT01412294.

A randomized phase II trial of capecitabine plus cisplatin (XP) versus S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) as a first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: XP ascertainment versus SP randomized PII trial (XParTS II)

105

Background: Capecitabine plus cisplatin (XP) is a standard global regimen for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer, however its efficacy compared to S-1 plus cisplatin (SP), a standard treatment in Japan has not been reported. To evaluate the efficacy of XP treatment, we conducted a multicenter randomized phase II trial comparing XP with SP for patients with advanced gastric cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT0140624). Methods: Patients with unresectable metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer, 20–74 years of age and HER2-negative, were assigned to receive either S-1 40 mg/m2 bid for 21 days plus cisplatin 60 mg/m2 (day 8) every 5-week cycle or capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 bid for 14 days plus cisplatin 80 mg/m2 (day 1) every 3-week cycle. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure, overall response rate (ORR) and safety. Planned sample size was 100 (50 in each arm) according to PFS at 24-weeks. Immunohistochemical evaluation of biomarkers was also implemented. Results: From November 2011 to June 2013, 116 patients were randomized: median age, 65 years; 79 (68%) male; 63 intestinal and 53 diffuse cancer subtypes. In 109 eligible patients, 24-week %PFS was higher in both groups than the protocol-specified threshold of 40%. Median PFS for SP vs. XP was 25 weeks vs. 23 weeks (HR, 0.76; 95%CI, 0.5-1.16; p=0.203); OS was 58 weeks vs. 56 weeks (HR, 0.90; 95%CI, 0.52-1.57; p=0.712); and ORR was 27.5% vs. 32.7% (p=0.562), respectively. Sub-group analysis by histological classification showed that SP gave better PFS than XP in the diffuse type (HR, 0.42; 95%CI, 0.20-0.86; p=0.015) with no other statistical difference. Most common grade ≥3 adverse events with SP and XP were anemia (16%/ 19%), neutropenia (9%/17%), anorexia (18%/13%), diarrhea (11%/0%), nausea or vomiting (11%/15%), fatigue (5%/6%) and hyponatremia (7%/13%), respectively. Conclusions: XP and SP are comparable and can be recommended as 1st line treatments for advanced gastric cancer. Further analysis for biomarkers related to histology is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT0140624.

A randomized 2X2 phase II trial comparing two and four courses of S-1/cisplatin (SC) and paclitaxel/cisplatin (PC) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally resectable advanced gastric cancer: Survival results of COMPASS

111

Background: The prognosis for stage III gastric cancer is not satisfactory even by S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a promising approach but its optimal duration and regimen have not been established yet. Methods: We conducted a randomized phase II trial to compare two or four courses and regimen of SC or PC using a two-by-two factorial design.Key eligibility criteria was (i) T2-3/N+ or T4aN0 in case of schirrhous or junctional tumors, T2-3 with N+ to the major branched artery, T4aN+, T4b, para-aortic nodal metastases, or resectable minimal peritoneal metastases confirmed by laparoscopy and (ii) no other distant metastasis. Patients received S-1 (80 mg/m2 for 21 days with 1 week rest) / cisplatin (60 mg/m2 at day 8) or paclitaxel / cisplatin (80 mg/m2 and 25 mg/m2, respectively, on days 1, 8, and 15 with 1 week rest) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Then, patients received D2 gastrectomy with curative intent. The primary endpoint was 3-year overall survival. The planned sample size was 80 eligible patients in total so that the treatment group with the superior observed 3-year OS rate by 10% increase was to be selected with a probability of 88% or higher. Results: Eighty-three patients were assigned to SC (n=41, two courses in 21 and four courses in 20) and PC (n=42, two courses in 21 and four courses in 21). Pathological response rate was 42% (17/41) in SC and 33% (14/42) in PC, and 36% (15/42) in the two courses and 39% (16/41) in the four courses. Pathological CR was 0% (0/42) in the two courses and 10% (4/41) in the four courses. Grade 3/4 adverse events by chemotherapy and grade 3/4 surgical morbidities defined by Clavien-Dindo classification were both less than 10% in each arm without treatment-related death. The 3-year OS was 60.9% (95% CI, 44.3-73.9%) in SC and 64.3% (95% CI, 47.9-76.7%) in PC, and 64.3% (95% CI, 47.9-76.7%) in the two courses and 61.0% (95% CI, 44.4-74.0%) in the four courses. Conclusions: Two courses of SC as neoadjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for a test arm of future phase III study for patients with locally resectable advanced gastric cancer. Clinical trial information: UMIN000002595.

Feasibility of enhanced recovery after surgery in gastric surgery: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs have been reported to be feasible and useful for maintaining physiological function and facilitating recovery after colorectal surgery. The feasibility of such programs in gastric surgery remains unclear. This study assessed whether an ERAS program is feasible in patients who undergo gastric surgery.

METHODS

The subjects were patients who underwent gastric surgery between June 2009 and February 2011 at the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center. They received perioperative care according to an ERAS program. All data were retrieved retrospectively. The primary end point was the incidence of postoperative complications. The secondary end point was postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 203 patients were studied. According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, the incidence of ≥ grade 2 postoperative complications was 10.8% and that of ≥ grade 3 complications was 3.9%. Nearly all patients did not require delay of meal step-up (95.1%). Only 6 patients (3.0%) underwent reoperation. The median postoperative hospital stay was 9 days. Only 4 patients (2.0%) required readmission. There was no mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that our ERAS program is feasible in patients who undergo gastric surgery.

Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase II study of TJ-14 (hangeshashinto) for gastric cancer chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis

BACKGROUND

Hangeshashinto (TJ-14, a Kampo medicine), which reduces the level of prostaglandin E2 and affects the cyclooxygenase activity, alleviates chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis (COM). We conducted a randomized comparative trial to investigate whether TJ-14 prevents and controls COM in patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS

We randomly assigned patients with gastric cancer who developed moderate-to-severe oral mucositis (CTCAE v4.0 grade ≧1) during any cycle of chemotherapy to receive either TJ-14 or a placebo as a double-blind trial. The patients received a placebo or TJ-14 for 2-6 weeks according to the chemotherapy regimen from the beginning of the next course of chemotherapy. The primary end point was the incidence of grade ≧2 oral mucositis in the protocol treatment course, and the secondary end points were the time to disappearance of oral mucositis and the incidence of adverse events.

RESULTS

Following the key opening of the blinding protocol, we analyzed 91 eligible patients (TJ-14: 45, placebo: 46) using a "per protocol set" analysis. The incidence of ≧grade 2 COM was 40.0 % in the TJ-14 group and 41.3 % in the placebo group (p = 0.588). The median duration of ≧grade 2 COM was 14 days in the TJ-14 group and 16 days in the placebo group (p = 0.894). Meanwhile, the median duration of any grade of COM was 9 days in the TJ-14 group and 17 days in the placebo group among the patients who developed grade 1 symptoms during the screening cycle [hazard ratio 0.60; 95 % CI (0.23-1.59), p = 0.290].

CONCLUSIONS

Although TJ-14 treatment did not reduce the incidence of ≥2 COM in the patients who developed mucositis during chemotherapy for gastric cancer, a trend was observed in which TJ-14 reduced the risk of COM in the patients who developed grade 1 COM during the screening cycle. Further, phase III studies with a larger sample size are needed to clarify the protective effects of TJ-14 for COM.

Low creatinine clearance is a risk factor for D2 gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The feasibility and safety of D2 surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has not been fully evaluated in patients with gastric cancer. Moreover, risk factor for surgical complications after D2 gastrectomy following NAC is also unknown. The purpose of the present study was to identify risk factors of postoperative complications after D2 surgery following NAC.

METHODS

This study was conducted as an exploratory analysis of a prospective, randomized Phase II trial of NAC. The surgical complications were assessed and classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. A uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for morbidity.

RESULTS

Among 83 patients who were registered to the Phase II trial, 69 patients received the NAC and D2 gastrectomy. Postoperative complications were identified in 18 patients and the overall morbidity rate was 26.1 %. The results of univariate and multivariate analyses of various factors for overall operative morbidity, creatinine clearance (CCr) ≤ 60 ml/min (P = 0.016) was identified as sole significant independent risk factor for overall morbidity. Occurrence of pancreatic fistula was significantly higher in the patients with a low CCr than in those with a high CCr.

CONCLUSIONS

Low CCr was a significant risk factor for surgical complications in D2 gastrectomy after NAC. Careful attention is required for these patients.

High false-negative proportion of intraoperative histological examination as a serious problem for clinical application of sentinel node biopsy for early gastric cancer: final results of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group multicenter trial JCOG0302

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of diagnosis using sentinel node (SN) biopsy in T1 gastric cancer, a multicenter trial was conducted by the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG).

METHODS

Sentinel node biopsy with indocyanine green (ICG) was performed in patients with T1 gastric cancer. Green-stained nodes (GNs), representing SNs, were removed first, and gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy was then performed. GNs in one plane (with the largest dimension) were histologically examined intraoperatively by frozen section with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain. All harvested lymph nodes (GNs and non-GNs) were histologically examined by paraffin section after surgery. The primary endpoint was to determine the proportion of false negatives, which was defined as the number of patients with negative GNs by frozen section divided by those with positive GNs and/or positive non-GNs by paraffin section. The sample size was set at 1,550, based on the expected and threshold value as 5 and 10 % in the proportion of false negatives.

RESULTS

Accrual was suspended when 440 patients were enrolled because the proportion of false negatives was high. In the primary analysis, the proportion of false negatives was 46 % (13/28) after a learning period with 5 patients for each institution. Seven of 13 patients had nodal metastases outside the lymphatic basin. False negatives remained at 14 % (4/28) even by examining additional sections of GNs by paraffin section.

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of false negatives was much higher than expected. Intraoperative histological examination using only one plane is not an appropriate method for clinical application of SN biopsy in gastric cancer surgery.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 and cisplatin followed by D2 gastrectomy with para-aortic lymph node dissection for gastric cancer with extensive lymph node metastasis

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced gastric cancer with extensive regional and/or para-aortic lymph node (PAN) metastases is typically unresectable and associated with poor outcomes. This study investigated the safety and efficacy of S-1 plus cisplatin followed by extended surgery with PAN dissection for gastric cancer with extensive lymph node metastasis.

METHODS

Patients with gastric cancer with bulky lymph node metastasis along the coeliac artery and its branches and/or PAN metastasis received two or three 28-day cycles of S-1 plus cisplatin, followed by gastrectomy with D2 plus PAN dissection. The primary endpoint was the percentage of complete resections with clear margins in the primary tumour (R0 resection). A target sample size of 50 with one-sided α of 0.105 and β of approximately 0.2 corresponded to an expected R0 rate of 65 per cent and a threshold of 50 per cent.

RESULTS

Between February 2005 and June 2007, 53 patients were enrolled, of whom 51 were eligible. The R0 resection rate was 82 per cent. Clinical and pathological response rates were 65 and 51 per cent respectively. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 59 and 53 per cent respectively. During chemotherapy, grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 19 per cent and grade 3/4 non-haematological adverse events in 15.4 per cent. The incidence of grade 3/4 adverse events related to surgery was 12 per cent. There were no reoperations or treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

For locally advanced gastric cancer with extensive lymph node metastasis, 4-weekly S-1 plus cisplatin followed by surgery including PAN dissection was safe and effective for some patients. Further investigation of this treatment strategy is warranted.