Twenty-four hour efficacy with the dorzolamide/timolol-fixed combination compared with the brimonidine/timolol-fixed combination in primary open-angle glaucoma

AIM

The aim of this study is to compare the 24-hour efficacy of dorzolamide/timolol-fixed combination (DTFC) and brimonidine/timolol-fixed combination (BTFC) in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).

METHODS

One eye each of 77 POAG patients was included in this prospective, observer-masked, crossover comparison. Following a 2-month timolol run-in period, patients had three intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements at 1000, 1200 and 1400 h while on timolol treatment. Patients showing at least a 20% IOP reduction on timolol were randomised to 3 months of therapy with DTFC or BTFC, and then were crossed over to the opposite therapy.

RESULTS

Sixty POAG patients completed the study. The mean 24-hour IOP was significantly reduced with both the fixed combinations compared with the timolol-treated diurnal IOP (P < 0.001). When the two fixed combinations were compared directly, DTFC demonstrated a lower mean 24-hour IOP level as compared with BTFC (mean difference: -0.7 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval (CI): (-1.0, -0.3), P < 0.001). At two individual time points, DTFC significantly reduced IOP more than BTFC: at 1800 h (-1.0 mm Hg, 95% CI (-1.6,-0.5), P = 0.001) and at 0200 (-0.9 mm Hg, 95% CI: (-1.4,-0.5), P = 0.001). No significant difference existed for the other time points.

CONCLUSION

Both the fixed combinations significantly reduce 24-hour IOP in POAG. DTFC provided significantly better 24-hour efficacy.

Kaposi's Sarcoma of the Bulbar Conjunctiva in an Immunocompetent Patient

Kaposi's sarcoma is an uncommon endothelial malignant tumor, first described by Moricz Kaposi in 1872. It is commonly encountered in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), immunosuppression or organ transplantation. Conjunctival Kaposi's sarcoma is a rare tumor, mostly in patients with AIDS. We present a selected case with a superior bulbar conjunctival lesion in a patient who is HIV negative and immunocompetent, with an unremarkable general medical history. The lesion was surgically excised with no adjunctive treatment, and histological examination confirmed the diagnosis. There was no recurrence or metastasis 5 years after surgery.

Hearing Evaluation in Patients with Exfoliative and Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma

Objective. The aim of this prospective study was to audiologically evaluate consecutive glaucoma patients with or without exfoliation.

Study Design. Prospective study.

Setting. Glaucoma Unit and Audiology Department at a university hospital.

Subjects and Methods. Consecutive subjects with exfoliative glaucoma (XFG) or primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) aged between 50 and 70 years were enrolled. Auditory thresholds at 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, and 8.0 Hz were measured bilaterally. Cochlear activity was assessed by recording distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOEs). Functional changes in the retrocochlear auditory pathway were evaluated by auditory brainstem responses (ABRs).

Results. One hundred and ten patients with XFG and 85 patients with POAG who presented in a glaucoma clinic were investigated. The mean age of study patients was 66.2 ± 5.6 years; range, 50-70 years). The odds of pathologic ABR central transmission time (interpeak latencies I-III, III-V, and I-V and waves I, III, and V) were 4.34 times higher in patients with XFG than in patients with POAG (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.22-8.49; P < .001). This significant association remained after adjusting for sex and age (odds ratio [OR] 4.12; 95% CI, 2.07-8.22; P < .001). Furthermore, the odds of ABR remained significantly higher in patients with XFG than in patients with POAG (OR 4.36; 95% CI, 2.10-9.06; P < .001) after controlling for systemic diseases (arterial hypertension, coronary heart disease, high cholesterol, and stroke).

Conclusion. In the first study to compare XFG and POAG monitoring of the peripheral and central auditory pathway, it has been documented that XFG patients show a greater prevalence of retrocochlear pathology.

Association of exfoliation syndrome and central retinal vein occlusion: an ultrastructural analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate prospectively the frequency with which exfoliation syndrome (XFS) occurs in patients with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) by clinical examination and ultrastructural examination of conjunctival biopsy specimens.

METHODS

Prospective observational case series. Thirty-six eyes of 36 consecutive patients with CRVO were investigated for XFS by slit-lamp examination and conjunctival biopsy when XFS was not clinically visible on examination.

RESULTS

A clinical diagnosis of XFS or a positive biopsy result for exfoliation material (XFM) was present in 22 of the 36 patients (61%; 95% confidence interval 45-75%). Twelve of these 22 patients (54%) had a clinical diagnosis of XFS. Aggregates of XFM were identified ultrastructurally in the biopsy specimens in 10 of 24 patients with no clinical signs of XFS (42%). Patients with and without XFS had similar distribution of age, gender, race and prevalence of systemic disorders. Twelve of the 22 (54%) XFS patients had neither glaucoma nor ocular hypertension prior to the CRVO.

CONCLUSION

In accordance with previous retrospective and histological studies, this prospective, in vivo study suggests that CRVO is commonly associated with XFS.

Association of POAG risk factors and the Thr377Met MYOC mutation in an isolated Greek population

PURPOSE

To characterize the MYOC genotype correlation with phenotypes in an isolated Greek population with a high incidence of glaucoma.

METHODS

Five hundred thirty-one villagers were enrolled in the study. Participants underwent a comprehensive ophthalmic examination. All three exons of myocilin were bidirectionally sequenced. Power calculations and measured genotype analysis was conducted using the genetic variance analysis program, SOLAR version 4.2, to account for the relatedness between individuals.

RESULTS

The participants, 376 of whom were linked in a single 11-generation pedigree, ranged in age from 10 to 95 years with a mean age of 49. Sixty-five individuals had POAG, and 27 of those carried the Thr377Met MYOC mutation. Both peak intraocular pressure and vertical cup-to dis- ratio were significantly associated with the MYOC Thr377Met variant (P = 9 x 10(-14) and P = 9 x 10(-8), respectively), whereas central corneal thickness showed no significant association (P < 0.7).

CONCLUSIONS

This village had a high frequency of glaucoma, with 12% of the participants aged 10 to 95 years having the disease. In this cohort, the Thr377Met MYOC mutation was significantly associated with both high intraocular pressures and high vertical cup-to-disc ratios. No association was found with central corneal thickness.

24-hour intraocular pressure and blood pressure levels with latanoprost/timolol fixed combination versus timolol

PURPOSE

To evaluate 24-hr intraocular pressure (IOP) and blood pressure (BP) with timolol or latanoprost/timolol fixed combination (LTFC).

METHODS

Patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension with normal blood pressure were randomized to LTFC, dosed each evening, or timolol dosed twice daily in a cross-over design for 8 weeks and the opposite medicine for 8 weeks. IOP was measured at 02:00, 06:00, 10:00, 14:00, 18:00 and 22:00 hours in the sitting position with Goldmann applanation tonometry and BP monitoring every 30 min while awake and every hour while asleep at the end of each 8-week treatment period.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients had a 24-hr baseline IOP of 26.3 +/- 2.5 mmHg, systolic BP (SBP) of 121.4 +/- 12.4 mmHg, diastolic BP (DBP) 72.9 +/- 7.1 mmHg, and ocular perfusion pressure (OPP) of 33.9 +/- 5.7 mmHg. No statistical differences were found between untreated and treated 24-hr SBP, DBP, mean BP (MBP), heart rate, or nocturnal BP dipping status with either medication. LTFC lowered IOP more at each timepoint compared to timolol (difference between treatments 2.7 mmHg, p = 0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

Neither timolol or evening-dosed LTFC reduced SBP, DBP, MBP, OPP, or increased nocturnal dipping. LTFC was more effective than timolol in decreasing IOP.

Intraocular pressure control over 24 hours using travoprost and timolol fixed combination administered in the morning or evening in primary open-angle and exfoliative glaucoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate intraocular pressure (IOP) control over 24 hours using travoprost and timolol fixed combination (TTFC) administered in the morning or evening in primary open-angle and exfoliative glaucoma.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to TTFC administered in either the morning or evening for 8 weeks. Previously treated patients underwent an untreated washout period of 4-6 weeks, after which baseline IOP was required to be > 25 mm Hg and < 38 mmHg (in two readings taken at 10.00 +/- 1 hours). During the treatment period, IOP was measured at 10.00, 14.00, 18.00, 22.00, 02.00 and 06.00 hours. Patients were then treated with the opposite dosing regimen for 8 weeks and IOP measurements were repeated.

RESULTS

In 32 subjects who completed the study, the untreated baseline IOP following washout was 27.7 +/- 3.5 mmHg. Both dosing regimens reduced IOP from baseline at each time-point and throughout the 24-hour diurnal curve (p < 0.0001). When treatments were compared directly, evening dosing (18.4 +/- 3.3 mmHg) provided a statistically significant lower 24-hour curve than morning dosing (19.2 +/- 3.5 mmHg; p = 0.001). Evening dosing also resulted in a lower 24-hour IOP fluctuation (3.8 +/- 1.6 mmHg) than morning dosing (5.1 +/- 1.6 mmHg; p = 0.0002) and lower peak IOP (p = 0.0003).

CONCLUSIONS

Both morning and evening administration of TTFC provide effective 24-hour IOP reduction, but evening dosing demonstrates better 24-hour pressure control.

Twenty-four-hour intraocular pressure control with the travoprost/timolol maleate fixed combination compared with travoprost when both are dosed in the evening in primary open-angle glaucoma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the 24 h efficacy and safety of the travoprost/timolol maleate fixed combination (TTFC) versus travoprost when both are dosed in the evening in primary open-angle glaucoma patients.

METHODS

Prospective, double-masked, crossover, active-controlled, randomised 24 h comparison. After a 6 week medicine-free period, patients were randomised to either TTFC or travoprost for 8 weeks and were then switched to the opposite treatment for another 8 weeks. At the end of the washout and treatment periods, a 24 h pressure curve was performed.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients completed the study. The TTFC group demonstrated a lower absolute intraocular pressure level (2.4 mm Hg) for the 24 h curve and at all time points, compared with travoprost (p</=0.047). The pressure reduction from untreated baseline was significantly different between treatments for all time points (p = 0.018). The mean 24 h pressure fluctuation was lower with TTFC (3.0 mm Hg) compared with travoprost (4.0 mm Hg, p = 0.001). No statistical difference existed between the two treatment groups for any adverse event (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that when both drugs are dosed in the evening the TTFC provides improved intraocular pressure reduction, compared with travoprost, over the 24 h curve and for each individual time point in primary open-angle glaucoma patients.

Comparison of morning versus evening dosing and 24-h post-dose efficacy of travoprost compared with latanoprost in patients with open-angle glaucoma

OBJECTIVE

To compare the IOP-lowering efficacy of a.m.-dosed travoprost and latanoprost at 24-h post-dose.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Open-angle glaucoma patients not naïve to prostaglandin therapy and currently controlled on p.m.-dosed (2100) latanoprost (n = 21) or travoprost (n = 30) had baseline IOPs measured at 0900. In a randomized, single-masked, crossover design, patients received travoprost (Travatan † ) or latanoprost (Xalatan ‡ ) at 0900 for 4 weeks, then were crossed over to receive the second prostaglandin for another 4 weeks. Treatment IOP was measured at 0900 prior to morning dose at both 4 and 8 week visits. Patient dosing preference (a.m./p.m.) was surveyed on exit.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Intraocular pressure (IOP). † Travatan is a registered trade name of Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX, USA ‡ Xalatan is a registered trade name of Pfizer, New York, NY, USA.

RESULTS

The mean IOP in the first period when all patients were dosed in the evening was assessed 12 h after dosing at 09:00 and it was similar in the two treatment groups (mean ± standard deviation: 17.9 ± 2.7 mmHg for travoprost versus 17.7 ± 2.5 mmHg for latanoprost, p = 0.812). In the a.m.-dosing crossover comparison, the 24-h post-dose IOP was significantly lower ( p < 0.001) on travoprost (16.9 ± 3.1 mmHg) compared to latanoprost (18.6 ± 3.3 mmHg). In the exit survey, 51% of patients preferred a.m.-dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

a.m.-dosed travoprost is superior to a.m.-dosed latanoprost by 1.7 mmHg at 24-h post-dose.

Second-line therapy with dorzolamide/timolol or latanoprost/timolol fixed combination versus adding dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination to latanoprost monotherapy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate open-angle glaucoma patients, who were insufficiently controlled on latanoprost monotherapy, to determine the 24 h intraocular pressure (IOP) efficacy and safety when changing them to dorzolamide/timolol (DTFC) or latanoprost/timolol fixed combination (LTFC) or adding DTFC.

METHODS

A prospective, observer-masked, placebo-controlled, crossover, comparison. Consecutive adults with primary open-angle or exfoliative glaucoma who exhibit a mean baseline IOP >21 mm Hg on latanoprost monotherapy were randomised for 3 months to: DTFC, LTFC or DTFC and latanoprost. Patients were then crossed over to the next treatment for periods 2 and 3. At the end of the latanoprost run-in and after each 3-month treatment period, patients underwent 24 h IOP monitoring.

RESULTS

31 patients completed this study. All three adjunctive therapies significantly reduced the IOP at each time point and for the mean 24 h curve, except at 18:00 and 02:00 with DTFC and 02:00 with LTFC. When the three treatments were compared directly, the DTFC and latanoprost therapy demonstrated lower IOPs versus the other treatment groups, including: the mean 24 h pressure, maximum as well as minimum levels and individual time points following a modified Bonferroni correction (p<0.0032).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed DTFC, LTFC and the addition of DTFC to latanoprost significantly decrease the IOP compared with latanoprost alone, but the latter therapy regime yields the greatest IOP reduction.

Twenty-four-hour intraocular pressure and blood pressure levels with bimatoprost versus latanoprost in patients with normal-tension glaucoma

AIM

To evaluate 24 h intraocular pressure (IOP) and blood pressure (BP) with bimatoprost or latanoprost in patients with normal-tension glaucoma.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomised, crossover, active-controlled, observer-masked study.

METHODS

After a 6-week medicine-free period, we randomised patients to either latanoprost or bimatoprost for 8 weeks and then to the opposite medicine for 8 weeks. At baseline, and at the end of each treatment period, we evaluated IOP and BP at 08:00 and then every 2 h over the 24 h day. Diastolic ocular perfusion pressure (DOPP) was calculated from the above parameters.

RESULTS

Forty completed patients had a 24 h untreated baseline IOP of 15.5 (2.3) mm Hg, and a DOPP of 59.2 (6.1) mm Hg. Both treatments lowered IOP at each time point (p<0.006), and over the 24 h curve (p<0.001, both medicines 13.1 mm Hg, 16% decrease). No difference existed between treatments in absolute IOP, at each time point, and over the 24 h curve (p>or=0.26). Additionally, no differences were found between treated 24 h systolic (p>or=0.29) and diastolic BP (p>or=0.12). The mean 24 h DOPP for latanoprost was increased from baseline (3%, p = 0.031) but not for bimatoprost (2%, p = 0.21). However, no difference in DOPP existed between treatments at any time point or over the 24 h curve (p>or=0.17). No difference was observed between treatments for any adverse event (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with normal-tension glaucoma, both bimatoprost and latanoprost reduce the 24 h intraocular pressure from untreated baseline to a similar extent. Latanoprost is associated with slightly improved ocular diastolic perfusion pressure over 24 h but similar absolute perfusion levels to that of bimatoprost.

Effects of the timolol-dorzolamide fixed combination and latanoprost on circadian diastolic ocular perfusion pressure in glaucoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of the timolol-dorzolamide fixed combination (TDFC) and latanoprost 0.005% on 24-hour intraocular pressure (IOP), systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure, and diastolic ocular perfusion pressure (DOPP) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).

METHODS

This was an institutional, randomized clinical trial. After a 24-hour assessment without treatment, 27 previously untreated patients with POAG were randomized to 6 weeks' treatment with twice-daily TDFC (8 AM and 8 PM) followed by once-daily latanoprost 0.005% (8 PM), or vice versa. One eye was analyzed per patient. The mean values of IOP, DBP, SBP, and DOPP (difference between DBP and IOP) were recorded at each time point, and the 24-hour data are the mean values of each patient's measurements over the 24-hour period. The differences between the values of the first treatment period and the baseline and the second treatment period and washout were calculated and analyzed by means of an analysis of variance model that tested the effects of sequence and treatment.

RESULTS

Both treatments significantly reduced 24-hour IOP (P < 0.0001), but TDFC led to lower 24-hour pressure (mean +/- SD: 15.4 +/- 1.9 vs. 16.7 +/- 1.7 mm Hg; P = 0.004). Latanoprost did not lead to any significant reduction in mean 24-hour SBP and DBP (SBP: P = 0.952; DBP: P = 0.831), but TDFC did (SBP and DBP: P < 0.0001). Both treatments significantly increased 24-hour DOPP (P < 0.0001), with no difference between the two medications (P = 0.09).

CONCLUSIONS

In previously untreated patients with POAG, TDFC, and latanoprost equally enhanced 24-hour DOPP: the former by counteracting the decrease in DBP with a substantial reduction in IOP and the latter by not affecting DBP and significantly reducing IOP. (isrctn.org number, ISRCTN67123277.).

Myocilin variations and familial glaucoma in Taxiarchis, a small Greek village

PURPOSE

To initiate a prospective study of glaucoma in a Greek village reported over 30 years ago to have several large families with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).

METHODS

A random group of 126 villagers from Taxiarchis, Greece was examined in the village community center. The detailed evaluation included ophthalmic and general history, measurement of blood pressure, intraocular pressure (IOP), and central corneal thickness (CCT) as well as evaluation of the optic nerve status.

RESULTS

The incidence of glaucoma approached 18% in this small isolated village. Myocilin variants were present in almost half of the individuals screened with Arg76Lys and Thr377Met being the most common finding (25% and 17%, respectively). Over half of the individuals with the Thr377Met mutation were diagnosed with glaucoma. Two of these patients were homozygous for the Thr377Met mutation. Three individuals with the Arg76Lys polymorphism had glaucoma; however, two of these individuals also had the Thr377Met mutation. Only two patients with pseudoexfoliation were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of glaucoma and the Thr377Met MYOC mutation in this population is much higher than that reported for other European populations.

Meta-analysis of 24-hour intraocular pressure studies evaluating the efficacy of glaucoma medicines

PURPOSE

To evaluate efficacy and safety data of currently available ocular hypotensive medicines derived from 24-hour studies, of similar design, in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), exfoliative glaucoma, or ocular hypertension (OH).

DESIGN

Meta-analysis of published articles evaluating patients with POAG, exfoliative glaucoma, or OH.

METHODS

We included articles that were randomized, prospective, single- or double-masked, comparative studies of ocular hypotensive therapies over 24 hours. Each article selected contained an untreated baseline, >or=4-week treatment period, >/=20 patients per treatment arm, and >or=6 time points not spaced >5 hours apart and used Goldmann applanation or Tonopen tonometry (supine measurements) to measure intraocular pressure (IOP).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Twenty-four-hour IOP efficacy.

RESULTS

This analysis included 864 separate 24-hour treatment curves from 386 patients in 28 treatment arms from 11 studies. A statistical difference in the mean diurnal pressure decrease existed between monotherapy treatments for POAG/OH patients, with bimatoprost (29%) and travoprost (27%) showing the greatest 24-hour reduction (P = 0.026). Timolol 0.5% was less effective than latanoprost (24% vs. 19% reduction) but decreased the pressure at each night time point (P = 0.0003). Dorzolamide showed a 19% 24-hour pressure reduction and brimonidine 0.2% a 14% one. In exfoliative glaucoma patients, latanoprost and travoprost showed higher baseline and treatment pressures, although the pressure reductions (29% and 31%, respectively) were greater generally than observed with POAG/OH. An evening-dosed latanoprost/timolol fixed combination reduced the pressure 33%, and the dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination (DTFC), 26%. However, the power to detect a difference for this specific comparison was probably low, due to the limited number of patients (n = 20) in the DTFC group. A statistical difference between evening-dosed (24%) and morning-dosed (18%) latanoprost (P<0.0001) was noted, but not between evening (27%) and morning (26%) travoprost (P = 0.074). The mean reduction of night time points was statistically lower than day time points for latanoprost (P = 0.031), timolol (P = 0.032), and brimonidine (P = 0.050), but not for dorzolamide. Dorzolamide (P = 0.60), travoprost (P = 0.064), and bimatoprost (P = 0.057) did not demonstrate nighttime pressures lower than daytime ones. The mean reduction of night time points was statistically lower than that of day time points for latanoprost (P = 0.031), timolol (P = 0.032), and brimonidine (P = 0.050), but not for dorzolamide (P = 0.60), bimatoprost (P = 0.057), travoprost (P = 0.064).

CONCLUSIONS

Similar relative efficacies generally exist in various classes of ocular hypotensive agents during night and day hours.

Comparison of the 24-hour intraocular pressure-lowering effects of latanoprost and dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination after 2 and 6 months of treatment

PURPOSE

To evaluate the 24-hour intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect of latanoprost and the dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination (DTFC) after 2 and 6 months of treatment.

DESIGN

Randomized, prospective, crossover comparison.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-nine patients had primary open-angle glaucoma, and 14 patients had ocular hypertension.

METHODS

After a 6-week washout period, patients were randomized to either 6 months of treatment with the DTFC twice daily or latanoprost every evening and then crossed over to the opposite treatment for an additional 6 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Mean 24-hour IOP after 2 and 6 months of treatment.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients had an average 24-hour baseline IOP of 25.2+/-2.3 mmHg. After 6 months of treatment, 24-hour IOPs were 18.1+/-1.9 mmHg for the DTFC and 18.3+/-1.9 mmHg for latanoprost. Compared with 2 months of therapy, at 6 months the DTFC showed no significant change in mean 24-hour IOP, whereas latanoprost demonstrated a reduction of 0.3 mmHg (P = 0.01). The DTFC had more burning (P<0.001) and bitter taste (P = 0.01), whereas the latanoprost had more hypertrichosis (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

After 6 months of therapy, the DTFC and latanoprost have clinically similar 24-hour IOP-lowering efficacies.

Twenty-four-hour efficacy of the brimonidine/timolol fixed combination versus therapy with the unfixed components

PURPOSE

To evaluate the 24-h intraocular pressure (IOP) control of brimonidine/timolol fixed combination (BTFC) versusthe unfixed combination of its individual components, each dosed twice daily, in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

METHODS

An observer-masked, randomized, crossover, active-controlled, two-centre comparison. Following a 6-week medicine-free period, patients were randomized to BTFC or to the unfixed combination of brimonidine and timolol for 3 months. Patients then were crossed over to the opposite treatment for another 3 months. At the end of the medicine-free period, and each treatment period, patients underwent 24-h IOP measurements at 0600, 1000, 1400, 1800, 2200, and 0200 hours.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients completed this study. Both BTFC and the unfixed components showed a significant IOP reduction from untreated baseline (P<0.0001), and were statistically equal when compared directly, for each individual time point and for the 24-h IOP curve (P>0.05). The mean 24-h IOP was 24.6+/-1.9 for baseline, 19.2+/-1.9 for BTFC, and 19.2+/-1.6 mmHg for the unfixed components (P=1.0). Four patients were discontinued due to side effects. The most common ocular adverse event was ocular hyperaemia (n=3 with BTFC and n=5 with the unfixed components, P=0.7) and systemic adverse events were rare.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that both BTFC and the unfixed components of brimonidine and timolol provide a significant 24-h IOP reduction from untreated baseline, and statistically equal control when compared directly, at each time point and for the 24-h pressure curve.

Efficacy and Safety of Latanoprost versus Travoprost in Exfoliative Glaucoma Patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate 24-hour intraocular pressure (IOP) efficacy of latanoprost versus travoprost, each given every evening, in exfoliative glaucoma patients.

DESIGN

Prospective, observer-masked, crossover comparison.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty patients with exfoliation glaucoma.

METHODS

Patients with a pressure of >24 mmHg were randomized to latanoprost or travoprost for an 8-week treatment period after a 6-week medicine-free period. Patients were then switched to the opposite treatment for the second period. At untreated baseline and at the end of each treatment period the IOP was measured at 6 am, 10 am, 2 pm, 6 pm, 10 pm, and 2 am.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Diurnal IOP.

RESULTS

The mean 24-hour IOP was 25.1+/-2.5 mmHg at baseline, 17.8+/-2.1 mmHg on latanoprost, and 17.3+/-2.2 mmHg on travoprost (P = 0.001). Individual time points were similar between treatments, except at 6 pm when travoprost provided lower IOP (16.7+/-2.6 vs 17.9+/-2.5 mmHg, P<0.001). Adverse events showed more conjunctival hyperemia with travoprost (n = 15) than latanoprost (n = 6; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Latanoprost and travoprost both significantly reduce the 24-hour IOP from baseline in exfoliative glaucoma, but travoprost may demonstrate a greater hypotensive efficacy in the late afternoon.

24-Hour control with a latanoprost-timolol fixed combination vs timolol alone

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate 24-hour intraocular pressure (IOP) control with an evening-dosed latanoprost-timolol maleate fixed combination vs timolol alone in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma.

METHODS

After a medicine-free period, qualified patients were randomized to either placebo dosed in the morning with a latanoprost-timolol fixed combination dosed in the evening or timolol alone dosed twice daily for 8 weeks. Patients were then switched to the opposite treatment for 8 weeks. At baseline and at the end of each treatment period, patients underwent IOP measurements.

RESULTS

Both treatments reduced the IOP from untreated baseline at each time point and for the 24-hour curve (P<.001). When treatments were compared, the latanoprost-timolol fixed combination decreased the IOP more than timolol alone at each time point and for the 24-hour curve (2.9 mm Hg), and provided a lower absolute IOP at each time point (P<.001) and for the range (fluctuation) in IOP (P = .003) and for the 24-hour curve. Several adverse effects were observed more often with the latanoprost-timolol fixed combination, including ocular stinging (P = .05), conjunctival hyperemia (P = .02), and ocular itching (P = .04).

CONCLUSION

The evening-dosed latanoprost-timolol fixed combination may provide better IOP control than timolol alone over 24 hours and may demonstrate a narrower range of IOP fluctuation in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma.

Diurnal IOP control with bimatoprost versus latanoprost in exfoliative glaucoma: a crossover, observer-masked, three-centre study

AIM

To evaluate the diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) control and safety of bimatoprost versus latanoprost in exfoliative glaucoma (XFG).

METHODS

One eye of 129 consecutive patients with XFG (mean (SD) age 66.5 (8.3) years) was included in this prospective, observer-masked, three-centre, crossover comparison. After a 4-6 week medicine-free period patients were randomised to bimatoprost or latanoprost monotherapy for 3 months. Patients were then switched to the opposite treatment for another 3 months. At the end of the washout and the treatment periods diurnal IOP was measured at 0800, 1300, and 1800.

RESULTS

At baseline the IOP (mean (SD)) was 28.0 (4.0), 26.9 (3.6), and 25.9 (3.6) mm Hg, at the three time points, respectively. Both treatments significantly reduced mean diurnal IOP at month 3. Mean diurnal IOP was 26.9 (3.5) mm Hg at baseline, 17.6 (3.3) mm Hg with bimatoprost, and 18.6 (3.6) mm Hg with latanoprost (p<0.0001). Furthermore, lower IOP values were obtained with bimatoprost at all time points (17.9 (3.4), 17.3 (3.3), and 17.6 (3.5) mm Hg, respectively) compared with latanoprost (18.7 (3.6), 18.5 (3.6), and 18.6 (4.1) mm Hg, respectively). The corresponding mean differences (0.8, 1.1, and 1.0 mm Hg, respectively) were all significant (p<0.001 for each comparison). Significantly more patients with XFG obtained a target diurnal IOP <17 mm Hg with bimatoprost than with latanoprost, 55/123 (45%) v 34/123 (28%); (p = 0.001), and significantly fewer patients were non-responders with bimatoprost than with latanoprost (5 v 13, p = 0.021). More patients reported at least one adverse event with bimatoprost than with latanoprost (58 v 41 at 3 months; p = 0.0003).

CONCLUSION

This crossover study suggests that better diurnal IOP control is obtained with bimatoprost than with latanoprost in patients with XFG.

Viral conjunctivitis interfering with the clinical activity score and management of thyroid ophthalmopathy

INTRODUCTION

The management of Graves' ophthalmopathy is shared between endocrinologists and ophthalmologists. Assessment and treatment of the active inflammatory stage is based on the clinical activity and disease severity scores, often without detailed eye examination by the treating endocrinologist.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We report a case of acute viral keratoconjunctivitis occurring during immunosuppressive treatment for Graves' ophthalmopathy which masked the signs, symptoms and response to treatment of the orbitopathy, posing a differential diagnostic challenge.

RESULTS

The apparent worsening of the ophthalmopathy and the increased clinical activity score led the treating endocrinologist to alter the management decisions. Ophthalmic examination confirmed the diagnosis of viral keratoconjunctivitis and immunosuppressive treatment was continued with significant final improvement of Graves' ophthalmopathy.

DISCUSSION

Ocular surface conditions, unrecognised by the treating physician, may complicate the assessment of thyroid ophthalmopathy when detailed eye examination is not performed. The diagnostic challenge of Graves' ophthalmopathy requires a combined approach by an endocrinologist and an ophthalmologist working as a team.