Metal hypersensitivity in patients with orthopaedic implant complications-A retrospective clinical study

BACKGROUND

Hypersensitivity to metals as a cause of implant-related complications has been a subject of controversy. Projections indicate an increase in the frequency of joint replacements of between 300% and 600% by the year 2030; therefore, this issue is of considerable interest.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate sensitization to implant materials in patients with implant-related complications, to identify allergens, and to clarify whether hypersensitivity is a relevant cause.

METHODS

Patients with implant-related complications or a positive history of contact allergy and planned total joint replacements referred for allergological investigation between 2004 and 2017 were retrospectively analysed.

RESULTS

In total, 311 patients were included. A positive patch test reaction to a metal was seen in 64.4% of preoperative patients and in 54.6% of patients with implant-related complications. Common alloy metals such as cobalt, chromium and titanium gave positive reactions in up to 2.9% of patients with implant-related complications. None of the patients with skin changes had a positive patch test reaction to an implant metal.

CONCLUSION

Other factors, such as the type of replaced joint and mechanical stress, seem to be more relevant for implant-related complications. Sensitization to metals or other materials seems to rarely play a role, and is overestimated.

Delayed-type hypersensitivity to oral and parenteral drugs

Adverse drug reactions of the delayed type rank among the most common dermatoses and are predominantly characterized by exanthematous macular or maculopapular eruptions. However, approximately 2 % of affected individuals develop severe or even life-threatening systemic immune reactions associated with organ involvement, requiring immediate diagnosis and treatment. Numerous drugs are capable of eliciting delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions, with antibiotics, anticonvulsant drugs, and the xanthine oxidase inhibitor allopurinol being the most common. Apart from genetic susceptibility, predisposing factors for the development of drug hypersensitivity reactions include high drug doses, polypharmacy, long treatment duration, female gender, as well as acute or chronic infections.

Allergic contact dermatitis caused by a new temporary blue-black tattoo dye - sensitization to genipin from jagua (Genipa americana L.) fruit extract

BACKGROUND

Temporary tattoos made with an extract of the jagua fruit (Genipa americana L.) are becoming increasingly popular. It is claimed that it is 'dermatologically tested' and does not contain p-phenylenediamine. Extracts of jagua and gardenia fruits have been used by indigenous people in South America, as well as in traditional Chinese medicine, for centuries. Genipin is currently used for its cross-linking effect in the manufacture of polysaccharides, and is being investigated for its anti-inflammatory and other properties.

OBJECTIVES

To report the presence of the allergenic substance genipin in a self-administered temporary tattoo dye made from the fruit juice of jagua (Genipa americana L.).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A 39-year-old female who repeatedly applied 'completely natural and 100% safe' Earth Jagua® tattoo, obtained via the internet, to her left hand developed allergic contact dermatitis within 6 weeks. Analysis of the dye showed the presence of geniposide and genipin.

RESULTS

Patch tests with the dye and with its main components, including genipin, gave strong positive reactions to the latter. There was no sensitization to other ingredients or p-amino compounds.

CONCLUSIONS

We report an extensively evaluated case of allergic contact dermatitis caused by a temporary Earth Jagua® tattoo. The allergen identified is genipin, a substance that is increasingly used for tattoos and as a therapeutic agent in medicine. This could result in an increase in the number of allergic reactions in the future.

Thaumatin and gum arabic allergy in chewing gum factory workers

Thaumatin is a sweetener and flavor modifier commonly used in the food industry. Likewise, gum arabic is widely used as a food stabilizer and thickening agent. We report here that a powder mixture composed of 10% thaumatin and 90% gum arabic led to allergic symptoms in the upper airways in occupationally exposed individuals: four of eight workers of a chewing gum factory exposed to this powder mixture had pronounced rhinitis. A positive skin prick test result for pure thaumatin was obtained in all four individuals with rhinitis of whom two also had a positive skin prick test result for pure gum arabic and gum arabic-specific IgE. Subsitution of a powdered thaumatin with a liquid form reduced symptoms among the rhinitic workers. Although gum arabic is a well-known potential allergen, we were unable to find prior documentation of allergic symptoms to thaumatin when it is used in the food industry.

Rhinitis in Swiss adults is associated with asthma and early life factors, but not second hand tobacco smoke or obesity

BACKGROUND

Second hand tobacco smoke (SHS) and overweight/obesity are risk factors for asthma and lower airway respiratory symptoms. We investigated whether SHS or overweight/obesity were also associated with allergic or non-allergic rhinitis.

METHODS

Cross-sectional data were obtained during the second SAPALDIA Study. Interviewer administered questionnaires were completed by 8047 participants from 8 communities in Switzerland. Blood was collected from 5841 participants and tested for allergen specific IgE. Allergic rhinitis was defined as nasal symptoms with detectable IgE. Data were analysed by multinomial logistic regression with four outcome categories defined according to the presence or absence of rhinitis and/or atopy.

RESULTS

The prevalence of allergic rhinitis was 885 (15.2%) and non-allergic rhinitis 323 (5.5%). The risk of allergic rhinitis was increased in subjects with physician diagnosed asthma (Relative Risk Ratio 6.81; 95%CI 5.39, 8.6), maternal atopy (1.56; 1.27, 1.92) and paternal atopy (1.41; 1.11, 1.79). Older subjects were at lower risk (0.96; 0.95,0.97 per year), as were those raised on a farm (0.64; 0.49,0.84), with older siblings (0.92; 0.86,0.97 per sib) or from rural areas. The risk of non-allergic rhinitis was also increased in subjects with physician diagnosed asthma (4.02; 2.86, 5.67), reduced in males (0.59; 0.46, 0.77), but not associated with upbringing on a farm or older siblings. There were no significant associations of SHS or overweight/obesity with either form of rhinitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Allergic and non-allergic rhinitis have different risk factors apart from asthma. There are significant regional variations within Switzerland, which are not explained by the factors examined.

Arzneimittelallergien: klinische Präsentation und Warnzeichen

Zusammenfassung. Prinzipiell können alle Medikamente allergische Reaktionen auslösen, allerdings gibt es erhebliche Unterschiede in der Häufigkeit und klinischen Präsentation. Antibiotika, Antiepileptika und NSAIDs gehören zu den häufigsten Auslösern. Das Risiko für Sensibilisierungen und für schwere Verläufe hängt vom Aussmass der Immunaktivierung des Einzelnen ab, von Dosis, Dauer der Behandlung, Verabreichungsart, Geschlecht und bei einigen Substanzen auch von HLA-Merkmalen. Im vorliegenden Artikel werden die häufigsten immunmediierten Hypersensitivitätsreaktionen gegen Arzneimittel vorgestellt und auf klinische Warnzeichen für schwere Verläufe hingewiesen.

Guideline for the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions: S2K-Guideline of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI) and the German Dermatological Society (DDG) in collaboration with the Association of German Allergologists (AeDA), the German Society for Pediatric Allergology and Environmental Medicine (GPA), the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG), the Swiss Society for Allergy and Immunology (SGAI), the Austrian Society for Allergology and Immunology (ÖGAI), the German Academy of Allergology and Environmental Medicine (DAAU), the German Center for Documentation of Severe Skin Reactions and the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Products (BfArM)

Drug hypersensitivity reactions are unpredictable adverse drug reactions. They manifest either within 1–6 h following drug intake (immediate reactions) with mild to life-threatening symptoms of anaphylaxis, or several hours to days later (delayed reactions), primarily as exanthematous eruptions. It is not always possible to detect involvement of the immune system (allergy). Waiving diagnostic tests can result in severe reactions on renewed exposure on the one hand, and to unjustified treatment restrictions on the other. With this guideline, experts from various specialist societies and institutions have formulated recommendations and an algorithm for the diagnosis of allergies. The key principles of diagnosing allergic/hypersensitivity drug reactions are presented. Where possible, the objective is to perform allergy diagnostics within 4 weeks–6 months following the reaction. A clinical classification of symptoms based on the morphology and time course of the reaction is required in order to plan a diagnostic work-up. In the case of typical symptoms of a drug hypersensitivity reaction and unequivocal findings from validated skin and/or laboratory tests, a reaction can be attributed to a trigger with sufficient confidence. However, skin and laboratory tests are often negative or insufficiently reliable. In such cases, controlled provocation testing is required to clarify drug reactions. This method is reliable and safe when attention is paid to indications and contraindications and performed under appropriate medical supervision. The results of the overall assessment are discussed with the patient and documented in an „allergy passport“ in order to ensure targeted avoidance in the future and allow the use of alternative drugs where possible.

Hypersensitivity from intravenous iron products

In the last several years, intravenous therapy with iron products has been more widely used. Although it has been a standard procedure in dialysis-associated anemia since the early 1990s, its use is expanding to a host of conditions associated with iron deficiency, especially young women with heavy uterine bleeding and pregnancy. Free iron is associated with unacceptable high toxicity inducing severe, hemodynamically significant symptoms. Subsequently, formulations that contain the iron as an iron carbohydrate nanoparticle have been designed. With newer formulations, including low-molecular-weight iron dextran, iron sucrose, ferric gluconate, ferumoxytol, iron isomaltoside, and ferric carboxymaltose, serious adverse events are rare.

Systemic Allergic Reaction to the GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Exenatide

Objective: To report a case of systemic hypersensitivity to the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist exenatide used in diabetes care to provide significant information within the context of postmarketing safety surveillance of this new drug class. Case Summary: We report on a 52-year-old male with insufficiently controlled diabetes. GLP-1 agonist treatment was indicated and the patient was started on 5 to 10 µg exenatide (Byetta) twice daily, which had to be stopped after 1 month due to intolerable nausea. One year later, an attempt with 0.6 to 1.8 mg liraglutide (Victoza) once daily was well tolerated but lacked efficacy after a few months. Finally, the patient was started on 2 mg exenatide (Bydureon) once weekly. Concomitant treatment included metformine 1000 mg twice daily and candesartan/hydrochlorothiazide (Blopress Plus) 16/12.5 mg once daily. A few hours after the second injection, local urticaria and disseminated pruritus evolved and after the third injection pruritus, urticaria, and shortness of breath developed, which resolved to antihistamines and corticosteroids. Intradermal tests were positive for Byetta (1:1000) and Bydureon (1:100) (both exenatide), while Victoza (liraglutide) was negative (1:10). Specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) to the drugs was not available for testing. Discussion: An objective causality assessment revealed that the adverse effect to exenatide (Bydureon) was probable (Naranjo probability scale: score of 8). Consistency was established through positive skin tests and the biological explanation that the administration of GLP-1 receptor agonists has been associated with antibody formation. Conclusion: Considering emerging use of GLP-1 receptor agonists, systemic hypersensitivity should be recognized as a risk in clinical practice.

[The significance of an allergological examination in asthma and COPD]

Of the two most common obstructive lung diseases - bronchial asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) - asthma is clearly associated with a possible allergic background, therefore an allergological examination should be included in the work-up of this disease. COPD on the other hand is usually not expected to be linked with an atopic diathesis. Medical history, clinical manifestations, the presence of other atopic diseases, prick tests and measurement of specific IgE antibodies in the serum provide an indication of an allergic genesis of the obstructive pulmonary disease. Bronchial asthma can be roughly divided into an allergic phenotype (TH2-weighted) and a non-allergic phenotype (non-TH2-weighted). The TH2- weighted form leads to an infiltration of eosinophils into the bronchial wall allowing the possibility of a higher concentration of nitrogen oxide in the exhaled air (FeNO measurement) to be detected. In addition to the differentiation between allergic and non-allergic bronchial obstruction, an evaluation of symptoms associated with the workplace (work related asthma) must take place. Furthermore, questions about an intolerance to aspirin (aspirin - exacerbated respiratory disease) or exercise induced symptoms (exercise-induced asthma) should be asked. After a careful interpretation of clinical symptoms and findings in allergy tests, an allergologist can analyze the usefulness of a specific immunotherapy (SIT). For children who suffer from allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, an early SIT can prevent the shift to inflammation of the lower respiratory tract (asthma). Due to the overlapping pathophysiology and symptomatology between bronchial asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease an allergological examination should be considered also in COPD patients.

[Allergies to betalactam-antibiotics: when and how to evaluate?]

When there is the suspicion of an allergic reaction to betalactam-antibiotics, the allergological evaluation is an important tool to confirm the allergy and to test alternative medicaments. As all the testing methods for the allergologic evaluation (cutaneous tests and in-vitro tests) don't have a high sensitivity, a broad case report and the former documentation of the symptoms and diagnostic findings are essential, to enable a high significance of the examination and to assess the indication for the provocation test which is the gold standard in many cases. The documentation of the time flow is basic, to differentiate between immediate reactions (hours after intake) and nonimmediate reactions (several days after intake). The diagnostic evaluation not later than after six months increases the prospects for a successful allergic evaluation.

Irritant contact dermatitis from a black henna tattoo without sensitization to para-phenylendiamine

Allergic contact dermatitis from nonpermanent black henna tattoos has been frequently reported, particularly in children. Contamination or adulteration of the dyes with para-phenylendiamine has been identified as major cause of active sensitization and elicitation of severe allergic contact dermatitis. Sequelae include permanent sensitization, hyper- or hypopigmentation, scarring, keloids, and hypertrichosis. We report a rare case of irritant dermatitis to an unknown ingredient in a black henna tattoo with consecutive hypopigmentation. Sensitization to para-phenylendiamine and other para-compounds was excluded by patch test evaluation. This is relevant for future exposure to consumer products such as hair dyes or in occupational settings. Generally, black henna tattoos, particularly if done with dyes of unknown composition, should be strongly discouraged.