Disease-free and overall survival at 3.5 years for neoadjuvant bevacizumab added to docetaxel followed by fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide, for women with HER2 negative early breast cancer: ARTemis Trial

Background

The ARTemis trial previously reported that addition of neoadjuvant bevacizumab (Bev) to docetaxel (D) followed by fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (D-FEC) in HER2 negative breast cancer improved the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. We present disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) with central pathology review.

Patients and methods

Patients were randomized to 3 cycles of D followed by 3 cycles of FEC (D-FEC), ±4 cycles of Bev (Bev + D-FEC). DFS and OS were analyzed by treatment and by central pathology reviewed pCR and Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) class.

Results

A total of 800 patients were randomized [median follow-up 3.5 years (IQR 3.2–4.4)]. DFS and OS were similar across treatment arms [DFS hazard ratio (HR)=1.18 (95% CI 0.89–1.57), P = 0.25; OS HR = 1.26 (95% CI 0.90–1.76), P = 0.19). Both local pathology report review and central histopathology review confirmed a significant improvement in DFS and OS for patients who achieved a pCR [DFS HR = 0.38 (95% CI 0.23–0.63), P < 0.001; OS HR = 0.43 (95% CI 0.24–0.75), P = 0.003]. However, significant heterogeneity was observed (P = 0.02); larger improvements in DFS were obtained with a pCR achieved with D-FEC than a pCR achieved with Bev + D-FEC. As RCB class increased, significantly worse DFS and OS was observed (P for trend <0.0001), which effect was most marked in the ER negative group.

Conclusions

The addition of short course neoadjuvant Bev to standard chemotherapy did not demonstrate a DFS or OS benefit. Achieving a pCR with D-FEC is associated with improved DFS and OS but not when pCR is achieved with Bev + D-FEC. At the present time therefore, Bev is not recommended in early breast cancer.

ClinicalTrials.gov number

NCT01093235.

Pharmacokinetics of multiple doses of transdermal flunixin meglumine in adult Holstein dairy cows

A transdermal formulation of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, flunixin meglumine, has been approved in the United States and Canada for single-dose administration. Transdermal flunixin meglumine was administered to 10 adult Holstein cows in their second or third lactation at the label dose of 3.33 mg/kg every 24 hr for three total treatments. Plasma flunixin concentrations were determined using high-pressure liquid chromatography with mass spectroscopy (HPLC-MS). Pharmacokinetic analysis was completed on each individual animal with noncompartmental methods using computer software. The time to maximum drug concentration (Tmax) was 2.81 hr, and the maximum drug concentration was 1.08 μg/ml. The mean terminal half-life (T½) was determined to be 5.20 hr. Clearance per fraction absorbed (Cl/F) was calculated to be 0.294 L/hr kg^-1 , and volume of distribution of fraction (Vz/F) absorbed was 2.20 L/kg. The mean accumulation factor was 1.10 after three doses. This indicates changes in dosing may not be required when giving multiple doses of flunixin transdermal. Further work is required to investigate the clinical efficacy of transdermal flunixin after multiple daily doses.

Abstract P4-04-06: AZD5363, an AKT inhibitor, significantly inhibits key biomarkers of the AKT pathway and Ki67, in a randomized, placebo, controlled study (STAKT) in human breast cancers

Background: AKT is an important intracellular control point through which Type 1 growth factors and IGFR signal. Mutations in PIK3CA, AKT and PTEN are prevalent in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer (BC) and have been implicated in resistance to endocrine therapies. AZD5363 is an inhibitor of AKT 1, 2 and 3 currently in Phase 2 trials for BC and other solid cancers.

Design: The study examined whether AZD5363 impacts on key biomarkers within the AKT pathway and their subsequent effects on Ki67, a marker of tumor proliferation. STAKT is a multi-center, two-stage, double blind, randomized, placebo controlled, biomarker 'window-of-opportunity' trial in women with newly diagnosed, previously untreated ER+ BC who were deemed would require chemotherapy as part of their primary treatment regimen. Stage 1 assessed AZD5363 at a dose of 480mg bd p.o. versus matching placebo. Up to 30 patients per arm were permitted, to allow 12 subjects per arm with evaluable paired biopsies - obtained at baseline, and after 4.5 days of AZD5363 / placebo. Primary endpoint markers were pPRAS40, pGSK3β and Ki67 assessed by immunohistochemistry. pPRAS40 and pGSK3β were assessed by H-scores and measured separately for cytoplasmic (cyto), nuclear (nuc) and total (cyto+nuc) staining. Ki67 was assessed as % positive staining of 500 tumor nuclei. Laboratory staff were blinded to treatment arm and whether the biopsies were taken before or after AZD5363/placebo. Changes in marker expression (both absolute and %) between biopsies were calculated, and compared between the two groups. An ANOVA test was applied for normally distributed data and Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney used if not normally distributed.

Results: 28/36 patients were evaluable with patient & tumor characteristics as follows: 17 received AZD5363 and 11 placebo; the median ages were 48 & 49 years respectively. 27 patients were Caucasian and 1 African-American. Tumors were all ER+. For HER2 status 8 were positive & 9 negative in the AZD5363 treated group compared to 2 & 9 respectively in the placebo group.

For pPRAS40 and pGSK3β cyto was the predominant staining while for Ki67 staining was nuclear. Changes in each marker with associated p-values are shown in the table.

MarkerType of change vs baselineDegree of change in AZD5363 arm (n=17)p-value versus placebo arm (n=11)pPRAS40 (H-score)TotalAbsolute-83.8&lt;0.0001Total%-50.2&lt;0.0001CytoAbsolute-90.0&lt;0.0001Cyto%-55.8&lt;0.0001NucAbsolute+6.90.42Nuc%+8.90.94pGSK3β (H-score)TotalAbsolute-55.30.006Total%-39.00.006CytoAbsolute-53.60.006Cyto%-39.20.006NucAbsolute-2.80.065Nuc%-36.50.058Ki67 (% cells+)Absolute-9.60.031%-29.40.052

Conclusions• AZD5363 for 4.5 days caused highly significant falls in pGSK3β and pPRAS40, key markers of AKT pathway activation

• AZD53643 also caused a significant decline in Ki67 even after only 4.5 days of drug. This is one of the shortest 'window'-studies to report such an early effect on proliferation.

• Placebo controlled 'window' studies of this short duration can provide important evidence of the therapeutic potential early in a drug's development.

Citation Format: Robertson JFR, Coleman RE, Cheung KL, Evans A, Holcombe C, Skene A, Rea D, Ahmed S, Jahan A, Kelly S, Horgan K, Rauchhaus P, Littleford R, Foxley A, Lindemann JPO, Pass M, Rugman P, Deb R, Finlay P, Gee JMW. AZD5363, an AKT inhibitor, significantly inhibits key biomarkers of the AKT pathway and Ki67, in a randomized, placebo, controlled study (STAKT) in human breast cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-04-06.

Abstract P4-15-13: When is cancer not really cancer? The PREvent ductal carcinoma in situ invasive overtreatment now (PRECISION)* initiative

Background

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) now represents 20-25% of all breast neoplasia due to large-scale detection by widely adopted population-based breast cancer screening programs. As a result, thousands of women are confronted with DCIS each year: more than 8,000 in the UK, 2,500 in the Netherlands, and some 50,000 in the US. Conventional management includes surgery, supplemented by radiotherapy and/or endocrine therapy, but overtreats the majority of DCIS as ˜1% recur annually and breast cancer mortality is ˜3% at 20 years. Uncertainty as to which DCIS lesions will progress to invasive cancer or, after excision, which will return with recurrent DCIS or invasive breast cancer drives this overtreatment. This urges us to learn how to distinguish DCIS that may progress to invasive breast cancer from the majority of indolent DCIS. Such distinction may be best achieved by synergistic international collaboration between leading global experts from various disciplines, driven by the essential input from patient voices as full members of the research team.

Aim

PRECISION (PREvent ductal Carcinoma In Situ Invasive Overtreatment Now) aims to save thousands of women with low risk DCIS the burden of intensive inappropriate treatment of DCIS (surgery, radiation therapy, hormonal therapies) through the discovery of new data and development of novel tests that promote informed and shared decision-making between patients and clinicians, without compromising the excellent outcomes for DCIS management presently achieved.

Methods

First, three large DCIS cohorts and supplementary resources will be collected enabling in depth molecular studies. Second, extensive genomic characterization, immune profiling and imaging analysis will be performed. In vivo and in vitro modeling will be performed to study the biology of DCIS in detail. Finally, all clinical, immune, and molecular data will be incorporated into a clinical risk prediction model. This risk prediction model will be validated in three prospective randomized DCIS trials in the US (COMET trial), UK (LORIS trial), and mainland Europe (LORD trial).

How the results of this research will be used

The discoveries from our laboratory studies, including a risk stratification model, will be cross-validated in three prospective trials of DCIS active surveillance versus conventional treatment (the COMET, LORIS and LORD trials). As such, the main result of this study will be that we can identify a group of women for which active surveillance for DCIS could be a safer alternative to intensive treatment. Ultimately, this may also contribute to a more reassuring perception of risk regarding non-life threatening precancerous lesions in general, reducing anxiety and preserving quality of life.

* The PRECISION Team is a Cancer Research UK Grand Challenge Award 2017 winning team and will be jointly funded by Cancer Research UK and the Dutch Cancer Society.

Citation Format: Wesseling J, Thompson A, Nik-Zainal S, Futreal A, Hwang S, Jonkers J, Lips E, Rea D, On Behalf of the PRECISION Team. When is cancer not really cancer? The PREvent ductal carcinoma in situ invasive overtreatment now (PRECISION)* initiative [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-15-13.

Abstract P2-09-17: Evaluation of the oncomine comprehensive assay for the identification of actionable mutations for therapeutic stratification from the TEAM pathology cohort

Large-scale sequencing initiatives have revealed a wealth of common and novel variants as well as copy-number aberrations, across different malignancies. This growing list of variants/aberrations can sometimes be matched to specific therapeutics. Such “actionable mutations/changes” hold promise for personalized treatment in the future, with treatments tailored to molecular abnormalities. Presently, women with hormone positive early breast cancer continue to experience improved survival on adjuvant anti-hormone therapy, but a significant number of women continue to progress. Therefore, there is a need to identify those women for whom current therapies are insufficient and to identify alternative therapeutic interventions. We explored the used of genetic profiling using a comprehensive solid tumor next generation sequencing (NGS) assay (the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay, OCA) to characterize early invasive breast cancer. The OCA is based on the Ion Torrent™ NGS platform and Ion AmpliSeq™ library preparation technology, coupled to the Oncomine™ Knowledgebase, for target selection, variant calling, and data annotations. The OCA includes 87 genes for hotspot mutation detection, 48 genes for full length sequencing and 43 genes for focal copy number assessment. The OCA provides a standardized informatics workflow and quality control (QC) parameters to process samples in a translational clinical research setting. To explore the application of the OCA to early invasive breast cancers, we performed a retrospective pilot study in a subset of cases from the TEAM trial. From the TEAM pathology samples, 420 were chosen in a case-control fashion, 413 samples were analyzed, 388 samples passed standard QC metrics, and 254 samples (65%) were found to contain 368 variants with Oncomine Knowledgebase annotations. Briefly, variants of PIK3CA were most frequent at 42.7% (157/368), followed by TP53 at 27.2% (100/368), PTEN at 5.7% (21/368), BRCA2 at 3.8% (14/368), SF3B1 (12/368), AKT1 (11/368) and PTCH1 (11/368) at 3.3%, 3.0%, 3.0%; respectively. Other variants were detected in ATM, ERBB2, RB1, FGFR2, NF1, CDKN2A, PIK3R1 and others. Amongst the 43 genes assessed for copy-number, 23 showed copy-number changes across 132 samples totalling 167 CNVs. 256 samples showed no copy-number alterations in any of the genes on the panel. ERBB2 was most frequently altered at 28.1% (47/167), followed by FGFR1 at 23.4% (39/167), CCND1 at 15.0% (25/167) and MDM2 at 10.2% (17/167). Copy-number losses were identified in TP53, RB1, PTEN, BRCA2 at 0.6% each; as well as CDKN2A at 1.8% (3/167). Analytical validation of a subset of gene variants and copy-number changes will be presented in addition to the evidence of potential future application of the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay to precision oncology goals.

Citation Format: Bayani J, Crozier C, Quintayo MA, Amemiya Y, Zhang X, Larivière M, Sadis S, Smith JM, Hasenburg A, Kieback D, Markopoulos C, Dirix L, Yaffe M, Seth A, Feilotter H, Rea D, Bartlett JMS. Evaluation of the oncomine comprehensive assay for the identification of actionable mutations for therapeutic stratification from the TEAM pathology cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-09-17.

Difficulties in the Diagnosis and Management of Paediatric Posterior Circulation Stroke

We present two children with posterior circulation stroke (PCS) highlighting the wide spectrum of presentation, the need for complete radiological assessment, and the relatively high recurrence risk.

Abstract P3-17-06: LORIS trial of active monitoring for DCIS: How does the online pathology eligibility review process work?

Introduction

The LORIS Trial is a UK randomized clinical trial comparing active monitoring with surgery for low risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), defined as low or low-intermediate grade DCIS without comedo necrosis, as diagnosed on vacuum-assisted (wide bore) core needle samples. Because of the inconsistency of grading DCIS, we have underpinned this trial with a Central Histopathology Review (CHR) before randomisation. The process of the CHR for the first 22 months of a two year pilot study between July 2014 and May 2016 is reported here.

Patients and methods

Patients were eligible for CHR if they satisfied all of the eligibility criteria and had locally reported low or intermediate grade DCIS. Patients were identified at 28 pilot sites and were registered for potential trial entry following written informed consent before being subjected to CHR. CHR comprised online examination of digitally scanned histology slides of all material from all diagnostic biopsies and was performed by at least two of the three LORIS specialist breast pathologists. Histology slides were submitted using Royal Mail Safebox® to the University of Birmingham where they were digitally scanned and made available for review via the Leica digital image hub. The outcome of the review was reported in a separate secure online database by completion of a Central Pathology Review Form. Access to both online systems is password protected. Eligibility was confirmed if two pathologists agreed that there was low or low to intermediate grade DCIS and no comedo necrosis. A maximum of 7 calendar days from receipt of the diagnostic material was allowed for the central review process.

The digital images of the histology slides are stored by the Leica system for future reference.

Results

100 patients were registered and their slides reviewed. 55 of these were deemed eligible by CHR; of these 38 have been randomised. 45 patients were deemed ineligible, most commonly due to grade being in the upper half of the intermediate category and/or comedo necrosis. In addition, 9 patients were deemed not to have DCIS and 1 patient had invasive disease.

Grouping the grade categories as low and low to intermediate grade (low risk and eligible for randomisation) Vs intermediate to high and high cytonuclear grade (ineligible for randomisation) showed 91% agreement on grade category amongst the reviewing pathologists.

Results of the central review were made available to sites within 7 days for 97% of cases submitted. On average, central review was completed within 4 days. Average time between registration and randomisation was 3 weeks. The LORIS central review pathologists found online viewing and reporting of sections acceptable.

Conclusions

Central Histopathology Review using online viewing of digital slides provides timely and efficient pathology Quality Assurance in this clinical trial setting, with acceptable turnaround times and good agreement between reviewing specialist breast pathologists. This process will be continued in the main phase of the trial.

Citation Format: Thomas J, Hanby A, Pinder S, Pirrie S, Rea D, Gaunt C, Young J, Francis A. LORIS trial of active monitoring for DCIS: How does the online pathology eligibility review process work? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-17-06.

Abstract P3-06-03: The short term effects of an AKT inhibitor (AZD5363) on biomarkers of the AKT pathway and anti-tumour activity in a breast cancer paired biopsy study (STAKT trial)

This abstract was withdrawn by the authors.

Abstract P3-13-05: Multicentre observational study evaluating why mastectomies are advised by UK multi-disciplinary teams

Background: Marked variation in mastectomy rates exists across the UK. Identification of variation in practice is a key step towards standardisation of service. The rationale for advising mastectomy by multi-disciplinary teams (MDTs) has not been previously explored in the UK. The main aim of this multicentre observational study was to describe current practice in MDT decision-making for patients undergoing mastectomy. A secondary aim was to determine utilisation of neoadjuvant therapies.

Methods: A multicentre, protocol-driven, prospective cohort study, led by trainees of the West Midlands Research Collaborative was performed during July and September 2015. Data was collected securely using Research Electronic Data Capture. Inclusion criteria were: women &gt;18 years undergoing mastectomy for in situ/invasive disease; presenting with symptomatic or screen detected disease; performed as a primary procedure or following failure of breast conserving surgery (BCS); with or without immediate breast reconstruction (IR).

Results: A total of 1776 patients (1823 mastectomies; 47 bilateral procedures) from 68 units were included. Median age was 63 years (range 20-99). In total 481 (26%) IRs were performed; median IR rate was 22% (range 0-67%).

Mastectomy was advised by the MDT in 1402 (77%) cases. Reasons for advising mastectomy are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. MDT rationale for advising mastectomyRationaleNumber of mastectomiesProportion (%)Large tumour to breast size ratio making BCS unsuitable53029.1Multi-centric disease on imaging37220.4Extensive malignant microcalcification1799.8Previous radiotherapy (Breast/Mantle)1638.9Requiring further surgery for positive margins following BCS1588.7Central tumour1136.2Large primary tumour, patient not suitable for neoadjuvant endocrine or chemotherapy treatment1126.1Neoadjuvant therapy failed to downsize tumour to allow BCS884.8Neoadjuvant therapy apparently successful but mastectomy advised anyway794.3Family History-High Risk512.8

In total 153 patients with oestrogen receptor positive (ER+) tumours were offered neoadjuvant endocrine treatment (NET); 131 (86%) received treatment. A total of 293 post-menopausal women with uni-focal, ER+ tumours, &gt;20mm were not offered NET; mastectomy was advised by MDTs in 202 patients and the rationale for advising mastectomy in 173 patients (86%) was large tumour to breast size ratio.

In total 104 patients with Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 over-expressing (HER2+) tumours were offered neoadjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab (NACT); 89 (86%) received treatment. A total of 88 women &lt;70 years old with HER2+ tumours, &gt;20mm were not offered NACT; mastectomy was advised by MDTs in 75 patients and rationale for advising mastectomy in 45 women (60%) was large tumour to breast size ratio.

Conclusions: Although most mastectomies are advised for large tumour to breast size ratio, there is inconsistency in the utilisation of neoadjuvant therapies with many potentially eligible patients with large tumours not being given the opportunity to be downsized. Application of standardised recommendations for neoadjuvant treatment resulting in increased and appropriate use of neoadjuvant therapies could reduce the number of mastectomies advised by MDTs.

Citation Format: Singh JK, McEvoy K, Marla S, Wilcox M, Rea D, Hallissey MT, Francis A, West Midlands Research Collaborative. Multicentre observational study evaluating why mastectomies are advised by UK multi-disciplinary teams [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-13-05.

Abstract OT1-03-01: The UK LORIS trial: Randomizing patients with low or low intermediate grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to surgery or active monitoring

Background: The independent review of the UK National Health Service Breast Screening Programme reported (The Lancet, Volume 380, Issue 9855, Page 1778, 17 Nov 2012) on the benefits and harms of breast screening. It concluded that breast screening saves lives and acknowledged the existence of overtreatment. It encouraged randomized trials to elucidate the appropriate treatment of screen-detected DCIS to gain a better understanding of its natural history. The LORIS trial addresses the possible overtreatment of low and low/intermediate grade screen-detected (low risk) DCIS by randomizing patients to standard surgical treatment or active monitoring, each with long term follow up.

Trial Design: LORIS is a phase III, multicentre, 2 arm study, with a built in 2 year Feasibility Phase, in patients confirmed to have low risk DCIS defined by strict criteria and determined by central pathology review. Patients will be randomized between standard surgery and active monitoring with annual mammography. Patients will be followed up for a minimum of 10 years.

Eligibility Criteria:

1) Female, age ≥ 46 years

2) Screen-detected or incidental microcalcification (with no mass lesion clinically or on imaging)

3) Low risk DCIS on large volume vacuum-assisted biopsy, confirmed by central pathology review

4) Patient fit to undergo surgery

5) No previous breast cancer or ipsilateral DCIS diagnosis

6) Written informed consent

Specific Aims: The LORIS Trial aims to establish whether patients with newly diagnosed low risk DCIS can safely avoid surgery without detriment to their wellbeing (psychological and physical) and whether those patients that do require surgery can be identified by pathological and radiological means.

Primary endpoint: Ipsilateral invasive breast cancer free survival time

Secondary endpoints: Overall survival; mastectomy rate; time to mastectomy; time to surgery; patient reported outcomes; health resource utilisation and assessment of predictive biomarkers.

A digital image data repository and tissue bank will provide a prospective resource for both translational and imaging studies.

Statistical Methods: A total of 932 patients will be randomized to a non-inferiority design to test the null hypothesis that active monitoring of women diagnosed with low risk DCIS is not non-inferior in terms of ipsilateral invasive breast cancer free survival (iiBCFS) time compared to treatment with surgery. The iiBCFS time will be compared across the two arms on a per protocol and intent-to-treat basis, using a 1-sided (α=0.05) log-rank test for non-inferiority. The iiBCFS rate is assumed to be 97.5% in the surgery arm at 5 years, utilizing 80% power to exclude a difference of more than 2.5% in the active monitoring arm.

Present Accrual and Target Accrual: 32 UK centres are open for the Feasibility Phase of the trial which is nearing completion. The web-based central pathology review process is functioning efficiently, with a one week maximum turn around. Registrations and sites randomizing patients are on or above target. Randomizations are currently approximately 70% of target. A total of 60 centres will open in the main trial.

Contact Information: For further information, please email the LORIS Trial Office LORIS@trials.bham.ac.uk.

Citation Format: Francis A, Bartlett J, Billingham L, Bowden S, Brookes C, Dodwell D, Evans A, Fairbrother P, Fallowfield L, Gaunt C, Hanby A, Jenkins V, Matthews L, Pinder S, Pirrie S, Rea D, Reed M, Roberts T, Thomas J, Wallis M, Wilcox M, Young J. The UK LORIS trial: Randomizing patients with low or low intermediate grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to surgery or active monitoring [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-03-01.

European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management and avoidance of adverse events of treatment in chronic myeloid leukaemia

Most reports on chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) focus on efficacy, particularly on molecular response and outcome. In contrast, adverse events (AEs) are often reported as infrequent, minor, tolerable and manageable, but they are increasingly important as therapy is potentially lifelong and multiple TKIs are available. For this reason, the European LeukemiaNet panel for CML management recommendations presents an exhaustive and critical summary of AEs emerging during CML treatment, to assist their understanding, management and prevention. There are five major conclusions. First, the main purpose of CML treatment is the antileukemic effect. Suboptimal management of AEs must not compromise this first objective. Second, most patients will have AEs, usually early, mostly mild to moderate, and which will resolve spontaneously or are easily controlled by simple means. Third, reduction or interruption of treatment must only be done if optimal management of the AE cannot be accomplished in other ways, and frequent monitoring is needed to detect resolution of the AE as early as possible. Fourth, attention must be given to comorbidities and drug interactions, and to new events unrelated to TKIs that are inevitable during such a prolonged treatment. Fifth, some TKI-related AEs have emerged which were not predicted or detected in earlier studies, maybe because of suboptimal attention to or absence from the preclinical data. Overall, imatinib has demonstrated a good long-term safety profile, though recent findings suggest underestimation of symptom severity by physicians. Second and third generation TKIs have shown higher response rates, but have been associated with unexpected problems, some of which could be irreversible. We hope these recommendations will help to minimise adverse events, and we believe that an optimal management of them will be rewarded by better TKI compliance and thus better CML outcomes, together with better quality of life.

Abstract PD2-02: NEO-EXCEL phase III neoadjuvant trial of pre-operative exemestane or letrozole +/- celecoxib in the treatment of ER positive postmenopausal early breast cancer

COX2 has been implicated in breast tumorigenesis, tumour proliferation & invasion. The role of COX2 in carcinogenesis is thought to be related to its abilities to increase production of prostaglandins, convert pro-carcinogens to carcinogens, inhibit apoptosis, promote angiogenesis, modulate inflammation & immune function & increase tumour cell invasiveness. COX2 inhibition may synergise with aromatase inhibition in controlling endocrine responsive breast cancer. The COX2 product prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) & cytokines such as interleukin-6 (IL6) can up regulate aromatase expression suggesting that aromatase inhibition may be more effective in combination with a COX2 inhibitor. There may be additional COX2 mediated anticancer activity. The hypothesis addressed is that activity of aromatase inhibitors(AI) as neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for early breast cancer may be enhanced by the addition of a COX2 inhibitor.

TRIAL OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the activity of AIs as neo-adjuvant endocrine therapy for ER positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women may be enhanced by the addition of the selective COX2 inhibitor celecoxib.

TRIAL DESIGN

Prospective phase III multicentre randomised trial. Patients were randomised to receive 16 weeks of exemestane 25 mg daily or letrozole 2.5 mg daily (open label) and celecoxib 400 mg twice daily or matched placebo (double blinded). Translational research tumour samples were collected before, during & after therapy.

KEY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Post menopausal, ER positive, invasive cancer, 2cms or greater with calipers & visible on USS.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

Objective clinical response to neoadjuvant treatment by RECIST criteria.

RESULTS

Primary Outcome; Response to treatment has been calculated for 266 patients (Table 1). Response rate was 73% in the celecoxib arm & 55% in the placebo arm (p=0.0022). The response rates 4 arm comparison are shown in Table 2. After adjustment for AI effect the significant difference in response rates remained (p=0.0023); the difference in response rates was greater in the exemestane treated group (29%) compared to the letrozole group (7%) although heterogeneity between AI arms was statistically non-significant (p=0.06).

Table 1 Primary Outcome Results: response ratesOUTCOMEPLACEBO N (%)CELECOXIB N (%)TOTAL N (%)X2statisticP-valueRESPONSE73(55)97(73%)170 (64%)9.38820.0022NO RESPONSE60 (45%)36 (27%)96 (36%)  TOTAL133133266  

Table 2: Response Rates 4 Arm Comparison EXEMESTANELETROZOLERESPONSEPLACEBO n(%)CELECOXIB n(%)TOTAL n(%)PLACEBO n(%)CELECOXIB n(%)TOTAL n(%)RESPONSE33 (49)52(78)85(63)40(61)45(68)85(64)NO RESPONSE34(51)15(22)49(37)26(39)21(32)47(36)TOTAL67671346666132

Secondary outcome; There was an USS response rate of 42% v 37% for celecoxib & placebo arms respectively (p=0.2513)

CONCLUSION

The addition of the COX2 inhibitor celecoxib to an AI significantly & substantially increased the clinical response from 55% to 73%. Effect on tumour size assessed with USS is less marked with a non-significant increase in responses from 37% to 42%.

This work was supported by CRUK: CRUK/06/005 and Pfizer.

Citation Format: Rea D, Francis A, Poole C, Brookes C, Stein R, Bartlett J, Dunn J, Canney P, Sutton R, Daoud R, Hallissey M, Achuthan R, Grant M, Babrah J, Smith S, Fraser J, Desai A, Al Dubaisi M, Patel A, Bristol J, Chandrasekharan S, Prest C, Jewkes A. NEO-EXCEL phase III neoadjuvant trial of pre-operative exemestane or letrozole +/- celecoxib in the treatment of ER positive postmenopausal early breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-02.

Abstract OT3-02-12: OPTIMA (optimal personalised treatment of early breast cancer usIng multi-parameter analysis), a prospective trial to validate the predictive utility and cost-effectiveness of gene expression test-directed chemotherapy decisions

Background: Multi-parameter gene expression assays (MPAs) are widely used to estimate individual patient residual risk and to guide chemotherapy use in hormone-sensitive HER2-negative node-negative early breast cancer. These uses of MPAs have not yet been prospectively validated. OPTIMA aims to validate the use of MPA testing to predict chemotherapy sensitivity in a largely node-positive breast cancer population.

Methods: OPTIMA is a partially blinded multi-center, phase 3 randomized controlled trial with an adaptive two-stage design. The preliminary phase (OPTIMA prelim) evaluated the performance of MPAs to identify a suitable test(s) to be used in the main efficacy trial and assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a large UK trial. Eligible patients are men or women aged 40 years or older who have surgically resected early stage breast cancer, which is ER-positive and HER2-negative and who have either 1-9 involved axillary lymph nodes or tumors of at least 30mm diameter. Randomization is to standard management (chemotherapy followed by endocrine therapy) or to MPA-directed treatment. Those with a tumor categorized as "high-risk" by the test will be assigned to standard management whilst those at "low-risk" will be treated with endocrine therapy alone. OPTIMA prelim used Oncotype DX as the primary discriminator; the main trial will use Prosigna (PAM50). The co-primary outcomes are (1) Invasive Disease Free Survival (IDFS) and (2) cost-effectiveness of test-directed therapy compared to standard practice. Secondary outcomes include IDFS in "low-risk" patients, distant disease free survival, breast cancer specific survival, overall survival and quality of life. An integrated qualitative recruitment study will identify and address challenges to recruitment and informed consent. Tumor blocks from all consenting participants will be banked allowing the performance of alternative MPA technologies to be evaluated. Recruitment of 4500 patients over 4 years will permit demonstration of 3% non-inferiority of test-directed treatment, with 5% significance and 85% power, assuming 3 years follow-up and a control arm 5-year IDFS of at least 85%. The addition of patients from OPTIMA prelim will allow non-inferiority to be assessed with 2.5% significance.

Results: OPTIMA-prelim recruited 412 patients in 23 months from 35 sites. It confirmed the acceptability of randomization to patients with a 47% acceptance rate, and to clinicians and hence the feasibility of a large prospective trial of test-directed treatment running in 100-plus UK sites. It showed that investment into research on test-directed therapy, especially with Prosigna, should be of substantial value to the NHS.

Conclusion: OPTIMA, as one of two large scale prospective trials validating the use of test-guided chemotherapy in node-positive hormone-sensitive early breast cancer will have a global impact on patient treatment. Recruitment into the main efficacy trial will commence in October 2015.

Funding: Project funded by the UK NIHR HTA Programme (10/34/501). Views expressed are those of the authors and not those of the HTA Programme, NIHR, NHS or the DoH.

Citation Format: Stein RC, Marshall A, Hall PS, Bartlett JMS, Rooshenas L, Campbell A, Cameron DA, Rea D, Macpherson I, Earl HM, Poole CJ, Francis A, Morgan A, Harmer V, Pinder SE, Stallard N, Donovan J, Hulme C, McCabe C, Hughes-Davies L, Makris A, Dunn JA. OPTIMA (optimal personalised treatment of early breast cancer usIng multi-parameter analysis), a prospective trial to validate the predictive utility and cost-effectiveness of gene expression test-directed chemotherapy decisions. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-02-12.

Abstract OT2-02-04: The LORIS trial: A multicentre, randomised phase III trial of standard surgery versus active monitoring in women with newly diagnosed low risk ductal carcinoma in situ

Background: The independent review of the UK National Health Service Breast Screening Programme reported (The Lancet, Volume 380, Issue 9855, Pages 1778 - 1786, 17 November 2012) on the benefits & harms of breast screening. It concluded that breast screening saves lives & acknowledged overtreatment. It encouraged randomized trials to elucidate the appropriate treatment of screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to gain a better understanding of its natural history. The LORIS trial addresses overtreatment of low & low/Intermediate grade screen detected (low risk) DCIS by randomizing patients to standard surgical treatment or active monitoring.

Trial Design: LORIS is a phase III, multicentre, 2 arm study, with a 2 year feasibility phase, in patients confirmed to have low risk DCIS by central pathology review. Patients are randomised to standard surgery or active monitoring with annual mammography. Patients will be followed up for a minimum of 10 years.

Key Eligibility Criteria:

1) Female 46 years or over.

2) Screen-detected or incidental microcalcification (with no mass lesion clinically or on imaging)

3) Low risk DCIS on large volume vacuum-assisted biopsy, confirmed by central pathology review

4) Patient fit to undergo surgery

Specific Aims: The LORIS Trial aims to establish whether patients with newly diagnosed low risk DCIS can safely avoid surgery without detriment to their wellbeing (psychological and physical) & whether those patients that do require surgery can be identified by pathological and radiological means.

Primary endpoint: Ipsilateral invasive breast cancer free survival rate at 5 years

Secondary endpoints: Overall survival; mastectomy rate; time to mastectomy; time to surgery; patient reported outcomes & health resource utilisation.

A digital image data repository and tissue bank provide a prospective resource for both translational & imaging studies.

Statistical Methods: A total of 932 patients will be randomized to a non-inferiority design to test the null hypothesis that active monitoring of women diagnosed with low risk DCIS is not non-inferior in terms of 5 year ipsilateral invasive breast cancer free survival (iiBCFS) rate compared to treatment with surgery. The iiBCFS rate will be compared across the two arms on a per protocol and intent-to-treat basis, using a 1-sided (α=0.05) log-rank test for non-inferiority. The iiBCFS rate is assumed to be 97.5% in the surgery arm giving 80% power to exclude a difference of more than 2.5% in the active monitoring arm at 5 years.

Present Accrual and Target Accrual: 21 UK centres are open & the feasibility phase of the trial is recruiting to target. The web based central pathology review process is functioning well with a one week maximum turn around. A further 40 centres will be opened on completion of the feasibility phase.

Contact: LORIS@trials.bham.ac.uk

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research [Health Technology Assessment Programme] (project number 11/36/16)

Department of Health Disclaimer: The views & opinions expressed therein are those of the authors & do not necessarily reflect those of the Health Technology Assessment Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.

Citation Format: Francis A, Fallowfield L, Bartlett J, Thomas J, Wallis M, Hanby A, Pinder S, Evans A, Billingham L, Brookes C, Dodwell D, Fairbrother P, Gaunt C, Jenkins V, Matthews L, Pirrie S, Reed M, Roberts T, Wilcox M, Young J, Rea D. The LORIS trial: A multicentre, randomised phase III trial of standard surgery versus active monitoring in women with newly diagnosed low risk ductal carcinoma in situ. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-02-04.