Regorafenib-induced hyperammonemic encephalopathy

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Regorafenib improves progression-free survival as a late-line treatment for patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST). As a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), the expected adverse events of regorafenib are similar to those reported with imatinib, sunitinib or sorafenib. We report the first case of hyperammonemic encephalopathy related to regorafenib in a patient with metastatic GIST.

CASE SUMMARY

A 61-year-old man maintained on regorafenib for metastatic GIST presented with acute confusion. Discontinuation of regorafenib led to complete resolution of confusion, which later recurred with hyperammonemia on recommencing regorafenib. Cessation of regorafenib and normalization of hyperammonemia then resulted in resolution of confusion.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS

Regorafenib withdrawal and recommencement had influenced the confusional state and hyperammonemia in this patient. There is a probable relationship between regorafenib and metabolic encephalopathy. There are case reports of similar encephalopathy thought to be induced by other multitargeted TKI, and, as such, a class effect could be postulated.

Final results of Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group ARCTIC study: an audit of raltitrexed for patients with cardiac toxicity induced by fluoropyrimidines

BACKGROUND

Cardiac toxicity an uncommon but serious side-effect of some fluoropyrimides. Cardiac toxicity from raltitrexed is rarely reported. With this background, we initiated this study to investigate the incidence of cardiac events in patients who had switched to raltitrexed following cardiac toxicity from fluoropyrimidines (5-fluorouracil or capecitabine).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Pharmacy records were used to identify patients receiving raltitrexed from January 2004 till March 2012. Medical records were then reviewed to confirm the use of raltitrexed after cardiac toxicity from 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine. The primary end point was the rate of further cardiac events after commencing raltitrexed.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients were identified and the majority had colorectal cancer. Prior regimens included 5-fluorouracil ± leucovorin, capecitabine alone, FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, epirubicin/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil, and capecitabine/oxaliplatin. Seven patients (17%) had bolus 5-fluorouracil regimens, 26 patients (62%) had infusion 5-fluorouracil regimens, and 9 patients (21%) had capecitabine alone or in combination. Angina was the most common cardiac toxicity from 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine and usually occurred in the first or the second cycle. Four patients after their first cardiac event continued with the same 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine regimen with the addition of nitrates and calcium antagonists but still had further cardiac events. After changing to raltitrexed, either as a single agent or a continuing combination regimen, no patients experienced further cardiac toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Raltitrexed is associated with no significant cardiac toxicity in patients who have experienced prior cardiac toxicity from 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine. Raltitrexed, alone or in combination with oxaliplatin or irinotecan, provides a safe option in terms of cardiac toxicity for such patients.

Management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the era of targeted therapies

BACKGROUND

Metastatic renal cell cancer is associated with poor prognosis and survival and is resistant to conventional chemotherapy. Therapeutic targeting of molecular pathways for tumour angiogenesis and other specific activation mechanisms offers improved tumour response and prolonged survival.

AIMS

To conduct a retrospective audit of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with targeted therapies.

METHODS

Data were extracted from clinical records of patients undergoing targeted treatment between 2005 and 2009 at two hospital sites. Data collected included pathology, systemic therapy class, toxicity and survival. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients were treated with 102 lines of therapy with a median overall survival (OS) of 23 months, median time to failure of first-line treatment (TTF1) of 10 months and median time to failure of second-line treatment (TTF2) of 5.2 months. Time from first diagnosis to treatment >12 months was significantly associated with improved OS, longer TTF1, TTF2 and response to first-line anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (anti-VEGF TKI) therapy. Variables associated with tumour biology, natural history and the systemic inflammatory response were associated with improved OS and TTF1. Development of hypertension was predictive of anti-VEGF TKI outcome. Toxicities were as expected for each drug class.

CONCLUSIONS

  Survival and toxicity outcomes from two Australian sites are comparable to published data. The adverse event profile differs to conventional chemotherapy. Clinicians caring for patients with metastatic renal cancer will need to become familiar with these toxicities and their management as these agents enter widespread use.

The relationship between the development of rash and clinical and quality of life outcomes by Kras mutation status in patients with colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab in NCIC CTG CO.17

481

Background: The NCIC Clinical Trials Group CO.17 trial, conducted with the Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group, showed cetuximab monotherapy (CET vs. best supportive care [BSC]) improved overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and maintained quality of life (QoL) in patients previously treated for advanced colorectal cancer. Correlative analyses showed strong relationships between CET benefits and both rash development and Kras mutation status. Association between rash and CET benefits is now presented by Kras mutation status.

Methods: Rash was graded weekly by NCI CTC 2.0 criteria. Landmark-type analyses (LTA) were performed by excluding patients who died within 28 days and then grouping by rash severity (gr 2+ vs. gr 0/1) based both on worst grade ever developed (LTA1) and worst grade on or before day 28 (LTA2). Multivariate Cox models were conducted separately for wild-type (WT) and mutated (MUT) Kras tumors.

Results: More rash of severity gr 2+ was observed in WT than MUT patients treated with CET (57.3% vs. 44.4%; p = 0.08). The median OS, PFS, and HRs from LTA2 are presented for WT and MUT groups (see Table).

Conclusions: Rash severity was positively correlated with PFS and OS in Kras WT patients who received CET, although only for gr 2+ rash did OS significantly exceed that of BSC patients. In Kras MUT patients, neither gr 0/1 nor gr 2+ rash was associated with either improved PFS or OS vs. BSC patients. Quality of life outcomes will also be reported by Kras mutation status.

[Table: see text]

[Table: see text]

Two cases of acrometastasis to the hands and review of the literature

This paper reports two cases of acrometastasis to the hands. The first case involved a 78-year-old woman with a permeative osteolytic lesion in her proximal second metacarpal. A biopsy of this lesion suggested a diagnosis of non-small-cell lung carcinoma with secondary osseous metastasis. This was the first presentation of the woman’s primary diagnosis. A single 8-Gy fraction of palliative radiotherapy was delivered to the patient’s left hand. The treatment proved successful: the woman soon experienced pain relief and regained the use of her hand. The second case involved a 69-year-old woman with extensive lytic destruction involving the proximal two thirds of her third metacarpal. This patient had been diagnosed with carcinoma of the breast in 1990. She also received a single 8-Gy fraction of radiation, which improved both her pain and her hand mobility.

An extensive review of the literature uncovered 257 previously reported cases of acrometastasis. Articles were analyzed based on age and sex of the patient, site of the primary carcinoma, metastatic locations within the hand and affected appendage or appendages, the treatment given, and the patient’s length of survival. Men were almost twice as likely to experience acrometastasis as women, and the median age of the patients overall was 58 years (range: 18 months–91 years). Lung, kidney, and breast carcinoma were the three most prevalent primary diagnoses reported in the literature. Cancers of the colon, stomach, liver, prostate, and rectum affected the remainder of the population.

Overall, the right hand was more often host to the metastatic lesions. In addition, almost 10% of the patients experienced lesions in both hands. The third finger was the digit most affected by osseous metastases reported in the literature. Lesions of the thumb, fourth finger, second finger, and fifth finger were less commonly reported. The region of the digit most often affected within the patient population was the distal phalanx. The metacarpal bones, proximal phalanges, and middle phalanges comprised the remainder of the four most frequent acrometastatic sites. In the literature, single lesions were more prevalent than multiple bony lesions.

Based on the reported cases, amputation appeared to be the preferred method of treatment. Radiation, excision, and systemic therapy were the next most frequently used treatments. Patient survival was not well documented within the literature. However, the median survival of patients in the reported cases was 6 months. Thus, our review suggested that a diagnosis of hand metastasis is an indication of poor prognosis.

This report serves to emphasize the importance of properly diagnosing acrometastases. Identifying and effectively treating these metastases in a timely manner can lead to a dramatic improvement in a patient’s quality of life.

After radiotherapy, do bone metastases from gastrointestinal cancers show response rates similar to those of bone metastases from other primary cancers?

PURPOSE

Reports investigating whether the response rates to palliative radiation therapy (RT) for painful bone metastases from gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are similar to rates for bone metastases from other primary cancer sites have been limited. The present study evaluated response rates for symptomatic bone metastases from gi cancers after palliative outpatient rt in the Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program (RRRP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified 69 patients with bone metastases from gi primaries who received palliative rt in the RRRP clinic during 1999-2006. We extracted records for 31 of these patients during 1999-2003 from an RRRP database that used the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS). Record for the remaining 38 patients during 2003-2006 were extracted from an RRRP database that used the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Eligibility criteria for encryption in the two RRRP databases and for collection of patient demographic information (age, sex, primary cancer site, and Karnofsky performance status) were identical. Response rates for this cohort of metastatic gi patients were then compared to rates for 479 patients receiving palliative RT for bone metastases from other primary cancer sites. Pain scores from the ESAS and BPI and data on analgesic consumption were collected at baseline and by telephone follow-up at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after RT for all patients. Complete (CR), partial (PR), and overall (CR+PR) responses were evaluated according to International Consensus Endpoints.

RESULTS

Assessment of the 69 patients with metastatic GI cancers revealed CR, PR, and CR+PR rates of 18%, 42%, and 61% at 4 weeks; 22%, 35%, and 57% at 8 weeks; and 50%, 21%, and 71% at 12 weeks for evaluable patients. The 479 evaluable patients with metastatic cancer from other primary cancer sites had CR, PR, and CR+PR rates of 25%, 27%, and 51% at 4 weeks; 26%, 22%, and 48% at 8 weeks; and 22%, 29%, and 51% at 12 weeks. No statistically significant differences were observed in RT response rates for bone metastases from GI cancers than from other primary cancer sites.

CONCLUSIONS

After palliative RT, bone metastases from gi cancers demonstrate response rates that are similar to rates for metastases from other primary cancer sites. Patients with symptomatic bone metastases from GI malignancies should be referred for palliative RT as readily as patients with osseous metastases from other primary cancer sites.

Chemotherapy and radiotherapy for inoperable advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer has a poor prognosis. The benefit of chemotherapy, radiotherapy or both as a palliative treatment of advanced or relapsed disease is uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy in the management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in people with inoperable advanced disease.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), which includes the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases (UGPD) Group Trials Register (The Cochrane Library 2005, Issue 1); CANCERLIT (1975-2002); MEDLINE (1966 to January 2005); and EMBASE (1980 to January 2005). We handsearched reference lists from trials revealed by electronic searches to identify further relevant trials. We searched published abstracts from relevant conference proceedings. We contacted colleagues and experts in the field, and asked them to provide details of outstanding clinical trials and any relevant unpublished materials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (single- or double-blind) in patients with advanced inoperable pancreatic cancer, in which one of the intervention types (chemotherapy or radiotherapy) was contrasted with either placebo or another type of intervention. Studies comparing non-chemotherapy agents such as biological agents, hormones, immunostimulants, vaccines and cytokines were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Studies were assessed for eligibility and quality. Data were extracted by groups of two independent reviewers, with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer. Study authors were contacted for more information.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifty trials (7043 participants) were included. Chemotherapy significantly reduced the one-year mortality (odds ratio (OR) 0.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25 to 0.57, P value < 0.00001) when compared to best supportive care. Also, chemoradiation improved one year survival (0% versus 58%, P value 0.001) when compared to best supportive care. There was no significant difference in one-year mortality for 5FU alone versus 5FU combinations (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.30); single-agent chemotherapy versus gemcitabine (OR 1.34, 95% CI 0.88 to 2.02, P value 0.17); or gemcitabine alone versus gemcitabine combinations (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.05). However, subgroup analysis showed that platinum-gemcitabine combinations reduced six-month mortality compared to gemcitabine alone (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.81, P value 0.001). A qualitative overview suggested that chemoradiation produced better survivals than either best supportive care or radiotherapy. Chemoradiation treatment was associated with more toxicity.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy appears to prolong survival in people with advanced pancreatic cancer and can confer clinical benefits and improve quality of life. Combination chemotherapy did not improve overall survival compared to single-agent chemotherapy. Gemcitabine is an acceptable control arm for future trials investigating scheduling and combinations with novel agents. There is insufficient evidence to recommend chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced inoperable pancreatic cancer as a superior alternative to chemotherapy alone.

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin followed by paclitaxel and carboplatin as first line therapy for patients with suboptimally debulked, advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. A phase II trial of sequential doublets. The GO-First Study

OBJECTIVES

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin are active in epithelial ovarian cancer with minimal overlapping toxicity. We studied the efficacy and toxicity of this combination in patients with advanced ovarian cancer when given prior to carboplatin and paclitaxel.

METHODS

Chemonaive patients with epithelial ovarian cancer and measurable disease were eligible for the study. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 8 every 21 days (GO) for 4 cycles. This was followed by carboplatin AUC = 6 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 on day 1 every 21 days (CP) for 4 cycles.

RESULTS

Twenty patients, median age 62 years (range 39-78), FIGO stages III (16) and IV (4) received treatment. The response rate (RR) after 4 cycles of GO was 80% (95%CI 61-99%) (4 complete responses (CR), 12 partial responses (PR)). Interval debulking surgery was performed in 7 patients (35%). After CP chemotherapy, RR increased to 85% (95%CI 68-100%) (CR = 13, PR = 4). Median time to progression was 14.5 months. Estimated median overall survival was 31.5 months. Toxicities of GO were mild; grade 3/4 nausea in 3 patients (15%) and vomiting in 2 patients (10%), grade 3/4 neutropenia in 5 patients (25%). Grade 2/3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 5 patients (25%). After sequential administration of CP, grade 2/3 neuropathy occurred in 13 patients (72%).

CONCLUSION

The sequential doublet regimen of GO followed by CP resulted in unacceptable neurotoxicity and is not recommended for further study; however, the doublet gemcitabine and oxaliplatin has significant activity in the first line treatment of patients with ovarian cancer.

A prospective evaluation of treatment with Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIR-spheres) in patients with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer previously treated with 5-FU based chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

To prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of Selective Internal Radiation (SIR) spheres in patients with inoperable liver metastases from colorectal cancer who have failed 5FU based chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients were prospectively enrolled at three Australian centres. All patients had previously received 5-FU based chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients were ECOG 0-2 and had liver dominant or liver only disease. Concurrent 5-FU was given at investigator discretion.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were treated between January 2002 and March 2004. As of July 2004 the median follow-up is 18.3 months. Median patient age was 61.7 years (range 36-77). Twenty-nine patients are evaluable for toxicity and response. There were 10 partial responses (33%), with the median duration of response being 8.3 months (range 2-18) and median time to progression of 5.3 mths. Response rates were lower (21%) and progression free survival shorter (3.9 mths) in patients that had received all standard chemotherapy options (n = 14). No responses were seen in patients with a poor performance status (n = 3) or extrahepatic disease (n = 6). Overall treatment related toxicity was acceptable, however significant late toxicity included 4 cases of gastric ulceration.

CONCLUSION

In patients with metastatic colorectal cancer that have previously received treatment with 5-FU based chemotherapy, treatment with SIR-spheres has demonstrated encouraging activity. Further studies are required to better define the subsets of patients most likely to respond.

Prospective study of treatment with selective internal radiation therapy spheres in patients with unresectable primary or secondary hepatic malignancies

AIM

To prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of Selective Internal Radiation (SIR) Spheres (Sirtex Medical, Sydney, NSW, Australia) in patients with unresectable primary or secondary hepatic malignancies.

METHODS

We report our experience of SIR sphere therapy at three Australian centres. Patients with previously untreated colorectal cancer (CRC) received concurrent 5FU, other patients with CRC received 5-FU at investigator discretion and all other patients received SIR spheres alone.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were enrolled between January 2002 and June 2003. The majority (32 patients) had metastatic colorectal cancer and five patients had hepatocellular carcinoma. The median age of patients was 64 years (range 46-78 years). Forty-three patients were evaluable for response. There were 12 partial responses, of which 10 were in patients with CRC. The median duration of response for all patients was 8.6 months (range 2-21 months). Overall treatment related toxicity was acceptable. Significant late toxicity included four cases of severe gastric ulceration, despite standard work-up and treatment by experienced interventional radiologists.

CONCLUSION

In this series of patients, treatment with SIR-spheres has demonstrated modest activity, mostly observed in patients with CRC. Toxicity was substantial in a small number of patients.

Use of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scans in patients with advanced germ cell tumour following chemotherapy: single-centre experience with long-term follow up*

AIMS

Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) may detect residual or recurrent malignancy in patients with germ cell tumours (GCT) following chemotherapy. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the use of FDG-PET in the setting of advanced GCT, and to determine the influence of FDG-PET on subsequent patient management.

METHODS

A computerized search of the patient database of the Department of Medical Oncology, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom, and a manual search of medical records, were conducted. All male patients with metastatic or extragonadal GCT treated with chemotherapy between July 1996 and June 1999 inclusive were identified. Data from patients that had a PET scan following chemotherapy were analysed. Reported PET scan findings were compared with subsequent clinical management and patient outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients with metastatic testicular GCT and three patients with extragonadal GCT were treated with chemotherapy. Of these, 15 patients (12 testicular; three extragonadal; 10 non-seminoma; and five seminoma) were investigated following chemo-therapy with at least one FDG-PET scan. Seven patients had two or more PET scans, and a total of 26 FDG-PET scans was performed. The most frequent indication for PET scan was evaluation of a residual mass (11 patients). Three patients had an FDG-PET to evaluate thymic prominence. Minimum follow up from first PET scan was 18 months. Three of 26 PET scans had false positive findings. Four PET scans yielded findings of equivocal significance with repeat PET scan recommended. Relapse of disease occurred in three patients; two of whom had normal previous PET scans and one had a previous equivocal result. PET had an impact on patient management in only one case where it 'prompted' surgical excision of a residual mass. Normal PET scans provided reassurance in patients with residual small masses but did not alter their subsequent -management.

CONCLUSIONS

A residual mass was the most common indication for PET. For the majority of patients PET did not have a discernible influence on clinical management. Oncologists should exercise caution in their interpretation of PET scan findings and guidelines for the appropriate use of PET in testicular cancer management need to be developed. Prospective trials are required to define the clinical role of PET in this setting.

A dose-escalating study of oral eniluracil/5-fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin in patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies

BACKGROUND

Oral eniluracil/5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was shown in early clinical studies to have promising activity against gastrointestinal malignancies. Oxaliplatin in combination with 5-FU also has activity against these tumour types. The primary objective of this study was to determine a tolerable dose for oral eniluracil/5-FU in combination with oxaliplatin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-three patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies were recruited into this open-label study. Patients received a fixed dose of oxaliplatin (130 mg/m(2) on the first day of a 21-day cycle), and the dose intensity of oral eniluracil/5-FU was gradually increased by escalating the number of days of treatment per course.

RESULTS

The maximum tolerated dose intensity was eniluracil/5-FU 10.0/1.0 mg/m(2) twice daily for 16 days in combination with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on the first day of a 21-day cycle. Dose-limiting toxicities included vomiting and diarrhoea. The objective tumour response rate was 26% with a median duration of response of 15.3 weeks (95% confidence interval 8.5-22.1). Twenty-two patients (96%) experienced neurotoxicity (sensory neuropathy or cold-related dysaesthesia), although only two events were severe (grade 3).

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended dose for future study in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer is 10.0/1.0 mg/m(2) oral eniluracil/5-FU twice daily for 14 days in combination with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on the first day of each treatment cycle.