A UNICANCER phase III trial of hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC): PRODIGE 7

LBA3503

Background: Promising results have been obtained during the last decade using cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus HIPEC for selected patients with colorectal PC who are amenable to complete macroscopic resection. This is the first trial to evaluate the specific role of HIPEC, after CRS, for the treatment of PC of colorectal origin. Methods: Prodige 7 is a randomized phase III, multicenter trial. Patients with histologically proven and isolated PC, peritoneal cancer index (PCI) ≤25 were eligible. Randomization (1:1) was stratified by center, complete macroscopic resection (R0/1 vs R2), and neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy. Patients were treated with CRS plus HIPEC with oxaliplatin or CRS alone, in association with systemic chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were relapse-free survival (RFS) and toxicity. 264 patients were required to show a gain in median OS from 30 to 48 months (HR = 0.625) with a two-sided α = 0,046 and 80% power. Results: 265 patients from 17 centers were included between February 2008 and January 2014: 132 in Arm without HIPEC and 133 in Arm with HIPEC. The median age was 60 years (range: 30-74). Baseline characteristics were well balanced. The overall post-operative mortality rate was 1.5% and was not different between the two arms. The morbidity rates did not differ statistically at 30 days. At 60 days, the grade 3-5 morbidity rate was significantly higher with HIPEC (24.1% vs. 13.6%, p= 0.030). After a median follow up of 63.8 months (95% CI: 58.9-69.8), the median OS was 41.2 months (95% CI 35.1-49.7) in the non-HIPEC Arm and 41.7 months (95% CI: 36.2-52.8) in the HIPEC Arm, HR = 1.00 (95% CI: 0.73-1.37) p = 0.995. The median RFS was 11.1 months (95% CI: 9-12.7) in non-HIPEC Arm and 13.1 months (95% CI: 12.1-15.7) in HIPEC Arm, HR = 0.90 (95% CI: 0.69-1.90) (p = 0.486), whilst the 1-year RFS rates were 46.1% in non-HIPEC Arm and 59 % in the HIPEC Arm. Conclusions: The therapeutic curative management of PC from colorectal cancer by CRS shows satisfactory survival results. While the addition of HIPEC with oxaliplatin does not influence the OS. Clinical trial information: NCT00769405.

Is there an oncological interest in the combination of CRS/HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis of HCC? Results of a multicenter international study

INTRODUCTION

Peritoneal metastasis (PM) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) without distant spread are rare. The related prognosis is poor without standard treatment available. The role of cytoreduction surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is poorly documented.

METHODS

An international multicentric cohort was constituted by retrospective analysis of 21 patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for PM of HCC between 1992 and 2016 from 10 reference centers of PSOGI. Data on clinical features, treatment strategies, and survival outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

The median time interval from the diagnosis of PM to the procedure was 4.5 months. The median peritoneal cancer index was 14. Sixteen patients had complete cytoreduction (CCR0-1). Ten patients had grades 3 to 4 complications. The median duration of follow-up was 52.2 months. The median OS was 46.7 months. The projected 3y-OS and 5y-OS were 88.9 and 49.4% respectively. The median OS for patients with CCR0-1 resection was not reached whereas it was 5.9 months for those with CCR2-3 resection after CRS (p = 0.0005). The median RFS was 26.3 months and projected RFS at 3 years of 36.5 months Three prognostic factors were associated with improved RFS in the univariate analysis: preoperative chemotherapy (p = 0.0156), PCI >15 (p = 0.009), Number of chemotherapy agents used for HIPEC (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

CRS/HIPEC is a safe and effective approach in selected patients with PM of HCC. CRS/HIPEC gives the patient a chance for a good relapse free and overall survival and should be considered as an option.

Cytoreductive Surgery Plus Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Metastases From a Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: Multi-Institutional Experience

BACKGROUND

The multi-institutional registry in this study evaluated the outcome after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) from small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA).

METHODS

A multi-institutional data registry including 152 patients with PM from SBA was established. The primary end point was overall survival (OS) after CRS plus HIPEC.

RESULTS

Between 1989 and 2016, 152 patients from 21 institutions received a treatment of CRS plus HIPEC. The median follow-up period was 20 months (range 1-100 months). Of the 152 patients, 70 (46.1%) were women with a median age of 54 years. The median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 10 (mean 12; range 1-33). Completeness of cytoreduction (CCR) 0 or 1 was achieved for 134 patients (88.2%). After CRS and HIPEC, the median OS was 32 months (range 1-100 months), with survival rates of 83.2% at 1 year, 46.4% at 3 years, and 30.8% at 5 years. The median disease-free survival after CCR 0/1 was 14 months (range 1-100 months). The treatment-related mortality rate was 2%, and 29 patients (19.1%) experienced grades 3 or 4 operative complications. The period between detection of PM and CRS plus HIPEC was 6 months or less (P = 0.008), and multivariate analysis identified absence of lymph node metastasis (P = 0.037), well-differentiated tumor (P = 0.028), and PCI of 15 or lower (P = 0.003) as independently associated with improved OS.

CONCLUSION

The combined treatment strategy of CRS plus HIPEC achieved prolonged survival for selected patients who had PM from SBA with acceptable morbidity and mortality.

Peritoneal Carcinomatosis of Rare Ovarian Origin Treated by Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: A Multi-Institutional Cohort from PSOGI and BIG-RENAPE

PURPOSE

Ovarian cancer is the most common deadly cancer of gynecologic origin. Patients often are diagnosed at advanced stage with peritoneal metastasis. There are many rare histologies of ovarian cancer; some have outcomes worse than serous ovarian cancer. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can be considered for patients with recurrence. This study was designed to assess the impact of CRS and HIPEC on survival of patient with peritoneal metastasis from rare ovarian malignancy.

METHODS

A prospective, multicentric, international database was retrospectively searched to identify all patients with rare ovarian tumor (mucinous, clear cells, endometrioid, small cell hypercalcemic, and other) and peritoneal metastasis who underwent CRS and HIPEC through the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) and BIG-RENAPE working group. The postoperative complications, long-term results, and principal prognostic factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

The analysis included 210 patients with a median follow-up of 43.5 months. Median overall survival (OS) was 69.3 months, and the 5-year OS was 57.7%. For mucinous tumors, median OS and DFS were not reached at 5 years. For granulosa tumors, median overall survival was not reached at 5 years, and median DFS was 34.6 months. Teratoma or germinal tumor showed median overall survival and DFS that were not reached at 5 years. Differences in OS were not statistically significant between histologies (p = 0.383), whereas differences in DFS were (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

CRS and HIPEC may increases long-term survival in selected patients with peritoneal metastasis from rare ovarian tumors especially in mucinous, granulosa, or teratoma histological subtypes.

Multicentre study of laparoscopic or open assessment of the peritoneal cancer index (BIG-RENAPE)

Background

The peritoneal cancer index (PCI) is a comparative prognostic factor for colorectal peritoneal metastasis (CRPM). The ability of laparoscopy to determine the PCI in consideration of cytoreductive surgery remains undetermined, and this study was designed to compare it with laparotomy.

Methods

A prospective multicentre study was conducted for patients with no known CRPM, but at risk of peritoneal disease. Surgery began with laparoscopic exploration followed by open exploration to determine the PCI. Concordance between laparoscopic and open assessment was evaluated for the diagnosis of CRPM and for the PCI.

Results

Among 50 patients evaluated, CRPM recurrence was found in 29 (58 per cent) and 34 (68 per cent) at laparoscopic and open surgery respectively. Laparoscopy was feasible in 88 per cent (44 of 50) and deemed satisfactory by the surgeon in 52 per cent (26 of 50). Among the 25 evaluable patients with satisfactory laparoscopy, there was concordance of 96 per cent (24 of 25 patients) and 38 per cent (10 of 25) for laparoscopic and open assessment of CRPM and the PCI respectively. Where there were discrepancies, it was laparoscopy that underestimated the PCI.

Conclusion

Laparoscopy may underestimate the extent of CRPM.

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for pseudomyxoma peritonei of appendicular and extra-appendicular origin

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of the primary neoplasm responsible for pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) remains poorly studied. The aim of this study was to determine the prognosis for patients with extra-appendicular PMP (EA-PMP) treated optimally with complete cytoreductive surgery (CCRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).

METHODS

All patients treated for PMP with CCRS and HIPEC between 1994 and 2016 were selected retrospectively from a French multicentre database. Patients with EA-PMP had pathologically confirmed non-neoplastic appendices and were matched in a 1 : 4 ratio with patients treated for appendicular PMP (A-PMP), based on a propensity score.

RESULTS

Some 726 patients were identified, of which 61 (EA-PMP group) were matched with 244 patients (A-PMP group). The origins of primary tumours in the EA-PMP group included the ovary (45 patients), colon (4), urachus (4), small bowel (1), pancreas (1) and unknown (6). The median peritoneal carcinomatosis index was comparable in EA-PMP and A-PMP groups (15·5 versus 18 respectively; P = 0·315). In-hospital mortality (3 versus 2·9 per cent; P = 1·000) and major morbidity 26 versus 25·0 per cent; P = 0·869) were also similar between the two groups. Median follow-up was 66·9 months. The 5-year overall survival rate was 87·8 (95 per cent c.i. 83·2 to 92·5) per cent in the A-PMP group and 87 (77 to 96) per cent in the EA-PMP group. The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 66·0 (58·7 to 73·4) per cent and 70 (53 to 83) per cent respectively.

CONCLUSION

Overall and disease-free survival following treatment with CCRS and HIPEC is similar in patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei of appendicular or extra-appendicular origin.

[Portal vein embolization: Present and future]

Portal vein embolization consists of occluding a part of the portal venous system in order to achieve the hypertrophy of the non-embolized liver segments. This technique is used during the preoperative period of major liver resection when the future remnant liver (FRL) volume is insufficient, exposing to postoperative liver failure, main cause of death after major hepatectomy. Portal vein embolization indication depends on the FRL, commonly assessed by its volume. Nowadays, FRL function evaluation seems more relevant and can be measured by 99mTc labelled mebrofenin scintigraphy. Portal vein embolization procedure is mostly performed with percutaneous trans-hepatic access by using ultrasonography guidance and consists of embolic agent injection, such as cyanoacrylate, in the targeted portal vein branches with fluoroscopic guidance. It is a safe and well-tolerated technique, with extremely low morbi-mortality. Portal vein embolization leads to sufficient FRL hypertrophy in about 80% of patients, allowing them to undergo surgery from which they were initially rejected. The two main reasons of non-resection are tumor progression (≈15% of cases) and FRL insufficient hypertrophy (≈5% of cases). When portal vein embolization is not enough to obtain adequate FRL regeneration, hepatic vein embolization may potentiate its effect (liver venous deprivation technique).

Preoperative intraperitoneal oxaliplatin for unresectable peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin: a pilot study

Background

Peritoneal carcinomatosis in colorectal cancer is an advanced stage of the disease where improved survival can be attained whenever the resection associated with hyperthermic intreperitoneal chemotherapy is possible. In unresectable cases, systemic chemotherapy is administered to obtain conversion to resectability but results have not yet been clearly evaluated. Local chemotherapy in this setting has been proven useful in several similar situations. The aim of the present pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility of pre-operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy with oxaliplatin in these patients.

Methods

Six patients with unresectable peritoneal disease of colorectal origin were included in the study. An intraperitoneal implantable chamber catheter was inserted during the laparotomy that evaluated the extent of the peritoneal disease (peritoneal carcinomatosis index 25 to 39). Patients then underwent intraperitoneal chemotherapy with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² in combination with systemic chemotherapy (FOLFIRI or simplified LV5FU) and a targeted therapy every 2 weeks.

Results

Two catheter perfusion incidents were reported due to the abdominal wall thickness. Two patients completed the four intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy cycles without major toxicity. One patient developed grade 3 or 4 diarrhea requiring a short intensive care unit (ICU) stay, though it is not clear whether the event was induced by intravenous irinotecan, IP oxaliplatin or the combination of both. Grade 3 fatigue and abdominal pain were also recorded. For one patient with aggressive disease, best supportive care was initiated after the first course of chemotherapy.

Conclusions

Our study is the first to assess intraperitoneal oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in the preoperative setting for patients with unresectable peritoneal metastases. The tolerance was acceptable for 85 mg/m² IP oxaliplatin combined with systemic therapy in these patients. Our results justify carrying on with a phase I/II trial to determine the recommended dose of oxaliplatin in this clinical context and its efficacy.

Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis in the Elderly: A Case-Controlled, Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to identify factors associated with morbidity and mortality in patients older than 70 years who underwent cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC).

BACKGROUND

Major surgery is associated with higher morbidity and mortality in elderly patients. For PC, CRS and HIPEC is the only current potential curative therapy, but the risks inherent to this patient population have called its benefits into question.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a multi-center database from 1989 to 2015. All patients who underwent CRS and HIPEC for PC were selected and patients older than 70 years were matched 1:4 with a younger cohort according to cancer origin, peritoneal cancer index (PCI), and completeness of cytoreduction. Major morbidity and mortality were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 2328 patients, 188 patients older than aged 70 years were matched with 704 younger patients. Patients older than aged 70 years demonstrated a higher American Society of Anesthesiologist score (≥ASA III 10.8 vs. 6.6 %, p = 0.008). There was no difference in overall 90-day morbidity (≥70: 45.7 % vs. <70: 44.5 %; p = 0.171); however, patients older than 70 years had significantly more cardiovascular complications (13.8 vs. 9.2 %, p = 0.044). Differences between the older and younger cohorts failed to reach significance for 90-day mortality (5.4 and 2.7 %, respectively; p = 0.052), and failure-to-rescue (11.6 and 6.1 %, respectively; p = 0.078). In multivariate analysis, PCI > 7 (95 % CI 1.051-5.798, p = 0.038) and HIPEC duration (95 % CI 1.106-6.235, p = 0.028) were independent factors associated with morbidity in elderly patients.

CONCLUSIONS

CRS and HIPEC appear feasible for selected patients older than aged 70 years, albeit with a higher risk of medical complications associated with increased mortality.

Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: Evaluation of systemic chemotherapy with comprehensive treatment through the RENAPE Database: Multi-Institutional Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) is a severe disease with mainly locoregional evolution. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is the reported treatment with the longest survival. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of perioperative systemic chemotherapy strategies on survival and postoperative outcomes in patients with DMPM treated with curative intent with CRS-HIPEC, using a multi-institutional database: the French RENAPE network.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1991 to 2014, 126 DMPM patients underwent CRS-HIPEC at 20 tertiary centres. The population was divided into four groups according to perioperative treatment: only neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NA), only adjuvant chemotherapy (ADJ), perioperative chemotherapy (PO) and no chemotherapy before or after CRS-HIPEC (NoC).

RESULTS

All groups (NA: n = 42; ADJ: n = 16; PO: n = 16; NoC: n = 48) were comparable regarding clinicopathological data and main DMPM prognostic factors. After a median follow-up of 61 months, the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 40%, 67%, 62% and 56% in NA, ADJ, PO and NoC groups, respectively (P = 0.049). Major complications occurred for 41%, 45%, 35% and 41% of patients from NA, ADJ, PO and NoC groups, respectively (P = 0.299). In multivariate analysis, NA was independently associated with worse OS (hazard ratio, 2.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-4.94; P = 0.033).

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study suggests that adjuvant chemotherapy may delay recurrence and improve survival and that NA may impact negatively the survival for patients with DMPM who underwent CRS-HIPEC with curative intent. Upfront CRS and HIPEC should be considered when achievable, waiting for stronger level of scientific evidence.

[Combining clinical pathway and patient education approaches]

The integration of the therapeutic education of the patient into a clinical pathway approach helps to optimise nursing practice. Despite some limits, this method allows the position of the caregiver to evolve, going beyond the required methodological framework. It results in the emergence of several new educational facets which are essential for the patient and enable them to become a player in their own care.

Two-stage hepatectomy for colorectal metastases: Association of a good pathologic response to intensified preoperative chemotherapy with second stage completion and longer survival

666

Background: The two-stage surgical resection (TSR) of bilobar colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is widely used and has shown encouraging survival results. The risk of drop-out after the first-stage hepatectomy remains high and associated with poor survival rates. Our objective was to evaluate the predictive factors of long-term survival, based on the pathologic response to an intensified systemic chemotherapy administered preoperatively. Methods: Data from 899 patients treated for CRLM in our institution were collected prospectively between January 2003 and August 2013. We evaluated the pathologic response to preoperative chemotherapy, and its impact on the second-stage completion and on survival. Results: Sixty-seven patients were eligible for the TSR first stage. All patients underwent an intensified chemotherapy in combination with a biotherapy (Bevacizumab or Cetuximab) in 38cases. The Tumour Regression Grade (TRG), the Blazer grade, and the modified-TRG were used to classify patients as responders (TRG and mTRG 1-3, Blazer 0-1) or non-responders (TRG and mTRG 4-5, Blazer 2) after the first stage. Responders in the three classifications (TRG: p = 0.033; mTRG: p = 0.03, Blazer:p = 0.005), and initial metastases number (p = 0.001) were independent predictive factors for the second-stage completion. Triple chemotherapy were associated with responders in the three classifications (TRG and mTRG: 73.7% versus 26.3% p < 0.0001 ; Blazer : 84.2% versus 15.8% p = 0.001). Median overall survival (OS) of patients who completed TSR was significantly different (44, 84 versus18,39 months; p < 0.0001). There was no statistical difference in OS and recurrence-free survival between the responders and non-responders. Conclusions: A good pathologic response to intensified preoperative chemotherapy is associated with completion of the second stage of TSR, and thus with a longer survival. Knowing this response before the first-stage resection may allow avoiding useless resections for patients who will not benefit from this strategy.

Feasibility and impact on resectability of FOLFIRINOX in locally-advanced and borderline pancreatic cancer

318

Background: Pancreatic cancer (PC) has a poor prognostic. Only patients who undergo a complete R0 surgery have longer survival rates. Treatment of locally-advanced (LA) and borderline (BL) PC is controversial. Folfirinox is considered as a standard first-line treatment in metastatic patients. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of Folfirinox in LA and BL PC. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively-collected data from LA and BL PC patients treated with original Folfirinox in our institution between January 2010 and February 2015. Results: 35 patients were enrolled, 20(57.1%) pancreatic head adenocarcinoma, 19(54.3%) LA and 16(45.7%) BL PC, 54.3% male, median age 60 years old [44-74]. OMS was 0, 1, 2 for 21(61.8%), 11(32.4%), 2(5.9%) patients. Median CA19.9 level was 5N [1-33]. All patients had Folfirinox in first-line followed by radiochemotherapy (RTCT) in 23(65.7%) patients, with Gemzar and Xeloda in 21 and 2 patients. Median number of chemotherapy cycles was 4 [1-13]. The grade 3-4 toxicity rate was 17.1% (n = 6), mainly digestive (67%), hematologic (16.7%), none neurologic. There was no toxic death. 17(46%) patients underwent surgery, 7 LA and 10 BL, with a R0 resection in 13 patients, mainly 8 PT3 (57.1%), no PT0, and 14N+. The morbidity rate was 40%, including 3 fistulae and 2 hemorrhages. Median overall survival was 24 months (95%CI:14-44), 53 (95%CI:26-.) and 12 months (95%CI: 9-19) in surgery versus no-surgery patients (p< 0.001). Progression-free survival was 13.9 months (95%CI:11.2-17.1), 16.2 (95%CI:13.7-25.3) and 9.5 (95%CI:7.4-15.9) months in surgery versus no-surgery patients. 13 patients were still alive at the time of analysis, with a median follow-up of 44 months (95%CI:7-53). 30 patients had disease progression, locally, distant or both in 7(24.1%), 20(69.0%) and 3(13.1%) patients. Weight loss, OMS status, abdominal pain and CA199 level at diagnosis were not correlated with better survival. Conclusions: Folfirinox, followed or not by RTCT, as inductive treatment for LA and BL PC is feasible with acceptable toxicity, and allowed resectability in 37.1% patients, and thus a longer survival. Further studies are needed to confirm these encouraging results.

Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for First Relapse of Ovarian Cancer

BACKGROUND

To assess impact of surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients treated for a first relapse of ovarian cancer (FROC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with a FROC treated with second-line chemotherapy, surgery and HIPEC were retrospectively included from 13 Institutions. Studied parameters were interval free between the end of initial treatment and the first relapse, second-line chemotherapy, peritoneal cancer index and completeness of surgery, HIPEC, mortality and morbidity, pathological results and survival.

RESULTS

From 2001 to 2010, 314 patients were included. The main strategy was secondary chemotherapy followed by surgery and HIPEC (269/314-85.6%). Mortality and morbidity rates were respectively 1% and 30.9%. Median follow-up was 50 months, 5-year overall survival was 38.0%, with no difference between platinum-sensitive or -resistant patients and 5-year disease-free survival was 14%.

CONCLUSION

HIPEC allows encouraging survival in the treatment of FROC, better in case of complete surgery, with acceptable mortality and morbidity rates.

Professional risks when carrying out cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal malignancy with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): A French multicentric survey

BACKGROUND

Over the last two decades, many surgical teams have developed programs to treat peritoneal carcinomatosis with extensive cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Currently, there are no specific recommendations for HIPEC procedures concerning environmental contamination risk management, personal protective equipment (PPE), or occupational health supervision.

METHODS

A survey of the institutional practices among all French teams currently performing HIPEC procedures was carried out via the French network for the treatment of rare peritoneal malignancies (RENAPE).

RESULTS

Thirty three surgical teams responded, 14 (42.4%) which reported more than 10 years of HIPEC experience. Some practices were widespread, such as using HIPEC machine approved by the European Community (100%), individualized or centralized smoke evacuation (81.8%), "open" abdominal coverage during perfusion (75.8%), and maintaining the same surgeon throughout the procedure (69.7%). Others were more heterogeneous, including laminar flow air circulation (54.5%) and the provision of safety protocols in the event of perfusate spills (51.5%). The use of specialized personal protective equipment is ubiquitous (93.9%) but widely variable between programs.

CONCLUSION

Protocols regarding cytoreductive surgery/HIPEC and the associated professional risks in France lack standardization and should be established.

Prolonged survival after two-stage resection of advanced colorectal liver metastases: Impact of an intensified chemotherapy

748

Background: Patients with advanced colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) experience poor prognosis. The impact of two-stage resection (TSR) after downstaging by chemotherapy is still controversial. Methods: Data on 899 patients with CRLM in a single institution during a 9-year period (2004–2013) were prospectively collected. We used intent-to-treat analysis to evaluate the survival of patients who underwent TSR associated with intensified chemotherapy before and between the two surgical stages. Results: 73 patients were eligible for the first stage of TSR. In this population, 54 patients underwent an intensified chemotherapy based on FOLFIRINOX (26 patients) or a standard chemotherapy associated with cetuximab or bevacizumab (28 patients). The first surgical stage was a clearance of the left liver in 56% of cases. An average of two radio-frequency ablations and two wedge resections were necessary. The post-operative morbidity of the first stage was 18%. 78% of patients received chemotherapy between the two stages. The average interval between two stages was 228 days (36-1561). 68% of TSR patients completed the second stage. The second resection was mainly a standard right lobectomy (32%). Morbidity after the second resection was 12%. One patient died post-operatively because of post operative liver failure. Median overall survival of patients who completed TSR was 48 months. In contrast, there was no survival advantage for patients who underwent only the first stage because of progression (median overall survival: 19 months) (p = 0.0003). The median overall survival of the whole population was 43 months and the median recurrence-free survival was 15 months. Conclusions: Intensified chemotherapy in association with TSR allows excellent outcome in patients with advanced CRLM. Chemotherapy delivered between the two surgical stages is responsible for an important waiting time but could contribute to a better control of the evolution of the disease.

Triplet chemotherapy (TC) with FOLFIRINOX regimen in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Experience of two French centres

776

Background: TC is a treatment option for mCRC to improve the tumour response rate in selected patients (pts) and the conversion rate of initially nonresectable liver metastases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact and feasibility of FOLFIRINOX regimen in mCRC pts. Methods: We selected all mCRC pts from the ICM and CLB French centres with unresectable disease treated from October 2000 to May 2012 with FOLFIRINOX alone or combined with bevacizumab or cetuximab. Clinical data were collected in a mCRC-specific data base and analysed. Results: 159 pts (52% of men), median age 58 yrs (range: 24-76) were treated with FOLFIRINOX (D1 oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² IV over 2H, then irinotecan 180 mg/m² IV over 90 min and elvorin 200 mg/m², then 5-fluorouracile 200 mg/m² and 2,400 mg/m² IV over 46H, D1=D15) alone (68%) or combined with cetuximab (24%) or bevacizumab (8%) as first–line treatment (88%). Primary tumour was located in colon (77%) or rectum (23%), and 134 pts (84%) presented with synchronous metastases: liver (96%), lung (46%), peritoneum (11%) and nodes (20%). Median number of courses was 8 (range: 1-26). There was 1 toxic death. Grade 3-4 toxicities were as follows: diarrhoea (23%), neuropathy (24%), cutaneous (9%), neutropenia (21%), febrile neutropenia (1%), thrombopenia (4%). Objective response rate according to RECIST V1.0 was 72% [95% CI: 65-79] including 12 pts with complete response. The primary tumour was resected in 127 pts (79%) and 19% had KRAS mutated tumour. Among the 105 pts (66%) with initially non-resectable liver-limited disease (LLD), 59 pts (56%) were eligible for secondary resection and a R0 resection rate was achieved for 44 pts. Median overall survival was 49 months [95% CI: 37-62] and 72 months [95% CI: 48-84] in resected LLD population. Conclusions: These results confirm the feasibility of FOLFIRINOX regimen with or without targeted therapies and its efficacy in LLD selected mCRC population.

Surgical resectability after neo-adjuvant FOLFIRINOX for borderline or locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

421

Background: FOLFIRINOX has already demonstrated its efficiency in metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC). This combination need to be assessed in a neoadjuvant situation for locally advanced non metastatic PC. Methods: From 2009 to 2013, 31 patients with borderline or locally advanced PC received a neoadjuvant treatment with FOLFIRINOX so as to get them to a resectable situation. According to the tumoral response, chemoradiotherapy with gemcitabine was done. The primary analysis endpoint was the resecability rate. Pathologic response, chemotherapy’s toxicity and surgical morbidity were also evaluated. Results: Among the 31 PC, 17 were borderline resectable and 14 locally advanced according to NCCN classification. 16 (52%) received complete chemotherapy with a median of 4 cycles. Toxicity lead to treatment modification or interruption for 9 patients (29%). Grade 3-4 toxicity occurred in 7 patients (24%). 22 patients (71%) underwent chemoradiotherapy after FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy. 13 patients (42%) had disease progression under treatment whereas 18 patients with objective radiologic response or at least stable disease were surgically explored with a resection completed in 13 cases (42%). Surgical morbidity was controlled with grade 1-2 complications for 9 patients (69%) and no mortality. 11 patients (35%) demonstrated a significant pathologic response. Resected patients had a global survival median of 36 months. Conclusions: FOLFIRINOX in a neoadjuvant setting seems feasible with limited morbidity in locally advanced PC with encouraging resecability and pathologic response rates. Resected patients’ survival is promising but need to be confirmed in larger series.