Cost-utility analysis of centrally inserted totally implanted access port (PORT) vs. peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) in the oncology chemotherapy

Background

Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) and centrally inserted totally implanted access port (PORT) are two types of intravenous infusion devices that are widely used in clinical practice. PORTs are more expensive to insert than PICCs but have fewer complications. Two cost-utility analyses of PICCs and PORTs in China have been published, but had conflicting findings. This study aimed to compare the cost-utility of PICCs and PORTs.

Methods

We conducted a prospective observational trial including 404 patients with cancer and a cross-sectional study to calculate cost and complications of a PICC and PORT. Utility was measured using the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). A cost-utility analysis was performed from a healthcare system perspective in China.

Results

The average total cost of PICCs and PORTs were ¥ 4,091.7 and ¥ 4,566.8, which yielded 0.46 and 0.475 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) in a 6-month dwell time, respectively. The incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) was ¥ 31,670.9 per QALY. A one-way sensitivity analysis showed that the base-case results were robust, and the probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of ¥ 80,976 per QALY (China's per capita GDP in 2021) the probability of a PORT being cost-effective was 96%.

Conclusion

PORTs were more cost-effective than PICCs for a 6 and 12-month dwell time. The total cost for a PORT was also less than that of a PICC. PORT is therefore recommended as a medium to long-term intravenous delivery device in clinical practice.

Dexmedetomidine inhibits cerebral nerve cell apoptosis after cerebral hemorrhage in rats via the Nrf2/HO-1/NQO1 signaling pathway

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of dexmedetomidine on the apoptosis of cerebral nerve cells after cerebral hemorrhage (CH) in rats and its molecular mechanism.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The rat model of CH was established by autologous blood injection. A total of 60 specific pathogen-free (SPF)-grade rats were randomly divided into sham-operation group, model group and dexmedetomidine group, and each group involved 20 rats. Rat brain water content was compared among the three groups. Besides, rat neurological function of the three groups was evaluated at 3, 5 and 7 d after operation by neurological function scoring. Western blotting assay was adopted to detect protein levels of apoptosis-related genes [B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) and Bcl-2-associated X protein (Bax)] in rat brain tissues in the three groups. Moreover, the apoptosis level in the brain tissues in the groups was measured through terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay. Biochemical tests were conducted to determine activities of reduced glutathione (GSH), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and malondialdehyde (MDA) in the brain tissues among the three groups. Furthermore, the activation of the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2)/heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1)/NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) signaling pathway in the brain tissues of the three groups of rats was examined via Western blotting assay. An in vitro oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD) model was prepared using SH-SY5Y cells. In addition, Nrf2 was intervened in SH-SY5Y cells by small hairpin ribonucleic acid (shRNA) transfection. Finally, flow cytometry and Annexin V/PI assay were performed to detect the response of cells to dexmedetomidine in OGD + dexmedetomidine + sh-Nrf2 group.

RESULTS

The brain water content and the neurological function score at 3, 5 and 7 d after operation were remarkably reduced in dexmedetomidine group compared with those in model group. The results of Western blotting and TUNEL assays indicated that dexmedetomidine group had a notably lowered apoptosis level in the brain tissues. Additionally, the biochemical test results manifested that activities of GSH and SOD were enhanced and that of MDA decreased in the brain tissues of dexmedetomidine group. Protein levels of Nrf2, HO-1 and NQO1 in the brain tissues were distinctly higher in dexmedetomidine group than those in model group. According to the results of flow cytometry, the apoptosis rate in OGD + dexmedetomidine + sh-Nrf2 group rose prominently compared with that in OGD + dexmedetomidine group.

CONCLUSIONS

Dexmedetomidine inhibits the nerve cell apoptosis in rat brain tissues by activating the Nrf2/HO-1/NQO1 signaling pathway in rat CH models.

A phase I dose-escalation and expansion study of HBM4003, an anti-CTLA-4 heavy chain only monoclonal antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors

2641

Background: HBM4003 is a fully human heavy chain only monoclonal antibody (HCAb) to CTLA-4, which has been engineered to deplete Treg cells by enhanced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) activity. In the Phase 1 dose escalation part, HBM4003 showed favorable safety and efficacy profile in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Here, we present the updated data from the dose escalation part and most recent safety and clinical activity data from three expansion cohorts of pts with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), melanoma, and renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Methods: In the dose-escalation part, pts were enrolled into 3 dose levels (DL): 0.3mg/kg QW (28-day cycle), 0.45mg/kg Q3W (21-day cycle), and 0.6mg/kg Q3W (21-day cycle). In the dose-expansion part, pts with advanced HCC, melanoma, and RCC received 0.45 mg/kg Q3W (21-day cycle). Tumor measurements were performed every 6 weeks for up to 12 months and subsequently every 12 weeks per RECIST v1.1. Results: In total 60 pts were included for this analysis, including 24 pts with advanced solid tumors in the dose escalation part and 36 pts in the dose expansion part: 18 pts with HCC, 4 pts with melanoma, and 14 pts with RCC, from 12 sites in mainland China, 5 sites in Australia, and 1 site in Hong Kong. 46 pts (77%) received ≥ 2 lines of previous systemic therapies and 37 pts (62%) received previous PD-1/PD-L1 treatment. For the HCC cohort, 19 pts were treated in dose-escalation (1 pt, 0.45 mg/kg Q3W) and dose-expansion parts. All 19 pts received previous PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. 12 pts were evaluable for efficacy. Two had stable disease (SD), 2 pts had partial response (PR) as best response. For 12 evaluable pts, ORR was 16.7% and disease control rate (DCR) was 33.3%. For the RCC cohort, 19 pts were treated in dose-escalation and dose-expansion parts; 18 pts were evaluable for efficacy. Eight had SD as best response; the DCR was 44.4%. Overall, the most common treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) (incidence ≥ 10%) of all grades was rash (16 [26.7%] pts). At the 0.45 mg/kg Q3W DL, the most common TRAE of all grades was hepatic function abnormalities (12 [27.9%] pts) and rash (12 [27.9%] pts). 30 (69.8%) pts reported Gr 1 or 2 TRAEs. Gr ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 4 (9.3%) pts. 1 pt reported Gr 4 TRAE: blood creatine phosphokinase increased. No Gr 5 TRAE was reported. TRAE leading to discontinuation occurred in 4 pts. In mouse model, only tumor infiltrating lymphocytes Treg was depleted upon HBM4003 treatment while no Treg change in blood and spleen. In pts, Treg depletion was observed only in tumor tissue on day 21 post dosing. Overall, HBM4003 demonstrated dose proportional pharmacokinetics and low immunogenicity. Conclusions: HBM4003 showed a favorable safety profile, promising antitumor activity and intratumoral Treg depletion in pts with advanced solid tumors at the 0.45 mg/kg Q3W DL. Clinical trial information: NCT04135261.

Ramucirumab as second-line treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) following first line sorafenib: Pooled efficacy and safety in Chinese patients across two global randomized phase 3 studies (REACH-2 and REACH)

e16081

Background: REACH-2 and REACH were two global, randomized, double-blind, placebo (PL)-controlled phase 3 studies of Ramucirumab (RAM) versus PL in patients with HCC after prior sorafenib. REACH-2 confirmed the RAM treatment benefit for patients with baseline AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL, consistent with results in a prespecified subgroup of patients in REACH with AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL. A pooled analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RAM in Chinese patients (including patients from mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan) from REACH-2 and REACH with baseline AFP ≥400 ng/mL. Methods: Except for AFP level requirement, REACH-2 and REACH were similar in study design and included patients who had advanced HCC (BCLC stage C or B disease refractory or not amenable to locoregional therapy), Child-Pugh A, ECOG PS 0-1, and prior sorafenib. Patients were randomized to RAM (8 mg/kg) I.V. or PL Q2W, plus best supportive care, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Individual patient data were pooled from REACH-2 and REACH (AFP ≥400 mg/mL). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety were reported. Efficacy analyses were stratified by study to account for any potential difference in the two studies. Results: Data from 155 Chinese patients were pooled from REACH (51) and REACH-2 (104) (N = 98 RAM vs N = 57 PL). Baseline characteristics were generally balanced between arms in pooled data set; however, lower median level of AFP was noted in the RAM arm. In the pooled population, RAM treatment numerically improved OS over PL (median OS 7.1 months vs 4.7 months; HR = 0.735 [95% CI: 0.512, 1.055]). Improvements in PFS (median PFS 2.6 months vs 1.5 months; HR = 0.666 [95% CI: 0.459, 0.967]), ORR (3.1% vs 0%), and DCR (44.9% vs 29.8%) were also observed. Hypertension (6.1% vs 1.8%), pneumonia (5.1% vs 1.8%), and hyponatremia (5.1% vs 1.8%) were the Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) among ≥ 5% patients that was more frequently observed in the RAM arm compared with the PL arm. Conclusions: Pooled analysis of two phase 3 trials of RAM as second-line treatment in patients with HCC following sorafenib demonstrated a clinically meaningful benefit with a manageable safety profile in Chinese HCC patients with baseline AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL. Treatment benefits in OS observed in the pooled Chinese population were consistent with the entire population from REACH/REACH-2 (AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL). Clinical trial information: NCT01140347, NCT02435433.

Clinical outcomes associated with tislelizumab in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who have been previously treated with sorafenib (SOR) or lenvatinib (LEN) in RATIONALE-208

4072

Background: Tislelizumab, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, demonstrated clinical activity and was well tolerated in pts with previously treated advanced HCC in the Phase 2 RATIONALE-208 study (NCT03419897). At the time of this study, SOR and LEN were recommended first-line treatments for pts with advanced HCC and continue to have an important role in the first-line treatment of HCC despite the recent approval of new immuno-oncology-based combinations (atezolizumab and bevacizumab) in some regions. We report the clinical outcomes of pts with advanced HCC who were previously treated with SOR/LEN. Methods: Pts who had received ≥ 1 prior line of systemic therapy for advanced HCC received tislelizumab 200 mg intravenously once every three weeks. Objective response rate (ORR) by independent review committee (IRC) (ORRIRC), duration of response by IRC (DORIRC), progression-free survival by IRC (PFSIRC), overall survival (OS), and safety were evaluated in pts who had been previously treated with SOR/LEN. Results: As of February 2020, 249 pts were enrolled and 235 pts had received prior treatment with SOR/LEN, of whom 126 and 109 pts had received 1 or ≥ 2 prior lines of systemic therapy, respectively. At study entry, 211 (89.8%) pts had BCLC stage C and 187 (79.6%) pts had extrahepatic spread. Median follow-up duration for pts previously treated with SOR/LEN was 12.5 months and ORRIRC was 13.6% (95% CI: 9.5, 18.7), including 2 complete responses and 30 partial responses. Median DORIRC was not reached. Median PFSIRC and OS of pts previously treated with SOR/LEN was 2.7 months (95% CI: 1.6, 2.8) and 13.5 months (95% CI: 10.9, 15.8), respectively. Tislelizumab was generally well tolerated in pts previously treated with SOR/LEN (Table), and the most common treatment-emergent adverse events were increased aspartate aminotransferase (n=70; 28.1%) and alanine aminotransferase (n=52; 20.9%). Conclusions: Tislelizumab was investigated beyond the first-line setting, as effective second- and third-line treatment options are limited for pts with advanced HCC and there is an unmet medical need. This analysis indicates that tislelizumab is clinically active and well tolerated in pts with advanced HCC who have received prior systemic treatment with SOR/LEN. Clinical trial information: NCT03419897. [Table: see text]

Safety and Feasibility of Microwave Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinomas in the Elderly: A Systematic Review

Background

Microwave ablation (MWA) for hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) in the elderly has been the subject of new research in recent years. However, there are currently no strong lines of evidence for the prognosis following MWA treatment for HCC in the elderly. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to assess the safety and feasibility of MWA for HCC in elderly patients.

Methods

Up until August 15, 2021, a comprehensive literature search was undertaken in PubMed, Scopus, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and Google Scholar databases for all published articles. Observational studies reporting the safety and feasibility of MWA for HCC in elderly patients were included. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to measure the quality assessment.

Results

Our review, composed of 7 observational studies, including a total of 7,683 HCC patients, looked at the safety and feasibility of MWA for HCC in the elderly. Current lines of evidence on the risks and outcomes of MWA of HCC treatments in elderly patients are discussed.

Conclusions

According to our findings, elderly patients, even those with a high comorbidity index, benefited from MWA of HCC similar to younger patients. More clinical data are needed to determine selection criteria for elderly HCC patients to increase the possibility of receiving MWA as a potential lifesaving option. As such, further studies evaluating the outcomes of MWA for HCC treatment modalities in elderly patients are warranted.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42021273091.

Application of lipid nanovesicle drug delivery system in cancer immunotherapy

Immunotherapy has gradually emerged as the most promising anticancer therapy. In addition to conventional anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, anti-CTLA-4 therapy, CAR-T therapy, etc., immunotherapy can also be induced by stimulating the maturation of immune cells or inhibiting negative immune cells, regulating the tumor immune microenvironment and cancer vaccines. Lipid nanovesicle drug delivery system includes liposomes, cell membrane vesicles, bacterial outer membrane vesicles, extracellular vesicles and hybrid vesicles. Lipid nanovesicles can be used as functional vesicles for cancer immunotherapy, and can also be used as drug carriers to deliver immunotherapy drugs to the tumor site for cancer immunotherapy. Here, we review recent advances in five kinds of lipid nanovesicles in cancer immunotherapy and assess the clinical application prospects of various lipid nanovesicles, hoping to provide valuable information for clinical translation in the future.

An N6-methyladenosine-associated lncRNA signature for predicting clinical outcome and therapeutic responses in hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the leading cause of tumor-related mortality worldwide. N⁶-methyladenosine (m6A) and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been reported to play significant roles in prognosis assessment and decision-making strategies for HCC. This study aimed to investigate the significance of prognosis and treatment response assessment of m6A-related lncRNAs in HCC.

Methods

We used Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) to identify m6A-associated lncRNAs. We then performed univariate, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multivariate Cox regression analyses on the screened m6A-related lncRNAs to build a prognostic risk model for patients with HCC. The prognostic values and predictive performance of the model were then analyzed through Kaplan-Meier curve, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and nomogram. In addition, the potential value of this model for assessing sorafenib or immunotherapeutic responses was investigated based on the R package “pRRophetic” and immunophenoscore (IPS), respectively.

Results

Fourteen m6A-related lncRNAs were identified to construct the predictive model (P<0.05). Patients with high risk showed poorer survival than those with low risk. The risk score may serve as an independent predictor for the prognosis of patients with HCC even in the subgroup analysis. Moreover, our predictive model outperformed TP53 mutation status or tumor mutation burden (TMB) scores in the stratification of patient survival. Notably, high- and low-risk patients were shown to have different estimated responses for sorafenib and immunotherapies.

Conclusions

This study identified that a novel 14-m6A-related lncRNA signature could be a promising predictor for patient survival, and it might provide a vista for treatment response assessment of chemotherapy and immunotherapy.

Chinese expert consensus on conversion therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (2021 edition)

Recent advances in systemic and locoregional treatments for patients with unresectable or advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have resulted in improved response rates. This has provided an opportunity for selected patients with initially unresectable HCC to achieve adequate tumor downstaging to undergo surgical resection, a 'conversion therapy' strategy. However, conversion therapy is a new approach to the treatment of HCC and its practice and treatment protocols are still being developed. Review the evidence for conversion therapy in HCC and develop consensus statements to guide clinical practice. Evidence review: Many research centers in China have accumulated significant experience implementing HCC conversion therapy. Preliminary findings and data have shown that conversion therapy represents an important strategy to maximize the survival of selected patients with intermediate stage to advanced HCC; however, there are still many urgent clinical and scientific challenges for this therapeutic strategy and its related fields. In order to summarize and learn from past experience and review current challenges, the Chinese Expert Consensus on Conversion Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (2021 Edition) was developed based on a review of preliminary experience and clinical data from Chinese and non-Chinese studies in this field and combined with recommendations for clinical practice. Sixteen consensus statements on the implementation of conversion therapy for HCC were developed. The statements generated in this review are based on a review of clinical evidence and real clinical experience and will help guide future progress in conversion therapy for patients with HCC.

A CT-Based Radiomics Nomogram to Predict Complete Ablation of Pulmonary Malignancy: A Multicenter Study

Objective

Thermal ablation is a minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of pulmonary malignancy, but the intraoperative measure of complete ablation of the tumor is mainly based on the subjective judgment of clinicians without quantitative criteria. This study aimed to develop and validate an intraoperative computed tomography (CT)-based radiomic nomogram to predict complete ablation of pulmonary malignancy.

Methods

This study enrolled 104 individual lesions from 92 patients with primary or metastatic pulmonary malignancies, which were randomly divided into training cohort (n=74) and verification cohort (n=30). Radiomics features were extracted from the original CT images when the study clinicians determined the completion of the ablation surgery. Minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) were adopted for the dimensionality reduction of high-dimensional data and feature selection. The prediction model was developed based on the radiomics signature combined with the independent clinical predictors by multiple logistic regression analysis. The area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calibration curves were used to evaluate the predictive performance of the model. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was applied to estimate the clinical usefulness and net benefit of the nomogram for decision making.

Results

Thirteen CT features were selected to construct radiomics prediction model, which exhibits good predictive performance for determination of complete ablation of pulmonary malignancy. The AUCs of a CT-based radiomics nomogram that integrated the radiomics signature and the clinical predictors were 0.88 (95% CI 0.80-0.96) in the training cohort and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.71–1.00) in the validation cohort, respectively. The radiomics nomogram was well calibrated in both the training and validation cohorts, and it was highly consistent with complete tumor ablation. DCA indicated that the nomogram was clinically useful.

Conclusion

A CT-based radiomics nomogram has good predictive value for determination of complete ablation of pulmonary malignancy intraoperatively, which can assist in decision-making.

Clinical outcomes associated with tislelizumab in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who have been previously treated with sorafenib (SOR) or lenvatinib (LEN) in RATIONALE-208

420

Background: Tislelizumab, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, demonstrated clinical activity and was well tolerated in pts with previously treated advanced HCC in the phase 2 RATIONALE-208 study (NCT03419897). At the time of this study, SOR and LEN were recommended first-line treatments for pts with advanced HCC and continue to have an important role in the first-line treatment of HCC despite the recent approval of new immuno-oncology-based combinations (atezolizumab and bevacizumab) in some regions. We report the clinical outcomes of pts with advanced HCC who were previously treated with SOR/LEN. Methods: Pts who had received ≥1 prior line of systemic therapy for advanced HCC received tislelizumab 200 mg intravenously once every three weeks. Objective response rate (ORR) by independent review committee (IRC) (ORRIRC), duration of response by IRC (DORIRC), progression-free survival by IRC (PFSIRC), overall survival (OS), and safety were evaluated in pts who had been previously treated with SOR/LEN. Results: As of February 2020, 249 pts were enrolled and 235 pts had received prior treatment with SOR/LEN, of whom 126 and 109 pts had received 1 or ≥ 2 prior lines of systemic therapy, respectively. At study entry, 211 (89.8%) pts had BCLC stage C and 187 (79.6%) pts had extrahepatic spread. Median follow-up duration for pts previously treated with SOR/LEN was 12.5 months and ORRIRC was 13.6% (95% CI: 9.5, 18.7), including 2 complete responses and 30 partial responses. Median DORIRC was not reached. Median PFSIRC and OS of pts previously treated with SOR/LEN was 2.7 months (95% CI: 1.6, 2.8) and 13.5 months (95% CI: 10.9, 15.8), respectively. Tislelizumab was generally well tolerated in pts previously treated with SOR/LEN (Table), and the most common treatment-emergent adverse events were increased aspartate aminotransferase (n=70; 28.1%) and alanine aminotransferase (n=52; 20.9%). Conclusions: Tislelizumab was investigated beyond the first-line setting, as effective second- and third-line treatment options are limited for pts with advanced HCC and there is an unmet medical need. This analysis indicates that tislelizumab is clinically active and well tolerated in pts with advanced HCC who have received prior systemic treatment with SOR/LEN. Clinical trial information: NCT03419897. [Table: see text]

Systemic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Chinese Consensus-Based Interdisciplinary Expert Statements

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of liver cancer and causes many cancer-related deaths worldwide; in China, it is the second most prevalent cause of cancer deaths. Most patients are diagnosed clinically with advanced stage disease.

SUMMARY

For more than a decade, sorafenib, a small-molecular-weight tyrosine kinase inhibitor (SMW-TKI) was the only molecular targeted drug available with a survival benefit for the treatment of advanced HCC. With the development of novel TKIs and immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced HCC, the management of patients has been greatly improved. However, though angiogenic-based targeted therapy remains the backbone for the systemic treatment of HCC, to date, no Chinese guidelines for novel molecular targeted therapies to treat advanced HCC have been established. Our interdisciplinary panel on the treatment of advanced HCC comprising hepatologists, hepatobiliary surgeons, oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, orthopedic surgeons, traditional Chinese medicine physicians, and interventional radiologists has reviewed the literature in order to develop updated treatment regimens.

KEY MESSAGES

Panel consensus statements for the appropriate use of new molecular -targeted drugs including doses, combination therapies, adverse reaction management as well as efficacy evaluation, and predictions for treatment of advanced HCC with evidence levels based on published data are presented, thereby providing an overview of molecular targeted therapies for healthcare professionals.

Genome-wide identification studies - A primer to explore new genes in plant species

Genome data have accumulated rapidly in recent years, doubling roughly after every 6 months due to the influx of next-generation sequencing technologies. A plethora of plant genomes are available in comprehensive public databases. This easy access to data provides an opportunity to explore genome datasets and recruit new genes in various plant species not possible a decade ago. In the past few years, many gene families have been published using these public datasets. These genome-wide studies identify and characterize gene members, gene structures, evolutionary relationships, expression patterns, protein interactions and gene ontologies, and predict putative gene functions using various computational tools. Such studies provide meaningful information and an initial framework for further functional elucidation. This review provides a concise layout of approaches used in these gene family studies and demonstrates an outline for employing various plant genome datasets in future studies.

TiO2-Based Bioprobe Enabling Excellent SERS Activity in Detection of Diverse Circulating Tumor Cells

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs), can be the seeds of tumor metastasis, and are closely linked to cancer-related death. Fast and effective detection of CTCs is important for early diagnosis of...

Ultrahigh SERS Activity of TiO2@Ag Nanostructure leveraged for Accurately Detecting CTCs in peripheral blood

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) usually shed from primary and metastatic tumors serve as an important tumor marker, and easily cause fatal distant metastasis in cancer patients. Accurately and effectively detecting...

Treatment efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization versus regorafenib monotherapy in colorectal cancer liver metastasis patients who fail standard treatment regimens

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of regorafenib plus drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) versus regorafenib monotherapy in colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) patients who failed standard treatment regimens.

Methods

Totally, 76 eligible CRLM patients were analyzed, among which 42 patients received regorafenib monotherapy (as regorafenib group) and 34 patients received regorafenib plus DEB-TACE (as regorafenib plus DEB-TACE group).

Results

Objective response rate (35.3% versus 7.1%, P = 0.002) and disease control rate (76.5% versus 47.6%, P = 0.011) were both increased in regorafenib plus DEB-TACE group compared with regorafenib group; meanwhile, negative conversion rate of carcinoembryonic antigen (66.7% versus 28.6%, P = 0.008) after treatment was elevated in regorafenib plus DEB-TACE group compared with regorafenib group. Notably, progression-free survival (PFS) (median value: 7.6 versus 4.1 months, P < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (median value: 15.7 versus 9.2 months, P < 0.001) were both higher in regorafenib plus DEB-TACE group compared with regorafenib group. Furthermore, liver function indexes (alanine transaminase, aspartate aminotransferase, and cholinesterase levels) after treatment were all similar between the two groups (all P > 0.05). In addition, the occurrences of upper abdominal distending pain (P < 0.001), nausea and vomiting (P = 0.002) and fever (P = 0.002) were higher in regorafenib plus DEB-TACE group compared with regorafenib group, while the majority of these adverse events were mild and tolerable.

Conclusions

Regorafenib plus DEB-TACE is superior to regorafenib monotherapy regarding treatment response, PFS and OS, while induces tolerable post-embolization syndrome in CRLM patients who fail standard treatment regimens.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-021-03708-1.

Sintilimab plus a bevacizumab biosimilar (IBI305) versus sorafenib in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (ORIENT-32): a randomised, open-label, phase 2-3 study

BACKGROUND

China has a high burden of hepatocellular carcinoma, and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is the main causative factor. Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma have a poor prognosis and a substantial unmet clinical need. The phase 2-3 ORIENT-32 study aimed to assess sintilimab (a PD-1 inhibitor) plus IBI305, a bevacizumab biosimilar, versus sorafenib as a first-line treatment for unresectable HBV-associated hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

This randomised, open-label, phase 2-3 study was done at 50 clinical sites in China. Patients aged 18 years or older with histologically or cytologically diagnosed or clinically confirmed unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma, no previous systemic treatment, and a baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 were eligible for inclusion. In the phase 2 part of the study, patients received intravenous sintilimab (200 mg every 3 weeks) plus intravenous IBI305 (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks). In the phase 3 part, patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either sintilimab plus IBI305 (sintilimab-bevacizumab biosimilar group) or sorafenib (400 mg orally twice daily; sorafenib group), until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Randomisation was done using permuted block randomisation, with a block size of six, via an interactive web response system, and stratified by macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis, baseline α-fetoprotein, and ECOG performance status. The primary endpoint of the phase 2 part of the study was safety, assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The co-primary endpoints of the phase 3 part of the study were overall survival and independent radiological review committee (IRRC)-assessed progression-free survival according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 in the intention-to-treat population. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03794440. The study is closed to new participants and follow-up is ongoing for long-term outcomes.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 11, 2019 and Jan 15, 2020, we enrolled 595 patients: 24 were enrolled directly into the phase 2 safety run-in and 571 were randomly assigned to sintilimab-bevacizumab biosimilar (n=380) or sorafenib (n=191). In the phase 2 part of the trial, 24 patients received at least one dose of the study drug, with an objective response rate of 25·0% (95% CI 9·8-46·7). Based on the preliminary safety and activity data of the phase 2 part, in which grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events occurred in seven (29%) of 24 patients, the randomised phase 3 part was started. At data cutoff (Aug 15, 2020), the median follow-up was 10·0 months (IQR 8·5-11·7) in the sintilimab-bevacizumab biosimilar group and 10·0 months (8·4-11·7) in the sorafenib group. Patients in the sintilimab-bevacizumab biosimilar group had a significantly longer IRRC-assessed median progression-free survival (4·6 months [95% CI 4·1-5·7]) than did patients in the sorafenib group (2·8 months [2·7-3·2]; stratified hazard ratio [HR] 0·56, 95% CI 0·46-0·70; p<0·0001). In the first interim analysis of overall survival, sintilimab-bevacizumab biosimilar showed a significantly longer overall survival than did sorafenib (median not reached [95% CI not reached-not reached] vs 10·4 months [8·5-not reached]; HR 0·57, 95% CI 0·43-0·75; p<0·0001). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events were hypertension (55 [14%] of 380 patients in the sintilimab-bevacizumab biosimilar group vs 11 [6%] of 185 patients in the sorafenib group) and palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome (none vs 22 [12%]). 123 (32%) patients in the sintilimab-bevacizumab biosimilar group and 36 (19%) patients in the sorafenib group had serious adverse events. Treatment-related adverse events that led to death occurred in six (2%) patients in the sintilimab-bevacizumab biosimilar group (one patient with abnormal liver function, one patient with both hepatic failure and gastrointestinal haemorrhage, one patient with interstitial lung disease, one patient with both hepatic faliure and hyperkalemia, one patient with upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage, and one patient with intestinal volvulus) and two (1%) patients in the sorafenib group (one patient with gastrointestinal haemorrhage and one patient with death of unknown cause).

INTERPRETATION

Sintilimab plus IBI305 showed a significant overall survival and progression-free survival benefit versus sorafenib in the first-line setting for Chinese patients with unresectable, HBV-associated hepatocellular carcinoma, with an acceptable safety profile. This combination regimen could provide a novel treatment option for such patients.

FUNDING

Innovent Biologics.

TRANSLATION

For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Efficacy and safety of bloodletting for herpes zoster: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of bloodletting therapy for herpes zoster.

METHODS

The following electronic databases will be searched from PubMed (1966 to March 2020), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (update to March 2020), EMBASE (1980 to March 2020), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (1979 to March 2020), Wan Fang Data (1980 to March 2020), Chinese Scientific Journal Database (1989 to March 2020), Chinese Biomedical Database (1978 to March 2020) and traditional Chinese medicine Literature Analysis and Retrieval Database (1949 to March 2020). All randomized controlled trials without any limitation of blinding or publication language about this topic will be included, exclude cohort studies and case reports. Two independent researchers will operate article retrieval, duplication removing, screening, quality evaluation, and data analyses by Review Manager (V.5.3.5). Meta-analyses, subgroup analysis, and/or descriptive analysis will be performed based on the included data conditions.

RESULTS

High-quality synthesis and/or descriptive analysis of current evidence will be provided from cure rate, converting to clinical diagnosis rate, and side effects of bloodletting.

CONCLUSION

This study will provide the evidence of whether bloodletting is an effective and safe intervention for herpes zoster.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020171976.

Update on overall survival (OS) of RESCUE: An open-label, phase 2 trial of camrelizumab (C) in combination with apatinib (A) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)

4076

Background: C+A combination therapy displayed high objective response rate, disease control rate, and durable response with a manageable safety profile in patients (pts) with advanced HCC. Here we performed an updated analysis of OS to characterize the OS benefit of C+A in HCC pts. Methods: 70 pts in first-line cohort and 120 pts in second-line cohort were enrolled. Median OS and 2-year OS rate were evaluated via updated data (data cutoff, 3 January, 2021). Median time from enrollment to data cutoff of the total population (N = 190) was 29.1 months (range, 24.0-33.7). Results: OS events had occurred in 58.6% pts in first-line cohort and 60.0% pts in second-line cohort. The median OS was 20.1 months (95% CI, 14.9-NR) and 2-year OS rate was 43.3% (95% CI, 31.3-54.7) in first-line cohort. The median OS was 21.8 months (95% CI, 17.3-26.8) and 2-year OS rate was 44.6% (95% CI, 35.5-53.3) in second-line cohort. Conclusions: Long-term follow-up of C+A demonstrated remarkable survival benefit in advanced HCC pts, which further suggested that C+A is a promising combination therapy in advanced HCC pts. Clinical trial information: NCT03463876.

Phase 2 study of AK104 (PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody) plus lenvatinib as first-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

4101

Background: Anti–PD-(L)1 plus anti-CTLA-4 therapies (e.g. nivolumab/ipilimumab, tremelimumab/durvalumab) produce durable immune responses in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). More recent data suggests that the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with a multi-kinase inhibitor is efficacious against unresectable HCC (uHCC). AK104 is a humanized IgG1 bispecific antibody that simultaneously binds to PD-1 and CTLA-4. Early data suggests that AK104 possesses encouraging anti-tumor activity in selected tumour types and an improved safety profile compared to the co-administration of anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 antibodies. Lenvatinib is a multi-kinase inhibitor and approved for first-line treatment of uHCC. Here, we report results from a phase 2 study of AK104 plus lenvatinib in pts with uHCC. Methods: In this single-arm, multicenter phase II study (NCT04444167), pts with uHCC, BCLC stage B or C, Child-Pugh class A, who had not previously received systemic treatment received AK104 (6 mg/kg IV q2w or 15 mg/kg IV q3w) and lenvatinib (8 mg [bodyweight < 60 kg] or 12 mg [weight ≥ 60 kg] PO QD). Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints include disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: As of February 1 2021, 30 pts (86.7% male, median age 52.5yrs [31-71], 30% was ECOG 1, 93.3% was HBV+) had received the combination therapy of (AK104 6 mg/kg q2w plus lenvatinib). Of 18 pts evaluable for antitumor activity (defined as pts with the opportunity to be followed for at least 2 scans [≥13 weeks]), ORR per RECIST v1.1 was 44.4% (8/18), DCR was 77.8% (8 PRs and 6 SDs including 2 pts who had 28.4% and 29.2% reduction in tumor size from baseline). Median PFS has not been reached. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 83.3% of pts (G3 TRAEs occurred in 26.7% [8/30], and no G4 TRAEs or TRAEs leading to death). Most common TRAEs (≥15%) were increased AST (36.7%) and ALT (36.7%), decreased platelet count (33.3%), decreased neutrophil count (30.0%), and increased blood bilirubin (26.7%), with the vast majority being grades 1 or 2. Conclusions: AK104 plus lenvatinib as first-line therapy for uHCC has showed promising antitumor activity and an acceptable safety profile. Toxicities were manageable, with no unexpected safety signals. Enrollment for AK104 15 mg/kg q3w plus lenvatinib is currently ongoing, and longer follow-up is needed to further evaluate the durability of response. Clinical trial information: NCT04444167.

lncRNA PCAT6 facilitates cell proliferation and invasion via regulating the miR-326/hnRNPA2B1 axis in liver cancer

Liver cancer is one of the most common malignant human tumors with the highest morbidity and mortality rates of all cancer types in China. Evidence suggests that long non-coding RNA prostate cancer-associated transcript 6 (PCAT6) plays an essential role in tumor progression. However, the roles and mechanism of PCAT6 in liver cancer remain unclear. The present study showed that the expression of PCAT6 and heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A2B1 (hnRNPA2B1) was upregulated in liver cancer tissues compared with non-cancerous tissues and were associated with poor overall survival time, whereas microRNA (miR)-326 expression was downregulated. Moreover, knockdown of PCAT6 significantly inhibited the proliferation and invasion of liver cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. A dual-luciferase reporter gene assay demonstrated that PCAT6 could bind to miR-326 and that hnRNPA2B1 was a direct target gene of miR-326. Mechanistically, silenced PCAT6 suppressed the malignant phenotype of liver cancer cells through upregulating the inhibitory effect of miR-326 on hnRNPA2B1 expression. Taken together, these data demonstrated that knockdown of PCAT6 inhibited liver cancer progression through regulation of the miR-326/hnRNPA2B1 axis, suggesting that PCAT6 functions as an oncogene and may be a useful biomarker for the future diagnosis and treatment of liver cancer.

Chinese expert consensus on technical recommendations for the standard operation of drug-eluting beads for transvascular embolization

Liver cancer is among the 10 most common tumors globally. In China, liver cancer ranks 4^th for prevalence and 3^rd for mortality among all malignant tumors. With respect to the treatment of primary liver cancer, there are a number of therapies currently available, including surgical resection, liver transplantation, ablation, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), systemic chemotherapy, radiation therapy, targeted drug therapy and immunotherapy. Clinical practice and research have shown that, compared with conventional TACE (cTACE), drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE) can achieve a higher response rate and longer survival time in patients with primary liver cancer. Compared with that of cTACE, DEB-TACE has more favorable basic conditions for achieving uniformity, which could facilitate the standardization of operation techniques. China is the country with the highest incidence of primary liver cancer, accounting for more than 50% of the global patients, and its etiology and epidemiology in Chinese patients differ from those in Europeans and Americans. Therefore, experts in China have drafted these technical recommendations for the standard operation of drug-eluting beads for the treatment of liver cancer on the basis of accumulated abundant clinical experience and evidence-based medical data.