26
|
Jenkinson M, Helmy A, Huckey H, Mills S, Grant R, Hughes D, Marson T, Tangney R, Bulbeck H, Ali U, Gamble C. RTID-10. SURGEONS TRIAL OF PROPHYLAXIS FOR EPILEPSY IN SEIZURE NAÏVE PATIENTS WITH MENINGIOMA: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (STOP ‘EM). Neuro Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa215.815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Meningioma is the commonest primary brain tumour. 70% of patients are seizure-free at presentation, but approximately 12% will have seizures within 12 months of surgery. Seizures impact quality of life. Neurosurgeons administer prophylactic anti-epileptic drugs (AED) to prevent seizures despite a lack of evidence to support this. A meta-analysis of RCTs in brain tumours suggests that older AED may prevent seizures in the first week after surgery but not thereafter. There are no studies assessing newer AEDs in the prophylactic setting.
RESEARCH QUESTION
In patients with meningioma who have never had a seizure and are undergoing surgical resection, does prophylactic levetiracetam reduce the risk of developing seizures?
DESIGN
multi-centre, double-blind RCT in 20 UK centres. 1:1 randomisation of 14 days levetiracetam 500mg bd started one day before surgery compared to placebo.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE
Determine whether 2 weeks prophylactic levetiracetam reduces the risk of developing seizures within 12 months of surgery compared to placebo.
ECONOMIC OBJECTIVE
Estimate cost-effectiveness of prophylactic levetiracetam.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES
Determine effect of prophylaxis on time to first seizure and first convulsive seizure, whether prophylaxis affects quality of life and influences return to driving, safety of prophylaxis.
POPULATION
seizure-naïve meningioma undergoing surgery.
SAMPLE SIZE
seizure rate at 12 months is 12.3%. A 50% reduction is clinically beneficial. A two-group chi-squared test with 5% two-sided significance level will have 90% power to detect the difference between a Group 1 proportion of 0.12 and a Group 2 proportion of 0.06 when the sample size in each group is 477. Allowing for 5% dropout, 1004 patients will be recruited.
FUNDING
NIHR (£1.64M) award June 2020. Study opens March 2021.
TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH
MRI, blood and tissue will be collected to explore risk factors for seizures.
CONCLUSIONS
study will provide class I evidence of the role of prophylactic levetiracetam in meningioma surgery.
Collapse
|
27
|
Grant R, Dowswell T, Tomlinson E, Brennan PM, Walter FM, Ben-Shlomo Y, Hunt DW, Bulbeck H, Kernohan A, Robinson T, Lawrie TA. Interventions to reduce the time to diagnosis of brain tumours. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 9:CD013564. [PMID: 32901926 PMCID: PMC8082957 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013564.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brain tumours are recognised as one of the most difficult cancers to diagnose because presenting symptoms, such as headache, cognitive symptoms, and seizures, may be more commonly attributable to other, more benign conditions. Interventions to reduce the time to diagnosis of brain tumours include national awareness initiatives, expedited pathways, and protocols to diagnose brain tumours, based on a person's presenting symptoms and signs; and interventions to reduce waiting times for brain imaging pathways. If such interventions reduce the time to diagnosis, it may make it less likely that people experience clinical deterioration, and different treatment options may be available. OBJECTIVES To systematically evaluate evidence on the effectiveness of interventions that may influence: symptomatic participants to present early (shortening the patient interval), thresholds for primary care referral (shortening the primary care interval), and time to imaging diagnosis (shortening the secondary care interval and diagnostic interval). To produce a brief economic commentary, summarising the economic evaluations relevant to these interventions. SEARCH METHODS For evidence on effectiveness, we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase from January 2000 to January 2020; Clinicaltrials.gov to May 2020, and conference proceedings from 2014 to 2018. For economic evidence, we searched the UK National Health Services Economic Evaluation Database from 2000 to December 2014. SELECTION CRITERIA We planned to include studies evaluating any active intervention that may influence the diagnostic pathway, e.g. clinical guidelines, direct access imaging, public health campaigns, educational initiatives, and other interventions that might lead to early identification of primary brain tumours. We planned to include randomised and non-randomised comparative studies. Included studies would include people of any age, with a presentation that might suggest a brain tumour. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed titles identified by the search strategy, and the full texts of potentially eligible studies. We resolved discrepancies through discussion or, if required, by consulting another review author. MAIN RESULTS We did not identify any studies for inclusion in this review. We excluded 115 studies. The main reason for exclusion of potentially eligible intervention studies was their study design, due to a lack of control groups. We found no economic evidence to inform a brief economic commentary on this topic. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS In this version of the review, we did not identify any studies that met the review inclusion criteria for either effectiveness or cost-effectiveness. Therefore, there is no evidence from good quality studies on the best strategies to reduce the time to diagnosis of brain tumours, despite the prioritisation of research on early diagnosis by the James Lind Alliance in 2015. This review highlights the need for research in this area.
Collapse
|
28
|
Price SJ, Joannides A, Plaha P, Afshari FT, Albanese E, Barua NU, Chan HW, Critchley G, Flannery T, Fountain DM, Mathew RK, Piper RJ, Poon MT, Rajaraman C, Rominiyi O, Smith S, Solomou G, Solth A, Surash S, Wykes V, Watts C, Bulbeck H, Hutchinson P, Jenkinson MD. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on surgical neuro-oncology multi-disciplinary team decision making: a national survey (COVID-CNSMDT Study). BMJ Open 2020; 10:e040898. [PMID: 32801210 PMCID: PMC7430412 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Revised: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Pressures on healthcare systems due to COVID-19 has impacted patients without COVID-19 with surgery disproportionally affected. This study aims to understand the impact on the initial management of patients with brain tumours by measuring changes to normal multidisciplinary team (MDT) decision making. DESIGN A prospective survey performed in UK neurosurgical units performed from 23 March 2020 until 24 April 2020. SETTING Regional neurosurgical units outside London (as the pandemic was more advanced at time of study). PARTICIPANTS Representatives from all units were invited to collect data on new patients discussed at their MDT meetings during the study period. Each unit decided if management decision for each patient had changed due to COVID-19. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome measures included number of patients where the decision to undergo surgery changed compared with standard management usually offered by that MDT. Secondary outcome measures included changes in surgical extent, numbers referred to MDT, number of patients denied surgery not receiving any treatment and reasons for any variation across the UK. RESULTS 18 units (75%) provided information from 80 MDT meetings that discussed 1221 patients. 10.7% of patients had their management changed-the majority (68%) did not undergo surgery and more than half of this group not undergoing surgery had no active treatment. There was marked variation across the UK (0%-28% change in management). Units that did not change management could maintain capacity with dedicated oncology lists. Low volume units were less affected. CONCLUSION COVID-19 has had an impact on patients requiring surgery for malignant brain tumours, with patients receiving different treatments-most commonly not receiving surgery or any treatment at all. The variations show dedicated cancer operating lists may mitigate these pressures. STUDY REGISTRATION This study was registered with the Royal College of Surgeons of England's COVID-19 Research Group (https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/coronavirus/rcs-covid-research-group/).
Collapse
|
29
|
Fountain DM, Jenkinson MD, Bryant A, Vale L, Bulbeck H, Hart MG, Barone DG. Intraoperative imaging technology to maximise extent of resection for glioma: a network meta-analysis. Hippokratia 2020. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
30
|
Grant R, Lawrie TA, Brennan PM, Walter FM, Ben-Shlomo Y, Hunt DW, Tomlinson E, Bulbeck H, Kernohan A, Robinson T, Vale L. Interventions to reduce the time to diagnosis of brain tumours. Hippokratia 2020. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
31
|
Hanna C, Lawrie TA, Rogozińska E, Kernohan A, Jefferies S, Bulbeck H, Ali UM, Robinson T, Grant R. Treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in the elderly: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 3:CD013261. [PMID: 32202316 PMCID: PMC7086476 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013261.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A glioblastoma is a fatal type of brain tumour for which the standard of care is maximum surgical resection followed by chemoradiotherapy, when possible. Age is an important consideration in this disease, as older age is associated with shorter survival and a higher risk of treatment-related toxicity. OBJECTIVES To determine the most effective and best-tolerated approaches for the treatment of elderly people with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. To summarise current evidence for the incremental resource use, utilities, costs and cost-effectiveness associated with these approaches. SEARCH METHODS We searched electronic databases including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and Embase to 3 April 2019, and the NHS Economic Evaluation Database (EED) up to database closure. We handsearched clinical trial registries and selected neuro-oncology society conference proceedings from the past five years. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised trials (RCTs) of treatments for glioblastoma in elderly people. We defined 'elderly' as 70+ years but included studies defining 'elderly' as over 65+ years if so reported. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methods for study selection and data extraction. Where sufficient data were available, treatment options were compared in a network meta-analysis (NMA) using Stata software (version 15.1). For outcomes with insufficient data for NMA, pairwise meta-analysis were conducted in RevMan. The GRADE approach was used to grade the evidence. MAIN RESULTS We included 12 RCTs involving approximately 1818 participants. Six were conducted exclusively among elderly people (either defined as 65 years or older or 70 years or older) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, the other six reported data for an elderly subgroup among a broader age range of participants. Most participants were capable of self-care. Study quality was commonly undermined by lack of outcome assessor blinding and attrition. NMA was only possible for overall survival; other analyses were pair-wise meta-analyses or narrative syntheses. Seven trials contributed to the NMA for overall survival, with interventions including supportive care only (one trial arm); hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT40; four trial arms); standard radiotherapy (RT60; five trial arms); temozolomide (TMZ; three trial arms); chemoradiotherapy (CRT; three trial arms); bevacizumab with chemoradiotherapy (BEV_CRT; one trial arm); and bevacizumab with radiotherapy (BEV_RT). Compared with supportive care only, NMA evidence suggested that all treatments apart from BEV_RT prolonged survival to some extent. Overall survival High-certainty evidence shows that CRT prolongs overall survival (OS) compared with RT40 (hazard ratio (HR) 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56 to 0.80) and low-certainty evidence suggests that CRT may prolong overall survival compared with TMZ (TMZ versus CRT: HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.98). Low-certainty evidence also suggests that adding BEV to CRT may make little or no difference (BEV_CRT versus CRT: HR 0.83, 95% CrI 0.48 to 1.44). We could not compare the survival effects of CRT with different radiotherapy fractionation schedules (60 Gy/30 fractions and 40 Gy/15 fractions) due to a lack of data. When treatments were ranked according to their effects on OS, CRT ranked higher than TMZ, RT and supportive care only, with the latter ranked last. BEV plus RT was the only treatment for which there was no clear benefit in OS over supportive care only. One trial comparing tumour treating fields (TTF) plus adjuvant chemotherapy (TTF_AC) with adjuvant chemotherapy alone could not be included in the NMA as participants were randomised after receiving concomitant chemoradiotherapy, not before. Findings from the trial suggest that the intervention probably improves overall survival in this selected patient population. We were unable to perform NMA for other outcomes due to insufficient data. Pairwise analyses were conducted for the following. Quality of life Moderate-certainty narrative evidence suggests that overall, there may be little difference in QoL between TMZ and RT, except for discomfort from communication deficits, which are probably more common with RT (1 study, 306 participants, P = 0.002). Data on QoL for other comparisons were sparse, partly due to high dropout rates, and the certainty of the evidence tended to be low or very low. Progression-free survival High-certainty evidence shows that CRT increases time to disease progression compared with RT40 (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.61); moderate-certainty evidence suggests that RT60 probably increases time to disease progression compared with supportive care only (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.46), and that BEV_RT probably increases time to disease progression compared with RT40 alone (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.78). Evidence for other treatment comparisons was of low- or very low-certainty. Severe adverse events Moderate-certainty evidence suggests that TMZ probably increases the risk of grade 3+ thromboembolic events compared with RT60 (risk ratio (RR) 2.74, 95% CI 1.26 to 5.94; participants = 373; studies = 1) and also the risk of grade 3+ neutropenia, lymphopenia, and thrombocytopenia. Moderate-certainty evidence also suggests that CRT probably increases the risk of grade 3+ neutropenia, leucopenia and thrombocytopenia compared with hypofractionated RT alone. Adding BEV to CRT probably increases the risk of thromboembolism (RR 16.63, 95% CI 1.00 to 275.42; moderate-certainty evidence). Economic evidence There is a paucity of economic evidence regarding the management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in the elderly. Only one economic evaluation on two short course radiotherapy regimen (25 Gy versus 40 Gy) was identified and its findings were considered unreliable. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS For elderly people with glioblastoma who are self-caring, evidence suggests that CRT prolongs survival compared with RT and may prolong overall survival compared with TMZ alone. For those undergoing RT or TMZ therapy, there is probably little difference in QoL overall. Systemic anti-cancer treatments TMZ and BEV carry a higher risk of severe haematological and thromboembolic events and CRT is probably associated with a higher risk of these events. Current evidence provides little justification for using BEV in elderly patients outside a clinical trial setting. Whilst the novel TTF device appears promising, evidence on QoL and tolerability is needed in an elderly population. QoL and economic assessments of CRT versus TMZ and RT are needed. More high-quality economic evaluations are needed, in which a broader scope of costs (both direct and indirect) and outcomes should be included.
Collapse
|
32
|
Watts C, Apps J, Ansorg O, Savage J, Fox R, Chalmers A, Short SC, Thompson G, Waldman A, Capper D, Hargrave D, Brennan P, Smith S, Ashkan K, Wykes V, Kurian K, Jamal-Hanjani M, Swanton C, Buckle P, Bulbeck H, Stead LF, Vivanco I, Bowden S. RBTT-06. TESSA JOWELL BRAIN MATRIX STUDY: A BRITISH FEASIBILITY STUDY OF MOLECULAR STRATIFICATION AND TARGETED THERAPY TO OPTIMIZE THE CLINICAL MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH GLIOMA. Neuro Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noz175.918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
In 2016 there were 5250 brain cancer deaths in the UK. Standard treatment is surgical resection followed by chemo-radiotherapy. In most cases of diffuse glioma, complete tumour resection is not feasible. Many chemotherapy drugs have untested penetration through the blood brain barrier, potentially leading to sub-therapeutic concentrations in the tumour. There is need to refine current treatment strategies in relation to the understanding of tumour biology, and rapidly introduce and evaluate novel therapeutic approaches and agents through delivering rigorous clinical trials. The TESSA JOWELL BRAIN MATRIX Study will evaluate the feasibility of delivering precision medicine for brain cancer patients within the NHS. A multicentre, platform feasibility study of 1200 patients with diffuse glioma will build on the 100,000 genome project to develop and evaluate an infrastructure to collect and integrate: 1) real time comprehensive integrated molecular analysis, including whole genome sequencing and epigenetic classification; 2) serial sampling and annotation of tumours; 3) collection of matched clinical data; 4) assessment of patient quality of life; 5) centralised radiological review and response assessment as per RANO criteria. Once developed this will allow rapid introduction of therapeutic trials to specific patient groups. Secondary objectives include: understanding the association between extent of resection and molecular stratification to refine the role of surgery; optimisation and harmonisation of protocols to best collect, manage and store tissue, clinical data, and radiological images in order to provide a resource for researchers, both within and outside of the study. Improve patient recruitment by identifying and removing recruitment barriers and improve the information and consent processes for patients. Promote the development of a national network with expertise in brain cancer. Enrolment of the first patient is expected in late 2019. For further information, please contact the Brain Matrix Trial Office BrainMatrix@trials.bham.ac.uk.
Collapse
|
33
|
Byrne A, Sivell S, Moraes FY, Bulbeck H, Torrens-Burton A, Bernstein M, Nelson A, Fielding H. Early palliative interventions for improving outcomes in people with a primary malignant brain tumour and their carers. Hippokratia 2019. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
34
|
Boele FW, Rooney AG, Bulbeck H, Sherwood P. Interventions to help support caregivers of people with a brain or spinal cord tumour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 7:CD012582. [PMID: 31264707 PMCID: PMC6604115 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012582.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The diagnosis and treatment of a brain or spinal cord tumour can have a huge impact on the lives of patients and their families with family caregiving often resulting in considerable burden and distress. Meeting the support needs of family caregivers is critical to maintain their emotional and physical health. Although support for caregivers is becoming more widely available, large-scale implementation is hindered by a lack of high-quality evidence for its effectiveness in the neuro-oncology caregiver population. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of supportive interventions at improving the well-being of caregivers of people with a brain or spinal cord tumour. To assess the effects of supportive interventions for caregivers in improving the physical and emotional well-being of people with a brain or spinal cord tumour and to evaluate the health economic benefits of supportive interventions for caregivers. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2018, Issue 7), MEDLINE via Ovid, and Embase via Ovid. We also handsearched relevant published conference abstracts (previous five years), publications in the two main journals in the field (previous year), searched for ongoing trials via ClinicalTrials.gov, and contacted research groups in the field. The initial search was in March 2017 with an update in August 2018 (handsearches completed in January 2019). SELECTION CRITERIA We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) where caregivers of neuro-oncology patients constituted more than 20% of the sample and which evaluated changes in caregiver well-being following any supportive intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently selected studies and carried out risk of bias assessments. We aimed to extract data on the outcomes of psychological distress, burden, mastery, quality of patient-caregiver relationship, quality of life, and physical functioning. MAIN RESULTS In total, the search identified 2102 records, of which we reviewed 144 in full text. We included eight studies. Four interventions focused on patient-caregiver dyads and four were aimed specifically at the caregiver. Heterogeneity of populations and methodologies precluded meta-analysis. Risk of bias varied, and all studies included only small numbers of neuro-oncology caregivers (13 to 56 participants). There was some evidence for positive effects of caregiver support on psychological distress, mastery, and quality of life (low to very low certainty of evidence). No studies reported significant effects on caregiver burden or quality of patient-caregiver relationship (low to very low certainty of evidence). None of the studies assessed caregiver physical functioning. For secondary outcomes (patient emotional or physical well-being; health economic effects), we found very little to no evidence for the effectiveness of caregiver support. We identified five ongoing trials. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The eight small-scale studies included employed different methodologies across different populations, with low certainty of evidence overall. It is not currently possible to draw reliable conclusions regarding the effectiveness of supportive interventions aimed at improving neuro-oncology caregiver well-being. More high-quality research is needed on support for family caregivers of people diagnosed, and living, with a brain or spinal cord tumour.
Collapse
|
35
|
Sage W, Fernández-Méndez R, Crofton A, Gifford MJ, Bannykh A, Chrysaphinis C, Tingley E, Bulbeck H, Brahmbhatt M, Pickard JD, Walter FM, Brodbelt A, Price SJ, Joannides AJ. Defining unmet clinical need across the pathway of brain tumor care: a patient and carer perspective. Cancer Manag Res 2019; 11:2189-2202. [PMID: 30962709 PMCID: PMC6433107 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s175886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to determine the experience of patients with brain tumors and their carers across distinct parts of their treatment pathway and identify their views on potential service gaps in need of addressing. Methods A structured survey was administered at patient workshops across the UK and online through a charity newsletter. Answers to closed questions were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and open questions were examined using techniques of inductive content analysis. Results A total of 136 survey responses were received, representing patients with a variety of diagnoses and geographical locations (30 counties). There was a wide range of opinions on the provision of current neuro-oncology services. Key themes identified included a perceived lack of information provision, a gap in postdischarge psychological and neuropsychological supports, and an unmet willingness for involvement in research. Conclusion This national survey enhances our knowledge of current patient and carer experience within neuro-oncology services. A number of areas of unmet clinical need are highlighted providing a basis for informing future patient-centered service improvements and research.
Collapse
|
36
|
Ahmad SS, Crittenden MR, Tran PT, Kluetz PG, Blumenthal GM, Bulbeck H, Baird RD, Williams KJ, Illidge T, Hahn SM, Lawrence TS, Spears PA, Walker AJ, Sharma RA. Clinical Development of Novel Drug-Radiotherapy Combinations. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 25:1455-1461. [PMID: 30498095 PMCID: PMC6397668 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-2466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2018] [Revised: 10/16/2018] [Accepted: 11/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Radiotherapy is a fundamental component of treatment for the majority of patients with cancer. In recent decades, technological advances have enabled patients to receive more targeted doses of radiation to the tumor, with sparing of adjacent normal tissues. There had been hope that the era of precision medicine would enhance the combination of radiotherapy with targeted anticancer drugs; however, this ambition remains to be realized. In view of this lack of progress, the FDA-AACR-ASTRO Clinical Development of Drug-Radiotherapy Combinations Workshop was held in February 2018 to bring together stakeholders and opinion leaders from academia, clinical radiation oncology, industry, patient advocacy groups, and the FDA to discuss challenges to introducing new drug-radiotherapy combinations to the clinic. This Perspectives in Regulatory Science and Policy article summarizes the themes and action points that were discussed. Intelligent trial design is required to increase the number of studies that efficiently meet their primary outcomes; endpoints to be considered include local control, organ preservation, and patient-reported outcomes. Novel approaches including immune-oncology or DNA-repair inhibitor agents combined with radiotherapy should be prioritized. In this article, we focus on how the regulatory challenges associated with defining a new drug-radiotherapy combination can be overcome to improve clinical outcomes for patients with cancer.
Collapse
|
37
|
Jenkinson MD, Watts C, Marson AG, Hill R, Murray K, Vale L, Bulbeck H, Grant R. TM1-1 Seizure prophylaxis in gliomas (SPRING): a phase III randomised controlled trial comparing prophylactic levetiracetam versus no prophylactic anti-epileptic drug in glioma surgery. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2019. [DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2019-abn.25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
ObjectivesThere is no consensus regarding the need for prophylactic anti-epileptic drug (AED) in seizure-naive newly-diagnosed glioma patients. Data regarding prophylactic AED use are scant and inconclusive from older, small studies that enrolled patients with brain metastases, benign tumours and gliomas. A definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT) is needed to determine whether the policy of prophylactic AED therapy reduces the risk of first seizures in this population.DesignMulti-centre RCT.SubjectsInclusion criteria: i. seizure-naive, ii. supratentorial glioma suitable for surgery (biopsy/resection), iii. age ≥16 years; iv. Karnofsky performance status >60.MethodsPatients are randomised 1:1. Levetiracetam 500 mg bd for 2 weeks, increased to 750 mg bd thereafter for 1 year. Non-blinded. No placebo. Primary Outcome: one year risk of first seizure. Secondary outcomes: time to first seizure, time to first tonic-clonic seizure, mood, fatigue, quality of life, progression free survival, overall survival and incremental cost per QALY. Estimate of 1 year seizure rate in glioma after surgery is 20%. Based on a reduction in seizure rate to 10% a total of 806 patients will be recruited.ResultsGrant awarded by NIHR. Feasibility questionnaire demonstrated prophylactic AED rarely used. Neurosurgeons willing to randomise. 15 UK centres have expressed interest in participating.ConclusionsSPRING will establish class I evidence for the use of seizure prophylaxis in glioma surgery. The trial will open to recruitment in January 2019.
Collapse
|
38
|
Lawrie TA, Hanna CR, Rogozińska E, Kernohan A, Vale L, Bulbeck H, Ali UM, Grant R. Treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in the elderly. Hippokratia 2019. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
|
39
|
Bulbeck H, Broggio J, Doubleday P, Jones W, Rashbass J, Vernon S. THE STORY BEHIND THE DATA: DEVELOPING THE CONVERSATION ABOUT BRAIN CANCER DATA BEYOND TRADITIONAL INDICATORS. Neuro Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noy129.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
40
|
Jenkinson M, Watts C, Vale L, Marson A, Bulbeck H, Grant R. SEIZURE PROPHYLAXIS IN GLIOMA - UK NEUROSURGICAL SURVEY AND CLINICAL TRIAL. Neuro Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noy129.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
41
|
Jenkinson MD, Weber DC, Haylock BJ, Sherratt FC, Young B, Weller M, Bulbeck H, Culeddu G, Hughes DA, Brain A, Das K, Preusser M, Francis P, Gamble C. Letter to the Editor. Phase III randomized controlled trials are essential to properly evaluate the role of radiotherapy in WHO grade II meningioma. J Neurosurg 2018; 129:1104-1105. [DOI: 10.3171/2018.6.jns181418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
42
|
Boele FW, Rooney AG, Bulbeck H, Sherwood PR. OS4.4 Interventions to help support caregivers of people with a brain or spinal cord tumour - a Cochrane systematic review. Neuro Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noy139.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
43
|
Amos R, Bulbeck H, Burnet N, Crellin A, Eaton D, Evans P, Hall E, Hawkins M, Kirkby K, Mackay R, Sebag-Montefiore D, Sharma R. Proton Beam Therapy - the Challenges of Delivering High-quality Evidence of Clinical Benefit. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018; 30:280-284. [PMID: 29551566 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.02.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2018] [Accepted: 02/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The use of proton beam therapy (PBT) offers the opportunity to improve greater conformality of radiotherapy treatment delivery in some patients. However, it is associated with a high capital cost and the need to build new dedicated facilities. We discuss how the global radiotherapy community can respond to the challenge of producing high-quality evidence of clinical benefit from PBT in adult patients. In the UK, the National Cancer Research Institute-funded Clinical and Radiotherapy Translational group has established the PBT Clinical Trial Strategy Group. An eight-point framework is described that can assist the development and delivery of high-quality clinical trials.
Collapse
|
44
|
Bulbeck H. What does the brain tumour community want to know about the behaviour and personality changes following a brain tumour diagnosis? Neuro Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nox237.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
45
|
Jenkinson MD, Barone DG, Bryant A, Vale L, Bulbeck H, Lawrie TA, Hart MG, Watts C. Intraoperative imaging technology to maximise extent of resection for glioma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 1:CD012788. [PMID: 29355914 PMCID: PMC6491323 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012788.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extent of resection is considered to be a prognostic factor in neuro-oncology. Intraoperative imaging technologies are designed to help achieve this goal. It is not clear whether any of these sometimes very expensive tools (or their combination) should be recommended as standard care for people with brain tumours. We set out to determine if intraoperative imaging technology offers any advantage in terms of extent of resection over standard surgery and if any one technology was more effective than another. OBJECTIVES To establish the overall effectiveness and safety of intraoperative imaging technology in resection of glioma. To supplement this review of effects, we also wished to identify cost analyses and economic evaluations as part of a Brief Economic Commentary (BEC). SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 7, 2017), MEDLINE (1946 to June, week 4, 2017), and Embase (1980 to 2017, week 27). We searched the reference lists of all identified studies. We handsearched two journals, the Journal of Neuro-Oncology and Neuro-oncology, from 1991 to 2017, including all conference abstracts. We contacted neuro-oncologists, trial authors, and manufacturers regarding ongoing and unpublished trials. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials evaluating people of all ages with presumed new or recurrent glial tumours (of any location or histology) from clinical examination and imaging (computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or both). Additional imaging modalities (e.g. positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance spectroscopy) were not mandatory. Interventions included intraoperative MRI (iMRI), fluorescence-guided surgery, ultrasound, and neuronavigation (with or without additional image processing, e.g. tractography). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed the search results for relevance, undertook critical appraisal according to known guidelines, and extracted data using a prespecified pro forma. MAIN RESULTS We identified four randomised controlled trials, using different intraoperative imaging technologies: iMRI (2 trials including 58 and 14 participants, respectively); fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) (1 trial, 322 participants); and neuronavigation (1 trial, 45 participants). We identified one ongoing trial assessing iMRI with a planned sample size of 304 participants for which results are expected to be published around autumn 2018. We identified no trials for ultrasound.Meta-analysis was not appropriate due to differences in the tumours included (eloquent versus non-eloquent locations) and variations in the image guidance tools used in the control arms (usually selective utilisation of neuronavigation). There were significant concerns regarding risk of bias in all the included studies. All studies included people with high-grade glioma only.Extent of resection was increased in one trial of iMRI (risk ratio (RR) of incomplete resection 0.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02 to 0.96; 1 study, 49 participants; very low-quality evidence) and in the trial of 5-ALA (RR of incomplete resection 0.55, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.71; 1 study, 270 participants; low-quality evidence). The other trial assessing iMRI was stopped early after an unplanned interim analysis including 14 participants, therefore the trial provides very low-quality evidence. The trial of neuronavigation provided insufficient data to evaluate the effects on extent of resection.Reporting of adverse events was incomplete and suggestive of significant reporting bias (very low-quality evidence). Overall, reported events were low in most trials. There was no clear evidence of improvement in overall survival with 5-ALA (hazard ratio 0.83, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.07; 1 study, 270 participants; low-quality evidence). Progression-free survival data were not available in an appropriate format for analysis. Data for quality of life were only available for one study and suffered from significant attrition bias (very low-quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Intra-operative imaging technologies, specifically iMRI and 5-ALA, may be of benefit in maximising extent of resection in participants with high grade glioma. However, this is based on low to very low quality evidence, and is therefore very uncertain. The short- and long-term neurological effects are uncertain. Effects of image-guided surgery on overall survival, progression-free survival, and quality of life are unclear. A brief economic commentary found limited economic evidence for the equivocal use of iMRI compared with conventional surgery. In terms of costs, a non-systematic review of economic studies suggested that compared with standard surgery use of image-guided surgery has an uncertain effect on costs and that 5-aminolevulinic acid was more costly. Further research, including studies of ultrasound-guided surgery, is needed.
Collapse
|
46
|
Kearney A, Williamson P, Young B, Bagley H, Gamble C, Denegri S, Muir D, Simon NA, Thomas S, Elliot JT, Bulbeck H, Crocker JC, Planner C, Vale C, Clarke M, Sprosen T, Woolfall K. Priorities for methodological research on patient and public involvement in clinical trials: A modified Delphi process. Health Expect 2017; 20:1401-1410. [PMID: 28618076 PMCID: PMC5689224 DOI: 10.1111/hex.12583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/09/2017] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite increasing international interest, there is a lack of evidence about the most efficient, effective and acceptable ways to implement patient and public involvement (PPI) in clinical trials. OBJECTIVE To identify the priorities of UK PPI stakeholders for methodological research to help resolve uncertainties about PPI in clinical trials. DESIGN A modified Delphi process including a two round online survey and a stakeholder consensus meeting. PARTICIPANTS In total, 237 people registered of whom 219 (92%) completed the first round. One hundred and eighty-seven of 219 (85%) completed the second; 25 stakeholders attended the consensus meeting. RESULTS Round 1 of the survey comprised 36 topics; 42 topics were considered in round 2 and at the consensus meeting. Approximately 96% of meeting participants rated the top three topics as equally important. These were as follows: developing strong and productive working relationships between researchers and PPI contributors; exploring PPI practices in selecting trial outcomes of importance to patients; and a systematic review of PPI activity to improve the accessibility and usefulness of trial information (eg participant information sheets) for participants. CONCLUSIONS The prioritized methodological research topics indicate important areas of uncertainty about PPI in trials. Addressing these uncertainties will be critical to enhancing PPI. Our findings should be used in the planning and funding of PPI in clinical trials to help focus research efforts and minimize waste.
Collapse
|
47
|
Majewska P, Ioannidis S, Raza MH, Tanna N, Bulbeck H, Williams M. Postprogression survival in patients with glioblastoma treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a routine care cohort study. CNS Oncol 2017; 6:307-313. [PMID: 28990795 DOI: 10.2217/cns-2017-0001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma is the commonest malignant brain tumor in adults. Most patients develop progressive disease before they die. However, survival after developing progressive disease is infrequently reported. We identified patients with histologically proven disease who were treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy during 2006-2013. We analyzed overall survival (OS), progression-free survival and postprogression survival (PPS) in relation to age, O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation and extent of surgical resection. We identified 166 patients. Median survival was 13.5 months; 2-year OS was 21.7%. Median progression-free survival and PPS were 7.03 and 4.53 months, respectively. Age and extent of surgical resection were correlated with OS. Only the extent of surgical resection was associated with PPS. Our work suggests that the established prognostic factors for glioblastoma do not appear to help predict PPS.
Collapse
|
48
|
Kurian KM, Jenkinson MD, Brennan PM, Grant R, Jefferies S, Rooney AG, Bulbeck H, Erridge SC, Mills S, McBain C, McCabe MG, Price SJ, Marino S, Moyes E, Qian W, Waldman A, Vaqas B, Keatley D, Burchill P, Watts C. Brain tumor research in the United Kingdom: current perspective and future challenges. A strategy document from the NCRI Brain Tumor CSG. Neurooncol Pract 2017; 5:10-17. [PMID: 31385960 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npx022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) is a partnership of charity and government research funders whose purpose is to improve health and quality of life by accelerating progress in cancer-related research through collaboration. Under this umbrella, the NCRI Brain Tumor Clinical Studies Group is focused on improving clinical outcomes for adult patients with brain and central nervous system tumors, including those with brain metastasis from other primary sites. This document discusses the current state of clinical brain tumor research in the United Kingdom and the challenges to increasing study and trial opportunities for patients. The clinical research priorities are defined along with a strategy to strengthen the existing brain tumor research network, improve access to tissue and imaging and to develop the future leadership for brain tumor research in the United Kingdom. This strategy document may serve as a framework for other organizations and countries.
Collapse
|
49
|
Jenkinson MD, Javadpour M, Haylock BJ, Young B, Bulbeck H, Farrell M, Preusser M, Hughes D, Gamble C, Weber D. P12.10 The ROAM / EORTC 1308 trial: Radiation versus observation following surgical resection of atypical meningioma - study update. Neuro Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nox036.368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
50
|
Boele FW, Bulbeck H, Browne C, Rooney AG, Sherwood P. Interventions to help support caregivers of people with a brain or spinal cord tumour. Hippokratia 2017. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|