[Orgasm after curietherapy with permanent iodine-125 radioimplants for localized prostate cancer]

OBJECTIVES

Orgasm is a domain of male sexuality that remains underreported in literature. Our aim was to realize the first detailed analysis of orgasm in patients treated by 125 I permanent prostate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a series of 270 sexually active men treated by prostate brachytherapy (125I permanent implantation), 241 (89%), mean age of 65 (43-80), participated in a mailed survey about sexual function after a mean time of 36 months (9-70). Erectile and ejaculatory functions and orgasm were explored using a mailed questionnaire. Two questions focused on orgasm. The first was about quality of orgasm (fast/intense/late, difficult/weak/absent) and the second about the presence of painful orgasm and its frequency (always/sometimes/often).

RESULTS

After prostate brachytherapy, 81.3% of sexually active men conserved ejaculation and 90% orgasm. There was a significant deterioration of the quality of orgasm (P=0.0001). More than 50% of the patients had an altered orgasm (weak, difficult, absent) after brachytherapy, vs 16% before implantation (P=0.001). Men with a diminished ejaculation volume often had a weak/difficult orgasm (P=0.007). Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy did not seem to impact the quality of orgasm or the frequency of painful ejaculation. Patients who had an IIEF-5 score higher than 12 had frequently intense orgasm (26.7% vs 2.7%; P<0.001) after brachytherapy. Sixty patients (30.3%) experienced often/sometimes painful ejaculation 12.9% (n=31) before implantation (P=0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Most of the patients treated by prostate brachytherapy conserved orgasm after treatment. However, most of the patients described a deterioration of the quality of orgasm.

Laparoscopic pelvic exenteration for gynaecological malignancy: is there any advantage?

INTRODUCTION

Pelvic exenteration (PE) remains one of the most mutilating surgical procedures with important postoperative morbidity. Laparoscopic approach has emerged in an attempt to reduce postoperative complications. The aim of the present study was to compare outcomes between laparoscopic pelvic exenteration combined with a vaginal or perineal approach, versus classical approach.

METHODS

A cohort study was performed by identifying patients who underwent laparoscopic pelvic exenteration, and retrospectively comparing data with open cases from the same period of time, from 2000 to 2008.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients underwent laparoscopic PE and 29 patients underwent an open exenterative procedure. All patients except one (97.6%) had received prior radiotherapy. Eighteen patients (41.9%) underwent total PE, 17 anterior PE (39.5%), and 8 posterior PE (18.6%). Urinary diversion (UD) technique consisted of 24 Miami pouch (68.6%), 9 Bricker diversion (25.7%), 1 Kock pouch (2.9%), and 1 ureterostomy (2.9%). Most frequent postoperative complications were related to the urinary diversion (45%) and bowel reconstruction (27.9%). Median estimated blood loss for the laparoscopy and laparotomy group was 400 ml (range 200-700 ml) and 875 ml (range 200-1600 ml), respectively. Transfusion rate was also significantly higher in the laparotomy group. Operative time, margin status, length of hospital stay, operative and postoperative morbidity, and disease and overall survival were not significantly different between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic PE is feasible with curative intent to selected patients. Potential postoperative advantages of laparoscopic approach when compared to classical approach, oncological safety of the procedure, and QOL considerations need to be further investigated.

Phase I study of irinotecan and cisplatin in combination with pelvic radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer: A GINECO trial

PURPOSE

To define the recommended dose of the association of weekly irinotecan (Iri) and cisplatin (CP) with pelvic radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Stage IB2-IV cervix cancer patients were treated with escalating doses of Iri starting from 30 mg/m(2) and a fixed dose of CP at 20 mg/m(2), both weekly concomitantly with a 45-Gy pelvic irradiation.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients entered the study, 6 at level 1 (Iri 30 mg/m(2)), 3 at level 2 (Iri 40 mg/m(2)) and 6 at intermediate dose (Iri 35 mg/m(2)). Median age was 47 years (34-72), FIGO stage IB (n=1), IIB (n=7), III (n=6), IVA (n=1). The recommended dose was weekly Iri 35 mg/m(2) and CP 20 mg/m(2). Dose limiting toxicities (grades 3-4) were diarrhea, abdominal pain, febrile neutropenia and fatigue.

CONCLUSION

In cervix cancer patients, radiosensitization with weekly cisplatin and irinotecan is feasible, and the recommended doses are cisplatin 20 mg/m(2)/week and irinotecan 35 mg/m(2)/week for future phase II studies.