Assessment of Ki67 in Breast Cancer: Updated Recommendations From the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group

Ki67 immunohistochemistry (IHC), commonly used as a proliferation marker in breast cancer, has limited value for treatment decisions due to questionable analytical validity. The International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group (IKWG) consensus meeting, held in October 2019, assessed the current evidence for Ki67 IHC analytical validity and clinical utility in breast cancer, including the series of scoring studies the IKWG conducted on centrally stained tissues. Consensus observations and recommendations are: 1) as for estrogen receptor and HER2 testing, preanalytical handling considerations are critical; 2) a standardized visual scoring method has been established and is recommended for adoption; 3) participation in and evaluation of quality assurance and quality control programs is recommended to maintain analytical validity; and 4) the IKWG accepted that Ki67 IHC as a prognostic marker in breast cancer has clinical validity but concluded that clinical utility is evident only for prognosis estimation in anatomically favorable estrogen receptor–positive and HER2-negative patients to identify those who do not need adjuvant chemotherapy. In this T1-2, N0-1 patient group, the IKWG consensus is that Ki67 5% or less, or 30% or more, can be used to estimate prognosis. In conclusion, analytical validity of Ki67 IHC can be reached with careful attention to preanalytical issues and calibrated standardized visual scoring. Currently, clinical utility of Ki67 IHC in breast cancer care remains limited to prognosis assessment in stage I or II breast cancer. Further development of automated scoring might help to overcome some current limitations.

A Rapid and Cost-Effective Gene Expression Assay for the Diagnosis of Well-Differentiated and Dedifferentiated Liposarcomas

Histologic examination neither reliably distinguishes benign lipomas from atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma, nor dedifferentiated liposarcoma from other pleomorphic sarcomas, entities with different prognoses and management. Molecular confirmation of pathognomonic 12q13-15 amplifications leading to MDM2 overexpression is a diagnostic gold standard. Currently the most commonly used assay for this purpose is fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), but this is labor intensive. This study assessed whether newer NanoString-based technology could allow for more rapid and cost-efficient diagnosis of liposarcomas on standard formalin-fixed tissues through gene expression. Leveraging large-scale transcriptome data from The Cancer Genome Atlas, 20 genes were identified, most from the 12q13-15 amplicon, that distinguish dedifferentiated liposarcoma from other sarcomas and can be measured within a single NanoString assay. Using 21 cases of histologically ambiguous low-grade adipocytic tumors with available MDM2 amplification status, a machine learning-based analytical pipeline was built that assigns a given sample as negative or positive for liposarcoma based on quantitative gene expression. The effectiveness of the assay was validated on an independent set of 100 sarcoma samples (including 40 incident prospective cases), where histologic examination was considered insufficient for clinical diagnosis. The NanoString assay had a 93% technical success rate, and an accuracy of 97.8% versus an MDM2 amplification FISH gold standard. NanoString had a considerably faster turnaround time and was cheaper than FISH.

Human Germline Gene Therapy

N/A

Sarcomas: Immune biomarker expression and checkpoint inhibitor trials

Sarcomas are a heterogenous group of mesenchymal cancers comprising over 100 subtypes. Current chemotherapy for all but a very few subtypes has limited efficacy, resulting in 5-year relative survival rates of 16% for metastatic patients. While sarcomas have often been regarded as an "immune cold" tumor category, recent biomarker studies have confirmed a great deal of immune heterogeneity across sarcoma subtypes. Reports from the first generation of clinical trials treating sarcomas with immunotherapy demonstrate a few positive responses, supporting efforts to stratify patients to optimize response rates. This review summarizes recent advances in knowledge around immune biomarker expression in sarcomas, the potential use of new technologies to complement these study results, and clinical trials particularly of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in sarcomas. Each of the immune biomarkers assessed was reviewed for subtype-specific expression patterns and correlation with prognosis. Overall, there is extensive heterogeneity of immune biomarker presence across sarcoma subtypes, and no consensus on the prognostic effect of these biomarkers. New technologies such as multiplex immunohistochemistry and high plex in situ profiling may offer more insights into the sarcoma microenvironment. To date, clinical trials using immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy have not shown compelling clinical benefits. Combination therapy with dual checkpoint inhibitors or in combinations with other agents has yielded more promising results in dedifferentiated liposarcoma, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, angiosarcoma and alveolar soft-part sarcoma. Better understanding of the sarcoma immune status through biomarkers may help decipher the reasons behind differential responses to immunotherapy.

The epigenomics of sarcoma

Epigenetic regulation is critical to physiological control of development, cell fate, cell proliferation, genomic integrity and, fundamentally, transcriptional regulation. This epigenetic control occurs at multiple levels including through DNA methylation, histone modification, nucleosome remodelling and modulation of the 3D chromatin structure. Alterations in genes that encode chromatin regulators are common among mesenchymal neoplasms, a collection of more than 160 tumour types including over 60 malignant variants (sarcomas) that have unique and varied genetic, biological and clinical characteristics. Herein, we review those sarcomas in which chromatin pathway alterations drive disease biology. Specifically, we emphasize examples of dysregulation of each level of epigenetic control though mechanisms that include alterations in metabolic enzymes that regulate DNA methylation and histone post-translational modifications, mutations in histone genes, subunit loss or fusions in chromatin remodelling and modifying complexes, and disruption of higher-order chromatin structure. Epigenetic mechanisms of tumorigenesis have been implicated in mesenchymal tumours ranging from chondroblastoma and giant cell tumour of bone to chondrosarcoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour, synovial sarcoma, epithelioid sarcoma and Ewing sarcoma - all diseases that present in a younger patient population than most cancers. Finally, we review current and potential future approaches for the development of sarcoma therapies based on this emerging understanding of chromatin dysregulation.

Evaluation of glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor (GITR) expression in breast cancer and across multiple tumor types

Glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor (GITR) is an emerging immunotherapy target that is expressed at high levels on regulatory T cells. Agonistic anti-GITR antibodies have anti-tumor activity in cancer mouse models, and recent phase 1 trials have demonstrated their safe pharmacological profile. However, there is limited knowledge on the relationship between GITR expression and the tumor microenvironment. GITR protein expression was assayed by immunohistochemistry on 3992 breast cancer surgical excision specimens assembled into tissue microarrays and scored visually by a pathologist for GITR expression on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and on carcinoma cells. GITR expression by the malignant cells was further surveyed in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (N = 713), lung carcinoma (N = 705), pancreatic cancer (N = 486), ovarian cancer (N = 445), bladder cancer (N = 88), prostate cancer (N = 88), testicular cancer (N = 76), melanoma (N = 75), renal cell carcinoma (N = 68),  epithelioid sarcoma (N = 53), and neuroendocrine tumors (N = 41). In breast cancer, GITR expression on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (12.4%) correlated with other immune response biomarkers (PD-L1+ on tumor cells, and PD-1+, LAG-3+, TIM-3+ lymphocytes; p < 0.001), and T-cell markers (CD8+, FOXP3+; p < 0.001). GITR+ carcinoma cells were observed in 6.0% of breast cancer cases and correlated with worse relapse-free survival (p = 0.015). Among the additional tumor types examined, cancers with GITR+ malignant cells included bladder cancer (5.7%), primary (but not metastatic) melanoma (4.5%), and ovarian cancer (3.2%); no expression was identified among examined sarcomas. To our knowledge, this is the first immunohistochemistry study to report the frequency and pattern of GITR expression in a large breast cancer cohort, or to report membranous GITR expression on malignant cells. The co-infiltration of GITR with other immune biomarkers and T-cell markers supports a potential role for anti-GITR agents in combination immunotherapies. In addition, GITR expression on carcinoma cells could imply the existence of a novel cancer immune evasion strategy worthy of further investigation.

Correction to: Mismatch repair protein loss in breast cancer: clinicopathological associations in a large British Columbia cohort

In the original publication of the article, the funding statement was published incompletely. The corrected funding statement should read as below.

Role of intratumoral NK cells in triple-negative breast cancer in the FinXX trial and Mayo Clinic cohort

510

Background: Several studies have established the critical role of preexisting immune response in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Most studies evaluated the tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in stroma. However, limited data are available with regards to the importance of specific subtypes and spatial distribution of these immune infiltrates. Methods: NanoString IO360 gene expression analysis and Digital Spatial Profiling (DSP) were used. DSP was used to quantify 39 immune-related proteins in stromal and tumor-enriched segments from 44 TNBC samples from the FinXX trial (NCT00114816) and 335 samples from the Mayo Clinic (MC) cohort of centrally reviewed TNBC (Leon-Ferre BCRT 2018). In FinXX trial, 22 patients with recurrence and 22 patients without recurrence were included. In MC cohort, 217/335 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy while 118 patients had surgery only without adjuvant chemotherapy. Regions were segmented based on pancytokeratin staining. The general linear model was used for statistical analysis of differential expression with recurrence free survival (RFS) as a categorical variable (recur yes or no). Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression models were also used for analysis. Results: In the FinXX trial, using global gene expression analysis with IO360, there was no signature significantly associated with RFS. However, using DSP, high protein expression of CD56 in the tumor-enriched segments was associated with significant improvement in RFS (HR 0.26, 95%CI 0.09-0.78, p 0.01). Nevertheless, CD56 expression in the stroma (HR 0.66, 95%CI 0.29-1.53, p 0.33) and all segments (HR 0.53, 95%CI 0.23-1.25, p 0.14) was not significantly associated with improved outcome. We further validated these findings in the MC TNBC cohort where intratumoral CD56 expression was associated with a significant improvement in RFS (HR 0.23, p 0.002) but not stromal CD56 (p 0.79). Interestingly, when evaluating the MC TNBC cohort according to receipt of chemotherapy, intratumoral CD56 was associated with improved outcome only in patients who received chemotherapy (p 0.02 vs. 0.07). In both cohorts, higher expressions of intratumoral PD-L1, HLA-DR, and CD8 were associated with improved outcome. Conclusions: Using an in-depth analysis with spatially defined context, we identify that intratumoral CD56-positive NK cells are associated with improved outcome in TNBC. Our study highlights the potential role of NK cells in TNBC and future implications for biomarkers and therapeutic targets.Support: W81XWH-15-1-0292, P50CA116201-9, P50CA015083. Clinical trial information: NCT00114816 .

Pitfalls in assessing stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in breast cancer

Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) are important prognostic and predictive biomarkers in triple-negative (TNBC) and HER2-positive breast cancer. Incorporating sTILs into clinical practice necessitates reproducible assessment. Previously developed standardized scoring guidelines have been widely embraced by the clinical and research communities. We evaluated sources of variability in sTIL assessment by pathologists in three previous sTIL ring studies. We identify common challenges and evaluate impact of discrepancies on outcome estimates in early TNBC using a newly-developed prognostic tool. Discordant sTIL assessment is driven by heterogeneity in lymphocyte distribution. Additional factors include: technical slide-related issues; scoring outside the tumor boundary; tumors with minimal assessable stroma; including lymphocytes associated with other structures; and including other inflammatory cells. Small variations in sTIL assessment modestly alter risk estimation in early TNBC but have the potential to affect treatment selection if cutpoints are employed. Scoring and averaging multiple areas, as well as use of reference images, improve consistency of sTIL evaluation. Moreover, to assist in avoiding the pitfalls identified in this analysis, we developed an educational resource available at www.tilsinbreastcancer.org/pitfalls.

Application of a risk-management framework for integration of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in clinical trials

Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) are a potential predictive biomarker for immunotherapy response in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). To incorporate sTILs into clinical trials and diagnostics, reliable assessment is essential. In this review, we propose a new concept, namely the implementation of a risk-management framework that enables the use of sTILs as a stratification factor in clinical trials. We present the design of a biomarker risk-mitigation workflow that can be applied to any biomarker incorporation in clinical trials. We demonstrate the implementation of this concept using sTILs as an integral biomarker in a single-center phase II immunotherapy trial for metastatic TNBC (TONIC trial, NCT02499367), using this workflow to mitigate risks of suboptimal inclusion of sTILs in this specific trial. In this review, we demonstrate that a web-based scoring platform can mitigate potential risk factors when including sTILs in clinical trials, and we argue that this framework can be applied for any future biomarker-driven clinical trial setting.

Report on computational assessment of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes from the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group

Assessment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) is increasingly recognized as an integral part of the prognostic workflow in triple-negative (TNBC) and HER2-positive breast cancer, as well as many other solid tumors. This recognition has come about thanks to standardized visual reporting guidelines, which helped to reduce inter-reader variability. Now, there are ripe opportunities to employ computational methods that extract spatio-morphologic predictive features, enabling computer-aided diagnostics. We detail the benefits of computational TILs assessment, the readiness of TILs scoring for computational assessment, and outline considerations for overcoming key barriers to clinical translation in this arena. Specifically, we discuss: 1. ensuring computational workflows closely capture visual guidelines and standards; 2. challenges and thoughts standards for assessment of algorithms including training, preanalytical, analytical, and clinical validation; 3. perspectives on how to realize the potential of machine learning models and to overcome the perceptual and practical limits of visual scoring.

Tumor-associated macrophages and macrophage-related immune checkpoint expression in sarcomas

Early trials for immune checkpoint inhibitors in sarcomas have delivered mixed results, and efforts to improve outcomes now look to combinatorial strategies with novel immunotherapeutics, including some that target macrophages. To enhance our understanding of the sarcoma immune landscape, we quantified and characterized tumor-associated macrophage infiltration and expression of the targetable macrophage-related immune checkpoint CD47/SIRPα across sarcoma types. We surveyed immunohistochemical expression of CD68, CD163, CD47, and SIRPα in tissue microarrays of 1242 sarcoma specimens (spanning 24 types). Non-translocation sarcomas, particularly undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma and dedifferentiated liposarcoma, had significantly higher counts of both CD68+ and CD163+ macrophages than translocation-associated sarcomas. Across nearly all sarcoma types, macrophages outnumbered tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and CD163+ (M2-like) macrophages outnumbered CD68+ (M1-like) macrophages. These findings were supported by data from The Cancer Genome Atlas, which showed a correlation between increasing macrophage contributions to immune infiltration and several measures of DNA damage. CD47 expression was bimodal, with most cases showing either 0% or >90% tumor cell staining, and the highest CD47 scores were observed in chordoma, angiosarcoma, and pleomorphic liposarcoma. SIRPα scores correlated well with CD47 expression. Given the predominance of macrophage infiltrates over tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, the bias toward M2-like (immunosuppressive) macrophage polarization, and the generally high scores for CD47 and SIRPα, macrophage-focused immunomodulatory agents, such as CD47 or IDO-1 inhibitors, may be particularly worthwhile to pursue in sarcoma patients, alone or in combination with lymphocyte-focused agents.

The path to a better biomarker: application of a risk management framework for the implementation of PD-L1 and TILs as immuno-oncology biomarkers in breast cancer clinical trials and daily practice

Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies targeting PD-1/PD-L1 are now the standard of care in oncology across several hematologic and solid tumor types, including triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Patients with metastatic or locally advanced TNBC with PD-L1 expression on immune cells occupying ≥1% of tumor area demonstrated survival benefit with the addition of atezolizumab to nab-paclitaxel. However, concerns regarding variability between immunohistochemical PD-L1 assay performance and inter-reader reproducibility have been raised. High tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have also been associated with response to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with breast cancer (BC). TILs can be easily assessed on hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides and have shown reliable inter-reader reproducibility. As an established prognostic factor in early stage TNBC, TILs are soon anticipated to be reported in daily practice in many pathology laboratories worldwide. Because TILs and PD-L1 are parts of an immunological spectrum in BC, we propose the systematic implementation of combined PD-L1 and TIL analyses as a more comprehensive immuno-oncological biomarker for patient selection for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition-based therapy in patients with BC. Although practical and regulatory considerations differ by jurisdiction, the pathology community has the responsibility to patients to implement assays that lead to optimal patient selection. We propose herewith a risk-management framework that may help mitigate the risks of suboptimal patient selection for immuno-therapeutic approaches in clinical trials and daily practice based on combined TILs/PD-L1 assessment in BC. © 2020 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The Prosigna 50-gene profile and responsiveness to adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy in high-risk breast cancer patients

The DBCG89D trial randomized high-risk early breast cancer patients to adjuvant CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil) or CEF (cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and fluorouracil). Prosigna assays were performed by researchers with no access to clinical data. Time to distant recurrence (DR) was the primary endpoint, time to recurrence (TR) and overall survival (OS) secondary. Among the 980 Danish patients enrolled, Prosigna results were obtained in 686. Continuous ROR score was associated with DR for CMF (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.20, 95% CI 1.09-1.33), and for CEF (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.92-1.18), P interaction = 0.06. DR was significantly longer in CEF compared to CMF treated patients with Her2-enriched tumors (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.86), but not in patients with luminal tumors. Heterogeneity of treatment effect was significant for TR and OS. In this prospective-retrospective analysis, patients with Her2-enriched breast cancer derived substantial benefit from anthracycline chemotherapy whereas anthracyclines are not an essential component of chemotherapy for patients with luminal subtypes. The benefit of CEF vs. CMF correlated with increasing ROR Score.

Abstract PD5-06: Digital spatial mapping of the immune landscape of triple negative breast cancer reveals novel features of immune-tumor cell interaction

Background: Growing evidence supports the critical role of preexisting immune response in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, there are limitations with current evaluation approaches: inability to functionally assess the type of immune infiltration with traditional pathologic evaluation and loss of spatial distribution in conventional high-plex gene or protein expression analyses from the whole tumor section. Here, we report the initial analysis of immune protein expression as a function of spatial distribution and clinical outcomes in TNBC samples. Methods: NanoString GeoMxTM Digital Spatial Profiling (DSP) was used to quantify 39 immune-related proteins in stromal and tumor segments from 44 TNBC samples from the FinXX trial. Samples were matched for patient characteristics, treatment arm (capecitabine vs. 5-fluorouracil), and outcome based on recurrence-free survival (RFS) with 22 samples from patients who recurred and 22 samples from patients with durable RFS. Regions of interest (ROIs) were selected based on expression of cytokeratin (tumor), CD45 (leukocytes), or CD68 (macrophages). Each ROI was segmented into tumor (pancytokeratin-positive area) and stroma (pancytokeratin-negative/nuclear SYTO13-positive area). The general linear model was used for statistical analysis of differential expression with RFS as a categorical variable (recur yes or no). Results: A total of 950 tumor and stroma segments were included in this initial analysis. In both tumor and stroma segments, over-expression of T cell activation markers (CD137, GITR) was associated with better outcome, whereas T cell markers (CD3, CD4, CD8) were not significantly associated with outcome. In tumor segments alone, improved outcome was significantly associated with increased protein expression [&gt; 2-fold change (FC) at p&lt;0.001] of CD56, PD-L2, HLA-DR, CD137, GITR, and CD40. In CD45-enriched stroma, improved outcome was associated with elevated expression (FC&gt;2.0, p&lt;0.001) of PD-L2; whereas durable RFS was associated with elevated PD-L2 and IDO1 expression in CD68-enriched stroma. In contrast, macrophage/dendritic cell markers CD68 and CD11c were not associated with outcome. In tumor cells adjacent to CD45-enriched stroma, durable RFS was associated with increased abundance (FC&gt;2.0, p&lt;0.001) of PD-L2, CD56, CD27, GITR, CD20, HLA-DR, and IDO1. Similarly, in tumor segment associated with CD68-enriched stroma, proteins associated with RFS included PD-L2, HLA-DR, CD56, GITR, and CD137. Among 39 immune function proteins, only elevated CTLA4 expression in CD68-enriched stroma was associated with recurrence (FC=0.55, p&lt;0.001), whereas tumor-segment CTLA4 was associated with RFS. Conclusions: Using an in-depth analysis to precisely quantify the abundance of multiple immune function proteins in a spatially defined manner, we observed that PD-L2, IDO1, and T cell activation markers were robustly associated with durable RFS in both tumor and stromal segments. In contrast, MHC components (HLA-DR, beta-2-microglobulin), B cell markers (CD20), and NK cell markers (CD56) were strongly associated with favorable outcome in tumor but not in stromal segments. Our study highlights the conclusion that the immune landscape of TNBC is far too complex to be encompassed by any single molecular marker, and more detailed analyses of the DSP data reported here are ongoing with a view towards using quantitative multiplex analyses to refine our understanding of how therapeutic outcome is influenced by interactions among immune cells and between immune and tumor cells. Acknowledgements: Supported by the Breast Cancer Research Foundation (BCRF18-161), Bankhead Coley (6BC05 Florida Department of Health), 26.2 with Donna Foundation, US National Cancer Institute (CA15083), and the Canadian Cancer Center

Citation Format: Saranya Chumsri, Douglas Hinerfeld, Jennifer M. Kachergus, Yaohua Ma, Heather A Brauer, Sarah Warren, Xue Wang, Torsten O. Nielsen, Karama Asleh, Heikki Joensuu, Edith A. Perez, E. A. Thompson. Digital spatial mapping of the immune landscape of triple negative breast cancer reveals novel features of immune-tumor cell interaction [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD5-06.

Abstract P5-02-01: Analytical validation and prognostic potential of an automated digital scoring protocol for Ki67: An International Ki67 Working Group study

Background: The nuclear proliferation biomarker Ki67 has multiple potential roles in breast cancer, including aiding decisions based on prognosis, but has unacceptable between-laboratory variability. Here we tested an open source and calibrated automated digital image analysis (DIA) platform to: (i) Assess inter-laboratory reproducibility of automated Ki67 measurement among 17 participating labs and compare those with standardized pathologist-based visual scoring. (ii) Investigate the comparability of Ki67 measurement across corresponding core biopsy and whole section cases. (iii) Test prognostic potential of the built Ki67 scoring algorithms on an independent cohort.

Methods: Two sets of 60 previously stained slides containing 30 core-cut biopsy and 30 corresponding whole tumor sections from 30 ER+ breast cancer cases were sent to 17 participating labs for automated assessment of average Ki67 expression. The blocks were centrally cut and stained for Ki67 using the Mib-1 antibody. The QuPath (open-source software) DIA platform was used to evaluate tumoral Ki67 expression. Calibration of the DIA method was performed in our previous study (Acs et al, Lab Invest 2019). A detailed guideline for building an automated Ki67 scoring algorithm was sent to the participating labs. Visual scoring of average Ki67 expression was performed by pathologists according to published standardized methods (Leung et al, NPJ Br Cancer 2016; Leung et al, Histopath 2019). Locked down DIA Ki67 scoring algorithms were applied to a validation cohort: 222 breast cancer cases from the Karolinska University Hospital in whole section format. Sufficient reproducibility to declare analytical validity was defined as an Intra Class Correlation (ICC) with lower limit of 95% credible interval (CI) &gt;0.80. Markov Chain Monte Carlo routines for generalized linear mixed models were used to estimate ICCs and calculate corresponding CIs.

Results: The same-section ICC was 0.902 (CI: 0.852-0.949) across 17 labs using calibrated DIA platform on core biopsy slides and 0.845 (CI: 0.778-0.912) on whole sections. The different-section ICC across the 17 labs was 0.873 (CI: 0.806-0.932) scoring on core biopsy slides and 0.777 (CI: 0.670-0.874) on whole sections. The pathologist-based visual Ki67 scoring showed ICC of 0.860 for all comparisons, respectively (CI: 0.795-0.927). Similar to what was observed for visual Ki67 scoring, the DIA scores are higher for core biopsy slides compared to paired whole sections (p≤0.001; median difference: 5.31%; IQR: 11.50%). Ki67 scores of all locked down DIA algorithms correlates significantly (p≤0.023) with outcome on the validation cohort (observed hazard ratios range: 2.518-2.922).

Conclusions: Automated Ki67 evaluation using a calibrated, open-source DIA platform (QuPath) met the pre-specified criterion of success on core biopsies but not on whole sections in the multi-institutional setting. The systematic discrepancy between core biopsy and corresponding whole sections was likely due to pre-analytical factors (tissue handling, fixation) and intratumor heterogeneity. We found that different algorithms built according to calibrated DIA methods had similar prognostic potential. Assessment of clinical utility is planned.

Citation Format: Balazs Acs, Samuel C.Y. Leung, Kelley M. Kidwell, Indu Arun, Renaldas Augulis, Sunil S. Badve, Yalai Bai, Anita L. Bane, John M.S. Bartlett, Jane Bayani, Gilbert Bigras, Annika Blank, Signe Borgquist, Henk Buikema, Martin C. Chang, Robin L. Dietz, Andrew Dodson, Anna Ehinger, Susan Fineberg, Cornelia M. Focke, Dongxia Gao, Allen M. Gown, Carolina Gutierrez, Johan Hartman, Judith C. Hugh, Zuzana Kos, Anne-Vibeke Lænkholm, Arvydas Laurinavicius, Richard M. Levenson, Rustin Mahboubi-Ardakani, Mauro G. Mastropasqua, Takuya Moriya, Sharon Nofech-Mozes, C. Kent Osborne, Liron Pantanowitz, Frédérique M. Penault-Llorca, Tammy Piper, Mary Anne Quintayo, Tilman T. Rau, Stefan Reinhard, Stephanie Robertson, Takashi Sakatani, Roberto Salgado, Melanie Spears, Jane Starczynski, Tomoharu Sugie, Bert van der Vegt, Giuseppe Viale, Shakeel Virk, Lila A. Zabaglo, Daniel F. Hayes, Mitch Dowsett, Torsten O. Nielsen, David L. Rimm, International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group, BIG-NABCG. Analytical validation and prognostic potential of an automated digital scoring protocol for Ki67: An International Ki67 Working Group study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-02-01.

Abstract P2-11-03: Predictive significance of an optimized immunohistochemical panel for basal-like breast cancer on the CCTG MA.12 phase III randomized clinical trial

Background: Tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors constitute the backbone of treatment for estrogen receptor positive early stage breast cancers based on immunohistochemical (IHC) results. While these therapies significantly reduce the risk of relapse of breast cancer, they have toxicities and add to costs. Gene expression profiling assays are widely used to quantify risk and support targeted therapies for luminal breast cancers treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy. In a prospective-retrospective analysis of the phase III CCTG MA.12 clinical trial (randomizing premenopausal women treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, to either tamoxifen or placebo for 5 years), luminal subtype by PAM50 was significantly predictive for tamoxifen benefit. However, IHC classification (as estrogen receptor positive) could not demonstrate a statistically significant benefit from tamoxifen over placebo. More accurate IHC biomarkers incorporating nestin positivity or loss of inositol polyphosphate-4-phosphate (INPP4B) have recently been optimized to identify the basal-like intrinsic subtype of breast cancer regardless of ER/PR/HER2 status. In this study, we examined the capacity of these basal biomarkers to identify intrinsic subtype and predict benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen vs. placebo in the CCTG MA.12 clinical trial Methods:492 formalin-fixed paraffin embedded blocks of primary tumor from patients randomized in the CCTG MA.12 trial were used to build tissue microarrays. IHC staining for nestin and INPP4B was done according to published methods, and interpretation was performed by pathologists with no access to molecular data. The performance of the nestin and INPP4B panel was assessed against PAM50 gene expression assay as a standard reference. A prespecified statistical plan was executed independently by the Canadian Cancer Trials Group, testing the primary hypothesis that patients with basal breast cancer, when defined as “positive for nestin or negative for INPP4B,” would not benefit from tamoxifen (primary endpoint: disease-free survival).Results: 366 primary tumor samples from the CCTG MA.12 had a full dataset available for IHCbiomarker evaluation, PAM50 subtype and clinical outcomes. Positive staining of nestin or loss of INPP4B was observed in 47 (13%) of the total cases and was significantly associated with poor prognostic factors including high grade, younger age, ER negativity, triple negative and core basal IHC status (p&lt;0.01). “Nestin+ or INPP4B-” status was significantly associated with basal-like PAM50 gene expression subtype, while the other cases (nestin- and INPP4B+) were significantly associated with PAM50 luminal subtype. Patients assigned as basals by “nestin+ or INPP4B-” IHC status did not demonstrate a benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen vs. placebo (HR=1.39, 95%CI [0.37-5.26], p=0.63), whereas “nestin- and INPP4B+” cases displayed a significantly higher benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen vs. placebo (HR=0.67, 95% CI [0.45-0.98], p=0.04), (p-interaction=0.87). While, in this trial, ER clinical status as determined in community hospitals or centrally by single biomarker IHC was not significantly predictive for tamoxifen benefit, patients classified as IHC non-basal “nestin- and INPP4B+” within the ER+ subgroup did benefit from addition of tamoxifen (HR=0.62, 95%CI [0.38-1.01], p=0.05).Conclusions:The nestin/INPP4B IHC panel offers a feasible and inexpensive methodology to accurately identify intrinsic subtype of breast cancer. Patients assigned as IHC basal by this panel did not display a superior survival when treated with tamoxifen vs. placebo in the adjuvant setting. Within the ER+ subgroup, these cases could potentially be spared the side effects of currently recommended endocrine therapies that do not benefit this group of patients.

Citation Format: Karama Asleh, Dongxia Gao, Vivien H Bramwell, Dongsheng Tu, Lois E Shepherd, Torsten O Nielsen. Predictive significance of an optimized immunohistochemical panel for basal-like breast cancer on the CCTG MA.12 phase III randomized clinical trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-11-03.

Predictive Biomarkers for Adjuvant Capecitabine Benefit in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in the FinXX Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

Recent studies have demonstrated a benefit of adjuvant capecitabine in early breast cancer, particularly in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, TNBC is heterogeneous and more precise predictive biomarkers are needed.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Tumor tissues collected from TNBC patients in the FinXX trial, randomized to adjuvant anthracycline-taxane-based chemotherapy with or without capecitabine, were analyzed using a 770-gene panel targeting multiple biological mechanisms and additional 30-custom genes related to capecitabine metabolism. Hypothesis-generating exploratory analyses were performed to assess biomarker expression in relation to treatment effect using the Cox regression model and interaction tests adjusted for multiplicity.

RESULTS

One hundred eleven TNBC samples were evaluable (57 without capecitabine and 54 with capecitabine). The median follow-up was 10.2 years. Multivariate analysis showed significant improvement in recurrence-free survival (RFS) favoring capecitabine in four biologically important genes and metagenes, including cytotoxic cells [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.38; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.16-0.86, P-interaction = 0.01], endothelial (HR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.20-2.22, P-interaction = 0.02), mast cells (HR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.49-1.27, P-interaction = 0.04), and PDL2 (HR = 0.31; 95% CI, 0.12-0.81, P-interaction = 0.03). Furthermore, we identified 38 single genes that were significantly associated with capecitabine benefit, and these were dominated by immune response pathway and enzymes involved in activating capecitabine to fluorouracil, including TYMP. However, these results were not significant when adjusted for multiple testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Genes and metagenes related to antitumor immunity, immune response, and capecitabine activation could identify TNBC patients who are more likely to benefit from adjuvant capecitabine. Given the reduced power to observe significant findings when correcting for multiplicity, our findings provide the basis for future hypothesis-testing validation studies on larger clinical trials.

Expression of lymphocyte immunoregulatory biomarkers in bone and soft-tissue sarcomas

Despite advances in our understanding of the underlying molecular drivers of sarcomas, few treatments are available with proven benefit for advanced metastatic sarcomas. Immunotherapy has value in this setting for some types of cancers, but sarcomas, with their multiplicity of rare types, have not been characterized in detail for their expression of targetable immune biomarkers. This study provides the most systematic evaluation to date of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and immune checkpoint biomarker expression in sarcomas. We examined by morphology and immunohistochemistry 1072 sarcoma specimens representing 22 types, in addition to 236 benign bone and soft-tissue tumors. Genomically-complex sarcoma types-those driven by mutations and/or copy-number alterations-had much higher numbers of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes than translocation-associated sarcomas. Prior exposure to radiotherapy was associated with increased immune infiltrates. Higher lymphocytic infiltration was associated with better overall survival among the non-translocation-associated sarcomas. Expression of PD-1 and CD56 were associated with worse overall survival. LAG-3 and TIM-3, two emerging immune checkpoints, were frequently expressed in most sarcoma types. Indeed, most cases positive for PD-(L)1 coexpressed one or both of these novel biomarkers, providing a potential rationale in support for trials targeting LAG-3 and/or TIM-3 in conjunction with PD-1 inhibition.

Mismatch repair protein loss in breast cancer: clinicopathological associations in a large British Columbia cohort

Purpose

Alterations to mismatch repair (MMR) pathways are a known cause of cancer, particularly colorectal and endometrial carcinomas. Recently, checkpoint inhibitors have been approved for use in MMR-deficient cancers of any type (Prasad et al. in JAMA Oncol 4:157–158, 2018). Functional studies in breast cancer have shown associations between MMR loss, resistance to aromatase inhibitors and sensitivity to palbociclib (Haricharan et al. in Cancer Discov 7:1168–1183, 2017). Herein, we investigate the clinical meaning of MMR deficiency in breast cancer by immunohistochemical assessment of MSH2, MSH6, MLH1 and PMS2 on a large series of breast cancers linked to detailed biomarker and long-term outcome data.

Methods

Cases were classified as MMR intact when all four markers expressed nuclear reactivity, but MMR-deficient when at least one of the four biomarkers displayed loss of nuclear staining in the presence of positive internal stromal controls on the tissue microarray core.

Results

Among the 1635 cases with interpretable staining, we identified 31 (1.9%) as MMR-deficient. In our cohort, MMR deficiency was present across all major breast cancer subtypes, and was associated with high-grade, low-progesterone receptor expression and high tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte counts. MMR deficiency is significantly associated with inferior overall (HR 2.29, 95% CI 1.02–5.17, p = 0.040) and disease-specific survival (HR 2.71, 95% CI 1.00–7.35, p = 0.042) in the 431 estrogen receptor-positive patients who were uniformly treated with tamoxifen as their sole adjuvant systemic therapy.

Conclusion

Overall, this study supports the concept that breast cancer patients with MMR deficiency as assessed by immunohistochemistry may be good candidates for alternative treatment approaches such as immune checkpoint or CDK4 inhibitors.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-019-05438-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Analytical validation of a standardised scoring protocol for Ki67 immunohistochemistry on breast cancer excision whole sections: an international multicentre collaboration

AIMS

The nuclear proliferation marker Ki67 assayed by immunohistochemistry has multiple potential uses in breast cancer, but an unacceptable level of interlaboratory variability has hampered its clinical utility. The International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group has undertaken a systematic programme to determine whether Ki67 measurement can be analytically validated and standardised among laboratories. This study addresses whether acceptable scoring reproducibility can be achieved on excision whole sections.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Adjacent sections from 30 primary ER⁺ breast cancers were centrally stained for Ki67 and sections were circulated among 23 pathologists in 12 countries. All pathologists scored Ki67 by two methods: (i) global: four fields of 100 tumour cells each were selected to reflect observed heterogeneity in nuclear staining; (ii) hot-spot: the field with highest apparent Ki67 index was selected and up to 500 cells scored. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the global method [confidence interval (CI) = 0.87; 95% CI = 0.799-0.93] marginally met the prespecified success criterion (lower 95% CI ≥ 0.8), while the ICC for the hot-spot method (0.83; 95% CI = 0.74-0.90) did not. Visually, interobserver concordance in location of selected hot-spots varies between cases. The median times for scoring were 9 and 6 min for global and hot-spot methods, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The global scoring method demonstrates adequate reproducibility to warrant next steps towards evaluation for technical and clinical validity in appropriate cohorts of cases. The time taken for scoring by either method is practical using counting software we are making publicly available. Establishment of external quality assessment schemes is likely to improve the reproducibility between laboratories further.

The FUS-DDIT3 Interactome in Myxoid Liposarcoma

Myxoid liposarcoma is a malignant lipogenic tumor that develops in deep soft tissues. While local control rates are good, current chemotherapy options remain ineffective against metastatic disease. Myxoid liposarcoma is characterized by the FUS-DDIT3 fusion oncoprotein that is proposed to function as an aberrant transcription factor, but its exact mechanism of action has remained unclear. To identify the key functional interacting partners of FUS-DDIT3, this study utilized immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry (IP-MS) to identify the FUS-DDIT3 interactome in whole cell lysates of myxoid liposarcoma cells, and results showed an enrichment of RNA processing proteins. Further quantitative MS analyses of FUS-DDIT3 complexes isolated from nuclear lysates showed that members of several chromatin regulatory complexes were present in the FUS-DDIT3 interactome, including NuRD, SWI/SNF, PRC1, PRC2, and MLL1 COMPASS-like complexes. Co-immunoprecipitation validated the associations of FUS-DDIT3 with BRG1/SMARCA4, BAF155/SMARCC1, BAF57/SMARCE1, and KDM1A. Data from this study provides candidates for functional validation as potential therapeutic targets, particularly for emerging epigenetic drugs.

HDAC2 Regulates Site-Specific Acetylation of MDM2 and Its Ubiquitination Signaling in Tumor Suppression

Histone deacetylases (HDACs) are promising targets for cancer therapy, although their individual actions remain incompletely understood. Here, we identify a role for HDAC2 in the regulation of MDM2 acetylation at previously uncharacterized lysines. Upon inactivation of HDAC2, this acetylation creates a structural signal in the lysine-rich domain of MDM2 to prevent the recognition and degradation of its downstream substrate, MCL-1 ubiquitin ligase E3 (MULE). This mechanism further reveals a therapeutic connection between the MULE ubiquitin ligase function and tumor suppression. Specifically, we show that HDAC inhibitor treatment promotes the accumulation of MULE, which diminishes the t(X; 18) translocation-associated synovial sarcomagenesis by directly targeting the fusion product SS18-SSX for degradation. These results uncover a new HDAC2-dependent pathway that integrates reversible acetylation signaling to the anticancer ubiquitin response.