Stereotactic body radiation therapy for sarcoma pulmonary metastases

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is standard for patients with inoperable early-stage NSCLC. We hypothesized that SBRT for sarcoma pulmonary metastases would achieve high rates of local control with acceptable toxicity and that patients with oligometastatic disease may achieve prolonged survival following SBRT.

MATERIALS/METHODS

This retrospective review included consecutive patients at our institution treated with SBRT for sarcoma pulmonary metastases. Cumulative incidence of local failure (LF) was estimated using a competing risks framework.

RESULTS

We identified 66 patients treated to 95 pulmonary metastases with SBRT. The median follow-up from the time of SBRT was 36 months (95% CI 34 - 53 months). The cumulative incidence of LF at 12 and 24 months was 3.1% (95% CI 0.9 - 10.6%) and 7.4% (95% CI 4.0% - 13.9%), respectively. The 12- and 24-month overall survival was 74% (95% CI 64 - 86%) and 49% (38 - 63%), respectively. Oligometastatic disease, intrathoracic only disease, and performance status were associated with improved survival on univariable analysis. Three patients had grade 2 pneumonitis, and one patient had grade 2 esophagitis. No patients had ≥ grade 3+ toxicities.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest series of patients treated with SBRT for pulmonary sarcoma metastases. We observed that SBRT offers an effective alternative to surgical resection with excellent local control and low proportions of toxicity.

Results of an Open-label, Phase Ia/b Study of Pembrolizumab plus Olaratumab in Patients with Unresectable, Locally Advanced, or Metastatic Soft-Tissue Sarcoma

PURPOSE

The study evaluated safety and efficacy of olaratumab + pembrolizumab in patients with unresectable locally advanced/metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) with disease progression on standard treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was open-label, multicenter, nonrandomized, phase Ia/Ib dose-escalation study followed by cohort expansion (olaratumab + pembrolizumab intravenous infusion). Primary objectives were safety and tolerability.

RESULTS

The majority of patients enrolled (n = 41) were female [phase Ia: 9 of 13, phase Ib/dose-expansion cohort (DEC), 17 of 28], aged < 65 years. In phases Ia and Ib, 13 and 26 patients received prior systemic therapy, respectively. Patients received olaratumab 15 mg/kg (phase Ia; cohort 1) or 20 mg/kg (phase Ia; cohort 2 and phase Ib) and pembrolizumab 200 mg (phase Ia/Ib). The median (Q1-Q3) duration of therapy (olaratumab) was 6.0 (3.0-11.9; cohort 1), 14.4 (12.4-20.9; cohort 2), and 14.0 (6.0-21.8) weeks (DEC). No dose-limiting toxicities and few grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAE; 15 mg/kg: 2 (increased lipase); 20 mg/kg: 1 (increased lipase), 1 (colitis), 2 (diarrhea), 3 (anemia)] were reported. Two TEAEs (increased lipase) were related to study discontinuations. Twenty-one patients reported mild (grade ≤ 2) TEAEs [phase Ia, disease control rate (DCR):14.3% (1/7, cohort 1); 66.7% (4/6, cohort 2); no responses were reported; phase Ib, DCR: 53.6% (15/28); objective response rate: 21.4% (6/28; RECIST and irRECIST criteria)]. No response was observed in patients with programmed death ligand-1-positive tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Antitumor activity was observed in some patients in DEC, and combination was well tolerated with manageable safety profile. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the efficacy and mechanistic impact of platelet-derived growth factor receptor inhibitors with immune checkpoint modulator coadministration.

ATRX guards against aberrant differentiation in mesenchymal progenitor cells

Alterations in the tumor suppressor ATRX are recurrently observed in several cancer types including sarcomas, which are mesenchymal neoplasms. ATRX has multiple epigenetic functions including heterochromatin formation and maintenance and regulation of transcription through modulation of chromatin accessibility. Here, we show in murine mesenchymal progenitor cells (MPCs) that Atrx deficiency aberrantly activated mesenchymal differentiation programs. This includes adipogenic pathways where ATRX loss induced expression of adipogenic transcription factors (Pparγ and Cebpα) and enhanced adipogenic differentiation in response to differentiation stimuli. These changes are linked to loss of heterochromatin near mesenchymal lineage genes together with increased chromatin accessibility and gains of active chromatin marks at putative enhancer elements and promoters. Finally, we observed depletion of H3K9me3 at transposable elements, which are derepressed including near mesenchymal genes where they could serve as regulatory elements. Our results demonstrate that ATRX functions to buffer against differentiation in mesenchymal progenitor cells, which has implications for understanding ATRX loss of function in sarcomas.

Undifferentiated and Dedifferentiated Metastatic Melanomas Masquerading as Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Mutational Signature Analysis and Immunotherapy Response

The distinction between undifferentiated melanoma (UM) or dedifferentiated melanoma (DM) from undifferentiated or unclassifiable sarcoma can be difficult and requires the careful correlation of clinical, pathologic, and genomic findings. In this study, we examined the utility of mutational signatures to identify patients with UM/DM with particular attention as to whether this distinction matters for treatment because the survival of patients with metastatic melanoma has dramatically improved with immunologic therapy, whereas durable responses are less frequent in sarcomas. We identified 19 cases of UM/DM that were initially reported as unclassified or undifferentiated malignant neoplasm or sarcoma and submitted for targeted next-generation sequencing analysis. These cases were confirmed as UM/DM by harboring melanoma driver mutations, UV signature, and high tumor mutation burden. One case of DM showed melanoma in situ. Meanwhile, 18 cases represented metastatic UM/DM. Eleven patients had a prior history of melanoma. Thirteen of 19 (68%) of the tumors were immunohistochemically completely negative for 4 melanocytic markers (S100, SOX10, HMB45, and MELAN-A). All cases harbored a dominant UV signature. Frequent driver mutations involved BRAF (26%), NRAS (32%), and NF1 (42%). In contrast, the control cohort of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas (UPS) of deep soft tissue exhibited a dominant aging signature in 46.6% (7/15) without evidence of UV signature. The median tumor mutation burden for DM/UM vs UPS was 31.5 vs 7.0 mutations/Mb (P < .001). A favorable response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy was observed in 66.6% (12/18) of patients with UM/DM. Eight patients exhibited a complete response and were alive with no evidence of disease at the last follow-up (median 45.5 months). Our findings support the usefulness of the UV signature in discriminating DM/UM vs UPS. Furthermore, we present evidence suggesting that patients with DM/UM and UV signatures can benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Distinct genomic landscapes in radiation-associated angiosarcoma compared with other radiation-associated sarcoma histologies

MYC amplifications have been frequently detected in radiation (RT)-associated angiosarcomas (ASs) by low-resolution molecular methods. However, large-scale next-generation sequencing (NGS) studies to investigate the genomic landscape of RT-AS are scarce, particularly compared with other RT-associated sarcomas. We performed a detailed comparative genomic investigation of RT-AS versus other RT-associated histotypes, as well as sporadic sarcomas with similar histologies. Our institutional targeted DNA-NGS assay database was searched for RT-associated sarcomas. Clinical outcome data, pathologic diagnosis, and the types and frequencies of genomic alterations, including single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and copy number alterations (CNAs), were analyzed. The cohort consisted of 82 patients, 68 (83%) females and 14 (17%) males, aged 37-88 (mean 64) years. Forty-four RT-ASs (38 from breast) and 38 RT sarcomas of other histologies, including 12 malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (RT-MPNSTs), 14 undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas (RT-UPSs), and 12 osteosarcomas (RT-OSs), were included. Median time intervals from radiation to initial diagnosis in RT-AS (8.0 years) were significantly lower than those in RT-MPNST and RT-UPS (12.5 and 18.5 years), respectively. Each RT-sarcoma histotype harbored distinct mutations and CNAs. RT-associated AS had more frequent MYC, FLT4, CRKL, HRAS, and KMT2D alterations than sporadic AS (enriched in TP53, KDR, ATM, ATRX), whereas the mutational landscapes of MPNST, UPS, and OS were similar in both RT and non-RT settings. CDKN2A/B deletions and TP53 alterations were infrequent in RT-AS compared with other RT sarcomas. Among RT sarcomas, RT-AS harbored the lowest fraction of genome altered (FGA), while RT-MPNST showed the highest FGA. RT-AS had the lowest insertion:SNV and deletion:SNV ratios, while RT-UPS had the highest. The predominant mutational signatures were associated with errors in DNA repair and replication. In conclusion, RT-AS has a distinct genomic landscape compared with other RT sarcomas and sporadic AS. Potential molecular targets for precision medicine may be histotype-dependent. © 2023 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Circulating tumor DNA analysis of the phase III VOYAGER trial: KIT mutational landscape and outcomes in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated with avapritinib or regorafenib

BACKGROUND

The current treatment paradigm of imatinib-resistant metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) does not incorporate KIT/PDGFRA genotypes in therapeutic drug sequencing, except for PDGFRA exon 18-mutant GIST that is indicated for avapritinib treatment. Here, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sequencing was used to analyze plasma samples prospectively collected in the phase III VOYAGER trial to understand how the KIT/PDGFRA mutational landscape contributes to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) resistance and to determine its clinical validity and utility.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

VOYAGER (N = 476) compared avapritinib with regorafenib in patients with KIT/PDGFRA-mutant GIST previously treated with imatinib and one or two additional TKIs (NCT03465722). KIT/PDGFRA ctDNA mutation profiling of plasma samples at baseline and end of treatment was assessed with 74-gene Guardant360® CDx. Molecular subgroups were determined and correlated with outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 386/476 patients with KIT/PDGFRA-mutant tumors underwent baseline (pre-trial treatment) ctDNA analysis; 196 received avapritinib and 190 received regorafenib. KIT and PDGFRA mutations were detected in 75.1% and 5.4%, respectively. KIT resistance mutations were found in the activation loop (A-loop; 80.4%) and ATP-binding pocket (ATP-BP; 40.8%); 23.4% had both. An average of 2.6 KIT mutations were detected per patient; 17.2% showed 4-14 different KIT resistance mutations. Of all pathogenic KIT variants, 28.0% were novel, including alterations in exons/codons previously unreported. PDGFRA mutations showed similar patterns. ctDNA-detected KIT ATP-BP mutations negatively prognosticated avapritinib activity, with a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 1.9 versus 5.6 months for regorafenib. mPFS for regorafenib did not vary regardless of the presence or absence of ATP-BP/A-loop mutants and was greater than mPFS with avapritinib in this population. Secondary KIT ATP-BP pocket mutation variants, particularly V654A, were enriched upon disease progression with avapritinib.

CONCLUSIONS

ctDNA sequencing efficiently detects KIT/PDGFRA mutations and prognosticates outcomes in patients with TKI-resistant GIST treated with avapritinib. ctDNA analysis can be used to monitor disease progression and provide more personalized treatment.

Assessing the Needs of Those Who Serve the Underserved: A Qualitative Study among US Oncology Clinicians

BACKGROUND

The American Society of Clinical Oncology established the 'Supporting Providers Serving the Underserved' (SUS) Task Force with a goal to develop recommendations to support cancer clinicians who deliver care for populations at risk for cancer disparities. As a first step, the Task Force explored barriers and facilitators to equitable cancer care delivery.

METHODS

Clinicians across the United States who deliver care predominantly for low-income and racially and ethnically minoritized populations were identified based on lists generated by the Task Force and the Health Equity Committee. Through purposive sampling based on geographical location, clinicians were invited to participate in 30-60 min semi-structured interviews to explore experiences, barriers, and facilitators in their delivery of cancer care. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, imported into qualitative data management software, and analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Thematic analysis revealed three major themes regarding barriers (lack of executive leadership recognition of resources; patient-related socio-economic needs; clinician burnout) and two major themes regarding facilitators (provider commitment, experiential training).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings reveal modifiable barriers and potential solutions to facilitate equitable cancer care delivery for populations at risk for cancer disparities.

A Phase II Study of Epacadostat and Pembrolizumab in Patients with Advanced Sarcoma

PURPOSE

Epacadostat, an indole 2,3 dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) inhibitor, proposed to shift the tumor microenvironment toward an immune-stimulated state, showed early promise in melanoma but has not been studied in sarcoma. This study combined epacadostat with pembrolizumab, which has modest activity in select sarcoma subtypes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This phase II study enrolled patients with advanced sarcoma into five cohorts including (i) undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS)/myxofibrosarcoma, (ii) liposarcoma (LPS), (iii) leiomyosarcoma (LMS), (iv) vascular sarcoma, including angiosarcoma and epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE), and (v) other subtypes. Patients received epacadostat 100 mg twice daily plus pembrolizumab at 200 mg/dose every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was best objective response rate (ORR), defined as complete response (CR) and partial response (PR), at 24 weeks by RECIST v.1.1.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were enrolled [60% male; median age 54 years (range, 24-78)]. The best ORR at 24 weeks was 3.3% [PR, n = 1 (leiomyosarcoma); two-sided 95% CI, 0.1%-17.2%]. The median PFS was 7.6 weeks (two-sided 95% CI, 6.9-26.7). Treatment was well tolerated. Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 23% (n = 7) of patients. In paired pre- and post-treatment tumor samples, no association was found between treatment and PD-L1 or IDO1 tumor expression or IDO-pathway-related gene expression by RNA sequencing. No significant changes in serum tryptophan or kynurenine levels were observed after baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination epacadostat and pembrolizumab was well tolerated and showed limited antitumor activity in sarcoma. Correlative analyses suggested that inadequate IDO1 inhibition was achieved.

High-Grade Sarcomas with Myogenic Differentiation Harboring Hotspot PDGFRB Mutations

PDGFRB-activating mutations have been reported in pediatric myofibroma and myofibromatosis. However, recurrent gain-of-function PDGFRB mutations have not been documented in sarcomas with myogenic differentiation. Driven by occasional sarcomas harboring PDGFRB mutations, we investigated their prevalence and clinicopathologic and genomic features in a large cohort of sarcomas. An institutional targeted DNA next-generation sequencing database was searched for sarcomas with myogenic differentiation harboring hotspot PDGFRB gene alterations. Among 3300 patients with sarcomas, 21 (0.6%) patients were identified (17 women, 4 men) with an age range of 35 to 88 years. The site distribution included 13 gynecologic tract (12 uteri, 1 vagina), 4 bone and soft tissue, and 4 viscera. All except 1 were high grade. Most patients were diagnosed as sarcomas with myogenic differentiation based on partial staining for 1 or more muscle markers, whereas 6 were labeled as leiomyosarcoma (LMS). Most tumors showed monomorphic spindle morphology, with either heterogeneous features of myofibroblastic and smooth muscle differentiation or an undifferentiated phenotype. Hormone receptors were negative in all uterine cases. PDGFRB immunostaining in all cases tested was strong and diffuse, whereas PDGFRA was negative/focal. The most frequent PDGFRB mutations were exon 12 (43%), exon 14 (N666K/S/T) (38%), and exon 18 (D850Y/H/V or insertion/deletion) (19%). The most frequent co-existing genetic alterations (26% to 37%) occurred in CDKN2A/B, TP53, TERT, and MED12. Moreover, PDGFRB-mutant sarcomas had an overall distinct genomic landscape compared with both uterine and soft tissue LMS control groups. These tumors were associated with a highly aggressive clinical course, with frequent distant metastases (81%) and death (76%), regardless of anatomic location, and worse overall survival compared with the 2 LMS control groups. This is the first study documenting recurrent hotspot PDGFRB alterations in high-grade sarcomas, which show a predilection for uterine location and myogenic differentiation that fall short of the diagnostic criteria for LMS. Further studies are needed to investigate the therapeutic potential of kinase inhibitors in this group of tumors.

Bolus versus Continuous Intravenous Delivery of Doxorubicin in Soft-Tissue Sarcomas: Post Hoc Analysis of a Prospective Randomized Trial (SARC021/TH CR-406)

PURPOSE

Continuous intravenous infusion (CIV) of doxorubicin (DOX) versus bolus (BOL) may minimize dose-dependent DOX cardiomyopathy, but it is unclear whether this advantage is evident as employed in typical soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) treatment. The impact of administration mode on adverse events (AE) and efficacy were compared using data from a randomized trial of DOX-based therapy (SARC021/TH CR-406).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In this post hoc analysis, CIV versus BOL was at discretion of the treating physician. Likelihood of AEs, and objective responses were assessed by adjusted logistic regression. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared using Kaplan-Meier, log-rank test, and adjusted Cox regression.

RESULTS

DOX was administered by BOL to 556 and by CIV to 84 patients. Proportions experiencing hematologic, non-hematologic, or cardiac AEs did not differ by administration mode. Hematologic AEs were associated with age, performance status, and cumulative DOX. Non-hematologic AEs were associated with age, performance status, and cumulative evofosfamide. Cardiac AEs were only associated with cumulative DOX; there was no interaction between DOX dose and delivery mode. PFS and OS were similar (median PFS 6.14 months BOL vs. 6.11 months CIV, P = 0.47; median OS 18.4 months BOL vs. 21.4 months CIV, P = 0.62). PFS, OS, and objective responses were not associated with delivery mode.

CONCLUSIONS

CIV was not associated with superior outcomes over BOL within DOX dosing limits of SARC021. Cardiac AEs were associated with increasing cumulative DOX dose. While not randomized with respect to DOX delivery mode, the results indicate that continued investigation of AE mitigation strategies is warranted.

Histopathologic Grading Is of Prognostic Significance in Primary Angiosarcoma of Breast: Proposal of a Simplified 2-tier Grading System

Despite a wide spectrum of clinical presentations, including primary or secondary, most angiosarcomas are considered high grade. One exception is primary breast angiosarcoma, where historically, histologic grading has shown to predict outcome using the Rosen 3-tier system. However, more recent studies have challenged this concept suggesting that even in this specific clinical context angiosarcomas should be considered high grade. This study aimed to critically reevaluate the impact of histologic grade in a clinically uniform cohort managed at a single institution using a newly proposed grading system. Our study included 49 primary breast angiosarcomas diagnosed during 1994 to 2022 (median follow-up: 33 mo), classified as low grade (29%), intermediate grade (20%), and high grade (51%), based on mitotic count, extent of solid components, and necrosis. At last follow-up, 22% patients developed locoregional recurrences, 63% distant metastases, and 47% patients died of disease. As patients with low and intermediate-grade angiosarcomas had relatively similar outcomes, our cohort was further analyzed using a 2-tier system (low grade and high grade). Targeted-DNA next-generation sequencing (505 cancer gene panel) performed in 11 cases found KDR mutations in 78% and PIK3CA mutations in 44% of high-grade lesions. Histologic grade, by either 3-tier or 2-tier grading systems, had a strong impact on survival, with the 2-tier system being an independent predictor of disease-specific survival and overall survival. Based on 2-tier system, the 5-year overall survival was 38% for high-grade angiosarcoma and 74% for low-grade angiosarcoma. PIK3CA mutations alone or concurrent with KDR alterations were identified in angiosarcomas with worse prognosis.

Distinct IDH1/2-associated Methylation Profile and Enrichment of TP53 and TERT Mutations Distinguish Dedifferentiated Chondrosarcoma from Conventional Chondrosarcoma

Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma (DDCS) is a rare high-grade chondrosarcoma characterized by a well-differentiated chondrosarcoma (WDCS) component that abruptly transitions to a high-grade, noncartilaginous sarcomatous component. To date, the molecular pathogenesis of DDCS and its distinction from conventional chondrosarcoma remain poorly understood. By targeted sequencing, we examined the mutational and copy-number profiles of 18 DDCS, including macrodissected WDCS components, compared with 55 clinically sequenced conventional chondrosarcomas. In conjunction with publicly available external data, we analyzed the methylation and expression profiles of 34 DDCS and 94 conventional chondrosarcomas. Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH1/IDH2) mutations were present in 36% conventional chondrosarcomas and 71% DDCS. Compared with conventional chondrosarcomas, DDCS had higher frequencies of TP53 and TERT promoter mutations and CDKN2A/B copy-number losses. Paired analysis of macrodissected WDCS and the high-grade components revealed TERT promoter mutations as early events. Despite phenotypic similarities, the percentage of genome with copy-number alterations in DDCS was significantly lower than that in other high-grade sarcomas. Differential methylation analysis revealed reduction of IDH1/IDH2-associated global hypermethylation characteristically seen in conventional chondrosarcoma and a distinct methylation profile in DDCS. The WDCS and high-grade components in DDCS showed similar methylation profiles. These CpG sites were associated with upregulated expression of genes involved in G2-M checkpoints and E2F targets. Genomic profiling revealed enrichment of TP53, TERT promoter, and CDKN2A/B alterations in DDCS. Integrated methylation and gene expression analysis revealed distinct IDH1/IDH2-associated methylation and transcriptional profiles as early events in DDCS, which may underlie the pathogenesis of dedifferentiation in chondrosarcomas.

Significance

DDCS is a rare, high-grade chondrosarcoma with a dismal prognosis. About 50%-80% of DDCS harbor IDH1/IDH2 mutations. We uncover a significant alteration of IDH-associated methylation profile in DDCS, which we propose is key to the progression to dedifferentiation. In this context, the potential effect of the use of IDH inhibitors is unclear but important to address, as clinical trials of selective IDH1 inhibitors showed worse outcome in DDCS.

TRAF7-mutated Fibromyxoid Spindle Cell Tumors Are Associated With an Aggressive Clinical Course and Harbor an Undifferentiated Sarcoma Methylation Signature: A Molecular and Clinicopathologic Study of 3 Cases

TRAF7 somatic mutations are rare and have been reported in meningiomas, intraneural perineuriomas, and mesotheliomas. Triggered by an index case of an unclassified low-grade mesenchymal tumor with TRAF7 mutation as the only genetic alteration, we searched our files and identified 2 additional cases with similar features. The tumors arose in 2 females and 1 male, aged 63 to 75 years old (median: 67 y). They were infiltrative deep soft tissue masses involving the shoulder, chest wall, and thigh, measuring 7.0 to 9.1 cm in greatest dimensions. One tumor was locally aggressive, and 2 were associated with lung and bone metastases. The tumors displayed alternating fibrous and myxoid stroma with mild to moderate cellularity and consisted of uniform spindle cells with open chromatin, inconspicuous nucleoli and scant cytoplasm. Significant mitotic activity or necrosis were not present. However, the metastatic tumor of 1 case showed an epithelioid morphology and brisk mitotic activity. Immunohistochemically, the tumors showed nonspecific and focal smooth muscle actin or CD34 expression. By DNA sequencing, all 3 cases harbored TRAF7 missense mutations involving the C-terminal WD40 domains as the only somatic mutations, showed nonrecurrent focal copy number alterations, and were negative for gene fusions by targeted RNA sequencing. On methylation profiling, the tumors clustered with the undifferentiated sarcoma and myxofibrosarcoma methylation classes and were distinct from morphologic mimics. On follow-up (5 to 36 mo), 2 patients died of disease following aggressive chemotherapeutic regimens. We describe a novel TRAF7- mutated mesenchymal tumor characterized by aggressive clinical behavior despite the histologic appearance of a low-grade fibromyxoid spindle cell tumor.

Subclonal somatic copy number alterations emerge and dominate in recurrent osteosarcoma

Multiple large-scale tumor genomic profiling efforts have been undertaken in osteosarcoma, however, little is known about the spatial and temporal intratumor heterogeneity and how it may drive treatment resistance. We performed whole-genome sequencing of 37 tumor samples from eight patients with relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma. Each patient had at least one sample from a primary site and a metastatic or relapse site. We identified subclonal copy number alterations in all but one patient. We observed that in five patients, a subclonal copy number clone from the primary tumor emerged and dominated at subsequent relapses. MYC gain/amplification was enriched in the treatment-resistant clone in 6 out of 7 patients with more than one clone. Amplifications in other potential driver genes, such as CCNE1, RAD21, VEGFA, and IGF1R, were also observed in the resistant copy number clones. Our study sheds light on intratumor heterogeneity and the potential drivers of treatment resistance in osteosarcoma.

Pexidartinib Provides Modest Pain Relief in Patients With Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor: Results From ENLIVEN

BACKGROUND

The double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 study of orally administered PLX3397 in patients with pigmented villonodular synovitis or giant cell tumor of the tendon sheath (ENLIVEN) showed that pexidartinib provides a robust objective tumor response in adults with tenosynovial giant cell tumors (TGCT) not amenable to improvement with surgery. Based on these results, in 2019, pexidartinib received accelerated approval in the United States in this population as a breakthrough therapy under an orphan drug designation. However, the ability of pexidartinib to relieve pain in ENLIVEN was not fully detailed, and the relationship between pain relief and objective tumor response was not described.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What level of pain relief was achieved by pexidartinib treatment in ENLIVEN? (2) How was pain relief related to objective tumor responses? (3) How durable was pain relief?

METHODS

The current study included planned primary and exploratory assessments of patient-assessed worst pain at the site of the tumor in the ENLIVEN trial. ENLIVEN was a phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial in which adults with TGCT not amenable to improvement with surgery received pexidartinib or placebo for 24 weeks, after which eligible patients could receive open-label pexidartinib. Of 174 patients assessed for eligibility, 121 were randomized (50% [60] to placebo, 50% [61] to pexidartinib), and 120 were given either placebo or pexidartinib (59 received placebo and 61 received pexidartinib) and were included in an intent-to-treat analysis. Fifty-nine percent (71 of 120) of the overall treated population was female, and 88% (106 of 120) were White. Mean age was 45 ± 13 years. Tumors were mostly in the lower extremities (92% [110 of 120]), most commonly in the knee (61% [73 of 120]) and ankle (18% [21 of 120]). As a secondary outcome, patients scored worst pain at the site of the tumor in the past 24 hours on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS). The primary definition of a pain response was a decrease of at least 30% in the weekly mean worst-pain NRS score and increase of less than 30% in narcotic analgesic use between baseline and week 25. Planned exploratory assessments of pain included the frequency of a pain response using alternative thresholds, including a decrease in worst-pain NRS score of 50% or more and a decrease of at least 2 points (minimum clinically important difference [MCID]), the magnitude of pain reduction between baseline and week 25, correlation between worst-pain NRS score and tumor shrinkage by RECIST 1.1 criteria, and the durability of the pain response during the open-label extension. Pain responses during the randomized portion of the trial were compared according to intention-to-treat analysis, with a one-sided threshold of p < 0.025 to reduce the risk of false-positive results. Pain assessment was complete for 59% (35 of 59) of patients in the placebo group and 54% (33 of 61) of patients in the pexidartinib group. Demographic and disease characteristics did not differ between the two treatment groups.

RESULTS

A difference in the primary assessment of a pain response was not detected between pexidartinib and placebo (response percentage 31% [19 of 61] [95% CI 21% to 44%] versus 15% [9 of 59] [95% CI 8% to 27%]; one-sided p = 0.03). In the exploratory analyses, pexidartinib provided a modest improvement in pain (response percentage 26% [16 of 61] [95% CI 17% to 38%] versus 10% [6 of 59] [95% CI 5% to 20%]; one-sided p = 0.02 using the 50% threshold and 31% [19 of 61] [95% CI 21% to 44%] versus 14% [8 of 59] [95% CI 7% to 25%]; one-sided p = 0.02 using the MCID threshold). The least-squares mean change in the weekly mean worst-pain NRS score between baseline and week 25 was larger in patients treated with pexidartinib than placebo (-2.5 [95% CI -3.0 to -1.9] versus -0.3 [95% CI -0.9 to 0.3]; p < 0.001), although the mean difference between the two groups (-2.2 [95% CI -3.0 to -1.4]) was just over the MCID. Improvement in the weekly mean worst-pain NRS score correlated with the reduction in tumor size (r = 0.44; p < 0.001) and tumor volume score (r = 0.61; p < 0.001). For patients in the open-label extension, the change in the worst-pain NRS score from baseline was similar to the change at the end of the randomized portion and just above the MCID (mean -2.7 ± 2.2 after 25 weeks and -3.3 ± 1.7 after 50 weeks of receiving pexidartinib).

CONCLUSION

Based on the current study, a modest reduction in pain, just larger than the MCID, may be an added benefit of pexidartinib in these patients, although the findings are insufficient to justify the routine use of pexidartinib for pain relief.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, therapeutic study.

The genetic landscape of SMARCB1 alterations in SMARCB1-deficient spectrum of mesenchymal neoplasms

SMARCB1 biallelic inactivation resulting in SMARCB1/INI1 deficiency drives a wide range of malignancies, including many mesenchymal tumors. However, the specific types of SMARCB1 alterations and spectrum of cooperating mutations among various types of sarcomas has not been well investigated. We profiled SMARCB1 genetic alterations by targeted DNA sequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in a large cohort of 118 soft tissue and bone tumors, including SMARCB1-deficient sarcomas (78, 66%): epithelioid sarcomas, epithelioid peripheral nerve sheath tumors, poorly differentiated chordomas, malignant rhabdoid tumors, and soft tissue myoepithelial tumors, as well as non-SMARCB1-deficient sarcomas (40, 34%) with various SMARCB1 genetic alterations (mutations, copy number alterations). SMARCB1 loss by immunohistochemistry was present in 94% SMARCB1 pathogenic cases. By combined sequencing and FISH assays, 80% of SMARCB1-deficient tumors harbored homozygous (biallelic) SMARCB1 loss, while 14% demonstrated heterozygous SMARCB1 loss-of-function (LOF) alterations, and 6% showed no demonstrable SMARCB1 alterations. FISH and sequencing were concordant in the ability to detect SMARCB1 loss in 48% of cases. Epithelioid sarcomas most commonly (75%) harbored homozygous deletions, while a subset showed focal intragenic deletions or LOF mutations (nonsense, frameshift). In contrast, most soft tissue myoepithelial tumors (83%) harbored SMARCB1 nonsense point mutations without copy number losses. Additionally, clinically significant, recurrent co-occurring genetic events were rare regardless of histotype. By sequencing, extended 22q copy number loss in genes flanking the SMARCB1 locus (22q11.23) occurred in one-third of epithelioid sarcomas and the majority of poorly differentiated chordomas. Poorly differentiated chordomas and soft tissue myoepithelial tumors showed significantly worse overall and disease-free survival compared to epithelioid sarcomas. Overall, SMARCB1 LOF alterations predominate and account for SMARCB1 protein loss in most cases: majority being biallelic but a subset were heterozygous. In contrast, SMARCB1 alterations of uncertain significance can be seen in diverse sarcomas types and does not indicate a SMARCB1-deficient entity.

A randomised phase II trial of a trivalent ganglioside vaccine targeting GM2, GD2 and GD3 combined with immunological adjuvant OPT-821 versus OPT-821 alone in metastatic sarcoma patients rendered disease-free by surgery

BACKGROUND

Recurrence after resection of metastatic sarcoma is common. The gangliosides GM2, GD2 and GD3 are strongly expressed across sarcoma subtypes. We hypothesised that generation of anti-ganglioside antibodies would control micrometastases and improve outcomes in sarcoma patients who were disease-free after metastasectomy.

METHODS

We conducted a randomised phase II trial of the immunological adjuvant OPT-821 with a KLH-conjugated ganglioside vaccine targeting GM2, GD2 and GD3, versus OPT-821 alone in patients with metastatic sarcoma following complete metastasectomy. Patients received 10 subcutaneous injections at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 28, 40, 52, 68 and 84 and were followed for evidence of recurrent disease. The primary end-point was relapse-free survival. Secondary end-points included overall survival and serologic response.

RESULTS

A total of 136 patients were randomised, 68 to each arm. The mean age was 51.2, 52.2% were male, 90.4% had relapsed disease, 86.8% had high-grade tumours and 14% had ≥4 metastases resected. Histologies included leiomyosarcoma (33%), spindle cell sarcoma (14%), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (13%), osteosarcoma (10%), synovial sarcoma (9%), liposarcoma (9%) and others (12%). Most adverse events were Grade ≤2 (83.8% and 70.6% in the vaccine and adjuvant arms, respectively). The most common (≥20% of patients) were injection site reaction (89.7%), fatigue (44.1%) and pyrexia (27.9%) on the vaccine arm, and injection site reaction (69.1%) on the adjuvant only arm. The 1-year relapse-free survival rate (34.5% and 34.8% in the vaccine and OPT-821 monotherapy arm, respectively) did not differ between arms (P = 0.725). One-year overall survival rates were 93.1% and 91.5% in the vaccine and OPT-821 monotherapy arm, respectively (P = 0.578). Serologic responses at week 9 were more frequent on the vaccine arm (96.5% of patients) than in the adjuvant arm (32.8%), and the difference between groups was durable.

CONCLUSIONS

A sustained serologic response to vaccination was induced with the vaccine, but no difference in recurrence-free or overall survival was observed between treatment arms.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov identifier: NCT01141491.

Myxoid pleomorphic liposarcoma is distinguished from other liposarcomas by widespread loss of heterozygosity and significantly worse overall survival: a genomic and clinicopathologic study

Myxoid pleomorphic liposarcoma (MPLPS) is a recently described and extremely rare subtype of liposarcoma with a predilection for the mediastinum. However, the genomic features of MPLPS remain poorly understood. We performed comprehensive genomic profiling of MPLPS in comparison with pleomorphic liposarcoma (PLPS) and myxoid/round cell liposarcoma (MRLPS). Of the 8 patients with MPLPS, 5 were female and 3 were male, with a median age of 32 years old (range 10-68). All except one were located in the mediastinum, with invasion of surrounding anatomic structures, including chest wall, pleura, spine, and large vessels. All cases showed an admixture of morphologies reminiscent of PLPS and MRLPS, including myxoid areas with plexiform vasculature admixed with uni- and/or multivacuolated pleomorphic lipoblasts. Less common features included well-differentiated liposarcoma-like areas, and in one case fascicular spindle cell sarcoma reminiscent of dedifferentiated LPS. Clinically, 4 experienced local recurrence, 4 had distant metastases and 5 died of disease. Compared to PLPS and MRLPS, patients with MPLPS had worse overall and progression-free survival. Recurrent TP53 mutations were present in all 8 MPLPS cases. In contrast, in PLPS, which also showed recurrent TP53 mutations (83%), RB1 and ATRX losses were more common. MRLPS was highly enriched in TERT promoter mutations (88%) and PI3K/AKT pathway mutations. Copy number profiling in MPLPS revealed multiple chromosomal gains with recurrent amplifications of chromosomes 1, 19 and 21. Importantly, allele-specific copy number analysis revealed widespread loss of heterozygosity (80% of the genome on average) in MPLPS, but not in PLPS or MRLPS. Our findings revealed genome-wide loss of heterozygosity co-existing with TP53 mutations as a characteristic genomic signature distinct from other liposarcoma subtypes, which supports the current classification of MPLPS as a stand-alone pathologic entity. These results further expand the clinicopathologic features of MPLPS, including older age, extra-mediastinal sites, and a highly aggressive outcome.

Quality care for patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumor: A multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative

56

Background: Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is a rare soft tissue sarcoma that is difficult to treat due to location, high risk of recurrence, and potential for significant morbidity. Recent approvals of novel systemic therapies provide new options for patients who may not be candidates for surgery. However, clinical teams may encounter challenges that inhibit prompt referral, quality of life assessment, and effective multidisciplinary care coordination between surgeons and oncologists. Methods: In September 2020, we surveyed multidisciplinary oncology health teams (n = 25) to assess gaps in TGCT diagnosis, clinical care, and multidisciplinary care coordination. To address identified gaps, teams participated in audit-feedback sessions to develop action plans for improvement. To better understand identified gaps, surveys and education were extended to a nationwide audience of providers caring for patients with TGCT (n = 553). Results: In the health teams survey, top challenges identified included differentiating among appropriate treatment management strategies (46%), coordinating care/transitions of care for patients with TGCT (25%), and making a proper TGCT diagnosis (13%). Confidence gaps echoed these challenges, with less than half of providers indicating high/very high confidence (5-point Likert scale) in their ability to distinguish between nodular and diffuse types of TGCT (47%), align treatment decisions with evidence-based guidelines (47%), and recognize and manage adverse events associated with novel therapies (47%). During audit-feedback sessions, teams developed action plans to improve collaboration between interprofessional teams, improve adverse event management, increase education for supportive care, and facilitate earlier referrals to medical oncologists. When healthcare providers nationwide were surveyed, only 13% reported high or very high confidence in differentiating available treatment options for TGCT. Additionally, the top challenges in coordination care for patients with TGCT included poor follow-up/monitoring for disease recurrence (23%), ineffective communication between multidisciplinary team members (20%), and lack of time for patient-centered measures (19%). Conclusions: These findings reveal important challenges in diagnosis, treatment, and multidisciplinary care of TGCT patients. The methods and findings from this study offer key opportunities for scalable interventions to improve care for patients with TGCT.

Assessing the needs of those who serve the underserved: A national survey among cancer care clinicians

175

Background: In 2009, ASCO confirmed that addressing cancer care disparities is critical for the Society and committed to approaches to eliminate such disparities. Yet, gaps remain in identifying the best approaches to do so. It remains unknown which cancer care providers serve patients from “underserved populations'' (defined as individuals who have historically received inadequate health care and health care services), what unmet needs they experience in their cancer care delivery, and how best to engage and support these providers. The objectives of this study were to explore challenges faced by providers serving underserved patients to inform development of a broader online survey and identify solutions that ASCO can implement to better support these providers. Methods: A multi-phase mixed-methods approach was utilized. Phase 1 involved key informant semi-structured interviews with 12 oncology providers caring for adult patients in the US from April to May 2021. Phase 2 involved survey development based on themes identified in Phase 1. The survey assessed: provider needs; processes for eliciting, documenting, and addressing social and economic needs of patients; and how ASCO could best support these providers. Phase 3 involved email distribution of the online survey in May 2022 to 5800 individuals identified through ASCO’s customer database. Eligibility criteria included providing care for adults with cancer in the US and prior consent to receive ASCO survey communications. Results: Of 477 respondents, the majority were ASCO members (88%), in an academic practice (57%), medical oncologists (77%), non-Hispanic (89%) and/or Caucasian/White (67%) and had > 15 years’ clinical experience (57%). A majority (60%) provided ≥25% of their clinical time providing cancer care to underserved populations and routinely engaged with administration to secure resources (61%) and local community organizations to obtain services (42%) for patients. Most (43-77%) indicated that a social worker/case manager was primarily responsible for addressing patient social needs. The majority reported that identification and dissemination of best practices (55%) and development of a return-on-investment business model (60%) would best help address patient needs. Some respondents expressed a desire to collaborate with ASCO on policy reform (32%) and for ASCO to help build or strengthen partnerships with local initiatives (29%). Conclusions: This is the first US-based survey assessing barriers and solutions to delivering cancer care among underserved populations. The findings from this work provide insights about how ASCO can help equip practices to address the social needs of their patients. Further work will be conducted to develop and implement suggested solutions.

Abstract B008: Investigating the evolution of undifferentiated soft tissue sarcomas in a genetically engineered mouse model

Undifferentiated soft tissue sarcomas (USTS) are an aggressive class of sarcomas with few effective treatment options. Because of the rarity of these sarcomas and the paucity of representative disease models, little is known about how they develop. We used single cell transcriptomics to study the initiation and evolution of an USTS in an autochthonous genetically engineered mouse model. We profiled multiple stages of tumor development and identified intermediary cell states that define sarcomagenesis. Interestingly, we identify two discrete evolutionary pathways that arise in parallel in the mouse model. To determine the human relevance of our findings, we are developing machine learning approaches to compare cell states between the mouse model with single-cell transcriptomes that we generated from patient-derived xenografts. This cross-species comparison will uncover core USTS cell states and define their ancestral state transitions. Our ultimate goal is to identify essential molecular features of USTS, which may represent entry points for future therapeutic strategies.

Citation Format: Jason E. Chan, Jonathan Rub, Carleigh Sussman, Olivera Grbovic-huezo, William D. Tap, Cristina Antonescu, Sam Singer, Doron Betel, Tuomas Tammela. Investigating the evolution of undifferentiated soft tissue sarcomas in a genetically engineered mouse model [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Sarcomas; 2022 May 9-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2022;28(18_Suppl):Abstract nr B008.

Abstract B022: Subclonal somatic copy number alterations emerge and dominate in relapsed/refractory osteosarcoma

Objective: Multiple large-scale tumor genomic profiling efforts have been undertaken in osteosarcoma, however little is known about the spatial and temporal intratumor heterogeneity and how it may drive treatment resistance. Methods: We performed 30-80x whole genome sequencing (WGS) of 37 tumor samples from 8 patients with relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma. Each patient had at least one sample from a primary site and one sample from a metastatic or relapse site. A set of high confidence single nucleotide variants (SNV), copy number alterations (CNA), structural variations (SV) were called for each sample using our pediatric expanded genomics pipeline and an evolutionary analysis was performed using a custom pipeline of computational tools. Results: Of the 8 patients in our cohort, 4 had localized disease at diagnosis (OSCE4, OSCE5, OSCE6, OSCE9) and 4 had metastatic disease at diagnosis (OSCE1, OSCE2, OSCE3, OSCE10). There were 17 samples from primary sites, 7 were pretreatment biopsies, 10 from on therapy primary resections. 20 samples came from metastatic sites, 15 of which were from lung metastases. Driver gene SNV’s were identified in 5 of 8 patients, including TP53 (OSCE1), ATRX (OSCE3, OSCE10), RB1 (OSCE4), and CDKN2A (OSCE9). There were no new driver SNV’s that emerged post-therapy in any patient. HATCHet, an algorithm that infers clone-specific copy number alterations, identified subclonal CNAs in all but one patient (OSCE2). In the 7 patients with subclonal CNAs, 6 had two copy number clones identified, and 1 patient (OSCE10) had three copy number clones identified. In 5 patients (OSCE1, OSCE4, OSCE5, OSCE6, OSCE10) there is a copy number clone that is subclonal in the primary tumor which emerges and dominates at subsequent relapses. The resistant clone in each of these cases had either MYC gain/amplification. Amplifications in CCNE1 (OSCE1), RAD21 (OSCE4, OSCE5, OSCE10), VEGFA (OSCE1, OSCE9), IGF1R (OSCE6) were also identified as potential drivers in the resistant copy number clones. In two of these patients (OSCE1, OSCE6), this treatment-resistant subclone becomes the dominant copy number clone by the time of primary resection. SNV based phylogenies revealed a heterogenous mix of monoclonal and polyclonal seeding of metastases and monophyletic and polyphyletic modes of dissemination. Over half the new mutations acquired in recurrent disease were attributed to HRD or cisplatin mutational signatures. TP53 structural variants were seen in 6/8 patients (OSCE2, OSCE3, OSCE4, OSCE6, OSCE9, OSCE10). New structural variants involving driver genes were only detected in one relapse sample from patient OSCE10 (DMD deletion). Conclusion: Subclonal copy number clones emerge and dominate in relapsed osteosarcoma, with MYC gain/amplification a defining characteristic in our cohort. Selective pressure from neoadjuvant chemotherapy reveals this clone at the time of primary resection, highlighting that genomic profiling at this time point may be more reflective of its metastatic potential.

Citation Format: Michael D. Kinnaman, Simone Zaccaria, Alvin Makohon-Moore, Gunes Gundem, Juan E. Arango Ossa, Nancy Bouvier, Filemon S. Dela Cruz, Meera Hameed, Julia Lynne Glade Bender, William D. Tap, Paul Meyers, Elli Papaemmanuil, Andrew Kung, Christine A. Iacobuzio-Donahue. Subclonal somatic copy number alterations emerge and dominate in relapsed/refractory osteosarcoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Sarcomas; 2022 May 9-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2022;28(18_Suppl):Abstract nr B022.

Abstract B023: Prospective clinical genomic profiling of ewing sarcoma: ERF and FGFR1 mutations as recurrent secondary alterations of potential biological and therapeutic relevance

Background: Ewing Sarcoma (ES) is a primitive sarcoma defined by EWSR1–ETS fusions as the primary driver alteration. To expand our understanding of the genetic and molecular characterization of ES, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of clinical genomic profiling data on tumors from 113 patients using the MSK-IMPACT platform (Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets). Methods: The dataset consisted of ES patients prospectively tested with the FDA-cleared MSK-IMPACT large panel, hybrid capture-based NGS assay. To assess the functional significance of ERF loss, we generated ES cell lines with increased expression of ERF as well as lines with knockdown of ERF. We assessed cell viability, clonogenic growth, and motility and performed transcriptomic and epigenetic analyses. Finally, we validated our findings in vivo using cell line xenografts. Results: Unlike previous ES genomic cohorts, ours included more adult patients (&gt;18 years of age) and more patients with advanced stage at presentation. TP53, STAG2, and CDKN2A were the most common alterations and were associated with worse overall survival at 5-years. Notably, 3% had activating FGFR1 alterations (1 amplification and 2 hotspot activating kinase domain mutations). Mining data generated using a targeted RNAseq assay that includes FGFR1 based on the Archer Anchored Multiplex PCR technology, FGFR1 was highly expressed in the ES cohort (N=42). The 2 patients with activating FGFR1 mutations had relatively high expression of FGFR1. The second novel subset of patients in our cohort were defined by recurrent secondary alterations in ERF, which encodes an ETS domain transcriptional repressor, in 7% of patients (5 truncating mutations, 1 deep deletion, 2 missense mutations). ERF alterations were non-overlapping with STAG2 alterations, suggesting a potentially important biologic role in ES. As the functional significance of FGFR1 mutation in ES has been previously studied, we focused our functional studies on the role of ERF status in ES. In vitro, increased expression of ERF decreased tumor cell growth, colony formation, and motility in two ES cell lines, while ERF loss induced cellular proliferation and clonogenic growth. Transcriptomic analysis of cell lines with ERF loss revealed increased expression of genes and pathways associated with aggressive tumor biology, and epigenetic, chromatin-based studies revealed that ERF competes with EWSR1-FLI1 at ETS binding sites. Conclusion: Our study reveals a previously unexplored role of ERF loss-of-function in ES. Older age in our cohort, and a higher proportion of patients with advanced disease at presentation, could potentially explain the finding of ERF alterations which were associated with aggressive tumor biology in our preclinical studies. Our functional analyses of how ERF modulates EWSR1-FLI1 oncogenicity may open a new window into the pathobiology of ES. Moreover, our data suggest that 3% of ES patients harbor activating FGFR1 mutations, the first targetable kinase alteration in this sarcoma.

Citation Format: Arielle Elkrief, Koichi Ogura, Anita S. Bowman, Richard P. Koche, Ryma Benayed, Audrey Mauguen, Marissa S. Mattar, Inna Khodos, Elisa de Stanchina, Paul A. Meyers, John H. Healey, William D. Tap, Neerav Shukla, Meera Hameed, Ahmet Zehir, Charles Sawyers, Rohit Bose, Emily Slotkin, Marc Ladanyi. Prospective clinical genomic profiling of ewing sarcoma: ERF and FGFR1 mutations as recurrent secondary alterations of potential biological and therapeutic relevance [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Sarcomas; 2022 May 9-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2022;28(18_Suppl):Abstract nr B023.

Retrospective observational studies in ultra-rare sarcomas: A consensus paper from the Connective Tissue Oncology Society (CTOS) community of experts on the minimum requirements for the evaluation of activity of systemic treatments

BACKGROUND

In ultra-rare sarcomas (URS) the conduction of prospective, randomized trials is challenging. Data from retrospective observational studies (ROS) may represent the best evidence available. ROS implicit limitations led to poor acceptance by the scientific community and regulatory authorities. In this context, an expert panel from the Connective Tissue Oncology Society (CTOS), agreed on the need to establish a set of minimum requirements for conducting high-quality ROS on the activity of systemic therapies in URS.

METHODS

Representatives from > 25 worldwide sarcoma reference centres met in November 2020 and identified a list of topics summarizing the main issues encountered in ROS on URS. An online survey on these topics was distributed to the panel; results were summarized by descriptive statistics and discussed during a second meeting (November 2021).

RESULTS

Topics identified by the panel included the use of ROS results as external control data, the criteria for contributing centers selection, modalities for ensuring a correct pathological diagnosis and radiologic assessment, consistency of surveillance policies across centers, study end-points, risk of data duplication, results publication. Based on the answers to the survey (55 of 62 invited experts) and discussion the panel agreed on 18 statements summarizing principles of recommended practice.

CONCLUSIONS

These recommendations will be disseminated by CTOS across the sarcoma community and incorporated in future ROS on URS, to maximize their quality and favor their use as control data when results from prospective studies are unavailable. These recommendations could help the optimal conduction of ROS also in other rare tumors.