Shedding light on experimental intra-articular drugs for treating knee osteoarthritis

INTRODUCTION

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a leading cause of disability among older adults without a curative therapy available. The development of disease-modifying OA drugs based on intra-articular injection (IA) is drawing extensive attention for its advantages in bioavailability and reduced systemic exposure. Based on the newly revealed pathogenesis of OA, several experimental IA drugs are successful in preclinical studies; moreover, some of them are in different phases of randomized clinical trials, bringing new opportunities for disease modification of OA.

AREAS COVERED

This is a targeted literature review to summarize experimental IA drugs targeting cartilage repair, cellular homeostasis, cellular senescence, and pain control. We also introduced targeted gene/oligonucleotide products.

EXPERT OPINION

Currently available therapeutics for KOA remain symptomatic relief and surgical replacement of damaged joints. Recently emerging experimental IA drugs are in different stages of development and are likely to enter practice in the near future and address many of the unmet needs. The major challenges for development of the new drugs are limited knowledge about the responsive subjects, heterogenicity of subjects and the complexity of the disease. Despite this, IA-based experimental drugs still hold great potential to be future disease-modifying treatments for their intrinsic advantages.

Clinical Trials with Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapies for Osteoarthritis: Challenges in the Regeneration of Articular Cartilage

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a whole-joint disease primarily characterized by the deterioration of hyaline cartilage. Current treatments include microfracture and chondrocyte implantation as early surgical strategies that can be combined with scaffolds to repair osteochondral lesions; however, intra-articular (IA) injections or implantations of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are new approaches that have presented encouraging therapeutic results in animal models and humans. We critically reviewed clinical trials with MSC therapies for OA, focusing on their effectiveness, quality, and outcomes in the regeneration of articular cartilage. Several sources of autologous or allogeneic MSCs were used in the clinical trials. Minor adverse events were generally reported, indicating that IA applications of MSCs are potentially safe. The evaluation of articular cartilage regeneration in human clinical trials is challenging, particularly in the inflammatory environment of osteoarthritic joints. Our findings indicate that IA injections of MSCs are efficacious in the treatment of OA and the regeneration of cartilage, but that they may be insufficient for the full repair of articular cartilage defects. The possible interference of clinical and quality variables in the outcomes suggests that robust clinical trials are still necessary for generating reliable evidence with which to support these treatments. We suggest that the administration of just-sufficient doses of viable cells in appropriate regimens is critical to achieve effective and durable effects. In terms of future perspectives, genetic modification, complex products with extracellular vesicles derived from MSCs, cell encapsulation in hydrogels, and 3D bioprinted tissue engineering are promising approaches with which to improve MSC therapies for OA.

Preparation, Properties and Therapeutic Effect of a TPL Nanoparticle Thermosensitive Gel for Intra-Articular Injection

Most injectable preparations for the articular cavity are solution-type preparations that are frequently administered because of rapid elimination. In this study, triptolide (TPL), an effective ingredient in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), was prepared in the form of a nanoparticle thermosensitive gel (TPL-NS-Gel). The particle size distribution and gel structure were investigated by TEM, laser particle size analysis and laser capture microdissection. The effect of the nanoparticle carrier material PLGA on the phase transition temperature was investigated by ¹H variable temperature NMR and DSC. The tissue distribution, pharmacokinetic behavior, four inflammatory factors and therapeutic effect were determined in a rat RA model. The results suggested that PLGA increased the gel phase transition temperature. The drug concentration of the TPL-NS-Gel group in joint tissues was higher than that in other tissues at different time points, and the retention time was longer than that of the TPL-NS group. After 24 days of administration, TPL-NS-Gel significantly improved the joint swelling and stiffness of the rat models, and the improvement degree was better than that of the TPL-NS group. TPL-NS-Gel significantly decreased the levels of hs-CRP, IL-1, IL-6 and TNF-α in serum and joint fluid. There was a significant difference between the TPL-NS-Gel and TPL-NS groups on Day 24 (p < 0.05). Pathological section results showed that inflammatory cell infiltration was lower in the TPL-NS-Gel group, and no other obvious histological changes were observed. Upon articular injection, the TPL-NS-Gel prolonged drug release, reduced the drug concentration outside the articular tissue and improved the therapeutic effect in a rat RA model. The TPL-NS-Gel can be used as a new type of sustained-release preparation for articular injection.

The Efficacy and Safety of Intra-articular Low Molecular Weight Fraction of Human Serum Albumin for the Management of Moderate to Moderately Severe Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Osteoarthritis is a chronic degenerative joint disease that affects weight-bearing joints. Low molecular weight fraction of 5% (LMWF-5A) human serum albumin is an intra-articular injection that emerged for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. The aim of this review is to assess the efficacy and safety of LMWF-5A versus placebo through a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), EBSCO, and ClinicalTrials.gov registry databases were utilized to search for studies. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy of LMWF-5A versus placebo were included. Efficacy endpoints were represented by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) A and C scores for pain and function, respectively. Serious adverse events (SAEs), non-serious adverse events (NSAEs), and mortality rates were used to evaluate the safety of the drug. The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool was used for the risk of bias assessment. Seven RCTs (n=2939) that met the inclusion criteria were included. The meta-analysis did not find significant improvement in pain (WOMAC A) (standardized mean difference (SMD)= -0.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.10 - 0.09, P=0.87, I²=30%). Additionally, no significant change in function was noted (WOMAC C) (SMD=0.01, 95% CI -0.08 - 0.10, P=0.87, I²=22%). The pooled analysis did not find a significant difference between LMWF-5A and placebo regarding the incidence of joint swelling (P=0.84), joint stiffness (P=0.53), arthralgia (P=0.53), extremity pain (P=0.45), NSAEs (P=0.21), SAEs (P=0.92), or mortality (P=1.00). However, the subgroup analysis showed a significant reduction of 42% in NSAEs upon administration of 10 mL of LMWF-5A (risk ratio (RR)=0.58, 95% CI 0.35-0.97, P=0.04). In summary, our meta-analysis did not find significant differences between LMWF-5A and placebo regarding the incidence of NSAEs, SAEs, or mortality. On the other hand, LMWF-5A did not demonstrate superiority over saline in terms of efficacy. Therefore, it is not an effective drug for managing knee osteoarthritis.

Comparison of radiological and clinical results of knee intra-articular injections with two ultrasonography-guided approach techniques: A randomized controlled study

Objectives

The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of intra-articular injections performed with two different ultrasound-guided approaches in knee osteoarthritis.

Patients and methods

The randomized controlled study was conducted on 80 knees of 40 patients (9 males, 31 females; mean age: 63.6±8.2 years; range, 46 to 78 years) with Grade 2-3 gonarthrosis that underwent ultrasound-guided intra-articular injections with suprapatellar (SP) or infrapatellar (IP) approaches between March 2020 and January 2021. After the injection, opaque material spread was fluoroscopically observed. Before the procedure and at the one and three months after the procedure, patients' Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores for pain and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores for functional recovery were recorded.

Results

In both techniques, one- and three-month VAS and WOMAC scores were found to be significantly lower (p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). Of the patients with positive opaque spread, 63.3% were in the IP technique group, and 36.7% were in the SP technique group (p=0.003). In 69.2% of those with radiologically positive opaque spread, the VAS score was significantly higher with >50% regression (p=0.04). In the IP technique, >50% regression rate of the VAS was 86.7% in patients with positive opaque spread, while VAS regression was significantly higher than those without opaque spread (p=0.02).

Conclusion

Although the IP approach shows an early-positive opaque transition due to its proximity to the joint, both approach techniques are clinically effective under ultrasound guidance.

The Corticosteroid Meniscectomy Trial of Extended-Release Triamcinolone Injection After Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy: Protocol for a Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Meniscal tear in older adults often accompanies knee osteoarthritis and is commonly treated with arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) when patients have persistent pain after a trial of physical therapy. Cross-sectional evidence suggests that synovitis is associated with baseline pain in this patient population, but little is known about the relationship between synovitis and postoperative recovery or progression of knee osteoarthritis.

Purpose/Hypothesis

Intra-articular extended-release triamcinolone may reduce inflammation and thereby improve outcomes and slow disease progression. This article presents the rationale behind the Corticosteroid Meniscectomy Trial (CoMeT) and describes its study design and implementation strategies.

Study Design

Randomized controlled trial.

Methods

CoMeT is a 2-arm, 3-center, randomized placebo-controlled trial designed to establish the clinical efficacy of extended-release triamcinolone administered via intra-articular injection immediately after APM. The primary outcome is change in Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Pain subscore at 3-month follow-up. Synovial biopsy, joint fluid aspirate, and urine and blood sample analyses will examine the associations between various objective measures of baseline inflammation and pre- and postoperative outcome measures and clinical responses to triamcinolone intervention. Quantitative 3-T magnetic resonance imaging will evaluate cartilage and meniscal composition and 3-dimensional bone shape to detect early joint degeneration.

Results

We discuss methodologic innovations and challenges.

Conclusion

To our knowledge, this is the first randomized double-blind clinical trial that will analyze the effect of extended-release triamcinolone acetonide on pain, magnetic resonance imaging measures of structural change and effusion/synovitis, soluble biomarkers, and synovial tissue transcriptomics after APM.

Injectable Temperature-Sensitive Hydrogel Loaded with IL-36Ra for the Relief of Osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA) is an inflammatory disease accompanied by synovial joint inflammation, and IL-36 plays an important role in this process. Local application of IL-36 receptor antagonist (IL-36Ra) can effectively control the inflammatory response, thereby protecting cartilage and slowing down the development of OA. However, its application is limited by the fact that it is rapidly metabolized locally. We designed and prepared a temperature-sensitive poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)-poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA-PEG-PLGA) hydrogel (IL-36Ra@Gel) system carrying IL-36Ra and evaluated its basic physicochemical characteristics. The drug release curve of IL-36Ra@Gel indicated that this system could slowly release the drug over a longer period. Furthermore, degradation experiments showed that it could be largely degraded from the body within 1 month. The biocompatibility-related results showed that it had no significant effect on cell proliferation compared to the control group. In addition, the expression of MMP-13 and ADAMTS-5 was lower in IL-36Ra@Gel-treated chondrocytes than in the control group, and the opposite results appeared in aggrecan and collagen X. After 8 weeks of treatment with IL-36Ra@Gel by joint cavity injection, HE and Safranin O/Fast green staining showed that the degree of cartilage tissue destruction in the IL-36Ra@Gel-treated group was less than those in other groups. Meanwhile, the joints of mice in the IL-36Ra@Gel group had the most intact cartilage surface, the smallest thickness of cartilage erosion, and the lowest OARSI and Mankins score among all groups. Consequently, the combination of IL-36Ra and PLGA-PLEG-PLGA temperature-sensitive hydrogels can greatly improve the therapeutic effect and prolong the drug duration time, thus effectively delaying the progression of degenerative changes in OA, providing a new feasible nonsurgical treatment for OA.

Effect of Fluoroscopic-Guided Corticosteroid Injection in Patients With Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction

Background Sacroiliac joint dysfunction is a major cause of axial low back pain which can masquerade as pain from lumbar disc diseases. Treatment of axial back pain arising due to sacroiliac joint dysfunction remains a challenge. This study was conducted to evaluate the long and short-term effects of intra-articular corticosteroid injection in the relief of pain and disability caused by sacroiliac joint dysfunction. Methodology A total of 83 patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction were included in this prospective randomized control study. Patients were randomized into two groups by a computer-generated randomization table. These two groups were treated with fluoroscopy-guided corticosteroid and local anesthetic injection (group A) and distilled water and local anesthetic injection (group B). Pre and post-intervention assessment of all patients was done based on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) for pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for disability. The outcome measures of the study were the NPRS and ODI assessed at the initial visit one (pre-injection), two weeks post-injection (visit 2), and four weeks post-injection (visit 3). Results Demographic data were comparable in both groups. There was no significant difference in pre-injection NPRS and ODI values in both groups. The changes in NPRS and ODI values were significant from pre-injection to two weeks to four weeks. Group A patients performed better in terms of a decrease in the perception of pain and a decrease in the perception of disability compared to group B patients in the second and fourth weeks of follow-up. Conclusions Fluoroscopy-guided corticosteroid injection is an effective measure for reducing pain and disability in patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction.

Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion-guided sacroiliac joint corticosteroid injection in patients with axial spondyloarthritis

Local glucocorticoid injections are used in the treatment of isolated sacroiliitis in patients with spondyloarthritis. Sacroiliac joint injections can be performed intraarticularly or periarticularly. Since the accuracy of blind injections is low, fluoroscopy, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, or ultrasonography guidance are used to increase the accuracy of sacroiliac joint injections. Currently, imaging fusion software is successfully used in sacroiliac joint interventions with three-dimensional anatomic information added to ultrasonography. Herein, we present two cases of sacroiliac joint corticosteroid injections under ultrasonography-magnetic resonance imaging fusion guidance.

miR-199a-5p Reduces Chondrocyte Hypertrophy and Attenuates Osteoarthritis Progression via the Indian Hedgehog Signal Pathway

Osteoarthritis (OA), the most common type of arthritis, is an age-associated disease, characterized by the progressive degradation of articular cartilage, synovial inflammation, and degeneration of subchondral bone. Chondrocyte proliferation is regulated by the Indian hedgehog (IHH in humans, Ihh in animals) signaling molecule, which regulates hypertrophy and endochondral ossification in the development of the skeletal system. microRNAs (miRNAs, miRs) are a family of about 22-nucleotide endogenous non-coding RNAs, which negatively regulate gene expression. In this study, the expression level of IHH was upregulated in the damaged articular cartilage tissues among OA patients and OA cell cultures, while that of miR-199a-5p was the opposite. Further investigations demonstrated that miR-199a-5p could directly regulate IHH expression and reduce chondrocyte hypertrophy and matrix degradation via the IHH signal pathway in the primary human chondrocytes. The intra-articular injection of synthetic miR-199a-5p agomir attenuated OA symptoms in rats, including the alleviation of articular cartilage destruction, subchondral bone degradation, and synovial inflammation. The miR-199a-5p agomir could also inhibit the Ihh signaling pathway in vivo. This study might help in understanding the role of miR-199a-5p in the pathophysiology and molecular mechanisms of OA and indicate a potential novel therapeutic strategy for OA patients.

Therapeutic effect of alendronate in an experimental temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis is a common degenerative joint disease. This disease negatively affects the daily life, speech and chewing functions of patients.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of intra-articular injection of alendronate to osteoarthritis, which has a protective effect on bone and cartilage tissue and helps reduce inflammation in temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis.

METHODS

A total of 24 Wistar albino rats were used in the study. Rats were divided into four groups: study, saline, control and sham. In both saline and control groups, monosodium iodoacetate was injected intra-articularly to induce osteoarthritis. Alendronate was administered intra-articularly to the study group weekly for 4 weeks. In the saline group, saline was administered by intra-articular injection. At the end of the 12th week, all groups were sacrificed. Mandibular condyle tissues were examined histopathologically.

RESULTS

According to the results, osteoarthritic changes in the control group were higher than those in the study group (p < .05). No significant reduction in osteoarthritic changes was observed in the saline group (p > .05). Significant osteoarthritis findings were observed in all groups compared with the sham group (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

Intra-articular injection of alendronate was found to have positive results on TMJ osteoarthritis. In addition, it was seen that alendronate has effects on reducing cartilage tissue degeneration and loss of matrix proteins.

Intra-articular injection of platelet-rich plasma in patients with hemophilia and painful knee joint cartilage degeneration

INTRODUCTION

Knee arthropathy causes pain to people with hemophilia (PWH). One of the current controversies is whether injections of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) are effective in relieving the knee pain of PWH.

AREAS COVERED

A narrative literature review was conducted on the efficacy of PRP injections in the knees of PWH.

EXPERT OPINION

Intra-articular PRP knee injections are widely used in patients with knee osteoarthritis to relieve pain and delay total knee arthroplasty. Although numerous publications have supported the use of PRP in knee osteoarthritis, there is still major controversy regarding its true usefulness, given that a number of studies with a high degree of evidence have failed to show the efficacy of PRP. With respect to painful hemophilic arthropathy, the use of PRP injections is even more controversial, as there are only four publications on the subject supporting the use of PRP in hemophilia, all of them with a low degree of evidence. A publication with grade 1 evidence recommended against the use of PRP in hemophilic arthropathy because its efficacy has not been demonstrated. My opinion is that intra-articular PRP injections should not be used in hemophilia until there is more evidence of its benefits.

Comparison of clinical efficiency between intra-articular injection of platelet-rich plasma and hyaluronic acid for osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid (HA) are non-surgical treatments for osteoarthritis (OA), but the comparison of their efficiency is still inconclusive.

Objectives

The objectives of this study were to compare the efficacy of PRP and HA in the treatment of OA by meta-analysis and to explore the effects of different injection times and leukocyte concentration on the efficacy of PRP.

Design

Meta-analysis and subgroup analysis were conducted. The data were analyzed by Review Manager v5.4.1.

Data sources and methods

Articles were retrieved and screened from PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase. The outcome included the total Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), the visual analog scale (VAS), adverse events (AEs), the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and the satisfaction rate.

Results

A total of 30 articles involving 2733 patients were included. The total WOMAC score and IKDC score of the PRP group were better than those of the HA group at the last follow-up time, while there was no significant difference in AEs, satisfaction rate, and VAS between the two groups. In our subgroup analysis, there was no significant difference between single-injection PRP and triple-injection PRP. Leukocyte-poor PRP (LP-PRP) was better than leukocyte-rich PRP (LR-PRP) in IKDC, but there was no significant difference between them in the other scores.

Conclusions

In the treatment of OA, compared with HA, PRP performed better in the improvement of the patient's function. There was no significant difference in VAS and AEs between the two groups, and the safety was comparable. LP-PRP looked to be superior to LR-PRP in functional recovery, but there appeared to be no significant difference in pain relief between them. There was no significant difference between single PRP and triple PRP in the subgroup analysis.

Intra-Articular Mesenchymal Stem Cell Injection for Knee Osteoarthritis: Mechanisms and Clinical Evidence

Knee osteoarthritis presents higher incidences than other joints, with increased prevalence during aging. It is a progressive process and may eventually lead to disability. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are expected to repair damaged issues due to trilineage potential, trophic effects, and immunomodulatory properties of MSCs. Intra-articular MSC injection was reported to treat knee osteoarthritis in many studies. This review focuses on several issues of intra-articular MSC injection for knee osteoarthritis, including doses of MSCs applied for injection and the possibility of cartilage regeneration following MSC injection. Intra-articular MSC injection induced hyaline-like cartilage regeneration, which could be seen by arthroscopy in several studies. Additionally, anatomical, biomechanical, and biochemical changes during aging and other causes participate in the development of knee osteoarthritis. Conversely, appropriate intervention based on these anatomical, biomechanical, biochemical, and functional properties and their interactions may postpone the progress of knee OA and facilitate cartilage repair induced by MSC injection. Hence, post-injection rehabilitation programs and related mechanisms are discussed.

Assessment of the effectiveness and satisfaction of platelet-rich plasma compared with hyaluronic acid in knee osteoarthritis at minimum 7-year follow-up: A post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial

Background: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) can be effectively treated conservatively using platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections into the affected joints. While the short-term therapeutic clinical benefits were well documented, the mid-term results remain undetermined. To clarify its efficacy, the mid-term clinical outcomes of intra-articular injections of either PRP or hyaluronic acid (HA) in KOA were compared. Methods: One hundred patients who complied with the inclusion criteria were randomized to undergo once a week 3 weeks, intra-articular injections of either PRP or HA. Patients were evaluated before the injection, at 3, 6, and a mean of 78.9 months of follow-up. Eighty-five patients reached the final evaluation. Data on survival, re-intervention, pain, function, imaging, and satisfaction were collected and analyzed. Results: With surgery for any reason as the endpoint, the cumulative survival rate of the PRP group was 90%, while that of the HA group was 74%. There was a significant difference between the two groups in the total re-intervention rate (56.7% vs 16.2%, p < 0.05). The comparative analyses showed significant intergroup differences in the visual analog scale (VAS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) (p < 0.01, p < 0.05, respectively) at the final follow-up. And base on the regression analyses, the type of treatment, age, and Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grade served as statistically an independent determinants of VAS (p < 0.001, p = 0.034, p < 0.001, respectively). Likewise, those variables independently determined WOMAC in our study. However, no difference was observed in the imaging evaluation, containing the K-L grade and Cartilage Lesion Score, between the two groups (p > 0.05). Besides, the satisfaction treated by the PRP was 78.6%, with a superiority compared with HA (55.8%, p < 0.05), and no complications were noted in the whole treatment process among patients who participated. Conclusion: PRP was more effective than HA in survival and re-intervention rates, VAS, and WOMAC, although there were no significant differences in the imaging evaluation between the two groups. Furthermore, patients treated with PRP were associated with higher satisfaction compared with HA.

Quality Improvement of a Hip Injection Service

Background Osteoarthritis is a substantive burden on the population and National Health Service (NHS) in the United Kingdom. A recent systematic review suggests that intra-articular steroid injections are an efficacious conservative treatment modality. The NHS Constitution states that "patients should wait no longer than 18 weeks from GP referral to treatment." An NHS hospital trust failed to meet this standard in a quarter of patients waiting for an intra-articular steroid injection of the hip. Strategies were considered to improve the time from referral to treatment (RTT). The aim of this quality improvement project was to improve the efficiency and capacity of the injection list. Materials and methods Patients who underwent an injection on a list between January and April 2019 were identified. Data were retrospectively collected and included the sites of injection and waiting times. Proformas for documentation and discharge summaries were introduced. Time taken for each appointment pre- and post-intervention were compared with the aim to increase the number of patients per list. Results Thirty-six (26%) of 138 patients experienced delays beyond 18 weeks from RTT. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) number of weeks waiting for an injection from the time of referral was 14 (6). The mean (SD) time for each appointment was 12 minutes 36 seconds (7 minutes 36 seconds) pre-intervention and 8 minutes 36 seconds (3 minutes 12 seconds) post-intervention. Discussion and conclusion Our standardized proformas led to an improvement in efficiency by reducing the time taken for documentation and capacity by subsequently increasing the number of patients per list.

The Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis Symptoms and Structural Changes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) usage in orthopedics continues to rise, despite guidelines suggesting non-superiority to comparative cohorts. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on PRP efficacy using two clinical assessments: (1) Visual Analog Scale and (2) Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. We assessed consistency and clinical relevancy by determining study heterogeneity (eg, sample sizes, ages, body mass index, arthritic severities, etc.). Comparative cohorts were: (A) hyaluronic acid (HA); (B) corticosteroid (CS); (C) normal saline (NS); and (D) exercise therapy. We performed sub-analyses of structural changes assessed on ultrasound, radiograph, or magnetic resonance imaging .

METHODS

We utilized PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases up to December 1, 2021, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic-Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Twenty-four studies met criteria, with comparisons to: HA (n = 11); CS (n = 6); NS (n = 5); and exercise therapy (n = 3). Seven studies assessed structural changes. Evaluations utilized a methodological scoring system. I² statistics and forest plots pooled analyses and delineated study results.

RESULTS

PRP led to Visual Analog Scale and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index improvements in most studies when compared to HA, CS, and NS (P ≤ .05). Comparison to exercise therapy resulted in inconclusive findings (P ≥ .05). However, substantial heterogeneity (I² ≥ 76%) was reported due to study variability. No differences were found when assessing structural changes or cartilage thickness by magnetic resonance imaging (standardized mean difference -0.01 [-0.19, 0.18], P = .91).

CONCLUSIONS

PRP may be associated with pain and functional improvements but was not clinically relevant (inconsistent study- and patient-metrics). In addition, PRP did not confer superiority when assessing knee-related structural changes.

Comparison of polynucleotide, sodium hyaluronate, and crosslinked sodium hyaluronate for the management of painful knee osteoarthritis: a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical effectiveness of sodium polynucleotide, classic hyaluronic acid, and crosslinked hyaluronic acid for the management of painful knee osteoarthritis.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial.

SETTING

Multicenter study.

SUBJECTS

Patients with chronic painful knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

Ninety patients were selected and randomized into polynucleotide, classic hyaluronic acid, and crosslinked hyaluronic acid groups (30 per group). Intra-articular injections of the viscosupplement for each group were administered to the patients three times at one-week intervals. The primary outcome was differences in changes of weight-bearing pain scores at 16 weeks between the groups. The secondary outcomes were changes in the intensity of knee pain during weight-bearing, walking, and rest, and functional disability, quality of life, and adverse events during the 16-week follow-up period.

RESULTS

At 16 weeks, the polynucleotide group showed a higher reduction in pain score using a Visual Analog Scale score (0-100) than the classic hyaluronic acid (-17.6 [95% CI = -35.1 to -0.1]; P = 0.048) and crosslinked hyaluronic acid (-22.4 [95% CI = -41.5 to -3.3]; P = 0.016) groups. The polynucleotide and crosslinked hyaluronic acid groups showed an early-onset reduction in knee pain during weight-bearing, walking, and rest. All three groups showed reductions in functional disability and improved quality of life at 16 weeks without inter-group differences. No severe adverse events were reported throughout the study period.

CONCLUSION

Polynucleotide significantly relieves pain more and relieves pain faster in patients with knee osteoarthritis than classic and crosslinked hyaluronic acid, with improved health-related quality of life.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER AND REGISTRY URL

Clinical Research Information Service (https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/index.jsp; Identifier: KCT0005308).

Acupotomy combined with intra-articular injection of sodium hyaluronate in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis

This retrospective study aimed to compare the effects of acupotomy combined with intra-articular injection of sodium hyaluronate (IA-SH) for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Eighty electronic medical records of patients with KOA were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into an intervention group (n = 40, acupotomy plus IA-SH) and a control group (n = 40, IA-SH). Outcome measures included the visual analog scale, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), and adverse events. Outcome data were collected and analyzed before and after treatment. The results of this study showed that there was a greater reduction in the visual analog scale (P < .01) and WOMAC scores (pain, P < .01; stiffness, P < .01; function, P < .01; total, P < .01) in the intervention group than in the control group. In addition, there were no significant differences in adverse events between the 2 groups. In this study, the effects of acupotomy plus IA-SH were superior to those of IA-SH alone for the treatment of patients with KOA. Further prospective studies are required to confirm these findings.

Effect of intra-articular hyalase, Ketorolac, marcaine and triamcinolone, versus Ketorolac, marcaine and triamcinolone for reducing knee joint pain other than joint replacement

Introduction

Knee pain is one of the causes of physiological complications in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. It is necessary to provide a solution to reduce pain in these patients. Our study aimed to compare the effect of intra-articular hyalase, ketorolac, marcaine, and triamcinolone versus ketorolac, marcaine, and triamcinolone for reducing knee joint pain after knee surgery.

Methods

This clinical study was performed on 30 candidates for knee surgery other than knee replacement from 2019 to 2020. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: hyalase, ketorolac, marcaine, and triamcinolone (group 1) and ketorolac, marcaine, and triamcinolone (group 2). The patient's pain score was recorded by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and range of motion (ROM) at the end of the first week, the end of the first month, and the end of the third month as well as the sixth month and the twelfth month after surgery.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 42.3 years. On average, the group receiving hyalase (first group) received about 30% better scores and had less pain (P < 0.05). In the first week, first month, and third month, no significant difference was observed between the two groups. But the pain scores for the first and second groups were 3.1 and 4.5 during the sixth to twelfth months, respectively (P < 0.05). Moreover, the increase in ROM during the sixth to twelfth months was significantly higher in the group receiving hyalase (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Adding hyalase to ketorolac, marcaine, and triamcinolone could improve pain control in the short and long term and this could be capable of reducing the need for additional drugs.

[Research progress of nanomaterials for intra-articular targeted drug delivery in treatment of osteoarthritis]

OBJECTIVE

To review the research progress of intra-articular targeted delivery of nanomaterials in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

The domestic and foreign related literature on intra-articular targeted delivery of nanomaterials for the treatment of OA was extensively reviewed, and their targeting strategies were discussed and summarized.

RESULTS

Rapid drug clearance from the joint remains a critical limitation in drug efficacy. Nanocarriers can not only significantly improve the residence profiles of drugs in the joint, but also achieve targeted delivery of drugs to specific joint tissues through active or passive targeting strategies.

CONCLUSION

With the continuous development of various emerging tissue- or cell-specific drugs, the targeted delivery of drugs with nanomaterials promise to realize the clinical translation of these drugs in the treatment of OA.

Preclinical In Vivo Safety of Poly-Phosphorylated Superlubrication Vectors for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA) can lead to a significant functional disability. Poly[2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl phosphorylcholine] (pMPC) liposomes are a novel treatment modality for OA, intended to restore the natural lubrication properties of articular cartilage. Here, we report on two studies aimed to assess the local and systemic safety and toxicity of pMPCylated liposomes in comparison with physiological saline, in Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats and in sheep after a single intra-articular (IA) injection. The animals were sacrificed after 1 and 6 weeks (rats) and 3 and 6 weeks (sheep). No signs of toxicity or abnormal clinical findings were observed. Histopathological evaluation revealed no signs of reactivity or abnormal findings in the injected joints or in any other organs. In conclusion, a single IA injection of the pMPCylated liposomes demonstrated an excellent safety profile and did not result in local reactivity or systemic toxicity, thus supporting its further development for use in humans.

Circular RNA circ_0000423 regulates cartilage ECM synthesis via circ_0000423/miRNA-27b-3p/MMP-13 axis in osteoarthritis

Circular RNA (circRNA) is related to many human diseases including osteoarthritis (OA). Our research purpose was to show that functional circRNAs have a role in the pathogenesis of OA, while also identifying potential circRNA that bind to miRNA-27b-3p. Microarray analysis was used to evaluate the expression of CircRNA in OA and normal cartilage. The role and functional mechanism of Circ_0000423 up-regulation were detected in OA and verified in vitro and in vivo. RNA transfection, qRT-PCR, Western blot analysis, immunofluorescence, and dual-luciferase assays were used to investigate the interaction between Circ_0000423 and miRNA-27b-3p in vitro. The roles of Circ_0000423 were discussed in vivo. Our results discovered 11 down-regulated circRNAs and 101 up-regulated circRNAs between control and OA tissues, and confirmed that Circ_0000423 an increase significantly in OA tissues by evaluating the different circRNAs expressions. Meanwhile, luciferase analysis confirmed Circ_0000423 can be directly targeted by miRNA-27b-3p and act as a miRNA-27b-3p sponge. Circ_0000423 can influence MMP-13 and collagen II expression by targeting miRNA-27b-3p expression as ceRNA in OA. Furthermore, AAV-shRNA-Circ 0000423 intra-articular injection slows the progression of OA by decreasing articular cartilage destruction and erosion, joint surface fibrosis, osteophyte formation, MMP-13 expression, and increasing collagen II expression in the articular cartilage of ACLT-induced OA mice model. These findings confirmed that the Circ_0000423-miRNA-27b-3p-MMP-13 axis could affect the pathogenesis of OA which might lead to a novel target for diagnostic molecular biological indicators and potential OA treatments.

Role and Effectiveness of Intra-articular Injection of Hyaluronic Acid in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative joint disease that causes persistent joint pain and stiffness of mainly the large peripheral weight-bearing joints. It is a leading cause of functional disability and poor quality of life. Various modalities of therapy are recommended by different research organizations at different stages of OA including non-pharmacological, pharmacological, and surgical interventions. Intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid (HA) is widely used for over three decades in the treatment of OA. However controversies exist regarding its safety and efficacy, the number of injections and courses, type of preparation, duration of its effects, and combining it with other drugs or molecules. This study aimed to review the most recent data available in the published literature to address these.

Electronic databases like Medline, Embase, ProQuest, and Google Scholar were searched for articles using keywords, intraarticular injections, hyaluronic acid, and osteoarthritis knee. The review was carried out as per PRISMA guidelines.

Thirty-eight randomized control trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy and safety of intra-articular injection of HA were included in the systematic review. Out of the 38 studies, 22 (57.9%) were double-blind, eight (21%) single-blind, three (7.9%) non-blind, four (10%) with simple randomization, and one (2.7%) was open-labeled. Total 5,025 patients were included in these studies. The mean age of the patients was 60.28 years and the osteoarthritis grade of the knee joint was 1 to 3. HA was studied as a test preparation in 19 (50%) while in another 19 (50%) it was studied as a control. In 24 (63.2%) studies, HA was used as high molecular weight preparation in eight (21%) as low molecular weight preparation while in six studies the information was not available. HA was used as a standalone preparation in 31 studies, in two studies it was injected with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and with either low-level laser therapy (LLLT), triamcinolone (TA), betamethasone (CS), poly deoxyribonucleotide (PDRN) or dexamethasone (DX) in one study each. In the majority of the studies, HA was given as a single injection (52.6% studies) or weekly three injections (28.9% studies). In 13.2 %, it was given as weekly 5 injections and in 5.3% as weekly two injections.

IA-HA injections have a limited role in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis in those patients who do not have sufficient pain relief with topical or oral medication and physical therapy. It is safe and effective except for minor side effects such as local pain and swelling lasting for a few days. Severe allergic reactions are extremely rare. They provide adequate pain relief and functional improvement for up to six months irrespective of a number of injections and type of preparations used. The combination formulations with corticosteroids or PRP or MSCs show better results than HA alone. Combining HA with newer molecules such as peptides or diclofenac for sustained and disease-modifying effects requires more studies in the future.

Effects and Safety of Intra-Articular Sodium Hyaluronate Injection for the Treatment of Ankle Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Clinical Trial

Various nonoperative treatments have been implemented to reduce pain and improve the quality of life in patients with ankle osteoarthritis. Among these treatments, intra-articular hyaluronate injection has proven efficacy and safety in patients with knee osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and complications of hyaluronate injection using various clinical scoring systems. This study included 37 patients with unilateral ankle osteoarthritis (grade 2 or 3 according to the Takakura classification) who did not respond to previous pharmacological treatment. 3 weekly hyaluronate injections (2 mL Hyruan Plus®) were administered. The efficacy of intra-articular hyaluronate injection was evaluated on the basis of patient-reported foot and ankle clinical assessment at a mean follow-up of 13.8 ± 8.3 (range 6-33) months. Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale scores for pain and disability, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot scores, and visual analog scale for pain significantly improved at the final follow-up compared to that before intra-articular hyaluronate injection (p ≤ .05). When patients were dichotomized according to age, sex, body mass index, symptom duration, and Takakura classification, all these factors were not related to clinical outcomes. This study suggests that 3 weekly intra-articular hyaluronate injections can be performed safely to reduce pain and improve function without serious complications in patients with early or intermediate-grade ankle osteoarthritis when patients inadequately respond to medication. Larger controlled studies are needed to clarify the effects of hyaluronate injection and identify patients who can benefit most from hyaluronate injection.