Bermúdez-Tamayo C, Jiménez-Pernett J, García Gutiérrez JF, Azpilicueta Cengotitobengoa I, Milena Silva-Castro M, Babio G, Plazaola Castaño J. [Questionnaire to evaluate health web sites according to European criteria].
Aten Primaria 2006;
38:268-74. [PMID:
17020711 PMCID:
PMC7669060 DOI:
10.1157/13092985]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2005] [Accepted: 12/19/2005] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
To design a questionnaire to evaluate compliance with quality criteria on health web sites and to analyse its reliability.
DESIGN
A descriptive study on the reliability of a questionnaire.
PARTICIPANTS
Twenty web sites on health topics.
SETTING
Internet.
MAIN MEASUREMENTS
The questionnaire was based on analysis of content of the criteria of the e-Europe 2002 code of conduct, comparing these with the criteria underlying the AMA, the Summit code and the e-Health Code of Ethics regulations and current directives. The dimensions studied were transparency, absence of conflicts of interest, authorship, data protection, updating, accountability, and accessibility. A preliminary questionnaire was drawn up for a pilot test conducted by 3 researchers for 20 web sites, its reliability was appraised, adjustments were made and the definitive questionnaire was designed. Reliability was evaluated again for 26 web sites evaluated by 3 researchers. To evaluate concordance in the answers of the participants, Cohen's Kappa index with a 95% confidence level was used.
RESULTS
All the quality directives of e-Europe 2002, the European regulations and relevant points from other questionnaires were included in the questionnaire designed. Reliability was acceptable (kappa > or = 0.60) for 12 of the 18 quality criteria included. The least concordant aspects of the questionnaire were information update (kappa = 0.310) and accessibility (search for contents and access for persons with disability).
CONCLUSIONS
Reliability of the questionnaire designed was acceptable.
Collapse