Radiation recall reaction following gemcitabine

A case of dermatitis and myositis in the upper thorax following administration of gemcitabine in a 65-year-old woman with metastatic non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is described. The reaction and time course suggest a radiation recall phenomenon. This report joins a small but increasing number of radiation recall events related to gemcitabine. The possibility of a radiation recall reaction should be borne in mind when a patient develops symptoms in a previously irradiated site without evidence of disease progression at that site. Cessation of the precipitating drug is the most important step in management and systemic steroids may hasten symptomatic relief.

Early toxicity from preoperative radiotherapy with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil for resectable adenocarcinoma of the rectum: a Phase II trial for the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group

PURPOSE

To assess the toxicity and the efficacy of preoperative radiotherapy with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the rectum.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eligible patients had newly diagnosed localized adenocarcinoma of the rectum within 12 cm of the anal verge, Stage T3-4, and were suitable for curative resection. Eighty-two patients were treated with radiotherapy-50.4 Gy in 28 fractions in 5.6 weeks, given concurrently with continuous infusion 5-FU, using either 96-h/week infusion at 300 mg/m(2)/day or 7-days/week infusion at 225 mg/m(2)/day.

RESULTS

The median age was 59 years (range, 27-87), and 67% of patients were male. Pretreatment stages of the rectal cancer were T3, 89% and resectable T4, 11%, with endorectal ultrasound confirmation in 67% of patients. Grade 3 acute toxicity occurred in 5 of 82 patients (6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2-14%). Types of surgical resection were anterior resection, 61%; abdominoperineal resection, 35%; and other procedures, 4%. There was no operative mortality. Anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection occurred in 3 of 50 patients (6%; 95% CI, 1-17%). The pathologic complete response rate was 16% (95% CI, 9-26%). Pathologic Stages T2 or less occurred in 51%.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative radiotherapy with continuous infusion 5-FU for locally advanced rectal cancer is a safe regimen, with a significant downstaging effect. It does not seem to lead to a significant increase in serious surgical complications.

Combined modality treatment for locally advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the oropharynx in a woman with Bloom's syndrome: a case report and review of the literature

We describe a case of locally advanced unresectable squamous-cell carcinoma of the oropharynx in a young woman with Bloom's syndrome. She was treated with radical radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy (cisplatin and 5-flurouracil). She was unable to complete treatment due to the development of severe side effects: confluent mucositis, moist desquamating skin reaction, severe diarrhea and severe myelosupression with neutropenic sepsis. The limited relevant literature is presented. We conclude that chemotherapy should be used with extreme caution in Bloom's syndrome patients.

Repetitive high-dose topotecan, carboplatin, and paclitaxel with peripheral blood progenitor cell support in previously untreated ovarian cancer: results of a Phase I study

OBJECTIVE

In view of the significant activity of topotecan in ovarian cancer with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of myelosuppression, we evaluated the addition of topotecan to carboplatin and paclitaxel with peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) support.

METHODS

Patients with previously untreated stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer with macroscopic residual disease following primary debulking surgery were eligible. Patients received two cycles of carboplatin AUC = 5 and 175 mg/m(2) of paclitaxel with collection of PBPCs after the second cycle. Patients subsequently received three cycles of high-dose therapy (HDT) with topotecan on a daily x5 schedule, paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2) over 24 h), and carboplatin (AUC = 12-16).

RESULTS

Nineteen patients with a median age of 49 years (range 21-63) were enrolled and topotecan was escalated in 6 patient cohorts up to a dose of 4.5 mg/m(2)/day. Fifty-two of the planned 57 treatment cycles were delivered with no treatment-related deaths. Neutrophil and platelet recovery was rapid and the interval between HDT was 28 days. Febrile neutropenia occurred following 57% of all HDT cycles. DLTs of mucositis and diarrhea were observed at topotecan (4.5 mg/m(2)/day), paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (AUC = 12). The protocol was subsequently modified to administer topotecan (2.5 mg/m(2)/day) with carboplatin (AUC = 16); however, 2 patients developed grade 4 diarrhea (1 with grade 3 mucositis and 1 with grade 4 mucositis). The clinical CR rate was 73% (14/19) with an overall clinical response rate of 95% (18/19). Of the 14 patients with a CCR, 13 of these underwent a second-look laparotomy with 8 (61%) achieving a pathological CR. With a median follow-up of 28 months (range 11-40 months), the median PFS is 36 months and OS has not been reached.

CONCLUSION

When combined with carboplatin (AUC = 12) and paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2)), the recommended topotecan dose is 3.5 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days. This outpatient HDT regimen combines three of the most active drugs in ovarian cancer with acceptable toxicity and promising activity.

Severe interstitial pneumonitis following high-dose cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and docetaxel: two case reports and a review of the literature

The use of high-dose chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer has been an area of recent interest and the role of such treatment in the management of metastatic breast cancer is still to be defined. Multiple studies have suggested that such treatment can be given with minimal morbidity and mortality. We describe two cases of life-threatening interstitial pneumonitis, following high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) with cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and docetaxel with stem cell rescue given for metastatic breast cancer. The available relevant literature is reviewed.

Phase I trial of concurrent tirapazamine, cisplatin, and radiotherapy in patients with advanced head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the maximum-tolerated dose of tirapazamine when combined with cisplatin and radiation in patients with T3/4 and/or N2/3 squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The starting schedule was conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (70 Gy in 7 weeks) with concomitant cisplatin 75 mg/m2 and tirapazamine 290 mg/m2 (before cisplatin) in weeks 1, 4, and 7 and tirapazamine alone 160 mg/m2 three times a week in weeks 2, 3, 5, and 6. Positron emission tomography scans for tumor hypoxia (18F misonidazole) were performed before and during radiotherapy.

RESULTS

We treated 16 patients with predominantly oropharyngeal primary tumors, including 10 patients with T4 or N3 disease. Febrile neutropenia occurred toward the end of radiotherapy in three out of six patients treated on the initial dose level. Two of these patients also developed grade 4 acute radiation reactions. Another 10 patients were treated with the same doses, but the week 5 and week 6 tirapazamine doses were omitted. This resulted in less neutropenia and only one dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) (febrile neutropenia), and eight out of 10 patients completed treatment without any dose omissions. In these 10 patients, the acute radiation toxicities were not obviously enhanced compared with chemoradiotherapy regimens using concurrent platinum and fluorouracil. 18F misonidazole scans detected hypoxia in 14 of 15 patients at baseline, with only one patient having detectable hypoxia at the end of treatment. With a median follow-up of 2.7 years, the 3-year failure-free survival rate was 69% (SE, 12%), the 3-year local progression-free rate was 88% (SE, 8%), and the 3-year overall survival rate was 69% (SE, 12%).

CONCLUSION

DLT was due unexpectedly to febrile neutropenia, which could be overcome by omitting tirapazamine in weeks 5 and 6. The combination of tirapazamine, cisplatin, and radiotherapy resulted in remarkably good and durable clinical responses in patients with very advanced head and neck cancers. It warrants further investigation.

Repetitive high-dose therapy with cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and docetaxel with peripheral blood progenitor cell and filgrastim support for metastatic and locally advanced breast cancer: results of a phase I study

This phase I study was designed to determine the optimal dosages of a novel repetitive high-dose therapy regimen for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The planned treatment was three cycles of high-dose cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and docetaxel delivered every 35 days with progressive dose-escalation in successive cohorts. Each cycle was supported by peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) and filgrastim. Eighteen patients were entered into this trial. Of the planned 54 treatment cycles, 44 were delivered and 11 patients completed all three cycles. The dose-limiting toxicities were interstitial pneumonitis and mucositis with moderately severe diarrhea (n = 3) and rash (n = 3). There were no treatment-related deaths. Of the 17 patients with evaluable disease, 16 patients responded with six patients achieving a complete remission and an additional four patients achieving no detectable disease (negative restaging including PET scan) but a persistently abnormal bone scan. At a median follow-up of 12 months, median progression-free survival was 11 months with the median overall survival not reached. The recommended doses for phase II/III studies are cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2), thiotepa (300 mg/m2) and docetaxel (100 mg/m2).

Docetaxel effectively mobilizes peripheral blood CD34+ cells

We prospectively evaluated docetaxel (100 mg/m2) with G-CSF (10 microg/kg S.C., daily) for mobilization efficiency in 26 patients with breast cancer. The minimum target yield was >4.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (optimum = 9 x 10(6)/kg), sufficient to support the subsequent three cycles of high-dose therapy (HDT). The peak days for peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cells were day 8 and day 9. Seven collections began on day 7, 16 on day 8 and three on day 9. The median peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) CD34+ cell content ranged from 1.2 to 5.9 x 10(6)/kg per day during days 7 to 11 with a median CD34+ content of the total 72 PBPC collections of 3.4 x 10(6)/kg (0.07-15.6). Fifteen patients obtained a PBPC collection exceeding 5 x 10(6)/kg on a single day of collection. Following a median 3 days collection for each patient (range 2-4), the median total CD34+ for all individual sets of collections was 9.7 x 10(6)/kg (range 1.0-28.4). We were able to achieve the minimum CD34+ cell target yield in 22 of 26 patients with one cycle of mobilisation chemotherapy and in two of these patients a second collection yielded sufficient cells. Twenty-two patients have subsequently received repetitive HDT and PBPC transplantation with 57 cycles of HDT having been delivered. For all 57 cycles, the median time to absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >0.5 x 10(9)/l and 1.0 x 10(9)/l was 10 days (range 8-22) and 11 days (range 8-23), respectively. The median time to platelets greater than 20 x 10(9)/l, 50 x 10(9)/l and 100 x 10(9)/l was 13 days (range 11-23), 17 days (range 12-53) and 23 days (range 18-70), respectively. We conclude that docetaxel with G-CSF effectively mobilises PBPCs with apheresis needing to be commenced approximately 8 days after docetaxel administration.

A randomised crossover trial of chemotherapy in the home: patient preferences and cost analysis

OBJECTIVES

To determine patient preferences and cost differences between home-based and hospital-based chemotherapy.

DESIGN

Randomised crossover trial.

SETTING

A tertiary cancer hospital in Melbourne, Victoria.

PARTICIPANTS

20 patients who required chemotherapy suitable for administration at home.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were assigned at random to receive their first chemotherapy treatment in either the home or the hospital and the second treatment in the alternative setting.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patient preference, costs.

RESULTS

There was universal agreement by the 20 patients in the randomised trial that home-based chemotherapy was the preferred option (P < 0.0001). No problems were nominated by the patients as being associated with home-based chemotherapy. Home-based treatment was estimated to result in an increased cost of $83 (P = 0.0002) for each chemotherapy treatment compared with hospital-based treatment. Reported advantages for chemotherapy in the home included the elimination of travel, reduction in treatment-associated anxiety, reduction in the burden on carers and family, and the ability to continue other duties. There were no significant complications associated with administration of chemotherapy in the home.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients prefer home-based chemotherapy to hospital-based treatment. The future of chemotherapy-in-the-home programs in Australia will depend on whether patient preferences are deemed to offset any potential increase in costs.

A phase II trial of paclitaxel and epirubicin in advanced breast cancer

Initial trials of paclitaxel and doxorubicin in advanced breast cancer yielded high response rates but significant cardiac toxicity was observed. In this phase II trial we investigated the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel combined with epirubicin. Patients with advanced breast cancer, performance status 0-2, measurable disease, and a normal left ventricular ejection fraction, who may have received adjuvant chemotherapy were treated with epirubicin 75 mg m(-2) followed by a 3-h infusion of paclitaxel 175 mg m(-2) repeated every 3 weeks. Forty-three eligible patients were treated at six centres. 67% patients received the maximum of six cycles. The response rate was 54% (95% CI 38-69%), 12% CR and 42% PR. Estimated median progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95% CI 5.4-10.0) and estimated median overall survival was 17.9 months (95% CI 14.2-25.7). Four patients had a decrease in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of > or =20% of baseline value, and in two patients the LVEF decreased to below the lower limit of normal, but no patient developed clinical evidence of cardiac failure. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 56% cycles, but only 4% of cycles were complicated by febrile neutropenia. Grade 3 or 4 non-haematologic toxicity was uncommon. In conclusion, paclitaxel 175 mg m(-2) and epirubicin 75 mg m(-2) is a well tolerated, promising regimen for the treatment of advanced breast cancer.

A phase I trial of docetaxel and gemcitabine in patients with advanced cancer

BACKGROUND

Docetaxel and gemcitabine are active in a broad range of malignancies. The objective of this phase I trial was to determine the maximally tolerated doses of the combination of docetaxel and gemcitabine.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced cancer, WHO performance status 0-2, who had received up to one prior chemotherapy regimen were treated with gemcitabine on days 1 and 8 and docetaxel on day 8 repeated every 21 days. Prophylactic ciprofloxacin was commenced on day 11 of each cycle and continued until the neutrophil count reached 1.0 x 10(9)/l. G-CSF was not administered. Dose levels studied were docetaxel/gemcitabine: 60/800, 60/1000, 75/1000, 75/1200, 85/1200 and 100/1200 mg/m2.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients were entered and all were assessable for toxicity. The highest administered dose level was 100 mg/m2 docetaxel and 1200 mg/m2 gemcitabine with dose limiting toxicities of febrile neutropenia, grade 4 neutropenia > or = 7 days, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, grade 3 stomatitis and/or grade 3 fatigue in three out of six patients. Treatment was well tolerated (40 cycles) in the 10 patients treated at the recommended dose level (85/1200) with only a single episode of febrile neutropenia and grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity was infrequent. There was no significant pulmonary toxicity. Responses were seen in a range of malignancies including non-small-cell lung cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended dose level of 85 mg/m2 docetaxel and 1200 mg/m2 gemcitabine has a favourable toxicity profile and is suitable for further investigation in phase II trials. This non-platinum containing regimen warrants further investigation as a potential alternative to platinum containing regimens in non-small-cell lung cancer and other malignancies.

Open label, multi-centre phase II study of raltitrexed ('Tomudex') in patients with inoperable squamous-cell carcinoma of head and neck

BACKGROUND

Raltitrexed ('Tomudex') is a folate based inhibitor of thymidylate synthase which has been registered in Europe and Australia for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. In a European phase I trial of raltitrexed anti-tumour activity was seen in two patients with head and neck cancer, prompting the current study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From November 1996 to December 1998, 24 patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck from 7 Australian centres received raltitrexed, 3 mg/m2 given intravenously over 15 minutes every 3 weeks, for a maximum of 6 cycles. Patients were required to be chemotherapy naïve and have measurable disease, age > 18 years, WHO performance status initially < or = 2, no significant intercurrent illness or organ dysfunction and a life expectancy > 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Twenty-two men and two women, median age 65 years, median performance status 1 were enrolled. Fifteen patients (63%) had received both prior surgery and radiotherapy. In 15 patients (63%) there was recurrent locoregional disease only. Twelve patients (50%) received one cycle of treatment with only four patients (17%) receiving four or more cycles of treatment. No patient achieved a complete or partial response, although 5 patients experienced stable disease which lasted a median of 188 days (range 61-436). The median survival for the whole group was 101 days (range 20436). Raltitrexed was generally well tolerated with minimal antiproliferative toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-agent raltitrexed does not demonstrate significant anti-tumour response rates in patients with predominantly locally recurrent head and neck cancer.

Radiation with concurrent late chemotherapy intensification ('chemoboost') for locally advanced head and neck cancer

The aim of this study was to review our experience with a treatment regimen that combined conventionally fractionated radiation therapy (70 Gy over 7 weeks) with chemotherapy (cisplatin and fluorouracil), given concurrently in the last 2 weeks of radiation therapy in patients with previously untreated advanced squamous cell cancer of the head and neck region.Twenty-eight patients, all but two having UICC stage IV disease, were treated at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute between November 1995 and April 1998. Planned chemotherapy consisted initially of continuous infusion at 10 mg/m(2) per day of cisplatin and 400 mg/m(2) per day of fluorouracil on days 1-5 of weeks 6 and 7 of a conventionally fractionated course of radiotherapy. After the first 14 patients, the dose of fluorouracil was reduced to 360 mg/m(2) per day because of acute toxicity.36.8 months), with an estimated 50% surviving at 2 years (CI, 29-71%). Sixteen patients (57%) developed confluent mucositis and 11 (39%) developed patchy mucositis. The median duration of mucositis for these 27 patients was 1.5 months. Seventeen patients (61%) required nutritional support for a median duration of 1.4 months. Fourteen patients (50%) had grade three skin reactions, and 12 (43%) had one or more other significant (Grade 3) toxicities, predominantly infective. Grade 3 late toxicity has been observed in three patients to date (three xerostomia, including one with severe depression), and one patient had chronic ulceration of the oral tongue (grade 4). This chemoradiation regimen achieved an excellent complete response rate and good locoregional control at 2 years in patients with a poor initial prognosis. Acute toxicity was significant but manageable. The regimen offers an alternative to surgery and postoperative radiation therapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer.

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of paclitaxel and epirubicin in advanced cancer

The objectives of this phase I trial were to determine the maximally tolerated doses of the combination of epirubicin and paclitaxel with and without G-CSF (granulocyte colony stimulating factor) support and to investigate whether epirubicin pharmacokinetics are altered by paclitaxel. Patients with advanced cancer, performance status 0-2, and a normal left ventricular ejection fraction who had received up to 1 prior chemotherapy regimen were treated with epirubicin followed by a 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel repeated every 3 weeks. Dose levels studied were (paclitaxel/epirubicin) 155/75, 175/75, 175/90, 200/90 mg/m2 without G-CSF and 175/90 mg/m2 with G-CSF. Thirty-five patients were entered and all were assessable for toxicity. The dose-limiting dose level was 175 mg/m2 paclitaxel and 90 mg/m2 epirubicin with limiting toxicities of febrile neutropenia, diarrhea and esophagitis. The addition of G-CSF did not allow escalation of epirubicin. No significant cardiac toxicity was observed. Epirubicin pharmacokinetics were studied during the first 2 cycles in 6 patients, who were randomized to receive 1 cycle with no interval between the completion of the epirubicin and the commencement of the paclitaxel infusion and the other cycle with a 72-hour interval between the drugs. There was no substantial effect of paclitaxel on epirubicin or epirubicinol pharmacokinetics, although there was a marginal increase in glucoronidation. In conclusion, paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and epirubicin 75 mg/m2 is recommended for phase II and III studies.

Altered multidrug resistance phenotype caused by anthracycline analogues and cytosine arabinoside in myeloid leukemia

The expression of P-glycoprotein (Pgp) is often increased in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, little is known of the regulation of Pgp expression by cytotoxics in AML. We examined whether Pgp expression and function in leukemic blasts was altered after a short exposure to cytotoxics. Blasts were isolated from 19 patients with AML (15 patients) or chronic myeloid leukemia in blastic transformation (BT-CML, 4 patients). Pgp expression and function were analyzed by flow cytometric analysis of MRK 16 binding and Rhodamine 123 retention, respectively. At equitoxic concentrations, ex vivo exposure for 16 hours to the anthracyclines epirubicin (EPI), daunomycin (DAU), idarubicin (IDA), or MX2 or the nucleoside analogue cytosine arabinoside (AraC) differentially upregulated MDR1/Pgp expression in Pgp-negative and Pgp-positive blast cells. In Pgp-negative blasts, all four anthracyclines and AraC significantly increased Pgp expression (P =.01) and Pgp function (P =.03). In contrast, MX2, DAU, and AraC were the most potent in inducing Pgp expression and function in Pgp positive blasts (P <.05). A good correlation between increased Pgp expression and function was observed in Pgp-negative (r =.90, P =.0001) and Pgp-positive blasts (r =.77, P =.0002). This increase in Pgp expression and function was inhibited by the addition of 1 micromol/L PSC 833 to blast cells at the time of their exposure to these cytotoxics. In 1 patient with AML, an increase in Pgp levels was observed in vivo at 4 and 16 hours after the administration of standard chemotherapy with DAU/AraC. Upregulation of Pgp expression was also demonstrated ex vivo in blasts harvested from this patient before the commencement of treatment. In 3 other cases (1 patient with AML and 2 with BT-CML) in which blasts were Pgp negative at the time of initial clinical presentation, serial samples at 1 to 5 months after chemotherapy showed the presence of Pgp-positive blasts. All 3 patients had refractory disease. Interestingly, in all 3 cases, upregulation of Pgp by cytotoxics was demonstrated ex vivo in blasts harvested at the time of presentation. These data suggest that upregulation of the MDR1 gene may represent a normal response of leukemic cells to cytotoxic stress and may contribute to clinical drug resistance.

Repetitive high-dose therapy with ifosfamide, thiotepa and paclitaxel with peripheral blood progenitor cell and filgrastim support for metastatic and locally advanced breast cancer: results of a phase I study

BACKGROUND

This phase I study was designed to determine the optimal dosages of a novel repetitive high-dose therapy regimen for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The planned treatment was three cycles of high-dose ifosfamide, thiotepa and conventional-dose paclitaxel delivered every 28 days with progressive dose-escalation in successive cohorts. Each cycle was supported by peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) and filgrastim.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were entered into this trial. Of the planned 69 treatment cycles, 59 were delivered and fifteen patients completed all three cycles. The dose-limiting toxicities were renal tubular acidosis, encephalopathy, mucositis and enterocolitis. There was one treatment-related hemorrhagic death.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended doses for phase II or III studies are ifosfamide (10 g/m2), thiotepa (350 mg/m2) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2).

Ifosfamide in combination with paclitaxel or doxorubicin: regimens which effectively mobilize peripheral blood progenitor cells while demonstrating anti-tumor activity in patients with metastatic breast cancer

For patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who undergo high-dose therapy with autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation, an important prerequisite is a mobilization regimen that efficiently mobilizes PBPCs while producing an effective anti-tumor effect. We prospectively evaluated ifosfamide-based chemotherapy for mobilization efficiency, toxicity and disease response in 37 patients. Patients received two cycles of the ifosfamide-based regimen; ifosfamide (5 g/m2 with conventional-dose cycle and 6 g/m2 with mobilization cycle) with either 50 mg/m2 doxorubicin (if limited prior anthracycline and/or progression more than 12 months after an anthracycline-based regimen) or 175 mg/m2 paclitaxel. For the mobilization cycle, all patients received additional G-CSF (10 microg/kg SC, daily) commencing 24 h after completion of chemotherapy. The target yield was >6x10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, sufficient to support the subsequent three cycles of high-dose therapy. The mobilization therapy was well tolerated and the peak days for peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cells were days 10-13 with no significant differences in the PB CD34+ cells mobilization kinetics between the ifosfamide-doxorubicin vs. ifosfamide-paclitaxel regimens. The median PBPC CD34+ cell content ranged from 2.9 to 4.0x10(6)/kg per day during days 9-14. After a median of 3 (range 1-5) collection days, the median total CD34+ cell, CFU-GM and MNC for all 44 individual sets of collections was 9.2x10(6)/kg (range 0.16-54.9), 37x10(4)/kg (range 5.7-247) and 7.3x10(8)/kg (range 2.1-26.1), respectively. The PBPC target yield was achieved in 35 of the 37 patients. The overall response rate for the 31 evaluable patients was 68% with 10% having progressive disease. Thirty-three patients have subsequently received high-dose therapy consisting of three planned cycles of high-dose ifosfamide, thiotepa and paclitaxel with each cycle supported with PBPCs. Rapid neutrophil and platelet recovery has been observed. Ifosfamide with G-CSF in combination with doxorubicin or paclitaxel achieves effective mobilization of PBPC and anti-tumor activity with minimal toxicity.

Induction of MDR1 gene expression by anthracycline analogues in a human drug resistant leukaemia cell line

The effects of 4-demethoxydaunorubicin (idarubicin, IDA) and MX2, a new morpholino-anthracycline, on up-regulation of the MDR1 gene in the low-level multidrug resistant (MDR) cell line CEM/A7R were compared at similar concentrations (IC10, IC50 and IC90) over a short time exposure (4 and 24 h). The chemosensitivity of each drug was determined by a 3-day cell growth inhibition assay. Compared with epirubicin (EPI), IDA and MX2 were 17- and eightfold more effective in the CEM/A7R line respectively. No cross-resistance to 5-FU was seen in the CEM/A7R line. Verapamil (5 microM) and PSC 833 (1 microM), which dramatically reversed resistance to EPI in the CEM/A7R line, had no sensitizing effect on the resistance of this line to MX2, but slightly decreased resistance to IDA. The sensitivity to 5-FU was unchanged by these modulators. The induction of MDR1 mRNA expression by IDA, MX2 and 5-FU was analysed by Northern blotting and semiquantitatively assessed by scanning Northern blots on a phosphorimager. The relative level of MDR1 expression was expressed as a ratio of MDR1 mRNA to the internal RNA control glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). IDA, MX2 and 5-FU differentially up-regulated MDR1 mRNA in the CEM/A7R line in a dose-dependent manner. Both IDA and MX2 induced MDR1 expression within 4 h. 5-FU up-regulated MDR1 expression only when drug exposure was prolonged to 24 h. Based on MRK 16 binding, flow cytometric analysis of P-glycoprotein (Pgp) expression paralleled the increase in MDR1 mRNA levels. For the three anthracyclines, the increase in MDR1 expression was stable in cells grown in the absence of drug for more than 3 weeks after drug treatment. The induction of MDR1 expression by 5-FU was transient, associated with a rapid decrease in the increased Pgp levels which returned to baseline 72 h after the removal of 5-FU. This study demonstrates that MDR1 expression can be induced by analogues of anthracyclines not pumped by Pgp, and that this induction appears to be stable despite a 3-week drug-free period.

Low-dose versus standard-dose lenograstim prophylaxis after chemotherapy: a randomized, crossover comparison

PURPOSE

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administered prophylactically after chemotherapy reduces the duration and severity of neutropenia. This randomized crossover study was designed to assess whether a lower dose of G-CSF is as effective as a standard dose of 5 microg/kg daily.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who received standard-dose chemotherapy regimens expected to cause neutropenia received G-CSF (lenograstim) that started the day after chemotherapy for 14 days or until the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovered to greater than 10 x 10(9)/L. The lenograstim dose was randomly allocated to be 2 or 5 microg/kg daily in the first cycle of chemotherapy and crossed over to the alternate dose for the second cycle. The study was designed to accrue 40 assessable patients to provide a power of 80% to detect a difference in duration of neutropenia of 1 day. Fifty-two patients were randomized to treatment and 43 patients completed two cycles of identical chemotherapy.

RESULTS

There was little neutropenia irrespective of the dose used. Twenty-three patients (53%) had no grade III or IV neutropenia and 30 patients (70%) had no grade IV neutropenia. Crossover trial methodology was used to assess the difference in outcome caused by the lower dose compared with the standard dose (estimated treatment effect). There was no significant difference in the measures of neutropenia, hospitalization, or other clinical outcomes. The 95% confidence interval (one-sided) for the additional duration of neutropenia caused by the lower dose of lenograstim was 0.43 days or less for grade III or IV neutropenia and 0.34 days or less for grade IV neutropenia.

CONCLUSION

Lenograstim 2 microg/kg provides similar protection to 5 microg/kg against neutropenia that complicates standard-dose chemotherapy. The use of a lower dose has important implications for the cost-effectiveness of prophylactic G-CSF therapy.

Phase I trial of cremophor EL with bolus doxorubicin

Cremophor EL (cremophor), a component of the paclitaxel formulation, can potentially reverse P-glycoprotein-associated multidrug resistance. A Phase I trial of cremophor as a 6-h infusion every 3 weeks was performed with bolus doxorubicin (50 mg/m2). The cremophor dose was escalated from 1 to 60 ml/m2. A standard paclitaxel premedication was given before cremophor. Using a bioassay, potentially active cremophor levels (> or = 1 microl/ml) were measured in plasma from patients receiving cremophor doses of 30, 45, and 60 ml/m2. A cross-over design was used to assess the influence of cremophor 30 ml/m2 on the pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin and doxorubicinol. The plasma area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) of doxorubicin increased from 1448 +/- 350 to 1786 +/- 264 ng/ml x h (P = 0.02) in the presence of cremophor, whereas the AUC of doxorubicinol increased from 252 +/- 104 to 486 +/- 107 ng/ml x h (P = 0.02). This pharmacokinetic interaction was associated with significantly increased neutropenia. With reduction of the doxorubicin dose to 35 mg/m2, the cremophor dose was increased to 60 ml/m2. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in two of six patients after 45 ml/m2 and two of four patients after 60 ml/m2, which included febrile neutropenia and grade III cremophor-related toxicities of rash, pruritus, headache, and hypotension. All patients who received 45 ml/m2 cremophor reached plasma levels > or = 1.5 microl/ml, but at 60 ml/m2, only two of four reached this level, and the calculated plasma clearance of cremophor was significantly faster at this dose. One patient with hepatoma resistant to epirubicin achieved a near-complete response. Cremophor 45 ml/m2 over 6 h with 35 mg/m2 doxorubicin is recommended for further studies. The pharmacokinetic interaction between cremophor and doxorubicin is quantitatively similar to that described in trials of paclitaxel with doxorubicin and suggests that the cremophor in the paclitaxel formulation is responsible.

Phase II study of docetaxel and cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Docetaxel (Taxotere, Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Antony, France) and cisplatin are two of the most active single agents used in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A recently reported phase I study of the combination of docetaxel and cisplatin recommended a dose of 75 mg/m2 of both drugs every 3 weeks for subsequent phase II study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients were aged 18 to 75 years with a World Health Organization (WHO) performance status < or = 2 and life expectancy > or = 12 weeks, with metastatic and/or locally advanced NSCLC proven histologically or cytologically. Patients were not permitted to have received prior chemotherapy, extensive radiotherapy, or any radiotherapy to the target lesion and must have had measurable disease. Concurrent treatment with colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) or prophylactic antibiotics was not permitted. Docetaxel (75 mg/m2) in 250 mL 5% dextrose was given intravenously (i.v.) over 1 hour immediately before cisplatin (75 mg/m2) in 500 mL normal saline given i.v. over 1 hour in 3-week cycles. Premedication included ondansetron, dexamethasone, promethazine, and standard hyperhydration with magnesium supplementation.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients, two thirds of whom had metastatic disease, were entered onto this phase II study. The majority of patients were male (72%) and of good (WHO 0 to 1) performance status (85%). All 47 patients were assessable for toxicity and 36 were for response. Three patients were ineligible and eight (17%) discontinued treatment because of significant toxicity. In assessable patients, the overall objective response rate was 38.9% (95% confidence limits [CL], 23.1% to 56.5%), 36.1% had stable disease, and 25% progressive disease. On an intention-to-treat analysis, the objective response rate was 29.8%. Median survival was 9.6 months and estimated 1-year survival was 33%. Significant (grade 3/4) toxicities included nausea (26%), hypotension (15%), diarrhea (13%), and dyspnea mainly related to chest infection (13%). One patient experienced National Cancer Institute (NCI) grade 3 neurosensory toxicity after eight cycles. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was common and occurred in 87% of patients, but thrombocytopenia > or = grade 3 was rare (one patient). Significant (grade 3/4) abnormalities of magnesium levels were common (24%). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 13% of patients and neutropenic infection in 11%, contributing to two treatment-related deaths. No neutropenic enterocolitis or severe fluid retention was reported.

CONCLUSION

Compared with other active regimens used in this setting, the combination of docetaxel and cisplatin in advanced NSCLC is an active regimen with a similar toxicity profile to other combination regimens.

A phase II trial of carboplatin and etoposide for relapsed or metastatic carcinoma of the cervix

This study reports the results of a phase II trial of carboplatin 100 mg/m2 combined with etoposide 120 mg/m2 each given for 3 consecutive days every 28 days in women with recurrent or metastatic carcinoma of the cervix. Seventeen eligible patients were treated between August, 1990 and May, 1993. In the 16 evaluable patients, there were 2 complete responses, and no partial responses with an overall objective response rate of 12.5% (95% confidence interval 1.6%-38%). The main toxicities of this regimen related to myelosuppression and emesis. The combination of carboplatin and etoposide did not achieve either a better response rate or a substantially improved toxicity profile than is seen with single agent cisplatin.

Phase I trial of docetaxel and cisplatin in previously untreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the maximum-tolerated doses (MTDs), principal toxicities, and pharmacokinetics of the combination of docetaxel and cisplatin administered every 3 weeks to patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have not received prior chemotherapy and to recommend a dose for phase II studies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced NSCLC and performance status 0 to 2 who had not received prior chemotherapy received docetaxel over 1 hour followed by cisplatin over 1 hour with hydration. Dose levels studied were (docetaxel/cisplatin) 50/75, 75/75, 75/100, and 100/75 mg/m2 repeated every 3 weeks. Colony-stimulating factor (CSF) support was not used. Pharmacokinetics of docetaxel and cisplatin were studied in the first cycle of therapy. Most patients (79%) had metastatic disease or intrathoracic recurrence after prior radiation and/or surgery.

RESULTS

Of 24 patients entered, all were assessable for toxicity and 18 for response. The MTD schedules were docetaxel 75 mg/m2 with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 (dose-limiting toxicities [DLTs] in five of six patients), and docetaxel 100 mg/m2 with cisplatin 75 mg/m2 (DLTs in two of two patients, including one fatal toxicity). Limiting toxicities were febrile neutropenia and nonhematologic, principally diarrhea and renal. Two patients had neutropenic enterocolitis. Pharmacokinetics of both drugs were consistent with results from single-agent studies, which suggests no major pharmacokinetic interaction. Neutropenia was related to docetaxel area under the plasma concentration-versus-time curve (AUC). An alternative schedule was investigated, with cisplatin being administered over 3 hours commencing 3 hours after docetaxel, but toxicity did not appear to be less. Independently reviewed responses occurred in eight of 18 patients (44%; 95% confidence interval, 22% to 69%), most following 75 mg/m2 of both drugs.

CONCLUSION

Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 over 1 hour followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m2 over 1 hour is recommended for phase II studies. The responses seen in this phase I study suggest a high degree of activity of this combination in previously untreated advanced NSCLC.

Activity and toxicity of docetaxel (Taxotere) in women with previously treated metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Metastatic breast cancer is a major cause of cancer death in Australian women. Docetaxel is a new cytotoxic drug that has shown promise in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer in patients who have previously received other chemotherapy, particularly an anthracycline, and has recently been approved for marketing in Australia.

AIM

To report the first Australian experience with docetaxel in a group of women with metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

Patients with progressive metastatic breast cancer who had previously received other chemotherapy were treated with docetaxel 75 mg/m2 or 100 mg/m2 given as a one hour infusion every three weeks. All patients received oral dexamethasone for five days starting 24 hours prior to docetaxel as prophylaxis against fluid retention. The patients' response to docetaxel and toxicity were assessed by standard criteria.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were treated. The major toxicity was neutropenia with 92% of patients experiencing at least one episode of grade 4 (absolute neutrophil count < 0.5 x 10(9)/L) neutropenia. Hospital admission for febrile neutropenia occurred in 44% of patients with one death from sepsis. Cumulative fluid retention was observed but in only one patient was it dose-limiting. Apart from alopecia, other toxicities were infrequent and rarely serious. In 23 patients assessable for response, there were 11 partial responses (48%). Three other patients whose disease could not be assessed for response had clinical improvement. The median survival of all patients treated was eight months.

CONCLUSIONS

The response rate observed with docetaxel is comparable to that seen in trials in the United States and Europe and confirms the high activity of this new cytotoxic agent. Neutropenia is the major toxicity, and consideration should be given to the use of prophylactic oral antibiotics or colony stimulating factors to try and prevent febrile episodes. Clinicians will need to balance the benefits, toxicities, and cost of docetaxel in determining the appropriateness of its use in their patients.

Plasma concentrations of polysorbate 80 measured in patients following administration of docetaxel or etoposide

Docetaxel (Taxotere, Rhone-Poulenc Rorer) and etoposide are water-insoluble drugs formulated with polysorbate 80 for intravenous administration. We have previously reported that surfactants, including polysorbate 80 and Cremophor EL, can reverse the multidrug resistance (MDR) phenotype in an experimental system and that plasma Cremophor EL concentrations measured following a 3-h infusion of paclitaxel were > or = 1 microliter/ml, sufficient to modulate MDR in vitro. The purpose of this study was to measure polysorbate 80 plasma concentrations in patients following intravenous administration of etoposide or docetaxel using a bioassay in which MDR-expressing cells are incubated with daunorubicin (DNR) plus 50/50 growth medium/plasma and equilibrium intracellular DNR fluorescence is measured by flow cytometry. In vitro experiments show maximal reversal of MDR at concentrations of 1.0-2.0 microliters/ml and 50% reversal at 0.2-0.3 microliter/ml. Patients received docetaxel at 75 mg/m2 (five patients) or 100 mg/m2 (four patients) (total dose 125-178 mg, containing 3.12-4.45 ml polysorbate 80) over 60 min. The median end-infusion polysorbate 80 concentration was 0.1 microliter/ml (range 0.07-0.41 microliter/ml). Only one patient had a level of > 0.2 microliter/ml. Five patients received intravenous etoposide at 120 mg/m2 over 45-120 min (total dose 180-250 mg, containing 0.67-0.93 ml polysorbate 80). In the end-infusion plasma sample, polysorbate 80 was not detectable (< 0.06 microliter/ml) in any patient. Plasma polysorbate 80 levels following an intravenous infusion of 120 mg/m2 etoposide or of docetaxel at doses used in Phase II trials, are insufficient to show modulation of MDR in vitro.

Activity of gemcitabine in patients with advanced ovarian cancer: responses seen following platinum and paclitaxel

Thirty-eight women with epithelial ovarian cancer were treated with gemcitabine, a new antimetabolite. All had previously received platinum, and 27 had also received paclitaxel. Four patients had a partial response giving a response rate of 13% in assessable patients (n = 31) and 11% for all patients entered. Additionally, 6 patients had stable disease with >50% reduction in CA-125 for at least 3 months. Activity was seen in patients resistant to both platinum and paclitaxel. Gemcitabine was well tolerated, with uncomplicated neutropenia the main hematological toxicity. Nonhematological toxicities were generally mild and included fatigue, myalgias, and skin rash. Gemcitabine has some activity in heavily pretreated ovarian cancer patients and deserves further investigation in this malignancy.

Cremophor pharmacokinetics in patients receiving 3-, 6-, and 24-hour infusions of paclitaxel

BACKGROUND

Paclitaxel (Taxol) is a new drug with efficacy against a variety of malignant tumors. The clinical formulation of paclitaxel contains 50% Cremophor EL, a polyethoxylated castor oil vehicle (carrier) that can reverse multidrug resistance (MDR) mediated by P-glycoprotein. Three-hour intravenous infusions of paclitaxel can yield end-of-infusion plasma Cremophor concentrations of 1 microL/mL or more, which are sufficient to reverse MDR in vitro by at least 50%. Despite extensive clinical use, the pharmacokinetics of Cremophor have not been described.

PURPOSE

We studied the pharmacokinetics of Cremophor in patients with ovarian cancer who were undergoing treatment with paclitaxel to determine whether plasma Cremophor concentrations achieved during and following 3-, 6-, and 24-hour drug infusions were similar to those shown to modulate MDR in vitro.

METHODS

Eleven patients with previously treated (i.e., with platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens) ovarian cancer were randomly assigned to receive one 3-hour, one 6-hour, and one 24-hour infusion of paclitaxel in varied sequences during their first three cycles of treatment with this drug. Blood samples were collected both during and following the three infusion periods, and Cremophor concentrations in these samples were measured by use of a bioassay based on the ability of Cremophor in plasma samples to reverse cellular resistance to daunorubicin in vitro.

RESULTS

Ten patients were treated with paclitaxel at a dose level of 175 mg/m2, and one patient was treated at a dose level of 135 mg/m2. At the 175-mg/m2 dose level, peak plasma Cremophor concentrations of 1 microL/mL or more were achieved in eight of 10 patients during both the 3-hour and the 6-hour infusions; with the 24-hour infusion, only one patient achieved a peak plasma Cremophor concentration of 1 microL/mL or more. The eight patients who achieved plasma Cremophor concentrations of 1 microL/mL during the 3-hour infusion were above this level 30 minutes into the infusion; the total time that the plasma concentration was greater than 1 microL/mL was 8.9 +/- 5.0 hours (mean +/- standard deviation; range, 4.1-15.6 hours). For the eight patients who achieved plasma Cremophor concentrations of 1 microL/mL during the 6-hour infusion, the total time that the concentration was greater than 1 microL/mL was 10.2 +/- 9.0 hours (range, 0.3-21.9 hours). The patient who received paclitaxel at a dose of 135 mg/m2 achieved a peak plasma Cremophor concentration of 1 microL/mL or more only during the 3-hour infusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Paclitaxel infusions of 3 and 6 hours can result in sustained plasma Cremophor concentrations sufficient for substantial reversal of P-glycoprotein-mediated MDR in vitro. These plasma Cremophor concentrations are not achieved during 24-hour infusions of paclitaxel.

Ormaplatin resistance is associated with decreased accumulation of its platinum (II) analogue, dichloro(D,L-trans)1,2-diaminocyclohexaneplatinum (II)

Ormaplatin (also known as tetraplatin) is a platinum-containing analogue which has recently undergone clinical trials. Ormaplatin may undergo conversion to dichloro(D,L-trans)-1,2-diaminocyclohexaneplatinum(II) [P1Cl2(trans-dach)]. The cisplatin-resistant murine lymphoma cell lines E8 and E5, were found to be cross-resistant to ormaplatin and PtCl2(trans-dach). We found an inverse rank correlation between drug resistance and drug accumulation for PtCl2(trans-dach) similar to our previous findings with cisplatin; however, accumulation of ormaplatin in the resistant cells was increased. Ormaplatin cytotoxicity appears to result primarily from extracellular conversion to PtCl2(trans-dach), since ormaplatin cytotoxicity was decreased under conditions where extracellular conversion to PtCl2(trans-dach) was minimised. Co-incubation with different inhibitors of energy metabolism resulted in a 65-70% increase in PtCl2(trans-dach) accumulation in the parental cell line R1.1 and a 113-307% increase in the resistant cell line E5 which suggests that the decrease in accumulation in E5 may be at least partly energy dependent. We conclude from these findings that cross-resistance to ormaplatin is associated with an energy-dependent decreased accumulation of PtCl2(trans-dach) in these cisplatin-resistant cell lines.

Carboplatin dosing based on measurement of renal function--experience at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute

BACKGROUND

Carboplatin is used in treating many types of cancer. Because renal excretion is the major variable determining the pharmacokinetics of this drug, a dosing formula based on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) has been proposed and is being increasingly used in carboplatin dosing. This method of dosing is critically dependent on accurate measurement of GFR.

AIMS

To report the experience at a single major oncology centre of carboplatin dosing based on GFR, and comparisons of different methods of measuring renal function for use in this dosing method.

METHODS

An initial group of patients (n = 24) was studied where GFR was measured by Cr51EDTA clearance and compared to Tc99mDTPA clearance, measured 24 hour urine creatinine clearance and the Cockcroft and Gault formula. The carboplatin area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) was calculated using total platinum measured in a single blood sample assayed by flameless atomic absorption spectrophotometry. A subsequent patient group (n = 16) was then studied using Tc99mDTPA clearance to measure GFR.

RESULTS

Carboplatin dosing using Cr51EDTA clearance to measure GFR was accurate (< 25% difference between planned and measured AUC) in 87% of samples. Estimation of renal function using the Cockcroft and Gault formula correlated with Cr51EDTA clearance only in patients with GFR < 100 mL/minute. The measured 24 hour urine creatinine clearance did not correlate with Cr51EDTA clearance. Using Tc99mDTPA clearance to measure GFR, carboplatin dosing was accurate in 81% of samples. Across a GFR range of 42-239 mL/minute, the Cr51EDTA and Tc99mDTPA clearance were closely correlated (r = 0.98, slope of regression line = 1.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Carboplatin dosing using a pharmacological formula based on GFR produces accurate targeting of the carboplatin AUC. Tc99mDTPA clearance can be used to measure GFR instead of Cr51EDTA clearance, which is both more convenient and has potential cost savings. Estimates of renal function using the Cockcroft and Gault formula or measured 24 hour creatinine clearance are insufficiently accurate to use for carboplatin dosing.

Association of acquired Pelger-Huet anomaly with taxoid therapy

We describe the occurrence of acquired Pelger-Huet anomaly (APHA) in 23 patients treated with paclitaxel (13) or docetaxel (10). A consistent peak of Pelger-Huet cells (PHC) within a range of 3-9 d after treatment with taxoids was noted. The APHA generally disappeared by day 21 after treatment. Peak PHC values for the first course were significantly different in paclitaxel versus docetaxel versus control groups (P < 0.0001) with the maximum PHC counts being significantly higher for docetaxel compared with paclitaxel (P < 0.001) and for paclitaxel compared with controls (P = 0.007). We conclude that taxoid therapy produces transient APHA which peaks between days 3 and 9 and is more pronounced with docetaxel than with paclitaxel.

Phase II trial of a 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel in previously untreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the antitumor activity and toxicity of paclitaxel administered as a 3-hour infusion in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-one patients with advanced measurable or assessable NSCLC and performance status 0 to 2 who had not received prior chemotherapy were treated with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 over 3 hours with premedication. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of nine cycles. Most patients had prior radiotherapy (57%), extrathoracic metastatic disease (65%), and measurable disease (75%). Twenty-two percent had previously untreated stage III disease.

RESULTS

The objective response rate was five of 51 (10%; 95% confidence interval, 3% to 21%). No subgroup with a higher response rate could be identified. There were no complete responses (CRs) and all responses lasted less than 5 months. Treatment was well tolerated with brief World Health Organization (WHO) grade IV neutropenia in only 16% of patients. Grade III/IV myalgia/athralgia occurred in 22% of patients. No significant hypersensitivity reactions occurred.

CONCLUSION

The antitumor activity of this dose and schedule appears inferior to that reported in previously published phase II trials in NSCLC that used higher doses of paclitaxel infused over 24 hours, although confidence intervals for response overlap. Determining the optimal dose and schedule for using paclitaxel in NSCLC requires further investigation, and these results should caution against using shorter infusions outside appropriate clinical trials.

Rectal adenocarcinoma with germ cell elements treated with chemotherapy

A patient with adenocarcinoma of the rectum containing germ cell elements in the form of endodermal sinus tumor and choriocarcinoma is described, believed to be the first such tumor reported in the literature. The serum levels of alpha-fetoprotein and human chorionic gonadotropin were markedly elevated. The source of the markers was localized to the neoplastic tissue by the immunoperoxidase technique. The patient developed extensive hepatic metastases thought to be due to choriocarcinoma for which she received chemotherapy. One wk after commencing treatment a massive fatal hepatic hemorrhage occurred.

A phase II trial of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, and prednisolone rapidly alternating with doxorubicin and vincristine (CMFP/AV) in advanced breast cancer

Sixty-seven patients with advanced breast cancer were prospectively entered into a Phase II trial of cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2 orally on days 1-14, methotrexate 40 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) on day 1, 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, and prednisolone 40 mg/m2 orally on days 1-14 (CMFP) rapidly alternating with doxorubicin 25-30 mg/m2 i.v. on day 8 and vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 i.v. on day 8 (AV). Complete responses (CR) were seen in 7 patients, partial responses (PR) in 25 (CR + PR, 48%), stable disease in 24, and progressive disease in 9. The median time to disease progression was 9.8 months, and the median survival 19.4 months. Neutropenia was the major toxicity with WHO grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in 50% of patients. CMFP/AV is a well-tolerated, effective regimen in advanced breast cancer but does not appear to be superior to CMFP alone.

A randomised trial of dexamethasone, lorazepam and prochlorperazine for emesis in patients receiving chemotherapy

To define further the place of dexamethasone in antiemetic combinations, lorazepam, prochlorperazine and placebo (LP) were compared with lorazepam, prochlorperazine and dexamethasone (DLP) in a randomised, double-blind, crossover study. Both patient and observer assessments were documented in 84 patients receiving both cisplatin and non-cisplatin chemotherapy. The addition of dexamethasone significantly reduced the severity of nausea (P = 0.002) and vomiting (P less than 0.0001), duration of nausea (P = 0.01) and vomiting (P = 0.002) and the number of vomiting episodes (P = 0.003). DLP was the superior regimen in subsets of patients receiving cisplatin and the non-cisplatin chemotherapy. The improvements produced by the dexamethasone regimen were large and of major benefit to our patients. Patients documented significantly improved tolerance to chemotherapy with DLP courses (P = 0.0006). Overall, significantly more patients preferred DLP (P less than 0.0001). Patient assessments produced results similar to observer assessments but gave a broader understanding of their experience. The addition of dexamethasone to prochlorperazine and lorazepam significantly improved our patients' experience while receiving chemotherapy.

Subxiphoid partial pericardiectomy with or without sclerosant instillation in the treatment of symptomatic pericardial effusions in patients with malignancy

Twenty-two patients with malignant pericardial effusions were treated with subxiphoid partial pericardiectomy between 1984 and 1989. Thirteen patients also had a sclerosing agent instilled intrapericardially. Tamponade was relieved by pericardiocentesis before administration of general anesthesia. In 18 patients (82%), the effusions were controlled for longer than 30 days, and two patients died before 30 days without effusion. There were two recurrences at 1.5 and 7 months. There was one death due to hemorrhage from a laceration in a heavily infiltrated pericardium, and one patient had persistent dyspnea after the procedure. Complications included transient atrial arrhythmias (two patients), chest pain after sclerosant instillation (three patients), and fever greater than 37.5 degrees C after sclerosant (five patients). The survival range was 0.1 to 18 months (median, 5 months). Subxiphoid partial pericardiectomy with or without intrapericardial sclerosant is a safe and efficacious treatment for malignant pericardial effusions.