Patient characteristics associated with the decision to undergo bilateral prophylactic mastectomy for lobular carcinoma in situ

148

Background: Women at increased risk for breast cancer due to a diagnosis of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) have three management options: high risk surveillance +/- chemoprevention (CP) or bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (BPM). Among a large cohort of women with LCIS, we previously reported there were no differences between women choosing CP compared to those choosing surveillance alone. The purpose of this study was to identify patient factors associated with the decision to pursue BPM for LCIS.

Methods: We reviewed our prospectively maintained LCIS database to identify women choosing BPM (1995-2009). Comparisons were made between patients who chose BPM versus those who chose high risk surveillance +/- CP.

Results: Among 995 pts with LCIS, 795 (80%) chose surveillance alone, 149 (15%) chose CP and 51 (5%) chose BPM. Compared to patients electing surveillance +/- CP patients who pursued BPM were younger at age of LCIS diagnosis (48 vs. 52 yrs, p < 0.001), more likely to have bilateral biopsies with LCIS (14% vs. 3%, p = 0.002) and more likely to be premenopausal (82% vs. 57%, p < 0.001). Patients choosing BPM were also more likely to have additional risk factors for breast cancer including: stronger family histories and extremely dense breasts (Table). Occult breast cancer was found in 4 (8%) BPM patients. At a median follow-up of 54 months (range 0-190 mos), 120/944 (13%) patients in the surveillance +/- CP group developed breast cancer.

Conclusions: High-risk surveillance alone is the preferred management option for women with LCIS at our institution. Patients electing BPM are younger and more likely to have other associated risk factors for developing breast cancer. Further research to define how the increased risk imparted by LCIS is augmented by these factors may allow for better risk stratification and more informed discussions with patients.

[Table: see text]

Differential roles of MAPK-Erk1/2 and MAPK-p38 in insulin or insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) signaling pathways for progesterone production in human ovarian cells

Insulin and insulin like-growth factor-I (IGF-I) participate in the regulation of ovarian steroidogenesis. In insulin resistant states ovaries remain sensitive to insulin because insulin can activate alternative signaling pathways, such as phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI-3 kinase) and mitogen-activated protein-kinase (MAPK) pathways, as well as insulin receptors and type 1 IGF receptors. We investigated the roles of MAPK-Erk1/2 and MAPK-p38 in insulin and IGF-I signaling pathways for progesterone production in human ovarian cells. Human ovarian cells were cultured in tissue culture medium in the presence of varying concentrations of insulin or IGF-I, with or without PD98059, a specific MAPK-Erk1/2 inhibitor, with or without SB203580, a specific MAPK-p38 inhibitor or with or without a specific PI-3-kinase inhibitor LY294002. Progesterone concentrations were measured using radioimmunoassay. PD98059 alone stimulated progesterone production in a dose-dependent manner by up to 65% (p<0.001). Similarly, LY294002 alone stimulated progesterone production by 13-18% (p<0.005). However, when used together, PD98059 and LY294002 inhibited progesterone production by 17-20% (p<0.001). SB203580 alone inhibited progesterone production by 20-30% (p<0.001). Insulin or IGF-I alone stimulated progesterone production by 40-60% (p<0.001). In insulin studies, PD98059 had no significant effect on progesterone synthesis while SB203580 abolished insulin-induced progesterone production. Either PD98059 or SB203580 abolished IGF-I-induced progesterone production. Both MAPK-Erk1/2 and MAPK-p38 participate in IGF-I-induced signaling pathways for progesterone production, while insulin-induced progesterone production requires MAPK-p38, but not MAPK-Erk1/2. These studies provide further evidence for divergence of insulin and IGF-I signaling pathways for human ovarian cell steroidogenesis.

Handedness Effects on Playing a Reversed or Normal Keyboard

A group of left-handers, approaching the piano for the first time, showed better performance in playing a reversed keyboard (where the pitch decreased from left to right) than a normal keyboard. By testing a separate group of "experienced" left-handers, it was also found that this observed preference that naive left-handers had for the reversed keyboard can disappear with a few years of practice on a normal keyboard. The initial preference for the reversed keyboard shown by left-handers appeared to be specific for this handedness group, as groups of right-handers, regardless of their level of experience with the piano, performed better with the regular keyboard. Finally, based on these results it was hypothesised that left-handers would encounter considerable frustration in learning the "right-handed" piano. However, an informal demographic study of piano students enrolling at a school of music did not reveal a substantially low prevalence of left-handed pianists.

The influence of erythropoietin on cognitive function in women following chemotherapy for breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

Cognitive dysfunction is a potential side effect of chemotherapy, and erythropoietin might be protective. A previously reported study compared quality-of-life in women undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer who were randomized to receive epoetin-alpha or standard care. Here, we report a non-randomized sub-study in which cognitive function of participants was evaluated at 12-30 months after chemotherapy.

METHODS

The primary endpoint was the proportion of women with moderate-severe cognitive impairment, as measured by the High Sensitivity Cognitive Screen (HSCS). Subjects also completed the Revised Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT-R), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy--Fatigue (FACT-F) and FACT-G self-report questionnaires for fatigue and quality-of-life, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

RESULTS

Of 278 patients receiving adjuvant treatment in the primary study, 87 participated in the sub-study: 45 had received epoetin-alpha and 42 standard care. Groups were well matched for age and type of chemotherapy. Eight patients (9%) had moderate-severe cognitive dysfunction by the HSCS: six of them in the epoietin-alpha group (not significant). There were no significant differences in the HVLT-R, or in fatigue, but patients who had received epoetin-alpha reported better quality-of-life.

CONCLUSION

This study failed to demonstrate a protective effect of epoetin-alpha against the development of delayed cognitive dysfunction after chemotherapy.