2021 update of the EULAR points to consider on the use of immunomodulatory therapies in COVID-19

OBJECTIVES

To update the EULAR points to consider (PtCs) on the use of immunomodulatory therapies in COVID-19.

METHODS

According to the EULAR standardised operating procedures, a systematic literature review up to 14 July 2021 was conducted and followed by a consensus meeting of an international multidisciplinary task force. The new statements were consolidated by formal voting.

RESULTS

We updated 2 overarching principles and 12 PtC. Evidence was only available in moderate to severe and critical patients. Glucocorticoids alone or in combination with tocilizumab are beneficial in COVID-19 cases requiring oxygen therapy and in critical COVID-19. Use of Janus kinase inhibitors (baricitinib and tofacitinib) is promising in the same populations of severe and critical COVID-19. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies and convalescent plasma may find application in early phases of the disease and in selected subgroups of immunosuppressed patients. There was insufficient robust evidence for the efficacy of other immunomodulators with further work being needed in relation to biomarker-based stratification for IL-1 therapy CONCLUSIONS: Growing evidence supports incremental efficacy of glucocorticoids alone or combined with tocilizumab/Janus kinase inhibitors in moderate to severe and critical COVID-19. Ongoing studies may unmask the potential application of other therapeutic approaches. Involvement of rheumatologists, as systemic inflammatory diseases experts, should be encouraged in clinical trials of immunomodulatory therapy in COVID-19.

Methotrexate improves endothelial function in early rheumatoid arthritis patients after 3 months of treatment

Background

Endothelial dysfunction contributes to increased cardiovascular (CV) disease in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Angiogenic T cells (Tang) are a key regulator of vascular function via their interaction with endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs). Methotrexate (MTX) has been associated to reduced CV disease risk, but its effects on endothelial homeostasis have been poorly explored. We investigated MTX effects on endothelial homeostasis in early, treatment-naïve RA patients.

Methods

Fifteen untreated, early RA patients and matched healthy controls (HC) were enrolled. RA patients with long-standing disease in remission or low disease activity treated with MTX for at least 6 months were selected as controls. Circulating CD28⁺ and CD28^null Tang cell, endothelial microparticle (EMP), EPC and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule (sVCAM)-1 levels were measured.

Results

Tang percentage was higher in early RA than in HCs and significantly increased after 3-month MTX treatment. Tang cells in RA were characterized by higher percentage of CD28^null and lower CD28-positive cells than HCs. MTX restored a Tang cell phenotype similar to HCs. Altered sVCAM-1, EMP and EPC were restored to levels similar to HCs after a 3-month MTX. Biomarker levels after 3 months of MTX were not different to those of patients with long-standing treatment.

Conclusions

MTX has a positive effect on Tang, sVCAM-1, EPCs and EMPs in RA. Restoration of imbalance between CD28 + and CD28^null Tang by MTX may be one of the mechanisms underlying its favourable effects on endothelial dysfunction. These effects seem to be long-lasting and independent from systemic inflammation reduction, suggesting a direct effect of MTX on the endothelium.

Risk and prognosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: a systematic literature review to inform EULAR recommendations

OBJECTIVES

Perform a systematic literature review (SLR) on risk and prognosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs).

METHODS

Literature was searched up to 31 May 2021, including (randomised) controlled trials and observational studies with patients with RMD. Pending quality assessment, data extraction was performed and risk of bias (RoB) was assessed. Quality assessment required provision of (1) an appropriate COVID-19 case definition, and (2a) a base incidence (for incidence data) or (2b) a comparator, >10 cases with the outcome and risk estimates minimally adjusted for age, sex and comorbidities (for risk factor data).

RESULTS

Of 5165 records, 208 were included, of which 90 passed quality assessment and data were extracted for incidence (n=42), risk factor (n=42) or vaccination (n=14). Most studies had unclear/high RoB. Generally, patients with RMDs do not face more risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 (n=26 studies) or worse prognosis of COVID-19 (n=14) than individuals without RMDs. No consistent differences in risk of developing (severe) COVID-19 were found between different RMDs (n=19). Disease activity is associated with worse COVID-19 prognosis (n=2), possibly explaining the increased risk seen for glucocorticoid use (n=13). Rituximab is associated with worse COVID-19 prognosis (n=7) and possibly Janus kinase inhibitors (n=3). Vaccination is generally immunogenic, though antibody responses are lower than in controls. Vaccine immunogenicity is negatively associated with older age, rituximab and mycophenolate.

CONCLUSION

This SLR informed the July 2021 update of the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology recommendations for the management of RMDs in the context of SARS-CoV-2.

Current Practice of Imaging-Guided Interventional Procedures in Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases: Results of a Multinational Multidisciplinary Survey

Objectives: To investigate opinion and routine practice of specialists from different disciplines on imaging techniques for interventional procedures related to rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs). Methods: An English-language questionnaire was developed by an international working group and distributed to health care providers of various disciplines involved in the care of people with RMDs via an online survey tool (SoSci Survey®) from December 2019 to May 2020. Results: A total of 1,105 respondents from 56 countries completed the survey, over 60% of participants were rheumatologists. The majority of respondents (88%) performed interventional procedures in RMDs patients and 90% of them used imaging guidance. Ultrasonography was the most frequently used technique, particularly among rheumatologists. X-ray and computed tomography were mainly used by radiologists. A discrepancy emerged between the importance assigned to certain items such as the availability of a second operator and their actual implementation in clinical practice. Local barriers, lack of resources and facilities were mentioned as the most relevant obstacles in this regard. Lack of training on imaging and/or imaging guided procedures did not emerge as a barrier to perform such interventions; in fact, 19% of respondents performing the procedures indicated not to have received adequate training in this field. Conclusions: This is the first multinational multidisciplinary survey exploring in detail the opinions and practice on imaging guidance for interventional procedures in RMDs. A harmonization of protocols based on international guidelines, along with adequate training programmes and interventions on barriers at national/local levels are the main unmet needs requiring attention.

Immunomodulatory therapies for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection: an update of the systematic literature review to inform EULAR points to consider

Objective

To update the EULAR 2020 systematic literature review (SLR) on efficacy and safety of immunomodulatory agents in SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Methods

As part of a EULAR taskforce, a systematic literature search update was conducted from 11 December 2020 to 14 July 2021. Two reviewers independently identified eligible studies and extracted data on efficacy and safety of immunomodulatory agents used therapeutically in SARS-CoV-2 infection at any stage of disease. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed with validated tools.

Results

Of the 26 959 records, 520 articles were eligible for inclusion. Studies were mainly at high or unclear RoB. New randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on tocilizumab clarified its benefit in patients with severe and critical COVID-19, mainly if associated with glucocorticoids. There are emergent data on the usefulness of baricitinib and tofacitinib in severe COVID-19. Other therapeutic strategies such as the use of convalescent plasma and anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies showed efficacy in subjects not mounting normal anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses.

Conclusion

This new SLR confirms that some immunomodulators (tocilizumab and JAK inhibitors) have a role for treating severe and critical COVID-19. Although better evidence is available compared with the previous SLR, the need of RCT with combination therapy (glucocorticoids+anti-cytokines) versus monotherapy with glucocorticoids still remains alongside the need for standardisation of inclusion criteria and outcomes to ultimately improve the care and prognosis of affected people. This SLR informed the 2021 update of the EULAR points to consider on the use of immunomodulatory therapies in COVID-19.

Traditional and disease-related non-computed variables affect algorithms for cardiovascular risk estimation in Sjögren's syndrome and rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

Several cardiovascular (CV) risk algorithms are available to predict CV events in the general population. Their performance and validity in rheumatic disease patients is suboptimal as some disease-specific variables which strongly contribute to the pathogenesis of CV disease are not included in these CV algorithms. We aimed to evaluate the performance of two CV algorithms and investigate which variables not included in the score contribute to CV risk score in a cohort of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and Sjögren's syndrome (SS) patients.

METHODS

A consecutive cohort of 77 RA and 68 SS patients without prior CV events was included. Clinical and serological features and traditional CV risk factors were collected. The 10-year CV risk was assessed by Reynold Risk Score (RSS) and "Progetto Cuore" algorithms.

RESULTS

Prevalence of traditional CV risk factors and 10-year risk of fatal and non-fatal CV events assessed by RSS and "Progetto Cuore" were similar between the two cohorts. Multiple linear regression model showed that, among variables not included in both algorithms, body mass index (BMI) and disease activity were predictors of "Progetto Cuore" while BMI and bone erosions of RSS in RA. In SS, C-reactive protein was predictor of "Progetto Cuore" while hypertension, ESSDAI and LDL-cholesterol of RSS.

CONCLUSIONS

The 10-year risk of fatal and non-fatal CV events is similar in RA and SS. Traditional CV risk factors, as hypertension, strongly contribute to CV risk in these patients. Inflammatory parameters and disease activity are two disease-specific variables which should be included in CV algorithm assessment in rheumatic disease patients.

Pericarditis after SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Another Pebble in the Mosaic of Long COVID?

With the emerging success of the COVID-19 vaccination programs, the incidence of acute COVID-19 will decrease. However, given the high number of people who contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection and recovered, we will be faced with a significant number of patients with persistent symptoms even months after their COVID-19 infection. In this setting, long COVID and its cardiovascular manifestations, including pericarditis, need to become a top priority for healthcare systems as a new chronic disease process. Concerning the relationship between COVID-19 and pericardial diseases, pericarditis appears to be common in the acute infection but rare in the postacute period, while small pericardial effusions may be relatively common in the postacute period of COVID-19. Here, we reported a series of 7 patients developing pericarditis after a median of 20 days from clinical and virological recovery from SARS-CoV-2 infection. We excluded specific identifiable causes of pericarditis, hence we speculate that these cases can be contextualized within the clinical spectrum of long COVID. All our patients were treated with a combination of colchicine and either ASA or NSAIDs, but four of them did not achieve a clinical response. When switched to glucocorticoids, these four patients recovered with no recurrence during drug tapering. Based on this observation and on the latency of pericarditis occurrence (a median of 20 days after a negative nasopharyngeal swab), could be suggested that post-COVID pericarditis may be linked to ongoing inflammation sustained by the persistence of viral nucleic acid without virus replication in the pericardium. Therefore, glucocorticoids may be a suitable treatment option in patients not responding or intolerant to conventional therapy and who require to counteract the pericardial inflammatory component rather than direct an acute viral injury to the pericardial tissue.

Presence of anti-acetylated peptide antibodies (AAPA) in inflammatory arthritis and other rheumatic diseases suggests discriminative diagnostic capacity towards early rheumatoid arthritis

Aims:

To determine the diagnostic value of anti-acetylated peptide antibodies (AAPA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods:

Three acetylated peptides (ac-lysine, ac-lysine.inv and ac-ornithine) derived from vimentin were employed to measure AAPA by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in sera of 120 patients with early RA (eRA), 195 patients with established RA (est RA), 99 healthy controls (HC), and 216 patients with other inflammatory rheumatic diseases. A carbamylated and a citrullinated version of the vimentin peptide were used additionally. Receiver operating characteristics and logistic regression analyses were used to assess the discriminative capacity of AAPA.

Results:

AAPA were detected in 60% of eRA and 68.7% of estRA patients, 22.2% of HC, and 7.1– 30.6% of patients with other rheumatic diseases. Importantly, AAPA were also present in 40% of seronegative RA patients, while antibodies to the carbamylated peptide were detected less frequently. Diagnostic sensitivity of individual peptides for eRA was 28.3%, 35.8%, and 34% for ac-lysine, ac-ornithine, and ac-lysine.inv, respectively. Positive likelihood ratios (LR+) for eRA versus HC were 14.0, 7.1, and 2.1. While the presence of a single AAPA showed varying specificity (range: 84–98%), the presence of two AAPA increased specificity considerably since 26.7% of eRA, as compared with 6% of disease controls, were double positive. Thus, double positivity discriminated eRA from axial spondyloarthritis with a LR+ of 18.3. Remarkably, triple positivity was 100% specific for RA, being observed in 10% of eRA and 21.5% of estRA patients, even in the absence of RF and ACPA.

Conclusion:

AAPA are highly prevalent in early RA and occur also independently of RF and ACPA, thereby reducing the gap of seronegativity. Furthermore, multiple AAPA reactivity increased the specificity for RA, suggesting high diagnostic value of AAPA testing.

Association between central nervous system stimulants used to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and Raynaud's phenomenon: A scoping review

The association between central nervous (CNS) stimulants used to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) has received little attention to date. Our aim was to map the existing literature on aetiopathogenesis, clinical presentation and management of peripheral vasculopathy, with a focus on RP, secondary to drug therapy for ADHD. We searched the PubMed® database (01/11/1951 to 01/08/2020) and included articles written in English, which focussed on CNS stimulants used to treat ADHD and RP. The search identified 150 articles 9 of which were eligible for inclusion (70 patients). The majority of studies (n = 6) related to children or adolescents; however, adult cases were also identified. Peripheral vascular manifestations included attacks of RP (new and worsening) and cold sensitivity (acrocyanosis and perniosis). Irreversible ischaemic complications including digital autoamputation and lower limb critical digital ischaemia have also been reported. The implicated causative CNS stimulants were Methylphenidate (n = 5), Dextroamphetamine (n = 4), Atomoxetine (n = 2), and Lisdexamphetamine (n = 2). Complete resolution of RP symptoms was observed in half (n = 5) of studies upon drug cessation. Other therapeutic strategies have included dose reduction and switching to an alternative drug therapy. A potential autoimmune association has also been postulated including drug-induced autoimmunity and new cases of systemic sclerosis which have been potentially attributed to treatment. Future research is required to understand the association between CNS stimulant drug therapies for ADHD and peripheral vascular manifestations, including RP.

EULAR Points to Consider (PtC) for designing, analysing and reporting of studies with work participation as an outcome domain in patients with inflammatory arthritis

BACKGROUND

Clinical studies with work participation (WP) as an outcome domain pose particular methodological challenges that hamper interpretation, comparison between studies and meta-analyses.

OBJECTIVES

To develop Points to Consider (PtC) for design, analysis and reporting of studies of patients with inflammatory arthritis that include WP as a primary or secondary outcome domain.

METHODS

The EULAR Standardised Operating Procedures were followed. A multidisciplinary taskforce with 22 experts including patients with rheumatic diseases, from 10 EULAR countries and Canada, identified methodologic areas of concern. Two systematic literature reviews (SLR) appraised the methodology across these areas. In parallel, two surveys among professional societies and experts outside the taskforce sought for additional methodological areas or existing conducting/reporting recommendations. The taskforce formulated the PtC after presentation of the SLRs and survey results, and discussion. Consensus was obtained through informal voting, with levels of agreement obtained anonymously.

RESULTS

Two overarching principles and nine PtC were formulated. The taskforce recommends to align the work-related study objective to the design, duration, and outcome domains/measurement instruments of the study (PtC: 1-3); to identify contextual factors upfront and account for them in analyses (PtC: 4); to account for interdependence of different work outcome domains and for changes in work status over time (PtC: 5-7); to present results as means as well as proportions of patients reaching predefined meaningful categories (PtC: 8) and to explicitly report volumes of productivity loss when costs are an outcome (PtC:9).

CONCLUSION

Adherence to these EULAR PtC will improve the methodological quality of studies evaluating WP.

Psychosocial burden in young patients with primary anti-phospholipid syndrome: an Italian nationwide survey (The AQUEOUS study)

OBJECTIVES

The AQUEOUS (Anti-phospholipid syndrome: a QUEstionnaire for yOUng patientS) study aimed to assess how the diagnosis of primary anti-phospholipid syndrome (PAPS) affects the psychosocial status of young patients.

METHODS

Subjects with PAPS aged 18-45 years were invited to compile an ad hoc designed questionnaire and the Short Form-12 to assess quality of life (QoL).

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients (83.7% females) were recruited in 10 Italian centres. Vascular and obstetric manifestations were equally represented. Nearly half of the patients perceived the need for psychological support, 89.2% when considering women after pregnancy complications. Social activities and working efficiency were reduced in APS patients, also intimacy was threatened. In all cases, fatigue appeared to be the main determinant. PAPS affected family planning, due to fears of treatment side-effects, disease hereditariness, inability to care for the newborn child. Fertility appeared to be conserved: the median time to pregnancy was 2 months; assisted reproduction techniques were pursued by 5 women. Our survey documented significantly lower rates of hospitalisation and learning disabilities in 51 children born after APS diagnosis as compared to 48 children born before. PAPS patients displayed lower QoL in physical and, to a greater extent, mental scores compared to the general Italian population. Both components were significantly lower in women and in patients with fatigue.

CONCLUSIONS

The AQUEOUS study assessed for the first time the unmet needs of young PAPS patients, enabling the development of a future "youth-focused" strategy to reduce disease burden.

Young people's perspectives on patient-reported outcome measures in inflammatory arthritis: results of a multicentre European qualitative study from a EULAR task force

INTRODUCTION

Although patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly used in clinical practice and research, it is unclear whether these instruments cover the perspective of young people with inflammatory arthritis (IA). The aims of this study were to explore whether PROMs commonly used in IA adequately cover the perspective of young people from different European countries.

METHODS

A multinational qualitative study was conducted in Austria, Croatia, Italy and the Netherlands. Young people with either rheumatoid arthritis (RA), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), Still's disease, psoriatic arthritis (PsA) or spondyloarthritis (SpA), aged 18-35 years, participated in semistructured focus group interviews. Thematic analysis was used and data saturation was defined as no new emergent concepts in at least three subsequent focus groups.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients (21 with RA/JIA/Still's, 17 with PsA, 15 with SpA; 72% women) participated in 12 focus groups. Participants expressed a general positive attitude towards PROMs and emphasised their importance in clinical practice. In addition, 48 lower level concepts were extracted and summarised into 6 higher level concepts describing potential issues for improvement. These included: need for lay-term information regarding the purpose of using PROMs; updates of certain outdated items and using digital technology for data acquisition. Some participants admitted their tendency to rate pain, fatigue or disease activity differently from what they actually felt for various reasons.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite their general positive attitude, young people with IA suggested areas for PROM development to ensure that important concepts are included, making PROMs relevant over the entire course of a chronic disease.

Methodological aspects of design, analysis and reporting of studies with work participation as an outcome domain in patients with inflammatory arthritis: results of two systematic literature reviews informing EULAR points to consider

Objective

To summarise the methodological aspects in studies with work participation (WP) as outcome domain in inflammatory arthritis (IA) and other chronic diseases.

Methods

Two systematic literature reviews (SLRs) were conducted in key electronic databases (2014–2019): search 1 focused on longitudinal prospective studies in IA and search 2 on SLRs in other chronic diseases. Two reviewers independently identified eligible studies and extracted data covering pre-defined methodological areas.

Results

In total, 58 studies in IA (22 randomised controlled trials, 36 longitudinal observational studies) and 24 SLRs in other chronic diseases were included. WP was the primary outcome in 26/58 (45%) studies. The methodological aspects least accounted for in IA studies were as follows (proportions of studies positively adhering to the topic are shown): aligning the studied population (16/58 (28%)) and sample size calculation (8/58 (14%)) with the work-related study objective; attribution of WP to overall health (28/58 (48%)); accounting for skewness of presenteeism/sick leave (10/52 (19%)); accounting for work-related contextual factors (25/58 (43%)); reporting attrition and its reasons (1/58 (2%)); reporting both aggregated results and proportions of individuals reaching predefined meaningful change or state (11/58 (16%)). SLRs in other chronic diseases confirmed heterogeneity and methodological flaws identified in IA studies without identifying new issues.

Conclusion

High methodological heterogeneity was observed in studies with WP as outcome domain. Consensus around various methodological aspects specific to WP studies is needed to improve quality of future studies. This review informs the EULAR Points to Consider for conducting and reporting studies with WP as an outcome in IA.

Multidisciplinary collaboration among young specialists: results of an international survey by the emerging EULAR network and other young organisations

Background

Multidisciplinary collaboration is defined as a collective work involving multiple disciplines and is common in clinical care and research. Our aim was to describe current clinical and research collaboration among young specialists and to identify unmet needs in this area.

Methods

An online survey was disseminated by email and social media to members of the EMerging EUlar NETwork, the Young Nephrologists’ Platform, the Paediatric Rheumatology European Society Emerging Rheumatologists and Researchers and the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Junior Members.

Results

Of 303 respondents from 36 countries, 61% were female, 21% were aged below 30 years and 67% were aged 31–40 years. Young rheumatologists were the most represented (39%), followed by young nephrologists (24%), young paediatricians (20%), young allergologists (11%) then young internists (3%) and 3% other specialities. Collaborations were reported frequently by phone and email, also by various combined clinics while common local multidisciplinary meetings were uncommon. 96% would like to develop clinical research collaborations and 69% basic research collaborations. The majority of young specialists would be interested in online (84%) and/or 1–2 days (85%) common courses including case discussion (81%) and training workshops (85%), as well as webinars recorded with several specialists on a specific disease (96%).

Conclusions

This collaborative initiative highlighted wishes from young specialists for developing (1) regular local multidisciplinary meetings to discuss complex patients, (2) clinical research collaboration with combined grants and (3) multidisciplinary online projects such as common courses, webinars and apps.

Assessment of competences in rheumatology training: results of a systematic literature review to inform EULAR points to consider

Objective

To summarise the literature on the assessment of competences in postgraduate medical training.

Methods

A systematic literature review was performed within a EULAR taskforce on the assessment of competences in rheumatology training and other related specialities (July 2019). Two searches were performed: one search for rheumatology and one for related medical specialities. Two reviewers independently identified eligible studies and extracted data on assessment methods. Risk of bias was assessed using the medical education research study quality instrument.

Results

Of 7335 articles in rheumatology and 2324 reviews in other specialities, 5 and 31 original studies were included, respectively. Studies in rheumatology were at variable risk of bias and explored only direct observation of practical skills (DOPS) and objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs). OSCEs, including clinical, laboratory and imaging stations, performed best, with a good to very good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α=0.83–0.92), and intrarater reliability (r=0.80–0.95). OSCEs moderately correlated with other assessment tools: r=0.48 vs rating by programme directors; r=0.2–0.44 vs multiple-choice questionnaires; r=0.48 vs DOPS. In other specialities, OSCEs on clinical skills had a good to very good inter-rater reliability and OSCEs on communication skills demonstrated a good to very good internal consistency. Multisource feedback and the mini-clinical evaluation exercise showed good feasibility and internal consistency (reliability), but other data on validity and reliability were conflicting.

Conclusion

Despite consistent data on competence assessment in other specialities, evidence in rheumatology is scarce and conflicting. Overall, OSCEs seem an appropriate tool to assess the competence of clinical skills and correlate well with other assessment strategies. DOPS, multisource feedback and the mini-clinical evaluation exercise are feasible alternatives.

OP0074 A FRAMEWORK OF POTENTIAL INTERVENTIONS TO ACCELERATE GENDER-EQUITABLE CAREER ADVANCEMENT IN ACADEMIC RHEUMATOLOGY

Background:

A growing number of professional societies in clinical and medically related disciplines investigate evidence, make recommendations, and take action to advance gender equity. Evidence on women’s advancement and leadership in the context of the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology, EULAR, is limited [1].

Objectives:

The objective of the EULAR Task Force on Gender Equity in Academic Rheumatology was to establish the extent of the unmet need for support of female rheumatologists, health professionals and non-clinical scientists in academic rheumatology and develop a framework to address this through EULAR and Emerging EULAR Network (EMEUNET).

Methods:

Potential interventions to accelerate gender-equitable career advancement in academic rheumatology were gathered from a narrative review of the relevant literature, expert opinion of a multi-disciplinary Task Force (comprised of 23 members from 11 countries), data from the surveys of EULAR scientific member society leaders, EULAR and EMEUNET members, and EULAR Executive Committee members. These interventions were rated by Task Force members, who ranked each according to perceived priority on a five-point numeric scale from 1 = very low to 5 = very high.

Results:

A framework of 29 potential interventions was formulated, which covers six thematic areas, namely, EULAR policies, advocacy and communication, EULAR Congress and associated symposia, training courses, mentoring/peer support, and EULAR funding (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

A framework of potential interventions with the levels of priority, mean and standard deviation (SD)

Conclusion:

The framework provides structured interventions for accelerating gender-equitable career advancement in academic rheumatology.

References:

[1]Andreoli L, Ovseiko PV, Hassan N, et al. Gender equity in clinical practice, research and training: Where do we stand in rheumatology? Joint Bone Spine 2019;86(6):669-72.

Acknowledgements:

The task force is grateful to EULAR for funding this activity under project number EPI 024.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

POS1099 EFFICACY OF INTRA-ARTICULAR CORTICOSTEROID INJECTIONS IN KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS

Background:

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a frequent degenerative disease representing an important health and economic burden. Symptomatic medical treatments available include intra-articular (IA) injections of corticosteroids (GC) but their efficacy is debated. In addition, safety signals regarding cartilage damage with IA GC have been highlighted in a few studies.

Objectives:

To perform a meta-analysis of studies assessing IA GC efficacy and safety in knee OA.

Methods:

A systematic literature review and a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of GC IA injections versus other interventions (IA Hyaluronic Acid, IA placebo, IA NSAID, oral NSAID or physiotherapy) in knee OA was performed. The effect of the interventions on pain and function were extracted from the single studies and pooled and are presented as short term (<6weeks), medium term (6-24 weeks) and long term (>24 weeks) follow-up period. Standardized mean differences (SMD) are reported.

Results:

Of 520 studies screened, 23 were included in the SLR and 14 subsequently included in the MA. While IA GC showed a superior effect compared to control on both pain (SMD -0.61 (95% CI -1,25, 0.03)) and function (SMD -1.02 (95% CI -2.14, 0.10)) in short term follow-up; long term follow-up analysis favored controls (IA HA, IA NSAID, physiotherapy) for both pain (SMD 0.68 (95% CI -0.11, 1.47)) and function (SMD 0.88 (95% CI -0.36, 2.12) outcomes (Figure 1). No difference was found between interventions in the medium term. Safety data were reported in 18/23 studies (n= 1936/2314 patients); and side effects were reported as follows: arthralgia (69 IA GC patients, 146 IA HA patients, and 20 saline patients); site injection pain (7 in the IA GC group, 2 in the IA saline group, 14 in the IA HA group); 16 post injection knee swelling without signs of septic arthritis in the IA GC group and 24 in the IA HA group. In one study assessing cartilage effects of GCs, the rate of cartilage loss was greater in the GC group with a reduction of cartilage thickness at 2 year compared to placebo group. No difference was observed in the progression of cartilage denudation or bone marrow lesion. On the contrary, another study showed no effect of injections on the cartilage structure.

Conclusion:

We demonstrate in this work that IA GC injections reduce pain and improve function in the early phase (≤6 weeks) of treatment. In the long term (≥24 weeks), other intervention such as IA HA injections or physiotherapy seem to be more efficient, but this effect was largely driven by single studies with large effect sizes and the comparators were heterogeneous.

Figure 1.

Knee pain outcome at short term (≤6weeks) (A), medium term (>6 & <24 weeks) (B), and long term (≥24 weeks) (C) follow up.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared.

OP0287 IMMUNOMODULATORY THERAPIES FOR SEVERE FORMS OF COVID-19: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW TO INFORM EULAR POINTS TO CONSIDER

Background:

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) pandemic is a global health problem. Beside the specific pathogenic effect of SARS-CoV-2, a deleterious aberrant non-effective host immune response plays an important role especially in severe forms of COVID-19. There is intense investigation to explore the utility of immunomodulatory drugs commonly used in the Rheumatology arena as agents that may mitigate against COVID-19 to improve disease prognosis. Rheumatologists are used to the utilization of these immune targeted therapies.

Objectives:

To summarize the available information on the use of immunomodulatory agents in severe COVID-19.

Methods:

As part of a EULAR taskforce, a systematic literature search was conducted from January 2019 up to December 11, 2020. Two reviewers independently identified eligible studies according to the PICO framework P (population): patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection; I (intervention): any immunomodulator agent/strategy; C (comparator): any comparator; O (outcome) any clinical outcome including but not limited to mortality, admission to intensive care unit and clinical improvement. Data on efficacy and safety of immunomodulatory agents utilized therapeutically in SARS-CoV-2 infection at any stage were extracted. The risk of bias was assessed using validated tools.

Results:

Of 60372 records, 401 articles were eligible for inclusion. Studies were at variable risk of bias. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were available for the following drugs: hydroxychloroquine (N=12), glucocorticoids (N=6), tocilizumab (N= 4), convalescent plasma (N=4), interferon beta (N=2), IVIg (N=2) and N=1 each for anakinra, baricitinib, colchicine, leflunomide, ruxolitinib, interferon kappa, and vilobelimab. For glucocorticoids, dexamethasone reduced mortality only in patients requiring respiratory support; while methylprednisolone reduced mortality in patients aged 60 years or over. Data from RCTs on tocilizumab are conflicting and definite conclusions cannot be drawn at this point in time, but recent studies suggest possible benefit in patients requiring respiratory support. Hydroxychloroquine was not beneficial at any disease stage, one RCT with anakinra was negative, one RCT with baricitinib+remdesivir was positive, and individual trials testing some other compounds provided interesting, albeit preliminary, results.

Conclusion:

Although there is emerging evidence about immunomodulatory therapies for the management of COVID-19, conclusive data is scarce with some conflicting data. Since glucocorticoids seem to improve survival in some subsets of patients, RCTs comparing glucocorticoids alone versus glucocorticoids plus anti-cytokine/immunomodulatory treatment are warranted. This SLR informed the initiative to formulate EULAR points to consider on pathophysiology and use of immunomodulatory therapies in COVID-19.

Figure 1.

Forest plots showing the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval for mortality in randomized controlled trials divided by intervention. The latest follow-up available is reported in the timing column.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

AB0652 FERRITIN IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE SEVERITY OF LUNG INVOLVEMENT BUT NOT WITH WORSE PROGNOSIS IN PATIENTS WITH COVID-19: DATA FROM TWO ITALIAN COVID-19 UNITS

Background:

The coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) is characterised by a heterogeneous clinical presentation and a wide range of imaging findings, depending on disease severity and time course. The pathophysiology is complex, involving immune and hematologic systems, epithelial cells and vascular system and to date reliable biomarkers aimed at stratifying patients and predicting worse outcomes have not been identified

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to describe clinical, serological and CT imaging features of a cohort of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and identify possible relationships between the variables and disease outcomes (admission to intensive care unit (ICU) and/or death).

Methods:

We evaluated hospitalized patients with proven SARS-CoV-2 infection, clinical signs of COVID-19 and computed tomography (CT) scan-proven pulmonary involvement. Clinical and serological records of patients admitted to two COVID-19 Units in Italy with proven SARS-CoV-2 pulmonary involvement investigated with CT scan, assessed at the time of admission to the hospital, were retrospectively collected.

Results:

Sixty-one patients (22 females and 39 males) of median age 65 years were enrolled. Fifty-six patients were discharged while death occurred in 5 patients. None of the lung abnormalities detected by CT was different between discharged and deceased patients. No differences were observed in the features and extent of pulmonary involvement according to age and gender. Logistic regression analysis with age and gender as covariates demonstrated that ferritin levels over the 25th percentile were associated with the involvement of all 5 pulmonary lobes (OR=14.5, 95% CI=2.3-90.9, p=0.004), the presence of septal thickening (OR=8.2, 95% CI=1.6-40.9, p=0.011) and the presence of mediastinal lymph node enlargement (OR=12.0, 95% CI=1.1-127.5, p=0.039) independently of age and gender.

Conclusion:

We demonstrated that ferritin levels over the 25th percentile are associated with a more severe pulmonary involvement, independently of age and gender, but not with disease outcomes (admission to ICU/death). The identification of reliable biomarkers in patients with COVID-19 may help guiding clinical decision, tailoring therapeutic approaches and ultimately improving the care and prognosis of patients with this disease.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared.

Immunomodulatory therapies for SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic literature review to inform EULAR points to consider

OBJECTIVE

To summarise the available information on efficacy and safety of immunomodulatory agents in SARS-CoV-2 infection.

METHODS

As part of a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) taskforce, a systematic literature search was conducted from January 2019 to 11 December 2020. Two reviewers independently identified eligible studies according to the Population, Intervention, Comparator and Outcome framework and extracted data on efficacy and safety of immunomodulatory agents used therapeutically in SARS-CoV-2 infection at any stage. The risk of bias was assessed with validated tools.

RESULTS

Of the 60 372 records, 401 articles were eligible for inclusion. Studies were at variable risk of bias. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were available for the following drugs: hydroxychloroquine (n=12), glucocorticoids (n=6), tocilizumab (n=4), convalescent plasma (n=4), interferon beta (n=2), intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) (n=2) and n=1 each for anakinra, baricitinib, colchicine, leflunomide, ruxolitinib, interferon kappa and vilobelimab. Glucocorticoids were able to reduce mortality in specific subsets of patients, while conflicting data were available about tocilizumab. Hydroxychloroquine was not beneficial at any disease stage, one RCT with anakinra was negative, one RCT with baricitinib+remdesivir was positive, and individual trials on some other compounds provided interesting, although preliminary, results.

CONCLUSION

Although there is emerging evidence about immunomodulatory therapies for the management of COVID-19, conclusive data are scarce with some conflicting data. Since glucocorticoids seem to improve survival in some subsets of patients, RCTs comparing glucocorticoids alone versus glucocorticoids plus anticytokine/immunomodulatory treatment are warranted. This systematic literature review informed the initiative to formulate EULAR 'points to consider' on COVID-19 pathophysiology and immunomodulatory treatment from the rheumatology perspective.

OP0077 THE EMERGING EULAR NETWORK (EMEUNET): AN INTERNATIONAL SURVEY REFLECTING ON A TEN-YEAR JOURNEY

Background:

The Emerging EULAR NETwork (EMEUNET), founded in 2009, aims to promote education, foster research collaborations and facilitate the integration of young researchers and rheumatologists within EULAR.

Objectives:

After 10 years, we aimed to interview our members to assess how EMEUNET is fulfilling its goals, understand if there are unmet needs and explore new ideas.

Methods:

In July 2019 a survey was circulated for 3 months among EMEUNET members via its social media channels. The survey contained 18 closed and 2 open items, in addition to general questions on age, job and country of origin and work.

Results:

Out of 124 total respondents, most completed all items (120/124) and only a minority had some missing items (4/124). A little over half of the respondents were female (n=69, 54.8%) and median age was 33y (range 25y-42y). Most respondents were born (n=109, 88.6%) and/or worked in Europe (n=114, 92.7%) (fig. 1), although there was also a representation from extra-European countries, which is in line with the general EMEUNET membership (https://emeunet.eular.org/map.cfm).

Figure 1.

Country of origin and where respondents work at the time of completing the EMEUNET VISE questionnaire.

11 (9.1%) had been EMEUNET members for less than 2 years, 81 (66.9%) for 2-5years and 29 (24.0%) for more than 5 years.

Figure 2 shows a clear link between the respondents’ perception of EMEUNET aim(s) and the actual aims of EMEUNET set out in our mission statement (https://emeunet.eular.org/mission_statement.cfm).

Figure 2.

The links between what participants would like to see as EMEUNET aims and the aims of EMEUNET as they are now

Most of the respondents got to know about EMEUNET through a friend/colleague in Rheumatology (n=67, 54.0%), at EULAR/ACR annual conferences (n=32, 25.8%), via social media (n=9, 7.3%), other international meeting (n=6, 4.8%), national Rheumatology meeting (n=6, 4.8%) or via the EMEUNETs country liaisons (n=4, 3.2%).

29 respondents (24%) were part of the EMEUNET working group (WG), 43% (n=53) applied before to be part of the WG, 24% (n=29) never applied and 15% (n=19) did not know what the WG was. Most of the respondents who never applied to the WG thought it to be too time consuming. Only 21 (16.9%) felt there was a subgroup in the WG missing and most of those (n=8, 38.1%) found this should fully focus on research collaborations, which is actually part of the general aims of EMEUNET and a focus of all Working Groups.

Only a relatively small portion of EMEUNET of respondents (<5%) stated to have approached EMEUNET with their ideas. Although 90.2% (n=110) felt that the opportunity to submit new ideas is a good initiative, only 52.5% (n=..) knew that such possibilities exists. This suggests that EMEUNET could do more to make members aware of this possibility. Additionally, while the main reasons for not contacting EMEUNET with an idea were ‘not having one’ (41.9%) or having ‘no time’ (34.9%), 20.9% feels their ideas would not be received well, which is another aspect offering room for improvement.

Twice a year, EMEUNET organises networking events (NE) for their members to discuss their work in an informal setting. We found that 56/120 (46.7%) of the respondents prefer a low-budget (<€20) event, including an activity and the possibility to network, accompanied by drinks and bites. This is much in line with EMEUNETs past NE. In addition, past NEs were often mentioned as an example of ideal events.

Conclusion:

Awareness on EMEUNET often comes from colleagues and international conferences in rheumatology, which coincides with one of the focuses of EMEUNET to increase visibility in the last 10 years. Expectations about NE are in line with the previously organised NE.

Areas for improvement are dissemination of information on the EMEUNET WG, the possibility to submit ideas -which is open to all members- and the increased focus on research collaboration, an aspect on which we are actively working as EMEUNET is fully engaged with the newly launched EULAR Virtual Research Centre.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared