Single agent, canfosfamide (C, TLK286) vs pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (D) or topotecan (T) in 3rd-line treatment of platinum (P) refractory or resistant ovarian cancer (OC): Phase 3 study results

LBA5528

Background: Canfosfamide (C) is a novel glutathione analog prodrug activated by glutathione S-transferase P1–1. P resistant OC has a poor prognosis and non-P agents are used for palliation. C reported objective responses in multicenter Phase 2 OC trials. Methods: Pts with P resistant OC who progressed after D or T, measurable disease (RECIST), adequate liver/renal/bone marrow function were eligible. Randomization was stratified by prior D or T treatment, ECOG PS (0 or 1 vs 2) and presence or absence of bulky disease (= 5cm). Patients received C at 1000 mg/m2 IV q3wks, or to D at 50 mg/m2 IV q4wks or T at 1.5 mg/m2 IV daily × 5 q3wks until progression. The trial had a 90% power to detect a 29% reduction in the relative risk of death. Results: 461 pts (C=232 and D or T=229) received 1052 cycles [median 3; range (r) 1–33], 699 (median 4; r 1–32), and 469 (median 5; r 1–21) for C, D and T respectively. Most common Grade 3–4 AEs for C were: nausea (31.6%), vomiting (8.7%), fatigue (6.1%), and anemia (5.6%), for D/T were: nausea (55.3%), anemia (15.2%), fatigue (6.9%), neutropenia (23.5%), thrombocytopenia (12.4%), febrile neutropenia (6%), stomatitis (6%), and PPE syndrome (6%). ORR for C was 4.3% including a CR, vs 10.9% ORR for D/T. Median survival (MS) was 8.5 mos for C, 13.6 mos for D/T (p=0.0001). Median progression-free survival was 2.3 mos for C and 4.4 mos for D/T, (p=0.0001). D/T MS was 14.2/10.8 mos, respectively. Conclusions: Canfosfamide did not meet the primary endpoint. C demonstrated single agent activity in P refractory or resistant OC and was well tolerated. C in combination with standard agents in less heavily treated OC trials are in progress.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Early CA-125 fluctuations in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer receiving chemotherapy

The objective of this study was to analyze retrospective populations with recurrent ovarian cancer to assess differences in CA-125 patterns during chemotherapy. The populations included all patients treated between January 1994 and January 2004, who received liposomal doxorubicin and topotecan, and all patients treated between July 1997 and June 2001, who received carboplatin. Prognostic variables were abstracted from the medical records. Eighty-nine patients received liposomal doxorubicin and topotecan therapy and 21 received carboplatin; of these, 59 (liposomal doxorubicin), 60 (topotecan), and 17 (carboplatin) patients had evaluable CA-125 patterns. Patients given liposomal doxorubicin were more likely to have received only one or two cycles of therapy (37/89 [42%]) than patients receiving either carboplatin (5/21 [24%]) or topotecan (20/89[22%]). In cycle 1, CA-125 increases in patients were carboplatin, 4/17 (24%); liposomal doxorubicin, 41/59 (69%); and topotecan, 11/60 (18%). In cycle 2, CA-125 increases were carboplatin, 2/16 (13%); liposomal doxorubicin, 19/37 (51%); and topotecan, 9/50 (18%). In cycle 3, CA-125 increases were carboplatin, 0/12 (0%); liposomal doxorubicin, 7/23 (30%); and topotecan, 6/38 (16%). Of patients having any CA-125 decrease and given two or more cycles, fewer declines were seen in those given liposomal doxorubicin precycle 2 (18/35[51%]) than in those given carboplatin (13/16[81%]) or topotecan (49/56[88%]). The most prominent delay in CA-125 decline was in patients given liposomal doxorubicin compared with those given topotecan or carboplatin. In the entire population, only 3 of 107 (2.8%) patients demonstrated first CA-125 decline precycle 4. Discontinuation of therapy solely on the basis of early CA-125 increase (precycle 3), particularly with liposomal doxorubicin chemotherapy, may exclude some patients who will benefit from continued therapy.

A phase I trial of BMS-247550 (NSC# 710428) and gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors

The purpose of this study is to establish the maximum tolerated dose and define the dose-limiting toxicity of the investigational epothilone BMS-247550 in combination with fixed dose-rate gemcitabine. Patients with advanced, recurrent solid tumors who had received <or=2 prior cytotoxic regimens for recurrent disease were treated with gemcitabine over 90 min on days 1 and 8 plus BMS-247550 over 3 h on day 8, every 21 days in a phase I study. Dose-limiting toxicity definitions were based on severe myelosuppression, or grade 3 or 4 treatment-related non-hematologic toxicity, or dose delay of greater than 2 weeks due to treatment toxicity observed in the first treatment cycle. Dose cohort 1 received gemcitabine 900 mg/m2 and BMS-247550 20 mg/m2. Grade 4 neutropenia lasting >or=7 days occurred in one of six patients. Two of three patients in cohort 2 (gemcitabine 900 mg/m2 plus BMS-247550 30 mg/m2) had dose-limiting toxicities of grade 4 neutropenia. An additional three patients were treated at dose level 1 with no additional dose-limiting toxicities observed. At an intermediate dose level (gemcitabine 750 mg/m2 plus BMS-247550 30 mg/m2), two of six patients experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (febrile neutropenia and grade 3 hypophosphatemia in 1, grade 3 hypophosphatemia and grade 3 hyponatremia in (1), and five of six patients experienced dose delays. In the final cohort (gemcitabine 750 mg/m2 plus BMS-247550 25 mg/m2), two of two patients experienced a dose-limiting toxicity. Treatment-related toxicities included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenic fever, hypophosphatemia, and hyponatremia. Nine of 14 patients evaluable for response had stable disease. The maximum tolerated dose for this schedule is gemcitabine 900 mg/m2 over 90 min days 1 and 8 plus BMS-247550 20 mg/m2 on day 8. Attempts to increase the dose of BMS-247550 by decreasing the gemcitabine dose did not sufficiently ameliorate myelosuppression. Stable disease was observed in some patients with prior taxane exposure.

A phase I study evaluating the safety and pharmacokinetics of weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin in relapsed ovarian cancer

This phase I study sought to determine the toxicity profile, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of giving carboplatin every 3 weeks and paclitaxel weekly in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer. Eligible patients with relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer and prior treatment with platinum- and paclitaxel-based therapy were treated with an escalating regimen of carboplatin (day 1) at an area under the curve (AUC) of 4–6 and 1-h infusions of paclitaxel (days 1, 8, and 15) at 50–80 mg/m2 cycled at 3-week intervals. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed on the first day of cycles 1 and 2. All patients had a platinum-free interval of greater than 6 months from the most recent platinum treatment. A total of 77 cycles were administered to 16 patients, with a similar median number of cycles per patient at each dose level varying from 4.6 to 5.3. Febrile neutropenia and grade 4 thrombocytopenia were the dose-limiting toxicities at dose levels 3 and 4 after the third cycle, with no mucositis, nausea, vomiting, or peripheral neuropathy observed greater than grade 2. The maximum tolerated dose of carboplatin was an AUC of 5 and 80 mg/m2 for paclitaxel. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed a marginal statistical difference with regard to reduced systemic paclitaxel concentration after cycle 2 compared with cycle 1 (P= 0.06). Of nine patients evaluable for a radiographic response, the response rate was 66.6% with a complete response of 33.3%. All five patients with nonmeasurable disease achieved a biochemical response. The combination of carboplatin given every 3 weeks at an AUC of 5 and 1-h weekly paclitaxel at 80 mg/m2 is a feasible and reasonably well-tolerated regimen and may have significant antitumor activity in relapsed ovarian cancer patients.

Preoperative serum YKL-40 is a marker for detection and prognosis of endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

YKL-40 is a secreted glycoprotein of the chitinase family that has been previously described as a diagnostic and prognostic marker for a number of cancers, including epithelial ovarian cancer. In this study, we examined the frequency of serum elevation as well as the diagnostic and prognostic significance of this serum marker in endometrial cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preoperative serum levels of YKL-40 and CA125 were evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for all endometrial cancer patient samples (34) available in the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Gynecology Service Tissue Bank between the years 1987 and 2002, and compared to a cohort of normal individuals. A YKL-40 value of 61 ng/mL has previously been determined to represent the upper limit of normal. YKL-40 values were correlated with clinical characteristics, including patient age, tumor grade, histology, clinical stage, and clinical outcome (progression-free survival [PFS] and overall survival [OS]).

RESULTS

YKL-40 was elevated (>61 ng/mL) in 26 (76%) of 34 endometrial cancer patients compared with elevations of CA125 in 21 (62%) of 34 patients (P=0.09). Twenty-eight (82%) of all 34 patients had elevations of either CA125 or YKL-40 or both; 16 (89%) of 18 advanced-stage endometrial cancer patients had elevation of at least one of these two markers. Median preoperative YKL-40 value was 137 ng/mL (range, 22-1738 ng/mL) for endometrial cancer patients compared with 28 ng/mL (range, 15-72 ng/mL) for normal healthy subjects (P<0.0001). There was no statistically significant association of YKL-40 with patient age, tumor grade, histology, or stage. Elevation of YKL-40 (>80 ng/mL) was correlated with poor clinical outcome in univariate analysis, but was not demonstrated in multivariate analysis. At 5 years' follow-up, the PFS rate was 80% for patients with YKL-40<80 ng/mL compared with 43% for patients with YKL-40>80 ng/mL (P=0.004). The 5-year OS rate for patients with YKL-40<80 ng/mL was 79% compared with 48% for patients with YKL-40>80 ng/mL (P=0.047).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative serum YKL-40 is frequently elevated and may represent a novel marker for the detection of endometrial cancer and the identification of high-risk subsets of patients with worse clinical outcome. Further investigation of this promising endometrial cancer marker in larger studies is warranted.

CA125 level as a predictor of progression-free survival and overall survival in ovarian cancer patients with surgically defined disease status prior to the initiation of intraperitoneal consolidation therapy

OBJECTIVES

Recent data suggest that differences in CA125 levels within the normal range may predict progression-free survival (PFS), but limited information is available regarding the value of these differences in predicting overall survival (OS) in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. The objective of this study was to determine whether CA125 is an independent predictor of OS in patients with surgically defined disease status at the end of primary therapy prior to intraperitoneal (IP) consolidation chemotherapy. A secondary objective was to assess the relationship of CA125 level to PFS.

METHODS

Using data from a retrospective cohort of 433 patients who received intraperitoneal (IP) therapy following primary treatment for ovarian cancer between 1984 and 1998, we identified 241 patients with a complete clinical response and CA125 data at the time of second-look surgery prior to IP chemotherapy. Patient demographics and updated follow-up status were abstracted from medical records. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared using the log-rank test, and Cox regression models were used for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The majority of patients had advanced stage III or IV disease (n=201, 83%) and high-grade histology (n=163, 68%). Taxane was used as part of primary platinum-based therapy in 56% (n=134) of patients, and subsequent IP chemotherapy was platinum-based in 85% (n=206). When considered as a continuous variable, CA125 was a predictor of OS (P=0.029). Using the median CA125 level in our study group as a cut-off, OS was increased in patients with CA125 < or =12 U/ml (median 5.8 years) compared with >12 (3.7 years) (P=0.0027). CA125 level was an independent predictor of OS (HR: 1.410; 95% CI, 1.044, 1.904, P=0.0248) in a multivariate model that included stage (P=0.0166), grade (P=0.0001), and findings at second-look surgery (P=0.0003). CA125 level was also a predictor of clinical PFS (radiographic or CA125 elevation criteria alone) in a subset of 161 patients as a continuous variable (P=0.0036), and when divided at the median (< or = or >12; median 2.8 years vs. 1.7 years; P=0.0017).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study population, CA125 level at the end of primary therapy was a predictor of OS and PFS when considered as a continuous variable, or when divided at the median (< or = or >12 U/ml). Further prospective study is required to optimize clinically significant cut-off values within the normal range of CA125 levels for both OS and PFS endpoints.

Phase I Study of Abagovomab in Patients with Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer

PURPOSE

This open-label study assessed the safety and immunogenicity of two doses and two routes of the anti-idiotypic monoclonal antibody abagovomab (formerly ACA125) in patients with epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Eligible patients from the three participating institutions were any stage at diagnosis, had relapsed, and had complete or partial response to additional chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to receive abagovomab at 2.0 versus 0.2 mg and i.m. versus s.c. for four immunizations every 2 weeks and then monthly for two additional immunizations. Planned evaluation included interval physical examinations and laboratory assessments with immune assessment, including HLA typing, human anti-mouse antibody, ELISA, and enzyme-linked immunospot. Patients were required to remain on study until week 10 (the first post-baseline Ab3 determination) to be considered for immunologic assessment. The primary end points were safety and immunogenicity primarily determined by Ab3 response.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients received at least one vaccination and were eligible for safety analysis. Thirty-three patients were available for Ab3 analysis (removed for progression of disease, 6; withdrawal of consent, 2; unrelated adverse event, 1). The most common adverse events were self-limited pain at injection site, myalgia, and fever. No hematologic or nonhematologic toxicity grade>2 related to immunization was seen. Ab3 was detectable in all patients (median, 236,794 ng/mL); none of route of administration (P=0.6268), dose (P=0.4602), or cohort (P=0.4944) was statistically significant in terms of effect on maximum post-baseline Ab3 titer. Human anti-mouse antibody was not detectable at baseline but was present in all patients at week 16 (range, 488-45,000 ng/mL).

CONCLUSIONS

Immunization with abagovomab is well tolerated and induced robust Ab3 responses at the two doses and routes tested. A phase III randomized study with abagovomab (2.0 mg s.c.) is warranted.

Phase I/II study of weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin and gemcitabine as first-line treatment of advanced-stage ovarian cancer: Pathologic complete response and longitudinal assessment of impact on cognitive functioning

BACKGROUND

To determine the pathologic complete response rate of advanced ovarian cancer to weekly paclitaxel plus gemcitabine and carboplatin with filgrastim, and assess the longitudinal impact of this regimen on quality-of-life and cognitive functioning.

METHODS

Fourteen patients with advanced ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer were treated in the phase I portion of the study. Initial doses were paclitaxel: 60 mg/m(2) days 1, 8, and 15; gemcitabine: 800 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8; and carboplatin: area under the curve (AUC) 5 day 1, every 21 days for 6 cycles with filgrastim. Twenty-seven patients were treated at the phase II dose. Pathologic response was assessed by second-look laparoscopy in patients with complete response. Patients completed longitudinal assessments of quality-of-life and cognitive functioning.

RESULTS

Maximally tolerated doses were paclitaxel: 80 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8; gemcitabine: 800 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8; and carboplatin: AUC 5 day 1, every 21 days. Forty-eight percent of patients (13/27) experienced at least 1 grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity. Fifty percent (95% confidence interval [CI], 31-69%) of assessable patients achieved pathologic complete response. Median progression-free survival was 27.3 months (95% CI, 17.7 months to not reached), and overall survival 43.6 months (95% CI, 42 months to not reached). Cognitive functioning did not decline during or after chemotherapy. More highly educated women reported a perceived decline in concentration and memory while on chemotherapy. Quality-of-life scores were maintained during therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Fifty percent of patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer achieved pathologic complete response to weekly paclitaxel plus gemcitabine and carboplatin. Cognitive functioning did not decline by objective measures, although highly educated women reported subjective impairment.

Population analysis of a 24-h paclitaxel infusion in advanced endometrial cancer: a gynaecological oncology group study

AIMS

To examine determinants of paclitaxel disposition and the association between paclitaxel exposure and toxicity or survival in patients with advanced stage or recurrent endometrial cancer treated with doxorubicin plus paclitaxel.

METHODS

A limited sampling scheme was used to examine the population pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel in 160 patients from one arm of a randomized Phase III trial of doxorubicin plus paclitaxel or cisplatin. Four plasma samples per patient were collected at approximately 0, 3, 22 and 27 h after the first 24-h infusion of paclitaxel and submitted to the Gynecological Oncology Group (GOG) Pharmacology Core Laboratory. Total paclitaxel concentrations were quantified by LC/MS and paclitaxel disposition was examined using NONMEM. Paclitaxel exposure was evaluated for associations with toxicity or survival.

RESULTS

Patient weight, age and serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase level were determinants of paclitaxel clearance (clearance increased 0.437 l h-1 kg-1; decreased 0.223 l h-1 year-1 and 0.105 l h-1 IU-1). Bayesian shrinkage was minimal for this parameter. In different measures of paclitaxel exposure, AUC was most predictive of toxicity, with higher AUC associated with granulocytopenia [probability of 1% at AUC=1 to 22% at AUC=4 microg l-1 h-1 for performance status (PS)=0]. PS was more strongly associated with survival than disease stage and higher paclitaxel AUC was associated with worse survival irrespective of PS and stage.

CONCLUSIONS

Paclitaxel AUC is an independent predictor of granulocytopenia and survival in patients with advanced stage or recurrent endometrial cancer. Future studies are needed to validate the latter finding. This study confirms the appropriateness of evaluating pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in multicentre oncology trials.

Eukaryotic elongation factor 1 alpha 2 alone is not sufficient to cause tumorigenicity in immortalized and neoplastic ovarian cell lines

15051

Background: EEF1a2 is amplified and overexpressed in 25% of ovarian tumors. Previous studies have shown EEF1a2 to have oncogenic and tumorigenic properties in rodent fibroblasts. However, its role in the tumorigenesis and behavior of human ovarian carcinomas is not known. Methods: Stable expression of EEF1a2 cDNA in both T80 immortalized human ovarian surface epithelial cells and SKOV-3 cell line was followed by standard proliferation assays, soft agar assays for anchorage independent growth, cell cycle analysis, mouse xenograft injections, evaluation for changes in factors such as VEGF and ras and susceptibility to CDDP. Transient transfections with 3 different siRNA’s to EEF1a2 were performed in both cell lines. Results: Stable expression of EEF1a2 was detected by Western Blot and IP. Compared to vector only control, transfection with pCMVTag2B EEF1a2 vector did not change proliferation in either cell line. Anchorage independent growth was slightly higher in the T80 transfected cells. Cell cycle and expression of VEGF and ras were not different than control. IC50 of CDDP was similar between the transfected and control cell lines. No size difference was seen in SKOV transfected and control xenografts. T80 controls grew larger and more frequent tumors than transfected controls. Transient transfection of T80 with siRNA did not result in changes in anchorage independent growth. Conclusion: EEF1a2 alone is not sufficient to act induce tumorigenicity, affect tumor growth rate or drug susceptibility in human ovarian epithelial cells. Experiments utilizing stable siRNA vectors specific to EEF1a2 are underway, as well the combination of EEF1a2 with recognized ovarian tumor oncogenes.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase I safety and immunogenicity study of NY-ESO-1b peptide and Montanide ISA-51 vaccination of patients with ovarian cancer (OC) in high risk first remission

5078

Background: The Cancer Testis (CT) antigen NY-ESO-1 is expressed in over 60% of advanced OC. NY-ESO-1 demonstrates strong immunogenicity and expression is restricted to gonadal tissues, making it an appealing immunologic target. Patients with high risk OC (suboptimal debulking, incomplete CA125 response at 3 cycles, or positive second look surgery) have a high recurrence rate, with median time to progression (TTP) of 10–12mos. Strategies to prolong remission are needed. Methods: After primary surgery and platinum based chemotherapy high risk HLA-A*0201 OC patients in first clinical remission received HLA-restricted NY-ESO-1b peptide (100 μg) and Montanide adjuvant (0.5mL) every 3 weeks for a total of 5 vaccinations. NY-ESO1 tumor expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Toxicity using NCI-CTC v2 and immunogenicity: 1) NY-ESO-1 specific humoral immunity (ELISA); 2) NY-ESO-1 specific T-cell immunity (tetramer and ELISPOT); and 3) delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) were assessed on weeks 0, 1, 4, 7, 10, 13, 16. Patients were monitored for progression of disease (POD). Results: Seventeen out of 46 (37%) screened patients were HLA-A*0201+. Eight of 10 enrolled patients have completed therapy, one patient is receiving treatment, and one patient was removed before initiation for POD. Treatment related adverse events (AEs) included: Grade 1 fatigue, anemia, pruritus, myalgias and hyperthyroidism and Grade 2 hypothyroidism. No Grade 3/4 AEs were seen. Five patients (50%) had NY-ESO-1+ tumor; 3 of 3 treated patients with NY-ESO1+ tumor demonstrated T cell immunity by positive tetramer (0.65%–9%) and ELISPOT (35–250 spots). Four of 5 (80%) treated patients with NY-ESO-1- tumor demonstrated T cell immunity by tetramer (1–12%) and/or ELISPOT (250–400 spots). There was no evidence of DTH reaction. With long-term followup 4 of 8 patients have recurred with median TTP of 8.5mos; 4 patients remain in complete remission at intervals of 9, 16, 22, and 37mos to date. Conclusion: Vaccination of high risk HLA A*0201+ OC patients with NY-ESO-1b and Montanide has manageable toxicity, and induces specific T cell immunity in patients with both NY-ESO-1 positive and negative tumors. Additional testing is warranted.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Not All Patients With Atrial Fibrillation–Associated Ischemic Stroke Can Be Started on Anticoagulant Therapy

Background and Purpose— Ischemic stroke patients in atrial fibrillation (AF) have a 10% to 20% risk of recurrent stroke. Warfarin reduces this risk by two thirds. However, warfarin is underutilized in this patient group. We performed a prospective study to determine the reasons why warfarin is not started in these patients.

Methods— All patients with AF-associated ischemic stroke over a 12-month period were identified. Demographic and other data, including whether warfarin was commenced or recommended at discharge, and if not why not, were recorded.

Results— Ninety-three of 412 (23%) ischemic stroke patients had paroxysmal or permanent AF. Of these patients, 17 (18%) died, 48 (52%) were discharged home, and 28 (30%) were discharged to institutional care. Only 13 of 64 (20%) patients with known AF were taking warfarin at stroke onset. Warfarin was started (or recommended) in 35 of 76 (46%) survivors. Of those not commenced on warfarin, 32 (78%) were dependent ( P <0.001) and 23 (56%) were discharged to institutional care ( P <0.001). Warfarin was not started because of severe disability and frailty in 13 (32%), risk of falls in 12 (30%), and limited life expectancy in 4 (10%).

Conclusions— In this cohort of patients with AF, warfarin was primarily underutilized before stroke onset, and it was too late to use anticoagulation, in approximately half, once a stroke had occurred. The decision to start or continue anticoagulation requires clinical judgment and should be made on a case by case basis after a complete risk benefit assessment.

Changing attitudes to the management of ischaemic stroke between 1997 and 2004: a survey of New Zealand physicians

AIM

In 1997, a survey of New Zealand physicians' opinions on the management of stroke was carried out. Since then, there have been a number of advances in stroke therapy. We have repeated the 1997 survey to assess changes in physicians' opinions on stroke management.

METHODS

A questionnaire was sent to 293 physicians responsible for patients admitted with acute stroke to hospitals throughout New Zealand. It included questions on the management of acute stroke and secondary prevention and was based on the 1997 questionnaire.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 211 physicians of whom 174 (82%) managed patients with an acute stroke. The number of respondents who thought that stroke units were efficacious has increased (57% in 1997 to 89%, P < 0.001). The use of aspirin acutely (P < 0.001) and intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (P = 0.006) has also increased. In 2004, antihypertensive therapy for secondary stroke prevention would be commenced if the blood pressure was 150/90 by 98% of respondents and 140/90 by 70% of respondents. In 2004, a statin would be commenced if the total cholesterol level was 4.0 mmol/L by 56% of respondents and 5.0 mmol/L by 91% of respondents.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey has shown important changes in the management of ischaemic stroke over the past 7 years.

Topotecan and liposomal doxorubicin in recurrent ovarian cancer: is sequence important?

A variety of agents have emerged to treat patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Most patients receive both topotecan (T) and liposomal doxorubicin (D); however, there are no data regarding the benefit of a sequence-D followed by T (DT) or T followed by D (TD). We identified 89 consecutive patients with recurrent EOC, who received both D and T from January 1994 to January 2004 at Memorial Hospital. We compared the duration of treatment, toxicity, and overall survival (OS) for patients who received either DT or TD. Sixty-four patients received DT, and 25 patients received TD. The groups were balanced regarding age, stage, surgical debulking, platinum sensitivity, prior therapy, and intervening drugs between D and T. Median numbers of cycles on DT and TD were seven and six, respectively (P= 0.61); there was no difference in duration based on platinum sensitivity. Removal from therapy for toxicity was similar, DT (22%) and TD (36%) (P= 0.18). Finally, there was no difference in median OS based on sequence, DT (18.28 months) and TD (17.75 months) (P= NS). Platinum sensitivity did not affect median OS based on sequence. Based on duration, toxicity, and OS there is no advantage of one sequence of D and T when treating patients with recurrent EOC.

Topotecan and liposomal doxorubicin in recurrent ovarian cancer: is sequence important?

A variety of agents have emerged to treat patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Most patients receive both topotecan (T) and liposomal doxorubicin (D); however, there are no data regarding the benefit of a sequence—D followed by T (DT) or T followed by D (TD). We identified 89 consecutive patients with recurrent EOC, who received both D and T from January 1994 to January 2004 at Memorial Hospital. We compared the duration of treatment, toxicity, and overall survival (OS) for patients who received either DT or TD. Sixty-four patients received DT, and 25 patients received TD. The groups were balanced regarding age, stage, surgical debulking, platinum sensitivity, prior therapy, and intervening drugs between D and T. Median numbers of cycles on DT and TD were seven and six, respectively (P= 0.61); there was no difference in duration based on platinum sensitivity. Removal from therapy for toxicity was similar, DT (22%) and TD (36%) (P= 0.18). Finally, there was no difference in median OS based on sequence, DT (18.28 months) and TD (17.75 months) (P= NS). Platinum sensitivity did not affect median OS based on sequence. Based on duration, toxicity, and OS there is no advantage of one sequence of D and T when treating patients with recurrent EOC.

Attitudes of hospital medical practitioners to the mandatory reporting of professional misconduct

BACKGROUND

New legislation now requires doctors to report unfit colleagues to the Medical Council of New Zealand. However, little research has examined the attitudes and willingness of doctors to report errant colleagues.

AIM

To examine the attitudes of a range of hospital-based medical practitioners towards the mandatory reporting of colleagues.

METHODS

House staff, registrars, and consultants at two major tertiary teaching hospitals in New Zealand were surveyed using a written questionnaire. Doctors were asked to state their level of agreement with a series of statements and to make responses to three hypothetical scenarios: an alcohol impaired practitioner; a senior colleague with recent behavioural change; and a surgeon expressing racist views.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 52% of medical staff at the two hospitals. Respondents were consultants (52%), registrars (39%), and house staff (9%). Most (98%) respondents agreed that all doctors make clinical errors and there was a need for open discussion about error. The majority (80%) also accepted that doctors were responsible for the actions of colleagues and agreed that they would act if a colleague was failing to achieve professional standards. Only 45% agreed with the mandatory reporting of error. The responses to three scenarios illustrate some variability in how different groups of doctors would address the behaviour of an errant colleague.

CONCLUSIONS

Although most hospital doctors accept they should act if a colleague is falling below professional standards, there is only limited support for mandatory reporting; instead, doctors may prefer to consult senior colleagues about an errant colleague or sometimes counsel the practitioner themselves.

Lysophosphatidic Acid Acyltransferase-β Is a Prognostic Marker and Therapeutic Target in Gynecologic Malignancies

Lysophosphatidic acid, the substrate for lysophosphatidic acid acyltransferase beta (LPAAT-beta), is a well-studied autocrine/paracrine signaling molecule that is secreted by ovarian cancer cells and is found at elevated levels in the blood and ascites fluid of women with ovarian cancer. LPAAT-beta converts lysophosphatidic acid to phosphatidic acid, which functions as a cofactor in Akt/mTOR and Ras/Raf/Erk pathways. We report that elevated expression of LPAAT-beta was associated with reduced survival in ovarian cancer and earlier progression of disease in ovarian and endometrial cancer. Inhibition of LPAAT-beta using small interfering RNA or selective inhibitors, CT32521 and CT32228, two small-molecule noncompetitive antagonists representing two different classes of chemical structures, induces apoptosis in human ovarian and endometrial cancer cell lines in vitro at pharmacologically tenable nanomolar concentrations. Inhibition of LPAAT-beta also enhanced the survival of mice bearing ovarian tumor xenografts. Cytotoxicity was modulated by diacylglycerol effectors including protein kinase C and CalDAG-GEF1. LPAAT-beta was localized to the endoplasmic reticulum and overexpression was associated with redistribution of protein kinase C-alpha. These findings identify LPAAT-beta as a potential prognostic and therapeutic target in ovarian and endometrial cancer.

Hematologic Safety and Tolerability of Topotecan in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer and Small Cell Lung Cancer: An Integrated Analysis

The purpose was to conduct an integrated analysis of the cumulative hematologic toxicity of topotecan in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Data were pooled from eight phase II and phase III clinical studies performed in patients with relapsed stage III/IV ovarian cancer or extensive SCLC treated with topotecan at a dose of 1.5 mg/m(2) per day on days 1-5 of a 21-day course. Quantitative hematologic toxicities were assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. A total of 4,124 courses of therapy was administered to the 879 patients in the pooled population. Grade 4 neutropenia was experienced by 78% of patients. The lowest nadirs for neutrophils and platelets generally occurred after the first course of therapy, followed by improvement or stabilization in subsequent courses. Neutropenia was noncumulative. During the first course, significant risk factors were identified: renal impairment and advanced age (grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and grade 4 neutropenia) and prior radiotherapy; performance status score > or =2; SCLC; and exposure to both cisplatin (Platinol; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, http://www.bms.com) and carboplatin (Paraplatin; Bristol-Myers Squibb) (grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia only). The most frequent interventions for hematologic toxicities were RBC transfusions, treatment delays, G-CSF support, and dose reductions. Analysis of neutrophil and platelet nadirs and dosing for each course of therapy showed no apparent evidence of cumulative neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. The risk of grade 3 or 4 anemia was higher during the first four courses of therapy and may need to be more aggressively managed with erythropoietin therapy.

Phase II Study of CT-2103 in Patients With Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma

Purpose

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of CT-2103, a novel conjugate of paclitaxel and poly-l-glutamic acid, in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer.

Patients and Methods

Ninety-nine patients with measurable disease received intravenous CT-2103 at 175 mg/m2of conjugated paclitaxel over 10 minutes every 3 weeks without routine premedications. Platinum-sensitive (n = 42) and platinum-refractory or platinum-resistant patients (n = 57) were enrolled. Thirty-nine patients (39%) had received one or two prior regimens, and 60 patients (61%) had received between three and 12 regimens.

Results

In 99 patients, the median number of cycles was three (range, one to 14 cycles). The response rate (RR) for all patients was 10% (10 of 99 patients), with median time to disease progression (TTP) of 2 months. The RR (partial response) in platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant patients was 14% (six of 42 patients) and 7% (four of 57 patients), respectively. In patients with only one or two prior regimens, the RR in platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant patients was 28% (five of 18 patients) and 10% (two of 21 patients), with a median TTP of 4 and 2 months, respectively. Grade 2 (15 patients) or 3 (15 patients) neuropathy was reported in 30 patients (30%). Grade 2 hypersensitivity occurred in eight patients (8%) who were subsequently treated with premedications; one patient had grade 3 hypersensitivity and was removed. Grade 2 alopecia was absent.

Conclusion

CT-2103 is active in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. Neurotoxicity in these heavily pretreated patients was more frequent than predicted from phase I trials. Further study to define toxicity and efficacy in patients with less prior therapy is ongoing.

Intraperitoneal cisplatin with intraperitoneal gemcitabine in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer: results of a phase I/II Trial

PURPOSE

The aims of this study were to determine the dose and schedule of i.p. cisplatin with i.p. gemcitabine in patients with persistent disease at second-look assessment, the toxicity of this regimen, and the time to treatment failure and overall survival.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We performed a Phase I/II evaluation of i.p. cisplatin at 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 with planned gemcitabine at 500, 750, 1000, or 1250 mg/m(2) i.p. on days 1, 8, and 15 on a 28-day schedule for four courses. Eligible patients completed surgical cytoreduction followed by adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. They had second-look assessment showing microscopic or macroscopic (< or =1 cm) disease, followed by i.p. port placement.

RESULTS

The Phase I dose-limiting toxicity was grade 3 thrombocytopenia at day 15 on dose level 1 (n = 5). The protocol was amended, and the Phase II portion accrued to 30 patients, who were given i.p. cisplatin (75 mg/m(2)) on day 1 and gemcitabine at 500 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 on a 21-day schedule for four courses. Nine patients were removed from the study: one each for hypersensitivity, cellulitis, and i.p. port malfunction; two for progression of disease; and four for renal toxicity. Other toxicities included grade 3 nausea (7%) and transient grade 3 neuropathy (3%). Grade 1 or 2 neuropathy was frequently seen (80%). Five patients (17%) returned to the operating room at a median of 6 months (range, 1-20 months) after i.p. therapy for evaluation of abdominal pain; two patients had recurrence, and all had areas of fibrous tissue with encasement of the bowel. In two patients, the fibrous tissue was causing partial bowel obstruction. No other patients had symptoms prompting surgical exploration. Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies showed a median area under the curve (AUC) i.p. of 3041 h. micro M (range, 676-5702 h. micro M) and AUC in plasma of 4.0 h. micro M (range, 0.92-8.2 h. micro M) reached between 120 and 240 min; the pharmacological advantage was 759-fold (range, 217-1415-fold) for i.p. versus plasma drug levels. The mean residence time of gemcitabine with i.p. administration was 4.7 h. The median time to progression of the intent to treat population was 15.93 months (95% confidence interval, 9.13-25.9 months), with a median overall survival of 43.5 months [95% confidence interval, (34.66- infinity)]. No statistical differences were seen with respect to overall survival if patients were grouped in terms of optimal debulking or not (median not reached versus 34.8 months, respectively; P = 0.16) or whether visible disease was present or not at the start of i.p. therapy (34.8 versus 47.7 months; P = 0.47). With regard to time to treatment failure, a statistical difference favored patients with optimal versus nonoptimal primary debulking (25.2 versus 10.2 months, respectively; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The median time to treatment failure and overall survival of 15.9 months and 43.5 months, respectively, are consistent with our historical data in patients receiving i.p. platinum-based regimens for consolidation. The fibrotic changes seen in explored patients suggest local toxicity of this combination. The absolute benefit of i.p. consolidation requires randomized trials to assess efficacy.

Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of the Novel Oral Cell-Cycle Inhibitor Ro 31-7453 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

Purpose

To determine maximum tolerated dose, pharmacokinetics (PK), and safety of Ro 31-7453, a novel, oral cell-cycle inhibitor.

Patients and Methods

Using an accelerated dose-escalation schedule, 48 patients with advanced solid tumors were treated with doses of Ro 31-7453 ranging from 25 to 800 mg/m2/d given for 4 consecutive days, every 3 weeks. The total daily dose was taken as a single dose (schedule A) or divided into two equal doses taken 12 hours apart (schedule B). PK samples of blood and urine were collected on the first and last days of dosing in cycles 1 and 2.

Results

Forty-five patients completed at least one cycle of therapy. Myelosuppression and stomatitis were dose-limiting toxicities, occurring at the 800 mg/m2/d dose level for both schedules. Toxicity was independent of body-surface area, leading to the recommended phase II flat dose of 1,000 mg daily for 4 days for both schedules. Common adverse events included diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, alopecia, and elevated liver-function tests. One death, related to neutropenic sepsis, occurred on study. The PK of the parent compound and major metabolites were apparently linear, with a half-life of approximately 9 hours and a maximum concentration of approximately 4 hours. Minor antitumor activity was observed against carcinoma of the lung, breast, pancreas, and ovary.

Conclusion

Ro 31-7453 was well tolerated, with manageable adverse effects. Significant PK variability (absorption, metabolism, and excretion) was observed, and a substantial number of additional patients are needed to confirm the recommended phase II dose. Additional pharmacology and phase II studies are under way to explore the dose-toxicity relationship.