Overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with advanced breast cancer (ABC) with visceral metastases (mets), including those with liver mets, treated with ribociclib (RIB) plus endocrine therapy (ET) in the MONALEESA (ML) -3 and -7 trials

1054

Background: In the Phase III ML-3 (NCT02422615) and ML-7 (NCT02278120) trials, RIB + ET demonstrated a significant OS benefit (ML-3: HR, 0.72, P = 0.00455; ML-7: HR, 0.71, P = 0.00973) over placebo (PBO) + ET in pts with HR+/HER2- ABC (Im et al. N Engl J Med. 2019; Slamon et al. N Engl J Med. 2019). The presence of visceral mets generally portends a poor prognosis, which is especially poor in pts with liver mets (He et al. Ann Oncol. 2019). Here we report OS in pts with visceral mets with a focus on those with liver mets in ML-3 and ML-7. Methods: In ML-3, postmenopausal pts were randomized 2:1 to receive RIB + fulvestrant (FUL) or PBO + FUL as first- (1L) or second-line (2L) treatment. In ML-7, premenopausal pts were randomized 1:1 to receive RIB + ET or PBO + ET (this analysis included only pts who received an NSAI as ET partner to match approved indication). Results: Visceral mets were identified in 293 pts (60.5%) in the RIB arm and 147 (60.7%) in the PBO arm in ML-3 and 150 (44.8%) and 142 pts (42.1%), respectively, in ML-7. In ML-3, the median age of pts with visceral mets was 63 and 65 years in the RIB and PBO arms, and in ML-7 it was 42.5 and 45.0 years, respectively. In ML-3, 214 pts with visceral mets received 1L therapy (RIB, n = 137; PBO, n = 77), while 219 pts received 2L therapy or had early relapse (RIB, n = 151; PBO, n = 68). Lung and liver were the most common sites of visceral mets for pts in ML-3 (49.8% and 44.8%, respectively) and ML-7 (51.4% and 58.2%, respectively). OS HRs in pts with visceral mets were consistent with the benefit in the overall pt populations and suggested a particularly substantial OS benefit in pts with liver mets (HR for liver mets group in ML-3, 0.629 [95% CI, 0.421-0.942]; HR in ML-7, 0.531 [95% CI, 0.321-0.877]; Table). No new safety signals were observed. Conclusions: Approximately half of the pts in ML-3 and ML-7 had visceral mets. The OS data in these pts are consistent with the benefit observed with RIB in the overall populations of each trial. In pts with liver mets, a group with an especially poor prognosis, RIB + ET demonstrated a substantial OS benefit compared with PBO + ET. Clinical trial information: NCT02422615; NCT02278120 . [Table: see text]

Results of ENCORE 602 (TRIO025), a phase II, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, multicenter study of atezolizumab with or without entinostat in patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer (aTNBC)

1014

Background: Chemotherapy remains as the only standard treatment option for aTNBC in second and subsequent lines. Entinostat (ENT) is an oral, class I-selective histone deacetylase inhibitor, that has shown antitumor activity in preclinical models of TNBC when combined with immune checkpoint blockade. ENCORE 602 evaluated the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab (ATEZO) + ENT vs ATEZO + placebo (P) in patients (pts.) with pretreated aTNBC. Methods: Pts. with previously treated aTNBC (PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors naïve) were randomized 1:1 to receive ATEZO (1200 mg IV Q3W) + ENT (5 mg PO QW) or ATEZO+P. Treatment continued until unequivocal progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was PFS as determined by the investigators using RECIST 1.1. The hypothesis was that the combination would improve median PFS by 3 months (hazard ratio = 0.57). Sixty events (from 70 pts.) would provide 80% power with 1-sided significance level of 0.1. Secondary endpoints were PFS per immune-related RECIST (irRECIST), ORR, clinical benefit rate (CBR), Overall Survival (OS), and safety. Results: 81 pts. were enrolled, median age 56 years (range 29-87), 69% received 1 prior line of therapy and 31% > 1 line. No significant difference in PFS per RECIST 1.1 was observed between ATEZO+ENT and ATEZO+P (median PFS 1.68 and 1.51 months, respectively [p = 0.64; HR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.53-1.48]), nor in any of the secondary efficacy endpoints (median PFS per irRECIST 1.68 vs 1.54 months; ORR 10.0% vs 2.4%; CBR 37.5% vs 31.7%; median OS 9.8 vs 12.4 months, respectively). Frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), SAEs, discontinuations due to TEAE and TEAE with outcome death were higher in the ENT+ATEZO arm. Conclusions: In pts. with previously treated aTNBC, median PFS was not prolonged when ENT was added to ATEZO compared to ATEZO and placebo, and the combination resulted in greater toxicity. Clinical trial information: NCT02708680 .

Management of adverse events in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer treated with tucatinib, trastuzumab, and capecitabine (HER2CLIMB)

1043

Background: Tucatinib (TUC) is an investigational TKI, highly selective for HER2 without significant inhibition of EGFR. HER2CLIMB is a randomized trial of TUC vs placebo in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine in patients (pts) with HER2+ breast cancer (NCT02614794, Murthy NEJM 2019). The most common G ≥3 adverse events (AEs) with higher incidence on the TUC arm (diarrhea, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome [PPE], and elevated liver enzymes) are described herein. Methods: Given that pts on the TUC arm had a longer duration of tx than those on the control arm, time-at-risk exposure-adjusted incidence rates of diarrhea, AST, ALT, and PPE were calculated as the number of pts with an event divided by the total exposure time-at-risk of an initial occurrence of the event among pts in the tx group. Time-to-event analyses were conducted for AST/ALT/bilirubin (in aggregate), diarrhea, and PPE. Results: Diarrhea and elevated AST/ALT/bilirubin on both the TUC and control arms were primarily G1/2 and manageable with dose modifications, and in some cases of diarrhea, with antidiarrheal tx. Median time to diarrhea onset was shorter on the TUC arm compared to control. For AST/ALT/bilirubin and PPE, median time to first onset was Cycles 1 and 2. On the TUC arm, antidiarrheals were used in 49.7% of cycles in which diarrhea was reported (39.8% on the control arm), and when used, the median duration of use on each arm was 3 days per cycle. Prophylactic antidiarrheals were not required per protocol. When adjusted for exposure (time-at-risk exposure-adjusted incidence rate per 100 person-years), the difference in G ≥3 events between tx arms becomes similar for diarrhea and PPE (21 vs 17 and 21 vs 19). The difference in G ≥3 events between arms is reduced for AST and ALT (7 vs 1 and 8 vs 1). Conclusions: TUC with trastuzumab and capecitabine was well-tolerated. Rates of G ≥3 diarrhea and PPE were similar between tx arms. Elevated liver enzymes were higher on the TUC arm, but were transient and reversible. Discontinuation of TUC due to AEs was rare. Clinical trial information: NCT02614794 . [Table: see text]

A phase Ib/II study of niraparib plus temozolomide plus atezolizumab versus atezolizumab as maintenance therapy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (TRIO-US L-06)

TPS9084

Background: Maintenance therapy is a promising therapeutic approach for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), especially in light of IMpower 133 (Horn NEJM 2018). SCLC models of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) protein 1 and 2 inhibition suggested synergy with temozolomide (TMZ) (Wainberg AACR 2016). Combining PARP inhibition and TMZ with atezolizumab after first-line therapy for ES-SCLC may improve disease control. Methods: This is a phase 1b/2, randomized, open-label study of TMZ plus niraparib, a PARP inhibitor, with atezolizumab versus atezolizumab as maintenance therapy in adult patients with ES-SCLC after completion of platinum-based first-line chemotherapy. The primary outcome for phase 1b is the RP2D of TMZ in combination with niraparib, and for phase 2, progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include safety, objective response rate, and overall survival. Exploratory endpoints include adverse events and patient-reported outcomes, including health-related quality of life. Phase 1b participants are required to have an advanced and incurable solid malignancy. Part one of phase 1b includes an accelerated lead-in of 12 participants treated in cohorts of 6 with an initial dose level of niraparib 200 mg po daily in 28-day cycles and low-dose TMZ 40 mg po daily on days 1-5 of each cycle. Part two includes a safety lead-in of 6 patients receiving standard-of-care atezolizumab, to which R2PD niraparib and TMZ will be added. For phase 2, participants are required to have ES-SCLC with a complete response or partial response per RECIST 1.1 following 4 to 6 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy and ability to proceed to randomization within 7 weeks after day 1 of the last cycle of prior chemotherapy. Prophylactic WBRT is allowed prior to study. 52 participants will be stratified by a history of brain metastases and randomized 1:1 to atezolizumab with or without RP2D niraparib plus TMZ. There will be no cross-over between arms. To date, cohort 1 had two DLTs. Enrollment to dose level -1 and an intermediate dose have been completed without a DLT. The atezolizumab safety lead-in begins enrollment in March 2020. Clinical trial information: NCT03830918.

Pooled ctDNA analysis of the MONALEESA (ML) phase III advanced breast cancer (ABC) trials

1009

Background: Biomarker analyses have been presented separately for each Phase III ML trial, which tested efficacy and safety of ribociclib (RIB) with different endocrine therapy (ET) combination partners as first- or second-line treatment for hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2−) ABC. Here, using the largest pooled biomarker dataset of a CDK4/6 inhibitor in ABC to date, we identify potential biomarkers of response or resistance to RIB across ML trials. Methods: Baseline ctDNA from 1503 patients (pts) enrolled in ML-2, 3, and 7 was assessed using next-generation sequencing with a targeted panel of 557 genes. Genes with an alteration frequency ≥2% and in ≥15 pts per treatment arm were included (83 genes). Genetic alteration was defined as presence of a mutation, short insertion/deletion, or copy number alteration. Cox proportional hazard model of progression-free survival (PFS) was fit with gene-by-treatment interaction. Genes with interaction P< 0.10 and genes of interest were investigated. Results: Pts with alterations in FRS2 and PRKCA (treatment interaction P< 0.05) as well as MDM2, ERBB2, AKT1, and BRCA1/2 ( P> 0.05 but considered actionable) had a trend for increased PFS benefit of RIB vs PBO (Table). Pts with alterations in CHD4, BCL11B, ATM, or CDKN2A/2B/2C derived little to no added PFS benefit with RIB vs PBO ( P interaction < 0.10; hazard ratio [HR] > 0.80). Data on genes implicated in the literature as potential mechanisms of resistance to ET and/or CDK4/6 inhibition ( ESR1, PTEN, FAT1, RB1, and NF1) will be presented. Conclusions: Results of this pooled analysis of the ML-2, 3, and 7 trials, the largest biomarker analysis of any CDK4/6 inhibitor in ABC, revealed several potential biomarkers of response ( FRS2, MDM2, PRKCA, ERBB2, AKT1, and BRCA1/2) or resistance ( CHD4, BCL11B, ATM, or CDKN2A/2B/2C) to RIB. Clinical trial information: NCT01958021; NCT02422615; NCT02278120 . [Table: see text]

Abstract P4-10-12: Characterizing the tumor and immune microenvironment through treatment to predict response to neoadjuvant HER2-targeted therapy using the Digital Spatial Profiler

Background: While introduction of HER2-targeted therapies has dramatically improved outcomes for patients with HER2-positive disease, even with the addition of HER2-targeted agents, 40-50% of patients do not achieve a pCR (pathologic complete response) following neoadjuvant therapy implying that clinical or molecular differences may be present in responders versus non-responders. While recent bulk expression studies have identified several biomarkers associated with response to HER2-targeted therapies in the neoadjuvant setting, these studies are limited in their ability to assign observed changes to specific geographic or phenotypic cell populations, such as the malignant tumor core or the surrounding microenvironment.

Methods: Here we used the Digital Spatial Profiler (DSP, NanoString Technologies, Inc.) to profile regions-of-interest containing pancytokeratin (panCK)+ tumor cells and infiltrated immune cells that are co-localized with the tumor cells. Using this technology, we assayed archival tissue from 28 patients with HER2-positive breast cancer from the TRIO-B07 (NCT00769470) clinical trial, who were treated with trastuzumab, lapatinib, or both, followed by standard chemotherapy plus HER2-targeted therapy. Tissue specimens were collected from the pre-treatment diagnostic biopsy (Baseline) and after one cycle of targeted therapy (Runin). To study regional heterogeneity, we selected an average of four panCK-enriched tissue regions from each sample. Using DSP, we performed multiplexed quantification of 38 tumor and immune protein markers and 96 RNA markers on the selected tissue regions and compared our findings to bulk mRNA expression data from the same cohort.

Results: Within the panCK-enriched regions, DSP revealed significant treatment-associated decreases in HER2 protein levels and the downstream PI3K-Akt signaling pathway in Runin compared to Baseline samples. In tandem, we observed a significant increase in infiltrating leukocytes, with CD45, a pan-leukocyte marker, and CD8, a marker for T cells that mediate tumor cell killing, showing the most dramatic changes. These changes in Runin compared to Baseline were more significant in the subset of cases that achieved a pCR versus those that do not, independent of ER status. Comparison of Runin samples to matched Baseline samples from the same patient enabled improved prediction of patient outcome (pCR) compared with analysis of a single timepoint alone. We also found that the DSP panCK enrichment strategy captures additional signal not observed in bulk expression data. For instance, using bulk expression, a decrease in HER2 RNA levels between Baseline and Runin was evident but there was no difference in the degree of decrease in HER2 mRNA between pCR and no pCR cases. Using DSP, we observed that the significant decrease in HER2 levels at Runin is more pronounced in cases that achieved a pCR. Across both tumor and immune markers, regional heterogeneity increased at Runin compared to Baseline.

Conclusions: In this study, we used DSP and a panCK enrichment strategy to retrospectively delineate the changes that occurred in tumor cells and co-localized immune cells during HER2-targeted therapy. In comparison to traditional or multiplexed IHC, DSP allows for simultaneous profiling of a large number of markers, enabling the characterization of multiple cancer signaling pathways and immune markers on a single tissue specimen. This study demonstrates the utility of pancytokeratin-enriched spatial proteomic profiling to characterize treatment-associated changes and identify predictive biomarkers.

NanoString’s Digital Spatial Profiler is for Research Use Only. Not to be used for diagnostic procedures.

Citation Format: Katherine Lee McNamara, Jennifer L. Caswell-Jin, Zhicheng Ma, Jason J. Zoeller, Michelle Kriner, Zoey Zhou, Jason Reeves, Margaret Hoang, Joseph Beechem, Dennis J. Slamon, Michael F. Press, Joan Brugge, Sara A. Hurvitz, Christina Curtis. Characterizing the tumor and immune microenvironment through treatment to predict response to neoadjuvant HER2-targeted therapy using the Digital Spatial Profiler [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-10-12.

Abstract P4-07-01: Tumor expression and microenvironment in HER2-positive breast cancer before and on HER2-targeted therapy: Analysis of microarray expression data from the TRIO-US B07 trial

Background: Neoadjuvant HER2-targeted therapy in combination with chemotherapy is a standard treatment approach for early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer. Proposed biomarkers to predict pathologic complete response (pCR), and thereby inform which patients may benefit from de-escalation of therapy, include expression-based subtyping and immune enrichment scores. Little is known about how tumors and their microenvironment may change with HER2-targeted therapy alone, and whether these changes may predict outcome.

Methods: The TRIO-US B07 phase II trial randomized 128 participants with stage I-III HER2-positive breast cancer to trastuzumab (N=34), lapatinib (N=36), or the combination (N=58) for three weeks, followed by six cycles of docetaxel and carboplatin with continued HER2-targeted therapy. Fresh-frozen core biopsies of the tumor prior to therapy (N=110) and after 14-21 days of HER2-targeted therapy alone (N=89) were collected, and RNA was extracted and subjected to Agilent Whole Human Genome 44K 2-color chip. The pre-treatment tumor RNA was normalized against a mixed breast tumor reference, and the on-treatment tumor RNA against the matched pre-treatment sample. Absolute intrinsic molecular subtyping was used to determine intrinsic subtype, the iC10 expression-based classifier to determine integrative subtype, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) to assess signature changes across treatment, single-sample GSEA to compare individual gene signature scores between tumors, and CIBERSORT to quantify immune cell populations before and on treatment.

Results: Primary trial results have been reported previously and showed a pCR rate of 47% with trastuzumab, 25% with lapatinib, and 52% with the combination. Prior to treatment, 56% of tumors classified as the HER2-enriched intrinsic subtype and 78% as the iC5 integrative subtype. HER2-enriched tumors trended toward a higher rate of pCR relative to other intrinsic subtypes (50% vs 33%, P=0.12), as did iC5 tumors relative to other integrative subtypes (48% vs 25%, P=0.08). However, in multivariate analysis, HER2 FISH ratio (P=0.04) and hormone receptor status (P=0.02), each associated themselves with intrinsic and integrative subtype, proved the most valuable in predicting pCR, with little information added by expression-based subtyping. Immune cell signatures correlated with pCR in the trastuzumab-containing arms only. Of 65 gene signatures tested, 47 changed across HER2-targeted therapy with false discovery rate &lt; 0.1, driven by decreasing tumor proliferation, increasing immune cell signatures, and increasing stromal cell/epithelial mesenchymal transition signatures. Quantification of immune cell populations suggested the immune changes were both anti-tumor (CD8+ T cells) and pro-tumor (M2 macrophages). Intrinsic subtype changed in 54% of tumors (79% of these converting to normal-like) and integrative subtype changed in 26%. Change in subtype, proliferation, or immune infiltration with targeted therapy did not correlate with pCR. A higher proportion of tumors treated with trastuzumab alone maintained their proliferation (42%), compared with lapatinib alone (20%; P=0.16) or the combination (16%; P=0.04).

Conclusions: In the TRIO-US B07 study, the biomarkers most predictive of response to neoadjuvant HER2-targeted therapy were hormone receptor status in combination with HER2 FISH ratio. Multiple changes in the tumor and its microenvironment occurred with HER2-targeted therapy, but these changes did not predict pCR. Tumors treated with lapatinib tended to decrease proliferation more than tumors treated with trastuzumab, despite trastuzumab being more effective in preventing recurrence, an observation with implications for window of opportunity studies.

Citation Format: Jennifer L. Caswell-Jin, Katherine L. McNamara, Judy Dering, Hsiao-Wang Chen, Robert Dichmann, Alejandra Perez, Ravindranath Patel, Eran Kotler, Jason J. Zoeller, Joan S. Brugge, Michael F. Press, Dennis J. Slamon, Christina Curtis, Sara A. Hurvitz. Tumor expression and microenvironment in HER2-positive breast cancer before and on HER2-targeted therapy: Analysis of microarray expression data from the TRIO-US B07 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-07-01.

Abstract GS2-01: High levels of interferon-response gene signatures are associated with de novo and acquired resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors in ER+ breast cancer

Background: The CDK4/6 inhibitors (i) palbociclib (Palbo), ribociclib, and abemaciclib remarkably improved the outcome of patients with metastatic ER+/HER2- breast cancer (BC) and are now under clinical investigation in early BC. Despite high efficacy, de novo and acquired resistance to CDK4/6i is common. Elucidating the molecular basis for sensitivity and resistance to CDK4/6i is crucial to identify predictive biomarkers and novel therapeutic targets to improve patient outcome. Materials and Methods: MCF7, T47D and ZR75-1 parental (P) BC cells and their derivatives made resistant to tamoxifen, estrogen deprivation (EDR), or fulvestrant were used. The P and EDR models of MCF7 and T47D cells were chronically exposed to increasing concentrations of Palbo to generate derivatives with acquired resistance to Palbo (PalboR). The transcriptomic profiles of P, endocrine-resistant (EndoR) and PalboR models were determined by RNA-seq. IC50s were determined by exposing MCF7, T47D, and ZR75-1 P and EndoR lines (n=12) to increasing concentrations of Palbo. Cell growth was assessed by methylene blue staining, and changes in the mRNA and protein levels of key cell cycle molecules were assessed by RT-PCR and Western blot, respectively. Gene expression data from the Cancer Dependency Map (DepMap), baseline tumors from the NeoPalAna (NCT01723774) and neoMONARCH (NCT02441946) neoadjuvant trials, as well as the TCGA and METABRIC datasets were interrogated for correlations of gene signatures and patient outcome (by KMPlot). Results: Palbo treatment resulted in a dose-dependent inhibition of the growth of P and EndoR BC cell lines, with varying degree of sensitivity among the models. GSEA analysis comparing the least sensitive (IC50&gt;350nM) vs. the most sensitive (IC50&lt;100) cell lines identified the ‘interferon gamma response’ (IFNg) and ‘interferon alpha response’ (IFNa) as the top-ranked hallmark enriched signatures. Likewise, DepMap analysis of ER+/HER2- BC cell lines (n=11) revealed that cells with low CDK4 dependency scores displayed high IFN-signaling. We derived a 35-gene signature (termed ‘IFN-Related Palbociclib-Resistance Signature’, IRPS) comprised of genes belonging to the INFg and INFa gene sets that positively correlated with the Palbo IC50 values of our collection of P and EndoR lines. To extend these findings to primary ER+ BC, we interrogated transcriptomic data from the NeoPalAna and neoMONARCH trials that evaluated neoadjuvant CDK4/6i with endocrine therapy. In both trials, the IFNg, IFNa, and IRPS gene signatures were highly enriched in patients with tumors exhibiting intrinsic resistance to CDK4/6i. We next investigated the underlying molecular changes and their association with IFN-signaling in our acquired resistant PalboR cell lines. Compared to the untreated cells, the PalboR models commonly displayed alterations in several components of the cyclin D-CDK4/6-Rb axis, including elevated expression of cyclin-D1, -E1, and CDK6, and reduced levels of Rb. Notably, the PalboR derivatives commonly displayed a dramatic activation of IFN/STAT1-signaling compared to their short-term treated or untreated counterparts. In primary ER+/HER2- tumors, the IRPS score was significantly higher in lumB vs. lumA subtype and correlated with increased gene expression of immune checkpoints (PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA-4), endocrine-resistance, and poor prognosis. Conclusion: Aberrant IFN-signaling predicts resistance to CDK4/6i in both ER+/HER2- BC cell lines and in primary BCs from neoadjuvant clinical trials. Experimentally, acquired resistance to Palbo is associated with activation of the IFN-pathway suggesting its involvement in resistance to CDK4/6i. Future studies are warranted to provide mechanistic insights into the association of IFN-signaling with response to CDK4/6i.

Citation Format: Carmine De Angelis, Xiaoyong Fu, Maria Letizia Cataldo, Agostina Nardone, Valerie M. Jansen, Jamunarani Veeraraghavan, Sarmistha Nanda, Lanfang Qin, Vidyalakshmi Sethunath, Resel Pereira, Matteo Benelli, Ilenia Migliaccio, Luca Malorni, Joshua Donaldson, Pier Selenica, David N. Brown, Britta Weigelt, Jorge S. Reis-Filho, Ben H. Park, Sara A. Hurvitz, Dennis J. Slamon, Mothaffar F. Rimawi, Rinath Jeselsohn, Kent Osborne, Rachel Schiff. High levels of interferon-response gene signatures are associated with de novo and acquired resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors in ER+ breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS2-01.

Abstract P2-05-07: Pan-cancer analysis of PARP inhibition reveals a suite of biomarkers that correlate with PARP1/2 activity in breast cancer

The development of multiple PARP inhibitors in BRCA mutant cancers has been one of the most successful implementations of molecularly targeted therapies in oncology. The recent approval of niraparib in BRCA WT Ovarian cancers demonstrates the potential for expansion of PARP inhibitors to other BRCA WT indications. The successful development of PARP inhibitors into new cancer indications will depend on using molecular biomarkers to identify tumors with a unique dependency on PARP1/2 activity. We screened a large (N=523), diverse panel of human cancer cell lines for response to three approved PARP inhibitors: olaparib, niraparib, and talazoparib. Despite differences in relative potency, there was a strong correlation between sensitive and resistant cell lines to all three compounds. In vitro experimentation revealed the inhibitors share a similar biologic mechanism of response, namely a global decrease in PARylation, as well as PARP-trapping at DNA nicks leading to G2 arrest and ultimately cell death. A suite of baseline genomic and proteomic characteristics were found to be strongly associated with response to PARP1/2 inhibition, and were largely consistent between different cancer types. Special attention was paid to BRCA1/2 variants, which represent the only approved patient selection biomarkers. Notably, neither mutations in BRCA1 nor BRCA2 were found to be associated with response to PARP1/2 inhibition in our panel, even when restricting to those with confirmed deleterious ClinVar scores. The molecular predictors of response identified in our screen may ultimately be used to develop diagnostic tools for enrollment into biomarker-enriched clinical trials to expand the use of this promising class of drug into areas of high unmet need. Triple-negative breast cancer represents one of the most intriguing spaces for development. The clinical failures in this space may be partially explained by the lack of empirical predictive biomarkers in the trial design. Our diagnostics may finally allow for the efficacious deployment of PARP inhibitors to triple-negative breast cancer. In particular we have identified a panel of biomarkers that can predict for sensitivity to PARP inhibitors in breast cancer that could be used as patient selection criteria for the expanded clinical development of these compounds into PARP-naïve patient populations with high unmet need.

Citation Format: Martina SJ McDermott, Dylan F Conklin, Neil A O'Brien, Kevin Chau, Dennis J Slamon. Pan-cancer analysis of PARP inhibition reveals a suite of biomarkers that correlate with PARP1/2 activity in breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-05-07.

Overall Survival with Ribociclib plus Fulvestrant in Advanced Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

In an earlier analysis of this phase 3 trial, ribociclib plus fulvestrant showed a greater benefit with regard to progression-free survival than fulvestrant alone in postmenopausal patients with hormone-receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer. Here we report the results of a protocol-specified second interim analysis of overall survival.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either ribociclib or placebo in addition to fulvestrant as first-line or second-line treatment. Survival was evaluated by means of a stratified log-rank test and summarized with the use of Kaplan-Meier methods.

RESULTS

This analysis was based on 275 deaths: 167 among 484 patients (34.5%) receiving ribociclib and 108 among 242 (44.6%) receiving placebo. Ribociclib plus fulvestrant showed a significant overall survival benefit over placebo plus fulvestrant. The estimated overall survival at 42 months was 57.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 52.0 to 63.2) in the ribociclib group and 45.9% (95% CI, 36.9 to 54.5) in the placebo group, for a 28% difference in the relative risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.92; P = 0.00455). The benefit was consistent across most subgroups. In a descriptive update, median progression-free survival among patients receiving first-line treatment was 33.6 months (95% CI, 27.1 to 41.3) in the ribociclib group and 19.2 months (95% CI, 14.9 to 23.6) in the placebo group. No new safety signals were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Ribociclib plus fulvestrant showed a significant overall survival benefit over placebo plus fulvestrant in patients with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. (Funded by Novartis; MONALEESA-3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02422615.).

Potent Cell-Cycle Inhibition and Upregulation of Immune Response with Abemaciclib and Anastrozole in neoMONARCH, Phase II Neoadjuvant Study in HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

neoMONARCH assessed the biological effects of abemaciclib in combination with anastrozole in the neoadjuvant setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Postmenopausal women with stage I-IIIB HR⁺/HER2^- breast cancer were randomized to a 2-week lead-in of abemaciclib, anastrozole, or abemaciclib plus anastrozole followed by 14 weeks of the combination. The primary objective evaluated change in Ki67 from baseline to 2 weeks of treatment. Additional objectives included clinical, radiologic, and pathologic responses, safety, as well as gene expression changes related to cell proliferation and immune response.

RESULTS

Abemaciclib, alone or in combination with anastrozole, achieved a significant decrease in Ki67 expression and led to potent cell-cycle arrest after 2 weeks of treatment compared with anastrozole alone. More patients in the abemaciclib-containing arms versus anastrozole alone achieved complete cell-cycle arrest (58%/68% vs. 14%, P < 0.001). At the end of treatment, following 2 weeks lead-in and 14 weeks of combination therapy, 46% of intent-to-treat patients achieved a radiologic response, with pathologic complete response observed in 4%. The most common all-grade adverse events were diarrhea (62%), constipation (44%), and nausea (42%). Abemaciclib, anastrozole, and the combination inhibited cell-cycle processes and estrogen signaling; however, combination therapy resulted in increased cytokine signaling and adaptive immune response indicative of enhanced antigen presentation and activated T-cell phenotypes.

CONCLUSIONS

Abemaciclib plus anastrozole demonstrated biological and clinical activity with generally manageable toxicities in patients with HR⁺/HER2^- early breast cancer. Abemaciclib led to potent cell-cycle arrest, and in combination with anastrozole, enhanced immune activation.

Assessment of ERBB2/HER2 Status in HER2-Equivocal Breast Cancers by FISH and 2013/2014 ASCO-CAP Guidelines

Importance

The 2013/2014 American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists (ASCO-CAP) guidelines for HER2 testing by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) designated an "equivocal" category (average HER2 copies per tumor cell ≥4-6 with HER2/CEP17 ratio <2.0) to be resolved as negative or positive by assessments with alternative control probes. Approximately 4% to 12% of all invasive breast cancers are characterized as HER2-equivocal based on FISH.

Objective

To evaluate the following hypotheses: (1) genetic loci used as alternative controls are heterozygously deleted in a substantial proportion of breast cancers; (2) use of these loci for assessment of HER2 by FISH leads to false-positive assessments; and (3) these HER2 false-positive breast cancer patients have outcomes that do not differ from clinical outcomes for patients with HER2-negative breast cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

We retrospectively assessed the use of chromosome 17 p-arm and q-arm alternative control genomic sites (TP53, D17S122, SMS, RARA, TOP2A), as recommended by the 2013/2014 ASCO-CAP guidelines for HER2 testing, in patients whose data were available through Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC) and whose tissues were available through the Breast Cancer International Research Group clinical trials. We used data from an international cohort database of invasive breast cancers (1980 participants) and international clinical trial of adjuvant chemotherapy in invasive, node-positive breast cancer patients.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary objectives were to (1) assess frequency of heterozygous deletions in chromosome 17 genomic sites used as FISH internal controls for evaluation of HER2 status among HER2-equivocal cancers; (2) characterize impact of using deleted sites for determination of HER2-to-internal-control-gene ratios; (3) assess HER2 protein expression in each subgroup; and (4) compare clinical outcomes for each subgroup.

Results

Of the 1980 patients in METABRIC,1915 patients were fully evaluated. In addition, 100 HER2-equivocal breast cancers by FISH and 100 comparator FISH-negative breast cancers from the BCIRG-005 trial were analyzed. Heterozygous deletions, particularly in specific p-arm sites, were common in both HER2-amplified and HER2-not-amplified breast cancers. Use of alternative control probes from these regions to assess HER2 by FISH in HER2-equivocal as well as HER2-not-amplified breast cancers resulted in high rates of false-positive ratios (HER2-to-alternative control ratio ≥2.0) owing to heterozygous deletions of control p-arm genomic sites used in ratio denominators. Misclassification of HER2 status was observed not only in breast cancers with ASCO-CAP equivocal status but also in breast cancers with an average of fewer than 4.0 HER2 copies per tumor cell when using alternative control probes.

Conclusions and Relevance

The indiscriminate use of alternative control probes to calculate HER2 FISH ratios in HER2-equivocal breast cancers may lead to false-positive interpretations of HER2 status resulting from unrecognized heterozygous deletions in 1 or more of these alternative control genomic sites and incorrect HER2 ratio determinations.

Impact of palbociclib plus letrozole on patient-reported health-related quality of life: results from the PALOMA-2 trial

Background

Patient-reported outcomes are integral in benefit-risk assessments of new treatment regimens. The PALOMA-2 study provides the largest body of evidence for patient-reported health-related quality of life (QOL) for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) receiving first-line endocrine-based therapy (palbociclib plus letrozole and letrozole alone).

Patients and methods

Treatment-naïve postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) MBC were randomized 2 : 1 to palbociclib plus letrozole (n = 444) or placebo plus letrozole (n = 222). Patient-reported outcomes were assessed at baseline, day 1 of cycles 2 and 3, and day 1 of every other cycle from cycle 5 using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-Breast and EuroQOL 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaires.

Results

As of 26 February 2016, the median duration of follow-up was 23 months. Baseline scores were comparable between the two treatment arms. No significant between-arm differences were observed in change from baseline in FACT-Breast Total, FACT-General Total, or EQ-5D scores. Significantly greater improvement in pain scores was observed in the palbociclib plus letrozole arm (-0.256 versus -0.098; P = 0.0183). In both arms, deterioration of FACT-Breast Total score was significantly delayed in patients without progression versus those with progression and patients with partial or complete response versus those without. No significant difference was observed in FACT-Breast and EQ-5D index scores in patients with and without neutropenia.

Conclusions

Overall, women with MBC receiving first-line endocrine therapy have a good QOL. The addition of palbociclib to letrozole maintains health-related QOL and improves pain scores in treatment-naïve postmenopausal patients with ER+/HER2- MBC compared with letrozole alone. Significantly greater delay in deterioration of health-related QOL was observed in patients without progression versus those who progressed and in patients with an objective response versus non-responders. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01740427 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01740427).

Efficacy and safety of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy in North American women with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer

Palbociclib is a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor indicated for treatment of hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer in combination with endocrine therapy. We investigated the efficacy and safety of palbociclib in patients enrolled in North America during two-phase 3 trials: PALOMA-2 (n = 267, data cutoff: May 31, 2017) and PALOMA-3 (n = 240, data cutoffs: April 13, 2018, for overall survival, October 23, 2015, for all other outcomes). In PALOMA-2, treatment-naïve postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer were randomized 2:1 to palbociclib (125 mg/d; 3 weeks on/1 week off [3/1]) plus letrozole (2.5 mg/d, continuous) or placebo plus letrozole. In PALOMA-3, patients who progressed on prior endocrine therapy were randomized 2:1 to palbociclib (125 mg/d; 3/1) plus fulvestrant (500 mg, per standard of care) or placebo plus fulvestrant; pre/perimenopausal patients received ovarian suppression with goserelin. Palbociclib plus endocrine therapy prolonged median progression-free survival vs placebo plus endocrine therapy in North American patients (PALOMA-2: 25.4 vs 13.7 months, hazard ratio, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.40-0.74], P < .0001; PALOMA-3: 9.9 vs 3.5 months, hazard ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.38-0.72], P < .0001). Objective response and clinical benefit response rates were greater with palbociclib vs placebo in North American patients in both trials. While overall survival data are not yet mature for PALOMA-2, median overall survival was increased in PALOMA-3 (32.0 vs 24.7 months, hazard ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.53-1.04]), though this did not reach statistical significance (P = .0869). Safety profiles in North American patients were similar to those of the overall populations; neutropenia was the most common treatment-emergent adverse event. No new safety signals were observed. In summary, palbociclib plus endocrine therapy is an effective treatment option for North American women with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer.

Safety and tolerability of CFI-400945, a first-in-class, selective PLK4 inhibitor in advanced solid tumours: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial

Background

CFI-400945 is a first-in-class oral inhibitor of polo-like kinase 4 (PLK4) that regulates centriole duplication. Primary objectives of this first-in-human phase 1 trial were to establish the safety and tolerability of CFI-400945 in patients with advanced solid tumours. Secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D).

Methods

Continuous daily oral dosing of CFI-400945 was evaluated using a 3+3 design guided by incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in the first 28-day cycle. Safety was assessed by CTCAE v4.0. ORR and CBR were evaluated using RECIST v1.1.

Results

Forty-three patients were treated in dose escalation from 3 to 96 mg/day, and 9 were treated in 64 mg dose expansion. After DLT occurred at 96 and 72 mg, 64 mg was established as the RP2D. Neutropenia was a common high-grade (19%) treatment-related adverse event at ≥ 64 mg. Half-life of CFI-400945 was 9 h, with C_max achieved 2–4 h following dosing. One PR (45 cycles, ongoing) and two SD ≥ 6 months were observed (ORR = 2%; CBR = 6%).

Conclusions

CFI-400945 is well tolerated at 64 mg with dose-dependent neutropenia. Favourable pharmacokinetic profiles were achieved with daily dosing. Response rates were low without biomarker pre-selection. Disease-specific and combination studies are ongoing.

Trial Registration

Clinical Trials Registration Number – NCT01954316 (Oct 1st, 2013)

Abstract 2978: Clinical evaluation of lapatinib induced BCL-2 adaptive responses

Our pre-clinical data identified BCL-2 upregulation as a critical component and biomarker of the adaptive response to blockade of PI3K/mTOR in vitro and inhibition of HER2 via lapatinib in vivo. We therefore evaluated whether a similar BCL-2 upregulation could be identified in patient clinical samples. Gene expression profiles of patient biopsies collected before and after lapatinib treatment from the TRIO-TORI-B-07 clinical trial were evaluated. Eighteen cases with matched samples were available for analysis. BCL-2 transcriptional upregulation was detected in both HER2+ER- (7 out of 11) as well as HER2+ER+ (5 out of 7) patient tumor samples. To address whether RNA expression correlated with BCL-2 protein expression, pre- and post-treatment FFPE tumors were evaluated for BCL-2 via IHC. We evaluated BCL-2 by intensity and proportion scores to calculate an H-score on a case-by-case basis. Twenty-three cases with matched samples were evaluated by blinded pathological assessment. Despite BCL-2 mRNA upregulation within lapatinib-treated HER2+ER- tumors, only 2 out of 12 cases displayed a minor increase in BCL-2 protein levels following treatment. BCL-2 protein levels were undetectable in most of the lapatinib-treated HER2+ER- tumors. 11 matched cases were HER2+ER+ (baseline ER H-score &gt; 0). All of these cases were BCL-2-postive before treatment. Post-treatment, BCL-2 upregulation was evident in 9 out of 11 HER2+ER+ cases (p = 0.0107). Evaluation of ER status by SP1 IHC in these specimens indicated parallel upregulation of ER in a subset of the HER2+ER+ tumors (p = NS). ER was upregulated in 6 out of the 9 cases where BCL-2 was upregulated in response to lapatinib. To determine whether treatment altered other prosurvival proteins, we performed BCL-XL IHC on the HER2+ER+ cases. BCL-XL was upregulated in 4 out of the 9 cases where BCL-2 was upregulated in response to lapatinib (p = NS). To determine whether BCL-2 upregulation correlated with HER2 inhibition, we performed Ki67 IHC on the HER2+ER+ samples. We observed an overall reduction in Ki67+ tumor cells post-lapatinib (p = 0.0273). Ki67 was reduced in 7 out of the 9 cases where BCL-2 was upregulated in response to lapatinib. Together, these results indicate that BCL-2 mRNA is upregulated following HER2 inhibition via lapatinib; however, protein levels post-treatment are undetectable in most HER2+ER- tumors. Within HER2+ER+ tumors, BCL-2 upregulation correlated with ER upregulation, consistent with evidence that BCL-2 is a direct target of ER transcriptional regulation; however, BCL-2 upregulation was also observed in tumors without ER upregulation, suggesting ER-independent regulation of BCL-2. These findings support evaluation of BCL-2 inhibitors to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of HER2 receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Note: This abstract was not presented at the meeting.

Citation Format: Jason J. Zoeller, Sara A. Hurvitz, Michael F. Press, Laura M. Selfors, Judy Dering, Dennis J. Slamon, Joan S. Brugge. Clinical evaluation of lapatinib induced BCL-2 adaptive responses [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2978.

Abstract 3825: Targeting activated PI3K/mTOR signaling overcomes resistance to CDK4/6-based therapies in preclinical ER+ breast cancer models

Addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors such as palbociclib, ribociclib or abemaciclib to endocrine-based therapies significantly improves progression-free and in some subgroups, overall survival in patients with advanced estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. However, acquired resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors remains a significant unmet clinical need. It is critical to ascertain the mechanisms by which tumor cells evade CDK4/6 based therapy. In this study we screen multiple in vitro and in vivo models of acquired resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors to identify potential resistance/escape pathways and targets for pharmaceutical intervention to overcome resistance. ER+ breast cancer cell lines of diverse molecular backgrounds were conditioned to acquire resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors through either long-term culture in the presence of clinically relevant concentrations of inhibitors or as cell line xenografts treated through progression on a CDK4/6 inhibitor plus fulvestrant. Baseline and pharmacodynamic changes in cell signaling were measured using reverse phase protein array (RPPA) and RNAseq analysis. Acquired resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors was associated with decreases in phosphorylated-Rb (pRb) and ER-alpha protein and increases in pAKT and pS6 relative to isogenic controls. The p110α-selective PI3K-inhibitor, alpelisib, in combination with fulvestrant or ribociclib/fulvestrant blocked pAKT signaling in xenografts progressing on palbociclib/fulvestrant and induced significant tumor regressions. Apelisib plus fulvestrant also produced robust anti-tumor responses in xenografts progressing on ribociclib/fulvestrant. Triple combination treatment with ribociclib/alpelisib/fulvestrant induced significant regressions in resistant tumors and in treatment naïve models, where complete tumor regressions occurred regardless of PIK3CA mutation status. Regressions were maintained for &gt;9 weeks post withdrawal of treatment, indicating that therapeutic resistance may be prevented by this triple combination approach. RPPA analysis of responding tumors identified sustained inhibition of both PI3K- and CDK4/6:Rb-pathway signaling accompanied by activation of pro-apoptotic proteins. These data support clinical investigation of targeting PI3K with alpelisib in breast cancers progressing on CDK4/6 based therapies and investigation of upfront triple combination therapy prior to acquisition of resistance to CDK4/6.

Citation Format: Neil A. O'Brien, Martina SJ McDermott, Dylan F. Conklin, Alex Gaither, Tong Luo, Raul Ayala, Suruchi Salgar, Emmanuelle DiTomaso, Naveen Babbar, Faye Su, Sara A. Hurvitz, Ronald Linnartz, Kristine Rose, Samit Hirawat, Dennis J. Slamon. Targeting activated PI3K/mTOR signaling overcomes resistance to CDK4/6-based therapies in preclinical ER+ breast cancer models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3825.

Neutralization of BCL-2/XL Enhances the Cytotoxicity of T-DM1 In Vivo

One of the most recent advances in the treatment of HER2+ breast cancer is the development of the antibody-drug conjugate, T-DM1. T-DM1 has proven clinical benefits for patients with advanced and/or metastatic breast cancer who have progressed on prior HER2-targeted therapies. However, T-DM1 resistance ultimately occurs and represents a major obstacle in the effective treatment of this disease. Because anti-apoptotic BCL-2 family proteins can affect the threshold for induction of apoptosis and thus limit the effectiveness of the chemotherapeutic payload, we examined whether inhibition of BCL-2/XL would enhance the efficacy of T-DM1 in five HER2-expressing patient-derived breast cancer xenograft models. Inhibition of BCL-2/XL via navitoclax/ABT-263 significantly enhanced the cytotoxicity of T-DM1 in two of three models derived from advanced and treatment-exposed metastatic breast tumors. No additive effects of combined treatment were observed in the third metastatic tumor model, which was highly sensitive to T-DM1, as well as a primary treatment-exposed tumor, which was refractory to T-DM1. A fifth model, derived from a treatment naïve primary breast tumor, was sensitive to T-DM1 but markedly benefited from combination treatment. Notably, both PDXs that were highly responsive to the combination therapy expressed low HER2 protein levels and lacked ERBB2 amplification, suggesting that BCL-2/XL inhibition can enhance sensitivity of tumors with low HER2 expression. Toxicities associated with combined treatments were significantly ameliorated with intermittent ABT-263 dosing. Taken together, these studies provide evidence that T-DM1 cytotoxicity could be significantly enhanced via BCL-2/XL blockade and support clinical investigation of this combination beyond ERBB2-amplified and/or HER2-overexpressed tumors.

Luminespib plus pemetrexed in patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Luminespib (AUY922) is a second-generation heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibitor with demonstrated activity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Since luminespib reduces levels of dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), a key enzymatic target of pemetrexed, we assessed the safety and tolerability of luminespib in combination with pemetrexed in patients with previously treated metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We also sought to study the pharmacokinetics and correlate tumor dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) expression with clinical response.

METHODS

Patients received weekly luminespib at either 40 mg/m², 55 mg/m², or 70 mg/m² according to a standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation design along with pemetrexed at 500 mg/m² followed by an expansion at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD).

RESULTS

Two-dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were experienced in the 70 mg/m2 cohort, therefore the MTD was determined to be 55 mg/m². 69% (N = 9) of patients experienced ophthalmologic toxicity related to luminespib. Maximum serum concentration (Cmax) of luminespib was associated with increased grade 2 drug related adverse events (DRAEs) (r_s = 0.74, P <  0.01), with volume of distribution (V_D) inversely associated with the number of DRAEs (r_s = - 0.81, P =  0.004) and ophthalmologic related DRAEs (r_s = - 0.65, P =  0.04). The best response was partial response in one patient for 20 months, prior to expiration of all luminespib. Amongst patients treated at the MTD, the objective response rate was 14%.

CONCLUSION

In patients with previously treated metastatic NSCLC, the MTD of luminespib in combination with pemetrexed was 55 mg/m² per week. The combination of luminespib and pemetrexed demonstrated clinical activity. Tolerability of luminespib with pemetrexed is limited by ocular toxicity.

Neoadjuvant trastuzumab (H), pertuzumab (P), and chemotherapy versus trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and P in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC): Final outcome results from the phase III KRISTINE study

500

Background: KRISTINE compared neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus dual HER2- blockade (HP) with T-DM1 plus P (T-DM1+P), a targeted regimen that omits standard chemotherapy. T-DM1+P resulted in a lower pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, but a more favorable safety profile. Here we present the final outcomes from KRISTINE. Methods: KRISTINE (NCT02131064) was a randomized study of T-DM1+P versus docetaxel, carboplatin, and H plus P (TCHP). Patients with HER2-positive stage II–III BC received 6 cycles of neoadjuvant T-DM1+P or TCHP q3w. Patients receiving T-DM1+P continued adjuvant T-DM1+P; patients receiving TCHP received adjuvant HP, for 12 cycles in each arm. Patients in the T-DM1+P arm without pCR were encouraged to receive standard adjuvant chemotherapy before adjuvant T-DM1+P. Secondary endpoints, analyzed with descriptive statistics, included event-free survival (EFS; all events pre- and post-surgery), invasive disease-free survival (IDFS; invasive events post-surgery), overall survival and safety. Results: At median follow-up of 37 months, EFS favored TCHP (HR = 2.61 [95% CI: 1.36–4.98]), due to more locoregional progression events in the T-DM1+P arm before surgery (6.7% vs 0; Table). pCR was associated with reduced risk of an IDFS event (HR = 0.24 [95% CI: 0.09– 0.60]) regardless of treatment arm. There were 5 deaths (2.3%) in the TCHP arm and 6 (2.7%) in the T-DM1+P arm. There were more grade ≥3 AEs with TCHP but a higher rate of AEs leading to treatment discontinuation with T-DM1+P. Conclusions: EFS numerically favors TCHP due to locoregional progression events with T-DM1+P prior to surgery. T-DM1+P was associated with fewer grade ≥3 AEs but increased treatment discontinuation. Clinical trial information: NCT02131064. [Table: see text]

NATALEE: Phase III study of ribociclib (RIBO) + endocrine therapy (ET) as adjuvant treatment in hormone receptor–positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2–) early breast cancer (EBC)

TPS597

Background: RIBO is a selective inhibitor of CDK4/6 with demonstrated efficacy and is well tolerated when combined with ET in pre-/peri- and postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2– advanced breast cancer. Given these findings and considering the role of CDK4/6–Rb–E2F pathway dysregulation in ET resistance, there is a rationale for evaluating whether RIBO + ET prevents, or delays acquired resistance to ET in the adjuvant setting, to improve invasive disease-free survival (iDFS). Methods: The phase 3 multicenter, randomized, open-label NATALEE trial will evaluate the efficacy and safety of RIBO + ET as adjuvant treatment in patients with HR+, HER2– EBC. Eligible women (any menopausal status) and men aged ≥ 18 years will be randomized to RIBO 400 mg/day (3 weeks on/1 week off) + ET or ET alone. In both arms, ET will comprise daily continuous letrozole 2.5 mg/day or anastrozole 1 mg/day; men and premenopausal women will also receive goserelin 3.6 mg once every 28 days. Treatment with RIBO will last 36 months whereas treatment with ET (in both arms) will last 60 months. Patients must have had American Joint Committee on Cancer (8th ed.) Anatomic Stage II (either N0 with grade 2-3 and/or Ki67 ≥ 20% or N1) or III EBC, with an initial diagnosis ≤ 18 months prior to randomization, and completed chemotherapy and radiotherapy (if indicated). Patients receiving standard (neo)adjuvant ET are eligible only if this treatment was initiated within 12 months of randomization. Key exclusion criteria include previous CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment and clinically significant, uncontrolled heart disease and/or cardiac repolarization abnormality. The primary endpoint is iDFS using STEEP (Standardized Definitions for Efficacy End Points) criteria as assessed by the investigator; secondary endpoints include recurrence-free survival, distant DFS, overall survival, patient-reported outcomes, and RIBO pharmacokinetics. Safety and tolerability will also be evaluated. Estimated enrollment is 4000 patients from 425 sites in 21 countries. Recruitment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03701334.

Long-term Pooled Safety Analysis of Palbociclib in Combination With Endocrine Therapy for HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Palbociclib administered with endocrine therapy was tolerable when the overall incidence of toxicities was assessed separately for three PALOMA studies. This study analyzed pooled, longer-term PALOMA safety data longitudinally.

METHODS

Data were pooled from three randomized phase II and III studies (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00721409, NCT01740427, NCT01942135) of hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‒negative advanced breast cancer patients. Front-line patients were randomly assigned to receive letrozole with/without palbociclib (PALOMA-1) or letrozole plus palbociclib/placebo (PALOMA-2). In PALOMA-3, patients with prior endocrine resistance received fulvestrant plus palbociclib/placebo. The cumulative event rates of adverse events (AEs), reporting up to 50 months of treatment, were assessed over time.

RESULTS

Patients who received endocrine therapy (n = 1343) were included in this pooled analysis (872 were also treated with palbociclib, and 471 were not). The most common AEs with palbociclib plus endocrine therapy were neutropenia and infections (any grade, 80.6% and 54.7%, respectively), which were higher than in the endocrine monotherapy arm (any grade, 5.3% and 36.9%). The most common hematologic AEs (≥15.0% in the palbociclib arm) were more likely to be reported in the initial months of the study, after which time the cumulative event rate did not substantially increase. With palbociclib plus endocrine therapy, any grade AEs leading to permanent discontinuation over three years occurred in only 8.3% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these long-term safety analyses, there is no evidence of specific cumulative or delayed toxicities with palbociclib plus endocrine therapy, supporting the ongoing investigation of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy in early breast cancer (NCT02513394).

Palbociclib plus letrozole as first-line therapy in estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer with extended follow-up

PURPOSE

In the initial PALOMA-2 (NCT01740427) analysis with median follow-up of 23 months, palbociclib plus letrozole significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in women with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) [hazard ratio (HR) 0.58; P < 0.001]. Herein, we report results overall and by subgroups with extended follow-up.

METHODS

In this double-blind, phase 3 study, post-menopausal women with ER+/HER2- ABC who had not received prior systemic therapy for their advanced disease were randomized 2:1 to palbociclib-letrozole or placebo-letrozole. Endpoints include investigator-assessed PFS (primary), safety, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of approximately 38 months, median PFS was 27.6 months for palbociclib-letrozole (n = 444) and 14.5 months for placebo-letrozole (n = 222) (HR 0.563; 1-sided P < 0.0001). All subgroups benefited from palbociclib treatment. The improvement of PFS with palbociclib-letrozole was maintained in the next 2 subsequent lines of therapy and delayed the use of chemotherapy (40.4 vs. 29.9 months for palbociclib-letrozole vs. placebo-letrozole). Safety data were consistent with the known profile. Patients' quality of life was maintained.

CONCLUSIONS

With approximately 15 months of additional follow-up, palbociclib plus letrozole continued to demonstrate improved PFS compared with placebo plus letrozole in the overall population and across all patient subgroups, while the safety profile remained favorable and quality of life was maintained. These data confirm that palbociclib-letrozole should be considered the standard of care for first-line therapy in patients with ER+/HER2- ABC, including those with low disease burden or long disease-free interval. Sponsored by Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01740427.