Peripheral arterial disease has a strong impact on cardiovascular outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes: from the START Antiplatelet registry

BACKGROUND

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) was reported to increase the risk of new cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). However, most of the evidence comes from randomized clinical trials. We aimed to assess the impact of PAD on cardiovascular outcome and treatment decisions in ACS patients in a current real-life setting.

METHODS

START-ANTIPLATELET is a multicenter registry enrolling ACS patient. Baseline clinical characteristics and treatment at discharge were recorded and follow-up was repeated at 6-months and 1-year. PAD was defined as intermittent claudication and/or previous revascularization.

RESULTS

Among 1442 patients enrolled, 103 (7.1%) had PAD. PAD patients were older (71.8 ± 10.6vs66.2 ± 12.6 yrs., p < 0.0001), more frequently hypertensive (90.3vs68.6%, p< 0.0001), hypercholesterolemic (66vs52%, p= 0.037), diabetic (51.5vs24%, p= 0.0001), obese (28.2vs19.3%, p= 0.029) and with previous TIA (7.8vs2.8%, p= 0.005) or stroke (11.7vs3.1%, p< 0.0001). Clinical presentation and acute treatment were similar in non-PAD and PAD patients, but the latter were discharged significantly less frequently on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) (68.9vs85%, p= 0.005). After a median follow-up time of 11.1 months, major cardio/cerebrovascular event-free survival [MACCE, including cardiovascular death, MI, TIA and stroke, target-vessel revascularization (TVR) and major arterial ischemic events] was significantly shorter (9.0vs11.2 months, p= 0.02; HR 3.2, 2.4-8.4) in PAD patients and net adverse cardiovascular events (NACE = MACCE plus major hemorrhages) were significantly more frequent (19.1%vs10.5%, p = 0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

PAD identifies a subgroup of ACS patients at significantly increased cardiovascular risk, but these patients tend to be undertreated. Patients admitted for ACS should be screened for PAD and optimal medical therapy at discharge should be implemented.

Ischemic and bleeding risk stratification in diabetic patients after acute coronary syndrome based on insulin requirement

Background

Diabetes is a known risk factor for a first or recurrent cardiovascular event, however, its association with an increased risk of bleeding is controversial. To date, no study has explored the prognostic weight of insulin therapy in the setting of ACS.

Purpose

To investigate the differential role of insulin versus no insulin therapy on ischemic and bleeding risks in patients with diabetes and ACS.

Methods

START-ANTIPLATELET is a prospective, real-world multicenter registry including consecutive patients admitted for ACS. For the purpose of this analysis, patients were stratified according to diabetes status and insulin therapy. We compared 1-year rates of major adverse cardiovascular events, a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke, and of any bleeding, according to diabetes status (no diabetes, diabetes not on insulin therapy, diabetes on insulin therapy). In addition, we evaluated the net clinical benefit of dual antiplatelet therapy with the newer P2Y12 inhibitors (ticagrelor or prasugrel) vs dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel according to diabetes status.

Results

In an overall population of 907 patients, 198 had diabetes, 10.6% of whom were on insulin. From non-diabetic patients to diabetic patients not on insulin and diabetic patients on insulin there was a stepwise decrease of MACE-free survival (log-rank p 0.039) with incidence of events at 1 year being 3.8%, 6.8% (adjusted p vs no diabetes 0.49) and 12.5% (adjusted p vs no diabetes 0.047), respectively (Figure, panel A). The rates of any bleeding were higher in patients on insulin (20.8% vs 8.8% in those without diabetes and 5.8% in diabetic patients not receiving insulin; log-rank p 0.028; Figure, panel B). Multivariable analysis demonstrated an almost 5-fold increase of any bleeding in diabetic patients with vs without insulin (OR 4.98, 95% CI 1.46–16.92; p=0.010). In the overall population, the incidence of the net composite endpoint including MACE or major bleeding with the use of ticagrelor/prasugrel on top of aspirin was significantly lower compared to use of clopidogrel (4.7% vs 8.4%; OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.30–0.94, p=0.031). This net clinical benefit in patients receiving a newer P2Y12 inhibitor was regardless of the diabetes status (p for interaction 0.48).

Conclusions

In this cohort of ACS patients, the presence of diabetes stratified by insulin therapy was associated with a graded increase in the 1-year rates of MACE. Conversely, insulin therapy significantly contributed to the overall increase of bleeding risk in diabetes.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Clinical phenotypes of atrial fibrillation and risk of mortality: a cluster analysis

Background

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) experience a high mortality rate despite optimal antithrombotic treatment. Characteristics of AF patients at higher mortality risk have been barely described so far and no risk score has been specifically developed at this aim. Furthermore, a clinical approach based on risk scores present some limits such as to not consider some important risk factors for mortality, and many available scores have poor predictive value. Cluster analysis may play a role in overcoming limitations of risk scores, especially in the case of overlapping risk factors.

Purpose

To identify of clinical phenotypes by using an unbiased statistical approach, such as the cluster analysis.

Methods

Cluster analysis was used to identify clinical phenotypes of AF patients associated with all-cause mortality in 5,171 AF patients from the START registry. Clinical variables used for the analysis were age, sex, diabetes, previous cerebrovascular events, previous cardiovascular events, heart failure, peripheral artery disease, use of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants, cancer, pulmonary disease, smoking habit, previous major bleeding. The risk of all-cause mortality in each cluster was analyzed.

Results

We identified 4 clusters (Figure 1). Cluster 1 was composed by youngest patients, with obesity and paroxysmal AF; Cluster 2 by patients with low cardiovascular risk factors and high proportion of cancer; Cluster 3 by men with diabetes and coronary and peripheral artery disease, a high proportion of thrombocytopenia, and a high use of aspirin, proton pump inhibitors, and statins; Cluster 4 included the oldest patients, mainly women, with previous cerebrovascular disease, persistent/ permanent AF, heart failure, kidney disease and anemia. In this cluster there was the highest use of digoxin and NOACs.

During 9856,84 patient/years of observation, 386 deaths (3.92%/year) occurred. Mortality rates significantly increased across clusters: 0.42%/year (cluster 1, reference group), 2.12%/year (cluster 2, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 3.306, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.204–9.077, p=0.020), 4.41%/year (cluster 3, aHR 6.702, 95% CI 2.433–18.461, p&lt;0.001) and 8.71%/year (cluster 4, aHR 8.927, 95% CI 3.238–24.605, p&lt;0.001).

Conclusions

We identified different clinical phenotypes of AF patients by cluster analysis which were specifically associated with mortality. This approach may help identify patients at higher risk of mortality.

Figure 1

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Effect of body mass index on ischemic and bleeding events in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes: insights from the START-ANTIPLATELET registry

Background

The protective effect of obesity on mortality in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) patients remains debated. We aimed at evaluating the impact of obesity on ischemic and bleeding events as possible explanations to the obesity paradox in ACS patients.

Methods

For the purpose of this sub-study, patients enrolled in the START-ANTIPLATELET registry were stratified according to Body Mass Index (BMI) into three groups: normal, BMI &lt;25kg/m2; overweight, BMI: 25–29.9kg/m2; obese, BMI ≥30kg/m2. The primary endpoint was net adverse clinical endpoints (NACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and major bleeding.

Results

Patients were classified as follows: 410 (33.9%) normal, 538 (44.5%) overweight, 261 (21.6%) obese. Compared to the normal weight group, obese and overweight patients had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, but were younger, with a better left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and lower PRECISE-DAPT score. At one-year follow-up NACE was more frequently observed in normal than in overweight and obese patients (15.1%,8.6%,and9.6%, respectively; p=0.004), driven by a significantly higher rate of all-cause death (6.3%,2.6%, and 3.8%, respectively; p=0.008), while no significant differences were noted in terms of MI, stroke, and major bleeding. When correcting for confounding variables, BMI loses its power in independently predicting outcomes, failing to confirm the obesity paradox in a real-world ACS population.

Conclusions

Our study conflicts the obesity paradox in real-world ACS population, and suggest that the reduced mortality rate may be explained by a lower bleeding risk in obese patients allowing a more aggressive medical treatment, and by a better LVEF translating into a higher survival rate.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in high bleeding risk patients presenting with Acute Coronary Syndromes: insights from the multicenter START-ANTIPLATELET registry

Background

Optimal dual antiplatelet therapy in high bleeding risk (HBR) patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remains debated. Although current guidelines recommend the use of potent P2Y12 inhibitors in these patients (according to the labeled indications), clopidogrel is frequently used in clinical practice based on a perceived advantage in terms of safety in the HBR population.

Purpose

We sought to investigate the use of clopidogrel versus ticagrelor in consecutive HBR ACS patients and their impact on ischemic and bleeding events at 1 year.

Methods

ACS patients enrolled in the START-ANTIPLATELET registry with at least 1 HBR criterion were included in the present analysis and stratified according to DAPT type (clopidogrel versus ticagrelor). The primary endpoint was net adverse clinical endpoint (NACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and major bleeding. The secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction and stroke, each individual component of NACE and MACE, and target vessel revascularization.

Results

Among a total of 1,209 patients with 1-year follow-up in the registry, 383 patients were considered at HBR, of whom 174 (45.4%) were on clopidogrel and 209 (54.6%) on ticagrelor. Clopidogrel was more likely to be administered in patients at increased ischemic and bleeding risk, while ticagrelor in those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Mean DAPT duration was longer in the ticagrelor group than in the clopidogrel group (10.40±4.29 versus 9.35±5.4; p-value=0.03). At 1-year follow-up, the risk of NACE and MACE events was significantly higher in the clopidogrel than in the ticagrelor group (NACE: HR 1.82; 95% CI 1.07–3.09; p-value=0.02; MACE: HR 1.83; 95% CI 1.04–3.24; p-value=0.03) (Figure). After multivariate adjustment for clinical and procedural characteristics, no difference in NACEs nor MACEs was observed between patients on clopidogrel versus ticagrelor (NACE: adjusted HR 1.27; 95% CI 0.71–2.27; p-value=0.42; MACE: adjusted HR 1.19; 95% CI 0.63–2.24; p-value=0.59) (Figure). Age, number of HBR criteria, and mean DAPT duration were independent predictors of NACEs.

Conclusions

In a real-world ACS registry, approximately 50% of patients are at HBR and frequently treated with clopidogrel. In HBR ACS patients, no difference was observed in ischemic and bleeding events between clopidogrel and ticagrelor after adjustment for potential confounders.

Kaplan-Meier curves at 1-year follow-up.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Anticoagulation in Italian patients with venous thromboembolism and thrombophilic alterations: findings from START2 register study

BACKGROUND

Randomised control trials have assessed the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in the prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Positive but limited results have been reported in patients with inherited thrombophilia. Using an Italian, multicentre, prospective registry of consecutive patients presenting with symptomatic, acute VTE, we aimed to assess which factors are involved in making the choice of the drug that best fits the patient's risk profile in a large real-world setting of VTE patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We investigated 4,866 VTE patients who took oral anticoagulants in the period between 2012 and April 2018 to prevent a new thromboembolic episode.

RESULTS

The large majority of patients who underwent thrombophilic screening, regardless of the results obtained, were prescribed direct oral anticoagulants rather than conventional anticoagulant therapy (p<0.001). During anticoagulation, bleeding events occurred more frequently in patients on conventional anticoagulant therapy (4.2%) than in those receiving direct oral anticoagulants (1.8%) and an increase in bleeding events was observed in patients who tested positive at the thrombophilic screening. Overall, a higher number of recurrent VTE was observed in patients not screened for thrombophilia (n=36; 1.7%) than in those screened (n=20; 0.7%; adjusted odds ratio: 2.2; 95% confidence interval: 1.2-4.1).

DISCUSSION

The present data confirm previous findings from other post-marketing registries and suggest that the choice of oral anticoagulation is strongly driven by patients' characteristics and VTE manifestations. Factors leading to the prescription of thrombophilic screening may identify a patient with a lower risk of VTE recurrence during anticoagulation.

Anticoagulation resumption after intracranial hemorrhage in patients treated with VKA and DOACs

BACKGROUND

Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is associated with severe prognosis and recurrent risk. This impacts on the decision to resume anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation (AF) or venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients. Purpose of our study is to evaluate the incidence rate of recurrent ICH in patients with AF or VTE resuming anticoagulation after a first ICH episode.

METHODS

We report data of two cohorts of AF or VTE after a first ICH. The Vitamin K antagonist (VKA) cohort (166 patients) derives from CHIRONE Study, the direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) cohort (178 patients) derives from START2-Register RESULTS: The clinical characteristics of the two cohort are similar with the exception of more prevalence of history of previous stroke/TIA in DOAC patients with respect to VKA (p = 0.02) and serum creatinine levels>1.5 mg/dL in VKA patients with respect to DOAC(p = 0.0001). The index ICH was spontaneous in 66.4% and in 33.7% among DOAC and VKAs cohort respectively (p = 0.0001). During follow-up, 14 recurrent ICH were recorded; 9 (rate 2.5 × 100 patient-years) in VKA and 5 (rate 1.3 × 100 patient-years) in DOAC (Relative Risk 1.9; 95% CI 0.6-7.4; p = 0.2). The univariate logistic regression analysis showed that patients with recurrent ICH were more frequently males, hypertensive, with a history of previous Stroke/TIA and older than patients without recurrence. VKA patients showed a higher risk of recurrence with respect to DOAC patients (OR 1.9;95% CI 0.7-6.7).

CONCLUSIONS

A trend toward fewer ICH recurrences was detected among DOACs patients in comparison to the previously reported rate of patients on warfarin.

Direct oral anticoagulant plasma levels' striking increase in severe COVID-19 respiratory syndrome patients treated with antiviral agents: The Cremona experience

BACKGROUND

Antiviral drugs are administered in patients with severe COVID-19 respiratory syndrome, including those treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Concomitant administration of antiviral agents has the potential to increase their plasma concentration. A series of patients managed in the Cremona Thrombosis Center were admitted at Cremona Hospital for SARS-CoV-2 and started antiviral drugs without stopping DOAC therapy. DOAC plasma levels were measured in hospital and results compared with those recorded before hospitalization.

METHODS

All consecutive patients on DOACs were candidates for administration of antiviral agents (lopinavir, ritonavir, or darunavir). Plasma samples for DOAC measurement were collected 2to 4 days after starting antiviral treatment, at 12 hours from the last dose intake in patients on dabigatran and apixaban, and at 24 hours in those on rivaroxaban and edoxaban. For each patient, C-trough DOAC level, expressed as ng/mL, was compared with the one measured before hospitalization.

RESULTS

Of the 1039 patients hospitalized between February 22 and March 15, 2020 with COVID-19 pneumonia and candidates for antiviral therapy, 32 were on treatment with a DOAC. DOAC was stopped in 20 and continued in the remaining 12. On average, C-trough levels were 6.14 times higher during hospitalization than in the pre-hospitalization period.

CONCLUSION

DOAC patients treated with antiviral drugs show an alarming increase in DOAC plasma levels. In order to prevent bleeding complications, we believe that physicians should consider withholding DOACs from patients with SARS-CoV-2 and replacing them with alternative parenteral antithrombotic strategies for as long as antiviral agents are deemed necessary and until discharge.

D-dimer testing, with gender-specific cutoff levels, is of value to assess the individual risk of venous thromboembolic recurrence in non-elderly patients of both genders: a post hoc analysis of the DULCIS study

Male patients, especially the young, are at a higher risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (RVTE) than females. Recent scientific reports show the use of D-dimer does not help predict RVTE risk in males. In the present report, we reviewed the data obtained in the DULCIS study (main report published in Blood 2014), focusing on D-dimer results recorded in non-elderly patients of both genders included in the study, and their relationship with RVTE events occurring during follow-up. Using specifically designed cutoff values for positive/negative interpretation, serial D-dimer measurements (performed during warfarin treatment and up to 3 months after discontinuation of anticoagulation) in 475 patients (males 57.3%) aged ≤ 65 years were obtained. D-dimer resulted positive in 46.3% and 30.5% of males and females, respectively (p = 0.001). Following management procedure, anticoagulation was stopped in 53.7% of males and 69.5% of females, who had persistently negative D-dimer results. The rate of subsequent recurrent events was 1.7% (95% CI 0.5-4.5%) and 0.4% (95% CI 0-2.5%) patient-years in males and females, respectively, with upper limits of confidence intervals always below the level of risk considered acceptable by international scientific societies for stopping anticoagulation (< 5%). In conclusion, using sensitive quantitative assays with specifically designed cutoff values and serial measurements during and after discontinuation of anticoagulation, D-dimer testing is useful to predict the risk of RVTE and is of help in deciding the duration of anticoagulation in both male and female adult patients aged up to 65 years.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Sulodexide and Other Extended Anticoagulation Treatments for Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis

Objective  This network meta-analysis (NMA) assesses the clinical comparative efficacy and safety of sulodexide versus direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs), vitamin K antagonist (VKA), and aspirin in patients with an unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE). Methods  We conducted a literature search in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library using both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. Reduction in recurrent deep venous thrombosis (r-DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), major bleeding (MB), clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB) were the primary efficacy and safety outcomes. Other secondary end points were also included. We performed a fixed, random effects, and hierarchical models Bayesian NMA for each outcome. Results  We identified 18 RCTs and seven observational studies. Random models showed sulodexide is the best treatment compared with DOACs, VKA, and aspirin at reducing the risk of CRNMB, for preventing death from any cause, and VTE/PE/myocardial infarction (MI)/stroke with 0.47, 0.81, and 0.65 probabilities, respectively. In the random model sulodexide was the best treatment for reducing the risk of MB with a 0.50 probability and hierarchical model that confirmed favorable results. Random and hierarchical models showed sulodexide and DOACs to be the best treatments for reducing PE risk. Sulodexide was more effective than aspirin for reducing r-DVT with 0.12 and less of 0.0001 probabilities, respectively. Conclusion  Sulodexide is more effective for reducing MB and CRNMB, for preventing deaths from any cause, and from VTE/PE/MI/stroke, than other treatments, for both random and hierarchical models. Sulodexide showed to be more effective than aspirin in reducing the risk of r-DVT and PE. Sulodexide's reduction in bleeding while protecting from recurrent DVT risk makes this therapeutic option an important alternative for extended anticoagulation treatment.

Determinants of low-quality warfarin anticoagulation in patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves. The nationwide PLECTRUM study

Quality of warfarin therapy in patients with a mechanical prosthetic heart valve (MPHV) has been barely investigated. We analysed determinants of low time in the therapeutic range (TiTR <60%) in 2111 patients with MPHVs from the nationwide PLECTRUM study by the Italian Federation of Anticoagulation Clinics. Overall, 48·5% of patients had a TiTR of < 60%. At logistic regression analysis, arterial hypertension (odds ratio [OR] 1·502, P < 0·001), diabetes (OR 1·732, P < 0·001), heart failure (OR 1·484, P = 0·004), mitral site (vs. aortic) (OR 1·399, P = 0·006), international normalised ratio (INR) ranges of 2·5-3·5 (OR 2·575, P < 0·001) and 3·0-4·0 (OR 8·215, P < 0·001) associated with TiTR < 60%. TiTR is substantially suboptimal in MPHV patients, particularly in higher INR ranges.

DOAC plasma levels measured by chromogenic anti-Xa assays and HPLC-UV in apixaban- and rivaroxaban-treated patients from the START-Register

INTRODUCTION

To measure direct factor Xa inhibitor (apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban) concentrations, dedicated chromogenic anti-Xa assays are recommended as suitable methods to provide rapid drug quantification. Moreover, the high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (HPLC-UV) is reported as a reliable quantitative technique. We investigated seven anti-Xa assays and an HPLC-UV method for measurement of apixaban and rivaroxaban levels in patients enrolled in the START-Register.

METHODS

A total of 127 apixaban and 124 rivaroxaban samples were tested by HPLC-UV and the following anti-Xa assays: Biophen DiXaI and Heparin LRT (Hyphen BioMed), Berichrom and Innovance Heparin (Siemens), STA-Liquid Anti-Xa (Stago Diagnostics), Technochrom anti-Xa (Technoclone), and HemosIL Liquid Anti-Xa (Werfen). Each method was performed in one of the participating laboratories: Bologna, Cremona, Florence, and Padua.

RESULTS

Our data confirmed the overestimation of apixaban and rivaroxaban levels by the antithrombin-supplemented anti-Xa method (Berichrom). Performances and reproducibility of the six anti-Xa assays not supplemented with antithrombin and the HPLC-UV method were good, with limits of quantification from 8-39 ng/mL (apixaban) and 15-33 ng/mL (rivaroxaban). The six chromogenic methods showed good concordances with the quantitative HPLC-UV [bias: -26.9-22.3 ng/mL (apixaban), -11.3-18.7 ng/mL (rivaroxaban)]. Higher bias and wider range between limits of agreement were observed at higher concentrations [<100 ng/mL: bias -21.3-4.1 ng/mL (apixaban) and -6.2-3.8 ng/mL (rivaroxaban); >200 ng/mL: bias -42.2-36.8 ng/mL (apixaban) and -20.1-68.9 ng/mL (rivaroxaban)].

CONCLUSION

Overall, the anti-Xa assays not supplemented with antithrombin and the HPLC-UV method proved to be suitable for apixaban and rivaroxaban quantification.

Optimal Medical Therapy on Top of Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy: 1-Year Clinical Outcome in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: The START Antiplatelet Registry

Optimal medical therapy (OMT) at discharge is recommended after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Few studies report the impact of OMT on long-term clinical outcome in a real-world scenario. We evaluated the impact of discharge OMT on top of dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) on clinical outcome in the real-world ACS population of the Survey on anTicoagulated pAtients RegisTer ANTIPLATELET registry. The primary end point was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE), a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or target vessel revascularization. The co-primary end point was net adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (NACE), based on MACCE plus major bleeding. Consecutive patients with ACS with 1-year follow-up were enrolled. They were evaluated at discharge for the use of a β-blocker, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blockers and statins. Optimal medical therapy was defined as the use of ≥2 of 3 medications. At multivariate analysis, both MACCE and NACE were significantly higher in non-OMT patients than in OMT patients (MACCE 18 [19] vs 59 [9], hazard ratio [HR] = 0.44 [0.26-0.75], P = .002, NACE 19 [20] vs 67 [10], HR = 0.47 [0.28-0.79], P = .004). In this real-world scenario, OMT at discharge on top of DAPT seems associated with a better clinical outcome compared with patients discharged on non-OMT.

The effect of management models on thromboembolic and bleeding rates in anticoagulated patients: an ecological study

The primary study objective is to compare the outcomes of patients taking oral anticoagulant medications in two distinct populations treated according to different management models (comprehensive vs. usual care). (Design: regional prospective cohort study; setting: hospital admission data from two regions). Eligible partecipants were patients taking oral anticoagulant drugs (vitamin K antagonist or direct oral anticoagulants), residents in the Vicenza and Cremona districts from February 1st, 2016 to June 30th, 2017. Patients were identified by accessing the administrative databases of patient drug prescriptions. The primary study outcome was admission to the Emergency Department for stroke, systemic arterial embolism, recurrence of venous thromboembolism or major bleeding. The study evaluated outcomes in 14,226 patients taking oral anticoagulants, of whom 6725 being followed in Cremona with a comprehensive management model. There were 19 and 45 thromboembolic events over 6205 and 6530 patient-years in the Cremona and Vicenza cohort, respectively (IRR 0.44, 95% CI 0.24-0.77). The reduction of events in the Cremona cohort was almost entirely explained by a decrease of events in patients taking VKA (IRR 0.41, 95% CI 0.20-0.78) but not DOACs (IRR 1.08, 95% CI 0.25-5.24). The rate of major bleeding was non-significantly higher in Cremona than in Vicenza (IRI 1.32; 95% CI 0.74-2.40). Across the two cohorts, the risk of bleeding was lower in patients being treated with DOACs rather than warfarin (10/4574 vs. 42/8161 event/person-years, respectively, IRR 0.42 95% CI 0.19-0.86). We conclude that a comprehensive management model providing centralized dose prescription and follow-up may significantly reduce the rate of thromboembolic complications, without substantially increasing the number of bleeding complications. Patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants appear to have a rate of thromboembolic complications comparable to VKA patients under the best management model, with a reduction of major bleeding.

Patients with isolated pulmonary embolism in comparison to those with deep venous thrombosis. Differences in characteristics and clinical evolution

BACKGROUND

Patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) often have leg deep vein thrombosis (DVT); sometimes, however, a DVT is not detected (isolated PE, I-PE). We aimed at assessing the proportion of patients with I-PE, and their characteristics and clinical evolution compared to those with DVT with/without PE (DVT/PE).

METHODS

Among 3573 patients included in the START2-Register for a venous thromboembolic event, 2880 (80.6%) had DVT/PE, the remaining I-PE (19.4%).

RESULTS

Patients with I-PE were older [(≥75 years, OR 1.4 (95%CI 1.13-1.69)], and more frequently females [OR 1.4 (1.19-1.67)]. Young females (aged ≤ 50 years) with an index event occurring during hormonal contraception (HC), were more prevalent in I-PE [OR 1.96 (1.26-3.03)]. At multivariate analysis, age > 75 years, female sex, heart failure, cancer and use of HC were risk factors significantly associated with I-PE, whereas thrombophilic alterations were associated with DVT/PE. During a follow-up of 4504 years (during anticoagulation), the rate of bleeding events was 1.1% patient/years and 1.0% patient/years in I-PE and DVT/PE, respectively. Venous thromboembolic events were equally prevalent in DVT/PE or I-PE (1.94% vs 0.86%, ns), whereas arterial complications were more prevalent in the latter group (1.01% vs 0.28%, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

I-PE and DVT/PE have important differences. Older age, female sex, heart failure and cancer, were risk factors for I-PE; thrombophilic alterations were associated with DVT/PE. HC use was more frequent in the I-PE group. The prevalence of arterial complications was higher in patients with I-PE. Further studies, specifically designed on this issue, are warranted.

Thrombocytopenia and Mortality Risk in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: An Analysis From the START Registry

Background

Thrombocytopenia is associated with increased mortality in the general population, but few data exist in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) taking oral anticoagulants. We investigated factor determinants of thrombocytopenia in a large cohort of patients affected by AF and its association with total mortality.

Methods and Results

Multicenter prospective cohort study, including 5215 patients with AF from the START (Survey on Anticoagulated Patients Register) registry, 3877 (74.3%) and 1338 (25.7%) on vitamin K or non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, respectively. Thrombocytopenia was defined by a platelet count <150×10⁹/L. Determinants of thrombocytopenia were investigated, and all‐cause mortality was the primary survival end point of the study. Thrombocytopenia was present in 592 patients (11.4%). At multivariable logistic regression analysis, chronic kidney disease (odds ratio [OR], 1.257; P=0.030), active cancer (OR, 2.065; P=0.001), liver cirrhosis (OR, 7.635; P<0.001), and the use of diuretics (OR, 1.234; P=0.046) were positively associated with thrombocytopenia, whereas female sex (OR, 0.387; P<0.001) and the use of calcium channel blockers (OR, 0.787; P=0.032) were negatively associated. During a median follow‐up of 19.2 months (9942 patient‐years), 391 deaths occurred (rate, 3.93%/year). Mortality rate increased from 3.8%/year to 9.9%/year in patients with normal platelet count and in those with moderate‐severe thrombocytopenia, respectively (log‐rank test, P=0.009). The association between moderate‐severe thrombocytopenia and mortality persisted after adjustment for CHA₂DS₂VASc score (hazard ratio, 2.431; 95% CI, 1.254–4.713; P=0.009), but not in the fully adjusted multivariable Cox regression analysis model.

Conclusions

Thrombocytopenia is common in patients with AF. Despite an increased incidence of mortality, thrombocytopenia was not associated with mortality at multivariable analysis. Thrombocytopenia may reflect the presence of comorbidities associated with poor survival in AF.

Long term risk of symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism after discontinuation of anticoagulant treatment for first unprovoked venous thromboembolism event: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To determine the rate of a first recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) event after discontinuation of anticoagulant treatment in patients with a first episode of unprovoked VTE, and the cumulative incidence for recurrent VTE up to 10 years.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (from inception to 15 March 2019).

STUDY SELECTION

Randomised controlled trials and prospective cohort studies reporting symptomatic recurrent VTE after discontinuation of anticoagulant treatment in patients with a first unprovoked VTE event who had completed at least three months of treatment.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two investigators independently screened studies, extracted data, and appraised risk of bias. Data clarifications were sought from authors of eligible studies. Recurrent VTE events and person years of follow-up after discontinuation of anticoagulant treatment were used to calculate rates for individual studies, and data were pooled using random effects meta-analysis. Sex and site of initial VTE were investigated as potential sources of between study heterogeneity.

RESULTS

18 studies involving 7515 patients were included in the analysis. The pooled rate of recurrent VTE per 100 person years after discontinuation of anticoagulant treatment was 10.3 events (95% confidence interval 8.6 to 12.1) in the first year, 6.3 (5.1 to 7.7) in the second year, 3.8 events/year (95% confidence interval 3.2 to 4.5) in years 3-5, and 3.1 events/year (1.7 to 4.9) in years 6-10. The cumulative incidence for recurrent VTE was 16% (95% confidence interval 13% to 19%) at 2 years, 25% (21% to 29%) at 5 years, and 36% (28% to 45%) at 10 years. The pooled rate of recurrent VTE per 100 person years in the first year was 11.9 events (9.6 to 14.4) for men and 8.9 events (6.8 to 11.3) for women, with a cumulative incidence for recurrent VTE of 41% (28% to 56%) and 29% (20% to 38%), respectively, at 10 years. Compared to patients with isolated pulmonary embolism, the rate of recurrent VTE was higher in patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis (rate ratio 1.4, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 1.7) and in patients with pulmonary embolism plus deep vein thrombosis (1.5, 1.1 to 1.9). In patients with distal deep vein thrombosis, the pooled rate of recurrent VTE per 100 person years was 1.9 events (95% confidence interval 0.5 to 4.3) in the first year after anticoagulation had stopped. The case fatality rate for recurrent VTE was 4% (95% confidence interval 2% to 6%).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with a first episode of unprovoked VTE who completed at least three months of anticoagulant treatment, the risk of recurrent VTE was 10% in the first year after treatment, 16% at two years, 25% at five years, and 36% at 10 years, with 4% of recurrent VTE events resulting in death. These estimates should inform clinical practice guidelines, enhance confidence in counselling patients of their prognosis, and help guide decision making about long term management of unprovoked VTE.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42017056309.

D-dimer levels during and after anticoagulation withdrawal in patients with venous thromboembolism treated with non-vitamin K anticoagulants

Background

D-dimer levels measured during and after vitamin K antagonist withdrawal may be used in clinical practice to assess the individual risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism. Currently, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are frequently used in venous thromboembolism treatment; however, their pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics characteristics are completely different than vitamin K antagonists. The present study aimed at comparing the results of D-dimer levels during and after anticoagulation withdrawal in patients with venous thromboembolism treated with DOACs or warfarin.

Material and methods

D-dimer levels were measured in 527 patients (“cases”) during DOACs treatment (T0) and after 15 (T15), 30 (T30), 60 (T60) and 90 (T90) days after their discontinuation and in 527 patients (“controls”) enrolled in the DULCIS study (all treated with warfarin), matched for sex, age (+/-3 y), type of D-dimer assay and site of venous thromboembolism. Both cases and controls received anticoagulant treatment after a first venous thromboembolism event that was unprovoked or associated with weak risk factors.

Results

The rate of positive D-dimer results was significantly higher in cases than in controls at T0 (10.8% vs 5.1%, p = 0.002) and at T30 (18.8% vs 11.8%, p = 0.019), as well as at the other time-points, though not statistically significant.

Conclusion

D-dimer levels during and after stopping an anticoagulant treatment for a venous thromboembolism episode differ between patients treated with a DOAC than in those treated with warfarin. Specifically designed prospective studies are warranted to reassess the use of D-dimer as predictor of the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients treated with DOACs.

Drug levels and bleeding complications in atrial fibrillation patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants

Essentials Currently, DOACs are given at fixed doses and do not require laboratory monitoring. Direct oral anticoagulant-specific measurements were performed at trough and peak. Patients who developed bleeding events showed higher DOAC plasma levels at peak. This study suggests the need of a more accurate DOAC dose assessment.

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are administered at fixed dose. The aim of the study was to evaluate the relationship between DOAC C-trough or C-peak plasma levels and bleeding complications in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).

METHODS

Five hundred sixty five consecutive naive NVAF patients were enrolled. The DOAC measurements at C-trough and at C-peak (available in 411 patients) were performed at steady state, within the first month of treatment. Major bleeding (MB), clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB), and minor bleeding (MinB), occurring during 1 year of follow-up after blood sampling, were recorded. For each DOAC, interval of C-trough and C-peak levels was subdivided into four equal classes and results were attributed to these classes; the median values of results were also calculated.

RESULTS

Two hundred eight patients were on apixaban, 185 on dabigatran, and 172 on rivaroxaban. For 1-[qqqdeletezzz] year follow up for all patients, we observed: 19 MB (3.36%), 6 CRNMB (1.06%), and 47 MinB (8.31%). The prevalence of bleeding patients with anticoagulant levels in the upper classes of C-peak activity (II + III + IV) was higher than that in the lowest class. Normalized results of C-peak levels were higher in patients with bleeding than in those without bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Bleeding complications during DOAC treatment were more frequent among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with higher C-peak anticoagulant levels. In addition to a previous study that showed an increased risk of thrombotic complications in the patients with low C-trough levels, this study seems to indicate that patients with NVAF on DOACs would need a more accurate definition of their optimal therapeutic window.

Oral anticoagulation in very elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: Results from the prospective multicenter START2-REGISTER study

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have shown similar efficacy and safety with respect to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the proportion of patients aged ≥85 years enrolled in clinical trials was low and the applicability of their results to very elderly patients is still uncertain. We have carried out a prospective cohort study on AF patients aged ≥85 years enrolled in the Survey on anticoagulaTed pAtients RegisTer (START2-Register) and treated with either VKAs or DOACs, with the aim to evaluate mortality, bleeding and thrombotic rates during a long-term follow-up. We enrolled 1124 patients who started anticoagulation at ≥85 years with VKA (58.7%) or DOACs (41.3%), Clinical characteristics of patients were similar, except for a higher prevalence of coronary artery disease and renal failure in VKAs patients and of a history of previous bleeding and previous stroke/TIA in patients on DOACs. Median CHA₂DS₂VASc and HAS-BLED scores were similar between the two groups. During follow-up, 47 major bleedings (rate 2.3 x100 pt-yrs) and 19 stroke/TIA (0.9 x100 pt-yrs) were recorded. The incidence of bleeding was similar between patients on VKAs and DOACs. Patients on DOACs showed a higher rate of thrombotic events during treatment (rate 1.84 and 0.50,respectively). Mortality rate was higher in patients on VKAs than in patients on DOACs (HR 0.64 (95% CI 0.46–0.91). In conclusion, we confirm the overall safety and effectiveness of anticoagulant treatment in very elderly AF patients, with lower mortality rates in DOACs patients, similar bleeding risk, and a higher risk for cerebral thrombotic events in DOACs patients.