National Estimates of Gender-Affirming Surgery in the US

Importance

While changes in federal and state laws mandating coverage of gender-affirming surgery (GAS) may have led to an increase in the number of annual cases, comprehensive data describing trends in both inpatient and outpatient procedures are limited.

Objective

To examine trends in inpatient and outpatient GAS procedures in the US and to explore the temporal trends in the types of GAS performed across age groups.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study includes data from 2016 to 2020 in the Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample and the National Inpatient Sample. Patients with diagnosis codes for gender identity disorder, transsexualism, or a personal history of sex reassignment were identified, and the performance of GAS, including breast and chest procedures, genital reconstructive procedures, and other facial and cosmetic surgical procedures, were identified.

Main Outcome Measures

Weighted estimates of the annual number of inpatient and outpatient procedures performed and the distribution of each class of procedure overall and by age were analyzed.

Results

A total of 48 019 patients who underwent GAS were identified, including 25 099 (52.3%) who were aged 19 to 30 years. The most common procedures were breast and chest procedures, which occurred in 27 187 patients (56.6%), followed by genital reconstruction (16 872 [35.1%]) and other facial and cosmetic procedures (6669 [13.9%]). The absolute number of GAS procedures rose from 4552 in 2016 to a peak of 13 011 in 2019 and then declined slightly to 12 818 in 2020. Overall, 25 099 patients (52.3%) were aged 19 to 30 years, 10 476 (21.8%) were aged 31 to 40, and 3678 (7.7%) were aged12 to 18 years. When stratified by the type of procedure performed, breast and chest procedures made up a greater percentage of the surgical interventions in younger patients, while genital surgical procedures were greater in older patients.

Conclusions and Relevance

Performance of GAS has increased substantially in the US. Breast and chest surgery was the most common group of procedures performed. The number of genital surgical procedures performed increased with increasing age.

Assessment of Gender-Specific COVID-19 Case Fatality Risk per Malignant Neoplasm Type

Importance

While the characteristics of COVID-19 infection and mortality among patients with a malignant neoplasm have previously been examined, little data are available for gender-specific COVID-19 mortality.

Objective

To examine the gender-specific COVID-19 case fatality risks among patients with a malignant neoplasm.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this cohort study using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample, patients admitted to the hospital from April to December 2020 with a diagnosis of COVID-19 infection were identified by the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision code U07.1. Data analysis was performed from November 2022 to January 2023.

Exposure

Diagnosis of malignant neoplasm, identified and classified according to the National Cancer Institute's definition.

Main Outcome and Measure

COVID-19 in-hospital case fatality rate, defined as the number of deaths that occurred during index hospital admissions.

Results

There were 1 622 755 patients who were admitted to the hospital from April 1 to December 31, 2020, with a diagnosis of COVID-19. The cohort-level COVID-19 in-hospital case fatality rate was 12.9% with a median time to death of 5 days (IQR, 2-11 days). Frequently reported morbidities among the patients with COVID-19 included pneumonia (74.3%), respiratory failure (52.9%), cardiac arrythmia or cardiac arrest (29.3%), acute kidney injury (28.0%), sepsis (24.6%), shock (8.6%), cerebrovascular accident (5.2%), and venous thromboembolism or pulmonary embolism (5.0%). In a multivariable analysis, gender (male vs female, 14.5% vs 11.2%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.28; 95% CI, 1.27-1.30) and malignant neoplasm (17.9% vs 12.7%; aOR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.27-1.32) were both associated with increased COVID-19 in-hospital case fatality risk at the cohort level. Among the group of female patients, there were 5 malignant neoplasms in which the COVID-19 in-hospital case fatality risk was greater than 2-fold higher. These included anal cancer (23.8%; aOR, 2.94; 95% CI, 1.84-4.69), Hodgkin lymphoma (19.5%; aOR, 2.79; 95% CI, 1.90-4.08), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (22.4%; aOR, 2.23; 95% CI, 2.02-2.47), lung cancer (24.3%; aOR, 2.21; 95% CI, 2.03-2.39), and ovarian cancer (19.4%; aOR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.79-2.59). Among the group of male patients, Kaposi sarcoma (33.3%; aOR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.18-3.66) and malignant neoplasm in the small intestine (28.6%; aOR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.18-3.53) had a greater than 2-fold increased COVID-19 in-hospital case mortality risk.

Conclusions and Relevance

The results of this cohort study confirmed the substantial case fatality rate among patients with COVID-19 in the early pandemic experience in 2020 in the US. While COVID-19 in-hospital case fatality risks were lower among women compared with men, the associations of a concurrent malignant neoplasm with the COVID-19 case fatality were overall more substantial for women than for men.

Trends, Characteristics, and Maternal Morbidity Associated With Unhoused Status in Pregnancy

Importance

Unhoused status is a substantial problem in the US. Pregnancy characteristics and maternal outcomes of individuals experiencing homelessness are currently under active investigation to optimize health outcomes for this population.

Objective

To assess the trends, characteristics, and maternal outcomes associated with unhoused status in pregnancy.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional study analyzed data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample. The study population included hospitalizations for vaginal and cesarean deliveries from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2020. Unhoused status of these patients was identified from use of International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification code Z59.0. Statistical analysis was conducted from December 2022 to June 2023.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary outcomes were (1) temporal trends; (2) patient and pregnancy characteristics associated with unhoused status, which were assessed with a multivariable logistic regression model; (3) delivery outcomes, including severe maternal morbidity (SMM) and mortality at delivery, which used the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definition for SMM indicators and were assessed with a propensity score-adjusted model; and (4) choice of long-acting reversible contraception method and surgical sterilization at delivery.

Results

A total of 18 076 440 hospital deliveries were included, of which 18 970 involved pregnant patients who were experiencing homelessness at the time of delivery, for a prevalence rate of 104.9 per 100 000 hospital deliveries. These patients had a median (IQR) age of 29 (25-33) years. The prevalence of unhoused patients increased by 72.1% over a 5-year period from 76.1 in 2016 to 131.0 in 2020 per 100 000 deliveries (P for trend < .001). This association remained independent in multivariable analysis. In addition, (1) substance use disorder (tobacco, illicit drugs, and alcohol use disorder), (2) mental health conditions (schizophrenia, bipolar, depressive, and anxiety disorders, including suicidal ideation and past suicide attempt), (3) infectious diseases (hepatitis, gonorrhea, syphilis, herpes, and COVID-19), (4) patient characteristics (Black and Native American race and ethnicity, younger and older age, low or unknown household income, obesity, pregestational hypertension, pregestational diabetes, and asthma), and (5) pregnancy characteristics (prior uterine scar, excess weight gain during pregnancy, and preeclampsia) were associated with unhoused status in pregnancy. Unhoused status was associated with extreme preterm delivery (<28-week gestation: 34.3 vs 10.8 per 1000 deliveries; adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.76 [95% CI, 2.55-2.99]); SMM at in-hospital delivery (any morbidity: 53.8 vs 17.7 per 1000 deliveries; AOR, 2.30 [95% CI, 2.15-2.45]); and in-hospital mortality (0.8 vs <0.1 per 1000 deliveries; AOR, 10.17 [95% CI, 6.10-16.94]), including case fatality risk after SMM (1.5% vs 0.3%; AOR, 4.46 [95% CI, 2.67-7.45]). Individual morbidity indicators associated with unhoused status included cardiac arrest (AOR, 12.43; 95% CI, 8.66-17.85), cardiac rhythm conversion (AOR, 6.62; 95% CI, 3.98-11.01), ventilation (AOR, 6.24; 95% CI, 5.03-7.74), and sepsis (AOR, 5.37; 95% CI, 4.53-6.36).

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this national cross-sectional study suggest that unhoused status in pregnancy gradually increased in the US during the 5-year study period and that pregnant patients with unhoused status were a high-risk pregnancy group.

Patterns of cervical cancer screening follow-up in the era of prolonged screening intervals

INTRODUCTION

Little is known as to how prolonged screening recommendations for cervical cancer have affected compliance.

OBJECTIVE

We examined compliance with repeat cervical cancer screening among U.S. women aged 30-64 who underwent index screening between 2013 and 2019.

STUDY DESIGN

The IBM Watson Health MarketScan Database was used to identify commercially-insured women 30-64 years old who underwent cervical cancer screening from 2013 to 2019. The cohort was limited to women with continuous insurance 12 months before and ≥ 2 months after index testing. Patients with prior hysterectomy, more frequent surveillance needs, or a history of abnormal cytology, histology, or HPV test were excluded. Index screening included cytology, co-testing, or primary HPV testing. Cumulative incidence curves described screening intervals. Compliance was considered if repeat screening occurred 2.5-4 years after index cytology and 4.5-6 years after index co-testing. Cause-specific hazard models examined factors associated with compliance.

RESULTS

Of 5,368,713 patients identified, co-testing was performed in 2,873,070 (53.5%), cytology in 2,422,480 (45.1%), and primary HPV testing in 73,163 (1.4%). The cumulative incidence of repeat screening among all women by seven years was 81.9%. Of those who underwent repeat screening, 85.7% with index cytology and 96.6% with index co-testing were rescreened early. Only, 12.2% with index cytology had appropriate rescreening and 2.1% had delayed rescreening. Among the index co-testing group, 3.2% had appropriate rescreening and 0.3% had delayed rescreening.

CONCLUSION

Appropriate cervical cancer follow-up screening is highly variable. The cumulative incidence rate of repeat screening was 81.9% and among women rescreened, the vast majority are tested earlier than recommended by current guidelines.

Cancer-directed surgery in patients with metastatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized evidence

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of primary-site surgery plus systemic therapy compared to systemic therapy alone on overall survival in common metastatic cancer types.

METHODS

Data sources included Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science (January 1, 1995-March 22, 2023). Randomized controlled trials were included that enrolled patients diagnosed with the 10 most common de novo metastatic cancer types in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and randomized patients to resection of the primary site and systemic therapy versus systemic treatment alone. Random-effects models were used to pool associations by cancer type.

RESULTS

Eight studies with 1774 patients evaluating the efficacy of surgery in breast, renal, stomach, and colorectal cancer were included. There was no statistically significant reduction in risk of all-cause mortality associated with surgical intervention for metastatic breast (HR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.63-1.40) or renal cancer (HR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.53-1.20), although results were heterogeneous (I²  = 73.7% and 80.6%, respectively). One study evaluating gastrectomy in metastatic stomach cancer found no benefit (HR = 1.09, 95% CI 0.78-1.52), while a small trial suggested that surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy might be beneficial for colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastasis (HR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.32-0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

Few randomized trials have evaluated cancer-directed surgery among patients with metastatic solid malignancies.

Racial disparities in diagnostic evaluation of uterine cancer among Medicaid beneficiaries

BACKGROUND

To inform reasons contributing to Black-White disparity in early diagnosis of uterine cancer, we compared the quality of diagnostic evaluation received by Black vs White patients with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) ultimately diagnosed with uterine cancer.

METHODS

Using 2008-2019 MarketScan Multi-State Medicaid Database, we identified Black (n = 858) and White (n = 1749) patients with uterine cancer presenting with AUB. Quality of diagnostic evaluation was measured by delayed diagnosis (>1 year after AUB reporting), not receiving guideline-recommended diagnostic procedures, delayed time to first diagnostic procedure (>2 months after AUB reporting), number of diagnostic procedures received, and number of evaluation and management visits for AUB. The association between race and quality indicators was examined by multivariable regressions adjusting for patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Black patients were more likely than White patients to experience delayed diagnosis (11.3% vs 8.3%, P = .01; adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.27 to 2.29) or to not receive guideline-recommended diagnostic procedures (10.1% vs 5.0%, P < .001; adjusted OR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.40 to 2.68). Even when they did receive recommended diagnostic procedures, Black patients were more likely than White patients to experience delay in time to the first diagnostic procedure (adjusted OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.97). In addition, Black patients underwent more evaluation and management visits for AUB before getting diagnosed compared with White patients (adjusted mean ratio = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.23).

CONCLUSIONS

Black and White patients with uterine cancer differed in the quality of diagnostic evaluation received. Improving equity in this area may help reduce Black-White disparity in stage at diagnosis.

A Transcriptome-Based Precision Oncology Platform for Patient-Therapy Alignment in a Diverse Set of Treatment-Resistant Malignancies

Predicting in vivo response to antineoplastics remains an elusive challenge. We performed a first-of-kind evaluation of two transcriptome-based precision cancer medicine methodologies to predict tumor sensitivity to a comprehensive repertoire of clinically relevant oncology drugs, whose mechanism of action we experimentally assessed in cognate cell lines. We enrolled patients with histologically distinct, poor-prognosis malignancies who had progressed on multiple therapies, and developed low-passage, patient-derived xenograft models that were used to validate 35 patient-specific drug predictions. Both OncoTarget, which identifies high-affinity inhibitors of individual master regulator (MR) proteins, and OncoTreat, which identifies drugs that invert the transcriptional activity of hyperconnected MR modules, produced highly significant 30-day disease control rates (68% and 91%, respectively). Moreover, of 18 OncoTreat-predicted drugs, 15 induced the predicted MR-module activity inversion in vivo. Predicted drugs significantly outperformed antineoplastic drugs selected as unpredicted controls, suggesting these methods may substantively complement existing precision cancer medicine approaches, as also illustrated by a case study.

SIGNIFICANCE

Complementary precision cancer medicine paradigms are needed to broaden the clinical benefit realized through genetic profiling and immunotherapy. In this first-in-class application, we introduce two transcriptome-based tumor-agnostic systems biology tools to predict drug response in vivo. OncoTarget and OncoTreat are scalable for the design of basket and umbrella clinical trials. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1275.

Uptake and Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Among US Patients With Less Common Epithelial Ovarian Carcinomas

Importance

Randomized clinical trials examining the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for advanced ovarian cancer predominantly included patients with high-grade serous carcinomas. The use and outcomes of NACT in less common epithelial carcinomas are understudied.

Objective

To investigate the uptake and survival outcomes in treatment with NACT for less common histologic subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A retrospective cohort study and systematic literature review with meta-analysis was conducted using the National Cancer Database from 2006 to 2017 and the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program from 2006 to 2019. Data analysis was performed from July 2022 to April 2023. The evaluation included patients with stage III to IV ovarian cancer with clear cell, mucinous, or low-grade serous histologic subtypes who received multimodal treatment with surgery and chemotherapy.

Exposures

Exposure assignment per the sequence of treatment: primary debulking surgery (PDS) followed by chemotherapy (PDS group) or NACT followed by interval surgery (NACT group).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Temporal trends and characteristics of NACT use were assessed using multivariable analysis, and overall survival (OS) was assessed with the inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity score.

Results

A total of 3880 patients were examined in the National Cancer Database including 1829 women (median age, 56 [IQR, 49-63] years) with clear cell, 1156 women (median age, 53 [IQR, 42-64] years) with low-grade serous, and 895 women (median age, 57 [IQR, 48-66] years) with mucinous carcinomas. NACT use increased in patients with clear cell (from 10.2% to 16.2%, 58.8% relative increase; P < .001 for trend) or low-grade serous (from 7.7% to 14.2%, 84.4% relative increase; P = .007 for trend) carcinoma during the study period. This association remained consistent in multivariable analysis. NACT use also increased, but nonsignificantly, in mucinous carcinomas (from 8.6% to 13.9%, 61.6% relative increase; P = .07 for trend). Across the 3 histologic subtypes, older age and stage IV disease were independently associated with NACT use. In a propensity score-weighted model, the NACT and PDS groups had comparable OS for clear cell (4-year rates, 31.4% vs 37.7%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.12; 95% CI, 0.95-1.33) and mucinous (27.0% vs 26.7%; HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.68-1.19) carcinomas. For patients with low-grade serous carcinoma, NACT was associated with decreased OS compared with PDS (4-year rates, 56.4% vs 81.0%; HR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.55-2.90). Increasing NACT use and histologic subtype-specific survival association were also found in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program cohort (n = 1447). A meta-analysis of 4 studies, including the current study, observed similar OS associations for clear cell (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.96-1.34; 2 studies), mucinous (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.71-1.21; 2 studies), and low-grade serous (HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.63-2.74; 3 studies) carcinomas.

Conclusions and Relevance

Despite the lack of data on outcomes of NACT among patients with less common carcinomas, this study noted that NACT use for advanced disease has gradually increased in the US. Primary chemotherapy for advanced-stage, low-grade serous ovarian cancer may be associated with worse survival compared with PDS.

Lymph node evaluation for endometrial hyperplasia: a nationwide analysis of minimally invasive hysterectomy in the ambulatory setting

BACKGROUND

Given the possibility of occult endometrial cancer where nodal status confers important prognostic and therapeutic data, role of lymph node evaluation at hysterectomy for endometrial hyperplasia is currently under active investigation. The objective of the current study was to examine the characteristics related to lymph node evaluation at the time of minimally invasive hysterectomy when performed for endometrial hyperplasia in an ambulatory surgery setting.

METHODS

The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample was retrospectively queried to examine 49,698 patients with endometrial hyperplasia who underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy from 1/2016 to 12/2019. A multivariable binary logistic regression model was fitted to assess the characteristics related to lymph node evaluation at hysterectomy and a classification tree model with recursive partitioning analysis was constructed to examine the utilization pattern of lymph node evaluation.

RESULTS

Lymph node evaluation was performed in 2847 (5.7%) patients. In a multivariable analysis, (i) patient factors with older age, obesity, high census-level household income, and large fringe metropolitan, (ii) surgical factors with total laparoscopic hysterectomy and recent year surgery, (iii) hospital parameters with large bed capacity, urban setting, and Western U.S. region, and (iv) histology factor with presence of atypia were independently associated with increased utilization of lymph node evaluation at hysterectomy (all, P < 0.05). Among those independent factors, presence of atypia exhibited the largest association for lymph node evaluation (adjusted odds ratio 3.75, 95% confidence interval 3.39-4.16). There were 20 unique patterns of lymph node evaluation based on histology, hysterectomy type, patient age, year of surgery, and hospital bed capacity, ranging from 0 to 20.3% (absolute rate difference, 20.3%).

CONCLUSION

Lymph node evaluation at the time of minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometrial hyperplasia in the ambulatory surgery setting appears to be evolving with large variability based on histology type, hysterectomy modality, patient factors, and hospital parameters, warranting a consideration of developing clinical practice guidelines.

Social determinants of health and CDK4/6 inhibitor use and outcomes among patients with metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Survival outcomes in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have improved due to novel agents such as CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i). Nevertheless, Black patients and patients with lower socioeconomic status (SES) continue to bear a disproportionate mortality burden.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of EHR-derived data from the Flatiron Health Database (FHD). A dataset was constructed to include Black/African-American (Black/AA) and White patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative MBC. Outcomes included CDK4/6i use (overall and first-line), and rates of leukopenia, dose reduction, and time on treatment for first-line CDK4/6i. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with use and outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 6802 patients with MBC were included, of which 5187 (76.3%) received CDK4/6i. Of those, 3186 (61.4%) received CDK4/6i first-line. Overall, 86.7% of patients were categorized as White and 13.3% as Black/AA; 22.4% were > 75 years old; 12.6% were treated at an academic site; 3.3% had Medicaid insurance. In addition to advanced age and poorer performance status, lower use of CDK4/6i was associated with Black/AA vs White race (72.9% vs 76.8%; OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70-0.99, p = 0.04) and Medicaid vs commercial insurance (69.6% vs 77.4%; OR: 0.68, 95% CI 0.49-0.95, p = 0.02). Odds of CDK4/6i use were twofold higher for patients treated at an academic center (p < 0.001). Rates of CDK4/6i-induced leukopenia and dose reductions did not differ significantly by race, insurance type, or treatment site. Time on CDK4/6i was significantly lower among Medicaid patients (395 days) than patients with commercial insurance (558 days) or Medicare (643 days) (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

This analysis of real-world data suggests that Black race and lower SES are associated with decreased CDK4/6i use. However, among patients treated with CDK4/6i, subsequent toxicity outcomes are similar. Efforts to ensure access to these life-prolonging medications are warranted.

Increasing trends of cervical conization with lymph node evaluation for fertility-sparing surgery in early cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

To examine uptake, characteristics, and survival outcome of less-radical fertility-sparing surgery with cervical conization and lymph node evaluation (Cone-LN) in reproductive age patients with early cervical cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study examined the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. The study population included 407 patients aged <50 years with stage IA-IB2 (≤4 cm) cervical cancer who received fertility-sparing surgery from 2004 to 2019. The exposure was fertility-sparing surgery type: Cone-LN (n = 196) or trachelectomy with lymph node evaluation (Trach-LN, n = 211). The main co-outcomes were (i) temporal trends of surgery type, assessed with Cochran-Armitage test, and (ii) clinical and tumor characteristics, assessed with multivariable binary logistic regression model. The secondary outcome was overall survival, assessed with inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity score.

RESULTS

The number of patients receiving Cone-LN increased from 43.5% in 2004-2007 to 58.4% in 2016-2019 (P-trend = 0.005). Patients receiving conization and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy alone increased from 0% to 14.4% (P-trend < 0.001). In a multivariable analysis, patients in the Cone-LN group were more likely to undergo SLN biopsy (aOR 6.04) compared to those in the Trach-LN group whereas those with adenocarcinoma (aOR 0.49) and T1b tumors (aOR for ≤2 cm 0.21, and aOR for 2.1-4.0 cm 0.10) were less likely to receive Cone-LN. In a propensity score-weighted model, the Cone-LN and Trach-LN groups had comparable overall survival (7-year rates, 98.9% vs 97.8%). Similar associations were observed for patients with squamous, adenocarcinoma / adenosquamous, T1a classification, and T1b(≤2 cm) classification.

CONCLUSION

The current population-based analysis suggests that the performance of cervical conization with lymph node evaluation, particularly with SLN biopsy, is gradually increasing for early cervical cancer patients desiring future fertility.

Opportunistic Salpingectomy at the Time of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Ovarian Cancer Prevention: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis to examine the utility and effectiveness of OS performed at the time of elective cholecystectomy [laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LAP-CHOL)].

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

OS has been adopted as a strategy to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer in women undergoing hysterectomy and tubal sterilization, although the procedure is rarely performed as a risk reducing strategy during other abdominopelvic procedures.

METHODS

A decision model was created to examine women 40, 50, and 60 years of age undergoing LAP-CHOL with or without OS. The lifetime risk of ovarian cancer was assumed to be 1.17%, 1.09%, and 0.92% for women age 40, 50, and 60 years, respectively. OS was estimated to provide a 65% reduction in the risk of ovarian cancer and to require 30 additional minutes of operative time. We estimated the cost, quality-adjusted life-years, ovarian cancer cases and deaths prevented with OS.

RESULTS

The additional cost of OS at LAP-CHOL ranged from $1898 to 1978. In a cohort of 5000 women, OS reduced the number of ovarian cancer cases by 39, 36, and 30 cases and deaths by 12, 14, and 16 in the age 40-, 50-, and 60-year-old cohorts, respectively. OS during LAP-CHOL was cost-effective, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $11,162 to 26,463 in the 3 age models. In a probabilistic sensitivity analysis, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for OS were less than $100,000 per quality-adjusted life-years in 90.5% or more of 1000 simulations.

CONCLUSIONS

OS at the time of LAP-CHOL may be a cost-effective strategy to prevent ovarian cancer among average risk women.

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOACs) prescribing practices of members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology

BACKGROUND

Cancer associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as alternatives to injectable medications for both thromboprophylaxis and treatment of VTE. Several recent clinical trials have demonstrated safety and efficacy of DOACs in high risk patients receiving systemic chemotherapy as well as postoperative prophylaxis after surgery for gynecologic cancer. Major consensus guidelines from multiple organizations support the use of DOACs for these indications but prescription practices are not well characterized.

METHODS

A survey study was sent concurrently to members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Research Survey Pool between May and June of 2021. The study was designed to assess DOAC prescription practices amongst members of these societies who routinely prescribe chemotherapy. Bivariate analyses comparing responses from ASCO participants and SGO participants were compared using chi-squared and Fisher exact tests.

RESULTS

A total of 103 physicians were included in the ASCO group and 139 in the SGO group. A majority of participants in both groups reported familiarity with prescribing DOACs (99% of ASCO and 96% of SGO respondents). ASCO respondents were more likely to consider DOACs as first line therapy for treatment of cancer-associated VTE than SGO members (82% vs 63%, p < 0.01) and SGO members were more likely to consider low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) the standard of care treatment (66% vs 25% p < 0.01). Most respondents in both groups (75%) felt DOACs were equally safe and effective compared to LMWH but more ASCO members felt DOACs were cost effective (70% vs 49%, p < 0.01). More SGO respondents reported having prescribed prophylactic anticoagulation during chemotherapy than ASCO members (53% vs 35%, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

ASCO respondents were more likely to prescribe DOACs for both treatment and prophylaxis of cancer-associated VTE than SGO members. However, SGO members were more likely to prescribe prophylactic anticoagulation to high risk patients initiating chemotherapy compared to ASCO members.

Systemic Progestins and Progestin-Releasing Intrauterine Device Therapy for Premenopausal Patients With Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia

OBJECTIVE

To estimate trends in use and outcomes of progestin therapy for premenopausal patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia.

METHODS

The MarketScan Database was used to identify patients aged 18-50 years with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia from 2008 to 2020. Primary treatment was classified as hysterectomy or progestin-based therapy. Within the progestin group, treatment was classified as systemic therapy or progestin-releasing intrauterine device (IUD). The trends in use of progestins and the pattern of progestin use were examined. A multivariable logistic regression model was fit to examine the association between baseline characteristics and the use of progestins. The cumulative incidence of hysterectomy, uterine cancer, and pregnancy since initiation of progestin therapy was analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 3,947 patients were identified. Hysterectomy was performed in 2,149 (54.4%); progestins were used in 1,798 (45.6%). Use of progestins increased from 44.2% in 2008 to 63.4% in 2020 (P=.002). Among the progestin users, 1,530 (85.1%) were treated with systemic progestin, and 268 (14.9%) were treated with progestin-releasing IUD. Among progestin users, use of IUD increased from 7.7% in 2008 to 35.6% in 2020 (P<.001). Hysterectomy was ultimately performed in 36.0% (95% CI 32.8-39.3%) of those who received systemic progestins compared with 22.9% (95% CI 16.5-30.0%) of those treated with progestin-releasing IUD (P<.001). Subsequent uterine cancer was documented in 10.5% (95% CI 7.6-13.8%) of those who received systemic progestins compared with 8.2% (95% CI 3.1-16.6%) of those treated with progestin-releasing IUD (P=.24). Venous thromboembolic complications occurred in 27 (1.5%) of those treated with progestins; the venous thromboembolism (VTE) rate was similar for oral progestins and progestin-releasing IUD.

CONCLUSION

The rate of conservative treatment with progestins in premenopausal individuals with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia has increased over time, and among progestin users, progestin-releasing IUD use is increasing. Progestin-releasing IUD use may be associated with a lower rate of hysterectomy and a similar rate of VTE compared with oral progestin therapy.

The potential role of GLP-1 receptor agonist targeting in fertility-sparing treatment in obese patients with endometrial malignant pathology: a call for research

INTRODUCTION

Most patients diagnosed with endometrial hyperplasia or cancer are obese. Obesity, along with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) and type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), may act synergistically to increase risk of malignant endometrial pathology. Incidence of malignant endometrial pathology is increasing, particularly in reproductive aged women. In patients who desire future fertility, the levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) is often utilized. If the first-line progestin therapy fails, there is not an effective second-line adjunct option. Moreover, pregnancy rates following fertility-sparing treatment are lower-than-expected in these patients.

AREAS COVERED

This clinical opinion provides a summary of recent studies exploring risk factors for the development of malignant endometrial pathology including obesity, PCOS, and T2DM. Studies assessing efficacy of fertility-sparing treatment of malignant endometrial pathology are reviewed and a potential new adjunct treatment approach to LNG-IUD is explored.

EXPERT OPINION

There is an unmet-need for a personalized treatment approach in cases of first-line progestin treatment failure. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists are a class of anti-diabetic agents, but may have a role in fertility-sparing treatment of obese patients with malignant endometrial pathology by reducing weight, decreasing inflammation, and decreasing insulin resistance; these changes may also improve chances of subsequent pregnancy. This hypothesis warrants further exploration.

Abstract PD6-06: PD6-06 Racial and ethnic disparities with influenza vaccine use in long-term survivors of metastatic breast cancer

Background: Due to therapeutic advancements, people diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are living longer. This is particularly true for elderly patients who are often diagnosed with more indolent disease. However, elderly patients have higher rates of comorbidity and are vulnerable to other adverse health outcomes, but the primary care management of patients with advanced cancer may be sub-optimal. Every year influenza results in hundreds of thousands of hospitalizations and tens of thousands of deaths. Guidelines recommend the influenza vaccine annually for those over the age of 65 as well as those with cancer based on studies showing a 40-60% reduction in hospitalizations and death. Patterns of use in patients with MBC is unknown. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)–Medicare linked data. Patients were included if they were diagnosed with stage IV MBC from 1/1/2008 – 12/31/2017, were ≥65 years of age, and had continuous Medicare enrollment for 12 months prior to diagnosis and at least three months after. Our primary outcome of interest was influenza vaccine use identified via CPT codes and defined as any use, use among patients surviving &gt; 3-years, use among patients surviving &gt;5-years, and repeated vaccine use. We then conducted bivariate analyses using demographic variables, including race, ethnicity, SES, age, and marital status, and clinical factors, including chemotherapy use, ER/PR positivity, and HER2 positivity. A multivariable logistic model was used to identify factors associated with influenza vaccine use in each cohort. Results: We identified 5182 patients with stage IV MBC during the study period that met our inclusion criteria. Overall, the median survival was 21 months and only 44% received at least one vaccination at any time after diagnosis. Within the cohort with the &gt; 3-year survival (n=1864), only 1222 (66%) received an influenza vaccination at least one time and only 54% received the vaccine at least two times during 3 years of follow-up. Among patients with at least five-years of survival (n=763), 73% received at least one vaccination and only 65% received the vaccine at least two times during 5 years of follow-up. In a bivariate analysis in the 3-year survival cohort, we found that black race (47% vs 67%, p&lt; 0.001) and Hispanic ethnicity (53% vs 66%, p=0.026), compared to white race and non-Hispanic ethnicity, respectively, were significantly associated with decreased vaccine use. The only factor associated with increased use was chemotherapy exposure. A multivariable model found lower odds of influenza vaccine receipt for black patients (OR=0.44, 95% CI 0.30-0.65, p&lt; 0.001) and Hispanic patients (OR=0.58, 95% CI 0.36-.94, p=0.026). Similar findings were found in the 5-year survival cohort. Ongoing landmark analyses will be presented evaluating the impact of vaccination on survival. Conclusions: Over 50% of survivors with MBC do not receive the influenza vaccine after diagnosis. Importantly black and Hispanic patients with MBC are about half as likely to receive the influenza vaccine as white patients. Given the known impact of influenza vaccination in the elderly, improving access to vaccination could be an important strategy to reduce disparities in health outcomes. Our findings demonstrate primary care access disparities amongst the MBC population and indicate a need for educational and policy-based interventions.

Citation Format: Sahil D. Doshi, David DeStephano, Melissa K. Accordino, Elena B. Elkin, Jason D. Wright, Dawn Hershman. PD6-06 Racial and ethnic disparities with influenza vaccine use in long-term survivors of metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD6-06.

Impact of a Hospital-Based Specialty Pharmacy in Partnership With a Care Coordination Organization on Time to Delivery and Receipt of Oral Anticancer Drugs

PURPOSE

Oral anticancer drug (OACD) prescriptions require extensive coordination between providers and payers, which can delay drug receipt. Specialty pharmacies facilitate communication between multiple entities. In 2018, our cancer center partnered with a freestanding organization to implement a hospital-based specialty pharmacy (HB-SP). We evaluated the time to drug receipt (TTR) before and after HB-SP implementation.

METHODS

Data were prospectively collected on all new OACD prescriptions for adult oncology patients from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019. In fall 2018, a HB-SP was initiated. We collected patient sociodemographic, clinical, and prescription data. TTR was the number of days from OACD prescription to drug receipt. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine factors associated with TTR ≤ 7 days before and after HB-SP implementation.

RESULTS

In total, 954 patients were included, representing 1,102 new OACDs. The majority of prescribed drugs were targeted OACDs (56%, n = 617), and 71% (n = 779) required prior authorization. Of all prescriptions, 84% (n = 960) were successfully received with an overall median TTR of 7 days. In unadjusted analysis, HB-SP implementation, drug class, race and ethnicity, and prior authorization requirement were significantly associated with TTR. Adjusted analyses found that patients were more likely to receive their drugs ≤ 7 days after HB-SP implementation (53% v 47%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.29; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.68; P = .05).

CONCLUSION

The implementation of a HB-SP in partnership with a collaborative care model contributed to a decrease in TTR for OACDs. This difference is in part attributable to improved care coordination and communication. A centralized approach may improve overall efficiency due to fewer practice disruptions.

Implementation of Systematic Financial Screening in an Outpatient Breast Oncology Setting

PURPOSE

Implementation of routine financial screening is a critical step toward mitigating financial toxicity. We evaluated the feasibility, sustainability, and acceptability of systematic financial screening in the outpatient breast oncology clinic at a large, urban cancer center.

METHODS

We developed and implemented a stakeholder-informed process to systematically screen for financial hardship and worry. A 2-item assessment in English or Spanish was administered to patients through the electronic medical record portal or using paper forms. We evaluated completion rates and mode of completion. Through feedback from patients, clinicians, and staff, we identified strategies to improve completion rates and acceptability.

RESULTS

From March, 2021, to February, 2022, 3,500 patients were seen in the breast oncology clinic. Of them, 39% (n = 1,349) responded to the screening items, either by paper or portal, 12% (n = 437) preferred not to answer, and the remaining 49% (n = 1,714) did not have data in their electronic health record, meaning they were not offered screening or did not complete the paper forms. Young adults (18-39 years) were more likely to respond compared with patients 70 years or older (61% v 30%, P < .01). English-preferring patients were more likely to complete the screening compared with those who preferred Spanish (46% v 28%, P < .01). Non-Hispanic White patients were more likely to respond compared with Non-Hispanic Black patients and with Hispanic patients (46% v 39% v 32%, P < .01). Strategies to improve completion rates included partnering with staff to facilitate paper form administration, optimizing patient engagement with the portal, and clearly communicating the purpose of the screening.

CONCLUSION

Systematic financial screening is feasible, and electronic data capture facilitates successful implementation. However, inclusive procedures that address language and technology preferences are needed to optimize screening.

Utilization of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the early ovarian cancer surgery

OBJECTIVE

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has been incorporated into surgical care for many malignancies; however, the utility has not been examined in ovarian cancer. This study examined population-level trends, characteristics, and outcomes related to SLN biopsy in early stage ovarian cancer.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study querying the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result Program from 2003-2018. The study population consisted of 11,512 women with stage I ovarian cancer who had adnexectomy-based surgical staging including lymph node evaluation. Exposure allocation was based on SLN biopsy use. Main outcomes measured were (i) trends and characteristics associated with SLN biopsy use, assessed by multivariable logistic regression model, and (ii) overall survival assessed with inverse provability of treatment weighting propensity score.

RESULTS

SLN biopsy was performed in less than 1% of study population. In a multivariable analysis, recent surgery (2011-2018 versus 2003-2010, odds ratio [OR] 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-2.59), smaller tumor size (< 10 versus ≥ 10 cm, OR 3.07, 95% CI 1.20-7.84), and East registry area (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.73-4.36) remained independent characteristics for SLN biopsy use. In a propensity score weighted model, 5-year overall survival rate was 90.5% for the SLN biopsy-incorporated group and 88.6% for the lymphadenectomy group (hazard ratio 0.96, 95% CI 0.53-1.73).

CONCLUSION

SLN biopsy was rarely performed for early ovarian cancer surgery during the study period with insufficient evidence to interpret the survival effect. SLN biopsy in early ovarian cancer appears to be in early development phase, warranting further study and careful evaluation to assess feasibility and oncologic outcome.

Prevalence of anxiety and depressive disorders in pregnant women with malignancy

OBJECTIVE

To examine national-level prevalence of anxiety and depressive disorders among pregnant women with malignancy.

METHODS

This is a pre-planned secondary analysis of a previous retrospective cohort study using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample. Study population was 14 648 135 deliveries including 10 145 patients with malignancy from 2016 to 2019. A multivariable binary logistic regression model was fitted to assess the association of malignancy and anxiety or depressive disorder.

RESULTS

Pregnant women with malignancy were 49% more likely to have the diagnosis of either anxiety or depressive disorder compared with those without malignancy (prevalence rate 114 vs. 61 per 1000 cases, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.40-1.58). The increase in the risk associated with malignancy on either anxiety or depressive disorder was more than two-fold among patients with brain and other nervous system tumors (aOR 2.69, 95% CI 2.01-3.60), bone and joint tumors (aOR 2.32, 95% CI 1.33-4.04), and leukemia (aOR 2.12, 95% CI 1.81-2.48).

CONCLUSIONS

This national-level analysis suggests that pregnant women with malignancy experience increased rates of psychological distress more often than pregnant women without malignancy.