Interleukin-1Beta and risk of premature death and MACE in patients with myocardial infarction

Background

Inhibition of the interleukin-1β (IL-1β) innate immunity pathway is associated with anti-inflammatory effects and a reduced risk of recurrent cardiovascular events in stable patients with previous myocardial infarction (MI) and elevated high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP). However, the prognosis value of IL-1β level in acute myocardial infarction patients has never been evaluated. We aim to assess the association between IL-1β level with all-cause mortality in patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention and the interplay between IL-1β and hs-CRP concentrations on the risk of premature death.

Methods

IL-1β concentration was measured among 1398 STEMI patients enrolled in a prospective cohort study. Crude and hazard ratios for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality were analyzed at 90-days and one-year using a multivariate-cox proportional regression analysis. Major cardiovascular events (MACE) were also analyzed.

Results

In a STEMI population, IL-1β concentration measured at admission was independently associated with all-cause mortality at 90 days (adjusted hazard ratio [adjHR], 1.43 per 1SD increase; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.83; p<0.005). The relation was nonlinear, and we identified a threshold of IL-1β >10 pg/mL that was markedly associated with higher mortality rates at 90 days (adjHR: 2.80; 95% CI: 1.63–4.80, p=0.0002) and one-year (adjHR: 1.75; 95% CI: 1.09–2.78, p=0.019), regardless of the hs-CRP concentration. The relationship was even stronger when considering cardiovascular mortality and MACE at 90 days (adjHR: 2.31; 95% CI: 1.30–4.10, p=0.004 and 2.17; 95% CI: 1.24–3.80, p=0.006) and at one year (adjHR: 2.26; 95% CI: 1.31–3.87, p=0.03 and 2.25; 95% CI: 1.33–3.79, p=0.004).

Conclusion

IL-1β measured at admission in acute MI patients is associated with the risk of mortality and recurrent major cardiovascular events, regardless of the CRP level. A threshold of 10 pg/mL identifies patients at higher risk of events.

Survival

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Impact of left atrial appendage closure on left atrial hemodynamics: a prospective single center study

Background

Percutaneous left atrial (LA) appendage closure is increasingly used to prevent strokes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). While LA appendage plays a key role in LA physiology, data regarding the impact of LA appendage occlusion on LA hemodynamics are lacking. The alteration of LA compliance by LA appendage occlusion may represent a clinical issue in AF patients which are at high risk of heart failure.

Purpose

To describe the impact of LA appendage occlusion on LA hemodynamics.

Material and methods

From july 2015 to january 2020, all patients undergoing LA occlusion procedure at Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (Paris, France) in whom LA pressure curves were recorded, before and immediately after device implantation, were included. The LA mean pressure was measured at baseline and after LA appendage occlusion during the same procedure. Abnormal LA mean pressure was defined as >15mmHg. We also recorded cardiovascular death and hospitalization for congestive heart failure at longest follow-up.

Results

We enrolled 85 patients (78±8 years, 46 men), the CHA2DS2-VASc score was 5±1 and the HAS-BLED score was 4±1. The mean LA volume index was 51±15mL/m2, the left ventricular ejection fraction was 60±7%. The LA mean pressure increased significatively after LA appendage closure from 12.6±3.9mmHg to 15.5±5.2mmHg (p<0.0001, Figure). The prevalence of abnormal LA pressure was 20% (17/85) at baseline and 45% (38/85) after LA appendage closure (p=0.005). Post procedural LA pressure elevation was not related to procedure duration nor to fluid expansion volume.

During a median follow-up of 364 [124–726] days, 3 (3.5%) patients died from a cardiovascular cause. Hospitalization for heart failure occurred in 6 (16%) of the 38 patients with abnormal postprocedural LA pressure, whereas no congestive episode was observed in the rest of the study population (p=0.006).

Conclusion

Catheter-based LA appendage occlusion induces an acute alteration of LA hemodynamics. Post procedural abnormal LA pressure may be linked to heart failure episodes in some patients. Further studies are warranted to investigate heart failure as a potential late complication of LA appendage closure.

Variations of mean LA pressure

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Early aspirin discontinuation following acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

The respective ischemic and bleeding risks of early aspirin discontinuation following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains uncertain.

Objectives

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of early aspirin discontinuation in ACS or PCI patients treated with P2Y12 inhibitors with or without anticoagulants.

Methods

We performed a review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing a P2Y12 inhibitor-based single antiplatelet strategy following early aspirin discontinuation to a strategy of sustained dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in ACS or PCI patients requiring or not anticoagulation for another indication. The primary safety endpoint was major bleeding while non-major bleeding and all bleeding were secondary safety endpoints. The primary efficacy endpoint was all-cause mortality while secondary efficacy endpoints included major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), myocardial infarction (MI), definite stent thrombosis (ST) or any stroke. We estimated risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random effect models. The study is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019139576).

Results

We included 9 RCTs comprising 40,621 patients.Compared to prolonged DAPT, major bleeding (2.2% vs. 2.8%; RR 0.68; 95% CI: 0.54 to 0.87; p=0.002; I2: 63%), non-major bleeding (5.0% vs. 6.1%; RR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.94; p=0.02; I2:87%) and all bleeding (7.4% vs. 9.9%; RR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.53 to 0.79; p<0.0001; I2: 88%) were significantly reduced with early aspirin discontinuation (Figure 1), without significant difference for all-cause death (p=0.60), MACCE (p=0.60), MI (p=0.77), definite ST (p=0.63), and any stroke (p=0.59). Results were consistent in patients with or without anticoagulation, without significant interaction for any outcomes but MI (p=0.04).

Conclusions

In patients on DAPT after an ACS or a PCI, early aspirin discontinuation prevents bleeding events with no effect on the ischemic risk or mortality.

Figure 1. Central illustration

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Incidence and delay of atrial tachycardia after patent foramen ovale closure

Background

In the large randomized trials evaluating patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure vs. medical treatment in secondary prevention of stroke, the incidence of atrial fibrillation has been reported more frequently with PFO closure (2.9–6.6%) than with medical treatment (0.4–1.9%). These episodes were clinically reported and may not reflect the real incidence detected by prolonged ECG recording.

Purpose

To evaluate the incidence and timing of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) after percutaneous PFO closure.

Methods

Prolonged cardiac monitoring was proposed to patients undergoing PFO closure at the tertiary center of Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Paris. According to the estimated risk of SVT, two different approaches were used to monitor cardiac rhythm. A 3-year permanent recording using REVEAL™ XT or LINQ was proposed to high risk patients (age >45 years, multiple CV risk factors, prior palpitations or supraventricular ectopic activity during Holter monitoring prior to the intervention). A 4-week, 15-lead ECG continuous recording using the patch-free, wire-free, wearable Cardioskin™ system was proposed to lower risk patients. Endpoints of interest were the occurrence of SVT episodes (>30 seconds) and unplanned medical consultation or hospitalization for this reason

Results

From October 2018 to January 2020, a total of 64 patients underwent prolonged ECG monitoring including 32 (50.0%) and 32 (50.0%) patients with Cardioskin™ and REVEAL™ systems, respectively. A SVT was recorded in 11 (17.4%) patients, including atrial fibrillation (AF) in 6 (9.5%) patients. The median delay of SVT occurrence was 33.0 (14.0–39) days after the procedure (Figure 1) and 18 (10.8–34.8) days for the 6 patients with AF. Unplanned hospitalization or emergency medical visit for symptomatic SVT occurred in 5 (45.5%) patients. Antiarrhythmic medication and oral anticoagulation were initiated in 10 (90.1%) and 7 (63.6%) of the 11 patients, respectively, and SVT recurrences were recorded in 5 (45.5%) patients. No stroke was reported in any of the 11 patients during follow-up. There were no significant differences with respect to baseline and procedural characteristics among patients with or without SVT during follow-up.

Conclusion

Atrial tachycardia is frequent (17.4%) after PFO closure and long-term continuous ECG recording suggests that the incidence is higher than the clinical episodes reported in the randomized trials. This arrhythmic complication of PFO closure seems limited to the first 4 months following the procedure. Larger studies need now to confirm our findings.

Figure 1

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): ACTION coeur

2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for management of dyslipidaemia: strengths and limitations

In 2019, the European Society of Cardiology and European Atherosclerosis Society released a new guideline document with substantial changes regarding the assessment of cardiovascular risk and treatments. The update of high-risk criteria and categories led to a better detection and primary prevention of patients at risk of a first cardiovascular event. Nonetheless, additional efforts are needed for a better inclusion of risk modifiers, especially specific to women, to improve risk stratification and direct primary prevention. Eventually, we discuss how these new guidelines implement PCSK9 inhibitors for very high-risk individuals and the evidence supporting new low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals below, such as 55 and 40 mg/dL.

Radial versus femoral artery access for percutaneous coronary artery intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction and multivessel disease complicated by cardiogenic shock: Subanalysis from the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial

BACKGROUND

The use and impact of transradial artery access (TRA) compared to transfemoral artery access (TFA) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (MI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) remain unclear.

METHODS

This is a post hoc analysis of the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial where patients presenting with MI and multivessel disease complicated by CS were randomized to a strategy of culprit-lesion-only or immediate multivessel PCI. Arterial access was left at operator's discretion. Adjudicated outcomes of interest were the composite of death or renal replacement therapy (RRT) at 30 days and 1 year. Multivariate logistic models were used to assess the association between the arterial access and outcomes.

RESULTS

Among the 673 analyzed patients, TRA and TFA were successfully performed in 118 (17.5%) and 555 (82.5%) patients, respectively. Compared to TFA, TRA was associated with a lower 30-day rate of death or RRT (37.3% vs 53.2%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34-0.96), a lower 30-day rate of death (34.7% vs 49.7%; aOR: 0.56; 95% CI 0.33-0.96), and a lower 30-day rate of RRT (5.9% vs 15.9%; aOR: 0.40; 95% CI 0.16-0.97). No significant differences were observed regarding the 30-day risks of type 3 or 5 Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding and stroke. The observed reduction of death or RRT and death with TRA was no longer significant at 1 year (44.9% vs 57.8%; aOR: 0.85; 95% CI 0.50-1.45 and 42.4% vs 55.5%, aOR: 0.78; 95% CI 0.46-1.32, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing PCI for acute MI complicated by CS, TRA may be associated with improved early outcomes, although the reason for this finding needs further research.

Blunting periprocedural myocardial necrosis: Rationale and design of the randomized ALPHEUS study

BACKGROUND

Clopidogrel associated with aspirin is the recommended treatment for patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although severe PCI-related events are rare, evidence suggests that PCI-related myocardial infarction and myocardial injury are frequent complications that can impact the clinical prognosis of the patients. Antiplatelet therapy with a potent P2Y12 receptor inhibitor such as ticagrelor may reduce periprocedural ischemic complications while maintaining a similar safety profile as compared with conventional dual antiplatelet therapy by aspirin and clopidogrel in this setting.

METHODS

Assessment of Loading with the P2Y12 inhibitor ticagrelor or clopidogrel to Halt ischemic Events in patients Undergoing elective coronary Stenting (ALPHEUS) (NCT02617290) is an international, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, open-label study in patients with stable coronary artery disease who are planned for an elective PCI. In total, 1,900 patients will be randomized before a planned PCI to a loading dose of ticagrelor 180 mg or a loading dose of clopidogrel (300 or 600 mg) in addition to aspirin. Patients will then receive a dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily or clopidogrel 75 mg once daily for 30 days. The primary ischemic end point is PCI-related myocardial infarction (myocardial infarction type 4a or 4b) or major myocardial injury within 48 hours (or at hospital discharge if earlier) after elective PCI/stent. Safety will be evaluated by major bleeding events (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5) at 48 hours (or discharge if it occurs earlier).

CONCLUSION

ALPHEUS is the first properly sized trial comparing ticagrelor to clopidogrel in the setting of elective PCI and is especially designed to show a reduction in periprocedural events, a surrogate end point for mortality.

Reduced Rivaroxaban Dose Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Background:

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) exposes to the risk of device thrombosis in patients with atrial fibrillation who frequently have a contraindication to full anticoagulation. Thereby, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is usually preferred. No randomized study has evaluated nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant after LAAC, and we decided to evaluate the efficacy and safety of reduced doses of rivaroxaban after LAAC.

Methods:

ADRIFT (Assessment of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Versus Rivaroxaban in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Treated With Left Atrial Appendage Closure) is a multicenter, phase IIb study, which randomized 105 patients after successful LAAC to either rivaroxaban 10 mg (R 10 , n=37), rivaroxaban 15 mg (R 15 , n=35), or DAPT with aspirin 75 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg (n=33). The primary end point was thrombin generation (prothrombin fragments 1+2) measured 2 to 4 hours after drug intake, 10 days after treatment initiation. Thrombin-antithrombin complex, D-dimers, rivaroxaban concentrations were also measured at 10 days and 3 months. Clinical end points were evaluated at 3-month follow-up.

Results:

The primary end point was reduced with R 10 (179 pmol/L [interquartile range (IQR), 129–273], P <0.0001) and R 15 (163 pmol/L [IQR, 112–231], P <0.0001) as compared with DAPT (322 pmol/L [IQR, 218–528]). We observed no significant reduction of the primary end point between R 10 and R 15 while rivaroxaban concentrations increased significantly from 184 ng/mL (IQR, 127–290) with R 10 to 274 ng/mL (IQR, 192–377) with R 15 , P <0.0001. Thrombin-antithrombin complex and D-dimers were numerically lower with both rivaroxaban doses than with DAPT. These findings were all confirmed at 3 months. The clinical end points were not different between groups. A device thrombosis was noted in 2 patients assigned to DAPT.

Conclusions:

Thrombin generation measured after LAAC was lower in patients treated by reduced rivaroxaban doses than DAPT, supporting an alternative to the antithrombotic regimens currently used after LAAC and deserves further evaluation in larger studies.

Registration:

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT03273322.

Acute Multivessel Coronary Occlusion Revealing COVID-19 in a Young Adult

A 42-year-old man was admitted for an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction revealing an acute thrombosis of the left anterior descending and right coronary arteries. Following this acute multivessel coronary occlusion in a young individual at low cardiovascular risk, he tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 infection. (Level of Difficulty: Beginner.)

Indirect comparison of the efficacy and safety of alirocumab and evolocumab: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

AIMS

Although alirocumab and evolocumab have both been associated with improved outcomes in patients with dyslipidaemia or established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, data on their respective performances are scarce. This study aimed at providing an indirect comparison of the efficacy and safety of alirocumab vs. evolocumab.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing alirocumab or evolocumab to placebo with consistent background lipid-lowering therapy up to November 2018. We estimated the relative risk (RR) and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using fixed-effect model in a frequentist pairwise and network meta-analytic approach. A total of 30 trials, enrolling 59 026 patients were included. Eligibility criteria varied significantly across trials evaluating alirocumab and evolocumab. Compared with evolocumab, alirocumab was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause death (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66-0.97) but not in cardiovascular death (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.65-1.05). This study did not find any significant differences in myocardial infarction (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.99-1.34), stroke (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.71-1.28), or coronary revascularization (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.99-1.29) between the two agents. Alirocumab was associated with a 27% increased risk of injection site reaction compared to evolocumab; however, no significant differences were found in terms of treatment discontinuations, systemic allergic reaction, neurocognitive events, ophthalmologic events, or new-onset of or worsening of pre-existing diabetes.

CONCLUSION

Alirocumab and evolocumab share a similar safety profile except for injection site reaction. No significant differences were observed across the efficacy endpoints, except for all-cause death, which may be related to the heterogeneity of the studied populations treated with the two drugs.

Early Aspirin Discontinuation Following Acute Coronary Syndrome or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

The respective ischemic and bleeding risks of early aspirin discontinuation following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain uncertain. We performed a prospero-registered review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing a P2Y₁₂ inhibitor-based single antiplatelet strategy following early aspirin discontinuation to a strategy of sustained dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in ACS or PCI patients requiring, or not, anticoagulation for another indication (CRD42019139576). We estimated risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random effect models. We included nine RCTs comprising 40,621 patients. Compared to prolonged DAPT, major bleeding (2.2% vs. 2.8%; RR 0.68; 95% CI: 0.54 to 0.87; p = 0.002; I²: 63%), non-major bleeding (5.0 % vs. 6.1 %; RR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.94; p = 0.02; I²: 87%) and all bleeding (7.4% vs. 9.9%; RR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.53 to 0.79; p < 0.0001; I²: 88%) were significantly reduced with early aspirin discontinuation without significant difference for all-cause death (p = 0.60), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACE) (p = 0.60), myocardial infarction (MI) (p = 0.77), definite stent thrombosis (ST) (p = 0.63), and any stroke (p = 0.59). In patients on DAPT after an ACS or a PCI, early aspirin discontinuation prevents bleeding events with no significant adverse effect on the ischemic risk or mortality.

Efficacy and Safety of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors on Top of Ticagrelor in STEMI: A Subanalysis of the ATLANTIC Trial

Background Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIs) in combination with clopidogrel improve clinical outcome in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI); however, finding a balance that minimizes both thrombotic and bleeding risk remains fundamental. The efficacy and safety of GPI in addition to ticagrelor, a more potent P2Y12-inhibitor, have not been fully investigated.

Methods 1,630 STEMI patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were analyzed in this subanalysis of the ATLANTIC trial. Patients were divided in three groups: no GPI, GPI administration routinely before primary PCI, and GPI administration in bailout situations. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, urgent target revascularization, and definite stent thrombosis at 30 days. The safety outcome was non-coronary artery bypass graft (CABG)-related PLATO major bleeding at 30 days.

Results Compared with no GPI (n = 930), routine GPI (n = 525) or bailout GPI (n = 175) was not associated with an improved primary efficacy outcome (4.2% no GPI vs. 4.0% routine GPI vs. 6.9% bailout GPI; p = 0.58). After multivariate analysis, the use of GPI in bailout situations was associated with a higher incidence of non-CABG-related bleeding compared with no GPI (odds ratio [OR] 2.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32–6.64; p = 0.03). However, routine GPI use compared with no GPI was not associated with a significant increase in bleeding (OR 1.78, 95% CI 0.88–3.61; p = 0.92).

Conclusion Use of GPIs in addition to ticagrelor in STEMI patients was not associated with an improvement in 30-day ischemic outcome. A significant increase in 30-day non-CABG-related PLATO major bleeding was seen in patients who received GPIs in a bailout situation.

Reasons for the Failure of Platelet Function Testing to Adjust Antiplatelet Therapy: Pharmacodynamic Insights From the ARCTIC Study

BACKGROUND

In the ARCTIC trial (Assessment by a Double Randomization of a Conventional Antiplatelet Strategy Versus a Monitoring-Guided Strategy for Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation and of Treatment Interruption Versus Continuation One Year After Stenting), treatment adjustment following platelet function testing failed to improve clinical outcomes. However, high-on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) is considered as a predictor of poor ischemic outcome. This prespecified substudy evaluated clinical outcomes according to the residual platelet reactivity status after antiplatelet therapy adjustment.

METHODS

We analyzed the 1213 patients assigned to the monitoring arm of the ARCTIC trial in whom platelet reactivity was evaluated by the VerifyNow P2Y₁₂ test before percutaneous coronary intervention and during the maintenance phase (at 14 days). HPR was defined as platelet reaction unit≥235U. The primary ischemic end point, a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, or urgent revascularization and the safety end point of major bleeding were assessed according to the platelet reactivity status.

RESULTS

Before percutaneous coronary intervention, 35.7% of patients displayed HPR (n=419). During the acute phase, between percutaneous coronary intervention and the 14-day platelet function testing, ischemic (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.74-1.18]; P=0.58) and safety outcomes (hazard ratio, 1.28 [95% CI, 0.22-7.59]; P=0.78) were similar in HPR and non-HPR patients. During the maintenance phase, the proportion of HPR patients (n=186, 17.4%) decreased by 56%. At 1-year, there was no difference for the ischemic end point (5.9% versus 6.0%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.40-1.58]; P=0.51) and a nonsignificant higher rate of major bleedings (2.7% versus 1.0%, hazard ratio, 2.83 [95% CI, 0.96-8.41]; P=0.06) in HPR versus non-HPR patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of HPR was halved after platelet function testing and treatment adjustment but without significant ischemic benefit at 1 year. HPR seems more as a modifiable risk marker than a risk factor of ischemic outcome.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00827411.

On- Versus Off-Hours Presentation and Mortality of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Treated With Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to assess the association between admission time with patient's care, procedure characteristics, and clinical outcomes within a contemporary ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) network of patients referred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

BACKGROUND

The effect of admission time on STEMI patient's outcomes remains controversial when primary PCI is the preferred reperfusion strategy.

METHODS

Characteristics and clinical outcomes of 2,167 consecutive STEMI patients admitted in a tertiary PCI-capable center were collected. On-hours were defined as admission from Monday through Friday between 8 am and 6 pm and off-hours as admission during night shift, weekend, and nonworking holidays. In-hospital and 1-year all-cause mortality were assessed as well as key time delays.

RESULTS

A total of 1,048 patients (48.3%) were admitted during on-hours, and 1,119 patients (51.7%) during off-hours. Characteristics were well-balanced between the 2 groups, including rates of cardiac arrest (7.9% vs. 8.8%; p = 0.55) and cardiogenic shock (12.3% vs. 14.7%; p = 0.16). Median symptom-to-first medical contact time and median first medical contact-to-sheath insertion time did not differ according to on- versus off-hours admission (120 min vs. 126 min; p = 0.25 and 90 min vs. 93 min; p = 0.58, respectively), as well as the rate of radial access for catheterization (85.6% vs. 87.5%; p = 0.27). There was no association between on- versus off-hours groups and in-hospital (8.1% vs. 7.0%; p = 0.49) or 1-year mortality (11.0% vs. 11.1%; p = 0.89), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In a contemporary organized STEMI network, patients admitted in a high-volume tertiary primary PCI center during on-hours or off-hours had similar management and 1-year outcomes.

P5534Causes and predictors of short, intermediate and long-term mortality in patients after PCI

Background

Causes of death after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) along multiple time-periods are poorly described.

Objective

To describe causes and predictors of short-term, intermediate-term, and long-term mortality after PCI.

Methods

Consecutive men and women admitted for PCI from 2008 to 2011 were prospectively included and followed-up in this cohort study. A dedicated follow-up by independent reviewers was performed to collect the outcomes and adjudicate the causes of death. A log-rank analysis was used to compare the occurrence of cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular death at 30 days, one year and up to 8 years. Last detailed cardiovascular and vital status were collected in January 2019.

Results

A total of 3524 patients including 2720 men (77.2%) and 804 women (22.8%) were followed-up for a median time of 7.0 years (IQ1: 5.4; IQ 3: 7.2). The rate of complete follow-up was 97.6%. All-cause death occurred for 30.3% (n=1070) of patients in the cohort, in a median time of 2.5 years after PCI, with a rate of 5.3 deaths per 100 patient-years. Overall, mortality was mostly related to cardiovascular causes than non-cardiovascular causes (17.7% versus 12.6%, log-rank <0.001) (Figure). This trend was strong within 30 days (4.7% vs. 0.3%, p<0.0001) and the first year after PCI (3.1% vs. 2.2 p=0.01), but became non-significant beyond one year (9.9% vs. 10.2%, P=0.67). Of note, cancer was the major cause of non-cardiovascular death (5.6%; 1 per 100 patient-years). Diabetes (adHR = 1.48 95% [1.29–1.71], p<0.001), active smoking (adHR = 1.37, 95% [1.16–1.62]) and chronic kidney disease (adHR = 1.97, 95% [2.55–3.45], p<0.001) were the strongest risk factors for all-cause death.

Survival after PCI

Conclusions

In this long-term cohort study, cardiovascular death was more frequent than non-cardiovascular death in patients treated with PCI in the short and intermediate-term but not beyond one year. Cancer accounted for one fifth of the overall mortality.