Barriers and enablers for safe medication administration in adult and neonatal intensive care units mapped to the behaviour change wheel

BACKGROUND

Intensive care settings have high rates of medication administration errors. Medications are often administered by nurses and midwives using a specified process (the '5 rights'). Understanding where medication errors occur, the contributing factors and how best practice is delivered may assist in developing interventions to improve medication safety.

AIMS

To identify medication administration errors and context specific barriers and enablers for best practice in an adult and a neonatal intensive care unit. Secondary aims were to identify intervention functions (through the Behaviour Change Wheel).

STUDY DESIGN

A dual methods exploratory descriptive study was conducted (May to June 2021) in a mixed 56-bedded adult intensive care unit and a 6-bedded neonatal intensive care unit in Sydney, Australia. Incident monitoring data were examined. Direct semi-covert observational medication administration audits using the 5 rights (n = 39) were conducted. Brief interviews with patients, parents and nurses were conducted. Data were mapped to the Behaviour Change Wheel.

RESULTS

No medication administration incidents were recorded. Audits (n = 3) for the neonatal intensive care unit revealed no areas for improvement. Adult intensive care unit nurses (n = 36) performed checks for the right medication 35 times (97%) and patient identity 25 times (69%). Sixteen administrations (44%) were interrupted. Four themes were synthesized from the interview data: Trust in the nursing profession; Availability of policies and procedures; Adherence to the '5 rights' and departmental culture; and Adequate staffing. The interventional functions most likely to bring about behaviour change were environmental restructuring, enablement, restrictions, education, persuasion and modelling.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reveals insights about the medication administration practices of nurses in intensive care. Although there were areas for improvement there was widespread awareness among nurses regarding their responsibilities to safely administer medications. Interview data indicated high levels of trust among patients and parents in the nurses.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

This novel study indicated that nurses in intensive care are aware of their responsibilities to safely administer medications. Mapping of contextual data to the Behaviour Change Wheel resulted in the identification of Intervention functions most likely to change medication administration practices in the adult intensive care setting that is environmental restructuring, enablement, restrictions, education, persuasion and modelling.

Accuracy of drawing up liquid medications by veterinary anaesthetists and nurses

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy with which veterinary anaesthetists and nurses of different experience draw up small volumes of liquid.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective blinded randomized study.

METHODS

A group of seven European College of Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia (ECVAA) diplomates, six ECVAA residents and six anaesthesia nurses participated in the study. For each participant, five target volumes between 0.01 and 1.0 mL were randomly allocated. They were drawn up 20 times in random order using a 1 mL syringe attached to a 23 gauge needle. A total of 1900 measurements were analysed. An investigator filled the syringe and needle dead space with water for injection before each experiment. The change in mass of the syringe once filled to the target volume was used to calculate the actual volume of liquid drawn up.

RESULTS

Large errors were made with measurements < 0.04 mL, so they were excluded from the statistical analysis. There was a significant effect of the target volume (p < 0.001) and of the order (p < 0.01). For each mL increase in the target volume, the absolute error decreased by 4% and from the first to the hundredth withdrawal each participant's absolute error decreased by 1%. The target volume was underestimated in 52.3% of measurements, 42% were overestimated and 5.7% were on target. None of the between-subject predictor variables approached significance.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Accuracy of veterinary anaesthetists and nurses in drawing up medications decreases as the target volume becomes smaller. Small veterinary patients receive small volumes of anaesthetic drugs with higher risks of overdosing compared with larger dogs. Years of experience and staff grade are not associated with greater accuracy. Large percentage errors may be seen with target volumes less than 0.04 mL. Dilutions are recommended for volumes > 0.19 mL in 1 mL syringe.

EPERCAS study (Strategies for Preventing Medication Administration Errors in Nursing Homes). Preparation of a list of strategies to prevent the most frequent medication administration errors in the residential care environment

Medication administration errors are one of the most frequent types of errors. There are different safety guides and recommendations to prevent medication errors generally directed to the hospital environment. However, specific recommendations for the management process in the residential care environment are lacking. The main objective of this study was to develop a list of recommendations to aid in preventing the most important medication errors that occur during the administration process in nursing homes (NHs), such as not administering doses or administering medication to the wrong patient. The effectiveness and feasibility of the strategies proposed were evaluated by a panel of experts. The conventional Delphi method was applied. The first round in our study was a face-to-face questionnaire; the second round included an online questionnaire based on the results of the first round. Finally, eight strategies were included in the EPERCAS List: one professional in charge per shift; one professional commissioned by the residential unit; avoid interruptions; avoid medication outside of meal times; personalized medication drawer for each resident including oral medication from a bag and laxatives, inhalers, syrups, eye drops, etc.; identification of the resident and their medication; visual check that everything has been administered; and signature to verify medication administration. The great continual challenge for NH is to define safe and affordable procedures. Minimum safety recommendations for administering the medications, such as those included in this study, should be employed. Our next stage is to implement these strategies in one of our NH and subsequently, evaluate its effectiveness and consider expanding it to the rest of the NH.

Automated search methods for identifying wrong patient order entry-a scoping review

Objective

To investigate: (1) what automated search methods are used to identify wrong-patient order entry (WPOE), (2) what data are being captured and how they are being used, (3) the causes of WPOE, and (4) how providers identify their own errors.

Materials and Methods

A systematic scoping review of the empirical literature was performed using the databases CINAHL, Embase, and MEDLINE, covering the period from database inception until 2021. Search terms were related to the use of automated searches for WPOE when using an electronic prescribing system. Data were extracted and thematic analysis was performed to identify patterns or themes within the data.

Results

Fifteen papers were included in the review. Several automated search methods were identified, with the retract-and-reorder (RAR) method and the Void Alert Tool (VAT) the most prevalent. Included studies used automated search methods to identify background error rates in isolation, or in the context of an intervention. Risk factors for WPOE were identified, with technological factors and interruptions deemed the biggest risks. Minimal data on how providers identify their own errors were identified.

Discussion

RAR is the most widely used method to identify WPOE, with a good positive predictive value (PPV) of 76.2%. However, it will not currently identify other error types. The VAT is nonspecific for WPOE, with a mean PPV of 78%-93.1%, but the voiding reason accuracy varies considerably.

Conclusion

Automated search methods are powerful tools to identify WPOE that would otherwise go unnoticed. Further research is required around self-identification of errors.

Drug shortages. Part 1. Definitions and harms

Drug shortages are repeatedly in the news. The earliest drug shortages were reported during the First World War, but the numbers of shortages have increased in recent years. In the first part of this two-part review, we discuss definitions of drug shortages and so-called stockouts, which are localized shortages, and the harms that they can cause. Drug shortages make it difficult or impossible to meet the therapeutic needs of individual patients or populations, but we lack an adequate definition. The problems are too complicated to be encompassed in a brief intensional dictionary-style definition, and that is reflected in the many different attempts at definition that have been proposed. We therefore propose an extensional operational definition that incorporates the processes by which products are manufactured, the causes of shortages and the contributory factors. A definition of this sort allows one to identify the main causes of a particular drug shortage and therefore the remedies that might prevent, mitigate or manage it. In the second part of the review we discuss the causes and solutions in more detail. Adverse drug reactions and medication errors attributable to shortages occur but are not often reported. Adverse reactions to substitute medicines are possible, and errors can occur because of unfamiliarity or unnecessary treatment with replacement medicines. Other harmful outcomes include withdrawal reactions, undertreatment, treatment delays and cancellations, failure of alternatives and disruption of clinical trials.

Drug shortages. Part 2: Trends, causes and solutions

Drug shortages make it difficult or impossible to meet the therapeutic needs of individual patients or populations. In the first part of this review we proposed an operational definition that incorporates the processes by which products are manufactured, the causes of shortages and stock-outs (local shortages), and the contributory factors. Here we discuss causes and possible solutions. Drug shortages have complex causes, and a single cause cannot always be identified. Reasons include lack or shortage of raw materials, manufacturing difficulties, regulatory and political actions, voluntary recalls, just-in-time inventory systems, halts in production for financial or other business reasons, low demand (eg, orphan products, reduced usage), mergers, market shifts (eg, diversion to home markets) and unexpected increases in demand (eg, improved diagnosis, new trial information, epidemics and pandemics, inappropriate use, off-label use). Potential solutions are as diverse as the potential causes. Prevention is hard, because shortages are not easily predicted. Everyone in the supply chain is involved in anticipating and managing shortages, with responsibilities for preventing them or at least trying to mitigate their effects. This includes manufacturers and suppliers, particularly of generic formulations, pharmacists, prescribers, patients and governments. Solutions can therefore be linked to the causes and classified according to where the responsibility for implementing them lies.

Recurrence of medical errors despite years of preventive measures: A grounded theory study

BACKGROUND

Despite great efforts to improve patient safety, serious preventable medical errors continue to occur. Accurate rooting causes of error recurrence are essential for reviewing methods to prevent them. This study aimed to identify the main causes of the recurrence of medical errors despite their previous occurrence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This qualitative study was performed using the grounded theory method, with theoretical sampling from April to July 2021, through semi-structured interviews with 25 experts and treatment staff of hospitals under the auspices of four universities of medical sciences in Iran.

RESULTS

Four main parts were identified: 1) primary and secondary factors leading to the occurrence of errors, 2) error prevention policies, 3) causes of error repetition, and 4) contextual factors.

CONCLUSION

The attention, seriousness, and commitment of health system managers, from top to bottom, to patient safety are essential for preventing error recurrence. The institutionalization of patient safety education from universities and attention to individual, social, and cultural factors should also be given serious attention.

Pharmacologic Stewardship in a Rural Community Pharmacy

BACKGROUND

Pharmacotherapy is an essential part of patient care. In order to achieve optimal health outcomes, safe and effective prescribing and administering of medications is crucial, especially since the process of pharmacotherapy can cause serious problems, mainly adverse events and/or interactions, that often pass undetected.

OBJECTIVE(S)

To investigate the feasibility of using community pharmacies as checkpoints to detect errors and failures in prescribing, as well as patients' compliance with pharmacotherapy. To this end, analysis and recording of the prescribing process was carried out and error-prone points were identified.

METHODS

Patients and caregivers filling prescriptions during the first 4 weeks of November 2017 and February 2018 answered questions in order to evaluate their attendance of regular checkups and their compliance with prescribing instructions. All prescriptions filled at the pharmacy were examined for detection of prescription errors and drug-drug interactions. Statistical analyses, including calculations of the correlation coefficient phi (φ), chi-square, and confidence intervals, were carried out. Detected errors and failures were evaluated by application of the Health Failure Mode Effect Analysis (HFMEA) quality tool.

RESULTS

A significant number of patients (16.7%) failed to regularly attend checkups regarding known health problems (95% CI: 10.6-22.7%), a corresponding percentage (16%, 95% CI: 10.1-21.9%) did not comply with prescribed pharmacotherapy, and a significant proportion of patients self-medicated regularly (32%, 95% CI: 24.5-39.5%). A total of 8.6% of prescriptions included medication combinations with a potential for severe drug-drug interactions (95% CI: 7.1-10.2%) while 58.7% of the prescriptions included combinations that could lead to moderate ones (95% CI: 56.1-61.4). The HFMEA indicated that all problems recorded required immediate interventions, except for prescribing errors.

CONCLUSIONS

Community pharmacies can be potential checkpoints for the detection and evaluation of prescribing errors and pharmacotherapy failures.

Evaluation of medication errors in nursing during the COVID-19 pandemic and their relationship with shift work at teaching hospitals: a cross-sectional study in Iran

Introduction

Medication errors in nursing negatively affect the quality of the provided health-treatment services and society's mentality about the health system, threatening the patient's life. Therefore, this study evaluates medication errors in nursing during the COVID-19 pandemic and their relationship with shift work at teaching hospitals.

Materials and methods

All the nurses working at teaching hospitals affiliated with Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences (southwest of Iran) comprised the statistical population of this research (260 participants). Data were collected using three questionnaires: a demographic characteristics questionnaire, a medication error questionnaire, and the standard Circadian Type Inventory (CTI) for a normal physiological cycle.

Results

At least one medication error was observed in 83.1% of nurses during their work span. A medication error was found in 36.2% of nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic (over the past year). Most medication errors (65.8%) occurred during the night shift. A significant relationship was detected between medication errors and shift work. Medicating one patient's drug to another (28.84%) and giving the wrong dose of drugs (27.69) were the most common types of medication errors. The utmost medication error was reported in emergency wards. The fear of reporting (with an average of 33.06) was the most important reason for not reporting medication errors (p < 0.01).

Discussion and conclusion

Most nurses experienced a history of medication errors, which were increased by shift work and the COVID-19 pandemic. Necessary plans are recommended to reduce the fatigue and anxiety of nurses and prevent their burnout, particularly in critical situations. Efforts to identify risky areas, setting up reporting systems and error reduction strategies can help to develop preventive medicine. On the other hand, since the quality of people's lives is considered the standard of countries' superiority, by clarifying medical errors, a higher level of health, satisfaction and safety of patients will be provided.

Minimizing prescribing errors: A phenomenological exploration of the views and experiences of independent prescribing pharmacists

AIMS

This study aims to explore the views and experiences of independent prescribing (IP) pharmacists regarding prescribing errors and strategies to mitigate errors in practice.

METHODS

One-to-one online semi-structured interviews were conducted with IP pharmacists across the United Kingdom. Verbatim transcripts of the interview were generated and coded using NVivo® 12 software for thematic analysis. A mixed inductive and deductive approach was used to generate themes and sub-themes which were then mapped onto the framework of factors that influence clinical practice proposed by Vincent et al. RESULTS: A total of 14 interviews were conducted. Participants linked the risk-averse nature of a pharmacist, self-perception of their roles as medicines experts, and previous experience of keeping checks on doctors' prescriptions as a dispenser often made them feel confident in prescribing. However, lacking adequate diagnostic skills, inadequate prescribing training programmes, and dealing with complex patients often made them feel vulnerable to committing errors. Organizational and system-related factors such as work interruptions and increased workload were identified as other factors linked to prescribing errors.

CONCLUSIONS

Independent prescribing pharmacists use a variety of strategies to reduce the risk of prescribing errors. Promoting diagnostic competency in their area of practice, strengthening undergraduate and prescribing curricula, and addressing known organizational and system-related factors linked to prescribing errors can minimize errors and promote patient safety.

Duplication errors due to brand name confusion; It is not always the name-Short case series

Confusion of drug names has been identified as a leading cause of medication errors and potential iatrogenic harm. Most of these errors occur because of look-alike or sound-alike drugs. This case series gives examples of duplication errors due to brand confusion, where there are no similarities in the names.

Exploring internship nursing students' experiences regarding the effect of supervision model implementation on medication safety: A descriptive qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Medication safety is one of the main aspects of safe care in the nursing profession, which leads to increasing patient safety and preventing medication errors. Clinical supervision is an integral part of nursing education that leads to the professional and social development of nursing students. This study was designed with the aim of revealing the experiences of nursing internship students from the implementation of the clinical supervision model on medication safety.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This descriptive qualitative study was done in 2022. The participants were selected from nursing internship students (Last year undergraduate) of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. Participants in this study were 15 nursing internship students selected using a purposeful sampling method. Data were collected using in-depth semi-structured interviews. The qualitative content analysis approach was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

After analyzing the data, four categories, "promotion medication safety competence and knowledge," "development trust and respect climate," "outcome of feedback," and "role of clinical supervisor," and 10 subcategories were extracted from the participants' experiences.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of the clinical supervision model led to an increase in the competence of nursing internship students in medication safety. The students believed that this educational method made them follow the principles of medication safety administration. The feedback provided in the clinical supervision sessions made students think about their clinical activities, understand the reason for their mistakes, and use the reliable nursing resources introduced by the supervisor to improve their performance.

Characteristics of Inhaler Technique in COPD Patients in a Specialized Center in Armenia, Colombia: A Cross-Sectional Study

Purpose

The aim of this research was to evaluate the technique of using inhaled drugs in patients with a confirmed history of COPD and describe errors in inhaler technique.

Patients and Methods

Descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in patients with a history of COPD using inhalation therapy, attending pulmonology consultation between August 2020 and April 2021 in Armenia, Colombia. A non-probabilistic sample of 80 adult participants was calculated, and the inhalation technique was evaluated (depending on the device used) using a scale validated for Colombia. Descriptive analysis of the qualitative variables was performed using frequencies and percentages. The Chi-Square test and Fisher's exact test (in corresponding cases) were used to look for association relationships between categorical variables.

Results

A total of 80 participants were evaluated, of which 66.3% (n = 53) were male, and 32.5% were older than 80 years. Clinically, 30.0% (n = 24) were classified as Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (mMRC) grade 3, and 51.2% (n = 41) had at least one exacerbation per year. The main comorbidity was hypertension (40.3%). Pressurized metered-dose inhalers with spacer were the most used device at 22.7% (n = 39). Incorrect technique (at least one error in the steps of the inhalation technique used) was found in 48.7%. The most frequent error among all the techniques was the failure to perform pre-inspiratory exhalation. No significant differences were observed between the development of the technique and the characteristics of the participants.

Conclusion

Nearly half of the patients who use inhalation devices make errors in the technique. Patient education and training of healthcare personnel represent a fundamental pillar in mitigating the incorrect use of these devices.

Impact of clinical pharmacist-led intervention for drug-related problems in neonatal intensive care unit a randomized controlled trial

Introduction: Drug-related problems (DRPs) incidence is higher in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), compared to other pediatric wards due to aspects like off-label medications, pharmacokinetic/dynamic variability, or organ dysfunction/immaturity. This study aimed to determine whether and to what extent a clinical pharmacist intervention improves medication safety and prevents DRPs [medication errors (MEs), adverse drug reactions (ADRs), drug-drug interactions (DDIs)]. Methods: A prospective, randomized, double blind, controlled study in NICU-admitted neonates was conducted. NICU patients were randomly assigned to the intervention (clinical pharmacist-led) (IG) or control group (standard care such as clinical diagnosis, pharmacotherapy) (CG). The clinical pharmacist was involved in the IG to identify-prevent-intervene MEs, or identify and monitor ADRs and DDIs. The primary outcome was the number of neonates who developed at least one DRP compared with those seen across IG and CG. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay, total number of drugs or DRP type. Results: Neonates were randomly assigned to CG (n = 52) or IG (n = 48). In total, 45%, 42%, and 16% of patients had at least 1 MEs, ADRs, and clinically significant DDIs, respectively. The number of patients with at least 1 ME was 28 (53%) and 17 (35%) in the CG and IG (p>0.05). The median (range) number of ME was higher in CG [1 (0-7)] than in IG [0 (0-4)] (p = 0.003). Applying regression analysis, the CG had 2.849 times more MEs than the IG (p<0.001). Furthermore, the number of patients (CG to IG) with at least one detected ADR or clinical DDI was 19 (36%) to 23 (47%) (p>0.05) and 4 (7%) to 12 (25%), respectively (p = 0.028). Conclusion: Clinical pharmacist availability to systematically and standardized identify, prevent and resolve DRPs among NICU patients is effective. Daily detailed clinical pharmacist observations and interventions enables prevention and monitoring of DRPs. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04899960.

Impact of a Treatment Guide on Intravenous Fluids in Minimising the Risk of Hospital-Acquired Hyponatraemia in Denmark

Hypotonic intravenous (IV) fluids are associated with an increased risk of hospital-acquired hyponatraemia, eventually leading to brain injury and death. We evaluated the effectiveness of a treatment guide to improve prescribing practices of IV fluids. We conducted a before-and-after cross-sectional survey among physicians working at Danish emergency departments. The primary outcome was prescribing practices of IV fluids. Participants were asked which IV fluid they would select in four clinical scenarios. We applied multivariate logistic regression models to estimate the odds ratio of selecting hypotonic fluids. Secondary outcomes included knowledge about IV fluids and hyponatraemia, and the receipt, reading, and usefulness of the treatment guide. After the intervention, about a third (47/154) reported that they would use hypotonic fluids in patients with increased intracranial pressure, and a quarter (39/154) would use hypotonic maintenance fluids in children, both of which are against guideline recommendations. A total of 46% selected the correct fluid, a 3% hypertonic saline solution for a patient with hyponatraemia and severe neurological symptoms. None of the knowledge questions met the predefined criteria of success of 80% correct answers. Of the respondents, 22% had received the treatment guide. Since the implementation failed, we recommend improving distribution by applying methods from implementation science.

Recommendations for wider adoption of clinical pharmacy in Central and Eastern Europe in order to optimise pharmacotherapy and improve patient outcomes

Clinical pharmacy as an area of practice, education and research started developing around the 1960s when pharmacists across the globe gradually identified the need to focus more on ensuring the appropriate use of medicines to improve patient outcomes rather than being engaged in manufacturing and supply. Since that time numerous studies have shown the positive impact of clinical pharmacy services (CPS). The need for wider adoption of CPS worldwide becomes urgent, as the global population ages, and the prevalence of polypharmacy as well as shortage of healthcare professionals is rising. At the same time, there is great pressure to provide both high-quality and cost-effective health services. All these challenges urgently require the adoption of a new paradigm of healthcare system architecture. One of the most appropriate answers to these challenges is to increase the utilization of the potential of highly educated and skilled professionals widely available in these countries, i.e., pharmacists, who are well positioned to prevent and manage drug-related problems together with ensuring safe and effective use of medications with further care relating to medication adherence. Unfortunately, CPS are still underdeveloped and underutilized in some parts of Europe, namely, in most of the Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries. This paper reviews current situation of CPS development in CEE countries and the prospects for the future of CPS in that region.

Identification of Medication Prescription Errors and Factors of Clinical Relevance in 314 Hospitalized Patients for Improved Multidimensional Clinical Decision Support Algorithms

Potential medication errors and related adverse drug events (ADE) pose major challenges in clinical medicine. Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) help identify preventable prescription errors leading to ADEs but are typically characterized by high sensitivity and low specificity, resulting in poor acceptance and alert-overriding. With this cross-sectional study we aimed to analyze CDSS performance, and to identify factors that may increase CDSS specificity. Clinical pharmacology services evaluated current pharmacotherapy of 314 patients during hospitalization across three units of two Swiss tertiary care hospitals. We used two CDSSs (pharmaVISTA and MediQ), primarily for the evaluation of drug-drug interactions (DDI). Additionally, we evaluated potential drug-disease, drug-age, drug-food, and drug-gene interactions. Recommendations for change of therapy were forwarded without delay to treating physicians. Among 314 patients, automated analyses by both CDSSs produced an average of 15.5 alerts per patient. In contrast, additional expert evaluation resulted in only 0.8 recommendations per patient to change pharmacotherapy. For clinical pharmacology experts, co-factors such as comorbidities and laboratory results were decisive for the classification of CDSS alerts as clinically relevant in individual patients in about 70% of all decisions. Such co-factors should therefore be used for the development of multidimensional CDSS alert algorithms with improved specificity. In combination with local expert services, this poses a promising approach to improve drug safety in clinical practice.

Dose adjustment of rheumatology and allergy/immunology medications in chronic kidney disease: awareness and knowledge among internal medicine housestaff

Background

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk for adverse drug events due to medication dosing errors. We studied the awareness and knowledge among internal medicine housestaff (IMHS) of proper dose adjustment of commonly used rheumatology and allergy/immunology medications for patients with CKD.

Methods

We surveyed 353 IMHS to evaluate their awareness of the need for medication dose adjustments for patients with CKD and knowledge for medication adjustment by level of glomerular filtration rate for common rheumatology and allergy/immunology medications.

Results

There was lack of awareness and knowledge for both rheumatology and allergy/immunology medications. Incorrect awareness and knowledge were as follows: allopurinol, 21.2%, 73.4%; colchicine, 19.0%, 75.9%; diphenhydramine, 34.0%, 34.0%; loratadine, 82.2%, 93.2%; and montelukast, 34.0%, 34.0%, respectively. Exploratory logistic regression analyses showed that PGY1 residents had higher odds for lack of awareness for allopurinol (odds ratio [OR] 24.57, 95% CI [confidence interval] 4.69, 99.13, P < 0.001), colchicine (OR 3.98, 95% CI 1.50, 10.51, P < 0.01), diphenhydramine (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.10, 4.54, P < 0.04), and montelukast (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.20, 5.00, P < 0.05) than PGY3 residents. A nephrology rotation in medical school was associated with lower odds for incorrect knowledge for allopurinol (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.25, 0.87, P < 0.05) and montelukast (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.27, 0.92, P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Overall, awareness and knowledge were poor among IMHS for dose adjustments of rheumatology and allergy/immunology medications in patients with CKD. Proper education and exposure to nephrology during training may improve quality and safety of care for patients with CKD.

Impact of preoperative pharmaceutical care consultation on medication errors in surgical patients: a comprehensive analysis

OBJECTIVE

Assessing the impact of introducing preoperative pharmaceutical care consultations by analyzing the severity of prevented medication errors (MEs) and their potential effects on the surgical process.

METHODS

Preoperative pharmaceutical care consultation was implemented in our hospital to assess the preoperative medication management of surgical patients between the pre-anesthesia consultation and the day of surgery. Pharmacists evaluated the appropriateness of medication management based on a consensus multidisciplinary institutional protocol. All errors identified between 2016 and 2020 were analyzed, and their severity and potential impact on surgery were standardized. A list of therapeutic groups was created to prioritize patients for consultations.

RESULTS

During the study period, 3,105 patients attended the consultations and 1,179 MEs were prevented. According to severity, 30.6% of MEs were classified as category E and 26.2% as D. The Number Needed to Treat to prevent a category E or higher ME (indicating potential harm to patients) was 5 patients. About 14.84% of MEs belonged to the prioritized drug groups. One hundred and thirteen errors would have resulted in a surgery delay of more than 24 h, and 175 errors were classified as G-H (irreversible damage).

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the effectiveness of pharmaceutical care consultations in preventing MEs and improving surgical outcomes.

Antiparkinsonian Medication Reconciliation as a Strategy to Improve Safety by Preventing Medication Errors

Background

About 70% of neurologists report that PD patients do not get their medication properly when hospitalized, and 33% are prescribed contraindicated drugs.

Objectives

To execute medication reconciliation (MedRec) focused on antiparkinsonian drugs to identify, characterize and, eventually, prevent medication errors, thus promoting therapeutic quality and safety in daily practice.

Methods

An interventional, single-center, 1 year, prospective study. All the patients who were hospitalized and had, at least, one active prescription containing an antiparkinsonian drug at hospital admission were included. MedRec was performed by following a three-phased check: inpatient electronic prescription validation after assessing the outpatient medication schedule, review of the latest clinical report emitted by the Neurology Department/General Practitioner, and pharmacist-driven interview of the patient and/or caregiver to confirm the information regarding medication gathered.

Results

A total of 171 admission episodes from 132 patients were registered (February 1, 2021, and January 31, 2022). Of 224 prescription lines involving antiparkinsonian drugs, 179 contained, at least, one medication error (59.8%). Commission errors (91.62%) were more frequent than omitted drugs (8.38%). The most common medication errors were related to timing (41.90%), frequency (21.23%), and dosing (19.55%). The implementation of this program prevented the erroneous administration of 2716 antiparkinsonian doses, 60% of the total number of doses prescribed. Interestingly, a significant relationship between the number of medication errors and having levodopa prescribed was evidenced (P < 0.05). A contraindicated drug was prescribed in almost one-third of the episodes (29.82%).

Conclusions

Clinical pharmacists' implementation of an antiparkinsonians reconciliation program sharply reduced medication errors and prescription of contraindicated drugs.

Medication safety climate from the perspectives of healthcare providers: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Medication safety as an indicator of care quality is the measures taken by healthcare team members to prevent or adjust adverse drug events at the time of medication administration. This study was conducted to investigate the medication safety climate from healthcare providers' perspectives.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted in a selected educational hospital affiliated with the Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran, in 2021. Participants were healthcare providers who are involved in the medication process. The sampling was done using the quota method. The study instruments were a demographic questionnaire and the Medication Safety Climate (MSC).

RESULTS

The total mean of positive responses to MSC items was 64.11%, denoting a moderate-level MSC. Collected data were managed using the SPSS software (v. 16.0) and were summarized using the measures of descriptive statistics, namely mean, standard deviation, frequency, and percentage. The lowest and the highest dimensional mean scores were related to the management support for medication safety dimension (mean: 48.42%) and the Teamwork dimension (mean: 80.43%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Managers' inattention and insufficient understanding of safety provide the basis for medication errors and threaten patient safety. Healthcare team members are highly motivated to provide quality and safe care by observing the managers' positive performance regarding patient safety. To improve the medication safety climate, healthcare team members are required to work in a safe workplace and have sufficient job satisfaction. Health center managers need to employ a proactive approach to prevent errors.

Evaluation of Detected Medication Errors Within the Operating Room at an Academic Medical Center

Background: Medication errors are preventable events that lead to inappropriate medication use and potential patient harm. This is especially prevalent within the operating room (OR) where one practitioner is involved in the entire medication-use process. Despite recent implementation of BD Pyxis™ Anesthesia ES, Codonics Safe Label System, and Epic One Step at the University of Kentucky Healthcare (UKHC) to prevent medication errors, errors continue to be reported. Curatolo et al found human error was the most frequent cause of medication error within the OR. Clumsy automation may be an explanation for this, which imposes burdens and promotes work arounds. This study endeavors to assess potential medication errors via chart review to identify risk reduction strategies. Methods: This a single-center retrospective cohort review of patients admitted to a UK HealthCare Main Operating Room, defined OR1A-OR5A and OR7A-OR16A, who were administered medications from 8/1/2021 to 9/30/2021. Results: Over a 2-month period, 145 cases were conducted at UK HealthCare. Of the 145 cases, 98.6% (n = 143) involved a medication error and 93.7% (n = 136) of the errors involved a high-alert medication. The top 5 classes of drugs involved in errors were all high-alert medications. Lastly, 46.6% (n = 67) of cases had documentation that Codonics was utilized. In addition to analyzing medication errors, the financial analysis found that $3154.04 in drug cost was lost in the study period. When extrapolating these results to all BD™ Pyxis Anesthesia Machines at UK HealthCare, $107 237.36 of drug cost is potentially lost per year. Conclusions: These findings add to previous data that have described the increased rate of medication errors when conducting chart review rather than rely on self-reported data. In this study, 98.6% of all cases involved a medication error. In addition, these findings provide additional insight in the increased use of technology within the operating room despite medication errors still occurring. These results can be applied to like institutions to critically evaluate anesthesia workflow to determine risk reduction strategies.

Evaluation of Pharmacy Resident-Driven Medication Reconciliation on Patients at High Risk of Hospital Readmission

Purpose: Pharmacists play a key role in preventing medication errors during transitions of care and preventing hospital readmissions through medication reconciliation (MR) programs. This study retrospectively evaluated the implementation of a standardized pharmacy residentdriven MR program for patients at high risk for readmission as defined by the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP). Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective cross sectional study of a pharmacy resident-driven MR program including patients at high risk of readmission defined by HRRP. The primary objective was to determine the number of inpatient regimen interventions identified during the MR. Secondary objectives include severity of interventions, number of medication discrepancies identified, types of interventions and discrepancies identified, and all-cause hospital readmission rates within 30 days of discharge.. Results: Fifty-three high-risk patients were included in the study. Pharmacy intervention recommendations were accepted by prescribers for nine patients (9/53; 17.0%) with a total of 13 accepted inpatient regimen interventions. The two most commonly identified medication classes for interventions were anticonvulsants (3/13; 23.1%) and antidepressants (6/13; 46.2%). Discrepancies on the admission MR were identified for 46 (46/53; 86.8%) patients with a median of three discrepancies per patient (interquartile range 2-4). The most common type of discrepancy was an incorrect or unnecessary drug. The 30-day all-cause readmission rate was 35.8% (19/53) for the total patient Conclusion: A pharmacy-resident driven MR program provided value in clarifying prior to admission medications and may help prevent drugrelated adverse events.

[Causes of medication administration errors in elderly people: a systematic review]

The elderly are particularly vulnerable to medication administration errors (MAE). To prevent these errors, it is crucial to identify and understand their causes. A review of the literature using the PRISMA method was conducted. Of 2,798 articles, 15 were included in the literature review. The causes identified were divided into 4 categories: patient-related, direct drug-related, healthcare professional-related, and organizational, teamwork, and environmental causes. It was found that the causes were many and varied (n = 56). These were mostly related to physical and cognitive disorders of the patient. Few studies of causes based on empirical data were conducted on this specific subject. The majority of studies were conducted in a health care facility and institution. Therefore, this study cannot provide a comprehensive review of all the risk factors for MAE, especially in the elderly who are capable of administering their medication on their own. To study this topic, a complementary literature review on the causes of non-adherence in the elderly would be necessary.

Patient Safety of Perioperative Medication Through the Lens of Digital Health and Artificial Intelligence

Perioperative medication has made significant contributions to enhancing patient safety. Nevertheless, administering medication during this period still poses considerable safety concerns, with many errors being detected only after causing significant physiological disturbances. The intricacy of medication administration in the perioperative setting poses specific challenges to patient safety. To address these challenges, implementing potential strategies and interventions is critical. One such strategy is raising awareness and revising educational curricula regarding drug safety in the operating room. Another crucial strategy is recognizing the importance of redundancy and multiple checks in the operating room as a hallmark of medication safety, which is not a common practice. Digital health technologies and artificial intelligence (AI) also offer the potential to improve perioperative medication safety. Computerized physician order entry systems, electronic medication administration records, and barcode medication administration systems have been proven to reduce medication errors and improve patient safety. By implementing these strategies and interventions, health care professionals can enhance the safety of perioperative medication administration and improve patient outcomes.