Cabozantinib in patients with advanced Ewing sarcoma or osteosarcoma (CABONE): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with Ewing sarcoma or osteosarcoma have a median overall survival of less than 12 months after diagnosis, and a standard treatment strategy has not yet been established. Pharmacological inhibition of MET signalling and aberrant angiogenesis has shown promising results in several preclinical models of Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma. We aimed to investigate the activity of cabozantinib, an inhibitor of MET and VEGFR2, in patients with advanced Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma.

METHODS

We did a multicentre, single-arm, two-stage, phase 2 trial in patients with advanced Ewing sarcoma or osteosarcoma recruited from ten centres in the French Sarcoma Group. Key eligibility criteria were aged 12 years or older, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, and documented disease progression (according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1) before study entry. The number of previous lines of treatment was not limited. Patients received cabozantinib (adults 60 mg, children [<16 years] 40 mg/m²) orally once daily in 28-day cycles until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, the investigator's decision to discontinue, or participant withdrawal. The primary endpoint for Ewing sarcoma was best objective response within 6 months of treatment onset; for osteosarcoma, a dual primary endpoint of 6-month objective response and 6-month non-progression was assessed. All enrolled patients who received at least one dose of cabozantinib were included in the safety analysis, and all participants who received at least one complete or two incomplete treatment cycles were included in the efficacy population. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02243605.

FINDINGS

Between April 16, 2015, and July 12, 2018, 90 patients (45 with Ewing sarcoma 45 with osteosarcoma) were recruited to the study. Median follow-up was 31·3 months (95% CI 12·4-35·4) for patients with Ewing sarcoma and 31·1 months (24·4-31·7) for patients with osteosarcoma. 39 (87%) patients with Ewing sarcoma and 42 (93%) patients with osteosarcoma were assessable for efficacy after histological and radiological review. In patients with Ewing sarcoma, ten (26%; 95% CI 13-42) of 39 patients had an objective response (all partial responses) by 6 months; in patients with osteosarcoma, five (12%; 4-26) of 42 patients had an objective response (all partial responses) and 14 (33%; 20-50) had 6-month non-progression. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were hypophosphataemia (five [11%] for Ewing sarcoma, three [7%] for osteosarcoma), aspartate aminotransferase increase (two [4%] for Ewing sarcoma, three [7%] for osteosarcoma), palmar-plantar syndrome (three [7%] for Ewing sarcoma, two [4%] for osteosarcoma), pneumothorax (one [2%] for Ewing sarcoma, four [9%] for osteosarcoma), and neutropenia (two [4%] for Ewing sarcoma, four [9%] for osteosarcoma). At least one serious adverse event was reported in 61 (68%) of 90 patients. No patients died from drug-related toxic effects.

INTERPRETATION

Cabozantinib has antitumor activity in patients with advanced Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma and was generally well tolerated. Cabozantinib could represent a new therapeutic option in this setting, and deserves further investigation.

FUNDING

Institut Bergonié; French National Cancer Institute; Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer.

Development of a disease-specific graded prognostic assessment index for the management of sarcoma patients with brain metastases (Sarcoma-GPA)

Abstract

Background

Brain metastases from sarcomatous lesions pose a management challenge owing to their rarity and the histopathological heterogeneity. Prognostic indices such as the Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) index have been developed for several primary tumour types presenting with brain metastases (e.g. lung, breast, melanoma), tailored to the specifics of different primary histologies and molecular profiles. Thus far, a prognostic index to direct treatment decisions is lacking for adult sarcoma patients with brain metastases.

Methods

We performed a multicentre analysis of a national group of expert sarcoma tertiary centres (French Sarcoma Group, GSF-GETO) with the participation of one Canadian and one Swiss centre. The study cohort included adult patients with a diagnosis of a bone or soft tissue sarcoma presenting parenchymal or meningeal brain metastases, managed between January 1992 and March 2012. We assessed the validity of the original GPA index in this patient population and developed a disease-specific Sarcoma-GPA index.

Results

The original GPA index is not prognostic for sarcoma brain metastasis patients. We have developed a dedicated Sarcoma-GPA index that identifies a sub-group of patients with particularly favourable prognosis based on histology, number of brain lesions and performance status.

Conclusions

The Sarcoma-GPA index provides a novel tool for sarcoma oncologists to guide clinical decision-making and outcomes research.

Genomic Profiling of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma and Clinical Results of a Phase I Study of the Protein Kinase C Inhibitor AEB071

Up to 50% of patients with uveal melanoma (UM) develop metastatic disease, for which there is no effective systemic treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the orally available protein kinase C inhibitor, AEB071, in patients with metastatic UM, and to perform genomic profiling of metastatic tumor samples, with the aim to propose combination therapies. Patients with metastatic UM (n = 153) were treated with AEB071 in a phase I, single-arm study. Patients received total daily doses of AEB071 ranging from 450 to 1,400 mg. First-cycle dose-limiting toxicities were observed in 13 patients (13%). These were most commonly gastrointestinal system toxicities and were dose related, occurring at doses ≥700 mg/day. Preliminary clinical activity was observed, with 3% of patients achieving a partial response and 50% with stable disease (median duration 15 weeks). High-depth, targeted next-generation DNA sequencing was performed on 89 metastatic tumor biopsy samples. Mutations previously identified in UM were observed, including mutations in GNAQ, GNA11, BAP1, SF3B1, PLCB4, and amplification of chromosome arm 8q. GNAQ/GNA11 mutations were observed at a similar frequency (93%) as previously reported, confirming a therapeutic window for inhibition of the downstream effector PKC in metastatic UM.In conclusion, the protein kinase C inhibitor AEB071 was well tolerated, and modest clinical activity was observed in metastatic UM. The genomic findings were consistent with previous reports in primary UM. Together, our data allow envisaging combination therapies of protein kinase C inhibitors with other compounds in metastatic UM.

Surgical Margins and Adjuvant Therapies in Malignant Phyllodes Tumors of the Breast: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

The optimal threshold of surgical margins for breast malignant phyllodes tumors (MPTs) and the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy were investigated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a multicenter nationwide retrospective study of all MPT cases with central pathological review within the French Sarcoma Group. Endpoints were local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS) rates.

RESULTS

Overall, 212 patients were included in the study. All non-metastatic patients underwent primary surgical treatment, including 58.6% of conservative surgeries. An R0 resection was achieved in 117 patients (59.4%: 26.9% of patients with 1-2 mm margins, 12.2% of patients with 3-7 mm margins, 20.3% of patients with ≥ 8 mm margins). Ninety-four patients (45%) underwent a second surgery (SS) to obtain R0 margins, with a final mastectomy rate of 72.6%. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy were performed in 91 (43.1%) and 23 patients (10.9%), respectively, but were not associated with better outcomes. Mastectomy was significantly associated with better LRFS (p < 0.001). Margins of 0, 1, or 2 mm with SS were associated with better MFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.3, p = 0.005) and OS (HR 0.32, p = 0.005) compared with margins of 0-1-2 mm without SS. Wider margins (> 8 mm) were not superior to margins of 3-7 mm (3-7 mm vs. > 8 mm; HR 0.81, p = 0.69). Age (HR 2.14, p = 0.038) and tumor necrosis (HR 1.96, p = 0.047) were found to be poor prognostic factors and were associated with MFS.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that 3 mm margins are necessary and sufficient for surgical management of MPTs, and emphasizes the importance of SS to obtain clear margins in case of 0-1-2 mm margins. No impact of adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy was detected in this study.

A phase II of gemcitabine combined with pazopanib followed by pazopanib maintenance, as second-line treatment in patients with advanced leiomyosarcomas: A unicancer French Sarcoma Group study (LMS03 study)

BACKGROUND

Options in second-line therapy after doxorubicin-based chemotherapy for metastatic/advanced leiomyosarcoma include gemcitabine (G), trabectedin and pazopanib (P) monotherapy. Currently, no combination therapy is better than monotherapy. LMS03 is an open-label multicentre single-group phase II study designed to assess the efficacy and tolerance of G + P in the second-line setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients (pts), ECOG ≤2, with metastatic leiomyosarcomas (LMS) after first-line doxorubicin chemotherapy failure were eligible. Pts were treated with G 1000 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 of each 21 days (maximum eight cycles), in combination with oral daily P (800 mg), until disease progression/toxicity. 9-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate was the primary endpoint. Inacceptable and promising 9-month PFS rates were defined, in the intent-to-treat population, as 32% and 44%.

RESULTS

106 pts were included with a mean age of 59.8 years and an ECOG 0 in 63.5%; the primary tumour site was uterus in 61%. Pts were treated with P + G for a median of 3.8 mo, and P for a median of 4.2 mo. The 9-month PFS rate was 32.1% (95% CI 23.1-41.1). After a median follow-up of 14.2 months, the PFS was 6.5 months (95% CI 5.6-8.2), and the overall survival was 22.4 months (95% CI 16.9-26.5). The best response was 23.8%. The most frequent reported grade 3-4 adverse events were haematological.

CONCLUSIONS

LMS03 failed to show that second-line therapy, with gemcitabine combined with pazopanib, followed by pazopanib alone, was beneficial for advanced LMS patients. Eudract N°2011-001308-36 and NCT01442662.

Genomic and transcriptomic comparison of post-radiation versus sporadic sarcomas

Post-radiation sarcomas are rare secondary cancers arising from radiation therapies. To date, few genetic specificities have been described for such malignancies and the oncogenesis of sarcomas with complex genetics (both sporadic and post-radiation) remains largely misunderstood. We performed genomic and transcriptomic analyses on 77 post-radiation sarcomas using DNA-array and RNA sequencing. Consequently, we were able to investigate changes in copy number variations, transcriptome profiling, fusion gene expression, and mutational landscapes. We compare these data to a reference cohort of 93 sporadic sarcomas. At genomic level, similar chromosomal complexity was observed both in post-radiation and sporadic sarcomas with complex genetics. We found more frequent CDKN2A and CDKN2B (coding for p14/p16 and p15 proteins, respectively; at 9p21.3) losses in post-radiation (71%) than in sporadic tumors (39%; P = 6.92e-3). Among all detected fusion genes and punctual variations, few specificities were observed between these groups and such alterations are not able to drive a strong and specific oncogenesis. Recurrent MYC amplifications (96%) and KDR variants (8%) were detected in post-radiation angiosarcomas, in agreement with the literature. Transcriptomic analysis of such angiosarcomas revealed two distinct groups harboring different genomic imbalances (in particular gains of 17q24.2-17qter) with different clinical courses according to patient's vital status. Differential gene expression analysis permitted to focus on the immune response as a potential actor to tumor aggressiveness. Histochemistry validated a lower inflammation and lower immune infiltrate at tumor periphery for highly aggressive angiosarcomas. Our results provide new genomic and transcriptomic information about post-radiation sarcomas. The techniques we used (RNA-seq and DNA-arrays) did not highlight major differences in sarcomas with complex genetics depending on the radiation context, revealing similar patterns of transcriptomic profiles and chromosomal copy number variations. Additional characterizations, particularly whole genome sequencing, could measure changes in DNA following radiation therapy in such malignancies and may precise their oncogenesis.

Impact of Metastasis Surgery and Alkylating-Agent-Based Chemotherapy on Outcomes of Metastatic Malignant Phyllodes Tumors: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Metastatic phyllodes tumors have poor prognosis with median overall survival of 11.5 months. The objective of this study is to identify prognostic factors and the best options for management of metastatic malignant phyllode tumors (MMPTs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A multicentric retrospective study, including cases of MMPT from 10 sarcoma centers, was conducted. The primary end-point was overall survival (OS), and the secondary end-point was the clinical benefit of chemotherapy (CBCT) rate.

RESULTS

51 MMPT patients were included. Median time from diagnosis to metastatic recurrence was 13 months. Management of MMPT consisted in surgery of the metastatic disease for 16 patients (31.3%), radiation therapy of the metastatic disease for 15 patients (31.9%), and chemotherapy for 37 patients (72.5%). Median follow-up was 62.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 31-80 months]. Median OS was 11.5 months (95% CI 7.5-18.7 months). On multivariate analysis, two or more metastatic sites [hazard ratio (HR) 2.81, 95% CI 1.27-6.19; p = 0.01] and surgery of metastasis (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14-0.78; p = 0.01) were independently associated with OS. The CBCT rate was 31.4% and 16.7% for the first and second lines. Polychemotherapy was not superior to single-agent therapy. Alkylating-agent-based chemotherapy, possibly associated with anthracyclines, was associated with a better CBCT rate than anthracyclines alone (p = 0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study emphasize the impact of the number of metastatic sites on survival of MMPT patients and the leading role of metastasis surgery in MMPT management. If systemic therapy is used, it should include alkylating agents, which are associated with a better clinical benefit.

Methotrexate-Etoposide-Ifosfamide Compared with Doxorubicin-Cisplatin-Ifosfamide Chemotherapy in Osteosarcoma Treatment, Patients Aged 18-25 Years

Purpose: The French standard chemotherapy for osteosarcoma combines high-dose methotrexate (HDM) and etoposide-ifosfamide (EI) in children and adolescents, and API-AI (doxorubicin-cisplatin-ifosfamide) in adults. We herein present the results of M-EI and API-AI in 18- to 25-year-old patients. Methods: Patients, 18-25 years old, received either M-EI or API-AI regimens. M-EI comprised seven M and two EI doses preoperatively then M-EI in standard-risk patients (good histological response without metastasis) and five M-AP (methotrexate-doxorubicin-cisplatin) in high-risk patients (poor histological response, metastasis, and/or unresectable primary), postoperatively. API-AI comprised three API and two AI doses preoperatively, then two AI and two PI in standard-risk patients and five EI in high-risk patients, postoperatively. Results: We analyzed 95 patients 18-25 years of age: 55 received M-EI and 40 API-AI. The groups had similar baseline characteristics. Eighty-nine patients (94%) had surgery. Twenty-nine of 55 M-EI patients (60%) and 16/40 API-AI patients (41%) had good histological responses to preoperative chemotherapy. At 5 years, event-free survival was 50% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 39-60) and overall survival was 65% (95% CI: 54-74). Acute toxicity was similar, without treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: Survival outcomes with M-EI and API-AI were not significantly different. Tolerance was acceptable with both regimens. HDM is thus feasible for young adults. However, our study limitations preclude any definitive conclusions.

So Close, yet so Far: Discrepancies between Uveal and Other Melanomas. A Position Paper from UM Cure 2020

Despite much progress in our understanding of uveal melanoma (UM) over the past decades, this rare tumour is still often misclassified. Although UM, like other melanomas, is very probably derived from melanocytes, it is drastically different from cutaneous melanoma and most other melanoma subtypes in terms of epidemiology, aetiology, biology and clinical features, including an intriguing metastatic hepatotropism. UM carries distinctive prognostic chromosome alterations, somatic mutations and gene expression profiles, allowing an active tailored surveillance strategy and dedicated adjuvant clinical trials. There is no standard systemic treatment for disseminated UM at present. In contrast to cutaneous melanoma, UMs are not BRAF-mutated, thus curtailing the use of B-Raf inhibitors. Although these tumours are characterised by some immune infiltrates, immune checkpoint inhibitors are rarely effective, possibly due to a low mutation burden. UM patients across the world not only face rare cancer-related issues (e.g., specific management strategies, access to information and to expert centres), but also specific UM problems, which can be exacerbated by the common misconception that it is a subtype of cutaneous melanoma. As a European Consortium dedicated to research on UM and awareness on the disease, "UM Cure 2020" participants urge medical oncologists, pharmaceutical companies, and regulatory agencies to acknowledge UM as a melanoma with specific issues, in order to accelerate the development of new therapies for patients.

Results of API-AI based regimen in osteosarcoma adult patients included in the French OS2006/Sarcome-09 study

In the OS2006 study, patients younger than 18 years were treated with a methotrexate-based regimen (MTX), patients older than 25 years with a doxorubicin-cisplatin-ifosfamide-based regimen (API-AI), whereas patients aged 18-25 years received either API-AI or MTX. We herein report the prespecified subgroup analysis of the outcome of 106 patients treated with API-AI. Preoperative chemotherapy combined three doxorubicin-ifosfamide-cisplatin (API) and two doxorubicin-ifosfamide (AI) courses. Postoperative chemotherapy was assigned by risk group: localised patients with a good histological response (<10% viable cells) received two AI and two cisplatin-ifosfamide (PI) courses; patients with synchronous metastases, poor histological response or unresectable primary received five cycles of etoposide-ifosfamide (EI). Of the 106 patients, 61 were randomised to receive or not zoledronate. Median age was 30 years (range 18-67), 66 (62%) patients were >25 years. The primary tumours were axial in 28 patients (26%), and 28 (26%) presented with metastases. Ninety-six patients (91%) had surgery, conservative in 82 (85%); 36 patients (38%, 95% CI 28-48%) were good responders. Toxicity was manageable, with no significant difference in severe acute toxicity between patients aged >25 years and those younger. With a median follow-up of 4.8 years, the 5-year event-free survival and overall survival rates were 46% (95% CI 36-56) and 57% (95% CI 47-67), respectively. The primary tumour size and initial metastases correlated with a higher risk of event. In these 106 osteosarcoma adult patients, API-AI proved feasible with no excess of toxicity, and favourable activity despite poor-prognosis factors.

Abstract CT068: A Phase I trial of LXS196, a novel PKC inhibitor for metastatic uveal melanoma

We assessed the safety, tolerability, PK, PD and efficacy of the PKC inhibitor LXS196 in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM). As of 30 Sep 2018, 68 patients received LXS196 at doses ranging from 100 to 1000 mg once daily (QD; 38 patients) and 200 to 400 mg twice daily (BID; 30 patients). All patients in the QD regimen had discontinued treatment due to progressive disease. Five patients in the BID regimen remain on study. LDH was &gt; ULN in 38 patients (55.9%), and 60 patients (88.2%) had liver involvement.

Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) in cycle 1 were reported in 7 of 38 patients on the QD schedule and in 2 of 17 patients on the BID schedule who were evaluable for the dose determination. The most common DLT was hypotension, manageable with LXS196 interruption and dose reduction.

The most frequent AEs (all grades, in ≥ 20% of patients) suspected to be related to LXS196 in patients across both dosing schedules (n = 68) included nausea (66.2%), diarrhea (45.6%), vomiting (30.9%), hypotension (22.1%), increased ALT (22.1%), and fatigue (20.6%). The majority of gastrointestinal and constitutional AEs were of low grade (grade 1 or 2). Grade 3 or 4 AEs suspected to be related to LXS196 were reported in 17 patients (25.0%), the most frequent being hypotension (8.8%). BID dosing was better tolerated than QD dosing with fewer grade 3 or 4 AEs reported (20% with BID vs 28.9% with QD dosing) and fewer drug-related SAEs (6.7% with BID vs 15.8% with QD). In this study, MTDs were determined at 500mg QD and 400 mg BID and the RDE was declared at 300mg BID. The most common AEs suspected to be related to LXS196 (any grade, in &gt;15% of patients) at the RDE (n = 18) included nausea (77.8%), diarrhea (61.1%), vomiting (38.9%), increased ALT (27.8%), asthenia, dry skin and rash (22.2% each), hypotension, fatigue, increased AST, dermatitis acneiform, and peripheral edema (16.7% each).

Clinical PK demonstrates rapid absorption of LXS196 with Tmax of ~1 hr post dose and consistent terminal T1/2 across different doses (~ 11 hr). Exposure at doses above 300 mg QD and 200 mg BID are in the efficacious range from preclinical projections. LXS196 results in reduction of pMARCKS and pPKC delta, evident of target engagement in on-treatment tumor biopsies.

Overall, amongst 66 evaluable patients, per RECIST v1.1, 6 had a PR (2 in QD; 4 in BID) and 45 had SD as their best response. At the RDE, of 17 evaluable patients, 2 had confirmed PRs and 12 had SD as their best response (including 2 patients with &gt; 30% tumor reduction/unconfirmed PRs). The median duration of exposure is 3.71 months (range; 1.81 - 15.28 months) and 4.6 months (range; 0.33 - 20.01 months) for patients in the QD and BID regimens, respectively. Of the 5 ongoing patients in the BID regimen, 2 maintain a PR (200 and 300 mg BID) and 3 have SD (all at 300 mg BID). All 5 patients have remained on study for &gt; 13 months.

These results suggest encouraging clinical activity of LXS196 as a single agent with manageable toxicity profile in patients with MUM.

Citation Format: Ellen Kapiteijn, Matteo Carlino, Valentina Boni, Delphine Loirat, Frank Speetjens, John Park, Emiliano Calvo, Richard Carvajal, Marta Nyakas, Juan Gonzalez-Maffe, Xu Zhu, Ramu Thiruvamoor, Padmaja Yerramilli-Rao, Sophie Piperno-Neumann. A Phase I trial of LXS196, a novel PKC inhibitor for metastatic uveal melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT068.

Abstract 2895: MBD4 inactivation results in an alternative evolutionary route in uveal melanoma

Introduction

Uveal melanomas (UM) are chemoresistant tumors that carry few copy number variations (CNV) and a low mutation burden. Genomics of UM metastases have been scarcely described. We assessed genetic heterogeneity in UM at primary and metastatic stages, in order to evaluate if tumor heterogeneity may explain this chemoresistance.

Methods

Whole-exome sequencing of primary and metastatic UM tumors.

Results

We obtained 97 tumor samples from 26 patients (16 samples from 15 primary tumors and 81 samples from 50 metastases). MBD4 was inactivated in two cases (MBD4-deficient; MBD4def). All samples presented high variant allelic frequencies of UM driver mutations (Gαq pathway mutations, BAP1, SF3B1 and EIF1AX). Indeed, mutational statuses of these genes were identical between primary tumors and metastases, except for one MBD4def case that carried both SF3B1 and BAP1 mutations in the primary tumor, while the metastasis only carried a different BAP1 mutation. MBD4-proficient (MBD4pro) primary tumors presented a median of 11.5 single nucleotide variants (SNV; range 5-22); while MBD4pro metastases carried a median of 14 SNV (range 6-23) with a very high genetic homogeneity between samples. No mutation was recurrently acquired during the metastatic process. Metastases presented a higher number of copy number variations (CNV; median = 11; range 2-25) than matched primary (median = 5; range 2-18). Metastases-associated CNV were similar to that usually associated with UM primary tumors, including 8q gain, 1p loss, 1q gain, 6q loss and isodisomy 3. MBD4def samples were hypermutated with at least 266 mutations/sample (&gt;20-fold increase compared to MBD4pro) with &gt;70% of CpG&gt;TpG. MBD4def cases presented a higher heterogeneity with less than 60% of common SNV concordance between tumors in a given patient. No major difference in CNV profiles was observed between MBD4def and MBD4pro samples.

Conclusion

MBD4pro are homogeneous diseases that evolve as metastases with few non-recurrent SNV and recurrent UM-typical CNV. These characteristics lead to simple evolutionary trees with a limited number of short clades and branches, supporting a punctuated evolutionary process. Genetic heterogeneity thus cannot explain the resistance to chemotherapy. In contrast, MBD4 inactivation in UM results in genetic heterogeneity, subclonality and risk of secondary resistance to anticancer drugs.

Citation Format: Manuel Rodrigues, Lenha Mobuchon, Alexandre Houy, Samar Alsafadi, Sophie Gardrat, Sophie Piperno-Neumann, Nathalie Cassoux, Gaelle Pierron, Sergio Roman-Roman, Pascale Mariani, Marc-Henri Stern. MBD4 inactivation results in an alternative evolutionary route in uveal melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2895.

Assessment of resection margins in bone sarcoma treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Literature review and guidelines of the bone group (GROUPOS) of the French sarcoma group and bone tumor study group (GSF-GETO/RESOS)

BACKGROUND

Standardized reports are essential to meeting the bone sarcoma reference center certification requirements of the French National Cancer Institute (INCa). The usual classifications of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS), the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC/IUCC) TNM R classification and the American College of Pathologists, are inexact inasmuch as they fail to include chemotherapy impact on tumor cells in assessing surgical margins. This leads to inconsistent interpretation by teams managing bone sarcoma. The present literature analysis sought to assess the limitations of existing classifications for purposes of standardized reporting of the management of surgical specimens from patients with osteosarcoma or Ewing sarcoma receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, by addressing the following questions: 1) What is the prognostic value of margins and chemotherapy response in the classifications? 2) What are the histologic changes induced by chemotherapy, with what impact on interpretation of margins?

METHOD

A PubMed literature analysis was performed, targeting the prognostic value of resection margin assessment, in September 2018. French bone pathology group (Groupe français des pathologistes osseux) and international guidelines on bone specimen management were referred to so as select items for a standardized report. Eight of the 523 articles retrieved met the study eligibility criteria.

RESULTS

Minimal distance between tumor and surgical margin, with a>2mm threshold, seemed to be the optimal parameter for predicting local recurrence. Good chemotherapy response and appendicular skeletal location were associated with lower risk of local recurrence. None of the available classifications take into account the microscopic changes induced by chemotherapy in interpreting resection margins.

DISCUSSION

To standardize practice, GROUPOS developed a standardized report for bone sarcoma specimens, considering the histopathologic changes in the tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The TNM R system was adapted and a threshold of>2mm was chosen as an acceptable limit to qualify surgical resection as safe (R0). R1 status (≤2mm) was subdivided into subgroups a, b and c, to include margin measurement in relation to the post-chemotherapy scar: R1a, resection within the scar; R1b, resection in healthy tissue,≤2mm from the scar and/or residual viable cells; and R1c, resection within the lesion in contact with viable cells or within coagulation necrosis areas. The GROUPOS members drew up this standardized report so as to ensure a common language, improving bone sarcoma management in specialized centers. Reliable data can thus be established for national and international multicenter studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Benefit of intensified perioperative chemotherapy within high-risk CINSARC patients with resectable soft tissue sarcomas (CIRSARC)

TPS11078

Background: We have recently identified a gene expression signature so called “CINSARC” which is related with chromosomal instability and highly predictive of metastasis-free and overall survival in soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) patients. The prognostic relevance of this signature has been validated recently in an independent set of sarcomas from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) consortium. Despite optimal locoregional treatment, patients with high-risk CINSARC have a very poor outcome.However, the main issues with peri-operative chemotherapy in STS patients are the identification of patients who are more likely to benefit from this approach and the characterization of the best chemotherapy regimen. Indeed, in all clinical trials investigating peri-operative chemotherapy in STS, patients were included on the basis of classical histological criteria (grade, tumor size, deep location). The CINSARC is more discriminant than grade to evaluate the prognosis of STS patients (35% of grade 3 are low-risk CINSARC and 40% of grade are high-risk CINSARC). We hypothesize than: (1) 6 cycles of anthracyclines-ifosfamide is associated with improved outcome in comparison to 3 cycles of chemotherapy (ISG-STS 10-01) in patients with high-risk CINSARC STS; (2) Chemotherapy-free strategy is not associated with detrimental outcome in low-risk CINSARC STS. Methods: This is a multicenter phase III trial (sponsor: Institut Bergonié) which aims to evaluate the efficacy (intent-to-treat analysis) of 6 cycles of neoadjuvant doxorubicin + ifosfamide based chemotherapy+ surgery +/-radiotherapy (Arm B) in comparison with 3 cycles of neoadjuvant doxorubicin + ifosfamide based chemotherapy + surgery +/- radiotherapy (Arm A) in terms of 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) in high-risk CINSARC patients with resectable STS. Patients with low-risk CINSARC signature will be treated at investigator discretion. 334 patients will have to be recruited over 36 months in 10 centers of the French Sarcoma Group. This is the first study assessing the impact of peri-operative chemotherapy in STS based on a prognostic molecular signature. The study is open for accrual at time of submission. Clinical trial information: NCT03805022.

Sarcome-13/OS2016 trial protocol: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase II trial of mifamurtide combined with postoperative chemotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed high-risk osteosarcoma

INTRODUCTION

The controversial results on the mifamurtide efficacy associated with chemotherapy, issued from the American INT-0133-study, in localised osteosarcomas, and the underpowered analysis performed separately in metastatic patients, should be clarified to homogenise international use of this promising drug. The European Commission has granted a marketing authorisation to mifamurtide combined with postoperative chemotherapy in localised osteosarcomas but not in metastatic patients, while the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has denied this authorisation.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Sarcome-13/OS2016 trial is a multicentre randomised open-label phase II trial evaluating the survival benefit of mifamurtide administered during 36 weeks in combination with postoperative chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone, in patients >2 and ≤50 years with newly diagnosed high-risk localised or metastatic osteosarcoma. The main objective is to evaluate the impact on event-free survival (EFS) of mifamurtide on intention-to-treat population. The secondary objectives are to evaluate the impact of mifamurtide on overall survival, to evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of the planned treatment, to correlate biology/immunology with the mifamurtide efficacy/toxicity. With a total of 126 enrolled patients and 51 events, the power is 80% if mifamurtide is associated with an 18% improvement of the 3-year EFS (52%vs70%, equivalent to an HR=0.55), with a one-sided logrank test alpha=10%. As relevant historical data are available (aggregate treatment effect from the INT-0133 trial and individual data from the control group of the Sarcome-09/OS2006 trial), a Bayesian analysis is also planned.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was approved by the 'Comité de Protection des Personnes Ile de France I' (12/06/2018), complies with the Declaration of Helsinki and French laws and regulations, and follows the International Conference on Harmonisation E6 Guideline for Good Clinical Practice. The trial results, even if they are inconclusive, as well as biological ancillary studies will be presented at appropriate international congresses and published in international peer-review journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

EudraCT 2017-001165-24, NCT03643133.

Sarcomas in patients over 90: Natural history and treatment-A nationwide study over 6 years

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumors accounting for less than 1% of human cancers. While the highest incidence of sarcomas is observed in elderly, this population is often excluded or poorly represented in clinical trials. The present study reports on clinicopathological presentation, and outcome of sarcoma patients over 90 recorded in the Netsarc.org French national database. NETSARC (netsarc.org) is a network of 26 reference sarcoma centers with specialized multidisciplinary tumor board (MDTB), funded by the French National Cancer Institute to improve the outcome of sarcoma patients. Since 2010, presentation to an MDTB, second pathological review, and collection of sarcoma patient characteristics and follow‐up are collected in a database Information of patients registered from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2016, in NETSARC were collected, analyzed and compared to the younger population. Patients with sarcomas aged >90 have almost exclusively sarcomas with complex genomics (92.0% vs. 66.3%), are less frequently metastatic (5.3% vs. 14·7%) at diagnosis, have more often superficial tumors (39.8% vs. 14.7%), as well as limbs and head and neck sites (75.2% vs. 38.7%) (all p < 0.001). Optimal diagnostic procedures and surgery were less frequently performed in patients over 90 (p < 0.001). These patients were less frequently operated in NETSARC centers, as compared to those of younger age groups including aged 80–90. However, local relapse‐free survival, metastatic relapse‐free survival and relapse‐free survival were not significantly different from those of younger patients, in the whole cohort, as well as in the subgroup of operated patients. As expected overall survival was worse in patients over 90 (p < 0.001). Patients over 90 who were not operated had worse overall survival than younger patients (9.9 vs. 27.3 months, p < 0.001). Patients with STS diagnosed after 90 have distinct clinicopathological features, but comparable relapse‐free survival, unless clinical practice guidelines recommendations are not applied. Standard management should be proposed to these patients if oncogeriatric status allows.

What's new?

While the highest incidence of soft‐tissue sarcoma (STS) is observed in the elderly, this population is often excluded or poorly represented in clinical trials. Therefore, little is known about the characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of STS in these patients. In this study, the authors analyzed numerous clinical characteristics of patients with sarcoma diagnosed at age 91 or older. They conclude that standard STS management and clinical practice guidelines should be followed for these patients if possible.