Combined Anterolateral Ligament and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Is Associated With Increased Lateral Femoral Condyle Ratio

PURPOSE

to investigate the association between the lateral femoral condylar ratio (LFCR), the posterior tibial slope (PTS), and injury of the anterolateral ligament (ALL).

METHODS

Inclusion criteria were patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear after noncontact injury during sports from October 1997 to May 2021. The LFCR and PTS were measured, and injury of the ALL was evaluated. Patients were divided into 2 groups: isolated ACL tear (isolated group) and combined ACL with ALL tear (combined group). The LFCR and PTS were compared between the isolated and combined groups. For each risk factor, the receiver operating characteristic curve, the area under the curve (AUC), and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to determine the cutoff for detecting increased risk of ALL injury.

RESULTS

There were 83 patients in the isolated group and 176 patients in the combined group. Demographics of the 2 groups did not differ significantly. The LFCR was significantly larger in the combined group than in the isolated group (P = .000). The PTS did not differ between the two groups (P = .405). The LFCR (odds ratio [OR] = 1.58; P = .000) was a significant factor. Age, body mass index, and PTS were not associated with an ALL injury. The AUC (0.79; 95% CI, 0.74-0.85) for the LFCR had a sensitivity of 73% and specificity of 76% to predict an ALL rupture. The calculated cutoff of 64.5 was associated with an increased risk for ALL rupture (OR = 8.65; 95% CI, 4.73-15.81) when compared with the isolated group.

CONCLUSIONS

An increased LFCR was associated with the ALL injury. However, increased PTS was not associated with ALL injury. These findings need to be considered for clinicians in treating ACL tear patients at risk for an ALL injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective comparative prognostic trial.

Risk Factors for Readmission following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

The purpose of this study is to identify risk factors for readmission after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and to determine costs associated with readmission. Using a private insurance claims' database, we identified patients who underwent ACL reconstruction from 2010 to 2015 using the International Classification of Diseases, Version 9 (ICD-9) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Univariate analysis was performed on demographic data, surgical characteristics, and comorbidities. Variables with p < 0.10 were added to a multivariate logistic regression model which was created to identify independent risk factors for all-cause readmission within 90 days postoperatively. Significance was considered at p < 0.05. Overall, 90,263 patients were included (average age: 29 ± 13 years, 44% female), and 1,066 (1.2%) of patients had a hospital readmission within 90 days following surgery. Risk factors for hospital readmission included cerebrovascular disease (odds ratio [OR] = 3.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9, 6.2), diabetes mellitus (OR = 2.6, 95% CI: 1.9, 3.5), concomitant medial collateral ligament (MCL) or lateral collateral ligament (LCL) reconstruction (OR = 2.5, 95% CI: 1.9, 3.3), concomitant posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction (OR = 2.2, 95% CI: 1.4, 3.3), age between 44 and 65 years (OR = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.6, 2.9), and depression (OR = 1.88, 95% CI: 1.49, 2.38, p < 0.001). Female sex was associated with decreased odds of 90-day hospital readmission (OR = 0.8, 95% CI: 0.7, 0.9). Each hospital readmission accounted for an estimated $17,841 (95% CI: $17,173, 18,509) in gross health care payments, and patients with readmissions had substantially higher 1-year cumulative health care costs. Readmission after ACL reconstruction was 1.2%. The strongest risk factors for 90-day readmission include cerebrovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, concomitant MCL/LCL reconstruction, concomitant PCL reconstruction, and age between 44 and 65 years. Readmission was associated with substantial health care costs.

Opioid Represcriptions After ACL Reconstruction in Adolescents Are Associated With Subsequent Opioid Use Disorder

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative opioid prescriptions may confer a risk for subsequent opioid use disorders (OUDs). For many children, postoperative analgesia is often the first opioid exposure. The rates of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in pediatric populations are rising. Here, we use an administrative claims database to describe opioid prescription patterns after ACL reconstruction and their effect on subsequent risk of OUD.

METHODS

Using International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9, ICD-10, and CPT codes, we identified patients, with ages 10 to 18, undergoing primary ACL reconstruction between 2014 and 2016 with minimum 1 year follow-up in the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart, which is a nationally representative administrative claims database. Demographic variables and prescription patterns (in morphine milligram equivalents [MMEs]) were analyzed using univariate tests and multivariable logistic regression to determine any potential association with the appearance of anew an ICD-9 or ICD-10 code for OUD within 1 year of the initial procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 4459 cases were included and 29 (0.7%) of these patients were diagnosed with an OUD within 1 year of surgery. Upon univariate analysis, opioid represcriptions within 6 weeks were significantly more common among patients with OUD; 27.6% vs. 9.7% of patients that did not develop a new diagnosis of OUD ( P =0.005). Multivariable logistic regression indicated an independent significant relationship between total MMEs initially prescribed and the odds of a subsequent OUD diagnosis: for each additional 100 MMEs prescribed in total, the odds of OUD increased by 13% ( P =0.002). Patients with a represcription within 6 weeks of surgery had an average increase in the odds of OUD by 161% ( P =0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of patient ages 10 to 18 undergoing primary isolated ACL reconstruction, we found substantial variability in opiate prescribing patterns and higher initial opioid prescription volume, as well as opioid represcription within 6 weeks were predictive of the subsequent development of OUD.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Is combined robotically assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction a good solution for the young arthritic knee?

PURPOSE

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency can be a consequence or a cause of femoro-tibial osteoarthritis (OA). Several studies have published satisfactory outcomes of unicompartimental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and combined ACL reconstruction despite its absence classically being considered a contraindication. A major challenge in the ACL deficient knee is obtaining appropriate gap balancing and limb axis. Robotically assisted UKA allows for precise control of these factors; however, it's utilisation as a tool with combined ACL reconstruction and UKA has not been described. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of robotically assisted UKA with combined ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

This was a retrospective single-centre study of ten patients operated by a single surgeon from 2016 to 2020. All surgery was performed using a cemented fixed bearing UKA prosthesis (Journey uni, Smith and Nephew®) (8 medial, 2 lateral) inserted with the assistance of an image-free robotic-assisted system (BlueBelt, Navio, Smith and Nephew®). All ACL reconstructions were performed using hamstring autograft. Clinical assessment included International Knee Score (IKS) score, Tegner score and patient satisfaction. Radiological assessment was performed to assess radiolucent lines, progression of OA in the other compartments, Hip-Knee-Ankle angle and Posterior Tibial Slope.

RESULTS

There were eight females (80%), mean age was 57 ± 7 [48-70], mean BMI was 26 ± 3 [22-31]. The mean follow-up was 45 months ± 13 months [24-66]. Mean post-operative IKS knee and function score were respectively 96 ± 4.5 [88-100] and 93 ± 8.2 [74-100], mean Tegner score was 4.5 ± 1.4 [3-6]. Nine patients (90%) returned to sport; one patient (10%) was dissatisfied because of residual pain preventing a return to a desired level of sport. 100% of the radiological objectives were achieved. No radiolucent lines were seen at the last follow-up. There were two re-operations (20%) for stiffness requiring arthroscopic arthrolysis at two and three months respectively following surgery, with full recovery of the flexion at the last follow-up in both cases. No other complications were observed.

CONCLUSION

Robotic UKA associated with ACL reconstruction provides satisfactory early patient outcomes and accurate implant positioning. The first results in terms of return to sports were promising.

Effect of Anterolateral Ligament Status and Inherent Knee Anatomy on Anterior Tibial Subluxation of the Lateral Compartment After Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Cohort Study Based on MRI Analysis

BACKGROUND

Anterior tibial subluxation (ATS) of the lateral compartment entails a pathological tibiofemoral alignment in knees with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Causes of increased ATS after an acute ACL injury are not clear, but soft tissue abnormalities and bony variations of the knee are potential causes.

PURPOSE

To determine whether increased ATS of the lateral compartment in knees with acute ACL injury is associated with (1) anterolateral ligament (ALL) status and (2) inherent anatomy of the lateral femoral condyle (LFC) and lateral tibial plateau (LTP).

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 337 patients with clinically diagnosed ACL injuries treated between September 2019 and August 2021 were retrospectively reviewed, and 119 patients with acute ACL injury were included. Of them, 79 patients with impaired ALL (ALL injury group) and 40 patients with intact ALL (ALL intact group) were identified based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The ATS of the lateral compartment measured on MRI was compared between the 2 groups. The bony anatomy of knees, quantified by the LFC length, LFC height, LTP length, and LTP slope, was also evaluated on MRI and correlated with the ATS with partial correlation coefficients. Multivariate linear regression was used to identify the independent predictors of increased ATS.

RESULTS

The ATS of the lateral compartment in the ALL injury group was significantly larger than that in the ALL intact group (6.3 mm vs 4.0 mm, respectively; P = .001). In all included patients, the presence of ALL injuries independently predicted a mean increase in ATS of 1.8 mm (P = .003). In the ALL injury group, ATS was significantly correlated with LFC length (r = 0.463; P < .001), LFC height (r = -0.415; P < .001), and LTP slope (r = 0.453; P < .001); further, a 1-mm increase in LFC length, 1-mm decrease in LFC height, and 1° increase in LTP slope independently predicted a mean increase in ATS of 0.7 mm (P < .001), 0.6 mm (P < .001), and 0.5 mm (P < .001), respectively. In the ALL intact group, there was no significant correlation between ATS and any bony parameter.

CONCLUSION

An impaired ALL increased the ATS of the lateral compartment after acute ACL injuries. In patients with combined ALL injuries, a flatter LFC and a steeper LTP in the sagittal plane were predictors of a further increase in ATS.

Failure modes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The reason for graft failure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is multifactorial. Controversies remain regarding the predominant factor and incidence of failure aetiology in the literature. This review aimed to provide a meta-analysis of the literature to evaluate the relative proportion of various failure modes among patients with ACLR failure.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EBSCO databases were searched for literature on ACLR failure or revision from 1975 to 2021. Data related to causes for ACLR surgical failure were extracted, and a random effects model was used to pool the results, which incorporates potential heterogeneity. Failure modes were compared between different populations, research methods, graft types, femoral portal techniques, and fixation methods by subgroup analysis or linear regression. Funnel plots were used to identify publication bias and small-study effects.

RESULTS

A total of 39 studies were analyzed, including 33 cohort studies and six registry-based studies reporting 6578 failures. The results showed that among patients with ACLR failure or revision, traumatic reinjury was the most common failure mode with a rate of 40% (95% CI: 35-44%), followed by technical error (34%, 95% CI: 28-42%) and biological failure (11%, 95% CI: 7-15%). Femoral tunnel malposition was the most common cause of the technical error (29%, 95% CI: 18-41%), with more than two times higher occurrence than tibial tunnel malposition (11%, 95% CI: 6-16%). Traumatic reinjury was the most common factor for ACLR failure in European populations and in recent studies, while technical errors were more common in Asian populations, earlier studies, and surgery performed using the transtibial (TT) portal technique. Biological factors were more likely to result in ACLR failure in hamstring (HT) autografts compared to bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts.

CONCLUSION

Trauma is the most important factor leading to surgical failure or revision following ACLR. Technical error is also an important contributing factor, with femoral tunnel malposition being the leading cause of error resulting in failure.

Prevention of Secondary Injury after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Relationship between Pelvic-Drop and Dynamic Knee Valgus

(1) Background: Optimal neuromuscular, Lumbo-Pelvic-Hip Complex, and lower extremity control are associated with decreased risk factors for secondary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. This study aimed to analyze any asymmetries and malalignments in the Lumbo-Pelvic-Hip Complex and the lower limbs at 6 months after ACL reconstruction (ACLR). (2) Methods: We conducted an exploratory retrospective observational single-center study in patients during the outpatient postoperative rehabilitation program at ICOT (Latina, Italy). From January 2014 to June 2020, 181 patients were recruited, but only 100 patients (86 male 28 ± 0.6 years, 178 ± 0.5 height; 14 female 24 ± 2.0 years, 178 ± 3.0 height) were eligible for the inclusion criteria and studied 6 months after ACL reconstruction surgery. (3) Statistical analysis: Student's t-tests and Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient were used to determine significant differences between affected and non-affected limbs and variables' association. (4) Results: The study shows a decrease in neuromuscular control of the Lumbo-Pelvic-Hip Complex and dynamic adaptive valgus of the knee at 6 months after ACLR (mean difference between pathological and healthy limb of dynamic adaptive valgus was -10.11 ± 8.19° 95% CI -14.84 to -9.34; mean value was 16.3 ± 6.8° 95% CI 14.04 to 18.55 for healthy limb and 4.2 ± 3.1° 95% CI 3.15 to 5.21 for pathological limb, p < 0.0001). The results also showed a relationship between dynamic adaptive valgus and contralateral pelvic drop (r = 0.78, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.88, magnitude of correlation very large). (5) Conclusions: The analysis showed an associative correlation between decreased postural control of the pelvic girdle and dynamic adaptive valgus of the knee in 38% of patients; this study highlights the usefulness of the Single-Leg Squat Test (SLST) as a clinical/functional assessment to evaluate the rehabilitation process and as a preventive tool to reduce the risk of second ACL injuries during the return to sport.

Clinical Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients With a Concomitant Segond Fracture: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The Segond fracture can be observed in patients with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear. It is unclear whether the Segond fracture affects clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction.

PURPOSE

To investigate whether the presence of a concomitant Segond fracture affects clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction and to compare clinical outcomes when a Segond fracture is repaired surgically or left unrepaired.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Three databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library) were searched in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines on July 27, 2020. Relevant studies regarding ACL injury with concomitant Segond fracture treated by primary ACL reconstruction were screened in duplicate. Data regarding patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were extracted. Descriptive data are presented, and a random-effects model was used to pool amenable data.

RESULTS

A total of 5 studies examining 2418 patients (987 female; 40.8%), mean age 25.4 years, were included in this study. There were 304 patients with a Segond fracture (mean age, 28.1 years; 35.9% female) and 2114 patients without a Segond fracture (mean age, 25.1 years; 41.5% female). Four studies directly compared outcomes between patients with an unrepaired Segond fracture and no Segond fracture. One study reported 12 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction and repair of a Segond fracture. Among 4 studies, 11 of 292 (3.8%) graft failures/revision surgeries were reported in the groups that had Segond fracture, whereas 145 of 2114 (6.9%) graft failures/revision surgeries were reported in groups that did not have Segond fracture. No significant difference was observed in the risk of graft failure between the 2 groups, with a pooled risk ratio of 0.59 (95% CI, 0.32-1.07; P = .08; I2 = 0%). No clinically significant differences were observed with regard to International Knee Document Committee score, Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale, and postoperative knee laxity between the group with Segond fracture and those without.

CONCLUSION

An unrepaired Segond fracture does not appear to have any significant negative effect on postoperative stability or risk of graft failure or revision surgery after ACL reconstruction. Future prospective studies may be warranted to confirm the finding that patients with combined ACL injury and Segond fracture may have outcomes comparable with those of ACL-injured patients without a Segond fracture when isolated ACL reconstruction is performed.

Are Neighborhood Conditions Associated With Surgical Delays and Meniscus Tears in Children and Adolescents Undergoing ACL Reconstruction?

BACKGROUND

Markers of a patient's social determinants of health, including healthcare insurance and median household income based on ZIP Code, have been associated with the interval between injury and ACL reconstruction (ACLR) as well as the presence of concomitant meniscus tears in children and adolescents. However, the aforementioned surrogate indicators of a patient's social determinants of health may not reflect all socioeconomic and healthcare resources affecting the care of ACL injuries in children and adolescents. The use of multivariate indices such as the Child Opportunity Index (COI) may help to better identify patients at risk for increased risk for delay between ACL injury and surgery, as well as the incidence of meniscus tears at the time of surgery. The COI is a summative measure of 29 indicators that reflect neighborhood opportunities across three domains: education, health and environment, and social and economic factors. COI scores range from 0 to 100 (100 being the highest possible score), as well as five categorical scores (very low, low, moderate, high, and very high) based on quintile rankings.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

To investigate the relationship between neighborhood conditions and the treatment of ACL injuries in children and adolescents via the COI, we asked: (1) Is a lower COI score associated with a longer delay between ACL injury and surgery? (2) Does a higher proportion of patients with lower COI scores have meniscus tears at the time of ACLR?

METHODS

In this retrospective, comparative study, we considered data from 565 patients, 18 years or younger, who underwent primary ACLR at an urban, tertiary children's hospital between 2011 and 2021. Of these patients, 5% (31 of 565) did not have a clearly documented date of injury, 2% (11 of 565) underwent revision reconstructions, and 1% (5 of 565) underwent intentionally delayed or staged procedures. Because we specifically sought to compare patients who had low or very low COI scores (lowest two quintiles) with those who had high or very high scores (highest two quintiles), we excluded 18% (103 of 565) of patients with moderate scores. Ultimately, 73% (415 of 565) of patients with COI scores in either the top or bottom two quintiles were included. Patient addresses at the time of surgery were used to determine the COI score. There were no differences between the groups in terms of gender. However, patients with high or very high COI scores had a lower median (IQR) age (15 years [2.6] versus 17 years [1.8]; p < 0.001) and BMI (23 kg/m 2 [6.1] versus 25 kg/m 2 [8.8]; p < 0.001), were more commonly privately insured (62% [117 of 188] versus 22% [51 of 227]; p < 0.001), and had a higher proportion of patients identifying as White (67% [126 of 188] versus 6.2% [14 of 227]; p < 0.001) compared with patients with low or very low COI scores. Medical records were reviewed for demographic, preoperative, and intraoperative data. Univariate analyses focused on the relationship of the COI and interval between injury and surgery, frequency of concomitant meniscus tears, and frequency of irreparable meniscus tears treated with partial meniscectomy. Multivariable regression analyses were used to determine factors that were independently associated with delayed surgery (longer than 60 and 90 days after injury), presence of concomitant meniscal injuries, and performance of meniscectomy. Multivariable models included insurance and race or ethnicity to determine whether COI was independently associative after accounting for these variables.

RESULTS

Patients with a high or very high COI score had surgery earlier than those with a low or very low COI score (median [IQR] 53 days [53] versus 97 days [104]; p < 0.001). After adjusting for insurance and race/ethnicity, we found that patients with a low or very low COI score were more likely than patients with a high or very high COI score to have surgery more than 60 days after injury (OR 2.1 [95% CI 1.1 to 4.0]; p = 0.02) or more than 90 days after injury (OR 1.8 [95% CI 1.1 to 3.4]; p = 0.04). Furthermore, patients with low or very low COI scores were more likely to have concomitant meniscus tears (OR 1.6 [95% CI 1.1 to 2.5]; p = 0.04) compared with patients with high or very high COI scores. After controlling for insurance, race/ethnicity, time to surgery, and other variables, there was no association between COI and meniscectomy (OR 1.6 [95% CI 0.9 to 2.8]; p = 0.12) or presence of a chondral injury (OR 1.7 [95% CI 0.7 to 3.9]; p = 0.20).

CONCLUSION

As the COI score is independently associated with a delay between ACL injury and surgery as well as the incidence of meniscus tears at the time of surgery, this score can be useful in identifying patients and communities at risk for disparate care after ACL injury. The COI score or similar metrics can be incorporated into medical records to identify at-risk patients and dedicate appropriate resources for efficient care. Additionally, neighborhoods with a low COI score may benefit from improvements in the availability of additional and/or improved resources. Future studies should focus on the relationship between the COI score and long-term patient-reported functional outcomes after ACL injury, identification of the specific timepoints in care that lead to delayed surgery for those with lower COI scores, and the impact of community-based interventions in improving health equity in children with ACL injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Consequences of anterior knee pain after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A 2015-2020 cohort study

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using hamstring tendon (HT) graft aims to stabilise the knee, but it may bring some complications like anterior knee (AKP) pain that can have consequences on the functional aspect of this surgery. The aim of this study was to compare isokinetic knee strength and functional outcomes between patients with and without AKP following an ACLR using HT graft during the first-year post-surgery. Three hundred and thirty subjects operated by ACLR using hamstring tendon graft were included in our retrospective cohort and divided into two groups: a group with AKP (AKP+ group) and one without AKP (AKP-group). In our population, 14.8% of the patients had AKP. At 4 post-operative months, subjects with pain had lower isokinetic strength limb symmetry index (LSI) for knee flexors and extensors, and a lower Lysholm score than subjects without pain (p < 0.0001). These differences did not persist at 7 post-operative months, and there was no difference in the one-leg hop test. After multivariate analysis, we highlighted the impact of time on the evolution of these parameters. Yet, the exact definition of AKP after ACLR remains to be clearly defined since an imprecise diagnosis may lead to inappropriate management. Pre-operative information about this type of complication, which evolves favourably with time, could be useful for patients. Indeed, AKP can occur after ACLR, even if a HT graft has been used, compared to other surgical procedures using the knee extensor apparatus as patellar tendon graft (AKP is associated with the donor site morbidity). In case of AKP after ACLR, monitoring the muscle inhibition by isokinetic tests may enable clinicians to adapt the retraining and the return to sport.

The incidence of deep vein thrombosis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: An analysis using routine ultrasonography of 260 patients

BACKGROUND

Recent studies regarding deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction investigated only symptomatic complications. The purpose of this study was to assess the true incidence of DVT after ACL reconstruction, regardless of symptom manifestation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medical records of 260 patients who underwent isolated ACL reconstruction between January 2014 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Regardless of symptom manifestation, DVT was examined for all patients at 1 week postoperatively using ultrasonography. Demographics, injury mechanism (high energy direct injury and low energy indirect injury), soft tissue injury, preoperative anterior laxity, tourniquet time, and surgical technique (transtibial, anteromedial portal, and outside-in techniques) were investigated. Soft tissue injury was evaluated on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, based on the Tscherne classification. Risk factors for proximal DVT were identified using logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 21 (8.1%) patients showed DVT. 5 (1.9%) patients had thrombosis at the popliteal vein; however, none of them exhibited symptoms. The other 16 patients had thrombosis at the distal veins: 1 patient at the anterior tibial vein, 5 patients at the posterior tibial vein, 3 patients at the peroneal vein, 6 patients at the soleal vein, and 1 patient at the muscular branch vein. The risk factors for proximal DVT included high energy direct injury (p = 0.013, odds ratio = 10.62) and grade 2 soft tissue injury (p = 0.039, odds ratio = 6.78).

CONCLUSIONS

The true incidence of DVT, including symptomatic and asymptomatic complications, were 8.1% after ACL reconstruction. This rate is higher than the previously known incidence which has been investigated only for symptomatic patients. Injury mechanism and soft tissue injury should be assessed when considering thromboprophylaxis.

ACL Reconstruction: Which Additional Physiotherapy Interventions Improve Early-Stage Rehabilitation? A Systematic Review

Despite the restoration of the mechanical stability of the knee joint after ACL reconstruction (ACLR), patients often experience postoperative limitations. To our knowledge, there are no systematic reviews analyzing additional physiotherapy interventions implementing standard rehabilitation programs in the early postoperative phase after ACLR. The objective of this study was to analyze the additional physiotherapy interventions implemented in standard rehabilitation programs that improve early-stage ACLR rehabilitation. For this systematic review, we followed the PRISMA guidelines. In March 2022 we conducted a literature review using electronic databases. Primary outcomes were pain, edema, muscle strength, ROM, and knee function. The risk of bias and scientific quality of included studies were assessed with the RoB 2, ROBINS-I and PEDro scale. For the review, we included 10 studies that met the inclusion criteria (total n = 3271). The included studies evaluated the effectiveness of Kinesio Taping, Whole-body vibration, Local Vibration Training, Trigger Point Dry Needling, High Tone Power Therapy, alternating magnetic field, and App-Based Active Muscle Training Program. Most of the additional physiotherapy interventions improved pain, edema, ROM, knee muscle strength, or knee function in early-stage postoperative ACL rehabilitation. Except for one study, no adverse events occurred in the included studies, which demonstrates the safety of the discussed physiotherapy interventions. Further in-depth research is needed in this area.

Complications following all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

We conducted a comprehensive analysis of possible perioperative complications following all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Additional techniques and tips are proposed to prevent and manage complications.

METHODS

Complications following all-inside ACLR performed between December 2015 and December 2020 were retrospectively analysed. Altogether, 348 operations were performed and 275 patients were enrolled with a minimum 12-month follow-up period. Only semitendinosus autograft was utilised in most patients, and semitendinosus-gracilis autograft and allograft were used in five and 31 patients, respectively. Simultaneous meniscal repair, partial meniscectomy, and chondral surgery were performed in 29.5%, 21.1%, and 4.4% of patients, respectively. Complications were observed based on the patient's clinical condition, plain film, and magnetic resonance imaging. Clinical outcomes were assessed pre-operatively and at 12 months post-operatively, using the International Knee Documentation Committee form, Lysholm and Tegner activity scores, and KT1000 side-to-side difference.

RESULTS

Intraoperative and post-operative complications developed in 65 patients (23.6%). The most common complication was cortical button malposition on the femoral side (19.3%). Intra-operative breakage of the retrograde drill was found in two cases (0.73%), with three cases (1.1%) of over-drilling with destruction of the outer cortex. Post-operatively, four (1.5%), 13 (4.7%), and 16 (5.8%) cases of infection, full-thickness re-rupture, and loss of extension, respectively, were recorded. Functional outcome scales showed significant post-operative improvement.

CONCLUSION

Cortical button malposition was the most common but easily preventable complication. All-inside ACLR could be safe and promising after the suggested additional operative techniques and proper perioperative management which decrease complication rates and improve favourable outcomes.

Early ACLR and Risk and Timing of Secondary Meniscal Injury Compared With Delayed ACLR or Nonoperative Treatment: A Time-to-Event Analysis Using Machine Learning

BACKGROUND

Surgical and nonoperative management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries seek to mitigate the risk of knee instability and secondary meniscal injury. However, the associated risk and timing of secondary meniscal tears have not been completely elucidated.

PURPOSE

To compare risk and timing of secondary meniscal injury between patients receiving nonoperative management, delayed ACL reconstruction (ACLR), and early ACLR using a machine learning survival analysis.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A geographic database was used to identify and review records of patients with a diagnosis of ACL rupture between 1990 and 2016 with minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients undergoing ACLR were matched 1:1 with nonoperatively treated controls. Rate and time to secondary meniscal tear were compared using random survival forest algorithms; independent models were developed and internally validated for predicting injury-free duration in both cohorts. Performance was measured using out-of-bag c-statistic, calibration, and Brier score. Model interpretability was enhanced using global variable importance and partial dependence curves.

RESULTS

The study included 1369 patients who underwent ACLR and 294 patients who had nonoperative treatment. After matching, no significant differences in rates of secondary meniscal tear were found (P = .09); subgroup analysis revealed the shortest periods of meniscal survival in patients undergoing delayed ACLR. The random survival forest algorithm achieved excellent predictive performance for the ACLR cohort, with an out-of-bag c-statistic of 0.80 and a Brier score of 0.11. Significant variables for risk of meniscal tear for the ACLR cohort included time to return to sports or activity ≤350 days, time to surgery ≥50 days, age at injury ≤40 years, and high-impact or rotational landing sports, whereas those in the nonoperative cohort model included time to RTS ≤200 days, visual analog scale pain score >3 at consultation, hypermobility, and noncontact sports.

CONCLUSION

Delayed ACLR demonstrated the greatest long-term risk of meniscal injury compared with nonoperative treatment or early ACLR. Risk factors for decreased meniscal survival after ACLR included increased time to surgery, shorter time to return to sports or activity, older age at injury, and involvement in high-impact or rotational landing sports. Pending careful external validation, these models may be deployed in the clinical space to provide real-time insights and enhance decision making.

Editorial Commentary: Clinically Depressed Patients Show Worse Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Than Situationally Depressed Patients and Patients Without Mood Issues

The impact of psychological factors on outcome after orthopaedic surgery is increasingly well reported. Specific to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, prior authors have reported that psychological factors influence return-to-sport outcome. Recent research shows that there is a difference between clinical depression and situational depression. Situationally depressed patients score low on psychological screens but do not have a pre-injury clinical diagnosis for depression. Clinically depressed patients score worse on outcome measures after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction than situationally depressed patients and patients without any mood issues. Furthermore 90.5% of situationally depressed patients had postoperative resolution of their depressive symptoms. Although there appears to be a strong link between clinical depression and limited postoperative outcome, it is still unclear whether depression is a modifier of outcome or whether poor outcome is predictive of persistent depression.

Rehabilitation versus surgical reconstruction for non-acute anterior cruciate ligament injury (ACL SNNAP): a pragmatic randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is a common debilitating injury that can cause instability of the knee. We aimed to investigate the best management strategy between reconstructive surgery and non-surgical treatment for patients with a non-acute ACL injury and persistent symptoms of instability.

METHODS

We did a pragmatic, multicentre, superiority, randomised controlled trial in 29 secondary care National Health Service orthopaedic units in the UK. Patients with symptomatic knee problems (instability) consistent with an ACL injury were eligible. We excluded patients with meniscal pathology with characteristics that indicate immediate surgery. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by computer to either surgery (reconstruction) or rehabilitation (physiotherapy but with subsequent reconstruction permitted if instability persisted after treatment), stratified by site and baseline Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-4 domain version (KOOS4). This management design represented normal practice. The primary outcome was KOOS4 at 18 months after randomisation. The principal analyses were intention-to-treat based, with KOOS4 results analysed using linear regression. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN10110685, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02980367.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 1, 2017, and April 12, 2020, we recruited 316 patients. 156 (49%) participants were randomly assigned to the surgical reconstruction group and 160 (51%) to the rehabilitation group. Mean KOOS4 at 18 months was 73·0 (SD 18·3) in the surgical group and 64·6 (21·6) in the rehabilitation group. The adjusted mean difference was 7·9 (95% CI 2·5-13·2; p=0·0053) in favour of surgical management. 65 (41%) of 160 patients allocated to rehabilitation underwent subsequent surgery according to protocol within 18 months. 43 (28%) of 156 patients allocated to surgery did not receive their allocated treatment. We found no differences between groups in the proportion of intervention-related complications.

INTERPRETATION

Surgical reconstruction as a management strategy for patients with non-acute ACL injury with persistent symptoms of instability was clinically superior and more cost-effective in comparison with rehabilitation management.

FUNDING

The UK National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme.

Single versus double hamstring tendon graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the paediatric patient: a single-blind randomised controlled trial study protocol

INTRODUCTION

There is currently no clear indication in the literature regarding a single or double hamstring tendon (single bundle) autograft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in the paediatric patient. The primary aim of this single blind randomised controlled trial is to determine whether a single or double hamstring tendon graft ACLR leads to superior clinical outcomes postsurgery in paediatric patients with ACL injury.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Single site, prospective, single blind, randomised controlled trial with two parallel treatment arms. 100 patients aged 10-18 years who present with an isolated ACL tear±meniscal injury, verified on MRI, will be randomly allocated to one of the two surgical groups. The primary outcomes will be side-to-side difference in anterior tibial translation and graft failure incidence 12 months postsurgery. Primary and secondary outcomes will also be assessed at 2-year and 5-year postsurgery.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Results will be presented in peer-reviewed journals and at international conferences and disseminated to participants and healthcare professionals via newsletters and hospital presentations. This study is approved by the Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service Human Research Ethics committee.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12620001170910p; Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry.

Anterior cruciate ligament tear increases the risk of venous thromboembolism: a population-based cohort study

PURPOSE

Previous studies highlighted an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR); however, the risk for those with ACL tear but without undergoing ACLR has not been reported yet. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of VTE among ACL tear individuals with or without ACLR derived from the general population.

METHODS

A cohort study was conducted using data from the IQVIA Medical Research Database of the United Kingdom. Up to five non-ACL tear individuals (n = 22,235) were matched to each case of ACL tear (n = 4474) by age, sex, body mass index and entry-time. The relation of ACL tear to VTE [pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT)] was examined using a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model. A sub-cohort analysis, in which the ACL tear individuals were stratified into those with ACLR and those without ACLR, was also conducted.

RESULTS

VTE developed in 13 individuals with ACL tear and nine individuals without ACL tear (incidence rates: 3.1 vs. 0.4/1000 person-years), with multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) being 6.59 (95% CI 2.28-19.08) in 1-year follow-up. For ACL tear individuals with ACLR, the HR was 11.44 (95% CI 2.71-48.28), and for those without ACLR, the HR was 6.02 (95% CI 1.44-24.25), compared with individuals without ACL tear.

CONCLUSION

This large-sample population-based cohort study provides the first evidence on an increased risk of VTE in ACL tear individuals regardless of subsequent ACLR, which supports the necessity for monitoring venous-thromboembolic complications in the target population, including those without ACLR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Return to play in paediatric & adolescent patients following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

There is an increased risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture and subsequent ACL reconstruction in patients <18 years old due to their high levels of sporting participation.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the rate and timing of return to play (RTP) in paediatric and adolescent patients following ACL reconstruction, and to compare the outcomes between those undergoing ACL reconstruction with bone patella tendon bone autograft (BTB) and hamstring tendon (HT) autograft.

STUDY DESIGN

Level of Evidence: Level III; Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study.

METHODS

The institutional ACL registry was screened for patients <18 that had undergone a primary ACL reconstruction. Outcomes were analysed for patients undergoing either a BTB or HT autograft for rate and timing of return to play, functional outcomes and subsequent knee injuries. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS.

RESULTS

358 (BTB; 253, HT; 105) patients were followed up for 24-months (95% follow up). 86 athletes (27 BTB; 59 HT) were aged 13-15 years old with no significant difference in RTP rate or timing between graft types, however, there was a difference in ipsilateral re-ruptures (10.2% HT vs 0% BTB p = 0.03). 272 athletes (226 BTB; 46 HT) were aged 16-18 years old with no significant difference in RTP rate or timing between graft types, or ipsilateral re-ruptures (8.7% HT vs 2.7% BTB p = 0.07). Concurrent ligament, meniscal or chondral injuries found at the time was treated as necessary.

CONCLUSION

Paediatric and adolescent patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with either BTB or HT had high rates of return to play. This was seen in both subgroups with 13-15-year-olds mostly receiving a HT graft repair and 16-18-year-olds mainly receiving a BTB repair. A moderate re-rupture rate was seen at 24-months. However longer follow up is needed to truly see the long-term impact of such an injury at such a young age.

Management of Chronic Transtibial Articulocutaneous Fistula After All-Inside ACL Reconstruction: A Case Report

CASE

A 29-year-old man presented 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction by autologous semitendinosus graft and suspensory fixation on both tibial and femoral sides for chronic drainage of clear fluid from an anteromedial wound at the site of the tibial tunnel with a visible sinus tract. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a transtibial articulocutaneous fistula. The patient was treated by tunnel debridement, impaction bone grafting, bioresorbable interference screw, and cement to fully seal the tunnel. The surgery was successful with good clinical outcomes for recurrence and knee stability.

CONCLUSION

Communicating transtibial articulocutaneous fistulas are rare complications after ACL reconstruction. Tunnel debridement and filling with graft material affected by an interference screw seem to be an effective method for dealing with such a clinical scenario.

Comparison of adductor canal block and femoral nerve block for pain management in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of adductor canal block and femoral nerve block for pain management in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

METHODS

A computerized search was performed in the database of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials. The outcome measures included visual analog scale, morphine consumption, quadriceps strength, length of hospitalization and postoperative adverse events. The risk of bias of randomized controlled trials was assessed according to the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. All quantitative syntheses were completed using STATA version 14.

RESULTS

Seven randomized controlled trials involving a total of 643 patients were included in our meta-analysis. The present meta-analysis indicated that there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of postoperative pain score, opioid consumption, length of hospitalization or adverse effects after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. However, adductor canal block showed superior quadriceps strength and range of motion in the early postoperative period.

CONCLUSION

Adductor canal block shows similar and adequate analgesia compared to the femoral nerve block in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and adductor canal block can preserve a higher quadriceps strength and better range of motion.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture in Skeletally Immature Patients

In the past 20 years, sports injuries in pediatric and adolescent athletes have increased dramatically, with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries accounting for more than 25% of all knee injuries at this age. Diagnosis is based on detailed clinical history, physical examination, and imaging assessment, where magnetic resonance imaging plays a central role. The growing immature skeleton presents specific characteristics, which require unique methods for surgical reconstruction, ideally avoiding the physes or minimizing the risk of damaging them. Specific rehabilitation protocols are needed, and these patients face a higher risk of recurrent and contralateral ACL injury. Nonsurgical treatment or delayed reconstruction has been associated with persistent instability, activity modifications, worst functional outcomes, and increased risk of irreparable injuries to menisci and articular cartilage. Consequently, surgical stabilization is the preferred treatment for most patients, despite the eventual risk of angular deformities or limb-length discrepancies due to iatrogenic physeal injury. A variety of surgical techniques have been described, depending on the skeletal maturity and growth remaining. Targeted prevention programs play a key role in reducing the risk of ACL injury, are easy to implement, and require no additional equipment. High-quality evidence supports its use in all pediatric athletes.