Fungi Associated with and Influence of Moisture on Development of Kernel Mold of Hazelnut

Kernel mold on hazelnuts is defined by the United States Department of Agriculture, U.S.A., as any visible fungal growth either on the outside or inside of the kernel. Only one yeast and one filamentous fungus have been associated with kernel mold of hazelnut in Oregon. In this report, fungi were isolated from kernels with mold and identified using morphological and molecular characters. Penicillium spp. were isolated most often from kernels with mold, but species of Aspergillus and Cladosporium and Diaporthe rudis were also frequently isolated. Additional fungi from three other genera were also isolated. All of the same fungi were also isolated from symptomless kernels. Eremothecium coryli or Ramularia sp. previously associated with kernel defects in Oregon were not found associated with symptoms of kernel mold. Incidence of mold was the highest when nuts were incubated in moist chambers on wet, nonautoclaved orchard soil and was significantly higher than kernel mold found in nuts incubated on either air-dried soil or wet, autoclaved soil. Preventing hazelnuts from coming in contact with wet soil in the field using elevated wire screens resulted in significantly less mold development in two out of three years evaluated. Nuts on screens had a greater chance to dry out between rainstorms as measured by significantly lower nut moisture levels at harvest.

Systematic review of the methods used in economic evaluations of targeted physical activity and sedentary behaviour interventions

The burden of noncommunicable diseases (NCD) on health systems worldwide is substantial. Physical inactivity and sedentary behaviour are major risk factors for NCD. Previous attempts to understand the value for money of preventative interventions targeting physically inactive individuals have proved to be challenging due to key methodological challenges associated with the conduct of economic evaluations in public health. A systematic review was carried out across six databases (Medline, SPORTSDiscus, EconLit, PsychINFO, NHS EED, HTA) along with supplementary searches. The review examines how economic evaluations published between 2009-March 2017 have addressed methodological challenges with the aim of bringing to light examples of good practice for future studies. Fifteen economic evaluations from four high-income countries were retrieved; there is a dearth of studies targeting sedentary behaviour as an independent risk factor from physical activity. Comparability of studies from the healthcare and societal perspectives were limited due to analysts' choice in cost categories, valuation technique and time horizon differing substantially. The scarcity of and inconsistencies across economic evaluations for these two behaviours have exposed a mismatch between calls for more preventative action to tackle NCD and the lack of information available on how resources may be optimally allocated in practice. Consequently, this paper offers a table of recommendations on how future studies can be improved.