Symptomatic subsegmental pulmonary embolism: what is the next step?

The introduction of computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) has led to an increase in the incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) diagnosis. However, the case fatality rate is lower and the mortality rates of PE have remained unchanged, suggesting a lower severity of illness. Specifically, the multiple-detector CTPA increased the rate of subsegmental filling defect reported in patients with suspected PE. Whether these filling defects reported on CTPA would correlate with true subsegmental PE (SSPE) on pulmonary angiography or are actually artifacts is unknown. The inter-observer agreement for SSPE diagnosis among radiologists with varied levels of experience is low (κ of 0.38; 95% CI, 0.0-0.89). Furthermore, the clinical importance of a symptomatic SSPE diagnosed by CTPA is unclear. SSPE are frequent on pulmonary angiography in patients with a low probability ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scan for suspected PE. Several prospective management cohort studies have demonstrated that patients with low or intermediate V/Q scan results can be safely managed without anticoagulation by combining the scan results with the pretest probability (PTP) of PE and compression ultrasonography. Although clinical equipoise exists, the majority of patients diagnosed with SSPE on CTPA are currently treated with anticoagulant therapy. Only a small number of patients with SSPE diagnosed by CTPA and without DVT who did not receive anticoagulation treatment have been reported in the literature. None of these patients suffered recurrent symptomatic VTE (PE or DVT) during the 3-month follow-up period (0%; 95% CI, 0-7.4%), suggesting that SSPE might be clinically unimportant. These conclusions are only hypothesis generating and need to be confirmed in prospective clinical management studies before changing clinical practice.

Sternal neoangiogenesis following internal mammary artery devascularization: an experimental model

AIM

The use of bilateral internal thoracic arteries (BIMA) for coronary artery revascularization is associated with better long-term survival and longer freedom from reoperation. Concerns of deep sternal wound infections and mediastinitis have constantly emerged with the utilization of BIMA grafts on a routine basis, especially in diabetic patients.

METHODS

We performed a quantitative evaluation of sternal bone healing and angiogenesis after left (LIMA) or bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA) ligation two and four weeks after sternotomy in normal and diabetic Sprague-Dawley rats.

RESULTS

The BIMA group showed a significant increase in neoangiogenesis two weeks after surgery compared to LIMA and control groups (control: 38.3 ± 5.1 vessels/mm², LIMA: 31.4 ± 3.6 vessels/mm², BIMA: 81.6 ± 7.7 vessels/mm²; P=0.047 and P=0.04, respectively). Four weeks after the procedure, bilateral devascularization was associated with lower microvessel formation when compared to LIMA or control groups (control: 50.4 ± 5.2 vessels/mm², LIMA: 64.6 ± 4.9 vessels/mm²; BIMA: 31.5 ± 4.4 vessels/mm²; P=0.006 and P=0.02, respectively). Diabetic animals showed similar results with lower four weeks microvessel formation. However, there were no significant differences when animals with induced diabetes were compared to the normal euglycemic groups for each procedure performed.

CONCLUSION

BIMA ligation promotes an early increase in neoangiogenesis. Progressive sternal consolidation is associated with a significant lower level of capillaries and arterioles in the BIMA group four weeks after ligation. Diabetes did not influence the extent of neoangiogenesis between groups with similar procedures. More important clinical determinants could explain the increase incidence of sternal infection in this specific population.

Baseline imaging after therapy for unprovoked venous thromboembolism: a randomized controlled comparison of baseline imaging for diagnosis of suspected recurrence

BACKGROUND

After a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE), many patients have residual pulmonary and/or lower limb vascular obstruction following completion of short-term anticoagulation. Residual vascular obstruction may complicate the diagnosis of recurrent VTE. Whether baseline imaging, conducted after completion of anticoagulation, helps in interpreting diagnostic testing in patients who subsequently have suspected recurrent VTE is unknown.

STUDY DESIGN

The REVERSE study is a cohort study whose primary aim was to derive a clinical decision rule to guide the duration of anticoagulation after a first unprovoked VTE. All patients underwent baseline imaging after completing 5-7 months of anticoagulant therapy. We performed a post hoc randomized controlled comparison among 121 patients investigated for a suspected recurrent VTE during follow-up: the decision on recurrent VTE with or without baseline imaging was made available to two independent adjudicators.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients not classifiable for recurrent VTE was statistically significantly higher in the group with no baseline imaging than in the group with baseline imaging: one in five as compared with one in 25. The interobserver agreement between the two adjudicators was better in the group with baseline imaging than in the group with no baseline imaging: κ-values were 0.78 and 0.54, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with a first unprovoked VTE, baseline imaging at completion of anticoagulant therapy helps in interpreting diagnostic tests performed in cases of suspected recurrent VTE.

Residual vein obstruction as a predictor for recurrent thromboembolic events after a first unprovoked episode: data from the REVERSE cohort study

OBJECTIVES

There is growing interest in using residual vein obstruction (RVO) to guide the duration of oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) for unprovoked deep vein thrombosis (DVT). We sought to determine if RVO as determined by compression ultrasonography (CUS) after completion of 5-7 months of anticoagulation for unprovoked DVT is associated with an increased risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a multicentre multinational prospective cohort study undertaken in tertiary care centers. Patients with a first 'unprovoked' major VTE were enrolled over a 4-year period and completed a mean 18-month follow-up in September 2006. All 452 patients with DVT had baseline CUS at inclusion to assess any RVO before stopping OAT at 5-7 months. During follow-up off OAT, all episodes of suspected recurrent VTE were independently adjudicated with reference to baseline imaging.

RESULTS

Forty-five out of 231 patients with abnormal CUS (19.5%) had recurrent VTE during follow-up, as compared with 32 out of 220 patients with normal CUS (14.6%), and one patient had inadequate CUS. There was no significant association between an abnormal CUS at inclusion and the risk of recurrent VTE: hazard ratio 1.4 (95% confidence interval, 0.9-2.1), P=0.19. None of the different degrees of clot resolution on baseline CUS was statistically significantly associated with the risk of recurrent VTE.

CONCLUSION

In our study, the presence of RVO at the time of OAT withdrawal was not associated with a statistically significant higher risk of recurrent VTE. RVO assessment may not be useful to guide duration of anticoagulation.

Residual vein obstruction to predict the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with deep vein thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

 Residual vein obstruction (RVO) detected on compression ultrasonography of the leg after a few months of anticoagulation therapy might be able to identify patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) at high risk of having a recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE).

AIM

 To determine whether RVO is associated with an increased risk of recurrent events in patients with DVT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

 A systematic literature search strategy was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials. We selected 14 articles (nine prospective cohort studies and five randomized controlled trials) that included patients with DVT who had an assessment for RVO with the use of compression ultrasonography. Two reviewers independently extracted data onto standardized forms.

RESULTS

 Overall, the presence of RVO was not associated with an increased risk of recurrent VTE (odds ratio [OR] 1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9-1.7) in patients with unprovoked DVT who stopped oral anticoagulation therapy at the time of RVO assessment. However, RVO was significantly associated with recurrent VTE in patients with any (unprovoked or provoked) DVT (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.0).

CONCLUSIONS

 RVO was associated with a modestly increased risk of recurrent VTE in patients with DVT (unprovoked and provoked). However, RVO did not seem to be a predictor of recurrent VTE in patients with unprovoked DVT following anticoagulation discontinuation. Further prospective studies are needed to assess the role of RVO in patients with unprovoked DVT.

Rates of venous thromboembolism in multiple myeloma patients undergoing immunomodulatory therapy with thalidomide or lenalidomide: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) treated with thalidomide- and lenalidomide-based regimens is high. Recent observational studies have suggested that thromboprophylaxis might be efficacious in decreasing the risk of VTE in this population.

PURPOSE

To determine the absolute rates of VTE with and without different thromboprophylactic agents in patients with newly diagnosed or previously treated MM receiving thalidomide- or lenalidomide-based regimens.

RESULTS

Patients with newly diagnosed MM treated with thalidomide in combination with dexamethasone have a VTE risk of 4.1 (95% CI, 2.8-5.9) per 100 patient-cycles. Therapeutic doses of anticoagulants seem to provide the largest absolute risk reduction of VTE. The rate of VTE in patients with previously treated MM receiving thalidomide in combination with dexamethasone is 0.8 (95% CI, 0.1-2.1) per 100 patient-months. A combination of lenalidomide and dexamethasone is associated with of risk of VTE of 0.8 (95% CI, 0.07-2.0) per 100 patient-cycles and 0.7 (95% CI, 0.4-0.9) per 100 patient-cycles in patients with newly diagnosed and previously treated MM, respectively. Similarly, the rates of VTE in patients also receiving thromboprophylaxis with aspirin were 0.9 (95% CI, 0.5-1.5) and 0.6 (95% CI, 0.01-2.1), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients with newly diagnosed or previously treated MM receiving thalidomide- or lenalidomide-based regimens in combination with dexamethasone are at high risk of VTE. The benefit of various types of thromboprophylaxis is difficult to quantify in patients with MM receiving immunomodulatory therapy, especially in those receiving lenalidomide-based therapy or who have previously treated MM. Randomized controlled trials are needed to address this important clinical need.