Silent cerebral embolisation during TAVI: evolution, predictors and neurocognitive effects

Background

Most patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) develop silent cerebral ischemic lesions (SCIL) detectable at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The natural history and clinical relevance of SCIL are not well established. We aimed to assess the characteristics, predictors, evolution, and neurocognitive effects of SCIL.

Methods

Cerebral MRI was performed within 7 days before TAVI to assess baseline status and age-related white matter changes (ARWMC) score. MRI was repeated postoperatively to assess the occurrence, location, number and dimensions of SCIL. Patients developing SCIL underwent a third MRI at 3–5 months follow-up. A neurocognitive evaluation was performed before TAVI, at discharge and at 3-month follow-up.

Results

Of the 117 patients enrolled, 96 underwent a postprocedural MRI; SCIL were observed in 76% of patients, distributed in all vascular territories, with a median number of 2 lesions, median diameter 4.5 mm, and median total volume 140 mm3. Independent predictors of SCIL occurrence were a higher baseline ARWMC score and the use of self-expanding or mechanically-expanded bioprostheses. Among 47 patients who underwent follow-up MRI, only 26.7% of postprocedural SCIL evolved into a gliotic scar. SCIL occurrence was associated with a more pronounced transient neurocognitive decline early after TAVI and with a lower recovery at follow-up.

Conclusions

SCIL occur in the vast majority of patients undergoing TAVR and are predicted by a more diffuse white matter damage at baseline and by the use of non-balloon-expandable prostheses. Although most SCIL disappear within months, their occurrence has a limited but significant impact on neurocognitive function.

Figure 1

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): unrestricted grants from Edwards Lifesciences SA, Nyon, Switzerland, and from Medtronic Italia SpA, Milan, Italy

Predictors of haemodynamic performance in patients with aortic stenosis and small annulus undergoing TAVI with self-expandable valves

Background

Small aortic annular size is one of the most important predictor of poor hemodynamic and clinical outcomes in patients treated for aortic stenosis. Post-hoc analyses of pivotal trials showed that transcatheter aortic valve intervention (TAVI) offer better outcomes then surgery in patients with small aortic annulus, especially with self-expandable valves (SEV). However, data about SEVs comparison in this population are limited.

Purpose

Our aim is to assess how valve design and oversizing, with anatomical and echographic features, impact on the hemodynamic performance of SEVs in TAVI patients with small aortic annulus.

Methods

The TAVI SMALL registry enrolled 859 patients with small aortic annulus (CT-scan annular perimeter≤72 mm or area ≤400 mm2) treated for aortic stenosis with currently available SEVs (Evolut R=397; Evolut PRO =84; Acurate Neo=140; Acurate TA= 61; Portico=177) at 9 European centers between 2011 and 2018. We performed multivariable backward logistic regression analyses to identify predictors of high postprocedural mean gradient, moderate-to-severe PPM, and moderate-to-severe para-valvular leak (PVL).

Results

After adjustment for LVEF, we identified annular perimeter and percentage of oversizing as independent predictors of lower post-procedural mean gradient.

Implantation of intra-annular rather than supra-annular bioprosthesis was the only independent predictor of moderate-to-severe PPM.

Predictors of moderate-to-severe PVL are reported in the Table.

Conclusions

Among patients with aortic stenosis and small aortic annulus treated with transcatheter SEVs, use of supra-annular bioproshtesis and oversizing were associated with improved valve performance.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

A HYbrid APproach Evaluating a DRug-Coated Balloon in Combination With a New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent in the Treatment of De Novo Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease: The HYPER Pilot Study

OBJECTIVES

To assess feasibility, safety and efficacy of hybrid approach, consisting in a combination of modern drug-eluting stent (DES) and drug-eluting balloon (DCB), for treatment of de-novo diffuse coronary artery disease (CAD).

BACKGROUNDS

Contemporary DES are associated with a persistent risk of major cardiovascular events, due to in-stent thrombosis and restenosis. The hybrid approach, reducing the permanent metallic cage length, is supposed to mitigate the risk of device-related adverse events, especially in diffuse CAD.

METHODS

This is a prospective, non-randomized, observational, multicenter study intended to obtain data from 100 consecutive patients affected by de-novo diffuse CAD undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with a hybrid approach, consisting in the combined use of DES and DCB in contiguous coronary segments. The study is recorded in ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifier: NCT03939468.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint is a device oriented composite end-point (DOCE) of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI) and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR) in DES- and/or DCB-treated segment. DOCE will be assessed at 12-months follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This will be the first study investigating the feasibility, safety and efficacy of hybrid DES/DCB approach for the treatment of de-novo diffuse CAD. Here we describe the rationale and the design of the study.

MitraClip Treatment for Severe Mitral Regurgitation Due to Chordae Rupture Following Impella CP Support in a Patient With Severe Aortic Stenosis

We report the case of an 85-year-old man with severe aortic stenosis who underwent high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with Impella CP support. Unfortunately, the device caused mitral chordae tendineae rupture leading to severe mitral regurgitation. The patient underwent a staged fully percutaneous treatment with transcatheter aortic valve replacement followed by elective Mitraclip therapy. Echocardiographic monitoring is of paramount importance during Impella insertion and removal in order to avoid and deal with mitral damage. Mitraclip therapy is a feasible rescue therapy for severe mitral regurgitation due to chordae rupture in patients at high risk for surgery.

Early detection of elevated cardiac biomarkers to optimise risk stratification in patients with COVID-19

OBJECTIVE

Risk stratification is crucial to optimise treatment strategies in patients with COVID-19. We aimed to evaluate the impact on mortality of an early assessment of cardiac biomarkers in patients with COVID-19.

METHODS

Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital (Rozzano-Milan, Lombardy, Italy) is a tertiary centre that has been converted to the management of COVID-19. Patients with confirmed COVID-19 were entered in a dedicated database for cohort observational analyses. Outcomes were stratified according to elevated levels (ie, above the upper level of normal) of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-TnI), B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) or both measured within 24 hours after hospital admission. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 397 consecutive patients with COVID-19 were included up to 1 April 2020. At the time of hospital admission, 208 patients (52.4%) had normal values for cardiac biomarkers, 90 (22.7%) had elevated both hs-TnI and BNP, 59 (14.9%) had elevated only BNP and 40 (10.1%) had elevated only hs-TnI. The rate of mortality was higher in patients with elevated hs-TnI (22.5%, OR 4.35, 95% CI 1.72 to 11.04), BNP (33.9%, OR 7.37, 95% CI 3.53 to 16.75) or both (55.6%, OR 18.75, 95% CI 9.32 to 37.71) as compared with those without elevated cardiac biomarkers (6.25%). A multivariate analysis identified concomitant elevation of both hs-TnI and BNP as a strong independent predictor of all-cause mortality (OR 3.24, 95% CI 1.06 to 9.93).

CONCLUSIONS

An early detection of elevated hs-TnI and BNP predicts mortality in patients with COVID-19. Cardiac biomarkers should be systematically assessed in patients with COVID-19 at the time of hospital admission in order to optimise risk stratification.

Drug-Coated balloons vs drug-eluting stents for the treatment of small coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of randomized trials

OBJECTIVES AND BACKGROUND

There is conflicting evidence about the effects of drug-coated balloons (DCB) compared with drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with native small vessel coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases and main international conference proceedings were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing DCB versus DES in patients with native small vessel CAD. Data were pooled by meta-analysis using a random-effects model. The primary endpoint was target vessel revascularization (TVR). Secondary clinical endpoints were: myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), all-cause death, cardiac death, and stent thrombosis or target vessel thrombosis. Secondary angiographic outcomes were: in-segment restenosis, in-segment percentage-diameter stenosis, in-segment late lumen loss, in-segment net luminal gain, and in-segment minimal lumen diameter.

RESULTS

Five trials enrolling 1,459 patients were included. Mean clinical follow-up was 10.2 months. The use of DCB, compared with DES, was associated with similar risk of TVR (odds ratio [OR]: 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56 to 1.68; p = .92), TLR (OR: 1.74; 95% CI: 0.57 to 5.28; p = .33), all-cause death (OR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.14 to 7.48; p = .98), with a trend toward a lower risk of MI (OR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.23 to 1.03; p = .06), and with significant lower risk of vessel thrombosis (OR: 0.12; 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.94; p = .04). DCB use was associated with similar risk of angiographic restenosis (OR: 1.12; 95% CI 0.69 to 1.84; p = .64), comparable late luminal loss (standardized mean difference (SMD): -0.18; 95% CI: -0.39 to 0.03; p = .09), while leading to significant higher percentage diameter stenosis (SMD: 0.27; 95% CI 0.12 to 0.41; p < .01) and smaller minimal luminal diameter (SMD: -0.52; 95% CI: -0.86 to -0.18; p = .003).

CONCLUSION

Compared with DES, the use of DCB for the treatment of native small vessel CAD is associated with similar TVR and restenosis and reduces the risk of vessel thrombosis, although DES implantation yields slightly better angiographic surrogate endpoints.

Predictors of patent and occlusive hemostasis after transradial coronary procedures

OBJECTIVES

To assess the independent predictors of patent and occlusive hemostasis (PH and OH, respectively) during radial hemostasis after coronary procedures.

BACKGROUND

Radial artery occlusion (RAO) is a thrombotic complication of transradial catheterization that can lead to permanent occlusion of the radial artery. Sheath-vessel diameter ratio, postprocedure compression time, occlusive hemostasis, inadequate, and excessive anticoagulation are all predictors of RAO.

METHODS

As a part of a previously published study investigating the relationship between residual anticoagulation and risk of RAO, 837 patients undergoing transradial diagnostic coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary interventions were enrolled. Cumulative heparin dose used during the procedure and ACT measured before sheath removal were recorded. PH with reverse Barbeau test was attempted in all patients (NCT02762344).

RESULTS

PH was less frequently obtained for increasing cumulative heparin dose and ACT values (p < .0001 and p = .0034, respectively). At logistic regression analysis both cumulative heparin dose and ACT values were independent predictors of OH (OR 1.017, 95% IC 1.011-1.023 p < .0001 and OR 1.004, 95% IC 1.001-1.006, p = .0004) while adjusted probability for RAO showed exponential relationship with both parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

The level of anticoagulation is strongly related to the incidence of RAO, and should be taken into account when choosing hemostasis protocol.

Evolution, Predictors, and Neurocognitive Effects of Silent Cerebral Embolism During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the characteristics, predictors, evolution, and neurocognitive effects of silent cerebral ischemic lesions (SCILs).

BACKGROUND

Most patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) develop SCILs detectable on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The natural history and clinical relevance of SCILs are not well established.

METHODS

Cerebral MRI was performed within 7 days before TAVR to assess baseline status and age-related white matter change score. MRI was repeated post-operatively to assess the occurrence, location, number, and dimensions of SCILs. Patients developing SCILs underwent a third MRI examination at 3- to 5-month follow-up. A neurocognitive evaluation was performed before TAVR, at discharge, and at 3-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Of the 117 patients enrolled, 96 underwent post-procedural MRI; SCILs were observed in 76% of patients, distributed in all vascular territories, with a median number of 2 lesions, a median diameter of 4.5 mm, and a median total volume of 140 mm³. Independent predictors of SCIL occurrence were higher baseline age-related white matter change score and the use of self-expanding or mechanically expanded bioprostheses. Among 47 patients who underwent follow-up MRI, only 26.7% of post-procedural SCILs evolved into gliotic scar. SCIL occurrence was associated with a more pronounced transient neurocognitive decline early after TAVR and with lower recovery at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

SCILs occur in the vast majority of patients undergoing TAVR and are predicted by more diffuse white matter damage at baseline and by the use of non-balloon-expandable prostheses. Although most SCILs disappear within months, their occurrence has a limited but significant impact on neurocognitive function.

Effect of Colchicine vs Standard Care on Cardiac and Inflammatory Biomarkers and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized With Coronavirus Disease 2019: The GRECCO-19 Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection has evolved into a global pandemic. Low-dose colchicine combines anti-inflammatory action with a favorable safety profile.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of treatment with colchicine on cardiac and inflammatory biomarkers and clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

In this prospective, open-label, randomized clinical trial (the Greek Study in the Effects of Colchicine in COVID-19 Complications Prevention), 105 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 were randomized in a 1:1 allocation from April 3 to April 27, 2020, to either standard medical treatment or colchicine with standard medical treatment. The study took place in 16 tertiary hospitals in Greece.

INTERVENTION

Colchicine administration (1.5-mg loading dose followed by 0.5 mg after 60 min and maintenance doses of 0.5 mg twice daily) with standard medical treatment for as long as 3 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Primary end points were (1) maximum high-sensitivity cardiac troponin level; (2) time for C-reactive protein to reach more than 3 times the upper reference limit; and (3) time to deterioration by 2 points on a 7-grade clinical status scale, ranging from able to resume normal activities to death. Secondary end points were (1) the percentage of participants requiring mechanical ventilation, (2) all-cause mortality, and (3) number, type, severity, and seriousness of adverse events. The primary efficacy analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients were evaluated (61 [58.1%] men; median [interquartile range] age, 64 [54-76] years) with 50 (47.6%) randomized to the control group and 55 (52.4%) to the colchicine group. Median (interquartile range) peak high-sensitivity cardiac troponin values were 0.0112 (0.0043-0.0093) ng/mL in the control group and 0.008 (0.004-0.0135) ng/mL in the colchicine group (P = .34). Median (interquartile range) maximum C-reactive protein levels were 4.5 (1.4-8.9) mg/dL vs 3.1 (0.8-9.8) mg/dL (P = .73), respectively. The clinical primary end point rate was 14.0% in the control group (7 of 50 patients) and 1.8% in the colchicine group (1 of 55 patients) (odds ratio, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.01-0.96; P = .02). Mean (SD) event-free survival time was 18.6 (0.83) days the in the control group vs 20.7 (0.31) in the colchicine group (log rank P = .03). Adverse events were similar in the 2 groups, except for diarrhea, which was more frequent with colchicine group than the control group (25 patients [45.5%] vs 9 patients [18.0%]; P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this randomized clinical trial, participants who received colchicine had statistically significantly improved time to clinical deterioration. There were no significant differences in high-sensitivity cardiac troponin or C-reactive protein levels. These findings should be interpreted with caution.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04326790.

Monotherapy with a P2Y12 inhibitor or aspirin for secondary prevention in patients with established atherosclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Antiplatelet therapy is recommended among patients with established atherosclerosis. We compared monotherapy with a P2Y₁₂ inhibitor versus aspirin for secondary prevention.

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, all randomised trials comparing P2Y₁₂ inhibitor with aspirin monotherapy for secondary prevention in patients with cerebrovascular, coronary, or peripheral artery disease were evaluated for inclusion. On Dec 18, 2019, we searched PubMed, Embase, BioMedCentral, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Additionally, we reviewed references from identified articles and searched abstracts from 2017 to 2019 presented at relevant scientific meetings. Data about year of publication, inclusion and exclusion criteria, sample size, baseline patients' features including the baseline condition determining study inclusion (ie, cerebrovascular, coronary, or peripheral artery disease), P2Y₁₂ inhibitor type and dosage, aspirin dosage, endpoint definitions, effect estimates, follow-up duration, and percentage of patients lost to follow-up were collected. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were used as metric of choice for treatment effects with random-effects models. Co-primary endpoints were myocardial infarction and stroke. Key secondary endpoints were all-cause death and vascular death. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I² index. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018115037).

FINDINGS

A total of nine randomised trials were identified and included in this study, and 42 108 patients randomly allocated to a P2Y₁₂ inhibitor (n=21 043) or aspirin (n=21 065) were included in our analyses. Patients who received a P2Y₁₂ inhibitor had a borderline reduction for the risk of myocardial infarction compared with those who received aspirin (OR 0·81 [95% CI 0·66-0·99]; I²=10·9%). Risks of stroke (OR 0·93 [0·82-1·06]; I²=34·5%), all-cause death (OR 0·98 [0·89-1·08]; I²=0%), and vascular death (OR 0·97 [0·86-1·09]; I²=0%) did not differ between patients who received a P2Y₁₂ inhibitor and those who received aspirin. Similarly, the risk of major bleeding (OR 0·90 [0·74-1·10]; I²=3·9%) did not differ between patients who received a P2Y₁₂ inhibitor and those who received aspirin. The number needed to treat to prevent one myocardial infarction with P2Y₁₂ inhibitor monotherapy was 244 patients. Findings were consistent regardless of the type of P2Y₁₂ inhibitor used.

INTERPRETATION

Compared with aspirin monotherapy, P2Y₁₂ inhibitor monotherapy is associated with a risk reduction for myocardial infarction and a comparable risk of stroke in the setting of secondary prevention. The benefit of P2Y₁₂ inhibitor monotherapy is of debatable clinical relevance, in view of the high number needed to treat to prevent a myocardial infarction and the absence of any effect on all-cause and vascular mortality.

FUNDING

Italian Ministry of Education.

[Ultralow-contrast transcatheter aortic valve implantation with an Acurate neo prosthesis in a patient with severe chronic kidney disease]

Chronic kidney disease patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation are at high risk of post-procedural acute kidney injury. In order to minimize this risk, a meticulous procedural planning is needed, as well as a multidisciplinary team of interventionalists and imaging specialists.We present the case of an ultralow contrast transcatheter aortic valve implantation with an Acurate neo self-expandable prosthesis in a patient with advanced chronic kidney disease.

Italian Multicenter Registry of Bare Metal Stent Use in Modern Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Era (AMARCORD): A multicenter observational study

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the use of bare metal stent (BMS) implantation in current percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) era, focusing on indications for use and clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND

Limited data on BMS usage in current clinical practice are available.

METHODS

All patients who underwent PCI with at least one BMS implantation in 18 Italian centers from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2017, were included in our registry. Rates of BMS use and reasons for BMS implantations were reported for the overall study period and for each year. Primary outcomes were mortality, bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium-BARC and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction-TIMI non-CABG definitions), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as the composite of all-cause and cardiac death, any myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, or any stent thrombosis.

RESULTS

Among 58,879 patients undergoing PCI in the study period, 2,117 (3.6%) patients (mean age 73 years, 69.7% males, 73.3% acute coronary syndrome) were treated with BMS implantation (2,353 treated lesions). The rate of BMS implantation progressively decreased from 10.1% (2013) to 0.3% (2017). Main reasons for BMS implantation were: ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (23.1%), advanced age (24.4%), and physician's perception of high-bleeding risk (34.0%). At a mean follow-up of 2.2 ± 1.5 years, all-cause and cardiac mortality were 25.6 and 12.7%, respectively; MACE rate was 35.3%, any bleeding rate was 13.0% (BARC 3-5 bleeding 6.3%, TIMI non-CABG major bleeding 6.1%).

CONCLUSION

In a large, contemporary, real-world, multicenter registry, BMS use progressively reduced over the last 5 years. Main reasons for BMS implantation were STEMI, advanced age, and physician's perception of high-bleeding risk. High rates of mortality and MACE were observed in this real-world high-risk population.

One-year clinical outcome of biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent in diabetic patients: Insight from the ULISSE registry (ULtimaster Italian multicenter all comerS Stent rEgistry)

BACKGROUND

The ULISSE registry evaluated the real-world performance of the Ultimaster® biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (BP-SES) in a multicenter-independent cohort of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, including a large proportion of diabetes mellitus (DM) patients.

METHODS

In this subgroup analysis, 1,660 consecutive patients, 2,422 lesions, treated with BP-SES enrolled in the ULISSE registry were divided in two groups: DM (485 patients, 728 lesions) and non-DM (1,175 patients, 1,694 lesions). Primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF), a composite endpoint of cardiac-death, target-vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 1-year. Secondary endpoint was TLR at 1-year.

RESULTS

At 1-year follow-up TLF occurred in 5% overall patients and was significantly higher in DM patients (8 vs. 3.7%; p = .001), due to more cardiac deaths (3.4 vs. 1.1%; p = .002). TLR occurred in 3.2% overall patients, and it was not significantly higher in DM compared to non-DM patients (4.4 vs. 2.8%; p = .114). The incidence of stent thrombosis was low and similar between groups (0.4 vs. 0.9%; p = .526). Insulin-treated DM (ITDM) patients showed higher rate of TLF as compared to non-ITDM patients (13 vs. 6.5%; p = .041), but similar rate of TLR (6 vs. 4%; p = .405). After adjustment for relevant comorbidities, DM was not significantly associated with TLF or cardiac death in patients undergoing BP-SES implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first all-comers evaluation of BP-SES in DM patients. Our findings show that DM patients, mostly those with ITDM, still represent a vulnerable population and experience significantly higher rate of TLF. Overall BP-SES efficacy is considerable, although not statistically significant higher rate of TLR is still present in DM compared to non-DM patients.

The Greek study in the effects of colchicine in COvid-19 complications prevention (GRECCO-19 study): Rationale and study design

OBJECTIVE

Colchicine has been utilized safely in a variety of cardiovascular clinical conditions. Among its potential mechanisms of action is the non-selective inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome which is thought to be a major pathophysiologic component in the clinical course of patients with COVID-19. GRECCO-19 will be a prospective, randomized, open-labeled, controlled study to assess the effects of colchicine in COVID-19 complications prevention.

METHODS

Patients with laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (under RT PCR) and clinical picture that involves temperature >37.5 oC and at least two out of the: i. sustained coughing, ii. sustained throat pain, iii. Anosmia and/or ageusia, iv. fatigue/tiredness, v. PaO2<95 mmHg will be included. Patients will be randomised (1:1) in colchicine or control group.

RESULTS

Trial results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

CONCLUSION

GRECCO-19 trial aims to identify whether colchicine may positively intervene in the clinical course of COVID-19. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04326790).

P6138Quality of clinical trial evidence on devices and drugs approved to treat coronary artery disease

Background

Regulatory approval of drugs and devices follow two different pathways. Whether different approval pathways underlie meaningful differences in quality of clinical trial evidence is unknown. We aimed to compare the quality of evidence of clinical trials that served as a basis for approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of drugs and devices used for the treatment of coronary artery disease.

Methods

FDA databases were searched for devices (i.e., coronary artery drug-eluting stents) and drugs (i.e., agents targeting atherothrombosis) approved between January 1st, 2001 and December 31st, 2017. FDA medical reviews were screened to identify trials that served for approval purposes. The pre-specified primary outcome was the prevalence of randomized trials used for approval (i.e. number of randomized trials/overall number of trials).

Results

A total of 97 trials were identified, 39 serving for approval of 13 devices and 58 serving for approval of 8 drugs. Devices were evaluated by fewer trials per item as compared with drugs (3.0±1.4 vs. 7.3±5.3, P=0.012) with similar study size (501 [100–1314] vs. 379 [183–904] patients per trial, P=0.55). Trials evaluating devices were less frequently randomized (56.4% vs. 94.8%, P<0.001) and more frequently designed powered for clinical endpoints (53.8% vs. 17.2%, P<0.001) as compared to those evaluating drugs. Use of randomization declined over time among trials supporting FDA approval of devices. In addition, significant differences were present between trials evaluating devices and those evaluating drugs in terms of study design, comparator used, blinding to treatment allocation, primary hypothesis, primary endpoint, and type of patients included.

Use of randomized trials for approval

Conclusions

There are substantial differences in clinical trial evidence serving for FDA approval of devices and drugs used for treatment of coronary artery disease. The lower degree of randomized evidence used for approval of devices as compared to drugs raises some concerns, particularly in view of its decline over time.