Characterizing opioid consumption in the 30-day post-operative period following shoulder surgery: are we over prescribing?

Objectives: The primary aim of this study was to characterize opioid consumption in the first 30 days after shoulder surgery. Secondary aims were to assess patient expectations, pain tolerance, risk factors for increase opioid consumption, and proper disposal of narcotics.Methods: Patients undergoing rotator cuff repair (RCR), anatomic shoulder arthroplasty, reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), distal clavicle resection, or labral surgery were prospectively enrolled. Collected data included demographics, Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), pain tolerance surveys, narcotic use, adverse effects, and disposal method.Results: Eighty patients were included in this study. At 28 days, RCR patients took significantly more 5 mg oxycodone-equivalent pills than RSA patients (18.4 vs. 7.5; p = 0.001). Number of days on narcotics did not differ between groups. By day 14, 73 (92.5%) patients had stopped taking narcotics entirely, with 872 5 mg oxycodone-equivalent pills prescribed in surplus. Ten (14.3%) patients required an additional prescription. There was a significant difference in tobacco use (20% vs. 1.4%; p = 0.04), psychiatric history (50% vs. 5.7%; p = 0.0004) and PCS (12.7 vs. 7.1; p = 0.027) in these patients, with PCS of 12.5 as predictive of requiring another prescription.Conclusion: All patients achieved adequate pain control, with 60 (75%) patients having excess pills. Opioid utilization differed based on surgery - significantly lower use in RSA patients compared to RCR. Only 13 (16.25%) patients required more than 20 5 mg oxycodone-equivalent pills. Tobacco use, history of psychiatric illness, and PCS were risk factors for requiring more prescriptions.

Liposomal bupivacaine infiltration in the surgical site for analgesia after rotator cuff repair: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is among the most painful of orthopedic surgeries. Liposomal bupivacaine is Food and Drug Administration approved for administration into surgical sites to provide postsurgical analgesia and has been used to address postoperative pain after many types of surgery, including total shoulder arthroplasty. However, its efficacy for pain control after rotator cuff repair is unclear.

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we compared liposomal bupivacaine with an equivalent volume of saline injected into the subacromial space and arthroscopy portal sites in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair under the interscalene block with sedation. The primary outcome measure was numeric rating pain score at the time of block resolution, as reported during the follow-up phone call on postoperative day 1. Secondary outcomes included mean pain scores at rest as well as oral morphine equivalent requirements on postoperative days 1, 2, and 3. This study provides Level 1 evidence.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in the primary outcome of numeric rating pain scores on resolution of the interscalene nerve block, nor in those reported on postoperative day 1 or 2. There was a minor but statistically significant difference in mean resting pain scores on day 3, though opioid consumption and patient satisfaction score did not differ between groups. In those instructed to perform passive range-of-motion exercises, there was no difference in reported mean pain scores among the groups.

DISCUSSION

In this study of patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, we found no statistically significant difference in mean pain scores on interscalene block resolution, a result consistent with a number of studies investigating liposomal bupivacaine for total shoulder arthroplasty. A modest reduction in pain was evident only on day 3, and there was no impact on perioperative opioid requirements, opioid-related side effects, or pain with motion. Liposomal bupivacaine, when injected into the subacromial space and the tissues around the arthroscopy port sites, provided minimal improvement in pain control in this patient population.

Resiliency influences postoperative outcomes following rotator cuff repair

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this retrospective review was to assess the effects of resiliency on postoperative outcome scores and complications following rotator cuff repair (RCR).

METHODS

In 2014, 49 consecutive patients underwent arthroscopic RCR for either a partial- or full-thickness tear performed by a single surgeon at a multi-location, single center. In these patients, the following scores were monitored: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R). Data collected at 4 years postoperatively were statistically analyzed by 1-way analysis of variance tests, Pearson correlations, and multivariate tests of between-subjects effects (multivariate analysis of covariance).

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant difference between cohorts and their scores of resiliency and optimism measured by the LOT-R (function portion of ASES score [ASESf], P = .048; pain portion of ASES score [ASESp], P = .003; and SST score, P = .009) as illustrated by a 1-way analysis of variance. A multivariate analysis of covariance found that LOT-R scores exhibited a significant impact on outcome scores (ASESf score, P = .043; ASESp score, P = .002; and SST score, P = .007). Correlational analysis indicated that LOT-R scores directly correlated with higher ASESp (P = .003), ASESf (P = .029), and SST (P = .018) scores. Regression line analysis provided a positive coefficient of determination value for all outcome scores.

CONCLUSION

The premise of this study was to look at mental resilience as a potential indicator of long-term outcome scores following RCR. The results of statistical analysis indicated that outcome scores are significantly different based on the degree of optimism; high levels of optimism impact and correlate to higher outcome scores. This study provides a basis for future studies of psychological resilience in the field of orthopedic surgery.

Revision Rotator Cuff Repair Versus Primary Repair for Large to Massive Tears Involving the Posterosuperior Cuff: Comparison of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes

Background:

The retear rate after revision rotator cuff repair (rRCR) ranges from 50% to 90%. Patients who undergo primary RCR (pRCR) for large to massive rotator cuff tear (mRCT) also have unpredictable outcomes.

Purpose:

To compare the clinical outcomes after rRCR for a posterosuperior rotator cuff tear of any size with those after pRCR for mRCT and to identify the risk factors for poor outcomes and retear after rRCR.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

Among patients with posterosuperior cuff tear treated between 2010 and 2017, the clinical outcomes of 46 patients who underwent rRCR were compared with 106 patients who underwent pRCR for mRCT. Between-group differences in patient-reported outcomes (visual analog scale [VAS] for pain, VAS for satisfaction and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] and Constant scores) at final follow-up were evaluated and compared with previously published minimal clinically important difference (MCID) values. Radiological outcomes were evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasonography at a minimum 1-year follow-up. Multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for poor ASES score, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess the risk factors for retear after rRCR.

Results:

The mean follow-up was 26.4 months (range, 24-81 months). Although final VAS for pain, VAS for satisfaction, and ASES scores in the rRCR group were significantly worse than those in the pRCR group, the Constant score was similar between the groups. These differences in outcomes did not exceed the MCID threshold. The retear rate in the rRCR group was 50% compared with 39% for the pRCR group (P = .194). In the rRCR group, risk factors for worse ASES score were retear (P = .043; r = –11.3), lower body mass index (P = .032; r = 1.9), and lower preoperative VAS for pain (P = .038; r = 2.3), and risk factors for retear were preoperative high-grade fatty degeneration (Goutallier grades 3 and 4) of the supraspinatus muscle (P = .026; odds ratio, 5.2) and serum hyperlipidemia (P = .035; odds ratio, 11.8).

Conclusion:

Both study groups had similar clinical and radiological outcomes. Patients with symptomatic failed rotator cuff repairs having high-grade fatty degeneration of the supraspinatus muscle and/or serum hyperlipidemia had a greater likelihood of retear after rRCR.

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Improves Sleep Disturbance and Quality of Life: A Prospective Study

Sleep disturbances are very common in patients with rotator cuff injury. Improvement of sleep quality in these patients can be considered a significant factor for healing in conjunction with surgery. The primary objective of this prospective study was to evaluate changes in sleep quality after surgery in patients with rotator cuff repair by analyzing the PSQI (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index) score. The secondary aim was to evaluate the improvement in quality of life in terms of functional limitations and shoulder pain after surgery. Fifty-eight patients with rotator cuff tears treated by arthroscopic surgery were included. All the patients completed the PSQI, the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36), the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES), the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) and the Constant-Murley Score (Constant) before and at one, three and six months after surgery. Overall improvement in all the scores analyzed (p < 0.001) was found. Preoperative and postoperative PSQI scores correlated with SF-36, SST, ASES and Constant scores at each follow-up. Preoperative and one-month postoperative OSS correlated with the PSQI score. Using the Friedman test, we found an overall improvement in all score analyses (p < 0.001). The results prove that after rotator cuff repair, sleep disturbances improve three to six months after surgery improving the quality of life of these patients.

Understanding Outcomes and the Ability to Return to Work After Rotator Cuff Repair in the Workers' Compensation Population

Introduction

Patients with a worker compensation claim are associated with a greater probability of continued symptoms and activity intolerance. This study aims to determine predictors of improved patient-reported outcomes in the workers’ compensation population.

Methods

Patients with workers’ compensation claims undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between 2010 and 2015 were included. Age, gender, dominant hand, occupation, and number of tendons involved were analyzed. At a minimum of two years, patients were contacted to complete American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Survey, Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and return-to-work status (RTW). Preoperative characteristics and scores were then compared.

Results

Seventy patients were available for follow-up at an average of 5.4 years (range: 2.1-8.8 years). Average age was 55 years (range: 37-72); 55 (78.6%) were males, 23 (32.9%) were laborers; and 59 (84.2%) patients returned to work. The sole predictor for RTW was surgery on the non-dominant arm (96.5% versus 75.6%; p = 0.021). Laborers showed decreased RTW (p = 0.03). Patients who completed RTW had excellent outcomes with higher ASES (87 versus 50; p value < 0.001) and SST scores (10.4 versus 4.6; p < 0.001). Patients with three tendon tears had inferior ASES (p = 0.026) and SST (p = 0.023) scores than those with less.

Conclusion

Most workers’ compensation patients have excellent outcomes from rotator cuff repair. Patients with three tendon tear repairs demonstrated the worst functional outcomes. Laborers showed decreased ability to RTW with nearly one-third unable.

Biomechanical evaluation of self-cinching stitch techniques in rotator cuff repair: The single-loop and double-loop knot stitches

In rotator cuff repair, strong and reliable suturing is necessary to decrease failure rates. The biomechanics of two self-cinching stitches – the single-loop knot stitch (SLKS) and the double-loop knot stitch (DLKS) – and the modified Mason-Allen stitch (mMAS) were compared. Twenty-seven porcine infraspinatus tendons were randomized among the three stitches. Each was cyclically loaded (10–80–200 N for 50 cycles each) while the gap formation was measured. Next, ultimate load to failure was tested. The gap widths after cyclic loading were 8.72 ± 0.93 mm for the DLKS, 8.65 ± 1.33 mm for the mMAS, and 9.14 ± 0.89 mm for the SLKS, without significant differences. The DLKS showed the highest ultimate load (350.52 ± 38.54 N) compared with the mMAS (320.88 ± 53.29 N; p = 0.304) and the SLKS (290.54 ± 60.51 N; p < 0.05). The DLKS showed similar reliability and better strength compared with the mMAS, while the SLKS showed a slight but not significant decrease in performance. In our experience, the DLKS and SLKS have clinical advantages, as they are easy to perform and the self-cinching loop knot allows the surgeon to grasp degenerative tendon tissue. Initial intraoperative tightening of the suture complex (preloading) before locking is important in order to decrease postoperative elongation.

'Physio's not going to repair a torn tendon': patient decision-making related to surgery for rotator cuff related shoulder pain

BACKGROUND

Rotator cuff related shoulder pain (RCRSP) is a common and disabling shoulder condition and surgical management is becoming more common. The rates and costs of surgical interventions have been on the rise. Understanding decision-making related to surgery and providing adequate information to people with RCRSP may improve patient-centred care and potentially reduce rates of surgery.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the decision-making processors of people who have undertaken surgery for RCRSP.

DESIGN

An in-depth thematic analysis.

METHOD

Interviews were conducted with patients from Melbourne who had had surgical management for RCRSP. Data were analysed using an inductive thematic approach.

RESULTS

Fifteen participants were recruited. Six key themes emerged: (1) Needing to get it done: "It was necessary to remedy the dire situation"; (2) Non-surgical treatment experience:" I knew that I'd done all I could"; (3) Mechanical problem:" Physio's not going to repair a torn tendon"; (4) Trust in medical professionals "If they told me that I needed to swallow a thousand spiders, I would have done it."; (5) Varied information sources "Dr Google played a big part in it"; (6) Organisational barriers "It was absolutely useless, my insurance."

CONCLUSION

Surgery appears to be commonly precipitated by unremitted severe symptoms and failed non-surgical treatment. While there was strong trust in highly trained surgeons, decision to undergo surgery also drew on questionable pathoanatomical beliefs and instances of inadequate patient information about treatment choices and risks that may be addressed by adopting a more patient-centred care approach.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONUnderstanding decision-making related to surgery and providing adequate information to people with rotator cuff related shoulder pain may improve patient-centred care.Surgery appears to be commonly precipitated by unremitted severe symptoms and failed non-surgical treatment.Decision to undergo surgery sometimes drew on questionable pathoanatomical beliefs.There was strong trust in highly trained surgeons but there were instances of inadequate patient information about treatment choices and risks.

Effects of Anxiety and Depression Measured via the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale on Early Pain and Range of Motion After Rotator Cuff Repair

BACKGROUND

Preoperative anxiety and depression are independent predictors of clinical outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. However, few studies have evaluated correlations between outcomes such as pain and range of motion (ROM) after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and preoperative anxiety and depression.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects of preoperative anxiety and depression, measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), on early pain and ROM after rotator cuff repair.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

A total of 144 consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were enrolled and divided into 2 groups according to HADS scores: group A, those with a healthy psychological status (n = 103; anxiety ≤7 and depression ≤7), and group B, those with psychological distress (n = 41; anxiety ≥8 or depression ≥8). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale for pain (pVAS) and ROM at 3 and 6 months postoperatively and annually.

RESULTS

There were no significant preoperative differences in age, sex, tear size, pVAS scores, and ROM. However, at 3 months postoperatively, group A showed significantly lower mean pVAS scores (2.2 ± 1.3 vs 3.4 ± 1.8, respectively; P = .001) and significantly higher mean forward flexion (146.4°± 23.0° vs 124.1°± 28.2°, respectively; P < .001) than group B, as well as significantly higher mean levels of internal rotation at the back (T11.5 ± 2.8 vs L1.9 ± 2.5, respectively; P < .001) and significantly higher mean external rotation (42.4°± 15.9° vs 35.2°± 16.8°, respectively; P = .019). At 6 months postoperatively, the mean pVAS score was still significantly lower in group A than in group B (0.8 ± 1.6 vs 1.8 ± 2.1, respectively; P = .016), but other ROM measurements had no significant differences. There was also no significant difference in clinical and functional outcomes at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Anxiety and depression negatively affected clinical outcomes after rotator cuff repair. Recovery from pain and of ROM after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair occurred more quickly in patients with a healthy psychological status. Therefore, assessments of preoperative psychological status should be emphasized to improve early clinical outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Proximal Biceps Tenodesis Incorporated into Supraspinatus Repair: A Case Series and Technical Description

Background:

Biceps tendon pathology is commonly associated with rotator cuff tears. A multitude of different biceps tenodesis techniques have been studied, with limited clinical data on arthroscopic biceps tenodesis techniques incorporated into rotator cuff repairs.

Purpose:

To evaluate the outcomes of an arthroscopic biceps tenodesis incorporated into a supraspinatus tendon repair.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

Patients undergoing surgical treatment of supraspinatus tendon tears with concomitant biceps tendon pathology were prospectively enrolled from 2014 to 2015. A total of 32 patients underwent combined biceps tenodesis and rotator cuff repair; of these, 19 patients were evaluated for a mean of 2.0 years. The primary outcome measures were the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES; patient self-report and physician assessment sections), visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, responses to specific biceps-related assessments, and biceps specific physical exam findings.

Results:

Patient-reported ASES scores improved from 45.9 preoperatively to 91.6 at the 2-year follow-up (P < .001). Pain VAS scores improved from 5.2 preoperatively to 0.7 at the 2-year follow-up (P < .001). Preoperatively, 18 patients had a positive Speed test; all were negative at 5 months postoperatively, and 21 patients had bicipital groove tenderness preoperatively, which resolved in all 21 patients at 5 months postoperatively. At the 2-year follow-up, 2 patients had cramping arm pain and 4 patients noticed a change in arm contour. There were no reoperations. No complications occurred in the study group.

Conclusion:

Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis incorporated into a supraspinatus tendon repair was a safe and reliable option for biceps pathology with a concomitant rotator cuff tear.

Celecoxib significantly reduces opioid use after shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The opioid crisis has illuminated the risks of opioid use for pain management, with renewed interest in reducing opioid consumption after common orthopedic procedures. Anti-inflammatory medication is an important component of multimodal pain management for patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of celecoxib on pain control and opioid use after shoulder surgery.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for either total shoulder replacement (group 1) or rotator cuff repair (group 2) were candidates for the study. The exclusion criteria included allergy to celecoxib, coagulopathy, use of anticoagulants, baseline use of long-acting opioids, and a history of medical conditions such as myocardial infarction or stroke. Consenting patients were randomized by type of procedure using block randomization to receive either placebo or celecoxib 1 hour prior to the procedure and for 3 weeks postoperatively. The primary outcome measure assessed was opioid utilization as measured by morphine-equivalent dose (MED). Secondary outcome measures included pain scores at 3 and 6 weeks postoperatively. Data were analyzed using multiple linear regression.

RESULTS

Of 1081 patients scheduled for either total shoulder replacement or rotator cuff repair from February 2014 to February 2018, 78 were enrolled for arthroplasty (group 1, with 39 receiving celecoxib and 39 receiving placebo) and 79 were enrolled for rotator cuff repair (group 2, with 40 receiving celecoxib and 39 receiving placebo). Compared with the placebo arm, patients prescribed celecoxib took fewer MEDs by -168 (95% confidence interval [CI], -272 to -64; P < .01) at 3 weeks in the total population and by -197.7 (95% CI, -358 to -38; P = .02) in the arthroplasty group. Similarly, at 6 weeks, total MEDs used was -199 (95% CI, -356 to -42; P < .01) in the total population and -270 (95% CI, -524 to -16; P = .04) in the arthroplasty group. No statistically significant differences in opioid consumption were found between study arms in the cuff repair group, at either 3 or 6 weeks. Of note, preoperative opioid use was statistically associated with higher levels of opioid use in the total population and group 1 at 3 and 6 weeks (P < .01 for all) but not in group 2 (P > .05 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of morphine equivalents was statistically significantly less at 3 and 6 weeks in patients who took celecoxib in the total population and in the arthroplasty group. Patients prescribed celecoxib for 3 weeks after shoulder surgery took less opioid medication for pain at 3 and 6 weeks. Multimodal pain control using celecoxib is an effective way to reduce postoperative opioid use in shoulder arthroplasty patients. Preoperative opioid use is associated with higher levels of opioid use after shoulder arthroplasty.

Clinical Outcomes of Nonoperative Treatment for Rotator Cuff Retears and Analysis of Factors That Affect Outcomes

Background

Patients who sustain a rotator cuff retear after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair are generally considered to have worse clinical outcomes compared with patients with an intact rotator cuff. However, some patients have good clinical outcomes, even with a retorn rotator cuff.

Purpose

To report the clinical outcomes of nonoperative treatment for rotator cuff retears and analyze the factors affecting clinical outcomes after a retear.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between 2011 and 2017 were reviewed, and those with a full-thickness retear on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included in this study. According to their pre- and postoperative scores on the pain visual analog scale (pVAS) and functional visual analog scale (fVAS), the patients were divided into 3 groups: (1) mild group (pVAS ≤ 1 and fVAS ≥ 8), (2) moderate group (pVAS ≤ 1 and fVAS ≤ 7 or pVAS 2-3 and fVAS ≥ 8), and (3) severe group (pVAS ≥ 3 and fVAS ≤ 7). Preoperative data (dominant hand involvement, heavy labor) and tear size on 6-month postoperative MRI were analyzed as factors affecting clinical outcomes.

Results

A total of 712 patients were reviewed, and a retear was observed in 62 patients (8.7%). Of the patients with retears, 52 were included in this study: 25 men and 27 women with a mean age of 62.6 years (range, 49-80 years) and mean follow-up period of 40 months (range, 24-88 months). According to the pVAS and fVAS scores, 25 patients (48.1%) were classified into the mild group, 9 (17.3%) into the moderate group, and 18 (34.6%) into the severe group. There were no significant differences in preoperative data among the 3 groups. The tear size in the coronal and sagittal planes decreased by 5.1 and 6.6 mm, respectively, in the mild group but increased by 2.8 and 1.4 mm, respectively, in the severe group.

Conclusion

In patients with retears, 48.1% had only mild symptoms at a mean of 40 months postoperatively. Patients with severe symptoms tended to have an increased tear size on postoperative MRI.

The 3D-Printed PLGA Scaffolds Loaded with Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Augment the Healing of Rotator Cuff Repair in the Rabbits

The healing of tendon-bone in the rotator cuff is featured by the formation of the scar tissues in the interface after repair. This study aimed to determine if the 3D-printed poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) scaffolds loaded with bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) could augment the rotator cuff repair in the rabbits. PLGA scaffolds were generated by the 3D-printed technology; Cell Counting Kit-8 assay evaluated the proliferation of BMSCs; the mRNA and protein expression levels were assessed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and western blot, respectively; immunohistology evaluated the rotator cuff repair; biomechanical characteristics of the repaired tissues were also assessed. 3D-printed PLGA scaffolds showed good biocompatibility without affecting the proliferative ability of BMSCs. BMSCs-PLGA scaffolds implantation enhanced the cell infiltration into the tendon-bone injunction at 4 weeks after implantation and improved the histology score in the tendon tissues after implantation. The mRNA expression levels of collagen I, III, tenascin, and biglycan were significantly higher in the scaffolds + BMSCs group at 4 weeks post-implantation than that in the scaffolds group. At 8 and 12 weeks after implantation, the biglycan mRNA expression level in the BMSCs-PLGA scaffolds group was significantly lower than that in the scaffolds group. BMSCs-PLGA scaffolds implantation enhanced collagen formation and increased collagen dimeter in the tendon-bone interface. The biomechanical analysis showed that BMSCs-PLGA scaffolds implantation improved the biomechanical properties of the regenerated tendon. The combination of 3D-printed PLGA scaffolds with BMSCs can augment the tendon-bone healing in the rabbit rotator cuff repair model.

Surgeon-Administered Nerve Block During Rotator Cuff Repair Can Promote Recovery with Little or No Post-operative Opioid Use

BACKGROUND

The use of opioid analgesia is common in both the acute and extended post-operative periods after rotator cuff repair. The current opioid crisis has prompted surgeons to seek alternatives that minimize or even eliminate the need for oral opioids after surgery.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We sought to investigate the effects on post-operative opioid use of a surgeon-administered block of the suprascapular and axillary nerves in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR), in particular to quantify outpatient opioid consumption and duration.

METHODS

In this prospective observational study, all patients undergoing primary ARCR performed under general anesthesia by a single surgeon were studied over a 15-month period. Of 91 ARCRs performed, 87 patients were enrolled and followed prospectively. At the conclusion of the procedure, the surgeon performed "local-regional" nerve blockade with injections to the sensory branches of the suprascapular nerve and the axillary nerve, as well as local infiltration about the shoulder. Use of medications in the post-anesthesia care unit was left up to the anesthesiologist. Patients were prescribed oral opioids (hydrocodone/acetaminophen 5/325 mg) for analgesia after discharge. The quantity and duration of opioid use and pain scores were recorded for 4 months. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate factors that could account for greater opioid use.

RESULTS

Total opioid consumption ranged from 0 to 30 opioid tablets (average, 4.2 tablets) over the 4-month period. Post-operatively, 91% of patients took between ten or fewer tablets, and 39% took no opioids. The average duration of opioid use was 2.4 days. No patients were taking opioids at the 4- to 6-week or 4-month follow-up visits, none required refills, and none received prescriptions from outside prescribers. No statistically significant differences were seen in opioids taken or duration of use in regard to tear size, sex, body mass index, surgery location, or procedure time. There was a significant inverse correlation between opioid use and age. In addition, the cost of the surgeon-performed procedure was substantially lower than that associated with pre-operative nerve blockade performed by an anesthesiologist. All patients were satisfied with the post-operative pain management protocol. Average reported post-operative pain scores were low and decreased at each visit.

CONCLUSION

With this local-regional nerve-blocking protocol, opioid use after ARCR was unexpectedly low, and a large proportion of patients recovered without any post-surgical opioids. The correlation seen between opioid use and age may not be clinically significant, given the low use of post-operative opioids overall. These results may be useful in guiding post-operative opioid prescribing after ARCR, as well as in lowering costs associated with ARCR.

Does change in occupancy ratio and fatty infiltration of the supraspinatus influence functional outcome after single-row rotator cuff repair? A magnetic resonance imaging-based study

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to analyze the correlation of occupancy ratio (OR) and fatty infiltration (FI) to functional outcome and retear rate following rotator cuff repair by single-row technique.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospectively, all the patients (n = 100) with rotator cuff tear were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively with functional scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form [ASES], University of California-Los Angeles [UCLA] shoulder score, Constant score) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for OR and FI. Two observers studied the MRI data separately. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS (version 16), paired t test, Pearson correlation, and intraclass correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

The mean (± standard deviation) follow-up was 16.24 ± 6.39 months, and the mean age was 56.18 ± 7.5 years. There was a significant increase in muscle atrophy (decreased OR) and FI (P < .01). The mean preoperative and postoperative ORs were 0.57 and 0.51, respectively. However, the mean functional scores improved significantly for ASES (55.78 to 82.09), UCLA (19.44 to 28.47), and Constant score (49.73 to 75.07) (P < .001). There was no significant difference in functional outcome among the different stages of FI (ASES P = .341, UCLA P = .839, Constant P = .376). Seven patients had asymptomatic retear during follow-up, of which 2 patients had grade 3, 4 patients had grade 2, and 1 patient had grade 1 FI, preoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Muscle atrophy and FI are irreversible phenomena and continue even after successful repair; however, they do not have a significant influence on the functional outcome at short-term follow-up after cuff repair. Repairing cuff with higher grades of FI can be performed as they achieve significantly improved functional outcomes.

Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State, and Substantial Clinical Benefit of the PROMIS Upper Extremity Questionnaire After Rotator Cuff Repair

BACKGROUND

The Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Upper Extremity (PROMIS UE) questionnaire has been validated as an effective and efficient outcome measure after rotator cuff repair (RCR). However, definitions of clinically significant outcomes used in interpreting this outcome measure have yet to be defined.

PURPOSE

To define clinically significant outcomes of the PROMIS UE questionnaire in patients undergoing arthroscopic RCR.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

We reviewed charts of consecutive patients undergoing RCR in our institution between 2017 and 2018 and included patients who were administered the PROMIS UE before surgery and 12 months after surgery. At 12 months postoperatively, patients were asked domain-specific anchor questions regarding their function and satisfaction after surgery, which were then used to determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State (PASS), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) using receiver operating characteristic and area under the curve (AUC) analysis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was utilized to identify patient factors associated with clinically significant outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients with RCR and minimum 12-month postoperative PROMIS UE were included in the analysis. The defined clinically significant outcomes were 4.87 for the MCID using a distribution-based method, 7.95 for the SCB (sensitivity, 0.708; specificity, 0.833; AUC, 0.760), and 39.00 for the PASS (sensitivity, 0.789; specificity, 0.720; AUC, 0.815). Among respondents, 79.0%, 62.9%, and 64.8% achieved the MCID, SCB, and PASS score thresholds, respectively. Workers' compensation was negatively associated with achievement of the PASS. Lower preoperative PROMIS UE scores were associated with obtaining the MCID (odds ratio [OR], 0.871; P = .001) and the SCB (OR, 0.900; P = .040), whereas higher preoperative scores were predictive of achieving the PASS (OR, 1.111; P = .020).

CONCLUSION

This study defines the clinically significant outcomes for the PROMIS UE after RCR, of which the majority of patients achieved the MCID, PASS, and SCB at 12 months after surgery. These thresholds should be considered in future study design and interpretation of PROMIS UE in patients with RCR.

Does a subscapularis tear combined with a posterosuperior rotator cuff tear affect postoperative functional outcomes?

BACKGROUND

The subscapularis is biomechanically important for the shoulder. However, few studies have clinically assessed its importance using a comparative design. Our objective was to compare the functional outcomes in patients who underwent isolated repair of posterosuperior rotator cuff tears and those with repair of combined tears involving the subscapularis.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study evaluating patients who underwent arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair between January 2013 and May 2017. The patients were divided into 2 groups: isolated repair of posterosuperior tears and repair of combined tears involving the subscapularis. The primary outcome was to evaluate the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) scales at 24 months' follow-up.

RESULT

A total of 326 patients were evaluated: 194 with isolated posterosuperior repairs and 132 with combined subscapularis repairs. Both groups showed significant improvement with the procedure (P < .001). The ASES score at 24 months showed no significant difference (P = .426) between the group without subscapularis repair (median, 90.0; interquartile range [IQR], 24.8) and the group with subscapularis repair (median, 86.3; IQR, 33.2). Similarly, the UCLA score showed no difference between the groups (median, 33.0 [IQR, 6.0] and 32.5 [IQR, 8.8], respectively; P = .190). The preoperative functional evaluation also showed no significant differences between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The functional results did not differ between patients who underwent isolated repair of posterosuperior tears and those with repair of combined tears involving the subscapularis, according to the ASES and UCLA scales at 24 months.

[Effect of unilateral rotator cuff repair on the contralateral shoulder in patients with bilateral rotator cuff tears]

Objective

To investigate the effect of unilateral rotator cuff repair on the contralateral shoulder in patients with bilateral rotator cuff tears.

Methods

A clinical data of 46 patients with bilateral rotator cuff tears met the criteria between May 2016 and May 2019 was retrospectively analyzed. Of 46 patients, 23 patients underwent bilateral conservative treatment (conservation group), 23 patients underwent unilateral arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, and conservative treatment on the contralateral side (operation group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, degree of rotator cuff tear, and comorbidities between 2 groups ( P>0.05). Before operation and at 6 and 12 months after operation, the degree of the rotator cuff tear was measured by MRI, and the shoulder function was evaluated by the visual analogue scale (VAS) score, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and range of motion (ROM) (forward flexion, external rotation, external rotation at 90° of abduction, and internal rotation). The evaluation results of the non-surgical side of shoulders in the operation group were compared with one side of shoulders in the conservation group.

Results

All incisions healed by first intention without any complication after operation. All patients were followed up 12 months. MRI reexamination showed that the degree of rotator cuff tear of the contralateral shoulder in the operation group increased significantly after operation ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the operation group and the conservation group before operation ( P>0.05), but the rotator cuff tear of the contralateral shoulder in the operation group was more serious than that of the conservation group at 6 and 12 months after operation ( P<0.05). At 6 and 12 months after operation, the VAS score, UCLA score, and ASES score significantly improved when compared with the preoperative scores in 2 groups ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the VAS score, UCLA score, and ASES score between 2 groups before operation ( P>0.05). The function scores in the conservation group were better than those in the operation group at 6 and 12 months after operation ( P<0.05). There were significant differences in the ROM of shoulder between pre- and post-operation in 2 groups ( P<0.05). And there was no significant difference between 2 groups at pre- and post-operation ( P>0.05).

Conclusion

For patients with bilateral rotator cuff tears, the unilateral rotator cuff repair can aggravate the rotator cuff tear of contralateral shoulder.

Preoperative Opioid Use Is a Risk Factor for Revision Surgery, Complications, and Increased Resource Utilization After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown preoperative opioid use to influence outcomes after various surgical procedures. Researchers have not assessed this relationship after rotator cuff repair (RCR).

HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE

The purpose was to assess the relationship between preoperative opioid use and outcomes after arthroscopic RCR. We hypothesized that patients prescribed higher daily averages of preoperative oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) would show increased rates of 90-day complications and 3-year revision surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

The MarketScan claims database was utilized to identify patients who underwent arthroscopic RCR between 2009 and 2018. We used preoperative opioid use status to divide patients into groups based on the average daily OMEs consumed in the 6 months before surgery: opioid-naïve, <1, 1-<5, 5-<10, and ≥10 OMEs per day. We retrieved 90-day complication and 3-year revision surgery rates. Opioid use groups were then compared with binomial logistic regression and generalized linear models.

RESULTS

We identified 214,283 patients. Of those patients, 50.7% did not receive any preoperative opioids, while 7.7%, 26.8%, 6.3%, and 8.6% received <1, 1-<5, 5-<10, and ≥10 OMEs per day over a 6-month time period, respectively. Complications increased with increasing preoperative OMEs. Multivariate analysis revealed that any patient using ≥1 OME per day had increased rates of 3-year revision surgery, reoperations, and infections. Specifically, patients averaging ≥10 OMEs per day showed a 103% (odds ratio, 2.03 [95% CI, 1.62-2.54]; P < .001) increase in the odds of revision surgery compared with opioid-naïve patients. Rates of hospital admissions and postoperative emergency department encounters were higher in all opioid use groups. Adjusted differences in 6-month preoperative and 3-month postoperative health care costs were seen in the opioid use groups compared with opioid-naïve patients, ranging from US$1307 to US$5820 (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative opioid use was a risk factor for complications and revision surgery after arthroscopic RCR. We also observed a dose-dependent response between opioid use and postoperative complications.

Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty after healed rotator cuff repair: a matched cohort

BACKGROUND

Rotator cuff tears are a common cause of failure after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a healed prior rotator cuff repair (RCR) on outcomes and complications after primary TSA. We hypothesized that patients with a prior healed RCR would have equivalent outcomes and complication rates compared with patients without prior surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all primary TSAs with a prior RCR was performed using a multicenter database between 2005 and 2017. Thirty shoulders with prior RCR were case matched on a 3:1 ratio with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Range of motion, strength, patient-reported outcome measures, complications, and reoperations were compared.

RESULTS

Thirty shoulders with a prior RCR were compared with 90 control patients without prior surgery at a mean follow-up of 43 months (range, 24-109 months). Groups demonstrated similar preoperative range of motion and patient-reported outcome measures. Postoperatively, TSAs with a prior healed RCR demonstrated less forward flexion (132° vs. 143°, P = .14) and strength (5.7 vs. 6.4 kg, P = .55) compared with control shoulders with no prior surgery; however, these did not meet statistical significance. Complications were significantly more common in patients with a prior RCR (17% vs. 7%, P = .01). Postoperative rotator cuff tears were significantly more common in TSA with a healed prior RCR (13% vs. 1%, P = .014).

CONCLUSIONS

TSA after RCR results in similar functional improvements compared with shoulders without prior surgery. However, the risk of a postoperative rotator cuff tear is significantly higher after prior successful RCR. Surgeons should consider this potential complication when indicating these patients for primary TSA.

Acromial morphology is not associated with rotator cuff tearing or repair healing

BACKGROUND

The purposes of this study were to determine whether acromial morphology (1) could be measured accurately on magnetic resonance images (MRIs) as compared to computed tomographs (CTs) as a gold standard, (2) could be measured reliably on MRIs, (3) differed between patients with rotator cuff tears (RCTs) and those without evidence of RCTs or glenohumeral osteoarthritis, and (4) differed between patients with rotator cuff repairs (RCRs) that healed and those that did not.

METHODS

This is a retrospective comparative study. We measured coronal, axial, and sagittal acromial tilt; acromial width, acromial anterior and posterior coverage, and glenoid version and inclination on MRI corrected into the plane of the glenoid. We determined accuracy by comparison with CT via intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). To determine reliability, these same measurements were made on MRI by 2 observers and ICCs calculated. We compared these measurements between patients with a full-thickness RCT and patients aged >50 years without evidence of an RCT or glenohumeral osteoarthritis. We then compared these measurements between those patients with healed RCRs and those with a retorn rotator cuff on MRI. In this portion, we only included patients with both a preoperative MRI and a postoperative MRI at least 1 year from RCR. Only those patients without tendon defects on postoperative MRIs were considered to be healed. In these patients, we also radiographically measured the critical shoulder angle.

RESULTS

In a validation cohort of 30 patients with MRI and CT, all ICCs were greater than 0.86. In these patients, the inter-rater ICCs of the MRI measurements were >0.53. In our RCT group of 110 patients, there was greater acromial width [mean difference (95% confidence interval) = 0.1 (0, 0.2) mm, P = .012] and significantly less sagittal acromial tilt [9° (5°-12°), P < .001] than in our comparison group of 107 patients. A total of 110 RCRs were included. Postoperative MRI scans were obtained at a mean follow-up of 24.2 ± 15.8 months, showing 84 patients (76%) had healed RCRs. Aside from acromial width, which was 0.2 mm different and thus did not have clinical significance, there was no association between healing and any of the measured morphologic characteristics. Patients with healed repairs had significantly smaller tears in terms of both width (P < .001) and retraction (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Although the acromion is wider in RCTs, the difference of 0.1 mm likely has no clinical significance. The acromion is more steeply sloped from posteroinferior to anterosuperior in those with RCTs. These findings call into question subacromial impingement due to native acromial morphology as a cause of rotator cuff tearing. Acromial morphology, critical shoulder angle, and glenoid inclination were not associated with healing after RCR. This study does not support lateral acromioplasty.

Stiffness after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a rehabilitation problem or a surgical indication?

Hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of clinically significant postoperative stiffness after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and its resolution. The study also sought to determine clinical and surgical factors that may be associated with increased rates of postoperative stiffness.

Methods

We conducted a level III retrospective review of a consecutive series of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs. During a 5-year period, the senior author (C.J.R.) performed 150 arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs at our institution. Demographic data, comorbid medical conditions, descriptions of rotator cuff tears (including size and level of retraction), and concomitant surgical procedures were evaluated on their correlation with stiffness. All office visits were reviewed to determine preoperative and postoperative motion. Patients were followed up at 1 week, 3 weeks, 6-8 weeks, 3 months, about 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively.

Results

In our analysis of tear types, we were unable to associate stiffness with the type of tear, the tendon torn, or the number of tendons torn or with whether the tendons were retracted. However, we were able to associate female sex, workers' compensation insurance, and a concomitant biceps procedure with stiffness at several time points. The incidence of stiffness was highest at 12 weeks, with 7.3% of patients presenting with stiffness. The rate of stiffness decreased with continued follow-up. Stiffness was found in 3.3% of patients at 16-24 weeks and in 1.6% of patients at 1 year.

Conclusions

Prolonged physical therapy will result in resolution of stiffness in the vast majority of cases, often obviating the return to the operating room for capsular release and lysis of adhesions or mobilization under anesthesia.

Clinical Outcomes of an All-Arthroscopic Biceps Tenodesis Using the Anterolateral Anchor During Concomitant Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair

Background:

Pathology of the long head of the biceps tendon frequently occurs concomitantly with rotator cuff tears, necessitating a surgical treatment, often in the form of a tenodesis procedure. Many techniques for a tenodesis exist; however, they often require additional implants or a separate incision.

Purpose:

To report an average of 2-year outcomes of an all-arthroscopic biceps tenodesis employing the stay sutures from the anterolateral anchor during concomitant double-row rotator cuff repair (RCR).

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed for all patients who underwent an all-arthroscopic biceps tenodesis during concomitant double-row RCR by the senior author between January 2014 and May 2018. Patients were included if they underwent this procedure and had baseline preoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with a minimum of 1 year of postoperative PROs for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain score. Additionally, patient data, surgical history, postoperative complications, and satisfaction were reported.

Results:

Fifteen patients were eligible for the study. There were 12 (80%) men and 3 (20%) women with a mean age of 50.0 years (range, 35-64 years). The mean follow-up time was 25.2 months (range, 13-63 months). Six of 15 (40%) patients also had an arthroscopic subscapularis repair performed. ASES shoulder scores improved from 37.1 preoperatively to 94.1 postoperatively (P < .001), and VAS scores improved from 6.4 preoperatively to 0.5 postoperatively (P < .001). One patient who underwent concomitant subscapularis repair reported continued anterior groove pain. No patients experienced biceps cramping, developed a deformity, or required a repeat operation at the final follow-up. Overall, 93.3% of the patients reported being highly satisfied with their surgery.

Conclusion:

This study presents the clinical results of an all-arthroscopic technique for concomitant double-row RCR and biceps tenodesis, which resulted in high rates of patient satisfaction and significant improvement in reported shoulder outcome and pain scores. Additionally, this technique offers the potential benefits of avoiding a secondary incision, which may decrease surgical morbidity while also decreasing cost by eliminating the need for an extra, tenodesis-specific implant.

Biomechanical effects of superior capsular reconstruction in a rotator cuff-deficient shoulder: a cadaveric study

BACKGROUND

Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) has been gaining popularity as a treatment for irreparable rotator cuff tears (RCTs), especially in younger patients. This biomechanical study aimed to investigate how SCR affects functional abduction force, humeral head migration, and passive range of motion following an irreparable RCT. We hypothesized that SCR will restore these parameters to nearly intact shoulder levels.

METHODS

Six fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were evaluated using a custom biomechanical testing apparatus. Each shoulder was taken through 3 conditions: (1) intact (control); (2) irreparable, complete supraspinatus (SS) tear; and (3) SCR. Functional abduction force, superior humeral head migration, and passive range of motion, including axial shoulder rotation, were measured in static condition at 0°, 30°, and 60° of glenohumeral abduction. Data were analyzed using the paired Student t test or Wilcoxon signed rank test, depending on the results of normality testing.

RESULTS

The irreparable SS tear resulted in significantly lower functional abduction force at 30° of abduction (P = .01) and a trend toward a decrease (P = .17) at 60° compared with the intact configuration. SCR shoulders produced greater functional force at 0° compared with the tear configuration (P = .046). Humeral head migration was significantly increased by 4.4 and 3.0 mm at 0° and 30° of abduction, respectively, when comparing the intact vs. SS tear configurations (P = .001). SCR decreased superior migration down to levels of intact shoulders at 0° and 30° of abduction (P = .008 and P = .013, respectively) and was not significantly different from the intact configuration at any angle. SCR decreased passive shoulder extension compared with the tear configuration and increased abduction compared with the intact configuration (P = .007 and P = .03, respectively). The overall arc of axial rotation was not significantly different between SCR and the intact configuration at any angle.

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of an irreparable SS tear, SCR restores key biomechanical parameters of the shoulder to intact levels. SCR should be considered for qualifying patients with irreparable RCTs.