Evaluation of estrogen receptor expression as a prognostic factor for very young women (below 35 years) with breast cancer in Taiwan

e22163

Background: In the past two decades, the incidence of very young (<35 years) breast cancer in Taiwanese has been rapidly increasing to quite close to that of Caucasian Americans. However, the clinicopathological features of this group of patients appear to be different from their Western counterpart. Here, we sought to determine the prognostic value of ER expression for this newly emerging population in Taiwan. Methods: We retrospectively collected information on all consecutive very young patients (age <35 years) with stage I-III breast cancer treated at National Taiwan University Hospital between 1997 and 2005. ER expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Tumor with more than 10% positive nuclei was considered ER positive. Results: A total of 178 patients with a median age of 32 (range: 21–35) years were included. The median follow-up time was 62.5 (95% confidence interval, 42.0–64.2) months. Univariate analysis showed that ER expression was significantly associated with favorable OS (HR=0.48, P=0.03), but not with DFS (hazard ratio [HR]=0.79, P=0.42). Multivariate analysis showed that stage and ER were independent prognostic factors. Conclusions: In contrast to the findings in Caucasians, ER expression was an independent prognostic factor for favorable overall survival in Taiwanese patients with very young breast cancer.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Quality of life in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving first-line gefitinib monotherapy

9614

Background: Gefitinib is a potential first-line treatment option for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), especially for patients with activating mutations in the EGFR gene. However, little is known about patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in this patient population. The aims of this study were to explore the prognostic values of baseline HRQOL for time-to-treatment failure (TTF), as well as the predictors of repeatedly measured posttreatment HRQOL, in advanced NSCLC patients receiving first-line gefitinib. Methods: A total of 106 chemonaive patients with advanced NSCLC were enrolled in a phase II trial. Gefitinib was given at a dose of 250 mg/d. HRQOL was assessed monthly with the EuroQoL instrument (EQ-5D) and the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) questionnaire. Baseline HRQOL and clinical/molecular predictors of TTF were jointly examined by multiple Cox's proportional hazards model. The associations between the clinical/molecular factors and repeatedly measured posttreatment HRQOL were analyzed by fitting marginal linear regression model using the generalized estimating equations (GEE) method. Results: In this prospective study, HRQOL data were obtained from 94 patients. Baseline EQ-5D index (estimated hazard ratio = 0.286, 95% C.I.: 0.135–0.603, p = 0.001) and the presence of L858R EGFR mutation in adenocarcinoma (estimated hazard ratio = 0.520, 95% C.I.: 0.307–0.880, p = 0.015) were retained as independent prognostic factors in the final multiple Cox's proportional hazards model for TTF. According to preliminary GEE analysis of repeatedly measured posttreatment HRQOL, the patients with wild-type EGFR consistently had worse HRQOL in EQ-5D index (p < 0.0001), EQ-5D VAS score (p = 0.0002), and LCSS global score (p < 0.0001), respectively. Conclusions: In advanced NSCLC patients receiving first-line gefitinib, better baseline EQ-5D index and L858R EGFR mutation in adenocarcinoma predict longer TTF. In addition, patients with wild-type EGFR had worse posttreatment HRQOL.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Helicobacter pylori-independent MALT lymphoma patients responsive to thalidomide—the molecular mechanism and the clinical application

e19512

Background: We have recently demonstrated that nuclear expression of BCL10 or NF-κB helps predict H. pylori-independent status; and inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α may be related to BCL10 nuclear translocation (Blood 2005;106:1037–41;J Biol Chem 2006;281:167–75). Recent studies have been shown that the chimeric protein of t(11;18)(q21;q21) can lead to constitutive NF-κB activity and thereby mediate cell survival and anti-apoptotic signals. The present study was conducted to investigate the molecular mechanism and the clinical efficacy of thalidomide, an TNF-α or NF-κB inhibitor, in H. pylori-independent MALT lymphoma. Methods: Between October 2003 and June 2007, our study enrolled 11 H. pylori-independent MALT lymphoma patients ( 7 men and 4 women; age range, 43 to 79 years; 7 patients who had failed chemotherapy or rituximab) with nuclear expression of BCL10 or NF-κB in pretreatment lymphoma tissues treated at National Taiwan University Hospital with thalidomide 100mg to 200 mg oral given daily. The presence of t(11;18)(q21;q21) was identified by a multiplex reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction of the API2-MALT1 chimeric transcript. Results: Three (27.3%) of 11 patients achieved a complete response (CR), and 3 (27.3) of 11 patients achieved a partial response (PR), resulting in an overall response rate of 54.5% (95% CI, 19.5%-89.6%). The median time from thalidomide therapy to CR was 3.0 months (range, 2.7–4.9 months). At a median follow-up of 41.6 months (range, 17.7–63.8 months), the 3-year event-free survival and overall survival after thalidomide treatment was 80.8%, and 88.9%, respectively. The API2-MALT1 fusion transcript for t(11;18)(q21;q21) was detected in 1 (16.7%) of 6 patients with CR or PR, and 4 (80.0%) of 5 patients with stable or progressive disease (P = 0.08). Conclusions: Our results indicate that thalidomide can be an adjuvant treatment for H. pylori-independent MALT lymphoma patients. Additional investigation of the molecular mechanisms and biologic significance of the API2-MALT1 fusion transcript responsible for thalidomide resistance in this group of tumors is needed.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Prognostic factors of survival in 236 advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients enrolled in prospective clinical trials of systemic therapy

e15632

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common malignant disease. Promising results of prospective clinical trials using systemic therapy for patients with advanced HCC are emerging. The aim of this study was to explore prognostic factors of survival in advanced HCC patients eligible for clinical trials of systemic therapy. Methods: From December 1990 to July 2005, 236 patients with unresectable HCC were enrolled into 6 phase II trials of systemic therapy using the following regimens: (1) oral etoposide + tamoxifen, (2)doxorubicin + tamoxifen, (3)IFN-α2b + doxorubicin + tamoxifen, (4)pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, (5)thalidomide, and (6)arsenic trioxide. Univariate and multivariate analyses of 23 relevant clinical characteristics/staging systems were used to identify prognostic factors of survival. Results: Baseline characteristics: median age 55; male/female: 192/44; HBsAg(+) 71%; anti-HCV(+) 30%; Okuda stage I/II/III: 42%/55%/3%; AJCC stage III/IV: 30%/61%; BCLC stage B/C/D: 1%/94%/5%; CLIP score 0–3/4–6: 70%/30%; portal vein thrombosis 53%; extrahepatic metastasis 59%; prior chemoembolization 46%. The objective response rate according to WHO criteria was 11.4%. The median overall survival was 118 days (95% CI, 103–133). In the multivariate analysis, significant predictors of a shorter overall survival were: HBsAg(+) with a hazard ratio (HR) = 1.808 (95% CI, 1.121–2.916; P= 0.015), symptomatic with HR = 1.745 (95% CI, 1.072–2.840; P= 0.025), ECOG≥2 with HR = 1.763 (95% CI, 1.040–2.988; P= 0.035), and high BCLC stage with HR = 3.282 (95% CI, 1.129–9.541; P= 0.029). Conclusions: Patients with advanced HCC who are eligible for systemic therapeutic trials have patient- and disease-related prognostic factors. Positive HBsAg, symptomatic, ECOG performance≥2, and high BCLC stage predict a shorter overall survival.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase II study of sorafenib in combination with tegafur/uracil (UFT) for Asian patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)

4589

Background: Sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor with antiangiogenic activity, has recently been approved for the treatment of unresectable HCC. Combination of sorafenib with metronomic chemotherapy has theoretic advantage in improving antitumor activity without increasing toxicities. UFT (tegafur: uracil = 4:1 in molar ratio), an oral fluoropyrimidine, is active in various gastrointestinal cancers. We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sorafenib plus low-dose UFT in advanced HCC patients (pts). Methods: Pts with histologically or cytologically proven unresectable/metastatic HCC, ECOG PS 0–2, Child-Puch class A, platelets ≥ 100 K/μl, transaminases ≤ 5 × ULN, bilirubin ≤ 3 mg/dl, INR ≤ 2.3 and creatinine ≤ 1.5 × ULN were enrolled. Prior systemic therapy for advanced disease is not allowed. Sorafenib (400 mg bid) and UFT (125 mg/m2 based on tegafur bid) were taken per os continuously. Tumor assessment was performed q8w by RECIST criteria. Primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Between April 2007 and April 2008, 53 pts were enrolled. Baseline pts characteristics were: M/F, 47/6; median age 57 (range, 31–83); CLIP score 0–3/4, 48/5; extrahepatic spread/macroscopic vascular invasion, 33/30; and HBsAg(+)/anti-HCV(+)/both(+), 38/13/4. 89% of pts were BCLC stage C. Pts received a median of 3.7 (range 0.3- 18.9+) months of treatment. There were 3 (6%) PR and 27 (51%) SD. The median PFS and OS were of 3.7 months (95% C.I., 1.9- 5.5) and 7.4 months (95% C.I., 3.4- 11.4), respectively. Adverse events (AEs) were summarized in Table . Hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR), fatigue, and diarrhea were most common AEs. HFSR was the major AE resulting in dose reduction (19%) or treatment delay (21%). Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 2 pts (4%). Conclusions: Adding metronomic UFT chemotherapy to sorafenib may improve therapeutic efficacy of the latter in pts with advanced HCC. The toxicity profile of the combination is similar to that of sorafenib alone.

[Table: see text]

[Table: see text]

Phase II study of cetuximab plus weekly cisplatin and 24-hour infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin for the first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer

4567

Background: Cisplatin-HDFL regimen, using weekly 24-hour infusions of cisplatin and high-dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin, is commonly used in Taiwan for patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC), showing an overall response rate of approximately 60% (95% CI: 45%-76%) [J Clin Oncol (Suppl) 2006; 24(18S): A14063 ]. We have demonstrated that cetuximab is cytotoxic to human GC cells, and has a chemosensitizing effect for cisplatin and 5-FU in GC cells [Proc AACR 2006; 47: A1233]. Methods: All patients had pathologically confirmed metastatic/ recurrent chemonaive GC, at least 1 measurable lesion, a fasting serum triglyceride level > 70 mg/dl, WHO PS 0/1/2, adequate hepatic, renal, and bone marrow functions. Cetuximab 400 mg/m2 was given as 2h infusion, initially (i.e., D1 of cycle 1); and followed by weekly 1h infusion of 250 mg/m2 (i.e., D8, D15, D22 of cycle 1, and D1, D8, D15, D22 of cycle 2). Cisplatin 35 mg/m2 was given as a 24h infusion, admixing with 5-FU 2,000 mg/m2 and leucovorin 300 mg/m2 (HDFL), D1, D8. A 24h infusion of HDFL was given on D15. Cycles were repeated every 28 days, and response evaluation was performed every 2 cycles & at the end of protocol treatment. The primary end-point was confirmed objective response rate (RR) by RECIST. Results: Between Dec. 2005 and Nov. 2008, 35 patients (M:19, F:16) with a median age of 56 (40–74) were enrolled and evaluable for response assessment. The overall RR was 68.6% (51–83%, 95% C.I.) with 1 CR and 23 PRs. Among a total of 269 cycles (median: 7, range: 2 to 22+ cycles) given, Gr3/4 neutropenia, infection, and hepatic toxicity developed in 6.0%, 4.8%, and 0.74% of 269 cycles, respectively. Two patients have developed acute hepatitis B flare-up among seven HBsAg (+) carriers, and were well controlled by lamivudine. Gr1, Gr2, and Gr3 acne- like rashes have developed in 57.1%, 31.4%, 5.7%; and Gr1, Gr2, Gr3 paronychia have developed in 40.0%, 8.6%, and 2.9% of 35 patients, respectively. Median PFS (range: 3 to 22+ months) and median OS (range: 3 to 35+ months) was11.0 and 14.5 months, respectively. Conclusions: Cetuximab plus infusional cisplatin-HDFL is a highly effective regimen with low toxicity and favourable survival in the first-line treatment of advanced GC.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): Asia-Pacific (AP) trial subgroup analyses by baseline transaminase (ALT/AST)/α-fetoprotein (AFP) levels

4590^

Background: Results of the phase III, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled AP trial demonstrated that sorafenib is effective and safe for the treatment of advanced HCC in patients from the AP region (Cheng et al, Lancet Oncol, 2009). Hepatic function influences treatment as a measure of organ damage and tumor stage. We performed subset analyses of the AP study dataset according to baseline hepatic function, as indicated by levels of ALT/AST and AFP. Methods: Patients (N=226) with advanced HCC, ECOG PS 0–2, Child-Pugh class A, and no prior systemic therapy were randomized 2:1 to receive sorafenib 400 mg BID or placebo. Endpoints included overall survival (OS), disease-control rate (DCR; defined as complete/partial response or stable disease by RECIST, maintained for ≥28 days from first demonstration of response), time to progression (TTP) and safety. Patients were grouped by baseline levels of ALT/AST (normal, mild, or moderate) and AFP (normal or abnormal). Results: Median TTP, OS and DCR by subset are shown in the table . The most common grade 3/4 adverse events in the sorafenib populations were hand-foot skin reaction and diarrhea. Conclusions: Sorafenib was effective and safe in patients from the AP region with advanced HCC within a broad range of baseline hepatic enzyme and AFP levels. These results suggest that sorafenib is an effective treatment for HCC, irrespective of baseline ALT/AST or AFP levels.

[Table: see text]

[Table: see text]

ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy and Exceptions

In compliance with the guidelines established by the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy (J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20;24[3]:519–521) and the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), ASCO strives to promote balance, independence, objectivity, and scientific rigor through disclosure of financial and other interests, and identification and management of potential conflicts. According to the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy, the following financial and other relationships must be disclosed: employment or leadership position, consultant or advisory role, stock ownership, honoraria, research funding, expert testimony, and other remuneration (J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20;24[3]:520). The ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy disclosure requirements apply to all authors who submit abstracts to the Annual Meeting.

For clinical trials that began accrual on or after April 29, 2004, ASCO's Policy places some restrictions on the financial relationships of principal investigators (J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20;24[3]:521). If a principal investigator holds any restricted relationships, his or her abstract will be ineligible for placement in the 2009 Annual Meeting unless the ASCO Ethics Committee grants an exception. Among the circumstances that might justify an exception are that the principal investigator (1) is a widely acknowledged expert in a particular therapeutic area; (2) is the inventor of a unique technology or treatment being evaluated in the clinical trial; or (3) is involved in international clinical oncology research and has acted consistently with recognized international standards of ethics in the conduct of clinical research. NIH-sponsored trials are exempt from the Policy restrictions. Abstracts for which authors requested and have been granted an exception in accordance with ASCO's Policy are designated with a caret symbol (^) in the Annual Meeting Proceedings.

For more information about the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy and the exceptions process, please visit www.asco.org/conflictofinterest .

Impact of prior surgical resection with curative intent on the efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): Subset analysis of the Asia-Pacific (AP) study

e15518^

Background: The multinational, phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled AP study demonstrated that sorafenib is effective and safe for the treatment of advanced HCC in patients from the AP region (Cheng, et al. Lancet Oncol, 2009). Surgical resection with curative intent is a commonly used procedure for the treatment of HCC; however, tumor recurrence occurs in the majority of patients. Hence, it is of interest to analyze the efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients who had undergone prior partial hepatectomy. Methods: Patients (N=226) with advanced HCC, ECOG PS 0–2, Child-Pugh class A, and no prior systemic therapy were randomized 2:1 to receive either sorafenib 400 mg BID or placebo. End points included overall survival (OS), disease-control rate (DCR; defined as complete/partial response or stable disease by RECIST, maintained for ≥28 d from first demonstration of response), time-to-progression (TTP), and safety. Results: Of 226 patients enrolled, 70 had previously undergone partial hepatectomy. Median TTP, OS, and DCR by subset are shown in the table. The safety profile of sorafenib in patients with and without prior hepatectomy was similar to that reported for the total study population. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events in the sorafenib groups were hand-foot skin reaction and diarrhea. Conclusions: Sorafenib was safe for the treatment of advanced HCC in patients from the AP region, whether or not they had undergone prior surgical resection. Sorafenib treatment resulted in similar TTP in patients with and without a history of prior partial hepatectomy, and the magnitude of TTP was similar in both groups to that in the overall population. Due to small sample size, further study is warranted. [Table: see text]

[Table: see text]

ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy and Exceptions

In compliance with the guidelines established by the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy (J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20;24[3]:519–521) and the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), ASCO strives to promote balance, independence, objectivity, and scientific rigor through disclosure of financial and other interests, and identification and management of potential conflicts. According to the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy, the following financial and other relationships must be disclosed: employment or leadership position, consultant or advisory role, stock ownership, honoraria, research funding, expert testimony, and other remuneration (J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20;24[3]:520). The ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy disclosure requirements apply to all authors who submit abstracts to the Annual Meeting.

For clinical trials that began accrual on or after April 29, 2004, ASCO's Policy places some restrictions on the financial relationships of principal investigators (J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20;24[3]:521). If a principal investigator holds any restricted relationships, his or her abstract will be ineligible for placement in the 2009 Annual Meeting unless the ASCO Ethics Committee grants an exception. Among the circumstances that might justify an exception are that the principal investigator (1) is a widely acknowledged expert in a particular therapeutic area; (2) is the inventor of a unique technology or treatment being evaluated in the clinical trial; or (3) is involved in international clinical oncology research and has acted consistently with recognized international standards of ethics in the conduct of clinical research. NIH-sponsored trials are exempt from the Policy restrictions. Abstracts for which authors requested and have been granted an exception in accordance with ASCO's Policy are designated with a caret symbol (^) in the Annual Meeting Proceedings.

For more information about the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy and the exceptions process, please visit www.asco.org/conflictofinterest .

Pediatric caustic ingestion: 50 consecutive cases and a review of the literature

Caustic injury to the aerodigestive tract remains a significant medical and social concern despite various efforts to minimize hazards of caustic household products. Agents with a pH less than two or greater than 12 are extremely corrosive, causing damage that can range from mild to extensive, including esophageal perforation leading to mediastinitis and death at the extreme scale. Methods include retrospective case note review of all admissions to the otolaryngology unit with caustic injury that underwent esophagoscopy to the Children's Hospital Westmead between 1990 and 2007. A protocol-based management system with antibiotics and steroids together with esophagoscopy at 48 hours was implemented. A total of 50 admissions were identified with an average follow-up of 5 years. There were a total of 28 males and 22 females with a median age of 22 months. Forty-nine cases (98%) were accidental. Thirty-eight cases (76%) occurred within the interiors of the family home with the kitchen being the common location. Another seven (14%) occurred within the external environment of the home, usually in the garage or pool shed. The causative agents were varied with 37 (74%) being alkali, three cases (6%) being acidic, and other agents, such as chlorine bleach, being the remainder. The most frequently ingested alkalis were dishwashing powder and disinfectants closely followed by degreasers. Twenty-five children (50%) drank directly from a container with the remainder ingesting granules or powder directly. At esophagoscopy, 17 cases (34%) had grade 1 injury and 10 (20%) had grade 2 injury. Fifty percent of patients of grade 2 injury subsequently developed strictures requiring multiple dilatations. Importantly, six cases (12%) had evidence of esophageal injury without oral injury. Caustic injuries continue to be a significant morbidity in the pediatric patient group. Most cases are still happening as a result of accidental ingestion from unmarked containers within reach of children at home. Oral injury is not always a useful marker of more significant distal injury. A protocol-based management can identify children at risk for long-term stricture earlier.

Life-threatening perineal sepsis after rubber band ligation of haemorrhoids

Rubber band ligation is a widely performed procedure in the outpatient setting for symptomatic haemorrhoids. This method is generally considered to be safe and easily performed. However, there have been reports of severe sepsis following interventions for haemorrhoids and the majority of patients had undergone rubber band ligation. We present a patient who had undergone elective rubber band ligation of haemorrhoids who presented with severe anal pain with difficulty in micturition. She deteriorated rapidly over a period of 3 days and succumbed to fulminant perineal sepsis.

The Sengstaken-Blakemore tube: uses and abuses

Due to its complications including oesophageal and gastric ulceration and perforation, the Sengstaken-Blakemore tube is used far less commonly in this new millennium where endoscopic intervention is available. We discuss in a 53-year-old Indian woman an unusual life-saving use of the Sengstaken-Blakemore tube in preventing fatal exsanguination from an aortoesophageal fistula, as well as rare but devastating consequences of the insertion and residence of the Sengstaken-Blakemore tube, including acute airway obstruction and bronchoesophageal fistula.

Randomized clinical trial comparing LigaSure haemorrhoidectomy with open diathermy haemorrhoidectomy

Background Milligan-Morgan excision haem-orrhoidectomy remains a very popular treatment modality for third and fourth degree haemorrhoids due to its cost effectiveness and good long-term results. The LigaSure tissue-sealing device is an alternative technique used in haemorrhoidectomy that has been shown to produce favourable results. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the LigaSure tissue sealing device in comparison with conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy

Methods A prospective clinical trial was conducted. Patients with newly diagnosed haemorrhoids requiring haemorrhoidectomy were randomized to either LigaSure haemorrhoidectomy or diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. Surgical technique and postoperative care was standardized. Outcome measures were operative time and bleeding, postoperative pain (measured on a visual analogue scale) and rate of wound healing

Results We randomized 44 patients, 22 to LigaSure and 22 to diathermy; 43 patients were evaluated. They were aged between 19 and 71 years. There were no differences in patient demographics or type of haemorrhoid being operated on. LigaSure haemorrhoidectomy had a significantly lower mean operative time and intraoperative bleeding. At 3 weeks after surgery, haemorrhoidectomy performed with LigaSure had an odds ratio for complete epithelialization of 3.1 over diathermy (95% CI 1.2–8.2). There was no difference in postoperative pain

Conclusion LigaSure haemorrhoidectomy is superior to diathermy for open haemorrhoidectomy