Lichen planus and mesalazine

Lichen planus is a recognized complication of sulfasalazine therapy. Two patients developed typical oral and cutaneous lichen planus on sulfasalazine and their skin lesions recurred when they were subsequently changed to mesalazine. Lichen planus only resolved on withdrawal of both drugs. It seems likely that the aminosalicylic acid moiety is responsible for this reaction and that lichen planus is a true complication of mesalazine therapy.

Risk-benefit assessment of drugs used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

Although the aetiology of inflammatory bowel disease remains elusive, many agents are available for the control of symptoms and inflammation. Knowledge of drug pharmacology, indications and side effects is essential to ensure the best possible clinical care while minimising toxicity and inappropriate use. Sulfasalazine consists of sulfapyridine linked to mesalazine (5-aminosalicylic acid) via an azobond. Its use is indicated in the treatment of mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis and in the prevention of relapse in patients with quiescent disease. Patients with mild to moderate colonic or ileocolonic Crohn's disease also benefit from this drug, as do a proportion of patients with isolated small bowel disease. Sulfasalazine has not been uniformly effective in preventing relapse in Crohn's disease, although many clinicians continue its use in patients who respond initially. A high incidence of side effects which limit therapy include intolerance, hypersensitivity reactions and impairment of male infertility. The newer aminosalicylates offer targeted delivery of mesalazine to the bowel, with fewer side effects. Topical mesalazine has proved extremely effective in patients with distal ulcerative colitis; oral forms are effective in the treatment of mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis and in relapse. Both types appear to be effective in the treatment of Crohn's disease, and possibly in preventing relapse. There is no current clinical advantage of one mesalazine preparation over another, nor is there an indication for their use in sulfasalazine-treated patients who have satisfactory response without adverse effects. Corticosteroids are indicated for more severe disease activity where the aminosalicylates have limited efficacy-specifically to induce remission in patients with severe or refractory ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease. They should not be used to maintain disease remission or in the prevention of postoperative recurrence. Topical corticosteroids allow their local use in distal colitis with minimal systemic side effects. Long term use is limited by side effects, many of which are dose related, although alternate-day therapy may lessen the incidence. Immunosuppressive agents are beneficial for the treatment of refractory inflammatory bowel disease unresponsive to other medications, and may also facilitate the withdrawal of steroids in refractory patients. Mercaptopurine has an added benefit in the treatment of Crohn's disease fistulae; the role of cyclosporin in bowel disease has not been established and its use cannot currently be recommended. The potential toxicity of immunosuppressive agents warrants careful consideration of their use by both physician and patient. Metronidazole is indicated for the treatment of mild to moderate Crohn's disease, including perineal disease. Common side effects include peripheral neuropathy and nausea.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

[Pancreatitis associated with 5-aminosalicylic acid]

Acute pancreatitis with severe belt-like upper abdominal pain developed within 1-4 weeks of starting medication in three patients (29-year-old man with ulcerative colitis; 43-year-old woman and 22-year-old woman with Crohn's disease) treated, for the first time, with 5-aminosalicylic acid (mesalazine), 500 mg three times daily. Concentrations of lipase initially were 545, 1182 and 3000 U/l, and of amylase 243, 449 and 129 U/l, respectively. Symptoms receded within a few hours after the drug had been discontinued, enzyme levels returning to normal in the course of the next 2-3 weeks. On repeating the drug in two of the patients, in lower dosage, the pancreatitis recurred within a few days. These observations support the view that 5-aminosalicylic acid can cause acute pancreatitis, perhaps as an allergic reaction.

Steady-state pharmacokinetics of a new 4-gram 5-aminosalicylic acid retention enema in patients with ulcerative colitis in remission

The pharmacokinetic profile of a new 4-g 5-aminosalicyclic acid (5-ASA) retention enema, Mesasal, was investigated. Nine patients with ulcerative colitis in remission and one patient with mild disease activity received one enema for seven consecutive nights. They were admitted to hospital for administration of the eighth enema. Plasma concentration and urinary excretion of 5-ASA and acetyl-5-aminosalicyclic acid (Ac-5-ASA) were studied for 45 h and faecal excretion for 24 h after administration of the last enema. The median peak plasma concentration of 5-ASA was 0.92 (range, 0.59-1.87) micrograms/ml at a median of 11 h after administration, and of Ac-5-ASA 1.62 (range, 1.03-4.36) micrograms/ml at a median of 12 h after administration. On average, the plasma concentration of Ac-5-ASA was almost twice that of 5-ASA at each sampling period. At 24 h after administration the median plasma concentration for 5-ASA was 0.12 (range, 0-0.77) micrograms/ml and for Ac-5-ASA 0.36 (range, 0.01-1.6) micrograms/ml. At 45 h after administration low levels of both 5-ASA (less than 0.2 micrograms/ml) and Ac-5-ASA (less than 0.3 microgram/ml) were noted in two patients, low levels of only Ac-5-ASA (less than 0.1 microgram/ml) in two patients, and neither 5-ASA nor Ac-5-ASA in the other six patients. All patients had detectable urinary levels of both 5-ASA and Ac-5-ASA during the first 4 h after administration. Median urinary recovery during 45 h was 12.6% (range, 5.6-22.2%), indicating a low absorption at steady-state conditions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[Acute pancreatitis due to 5-aminosalicylic acid]

We report a case of a 5-aminosalicylate-induced pancreatitis in a patient with Crohn's disease. These findings suggest that some side effects, traditionally thought to be related to sulphafapyridine, are really due to 5-aminosalicylate. The good prognosis of this rare complication depends on the early withdrawal of the drug. Therefore the degree of the clinical suspicion plays a essential role in the appropriate diagnosis, but a challenge with mesalazine must be carried out in those patients in which other causes of pancreatitis could not be excluded.

Mesalamine in ulcerative colitis

Sulfasalazine has been used for many years in the management of ulcerative colitis. As many as 20 percent of patients treated with it experience intolerable adverse effects usually attributed to its sulfapyridine component. The other active component is 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA); the only 5-ASA enema preparation currently available in the U.S. is mesalamine (Rowasa, Reid-Rowell) containing 5-ASA 4 g in 60 mL. In clinical trials, mesalamine has proved efficacious in treating refractory cases of distal ulcerative colitis, proctitis, and proctosigmoiditis. Because of its high cost compared with more conventional treatment modalities, it should be reserved for cases that are either refractory or intolerant to conventional treatment.

[Acute alveolitis in ulcerative colitis: extra-intestinal organ complication or drug side effect]

The histories of three possible cases of 5-ASA-induced toxic interstitial lung disease are presented. In addition diagnostical methods and procedures for the differential-diagnosis are discussed and as diagnostical program for the identification of remedy-induced toxic lung-damages is explained.

Acute pancreatitis during oral 5-aminosalicylic acid therapy

Therapy with oral 5-aminosalicylic acid for inflammatory bowel disease has been reported as effective and safe. We report two cases of biochemically proven mild acute pancreatitis occurring 2 and 14 days, respectively, after oral 5-aminosalicylic acid therapy was instituted for inflammatory bowel disease. A hypersensitivity mechanism might be involved, owing to possible erratic systemic absorption of the drug. We suggest clinical and biochemical monitoring for patients undergoing oral 5-aminosalicylic acid therapy in order to confirm its possible association with acute pancreatitis and to assess the actual incidence of such an adverse reaction.

Double-blind placebo-controlled study of olsalazine in the treatment of ulcerative colitis

Olsalazine is a compound consisting of two 5-amino salicylate (5-ASA) molecules linked by an azo bond, which, administered orally, is split by colonic bacteria to liberate 5-ASA. It lacks the sulfapyridine moiety found in sulfasalazine. Using a specific protocol, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of olsalazine in patients with symptomatic ulcerative colitis. Inclusion criteria included mild to moderate disease with involvement of more than 15 cm of colon, visible blood in stools, and the discontinuation of all other medications prior to and during the study. Patients were given oral olsalazine 3.0 g/day or placebo for 4 wk. Patients were evaluated clinically, by laboratory analysis and by colonoscopic evaluation, at entry and at 4 wk. Additional clinical and laboratory evaluations were performed at 2 wk. Fifteen patients entered the study. Of the seven patients randomized to olsalazine, four (57%) improved clinically and by colonoscopic scoring, one showed no improvement in either, and two (29%) withdrew after developing severe watery diarrhea. Of the eight patients treated with placebo, two (25%) improved clinically but were without colonscopic improvement and six (75%) worsened, of whom four withdrew early because of worsening symptoms of colitis. Seven of eight placebo patients were then treated with olsalazine on an open basis. Of these seven, five (71%) improved clinically and colonoscopically and two (29%) withdrew because of severe watery diarrhea. Overall, of 14 patients treated with Olsalazine, nine (64%) improved, one showed no improvement, and four (29%) discontinued because of persistent watery diarrhea. No other serious side effects were noted. Minor side effects included transient diarrhea, flares of acne, and anxiety attacks which resolved despite continuation of the drug.

Pancreatitis after rectal administration of 5-aminosalicylic acid

A patient treated with sulfasalazine for new-onset ulcerative colitis developed self-limited pancreatitis. Rechallenge with 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) in enema form (Rowasa) again induced pancreatitis. Recent case reports suggest that the salicylate component of sulfasalazine can lead to the development of pancreatitis with oral 5-ASA administration. This patient's course demonstrates further that rechallenge with 5-ASA in a rectal form may also lead to pancreatitis.

Coated oral 5-aminosalicylic acid versus placebo in maintaining remission of inactive Crohn's disease. International Mesalazine Study Group

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre study was undertaken to evaluate the safety and efficacy of coated, oral 5-aminosalicylic acid (Mesasal/Claversal; 5-ASA) in maintaining remission of inactive Crohn's disease for up to 12 months. A total of 248 patients were entered from eight countries, of which 206 adhered to the protocol and were included in the analysis. The patients had Crohn's disease for an average of 5 years, with their disease clinically inactive for at least 1 month prior to entry into the study, and for an average of over 12 months previously. Thirty per cent of patients had had a previous resection, 16% of patients had been treated with sulphasalazine, while none of those analysed received glucocorticosteroids. Treatment consisted of 500 mg 5-ASA t.d.s. or placebo. 'Relapse' was defined as the first occurrence of Best's Crohn's Disease Activity Index greater than 150, which had increased 60 points from the pre-trial index. The cumulative life-table relapse estimate was lower in 5-ASA patients compared to placebo (22.4% vs 36.2%, respectively, Log rank test P = 0.0395). The 12-month relapse estimate in the 5-ASA group was also lower in patients with ileal disease (8.3% for 5-ASA and 31.0% for placebo, P = 0.0535) and in patients with previous bowel resections (14.2% vs 47.0%, P = 0.0436). The incidence of side-effects was similar in both treatment groups. It is concluded that 5-ASA was significantly superior to placebo in preventing relapse of Crohn's disease; this effect was most apparent in patients with disease restricted to the ileum and in patients with previous bowel resection. 5-ASA was well-tolerated, as demonstrated by a low incidence of adverse events.

Newer pharmacologic agents for the therapy of inflammatory bowel disease

Topical 5-ASA Agents. Observations that 5-ASA may be the clinically active component of sulfasalazine have stimulated extensive pharmaceutical efforts to develop a new class of agents for the treatment of the inflammatory bowel diseases. Both oral and rectal forms of 5-ASA have been designed, tested, and released for use in Europe and Canada. Only one rectal 5-ASA formulation is now commercially available in the United States. Studies with topical 5-ASA have demonstrated that this formulation is safe and effective for distal colitis, even in patients with disease refractory to standard therapy. Adverse effects of topical 5-ASA are minimal. However, optimal treatment doses have not been defined, relapse is common after withdrawal of therapy, and issues regarding maintenance regimens are not yet resolved. Other disadvantages include the expense and inconvenience of enema therapy. However, rectally administered 5-ASA is an appropriate initial therapy for the treatment of distal ulcerative colitis, or as a therapeutic option for refractory distal colitis. Data are insufficient to make recommendations regarding the use of topical 5-ASA in Crohn's disease. Whether this class of agents will be of benefit for Crohn's proctitis or for perineal disease must await further clinical trials. Oral 5-ASA Agents. There appears to be a well-substantiated benefit equivalent to that of sulfasalazine achieved by the new oral formulations of 5-ASA when used for the treatment of acute mild to moderate ulcerative colitis, and as maintenance treatment of ulcerative colitis in remission. Adverse reactions to these agents are uncommon, usually mild, and infrequently require withdrawal of therapy. The major problem reported with these agents is watery diarrhea, most commonly associated with olsalazine, but the practical importance of this adverse effect is disputed. Rare occurrences of reversible pericarditis and acute pancreatitis have been encountered during clinical application of these agents. As more experience is obtained, these agents may become the initial therapy of choice for the treatment of mild to moderate ulcerative colitis and for maintenance in inactive disease. Currently available data have defined a role for these agents as an important alternative for the treatment of patients intolerant or allergic to sulfasalazine. As with sulfasalazine, these agents should not be used as the sole treatment for severely active ulcerative colitis. Many unanswered questions remain regarding therapy with these agents for ulcerative colitis. Still undefined are optimal drug dosages, appropriate dosing intervals, and the necessary duration of therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

[Efficacy and tolerability of 5-aminosalicylic acid in the short-term treatment of ulcerative rectocolitis during the mild or moderate stage]

The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and side-effects of 5-ASA and SASP in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis. An improvement was seen in 71.4% (5-ASA) and 70.3% (SASP) but there were no complete remissions. The incidence of improvements was only 36.3% (5-ASA) and 37.5% (SASP) in pancolitis. The side-effects appeared in 14.2% (5-ASA) and 21% (SASP).

Mesalazine: a global safety evaluation

The potential benefit of sulphasalazine in inflammatory bowel disease is limited by the wide variety of side effects that occur in about one-third of treated patients. Most of the side effects of sulphasalazine are due to the sulphapyridine moiety. Claversal has the advantage of delivering the active ingredient of sulphasalazine--mesalazine--without the undesirable effects of sulphapyridine. Four international multicentre trials involving 932 patients with ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease compared 0.75 g/day or 1.5 g/day mesalazine, 1.5 g/day or 3.0 g/day sulphasalazine, or placebo. Forty-seven (14%) of 331 patients receiving mesalazine reported adverse events, whereas 33 (23%) of 144 patients receiving sulphasalazine and 23 (19%) of 123 patients receiving placebo reported adverse effects. When lower doses of both mesalazine (0.75 g/day) and sulphasalazine (1.5 to 2.0 g/day) were evaluated in a maintenance trial, the percentage of adverse events was similar for both drugs--14% and 12%, respectively. In these trials the incidence of adverse effects was similar with both doses of mesalazine; however, doubling the sulphasalazine dose resulted in a twofold increase in adverse effects. In contrast, mesalazine appeared not to induce dose-related effects, suggesting that patients may be able to tolerate even higher mesalazine doses than those studied. The withdrawal rate owing to adverse events in all four controlled trials was similar for patients treated with mesalazine (6%) and sulphasalazine (8%). Results of an open postmarketing sampling trial of just over 1700 patients in Germany showed a low overall incidence of adverse effects (3%) with mesalazine and none of the rare, more serious effects, such as hepatoxicity, agranulocytosis, or pulmonary complications.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Advances in drug therapy for inflammatory bowel disease

PURPOSE

To identify advances in drug therapy for inflammatory bowel disease, and to evaluate the effectiveness of the new agents in treating both ulcerative colitis and Crohn disease.

DATA IDENTIFICATION

Studies published from January 1980 through June 1989 were identified using MEDLINE and through extensive hand searching of bibliographies in identified articles.

STUDY SELECTION

One hundred and ten articles directly related to the topic were found and analyzed. Another 42 articles were relevant to the material reviewed.

DATA EXTRACTION

Articles were selected on the basis of study quality and their significance with regard to treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.

RESULTS OF DATA ANALYSIS

The aminosalicylates are emerging as effective and safe therapy for inflammatory bowel disease. Corticotropin can be considered the drug of choice for certain patients with severe ulcerative colitis, and new rapidly metabolized topical steroids appear to be as effective as traditional forms and have fewer side effects. Immunosuppressive agents, including 6-mercaptopurine and azathioprine, may be useful in treating difficult-to-manage patients with either Crohn disease or ulcerative colitis, whereas cyclosporine appears promising but should be reserved for patients in whom other measures have failed. Patients with refractory perineal Crohn disease and those with Crohn colitis may benefit from metronidazole. Many other drugs including clonidine, cromoglycate, chloroquine, fish oil, methotrexate, antituberculous agents, interferon, and superoxide dismutase have shown enough promise in preliminary studies to warrant controlled clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Drug therapy for inflammatory bowel disease, limited for many years to sulfasalazine and some corticosteroids, has been extended to include the aminosalicylates, rapidly metabolized topical steroids, immunosuppressive agents, and metronidazole. Potentially useful newer drugs await further study.