The effect of dose on local control of prostate cancer

The Determinants of Toxicity in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer With a Focal, Intraprostatic "Microboost"

PURPOSE

A single-phase 3 trial has demonstrated that prostate radiation therapy with a focal, intraprostatic "microboost" can improve disease control without an overall increase in toxicity. It is unclear how these results generalize to other treatment schedules and protocols.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A systematic search of PubMed and the Cochrane review was performed for studies published on or before September 1, 2023. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool the cumulative incidence of grade ≥2 (≥G2) acute and late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. Heterogeneity was assessed, and the association of trial-level covariates with toxicity was examined via the subgroup analyses and meta-regression. Odds ratios (ORs) for dose metrics were reported per Gy equivalent dose in 2Gy per fraction (EQD2).

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patient cohorts were included. The pooled estimate of the cumulative incidence of ≥G2 acute and late GU toxicity was 25.3% (95% CI, 19.1%-32.8%) and 21.1% (95% CI, 16.7%-26.3%), respectively. Late ≥G2 GI toxicity was less frequent, estimated at 5.6% (95% CI, 3.5%-8.7%) and 6.9% (95% CI, 4.6%-10.1%), respectively. Subgroup factors associated with at least one ≥G2 toxicity category were treatment technique, imaging used for boost volume definition, intrafraction motion management, trial phase, and toxicity grading. Rectal DMax was associated with acute ≥G2 GI toxicity (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.08; P < .001). Additionally, urethral DMax was associated with late ≥G2 GU toxicity (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03; P < .001), and a stronger relationship was observed with the average plan urethral DMax (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.03-1.07; P < .001). No association of toxicity with any bladder dose metric examined was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The utilization of a microboost seems tolerable across treatment protocols; however, subgroup factors, including the use of intrafraction motion management and the type of imaging modality used, may influence the probability of toxicity. Attention to rectal DMax constraints and urethral DMax dose constraints may help to mitigate GI and GU toxicity, respectively. No association between toxicity and bladder dose constraints was observed.

Target Volume Optimization for Localized Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

To provide a comprehensive review of the means by which to optimize target volume definition for the purposes of treatment planning for patients with intact prostate cancer with a specific emphasis on focal boost volume definition.

METHODS

Here we conduct a narrative review of the available literature summarizing the current state of knowledge on optimizing target volume definition for the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

RESULTS

Historically, the treatment of prostate cancer included a uniform prescription dose administered to the entire prostate with or without coverage of all or part of the seminal vesicles. The development of prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) using prostate-specific radiotracers has ushered in an era in which radiation oncologists are able to localize and focally dose-escalate high-risk volumes in the prostate gland. Recent phase 3 data has demonstrated that incorporating focal dose escalation to high-risk subvolumes of the prostate improves biochemical control without significantly increasing toxicity. Still, several fundamental questions remain regarding the optimal target volume definition and prescription strategy to implement this technique. Given the remaining uncertainty, a knowledge of the pathological correlates of radiographic findings and the anatomic patterns of tumor spread may help inform clinical judgement for the definition of clinical target volumes.

CONCLUSION

Advanced imaging has the ability to improve outcomes for patients with prostate cancer in multiple ways, including by enabling focal dose escalation to high-risk subvolumes. However, many questions remain regarding the optimal target volume definition and prescription strategy to implement this practice, and key knowledge gaps remain. A detailed understanding of the pathological correlates of radiographic findings and the patterns of local tumor spread may help inform clinical judgement for target volume definition given the current state of uncertainty.

Toxicity of dose-escalated radiotherapy up to 84 Gy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

The outcome of radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer (PCA) depends on the delivered dose. While the evidence for dose-escalated RT up to 80 gray (Gy) is well established, there have been only few studies examining dose escalation above 80 Gy. We initiated the present study to assess the safety of dose escalation up to 84 Gy.

METHODS

In our retrospective analysis, we included patients who received dose-escalated RT for PCA at our institution between 2016 and 2021. We evaluated acute genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity as well as late GU and GI toxicity.

RESULTS

A total of 86 patients could be evaluated, of whom 24 patients had received 80 Gy and 62 patients 84 Gy (35 without pelvic and 27 with pelvic radiotherapy). Regarding acute toxicities, no > grade 2 adverse events occurred. Acute GU/GI toxicity of grade 2 occurred in 12.5%/12.5% of patients treated with 80 Gy, in 25.7%/14.3% of patients treated with 84 Gy to the prostate only, and in 51.9%/12.9% of patients treated with 84 Gy and the pelvis included. Late GU/GI toxicity of grade ≥ 2 occurred in 4.2%/8.3% of patients treated with 80 Gy, in 7.1%/3.6% of patients treated with 84 Gy prostate only, and in 18.2%/0% of patients treated with 84 Gy pelvis included (log-rank test p = 0.358).

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that dose-escalated RT for PCA up to 84 Gy is feasible and safe without a significant increase in acute toxicity. Further follow-up is needed to assess late toxicity and survival.

Patterns of treatment failure in patients with prostate cancer treated with 76-80 Gy radiotherapy to the prostate and seminal vesicles ± hormonotherapy

PURPOSE

To assess the pattern of treatment failure in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) treated with radiotherapy (76-80 Gy) ± hormone therapy (HT). We also evaluated the influence of treatment failure on survival outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective study of patients with PCa (n = 302) treated with radiotherapy (RT) ± HT at our centre between November 1999 and July 2007. The mean patient age was 70.2 years (range 51-87). Distribution by NCCN risk group was low (n = 80, 26.5%), intermediate (n = 86, 28.5%), high (n = 77, 25.5%), and very high (n = 49, 16.2%). Most patients (n = 273, 90.4%) received IMRT at a dose of 76-80 Gy. HT was administered in 237 patients (78.5%), in most cases (n = 167, 55.3%) for < 7 months RESULTS: Survival rates at 10 years were: overall survival (OS), 64.3%; biochemical disease-free survival, 83.9%; disease-free survival, 92.5%; and metastasis-free survival (MFS), 94.3%. Biochemical failure (BF) was observed in 55 cases (18.2%), 32 of whom subsequently developed clinical recurrence: metastasis (n = 17, 5.6%), local failure (n = 11, 3.6%), and regional failure (n = 4, 1.3%). The cause of death (n = 159) was intercurrent disease in 115 cases (72.3%), second cancer in 27 (17.0%), and PCa in 17 (10.7%). Biochemical failure-free survival ≤ 24 months was significantly associated with worse OS and MFS (p = 0.0001). Late genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity grade ≥ 3 (RTOG) was observed in 18 (6.0%) and 7 (2.3%) patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The main type of treatment failure after 76-80 Gy of radiotherapy ± HT is local or metastatic. In all cases, biochemical failure occurred prior to treatment failure. BF within 24 months of treatment completion was significantly associated with worse OS and MFS.

3D-Conformal Radiation Therapy in Prostate Cancer. Technical Considerations after 5 Years of Experience and 334 Patients Treated at the Istituto Europeo Di Oncologia of Milan, Italy

Aims and Background

To report the technique of 3D-conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) currently used at our Institute for the treatment of prostate cancer with a curative intent. A critical review of the technical aspects of the technique is provided.

Methods and Study Design

Between December 1995 and October 2000, 334 patients with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate were treated with 3D-CRT. All patients were treated in a prone position with 15 MV X-ray beams and a 6-field technique for all but 20 patients, who were treated with a 3-field technique. Patients were simulated with the rectum and bladder empty. To ensure reproducible positioning, custom-made polyurethane foam or thermoplastic casts were produced for each patient. Subsequently, consecutive CT scan slices were obtained. The clinical target volume and critical organs (rectum and bladder) were identified on each CT slice. The beam's eye view technique was used to spatially display these structures, and the treatment portals were manually shaped based on the images obtained. The beam apertures were initially realized by conventional Cerrobend blocks (48 patients), which were replaced in October 1997 by a computer-driven multi-leaf collimator. The total target dose prescribed at the ICRU point is 76 Gy, delivered in 38 fractions and 54 days. The seminal vesicles are excluded at 70 Gy. Dose-volume histograms were obtained for all patients. If more than 30% of the bladder and/or more than 20% of the rectum receive >95% of the prescribed total dose, the treatment plan is judged as unsatisfactory and is adjusted. The dose-volume histogram can be improved by changing the beam's arrangement and/or weights or by introducing or modifying the wedge filters.

Conclusions

3D-CRT in prostate cancer patients is a highly sophisticated and time-consuming method of dose delivery. Important technical issues remain to be clarified.

Three-Dimensional Conformal External Beam Radiotherapy versus the Combination of External Radiotherapy with High-Dose Rate Brachytherapy in Localized Carcinoma of the Prostate: Comparison of Acute Toxicity

Aims and background

Radiotherapy represents one of the basic therapeutic methods in treatment of localized carcinoma of the prostate. Optimal irradiation dose is the cornerstone of a successful treatment. Along with local control of the disease and overall survival of the patient, possible acute and long-term side effects need to be monitored very closely.

Methods

A non-randomized prospective study comparing the acute genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity in patients irradiated for localized carcinoma of the prostate. Fifty-seven patients were treated with three-dimensional conformal external beam radiotherapy alone, and in the second treatment arm a combination of external beam radiotherapy and high-dose rate brachytherapy was employed in 40 patients.

Results

Three-dimensional conformai external beam radiotherapy. Acute G1 genitourinary toxicity was recorded in 35.1% of patients, G2 in 22.8%, and G2-3 in one patient (1.7%). Acute gastrointestinal toxicity was experienced by 54.4% of patients, G1 in 28.1%, G2 in 17.5%, and G3 in 8.8%. Three-dimensional conformal external beam radiotherapy + brachytherapy. Acute G1 genitourinary toxicity was recorded in 37.5% and grade 2 in 15% of the patients. Only G1 acute gastrointestinal toxicity was recorded in 40% of the patients.

Conclusions

Acute G1 genitourinary toxicity was experienced by a similar percentage of patients in both treatment arms. Acute G2 genitourinary toxicity was more frequent in the three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy arm. Higher acute genitourinary toxicity, G3 or G4, was recorded only in one patient per treatment arm. Acute gastrointestinal toxicity was more frequent in the three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy arm. Higher acute gastrointestinal toxicity, G2 and G3, was only observed in the three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy arm. The acute toxicity observed was of a low grade. The combination of external beam radiotherapy with brachytherapy resulted in a lower incidence of gastrointestinal toxicity than external beam radiotherapy alone.

Clinical Implementation of Adaptive Helical Tomotherapy: A Unique Approach to Image-Guided Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy

Image-guided IMRT is a revolutionary concept whose clinical implementation is rapidly evolving. Methods of executing beam intensity modulation have included individually designed compensators, static multi-leaf collimators (MLC), dynamic MLC, and sequential (serial) tomotherapy. We have developed helical tomotherapy as an innovative solution to overcome some of the limitations of other IMRT systems. The unique physical design of helical tomotherapy allows the realization of the concepts of adaptive radiotherapy and conformal avoidance. In principle, these advances should improve normal tissue sparing and permit dose reconstruction and verification, thereby allowing significant biologically effective dose escalation.

Recent radiobiological findings can be translated into altered fractionation schemes that aim to improve the local control and long-term survival. This strategy is being tested at the University of Wisconsin using helical tomotherapy with its highly precise delivery and verification system along with meticulous and practical forms of immobilization. Innovative techniques such optical guidance, respiratory gating, and ultrasound assessments are being designed and tailored for helical tomotherapy use. The intrinsic capability of helical tomotherapy for megavoltage CT (MVCT) imaging for IMRT image-guidance is being optimized.

The unique features of helical tomotherapy might allow implementation of image-guided IMRT that was previously impossible or impractical. Here we review the technological, physical, and radiobiological rationale for the ongoing and upcoming clinical trials that will use image-guided IMRT in the form of helical tomotherapy; and we describe our plans for testing our hypotheses in a rigorous prospective fashion.

Expanding the Therapeutic Index of Radiation Therapy by Combining In Situ Gene Therapy in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer

The advances in radiotherapy (3D-CRT, IMRT) have enabled high doses of radiation to be delivered with the least possible associated toxicity. However, the persistence of cancer (local recurrence after radiotherapy) despite these increased doses as well as distant failure suggesting the existence of micro-metastases, especially in the case of higher risk disease, have underscored the need for continued improvement in treatment strategies to manage local and micro-metastatic disease as definitively as possible. This has prompted the idea that an increase in the therapeutic index of radiotherapy might be achieved by combining it with in situ gene therapy. The goal of these combinatorial therapies is to maximize the selective pressure against cancer cell growth while minimizing treatment-associated toxicity. Major efforts utilizing different gene therapy strategies have been employed in conjunction with radiotherapy. We reviewed our and other published clinical trials utilizing this combined radio-genetherapy approach including their associated pre-clinical in vitro and in vivo models. The use of in situ gene therapy as an adjuvant to radiation therapy dramatically reduced cell viability in vitro and tumor growth in vivo. No significant worsening of the toxicities normally observed in single-modality approaches were identified in Phase I/II clinical studies. Enhancement of both local and systemic T-cell activation was noted with this combined approach suggesting anti-tumor immunity. Early clinical outcome including biochemical and biopsy data was very promising. These results demonstrate the increased therapeutic efficacy achieved by combining in situ gene therapy with radiotherapy in the management of local prostate cancer. The combined approach maximizes tumor control, both local-regional and systemic through radio-genetherapy induced cytotoxicity and anti-tumor immunity.

Image-guided radiotherapy of the prostate using daily CBCT: the feasibility and likely benefit of implementing a margin reduction

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether planning target volume (PTV) margins may be safely reduced in radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer incorporating daily online tube potential-cone beam CT (CBCT) image guidance and the anticipated benefit in predicted rectal toxicity.

METHODS

The prostate-only clinical target volume (CTV2) and rectum were delineated on 1 pre-treatment CBCT each week in 18 randomly selected patients. By transposing these contours onto the original plan, dose-volume histograms (DVHs) for CTV2 and the rectum were each calculated and combined, for each patient, to produce a single mean DVH representative of the dose delivered over the treatment course. Plans were reoptimized using reduced CTV2 to PTV2 margins and the consequent radiobiological impact modelled by the tumour control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of the rectum.

RESULTS

All CBCT images were deemed of sufficient quality to identify the CTV and rectum. No loss of TCP was observed when plans using the standard 5-mm CTV2 to PTV2 margin of the centre were reoptimized with a 4- or 3-mm margin. Margin reduction was associated with a significant decrease in rectal NTCP (5-4 mm; p < 0.05 and 5-3 mm; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Using daily online image guidance with CBCT, a reduction in CTV2 to PTV2 margins to 3 mm is achievable without compromising tumour control. The consequent sparing of surrounding normal tissues is associated with reduced anticipated rectal toxicity.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Margin reduction is feasible and potentially beneficial. Centres with image-guided radiotherapy capability should consider assessing whether margin reduction is possible within their institutes.

Treatment planning comparison between high dose rate and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer as a means of boost dose

Purpose

The main objective of this study was to compare dosimetric characterisation of high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) with external beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (EX-IMRT) as a means of delivering boost dose.

Materials and methods

Five HDR patients were selected for IMRT planning. Patients underwent ultrasound-guided catheter placement for HDR. Computed tomography (CT) images were obtained and imported into the Nucletron PLATO Brachytherapy system. The prostate, urethra, bladder and rectum were contoured on axial slices. The dose was calculated and optimised by graphical optimisation. The CT images of these structures were exported from the PLATO to Eclipse workstation for IMRT planning. For each patient, the dose–volume histogram (DVH) of HDR and IMRT plans were generated, drawn on the same scale and compared.

Results

The dose distribution in HDR plans was non-uniform and conformed peripherally inside the planned target volume (PTV). A small volume of the prostate received a very high dose from HDR.In IMRT plans, a uniform dose distribution was observed. The DVH curves for PTV dropped sharply and reached to a zero volume of the prostate at about 6·4 Gy. In HDR plans, the DVH curves for PTV showed a long tail up to a very high dose. About 10% of the prostate received about 13·3 Gy, which is 222% of the prescribed dose (6 Gy) in HDR plans. In contrast, the same volume in IMRT plans received <6 Gy (100%). The average dose for V90 was about 6·3 Gy for HDR and 5·8 Gy for IMRT plans. At a prostate volume of V100 level, the average dose in all plans was 5·0 Gy from HDR and 5·4 Gy from IMRT plans. In HDR plan, the V100 dose for urethra varied from 0·6 to 3·0 Gy (average 1·8 Gy). The range in IMRT plans varied from 3·6 to 6 Gy with an average of 4·7 Gy. At V90 level, the dose range in HDR and IMRT plans varied from 2·5 to 4·7 Gy (average 3·8 Gy) and 4·8 to 5·4 Gy (average 5·3 Gy), respectively. In general, the dose to the bladder and rectum was comparatively lower in HDR than in IMRT plans.

Conclusions

HDR brachytherapy may reduce normal tissue toxicities in prostate boost treatments, even though the dose homogeneity inside the PTV is far worse than in IMRT treatments. Another advantage of HDR over IMRT is that the organ motion is not a significant concern as in IMRT.

Software for quantitative analysis of radiotherapy: overview, requirement analysis and design solutions

Radiotherapy is a fast-developing discipline which plays a major role in cancer care. Quantitative analysis of radiotherapy data can improve the success of the treatment and support the prediction of outcome. In this paper, we first identify functional, conceptional and general requirements on a software system for quantitative analysis of radiotherapy. Further we present an overview of existing radiotherapy analysis software tools and check them against the stated requirements. As none of them could meet all of the demands presented herein, we analyzed possible conceptional problems and present software design solutions and recommendations to meet the stated requirements (e.g. algorithmic decoupling via dose iterator pattern; analysis database design). As a proof of concept we developed a software library "RTToolbox" following the presented design principles. The RTToolbox is available as open source library and has already been tested in a larger-scale software system for different use cases. These examples demonstrate the benefit of the presented design principles.

Dosimetric evaluation of intensity modulated radiotherapy and 4-field 3-d conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer treatment

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this dosimetric study is the targeted dose homogeneity and critical organ dose comparison of 7-field Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and 3-D 4-field conformal radiotherapy.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross sectional study.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty patients with low and moderate risk prostate cancer treated at Gülhane Military Medical School Radiation Oncology Department between January 2009 and December 2009 are included in this study. Two seperate dosimetric plans both for 7-field IMRT and 3D-CRT have been generated for each patient to comparatively evaluate the dosimetric status of both techniques and all the patients received 7-field IMRT.

RESULTS

Dose-comparative evaluation of two techniques revealed the superiority of IMRT technique with statistically significantly lower femoral head doses along with reduced critical organ dose-volume parameters of bladder V60 (the volume receiving 60 Gy) and rectal V40 (the volume receiving 40 Gy) and V60.

CONCLUSION

It can be concluded that IMRT is an effective definitive management tool for prostate cancer with improved critical organ sparing and excellent dose homogenization in target organs of prostate and seminal vesicles.

High dose rate prostate brachytherapy: an overview of the rationale, experience and emerging applications in the treatment of prostate cancer

The technological advances in real-time ultrasound image guidance for high dose rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy places this treatment modality at the forefront of innovation in radiotherapy. This review article will explore the rationale for HDR brachytherapy as a highly conformal method of dose delivery and safe dose escalation to the prostate, in addition to the particular radiobiological advantages it has over low dose rate and external beam radiotherapy. The encouraging outcome data and favourable toxicity profile will be discussed before looking at emerging applications for the future and how this procedure will feature alongside stereotactic radiosurgery.

Improvement in prostate cancer survival over time: a 20-year analysis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the changes in outcome for men with localized prostate cancer treated with definitive external beam radiation therapy during a 20-year period at a comprehensive cancer center.

METHODS

We categorized 2675 men with prostate cancer treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center with definitive external beam radiation therapy with or without androgen deprivation therapy into 3 treatment eras: 1987 to 1993 (n = 722), 1994 to 1999 (n = 828), and 2000 to 2007 (n = 1125). To help adjust for stage migration, patients were stratified according to risk group as defined by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Biochemical (Phoenix definition), local, distant, and any clinical failure, prostate-cancer specific survival, and overall survival were analyzed according to the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Median age was 68.5 years and median follow-up was 6.4 years. Fewer men in the most recent era had high-risk disease, and a higher proportion received 72 Gy or higher (99% vs 4%) and androgen deprivation therapy (60% vs 6%) than the earliest era. All risk groups treated in the modern era experienced improved rates of biochemical, local, and distant failure. In high-risk patients, decreased rates of distant failure and clinical failure led to improved prostate cancer-specific survival and overall survival. Local control was improved for intermediate- and high-risk patients, with a trend toward improvement in low-risk patients. On multivariate analysis, recent treatment era was closely correlated with a dose of 72 Gy or higher and treatment with androgen deprivation therapy and predicted for lower rates of biochemical, local, and distant failure. Androgen deprivation therapy, higher dose, and more recent treatment era predicted for improved prostate cancer-specific survival.

DISCUSSION

During the last 20 years of prostate cancer irradiation, disease control outcomes have improved in all patients, leading to improved prostate cancer-specific survival and overall survival for men with high-risk disease. This may reflect advances in workup, staging accuracy, and prostate cancer treatment in the modern era.

Long-term biochemical results after high-dose-rate intensity modulated brachytherapy with external beam radiotherapy for high risk prostate cancer

Background

Biochemical control from series in which radical prostatectomy is performed for patients with unfavorable prostate cancer and/or low dose external beam radiation therapy are given remains suboptimal.

The treatment regimen of HDR brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy is a safe and very effective treatment for patients with high risk localized prostate cancer with excellent biochemical control and low toxicity.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® definitive external beam irradiation in stage T1 and T2 prostate cancer

PURPOSE

: External beam radiation therapy is a standard of care treatment for men who present with clinically localized (T1-T2) prostate cancer. The purpose of this review was to provide clarification on the appropriateness criteria and management considerations for the treatment of prostate cancer with external beam radiation therapy.

METHODS

: A panel consisting of physicians with expertise on prostate cancer was assembled and provided with a number of clinical scenarios for consensus treatment and management guidelines. Prostate cancer patient vignettes were presented along with specific management recommendations based on an extensive review of the modern external beam radiotherapy literature. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of a well established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances, where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

RESULTS

: Modern external beam radiation therapy series demonstrate favorable biochemical control rates for patients with localized prostate cancer. Morbidity profiles are also favorable and it is clear that this is enhanced by modern techniques like 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy. An active area of investigation is evaluating the use of hypofractionated dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

: Continued investigation to refine patient selection, external beam radiation technology application, and alternative dosing schedules should result in further improvements in biochemical outcome and decreased morbidity with external beam radiation treatment for localized prostate cancer.

Biochemical outcome after high-dose-rate intensity modulated brachytherapy with external beam radiotherapy: 12 years of experience

Study Type - Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Biochemical control from series in which radical prostatectomy is performed for patients with unfavorable prostate cancer and/or low dose external beam radiation therapy are given remains suboptimal. The treatment regimen of HDR brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy is a safe and very effective treatment for patients with high risk localized prostate cancer with excellent biochemical control and low toxicity.

OBJECTIVE

• To investigate the long-term oncological outcome, during the PSA era, of patients with prostate cancer who were treated using high-dose-rate (HDR) brachy therapy (BT) combined with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• From June 1998 to April 2007, 313 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with 46 Gy of EBRT to the pelvis with a HDR-BT boost. • The mean (median) follow-up was 71 (68) months. • Toxicity was reported according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Event, V.4.

RESULTS

• The 10-year actuarial biochemical control was 100% for patients with no high-risk criteria, 88% for patients with two intermediate-risk criteria, 91% with one high-risk criterion and 79% for patients with two to three high-risk criteria (P= 0.004). • The 10-year cancer-specific survival was 97% (standard deviation ± 1%). • The multivariate Cox regression analyses identified, Gleason score and T stage as independent prognostic factors for biochemical failure. • Gleason score was the only factor to significantly affect distant metastases. • Grade ≥ 3 late toxicity was not detected.

CONCLUSION

• The 10-year results confirm the feasibility and effectiveness of EBRT with conformal HDR-BT boost for patients with localised prostate cancer.

Rectal dose constraints for intensity modulated radiation therapy of the prostate

Prostate dose escalation appears to have resulted in increased cancer control. Such escalation has been made possible by the ability to deliver more conformal treatment that spares normal tissue from the higher radiation doses. The supposition is that this has enabled higher doses, but without an increase in toxicity. The most disabling toxicity in prostate cancer radiotherapy is rectal. We evaluated the current status of conformal radiation and late rectal toxicity with the goal of determining whether reasonable rectal dose and volume constraints can be determined. Although the literature is inexact, we believe that some generalized constraints can be recommended and show that those recommendations are consistent with what is being used at experienced centers.

70 Gy versus 80 Gy in localized prostate cancer: 5-year results of GETUG 06 randomized trial

PURPOSE

To perform a randomized trial comparing 70 and 80 Gy radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 306 patients with localized prostate cancer were randomized. No androgen deprivation was allowed. The primary endpoint was biochemical relapse according to the modified 1997-American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology and Phoenix definitions. Toxicity was graded using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 1991 criteria and the late effects on normal tissues-subjective, objective, management, analytic scales (LENT-SOMA) scales. The patients' quality of life was scored using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire 30-item cancer-specific and 25-item prostate-specific modules.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 61 months. According to the 1997-American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition, the 5-year biochemical relapse rate was 39% and 28% in the 70- and 80-Gy arms, respectively (p = .036). Using the Phoenix definition, the 5-year biochemical relapse rate was 32% and 23.5%, respectively (p = .09). The subgroup analysis showed a better biochemical outcome for the higher dose group with an initial prostate-specific antigen level >15 ng/mL. At the last follow-up date, 26 patients had died, 10 of their disease and none of toxicity, with no differences between the two arms. According to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scale, the Grade 2 or greater rectal toxicity rate was 14% and 19.5% for the 70- and 80-Gy arms (p = .22), respectively. The Grade 2 or greater urinary toxicity was 10% at 70 Gy and 17.5% at 80 Gy (p = .046). Similar results were observed using the LENT-SOMA scale. Bladder toxicity was more frequent at 80 Gy than at 70 Gy (p = .039). The quality-of-life questionnaire results before and 5 years after treatment were available for 103 patients with no differences found between the 70- and 80-Gy arms.

CONCLUSION

High-dose radiotherapy provided a better 5-year biochemical outcome with slightly greater toxicity.

Long-term failure patterns and survival in a randomized dose-escalation trial for prostate cancer. Who dies of disease?

PURPOSE

To report long-term failure patterns and survival in a randomized radiotherapy dose escalation trial for prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 301 patients with Stage T1b-T3 prostate cancer treated to 70 Gy versus 78 Gy now have a median follow-up of 9 years. Failure patterns and survival were compared between dose levels. The cumulative incidence of death from prostate cancer versus other causes was examined and regression analysis was used to establish predictive factors.

RESULTS

Patients with pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >10 ng/mL or high-risk disease had higher biochemical and clinical failures rates when treated to 70 Gy. These patients also had a significantly higher risk of dying of prostate cancer. Patients <70 years old at treatment died of prostate cancer nearly three times more frequently than of other causes when they were radiated to 70 Gy, whereas those treated to 78 Gy died of other causes more frequently. Patients age 70 or older treated to 70 Gy died of prostate cancer as often as other causes, and those receiving 78 Gy never died of prostate cancer within 10 years of follow-up. In regression analysis, factors predicting for death from prostate cancer were pretreatment PSA >10.5 ng/mL, Gleason score 9 and 10, recurrence within 2.6 years of radiation, and doubling time of <3.6 months at the time of recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Moderate dose escalation (78 Gy) decreases biochemical and clinical failure as well as prostate cancer death in patients with pretreatment PSA >10 ng/mL or high-risk disease.

Dose distribution in 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: comparison of femur doses for four treatment techniques

Purpose: Conformal radiotherapy of the prostate is an increasingly common technique in the treatment of prostate cancer. When using 3D conformal radiotherapy (CFRT) methods, it is desirable to protect the vital structures such as bladder, rectum, and femur. In this study, our aim was to compare the femur head doses resulting from co-planar beam arrangements in four-field (4F), five-field (5F), six-field (6F) and seven-field (7F) treatment plans, in a dose-escalated CFRT schedule.

Materials and Methods: From January 2005 to December 2006, at Istanbul University Medical Faculty of Radiation Oncology Clinic, a total of 22 patients with carcinoma of the prostate had been scanned using computed tomography (CT) (0.50 mm) in the supine position. During the CT scanning which used the Sim Pro (CMD–USA) programme, planned target volume (PTV), clinical target volume (CTV), and dose volumes received by the bladder, rectum and femur heads were recorded and dose–volume histogram (DVH) were created. The dose volume relating to prostate and seminal vesicles was termed CTV 1, and the dose volume relating to prostate alone was termed CTV 2. During the formation of PTV, into CTV 1, from the anterior-superior-inferior 8 mm, and from posterior 5 mm tolerance were taken into account. After volume determination is calculated using XiO (CMS-USA) 3D treatment planning computer, each patient 4F (45° – 25%, 135° – 25%, 225° – 25%, 315° – 25%), 5F (0° – 20%, 45° – 20%, 90° – 20%, 270° – 20%, 315° – 20%), 6F (45° – 20%, 90° – 10%, 135° 20%, 315° – 20%, 270° – 10%, 225° – 20%) and 7F (0° – 4%, 45° – 12.9%, 90° – 22.2%, 135° – 12.9%, 315° – 12.9%, 270° – 22.2%, 225° – 12.9%) was entered; 70 – 76 Gy was calculated to be given to prostate lodge. With the use of Siemes Oncor, 18 MV photons CFRT was applied. In DVH analysis, following were observed: V50, minimum and maximum doses for head of left femur and right femur total doses.

Results: Our statistical evaluation was made using SPSS software, and we found femur doses following; 4F V50 1030 cGy (minimum 58, maximum 1390), 5F V50 2425 cGy (minimum 540, maximum 3631), 6F V50 1769 cGy (minimum 1234, maximum 3912) and 7F V50 3230 cGy (minimum 2150, maximum 4137). In comparing different techniques, the greatest rectal sparing was achieved by the 5F plan. (Rectal: 5F V%25 = 59.90 ± 6.8 Gy, 4F V%25 = 62.30 ± 10.3 Gy, 6F V%25 = 69.36 ± 5.7 Gy, 7F V%25 = 61.32 ± 7.3 Gy). The greatest femoral head sparing was achieved by the 4F techniques. When paired samples t-test was made, we found considerable lower femur doses for 4F techniques (p = 0.05).

Conclusion: We concluded that, during radiotherapy to treat carcinoma of the prostate, the dose received by the rectum is the most important factor to consider, given the potential for late toxicity in this organ. However, while using lateral fields (90–270°) so as to protect the rectum, the doses received by the femur heads were observed to be higher. Especially in older patients, the critical doses of 52 Gy for TD5/5 and 65 Gy for TD 50/5 were observed to be not reached late toxicity for 4F, 5F, 6F and 7F.

Whole-body dosimetry for individualized treatment planning of 131I-MIBG radionuclide therapy for neuroblastoma

The aims of this study were to examine the relationship between whole-body absorbed dose and hematologic toxicity and to assess the most accurate method of delivering a prescribed whole-body absorbed dose in (131)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine ((131)I-MIBG) therapy for neuroblastoma.

METHODS

A total of 20 children (1-12 y), 5 adolescents (13-17 y), and 1 adult (20 y) with stage 3 or 4 neuroblastoma were treated to a prescribed whole-body absorbed dose, which in most cases was 2 Gy. Forty-eight administrations of (131)I-MIBG were given to the 26 patients, ranging in activity from 1,759 to 32,871 MBq. For 30 administrations, sufficient data were available to assess the effect of whole-body absorbed dose on hematologic toxicity. Comparisons were made between the accuracy with which a whole-body absorbed dose could be predicted using a pretherapy tracer study and the patient's most recent previous therapy. The whole-body absorbed dose that would have been delivered if the administered activity was fixed (7,400 MBq) or determined using a weight-based formula (444 MBq.kg(-1)) was also estimated.

RESULTS

The mean whole-body absorbed dose for patients with grade 4 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) neutropenia after therapy was significantly higher than for those with grade 1 CTCAE neutropenia (1.63 vs. 0.90 Gy; P = 0.05). There was no correlation between administered activity and hematologic toxicity. Absorbed whole-body doses predicted from previous therapies were within +/-10% for 70% of the cases. Fixed-activity administrations gave the largest range in whole-body absorbed dose (0.30-3.11 Gy).

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that even in a highly heterogeneous and heavily pretreated patient population, a whole-body absorbed dose can be prescribed accurately and is a more accurate predictor of hematologic toxicity than is administered activity. Therefore, a whole-body absorbed dose can be used to deliver accurate and reproducible (131)I-MIBG therapy on a patient-specific basis.

Dose escalation using a hypofractionated, intensity-modulated radiation therapy boost for localized prostate cancer: preliminary results addressing concerns of high or low alpha/beta ratio

PURPOSE

The possibility that prostate cancers have a low alpha/beta ratio led to a schedule including a hypofractionated boost. The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcomes of this regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2002 and 2007, 125 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated. Median follow-up was 33 months. Radiation therapy was delivered to a planning target volume including the prostate and seminal vesicles with a 1-1.5 cm margin to block edge using a 6-field technique to 45 Gy in 25 fractions. This was followed by a 2.5-Gy/fraction intensity-modulated radiation therapy boost to the prostate alone to a total dose of 75 Gy in 61 low-risk patients and 77.5 Gy to the prostate and seminal vesicles in 64 high- and intermediate-risk patients.

RESULTS

There have been 2 (1.6%) biochemical failures, 1 death from prostate cancer, and 1 death in a patient with no evidence of disease. Rates of acute genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity (grade 1 and 2) for the whole group were 31.2% and 16%, respectively. Rates of chronic genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity (grade 1 and 2) for the whole group were 30.4% and 27.2%, respectively. There were 2 patients (1.6%) with grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity at 12 and 18 months' follow-up. They had radiation proctitis requiring laser cauterization.

CONCLUSION

The preliminary results of this novel schedule were excellent. Given that the alpha/beta ratio is still in question, this technique addresses concerns regarding low and high ratios. This technique is a suitable alternative method of dose escalation in the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Five-year follow-up of health-related quality of life after intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or three-field conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT).

METHODS

A total of 97 patients underwent 3DCRT and 36 underwent IMRT for localized prostate cancer between 2002 and 2004. We measured the general and disease-specific HRQOL with the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Health Survey and University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index, respectively.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the pre-operative characteristics of the two groups. The patients in the 3DCRT group were more likely to receive hormonal therapy compared with the IMRT group before and after radiation therapy (P < 0.001 and P = 0.011, respectively). With regard to general HRQOL domains, both the 3DCRT and IMRT group scores showed no significant difference between baseline and any of the observation periods. At 60 months after treatment, the 3DCRT group had significantly worse bowel function and bother scores than baseline (both P < 0.001). On the other hand, there were no significant differences between the baseline and any of the post-treatment time periods in the IMRT group. In the 3DCRT group, sexual function remained substantially lower than the baseline level (P = 0.023). The IMRT group tended to show a decrease in sexual function, which was not statistically significant (P = 0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

IMRT can provide the possibility to deliver a high irradiation dose to the prostate with satisfactory functional outcomes for long-term periods.

Novel treatment methods for localized prostate cancer: hypofractionated robotic radiation therapy and adjuvant chemotherapy

The standard localized therapies for prostate cancer include external-beam radiation therapy, brachytherapy and radical prostatectomy. There are several novel approaches in development aimed at improving local disease control and survival, and reducing post-treatment complications. In low-to-intermediate-risk patients, new radiation approaches are being explored to include hypofractionated robotic radiation therapy. For high-risk patients, the focus is on multimodality approaches, especially the addition of chemotherapy. Recent developments in radiation therapy and adjuvant chemotherapy are the focus of this review.

High-dose-rate intensity modulated brachytherapy with external-beam radiotherapy improves local and biochemical control in patients with high-risk prostate cancer

Purpose Our aim was to report the 8-year outcome of local dose escalation using high-dose-rate conformal brachytherapy combined with external irradiation for patients with high-risk prostate cancer. Material and methods From June 1998 to June 2007, 134 patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer were prospectively enrolled in the study. The median follow-up was 45 months (12-107). Only patients considered as having high-risk criteria were accepted [prostate-specific antigen (PSA) > or =20 ng/ml and/or Gleason >7 and/or stage > or =T3a or two intermediate-risk criteria: PSA 11-19 ng/ml, Gleason 7, stage T2b-c]. The total dose applied by external beam radiotherapy was 46 Gy in 200-cGy daily fractions. High-dose-rate brachytherapy was performed at the end of weeks 1 and 3 of the 5-week radiotherapy course. The doses administered in each application was 1,150 cGy. Any patient free of clinical or biochemical evidence of disease was termed b-NED. Actuarial rates of outcome were calculated by Kaplan. Meier analysis and compared using the log-rank test. Cox regression models were used to establish prognostic factors of the measures of outcome. Results Mean follow-up for the entire group was 45 months (range 12-107). The overall survival (OS) according to Kaplan-Meier estimates was 85% (+/-5) at 5 and 8 years. The 5 and 8 years for biochemical control were 80% (+/-4%) and 73% (+/-7%), respectively, whereas for failure in tumor-free survival (TFS), they were 82% (+/-3) at 5 and 8 years, respectively. The 8-year cause-specific mortality was 10% (+/-4%). The multivariate Cox regression analyses identified the number of poor prognostic factors as independent for biochemical failure. Our report includes only patients considered as high risk, and the 8-year b-NED survival rate was 83% for patients with two intermediate-risk criteria, 78% for patients with one poor prognostic factor, 56% for two and 35% for all three (p = 0.001). There were no urethral strictures and/or urinary incontinence. Gastrointestinal toxicity grade 2 was 7.5%. Conclusions The 8-year results confirm the feasibility and effectiveness of external-beam radiation therapy with conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost for patients with high-risk tumor. The late toxicity rates were low, corroborating the excellent dose conformity.

Patient-reported lower urinary tract symptoms, urinary incontinence, and quality of life after external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer--15 years' follow-up. A comparison with age-matched controls

BACKGROUND

To prospectively examine the urinary toxicity and quality of life (QOL) in patients 15 years after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for localized prostate cancer (LPC) and compare the outcomes with results for age-matched controls.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Urinary symptoms were assessed using the symptom-specific Prostate Cancer Symptom Scale (PCSS) questionnaire, and QOL was assessed with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)'s Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30). Both questionnaires were sent to the surviving 41 patients(25%) and the PCSS questionnaire was sent to 69 age-matched controls for comparison.

RESULTS

The response rate was 71% in the patient group and 59% in the control group. Two patients and four controls were excluded due to other cancer diagnoses, resulting in a total of 27 patients and 37 controls for inclusion in the analyses. The mean age in both groups was 78 years. In the patient group, incontinence had increased between the 8-year (mean 0.6) and the 15-year follow-up (mean 2.1; p0.038). No other differences in urinary problems were seen between these two follow-ups. Increased incontinence, stress incontinence, and pain while urinating were reported by the patients in comparison with the controls at 15 years. Role function was worse in the patient group (mean 67.3) compared with the controls (mean 82.4; p0.046). The patients also reported more appetite loss, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, and pain than the controls.

CONCLUSION

EBRT for LPC has divergent effects on urinary symptoms and QOL in comparison with age-matched controls. In our patient population, urinary incontinence increased between 8 and 15 years of follow-up. Otherwise, no differences in urinary symptoms were seen between 4 and 15 years. Incontinence, stress incontinence, and pain while urinating were increased after EBRT in comparison with the controls. Conventional EBRT did not result in a major deterioration in QOL 15 years after treatment.

Forward-planning intensity-modulated radiotherapy technique for prostate cancer

In this study, we present an intensity‐modulated radiotherapy technique based on forward planning dose calculations to provide a concave dose distribution to the prostate and seminal vesicles by means of modified dynamic arc therapy (M‐DAT). Dynamic arcs (350 degrees) conforming to the beam's eye view of the prostate and seminal vesicles while shielding the rectum, combined with two lateral oblique conformal fields (15 degrees with respect to laterals) fitting the prostate only, were applied to deliver doses of 78 Gy and 61.23 Gy in 39 fractions to the prostate and seminal vesicles respectively. Dynamic wedges (45 degrees of thick end, anteriorly oriented) were used with conformal beams to adjust the dose homogeneity to the prostate, although in some cases, hard wedges (30 degrees of thick part, inferiorly oriented) were used with arcs to adjust the dose coverage to the seminal vesicles. The M‐DAT was applied to 10 patients in supine and 10 patients in prone positioning to determine the proper patient positioning for optimum protection of the rectum. The M‐DAT was compared with the simplified intensity‐modulated arc therapy (SIMAT) technique, composed of three phases of bilateral dynamic arcs. The mean rectal dose in M‐DAT for prone patients was 22.5±5.1 Gy; in M‐DAT and SIMAT for supine patients, it was 30.2±5.1 Gy and 39.4±6.0 Gy respectively. The doses to 15%, 25%, 35%, and 50% of the rectum volume in M‐DAT for prone patients were 44.5±10.2 Gy, 33.0±8.2 Gy, 25.3±6.4 Gy, and 16.3±5.6 Gy respectively. These values were lower than those in M‐DAT and in SIMAT for supine patients by 7.7%, 18.2%, 22.4%, and 28.5% and by 25.0%, 32.1%, 34.9%, and 41.9% of the prescribed dose (78 Gy) respectively. Ion chamber measurements showed good agreement of the calculated and measured isocentric dose (maximum deviation of 3.5%). Accuracy of the dose distribution calculation was evaluated by film dosimetry using a gamma index, allowing 3% dose variation and 4 mm distance to agreement as the individual acceptance criteria in prostate and seminal vesicle levels alike for all supine and prone patients. We found that fewer than 10% of the pixels in the dose distribution of the calculated area of 10×10−cm failed the acceptance criteria. These pixels were observed mainly in the low‐dose regions, particularly at the level of the seminal vesicles.

In conclusion, the single‐phase M‐DAT technique with patients in the prone position was found to provide the intended coverage of the prescribed doses to the prostate and seminal vesicles with improved protection for the rectum. Accordingly, M‐DAT has replaced non‐modulated conformal radiotherapy or SIMAT as the standard treatment for prostate cancer in our department.

PACS number: 87.53.Tf

[Brachyterapy in localized prostate cancer]

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Considering the high frequency of localized prostate cancer in stages, at the moment there are minimally invasive techniques that compete with the classic surgery. One of them is the Low Dose Rate (LDR) Brachytherapy with permanent implants of 1125 seeds. The objective of the present study is to expose our experience from the year 1998, when we made the first treatment, until today. The results and the morbidity of the patients over a 7 and a half years period are analyzed.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 800 patients were treated with LDR brachytherapy, with average age of 68 years and range between 48 and 83 years. In all patients the 1125 seeds were used with Rapid-Strand and peripheral load by means of intraoperative planning.

RESULTS

The urinary rate of complications was of 3% of AUR, and 0.2% of urinary incontinence. The morbidity on the digestive apparatus was of a 12% intermittent bleeding, 2% of proctitis, and a 0.3% of rectal fistulas.

Long-term results of the M. D. Anderson randomized dose-escalation trial for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To report the long-term results of a randomized radiotherapy dose escalation trial for prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1993 to 1998, a total of 301 patients with stage T1b to T3 prostate cancer were accrued to a randomized external beam dose escalation trial using 70 Gy versus 78 Gy. The median follow-up is now 8.7 years. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compute rates of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure (nadir + 2), clinical failure, distant metastasis, disease-specific, and overall survival as well as complication rates at 8 years post-treatment.

RESULTS

For all patients, freedom from biochemical or clinical failure (FFF) was superior for the 78-Gy arm, 78%, as compared with 59% for the 70-Gy arm (p = 0.004, and an even greater benefit was seen in patients with initial PSA >10 ng/ml (78% vs. 39%, p = 0.001). The clinical failure rate was significantly reduced in the 78-Gy arm as well (7% vs. 15%, p = 0.014). Twice as many patients either died of prostate cancer or are currently alive with cancer in the 70-Gy arm. Gastrointestinal toxicity of grade 2 or greater occurred twice as often in the high dose patients (26% vs. 13%), although genitourinary toxicity of grade 2 or greater was less (13% vs. 8%) and not statistically significantly different. Dose-volume histogram analysis showed that the complication rate could be significantly decreased by reducing the amount of treated rectum.

CONCLUSIONS

Modest escalation in radiotherapy dose improved freedom from biochemical and clinical progression with the largest benefit in prostate cancer patients with PSA >10 ng/ml.

Late radiotherapy-induced lower intestinal toxicity (RILIT) of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: the need for adapting toxicity scales and the appearance of the sigmoid colon as co-responsible organ for lower intestinal toxicity

PURPOSE

To report on: 1. Late radiotherapy-induced lower intestinal toxicity (RILIT) after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer. 2. The correlation between late RILIT and volume parameters of the rectum, sigmoid colon and small bowel.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 241 patients with a follow-up of >or=18 months for this analysis. Late RILIT consisted of 8 different symptoms, comprising the 5 symptoms from the RTOG toxicity score supplemented with urgency, fecal incontinence and anal pain. Late RILIT and late RTOG toxicity were scored prospectively and correlated with: 1. Different rectum, sigmoid colon and small bowel volume parameters. 2. Patient-related morbidity. We calculated the median, quartile and percentiles for the different volume parameters and correlated them with grade 1-3 late RILIT.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 42 months. Three patients developed grade 3 red blood loss. We registered grade 2 RILIT and RTOG toxicity in 13% and 10%, respectively, the most frequent grade 1 symptom being fecal urgency. The intermediate rectal volume parameters were significantly correlated with late RILIT. We were able to calculate cut-off dose-volume histograms (DVHs) that predict for grade 0-2 RILIT.

CONCLUSIONS

After IMRT for prostate cancer, the overall incidence of grade >or=2 RILIT is low. Cut-off DVHs can be used for patient counseling.

Predictors for rectal and intestinal acute toxicities during prostate cancer high-dose 3D-CRT: results of a prospective multicenter study

PURPOSE

To find predictors for rectal and intestinal acute toxicity in patients with prostate cancer treated with > or =70 Gy conformal radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between July 2002 and March 2004, 1,132 patients were entered into a cooperative study (AIROPROS01-02). Toxicity was scored using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer scale and by considering the changes (before and after treatment) of the scores of a self-administered questionnaire on rectal/intestinal toxicity. The correlation with a number of parameters was assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Concerning the questionnaire, only moderate/severe complications were considered.

RESULTS

Of 1,132 patients, 1,123 were evaluable. Of these patients, 375, 265, and 28 had Grade 1, 2, and 3 Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer toxicity, respectively. The mean rectal dose was the most predictive parameter (p = 0.0004; odds ratio, 1.035) for Grade 2 or worse toxicity, and the use of anticoagulants/antiaggregants (p = 0.02; odds ratio, 0.63) and hormonal therapy (p = 0.04, odds ratio, 0.65) were protective. The questionnaire-based scoring revealed that a greater mean rectal dose was associated with a greater risk of bleeding; larger irradiated volumes were associated with frequency, tenesmus, incontinence, and bleeding; hormonal therapy was protective against frequency and tenesmus; hemorrhoids were associated with a greater risk of tenesmus and bleeding; and diabetes associated highly with diarrhea.

CONCLUSION

The mean rectal dose correlated with acute rectal/intestinal toxicity in three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer, and hormonal therapy and the use of anticoagulants/antiaggregants were protective. According to the moderate/severe injury scores on the self-assessed questionnaire, several clinical and dose-volume parameters were independently predictive for particular symptoms.

Intensity modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: rigid compliance to dose-volume constraints as a warranty of acceptable toxicity?

BACKGROUND

To report the toxicity after intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for patients with localized prostate cancer, as a sole treatment or after radical prostatectomy.

METHODS

Between August 2001 and December 2003, 132 patients with prostate cancer were treated with IMRT and 125 were evaluable to acute and late toxicity analysis, after a minimum follow-up time of one year. Clinical and treatment data, including normal tissue dose-volume histogram (DVH) constraints, were reviewed. Gastro-intestinal (GI) and genito-urinary (GU) signs and symptoms were evaluated according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) toxicity scales. Median prescribed dose was 76 Gy. Median follow-up time was of 26.1 months.

RESULTS

From the 125 patients, 73 (58.4%) presented acute Grade 1 or Grade 2 GI and 97 (77.2%) presented acute Grade 1 or Grade 2 GU toxicity. Grade 3 GI acute toxicity occurred in only 2 patients (1.6%) and Grade 3 GU acute toxicity in only 3 patients (2.4%). Regarding Grade 1 and 2 late toxicity, 26 patients (20.8%) and 21 patients (16.8%) presented GI and GU toxicity, respectively. Grade 2 GI late toxicity occurred in 6 patients (4.8%) and Grade 2 GU late toxicity in 4 patients (3.2%). None patient presented any Grade 3 or higher late toxicity. Non-conformity to DVH constraints occurred in only 11.2% of treatment plans. On univariate analysis, no significant risk factor was identified for Grade 2 GI late toxicity, but mean dose delivered to the PTV was associated to higher Grade 2 GU late toxicity (p = 0.042).

CONCLUSION

IMRT is a well tolerable technique for routine treatment of localized prostate cancer, with short and medium-term acceptable toxicity profiles. According to the data presented here, rigid compliance to DHV constraints might prevent higher incidences of normal tissue complication.

Radiation proctopathy in the treatment of prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To compile and review data on radiation proctopathy in the treatment of prostate cancer with respect to epidemiology, clinical manifestations, pathogenesis, risk factors, and treatment.

METHODS

Medical literature databases including PubMed and Medline were screened for pertinent reports, and critically analyzed for relevance in the scope of our purpose.

RESULTS

Rectal toxicity as a complication of radiotherapy has received attention over the past decade, especially with the advent of dose-escalation in prostate cancer treatment. A number of clinical criteria help to define acute and chronic radiation proctopathy, but lack of a unified grading scale makes comparing studies difficult. A variety of risk factors, related to either radiation delivery or patient, are the subject of intense study. Also, a variety of treatment options, including medical therapy, endoscopic treatments, and surgery have shown varied results, but a lack of large randomized trials evaluating their efficacy prevents forming concrete recommendations.

CONCLUSION

Radiation proctopathy should be an important consideration for the clinician in the treatment of prostate cancer especially with dose escalation. With further study of possible risk factors, the advent of a standardized grading scale, and more randomized trials to evaluate treatments, patients and physicians will be better armed to make appropriate management decisions.

Health-related quality-of-life after external beam radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus conformal radiation therapy

We compared health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with statuses obtained after old and new protocols of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) for localized prostate cancer. We measured the general and disease specific HRQL using the MOS 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36), and the University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index (UCLA PCI), respectively. IMRT resulted in similar profiles of general and disease-specific HRQL to two other methods within the first year after treatment. Moreover, IMRT gave rise to comparable urinary, intestinal and sexual side effects despite the high dose of radiation applied.

Dose distribution in 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Comparison of two treatment techniques (six coplanar fields and two dynamic arcs)

PURPOSE

To compare dose distribution for two techniques of 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (RT): 6-field technique (6F) and 2-dynamic arc therapy (2DA).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty nonmetastatic prostate cancer patients were included. In each patient, two treatment plans were prepared: with six coplanar fields (45 degrees , 90 degrees , 135 degrees , 225 degrees , 270 degrees , 315 degrees ) and with two dynamic lateral 100 degrees -wide arcs (40-140 degrees , 220-320 degrees ). Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were computed and mean area under curve (AUC) values were calculated for the DVHs of Planning Target Volume (PTV), rectum, urinary bladder and femoral heads. Doses given to 30% of rectum (DR(30)), to 60% of rectum (DR(60)), to 50% of bladder (DB(50)), to 50% of femoral head (DF(50)) and to 95% of PTV (DPTV(95)) were reported as a percentage of the total dose.

RESULTS

Mean DR(30) and DR(60) for 6F and 2DA were 75.8%, 51.5% and 72.2%, 37.2%, respectively. Mean DB(50) for 6F and 2DA were 68% and 64.2%, respectively. Mean right DF(50) for 6F and 2DA were 35.4% and 45.5%, respectively. Mean DPTV(95) for 6F and 2DA were 99% and 99.2%, respectively. Mean AUCs of DVHs of rectum and urinary bladder were significantly higher for 6F (this was more evident for small PTV and in the intermediate dose range). Mean AUC of DVHs of PTV and femoral heads were significantly higher for 2DA.

CONCLUSIONS

Both 6F and 2DA offer good dose distribution for PTV. 2DA allows for significantly better sparing of rectum and urinary bladder with slightly worse femoral head dose distribution. Further study is warranted in order to establish the clinical relevance of these differences.

Five-year prospective patient evaluation of bladder and bowel symptoms after dose-escalated radiotherapy for prostate cancer with the BeamCath® technique

PURPOSE

Late side effects were prospectively evaluated up to 5 years after dose-escalated external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and were compared with a previously treated series with conventional conformal technique.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Bladder and bowel symptoms were prospectively evaluated with the Prostate Cancer Symptom Scale (PCSS) questionnaire up to 5 years posttreatment. In all, 257 patients completed the questionnaire 5 years posttreatment. A total of 168 patients were treated with the conformal technique at doses<71 Gy, and 195 were treated with the dose-escalated stereotactic BeamCath technique comprising three dose levels: 74 Gy (n=68), 76 Gy (n=74), and 78 Gy (n=53).

RESULTS

For all dose groups analyzed together, 5 years after treatment, urinary starting problems decreased and urinary incontinence increased in comparison to baseline values. No increase in other bladder symptoms or frequency was detected. When comparing dose groups after 5 years, both the 74-Gy and 78-Gy groups reported increased urinary starting problems compared with patients given the conventional dose (<71 Gy). No increased incontinence was seen in the 76-Gy or the 78-Gy groups. Bowel symptoms were slightly increased during the follow-up period in comparison to baseline. Dose escalation with stereotactic EBRT (74-78 Gy) did not increase gastrointestinal late side effects after 5 years in comparison to doses<71 Gy.

CONCLUSION

Dose-escalated EBRT with the BeamCath technique with doses up to 78 Gy is tolerable, and the toxicity profile is similar to that observed with conventional doses<71 Gy.

Clinicopathologic analysis of extracapsular extension in prostate cancer: Should the clinical target volume be expanded posterolaterally to account for microscopic extension?

PURPOSE

We performed a complete pathologic analysis examining extracapsular extension (ECE) and microscopic spread of malignant cells beyond the prostate capsule to determine whether and when clinical target volume (CTV) expansion should be performed.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A detailed pathologic analysis was performed for 371 prostatectomy specimens. All slides from each case were reviewed by a single pathologist (N.S.G.). The ECE status and ECE distance, defined as the maximal linear radial distance of malignant cells beyond the capsule, were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 121 patients (33%) were found to have ECE (68 unilateral, 53 bilateral). Median ECE distance=2.4 mm [range: 0.05-7.0 mm]. The 90th-percentile distance = 5.0 mm. Of the 121 cases with ECE, 55% had ECE distance>or=2 mm, 19%>or=4 mm, and 6%>or=6 mm. ECE occurred primarily posterolaterally along the neurovascular bundle in all cases. Pretreatment prostrate-specific antigen (PSA), biopsy Gleason, pathologic Gleason, clinical stage, bilateral involvement, positive margins, percentage of gland involved, and maximal tumor dimension were associated with presence of ECE. Both PSA and Gleason score were associated with ECE distance. In all 371 patients, for those with either pretreatment PSA>or=10 or biopsy Gleason score>or=7, 21% had ECE>or=2 mm and 5%>or=4 mm beyond the capsule. For patients with both of these risk factors, 49% had ECE>or=2 mm and 21%>or=4 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

For prostate cancer with ECE, the median linear distance of ECE was 2.4 mm and occurred primarily posterolaterally. Although only 5% of patients demonstrate ECE>4 to 5 mm beyond the capsule, this risk may exceed 20% in patients with PSA>or=10 ng/ml and biopsy Gleason score>or=7. As imaging techniques improve for prostate capsule delineation and as radiotherapy delivery techniques increase in accuracy, a posterolateral CTV expansion should be considered for patients at high risk.

Radiation therapy in the management of locally advanced prostate cancer

Locally advanced prostate cancer generally refers to those patients with clinical stages T3-4 disease. Patients with locally advanced cancer frequently are included in clinical trials that examine treatment for patients at high risk for relapse based on presenting prostate-specific antigen, high Gleason score, or advanced clinical stage. There is a growing body of evidence that suggests that men with localized prostate cancer benefit from high-dose radiation therapy delivered with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy, or proton beam therapy. Most importantly, neoadjuvant and adjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy have significantly improved outcomes in men with locally advanced or high-risk prostate cancer. Although questions remain regarding the optimal timing and duration of adjuvant hormonal therapy, a combination of long-term androgen deprivation started before radiation therapy and continued for 2 years represents a North American standard of care for this patient population.